Kathy Griffin pitifully seeks relevance with anti-Trump image

ready for Halloween

Well, it looks like Kathy Griffin is back at it, reminding us all why she’s the gift that keeps on giving, if by “gift” you mean a migraine that won’t quit. 

This weekend, the former comedian and self-proclaimed provocateur decided to spice up her TikTok with a little arts-and-crafts project: a video showcasing severed heads of four billionaires, including President Donald Trump. Yes, you read that right. Severed heads. Because nothing screams “edgy comedy” like fake blood dripping from the necks of Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Trump. 

The video, which I will not show here, ends with Griffin tilting her head, smirking like she just invented irony, and text overhead that reads: “That’s all.” 

Subtle, like Porky Pig subtle, Kathy. The fine folks at Libs of TikTok weren’t exactly popping champagne over this one. They reposted the video and sounded the alarm, writing, “Kathy Griffin apparently posted this video which appears to be decapitated heads including Trump. This should be investigated.@FBI.” 

She really sounds like she's losing it. Perhaps a thorough psych eval would tell us something useful.

I mean, it’s not like depicting the president’s severed head might raise a few red flags or anything. If this feels like déjà vu, it’s because Griffin’s been down this road before. Back in 2017, she thought it would be funny to pose with a mask styled like Trump’s decapitated head, because she's an idiot. 

The backlash was swift, and Griffin ended up issuing a mea culpa after the internet lit her up like a Christmas tree. Her attorney at the time, Lisa Bloom, tried to clean up the mess, saying, “Griffin never imagined that it could be misinterpreted as a threat of violence against Trump. That was never what she intended. She has never threatened or committed an act of violence against anyone.” 

Sure, Lisa, and I never imagined my chocolate bar was actually a laxative, but here we are. 

The fallout was brutal. CNN gave her the boot from their New Year’s Eve gig because nothing says “festive” like a severed-head controversy. And Squatty Potty, a company that sells, uh, toilet stools, decided they didn’t need Griffin’s brand of charm to move product. 

You know you’ve hit rock bottom when the poop-stool people want nothing to do with you--no offense to the poop-stool folks; I'm sure they're decent people.

So, you’d think Griffin might’ve learned her lesson, right? Not one bit. 

Here we are in 2025, and she’s doubling down with this latest stunt. Conservatives, predictably, are losing their minds. One X user summed it up nicely: “How is she still not in jail?” Fair question. Meanwhile, her hypocrite defenders are out here waving the “freedom of expression” flag, because apparently, depicting political violence is just performance art now. 

Newsflash: calls for political violence aren’t protected speech in the U.S., no matter how many TikTok filters you slap on it. Obvioisly, Kathy’s gotta keep the outrage machine humming to stay relevant. But maybe, just maybe, it’s time to retire the severed-head bit. Try juggling, or better still, become a mime. 

Hey amazing readers! Love the content you find here? Your support keeps this blog thriving! A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

Meta Head Zuckerberg admits he went along with Biden-Harris admin censorship scheme

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta [formerly Facebook] admitted in a letter that he was wrong and regrets that he went along with the Biden-Harris administration to basically pee on the U.S Constitution and the First Amendment by censoring Americans in a variety of subjects.

It's about time, Marky--what took you so long to grow a pair? Or are you really being sincere?

Facebook has been for years censoring its content, almost exclusively the content from conservatives. Zuckerberg's mea culpa is an insult and I don't trust him. His sudden regret comes after he and his company spent years fighting to hide the evidence of its hand-in-glove relationship with the Democrats to censor opposing views.

Thanks to the hard work of House Judiciary Committee Chairman  Jim Jordan (R-OH), Zuckerberg was forced to release incriminating documents and then admitted to what we knew for years. But at least he's "really, really sorry."

Do you believe him or do you think he's only sorry that he got caught?

Tweet

Now that the 2020 election is over, ex-Twitter safety chiefs fesses up

Ex-Twitter safety chief, Yoel Roth, spoke with journalist Kara Swisher about the then pre-free speech social media site, specifically focused on the company's decision to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020. He confessed that it was a "mistake," making it sound like a simple math error in subtraction rather than the manipulation of a presidential election.

During the interview, Roth said that despite concerns about the veracity of the laptop story, it did not reach a point where he wanted to remove the content—which was later censored anyway. It was first reported that Roth blocked the user's ability to access the October 2020 story, but he claimed that the decision wasn't up to him but didn't mention who made the decision (which may have come from the same person who went balls-to-the-wall with the Russian disinformation story that was in itself, disinformation).

"We didn’t know what to believe, we didn’t know what was true, there was smoke—and ultimately for me, it didn’t reach a place where I was comfortable removing this content from Twitter," Roth said. "But it set off every single one of my finely tuned APT28 hack and leak campaign alarm bells."

Funny how censorship on social media only works in one direction, but now that Elon is at the Twitter helm, the left is having a cow.

Roth repeatedly reiterated that despite Big Tech companies' high-alert status and his personal feeling of responsibility to protect the "integrity of conversations" from foreign governments attempting to interfere in elections, it never rose to the level where he believed the story should be censored, which again calls into question as to who was the decision maker at the time.

"But—so it was a mistake?" Swisher asked.

"In my opinion, yes," he responded, pretending to be unbiased.

Roth planned to meet with the Department of Homeland Security’s now-defunct and anti-free speech Disinformation Governance Board, where the government was expected to ask Twitter to become more involved in efforts to monitor 'misinformation,' as determined by the Democrat Party.

Both Roth and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed they were approached by the FBI prior to the 2020 election, warning the platforms about foreign propaganda and misinformation. "You got a nice website here--it would be a shame if something were to happen to it."

So when the New York Post reported on Hunter Biden's laptop, just weeks before the 2020 election, both Facebook and Twitter quickly blocked the story from being shared on their platforms in an incredibly well-coordinated anti-free speech move.

Now that Joe Biden is wandering the halls of the White House, it was safe for former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to admit that his platform was wrong to intervene in the Hunter Biden laptop story, which turned out to be true. 

Nobody has since apologized to the New York Post for blocking their reporting.

Still, the left is going after Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter who has since reinstated accounts that had originally been removed, such as our former President Donald Trump and the Babylon Bee, a conservative satire publication. Now that Musk is in charge of Twitter, he said that he might release more information regarding the company's past censorship, and this is scaring the crap out of the left.

Let's not forget how the legacy media and Big Tech labeled the laptop as Russian disinformation and published it knowing it wasn't vetted. Along with that, about fifty FBI and other former intelligence heads also signed a letter stating they believed the story that it was part of Putin's disinformation campaign.

There are currently many news organizations that have independently verified the laptop as authentic because the election is history.

Tweet

Trump pokes his finger in Zuckerberg's and Dorsey's eyeballs launching new communication platform

In a Fox News exclusive, former President Trump on Tuesday launched a communication platform that will soon give him the ability to communicate with his followers and anyone else who wants to do so. This comes after several months of being banned from sites run by leftists who simply don't want their garbage message stepped on, leftists like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey, CEOs of Facebook and Twitter respectively.

The platform will be known as "From the Desk of" and appears on DonaldJTrump.com/desk. It will allow Trump to post comments, videos and images, and while I don't know who will be a sponsor for the platform, if anyone, you can bet that if there will be, Mike Lindell will be the first to sign up.

The platform's technology appears to be powered by Campaign Nucleus— the "digital ecosystem made for efficiently managing political campaigns and organizations," created by Trump's former campaign manager, Brad Parscale.

And for your schadenfreude enjoyment, Trump's followers will be able to share his posts to Twitter and Facebook. Unfortunately, the platform has no feature to allow users to "reply" or otherwise engage, but perhaps it will in the future. Thus, it is a one-way communication.

Trump’s new platform surfaced Tuesday, after advisers had told Fox News that the former president planned to "move forward" to create a social media platform of his own after being banned from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat after the Capitol riot. Not surprisingly, not one of those platforms banned Rep. Maxine Waters and other Democrats who called for violence as in the George Floyd case should he have been found not guilty, and in other riots that CNN described as "mostly peaceful" as businesses burned in the background.

It unclear, at this point, if this platform is part of those plans, or if there is a separate project underway.

On Wednesday, Facebook's leftist Oversight Board is expected to announce whether they plan to ban Trump permanently from Facebook and Instagram where they haven't banned propaganda outlets for Iran and Palestine.

If they do decide to maintain a ban of Trump, perhaps it's time for those on the right to grow a pair and take a stand. 

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Facebook execs discuss crushing First Amendment under Biden

You've got to love Project Veritas and their guerrilla journalism approach to uncovering the truth.

On January 31st, Veritas released a devastating leak showing Facebook (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg getting all moist over Biden's executive orders, calling them "important and positive steps," in spite of Biden's admission that the same thing Trump did with executive orders was dictatorial. [H/T Media Research Center]

Zuckerberg then went on to say that he looks forward to when "Facebook is going to be able to work together with this new administration."

Guy Rosen, a guy whose job is an oxymoron known as Facebook VP of Integrity, was also shown discussing how the company's cutting-edge technology could be used to target conservative speech, in contrast to the First Amendment. 

Rosen, who some believe to be a total crap weasel, described how the platform is trying to “limit the spread of content that could potentially lead to further civil unrest, further violence.” Translation: Rosen wants to suppress free speech by people with whom he disagrees because if they are allowed to say what they believe, Antifa and perhaps BLM, will become violent and blame their behavior on words.

Rosen went on to describe how FB is specifically targeting political FB groups:

"We have a system that is able to freeze commenting on threads in cases where our systems are detecting that there may be a thread that has hate speech or violence in the comments. These are all things we've built over the past three, four years as part of our investments into the integrity space, our efforts to protect elections.”

Meanwhile, these FB buttheads are not willing to ban actual violent leftist organizations such as Rose City Antifa as they remain fully operational on their platform with thousands of followers.

Other far-left leaders at FB made anti-free speech comments on the company’s future as well.

Roy Austin, FB's VP of Civil Rights [not a joke] believes that all company decisions should be "run through a civil rights lens,” including the use of advanced virtual reality technology to re-educate people [to believe what he and FB believes]:

“I wonder whether or not we can use Oculus to help a white police officer understand what it feels like to be a young black man who’s stopped and searched and arrested by the police. … I want every major decision to run through a civil rights lens.” [FB's civil rights lens, no doubt.]

There is no question that conservatives and their civil rights are under attack by the far-left and Big Tech [but I repeat myself]. Please consider contacting Facebook headquarters at: 1-650-308-7300 and demand they and Big Tech be held to account to provide clarity on "hate speech" rules that seem to apply in only one direction.

Anyone who has been censored should contact the Media Research Center and use their contact form, and help them hold Big Tech accountable.

Please consider subscribing to this free blog, Brain Flushings, and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help feed my backyard squirrel and help in the fight of the China virus.

Tweet

Religion of Peace Islamist imam calls for extermination of Jews

A California imam Ahmed Billoo, an indoctrinator-educator who trains the next generation of imams, advocates for the genocide of Jews, for which he is praised by prominent Islamists in the US.

We don't know where the "Squad" composed of Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) Rashida Tlaib (D-IL) Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) and their intellectual leader, Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-NY) stands on this issue, but nobody is hearing them denounce the call for genocide.

While waiting at Ben Gurion Airport in Israel, after a trip to the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, California Imam Ahmed Billoo (aka Ahmed Ibn Aslam; aka Al Lou Akbar;), wrote on his private Facebook account that he was “feeling annoyed” about his being in his location [an Israeli airport named after a famous Israeli Jew]. He offered a prayer to deal with the numerous Jews in the building: “Oh God, reduce their numbers, exterminate them, and don’t leave a single one alive.” He added the hashtag “Zionists.”

Now THAT is reducing their numbers!

Will Facebook characterize this crap as going against their policy of "hate speech" and throw him off Facebook?  Don't put any money on it.

Billoo seemed extremely relieved when he arrived in Istanbul the next day, writing “So good to be in a Muslim country” and “#TiredofSeeingZionists.”

For those of you who don't know what Billoo means by Zionists, he's referring to Jewish people.

Billoo is a prominent cleric in California and part of a prominent Islamist family. He works as the religious director at the Islamic Center of Cypress, serves as a “professor” at California Islamic University [Go Fightin' Beheaders!], and is a teacher at the Institute of Knowledge, an oxymoron title of a seminary that offers religious advice to Muslim students ["Kill them wherever you find them"] and trains the next generation of imams to hate Jews. Its faculty includes prominent clerics from the hardline Salafi and Deboandi strains of Islam.

A 2007 article in the Jewish Journal refers to an Ahmed Billoo (also from Alhambra, home of the Billoo family) as the then-President of Cal State Long Beach’s Muslim Student Association [an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood] and quotes him expressing support for suicide bombings in Palestine, adding that “Islam justifies” such attacks.

That's true--Islam at its core is fine with killing and dying in the name of Islam. It's how the prophet of Islam Mohammed, was able to convince his terrorist army to give their lives for "the cause" while he collected the booty and sex slaves.

But Ahmed Billoo is a lesser-known Billoo, even lesser known than Cat Billoo, and perhaps was hoping to come to anti-Semitic prominence with his Facebook post.

His sister, Zahra Billoo, is director of the San Francisco branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and an important figure in the Women’s March movement. Zahra Billoo, who is also not shy about anti-Jewish sentiments and support for terror, frequently appears alongside her brother at events across California. She is proud to say that she never met a Jew she wouldn't kill, if she had the chance.

So we ask: how did prominent activists and clerics respond to Billoo’s murderous wishes?

It appears no one objected.

Faisal Ahmad, who heads another religious training organization in New York named the Fiqh Institute, wrote: “Ameen!!! Wow you were at the place where Eesa [Jesus] will slay the Dajjal [Anti-Christ]! Oh Allah make it happen soon make it happen soon. Destroy the forces of kufr [non-Muslims] and cause Emaan [faith] in you to spread throughout the earth Ameen!”

Nasreen Khan, a colleague of Billoo at the California Islamic University simply wrote “Ameen.” She is a devout Muslima whose hobby it is to pray and put sequins on suicide vests.

Other prominent Islamists simply "Liked" the Facebook post.

Ironically, the Jewish co-creator of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, doesn't have the stones to throw Balloo or those who praised his post, off the platform.

Many of these Islamic officials and the groups they represent have long pretended their dedication to liberal values and interfaith dialogue, in the "some of my best friends are Jews" approach. But of course, these public commitments are shown to be a mere facade, lies, balderdash, designed to cover up absolute hatreds of Koranic proportion.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.





Tweet

Zuckerberg says he'll play G-d with the news

Facebook CEO and flaming liberal Mark Zuckerberg announced that his hard left-leaning company has begun implementing a system that ranks news organizations based on how much he agrees with what they say, and will suppress ideas that go against his political philosophy.

The way he said it, however, was that his company will use a system that ranks news organizations based on trustworthiness, and will promote or suppress outlets based on that metric.

But he and his minions will decide what the parameters of that metric is, which proves conclusively, that either Zuckerberg knows nothing about journalism, or he's lying.

The Zuck said Facebook has gathered data on how consumers perceive news brands by asking them to identify whether they have heard of various publications and if they trust them.

"We put [that data] into the system, and it is acting as a boost or a suppression, and we're going to dial up the intensity of that over time," he said, implying that news is true or false if it feels true or false. Kind of like those idiot liberals who say such nonsense as: "My truth." 

The Zuckster added, "We feel like we have a responsibility to further [break] down polarization and find common ground" --or, let's put the veracity of this news to a vote.

Facebook is also hoping to one day make inroads with suppressing free speech in the actual use of the spoken word.



Tweet

Liberal media: 'How dare Trump do what Obama did!'

What's good for the goose, is good for the gander, unless the goose is Obama and the gander is Trump, says the liberal media.

The left is angry that President Trump's campaign used data mining to win the 2016 election. The left, both in media and the Democrats, were happy that Obama used data mining to win the 2012 election.

You have to hand it to conservative commentator Ben Shapiro for penning a column for The Hill on Tuesday with the headline: "What's genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump."

Shapiro uncovered a 2012 report from The Guardian saying Obama's reelection team was mining data via Facebook (FB) to target specific voters. The Guardian also happens to be the publication that reported Cambridge Analytics and its ties to Trump's 2016 campaign.

Cambridge Analytica is accused of harvesting data to build profiles on 50 million FB users, who agreed to complete a survey in an attempt to target specific voters with ads and stories.

Shapiro said that FB was fine when Obama's team used similar tactics to what Trump's team used, noting that a former Obama campaign staffer admitted FB didn't attempt to stop Obama's 2012 re-election because the company wanted him to win.

The Obama campaign built a database of every voter using the same FB developer tools that Cambridge (known as API)  used. This allowed Obama's campaign to gain information of voters to calculate "which people would be most likely to influence other people in their network to vote," according to the Washington Post, a left-leaning tabloid.

"Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realized that was what we were doing," former Obama campaign staffer Carol Davidsen tweeted on Sunday from her verified account.

Davidsen said that FB revealed that the company allowed the Obama campaign to do things it would not have allowed a Republican candidate to get away with.

Shapiro explained, "Not so with Trump. As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm. This isn't surprising. Since Trump's election, Democrats--in search of a rationale for their favored candidate's defeat--have blamed a bevy of social media outlets."

In other words, the Democrats are like children playing in the sandbox making up rules to games as they go along, and always favoring themselves.

FB has agreed to discuss matters with House Judiciary Committee staff as soon as today, Wednesday, after the fallout over Cambridge Analytica's use and exploitation of user data from about 50 million Americans.

Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been slammed for being silent on this issue, which needs to be explored for possible election tampering, in this writer's opinion.

Axios reported that Zuckerberg may finally break silence or perhaps wind.

In 2012, Time wrote a glowing article about the data mining used by Obama's team. It was headlined: "Friended: How the Obama Campaign Connected with Young Voters." It explained how social networks are changing the way modern, sophisticated politicians campaign, and even stated that by 2016, "this sort of campaign-driven sharing over social networks is almost certain to be the norm." 

But only Democratic politicians need apply.

Of course the headlines tying Trump's 2016 campaign to data mining were quite different and less glowing than Obama's.

The New York Times wrote: "How Trump consultants' exploited the Facebook Data of millions."

Did you catch the subtle difference?

Obama = genius. Trump = exploiter and a travesty of democracy.

Ironically, Shapiro doesn't believe the "supposedly nefarious workings" of data mining by Trump's campaign made any difference in the outcome of the election.

"It didn't win Trump the election, by the way. Trump won the election because Hillary was an unbelievably crappy candidate and Trump campaigned in the right places," Shapiro said. "It's just nonsense."

It's also something to think about regarding whether or not to stay on Facebook. Maybe it's time to say "Chuck it."


Tweet

Facebook too scared to make LGBTQ stand in countries that kill non-heterosexuals

Facebook is scared to death (literally) to participate in the oppression of LGBT folks by withholding a rainbow avatar in countries in which the local religion prescribes the killing of gays, lesbians, transgenders, queers, people of different religions, especially Jews, atheists and so on and so forth, etc., etc.

The company rolled out a new "reaction

" feature in June, or LGBT Pride Month, a month in which people who are sexually involved with people of the same sex, or those who have their genitalia surgically altered to go along with the delusion they harbor, can have pride and celebrate something that isn't an actual accomplishment, but a definition of who they are or think they are.

LGBT Pride Month celebrates gay sexual preference around the world.

Users who sign up for the LGBTQ@Facebook page can get to use reacts such as "like", "wow", "angry", "sad", and now they can add an extra rainbow flag-themed "pride" response to posts. 

Canada's "pretty boy" Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, posted on the page. It's readily available in the West, but don't even think about posting it in Russia, Malaysia, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Qatar, Syria, South Africa, Egypt or Pakistan, not to mention any Islamic-run country I left out.

But even in India and Singapore (where gay sex is illegal), as well as Lithuania and the Philippines (that ban gay marriage) the feature is not available to them.

And they're spitting mad.

Facebook said, in response to user complaints about the feature not being available to them, that "this isn't yet available in some areas, but we hope to roll it out in more soon."

Advocates for free expression online weren't impressed.

Facebook CEO (Cowardly Executive Officer) Mark Zuckerberg effectively promised to ban more things in areas like the Middle East, by making content filters more limiting to achieve "local governance" in line with inhuman, sexist, homophobic, blasphemous and anti-Semitic "cultural norms."

Some say Zuckerberg simply cannot suck enough.



Tweet

Fakebook News

Facebook is finally getting its act together and going after "fake news." 

The giant social media's CEO and hard left liberal, Mark Zuckerberg, announced its plan to tackle what they consider fake news, especially "the garbage you see from Fox News, The Washington Times, The National Review, Breitbart, PJ Media and those damn alt right blogs, just to name a few.

The methodology the liberal media website plans to use to tackle fake news will be by harnessing fact-checking experts such as those found in PolitiFact, Salon, the Huffington Post, MSNBC and Newsweek Magazine, just to name a few.

Democrats have blamed bogus news stories from made-up media outlets for influencing the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have been very fair to Trump while being tough on Hillary Clinton. 

"We believe in giving people a voice and that we cannot become arbiters of truth ourselves, so we're approaching this problem carefully," Facebook's VP of News Feed, Adam Mosseri said in a blog post. "We've focused our efforts on the worst of the worst, on the clear hoaxes spread by spammers for their own gain, and on engaging both our community and third party organizers."

Specifically, Mosseri was referring to hoaxes perpetrated by FBI Director James Comey who claimed that Hillary Clinton used a private email server while secretary of state. That's simply too hard to believe--nobody is that stupid.


Tweet

Facebook Faces media bias criticism

Facebook CEO and filthy rich Mark Zuckerberg defended his network's algorithm Thursday from accusations his company allowed "fake news" to tilt the election.

"Personally I think the idea of fake news on Facebook--of which it's a very small amount of the content--influenced the election in any way is a pretty crazy idea," Zuckerberg said at a conference in Half Moon Bay, California.

"But what about the story Facebook carried on Miley Cyrus' account that said Trump grabbed her by her lady parts? That turned out to be false and it was allowed anyway," one reporter asked.

"Everyone knew that was a joke, just a lighthearted joke. It wasn't even the real Miley Cirus' account--it turns out it belonged to Michael Moore. He loves Miley and sometimes dresses up like her," Zuckerberg said. "But please don't print that. He would be very upset."

Zuckerberg explained that Facebook exposed its monthly users, over a billion people, to various political views, citing the "Pin the hairpiece on the Trump Head" contest, and the essay contest: "Ten Reasons Why I'm Voting for Hillary Clinton."

"But the "Photoshop a Tragic Trump Moment" contest was fair and balanced, you gotta admit that," Zuckerberg said to a media audience who nodded in agreement and finally 'got it.'


Tweet

Facebook Shocker

In a stunning revelation, former Facebook staffers are claiming that conservative news is deliberately suppressed on the FB site. In other words, where FB used to stand for "Fair and Balance," it now stands for "False Bulls**t if these former staffers aren't just tasting sour grapes.

The giant social media site is accused of fiddle farting with its formulas to suppress conservative news, but like those sour grapes, this is hard to swallow. But this is what these anonymous losers told tech site Gizmodo. 

Who'd a thunk? Accusations like this goes after the very credibility of what the world thought of as a site for all eyes and minds. This claim, saying that any media organization has a political bias, may blow the lid off the media industry.

FB relies on computer algorithms to determine what is "trending" in order to boost traffic for the hottest topics the algorithms spit out. But according to these obvious vast right wing conspiracy liars, FB hires "journalists" to tweak the algorithm formulas, and this is where the political bias is supposedly born.

Who knew? I mean Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, is a freaking billionaire, and that has to make him a rich conservative white guy. He couldn't possibly go against his own party as a former journalist told Gizmodo, claiming they "routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers."

Even more unbelievable was that several former FB "news curators" told Gizmodo that they were directed to "inject" certain topics into the trending list, even if they weren't popular enough to warrant making the list.

I feel terrible. I cannot conceive of any media outlet abdicating their responsibility of reporting the news that has the merit to be reported fairly. That's just not the liberal way.

Oh, wait.


Tweet

Zuckerberg armed to the teeth with protection

"When you're famous, like me, you can't spend enough on personal security. I mean, people want me dead. ISIS wants to cut my freaking head off. It's scary. I'm scared. I'm worried and I'm going to protect myself, even though I'm anti-gun for the common man. I'm not common and I'm not going down without a fight (by my bodyguards). 

These are not the actual words of Facebook founder and billionaire Mark Zuckerberg, but his actual uncensored thoughts picked up by a mind reading device I got on EBay for a great price.

The Zuckster spent $7.8 million for protection in 2014 and $6.5 million last year. The total amount of money his company has paid to keep him from being "offed" is around $19 million. 

The Facebook CEO is scared, very scared, and has no less than 16 big strong people protecting his rich butt at his California home.

But who can blame him? He has been threatened by ISIS and others whose FB privacy settings were allegedly messed with.

He doesn't fly on public airlines but has FB pay for private jets, security cameras, alarms, parachutes, safe spaces in buildings he visits, and earmuffs given to him by his mom.

Nobody knows the actual number of legal firearms Zuckerberg has to protect him, but like others who hate the Second Amendment, he's a scaredy cat hypocrite.


Tweet

Mark Zuckerberg's Softer, More Frightened Side

Money can buy you bodyguards, but it cannot buy you courage or keep you from appearing a coward in the eyes of the world.

Mark Zuckerberg is like Obama in that he often says things that people want to hear, but his words are about as honest as a "Three-Card Monty" shark.

Just two weeks after Zuckerberg symbolically grabbed his crotch to protect his "boys," while saying "je suis Charlie" (following the attack on the satirical magazine) he now shows the world who he really is: an inconsistent lying coward.

His website, Facebook, is censoring, in Turkey, images of the prophet of Islam, the "pedophile of the desert,"  the one, the only, Mohammad, peas be up in him. In spite of the fact that he flexed his CEO muscles back in early January, Facebook refuses to post any images of Mohammad, and doesn't even show the newsworthy photo originally seen at Charlie Hebdo.

The Post stated that Facebook is blocking a significant number of pages that "offended the Prophet Muhammad." This has been confirmed to the BBC by a person not authorized to speak publicly on Zuckerberg's disgraceful, disgusting, and wussy move, admitting that Facebook moved to "block content so that it's no longer visible in Turkey following a valid legal request."

So it's one thing to act as if you believe in freedom of speech and expression, and quite another to back it up.

Here's what Zuckerberg said:

We are allowing Sharia law to run the way we live and do business. Soon it will be the law of the land if we continue this insanity. There are too many Mark Zuckerberg's in this world who believe that they are protected by their appeasement of the alligator, when, in fact, it plans to eat them too.




Tweet