Posts
According to The Jerusalem Post, dozens of suspected bot accounts flooding X with glowing praise for New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his allies may have something rather awkward in common: cyber experts say they appear to trace back to City Hall's own internet infrastructure. Apparently, taxpayer-funded enthusiasm may be the hottest new renewable energy source.
The Post independently consulted the cyber experts involved, who said they are "100% sure" the IP addresses could be traced to City Hall. The report, however, does not establish who controlled the accounts or whether city officials directed their activity. [My money is on Mamdani.]
The findings were compiled by the World Zionist Organization's Department for Combating Antisemitism, which has been monitoring coordinated online campaigns amid rising anti-Semitism. Their cyber specialists examined IP addresses, posting habits, and account behavior that looked less like passionate grassroots activism and more like someone accidentally leaned on the "copy" button for several months.
According to the analysis, dozens, and possibly hundreds, of accounts displayed nearly identical characteristics. Many pumped out hundreds of posts every single day, rarely produced any original content, had virtually empty profiles, and spent their existence doing little more than enthusiastically repeating posts from Mamdani's official account, city accounts, and political allies.
One account reportedly averaged 955 tweets per day with a 100% repost rate. Another managed 864 daily tweets with the same flawless commitment to never having an original thought. Even the most terminally online political activist usually remembers to stop for coffee.
The researchers emphasized that posting at an absurd pace does not automatically prove automation. A determined human equipped with unlimited caffeine, no employment, and an alarming disregard for sunlight could theoretically accomplish similar numbers. Still, when dozens of accounts exhibit virtually identical behavior while reposting the same material around the clock, suspicion naturally grows.
The report found that Mamdani's account frequently served as the launch point for what appeared to be coordinated amplification. A post would appear on the mayor's account before rapidly spreading through networks of accounts displaying the same unusual characteristics. Some reportedly devoted between 98% and 100% of their activity to amplifying the mayor's content, proving once again that loyalty programs have come a long way.
Some accounts were only a few days old yet somehow managed to put out hundreds of daily posts almost immediately. One account, created just three days before researchers examined it, reportedly generated 201 tweets per day despite having virtually no followers or posting history.
Researchers say this kind of amplification can dramatically increase visibility. The initial wave of coordinated reposts encourages algorithms to promote the content, attracting genuine users whose engagement then pushes the posts even farther. In other words, the internet's recommendation engine may have mistaken an echo chamber for public enthusiasm.
The report cited a July 27 video in which the anti-Semite Mamdani discussed why he could not arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while accusing Israel of killing thousands. The video ultimately received millions of views, with researchers saying the suspected bot network played a major role in expanding its reach.
The analysts stressed that the available evidence does not prove Mamdani, his staff, or his communications team instructed anyone to operate the accounts. Rather, they say the evidence raises questions about whether city officials were aware of the activity, whether it was reported internally, and whether any organizational relationship existed between those operating the accounts and City Hall.
In short, the evidence points to what researchers describe as significant signs of organized amplification, while leaving unanswered who was behind it, who funded it, and whether anyone in government knew what was happening.
The World Zionist Organization says it plans to ask Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun, the United States' Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, to forward the findings to federal law enforcement for further investigation.
"There is a need for a thorough, professional, and independent investigation into these hate-amplification operations," Yifat Ovadia-Luski, head of the WZO's Department for Combating Antisemitism, told the Post.
"Today's anti-Semitism begins online and then moves into the streets, and the spread of hatred on social media is a central driver of that incitement. This is a well-oiled influence machine designed to shape the international arena, and it is making Jews feel less safe in New York City and across the United States.
"We cannot stand by. We are calling for intervention by the US federal authorities."
Mark Goldfeder, CEO and director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center, said his organization is referring the matter to New York City's Department of Investigation and the Conflicts of Interest Board while requesting access to City Hall server logs.
"City employees may not use public resources for political messaging, and public officials may not deceive the public they serve; that has been New York law since long before anyone wrote a bot," Goldfeder told The Jerusalem Post.
If the allegations are substantiated, New Yorkers may discover they weren't witnessing a spontaneous outpouring of public support after all. They may simply have been watching the world's most enthusiastic municipal fan club, one that never sleeps, never complains, and apparently tweets faster than any human who has ever lived.
I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.
