Trump Slams the Brakes on Weak-Kneed Bureaucrats: Orders ICE to Get Back to Work Nabbing Criminals

President Trump wasted no time telling the Department of Homeland Security to cut the nonsense. One day after DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin hit the brakes on ICE vehicle stops, Trump ordered the agency to reverse course and resume one of its most effective tools for catching illegal aliens and criminals.

In a blunt social media post, Trump made his position crystal clear. "We CANNOT give up one of ICE's most important and effective Crime fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!" He added that pausing the tactic would only play right into the criminals' hands.

The Radical Left Dumocrats (sic) would love nothing more than to see ICE tied down, he noted, but that surrender would not happen on his watch.

Trump told the agents directly to be judicious, fair, and smart, then get right back to doing their important job. The White House confirmed the pause was dead. Nationwide instructions telling agents to stop most vehicle stops, except for the worst violent offenders, were scrapped.

The original plan had been to keep the pause going indefinitely until new training was rolled out. That idea lasted about 24 hours once Trump weighed in.The pause came after two fatal shootings during stops in Maine and Texas. Some inside ICE called the change "horrible but needed."

Trump saw it differently. He praised the men and women of ICE for doing a great job under tough conditions and pointed out that crime is way down across America, with numbers not seen in decades. He reminded everyone that Sleepy Joe Biden opened the border and let in roughly 25 million people, many unchecked and unvetted, including plenty of criminals. Getting them out requires strength, toughness, and smarts, Trump said, not timid pauses cooked up by nervous bureaucrats.

To the agents on the ground he sent a clear message: Keep those crime statistics coming. Remember, you are loved and respected in America. While sanctuary city politicians and their media allies try to make every enforcement action look like a crisis, Trump continues to back the officers who actually have to clean up the mess. Traffic stops remain on the table. The adults are back in charge.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

U.N. Discovers Closing One Of World's Most Important Shipping Lanes Might Actually Be Bad

The United Nations emerged from another emergency meeting Tuesday to announce a startling revelation: shutting down one of the world's busiest maritime chokepoints could have consequences.

The international body condemned the renewed fighting between the United States and Iran, warning that another closure of the Strait of Hormuz would create humanitarian problems across the globe. Apparently, even the U.N. has noticed that stopping the flow of oil, food and medicine isn't exactly a winning strategy.

U.N. rights chief Volker Turk called the renewed attacks "a huge setback for civilians in the region and beyond," warning about the "impact on human rights far beyond the region."

The strait "is a vital lifeline on which millions are reliant," Turk said.

More on Turk.

He is an anti-Zionist Austrian-born UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, which in his case, is an oxymoron.  Since Oct, 7, 2023, Turk has been consistently critical of Israel's refusal to do nothing about the attack, while softly condemning the Hamassholes who FA'd. While he did refer to Hamas' slaughtering of Jews "heinous, brutal and shocking" war crimes, he apparently cannot comprehend Israel's need to defend herself.

This anti-Semite repeatedly accused Israel of war crimes, "mass killing" of Palestine civilians [without mentioning how Hamas fires rockets among the civilian population], hindering humanitarian aid, thus contributing to starvation, [without mentioning how Hamas blocks or steals the aid, uses it or sells it back to Gazans], and the "horrifying and unconscionable suffering" meted out to Palestinians [which doesn't actually exist].  This is not an exhaustive list of Turk's anti-Zionist claims, but you get the picture.

A lifeline is one way of describing the narrow waterway through which a massive share of the world's energy supply travels. It turns out civilization enjoys having cargo ships reach their destinations instead of playing maritime bumper cars with Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

"Disruptions to the flow of food, medicines, and other necessary commodities have severe socioeconomic and humanitarian consequences, both regionally and globally, he continued, adding that diplomacy, restraint and de-escalation must be prioritized," Turk said.

It is a familiar refrain from Turtle Bay, where calls for "restraint" tend to always arrive after terrorists, dictators or rogue regimes strike the innocents. 

Turk also insisted hostilities between the U.S. and Iran "must stop immediately," urging an immediate return to the ceasefire, especially due to the fact that Iran is getting its butt handed to them.

The appeal will no doubt be filed alongside the U.N.'s long and distinguished collection of sternly worded statements that have proven absolutely terrifying to the world's most aggressive regimes. Not!

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Democrats Find Perfect Anti-ICE Spokesman by Apparently Asking, "Who Has the Longest Rap Sheet?"

Democrats eager to denounce ICE may have accidentally wandered into yet another casting disaster.

Houston immigration attorney Hugo Balderas-Ibarra, who rushed to defend two illegal immigrants involved in last week's fatal ICE shooting, has now found himself starring in a story with considerably more courtroom drama than the one he held a press conference to promote.

Balderas-Ibarra represents two of the three passengers who were riding with Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, who was shot after ICE says he attempted to ram an agent with his vehicle during a traffic stop. At a fiery press conference, the attorney accused ICE of lying, demanded the immediate release of his clients, and declared that they "will forever be physically and emotionally scarred by this killing," adding, "None of these families will ever be whole again."

Those remarks landed a little differently after court documents surfaced showing Balderas-Ibarra is currently out on a $20,000 bond for felony assault involving family violence by impeding breathing.

According to court records, the alleged victim was preparing to leave for a flight after discovering something on Balderas-Ibarra's phone. She packed her belongings, which he allegedly confiscated before eventually agreeing to bring them to the airport.

That airport reunion reportedly went about as smoothly as a TSA line on Thanksgiving.

Court documents allege Balderas-Ibarra threw her luggage onto the ground and, when she bent over to retrieve it, "grabbed her by her neck with his left hand." The records further state that as other people approached, he "squeezed harder and twisted her throat."

The alleged victim told investigators she could not breathe, became dizzy, and later suffered nausea, headaches, and swelling to her neck. Authorities documented visible injuries, leading to the felony strangulation charge.

As if that résumé wasn't already impressive enough for modern political activism, records also show Balderas-Ibarra was already free on bond in Florida for separate domestic violence, kidnapping, and false imprisonment charges when the alleged Texas assault occurred.

Naturally, none of this prevented him from appearing alongside Democratic Rep. Al Green, Rep. Sylvia Garcia, and Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare to lecture America about justice.

At the press conference, Balderas-Ibarra insisted ICE's version of events had "varied" and claimed his clients had a completely different account.

"All three of my clients reiterated that at no point was there ever an agent standing in front of the vehicle, nor was an agent ever placed in the line of danger. That is simply false. And I believe my clients are telling the truth," said Balderas-Ibarra.

He also demanded ICE release his clients before they could be deported, arguing it was necessary to preserve the "integrity" of the investigation.

Repulsive Al Green yelling as usual

Then came the inevitable applause line.

"I am calling for drastic changes to the way ICE conducts their immigration enforcement," he said, adding, "This is not immigration enforcement. This is racial profiling."

Everything is racism, isn't it, for the left?

Democrats have spent years assuring Americans they stand with victims. They just keep having an uncanny knack for putting people with criminal charges at the microphone while insisting everyone else is the real problem.

At this point, opposition research has become so optional that campaign staff may simply be scrolling arrest records looking for the next civil rights icon.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

New York Professor, Ibrahim Zabad, Celebrates Lindsey Graham's Death, Then Discovers Compassion Before Breakfast

One of the more revealing features of modern academia is not merely its ideological conformity, but the astonishing confidence with which some of its members mistake moral outrage for moral seriousness. The latest example comes from St. Bonaventure University, where political science professor Ibrahim Zabad briefly demonstrated that for certain intellectuals, even death is not enough to suspend political tribalism.

According to Campus Reform, a social media account identified as belonging to Zabad published a late Saturday evening tirade celebrating the death of Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., before deleting it less than 12 hours later.

Graham, who died Saturday at the age of 71, was described by the professor as "a certified anti-Palestinian, anti-Arab, anti-Muslim bloodthirsty bigot. He personified belligerence and evil. He supported every savage war Israel launched against the Palestinians and the Lebanese and the Syrians and the Iranians and the Iraqis and the Yemenis."

The post continued with an even more extraordinary denunciation.

"He genuinely endorsed Israel's genocidal war and unabashedly supported the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians from their native lands. He wholeheartedly and passionately supported the project of Greater Israel along with all the massacres, occupation, dispossession and savagery and barbarism that this entails. He was a merciless warmonger and bigot. Rest in Hell."

One is entitled to disagree with a senator's foreign policy. One is even entitled to despise it. What ought to concern any civilized society is how readily some academics abandon the elementary standards of decency that they so frequently insist everyone else observe. It is difficult to lecture students about empathy while publicly rejoicing at another person's death.

By 5:09 a.m. the following morning, according to Campus Reform, the post had disappeared. In its place was an apology.

"I want to sincerely apologize for the post regarding the passing of Senator Lindsey Graham. My words were inappropriate and disrespectful and failed to show compassion during time of loss and grief. I regretted the post and the words I used."

Whether this represented genuine reflection or simply an appreciation for the consequences of public exposure is something only the professor himself can answer.

St. Bonaventure University, to its credit, did not attempt to defend the remarks under the fashionable banner of free expression or academic freedom. Instead, the university made clear that the professor's comments violated the institution's principles.

"We are aware of the post and subsequent apology by Dr. Zabad. His post about Sen. Graham was clearly not aligned with our university mission and values and we will be addressing the situation with him to ensure that Franciscan values are maintained and lived out at St. Bonaventure."

The incident serves as another reminder that America's universities face a crisis extending well beyond politics. Increasingly, institutions entrusted with cultivating wisdom produce people who confuse ideological fervor with intellectual rigor, and personal hatred with moral courage.

Meanwhile, Washington continued mourning Graham's passing. The longtime South Carolina senator died Saturday evening at age 71. An autopsy performed Sunday suggested he died from an aortic dissection caused by arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, although officials said further toxicological and microscopic testing remains pending before a final cause of death is certified.

A statement from Graham's office noted, "The death certificate will be PENDING until all the toxicological and microscopic testing are finalized, and at that point the death certificate will be updated to reflect the cause of death and appropriately classify the manner of death."

In the end, the most striking aspect of this episode is not that an academic harbored intense political views. Universities have always been homes to passionate disagreement. Rather, it is that a professor entrusted with educating future citizens publicly celebrated the death of a political opponent, only to rediscover the virtues of compassion once daylight, and public scrutiny, arrived.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Mamdani Discovers Crime Stats Improve Dramatically If You Explain Them Long Enough

New York City Mayor comrade Zohran Mamdani found himself taking incoming fire Monday after offering what may become the Left's newest crime-fighting strategy: explaining away bad statistics until everyone forgets why they were worried in the first place. That tactic is known in the military as "baffle them with your bullsht."

During an interview with PIX11 News, Mamdani was asked about concerns over rising rape and felony assault numbers raised by New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin. Rather than promising tougher enforcement or more police, the mayor reached for a familiar progressive comfort blanket, context.

"And what I think is important to know is a lot of the increase in rape also comes from an expanded definition of what counts as rape, as well as survivors coming forward for acts that took place years prior," Mamdani said. "And we are thankful for them coming forward, the courage and the bravery it takes, but just to provide New Yorkers with that context."

Translation: don't believe your lying statistics.

To be fair, Mamdani also pointed out that murders and shootings remain among the lowest on record. Unfortunately for New Yorkers, that reassurance landed about as well as telling someone their apartment fire isn't so bad because the kitchen is still standing.

Even some Democrats were less than thrilled with the explanation.

New York City Council member Susan Zhuang wrote on X, "Expanding the legal definition of rape was an important step toward recognizing more survivors under the law. But it should never be used to deflect from the responsibility to reduce sexual violence. Survivors deserve leadership, action, accountability, and justice. They don’t deserve deflection."

Women's sports advocate Riley Gaines summed up the reaction with a question many were already asking: "HOW did women vote for this guy?"

Rep, Chip Roy (R-TX), offered his own assessment: "Rapes are up. Rents are up. Foreign diseases and parasites spreading. Historic Churches burning left and right. Elect the third world, get the third world."

OutKick founder Clay Travis piled on with, "Sure, New York City rents hit an all time record high today, but at least the mayor is still very eloquent on social medi…whoops!"

RedState writer Bonchie simply observed, "Going great."

Pro-Israel activist Lizzy Savetzky added, "Didn’t realize rape had a dynamic definition."

Substack writer Jim Treacher quipped, "No wonder these guys saw no problem with Platner."

Mamdani's reference to an "expanded definition" appears to point to New York's Rape is Rape Act, signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul in 2024. The law broadened the legal definition of rape to include forms of nonconsensual sexual assault beyond vaginal penetration.

That explanation, however, leaves one awkward detail. The law took effect in September 2024, yet the NYPD's latest CompStat report still shows rapes up 6.6 percent compared with the same period last year, well after the legal definition had already changed.

Apparently, in progressive governance, reality is just another statistic waiting for the proper explanation.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Ro Khanna pulls a Greta Thunberg with his camera crew and NY Times "reporter"

Last Wednesday California Democrat Ro Khanna took a page from the Greta Thunberg coloring book and arranged his own capture. This time the villains were not the Taliban but Israeli settlers in the West Bank, as if that was a real thing.

The leftist congressman, probably wearing facial makeup, wandered down a road closed to civilians. He had a camera crew and New York Times reporter in tow, creating the ideal conditions for a political stunt that collapsed faster than a Karen having 'the vapors.'

Khanna had skipped meetings with October 7 survivors and passed on any briefing about Israel’s actual border threats. He was far too busy chasing a dramatic capture in what he hoped would be some violent event.

When the footage finally dropped the so-called hostage video turned out to be as calm as Hindu cows.

The obvious goal was to gin up anti-Israel hatred at home and float a 2028 presidential bid. Behold the circus.

Even New Jersey Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer called him out: "Let’s be honest, this was a publicity stunt. Channels exist to protect elected officials, and Khanna intentionally entered a restricted, unstable area without coordinating to provoke a response.What’s appalling is that Ro ignored requests to meet 10/7 survivors and hostages, or...Rep Josh Gottheimer (@RepJoshG July 13, 2026)

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

"Moderate" Governor Hires Anti-Catholic FBI Agent to Reform Prisons

Virginia’s self-styled “moderate” governor, Abigail Spanberger, has made another bold statement about moderation. She has handed the co-chairmanship of her new Community Partnership Council on Corrections to Stanley Meador, the former FBI special agent in charge in Richmond who presided over the now-retracted 2023 memo that treated traditionalist Catholics as a fresh domestic-terrorism opportunity.

The council, Spanberger announced, will advance “safety reforms by hearing directly from [corrections] staff, incarcerated individuals, and communities across Virginia” on reentry, public accountability, and “conditions of confinement.” It will create “a permanent, structured forum for dialogue and action on the issues that matter most” so that the governor’s reforms “take root, and build a foundation for Virginia long after I am no longer in this office.”

Many things, she added, are “systemically wrong” with the state’s prisons. Meador is the man for the job. While he ran the Richmond field office, the FBI produced an internal document titled “Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical-Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities.” The memo proposed keeping an eye on Catholic churches in Virginia and drew its analytical horsepower from the Southern Poverty Law Center, an outfit now facing wire-fraud charges for its long practice of labeling conservative Christians as extremists.

The memo leaked. The FBI yanked it back.

Bishop Barry Knestout of Richmond called it a “threat to religious liberty.” Then-Attorney General Merrick Garland told the Senate Judiciary Committee it was “appalling. It’s appalling. I’m in complete agreement with you.” FBI Director Christopher Wray told the House Judiciary Committee he had been “aghast” and ordered the thing withdrawn the moment he saw it.

The Justice Department inspector general later concluded the memo failed basic analytic standards and lacked sufficient evidence. Meador met with diocesan leaders and expressed regret for the “negative attention.” He did not, however, express regret for the memo itself. When one of his own subordinates apologized for having helped draft the document, Meador replied in an email: “No apology needed. I’m glad you are on the team and thankful for your commitment. Keep that head up, this too shall pass. Will make for a great chapter in your memoirs some day!”

That is the fellow Spanberger has now placed in a position to shape prison policy by listening to “incarcerated individuals.” The same administration that once worried traditional Catholics might radicalize has decided the urgent task is to give convicted criminals a structured forum in which to explain what is “systemically wrong” with their living arrangements.

Spanberger billed herself as a moderate on the campaign trail. Since taking office she has stocked her administration with a former Obama adviser who favored masking two-year-olds and mandatory COVID shots, a trans activist, and an advocate tied to a Soros-funded criminal-justice group. Appointing the man who ran the Richmond office during the Catholic memo was apparently just the next logical step in that program of moderation.Virginia’s prisons have recently featured MS-13 gang members, here illegally and already convicted of violent crimes including murder, stabbing three corrections officers.

At Red Onion State Prison, inmates set themselves on fire; the Department of Corrections said there was “no evidence” this was a protest and that the prisoners were simply trying to get moved.

Spanberger’s council will address these matters through dialogue, visitation-hour extensions, and a one-page code of ethics that instructs staff to “Do the Right Thing” and embrace a “People First” culture.The governor reports that her administration has already “immediately actioned” about 85 percent of the concerns raised by advocacy groups. She also cites a 56 percent drop in serious inmate-on-staff assaults and a 47 percent drop in confirmed overdoses. Other numbers, she notes, reflect how staff handle prisoners rather than any actual reduction in violence.

Meador was placed on leave and removed from the FBI in June 2025. CatholicVote national political director Logan Church observed that Spanberger’s decision to elevate him “tells every Catholic in America that violating our civil liberties isn’t a problem, it’s a pathway to advancement.” In the world of contemporary Democratic moderation, that is apparently high praise.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

POTUS warns that starting tonight, Iran can expect shock and awe

The game is over. The talks are done. It is time to clean up the mess, or at least try to, because negotiations with what is left of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards have been a total failure. It is not shocking. These are terrorists and you can trust them like you can trust the scorpion carrying a frog across the stream.

After weeks of messing around with whatever is left of Iran’s government, Trump said enough. He ordered new airstrikes, a complete blockade, and announced that the United States will now charge tolls for passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

On July 13, 2026, during an interview with Hugh Hewitt on Salem Radio, the President said the U.S. would strike Iran hard that night and the next day. Media outlets and commentary have framed his remarks using the dramatic phrase “hell will rain down” or “all hell will rain down,” echoing similar tough rhetoric he has used before regarding Iran.

Trump stated: “We’re going to hit Iran very hard tonight and we're going to hit them hard tomorrow, and there's not a damn thing they can do about it.”

He described the Iranian regime and remnants of the Revolutionary Guards as “stone-cold crazy people,” “cuckoo,” “sleaze bags,” and “extremely unreliable.” He noted that a prior memorandum of understanding or test deal had failed because Iran did not honor it. He also referenced watching Iran’s nuclear situation closely and mentioned the possibility of striking sites like “Pickaxe Mountain,” a fortified underground complex near Natanz.

The U.S. has been conducting airstrikes on Iranian military targets. U.S. Central Command reported that a third consecutive night of strikes began at 4:45 p.m. ET on July 13, targeting Iranian forces to degrade their capabilities. Over 300 targets have reportedly been hit in recent days.This follows the breakdown of an earlier ceasefire reached around April to June 2026.

Trump has said the ceasefire is over. Key flashpoints include control of the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian actions against shipping, and concerns over Iran’s nuclear program and regime behavior.Trump notified Congress of the new military actions. Additional measures include a U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and charging tolls for passage.This fits a pattern of escalatory warnings from Trump throughout 2026.

In April 2026 he issued 48-hour deadlines tied to reopening the Strait of Hormuz. In June 2026 he warned that “all hell will rain down” if Iran pursued nuclear weapons during ceasefire talks. Strikes are already underway as of the evening of July 13.

The situation remains fluid, with ongoing military action, negotiations reportedly continuing in some form, and high tensions over energy routes and regional stability. Oil prices and markets have been volatile amid the developments.For the most up-to-date official information, check sources like White House statements, CENTCOM releases, or major news outlets. Developments can change quickly in this conflict.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet