Jihadi Democrat Abdul El-Sayed refuses to condemn IRGC

The Democrats’ jihadist nominee for the Senate in Michigan was asked a straightforward question at a town hall in Ann Arbor on Wednesday: would he condemn the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps?

He declined to do so.

As reported by Newsweek, Iman Dashti, an attendee who identified himself as Persian, informed the candidate, Abdul El-Sayed, that his own family had suffered persecution at the hands of the regime in Tehran. 

Dashti noted his dismay over leaked audio in which El-Sayed refused to comment on the death of former Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei after U.S. strikes, remarking at the time that “there are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today.”

“That silence had a gaping hole in our community,” Dashti said, before pressing El-Sayed to clarify whether “you stand unequivocally against the IRGC?”

Rather than offering a clear rejection of a brutal state apparatus, El-Sayed offered a studied evasion, replying, “I will always stand for and with democratic movements,” while adding that he opposed U.S. involvement in regime change. Of course, in actuality, El-Sayed opposes the U.S. in general. His good buddy, Hasan Piker, had openly said that the United States deserved 911.

The voter who posed the question was under no illusions about the reason for this hesitation. Speaking later on Fox News, he observed that “a lot of his supporters are very supportive of these institutions, the IRGC. They love the Iranian regime and he doesn’t want to alienate them.”

Hey folks, please take time to give a click to the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Democratic Socialist [aka socialist] arrested outside UN

In a scene straight out of the high-stakes world of modern political theater, local Democratic Socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier courageously placed herself in front of news cameras Thursday outside the United Nations General Assembly, earning a highly coveted arrest badge after protesting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Chevalier, who rocketed to fame after discovering that declaring everything a human right wins democratic primaries, joined fellow activists in denouncing Netanyahu as a “genocidal murderer.” Demonstrators expressed deep outrage that the U.N. would allow the leader of a democratic nation to speak, a prestige normally reserved for gentle, peace-loving regimes like China, Russia, Syria, and the Taliban.

Protesters cited Israel's military operation in Gaza as the primary reason for their rage. The IDF, currently fighting a terrorist organization that uses its own citizens as human shields in dense urban combat, has somehow managed a lower civilian-to-combatant casualty ratio than the United States military, a fact that local activists strictly agree to ignore.

“As the Democratic Nominee for New York’s 13th Congressional District, I refuse to allow a war criminal to roam the streets of our city unchallenged,” Avila Chevalier declared in a statement following her heroic photo op.

“I refuse to play host to a man who has overseen the slaughter or injury of more than 64,000 children in Gaza with American taxpayer dollars.”

While the exact charges remain unclear, keen-eyed observers noted that the arrest bore a striking resemblance to the classic Greta Thunberg model: carefully staged, perfectly framed for Instagram, and executed with the gentle touch of NYPD officers who clearly understood the assignment. Experts confirm Chevalier faces a harrowing few minutes of administrative processing before being released with a glowing campaign asset.

Chevalier previously made headlines by defeating incumbent Rep. Adriano Espaillat in June. As one of three DSA-backed candidates to unseat establishment Democrats, she is now heavily favored to bring her exquisite sense of dramatic timing to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives this November.

Hey folks, please take time to give a click to the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Tragic Loss: Al Jazeera Forced To Lay Off 24 Highly Skilled Terrorists Acting As Journalists

GAZA — In a devastating blow to objective objective journalism, Al Jazeera has been forced to part ways with 24 of its valued Gaza staff members after a pesky US lawsuit pointed out that they were actually members of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

The lawsuit, filed by civil rights group Shurat HaDin, daringly alleged that writing news reports while actively participating in terrorist organizations might represent a slight conflict of interest.

The news sent shockwaves through the mainstream media community, which has long relied on unbiased reporting from neutral observers wearing "PRESS" vests over their tactical military gear.

AI Generated and you get the picture

"CPJ has always been clear that we do not include anyone in our data sets if there is evidence that they were engaging in combat or inciting imminent violence," said Committee to Protect Journalists CEO Jodie Ginsberg, defending the organization's rigorous method of taking Hamas obituaries at face value. "This is consistent with international humanitarian law, which considers journalists affiliated with non-state actors to be civilians, provided they do not directly participate in hostilities."

After a thorough audit, CPJ reluctantly scrubbed 20 names from its fallen reporters list after Hamas helpfully published obituaries praising the "journalists" for their brave service in firing rockets at those pesky Israeli "Jooooze."

"CPJ condemns in no uncertain terms the misrepresentation of combatants as journalists or media workers, or the misuse of ‘Press’ insignia," Ginsberg added, expressing deep sadness that rocket-launching freedom fighters keep ruining the reputation of totally legitimate press credentials. "Such actions endanger every single individual journalist legitimately trying to report. We are conducting a full review of the names on our lists to confirm that no one who was actively engaged in combat is listed in our data."

At publishing time, Al Jazeera was reportedly accepting applications for new Gaza correspondents, requiring candidates to have "at least three years of media experience and zero active RPG-launching convictions. Anti-Zionism a plus."

Hey folks, please take time to give a click to the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Aborted baby wins wrongful death lawsuit against abortionist

ALBUQUERQUE, NM — In a historic legal breakthrough that has left policy analysts staring blankly into the middle distance, an estate representing a 26-week-old victim of an abortion has successfully collected a $200,000 wrongful-death settlement from the clinic responsible.

The lawsuit, Wabbington v. Boyd, targeted late-term abortionist Curtis Wayne Boyd, Emily Cohen, and the late Carmen Landau. According to legal documents, the complaint classified the child as a "26-week-old viable fetus" and a "person" under New Mexico’s Wrongful Death Act who was "entitled to equal protection under the law of New Mexico and the United States." 

By 'fetus' it means a human being.

The suit detailed how the mother was under the influence of methamphetamine when she entered Southwestern Women’s Options, rendering her legally incapable of giving informed consent for the procedure. So, like assisted suicides in Canada, death was the choice by those in charge.

Albuquerque attorney Mike Seibel, who represented the plaintiffs alongside co-counsel Justin Hall, confirmed the unprecedented nature of the payout.

“This is the first time that an abortionist has ever been sued for the wrongful death of a baby,” Seibel said. “There have been numerous cases for injuries to the mother, but in this case both the mother and the baby’s estate sued.”

Seibel noted that the legal framework handled the situation with standard bureaucratic rigor. “This case recognized the baby to have an estate, and receive compensation for wrongful death, as a ‘person’ under New Mexico law,” he explained.

Elaborating on the 2020 incident, Seibel recalled that the mother immediately regretted the decision the following day. He noted that while the state maintains assistance programs for pregnant women suffering from addiction, clinic staff proceeded despite her visible intoxication.

“You can’t consent while you’re intoxicated with anything. It’s a basic thing,” Seibel said. “So I sued for the wrongful death of the baby.”

Shortly thereafter, a check for $200,000 arrived in the mail.

“The first time this has ever happened in the history of the United States where a baby has sued the abortionist for the wrongful death in this situation,” Seibel added.

Legal scholars have noted the state's remarkably agile statutory logic, which seamlessly classifies an unborn child as a legal non-entity up until the point a civil claim requires them to be a human being with a financial balance sheet.

“You can collect for the death of the unborn baby as a person, but you can still murder the unborn baby under New Mexico law,” Seibel said of the legal doctrine.

At press time, state officials were reportedly drafting guidelines to ensure that while unborn children remain fully eligible to collect financial damages for their own deaths, they remember to pay the applicable state capital gains tax on the settlement.

Hey folks, please take time to give a click to the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tell Mamdani what he thinks of him right to his face

AI Generated 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin (Bibi) Netanyahu directly addressed New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani during his speech to the UN General Assembly today, September 24, 2026. He referred to comrade Mamdani the “anti-Semitic mayor of New York” and accused him of spreading lies about Israel, making Jews feel unsafe in the city, associating with Hamas supporters, and trying to prevent him from speaking.

“To all those spreading these lies about my country,” Bibi began, “and our brave soldiers, whether they sit in this hall or in the office of the anti-Semitic mayor of New York, I say this: Shame on you. Shame on you for distorting the facts. Shame on you for inverting victim and aggressor. Shame on you for spitting in the face of truth.”

“Mr. Mamdani, since you were elected mayor of this city, many Jews no longer feel safe in New York. They talk to me. They tell me, ‘This isn’t the city we remember. It changed so quickly.’ No wonder. You praise criminals convicted of supporting Hamas. You count as friends people like Hasan Piker, who said America deserved 9/11. Some friends you have.”

“You invite into your home a Palestinian journalist who filmed Hamas terrorists beating and torturing Israeli hostages and later admitted that he refused to publish the videos in order to protect, you guessed it, the terrorists. Your wife liked a post praising the October 7 massacre. She liked another post saying Tel Aviv shouldn’t exist. You refuse to condemn any of that. You falsely and repeatedly accuse Israel of genocide.”

Boom!

“Mr. Mamdani, you try to stop me from coming here. You try to silence me. Well, you can’t silence me. You can’t silence the truth. And here’s the simple truth: Israel didn’t commit genocide. Israel prevented genocide. And that’s exactly what Mr. Mamdani’s Hamas buddies would have done to us had we not stopped them. They would have killed every last one of us.”

Netanyahu framed these comments as part of a broader rejection of genocide accusations against Israel and criticism of what he described as antisemitism and attempts to isolate Israel. Mamdani later issued a statement calling Netanyahu’s remarks “baseless lies meant to sanitize his genocide of Palestinians.” The exchange followed months of public tension, including Mamdani’s earlier calls related to an ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu.

Meanwhile, 77 delegates walked out before Bibi spoke, which makes me wonder why the United Nations isn't kicked out of the USA. Bibi, who has more class than all the jihadis who walked out, invited anyone else who was a moral coward to leave.

Hey folks, please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Convicted felon judge, Hannah Dugan, gets to keep her law license because she's evidently special

MILWAUKEE, WI — In a stunning victory for the bold, brave principle that laws are merely vague suggestions for people with fancy robes, local legal hero and convicted felon Hannah Dugan will officially be allowed to keep her law license.

For years, legal scholars have insisted that "no one is above the law." Fortunately, Wisconsin’s highest court is here to clarify that this rule only applies to common plebeians who commit felonies, not distinguished judicial officers who simply indulge in a little light courthouse felonious smuggling.

For those who don't remember, last year, Dugan was arrested after she helped an illegal alien criminal, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who was in her courtroom on domestic violence charges, flee from ICE agents in the Milwaukee County Courthouse. 

Dugan went to trial, and she was found guilty of felony obstruction. Fortunately for her, it was no big deal.

Sources confirm that guiding a domestic violence suspect out a secret back door to dodge federal law enforcement is a sacred, time-honored judicial duty, right up there with banging a wooden mallet and wearing black polyester.

Before and during her trial, Dugan and her attorneys argued her acts were protected by judicial immunity. After her conviction, Dugan's legal team tried to get the verdict thrown out and pushed for another trial or the dismissal of the guilty verdict.

In a move that truly showcases the absolute ferocity of the American justice system, Dugan was dealt a crushing blow on July 8 when she was fined just $5,000 which is a pittance for her crime. 

She was given no prison time and no probation for a felony that carried a maximum of five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Legal experts speculate the court showed such immense mercy because $5,000 is almost two whole weeks of a taxpayer-funded judicial salary, leaving her barely enough money to purchase a second summer home.

But it gets even worse. Now the Wisconsin Supreme Court has refused to suspend Dugan's law license, for now, and Dugan will get her full pension. The state Supreme Court is waiting for longer disciplinary proceedings before moving ahead.

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court is not suspending the law license of a former Milwaukee County judge who was convicted of a felony — at least for now.

The high court’s decision does not mean that justices won’t revoke Hannah Dugan’s law license at some point in the future. Rather, justices declined to suspend her license on a expedited basis while more lengthy disciplinary proceedings are still pending.

Court officials laughingly assured the public that they take felony convictions very seriously, which is why they plan to ponder the situation for the next three to five business decades before taking any action that might inconvenience a fellow lawyer.

In December 2025, a federal jury found Dugan guilty of impeding a federal proceeding. That’s after Dugan led a man through a side door of her courtroom, after immigration agents had arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse to arrest the man for being in the country illegally.

Dugan is appealing her conviction.

At press time, the Wisconsin Bar Association was reportedly preparing to honor Dugan with a Lifetime Achievement Award in the field of Creative Escape Planning.

Hey folks, please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Trump Breaks Protocol To Show Xi Who’s Boss — With The Help Of B-1 Bombers

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a masterclass of high-stakes diplomatic hospitality, President Donald Trump greeted Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday by personally rolling out the red carpet and immediately subjecting him to the deafening roar of two strategic B-1 bombers.

Xi and his lovely communist wife, Peng Liyuan, touched down at Joint Base Andrews shortly before 6 p.m. Waiting at the end of a massive 100-foot red carpet were Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, marking a complete departure from normal presidential protocol, which typically involves making foreign leaders travel to the White House like normal tourists.

The welcoming committee featured a 21-person honor cordon, color guards, a military band, and the national anthems of both nations. However, the serene atmosphere was promptly shattered when two nuclear-capable B-1 bombers roared directly overhead just as the American anthem hit its stride.

As Trump stood saluting, the noise level reached a point that caused the Commander-in-Chief to visibly wince and briefly duck his head. Trump then turned to Xi with a grin, appearing to remark on the bone-rattling sound of air superiority.

Xi, trained in the art of communist stoicism, did not visibly react, choosing instead to maintain a complete poker face as multi-million-dollar war machines rattled his eardrums. [Rumor has it he may have needed a change of skivvies.]

Observers noted the extreme contrast between classic diplomatic pageantry and subtle military posturing as the world’s two largest economic powers kicked off their three-day summit. Trump's airport greeting was a stark departure from standard procedure, especially after Trump received a much more subdued welcome from Chinese Vice President Han Zheng upon landing in Beijing back in May.

Melania Trump defended the grand gesture Wednesday morning, explaining that Xi was “coming on our soil” and that the United States should “welcome them with the most respect.”

Sources confirm the lavish greeting comes amidst ongoing tension over trade, tariffs, rare-earth minerals, artificial intelligence, and Taiwan. The two leaders are hoping to protect a fragile trade truce set to expire in November, assuming both nations' hearing recovers from the airport ceremony.

The visit marks Xi's first state visit to the nation's capital in over a decade. The White House plans to follow up the airport flyover with another elaborate ceremony on the South Lawn, formal talks, and a state dinner filled with tech executives eager to explain why they need China to keep manufacturing their hardware.

Hey folks, please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Javier Milei shreds ‘useless’ UN to its face in fiery speech to 'fatally arrogant parasites'

NEW YORK — World leaders gathered at the United Nations General Assembly were left in utter shock Wednesday after Argentine President Javier Milei used his scheduled speaking time to state simple facts instead of reading a bland, pre-approved statement off an index card about global cooperation.

The chainsaw-wielding, free-market libertarian took the podium in New York to address the body, where he boldly dropped a truth bomb and referred to as "useless" and populated by "fatally arrogant parasites."

"That’s to say, it has become a useless organization whose only purpose is to sustain a caste of fatally arrogant parasites masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats," Milei charged, causing several career diplomats to drop their organic iced lattes in horror.

Milei commended the U.N.’s founding mission of resolving conflict peacefully as "noble words," but noted that "today, regrettably, it is time to acknowledge that, in practice, that sacred covenant has been broken."

To support his claim, Milei cited the U.N.’s enthusiasm for global pandemic lockdowns, radical climate policies, and aggressive social engineering.

"During the pandemic, bodies under the auspices of this house put themselves before scientific evidence and the sovereignty of nations and promoted forced lockdown policies throughout the world," Milei stated. "Where some allege a public health policy error, we see a global experiment in social control disguised as science. And when a state wearing public health blinkers deprives its population of the right to work, to receive an education and to bid farewell to their dead, this results in millions of avoidable deaths; there is a word for it, genocide."

"Every time [the U.N.] failed, rather than reviewing the model or apologizing, they doubled down," he added, accurately summarizing the operating procedure of every government agency since the dawn of time.

Milei continued his ruthless audit of the international body, pointing out the awkward contradiction of an entity claiming to protect human rights while elevating human rights violators.

"Those who were supposed to guarantee collective security and human rights failed in their task. They allowed chaos, violence and international terrorism to flourish," he said. "The alleged defenders of human rights have sheltered bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women in the streets; they have systematically voted against Israel while remaining silent in the face of Islamic terrorism and the genocide of Christians in Africa."

The Argentine leader also noted that the U.N. looked the other way regarding the Malvinas [Falkland] Islands, calling the territory "a test of the gulf that exists between the words of international institutions and the reality upon which they purport to act."

"There's no shortage of words or resolutions; what is lacking is consequences," he asserted. "Because an institution that cannot ensure that its words carry weight in the real world loses the most important thing of all, its authority."

According to Milei, the U.N. has "built a bureaucratic leviathan devoted to deciding how the peoples of the world and their citizens should live," creating "a curious mixture of anarchy and tyranny, impotence in the face of those who break the most basic rules, such as bloodthirsty dictatorships and terrorist organizations coupled with Orwellian control and impositions on liberal democracies that abide by the rules."

Closing out his remarks, Milei offered a brief economic lesson to the assembly of professional spenders.

"I would remind them of what Mises said, ‘Good people do not think about controlling the lives of their fellow human beings.’"

At press time, U.N. officials were reportedly forming a special committee to investigate whether allowing world leaders to speak the truth violates international law.

Hey folks, please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet