Biden's Border Policy Makes Another Unwanted Appearance Near the White House

Suspect: Ronny Yordrix Guanipa Chrinos

Washington, D.C., has no shortage of visitors, but an armed illegal immigrant allegedly showing up in a stolen car with three guns and a reported mission to assassinate President Donald Trump is a particularly disturbing addition to the capital's visitor log.

The illegal alien, a Venezuelan national, who allegedly told Secret Service officers that Spanish-speaking voices in his head had directed him to Washington to kill Trump, was arrested Thursday evening near the White House, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

U.S. Secret Service officers approached the suspect after spotting him "acting suspicious in his car while it was parked on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C.," DHS told Fox News.

When questioned, the suspect reportedly told officers he had heard voices instructing him to travel to the nation's capital and kill Trump. “Ve a Washington y mata al presidente Trump, por favor,” it politely commanded him.

Guns, ammo, AR-15 style rifle, Mac 10 and Glock 43X in suspect's car

Things went downhill from there, at least for the suspect. Officers discovered the vehicle had been reported stolen, and he admitted to having weapons inside. One weapon, not a boatload of weapons.

A subsequent search reportedly uncovered three firearms, including an AR-15-style rifle and two handguns, along with dozens of rounds of ammunition. Apparently, the trip to Washington involved considerably more than sightseeing.

The suspect was identified as Ronny Yordrix Guanipa Chrinos, a Venezuelan national who illegally crossed the border into Texas in March 2024. U.S. Border Patrol arrested him at the time, but he was subsequently released into the country under the Biden administration because there was a good chance he would vote blue if he voted at all.

That decision has aged about as well as gas station sushi.

Following Thursday's arrest, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) lodged a detainer against Chrinos with the U.S. Marshals Service, which currently has him in custody.

The Secret Service warned that the incident illustrates the growing threat posed by armed individuals "drawn to the White House complex."

"This is the latest example of Secret Service personnel relying on extensive training and experience to de-escalate a volatile situation that posed an imminent threat to our protectees and other Americans," U.S. Secret Service Director Sean Curran said in a statement.

"While our personnel are trained to respond to situations like this, and we remain confident in our tactics, we are alarmed by the increase in threat cases that continue to arise."

Curran added that the agency would continue to "focus on proactively investigating and identifying individuals" who raise suspicion before they make it to Washington.

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin also praised the Secret Service for stopping the armed suspect before anyone was hurt.

Markwayne Mullin

"This is just an example of the incredible work done by the men and women of the Secret Service every single day as they put their lives on the line to protect our nation’s leaders," Mullin said in a statement.

Chrinos faces an impressive list of charges, including carrying a rifle outside a home or business, three counts of unlawful transportation of a firearm, three counts of possessing an unregistered firearm, three counts of possessing unregistered ammunition, possession of certain dangerous weapons, carrying a pistol without a license, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, theft and receiving stolen property, and a partridge in a pear tree. [Just checking to see if you're reading this post.]

In other words, Thursday's alleged assassination plot came with a rather extensive criminal itinerary, one might say.

Unfortunately, the incident is hardly an isolated example of bizarre and potentially dangerous activity around the nation's capital.

Just three months ago, a California resident was discovered near Capitol Hill after driving cross-country with an operational 10-foot guillotine in his pickup truck. The man was identified as Philan-Tam-Duy Le.

In two other incidents, suspects rammed vehicles into security barricades near the White House, one in March 2026 and another in October 2025.

President Trump has spent years warning about the consequences of an unsecured border. Now, the Secret Service is dealing with an alleged armed assassin who entered the country illegally, was released under Biden, and reportedly arrived in Washington after hearing voices telling him to kill the president.

The Secret Service deserves credit for stopping him. But Americans have every reason to ask how many more people with criminal intentions were given the opportunity to enter and remain in the country under the previous administration.

And now we must wonder what's going to happen after the results of the midterm elections. Go left, young man, go left. 

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Woman Who Joined ISIS Discovers U.S. Justice System Is Slightly Less Accommodating Than The Caliphate

Salman holds electronic version of Koran to her head hoping for osmosis

A federal jury in Brooklyn delivered an unwelcome surprise to Halima Salman on Tuesday, finding her guilty of knowingly receiving military-style training from ISIS. Prosecutors presented a rather difficult collection of evidence for the defense to explain away, including video of Salman holding an assault rifle, a photograph of her posing with an ISIS flag, and an official document certifying that she had completed the terrorist organization's training.

Salman, 27, also known as "Umm Khattab al-Muhajir," [Arabic for 'Um, I Can't Remember Al's Mother'] now faces up to 10 years in prison. She is scheduled to be sentenced February 2. The case is believed to be the first time a woman accused of joining ISIS has stood trial in a U.S. federal court.

With the Democrats taking power on January 20, 2027, it's likely she'll get prison time and may even get an award.

According to prosecutors, Salman's parents took her and her eight siblings to ISIS-controlled territory in Syria in 2016. At 18, she married an odiferous ISIS fighter, a guy who never saw a bar mitzvah he didn't try to bomb. Salman pledged allegiance to the terrorist organization, and received authorization to carry an assault rifle, wear camo, and hunt non-believers.

Apparently, the family vacation had taken an unfortunate turn.

"With today’s verdict, Salman is held accountable for joining forces with a terrorist organization," U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. for the Eastern District of New York said in a statement. "ISIS ravaged Syria and caused havoc across the globe; our Office will continue to prosecute those who supported its murderous reign."

Salman, caught like a rat in a trap, broke down crying after the verdict was announced. Her mother arrived later, fell to her knees in the gallery,  pulled out a nosehair and began crying as well. Members of the defense team were also visibly emotional because they too wanted to join ISIS but didn't have a death wish.

The defense portrayed Salman as a poor, little teenager swept into Syria's civil war against her wishes, first by her father and later by her smelly husband. Salman testified that she believed the family was traveling to visit relatives in Turkey. Evidently, the destination turned out to be considerably less hospitable than advertised.

"I do blame my father for a lot of things that happened," she testified, throwing her own father under the goat.

She also claimed she never wanted to be married off at 18 and had attempted to obtain a divorce. Unfortunately, divorce apparently wasn't an option that ISIS was particularly enthusiastic about granting.

"You try to leave, it is death," Salman testified.

According to her account, she eventually escaped with other refugees, was detained in Baghouz in 2019, and was arrested by U.S. authorities after returning to New York in 2024.

Her attorneys have since asked the judge to set aside the verdict, arguing that in spite of photos and statements by the accused, the evidence was legally insufficient. That evidence included a photograph with an ISIS flag, an assault rifle video, and a certificate documenting her terrorist training. The defense clearly has some 'splaining left to do.

The jury itself had initially indicated that it was struggling to reach a unanimous decision. After being sent back twice to continue deliberations, jurors finally returned with a guilty verdict.

Salman may have left ISIS behind, but she now faces the prospect of answering for her time with the organization in an American courtroom. And unlike her former associates, the people deciding her fate actually believe in due process.

Upon release, regardless of how long or how little she serves, if at all, she is expected to vote Democrat and possibly run for Congress as a Democratic Socialist.

Senator and devout comrade Bernie Sanders (Commie-VT) said, "I will suppawt her no mattah what she decides to do aftah she is released from this unfaih sentence."

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed Supporter Calls for Mass Executions of Republicans

AI generated

A prominent online influencer supporting Michigan Democrat Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed has clarified that the incoming Democratic Congress should treat its mandate as a limited-time opportunity for decisive action rather than ordinary governance.

"Nuremberg Trials, Democrats," says influencer Nick 'Chips' Pringle. "Nuremberg Trials for all these people. You have not been hired to come in and do your best. You have been hired to come in and do your worst. And understand, this is the last vote you get until we see Epstein file convictions, alright?"

"Abdul, take those Wolverine claws I got you and park them under Stephen Miller's chin," he continued. "I want to see Jared Kushner's size five loafers swinging and dangling. Alright? If Elon Musk is alive at Christmas, it has been a failure, alright? We need to build Guantanamo Bay Two on Epstein Island, alright? Break ground on that today. GuanPedemo Island. Build it."

"Start sinking posts right now. Today. This is what we want to see. I swear to God if you come at us and say you're gonna let bygones be bygones, and we need to move on and heal as a country. I swear to God. We want justice, we want judgement day. Now's the time. This is the last time we vote for you unless you put belt to a**. We want Armageddon. We want justice," Pringle added.

"Judgement day, alright?" he said. "Go do it. Go to work. The celebrating, that was for last night . . .  go to work. Let's see it."

The influencer did not address the minor scheduling detail that any new Democratic majority takes office in January. 

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Analysts described the remarks as a straightforward expression of support for lower prescription drug prices. Several Democratic strategists privately noted that following the suggested timeline could complicate the party's position in 2028, 2030, and subsequent cycles, though public statements emphasized the importance of listening to the base. Republicans observed that the same voices had previously floated a national gun ban. 

The Epstein files were presented as the necessary legal foundation for the broader program of accountability. America is expected to absorb the practical consequences of the election results in due course.

Tweet

Vance Asks Iranian Regime to Please Consider Not Building Bomb After Midterms Go Poorly

Iran is weighing “concrete proposals” on its nuclear program during Qatari-mediated talks meant to wrap up the war, five officials told The New York Times. The development suggests Washington and Tehran might actually reach some sort of agreement, or at least exchange enough paperwork to claim progress.

An American official and two Iranian officials confirmed the details. They called the ideas “concrete proposals” while declining to share any of the actual concrete parts or which nuclear issues they address.

Negotiations are taking place in Doha, where Qatar is serving as mediator between the two countries. Qatari representatives also met Iranian officials in Armenia recently, according to people familiar with the contacts.

Vice President JD Vance backs the mediation, which aims to head off fresh fighting, three of the officials told The New York Times. Last month Vance tried direct outreach by sending a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. The letter proposed talks between American and Iranian representatives on both ending the conflict and Iran’s nuclear program.

Rezaei took the letter as proof that Washington had adjusted its stance toward Iran and described the shift as a demonstration of the “Iranian nation’s strength and victory.”

The diplomatic flurry comes after midterm elections that handed Democrats sweeping wins and sparked fresh arguments inside the Trump administration over how the military campaign played with voters. Vance linked part of the Republican losses to public unhappiness with the Iran war in a post on X after the results.

President Donald Trump likewise conceded the conflict may have influenced the outcome, while dismissing any notion that starting the campaign had been an error. Speaking to reporters, Trump stood by the operation against the Iranian regime and said stopping Tehran from getting a nuclear bomb stayed essential no matter the political cost.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry offered no immediate comment on the nuclear proposals under review.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

US may strike Iran as Trump meets with his national security team

President Trump assembled his national security team Thursday to ponder the pressing question of whether the United States should resume turning parts of Iran into rubble, senior officials confirmed to Fox News.

There were meetings at the White House Wednesday and Thursday, the officials said, presumably featuring PowerPoint slides and the usual grim nods.

Nov. 9 marks a new moon in the Middle East, meaning little to no moonlight. Officials added that this condition is favorable for military operations, the way complete darkness is favorable for any activity one prefers the neighbors not to watch, if you get my drift.

Trump told reporters in the Oval Office earlier Thursday that Washington would “make a decision” on resuming the war.

“Do we want to go further” with strikes to ensure Iran's nuclear program is dead and that “it will never happen again?” he added.

“I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible, but maybe I will have to. You'll know soon enough.”

U.S. Central Command is finalizing preparations for a potential resumption of major operations in Iran but has not received a new directive from Washington, according to reports citing a U.S. official who has already ordered extra coffee.

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Faleh Al-Zaidi also told Trump during a phone call Thursday that Iraqi territory must not be used to launch strikes against neighboring countries.

"Mr. Prime Minister affirmed Iraq's position calling for respect for the sovereignty of states, non-use of its territories as a launchpad for aggression against neighboring countries," the prime minister's office said in a statement on X.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

JD Vance, After Convincing Several People He Was MAGA For A Hot Second, Now Blames Trump’s Iran War For Entire Midterm Disaster.

A lot of good people were sucked in by JD Vance. He talked a hell of a game. For about two seconds, he even sounded like he meant it, but Tucker Carlson got his guy, and his playing to MAGA was just a short performance.

Hours after Democrats routed Republicans in the midterm elections, the vice president, who has the allegiance of a scorpion, took to X to announce that the real problem was President Trump had the nerve to start knocking the mullahs around instead of sending them another pallet of cash. 

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance wrote. “If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so,” he continued. “Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.”

Vance, currently auditioning for the role of 2028 nominee by pointing at everyone else, also cited an unnamed pollster he described as “one of the smartest people I know in politics.” This pollster, who “nailed the results,” informed Vance that voters wanted Republicans to end the war on Iran, focus on the cost of living and inflation, put America first, and change the U.S. relationship with Israel. “Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats,” Vance progressively explained. “This is according to a pollster who nailed the results.”

Critics were unimpressed. 

Emily Schrader, a journalist: No, JD Vance and his desperation to appease the mullahs is what led to a GOP defeat in the midterm . . .  that is why he’s now trying to cast blame on others. He also undermined President Trump and divided the GOP, giving credence to psychotic grifters like his “friend” Tucker Carlson whom he continues to defend.

Of course the Democrats, the RINOs and traitors like Vance will blame President Trump. Blame the one man who actually did something. Hell of an alibi for the rest of them. I had my own disagreements with some of what Trump says about people who don't always agree with him. For example, he should have let Israel finish off Hamas. Instead, here in America, voters elected Hamas. He should have crushed the mullahs’ regime. I disagree with him on both counts. But he is the best President we ever had and you don't punish the country over a difference in policy.

Trump, for his part, acknowledged in a Wall Street Journal interview that “Iran was a piece of it,” before adding, “I don’t think about it. I did the right thing. I would have done it again.” 

On the campaign trail he had described the conflict as “a very soft war” and promised that “as soon as the war ends, fuel prices are going to drop like a rock.” After the results came in, he noted on Truth Social, “I wasn’t on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

He’s not our guy in ’28. It’s DeSantis or Rubio, and if I had my druthers, I'd go for the latter.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Peshawar’s Newest Cultural Ambassador, Hafiz Salman, Brings Innovative Grave-Digging Workshop to Girls’ Cemeteries

PESHAWAR, PAKISTAN — Local authorities have temporarily paused an ambitious community enrichment program after a 19-year-old Afghan national identified as Salman (an Afghan national living in Bara Qadeem) was arrested in the Sheikhan/Budh Bher area. Locals caught him red-handed digging up a grave and removing the body of a young girl (reportedly around 2–3 years old). Police said he targeted only girls’ graves . . . for some reason.

According to police (including SP Saddar Fida Hussain), initial investigations and his reported confession indicated he had previously exhumed several other graves (reports cite around 4, with some later mentions of up to 10), removed girls’ bodies, took them to isolated areas, cleaned and dressed them, and sexually assaulted/desecrated them. He was described in some reports as a Hafiz-e-Quran who had completed intermediate (12th-grade) education.

Experts note that Salman’s intermediate education and complete memorization of the Quran positioned him uniquely to interpret ancient texts in a way that prioritized “inclusive outreach” exclusively toward deceased female children. Local progressive voices have already begun framing the incident as a tragic intersection of “unprocessed trauma,” “colonial borders,” and “systemic underfunding of afterlife gender studies.”

He was later killed on September 22, 2026, when unidentified gunmen ambushed a police team transporting him to the graveyard for identification. He died of gunshot wounds en route to the hospital. An FIR reportedly included charges related to grave desecration, sexual assault, child protection, and the Foreigners Act.

Photos and videos circulating online are from this incident. Details of the alleged sexual abuse come primarily from police statements and reported confessions; some outlets noted that not every graphic claim was independently verified beyond that.

The incident was widely covered by Pakistani media outlets such as The News, Kashmir English, Siasat, and others, though Western outlets are still awaiting confirmation that the perpetrator used incorrect pronouns before issuing full condemnation.

In a statement that has not yet been issued, community organizers praised Salman’s “bold reimagining of public space” and announced plans to rename a local park in his honor, provided the remaining graves can be relocated to a more welcoming, gender-affirming location.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Judge Halts Hearing to Protect Name of Juror Who Committed the Unforgivable Sin of Thinking Strangling Three Kids Was Bad

Lindsay Clancy

DUXBURY, MA — In a stunning defense of courtroom dignity, Judge William F. Sullivan on Monday interrupted proceedings to rebuke a lawyer for the shocking offense of uttering the name of the single juror who refused to pretend that a mother strangling her three small children was simply a very understandable case of the baby blues that could happen to anyone with a uterus and a bad day.

The other eleven jurors had already done the mature, compassionate thing and voted that the killings were not really killings in any meaningful moral or legal sense. One holdout ruined the vibes. That man has since been correctly identified as the real problem in the story.

Judge Sullivan stopped defense attorney Kevin Reddington while the lawyer discussed the holdout’s questionnaire answers and alleged conduct during deliberations in the trial that ended 11-1.

“I’m going to stop you right there,” Sullivan said.

Reddington replied, “No, you’re not gonna stop me,” the contemptuous lawyer said. 

The judge stated there was “no need here in this courtroom to use that” juror’s name.

Reddington continued, saying the juror “got more face time than I do,” a reference to media interviews the holdout has given since the mistrial.

“But that’s not through any rulings I’ve made,” Sullivan answered.

Reddington added, “And his attorney from Houston is sitting in the back.” Sullivan replied, “Well that’s great, too,” and told him, “We don’t need this.”

Observers reported gasps in the gallery as Reddington used the juror’s name. Sources confirmed the same gallery had remained perfectly still and respectful when the topic was the actual strangulation of a five-year-old, a three-year-old, and an eight-month-old. Naming a living adult who declined to excuse it, however, was simply too much for some people to bear.

Reddington argued that the name was already widely known online and referenced claims involving the juror’s cellphone use and research into filicide during the trial period. Local experts agreed that looking up “filicide” on your phone is far more troubling than performing it.

The hearing concerned the defense effort to dismiss the charges on double-jeopardy grounds. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder for the January 2023 deaths of 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan in their Duxbury home. She has admitted the killings but pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. In modern America this is widely considered the correct plea whenever the victims are small enough and the perpetrator is female enough.

Eleven jurors favored a finding of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility due to postpartum mental health problems; the holdout, who has publicly identified himself as Michael Desronvil, did not. He has stated that he had no doubts and that the evidence showed Clancy knew what she was doing and planned the acts. Other jurors said he refused to apply the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Translation: he stubbornly insisted on noticing that three children were dead and that their mother was the one who made them that way.

Sullivan previously denied the defense request for a hearing to examine the juror’s questionnaire, prior domestic-violence matter and alleged phone use, ruling that information that surfaced after the mistrial could not be used to challenge the decision to declare one. Prosecutors also pushed for a gag order after Reddington told reporters he hoped the holdout could “sleep well at night.” The possibility that the man who voted against excusing triple child murder might sleep poorly was apparently the true injustice that needed addressing.

The judge took the dismissal motion and related matters under advisement. Prosecutors have not said whether they will seek a retrial. If they do, legal observers expect the next jury to be carefully screened for anyone who has ever been troubled by the concept of a parent killing their children.

The case centers on the deaths of three small children and the question of criminal responsibility for those deaths after Clancy admitted the acts. The single holdout juror’s refusal to join an insanity finding produced the mistrial after roughly 38 hours of deliberation. Postpartum mental illness is real, but a person can be mentally ill and still criminally responsible. Mental illness does not change that three children were killed in the home where they were supposed to be safest. They will never grow up. The children cannot speak in the courtroom. Dismissing the charges would leave the taking of their lives without a completed finding of criminal responsibility. This last point has been widely criticized as insufficiently focused on the mother’s emotional journey.

Pro-life writers have called that reaction a moral inversion: compassion for a mother who killed her children, with far less public focus on Cora, Dawson and Callan themselves. Some have even suggested, wildly, that the children being dead is the central fact of the story rather than a regrettable side effect of the mother’s distress.

Journalist Caitlin Flanagan wrote that “what began as admirable compassion for a woman who says she was driven by mental illness to commit the world’s greatest form of evil has turned into something strange: an almost exultant, fan-like celebration of Lindsay Clancy.”

Paul Batura of Focus on the Family argued that a culture already trained to treat a child’s death as secondary to a mother’s distress — first in abortion, then in cases like this one — struggles to say plainly that killing children is wrong even when the mother is ill. Postpartum mental illness is real, he wrote, but “an individual can be mentally ill and still criminally responsible.”

Abby Johnson, CEO and founder of And Then There Were None and ProLove Ministries, who herself experienced postpartum psychosis after the birth of one of her children, said the intense identification with Clancy reveals a deeper moral distortion long cultivated by abortion advocacy.

“I am not arguing that compassion for Lindsay is wrong…What concerns me is something different. We have become extraordinarily practiced at looking at a dead child and asking first what his or her mother was going through. And abortion taught us how to do that. For decades, the defense of abortion has depended on shifting the moral center of the story away from the human being who dies and toward the human being experiencing the crisis. The mother’s suffering becomes the justification. But suffering does not make killing good,” Johnson wrote.

The Clancy babies

Johnson stressed that mental illness may affect legal culpability without changing the moral nature of the act.

“Mental illness may affect a person’s culpability for an act. It does not change the moral nature of the act itself,” she said. “Cora was five years old. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Their mother killed them.”

Johnson argued that culture has spent more than 50 years training itself to begin with a mother’s fear, financial stress, lack of support or depression until the child’s humanity nearly disappears—first in abortion and now in cases like this one.

“We can demand better postpartum mental-health care in their names. We can acknowledge that their mother may have been gravely ill. We can pray for Lindsay,” Johnson wrote. “None of that requires us to forget where the greatest irreversible harm occurred. Three children went to bed on January 24, 2023, in the home where they were supposed to be safest. They will never get to grow up.”

The courtroom, for its part, made clear that the real emergency was the unauthorized use of a holdout juror’s name. The three children, already dead and therefore unavailable for interviews, public statements, or fan clubs, remained unavailable for comment.

I hope you will take the time to click on any of the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to simply look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet