Iran is a total clusterfrack today

The Iranian government appears deeply divided and weakened with power struggles.

Reports indicate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has gained significant influence to the point that the situation can be considered to be a coup, sometimes overriding civilian officials like the Foreign Minister. There's indications that IRGC commanders are controlling military decisions and even isolating parts of the leadership. 

President Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration seems sidelined in key areas and he is even less of a figurehead than ever before.

The current ceasefire is nearing its end (or extension deadline) but it looks like President Trump is going to hold off attacking the regime . Iran has sent mixed signals, some officials announced the Strait of Hormuz was "open," but the IRGC contradicted this and attacked vessels, so it's as if the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. 

The situation is highly volatile,

Iran has stated it has "no plans" for further peace talks (e.g., in Islamabad, Pakistan), accusing the US of bad faith [because we refuse to allow them to continue with their nuclear ambitions]. The Trump administration has threatened to resume strikes on infrastructure if no deal is reached, while also signaling a possible short extension tied to Iran's internal fractures.

Meanwhile, the regime continues executions, torture of detainees, and crackdowns on dissent, including against protesters from earlier this year. Opposition groups like the PMOI (Mujahedin-e Khalq) report ongoing anti-regime activities despite the risks.

Pro-regime rallies in Tehran supporting the government, showing some remaining base of support amid the chaos. However, these Islamists are significantly fewer in number than the Iranian people who are attempting to replace the current government with non-terrorist people.

Broader ContextThe regime survived the immediate aftermath of the strikes and Khamenei's death without collapsing, but it is "seriously fractured," as Trump has noted. Economic damage from sanctions, protests, and the war has compounded long-standing issues. The IRGC's hardline stance seems to be driving more aggressive or inconsistent policies compared to the Foreign Ministry.

No one knows exactly "who’s in charge" at every moment, with the IRGC appearing to hold significant de facto power. The situation remains fluid--talks could resume, the ceasefire could extend (or break), or escalation could return quickly. 

It's a veritable clusterfrack.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Southern Poverty Law Center up to its eyeballs in legal stuff

U.S. Attorney's Office, Middle District of Alabama reported that between 2014 and 2023, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including the Ku Klux Klan and National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party). 

And you wonder why they always attacked conservatives and supported leftists.

A Grand Jury in Montgomery, Alabama, today returned an indictment charging the SPLC with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Alabama Northern Division filed two forfeiture actions to recover alleged proceeds of the organization’s fraud scheme. The FBI investigated this case with assistance from the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).

An indictment is merely an allegation of course, and all defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

“The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked. This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable. No entity is above the law.”

“The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public," said FBI Director Kash Patel. "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups - even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes. That is illegal – and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”

The SPLC is a non-profit organization headquartered in Montgomery, Alabama, whose mission, according to its website during the relevant time period, was to be a “catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people.” [Not to include Republicans, conservatives and anyone who even thought of voting for President Trump.]

According to the indictment starting in the 1980s, the SPLC began operating a covert network of individuals who were either associated with violent and extremist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, or who had infiltrated violent extremist groups at the SPLC’s direction. Unbeknownst to donors, some of their donated money was being used to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups at the same time that the SPLC was denouncing the same groups on its website. 

“Donors gave their money believing they were supporting the fight against violent extremism,” said Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson. “As alleged, the SPLC instead diverted a portion of those funds to benefit individuals and groups they claimed to oppose. That kind of deception undermines public trust and social cohesion.”

"Today’s indictment reflects that no one, no organization, is above the law,” said Special Agent in Charge Sara J. Jones with the FBI-Mobile Field Office. “Charitable donors deserve transparency about how their contributions will be used, and those who betray that trust through concealment and fraudulent means must be held accountable. The alleged fraudulent activities of the Southern Poverty Law Center sowed hate-filled discord and spurred criminal conduct as set forth in the indictment. The FBI will continue to work tirelessly to protect the American public from financial crimes and to pursue justice against those who violate public trust."

Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including: Ku Klux Klan, United Klans of America, Unite the Right, National Alliance, National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nations affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party), American Front.

Holy hypocrisy Bat Person!

According to the indictment, the objective of the scheme and artifice was to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for.

In order to covertly pay the individuals, the SPLC opened bank accounts connected to a series of fictitious entities. The covert nature of the accounts allowed the SPLC to disguise the true nature, source, ownership, and control of the fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid the individuals. In order to keep the scheme going, the SPLC made a series of false statements related to the operation of the accounts.

A conviction will result in the forfeiture of financial gains from the alleged illegal activities.Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel made the announcement in Washington.

The details contained in the civil forfeiture complaint are allegations only, but c'mon, this has been going on since bell bottoms were in vogue. Time to close them down.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Comrade Bernie Sanders-backed group just endorsed a billionaire in governor's race

Millionaire Comrade Bernie and his bad breath

Well, here’s a twist you almost have to admire for its sheer lack of self-awareness. Sen. Bernie Sanders (Communist-VT) used to attack millionaires and billionaires, but now that he has become a millionaire, it's only the billionaires now that he goes after. Hypocrisy much?

Billionaire California gubernatorial candidate Tom Steyer has just landed the endorsement of Our Revolution, a group tied to Bernie Sanders that has made a name for itself railing against… billionaires.

Yes, really.

To their credit, the group didn’t try to dodge the obvious contradiction. They leaned into it, acknowledging Steyer’s billionaire status in a press release while insisting that “it matters what he is doing with that power: pushing for taxes on the wealthy, expanding universal programs, and dismantling corporate influence in our politics.”

So, the problem isn’t billionaires; it’s the wrong billionaires. 

“Tom Steyer understands that California’s affordability crisis is not inevitable, it’s the result of a political system shaped by concentrated wealth and corporate power at the expense of working people,” said Our Revolution Executive Director Joseph Geevarghese.

“At a moment when too many defend the status quo, Tom has taken a different path, challenging the very system that benefits people like him,” he added.

And if you’re keeping score at home, the group even noted on X that this is the first time they’ve endorsed a billionaire for public office. Historic stuff.

Steyer, for his part, was more than happy to accept the nod, saying he’s “honored” and promising that “as Governor, [he’ll] work tirelessly to realize our shared vision of a California that works for working people.”

Meanwhile, Our Revolution’s own website still proudly calls for efforts to “Defund Oligarchy” and to “eliminate in the influence of corporations, billionaires and consultants in our political process.” Apparently, there are exceptions, especially when the billionaire in question is writing checks in the right direction.

Steyer, a climate activist who made his fortune founding Farallon Capital, is worth about $2.4 billion, according to Forbes. He’s poured tens of millions into saturating California’s airwaves, something he also did during his unsuccessful 2020 presidential bid.

And here’s the kicker: it might actually be working because he has a 'D' after his name and that's all it takes for the left.

Polling aggregated by RealClearPolitics suggests Steyer is currently the top Democrat heading into the June 2 top-two primary.

The race, however, is anything but settled. Eric Swalwell dropped out and resigned from Congress following multiple sexual misconduct allegations, blowing up what many thought was the Democrats’ strongest hand.

The field is still crowded, with Steyer facing off against Katie Porter, Xavier Becerra, and Matt Mahan, among others. Betty Yee has already bowed out after weak polling, and Gavin Newsom hasn’t tipped his frenetic hand on a successor.

On the Republican side, Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco are still putting up respectable numbers—enough to raise the outside possibility of a Democratic lockout in California’s “jungle primary.”

In that system, the top two vote-getters—party labels be damned—advance to November.

And if current trends hold, one of them could very well be a billionaire endorsed by a group that exists to oppose billionaires. 

Politics doesn’t get much cleaner than that.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Florida Democrat Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick resigns from Congress

Former Democrat Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick and her eyelashes 

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) resigned from Congress today, Tuesday, April 21, 2026. The resignation went down just minutes before a scheduled House Ethics Committee hearing set to consider formal disciplinary action, which could have included expulsion recommendations.

The committee had previously found "clear and convincing evidence" of 25 out of 27 violations related to ethics rules and campaign finance laws, including allegations that she misused millions in federal COVID-era FEMA disaster relief funds (improperly sent to her family's health care company) to support her 2022 congressional campaign.
Cherfilus-McCormick said in her arrogant statement that the process was a "witch hunt" and unfair "political games," saying she chose to step away rather than continue. Her resignation is effective immediately.

"Rather than play these political games, I choose to step away so I can devote my time to fighting for my neighbors in Florida's 20th District," she wrote on social media Tuesday afternoon. "I hereby resign from the 119th Congress, effective immediately."

"This fight is far from over," Cherfilus-McCormick, who was indicted by a grand jury last year for allegedly stealing COVID-19 emergency funds, added in her statement.

She is facing 53 years in prison as part of a separate criminal indictment. The chances that her actually serving that sentence is as remote as JD Pritzker running a marathon.

Her abrupt announcement came after Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) pledged to file a motion to expel her, teeing up a vote later this week. It takes two-thirds of the House to remove a lawmaker, but a growing number of Democrats have voiced support for the expulsion effort.

House Ethics Chairman Michael Guest (R-MS) announced the panel lost jurisdiction with Cherfilus-McCormick's eleventh-hour decision to quit Congress. The committee panel dropped a bombshell back in March, uncovering "clear and convincing evidence" that Florida Democrat Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick had misused federal disaster relief money, funneled improperly straight to her family’s healthcare company, along with a boatload of other misconduct that would make even the most jaded Capitol Hill veteran raise an eyebrow.

Cherfilus-McCormick, of course, has denied any wrongdoing from day one and repeatedly swatted away any chatter that she might actually resign if faced with the real possibility of an expulsion vote.

She took to social media to blast the entire ethics investigation as a "witch hunt" and whined about supposed violations of her due process rights, even though the committee had bent over backward to accommodate her, granting a delay earlier this year when she temporarily lost her legal representation.

But Rep. Michael Guest wasn’t having any of it on Tuesday. The Mississippi Republican pushed back hard on that narrative, pointing out that Cherfilus-McCormick had repeatedly turned down the committee’s invitations to hand over any exculpatory evidence that might clear her name."The committee has worked diligently to investigate this matter," Guest said. "This was not a rush to judgment, as some would claim … this was a very deliberate process to gather information into allegations that were extremely serious, and extremely complicated."

Guest also made sure to thank the committee staff who had spent more than two years grinding through this mess, poring over tens of thousands of documents to get to the bottom of Cherfilus-McCormick’s alleged shenanigans.

And just like that, she became the third lawmaker to resign from Congress in the past week alone. California Democrat Eric Swalwell and Texas Republican Tony Gonzales both stepped down last week to dodge their own expulsion threats tied to serious sexual misconduct allegations.

At least five women have now come forward accusing Swalwell of sexual assault and rape. Gonzales, for his part, admitted to sexual misconduct back in March with a former aide, who later tragically died by suicide.

Despite the storm clouds, Cherfilus-McCormick went ahead and filed for re-election anyway, though her fundraising tells a different story: she scraped together a measly $11,000 in the first quarter of the year, according to the latest FEC filings. Whether she plans to actually keep that campaign alive remains to be seen.

Notably, Cherfilus-McCormick herself wasn’t even on the House floor when her resignation announcement was read aloud.

A staffer for the congresswoman told reporters she was back in Washington with her family as the news dropped.

"She's with her family digesting this development and digesting this decision," the aide said. "As you can imagine, this wasn't what she wanted."

House Democratic leadership stayed conspicuously silent in the run-up to her resignation announcement, even after the Ethics Committee laid out the extensive misconduct in painstaking detail.

But it looks like Cherfilus-McCormick finally caved once a wave of her own Democratic colleagues made it crystal clear they’d vote to expel her if that rare removal vote ever hit the floor.

Former Speaker Nancy Hands-a-Flying Pelosi, never one to mince words, went on Fox News Tuesday and basically said enough is enough: "Let’s just get this over with."

Pelosi also called for the swift boot of embattled Rep. Cory Mills, the Florida Republican currently under Ethics Committee scrutiny for an alleged domestic violence incident and other issues.

"These cases just being out there . . .  they make us look terrible," Pelosi said.House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, meanwhile, didn’t publicly call on Cherfilus-McCormick to step down before she pulled the plug.

On the other side of the aisle, Speaker Mike Johnson argued that the Ethics Committee should be allowed to finish its work on Mills before any punishment gets considered.

"I'm confident that they are moving along as quickly as they are able," Johnson told Fox News. "And when members cooperate, which my understanding is Representative Mills is cooperating, unlike Cherfilus-McCormick, I would expect that the outcome would be much sooner."

"He's very upset about some of the allegations that have been made," Johnson added of Mills. "He says that he wants to prove his innocence, and he has the opportunity to do that."

By the way, this resignation didn’t fly under the radar, major outlets across the spectrum, Brain Flushings, PBS and CNN to CBS, Fox News, The Hill, Politico, Reuters, NBC, and The Washington Post, all jumped on the story today.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Labor Sec. Lori Chavez-DeRemer quits after misconduct probe

Credit: Photo by Jeff Kowalsky/Bloomberg via Getty Images.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer became former Labor Secretary on Monday after a whistleblower complaint prompted an investigation launched earlier this year by the Inspector General’s Office, so she resigned.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung made the official announcement on X, saying Chavez-DeRemer would leave the administration to work in the private sector. 

“Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer will be leaving the Administration to take a position in the private sector. She has done a phenomenal job in her role by protecting American workers, enacting fair labor practices, and helping Americans gain additional skills to improve their lives. Keith Sonderling will take on the role of Acting Secretary of Labor,” he posted.

Chavez DeRemer is the third Cabinet member to leave the Trump administration this year. News of the U.S. (NOTUS) was first to report that Chavez-DeRemer was likely to step down, while The New York Post tied her exit to the probe into her alleged use of government-funded travel to visit family and friends, among other things. 

According to the report, DeRemer was accused of encouraging staffers to fabricate “official” government trips to areas where she had friends and family so she could visit them at government expense.  Also at issue were claims that she had been drinking during work hours and in the office, and allegations that she had been carrying on an extramarital affair with one of her security guards.

The investigation also delved into a series of text messages between Chavez-DeRemer’s staff members and her husband and her father.

In one such exchange, a staffer identified only as a woman, texted Shawn DeRemer, “I’ve been having so much fun traveling with LCD and being in the moment for everything!! I promise from now on I’ll check in.”

“You better. I was feeling forgotten. I figured you were still in church repenting after your exposure to the demon state of Oregon,” was DeRemer’s reply. 

The Inspector General’s investigation is ongoing.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

IRGC grows like a tumor and puts their president on the sidelines

Dancing to the song "Gloria, Gloria"

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, that charming bunch of regime enforcers who make the old-school mullahs look almost reasonable, has decided it’s tired of pretending the civilians are in charge. According to a report out Tuesday from Iran International, the IRGC has blocked President Masoud Pezeshkian’s presidential appointments and thrown up what sources are calling a security cordon around the gay Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

The IRGC has basically grabbed the wheel on key state functions, the report claimed. Color us shocked.

"It was always a matter of when, not if, the IRGC was going to step forward even more than it has in the last three decades," Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital.

Pezeshkian has hit a "complete political deadlock" as the knife fight between his administration and the military brass gets uglier by the day, according to the report.

The reported power grab could echo way beyond Iran’s dusty borders. Analysts figure a pumped-up IRGC means an even more belligerent Tehran, one that will laugh in the face of any serious talks with Washington and keep cranking up the military chaos across the region. With U.S.-Iran negotiations already circling the drain and nobody sure if Tehran will even bother showing up for the next round, this IRGC dominance raises some fresh and unpleasant questions about who is actually calling the shots in Iran and whether any civilian stooge can still pretend to speak for the terrorist regime.

"But it’s a mistake to assume this is some sort of coup," Ben Taleblu said. "This has been the process in Iran for years now, as the regime has chosen conflict over cooperation and emboldened its security forces at every juncture."

Pezeshkian’s latest pathetic attempt to name a new intelligence minister went belly-up after IRGC commander Ahmad Vahidi applied the usual gentle persuasion. Sources told Iran International that every candidate, including former Defense Minister Hossein "Hoss" Dehghan, got the boot.

Vahidi reportedly insisted that under wartime conditions, all critical and sensitive positions must be chosen and managed directly by the Revolutionary Guard until further notice.

"By any standard, Vahidi is considered a radical even within the regime’s hardline elite, and his rise is a warning that Tehran’s war machine now calls the shots," Lisa Daftari, foreign policy analyst and journalist, told Fox News Digital.

Under Iran’s delightful theocratic setup, the president is supposed to nominate an intelligence minister only after getting the supreme leader’s blessing. But with Mojtaba Khamenei’s condition and whereabouts looking sketchy lately, the IRGC seems perfectly happy operating without any civilian fig leaf.

The report claims Pezeshkian has been begging for an urgent sit-down with Khamenei and keeps getting ghosted.

Instead, Iran International says a "military council" of senior IRGC officers is now guarding the gates to real power, blocking government reports from reaching Mojtaba and basically keeping the elected government on the outside looking in.

Still, the smart analysts point out this is less a shocking twist and more the logical endpoint of a long, ugly trend. The Revolutionary Guard has been slowly swallowing Iranian politics, the economy, and national security for years.

Ben Taleblu argued that anyone getting worked up over Pezeshkian’s apparent sidelining should remember the guy never had real juice to begin with. It has always been the mullahs and the Ayatollahs.

"Those who worry about Pezeshkian’s potential sidelining need to consider what he realistically was or wasn’t able to do mere months ago when the regime slaughtered 40,000 Iranians in the streets," he said.

Pezeshkian, who won in 2025 by promising moderation and reform like every other reformist sucker before him, has spent his whole time in office getting slapped down by the security goons and the clerical overlords. The latest report just suggests that slap has turned into a full-on beatdown as Iran stares down more external heat and internal mess.

One of the juicier details involves Ali Asghar Hejazi, a heavyweight security guy inside the supreme leader’s office. Some of Mojtaba’s straight pals are now trying to shove Hejazi out the door because he had the nerve to oppose Mojtaba inheriting the throne from daddy.

The report said Hejazi warned the Assembly of Experts that Mojtaba didn’t have the chops to be supreme leader and that turning the job into a family business would trash the principles old man Ali Khamenei supposedly laid out.

Hejazi reportedly also warned that installing Mojtaba would basically gift-wrap the whole country for the Revolutionary Guard and shove civilian institutions into the dumpster for good.

That warning is starting to look less like prophecy and more like today’s headlines.

The Revolutionary Guard, cooked up after the 1979 Islamic Revolution to protect the regime from its own people, long ago stopped pretending it was just a military outfit. It now runs big chunks of Iran’s economy, babysits the missile and nuclear programs, and has its tentacles in pretty much every corner of government. The latest moves suggest the IRGC isn’t even bothering to lurk in the shadows anymore. It’s out in the open, flexing as the real boss in Tehran. And the mullahs wonder why the world keeps treating them like the threat they are.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Iran warms Trump they're "prepared to reveal new battlefield cards"

Ghalibaf / Morteza Nikoubazl / NurPhoto via Getty Images

Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, issued a direct warning to President Donald Trump on Monday via X. Iran, he declared, would not accept negotiations with the United States while under threat.

"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.

"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.

This is the familiar language of the Islamic Republic: defiant, theatrical, and steeped in the conviction that weakness invites only greater pressure.

 

Ghalibaf, who led the Iranian delegation in talks with Vice President J.D. Vance in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 11, knows perfectly well that the regime’s position grows more precarious with every passing week of sanctions and isolation. Yet the script remains unchanged. 

Threats of new “cards on the battlefield” are offered as though they might intimidate rather than invite the very escalation Tehran claims to fear. It is a posture the mullahs have perfected over decades: rejection of diplomacy dressed up as principled resistance, while the Iranian people continue to pay the price for their rulers’ intransigence.

Is it just me, or do you also hear the Kenny Rogers song, "The Gambler" in the back of your head?

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Democratic fundraisers plead the Fifth

Five employees of the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned by congressional investigators, refusing to answer any questions.

The witnesses were called to testify as part of an investigation into whether ActBlue misled Congress about its safeguards against foreign contributions. Those subpoenaed included former Vice President of Customer Service Alyssa Twomey, former General Counsel Darrin Hurwitz, former Director and Associate General Counsel Aaron Tug, Legal Counsel Zain Ahmad, and a senior workflow specialist involved in fraud prevention.

According to committee officials, the five employees invoked their Fifth Amendment rights 146 times, declining to answer questions ranging from “When did you work at the ActBlue” to “Did members of ActBlue’s legal and compliance teams leave ActBlue after the 2024 election because of the platform’s inability to prevent fraud during previous election cycles?”

Committee leaders said the refusal to testify “only amplifies” concerns about the platform’s internal controls.

A joint report obtained by conservative media outlet The Daily Wire from the House Administration, Judiciary, and Oversight and Government Reform Committees alleges a mass exodus of ActBlue legal and compliance staff after the 2024 presidential election. The report also says one ActBlue attorney “appears to have been retaliated against by ActBlue executives for blowing the whistle.”

Ahmad, described as one of the remaining attorneys at the organization, forwarded memoranda from outside counsel warning about weaknesses in ActBlue’s fraud detection and compliance practices, according to the report. Lawmakers argue the documents showed a failure to screen for foreign donations.

Ahmad reportedly went on leave after escalating the concerns to ActBlue’s board and senior leadership. Two days later, the organization’s director of compliance “either quit … or was fired” after more than a decade with the group.

The investigation is ongoing, with lawmakers examining whether ActBlue allowed foreign contributors into American elections and whether it misled Congress about its safeguards.A memo cited in the report warned that ActBlue could face allegations that it “accepted and/or facilitated the acceptance of foreign-national contributions,” and that any violations could be considered “knowing and willful,” potentially exposing the organization to increased penalties or a criminal investigation.

Under United States law, foreign citizens cannot donate directly to federal candidates or political action committees, and no one can lie to or obstruct evidence before Congress.

Nothing says "nothing to hide" quite like five ActBlue bigwigs pleading the Fifth a combined 146 times while Congress tries to figure out if the Democrats' favorite money-laundering machine has been letting foreign cash slosh into our elections. These are former vice presidents, general counsels, and senior compliance folks, the very people who were supposed to make sure ActBlue wasn't turning American democracy into an international PayPal for anyone with a suitcase full of unmarked bills.

When even the lawyers start clamming up and the compliance team does a mass vanishing act right after the 2024 election, you don't need a crystal ball to smell the panic. One attorney gets retaliated against for blowing the whistle, another gets shown the door after a decade on the job, and the remaining legal eagle is suddenly on leave after daring to point out that the fraud safeguards were about as sturdy as a wet paper bag.

The joint report from three House committees lays it out plainly: warnings ignored, foreign donation screens that apparently screened nothing, and a chilling memo spelling out the possibility of "knowing and willful" violations that could land the whole operation in serious legal crosshairs.

Democrats love to lecture the rest of us about "defending democracy," but when their premier fundraising platform gets hauled in front of Congress and responds with a collective "I refuse to answer on the grounds that it might incriminate me," the mask slips completely. 

If ActBlue has nothing to fear, why are all the adults in the room suddenly exercising their right to remain silent? The American people deserve straight answers, not a master class in stonewalling. This is the sound of a very expensive grift starting to unravel.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet