El-Sayed Says Returning Terror-Tied Cash Would Be Racist, Offers Gas Prices Instead

DETROIT — Michigan Democratic Senate candidate and secret jihadi Abdul El-Sayed refused Tuesday to consider returning more than $115,000 in campaign donations from donors linked to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, then explained that asking him to do so was racist. If you're a leftist, everything is racist.

The refusal came after Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) said El-Sayed should send the money back, citing what Rogers called a "dubious cloud" over CAIR. The group has been designated a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates and is treated as such by Florida and Texas. 

FEC records show El-Sayed took the funds from at least 40 people tied to CAIR, including national Board Chair Manal Fakhoury, national Board Treasurer Eyas Abdeen, national Vice Chair Emad Sabbah, and CAIR-Michigan board member Jukaku Tayeb, who is El-Sayed's father-in-law. 

Can I get an Allahu akbar!

FOX 2 Detroit anchor Roop Raj put the question to him directly. "Rogers has said that it’s time for you to return money that you may have gotten from organizations like CAIR, citing what he calls a ‘dubious cloud’ over that. Is that something that you’re thinking about doing, would be willing to do? And what do you have to say about that?"

El-Sayed said no. He said Rogers had invented CAIR's terror ties in order to smear Muslims and, conveniently, the Democrat running against him." 

But let us not forget that the United Arab Emirates has declared CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) as a terrorist organization.  

You know, that civil rights organization exists because people like Mike Rogers want to make this race about the color of my skin or how I pray," El-Sayed replied. "So I’m focused on you and your gas prices and the price of your groceries. He’s focused on trying to turn this into some kind of culture war."

Party officials praised the pivot as statesmanship rather than bull crap. 

Noticing a donor list, they said, is a culture war. Noticing gas prices is public service. Noticing both is racism. 

El-Sayed evidently forgot to mention that CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terror-financing case in U.S. history, after which the FBI cut ties with the group's leadership. He also skipped CAIR's early leadership links to the Islamic Association for Palestine, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Hamas. 

The candidate has had similar trouble shaking campaign surrogate the execrable Hasan Piker, the Jew hating communist streamer who has praised Hezbollah, Mao Zedong, and the idea that "America deserved 9/11." [Do you know what POS stands for?]

El-Sayed has likewise spent months outrunning his own old posts that downplayed victims of Islamic terror and blamed the United States for hitting back with a negative opinion. Advisers insist this is about grocery receipts.

FEC filings added one more coalition partner: a curious overlap between El-Sayed donors and backers of Instagram playboy Dan Bilzerian, who ran a losing, Hitler-praising primary campaign for Congress in Florida. Strategists called it a big tent; I call it a big gas chamber.

The FOX 2 appearance was first billed as a possible debate. Rogers has already agreed to two debates in October but declined this one over the moderator. His campaign said Raj, who has praised El-Sayed and been praised by Piker, was not a neutral referee. "Michiganders deserve to see their candidates engage in a healthy, fair debate — not one compromised by media bias," campaign communications director Alyssa Brouillet said.

El-Sayed remained focused on the issues that matter: your pump, your cart, and the unpardonable bigotry of reading his donor report. Oh, and let's not forget about Israel and you know, those Jooooze!

Sex! Now that I have your attention, please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Islamic charity does verbal calisthenics to find a way to blame the Jews for 911

WASHINGTON, D.C. , In what education experts are calling a bold new approach to history, the Council on American-Islamic Relations has reportedly released a school resource guide suggesting that the September 11 terrorist attacks were less about Islamic terrorism and more about America's unfortunate habit of supporting Israel, you know, the Jooooooze!

The guide, released as part of CAIR's “Back to school resource guide,” was apparently designed to help teachers explain the 2001 attacks to a new generation of students who might otherwise make the historically outrageous mistake of believing that terrorists were responsible for the terrorism. 

How Canadian Broadcasting Corporation of them, eh.

Thankfully, the guide appears to have been removed shortly after its publication, presumably after someone remembered that telling American children that their country basically had it coming for supporting Israel might not be considered traditional civics education. But I bet it wasn't Randi Weingarten who had the guides removed.

Among the guide's more creative historical formulations was the claim that the attacks were carried out not by Islamic terrorists, but by a “group self-identifying as Al Qaeda hailing from the mountains of Afghanistan.” In fact, some of them may have even looked Jewish.

This distinction is important. After all, if a group calling itself Al Qaeda hijacks four airplanes, murders nearly 3,000 people and attacks the Pentagon and World Trade Center, the least we can do is carefully avoid jumping to conclusions about whether it might have had anything to do with Islamic terrorism.

The guide also cited American support for Israel and the U.S. military's involvement in the Gulf War as grievances that supposedly helped justify attacks against the United States. In other words, we had it coming. 

Apparently, the terrorists had grievances, America had foreign policy, Israel existed, and therefore everyone can go home with a B-plus in History.

The guide's explanation of the aftermath of 9/11 was even more remarkable. According to the materials, the Global War on Terror helped create an “Islamophobic” culture in which the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” were supposedly applied primarily to Muslims.

“While Islamophobia and anti-Muslim racism existed long before the 9/11 attacks, this time period marked a stark shift in US policy and state sponsored Islamophobia in the U.S. and abroad. There was immediate backlash against anyone perceived to be Muslim,” the propaganda read.

Of course, there was also an immediate backlash against people who flew airplanes into buildings, murdered civilians and attacked the Pentagon. But apparently that distinction was considered too nuanced for the back-to-school crowd.

The guide also included terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden's “Letter to America” as “resource material,” apparently because nothing says "educational enrichment" quite like assigning students the writings of the man responsible for the murder of thousands of Americans.

Among the gems included in bin Laden's letter was this passage:

“Your law is the law of the rich and wealthy people, who hold sway in their political parties, and fund their election campaigns with their gifts. Behind them stand the Jews, who control your policies, media and economy.”

Somewhere in Israel, a history teacher is presumably preparing a lesson explaining that this is definitely not antisemitic, but merely another example of America's complicated relationship with foreign policy.

Nicholas Haros Jr., whose mother Frances was killed on 9/11, wasn't buying it.

“The further we get from 9/11, this new generation of kids will learn to blame our country. These kids are going to be poisoned – and that’s the intent.”

Sen. Tom Cotton had already warned about CAIR's efforts to influence American schools nearly a year earlier.

“I write to alert you to the Council on American-Islamic Relations’s (CAIR) efforts to influence K-12 schools … It is well documented that CAIR has deep ties to pro-Hamas terrorist organizations and publicly supports Hamas’s terrorist activities,” Cotton wrote in part.

“Such an organization should never have access to our nation’s children,” he asserted, adding, “The organization offers ‘educational’ materials on its website that perpetuate pro-terrorist, anti-Israel rhetoric. CAIR Philadelphia recently issued guidance for educators titled ‘Remembering and Reflecting: Teaching September 11, 2001, in Diverse Classrooms.’ The guide directs teachers to avoid using ‘inaccurate and inflammatory terms such as ‘Islamic terrorists,’ ‘jihadists,’ or ‘radical Islamic terrorists,’’ when describing the September 11 terrorists.”

“The U.S. Department of Education must ensure that CAIR is not given an opportunity to push its radical, pro-terrorist, anti-Israel ideology on American schoolchildren,” he concluded.

The whole episode raises an important question for American parents: When their children come home from school saying that Israel somehow caused 9/11, should parents correct them, or simply congratulate them for successfully completing Advanced Blame-America Studies?

Fortunately, there remains one group that cannot be blamed for the attacks: Israel.

But give the education establishment another semester and somebody will probably assign that possibility as extra credit.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

El-Sayed campaign backed by over $100,000 from dozens of members of group with alleged terror ties

The "Taqiyya Grin"

The political fundraising rule used to be simple. Candidates would promise to keep special interests out of politics, then quietly cash checks from the usual suspects. Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed appears determined to modernize the tradition by proving that "special interests" is apparently just another term that depends on who's writing the check. [H/T Fox News Digital.]

According to a Fox News Digital review, El-Sayed's campaign has collected more than $115,000 from at least 41 individuals who either work for, formerly worked for, or held leadership positions with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, better known as CAIR. That's one way to build a coalition. Another is to skip the middleman and rent a conference room at headquarters.

The irony is particularly rich because El-Sayed has made getting "money out of politics" one of the signature themes of his campaign. Apparently, the money was willing to leave politics, but politics kept inviting it back for coffee and a little bit o' jihad.

Among the contributors were some of CAIR's biggest names, including national Board Chair Manal Fakhoury, national Board Treasurer Eyas Abdeen, national Vice Chair Emad Sabbah, and CAIR-Michigan board member Jukaku Tayeb, who also happens to be El-Sayed's father-in-law. Family gatherings must feature unusually productive finance committee meetings.

Tayeb has reportedly been one of the largest financial backers of the super PAC supporting El-Sayed's campaign. He is also part of the founding committee of the Islamic Society of North America, a group that has been linked to Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood funding, according to previous reporting by the Washington Free Beacon.

Another donor attracting attention is CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, [aka Nihad Adickwad] listed in Federal Election Commission records under the name Nehad Hammad. The dickwad sparked widespread criticism after saying he was "happy" to see Hamas break out of Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023, while arguing Israel "does not have the right to self-defense" as an occupying power. In Washington, that apparently qualifies as a controversial statement. On some college campuses, it qualifies as tenure material.

The support for El-Sayed stretched far beyond Michigan. Fox News Digital identified contributions from CAIR officials representing chapters in California, Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Washington, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, and several other states, suggesting that El-Sayed's fundraising operation has become something of a national reunion tour.

Other contributors include CAIR-California Governance Board Treasurer Rubina Alvi, Governance Board Chair Asaad Traina, CAIR-Michigan board member Muzammil Ahmed, who contributed $11,600, Governance Board members Atef Ibrahim and Dina Ezzeddine, along with former National Board Chair Roula Allouch.

"Taqiyya Grin"

El-Sayed's relationship with CAIR extends beyond campaign donations. In 2022, he appeared at a CAIR event and was paid for a speaking engagement, where he criticized Oklahoma's ban on Sharia law and compared it to the Trail of Tears, according to the Washington Free Beacon. Nothing says "local Senate campaign" quite like re-litigating Oklahoma's legal code through historical analogies.

CAIR has faced scrutiny for years over allegations regarding ties to Hamas. In 2007, federal prosecutors identified the organization as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case, the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history.

CAIR was never charged with a crime and has consistently denied the allegations, challenging its designation in the case. Still, the organization has been formally designated or labeled a terrorist organization by Florida and Texas, while the United Arab Emirates designated CAIR a terrorist organization in 2014, a move widely understood to reflect the UAE's assessment that CAIR has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Responding to Fox News Digital, CAIR rejected allegations that it has ties to terrorism. The organization pointed to its "Dispelling Rumors About CAIR" webpage, memoranda stating it has "repeatedly condemned anti-Semitism throughout our 30 years of existence," and statements saying it has condemned attacks by Hamas and other designated terrorist organizations "for decades."

CAIR also highlighted a 2009 declaration stating, "We unequivocally condemn all acts of terrorism, whether carried out by al-Qa’ida, the Real IRA, FARC, Hamas, ETA, or any other group designated by the U.S. Department of State as a ‘Foreign Terrorist Organization."

The organization further cited a National Board statement condemning antisemitism and the Oct. 7 attacks, along with a 2023 editorial in which National Executive Director Nihad Awad said he agreed with CAIR's condemnation of attacks on civilians.

Meanwhile, El-Sayed has continued to draw criticism from Republicans and pro-Israel advocates over various Middle East-related controversies, including campaigning alongside far-left streamer Hasan Piker, his response to an attack targeting a Detroit synagogue, and declining to comment on the death of Iran's supreme leader because, he said, some constituents in Dearborn were mourning. Piker is the nephew of Cenk Uygur, the guy who yells garbage about Israel and founded Young Turks.

Despite the controversy, El-Sayed defeated Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens in Tuesday's Senate primary, surprising many political observers with a much stronger showing than expected. He now heads into a November showdown against Republican Mike Rogers.

Michigan voters will ultimately decide whether this fundraising strategy represents principled coalition building or merely another case of campaign ethics discovering that campaign slogans come with plenty of fine print.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Abdul El Sayed's Campaign of "Getting Money Out of Politics" Depends Heavily on Father in Law Tied to Muslim Brotherhood Linked Organization

One of the more curious habits of modern politics is the insistence that we ignore patterns which, in any other context, would immediately invite scrutiny. We are told that connections do not matter, associations are merely historical accidents, and family ties become irrelevant precisely when they are politically inconvenient.

That indulgence is now being extended to Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El Sayed. And just because his father-in-law has help fund terrorist organizations is no reason to worry where El Sayed's heart lies.

A review by the Washington Free Beacon found that El Sayed's father in law, Dr. Jukaku Tayeb, is both one of the largest financial backers of the super PAC supporting El Sayed's campaign and a longtime senior figure within the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, an organization federal prosecutors identified during the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case as a public facing component of the Muslim Brotherhood's American network.

Tayeb has contributed $200,000 to the Fighting for Michigan PAC, nearly half of the group's fundraising total through the end of March. This might be considered what is often referred to as financial jihad, as it helps fund jihad causes.

His financial support would already merit attention. His organizational affiliations make the story considerably more significant.

According to ISNA's own publications, Tayeb has served on the organization's 20 member founding committee since at least 2007. Membership on that committee is not ceremonial. Founders are expected to contribute at least $5,000 annually while also supporting the group's Founders Legacy Fund.

Federal prosecutors identified ISNA as an unindicted co-conspirator during the landmark Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history. That case resulted in convictions after prosecutors demonstrated that more than $12 million had been funneled to Hamas through charitable fronts. One of the federal prosecutors, you may recall, was Andy McCarthy, who put the "Blind Sheikh" (Omar Abdel-Rahman) behind bars.

Government filings also identified ISNA as one of several organizations "who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood."

This was not a passing allegation or an abandoned theory. This was big guns, or rather sharp swords, to be more precise.

In a 2009 ruling, a federal judge concluded that the Department of Justice had presented "ample evidence" connecting both ISNA and the Council on American Islamic Relations, or CAIR, to Hamas during the litigation.

The court noted that the Holy Land Foundation and ISNA shared banking arrangements and cited evidence showing checks deposited into those accounts were frequently made payable to "the Palestinian Mujahadeen," the original name used by Hamas's military wing.

The ruling also referenced a now well known 1991 memorandum from the Muslim Brotherhood's Shura Council describing its American strategy as "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

These are not the inventions of political opponents. They are findings and evidence introduced during one of the most consequential terrorism financing cases in modern American legal history.

Lorenzo Vidino, director of George Washington University's Program on Extremism, offered little ambiguity regarding ISNA's origins.

"ISNA was historically, no question, an organization created … by the Muslim Brotherhood and fellow travelers from the Indian subcontinent as basically the Islamist organization in America."

He added that Tayeb remained active during years "when they were putting out some really nasty stuff."

"To be on the founding committee, this is the elders of the organization."

Tayeb's involvement did not end there.

IRS records show he served as president of CAIR Michigan from 2005 through 2010 and remains on its board of directors. Like ISNA, CAIR was named as an unindicted co conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation prosecution.

Vidino described the overlap as entirely predictable.

"This is kind of the pattern," he explained. "To some degree, it's a good old boys network. And so, if you're on the board committee in ISNA, chances are you also belong to your local CAIR branch. Chances are you sit on the board of another charity that is part of the network. That's kind of how it works."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy argued that these relationships have long been visible.

"It’s been obvious since the 1970s that the Muslim Students Associations and ISNA … have very strong ties to the extreme fringes of the Democratic Party."

Meanwhile, El Sayed campaigns beneath lawn signs declaring that he wants to push "money out of politics."

His rhetoric frequently targets AIPAC, which he accuses of attempting to "buy off government" to "make sure that our money is sent abroad to kill other people."

Yet while condemning outside money, the super PAC sustaining his campaign is heavily financed by his own father in law.

His Democratic opponent, Representative Haley Stevens, highlighted the contradiction during last week's debate.

"He's great at covering up that his father-in-law is running his super PAC that's spending millions of dollars for him," Stevens said. "Abdul, you talk about getting money out of politics and putting money in people's pockets. But who is putting money in yours? What are you hiding?"

The questions do not stop with campaign finance.

El Sayed has repeatedly appeared alongside some of the loudest anti Israel activists on the American left, including Hasan Piker, who has infamously declared that "America deserved 9/11."

One of El Sayed's former campaign staffers, Mariam Odeh, was indicted in June for allegedly participating in what prosecutors described as a coordinated campaign targeting Jewish officials, businesses, and organizations connected to the University of Michigan.

Perhaps most revealing was El Sayed's own recorded guidance to campaign staff following the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

"I also want to remind you guys that there are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today," El Sayed said. "So, like, I just don't want to comment on Khamenei at all. Like, I don't think it's worth even touching that."

That is an extraordinary statement for any American politician. One might have expected even a minimal condemnation of a man responsible for decades of repression, terrorism, and regional instability. Instead, electoral sensitivities apparently took precedence over moral clarity.

None of this proves Abdul El Sayed shares every belief of his father in law or every historical position associated with ISNA or CAIR. Guilt by association is an inadequate standard.

But neither can serious political journalism pretend these relationships are meaningless.

When a candidate's principal financial benefactor occupies a senior leadership position in organizations repeatedly scrutinized in one of America's largest terrorism financing investigations, and when that candidate consistently avoids condemning Islamist figures while courting activists sympathetic to them, the public has every right to ask difficult questions.

The remarkable thing is that so many in the political and media establishment seem determined to insist the questions should never be asked.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

NJ Dem congressional candidate has a history you wouldn't believe, or maybe you would

Adam Hamawy, running to represent the state’s 12th district, told prosecutors he had a years-long relationship with the so called cleric whose followers carried out the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Hamawy is a New Jersey reconstructive surgeon, U.S. Army veteran who served as a combat trauma surgeon in Iraq, and now a Democratic candidate for Congress in NJ-12 to replace the retiring Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman. He shot to prominence by volunteering as a doctor in Gaza in 2024 at the European Hospital in Khan Younis, where he got briefly trapped after the Rafah crossing shut down.

The guy has racked up endorsements from all the usual suspects: Justice Democrats, CAIR Action, PAL PAC, Senator Comrade Bernie Sanders, Rep. Ro Khanna, and the rest of the pro-Palestine progressive crowd. His platform is the standard leftist greatest hits: Medicare for All, ending U.S. funding for Israel's military actions, and the ever-so-clever slogan "healthcare not bombs."

The real fireworks, as always with these candidates, center on his blistering criticism of Israel amid the Israel-Hamas war. Hamawy popped up on streamer Hasan Piker's show and came out swinging against U.S. funding for Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system. He argued it "insulates Israel from having to make decisions to make peace" and "isolates them from having to deal with the consequences," likening it to "giving a bully body armor." He backed a full arms embargo on Israel and insisted that Israelis need to "feel the effects of war" to get serious about peace.

That did not sit well with fellow progressive Democrat Sue Altman in the same primary. Altman accused him of "cheerleading and wishing for the deaths of Israeli children" and said she draws the line at rhetoric that seems to treat more Israeli civilian deaths as some kind of goal.

Hamawy's supporters immediately cried smear and Islamophobia, pointing to his humanitarian record (including saving Sen. Tammy Duckworth's life in Iraq). Altman eventually issued an apology (though it was apparently unwritten), which Hamawy graciously accepted. Critics, however, figured the damage from the inflammatory exchange was already done.

During and after his Gaza stint, Hamawy insisted he saw no weapons, no military presence, and "definitely no tunnels" under the European Hospital or places like Nasser. He described it as a purely civilian facility treating mostly civilians, many of them children, in the middle of the devastation. Later reports about Hamas command centers and tunnels under or near the hospital (including the strike that took out Mohammed Sinwar in a tunnel beneath it) led critics to call him naive, in denial, or worse. Hamawy and his backers stand by his firsthand medical observations and dismiss the rest.

A shiny new Super PAC called American Priorities (or PAL PAC) is dumping serious cash, around $2 million, to boost him as a counter to pro-Israel money in the race. There is also some past testimony linked to the "Blind Sheikh" from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that conservative outlets have dusted off. His strong progressive bona fides get him cheers from the Sanders wing and eye rolls from everyone else who thinks his Israel rhetoric veers into antisemitism territory or puts civilians at risk.

Hamawy likes to frame it all as principled opposition to U.S.-funded wars and military aid overseas while focusing on domestic priorities like healthcare. To his fans he is a heroic humanitarian. To his detractors he is another example of the Democratic Party's lurch into territory that endangers allies and excuses terrorists. The NJ-12 primary remains a messy fight between the pro-Israel and anti-Israel factions as of early May 2026. For the unvarnished details, primary sources like the Jewish Insider piece or his own campaign site are worth a look.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

CAIR & Muslim Brotherhood Money Laundered Taxpayer Dollars To Run Thousands of Muslim Candidates in America

CAIR protest at Jewish seminar in Chicago

Holy moley, folks. The mask is OFF. Fox News just dropped a nuke on CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood, and if you still think this is some fringe "Islamophobia" conspiracy theory after this, you're either brain-dead or on their payroll.

They're not just "community organizing." They’re running THOUSANDS of Muslim candidates for public office across America because that's where the real power is now: city councils, school boards, state legislatures. You take those, you own the country from the ground up.

And how are they bankrolling this stealth jihad? By laundering your taxpayer dollars, of course. "What CAIR did in California that's under investigation, they took money purportedly for Afghan refugees, helped less than 200, took half of that $7 million and put it back in their own organization. They're disclosing only small fractions of their lobbying, which they're then using to finance and support radicals on campus. So they are subverting our academic institutions in line with their Islamist goals."

Always swords or rifles 

Straight-up grift. Seven million in federal cash supposedly for refugees → fewer than 200 actually helped → millions funneled right back into CAIR's war chest to fund campus jihadis and buy politicians. And while the feds are actively investigating this scam in California, they're still getting federal funds. Because nothing says "accountability" like rewarding open fraud.

"They're using hundreds of nonprofits, charities, student groups, professional societies, undermining local government, putting in politicians that are sympathetic to their views or openly acolytes and modifying and changing our democracy. That's happening here in the United States, too. And while CAIR was being investigated in California, it's still receiving federal funds."This is the Muslim Brotherhood playbook on steroids. And they've never hidden it:

"The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s mastership of the world."

Remember when anyone pointed this out and we got called bigots? Remember when we showed you their own documents and the media smeared us as 

"hate mongers"? Yeah, about that…

For decades we’ve been screaming from the rooftops while the same people now clutching pearls called us racists. Meanwhile CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest Hamas terror-funding case in U.S. history, kept getting invited to the White House, kept getting fawning profiles, kept getting platformed by Democrat politicians who knew exactly who they were.

And just in case you forgot what these ghouls actually believe, here's their own words from the Holy Land Foundation trial:

"…eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions."

That’s not "taken out of context." That's not ancient history. That's the mission statement, straight from the Muslim Brotherhood's internal documents, and CAIR was literally named in them as part of the network.

We told you. We begged you to listen. And instead of gratitude, we got canceled, deplatformed, and demonized by the same media that spent years pretending CAIR was just a "civil rights group."

Enjoy the country you refused to defend, suckers. Because they're not coming for it anymore. They're already inside the gates, and half of them are on your dime.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you.

Tweet

Council on American-Islamic Relations leader cheers Biden's cancer diagnosis, says Trump's 'time will come'

Zaghra Billoo

It is a peculiarity of our age that those who claim the mantle of civil rights can so gleefully revel in the suffering of others. Yet here we are, confronted with the grotesque spectacle of Muslima, Zahra Billoo, executive director of the San Francisco branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and a member of California’s Civil Liberties Program, celebrating the cancer diagnosis of former President Joe Biden as “God’s wrath” for his stance on Israel’s war against Hamas. 

Don't you love it when people speak for the Creator of the Universe?

Not content with this venomous outburst, Billoo expressed her fervent hope that President Donald Trump’s “time will come too.” One might pause to wonder what sort of moral compass guides a person to pray that Biden’s cancer be “as aggressive” as Israel’s military campaign against a terrorist group. The answer, it seems, is one forged in the crucible of anti-Israel, Jew hatred.

Billoo’s words, dripping with malice, are not an isolated lapse. They reflect a broader pattern of inflammatory rhetoric from CAIR, an organization that has long flirted with sympathies for terrorist causes. 

Last year, Billoo mourned the death of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, declaring that “his martyrdom is not in vain.” CAIR’s director, Nihad Awad, went further, proclaiming himself “happy to see” Hamas’s barbaric October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which left 1,200 civilians dead. 

This is the intellectual company Billoo keeps, and it is under this banner that she serves on a California state panel tasked with providing “insight and expertise in ongoing civil liberties and civil rights issues.” The irony is as thick as it is nauseating.

The spotlight now falls on failed Governor Gavin Newsom, whose office appoints members to this increasingly farcical Civil Liberties Program. Appointed in 2018 by Newsom’s predecessor, Jerry Brown, Billoo remains on the panel, despite its apparent dormancy due to a lack of funding. One might ask why Newsom, a man who fancies himself a champion of progressive virtue and a 2028 presidential contender, has not seen fit to distance himself from an organization so steeped in extremism. His administration’s cozy relationship with CAIR raises uncomfortable questions. 

Just days after Hamas’s slaughter of Israeli civilians, Newsom’s office quoted CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush in a press release announcing security grants for houses of worship. In January 2024, Newsom met with Ayloush and other CAIR leaders, mere weeks before calling for an Israeli ceasefire in Gaza. Actions, as ever, speak louder than words.

Worse still, Newsom’s administration has funneled millions in state grants under an anti-terrorism program to mosques and Islamic groups that have openly cheered Hamas and called for Israel’s annihilation. The Islamic Center of San Diego, linked to two 9/11 hijackers and led by an imam who deemed Hamas’s attack “justified,” received $500,000 of California taxpayers’ money. 

This is not oversight; it is complicity dressed up as compassion. And Newsom seems to want to run for President in 2028.

The broader anti-Israel chorus has not been shy in joining Billoo’s grim jubilation. Shaun King, once a surrogate for Bernie Sanders, branded Biden a “genocidal monster” and wished for his “final days” to be painful. 

Taylor Lorenz, idiot 'reporter' formerly of The Washington Post, offered her own contribution to this festival of spite, hoping Biden “rots in hell and rests in piss.” Such is the state of discourse among those who claim to speak for justice, while doing all they can to get their butts into the spotlight.

Newsom’s silence on Billoo’s remarks is deafening and disturbing. 

If he is to maintain any pretense of supporting Israel in its existential fight against Hamas, he must reckon with the company he keeps. To allow individuals like Billoo to hold positions of influence while spewing such venom is to undermine the very principles of civility and reason that California’s Civil Liberties Program claims to uphold. 

One wonders how long this charade can persist before the governor is forced to confront the rot within his own administration. For now, the world watches, and the question lingers: what does it say about a society when those tasked with defending its liberties cheer the afflictions of its leaders?

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

U.S. Mayor wears Hamasshole gear-- is blasted by Jewish community

Mayor of major US city blasted by Jews for wearing pro-Hamas symbol

Chicago’s Jewish community just got a slap in the face, and Hamas-loving Mayor Brandon Johnson’s the one swinging. 

Johnson posed for a photo wearing a keffiyeh—yeah, that scarf—to celebrate Arab Heritage Month, arm-in-arm with the local CAIR chapter. The Chicago Jewish Alliance (CJA) isn’t having it, and frankly, who can blame them? 

CAIR is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and they are the unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) terrorism financing trial in the US. This case, prosecuted in 2007 and 2008 involved charges that they funneled millions of dollars to Hamas. CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) along with the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) were listed, among others, as unindicted co-conspirators, who were alleged to have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and its U.S.-based networks. The 2008 retrial ended in guilty verdicts against HLF officials on 108 counts.

“This is outrageous,” the CJA said, and they’re not wrong. “For the mayor of Chicago to stand there—cloaked in a symbol now synonymous with Jewish bloodshed, flanked by an organization that justifies it—is more than tone-deaf. It’s a betrayal.” 

Exactly.

They didn’t stop there: “It tells Jewish Chicagoans: Your pain doesn’t matter. Your dead don’t count. Your safety is negotiable.” That’s not just a statement; it’s a gut punch. They called the keffiyeh “not neutral. It’s a flag of war.” Harsh? Perhaps. But it's not very different than a swastika. 

Let’s break it down. The keffiyeh isn’t just some hipster fashion statement anymore. “In today’s world, it’s worn at Hamas rallies. It’s paraded in the streets when mobs chant ‘From the river to the sea,’ a call for the eradication of Israel. It’s the uniform of those who cheered on the Oct. 7 massacre — where babies were burned, women raped, and over 1,200 Jews slaughtered.” That’s not hyperbole; that’s reality.

Then there’s CAIR. They blamed Israel for the Hamas-led Oct. 7 attacks, got kicked out of Biden’s anti-Semitism strategy, and their bigwig Nihad Awad flat-out said Israel has no right to defend itself. Subtle, right?

The alliance isn’t saying Arab Heritage Month shouldn’t happen—nah, they’re all for it. “Food, music, poetry, and history” are the way to go, they say, not “embracing symbols of terror.” Fair point.

Lisa Katz from the Combat Anti-Semitism Movement chimed in, urging Johnson to quit posturing and start talking. “Engage in open dialogue with Chicago’s Jewish community, learn more about the evolving symbols of modern-day antisemitism, and show solidarity against antisemitism and hate in all their contemporary forms,” she said. Translation: Step up, Mayor. Be a leader, not a photo-op.

Katz sees a chance here: “This moment presents an opportunity for education, for empathy and for leadership that brings communities together rather than deepening divides.” Noble, but good luck with that when the mayor’s already picked his side.

Tweet

Terror supporting organization labels Trump the "new Biden" because he supports Israel against terrorists

Well, well, well, look who’s back at it again—the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the perpetually aggrieved outfit that’s been moonlighting as a cheerleader for terrorist causes while pretending to “advocate” for Muslim Americans. This time, they’ve got their knickers in a twist over President Donald Trump, slapping him with the oh-so-clever label of “the new Joe Biden” because he’s dared to back Israel’s smackdown of Hamas in Gaza. 

Yes, folks, in CAIR’s world, supporting an ally against a terrorist group is apparently a crime worthy of a Biden comparison. Duh.

CAIR, which has spent years dodging accusations of cozying up to some of the nastiest players in the terrorism game, is now clutching its pearls over the body count in Gaza. They’re wailing about Israel’s so-called “genocide”—a term they fling around like confetti—and demanding Trump yank all U.S. support for the Jewish state. 

In their Sunday sob-fest, they whined, “As the minimum death toll in [Gaza] crosses 50,000, the Israeli government is completely out of control because Donald Trump is the new Joe Biden: a president who supports genocide and puts Israel first in violation of federal law and disregard for the wishes of the American people.” 

Translation: Trump’s not bowing to the Hamas fan club, and CAIR’s feelings are hurt.

The terror-fans went on, practically begging: “President Trump must force [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu to permanently stop his self-serving genocide and accept the comprehensive ceasefire deal that frees all captives. If President Trump wishes to be remembered as a peacemaker and not Netanyahu’s poodle, he must act before the death toll crosses 100,000.” 

Oh, the drama! You can almost hear the violins. 

Meanwhile, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry—because who doesn’t trust a terrorist PR firm?—claims 50,000 Palestinians have been killed. Naturally, they don’t bother sorting out how many were gun-toting jihadis versus actual civilians. And let’s not forget the pesky little detail that researchers have caught those numbers being inflated faster than a politician’s ego to smear Israel. Facts? Who needs ‘em when you’ve got a narrative?

Trump, of course, ran on a promise to stand by Israel, our incredibly important ally in the Middle East, while it pounds Hamas into the dirt—a stark contrast to Biden, who spent his term waffling under progressive pressure like a soggy noodle. 

Just last month, the White House green-lit a batch of heavy bombs for Israel that Biden had held back, fretting over civilian casualties. Trump? He’s not here for the hand-wringing. He’s told Israel to “finish the job” against Hamas, and CAIR’s not taking it well.

For the past 17 months, ever since Hamas’s charming little Oct. 7, 2023, rampage across southern Israel—complete with rape, murder, and kidnapping—CAIR’s been on a tear, accusing Israel of “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” at every turn. They even tried pinning “ethnic cleansing” on Israel’s limited ops in Syria after Assad’s regime took a nosedive in December. Then, last month, they screeched that Israel was “moving the genocide from Gaza to the occupied West Bank” during a counterterrorism op dubbed “Operation Iron Wall.” 

It’s like CAIR’s got a Mad Libs book of atrocities, and Israel’s the only noun they know.

Since Trump strolled back into the Oval Office, CAIR’s been whining that his administration’s discriminating against Arab and Muslim Americans. They’re mad he’s cracking down on universities letting anti-Semitism fester on campus—calling it “unconstitutional” censorship and Islamophobia. They also flipped out when Trump moved to deport foreign students waving Hamas flags at rallies, branding it “anti-Palestinian.” Poor dears.

CAIR’s rap sheet isn’t exactly spotless, either, as I posted about here.

Back in the 2000s, they got tagged as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case. Politico pointed out in 2010 that “US District Court Judge Jorge Solis found that the government presented ‘ample evidence to establish the association’” of CAIR with Hamas. The ADL’s noted some of CAIR’s bigwigs had early ties to Hamas affiliates, though CAIR swears up and down it “unequivocally condemn[s] all acts of terrorism,” listing off groups like al-Qa’ida, Hamas, and the Real IRA like it’s a Boy Scout merit badge.

But the mask slipped hard after Oct. 7. CAIR’s co-founder Nihad Awad took the stage at an American Muslims for Palestine convention in Chicago last November and the scumwafer couldn’t hide his glee. 

“The people of Gaza only decided to break the siege—the walls of the concentration camp—on Oct. 7,” he gushed. “And yes, I was happy to see people breaking the siege and throwing down the shackles of their own land, and walk free into their land, which they were not allowed to walk in.” 

Happy? Over the biggest single-day slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust? That’s not a dog whistle—it’s a foghorn.

So here we are: CAIR’s throwing tantrums because Trump won’t ditch Israel for their terrorist buddies. If they think he’s going to cave, they’ve got another thing coming. Pass the popcorn—this is gonna be good.

We dodged a bullet in this last election. 

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

Council on American-Islamic Relations reveals its pro-Hamxs stance, calls Trump the "new Biden" for supporting the Jews

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization that advocates on behalf of Muslim Americans, and opposes anything Jewish, has repudiated US President Donald Trump as “the new Joe Biden” because of his strident support of Israel’s military operations against Hamas in Gaza.

To be blamed for supporting Israel against the Hamassholes and others who massacred Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023 is an unintended compliment. 

Let's look at what CAIR is all about.

In 2007, CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal case against the Holy Land Foundation, a charity convicted in 2008 of funneling over $12 million to Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. 

Critics, including some U.S. officials, pointed to evidence suggesting CAIR’s founders had ties to the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), which was linked to Hamas. CAIR has maintained that it was never charged, and in 2010, a federal appeals court ruled that the public listing of unindicted co-conspirators violated the rights of CAIR and others, calling it a tactical move by prosecutors rather than proof of guilt.

And CAIR has faced persistent accusations of being linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, a transnational Islamist organization that seeks to establish a global caliphate. These allegations often stem from a 1991 document titled “An Explanatory Memorandum,” which listed CAIR among groups allegedly tied to the Brotherhood’s efforts in North America. 

CAIR has dismissed this as a discredited conspiracy theory, noting that the FBI, in a 2011 review, found no evidence to support such a connection and removed related references from its training materials. But if you believe they are squeaky-clean, you might also believe pigs are halal.

In November 2023, CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, [aka Dickawad] spoke at an American Muslims for Palestine event, where he expressed happiness at Palestinians “breaking the siege” on the October 7 attacks. 

Awad's remarks drew widespread condemnation, including from the White House, which removed CAIR from a national strategy to combat anti-Semitism, which made as much sense as putting Kamala Harris as the National President of Mensa.

Awad later clarified that he condemned violence against civilians [but forgot to mention that he sees all Jews and Christians as enemy combatants] and meant to praise nonviolent defiance, but the incident fueled accusations of CAIR supporting extremism, which, of course, it did and still does.

Then there's the deal with Zahra Billoo. 

In 2021, Zahra Billoo, executive director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter, gave a speech calling “Zionist synagogues” and Jewish organizations “enemies” of Muslims, accusing them of driving Islamophobia. It's just another incidence where Muslims play the victim card, just as Hamas is doing now in Gaza.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and others labeled Billoo's remarks anti-Semitic. 

CAIR, of course, defended her, claiming she was misquoted and targeted by a smear campaign, but the controversy intensified scrutiny of CAIR’s rhetoric on Israel and Jewish groups.

In 2014, the United Arab Emirates listed CAIR as a terrorist organization alongside groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. Critics saw this as evidence of CAIR’s extremist ties, while CAIR argued it was a politically motivated move by the UAE to silence dissent, pointing to its humanitarian efforts—like opposing death fatwas and supporting church rebuilding—as proof of its peaceful mission.

More recently, CAIR has faced internal controversies, including lawsuits from former employees alleging sexual harassment and misconduct by leadership. 

A 2024 lawsuit by a former staffer claimed CAIR received funding from foreign governments and terrorists through its Washington Trust Foundation, prompting accusations of fraud and money laundering. CAIR has denied these claims, and legal proceedings are ongoing, with discovery potentially shedding more light.

So in summary, if you care what CAIR says about our President, you're not understanding who these scumcrumpets are.

In the 17 months following Hamxs’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of southern Israel, CAIR has repeatedly lambasted Israel’s military efforts, accusing the Jewish state of committing “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing,” when on that horrible day, it was obvious that Hamxs was doing exactly what they were accusing Israel of doing. 

Let's face it: if Israel wanted to commit genocide of the Gazan population, the war would have been over by the afternoon of October 7, 2023.

Am Yisrael Chai!

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

Former CAIR Director Shouts Anti-Semitic Rant in NY City: "F**k the Jew, F**k the Zionist"

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has been defending terrorists and overt anti-Semites since 1994. It was initially located in Washington, D.C., and co-founded by Omar Ahmad and Nihad Awad.

A word or two about Awad:

In a 1994 speech at Barry University, Awad expressed support for Hamas and the previous year, an FBI wiretap caught him verbalizing support for the terrorist organization which has been cited in the Holy Land Foundation legal proceedings. [Google it.]

Regarding the October 7, 2023 Hamas massacre on Israel, the scumcrumpet Awad described it as Gazans "breaking the siege" and was happy seeing people "throw down the shackles of their own land." Even then-President Joe Biden's anti-Israel White House condemned his remarks as anti-Semitic and Awad later walked his remarks back by condemning violence against civilians but holding on to the notion that the attack was merely Palestinian resistance to occupation, in spite of there no being a "Palestine" land until Yasar Arafat used the term "Palestine" after co-founding the Fatah movement in 1959.

Awad was also a central figure in CAIR's problems with sexual harassment. A former senior staffer alleged that he engaged in sexual harassment and there had also been additional accusations of a cover-up of sexual harassment by other CAIR leaders under his leadership.

Under his watch, Awad has influenced American politics, particularly for his advocacy against what he calls Islamophobia. Of course Islamophobia is a made up term to shut people up from criticizing Islamic terrorism. Phobias are irrational fears; but fear of Islamic terrorism is certainly not irrational. Awad suggested a creation of an "army" of Muslim lawyers, journalists, and scholars to influence public opinion and politics with the end goal of making Islam the only religion in the West.

The FBI stopped working with CAIR in 2008 over concerns with its ties to Hamas, which now brings us to today, when a former senior employee for the organization, Noora Shalash, was caught on camera launching a profanity-laden, anti-Semitic tirade at Jewish men in New York City. The video went viral on social media Thursday.

Shalash had worked as director of government affairs for CAIR's Kentucky branch and was seen harassing a "visibly Jewish man" and eventually getting arrested.

“F**k the Jew. F**k the Zionist,” Shalash ranted.

Shalash then said that she “loves Jesus” and claimed Jews “dishonor the Virgin Mary and call her a ‘whore.'” She also called the man recording the video a “b**ch” and swiped her hand at his cellphone. A security guard intervened and physically pulled Shalash away while she appeared to continue attempting to assault the man.

“This is what Jews have to deal with in New York City,” the man said.

Midtown Manhattan – crazed antisemite assaults a visible Jew and gets arrested.
“F*ck the Jew … f*ck the Zionists” she says confidently. pic.twitter.com/EdmTR2UzWg
— StopAntisemitism (@StopAntisemites)

A final word: Jews do not dishonor the Virgin Mary, Jesus, or anyone of other religions. We do not dishonor atheists because Judaism is a very tolerant religion. Unlike many religions, Jews don't seek out converts and in order to convert to Judaism one must be dedicated and serious. In order to become a Muslim, for example, all one needs to do is recite a few words and 'poof' you're a Muslim: La ilaha illallah [there is no god but Allah] then Muhammadur resulullah {Muhammed is the messenger of Allah].

Piece of cake.

Tweet

Imagine what cops found at pro-Palestinian student leaders

Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is an organization correctly accused of supporting terrorism and being anti-Semitic. 

When Hamas slaughtered 1,200 Israeli [read 'Jewish'] civilians on October 7, 2023, SJP celebrated the murders, rapes and kidnapping of Jewish civilian men, women and babies. This national organization of disgusting scumbags, released propaganda with images of paragliders,  symbolizing one of the ways some of the terrorists entered Israel to carry out the slaughter. 

In the following months, several SJP chapters have acted disgracefully, leading to some being shut down. 

This brings us to an investigation at George Mason University in Northern Virginia where police searched the home of two local SJP leaders due to allegations of criminal behavior. 

Here's the background:

Last August a group of student radicals vandalized George Mason's student center by spray painting messages about a "student intifada." An intifada is an Arabic word meaning "uprising" or "shaking off." Specifically, it refers to 2 major periods of so called Palestinian resistance against Israel's existence.

The Washington Post reported that "activists spray-painted words on Wilkins Plaza outside the university’s Johnson Center." This vandalism, which caused thousands of dollars in damage, is a felony in Virginia, and the police think that SJP leaders, sisters Jena and Noor Chanaa, were behind it. A county judge gave police a warrant in November to search the Chanaa family home for electronics, but the details of this warrant are sealed until February.

When the police used their warrant to search the home, here's what they found:

When officers entered the Chanaa family home, they found firearms—modern weapons, not old ones—along with lots of ammunition and foreign passports, all out in the open, as per court documents and insider sources. They also discovered items supporting terrorism, like Hamas and Hezbollah flags and signs saying "death to America" and "death to Jews."

"Death to America" and "death to Jews." These messages are anything but subtle. They publicly criticize "Zionists," but it's clear what they're really targeting. And they're not shy about it:

Under Jena and Noor's leadership, George Mason's SJP chapter has openly supported the Hamassholes and its "martyrs," although they would never want to be a martyr themselves. 

Just two days after the October 7 attack, they issued a statement celebrating the "liberation of the Palestinian people" [aka the killing, torturing, burning, raping, and kidnapping of Israelis of all ages and sexes, including babies] and justifying "the right to resist for Palestinians living under the zionist [sic] occupation," which is actually the reverse of the situation when considering that Jews inhabited Israel for thousands of years, long before Islam was invented by a pedophile in the desert. 

The Jew-hating sisters described the attack as "reclaiming land and settlements considered illegal" for "decolonization," falsely explaining that, "[D]ecolonization entails the struggle for liberation of a colonized people from the grasp of their colonizers. This struggle for the much-sought after liberation from the colonizer is not meant to be metaphysical—but material." They also claimed, "Every Palestinian is a civilian even if they hold arms. A settler is an aggressor, a soldier, and an occupier even if they are lounging on our occupied beaches." They claim this as a way to claim that the IDF kills Palestinian civilians in order to create sympathy among people who need a reason to hate something.

These statements show clear support for terrorism and anti-Semitism, making one wonder if these individuals were preparing to join the ranks of actual terrorists, especially with the weapons found, or if they were planning to hand them out to others who would martyr themselves for the sake of Islamic anti-Semitism.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a putrid organization, defended these radicals and criticized the investigation. It's worth noting that CAIR's leader has previously praised Hamas' attacks on Jews. Both CAIR and SJP openly support terrorism, and both should be put out of business. 

Meanwhile, threats and acts of violence from the "pro-Palestinian" community continue to grow, but like the UK, we [i.e., the government] just sit around with our thumbs someplace they shouldn't be and hope they leave us alone.

Tweet

Iran leader and some US congress people have a cow over Bibi Netanyahu's address

Iran's Ayatollah, a guy who hasn't met a Jew or an American he didn't want to kill, has gotten his Amama all twisted in a knot along with his tarboosh. The dude was "enraged" by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress this week. Along with him in rage was Nancy "Hands-a-Blur" Pelosi, Rashida "Worm Lips" Tlaib, comrade Bernie Sanders, along with the rest of the so-called squad.

The Iranian regime tap danced to "desperately discredit" Bibi's speech with the old "predictable spin" you'd expect from people who have nothing original to say.

With the American-Israeli alliance healthier than many in the regime had expected and hoped would not be, Iranian state media focused on anti-Israel protests in Washington and Hamas’s response to Netanyahu’s speech--not the speech itself. 

The Ayatollah was miffed and rattled so much so that even their state media couldn't hide it any better than CNN hid Joe Biden's dementia.

Kasra Aarabi, Director of IRGC Research, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), said: “The Iranian regime was desperately seeking to discredit Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech in the US and foment chaos around it.”

Well, the only chaos fomented began with Pelosi and many on the far left. There was Tlaib who brought a ping pong paddle to the hallowed chamber with signs on it that she apparently believed would accuse Israel of war crimes. One such sign said "War Criminal" and it looked as if Tlaib was labeling herself as such, rather than accusing Israel.

Meanwhile, Aarabi warned that protesters burning US flags in Washington "will have brought a smile to Ayatollah Khamenei’s face. Make no mistake, the Iranian regime and its networks abroad will try and further fuel chaos with the goal of polarizing US society ahead of the presidential elections. In many ways, this regime influence operation is already in full swing.”

Islamic State officials tried to dismiss Netanyahu’s speech. Massoumeh Ebtekar, Iran’s Vice President for Environmental Affairs, told AFP that she didn’t think Netanyahu’s opinion “carries much weight,” but she had to say that to keep her head on her shoulders.

Iran’s foreign spokesman, Nasser Kanani, condemned US officials, writing on X: "the American government and Congress are welcoming this executioner with applause... The criminal prime minister of a fake regime is embraced by his supporters after nine months of genocide and infanticide.”

Yeah, Israel gets attacked on Oct. 7, when 1,200 Israelis are killed outright or raped first, 253 are taken hostage, dead and alive, babies are burned alive, parents are made to watch their children die, children are made to watch their parents die, and Israel refuses to obediently march in line into the "showers." 

Screw the anti-Semites who condemn Israel for fighting back and winning. And screw those in government who call for a ceasefire by Israel, but not a surrender by Hamas and their jihadi co-terrorists.

Despite Iranian officials dismissing Netanyahu’s US trip, the story was the biggest item across Iranian news channels on Wednesday because they're worried that they can't get away with genocide of the Jews and saying that Israel are the ones committing genocide is being seen for the lie that it is.

Netanyahu called for an alliance against an Iranian "axis of terror," correctly saying that Tehran is behind almost all sectarian violence in the Middle East. Of course they are--they the number one sponsors of terrorism throughout the Middle East and would like to see the United States destroyed "from within" like even the CAIR's charter (Council on American-Islamic Relations) states.

"America and Israel today can forge a security alliance in the Middle East to counter the growing Iranian threat," Netanyahu told Congress.

And we must. Israel is our best ally in the Middle East.

Tweet