Thursday, October 29, 2026

Nazi-loving Nick Fuentes upset that Netanyahu won: now we know it's a good thing he did




Nazi-loving pond scum podcaster and Holocaust denier Herr Nick Fuentes reacted angrily over the results of Israel’s general election, declaring that the “Jews win again” after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party emerged as the largest faction in the Knesset.

So, if this POS is upset, then it's a good thing Bibi won.

In a video circulated on X on Wednesday, Fuentes described the election results as a major disappointment, expressing frustration that Netanyahu appeared to have retained a path to remaining in power despite a closely contested election.

“I got to be honest, the goyim are getting killed out here,” Fuentes said. “Man, we need a win. They can’t keep getting away with it.”

Sorry Nicky, Hitler wasn't running.

“Israel held their elections today and it looks like Netanyahu has won.”

Fuentes added sarcastically, “Congratulations! All right, Jews win again.”

The remarks came after Tuesday’s Israeli election produced a political deadlock, with Netanyahu’s Likud winning more seats than any other party but neither the prime minister’s governing bloc nor the Jewish-led opposition securing the 61 Knesset seats necessary to establish a majority government.

According to results released by the Central Elections Committee on Wednesday evening, Netanyahu’s right-wing and religious bloc was projected to receive 53 seats, compared with 48 for the Jewish-led opposition and 19 for the two Arab parties.

The figures were preliminary, with hundreds of thousands of double-envelope ballots still awaiting counting.

Votes by soldiers and overseas diplomats are expected to strengthen the Netanyahu bloc and the Zionist opposition parties at the expense of the Arab factions, though neither side is likely to come close to an outright majority.

Fuentes acknowledged that Netanyahu’s apparent electoral success did not guarantee his continued ability to govern.

He noted that if neither political bloc succeeded in assembling a coalition, Netanyahu could remain in office as caretaker prime minister pending another election.

Under those circumstances, Fuentes suggested, Netanyahu might become a “lame duck,” retaining his position while facing constraints on his political authority.

Fuentes, 28, is among the most prominent figures in the American white nationalist movement and leads an online following commonly known as the Groypers.

He has repeatedly promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories, expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler and denied or minimized the Holocaust.

In a March 2023 broadcast, Fuentes declared, “I think the Holocaust is exaggerated,” before adding, “I think there’s a Jewish conspiracy.”

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed's Muslim Brotherhood Situation

Abdulrahman Mohamed el-Sayed

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed really, really does not want to talk about the Muslim Brotherhood and he will attack you with claims of racism if you ask him about it.

When NBC News’ Tom Illamas pressed him on the subject, the Muslim Brotherhood fanboy grew testy, apparently hoping that if he glared hard enough at the question, it would magically disappear. His message seems straightforward enough: trust him, stop asking questions, and please do not look too closely at the company he and his family have allegedly kept.

The problem is that Americans have developed a rather inconvenient habit of wanting to know whether their elected officials have any questionable associations. We already have Ilhan Nur Said Elmi [aka Ilhan Omar] and Rashida Tlaib providing Democrats with more than enough opportunities to explain away radicalism and controversial foreign allegiances. 

The Senate hardly needs another candidate handing voters a fresh stack of uncomfortable questions.

El-Sayed insists that he and his family have no ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization so extreme that it has been banned in five Muslim-majority countries. Unfortunately for him, the story keeps getting more complicated.

According to previous reporting, El-Sayed wrote a letter to the organization when it took power in Egypt. His sister appears to have an affinity for the group, while his mother reportedly worked for a charity with alleged al-Qaeda ties, and his uncle served as its bookkeeper. Perhaps nobody in the family has an official Muslim Brotherhood membership card tucked into a wallet, but when the family scrapbook starts looking like something that might interest a congressional investigative committee, voters are entitled to ask a few questions.

And now, RedState uncovered another reason El-Sayed might prefer to change the subject: a retreat he reportedly attended that has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

As RedState reported:

El-Sayed recently appeared defensive when Fox News' Bret Baier asked him a straightforward question posed over and over by the Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, and his campaign, about his background and connections to Islamist radicalism.

On Wednesday, more questions started to surface about his ties to these terror groups and their supporters, with new images circulating on social media reportedly showing Abdul El-Sayed in some questionable company at an overseas private retreat.

The photos, in an X post shared by the Government Accountability Institute's president, Peter Schweizer, appear to show the Democrat socializing with members of organizations with "credible ties" to MB or other "Islamic terror groups" in Colombia in 2022.

If the images show what Schweizer says they show, El-Sayed has a serious explaining problem on his hands. The question is not whether a politician must personally approve every person who happens to occupy the same room. The question is why a candidate who emphatically denies connections to Islamist radicalism seems to keep finding himself in situations that invite scrutiny of those very connections.

And when Fox News asks about it, voters deserve more than an irritated response and an apparent hope that everyone will eventually get bored.

El-Sayed would presumably prefer to spend his campaign discussing health care, economic policy, or whatever other subject he believes will put him in the best light. Instead, he is being asked to explain the people and organizations surrounding him. That is an unfortunate development for a candidate who would probably rather have his biography treated like a sealed court filing.

Michigan voters deserve answers before they cast their ballots on September 3. They should not have to piece together a candidate's associations from photographs, investigative reports, and increasingly uncomfortable interviews.

There is an old rule in politics that if you're explaining, you're losing. 

El-Sayed now has an opportunity to test that theory, although the growing list of questions suggests he may be getting more practice than he wanted.

Republicans should make sure voters understand what is being reported, demand straightforward answers, and turn out at the polls. They should also remind their friends and family members to do the same. Elections have consequences, and the best way to prevent an unwanted candidate from taking office is to vote against him rather than merely complain about him afterward.

Expect more questions about this. El-Sayed has chosen to run for elected office, and that means his public record, associations, and past statements are legitimate subjects of scrutiny. He is entitled to answer those questions as he sees fit. Voters are equally entitled to judge those answers.

If he wants the power of public office, he will have to endure the inconvenience of public accountability. That comes with the job, whether he likes it or not.


I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Not Even The New York Times Could Ignore James Talarico's 45-Student Classroom Fantasy

AI generated image of manly man Big Jim Talarico

Democratic Senate hopeful James Talarico has apparently discovered that a political career is a lot like a middle school classroom: It helps to have a good story, even if the attendance records don't quite cooperate.

Much like Joe Biden's claim that Charlottesville inspired his 2020 presidential run, Talarico, a former middle school teacher, has built part of his political origin story around a harrowing tale of educational austerity.

According to manly man Talarico, his first year teaching in San Antonio was a nightmarish exercise in overcrowding, with 45 students crammed into a single classroom and not enough desks to go around.

It's a compelling story. There's just one small problem. According to former newspaper The New York Times, the official records don't support it. Is it possible that a political candidate would lie? Heaven forfend!

Talarico has repeatedly trotted out the tale to explain how Republican budget cuts supposedly opened his eyes to the cruelty of conservative governance. In one account, he recalled teaching sixth-grade language arts at Rhodes Middle School, home of the Fighting Wildcats, in a poor neighborhood on San Antonio's west side.

He practically had to fight his way into the building.

Manly man Big Jim Talarico

"The west side is this beautiful, historic neighborhood. It's also one of the poorest ZIP codes in the entire state of Texas," Talarico explained. "And it was in 2011, right after our state legislature in Texas cut more than $5 billion from public education in our state. And so I saw the impacts of these cuts firsthand. I saw how decisions made in the halls of power hurt flesh and blood human beings."

Then came the classroom catastrophe.

"At one point, I had 45 students in one classroom, and there weren't enough desks for all those kids," Talarico said. "And it was after lunch so you can imagine middle schoolers after lunch in a giant, you know, in a packed classroom."

One can practically hear the anguished cries of overworked teachers and the distant sound of a Democratic campaign consultant realizing he'd found the perfect anecdote.

Talarico repeated the story on The Breakfast Club podcast, again connecting his supposed classroom ordeal to Republican education cuts.

"I always say that teaching middle school is the best preparation for politics," Talarico said. "And the west side of San Antonio, it's one of the poorest ZIP codes in the state of Texas. I entered the classroom in the fall of 2011, right after the state legislature in Texas cut $5 billion dollars from public schools. So as a brand new teacher, I saw the impact of those cuts firsthand. At one point, I had 45 students in one classroom. There weren't enough desks for all those kids."

Apparently, the story was too good to leave in the classroom. It had to be taken on the road.

Unfortunately for Talarico, The New York Times decided to do something increasingly unfashionable in modern journalism: check the records.

Big Jim and Howdy Doody

According to the newspaper, Texas Education Agency documents show that the largest class assigned to Talarico ever contained 30 students. Most of his classes had between 22 and 27 students, while one had just 17.

Former students and colleagues remembered classrooms in which every desk was occupied. They did not, however, recall the sort of overcrowded human warehouse Talarico described, complete with students apparently competing for seating rights on top of air conditioners.

Thirty students is certainly a substantial class. But it's also 15 fewer than the number featured in Talarico's repeatedly delivered tale of educational misery. That's a rather inconvenient discrepancy for a politician who has made a career out of explaining how his classroom experiences shaped his progressive worldview.

Talarico's spokesman, JT Ennis, did not dispute the official class-size records, but offered an explanation that raises its own questions. According to Ennis, Talarico had worked with school administrators to reduce the number of students in his classroom.

"After having 45 students placed in his classroom, James worked with school administrators to redistribute students across classes and create the learning environment that his students deserved," Ennis said.

That explanation appears to introduce a crucial distinction. Perhaps 45 students were initially assigned to Talarico's classroom before administrators redistributed them. But the official records cited by the Times do not establish that this happened, and the spokesman declined to arrange an interview with Talarico to clarify the matter.

For a candidate who has repeatedly used the 45-student figure to illustrate the damage allegedly inflicted by Republican lawmakers, some additional details would seem appropriate.

How many students were actually in the room? When were they redistributed? And if the classroom was reduced to 30 students or fewer, why does the original number continue to appear in Talarico's political storytelling?

These are apparently the sorts of questions that can turn a stirring campaign anecdote into an administrative paperwork problem.

And the 45-student story isn't the only part of Talarico's teaching career attracting scrutiny.

Lone Star Liberty PAC has also highlighted Talarico's recurring account of a troubled student named Justin, whose story has become another centerpiece of the candidate's personal mythology.

According to Talarico's telling, Justin was a new student who had been kicked out of his elementary school twice for bringing a knife to school and threatening to stab his teacher. The Texas Tribune reported that Talarico described welcoming the boy with a handshake and telling him he was glad to have him in class.

The story then followed a reassuring narrative arc. Justin began seeing a school-provided therapist, joined a group of students who ate lunch in the classroom, and started participating in lessons.

Then came the Christmas break.

After returning from the holidays, Justin reportedly got into a fight and was removed from the building by "two football coaches." According to Talarico's account, the boy was never seen again.

It's a dramatic tale of troubled youth, compassionate teaching, and the limits of intervention. It would also make a fine screenplay, assuming the production could secure the necessary documentation.

The Texas Tribune reported that school officials remembered Justin but "could not confirm the specific details Talarico described."

That doesn't prove the story was fabricated. Memories differ, and school records may not preserve every detail of a student's life. But it does mean that another emotionally powerful anecdote in Talarico's political biography remains unverified in important respects.

At some point, voters are entitled to wonder whether they're hearing a teacher's recollections or a campaign writer's increasingly polished screenplay.

Talarico's broader political record has also drawn criticism over his positions on fossil fuels, transgender issues, and boys competing in girls' sports. Conservatives have challenged his explanations of those positions, particularly when they appear at odds with his more moderate public presentation.

Now, with the classroom story under scrutiny, Talarico faces a problem that no amount of carefully rehearsed political theater can easily solve: his own repeated words are colliding with the available evidence.

"Yes, Mom, I'll shave when I get home"

The irony is that Talarico has spent considerable time presenting himself as a teacher who understands the consequences of dishonesty in public life. His classroom anecdotes are intended to establish his moral credentials, demonstrating that he witnessed the failures of conservative governance firsthand and emerged determined to fight for ordinary Texans.

But if the numbers in his signature classroom story are wrong, the lesson may be rather different from the one he intended.

Texas voters should not have to grade a Senate candidate on a curve. They should be able to expect that the stories politicians use to justify their ambitions bear some resemblance to reality.

And if Talarico wants to lecture Texans about accountability, perhaps he could begin with a simple assignment: explain where the other 15 students came from.

No extra credit will be awarded for dramatic storytelling.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Marco Rubio does to Cuban diplomat what Israel did to Hamas: FAFO


The United Nations is supposed to be a place where representatives of the world's nations gather to lecture one another about peace, justice, and human rights while accomplishing approximately nothing. But when U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz exposed the luxurious lifestyles of Cuba's communist overlords during a General Assembly debate Tuesday, the proceedings briefly transformed into a live demonstration of what happens when a dictatorship encounters an inconvenient PowerPoint presentation.

As media outlet PJ Media reported, the Cuban delegation responded to Waltz's remarks with an epic shouting match, culminating in a Cuban diplomat allegedly shoving an American diplomat. Apparently, exposing the perks of the proletariat's supposed champions is grounds for a diplomatic incident.

Now one of Cuba's representatives is preparing for an involuntary change of scenery.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed an order expelling Richard Tur de la Concepción, the first secretary of Cuba's mission to the U.N., who allegedly shoved an American diplomat during the confrontation at U.N. headquarters. Waltz announced the expulsion before sitting down with Fox News to explain that Cuba's diplomatic privileges apparently do not include free swings at American officials.

"He's gone," Waltz told Fox News. "He is going to be on a plane to Havana within the next 24 hours."

Asked where the Trump administration stands, Waltz made its position abundantly clear.

"You lay a hand on an American here in the United States, President Trump, Secretary Rubio and myself, we're not gonna stand for it," he said. Mike happens to be a decorated Green Beret and Army Special Forces soldier, so it's a good thing the Cuban didn't attack him directly lest he get handed his butt in spades.


Cuban officials, meanwhile, have remained silent about the expulsion, presumably busy consulting the revolutionary handbook for a chapter titled What To Do When The Americans Actually Enforce A Consequence.

The confrontation began over a non-binding resolution demanding an end to the U.S. economic, commercial, and financial embargo on Cuba, scheduled for a vote Wednesday. According to the New York Post, Waltz used his speaking time to expose the economic arrangement behind Cuba's supposedly egalitarian paradise: a ruling class enjoying real estate, luxury watches, and private jets while ordinary Cubans endure blackouts, shortages, and the exciting daily adventure of discovering which necessities are unavailable today.

To illustrate the arrangement, Waltz held up a photograph of Che Guevara wearing a Rolex worth roughly $40,000. The revolutionary icon, famous for preaching equality, apparently understood that some watches are more equal than others.

"According to the regime's own statistics, that would pay for 55 years of an average Cuban wage," he said.

Waltz then produced a second photograph, this time featuring current Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel. The man currently overseeing Cuba's socialist paradise was also sporting a Rolex, suggesting that the revolution's commitment to eliminating class distinctions has developed a few highly exclusive exceptions.

"It didn't just start with Castro," Waltz said. "This is the current Cuban president, also with a Rolex on."

That was apparently the moment the Cuban delegation decided that international diplomacy had become intolerable. Delegates began banging on their desks, presumably hoping to drown out the sound of their own government's luxury-watch collection being discussed in public.

Che with his $40,000 Rolex: Communism was berry, berry good to him


Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla rose from his seat, marched toward the podium, and demanded that General Assembly President Khalilur Rahman call Waltz to order under Rule 71. Waltz turned toward the agitated delegation.

"He doesn't like hard truths," he told them. "You can come and intimidate all you want."

Rodríguez continued toward the podium, but Waltz refused to surrender his place. The encounter was beginning to resemble a hostage negotiation in which the hostage had just discovered that the captors were wearing Rolexes.

"You understand who you're dealing with? This is America. Back up!" Waltz shouted.

U.N. officials scrambled to restore order, while Rahman threatened to suspend the session. Waltz, however, continued speaking, apparently unwilling to let the proceedings be derailed by a government whose preferred response to criticism involves intimidation rather than answering questions.

"He's not going to intimidate me in the United States of America — like he tries to intimidate political prisoners," he told the Assembly.

After another round of desk-banging, Waltz resumed his speech, delivering a reminder that the United Nations is not technically an extension of the Cuban Communist Party's central committee.

"This is America, my friend," he said. "This is the United Nations. This isn't your communist dictatorship. You cannot silence me."

Richard Tur de la Concepción now has a plane ride to Havana ahead of him, where he can presumably explain how a diplomatic mission intended to defend Cuba's interests wound up producing an expulsion order, an international spectacle, and an unexpectedly expensive lesson in personal space.

The revolution may promise to abolish the ruling class, but it apparently never promised to abolish its Rolex collection. And after Tuesday's performance, one Cuban diplomat has discovered that the United States is not obligated to let him stay just because he has a fancy title and a seat at the U.N.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Israel Helpfully Escorts 214 Gazans Out Of Gaza While Also Escorting Several Hamas Commanders Straight To Hell



This week Israel facilitated the departure of 214 Gaza residents, along with their escorts, through the Kerem Shalom Crossing. The operation formed part of the weekly humanitarian evacuations Israel coordinates with international partners. Since October 2023 Israel has facilitated the departure of more than 52,000 Gaza residents for medical treatment and other purposes, according to the Israeli Defense Ministry’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories.

At the same time the Israel Defense Forces killed three Hamas commanders in separate airstrikes in the Gaza Strip on Oct. 25-26, including two who participated in the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks on Israel, the military stated on Wednesday.

Anas Akram Muhammad Humaida, a commander in Hamas’s elite Nukhba force who infiltrated the Sufa military outpost on Oct. 7, was killed Sunday near Khan Yunis, according to the IDF. Ashraf Mahmoud Yusuf Dahlan, a company commander in Hamas’s East Jabalia Battalion who also infiltrated Israel during the massacre, was killed the same day in Gaza City. Mahmoud Othman Abdullah Alwan, a Nukhba commander in the West Jabalia Battalion, was killed Monday in Gaza City.

The IDF said the terrorists had been planning attacks against Israeli troops and civilians and working to rebuild Hamas’s capabilities in violation of the ceasefire. Prior to the strikes, measures were taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the use of precision munitions and aerial surveillance, the army added.

FA

In a separate statement on Wednesday, the IDF said it killed three Hamas Nukhba Force terrorists in airstrikes across the Gaza Strip on Oct. 22 and 23, including one who participated in the abduction of Israeli civilians during the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre.

Ahmed Muhammad Ahmed Baraka, killed in southern Gaza on Thursday, took part in the abduction of several Israelis, including Alexander Dancyg from Kibbutz Nir Oz, and later helped hold hostages, including Nimrod Cohen, according to the IDF. Two other terrorists, Nukhba platoon commander Omar Awadallah and Moataz Mahmoud Mohammed Al-Nimr, were killed in northern Gaza on Friday.

Observers noted that the commanders appeared genuinely surprised that participating in the mass murder of Jews and the kidnapping of civilians did not grant them permanent immunity under the ceasefire. Hamas has not yet issued a statement clarifying which specific clause of the agreement they believed allowed them to continue planning attacks and rebuilding their capabilities.

FO

Meanwhile, an IDF reservist was arrested on suspicion of trying to smuggle about 10 kilograms (22 pounds) of captagon into the Gaza Strip, the military, Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) and Israel Police said in a joint statement on Wednesday. Captagon is an amphetamine-type stimulant that has been reported to have been used by ISIS and Hamas terrorists, including during the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre.

The suspect, a man in his 30s from the southern Bedouin town of Tel Sheva, was detained in the Strip while in an IDF patrol vehicle, according to the statement. Forces found a bag containing about 10 kilograms of a substance suspected to be captagon, allegedly meant for smuggling. The Beersheva Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday granted a police request and extended the suspect’s remand until Thursday, Oct. 29, the statement said.

Local analysts suggested the smuggling attempt may have been an attempt to keep Hamas’s remaining fighters properly motivated for the next round of violations.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Hasan Piker Finds Humor In Injured Federal Agents, Democrats Find Another Reason To Call Him A Voice Of The People

Hasan Piker [AI generated]

Far-left Twitch streamer, anti-Semite, and professional purveyor of revolutionary nonsense, Hasan Piker sparked outrage Monday night after mocking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents injured during Operation Metro Surge, delivering his routine blend of socialist agitation, hatred of America, and contempt for law enforcement at a campaign event alongside  Rep. Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, [aka Ilhan Omar] (D-MN).

Recounting his time in Minnesota amid protests against the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, comrade Piker suggested that ICE agents braving the state’s brutal winter weather must be "extra racist" and proceeded to joke about an injured officer while the obscene audience laughed along. 

Remember, Piker is the same post-digested waste who said the USA deserved the 9/11 attack.


Apparently, the revolution has reached the stage where broken bones qualify as entertainment, provided the victim has the wrong job and political affiliation. And don't get me started on Jews.

"We saw a lot of funny compilations as well, you know. A lot of hip bones were broken. 'Officer Martinez down,'" the scumcrumpet said while speaking to Democratic socialist and failed Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh, who hosted the sold-out Minneapolis event.

The spectacle offered another glimpse into the Democratic Party’s increasingly awkward courtship of keyboard radicals, a political ecosystem where calling for economic revolution can apparently coexist with celebrating injuries to the people tasked with enforcing federal law. 

Piker has accompanied several prominent Democrats on the campaign trail, emerging as a polarizing figure whom some party leaders embrace while others would apparently prefer to keep several counties away from a microphone, at least until after the elections.

His previous controversies include, as mentioned above, his declaring that "America deserved 9/11" and making remarks about Israel and Hamas that have shown us his anti-Semitism. Yet his standing among segments of the progressive left remains strong, suggesting that Democratic political strategists have decided the best way to reach young voters is to invite a wealthy internet personality with a history of inflammatory rhetoric to explain why America is irredeemably evil and that the world needs more dead Jews.

Omar, meanwhile, has accumulated controversies of her own. 

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents searched her Washington, D.C., home earlier this month, and a federal court filing identified the congresswoman as "Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, aka Ilhan Abdullahi Omar." She joined Piker onstage as Minnesota Democrats continued wrestling with the question of whether associating with the far-left online celebrity would energize young voters or convince everyone else that the party's internal compass had been replaced with a broken turn signal.

Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN) and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) publicly condemned Piker's remarks, while other Minnesota Democrats called for the event to be canceled ahead of next week's midterm elections. Omar's campaign defended her decision to attend, arguing that the event would help mobilize young voters.

The campaign's reasoning is understandable. Young voters are notoriously difficult to mobilize, and few things demonstrate a commitment to political moderation quite like sharing a stage with a streamer who finds injured federal officers amusing. Still, the strategy could prove effective if the campaign's goal is to convince voters that the Democratic Party's definition of compassion depends heavily on the victim's government employer.

Piker also told Fateh that he had been inspired by the "solidarity" and "mutual aid" that emerged after thousands of ICE and Customs and Border Protection agents were deployed to Minnesota. The resulting protests included multiple arrests, objects and fireworks thrown at law enforcement, and the disruption of a church service. Two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were killed during interactions with federal law enforcement, both under justified circumstances. 

"It wasn’t just the networks that were very quickly propped up, the mutual aid that I saw, the protests that sparked up that said, ‘We’re not going to take it. We’re not going to sit aside and watch this administration come and rip our communities apart and kidnap our neighbors,'" the weasel said.

For Piker, the protests represented a triumph of community solidarity. Critics might describe the same scenes as evidence of what happens when political activists decide that federal law enforcement has no legitimate authority whenever its activities conflict with their ideological preferences. The difference, apparently, depends on whether one views immigration enforcement as a lawful government function or an international conspiracy personally designed to ruin one's X feed.

Piker, using the psychological defense mechanism known as projection, called Republicans "terrorists" during the event, while Omar disgustingly referred to the party as the "pedophile protection party." 

The exchange demonstrated the high-minded civility that has become a hallmark of American political discourse, with elected officials and celebrity activists competing to see who can attach the most grotesque label to millions of fellow citizens before the next commercial break.

Conservatives on social media were quick to condemn Piker's divisive comments.

"Hasan Piker was asked what stuck with him from Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis: ‘Funny compilations’ of federal agents being injured," Charlie Kirk Show executive producer Andrew Kolvet posted on X. "He also called the agents ‘extra racist.’ This isn’t comedy. It’s tacit support for the far-left insurrection network against federal law enforcement. Pro-revolution. Pro-anarchy."

"Every Democrat he campaigned with should be asked if they agree. Disgusting."

"Hasan and his elected Democrats are sick," Loomer Unleashed posted on X.

Federal law enforcement agents confront anti-ICE protesters during a demonstration outside the Bishop Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 15, 2026. (Getty Images)

In another post on X, Crucible Updates wrote, "Hasan watched federal agents get hurt and his takeaway was 'funny compilations… a lot of hip bones were broken.' Millions of young women take their politics from this guy. Let that sink in."

"WTF?!" Gina Milan, a conservative media personality, posted on X.

"This guy is America’s biggest cancer. Just another Nepo baby," Kevin Smith, host of Loud Majority Live, posted on X.

A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the "vilification" of ICE agents who "put their lives on the line" every day to enforce the law is contributing to a more than 1,600% increase in assaults against them, thanks to dolts like Piker and the media that minimizes attacks on law enforcement. 

"They should be thanking our law enforcement for removing these dangerous criminals from Minnesota—NOT vilifying law enforcement," the spokesperson wrote. "While these people smear ICE, law enforcement is arresting criminals and saving countless American lives."

The spokesperson added that ICE agents do not target individuals based on skin color and take required steps to determine immigration status and removability before making an arrest.

"Politicians and activists must turn the temperature down and tone down their rhetoric," the spokesperson wrote.

That advice may prove difficult to implement in a political environment where activists portray immigration officers as villains, politicians describe their opponents as protectors of pedophiles, and online celebrities receive applause for joking about injured law enforcement personnel. Turning down the temperature would require somebody to stop throwing rhetorical gasoline on the fire, a task that seems unlikely to attract many volunteers.

John Nagel 

Omar is running against former state trooper John Nagel and independent candidate DeVelle Jackson in the upcoming midterm elections for Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District. 

Voters will ultimately decide whether the district wants another term of Omar's progressive politics, whether Piker's brand of revolutionary commentary helps or hurts the campaign, and whether mocking injured federal agents is the kind of political entertainment Minnesota residents want their representatives endorsing.

For now, the far-left's latest demonstration of compassion appears to have come with a curious exception: the people wearing badges.

And at least Hasan Piker hasn't married his sister, we believe.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Netanyahu’s Opponents Celebrate Prematurely, Discover They Still Have Netanyahu

In the frantic hours after Israelis cast their ballots Tuesday, Benjamin Netanyahu’s political enemies briefly indulged in their favorite pastime: imagining a future in which the Israeli prime minister was finally gone.

Tough luck for them.

Early exit polls appeared to offer a glimmer of hope to the left wing, prompting speculation that Netanyahu’s lengthy political career might at last be approaching its final chapter. By Wednesday morning, however, reality had rudely interrupted the festivities.

With roughly 71% to 77% of ballots counted in the election for the 26th Knesset, Netanyahu’s right-wing and religious alliance stood at approximately 54 seats, short of the 61 needed for a parliamentary majority. The opposition’s anti-Netanyahu “change bloc,” [sounds kind of like Democratic socialist] led by former military chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, trailed at roughly 47 seats, despite turnout reaching 77.7%, Israel’s highest since 1999.

On paper, the numbers suggest another exhausting round of political deadlock. In practice, they suggest that Netanyahu’s opponents may have spent an enormous amount of energy trying to defeat a man who still holds the stronger hand and actually knows what a woman is.

The opposition’s problem is that arithmetic, unlike political commentary, refuses to cooperate with wishful thinking. Eisenkot cannot assemble a governing majority without the support of Arab parties, the Joint List and Ra’am, which collectively secured 19 seats amid an extraordinary 80% Arab turnout.

That presents a rather substantial public relations challenge in a country still reeling from the October 7 Hamas massacre. Asking a Zionist coalition that includes bereaved families who lost loved ones to Hamas to govern alongside Arab lawmakers accused of dismissing the threat posed by terrorist organizations is not exactly a recipe for national unity. It is, however, the sort of predicament that emerges when a political movement builds its entire identity around removing one man without agreeing on what to do after he leaves.

Eisenkot, whose Yashar party captured approximately 20 seats to finish behind Netanyahu’s Likud with 27, now faces what might generously be described as a governing challenge. A less charitable assessment would call it a political trap with no particularly attractive exits.

If Eisenkot embraces the Arab parties, he risks alienating right-leaning voters whose support he needs. If he rejects them, his coalition remains short of a majority. And if he pushes for another election, he could find himself facing an electorate that has shifted even further to the Right, particularly as ultra-Orthodox voters return to the polls in greater numbers.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, can afford to be patient. With Likud established as the largest single party, he has several options available while his opponents argue over which impossible compromise they would prefer to make.

He can wait for soldiers’ ballots, which have yet to be counted and traditionally favor the political Right. He can attempt to recruit defectors from an opposition already struggling to hold itself together. He can negotiate a broad unity government while demanding terms favorable to his own camp. Or he can allow negotiations to collapse and head into another election, betting that demographic trends and religious mobilization will work in his favor.

In other words, Netanyahu does not need to win every political battle immediately. He merely needs to avoid losing the one that matters, while his opponents attempt to construct a government out of factions that agree on little beyond their shared dislike of him.

The opposition had hoped that public anger over the war, disputes surrounding religious exemptions and years of political exhaustion would finally deliver a decisive verdict against Netanyahu. Instead, the results have left his rivals confronting the uncomfortable possibility that their campaign against him has produced another election in which he remains the central figure.

For Netanyahu’s opponents, the arithmetic is merciless. They can denounce him, negotiate against him and promise voters that his departure is finally within reach. But unless they can assemble a workable majority, their victory remains largely theoretical.

Netanyahu’s phone lines remain open. His rivals, having failed to remove him at the ballot box, may soon discover that the next stage of their political future depends on getting him to answer.    

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed hangs tight with Hamas-supporting editor



DEARBORN, MI—In a stunning display of political courage, local politician Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed bravely sat down for a warm and cozy interview this week with Osama Siblani, a local publisher who sweetly suggests sending Israeli Jews back to the very European nation where the Nazi death camps were located. 

What a guy. His given name should be a clue.

The sit-down took place at the offices of Siblani’s newspaper, The Arab American News, where the atmosphere was thick with mutual admiration and zero awkward questions about why Siblani refers to Hamas and Hezbollah, [scumbags who kill Jewish men, women and their babies] as "freedom fighters." 

Siblani gently urged the candidate to do some light emotional labor for the community.

"Some of them are not very happy, as you know," Siblani said.

True to form, El-Sayed immediately offered comfort to voters who might be feeling a bit blue that their favorite militant groups are facing pushback. Explaining that perfection is elusive, El-Sayed pledged to redirect taxpayer dollars to Michigan "rather than send it abroad to kill or maim people who might be related to you in the south of Lebanon or in Gaza or in the West Bank."

During the discussion, the candidate thoughtfully avoided mentioning minor historical footnotes like the October 7 massacre. After all, dwelling on the slaughter of 1,200 innocent Israelis might harsh the vibe of a nice afternoon chat about foreign policy.

Critics have foolishly tried to paint El-Sayed's cozy relationship with extremist sympathizers in a negative light, pointing out instances where he refused to comment on the death of Iran's supreme leader because local residents were sad, or when he explained a synagogue attack by casually noting that "hurt people hurt people."

Naturally, El-Sayed recognized these attacks for what they truly are.


"I want us to remember that when they attack like this, those attacks are the last vestiges of small-mindedness for small-minded people," he said, bravely brushing off pesky concerns about his family's historical ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and the little fact that former President Barack Hussein Obama put his sister on the Terrorist Watch List.

Never one to miss an opportunity to take a stand against corporate lobbying, El-Sayed also made sure to distance himself from Washington interests.

"I'm not willing to take orders from AIPAC," he declared, prompting a clever little joke from Siblani to ensure everyone knew he wasn't talking about Siblani’s own political action committee, because nothing screams grassroots independence quite like a $350,000 fundraiser hosted by a Hezbollah fanboy.

As the interview wrapped up, El-Sayed warned voters that Republicans are definitely going to try and steal the upcoming election, offering the foolproof strategic insight that "You can't steal a 7-point election. You got walloped, so let's go wallop them."

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Nazi-loving Nick Fuentes upset that Netanyahu won: now we know it's a good thing he did

Nazi-loving pond scum podcaster and Holocaust denier Herr Nick Fuentes reacted angrily over the results of Israel’s general election , decla...