White House Condemns 'Targeted Sabotage' of Reflecting Pool as Repairs Pushed Past July 4 Celebration

Ah, America, land of the free, home of the brave, and apparently also the preferred target range for every half-witted malcontent with a pocketknife and a grudge against beauty itself. In a development that would shock no one who has been paying attention to the ongoing national nervous breakdown, the White House has revealed that our beloved Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was subjected to what can only be described as an act of aquatic terrorism by the sort of people who look at a shimmering monument to greatness and think, "Yes, this needs more garbage and vandalism."

A court document released by the White House shows that the National Park Service plans to drain the reflecting pool yet again after Independence Day to fix the mess left by these champions of civil discourse. According to the filing, on June 9, U.S. Park Police rolled up to discover that someone had taken a "sharp knife or razor" to the caulk over the foam sealant and engaged in the "destruction of delaminating surface material." As if that weren't enough artistry for one evening, approximately 70 fence post tops were thoughtfully thrown into the water, turning a symbol of reflection into a junk drawer.

This comes, of course, after more than two months of renovations ordered by President Donald Trump, because nothing says "Make America Beautiful Again" like watching your hard work get sliced up by people who probably think spray-painting slogans on war memorials is performance art.

Lands said NPS plans to drain the reflecting pool to conduct repairs, including "assessing and repairing any damage to the lining," and will begin "following the Independence Day celebration."Washington, D.C., is gearing up for massive crowds celebrating America's 250th anniversary, but the festivities have been complicated by these additional masterpieces of progressive self-expression. The National Mall has been adorned with "8647" markings, which the administration correctly reads as the restaurant slang for "eighty-six" meaning "get rid of," paired with 47 for the 47th president. Subtle as a brick through a window.

"It wasn't until several days thereafter that there were recurring cases and videos of people ripping at the coating began to circulate." (Department of the Interior) (Department of Interior)In another act of high-minded protest, some visionary used his own blood to write "I've come" on the Washington Monument. Deep stuff. Really makes you feel the intellectual weight of the resistance.

The White House reports that seven individuals have been arrested in connection with the reflecting pool caper, seven more received federal citations, and 18 police reports were filed. This week, U.S. Park Police released video of a suspect kneeling by the pool and reaching in, because apparently the revolution will be livestreamed in low-resolution security footage.

The White House released a statement on Thursday, positing "this isn’t random mischief – it’s targeted sabotage by anti-American crackpots who despise a strong, proud, and beautiful country."

The White House called the alleged vandals "crazed and deranged lunatics [who] have once again exposed their hatred for America with a cowardly, deliberate attack on one of our nation’s most iconic landmarks."
And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. While President Trump tries to restore some dignity and splendor to the nation's capital, the usual suspects respond by knifing sealants and chucking fence parts like particularly untalented performance artists. These are not misunderstood youths expressing dissent.

These are the spiritual descendants of people who would have complained that Mount Rushmore needed more graffiti. Happy almost 250th birthday, America. Try not to let the lunatics ruin the punch bowl.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Marco Rubio Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Iran's Ruling Fanatics

One of the more refreshing things about Secretary of State Marco Rubio is that he doesn't waste everyone's time pretending obvious things aren't obvious. In a political world where diplomats often communicate in layers of carefully polished mush, Rubio looked at the ruling regime in Tehran and described it with refreshing accuracy.

"Religious-theocratic lunatics."

That's a reasonably concise description of a government run by radical clerics who have spent decades funding terrorism, threatening America's allies, chanting "Death to America," and treating basic human rights like optional suggestions.

While speaking during his Middle East trip on Thursday, Rubio was asked whether he still stood by those remarks.

"You used to call them religious theocratic lunatics," a reporter said. "Do you still believe that language applies to the leadership today?"

Rubio didn't blink.

"Well, look, it's not that I believe it. It's the fact of the matter," the Secretary of State replied. "I mean, the Iranian system is led by clerics, radical clerics. That's what it's always been led by, and that's what it continues to be led by. That said, we also have to manage the geopolitics of the situation. And if they've changed their mindset or if they've changed their approach to their relations with the United States and their neighbors, then we're going to give this thing a chance to work."

How novel--the truth be told.

That's about as sensible as foreign policy gets. Recognize reality first. Explore diplomacy second. Don't confuse wishful thinking with evidence.

