Michigan Dem Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed: Because Nothing Says 'Electable' Like Calling Border Agents 'White Supremacists'

Oh, the joys of Democratic primary season in Michigan. Enter Abdul El-Sayed, the progressive darling gunning for that open Senate seat in 2026, who's apparently decided that the best way to win hearts and minds is by channeling his inner AOC on steroids. 

In a post that's now vanished faster than a Hunter Biden stash, El-Sayed decided to drop some real wisdom on the border crisis: labeling U.S. Border Patrol agents as "white supremacists" while pinning the blame for illegal immigration square on Uncle Sam's shoulders. Interesting strategy that tends to cater to the kids.

Flash back to September 24, 2021, when El-Sayed took to X (back when it was still Twitter and free speech wasn't yet a punchline) to rant about a photo that had all the hallmarks of a viral hoax. You know the one: the "whipping" incident with Haitian migrants, where a mounted agent was accused of playing cowboy with a lash. [Spoiler: It was just a rein, and it was only being used on the horses.] Investigations cleared the agents quicker than you can say "fake news," but that didn't stop our hero from saddling up his high horse.

"Blaming horses for the dudes riding them to whip Haitian refugees is like blaming Haiti for the fact they're coming," El-Sayed wrote. "How about asking how our policies decimate Caribbean & Central American (and so many other) countries—and why we allow white supremacists to police our borders?"

Nothing screams "I'm ready for prime time" like equating hardworking federal agents with the ghosts of the Klan while ignoring the actual pull factors drawing folks north: jobs, safety, and the American dream that libs like El-Sayed pretend is just a mirage cooked up by colonial ghosts.

This gem surfaced right on the heels of El-Sayed getting roasted for scrubbing other social media landmines where he peddled the "defund the police" gospel. 

Remember that fever dream from 2020-2021, the one where torching precincts was "mostly peaceful" and cops were the real villains? Yeah, that toxic sludge has curdled into electoral kryptonite for Democrats, and El-Sayed's border bromides aren't exactly a palate cleanser. The Comedy News Network, of all outlets, clocked the deletions on Monday, because even the legacy media can't ignore a self-own this epic.

But let's get real for a second, or as real as El-Sayed allows reality to enter the arena. He loves to finger-wag at "bad U.S. policy" for the migrant flood, but the numbers laugh in his face. Federal surveys paint a picture straight out of Economics 101: Immigrants, documented or not, flock here for the greenbacks and the lack of cartel drive-bys back home. Central America's a hot mess of violence and poverty, sure, but it's the stars-and-stripes beacon of opportunity that's the magnet, not some CIA plot from the School of the Americas playbook.

That's why voters have been demanding tougher borders louder than an antifa riot in LA. We're talking assimilation overload, too many arrivals, too fast, and the system's creaking like an old pickup on I-75. In Michigan, no less, where nearly 20% of voters last year pegged immigration as their top beef, per the Associated Press. And don't forget: That hawkish vibe was the secret sauce in Trump's 2024 Michigan magic, as an AP poll confirms. Blue-collar folks aren't buying the "open borders or bust" schtick; they want security with their sanctuary cities.

El-Sayed, bless his activist heart, has been slinging shade at Trump since the announcement, whining that the ex-prez's moves are "destroy[ing] the rule of law" and siccing ICE on folks to "terrorize neighborhoods." Cute. But calling border guards "white supremacists"? That's not just extreme; it's the kind of unhinged that makes even his Squad mates blush. If this is the Left's idea of a swing-state savior, pass the popcorn—2026's gonna be a clown show for the ages.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Anti-Semite leaders at U. of Michigan get the boot

A pair of student leaders at the University of Michigan have been given their walking papers on Tuesday after they tried to force the school to freeze all funding with Israel. The anti-Semitism in the West has risen to the surface like a gas bubble in a bathtub but something was finally done about it in this case.

President Alifa Chowdhury and Vice President Elias Atkinson were impeached following a marathon hearing that lasted 20 hours and spanned seven days.

The Jew-hating duo arose to power last spring from their “Shut It Down” platform and made good on their promise to freeze $1.3 million in student funding until Michigan cut ties with companies linked to Israel.

Their ploy to hurt Israel economically with campus protests left campus groups scrambling to make it to their events: blue- and pink-haired gender confused students couldn't make it to their Underwater Lesbian Mermaid Mythology class; Taylor Swift Studies majors were late arriving for their intense lessons; and Practical Marx in Practice studies were canceled. 

By October, the university was done with these idiots. Administrators adopted a hands-off approach to political issues outside campus operations, and the student government restored funding.

However, at this point the damage was done. Even students who backed Chowdhury and Atkinson’s stance thought they had gone too far.

“They look like extremists,” Tiya Berry, an Arab American assembly member who couldn’t stomach their methods, told former newspaper The New York Times.

Margaret Peterman, a sophomore member of the student assembly who led the impeachment motion, said that Chowdhury encouraged verbal attacks and threatening language, as she recalled an incident where an assembly member was spat on by a protester.

“There is a line between free speech and hate speech, between engaging in your rights as a student and as an American to disagree as vehemently as you might want to, and crossing that line into threatening someone,” Peterman said. It's also a clear line whereby one's right to free speech is assaulted by protesters who refuse to allow it to take place.

The University of Michigan has been a hotbed for anti-Semitism following the massacre by Hamas and other terrorist groups along with Palestinian civilians against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 where these terrorists invaded Israel, killed, tortured, and raped over 1,200 men, women and children, almost all civilians, and then blamed it on the Jewish State for existing.

In June, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights launched an investigation that revealed the school’s failure to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, identifying 75 harassment complaints against Jewish students that the university largely ignored.

The University of Michigan receives a ton of federal funding annually for its research and other programs. According to recent data, in fiscal year 2023, the university reported over $1 billion in federally sponsored research expenditures, which accounted for 56% of its total research volume. 

Maybe it's time for the incoming government to reconsider how they spend taxpayer money.

No longer should any school, at any level, tolerate chants about "Nazi liberation" or anti-Semitic behavior, like the case of a 19-year-old student who was thrown to the ground, spat upon and kicked while he was down.

It's time for decent Americans to kick back and stop this jackboot behavior--we're supposed to be better than that.

Tweet

Stanford students want woke Dean who led heckling of federal judge fired

Students at Stanford Law School blasted the school and its woke Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion deans in the school's publication, "Stanford Review." The headline went straight to point: “Fire Tirien Steinbach.”

Fire Tirien Steinbach https://t.co/imVeG5Usgy

— The Stanford Review (@StanfordReview)

Here's what happened that led up to the students' ire. Steinbach is Stanford's Law Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Judge Kyle Duncan at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals was attempting to give a speech at the school and was ruthlessly heckled and screamed at by students. When he asked for the administration to intervene, Steinbach went into a 6-minute diatribe stating that Judge Duncan was "literally denying the humanity of people."

Duncan's crime? 

He refused to retroactively change court records to reflect that a child porn scumcrumpet and repeated sex offender Norman Varner decided after his trial to identify as female and demanded to be referred to as “Kathy Jett.” Duncan refused to change the record to accommodate him.

Although the university belatedly delivered a written apology to Duncan, many felt that it was weak, like an Ilhan Omar apology for an anti-Semitic statement, for example, and Steinbach suffered no repercussions for her unacceptable behavior.

The real kick in the gonads came after the university issued a letter to students who were upset about the interruptions, and were advised to seek mental help. 

The letter was written by Tirien Steinbach!

Judge Duncan had to be escorted from the intended speech by armed marshalls to ensure his safety. This is what is happening to our so-called "elite" universities.

Fox News' Laura Ingraham host of the  eponymous "Ingraham Angle" tweeted:

Imagine if Tirien Steinbach was a conservative white male Stanford dean who had berated a federal judge appointed by Pres. Obama. Yeah, I can’t either.https://t.co/DrZj80Ggl3 pic.twitter.com/ZSbecohqcV

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 11, 2023

The Stanford Review is a student-run independent newspaper. The outlet’s article, credited to “multiple authors,” described their disgust with how the situation went down at a school that falsely touts its commitment to free speech:

Perhaps the only thing uglier than the Stanford Law School building is the events that took place there on Thursday. The Stanford Federalist Society’s event with Kyle Duncan, a judge on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, was disrupted by a mob of unruly law students and a Stanford DEI Dean who prevented the judge from speaking entirely.

The article did not forget to include the part about Steinbach:

… at the center of the debacle was not the group of unruly law students, but Stanford Law School’s own Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Tirien Steinbach.

These future lawyers say that this DEI Ass[ociate] Dean should suffer consequences for defaming Stanford's reputation. It also stated that the university's claims that it values free speech are baseless if the administration doesn't actually protect free speech.

The apology said that Stanford would take steps to prevent this from reoccurring again, but didn't say what those steps were going to be to keep this from happening in the future. One thing is certain, getting rid of Steinbach is a good first step.

The article also noted that Steinbach clearly planned for this whole thing to take place:

Someone who is so eager, at the behest of an unruly mob, to shut down free speech, which Stanford itself considers “a bedrock principle for the law school, the university, and a democratic society,” has no place as a Stanford dean. She helped engineer chaos with her email before the event, delivered prepared remarks interrupting his speech, took the spotlight for herself, and has shown no remorse since.

At least some Stanford students (hopefully the majority of them) recognize tyranny when they see it and are standing up against the woke leftists who are obviously unaware of what their tyrannical goals would achieve in the long run, because once those in power get what they want, the underlings lose what they had--unalienable rights and freedom.

The piece closes with a powerful argument:

If these law students are to be trained for bench and bar, it certainly should be with a deep respect for the bedrock principle of free speech. Steinbach’s actions not only degrade the principles of free speech but degrade the prestige and reputation of Stanford Law School itself.

This is a good case of where the children are teaching their teachers.

It's time to get rid of Steinbach and anyone else who would take away our free speech. Consider forwarding this on to a friend, especially those who care about this issue or may be affected by it.

Tweet

Twitter board unanimously approves the $44B takeover bid

According to a regulatory finding, Twitter's board on Tuesday has unanimously recommended their shareholders approve the $44 billion sale of the tech company to Elon Musk, the richest man on planet Earth.

Musk has made it clear once again of his plan to move forward with the Twitter acquisition last week during a virtual meeting with the company's employees, while shares of the company are still well below his offering price, causing serious doubt that the deal will be consummated.

Shares rose only about 3% to $38.98 before the opening bell Tuesday, far short of the $54.20 per-share that Musk has offered for each share. This level was last met on April 5, when Musk was offered a seat on the board before he offered to buy the entire company.

In a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday detailing a letter to investors, Twitter’s board of directors said that it “unanimously recommends that you vote (for) the adoption of the merger agreement.”

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

If the deal were to close now, investors in the company would pocket a profit of $15.22 for each share they own.

And Twitter users would not be banned for failing to be woke.

Tweet

Grad student sues her college after receiving "no contact" orders

A Christian graduate student at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville allegedly issued three no-contact orders against her for expressing her conservative political opinions. [H/T Fox News]

She is suing the school administration and staff in the art therapy program.

“I was alarmed when I had received three no-contact orders that prevented me from having direct or indirect communication with these three students,” Art therapy student Maggie Dejong said Friday on “Fox & Friends First.”

“Essentially, they were restraining orders that applied to on and off-campus,” Dejong explained, and if true, seems to go beyond the purview of the institution.

No-contact orders and no-communication orders are the way the University restricts students by preventing them to even attempt communicating with other students either directly or indirectly. You might say it's a violation of the First Amendment, but then they would have to kill you, or something.

These restrictions are designed to be used in Title IX cases involving sexual harassment or misconduct. In Dejong's case, it's apparently being abused, as is she.

Near the end of last year of her three-year graduate degree program, the University's director for Equal Opportunity, Access and Title IX Coordination, Jamie Ball, imposed three no-contact orders after three snowflakes were upset with Dejong's political convictions. They evidently felt scared to walk outside their safe areas where people with different opinions, backed up with facts and logic, make them feel threatened and in danger of losing their opinions based on their deeply entrenched feelings.

Ball informed Dejong about the orders’ issuances in a series of emails on February 10, according to a copy of the original lawsuit shared on conservative legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom’s website. You need to read the legal complaint--it's clear and beautifully written. It even points out that two of the students who somehow felt harmed by Dejong, are practicing witches.

The no-contact orders were rescinded on February 28 after Dejong sent an attorney letter to the school, but they were once again imposed the following month.

The Title IX coordination director, Jamie Ball, warned Dejong that she was ordered to have “no contact” or no “indirect communications” with the three students and that if she disregarded the no-contact orders, she could face repercussions, the lawsuit stated.

Ashley Strohmier, Dejong’s lawyer and ADF senior counsel Tyson Langhoffer told Fox News that the University issued the orders even though she “never violated any university policy.” This is also included in the complaint.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

“Yet the university issued no-contact orders against her, prohibiting her from fully participating in classes, including discussions about race relations and the police, simply because they deemed her or her beliefs as unwelcome,” Langhoffer said.

“Universities can’t issue no-contact orders and tell students they can’t speak with other students simply for expressing their views,” Langhoffer added,

I hope Dejong wins and wins bigly.

Tweet

Ministry of Our Truth czar wouldn't know truth if it bit her on her butt

The PINO Biden administration is now openly showing their Orwellian side as they have chosen a person to head a Disinformation Governance Board, as part of the DHS. 

The person heading this Ministry of Our Truth, as it should be called, is a bizarre Mary Poppins fan named Nina Jankowicz. 

I refer to her as a Mary Poppins fan only because of a TikTok video she made in which she sang a song to the tune of Supercalifragilisticexpialodocious" about fake news. People who saw the video were upset with her for not taking the issue seriously. Now she's going to be the one to determine what is her truth versus the truth. 

In other words, the failing Biden administration wants to do what social media has done with free speech, and quash it, like they did with so many conservatives, including a sitting President, Donald Trump. It's exploding their heads that Elon Musk has bought Twitter, the only tech giant not on the far-left, and plans to allow open dialogue on both sides of the aisle.

Hopefully, you clicked on the video [at the above link] and watched Big Brother Jankowicz's performance--her voice isn't bad.

Some of the lyrics to the song are:

“Information laundering is really quite ferocious. It’s when a huckster takes some lies and makes them sound precocious, by saying them in Congress or a mainstream outlet, so disinformation’s origins are slightly less atrocious.”

It goes on and you can listen to it if you must.

Jankowicz as some kind of disinformation czar is like making Hunter Biden the head of the DEA. She was quick to say that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation and of course, was proven wrong.

"Back on the ‘laptop from hell,’ apparently—Biden notes 50 former natsec officials and 5 former CIA heads that believe the laptop is a Russian influence op. Trump says ‘Russia, Russia, Russia,’" Jankowicz tweeted in October 2020.

After the tweet resurfaced and conservatives jumped on it, comrade Jankowicz cast doubt on the controversy by claiming it was "simply a direct quote" from the presidential candidates.

Double Speak.

However, a week prior to her tweet about the debate, she said the laptop should be viewed as a "Trump campaign product" during a conversation with the Associated Press.

Disinformation.

Now ask yourself why is the DHS involved in this crap in the first place? The agency is generally a waste, but even more significant is that it is supposed to protect the US from terrorist threats, not words. The Soros-funded fool who's heading the DHS, Alexandro Majorkas, is disregarding the actual mission of the department, but they never did a good job of it anyway. Now these clowns want to tell us what's true and what isn't? 

The pretend reason the Disinformation Governance Board was formed right after Musk bought Twitter and the 2022 midterm elections are just around the corner, is to counter online "misinformation" related to COVID-19, elections, and migrant smuggling. But really it's about elections and the other stuff is just stuffing.

Jankowicz, a Wilson Center global fellow [and Woodrow Wilson was a far-far-left a-hole who got us into war] upset a lot of normal people after it was found that she has pushed false and/or misleading information herself.

In March 2020 she announced that Facebook was providing the World Health Organization as well as other groups, as many free ads as they wanted for COVID-19 response, when she quoted and posted a tweet from Rob Leathern, who'd worked at the FB on integrity products.

"This is good. Now hope the rest of the adtech industry stops placing ads for mask and worse (straight up disinfo!) on articles and info about coronavirus," Jankowicz wrote on Twitter.

She was touting Pope Fauci and others in the U.S. health industry who, at that time was saying masks should not be worn. Fauci later admitted he lied [calling it a 'noble lie'] because he was concerned there wouldn't be enough PPE equipment to protect frontline health care workers. This was also at a time when health "experts" first said they didn't fully know how contagious coronavirus was or how it spread.

Disinformation.

Jankowicz also hyped up Chris Steele, the former British spy whose fake dossier was used in part as the impetus for the investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. As we all know, the dossier has since been discredited as dubiously sourced and full of innuendo, rumor, or information that was already publicly available.

"Listened to this last night – Chris Steele (yes THAT Chris Steele) provides some great historical context about the evolution of disinfo. Worth a listen," Jankowicz wrote in August 2020.

And there's much more, including her tweets during Hillary Clinton's campaign when she posted this: "Maybe @HillaryClinton's most important point so far: 'A @realDonaldTrumppresidency would embolden ISIS.' #ImWithHer."

Disinformation: the Islamic State collapsed under Trump and now, under PINO Biden, the Taliban has made a comeback.

During a conversation with NPR just days ago, Jankowicz discussed Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter. She was concerned that "free speech absolutists" would have negative consequences for marginalized communities on social media platforms. She reiterated her point in an April 25 tweet. 

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Whenever someone uses the term "free speech absolutist," know that they are extremists and fascists who want the power to determine what is and is not acceptable. When the issue came up that conservatives would not wear masks unless forced to do so she wrote: "So force away! Lock us down. People are not taking this seriously." 

No Mary Poppins, we are taking it seriously, you fascist! You don't get to dictate what is true and what is fake.

There is no doubt whatsoever that Jankowicz is a far-left operative and as Big Brother will suppress the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

Tweet

Musk seals the deal, America wins!

Elon Musk has bought Twitter and my first tweet was: 

Freedom of speech. As Mike Lindell of My Pillow said, "What a concept." Except he was speaking about pillows or something like that.

When I first got onto Twitter this morning, I saw that the deal had not gone through but the Twitter twits were considering Musk's offer after the company's shareholders got pissed at them for trying to keep them from making serious money. Meanwhile, everyone was holding their collective breath. The left hoping the deal falls through so that the platform could still ban people they don't want to speak there such as: former President Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, the Babylon Bee, and thousands of our conservative friends who simply think and believe differently than the far-left.

So I watched and waited to see if the deal was going to go through, and then I saw this tweet from Robby Starbuck:

Twitter is reportedly accepting the offer Elon Musk made. We’re about to see a Nov 2016 level freak out from the left.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck)

Wow! 

My imagination immediately pictured the "Screaming at the Sky" woman who lost her s**t when Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016. I searched my cupboard and retrieved my Leftist Tears decanter from my Daily Wire membership and poured me a glass of the fine liquid from my Zero Water pitcher.

I knew there would be a mad dash of leftists running out of Twitter's door. They can't deal with discussions that come from people with whom they disagree and with whom have facts, not just feelings. But I really hope they stay on Twitter because this may be the first opportunity in a very long time where both sides of the aisle can have some dialogue, hopefully honest and respectful dialogue. We shall see, but I won't hold my breath.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Twitter's board did all they could to stop Musk from buying the company. They used what is colloquially known as a "poison pill" but that didn't work as Musk got others involved in his mission. They did their best to smear him and their game became obvious to the public.

The deal cost about $44 billion and Elon Musk wholly owns the company for $54.20 per share that he paid for in cash. Once the transaction is completed, Musk will own the company privately.

They lost, Musk won. Even better, we all won.

Tweet

DOJ, FBI investigating "disturbing spike' in freedom of speech targeting school administrators

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on Monday has ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate a recent spike in people's First Amendment rights, aka, freedom of speech. He labels this freedom as "harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence" against Marxist-inspired school administrators who call for revolution, harassment and threats of violence as also witnessed by leftist. 

When Trump won the presidential election, leftists rampaged through the streets, randomly destroying property and screaming at the sky. The latter was their constitutional right, but not the former whereby innocent people were victimized. Maxine Waters (D-CA) told people to harass Trump supporters from public places and gas stations, and nobody on the Left batted an eye. 

Hillary Clinton divisively called Trump voters "deplorables," and Democrats across the country cheered her on. Some Trump voters were intimidated at their workplace and even terminated before the election. 

Leftists got in the face of GOP members while they sat with their families in restaurants but Garland fails to talk about this kind of intimidation because it comes from the Left.

The Left only likes the U.S. Constitution when it serves their purposes and they undermine it when it protects their political opponents, especially when it comes to the First Amendment.

The Department of Justice [a department whose title has become an oxymoron] published a memo by Garland directing U.S. attorneys and the FBI to work with local officials to identify and curb threats to school administrators. What he defines as "threats" is the anger parents are voicing about schools teaching Marxism and anti-American sentiment in the classrooms. Anger is not the same thing as calls for violence.

“In recent months, there has been a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff who participate in the vital work of running our nation’s public schools,” the memo said, without citing specific examples. “While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, the protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views."

Spirited debate in Loudon County, Virginia is what sparked Garland's intervention. The school board is being challenged by parents who object to their children being taught Marxist critical race theory. But as far as spirited debate is concerned, they are only allowed to speak for 60 seconds to voice their objections. Tell me, how can the average person get their points across in such a limited period of time? 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

A host of The Daily Wire, Matt Walsh, spoke at one of the school board meetings and was able to quickly and succinctly present his case against the current curriculum. Since Walsh did not live in the school district when he first presented, the school board changed its rules stating that one must live within the district in order to be at the meetings--a ploy designed to get rid of his input. 

So Walsh rented an apartment in the district and his landlady charged him one dollar a month rent just so he can have a voice.

In his initial presentation, Walsh called on school board members to present evidence to back up their universal mask mandate for all students at school. He went on to cite official data on total number of cases for children since the beginning of the pandemic, around 4.2 million, and the extremely low death rate among children, which Walsh compared to the common flu. Forcing students to be masked, he argued, is “cruel” and a form of “child abuse.”

These idiots are running scared because parents don't want their kids being taught how terrible America is, and how they are bad because of their skin color.

Just imagine if Merrick Garland had gotten onto the Supreme Court at the end of the Obama administration when he was nominated but blocked by Mitch McConnell. 

Tweet

Maryland billboard calls Co-Presidents Biden and Harris 's**theads'

Fill in the blank space

A Maryland billboard on Route 4 in Huntingtown is causing a lot of controversy and making a big stink over Co-Presidents Biden and Harris, calling them s**theads' and making no apologies.

The sign shows the cartoon faces of the presidents smiling, each head above a pile of emoji-style feces.

“DON’T BLAME TRUMP! YOU ARE STUCK WITH THESE TWO S–T HEADS!!!” the billboard reads.

Sending the message home with two more poop images, the billboard is signed “from all of your deplorables in Calvert County,” referring to Hillary Clinton’s infamous disrespect of all Trump supporters--the thing that actually lost her the election, rather than Russian collusion, which was a hoax.

The sign is on private property and of legal size, therefore it is a First Amendment right and does not break any local laws. But boy, does it tick off the local Democrats

“It’s just vulgar,” Jeanette Flaim, chair of the Calvert County Democratic Central Committee, told Fox 5 DC. This may be true, but that's why we have a First Amendment and it's also why Flaim was allowed to say the nasty things she did about former President Trump.

“Kids are going to school, and they’re going by it every day, and parents are driving their kids. We just don’t think kids should have to see that or parents should have to explain that,” Flaim complained.

For many of us on the right, the explanation is quite simple.

She also told The Southern Maryland Chronicle that the “deeply disturbing” sign “does not reflect the values of our County, regardless of party.” Except if you look at social media, you'll see that it certainly does reflect how both sides value the other side's leadership. 

“And it certainly shouldn’t be what our visitors remember us for,” Flaim said, referring to the County's political sense of humor.

And in spite of the local kerfuffles over the sign, so far it has stayed in place.

“There is nothing that we as county government can do for language that’s on a legal sign,” Board of County Commissioners President Buddy Hance told Fox 5.

“You know this country was built on the foundation of free speech, and sometimes we like what that free speech says and sometimes we don’t,” Hance said. 

Yes, that is exactly the reason for free speech--it isn't for the speech we like, but for the speech we don't like.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

CNN lawyer doesn't know the First Amendment due to TDS

Jennifer Rodgers, the Comedy News Network's so-called legal analyst, apparently understands the U.S. Constitution to the same degree a spitting cockroach understands Einstein's theory of relativity in its application to the existence of black holes.

Rodgers spoke during a discussion about this week's scheduled Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump and attempted to discredit Trump's lawyer's legal argument that impeaching someone who is no longer in office is "unconstitutional." The grounds, the Left is using stems from Trump's Jan. 6 remarks at a rally which preceded the Capitol riot, which his lawyer says is protected by his First Amendment right to free speech.

"Yeah, those are wrong," Rodgers pontificated about that argument. "I mean, you don't have a First Amendment right to lie. You don't have a First Amendment right to put people in danger. And he did both of those things."

Bong! Rodgers is wrong. 

While you don't have the right to call for violence and put people in danger, you sure as hell have the right to lie. CNN and the rest of us do it all the time. This isn't about truth in advertising, which is a totally different animal; it's about having the right to say what you want to say as long as it doesn't call for violence or put people in danger, such as yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater.

And Trump was crystal clear before the protest when he called for a "peaceful" and "patriotic" protest. Most people at the rally were, in fact, peaceful and were not calling for a coup [an overthrow of government] but were calling for the government to look into the election proceedings that seemed questionable. 

The idiots that were rioting were outliers and nobody on the right, outside of they themselves, support what they did, in spite of how the Left is trying to put all conservatives, libertarians and Trump supporters in the same category.

For now, all we can do is pray for Reps. Alexandria Obviously-Callow (D-Twitter) and Rashida "Aunty Semitic" Tlaib (D-MI) who, while they were nowhere near the action at the Capitol, nevertheless believe they deserve the role of victim in order to forward their agenda, an agenda they laughingly call democracy.

Please consider subscribing to this free blog, Brain Flushings, and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help feed my backyard squirrel and help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Facebook execs discuss crushing First Amendment under Biden

You've got to love Project Veritas and their guerrilla journalism approach to uncovering the truth.

On January 31st, Veritas released a devastating leak showing Facebook (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg getting all moist over Biden's executive orders, calling them "important and positive steps," in spite of Biden's admission that the same thing Trump did with executive orders was dictatorial. [H/T Media Research Center]

Zuckerberg then went on to say that he looks forward to when "Facebook is going to be able to work together with this new administration."

Guy Rosen, a guy whose job is an oxymoron known as Facebook VP of Integrity, was also shown discussing how the company's cutting-edge technology could be used to target conservative speech, in contrast to the First Amendment. 

Rosen, who some believe to be a total crap weasel, described how the platform is trying to “limit the spread of content that could potentially lead to further civil unrest, further violence.” Translation: Rosen wants to suppress free speech by people with whom he disagrees because if they are allowed to say what they believe, Antifa and perhaps BLM, will become violent and blame their behavior on words.

Rosen went on to describe how FB is specifically targeting political FB groups:

"We have a system that is able to freeze commenting on threads in cases where our systems are detecting that there may be a thread that has hate speech or violence in the comments. These are all things we've built over the past three, four years as part of our investments into the integrity space, our efforts to protect elections.”

Meanwhile, these FB buttheads are not willing to ban actual violent leftist organizations such as Rose City Antifa as they remain fully operational on their platform with thousands of followers.

Other far-left leaders at FB made anti-free speech comments on the company’s future as well.

Roy Austin, FB's VP of Civil Rights [not a joke] believes that all company decisions should be "run through a civil rights lens,” including the use of advanced virtual reality technology to re-educate people [to believe what he and FB believes]:

“I wonder whether or not we can use Oculus to help a white police officer understand what it feels like to be a young black man who’s stopped and searched and arrested by the police. … I want every major decision to run through a civil rights lens.” [FB's civil rights lens, no doubt.]

There is no question that conservatives and their civil rights are under attack by the far-left and Big Tech [but I repeat myself]. Please consider contacting Facebook headquarters at: 1-650-308-7300 and demand they and Big Tech be held to account to provide clarity on "hate speech" rules that seem to apply in only one direction.

Anyone who has been censored should contact the Media Research Center and use their contact form, and help them hold Big Tech accountable.

Please consider subscribing to this free blog, Brain Flushings, and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help feed my backyard squirrel and help in the fight of the China virus.

Tweet

Twitter's self-awareness is that of a cactus

You've heard the overused term 'you can't make this stuff up.' Well Twitter has people saying that and it shows the social media giant's total lack of self-awareness to the point it makes you laugh and be angry simultaneously.

The statement Twitter made regarding the Ugandan election, just prior to permanently banning President Trump from its platform, is almost too hypocritical to believe, but they meant what they pontificated to the African nation, optics be damned.

Here's the story: just days after Twitter permanently banning President Donald Trump from its platform, Twitter posted their thoughts about "freedom of expression" and "access to information" regarding the Ugandan election. Normal people who read the post either laughed at the hypocrisy or were amazed at Twitter having the balls to pontificate about the exact thing they are guilty of doing to the President of the United States of America.

The post stated:

"Ahead of the Ugandan election, we're hearing reports that Internet service providers are being ordered to block social media and messaging apps," Twitter Public Policy began. "We strongly condemn internet shutdowns — they are hugely harmful, violate basic human rights and the principles of the #OpenInternet."

But not so much for President Trump and a bunch of conservatives with different political and cultural views.

Twitter Public Policy next added: 

"Earlier this week, in close coordination with our peers, we suspended a number of accounts targeting the election in Uganda. If we can attribute any of this activity to state-backed actors, we will disclose to our archive of information operations."  

Then came the the incredible, blatant hypocrisy: 

"Access to information and freedom of expression, including the public conversation on Twitter, is never more important than during democratic processes, particularly elections."

Huh? Are you freaking kidding us?

When leaders from Germany, France and Mexico condemn banning Trump from social media, all leaders who are not fond of Trump, you know there's a "freedom problem" in the United States.

The anti-American values of the far-left didn't see it as a problem but they're too stupid to see that their loss of freedom will soon come for them.

Many normal people hit back at Twitter for what they said about the Ugandan election:

"Are there no mirrors at Twitter?" TheBlaze's Jessica O'Donnell asked. 

"High comedy!" conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza exclaimed. "You can't make this stuff up."

My personal favorite:

"Twitter's like: 'Don't restrict people's speech, that's our job,'" another user said.

So Twitter shuts down the New York Post for a story they don't want going public, then bans prominent conservatives and President Donald Trump from their platform, and think they own the moral high ground to lecture Uganda?

If you don't see the unintentional humor in Twitter's virtue signaling, you need to pay closer attention. I will continue posting Brain Flushings on Twitter, at least until they ban all conservative narratives. Perhaps you'll subscribe to this blog and others as you see fit. I really hope you will because it's only a matter of time when the voices on the right will be hard to hear.

Please subscribe and look for other voices too. 

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

NYC wants to fine New Yorkers for their free speech rights

Speaking in a derogatory way about a person or group of people is disgusting but there used to be a time when our words were protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. You could say anything as long as you didn't call for violence, and sure, a lot of what was said was horrible, rude, vulgar and wrong, but you had the constitutional right to say it.

Now the New York City's Commission on Human Rights said on Thursday that New Yorkers in the Big Apple could face a fine up to $250,000 for using the words "illegal alien . . .  with the intent to demean, humiliate or harass a person."

It's unclear if the same fine would hold for actual illegal aliens but the fine details have not been totally explained.

"Hate has no place here," a tweet from the City of New York read. By that, they also mean "free speech has no place here." 

Once they criminalize two words, it's a baby step to criminalize more.

And illegal alien is not derogatory--it's explanative. A person who is in a country unlawfully, [without proper authorization] is in the country illegally. If they are from a different country, they are alien to the country they are in. They are by definition, illegal aliens.

 The city's announcement ticked off a list of offensive ways to address immigrants -- including threatening to call the authorities on them for being in the country illegally, or harassing someone for having "limited English proficiency." Both situations are not unlawful, but the uber left New York City wants lawbreakers to be happy and free.

"Threatening to call ICE when motivated by discrimination, derogatory use of the term 'illegal alien,' and discrimination based on limited English proficiency are unlawful discriminatory treatment under the NYC Human Rights Law," the announcement read. So by that statement, the NYC Commission on Human Rights is implying that they can know what is in a person's mind/heart that motivates them to use a perfectly legal term, or to exercise their free speech rights.

It clarified that calling ICE with a "discriminatory motive" was a violation, but it didn't specify what NYC would consider a call to ICE would be that lacked a "discriminatory motive."

"Fines of up to $250,000 can be assessed for each act of willful discrimination, and damages are available to complainants," the leftist city said.

"The NYC Commission on Human Rights ... defines discrimination on the basis of perceived or actual immigration status and national origin under the New York City Human Rights Law in public accommodation, employment, and housing," the announcement read.

This explains why Democrats want to eliminate voter ID and allow illegal aliens sanctuary from the law.

Notice that politicians never have to be personally involved with the decisions they make--only we must--and that was even true with Obamacare.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue. And you can also see my blog on the Times of Israel.

Tweet

Trans activist releases texts with real woman esthetician

"Why won't you wax my balls?"

Gender identity confused and transgender activist Jessica Yaniv released text messages between him and a female esthetician who refused to wax his arabian goggles because he is a guy and she is a married woman whose husband wouldn't approve.

Yaniv released the text messages to Pink News. The esthetician was merely one of the 16 female estheticians this butt munch filed human rights complaints in Canada, where the men are men and the women are women, unless they think otherwise. Yaniv's complaints are for alleged discrimination against his "gender identity" [delusion] when they all refused to wax his wrinklepurse. 

You see, Yaniv is a dude who believes he's a female, but his meat clackers and XY chromosomes prove otherwise.

According to Canadian media coverage, most of the women targeted by Yaniv are immigrants of color. 

At least one business, headed by a Brazilian immigrant, has been shut down due to the Yaniv's complaints to the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal. During a livestream interview with YouTuber Blaire White, the delusional Yaniv boasted about triggering the woman's business to close and bragged that he will "win" every one of the 16 cases because transgenders are a “protected class” in Canada.

Pink News did not reveal the name of the woman Yaniv was texting with, presumably to rightly protect their identity. Here's how they read (slighted edited for comprehension):

Salon Owner: I only do Surrey. I go to people’s house.
Jessica Yaniv: I’m right on the Surrey/Langley border.
SO: But you look like a man lol
JY: Excuse me? I’m a girl..
SO: Ohh okay
JY: So what’s your availability like?
SO: Monday to Friday 10 to 6
JY: I’m a transgender, is that an issue for you?
SO: Ummm I don’t know what transgender is . I never meet transgender.
JY: I’m a girl now… I used to be a guy….
SO: Yeah there is a problem I don’t think I can do you sorry.
JY: Why is that a problem?
SO: Don’t feel comfortable.
JY: I’m a girl..
SO: Sorry no
JY: You can’t do that fyi. It’s discrimination.
SO: Sorry I’m not trying to be rude or anything it’s just that I don’t feel comfortable doing this and I know you have the right it’s just that you’re a man into a lady but you’re still a man right but into a lady. My husband won’t accept me doing this sorry once again. I just don’t know what to say except sorry once again.
JY: No that’s not ok, it doesn’t matter what your husband will or won’t allow, you CANNOT discriminate and reject services based on someone’s gender identity and/or gender.

Yaniv also told Pink News that he used "racist remarks."

"Yes, I did publish 'racist remarks' because being denied services daily from the East Indian community at any business, sucks," the activist told the outlet, adding, "The immigrants are targeting trans people. We are the victims, not them," Yaniv, the guy who victimized immigrant women of color for not waxing his bojangles, said.

The Daily Wire covered how Yaniv was previously been accused of misconduct with female minors [aka young girls]. He responded to the accusations by denying sending predatory messages (some of which were confirmed to have come from the activist's "trustednerd" verified Facebook account by The Post Millennial) while simultaneously admitting that he sought out underage girls for another job as a social media manager for a popular girl band. 

Yeah, okay.

Yaniv also admitted to sending voice messages in a so-called "baby voice," but contended they were sent to a legal-age friend and not an underage girl; then he claimed to be dumbfounded as to how they ended up in messages to Jessica Rumpel, the 15-year-old minor who came forward.  (Jessica is now 20 years old). Yaniv also said that it was his right to "attend" a pool party with topless 12-year-old girls if he wanted to.

Yaniv is a blight to society and is a narcissistic fool. Let him go wax his own fun bags.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.





Tweet

Joy Behar never read a U.S Constitution she liked--wants Trump charged for 'hate speech'

"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.”
― Benjamin Franklin

Joy Behar, the least intelligent host on "The View," asked on Thursday why President Trump has not yet been "charged" with "hate speech." She was being serious when she said, "Why can't he be sued by the ACLU [American Civil Liberties Union] for 'hate speech'"?

“I don’t get it,” she said in a full-throated admission that she doesn't know her derriere from her antecubital fossa. “How does he get away with this?” she wondered, having never actually read nor understood the U.S. Constitution, particularly the First Amendment.

Joyless, as she is known to Megan McCain, was referencing Trump’s recent tweets about four fresh faces of Congress: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

The tweets sparked a leftist media feeding frenzy, and created controversy at the president’s campaign rally on Wednesday night in North Carolina where “send her back” was briefly chanted by the crowd about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN). Trump should have stopped the chant immediately but waited and finally condemned it on Thursday, telling the press: “I disagree with it ... I felt a little bit badly about it ... I was not happy with it, I disagree with it.”

When it first occurred, the "press" and the Democrats contrasted the grace of the late Sen. John McCain, who while on the presidential campaign trail against Barack Obama, stopped a woman from implying that he was from Kenya. That is now, but when McCain was running in 2008, the press and the other hypocrites on the left attacked him as a "racist," "bigot" and whatever else they could get away with.

In a series of Sunday tweets, Trump wrote:

So interesting to see ‘Progressive’ Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run . 

 Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough.

I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!

Behar’s idea that Trump should be shut up and charged by the government for saying words is characteristically stupid on her part. Just because speech is offensive, it is protected under the First Amendment and Behar, a failed comedian with a history of controversial statements herself, should be well aware of this.

Earlier this year, another sort of comedian pretending to be a journalist, Christiane Amanpour, said Trump supporters chanting “lock her up” about Hillary Clinton were engaging in “hate speech” and should have been banned from doing so. Amanpour should know better, but it's possible she is from another planet and doesn't quite understand the law.

If you enjoyed this post, consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.

Tweet

Weird Frederica Wilson wants to incarcerate you if you make fun of her

Looney tune Frederica Wilson, a Democratic [naturally] congresswoman representing Florida's 24th District went to an immigrant detention concentration camp with a congressional delegation on Tuesday. After the visit she said that people who use their freedom of speech to freely say whatever they want about members of Congress "should be prosecuted" if they make fun of her and other idiots in her party such as Alexandria Obviously-Cretinous.

"They went inside around 1 p.m. with the purpose of investigating the conditions that migrant children are living in" [and which they helped create by refusing to fund border facilities and personnel working at the border], CBS Miami reported.

"Joining [Weird] Wilson was fellow South Florida Rep. Donna Shalala (FL-27), Rep. Bennie Thompson (MA-02), Rep. Brenda Lawrence (MI-14), Rep Yvette Clarke (NY-09), Rep. Katherine Clark (MA-05), Rep. John Lewis (GA-05) and Rep. Madeleine Dean (PA-04)."

"Those people who are online making fun of members of Congress are a disgrace and there is no need for anyone to think that is acceptable," Wilson said during a press conference. "We are going to shut them down and work with whoever it is to shut them down, and they should be prosecuted" for exercising their First Amendment rights. She called for a new law enforcement team to be assembled in order to deal with people who make fun of her and wants to call them "Black Shirts."

If Trump refuses to form a Black Shirts team, Wilson plans to call on Antifa to assuage the problem with their form of intervention.

Later during the press conference, Wilson said: "This administration has shown a blatant disregard for the mental and physical health of children in custody. They’re spending weeks, and even months, in detention conditions that are tantamount to living under house arrest. We are upset about it."

[When President Obama had the children put in cages, Wilson said:]

Wilson, wearing her signature clown hat, added: "We came today to say we will shut this down because this does not have to be this way. These children can be processed and sent to foster care, they can be processed and sent to next of kin, aunts, grandmothers, people in the community who know them and that’s what we are fighting for today."

Then she ripped up her Congressional copy of the U.S. Constitution and threw the pieces in the air laughing maniacally all the while.

Wilson garnered national recognition in October 2017 over a spat she had with then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, who called the idiot "someone that is that empty a barrel" for allegedly using "a presidential call to Gold Star widow Myeshia Johnson for her own political gain."

Wilson later laughed over the whole ordeal, which sparked national outrage, after she said on camera: "I'm a rockstar now."

By "rockstar" she meant "rock head in a cheap cowgirl hat." 

If it was up to the left, only they would have full constitutional rights.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.

Tweet

Actress wants prison time for fat-shamers

Being fat is unhealthy and it makes you feel slower because you are slower with many of the activities you might want to do, such as walk up a long flight of stairs, or catching a bus. It's also a known cause of many serious medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes and heart disease.

But that isn't what this post is about.

There's an actress, Jameela Jamil, who wants to classify "fat-shaming" as hate speech, First Amendment be damned.

Now fat-shaming is wrong and cruel because its intention is to make a fat person feel bad about their excessive weight.

And calling Jews "termites" is wrong because it is intended to dehumanize Jews. And calling liberals "morons" is cruel, since it makes morons feel bad because it gives them a bad name. But it isn't illegal--it's simply wrong.

But it's freedom of speech to do so, and the remedy to this disgusting speech is more speech from the other side, the other opinion. Because who is it to determine what is hate speech over free speech? Certainly not you or me. It will end up to be the government, and we all know what happens when the government takes over something.

Jamil announced announced last week that she would start a company based on her Instagram account, “I Weigh,” which focuses on body positivity. She said in a tweet last Wednesday that one of her new company's  “main goals is to work towards a policy change that means this way of talking about people’s bodies is considered hate speech.”

“Fat-phobia is real, it is pervasive and prevalent and is damaging the mental health of millions,” she added, obviously not understanding the term "phobia," or irrational fear. Fat-shaming has nothing to do with fear of being fat or fear of fat people, it's a form of abusive negative speech that when used against a person of girth, needs to be countered with an intelligent put down of the moron [there I go again insulting morons] who fat-shamed.

But to make it illegal is an attack on the U.S. Constitution.

Jamil's tweet was a response to a Twitter user who posted photos from a tabloid showing two female celebrities in bathing suits. In one photo, Rebel Wilson wears a one-piece bathing suit with the caption: “The stand-up comedian, 29, made a big splash in Pitch Perfect, and does the same when she hits the surf!”

Not very nice.

Now one might not see this as cruel, but the comment is made among other photos mocking celebrities for their looks, including Tara Reid’s “botched surgery.”

The person who posted this crap is obviously an anal sphincter of the first kind.

Another photo posted by the same sphincter shows “Glee” actress Lea Michele in a bikini bending over with the caption: The 28-year-old singer’s most famous role was on Glee, but her biggest rolls are…” the photo cuts off. The image includes a circle around her torso and the words “roll player.”

And so on with other famous people.

Jamil explained that her Instagram account and her new company aren't about “making women feel more better” [more better is redundant, which, like excessive fat, is an excess of words] but about “encouraging people to see beyond their exterior and celebrate attributes that aren’t about their aesthetics.”

Honestly, Jamil probably means well and is a successful signaler of virtue, but you cannot allow hate speech to be equal to a hate crime.

Well here we are in the beginning of a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.




Tweet

High School girl who refused to stand for the pledge of allegiance, settles out of court

Texas -- Between the 2016 and 2017 school year, Windfern High School student India Landry refused to stand for the pledge of allegiance. But Texas law requires that if a minor is going to exhibit such resistance, they must have permission from the parent. If not, they must stand for the pledge.

Landry continued to refuse standing for the pledge and as a result, she was expelled from the school. Principal Martha Strother ordered India to leave the school or else the law would be involved.

“I don’t think that the flag is what it says it’s for, for liberty and justice and all that. It’s not obviously what’s going on in America today,” Landry said.

She filed a lawsuit against the school district.

State Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened thusly:

“Schoolchildren cannot unilaterally refuse to participate in the pledge. Requiring the pledge to be recited at the start of every school day has the laudable result of fostering respect for our flag and a patriotic love of our country. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held that parents have a fundamental interest in guiding the education and upbringing of their children, which is a critical aspect of liberty guaranteed by the Constitution.”

Paxton’s court filing read as follows:

“The United States flag represents the values of liberty and justice that form the foundation of this country and are defended by our armed forces. It is thus deserving of the highest levels of reverence and respect, which is expressed through every recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.”

The school district made a failed attempt to have the case dismissed. India’s attorney wanted to go. all. the. way.

“If Cy-Fair wants to bury its head in the sand and say we will violate these people’s rights, then we will go to the court and we will go all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to.”

So why did she think the country was so crappy? She was awakened to the nation's crappiness by the NFL. As per the Houston Chronicle:

Landry told reporters in July that her opposition to the pledge was political, inspired by NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem to draw attention to a surge of police violence against African-Americans. [The fact is, there hasn't been a surge in police violence against blacks or any one group. Blacks, it turns out, are less likely to be victims of police shootings than whites.]

The lawsuit accuses the principal, vice principal, secretary and two teachers of violating Landry’s rights to free speech, equal protection and due process and of singling her out because she was black.

The first step, upon hearing something, should be to first find out if it’s true. Look at the evidence and facts. India didn’t do that and neither did the NFL players.

Fact: statistics don’t bear out Colin Kaepernick’s police violence position, and that's what makes him a crappy role model to young people He proceeded with ignorance, going on something he’d heard from his girlfriend perhaps, but did not verify it. The result is a chain of stupidity.

As it turned out for India, she and the Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District have settled out of court. But her mother too should have known better and she along with India, should have done a little fact checking.


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.



Tweet