Red State ditches Pride Month, swaps it for "Nuclear Family Month"

Tennessee’s had enough of this LGBT Pride Month nonsense, guys. They’re done. Starting now, June is officially “Nuclear Family Month” in the Volunteer State.

Republican Governor Bill Lee just signed a resolution declaring June a time for Tennesseans to celebrate the nuclear family, defined plainly as a husband, a wife, and any biological or adopted children. The resolution sailed through the Republican-dominated legislature. It cleared the House 72-18 last year and passed the Senate 26-4 just last month. No surprise there.

“The nuclear family, consisting of one husband, one wife, and any biological, adopted, or fostered children, is God’s design for familial structure and has been the bedrock of society since the creation of the world,” the resolution states. 

What an interesting concept.

“Tennessee’s values do not align with the humanistic, globalist ideologies of the World Health Organization, the United Nations, and like-minded organizations that fight for population control through the means of promoting sterilization and abortion practices,” the Tennessee resolution continues, adding, “The nuclear family is under attack in our beloved State and nation, and it is our responsibility to uplift, protect, and support values that help Tennessee prosper.”

The resolution doesn’t sugarcoat the damage either. It points straight to the devastating results kids often face growing up in fatherless homes. It even cites a 2016 study showing that of 56 school shooters sampled, 82 percent “were raised in an unstable family environment or without both biological parents together.”

Of course, the usual leftist outrage machine kicked into high gear the second Governor Lee put pen to paper. The LGBT activist group GLAAD called the Tennessee lawmakers who passed this “clueless.”

“The strongest families are grounded by love,” a GLAAD spokesman told the LGBT news outlet The Advocate. “Lawmakers trying to exclude and intentionally harm some families should be recognized as actively harming all by not focusing their time working for an inclusive Tennessee where all are welcome and can succeed.”

Let’s get one thing straight here. June has been nationally recognized as Pride Month ever since Bill Clinton signed that declaration back in 1999. After the Supreme Court’s 2015 gay marriage ruling, the whole thing exploded. Companies, organizations, you name it, they were shoving rainbow flags and LGBT messaging down everyone’s throats all month long.

But last year, Americans finally started pushing back hard against the nonstop LGBT parade, especially the push for transgender procedures on kids. Some big corporations quietly dialed back their Pride Month madness. Then came the 2024 election. President Trump’s victory made it crystal clear: people are sick and tired of the Democratic Party’s obsession with these talking points.

And Tennessee? They’ve been leading the charge. They were one of the first states to ban gender procedures on children, stop schools from hiding kids’ so-called “transitions” from their parents, and crack down on drag queen shows in public or anywhere kids might be around.That’s not hate, folks. That’s common sense. 

That’s putting families first, as it should be.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Murder-Suicide by Prominent Former Democrat Ends Ugly Divorce

Former Democratic lieutenant governor of Virginia Justin Fairfax murdered his wife before committing suicide overnight, police said Thursday.  Not a good look for the former Democrat.

Police believe Fairfax shot his wife Cerina after a domestic incident at their home in Annandale, Virginia, just outside of Washington, D.C. Police waited hours to release the identities while they said they notified next of kin.

"Former Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shot and killed his wife inside of their home, and then shot and killed himself," police said Thursday, adding that the couple was in the middle of a messy divorce.

Police said that Fairfax and his wife were in the middle of an "ongoing domestic dispute" surrounding a "complicated or messy divorce." They added that he was recently served some paperwork for an upcoming proceeding and that "apparently led to this incident last night."

In January 2026, Fairfax claimed that he was assaulted by his wife and police were called to the home. That claim was not true, police said, adding that Cerina put cameras up throughout the house and proved the former Democrat was a liar, not uncommon with the left.

Local outlet Fox5 reported that the first call to report the incident came shortly after midnight from someone who said he believed his father had stabbed his mother. Police arrived and found a woman unconscious and bleeding, discovering that she had been shot. The caller did not know where their father was, but police later found him dead in another part of the house.

The house was later identified as belonging to Fairfax and there were reportedly multiple people inside the house at the time of the suspected murder-suicide. Fairfax had two children, both teenagers, who were in the house at the time of the murder. One of the children was the person who called the police.

The first information about the killing began trickling in shortly after midnight when police posted an alert on their investigation.

"Shortly after midnight, officers responded to the 8100 block of Guinevere Drive in Annandale, where they located an adult male and an adult female deceased inside of a residence. Preliminarily, it appears that the adult male shot the adult female before shooting himself in a domestic related incident. We were withholding the identities of the individuals until next of kin can be notified."

Police added that "all parties are accounted for and there is no threat to the community." Fairfax was the lieutenant governor of Virginia from 2018 to 2022 and faced sexual assault allegations in 2019 shortly after images of then Democratic Governor Ralph Northam wearing blackface emerged. [You remember Ralphy Boy--he's the guy who suggested keeping an unwanted baby, a baby who was accidentally admitted through the mother's birth canal and thus entered the outside world, to make the infant comfortable while the doctor and mother decide whether or not to kill him or her.]

The FBI later conducted an investigation into how the allegations surfaced against Northam and probed whether they were politically motivated.

Fairfax later ran for governor in 2021, but did not make it out of the Democratic primary. During his time in office, he pushed for gun control, [seriously] including restrictions on magazine capacity and so-called assault rifles. He also supported abortion and raising the minimum wage. 

Hypocrisy much?

Yes, this is yet another grim chapter in the long, sordid saga of Democratic hypocrisy in Virginia. Here was Justin Fairfax, the guy who spent his time in office lecturing everyone about gun control and pushing hard for magazine bans and assault weapon restrictions, only to apparently turn a firearm on his own wife in the middle of a nasty divorce before offing himself. The same man who rode into office on a wave of progressive promises now leaves behind a trail of tragedy that no amount of political posturing could hide.

And let's not forget the context. Fairfax's political career was already teetering after those 2019 sexual assault allegations that nearly derailed the entire Democratic ticket alongside Ralph Northam's blackface scandal. He tried to claw his way back with a gubernatorial bid in 2021, but Democrats tossed him aside in the primary. Now this. 

The party that loves to moralize about domestic violence and "toxic masculinity" has to reckon with one of its own once again.

The details are chilling: teenage kids in the house, one of them making the desperate 911 call thinking it was a stabbing, cameras installed because of prior false claims, and an "ongoing domestic dispute" tied to divorce papers that apparently set it all off. Police did their job notifying next of kin before naming names, but the facts are now out there for everyone to see.

This is not just a personal tragedy. It is a stark reminder of the failures and contradictions within the political class that claims to have all the answers on everything from guns to family issues. Fairfax wanted to disarm law-abiding citizens while his own home descended into chaos. 

The left will no doubt try to memory-hole this one as quickly as possible, but the quotes from police and the timeline speak for themselves. Another day, another example of elite hypocrisy ending in heartbreak.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Turkey, a NATO "ally" says Israel 'cannot live without hostility' then says Turkey may invade it

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said Monday that Israel was seeking a new enemy and could soon set its sights on Turkey. Those remarks came just a day after President Recep Tayyip Erdogan sharply escalated rhetoric by threatening possible military action against the Jewish state.

"After Iran, Israel cannot live without hostility," Fidan said during an extensive interview with the Turkish state-run news agency Anadolu. The Turkish minister accused Jerusalem of fostering "a new rhetoric" to justify its aggression in the region and declare Turkey an enemy.

The official further argued that this trend extended "not only to Netanyahu’s administration" but also "to certain figures within the Israeli opposition," though he did not specify whom he was referring to.

Fidan warned that Israeli military activity could next extend to Syria, where the IDF operated last year in what it said were efforts to protect the Druze minority in the south. He cautioned that such actions could create broader "risks" across the region. "Because of the ongoing war in Iran, [Israel] is not doing certain things right now," he said. "Later, when the time comes, it may want to act."

Fidan's comments follow remarks made on Sunday by Erdogan, suggesting that Ankara could soon choose to engage militarily with Israel.

At this rate, Turkey's next big diplomatic move will probably be demanding that Israel apologize for the Crusades while simultaneously shopping for new Ottoman Empire cosplay outfits. Classic NATO ally behavior.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Iran warns US Navy their ships in Strait of Hormuz are within missile range

Iranian military personnel took part in the “Smart Control of the Strait of Hormuz” exercise in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz on February 16, 2026. (Press Office Of The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

A senior Iranian official has issued a stark warning: American warships now sailing through the Strait of Hormuz lie within easy striking range of Iranian missiles. The United States Navy, he declared, is “under our missile launchers.” 

Try not to chuckle.

According to Iran International, Mohsen Rezai, a military adviser to the now deceased Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, delivered the threat in a video that does nothing to calm the rising tensions in one of the world’s most vital waterways.

“The launchers have most likely been moved by our brothers and are now aimed at the Abraham Lincoln and all American warships,” Rezai said. “They are all under our launchers now and we will sink them all. We will not allow a single one to escape us.”

Such language is not new from Tehran, yet it carries the familiar blend of bluster and menace that has long defined the regime’s posture toward the West. 

The Islamic Republic delights in painting itself as the bold David to America’s lumbering Goliath, even as its own economy buckles under sanctions and its people grow restive under clerical rule. One wonders how many times the mullahs must issue these theatrical threats before the world ceases to treat them as serious statements of policy and begins to recognize them for what they are: the desperate posturing of a regime that senses its own fragility.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

IAF devastates Hezbollah: more destruction than 2024 pager attack

Hezbollah, that kooky, crazy, Iran-backed terrorist outfit, saw its command structure across Lebanon take one of the most devastating blows of the war on April 8.

Nearly simultaneously, explosions ripped through Beirut, the Beqaa Valley and southern Lebanon as roughly 50 Israeli aircraft hammered more than 100 Hezbollah targets, blowing many top terrorists into kibbles and bits.

These were not rocket launchers or weapons depots, according to the Israel Defense Forces. Instead, the IDF went after the nerve centers: command rooms, intelligence headquarters and the offices where Hezbollah commanders sat around planning their next round of murder, until shock and awe sent them straight to their celestial goat farm.

The strike marked a new phase in the war between Israel and the Hezbollonians, which kicked off March 2 after the scumcrumpets jumped in to help Iran the day after U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran and the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Since then, Hezbollah has been lobbing rockets, drones and anti-tank missiles into northern Israel, and sometimes just down the road, while Israel has answered with ever-widening airstrikes and a ground offensive in southern Lebanon.

"Within only a minute, the IDF eliminated 250 Hezbollah terrorists in three areas simultaneously," the Israeli military said in a statement, adding that the assessment is still ongoing.

Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, an IDF spokesman, told Fox News Digital the strike was the result of weeks of intelligence work.

Israeli intelligence agencies had tracked Hezbollah operatives as they shuffled between apartments, offices and safe houses across Lebanon, no longer loving death more than normal people love life.

"The timing had to do with the preparations," Shoshani said. "There was weeks of amazing intelligence."

Asked whether the operation showed Israel still has deep penetration inside Hezbollah despite months of war, Shoshani pointed to the sheer scale of the attack, and one might have noticed a tiny smile at the corner of his mouth.

"The fact that we were able to find 250 terrorists hiding in different locations in Lebanon, many of them in locations for recent weeks, eliminating them in real time, I think the capabilities speak for themselves," he said. The smile grew almost into a grin.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned Wednesday's strikes because he is no fan of Israel and some might say he's a Jew-hating weasel.

"The scale of the killing and destruction in Lebanon today is nothing short of horrific," said United Nations Human Rights Chief Volker Türk. "Such carnage, within hours of agreeing to a ceasefire with Iran, defies belief."

But let us be perfectly clear: There is no active ceasefire specifically between Israel and Hezbollah as of mid-April 2026. Diplomatic talks between Israel and Lebanon have begun or are scheduled, but Israel has rejected pausing operations until Hezbollah is sufficiently degraded. Iran and some others argue the U.S.-Iran truce should extend to Lebanon; Israel and the U.S. disagree. One ceasefire does not translate to a different ceasefire with different operators.

Of course Hezbollah and other terrorist groups would never fire rockets at Israel in the sheer hope of killing Jews during an actual ceasefire, would they?

"This response will continue until the Israeli-American aggression against our country and our people ceases," Hezbollah said in a statement. It must have been backwards Wednesday when he said that.

The strike drew comparisons to the "beeper" operation back in September 2024, when thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah operatives exploded almost simultaneously across Lebanon and Syria in an operation widely attributed to Israel. Many men received transgender transformations when their device went off.

The blasts killed more than 40 people and wounded roughly 4,000, according to Lebanese authorities, while Hezbollah later admitted that about 1,500 fighters were taken out of action. That operation shattered Hezbollah's communications network and set the gold standard in Israel for a strike that actually changed the battlefield.

"The beeper had more . . .  effective injuries. That was the purpose of it," Shoshani said. "But both targeted hundreds of terrorists and within 60 seconds."

Like the beeper operation, he said, the April 8 strike was meant not just to kill terrorists but to throw Hezbollah into complete disarray and create a state of confusion.

"It was important to the aspect of creating disarray, of breaking their chain of command, breaking their command and patrol capabilities and kind of tilting the organization out of balance," he said. A former Israeli intelligence official, speaking on background, said the strike may not have reached the level of the beeper operation, but it appeared to hit an unusually broad layer of Hezbollah's middle ranks.

Hezbollah remains in shock from the blow, according to the former official, even if that has not yet shown up in a drop in its haphazard rocket fire.

But he cautioned against judging the operation only by the body count. The real measure, he said, is whether the strike changes the course of the war and leaves Hezbollah less able to operate.

The IDF said many of those killed were members of Hezbollah's Radwan Force, the group's most capable and best-trained combat unit, along with its intelligence apparatus, missile units and aerial Unit 127.

The Israeli military noted that most of the targets were embedded inside civilian areas where the IDF is inclined not to return fire when engaged in combat, unless it's known the civilians have evacuated."Most of the infrastructure that was struck was located within the heart of the civilian population," the IDF said.

Shoshani said Israel warned civilians to evacuate before the strikes, but Hezbollah simply moved its operatives into new civilian locations. They like to use schools and hospitals if available.

"When we gave the warnings for areas, civilians moved out, then Hezbollah saw that they moved out and started hiding behind civilians in new locations," he said.

Despite the hit, Israeli officials say Hezbollah remains a major threat. Shoshani said the group, which before the war possessed between 150,000 and 200,000 rockets and missiles, still has the ability to fire into Israel.

"They still are a real threat for our civilians," he said.

The strike comes as Israel and Lebanon opened their first direct talks in more than three decades at the U.S. State Department in Washington.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun has signaled willingness to discuss normalization and the eventual disarmament of Hezbollah, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted there will be no ceasefire until Hezbollah is dismantled and pushed back from the border.

Within hours of that diplomatic opening, Israeli warplanes struck Lebanon again and Hezbollah fired rockets into northern Israel.

Because that's how these people operate. Always.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Cuba is on deck and Trump's got the ball and into the wind-up

President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have made no secret of the fact that Cuba is next. We already removed Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is gone, along with most of his rotten regime. Now the focus shifts to the last stubborn communist holdout in the hemisphere.

Even the aging dinosaurs still clinging to power on that island, long after Fidel shuffled off this mortal coil, are starting to rattle their sabers. Cuba's president felt the need to puff out his chest and declare he's "not afraid" of the United States. He has to say that, of course. It's the party line. But anyone who's visited Cuba knows the place feels like a time capsule frozen in the 1950s, and most ordinary Cubans understand the truth: they would be overwhelmed quickly if it came down to it.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Pentagon had a contingency plan called Operation Ortsac—Castro spelled backward—for a full-scale invasion if things escalated and the Soviet missiles needed to be ripped out by force. It's not officially back on the books, but according to USA Today, military planning is quietly heating up anyway:

"Military planning for a possible Pentagon-led operation in Cuba is quietly ramping up, in case President Donald Trump gives an order to intervene there, USA TODAY has learned."The report cites two sources familiar with the directives who spoke on condition of anonymity. These moves mark an escalation of tensions that kicked off in January when the Trump administration curbed oil shipments to Cuba as part of a deliberate campaign to force sweeping political changes on the communist-run island.

The piece adds that the U.S. and Cuba have acknowledged they're in the early stages of trying to find some off-ramp from the crisis, though it's anyone's guess how much real compromise either side is willing to offer. Back in March, USA Today itself reported the two countries were in discussions that could have led to a "historic economic deal" to thaw relations.

Translation: the old guard in Havana can bluster all they want about dying for the revolution and giving their lives for the cause. Brave words from men who’ve spent decades presiding over poverty, blackouts, and repression while the Cuban people suffer. But after watching Maduro get yanked and Khamenei’s regime crumble, the message from Washington is crystal clear. The era of tolerating these backward communist fossils on America's doorstep is rapidly coming to an end—and the clock is ticking.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Left of Left Spanberger signs law to render Virginia's votes 'null and void'

Bringing the United States perilously close to dismantling its constitutional foundation, leftist Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has signed HB965 into law, officially entering the Commonwealth into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. The decision has sparked immediate outrage across the state, as critics realize the measure effectively renders the individual votes of Virginians “null and void.”

By signing this compact, Spanberger has agreed to hand Virginia’s 13 electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the national popular vote, regardless of how the people of Virginia actually cast their ballots. [Unsurprisingly, the popular vote tends to side with the Democrats a majority of the time, but President Trump won it for the first time since 2004 when George W. Bush won it.]

With Virginia’s entry, the movement is now a terrifying 48 electoral votes away from taking effect. The current total stands at 222 votes, or 82 percent of the way to the 270-vote threshold required to fundamentally upend American elections.

It is no coincidence that the states rushing to bypass the Constitution represent a monolithic partisan bloc. To date, every single state that has joined the compact is a blue state, moving the country toward a system where a few deep-blue urban centers could dictate the presidency for the entire Union. The list of members includes Maryland, New Jersey, Illinois, Hawaii, Washington, Massachusetts, District of Columbia, Vermont, California, Rhode Island, New York, Connecticut, Delaware, New Mexico, Oregon, Colorado, Minnesota, Maine, and now Virginia.This partisan rush to ignore state boundaries flies in the face of Alexander Hamilton’s warnings in Federalist No. 68. Hamilton cautioned that the Electoral College was not a mere suggestion, but an “excellent” system designed to protect the Republic from the very “tumult and disorder” that a direct popular vote invites.

The Founders were explicitly wary of a direct popular vote, fearing it would allow a “demagogue” with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” to manipulate the masses. Hamilton argued that the presidency should not be a prize for the most famous or the most populist, but should be determined by an intermediate body of electors, men “most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.”

By moving toward a national popular vote, Spanberger and the NPVIC proponents are discarding what Hamilton called a “judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements” proper for selecting a leader. Instead of a deliberative process, the nation is being pushed toward a system where candidates will focus exclusively on high-population urban centers like New York City or Los Angeles, leaving rural and small-state voters entirely ignored. This would mean an end to a republic form of governor. 

Hamilton was particularly concerned with the potential for national chaos during an election. He argued that by having electors meet in their respective states, their “detached and divided situation” would protect the process from “heats and ferments” that might otherwise “convulse the community with any extraordinary or violent movements.”

A national popular vote does the exact opposite. It removes the firewall provided by state lines. In a popular vote system, a dispute in a single precinct could trigger a 50-state national recount, creating the very “tumult” Hamilton sought to avoid. The Electoral College, by contrast, provides “effectual security against this mischief” by containing election disputes within individual states. 

A simple analogy regarding this kind of 'democracy' is: if there are 3 lions and one sheep voting on 'what's for dinner' grass or meat, guess who would win.

Perhaps most frightening is how this move weakens the nation’s defenses against foreign influence. Hamilton noted that the Electoral College was designed to oppose “cabal, intrigue, and corruption,” which he called the “most deadly adversaries of republican government.” He believed that a national popular vote would make it easier for “foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils” by raising a “creature of their own” to the presidency. The Founders’ system ensured that the Executive was “independent for his continuance in office on all but the people themselves.” With Virginia becoming the latest blue state to join this compact, the “moral certainty” Hamilton promised, that the office would fall only to those “endowed with the requisite qualifications,” is under direct threat.

If 48 more electoral votes are secured, the system that has guided the nation for over two centuries will be sacrificed at the altar of political expediency.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Calif. proposes a bill to criminalize undercover journalism

California Democrat Assembly-member Mia Bonta authored bill AB 2624 which has advanced out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee on a reported 11-2 vote as of April 13th. It has yet to become law, but if it does, the Golden State will become even more Orwellian than it already is.

Let me 'splain.

Assembly-member Carl DeMaio and independent journalist and YouTuber Nick Shirley along with other critics, have dubbed the bill the "Stop Nick Shirley Act," asserting that it would put the kibosh on investigative journalism by allowing taxpayer-funded organizations [particularly those serving immigrant communities] to demand the removal of videos that record in or even around their facilities, while imposing civil penalties, (such as fines up to $10,000 in some descriptions). 

Nick Shirley has used public filming to expose alleged fraud in daycares, hospices, and government-funded programs, and opponents say the bill is a direct response to shield such entities from scrutiny.

So the 'Learing Centers' will remain in business by not providing services to children who don't go there, for example.

Supporters frame the bill as protecting privacy, particularly of those committing fraud, preventing doxxing/harassment, which is exceedingly a tactic on the left, and safeguarding vulnerable organizations or clients (e.g., in immigration support services and other 'Learing Centers') rather than broadly banning journalism. 

The bill targets the release or use of recordings in specific contexts involving fraudulent government-funded entities, not all undercover work. 

This is not the first time California has seen proposals affecting undercover or hidden-camera investigations. Past efforts included "ag-gag" [agriculture gag] style bills aimed at farms (to restrict secret filming of animal cruelty), some of which failed or were challenged on free speech grounds. An older bill (AB 1671 from 2016) sought to punish media for publishing certain undercover videos of health care providers but did not broadly pass in the criticized form.

Similar "ag-gag" laws in other states have faced court challenges for restricting First Amendment-protected news-gathering. As of April 15, 2026, AB 2624 remains in the legislative process (likely needing further votes in the Assembly and Senate, plus the governor's signature to become law). Some internet platforms make claims that it has already "passed" but it is only at the committee stage.

The bill's final scope, constitutionality (especially regarding public recordings or news gathering), and enforcement would depend on its exact text if enacted.

For the latest status, check the official California Legislative Information site (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov) for AB 2624. Free speech concerns around restrictions on filming in public or semi-public spaces tied to government funding have drawn significant criticism from journalists and transparency advocates across the spectrum.

Journalism is not dead--it's on life support.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet