Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Devastating: Israel Neutralizes Local Hamas HR Director and Supply Chain Enthusiast


GAZA — In another heartbreaking blow to the local organic pharmaceutical and import-export sector, Israeli forces and the Shin Bet reportedly neutralized [aka goaterized] Mohammed Fathi Abdelhai Abu Fakher Yadda Yadda Yadda on Monday. Abu Fakher was widely known within his community as a passionate regional director for the "Yabna" youth outreach program, a subsidiary of the Rafah Brigade.

According to sources close to the community, Abu Fakher was a tireless advocate for workforce development. He had recently dedicated his days to an aggressive talent acquisition campaign, onboarding energetic new operatives and spearheading an ambitious corporate restructuring plan to rebuild the battalion's operational capabilities in order to destroy Israel and all the Jews in the world to make room for a global caliphate.

In addition to his human resources work, colleagues noted he was a logistics wizard who specialized in creative, unconventional supply chain management and international procurement, ensuring that specialized hardware such as rockets, drones, rifles and ammunition, was successfully acquired and distributed throughout Gaza for many years.

At press time, mainstream media outlets were already drafting headlines mourning the loss of yet another "passionate logistics manager and youth mentor."

May the goats stand ready to satisfy his proclivities.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Deranged New York Woman Who Wished 'Every Day Were Oct. 7' Arrested For Funding Palestinian Terror Group

Catherine Beth Washburn, 2 grenades, and Hamasshole flag

NEW YORK — A proudly anti-Semitic New Yorker who dreamed of turning every calendar page into another glorious Oct. 7 has finally been hauled off in cuffs for allegedly sending piles of cash to actual terrorists, proving the theory of FAFO.

Catherine Beth Washburn, 37, of Irondequoit, a peaceful Rochester suburb, stands accused of leading a radical outfit and posing for photos with hand grenades in front of a Hamas flag.
Federal authorities say she funneled tens of thousands of dollars to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization whose idea of diplomacy involves rockets and suicide vests.

If convicted, Washburn faces up to 20 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine, which is probably less than she spent on crypto transfers and keffiyehs.

Blaming the victim for Hamas' terrorism

According to the Justice Department, Washburn headed the Direct Action Movement for Palestinian Liberation (DAMPL), a group that sprang up right after Hamas's heroic slaughter of 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023. Unlike those boring moderates who prefer signs and chants, DAMPL favors "direct action" — things like smashing windows and sabotaging anything remotely connected to the Jewish state.

Communications recovered by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force show Washburn chatting with someone claiming to be an active PIJ fighter in Gaza. In those chats she reportedly confessed that she hated Jewish people "very much" and wished Israel "would disappear."

"I wish every day were October 7th," Washburn is accused of writing. "If I lived in Gaza, I would fight alongside the resistance."

She later added that she felt "excited every time I see news of the killing of an occupation soldier."

U.S. Attorney Michael DiGiacomo noted that Washburn went to "great lengths" to finance violence, driven by "her self-described hate of Israel and Jewish people."

Financial records reveal roughly 80 cryptocurrency transfers totaling more than $30,000 sent to the PIJ fighter's account. In November 2025 she allegedly joked about her future prison wardrobe, writing, "Based on my passed [sic] fundraising and posting Im [sic] gonna get put away for a few life times," followed by a laughing emoji.


FBI Counterterrorism Division Acting Assistant Director Coult Markovsky made it clear that bankrolling murder carries consequences.

"This individual, as alleged in the criminal complaint, provided money to a foreign terrorist organization engaged in acts of violence," Markovsky said. "The FBI is committed to cutting off funding to terrorist groups and will continue to work side-by-side with our Justice Department partners to make sure anyone who engages in terrorism or provides assistance to such organizations is held fully accountable in our justice system."

In other news, progressive activists are already calling Washburn a "political prisoner" and planning a "Free Cathy" rally, because nothing says "social justice" like wiring Bitcoin to people who celebrate baby-killing.


Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



House Passes Bipartisan Resolution To Throw Rashida Tlaib's Latest Anti-Israel Tantrum In The Congressional Trash


WASHINGTON—In a development so shocking it briefly caused Capitol Hill to malfunction like a government website on tax day, the House of Representatives actually accomplished something useful Tuesday. Democrats and Republicans united in rare harmony to take the anti-Semitic Rep. Rashida Tlaib's latest anti-Israel performance art piece, escort it gently but firmly to the nearest legislative Port-o-Potty, and set it on fire.

Tlaib's war powers resolution, aimed at handcuffing U.S. military involvement in Lebanon, went down in a solid bipartisan 235-189 vote. Twenty-two Democrats bravely jumped ship from the Michigan congresswoman, joining nearly every Republican in opposition. 

In Washington terms, that's the equivalent of the entire room agreeing the fire alarm isn't just another progressive policy proposal.

The measure would have banned U.S. forces from any "hostilities" in Lebanon, a pressing issue if America were, you know, actually fighting there. But facts remain stubbornly uncooperative with Tlaib's worldview, i.e., that the Jewish state needs to be eliminated.

One lonely Republican dissenter was the execrable Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, whose foreign policy instincts continue to spin wildly like a compass next to an industrial magnet. Time to vote him out.

Michigan's premier anti-Israel activist cosplaying as a member of Congress tried to limit military authority in a nation where America isn't conducting combat operations. It's roughly as urgent as demanding emergency legislation to stop astronauts from invading Saskatchewan.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and most Democrats voted to tie President Donald Trump's hands on using force in Lebanon without congressional permission. Of course, Jeffries had opposed an earlier version of Tlaib's scheme, proving once again that consistency in the Democratic Party is treated like an optional accessory, right next to "supporting the troops."

The whole thing was a concurrent resolution, carrying all the legal weight of a strongly worded Facebook post. Even if it passed, it would never have reached President Trump's desk for a signature, veto, or well-deserved eye-roll.

Tlaib, Congress's only Palestinian American member and Israel's most dedicated congressional tormentor, has spent years accusing the Jewish state of "ethnic cleansing" in Gaza and Lebanon. Republicans correctly note that her laser focus on condemning Israel while giving Hezbollah a rhetorical free pass amounts to providing comfort to an Iranian-backed terrorist outfit.

Strangely missing from Tlaib's resolution was any condemnation of Hezbollah, the terror group that has spent years rocketing Israeli civilians and turning southern Lebanon into its personal launchpad. Apparently the actual people firing rockets at school buses deserve less congressional attention than the country daring to defend itself.

Earlier this month, Tlaib pushed an even broader version that critics said could have forced U.S. personnel guarding the American Embassy to abandon their posts and crippled aid to the Lebanese Armed Forces fighting actual terrorists. Even by Washington standards, siding against the non-terrorist side is a special kind of genius.

After that flop, she rolled out a revised version with polite exemptions for diplomatic security and training Lebanese troops. Nothing says "principled stand" like frantically editing your legislation after everyone reads the first draft and recoils in horror.

Republicans rightly wondered why Congress was wasting time stopping a war America isn't fighting.

"There are not U.S. combat forces conducting operations or engaged in hostilities in Lebanon," House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, (R-FL), said during debate. "They are training the Lebanese Armed Forces."

"Why are they training?" Mast continued. "Because there's probably at least 40,000, probably more, Hezbollah terrorists spread across the South of Lebanon that are actively engaged in targeting Israel and have been doing so for many years."

Brian Mast

Mast went further, correctly labeling supporters of the resolution as "proxies for Hezbollah," a remark unlikely to earn him a Christmas card from the Squad.

Ranking Member Gregory Meeks (D-NY), defended the pointless exercise by claiming it would prevent America from entering "another forever war that is not in our national interest."

A noble thought, if only the United States were actually in a war in Lebanon. Instead, Congress spent the afternoon solemnly debating how to stop a ghost from invading a house it never entered, while Hezbollah kept doing what it does best: trying to annihilate Israel and counting on enough useful idiots in Washington to stay distracted by imaginary American aggression. 

At least this time, sanity prevailed. Barely.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Israeli Ambassador Drops Mic With "Journalist Or Terrorist?" Quiz, Catches UN Red-Handed Platforming Hamas Lies



In a move that had the usual suspects squirming in their seats, Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon turned a Security Council session into a much-needed reality check Tuesday, unveiling what he called a "Journalist or Terrorist?" quiz to expose how the United Nations and international media eagerly swallow Hamas propaganda before the facts can even catch up.

"Israel is condemned again and again and again," Danon said during the meeting while holding up photos.

"A claim is made against Israel. The U.N. repeats it, and then the world condemns it. Then, when the truth comes out, it takes time, sometimes weeks, months, years, there is no apology, no correction and no retraction. They move on. We will not move on," he added.

As Danon flipped the photos over, they revealed clear evidence of the deceased's membership in Hamas or other terror groups, proving once again that the Jewish state is fighting actual terrorists while the world clutches its pearls over "journalists."

Danon also took aim at New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani for rushing to condemn Israel over the killing of Al Jazeera contributor Ahmed Wishah, whom Danon rightly described as "a Hamas terrorist."

"This is the machine," Danon said. "Hamas makes a claim. The NGO ecosystem, rapporteurs and briefers all repeat the lies."



"Then a U.N. report rubber-stamps it, the world's media broadcasts it, and Israel is condemned before the facts are even checked," he added.

In other words, the UN's favorite hobby: rushing to bash the only democracy in the Middle East while giving a global megaphone to a pack of bloodthirsty jihadists. Danon isn't letting them get away with it. Israel stands firm, and the truth keeps winning, no matter how slowly the rest of the world catches up.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


BREAKING: More IRGC leaders assassinated in Iran: can you spell 'chaos'?

The "FAFO Wall"

More Iranian regime honchos have been 'eliminated' via assassination today. This is what happens when you provide arms to the citizens. Can someone please tell President Trump?

There was also a 'security incident' in the border county of Paveh in Kermanshah province. Initial reports depict clashes and shootings in the area but the details are still murky and official authorities have yet to release more information.

Some of the families of IRGC members have also been killed and now the regime is feeling the heat from what they've perpetrated.

Another Mohammed, Zadeh, I believe it's spelled, a deputy of political affairs of the IRGC navy has also been eliminated via death a few hours ago due to a "car accident". In Iran, driving cars is somehow very dangerous. And if you believe that, you might be interested in a bridge I'm selling.

A broadcaster of Iranian regime TV has also been eliminated, due to a "heart attack." The so called hospital where he was supposed to have been taken to had 'no comment.'

More information will follow.

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Supreme Court Just Ruled on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order


The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship for immigrant children, proving once again that nine black robes in Washington know better than the American people what the Constitution actually means.

The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, which means they are considered citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The ruling means that Trump's executive order is rendered invalid and cannot be enforced, handing another glorious victory to the open-borders crowd and their judicial enablers, and Chuck 'Nostrils' Schumer may be coming for Gorsuch.

Trump issued the executive order on his first day back in office last year, seeking to limit birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a challenge to that order on April Fools Day, and was expected to issue a ruling before the end of its current term.

The order directed federal agencies not to recognize U.S. citizenship for children born in the country after late February 2025 if the mother was in the country illegally and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Supporters defended the order, arguing that it is a necessary correction in a longstanding misreading of the 14th Amendment. They contend that the provision was not intended to grant automatic citizenship to the children of parents who lack full allegiance to the United States. In a post on Truth Social, Trump argued that the country “cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it!”

This decision is peak judicial activism dressed up as originalism. The Fourteenth Amendment was never meant to turn America into a global maternity ward for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. While the Supreme Court once again chooses international norms over common sense, everyday Americans are left footing the bill for endless chain migration, strained welfare systems, and eroded national sovereignty.
Trump was right: birthright citizenship as currently practiced is a magnet for abuse that no serious country tolerates. Time for Congress to fix what the courts refuse to or for us voters to fix Congress.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Monday, June 29, 2026

Pastor Among Dozens of Christians Slain in Nigeria as Faithful Continue to Pay the Highest Price



There are tragedies that briefly capture the world's attention before vanishing beneath the endless churn of the news cycle. Then there are tragedies that persist for years, claiming thousands of lives while attracting little more than passing notice. The systematic slaughter of Christians in Nigeria belongs firmly in the latter category.

A pastor and dozens of Christians were killed in an overnight assault on a village in Nigeria's Plateau State, the latest episode in a conflict where sectarian violence, terrorism, and competition over land have combined into an unrelenting campaign of bloodshed against Christian communities.

The attack began around 2 a.m. on June 22 in Kawel village in Bokkos County. 

According to Christian Daily International, Fulani herdsmen killed 28 Christians, among them Rev. Markus Nyam, pastor of the Church of Christ in Nations.

Resident Jesse Peter Dukut described a night of terror in which villagers were effectively imprisoned inside their own homes while armed men hunted them through the darkness.

“We were inside our houses when the Fulani herdsmen invaded our village,” Dukut said. “If anyone came out of their houses, they were shot at sight. And a sound from any of the houses in the village attracts shooting from the terrorists.”

Dukut said telecommunications had been disabled, making it impossible for residents to summon security forces. He added that the attackers spoke in Fulani and Hausa and called out the names of Christian leaders, suggesting the assault had been carefully planned rather than carried out indiscriminately.

“They killed my uncle and brothers,” he said. “I narrowly escaped being shot.”

Rev. Nyam was murdered alongside members of his congregation. Church leaders in Bokkos confirmed his death, saying they received the news “with deep sadness” while offering prayers for his family, friends, and the devastated community he served.

What occurred in Kawel is not an isolated atrocity. It is another chapter in a grim pattern that has become all too familiar across Nigeria's Middle Belt. According to Open Doors' 2026 World Watch List, 3,490 of the 4,849 Christians killed worldwide for their faith between October 2024 and September 2025 were Nigerian. That represents 72 percent of all documented Christian martyrdoms during that period.

Statistics alone, however, can obscure what they reveal. Each number represents a life extinguished, a family shattered, and a community left to bury its dead while wondering when the next attack will come.

Christian leaders have long argued that the violence cannot be reduced to a single explanation. Competition over increasingly scarce farmland, driven in part by desertification, has undoubtedly intensified tensions. Yet to ignore the ideological dimension is to misunderstand the nature of the violence itself.

Most Fulani people reject extremism and should not be conflated with those who commit such crimes. But a radicalized faction has embraced methods and objectives strikingly similar to those employed by Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province.

A 2020 report by the United Kingdom's All-Party Parliamentary Group for International Freedom or Belief concluded that these militants “adopt a comparable strategy to Boko Haram and ISWAP and demonstrate a clear intent to target Christians and potent symbols of Christian identity.”

Open Doors U.K. reported that at least 20 people, including a church leader and a pregnant woman, were killed in the Kawel assault. Police reportedly arrived only after daylight, hours after the attack had begun. Bishop Ayuba Matawal lamented that the delayed response “left the defenseless community entirely at the mercy of their assailants for the duration of the raid.”

The deterioration of Nigeria's security landscape shows little sign of ending. Christian Daily also reports that a new jihadist organization known as Lakurawa has emerged in the country's northwest. Armed with sophisticated weaponry and aligned with Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), an Al-Qaeda-linked insurgency originating in Mali, the group represents yet another front in an expanding Islamist insurgency.

The massacre at Kawel is therefore more than a local tragedy. It is another reminder that thousands of Nigerian Christians continue to live under the constant threat of violence simply because of their faith. While the world debates many injustices with understandable passion, one of the largest and deadliest campaigns of religious persecution in the modern era continues to unfold with remarkably little international attention.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Abdul El-Sayed's Bold New Crime Plan: What If We Just Let Everyone Out?



In what can only be described as the Democratic Party's latest audition for a reboot of Escape from New York, Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed has resurfaced comments advocating for the mass release of prisoners while participating in a webinar that featured a convicted murderer and a registered sex offender.

The August 2020 webinar, hosted by prison abolition activists and promoted with hashtags such as #FreeThemAll and #AbolishPrison, invited El-Sayed to discuss the "road to decarceration and abolition." For those unfamiliar with progressive jargon, "decarceration" is the fancy academic term for "let's see what happens if we stop putting criminals in prison."

El-Sayed enthusiastically embraced the concept.

"Not only are we taking people's rights from them, but also we have failed to provide them the basic means of a dignified life," he said. "Every choice we make about incarcerating somebody is about robbing that somebody from the people who love them and the people who need them."

Noticeably absent from the discussion were the people who got robbed, assaulted, raped, murdered, or otherwise victimized by the criminals in question. In the progressive hierarchy of compassion, crime victims increasingly appear to rank somewhere below convicted felons and slightly above carbon emissions.

El-Sayed went even further, declaring:

"Any and all efforts to get people out of jails and prisons and to keep people out of jails and prisons is policy that we need to be investing in."

Any and all efforts.

That's quite a slogan. Most politicians at least pretend to draw a distinction between a shoplifter and a serial violent offender. El-Sayed appears to have settled on a more streamlined approach: prison bad, freedom good, details unnecessary.

The webinar itself was a remarkable spectacle. Joining El-Sayed were former prisoners Martin Vargas, a registered sex offender convicted of raping a 17-year-old girl, and LaWanda Hollister, who served 34 years for second-degree murder. It was essentially a campaign event that accidentally wandered into the casting department for a true-crime documentary.

Yet this wasn't an isolated incident. Earlier that year, El-Sayed appeared on a podcast hosted by Joshua Hoe, a registered sex offender who pleaded guilty to soliciting a 14-year-old girl for sex. Rather than treating such a background as disqualifying for public leadership, El-Sayed encouraged Hoe and other former convicts to run for office because their "voice is needed."

One can only imagine the campaign slogan: Experience matters.

Republicans have already seized on El-Sayed's record, portraying him as a far-left ideologue whose political instincts seem permanently trapped inside a graduate seminar on prison abolition. His associations with socialist influencers, anti-Israel activists, and various progressive causes have already raised eyebrows. But telling voters that prisons themselves are the problem may be the kind of argument that sounds better in an activist Zoom call than in a general election.

After all, most Americans still cling to the quaint and outdated notion that people who commit serious crimes should face serious consequences.

El-Sayed and his allies appear determined to challenge that assumption.

The rest of Michigan may soon have an opportunity to decide whether that vision represents criminal justice reform or simply criminal justice surrender.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Devastating: Israel Neutralizes Local Hamas HR Director and Supply Chain Enthusiast

GAZA — In another heartbreaking blow to the local organic pharmaceutical and import-export sector, Israeli forces and the Shin Bet reportedl...