Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Devastating: Israel Neutralizes Local Hamas HR Director and Supply Chain Enthusiast


GAZA — In another heartbreaking blow to the local organic pharmaceutical and import-export sector, Israeli forces and the Shin Bet reportedly neutralized [aka goaterized] Mohammed Fathi Abdelhai Abu Fakher Yadda Yadda Yadda on Monday. Abu Fakher was widely known within his community as a passionate regional director for the "Yabna" youth outreach program, a subsidiary of the Rafah Brigade.

According to sources close to the community, Abu Fakher was a tireless advocate for workforce development. He had recently dedicated his days to an aggressive talent acquisition campaign, onboarding energetic new operatives and spearheading an ambitious corporate restructuring plan to rebuild the battalion's operational capabilities in order to destroy Israel and all the Jews in the world to make room for a global caliphate.

In addition to his human resources work, colleagues noted he was a logistics wizard who specialized in creative, unconventional supply chain management and international procurement, ensuring that specialized hardware such as rockets, drones, rifles and ammunition, was successfully acquired and distributed throughout Gaza for many years.

At press time, mainstream media outlets were already drafting headlines mourning the loss of yet another "passionate logistics manager and youth mentor."

May the goats stand ready to satisfy his proclivities.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Deranged New York Woman Who Wished 'Every Day Were Oct. 7' Arrested For Funding Palestinian Terror Group

Catherine Beth Washburn, 2 grenades, and Hamasshole flag

NEW YORK — A proudly anti-Semitic New Yorker who dreamed of turning every calendar page into another glorious Oct. 7 has finally been hauled off in cuffs for allegedly sending piles of cash to actual terrorists, proving the theory of FAFO.

Catherine Beth Washburn, 37, of Irondequoit, a peaceful Rochester suburb, stands accused of leading a radical outfit and posing for photos with hand grenades in front of a Hamas flag.
Federal authorities say she funneled tens of thousands of dollars to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization whose idea of diplomacy involves rockets and suicide vests.

If convicted, Washburn faces up to 20 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine, which is probably less than she spent on crypto transfers and keffiyehs.

Blaming the victim for Hamas' terrorism

According to the Justice Department, Washburn headed the Direct Action Movement for Palestinian Liberation (DAMPL), a group that sprang up right after Hamas's heroic slaughter of 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023. Unlike those boring moderates who prefer signs and chants, DAMPL favors "direct action" — things like smashing windows and sabotaging anything remotely connected to the Jewish state.

Communications recovered by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force show Washburn chatting with someone claiming to be an active PIJ fighter in Gaza. In those chats she reportedly confessed that she hated Jewish people "very much" and wished Israel "would disappear."

"I wish every day were October 7th," Washburn is accused of writing. "If I lived in Gaza, I would fight alongside the resistance."

She later added that she felt "excited every time I see news of the killing of an occupation soldier."

U.S. Attorney Michael DiGiacomo noted that Washburn went to "great lengths" to finance violence, driven by "her self-described hate of Israel and Jewish people."

Financial records reveal roughly 80 cryptocurrency transfers totaling more than $30,000 sent to the PIJ fighter's account. In November 2025 she allegedly joked about her future prison wardrobe, writing, "Based on my passed [sic] fundraising and posting Im [sic] gonna get put away for a few life times," followed by a laughing emoji.


FBI Counterterrorism Division Acting Assistant Director Coult Markovsky made it clear that bankrolling murder carries consequences.

"This individual, as alleged in the criminal complaint, provided money to a foreign terrorist organization engaged in acts of violence," Markovsky said. "The FBI is committed to cutting off funding to terrorist groups and will continue to work side-by-side with our Justice Department partners to make sure anyone who engages in terrorism or provides assistance to such organizations is held fully accountable in our justice system."

In other news, progressive activists are already calling Washburn a "political prisoner" and planning a "Free Cathy" rally, because nothing says "social justice" like wiring Bitcoin to people who celebrate baby-killing.


Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



House Passes Bipartisan Resolution To Throw Rashida Tlaib's Latest Anti-Israel Tantrum In The Congressional Trash


WASHINGTON—In a development so shocking it briefly caused Capitol Hill to malfunction like a government website on tax day, the House of Representatives actually accomplished something useful Tuesday. Democrats and Republicans united in rare harmony to take the anti-Semitic Rep. Rashida Tlaib's latest anti-Israel performance art piece, escort it gently but firmly to the nearest legislative Port-o-Potty, and set it on fire.

Tlaib's war powers resolution, aimed at handcuffing U.S. military involvement in Lebanon, went down in a solid bipartisan 235-189 vote. Twenty-two Democrats bravely jumped ship from the Michigan congresswoman, joining nearly every Republican in opposition. 

In Washington terms, that's the equivalent of the entire room agreeing the fire alarm isn't just another progressive policy proposal.

The measure would have banned U.S. forces from any "hostilities" in Lebanon, a pressing issue if America were, you know, actually fighting there. But facts remain stubbornly uncooperative with Tlaib's worldview, i.e., that the Jewish state needs to be eliminated.

One lonely Republican dissenter was the execrable Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, whose foreign policy instincts continue to spin wildly like a compass next to an industrial magnet. Time to vote him out.

Michigan's premier anti-Israel activist cosplaying as a member of Congress tried to limit military authority in a nation where America isn't conducting combat operations. It's roughly as urgent as demanding emergency legislation to stop astronauts from invading Saskatchewan.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and most Democrats voted to tie President Donald Trump's hands on using force in Lebanon without congressional permission. Of course, Jeffries had opposed an earlier version of Tlaib's scheme, proving once again that consistency in the Democratic Party is treated like an optional accessory, right next to "supporting the troops."

The whole thing was a concurrent resolution, carrying all the legal weight of a strongly worded Facebook post. Even if it passed, it would never have reached President Trump's desk for a signature, veto, or well-deserved eye-roll.

Tlaib, Congress's only Palestinian American member and Israel's most dedicated congressional tormentor, has spent years accusing the Jewish state of "ethnic cleansing" in Gaza and Lebanon. Republicans correctly note that her laser focus on condemning Israel while giving Hezbollah a rhetorical free pass amounts to providing comfort to an Iranian-backed terrorist outfit.

Strangely missing from Tlaib's resolution was any condemnation of Hezbollah, the terror group that has spent years rocketing Israeli civilians and turning southern Lebanon into its personal launchpad. Apparently the actual people firing rockets at school buses deserve less congressional attention than the country daring to defend itself.

Earlier this month, Tlaib pushed an even broader version that critics said could have forced U.S. personnel guarding the American Embassy to abandon their posts and crippled aid to the Lebanese Armed Forces fighting actual terrorists. Even by Washington standards, siding against the non-terrorist side is a special kind of genius.

After that flop, she rolled out a revised version with polite exemptions for diplomatic security and training Lebanese troops. Nothing says "principled stand" like frantically editing your legislation after everyone reads the first draft and recoils in horror.

Republicans rightly wondered why Congress was wasting time stopping a war America isn't fighting.

"There are not U.S. combat forces conducting operations or engaged in hostilities in Lebanon," House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, (R-FL), said during debate. "They are training the Lebanese Armed Forces."

"Why are they training?" Mast continued. "Because there's probably at least 40,000, probably more, Hezbollah terrorists spread across the South of Lebanon that are actively engaged in targeting Israel and have been doing so for many years."

Brian Mast

Mast went further, correctly labeling supporters of the resolution as "proxies for Hezbollah," a remark unlikely to earn him a Christmas card from the Squad.

Ranking Member Gregory Meeks (D-NY), defended the pointless exercise by claiming it would prevent America from entering "another forever war that is not in our national interest."

A noble thought, if only the United States were actually in a war in Lebanon. Instead, Congress spent the afternoon solemnly debating how to stop a ghost from invading a house it never entered, while Hezbollah kept doing what it does best: trying to annihilate Israel and counting on enough useful idiots in Washington to stay distracted by imaginary American aggression. 

At least this time, sanity prevailed. Barely.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Israeli Ambassador Drops Mic With "Journalist Or Terrorist?" Quiz, Catches UN Red-Handed Platforming Hamas Lies



In a move that had the usual suspects squirming in their seats, Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon turned a Security Council session into a much-needed reality check Tuesday, unveiling what he called a "Journalist or Terrorist?" quiz to expose how the United Nations and international media eagerly swallow Hamas propaganda before the facts can even catch up.

"Israel is condemned again and again and again," Danon said during the meeting while holding up photos.

"A claim is made against Israel. The U.N. repeats it, and then the world condemns it. Then, when the truth comes out, it takes time, sometimes weeks, months, years, there is no apology, no correction and no retraction. They move on. We will not move on," he added.

As Danon flipped the photos over, they revealed clear evidence of the deceased's membership in Hamas or other terror groups, proving once again that the Jewish state is fighting actual terrorists while the world clutches its pearls over "journalists."

Danon also took aim at New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani for rushing to condemn Israel over the killing of Al Jazeera contributor Ahmed Wishah, whom Danon rightly described as "a Hamas terrorist."

"This is the machine," Danon said. "Hamas makes a claim. The NGO ecosystem, rapporteurs and briefers all repeat the lies."



"Then a U.N. report rubber-stamps it, the world's media broadcasts it, and Israel is condemned before the facts are even checked," he added.

In other words, the UN's favorite hobby: rushing to bash the only democracy in the Middle East while giving a global megaphone to a pack of bloodthirsty jihadists. Danon isn't letting them get away with it. Israel stands firm, and the truth keeps winning, no matter how slowly the rest of the world catches up.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


BREAKING: More IRGC leaders assassinated in Iran: can you spell 'chaos'?

The "FAFO Wall"

More Iranian regime honchos have been 'eliminated' via assassination today. This is what happens when you provide arms to the citizens. Can someone please tell President Trump?

There was also a 'security incident' in the border county of Paveh in Kermanshah province. Initial reports depict clashes and shootings in the area but the details are still murky and official authorities have yet to release more information.

Some of the families of IRGC members have also been killed and now the regime is feeling the heat from what they've perpetrated.

Another Mohammed, Zadeh, I believe it's spelled, a deputy of political affairs of the IRGC navy has also been eliminated via death a few hours ago due to a "car accident". In Iran, driving cars is somehow very dangerous. And if you believe that, you might be interested in a bridge I'm selling.

A broadcaster of Iranian regime TV has also been eliminated, due to a "heart attack." The so called hospital where he was supposed to have been taken to had 'no comment.'

More information will follow.

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Supreme Court Just Ruled on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order


The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship for immigrant children, proving once again that nine black robes in Washington know better than the American people what the Constitution actually means.

The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, which means they are considered citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The ruling means that Trump's executive order is rendered invalid and cannot be enforced, handing another glorious victory to the open-borders crowd and their judicial enablers, and Chuck 'Nostrils' Schumer may be coming for Gorsuch.

Trump issued the executive order on his first day back in office last year, seeking to limit birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a challenge to that order on April Fools Day, and was expected to issue a ruling before the end of its current term.

The order directed federal agencies not to recognize U.S. citizenship for children born in the country after late February 2025 if the mother was in the country illegally and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Supporters defended the order, arguing that it is a necessary correction in a longstanding misreading of the 14th Amendment. They contend that the provision was not intended to grant automatic citizenship to the children of parents who lack full allegiance to the United States. In a post on Truth Social, Trump argued that the country “cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it!”

This decision is peak judicial activism dressed up as originalism. The Fourteenth Amendment was never meant to turn America into a global maternity ward for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. While the Supreme Court once again chooses international norms over common sense, everyday Americans are left footing the bill for endless chain migration, strained welfare systems, and eroded national sovereignty.
Trump was right: birthright citizenship as currently practiced is a magnet for abuse that no serious country tolerates. Time for Congress to fix what the courts refuse to or for us voters to fix Congress.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Monday, June 29, 2026

Pastor Among Dozens of Christians Slain in Nigeria as Faithful Continue to Pay the Highest Price



There are tragedies that briefly capture the world's attention before vanishing beneath the endless churn of the news cycle. Then there are tragedies that persist for years, claiming thousands of lives while attracting little more than passing notice. The systematic slaughter of Christians in Nigeria belongs firmly in the latter category.

A pastor and dozens of Christians were killed in an overnight assault on a village in Nigeria's Plateau State, the latest episode in a conflict where sectarian violence, terrorism, and competition over land have combined into an unrelenting campaign of bloodshed against Christian communities.

The attack began around 2 a.m. on June 22 in Kawel village in Bokkos County. 

According to Christian Daily International, Fulani herdsmen killed 28 Christians, among them Rev. Markus Nyam, pastor of the Church of Christ in Nations.

Resident Jesse Peter Dukut described a night of terror in which villagers were effectively imprisoned inside their own homes while armed men hunted them through the darkness.

“We were inside our houses when the Fulani herdsmen invaded our village,” Dukut said. “If anyone came out of their houses, they were shot at sight. And a sound from any of the houses in the village attracts shooting from the terrorists.”

Dukut said telecommunications had been disabled, making it impossible for residents to summon security forces. He added that the attackers spoke in Fulani and Hausa and called out the names of Christian leaders, suggesting the assault had been carefully planned rather than carried out indiscriminately.

“They killed my uncle and brothers,” he said. “I narrowly escaped being shot.”

Rev. Nyam was murdered alongside members of his congregation. Church leaders in Bokkos confirmed his death, saying they received the news “with deep sadness” while offering prayers for his family, friends, and the devastated community he served.

What occurred in Kawel is not an isolated atrocity. It is another chapter in a grim pattern that has become all too familiar across Nigeria's Middle Belt. According to Open Doors' 2026 World Watch List, 3,490 of the 4,849 Christians killed worldwide for their faith between October 2024 and September 2025 were Nigerian. That represents 72 percent of all documented Christian martyrdoms during that period.

Statistics alone, however, can obscure what they reveal. Each number represents a life extinguished, a family shattered, and a community left to bury its dead while wondering when the next attack will come.

Christian leaders have long argued that the violence cannot be reduced to a single explanation. Competition over increasingly scarce farmland, driven in part by desertification, has undoubtedly intensified tensions. Yet to ignore the ideological dimension is to misunderstand the nature of the violence itself.

Most Fulani people reject extremism and should not be conflated with those who commit such crimes. But a radicalized faction has embraced methods and objectives strikingly similar to those employed by Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province.

A 2020 report by the United Kingdom's All-Party Parliamentary Group for International Freedom or Belief concluded that these militants “adopt a comparable strategy to Boko Haram and ISWAP and demonstrate a clear intent to target Christians and potent symbols of Christian identity.”

Open Doors U.K. reported that at least 20 people, including a church leader and a pregnant woman, were killed in the Kawel assault. Police reportedly arrived only after daylight, hours after the attack had begun. Bishop Ayuba Matawal lamented that the delayed response “left the defenseless community entirely at the mercy of their assailants for the duration of the raid.”

The deterioration of Nigeria's security landscape shows little sign of ending. Christian Daily also reports that a new jihadist organization known as Lakurawa has emerged in the country's northwest. Armed with sophisticated weaponry and aligned with Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), an Al-Qaeda-linked insurgency originating in Mali, the group represents yet another front in an expanding Islamist insurgency.

The massacre at Kawel is therefore more than a local tragedy. It is another reminder that thousands of Nigerian Christians continue to live under the constant threat of violence simply because of their faith. While the world debates many injustices with understandable passion, one of the largest and deadliest campaigns of religious persecution in the modern era continues to unfold with remarkably little international attention.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Abdul El-Sayed's Bold New Crime Plan: What If We Just Let Everyone Out?



In what can only be described as the Democratic Party's latest audition for a reboot of Escape from New York, Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed has resurfaced comments advocating for the mass release of prisoners while participating in a webinar that featured a convicted murderer and a registered sex offender.

The August 2020 webinar, hosted by prison abolition activists and promoted with hashtags such as #FreeThemAll and #AbolishPrison, invited El-Sayed to discuss the "road to decarceration and abolition." For those unfamiliar with progressive jargon, "decarceration" is the fancy academic term for "let's see what happens if we stop putting criminals in prison."

El-Sayed enthusiastically embraced the concept.

"Not only are we taking people's rights from them, but also we have failed to provide them the basic means of a dignified life," he said. "Every choice we make about incarcerating somebody is about robbing that somebody from the people who love them and the people who need them."

Noticeably absent from the discussion were the people who got robbed, assaulted, raped, murdered, or otherwise victimized by the criminals in question. In the progressive hierarchy of compassion, crime victims increasingly appear to rank somewhere below convicted felons and slightly above carbon emissions.

El-Sayed went even further, declaring:

"Any and all efforts to get people out of jails and prisons and to keep people out of jails and prisons is policy that we need to be investing in."

Any and all efforts.

That's quite a slogan. Most politicians at least pretend to draw a distinction between a shoplifter and a serial violent offender. El-Sayed appears to have settled on a more streamlined approach: prison bad, freedom good, details unnecessary.

The webinar itself was a remarkable spectacle. Joining El-Sayed were former prisoners Martin Vargas, a registered sex offender convicted of raping a 17-year-old girl, and LaWanda Hollister, who served 34 years for second-degree murder. It was essentially a campaign event that accidentally wandered into the casting department for a true-crime documentary.

Yet this wasn't an isolated incident. Earlier that year, El-Sayed appeared on a podcast hosted by Joshua Hoe, a registered sex offender who pleaded guilty to soliciting a 14-year-old girl for sex. Rather than treating such a background as disqualifying for public leadership, El-Sayed encouraged Hoe and other former convicts to run for office because their "voice is needed."

One can only imagine the campaign slogan: Experience matters.

Republicans have already seized on El-Sayed's record, portraying him as a far-left ideologue whose political instincts seem permanently trapped inside a graduate seminar on prison abolition. His associations with socialist influencers, anti-Israel activists, and various progressive causes have already raised eyebrows. But telling voters that prisons themselves are the problem may be the kind of argument that sounds better in an activist Zoom call than in a general election.

After all, most Americans still cling to the quaint and outdated notion that people who commit serious crimes should face serious consequences.

El-Sayed and his allies appear determined to challenge that assumption.

The rest of Michigan may soon have an opportunity to decide whether that vision represents criminal justice reform or simply criminal justice surrender.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Sunday, June 28, 2026

Belfast Erupts After Sudanese Asylum Seeker Charged in Brutal Stabbing That Left Man Blinded


Europe's migration crisis has once again exploded into the streets.

Northern Ireland descended into chaos after a Sudanese asylum seeker was charged with attempted murder in a savage knife attack that left a Belfast man blinded in one eye, triggering nights of riots, arson, and renewed questions about immigration and border security.

Hadi Alodid, 30, appeared Wednesday by video in Belfast Magistrates' Court after prosecutors alleged he viciously attacked Stephen Ogilvie late Monday night in north Belfast. According to prosecutors, the assault left Ogilvie blind in his left eye.

Alodid faces charges of attempted murder, threatening to kill a radiographer, and possessing a knife. Using an Arabic interpreter, he declined legal representation and entered no plea. He was ordered held in custody.

The attack occurred shortly after 10:30 p.m. Monday and was captured on graphic video that quickly spread across social media. Police said Ogilvie, a man in his 40s, suffered severe injuries to his face, neck, back, and eyes. Investigators recovered what they believe was a kitchen knife at the scene.


Video circulating online also showed members of the public confronting the suspect, with one bystander using a hurling stick. PSNI Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson praised those who intervened, calling them "heroic" and crediting their actions with helping save Ogilvie's life.

Authorities said Alodid entered Northern Ireland from the Republic of Ireland in 2023, applied for asylum, and received a five-year permit to remain. Police initially identified him as Somali before later correcting his nationality to Sudanese.

Henderson also sought to tamp down speculation about the motive, saying investigators had "no information to suggest that this was a terrorist-related incident" and that police were not searching for additional suspects.

That did little to calm public anger.

Violence erupted across Belfast as masked rioters torched homes they believed were occupied by immigrants, set fire to garbage bins, burned a city bus, and hurled projectiles at police officers. Firefighters rescued multiple people trapped inside burning homes as authorities declared a critical incident and surged additional officers into affected neighborhoods amid fears of further unrest.

The violence highlighted the deep tensions simmering over immigration throughout the United Kingdom.


Belfast resident Anselme Shima, originally from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, described the fear gripping immigrant communities.

"I've lived on my street for almost 10 years, I have a good relationship with my neighbors, but last night was a horrific one," he told Reuters. "We don't know what to do. I'm scared. Seeing this, I'm wondering if I'm next."

Northern Ireland's political leaders condemned the riots.

First Minister Michelle O'Neill of Sinn Fein called the violence "thuggery."

"Groups of masked men burning families out of their homes is nothing less than disgusting cowardice," she said.

Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly of the Democratic Unionist Party added that "taking frustration at the evil actions of a person out on those who had no part in it is utterly wrong."

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also weighed in, denouncing both the stabbing and the riots.

"The scenes in Belfast last night were shocking and completely unacceptable," Starmer wrote on X. "There is no justification for the violence and disorder that we saw threatening our communities, nor for those who encouraged it, online or elsewhere. It is clear that people were targeted last night because of their background and I will not tolerate it."

The unrest gained momentum online through anti-immigration activists, including Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson.

Meanwhile, the attack has reignited debate over the largely open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Some lawmakers argue the case demonstrates the need to reassess cross-border movement, though the issue remains politically explosive because unrestricted travel is a cornerstone of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement that helped end decades of sectarian violence known as "The Troubles."

Much of the rioting occurred in working-class neighborhoods where former paramilitary organizations still retain influence.


The Belfast stabbing also arrives as Britain continues grappling with the political fallout from another high-profile knife attack.

Last week, Vickrum Digwa was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 21 years for murdering freshman student Henry Nowak in Southampton in December 2025. Digwa, a Sikh man, falsely claimed to police that Nowak had carried out a racist attack against him. Officers initially treated the severely wounded Nowak as the suspect before realizing he was the victim and attempting to save his life.

The murder sparked national debate over policing, race, and public safety. Protests following the killing also turned violent, with demonstrators attacking officers using chairs and rocks. Multiple participants were later charged with violent disorder.

With Belfast now engulfed in unrest following another gruesome knife attack involving an asylum seeker, immigration and public safety are once again front and center in Britain's increasingly heated political debate.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Venezuela Earthquake Death Toll Climbs Past 1,400 as Rescue Window Narrows: UPDATE

AI Generated image

The death toll from the devastating twin earthquakes that struck Venezuela on June 24 has climbed to more than 1,430, making it one of the deadliest natural disasters to hit the country in recent history.

According to Venezuelan officials, including National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez, at least 1,430 people have been confirmed dead, while some reports place the number above 1,450 as recovery crews continue pulling victims from the rubble. More than 3,150 people have been injured.

The powerful earthquakes, measuring 7.2 and 7.5 in magnitude, leveled neighborhoods across parts of Caracas and La Guaira, reducing apartment buildings, businesses, and public infrastructure to piles of concrete and twisted steel. Rescue teams continue searching collapsed structures despite persistent aftershocks that have complicated recovery efforts and endangered first responders.

Officials say the chances of finding additional survivors are fading with each passing day. While thousands of rescue workers remain on the ground, the operation has increasingly shifted from rescue to recovery.

Reports regarding the number of missing people remain uncertain. Some tracking systems have suggested that tens of thousands may still be unaccounted for, though authorities caution that those figures likely include duplicate reports and communications disruptions caused by the disaster. Government officials have indicated that the verified number of missing persons is significantly lower, though they have not released a definitive total.

The confirmed death toll has risen steadily since the immediate aftermath of the quakes, when early estimates counted only dozens of fatalities. As emergency crews gain access to previously unreachable areas, officials expect the number of confirmed deaths could continue to increase.

The disaster has left Venezuela facing an enormous humanitarian challenge, with thousands displaced from their homes and critical infrastructure severely damaged. Relief operations remain underway as emergency personnel race to assist survivors and provide aid to devastated communities.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Iran Declares World's Busiest Shipping Lane Now Subject to "Supreme Leader's HOA Rules"


Iran's ruling mullahs apparently woke up Sunday and decided that one of the world's most important shipping routes now belongs to them.

An Iranian lawmaker announced that Tehran intends to keep a firm grip on the Strait of Hormuz, confidently informing the rest of the planet that everyone else will simply have to obey. It is the diplomatic equivalent of the neighborhood bully claiming ownership of the public sidewalk.

"We unequivocally support the ever-victorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' decisive action against the American enemy and the assertion of Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz," Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for the Parliament's Foreign Policy and National Security Commission, wrote in a post on X.

Apparently, "ever-victorious" now means repeatedly picking fights with countries that possess aircraft carriers, stealth bombers, and a habit of responding when provoked.

Rezaei doubled down on the fantasy by declaring, "The Strait of Hormuz will not return to its previous state, and others have no choice but to submit to Iran's directives in the Strait."

The statement was widely interpreted as Iran's version of posting a handwritten "My Pool, My Rules" sign on an international waterway.

The bravado came after President Donald Trump warned on June 27 that the U.S. military would "complete the job" if Tehran failed to honor the ceasefire agreement. History suggests that when Trump starts talking about "completing the job," Iranian officials suddenly become very interested in underground architecture.

The interim Memorandum of Understanding between Tehran and Washington includes provisions governing the Strait of Hormuz intended to guarantee toll free passage for commercial vessels during a 60 day period.

Whether Iran plans to honor that agreement or simply continue issuing royal decrees over waterways it doesn't own remains to be seen. Fortunately for the world's shipping industry, international law has traditionally carried a little more weight than an angry post on X.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.




Saturday, June 27, 2026

Rubio and Vance Offer Competing Visions While White House Insists Everyone Is Singing From the Same Hymnal





For an administration that likes to remind everyone it's playing four-dimensional chess on the world stage, the Trump White House has found itself looking like a family trying to assemble IKEA furniture after losing the instructions. Everyone insists they're building the same bookshelf, but one guy is holding a hammer while another is convinced the leftover screws are decorative.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has spent the past week doing something that used to be considered a basic qualification for running American foreign policy: acknowledging that the Iranian regime is exactly what decades of history say it is. Vice President JD Vance, on the other hand, has been floating a more optimistic theory that suggests the mullahs are just one reconstruction package and a few friendly conversations away from becoming respectable neighbors. What has he been smoking?

The White House would like everyone to stop noticing.

Rubio has consistently defended Israel's campaign against Hezbollah for what any honest observer can see it is: a response to years of rocket attacks, terrorism, and the bizarre international expectation that Israelis should quietly absorb missiles because it makes European diplomats feel more comfortable and besides, Jews need to be annihilated because, you know, the Qur'an and stuff.

While visiting the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Bahrain, Rubio worked to reassure nervous allies following the preliminary U.S.-Iran agreement signed on June 17. Critics have questioned whether the deal hands Tehran far too much for far too little. Rubio answered those concerns with a sentence so grounded in reality that it almost sounded old fashioned.

"While we want a deal, we don't want a deal at any price," Rubio said.

Imagine that. A Secretary of State who remembers that negotiations are supposed to benefit America instead of serving as therapy sessions for hostile dictators.

That practical approach stands in pretty stark contrast to the messaging coming from the vice president.

Vance, on the other hand, has defended the agreement against Israeli criticism while arguing that Israeli strikes on Hezbollah infrastructure in Beirut could complicate American diplomacy. That assumes Hezbollah is simply misunderstood and that their biggest obstacle to peace is poor calendar coordination with U.S. negotiators rather than an obsessive commitment to wiping Israel off the map.

Does he know nothing about Islamic anti-Semitism?

The vice president has also spoken favorably about Gulf nations helping finance Iran's reconstruction and has entertained the possibility of a more cooperative relationship with the Islamic Republic. Apparently decades of hostage taking, proxy wars, terrorism, and "Death to America" chants are now considered minor misunderstandings that can be smoothed over with enough infrastructure spending. He needs to forget about running for POTUS in '28.

Then came Thursday's interview.

Vance revealed that Washington had invited an Iranian intelligence official to serve as a deconfliction liaison with the Pentagon in Qatar. That's one of those ideas that sounds like it came out of a brainstorming session where someone asked, "What's the foreign policy equivalent of letting the bank robber install the security cameras?"

Naturally, everyone in the administration insists there isn't even the slightest disagreement.

"There is one camp, President Trump's camp, and the entire administration is fully behind the president's efforts to ensure Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon," spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.

State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott dismissed reports of friction as a "tired and fake" narrative before adding, "The entire administration is 100% in lockstep behind President Trump."

Rubio offered the same assurance Thursday.

"Everyone here is aligned behind the president."

Maybe they are.

But from where everyone else is sitting, this doesn't look like perfect harmony. It looks like one side is reading Ronald Reagan while the other is speed-running Barack Obama's Middle East playbook. Both keep insisting they're singing the same song, but one sounds like "God Bless America" while the other is humming "Kumbaya" with the ayatollah.

If this really is one unified strategy, somebody might want to hand out the same script before the next press conference.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Left Eats Its Own: Pro Hamas Activists Chase Scott Wiener Out of San Francisco Pride Event Anyway


If anyone still needed proof that the modern Left eventually devours everyone who isn't sufficiently revolutionary, California state Sen. Scott Wiener, a gay Jewish activist, just volunteered as Exhibit A.

Wiener, a Democrat, is one of the architects of California's progressive agenda, discovered the hard way that decades of faithful service to the activist class earn you exactly nothing once the mob decides your loyalty to Israel is unforgivable.

Video posted to X shows Wiener attempting to walk through crowds gathering for San Francisco's Trans March before being greeted with the sort of tolerance, inclusion, and acceptance progressives are always promising everyone else.

"You stopped being queer the moment you started supporting Israel, you piece of sh*t!" one participant screamed in a high-pitched falsetto.

Nothing says "love is love" quite like informing a gay Jewish man that his sexual orientation has been revoked because he refuses to hate the Jewish state.

Ironically, the video begins with the person filming praising Wiener's record on LGBT legislation. Apparently all of those years of advancing progressive causes were erased the instant Israel entered the conversation.

"I think your policy on the genocide of Gaza is terrible," the person filming Wiener said as masked activists converged around him. "I think you do not belong here."

Soon, more masked protesters surrounded the senator, shouting that he was a "genocidal piece of sht" while chanting, "We fcking hate you!" Because they love Hamas.

It was another inspiring display from the same political movement that constantly lectures America about kindness, empathy, and stamping out hate. 

To view the video, click here

Former MTV reality star Spencer Pratt could not resist pointing out the poetic justice.

"Hey, Wiener guy! Remember when you called me a 'McBigot'?" Pratt wrote on X. "How does it feel now that the Frankenstein you created is coming for you? Every stupid communist learns this history lesson the hard way. Enjoy!"

That may have been the most accurate political analysis of the entire episode.

The activists repeatedly insisted Wiener had betrayed the LGBT community by refusing to adopt their preferred anti Israel orthodoxy.

"It sucks because you've been wonderful, you've been wonderful for trans people, and you've been terrible, and you've been terrible, you've been terrible, you've been terrible on Gaza!" one protester yelled as Wiener kept walking.

Dimitry Yakoushkin, who shared the video online, celebrated the confrontation by declaring Wiener insufficiently radical.

"Scott Wiener showed up to the trans march and for the first time we kicked his a** out," Yakoushkin wrote. "It's sad because while he's written some good legislation for queers, hes [sic] ultimately a genocidal-supporting center right shill."

Imagine being a California Democrat who helped push one of the most progressive agendas in America only to be branded "center right" because you failed the latest ideological purity test. On today's Left, anyone to the right of Che Guevara is apparently a conservative.

The truly remarkable part is that Wiener has hardly been an unwavering defender of Israel. After the October 7 Hamas massacre, he criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and by January 2026 even declared in a video that he does "believe Israel has committed genocide in Gaza."

That dramatic shift earned him exactly zero forgiveness.

The revolutionary tribunal had already reached its verdict.

"You're a piece of sh*t on Gaza!" the person filming shouted. "How could you do that? How could you betray queers? How could you oppress people?"

For years, conservatives have warned that identity politics eventually collapses into endless purity tests where no amount of ideological conformity is ever enough. Scott Wiener spent years helping build that machine.

This week, it finally decided to run over one of its own.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Venezuela Earthquake Death Toll Rises



While some predictions believe there will be up to 20,000 or more deaths from the two earthquakes that struck Venezuela last Wednesday, June 24th, around 6:04 p.m. local time, followed by another quake 39 seconds later, the most recent official toll rose to 920 deaths. 

The first quake registered 7.2 magnitude followed by a 7.5 earthquake, a significantly stronger one about 100 miles west of Caracas.

Caracas was devastated, flattened in parts and the government has estimated hundreds of people are still trapped and missing since the disaster.

The president of the national assembly, Jorge Rodriguez released the official death toll, but obviously, it's expected to rise as more information is revealed.

A website established to collect reports of missing individuals had registered more than 50,000 unaccounted-for people as of midday Friday. The United Nations’ chief aid official provided a similar estimate.

Foreign rescue teams and humanitarian aid began arriving in the country on Friday, while desperate Venezuelans and an increasing number of international volunteers worked urgently to locate survivors trapped beneath collapsed buildings and debris.

Rodriguez reported that 871 international rescue workers were operating in Venezuela by Friday afternoon. Among the nations dispatching teams were Mexico, El Salvador, and Spain. The U.S. Geological Survey has forecasted a high likelihood of more than 10,000 fatalities, which would rank these earthquakes among the deadliest in Latin America over the past century.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Hezbollah Furious That Lebanon Might Stop Letting Hezbollah Run Lebanon



Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem is having a rough weekend. The terror group's secretary general blasted the newly signed Israel-Lebanon framework agreement as "null," a "humiliation," and an outrageous assault on the sacred tradition of heavily armed militias operating their own private state inside another state.

Apparently, nothing says "national sovereignty" quite like taking orders from Tehran while stockpiling rockets in civilian neighborhoods.

Speaking on Saturday, Qassem declared that any effort to tie Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon to Hezbollah giving up its arsenal crossed "all red lines." Translation: Israel is expected to leave, but Hezbollah is expected to keep enough missiles to redecorate northern Israel whenever the mood strikes.

“We say to the Lebanese authorities, it is time for you to retract your sins that are destroying Lebanon,” Qassem asserted.

That is certainly one way to describe the situation. Another would be to ask whether the organization that has dragged Lebanon into repeated wars, frightened away investors, and treated the country's sovereignty like an optional suggestion is perhaps looking in the wrong mirror.

The framework agreement, signed Friday by the United States, Israel, and Lebanon after days of negotiations in Washington, lays out a step by step plan to dismantle Hezbollah's terrorist infrastructure, disarm the group, and allow the IDF to withdraw from southern Lebanon as the threat disappears.

In other words, somebody finally proposed the radical idea that a country's army should be the country's army.

The agreement also calls for the United States to strengthen the Lebanese Armed Forces so the nation's military, instead of an Iranian proxy, can provide security within Lebanon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the deal, calling it “a major achievement for the State of Israel” in a public address.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun welcomed the agreement as “the first step on the path to restoring Lebanon's sovereignty” in a post on X.

Qassem, meanwhile, appears to believe Lebanese sovereignty is best preserved by ensuring Hezbollah remains more heavily armed than the Lebanese government itself. It is a fascinating constitutional theory, albeit one that seems to exist nowhere outside the offices of Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

For years Hezbollah has insisted it is merely defending Lebanon. Now that someone has suggested Lebanon might defend itself, Hezbollah suddenly finds the proposal deeply offensive.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



John Bolton's Classified Documents Lecture Tour Ends With an Awkward Plot Twist


For years, John Bolton has been one of President Donald Trump's loudest critics, happily appearing on television to explain why mishandling classified documents was practically the crime of the century. On Friday, that moral lecture tour hit an unexpected speed bump when Bolton pleaded guilty to a felony count of illegally retaining sensitive national security information.

Turns out the self-appointed hall monitor wandered off with the answer key.

Under a plea agreement, Bolton will pay a $2.5 million fine while avoiding prison. The court could still impose probation, home confinement, or another penalty, but the former national security advisor walked away with far less than the mountain of charges he originally faced, just like most high-level politicians.

Federal prosecutors initially charged Bolton with 18 counts related to retaining and transmitting national defense information, a crime that should result in capital punishment or at least a life sentence. However, most of those charges disappeared as part of the deal, but Bolton admitted guilt to one serious felony involving sensitive national security information that could have endangered the country if it landed in the wrong hands.

The case stems from Bolton's time serving as Trump's national security advisor between 2018 and 2019 and the tell all memoir he later published after reinventing himself as one of Trump's favorite cable news critics.

According to prosecutors, Bolton kept detailed diary style notes on his personal computer and stored them at both his Maryland home and his Washington office. The notes reportedly included information from intelligence briefings, meetings with senior officials, and conversations with foreign leaders, including material classified at the Top Secret and Sensitive Compartmented Information levels. But alas, no firing squad, no life sentence, just a big fine and loss of pension. 

Whoop-dee-doo!

Investigators also alleged Bolton handed more than 1,000 pages of these notes to two relatives who had no security clearance, reportedly so they could help with his book.

The FBI raided Bolton's home and office last August, recovering documents and other evidence. Bolton initially pleaded not guilty, insisting the notes were merely personal records used during the writing process. He also maintained that the published version of his memoir successfully passed prepublication review and contained no classified information. He lied.

The irony here could not be thicker if it were poured over pancakes.

Bolton spent years insisting President Trump belonged behind bars over the classified documents case Democrats aggressively pursued during the 2024 campaign.

"I think this is a potentially catastrophic turn of events for him. It certainly should be, because if proven in trial it should put Trump in jail for a long time," Bolton declared during a June 2023 interview with NPR.

He also argued that the government should "hold everyone accountable equally, and that does not exclude the president. I think this is a real issue that's going to have profound impacts on our national security if we don't take it seriously."

And still he gets no prison time or a rope.

Fast forward a few years, and suddenly accountability comes with a plea bargain instead of dramatic cable news predictions.

After the Justice Department indicted him, Bolton sounded remarkably familiar, claiming he had "become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts." He lied.

Funny how quickly someone discovers the dangers of a weaponized Justice Department once they're sitting in the defendant's chair instead of the commentator's chair.

The plea agreement closes the criminal case without any admission of wrongdoing related to the classified information that ultimately appeared in his book. Even so, Bolton's guilty plea leaves behind one unforgettable lesson: if you're going to spend years demanding that everyone else be treated equally under the law, it helps not to end up pleading guilty to the very kind of offense you insisted deserved harsh punishment.

Still, the walrus gets to stay out of the slammer.

What do you think? Feel free to comment.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Friday, June 26, 2026

Carville finally decides his Party has become a circus


The Democratic Party has spent years insisting it's a "big tent." Now one of its own elder statesmen has looked around the circus and decided the tent has become a full blown asylum.

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville has finally reached the point where reality has overpowered partisan loyalty, publicly disowning a candidate backed by New York City Mayor Comrade Zohran Mamdani and calling for nothing less than a formal split in the Democratic Party.

Speaking with co-host Al Hunt on the "Politics War Room" podcast, Carville reacted to the stunning primary victories of three Mamdani-backed candidates in New York, including Democratic socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier. While both men complained that Republicans are exaggerating these candidates' influence, Carville immediately demonstrated why conservatives don't have to exaggerate anything.

"I have the quote right here, I’ll get to it. She has attacked interracial relationships and the American flag. Lady, I ain't in the same party as you. I'm sorry," Carville said. "I’m just not, and I actually do think it's time for Democrats to talk ‘the S-word.’ ‘Schism.’ I really do."

Imagine that. After years of being told conservatives were the ones harboring extremists, one of the Democratic Party's chief strategists is now openly wondering whether his own party needs an exorcism.

"Everybody's always said, 'No, no, we're coalition. We're a big tent,'" Carville continued. "And there's some there's just some s--- that I can't be in the same tent with."

Welcome to the party you helped build.

Carville argued that many of these far left activists don't even believe in the Democratic Party itself but use its ballot line as a convenient vehicle to push radical ideas.

"Let's negotiate a terms of a schism here. Maybe we can part under some kind of advantageous terms for both of us, but I'm done. And I'm not in that f---ing political party."

His breaking point was not merely socialism. It was Israel.

"I am totally comfortable in a political party that spends time questioning the policies of the government of Israel. In fact, I'm enthusiastic about that. I don't want to be in a political party that denies the right of the state of Israel to exist. That's just not I just can't do that. I'm sorry. It's just not doable."

It's remarkable to hear one of the Democratic Party's longest serving strategists say aloud what many moderate Democrats whisper behind closed doors. The anti Israel faction is no longer knocking on the door. It's redecorating the living room.

Hunt didn't disagree.

"They are a great gift to Donald Trump," he replied, urging prominent Democrats including Barack Obama to publicly distance themselves from the movement. "Certainly people like Obama, but also some of the younger Democrats and said, ‘This is not us.’"

They're doing the Comrade Polka
He also warned that unless Democrats score a decisive victory in November, "that group of crazies" could spend years undermining House Democratic leadership.

Even Hunt, who credited Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with eventually becoming a functional member of Congress after her early years, admitted he saw little hope for Mamdani's political allies.

"I don't think this group has that potential."

"I don't either," Carville answered. "And I think AOC is smart. I could be in the same party with her in many ways. I can't be in the same party with Miss Chevalier. Can't do it. Sorry."

It's a remarkable admission. When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suddenly qualifies as the reasonable wing of your political party, your ideological Overton window hasn't shifted. It has fallen off a cliff.


Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Devastating: Israel Neutralizes Local Hamas HR Director and Supply Chain Enthusiast

GAZA — In another heartbreaking blow to the local organic pharmaceutical and import-export sector, Israeli forces and the Shin Bet reportedl...