The Secretary of State continued: "Maybe this changed. I'm not saying it has. I'm saying the president wants to explore whether that's the case. And if it has, we're going to find out. But we're not going to find out because of what they say. We're going to find out because of what they do. We're going to judge them by their actions."

Imagine that. Judging the Iranian regime by its actions instead of its press releases. What a concept.

The Trump administration is trying to reassure America's Middle Eastern allies that Iran will be handled appropriately following last week's memorandum of understanding. That's understandable, because Tehran hasn't exactly been behaving like a government eager to join the civilized world as much as they appear to want to destroy it in order to welcome in the Twelfth Imam.

Instead, Iran has continued acting as though it somehow has leverage. During negotiations in Switzerland over the weekend, the regime reportedly treated American negotiators with its usual mix of arrogance and theatrical contempt. Then on Thursday, it attacked a cargo vessel attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz using a route that wasn't blessed by the ayatollahs.

That's less the behavior of a government seeking peace than one testing how much mischief it can get away with before someone reminds it that actions have consequences.

President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Iran holds no cards. Fair enough, but there comes a point where the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism has to stop being told where the line is and start discovering that crossing it carries a price.

Everyone wants peace. Rational people always do, which obviously leaves out the Iranian Regime.

The problem is that peace only works when both sides value it. The Iranian regime has spent nearly half a century demonstrating that what it respects isn't goodwill or carefully worded diplomatic communiqués. It respects strength.

Rubio's blunt assessment may offend the professional pearl-clutchers in Washington, but pretending the ayatollahs are misunderstood statesmen has never produced results. Calling reality by its proper name is a much better place to start.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Trump Declares Victory, Then Offers Iran a Shopping Spree

President Donald Trump has apparently discovered a bold new doctrine of foreign policy. First, bomb the regime into next Tuesday. Then invite it to become America's newest agricultural customer.

Speaking Thursday evening during a dinner with American farmers in the White House Rose Garden, Trump insisted America now holds all the cards.

"We knocked the hell out of them, and now we're negotiating from a position of pure strength," Trump said. "Pure strength. They know that."

Nothing says "maximum pressure" quite like immediately sitting down at the bargaining table with the people you just spent weeks calling the world's leading state sponsors of terrorism.

Trump assured supporters that Iran is desperate. "They want to make a deal with us very badly," he said.

Perhaps, or perhaps Tehran has simply learned that Washington has an irresistible habit of declaring military victories before offering diplomatic consolation prizes.

The president again promised that Iran would never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons.

"They will not have a nuclear weapon," Trump said. "And they've agreed to that." [LOL]

That's encouraging. Of course, Iran has agreed to plenty of things over the last twenty years, usually right before inspectors discover another suspicious facility buried under a mountain.

Trump also celebrated that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, a welcome development after weeks of global concern over shipping lanes.

Then came the sales pitch.

According to President Trump, Iran could soon become a lucrative export market for American farmers. His administration, he said, would use Iranian money to purchase "wheat, soybeans and corn" as the Islamic Republic struggles with food shortages.

Conservatives who applauded a hard line against the ayatollah may be wondering exactly when "America First" became "Ayatollah Approved Farm Subsidy Program."

For years Republicans argued that every sanctions waiver, every cash infusion, and every economic lifeline merely helped keep the regime alive. Now the pitch appears to be that the mullahs can skip straight from "Death to America" chants to filling shopping carts with Midwestern grain. 

Holy moley.

It's an unusual negotiating strategy. Win the fight. Declare overwhelming strength. Then reward the losing side with access to American markets.

The only people happier than Iran's negotiators might be the State Department officials who suddenly discovered that "maximum pressure" apparently includes a frequent buyer discount.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Congress Hosts Finger-Wagging Olympics As DHS Chief Reminds Democrats About 450,000 Missing Kids

Washington's latest episode of Political Theater Live featured enough finger pointing to qualify as an OSHA workplace hazard after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Rep. Rosa DeLauro turned a routine budget hearing into an audition for daytime television.

Testifying before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, Mullin found himself on the receiving end of another well rehearsed Democratic outrage performance centered on family separation.

"3,900 children were separated from their families," DeLauro declared, delivering the line as though nobody had updated the script since 2019.

Mullin promptly reached into the file Democrats apparently keep locked in a basement.

"450,000 kids were lost during the Biden administration, and you didn’t say a word about it."

That was apparently the signal for the hearing to transition from congressional oversight into interpretive finger wagging.

"Mr. Secretary! Do not interrupt," DeLauro snapped, raising her voice as cameras happily captured every second.

"Don’t you point your finger at me," Mullin answered. "Don’t be a hypocrite."

Not to be outdone, DeLauro doubled down.

"I will point my finger at you," she fired back before asking the committee chairman to put Mullin "in his place."

Mullin wasn't interested in playing along.

"You should be as upset about the 450,000 kids that were lost. You didn’t say a word about it. For four years, you never said a word."

Then he delivered one final jab.

"You should be put in your place."

The Capitol Hill fireworks came just hours after the Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two major immigration victories, triggering what could only be described as a nationwide shortage of coping mechanisms on the Left.

In one 6 to 3 decision, the Court ruled the administration could move forward with ending Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Haitian migrants and 6,000 Syrians currently living in the United States. In another 6 to 3 ruling, the justices upheld the federal government's authority to limit asylum processing at ports of entry through the "metering" policy, rejecting claims that every migrant who arrives at the border must immediately be processed.

Adding another twist, Florida officials announced that the now famous Everglades detention center nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz" is closing its gates after helping deport roughly 21,000 illegal immigrants.

Standing beside White House Border Czar Tom Homan, Gov. Ron DeSantis explained that the facility had always been intended as a temporary emergency measure.

"I said from the beginning that this was an emergency solution that would be temporary, that once DHS had the wherewithal to be able to handle these illegal aliens, particularly the criminal illegal aliens, that they would be able to do so, and we would still help," DeSantis said. "In terms of us managing this facility, the minute that’s no longer needed, then we obviously would break down the facility."

In Washington, however, one thing remains permanent. As long as there are cameras rolling, there will always be another finger to point.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

U.N. Official Responds To Oct. 7 Survivor With The International Symbol For "Not My Problem"

For decades, the United Nations has searched tirelessly for new and innovative ways to disappoint Jews. This week, it may have achieved a career defining performance.

The chamber of the United Nations Human Rights Council fell into an awkward silence as Ilana Gritzewsky, a survivor of Hamas' October 7 massacre, stepped up to the microphone and did something increasingly rare in international diplomacy: tell the truth in front of people determined not t:o hear it.

Standing before Reem Alsalem, the U.N.'s special rapporteur on violence against women, Gritzewsky delivered firsthand testimony of the horrors she endured during Hamas captivity. While most people would respond to such testimony with compassion, horror, or at the very least basic human decency, the U.N. apparently prefers a more avant garde approach.

Gritzewsky recounted the attack on her kibbutz. She described murder, arson, kidnapping, sexual abuse, beatings, and waking up half naked surrounded by seven Hamas terrorists. She spoke about her broken hip, broken jaw, and the psychological scars that still follow her home every day.

She then confronted the woman whose job title literally includes the words "violence against women."

“In captivity, Jewish women were raped, abused, and humiliated. And you, special rapporteur, you choose silence and denial. You say there was no evidence of sexual violence on October 7th,” she told Alsalem directly. “I’m standing here today, not as a report, not as a statistic. I am a woman who survived. I am the living proof of sexual violence by Hamas.”

Then came the question that turned the room into a monument to moral cowardice.

“When I, another Israeli woman, begged not to be raped, why were you silent? Please look at me. Do you believe us now? Will you apologize?”

At that moment, Alsalem faced an incredibly difficult choice. She could acknowledge reality. She could show empathy. She could apologize.

Instead, she apparently chose Option Four.

Silence.

Followed by a smirk.

Nothing quite captures the modern U.N. like watching a survivor of sexual violence beg to be believed while a senior human rights official reacts like she's sitting through an inconvenient staff meeting.

The exchange exposed a record that would be scandalous if scandal still existed at Turtle Bay. Last November, Alsalem publicly claimed that “no independent investigation found that rape took place on October 7,” despite a U.N. report concluding there were reasonable grounds to believe Hamas committed sexual violence during the massacre and even stronger evidence regarding hostages held in captivity.

As recently as April 2026, she was reportedly dismissing survivor testimony as “misinformation” used to “justify genocide against Palestinians.”

Apparently, according to this remarkable theory, Israeli women are simultaneously victims, witnesses, and public relations props whose testimony becomes invalid whenever it interferes with a preferred political narrative.

Her June 2026 report, "Violence against Mothers," somehow managed to discuss motherhood, war, and women's rights while treating Hamas like a mythical creature whose existence remains unconfirmed. The report accused Israel of reproductive violence and genocide, worried that American and Israeli strikes against Iran might harm Tehran's women's rights record, and omitted any meaningful discussion of Hamas atrocities.

Israeli mothers murdered in front of their children? Missing.

Bibas children and mother murdered by Hamas

Families tortured by years of hostage uncertainty? Missing.

The systematic destruction of entire families by Hamas terrorists? Also missing.

One suspects that if Hamas filed its atrocities under a different heading, perhaps "climate justice" or "sustainable development," they might finally receive a mention.

On June 23, Ilana Gritzewsky offered Reem Alsalem a simple choice. Look at a survivor. Acknowledge her suffering. Admit the truth.

The survivor spoke.

The evidence stood in front of her.

And the U.N.'s representative for violence against women looked away.

For an organization that constantly reminds the world to listen to women, the message could not have been clearer.

Some women, apparently, are more equal than others.

Comments?

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Trump Senate Meeting Accidentally Turns Into Live-Action Thanksgiving Dinner Argument Over Iran

WASHINGTON, D.C. — What was supposed to be a routine Republican strategy meeting on election security reportedly descended into a spirited reenactment of every family Thanksgiving since 2016, as President Donald Trump and Senate Republicans traded shouts over the ongoing war with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Sources say lawmakers entered the room expecting a discussion about voter ID requirements and citizenship verification. Instead, they found themselves front-row for what one attendee described as a "7 out of 10" verbal cage match complete with finger-pointing, raised voices, and at least one senator channeling his inner Irish pub debater. At least nobody flipped 'the bird.'

The meeting came amid lingering frustration over Trump's decision to torpedo the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, a bipartisan bill Republicans had hoped to market as proof that Congress occasionally remembers how to pass legislation.

Despite reports of the chaos, Trump emerged from the closed-door meeting sounding like a man who had just finished a pleasant church picnic.

"I think we had a really great meeting, and we're very proud of the party," he said. "We like our leader. We like everybody, really, in the room. I don't like a few people, but that's okay. I think you know who they are."

The festivities reportedly escalated when Trump questioned why Republicans had supported a War Powers Act resolution limiting his authority in Iran.

"He asked, ‘why would anybody vote for the War Powers Act?’" Sen. Bill Cassidy recalled afterward. "As he continued, I said, ‘is that a rhetorical question, or would you like to really know?’ He said, ‘I'd like to know.’"

Witnesses say Cassidy then committed the cardinal sin of Washington by answering a politician's question directly.

"I stood and said, ‘you have not told the American people what's going on. It was supposed to last four weeks, it's lasted four months,’" Cassidy [aka Hopalong] said. "‘Our original objectives have not been achieved, and I want to know what's going on.’"

At that point, the meeting reportedly transformed into a cross between a Senate hearing and two dads arguing over whose grill technique ruined the burgers.

Cassidy later attributed his enthusiasm to "the Irish in me," while colleagues eventually encouraged him to sit down before CSPAN cameras somehow materialized through the walls.

"I guess my point is, though, that the American people need to know more than we are being told," Cassidy said. "The Senate needs to know, and it does not appear, although I don't know for sure, that the course of this is going the way that we were told."

Lawmakers remain frustrated that they still have not received a full explanation of the administration's recent agreement with Iran, leading many senators to experience the unfamiliar sensation of wanting to know what their government is doing before voting on it.

One source familiar with the meeting said Trump became especially animated because the war powers vote complicated negotiations with Tehran. According to the source, the president began naming Republicans who sided with Democrats, including Sen. Dave McCormick, who had the unique advantage of not being present for the vote because he was standing next to Trump at another event.

The source described the confrontation as a "7 out of 10."

"You know, [like] two boys on recess that are yelling at each other over a foul on a basketball court," they said.

Republicans hoping the meeting might produce a strategy for passing the SAVE America Act were reportedly disappointed to discover that Congress had once again found a way to spend hours talking without resolving anything.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune later explained that Trump emphasized the importance of the legislation but did not spend much time discussing how to overcome the minor obstacle of not having enough votes.

"It was more the president saying, ‘If we don't do this, we're gonna get ourselves in real trouble going down the road,’" Sen. Jim Justice said.

At press time, congressional aides confirmed that lawmakers had left the meeting with exactly the same number of votes they entered with, but with significantly higher blood pressure readings.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Trump DOJ Drops the Hammer on Antifa Terror Scum—Finally

The Trump administration just notched its first major Antifa-related terror prosecution, and the results are glorious: a pile of domestic terrorists who attacked federal agents are now staring down decades in prison where they belong.

Eight Antifa clowns convicted earlier this year for their July 4, 2025 assault on an ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas, got sentenced on Tuesday. The ringleader? A full century behind bars. One hundred years. Let that sink in.

Benjamin Song earned the longest staycation at 100 years. Maricela Rueda got 70. Autumn Hill, Zachary Evetts, Savanna Batten, Meagan Morris, and Elizabeth Soto each pulled 50 years. Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada drew 30.

Prosecutors laid it out: these geniuses carried out a premeditated terror attack on the Prairieland ICE center, inspired by their beloved Antifa ideology. Fireworks, vandalism, and straight-up shooting at cops. One officer took a bullet to the neck and lived to tell the tale.

About damn time these revolutionary cosplayers faced real consequences instead of Soros-funded slaps on the wrist. Lock 'em up and throw away the key.

Do you agree with the outcome? Leave your comments.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Communist candidate runs out of live interview when asked about her social media history, wins nomination anyway

Newly minted socialist congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier dramatically walked out of a radio interview Tuesday after hosts had the audacity to ask her about the mountain of unhinged social media posts that have defined her campaign against New York Democratic Rep. Adriano Espaillat.

Just hours after bolting from the live Spanish-language station La Mega like a student fleeing a pop quiz, Comrade Avila Chevalier pulled off a stunning upset by defeating the five-term incumbent and Congressional Hispanic Caucus chair in New York's deep-blue 13th District, which covers chunks of Manhattan and the Bronx. 

The win sends this DSA darling straight to Congress, where she will almost certainly be sworn in come November to represent the very voters she once lectured about the evils of nationalism.

Backed by socialist anti-Zionist/anti-Semitist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists [aka Communists] of America, Avila Chevalier had zero interest in answering questions on primary Election Day about her colorful history of archived, now-deleted posts. Those greatest hits include trashing Democratic leaders, demanding the abolition of police and prisons, opposing all deportations, and hurling various rhetorical grenades at U.S. institutions and foreign policy. Other than that, she's as sweet as apple pie.

Oh, wait. 

She also spearheaded anti-Israel protests at Columbia University and hung around with a campus crew that openly cheered "Death to America." Because nothing says "future congresswoman" than calling for the death of the nation in which you choose to run for public office.

The backlash reached new heights over her bizarre takes on Dominican nationalism. 

In old posts, she refused to fly the Dominican flag on her profile because, unlike calling for death to America, she considered nationalism "violent." This landed especially well in her heavily Dominican-American district, where locals began wondering if their candidate actually likes the culture she wants to represent.

When radio hosts tried to give her a chance to address the Dominican community before polls closed, Avila Chevalier pivoted straight into unity mode. She said she felt bad about her old tweets in a general, non-specific way and that it was time to come together and fight for the important things. Pressed on the flag controversy, she insisted she wanted to talk about "the issues impacting residents of New York 13" instead. When a third host kept pushing, she snapped that she was not going to sit there and be yelled at, declared she had already addressed it, wished everyone a beautiful day, yanked off her headphones, and marched out of the studio.

Truth being, she was scared to deal with her own words.

The old social media dumpster fire has been the central drama of the Democratic primary, with Avila Chevalier claiming the scrutiny distracts from the real issues and insisting she has evolved since posting all that stuff. She has apologized for some of the rhetoric, including shots at former Vice President Kamala Harris, but she still proudly defends her belief that "all deportations are wrong." Opponents have pointed out that this might be a problem for voters who prefer not having open borders as official policy.

In the end, none of it mattered much in one of America's bluest districts. The controversy simply tested whether voters would overlook a trail of radical statements in favor of fresh socialist promises. They did. Congratulations to the newest member of Congress. America surely cannot wait, and will get what they voted for . . . good and hard.

Comments?

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet