Showing posts with label First Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label First Amendment. Show all posts

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Woman Who Called ICE “Nazis” Punches State Trooper, Later Admits She “Messed Up Really Ugly”


JACKSONVILLE, FL — A local woman conducting important First Amendment work from behind the wheel of a moving Dodge Ram has pleaded guilty after punching a Florida Highway Patrol trooper in the face during a joint immigration operation, then kicking several more officers for good measure.

Jennifer Susan Cruz of Jacksonville was driving on Beach Boulevard near Mi Pueblo on January 13, 2026, when she spotted Florida Highway Patrol and federal immigration officers conducting a traffic stop.

 Sensing history, and perhaps personal fame unfolding, she began recording on her phone while tailgating, an act authorities later described as unsafe and unlawful cellphone use. 

A trooper approached her about that. Cruz grew argumentative, referred to ICE as “Nazis,” and asked the trooper not to shoot her in the face.

Officials say her license was suspended. 

She then drove off a short distance until troopers boxed her in. Once stopped, Cruz refused to surrender her keys and announced she was “ready to fight.” When officers tried to take the keys, she punched an FHP trooper in the face with a closed fist. The trooper was injured in the nose and fingers. 

Cruz then resisted, kicked officers including an ICE officer who injured a hand and a CBP agent, and was tased. She later apologized and said she “messed up really ugly.” [Not surprisingly, she has lived with ugly for the best part of her adult life.]

Cruz faced state charges plus a federal charge of assaulting officers conducting an immigration operation. She pleaded guilty in June 2026. Prosecutors have cited a statutory maximum of 20 years. Sentencing is scheduled for late September 2026. 

Actual prison time, if any, will be decided by the judge and is typically far below the maximum because in large part, law and order has been canceled in our nation.

Online commentators immediately identified the real issue: she must have mistaken the state trooper for an ICE agent, which would have made the punch principled, albeit illegal and deserving of incarceration.

Official DOJ and police accounts do not say that. She was interacting with a clearly identified state trooper assisting ICE. ICE vehicles and officers were present. The punch occurred during the key-surrender struggle after the suspended-license stop, not because she thought the trooper was ICE.

The popular photo pairing of Cruz next to an ICE-marked vehicle reflects the joint operation. It does not prove a case of mistaken identity. It does prove she managed to assault both the people she thought were “Nazis” and the people she did not. 

In short, she punched an FHP trooper during an ICE-assisted operation, she pleaded guilty, and 20 years is the stated maximum, with the likelihood of it being imposed on par with finding the Holy Grail. 

The “mistook him for ICE” framing remains meme editorializing, not what the charging documents describe. At press time, Cruz had not yet released a statement clarifying whether punching a state trooper counts as punching up.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Thursday, September 3, 2026

BREAKING: LA Podcaster Arrested After Discovering ‘Kill Donald Trump’ Is Apparently Not A Great Free Speech Strategy



LOS ANGELES, CA: An LA-based left-wing podcaster has reportedly discovered the exciting limits of free speech after FBI agents showed up at his Westlake home to arrest him for allegedly threatening to kill President Donald Trump.

Azariah Southworth, 40, a gay Christian podcast host, was detained after allegedly making repeated threats against the president and stalking Trump's personal lawyer and the lawyer's family, according to the New York Post.

Apparently, Southworth had been operating under the increasingly popular California legal theory that anything can be considered protected speech as long as you say "free speech" loudly enough.

According to court documents, Southworth posted a video on Instagram on April 7 in which he declared, “I have been vocal in calling for the execution of Donald Trump. This government is illegitimate and out of control. It’s time for course correction. Kill Donald Trump."

Authorities apparently interpreted this less as a nuanced commentary on constitutional government and more as a threat, which is the correct interpretation if you understand English.

As police took him away, Southworth reportedly continued expressing his political opinions by yelling, “Donald Trump is a pedophile! The country has fallen!” Chances are Southworth is merely projecting.

Prosecutors said Southworth had called for Trump's assassination multiple times, both publicly and privately.

In a January text conversation with an associate, Southworth allegedly wrote, “If I encounter any Trump official in-person, I’m seriously afraid I will end up in Jail,” before immediately demonstrating an impressive lack of confidence in his own prediction.

“But if I could Kill him, I wouldn’t waste the opportunity," he added.

“I want to funnel this rage into street art. That’s my plan,” he continued. “But GOD I want that motherf*cker and his minions dead.”

Trump's minions

According to prosecutors, Southworth regularly used his podcasting platform to encourage violence against the president, apparently believing that the First Amendment includes a special clause covering people who really, really hate the president.

“I want to practice my free speech as a survivor of conversion therapy for five years,” he said in a video in March. “Kill Donald Trump. Kill that mothef*cking pedophile in the White House. Kill that traitor of the United States Constitution.”

The phrase "free speech" was reportedly invoked so frequently that somewhere, an actual First Amendment attorney quietly developed a migraine.

Then, in April, Southworth allegedly posted another video depicting himself teleporting into the White House behind Trump while raising a knife as though preparing to stab the president.

Southworth had apparently anticipated that his increasingly specific calls for the president's execution might eventually attract the attention of federal law enforcement.

On Instagram, he previously posted a statement to followers explaining what he believed might happen if he were arrested.

“I am making this video today in the event of my arrest. It has been a long-held belief that calling for the execution of the president of The United States will get you put on a list or arrested,” he said. “I have friends who are concerned this will happen to me as I have been vocal in calling for the execution of Donald Trump.”

It turns out his friends may have been onto something.

“It’s time for course correction,” he added.

“Kill Donald Trump.”

And thus concludes another fascinating chapter in the ongoing American experiment in which people discover that the First Amendment protects an astonishing amount of speech, but apparently does not come with a complimentary federal immunity package.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Calif. coffee shop accused of kicking out Jewish dad, 5-year-old son shutters amid anti-Semitism lawsuits


There is a particular sort of establishment that flatters itself as a sanctuary of conscience. It sells coffee, posts murals, and treats the slaughter of Jews as a branding exercise.

Jerusalem Coffee House in Oakland has now closed its doors, at least for the moment, while its owners prepare for an October federal civil rights trial. The pause is not an act of reflection. It is the consequence of having spent years turning a public café into a checkpoint for Jewish identity.

The Palestinian-owned shop remained shut on Wednesday after announcing it would stop operating after August 23. Three lawsuits allege that it discriminated against Jewish customers, among them a father and his five-year-old son. One of those cases is a Justice Department action under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, scheduled for trial on October 26. 

A federal judge has already refused to throw it out. The complaint is not complicated. Fathi Abdulrahim Harara and his staff allegedly refused service to Jewish customers wearing Star of David caps and then followed them into the street with insults and threats.

That is the oldest prejudice in the Western world, rehearsed over an espresso machine.The café prefers another story. In an August statement on Substack it blamed its legal troubles on a campaign to silence its politics.

"These lawsuits represent the ongoing efforts of Zionist organizations [read: Jewish organizations] and the federal government to use the courts as a tool to repress free speech and public political commitments to Palestine," it said.

Note the sleight of hand. The Star of David becomes “Zionist harassment.” A father and a child become instruments of the federal government. Israel, the Jewish state that exists because Jews learned what happens when they are left without one, is recast as the aggressor. 

The massacre of October 7, in which Palestinian terrorists murdered more than 1,200 people and dragged children and Americans into Gaza as hostages, is treated as background noise. The Jewish customer who declines to disavow his people is the problem.


Elizabeth Barcohana, the California Republican Party Jewish engagement chair and an attorney, put the inversion with the precision it deserves. "It is ironic that after freely expressing support for terrorism with these beverage names, the café owners appear to now be using the First Amendment as a defense for ejecting two Jewish customers who wore hats with Stars of David on them, in one case calling it a 'violent' hat," she said. "By their own standard, if a hat can be violent, so can an iced tea. The First Amendment protects speech on hats; it does NOT protect businesses open to the public to discriminate against its customers because they're Jews while chasing them in the street shouting 'Jew' at them."

On the one-year anniversary of October 7th, a Palestinian terrorist attack against innocent civilians that killed over 1,200 people and took hundreds of hostages including children and Americans, Jerusalem Coffee Shop in Oakland unveiled a new menu celebrating terrorism. Beverage items named 'Iced in Tea Fada' celebrate Intifada (an Arabic call to violence signifying resistance by any means necessary, including terrorism) and 'Sweet Sinwar' honoring the principal architect behind the attack," she added. 

The cowardly shop owner denied that “Sweet Sinwar” referred to the Hamas leader who planned the slaughter, and claimed the October 7 menu launch merely marked its own anniversary. 

One may believe that if one is determined to. The rest of us can read. Intifada is not a flavor. Sinwar was not a pastry chef. Israel’s war in Gaza is the war that any nation would fight after its civilians were hunted in their homes. To name a drink after the architect of that hunt, on the anniversary of the hunt, and then to call a Jewish child’s father a “violent” presence for wearing the symbol of his people, is not speech. It is a confession.


Barcohana hopes the shutdown lasts. "The owners have temporarily closed the coffee shop while they defend this discrimination lawsuit against them," she said. "Hopefully it remains permanently closed."

The Anti-Defamation League and Benesch sued on behalf of Michael Radice, who says he was refused service and subjected to anti-Semitic slurs. The Louis D. Brandeis Center filed a state case for Jonathan Hirsch, ejected with his young son after Harara confronted him over the Star of David. The Justice Department filed in June 2025. When it did, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Civil Rights Division stated the law without the usual throat-clearing. "It is illegal, intolerable and reprehensible for any American business open to the public to refuse to serve Jewish customers," she said. "Through our vigorous enforcement of Title II of the Civil Rights Act and other laws prohibiting race and religious discrimination, the Justice Department is committed to combatting anti-Semitism and discrimination and protecting the civil rights of all Americans."


That is the point the café and its chorus refuse to grasp. You may despise Israel. You may chant for Palestine until the cups rattle. You may even, in the moral slum that parts of American progressivism have become, treat Hamas as folklore. What you may not do is open a shop to the public and then decide that Jews, identified by the oldest emblem of their faith and peoplehood, are unfit to sit down. 

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee [but not at the Jerusalem Cafe] at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Zionism is not a hat crime. It is the name for the Jewish refusal to be murdered again and then lectured about it. Oakland has produced a case study in how anti-Semitism now travels. It arrives as solidarity. It names its drinks after killers. It tells a five-year-old that his father must leave. Then it files the paperwork of martyrdom and calls the courts a Zionist plot. Israel remains the only democracy in its neighborhood and the only state that would have been condemned for surviving October 7. The coffee shop is closed. The argument it made about Jews is not. 

That argument should lose.

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

PP told Dem AGs to shut down pro-life centers


Democrats Took Notes: Planned Parenthood Handed State Attorneys General a Post-Roe To-Do List

Apparently, overturning Roe v. Wade was not supposed to end the abortion industry’s relationship with government. It was merely supposed to move the relationship into the states, where Democrat attorneys general could continue doing what Washington had been doing for decades.

Just a month after the Supreme Court overturned Roe, Planned Parenthood circulated a 14-point memo giving state attorneys general a handy-dandy checklist for fighting back against the Dobbs decision. The document essentially amounted to an abortion-industry field manual, complete with instructions for targeting crisis pregnancy centers, pressuring federal regulators, enforcing state abortion laws and issuing abortion-friendly legal opinions.

And, according to documents obtained by the Daily Signal, several blue-state attorneys general appear to have read the memo and thought, “Excellent. Where do we sign?”

On July 25, 2022, Brittany Jenkins, policy director of the Progressive State Leaders Committee, forwarded the Planned Parenthood memo to attorneys general and their staffs. Jenkins informed them that Rachel Sussman, Planned Parenthood’s vice president of state policy, would brief them the following day “to continue our discussion of continued actions AGs can take in response to the Dobbs decision.”

The memo declared war on pro-life crisis pregnancy centers, organizations that provide expecting mothers with food, clothing, shelter, counseling and other assistance while encouraging them not to abort their children.

Planned Parenthood apparently considered all that assistance suspicious.

“Provide information to the public about CPCs and take steps to curb their misleading and deceptive practices. For example, CA issued a Consumer Alert,” the memo stated. It also urged attorneys general to ask the Federal Trade Commission to “target misinformation perpetuated by crisis pregnancy centers regarding medication abortion.”

In other words, if someone is offering a pregnant woman diapers instead of an abortion, the government may need to investigate.

Less than a month later, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a “consumer alert” targeting crisis pregnancy centers because, apparently, “pregnant people” needed the government to explain which pregnancy-related organizations they were allowed to trust.

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin followed in December 2022 with his own consumer alert. He later subpoenaed First Choice, a crisis pregnancy center, demanding the names, phone numbers, addresses and places of employment of its individual donors.

Unfortunately for the subpoena, the First Amendment has an annoying habit of getting in the way.

In April of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that donors have a First Amendment right to contribute anonymously.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose state Planned Parenthood had already held up as an example, went even further, suing several crisis pregnancy centers. In October 2023, Bonta joined 15 other Democrat attorneys general in an open letter attacking the centers.

“We have watched with increasing concern in recent years as anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) have proliferated in our states, outnumbering abortion clinics by a three-to-one ratio,” the letter said.

Apparently, having three times as many places offering women an alternative to abortion is considered a crisis.

And the abortion industry was not merely making suggestions from the sidelines. According to documents obtained by the Daily Signal through a public records request to the office of Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, Planned Parenthood was coordinating with multiple state attorneys general.

That would be quite a coincidence, except that the memo helpfully provided the blueprint.

The Planned Parenthood memo urged states to use their own versions of the FACE Act, the federal law governing access to abortion clinics, pregnancy centers and houses of worship.

“States should utilize all state laws, including state FACE Acts, to protect health care facilities that provide abortion.”

Eight days later, Platkin announced a partnership with the U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New Jersey and issued guidance to state prosecutors concerning enforcement of clinic-access laws.

But Planned Parenthood was not finished handing out assignments.

The memo also encouraged attorneys general to issue legal opinions resolving abortion-related questions, including “guidance explicitly asserting consent to abortion rights for minors.”

According to the Center for American Progress, attorneys general in Arizona, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania subsequently issued guidance concerning abortion and medication abortion.

Planned Parenthood also urged states to coordinate legal representation for women seeking abortions, abortionists and abortion funds. Arizona, California, New Jersey and New York later established task forces for that purpose, according to the Center for American Progress.

At this point, calling the document a “memo” seems almost quaint. It looks more like a corporate franchise manual.

Step one: Target crisis pregnancy centers.

Step two: Pressure federal regulators.

Step three: Encourage state prosecutors to enforce abortion-friendly laws.

Step four: Issue legal opinions supporting abortion.

Step five: Establish task forces.

Step six: Hope nobody notices that the supposedly independent government officials are following the abortion industry's homework.

The revelations come after the Biden administration's Justice Department released an 882-page report detailing coordination between the administration and major abortion-industry groups, including Planned Parenthood, in efforts to use federal law enforcement against pro-life activists.

The documents now suggest that the strategy did not stop at the federal level.

Some attorneys general had already begun taking action before the Supreme Court handed down Dobbs. But Planned Parenthood's memo provided a remarkably specific roadmap that closely resembled policies subsequently adopted by several blue states.

Kaul’s office, which fulfilled its legal obligation to provide the records, did not respond to inquiries for this story.

A spokesperson for Planned Parenthood did not respond to phone and email inquiries.

Neither a spokesperson for the Progressive State Leaders Committee nor the Democratic Attorneys General Association responded to inquiries.

The Progressive State Leaders Committee is a 501(c)(4) advocacy group founded in 2005 that shares an address with the Democratic Attorneys General Association and, according to the Capital Research Center, lists no paid staff on its tax filing.

So there you have it.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe, Planned Parenthood produced the homework, and Democrat attorneys general apparently showed up to class prepared.

The only thing missing from the memo was a note at the bottom saying, “Please remember to turn in your assignment by Friday.”

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Friday, July 31, 2026

State takes kids away from Christian couple who refuse to agree their daughter is a boy



A Christian mom and her husband are fighting back in court after Oregon’s Department of Human Services determined that they caused “mental injury” to her daughter by refusing to “affirm” her transgender identity.

“It has destroyed our lives,” Nicole Calaway, the mother of two daughters who are now estranged because they both claim a transgender identity, told the Daily Signal in an interview Sunday. Child Protective Services took custody of her then-15-year-old daughter, K.A., on July 18, 2024, one day after Calaway and K.A. terminated the services of K.A.’s therapist, Jennifer Forster. 

According to court documents, Forster filed the complaint that resulted in K.A.’s removal. ODHS notified the Calaways that the agency considered them “responsible for the mental injury” of K.A. “Your adverse reactions to [K.A.] expressing their gender identity have caused serious harm to [K.A.’s] psychological functioning,” ODHS caseworker Rachel Woods wrote in a Sept. 13 letter. 

Calaway’s older daughter had already moved out. “I was so distraught, it felt like I was gutted,” the mother said. “Both my daughters were gone. I took myself to the hospital and admitted myself for a week because I couldn’t handle it.”

The mother remains estranged from her daughters, and Oregon has ordered her not to contact K.A. Yet the state’s findings haven’t just affected her maternal relationship. A Black Mark on the Parents’ RecordsThe “mental injury” finding constitutes a child abuse ruling on Calaway’s permanent record, and on the record of her husband, David. 

But seriously, what are the chances that both female siblings would believe they were males? That only seems to happen in the Hollywood crowd. 

The stigma of a state agency finding the two guilty of child abuse has followed them across state lines after their move to Florida in July 2025. “In Oregon, if they were to do a background check, I could have lost my notary license, I still cannot, even here, volunteer with the church, anything to do with children,” the mother told the Daily Signal.

The stigma may be even worse for her husband. Months after the two moved to Florida, the disgusting Oregon Department of Human Services determined that David Calaway had “exhibited a pattern of inappropriate grooming behaviors to include making inappropriate sexual comments while [K.A.] was in his care.” 

The husband vehemently contested the claims, saying he is innocent and was not given an opportunity to appeal. While the office made the determination in December 2025, he did not receive notification of it until May 12. 

The husband told the Daily Signal that his employment has yet to be affected by the matter, but he highlighted this message from the notice: “This abuse finding could have an impact on David Calaway’s ability to volunteer or to obtain or retain a professional license or certain types of employment.”

“If I was being accused of sexual abuse, wouldn’t there be a police record? Wouldn’t I be arrested? Wouldn’t I be in jail?” the husband asked. [I believe him.] 

“It’s like we’re guilty until proven innocent,” the mother said. The couple filed a lawsuit earlier this month, accusing the therapist, Forster, and ODHS agents of violating their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. 

The lawsuit states that ODHS had previously screened out one child abuse referral against the Calaways and found a second referral unfounded, both in 2023. K.A.’s father, Keith Allison, who sought custody of the daughter, claimed that K.A. was in immediate danger, but the court denied two of his motions in 2024. 

“On essentially the same facts later used to remove K.A., a neutral court had twice declined to find immediate danger, and ODHS had already once found the mental-injury allegation unfounded,” the lawsuit states. 

On May 23, 2024, K.A. left school with a friend and did not notify her mother. She told school staff that she did not feel safe at home because her mother had showed her videos opposing transgender ideology the night before. School staff insisted she be taken to a stabilization center. Later, K.A. apologized to her mother and thanked her for helping her “acknowledge reality.” 

On July 17, Nicole Calaway and K.A. spoke on the phone with Forster, and terminated her services. Both K.A. and her mother accused the therapist of hiding information from the mother. According to the lawsuit, ODHS caseworker Rachel Woods recommended Forster call the Child Protective Services hotline shortly after this call. Forster called the hotline the next morning, and made many claims the lawsuit describes as false.

The therapist said that the mother had “presented as aggressive and angry,” and that she said K.A. “would no longer have support.” 

Forster would also write that the mother terminated counseling out of a “desire to manage client’s mental health without counseling support.” The lawsuit claims these statements were false but gave ODHS a “fabricated appearance of urgency.” 

On July 18, ODHS and law enforcement officers removed K.A. from the Calaways’ home for “mental injury.”According to the lawsuit, ODHS concluded that Nicole Calaway’s decision to show her daughter videos presenting arguments against transgender ideology harmed her daughter’s psychological functioning. The Calaways dispute this, saying the agency treated disagreement with the ideology as child abuse. “When did the truth become mental injury?” David Calaway asked in an interview with the Daily Signal.

The Calaways appealed the decisions, but ODHS stood by the finding. In November 2024, ODHS voluntarily withdrew the dependency petition, by which the department had removed K.A. from the Calaways’ home. While the department had dismissed the underlying claim, it nonetheless maintained the child-abuse findings against the Calaways. The plaintiffs argue the dismissal undercuts the state’s justification for removing K.A. from their home. 

“It began with them accusing us because we’re conservative Christians, and we don’t affirm her transgender ideology, that we provided hours of lectures to teach her daughter that this ideology isn’t right for her, and isn’t healthy for her, and they come and remove her from the home, and that was their reasoning,” the husband told the Daily Signal. 

According to the lawsuit, the Calaways refused to “affirm” K.A. as “transgender” due to their conservative Christian convictions that “a person cannot change from one sex to the other” and their view “that so-called ‘gender-affirming care,’ including ‘social transition,is harmful to children and teens and has never been proven safe or effective.” 

The lawsuit cites the United Kingdom’s Kass Review and the Department of Health and Human Services’ study finding little evidence for positive impacts from sex-rejecting procedures. The lawsuit accuses Forster of engaging in therapeutic malpractice because she “knew, or in the exercise of reasonable professional care should have known, that so-called ‘gender-affirming care,’ including social transition, is not a proven, safe, or effective treatment for an adolescent girl and is psychologically harmful.” 

Nicole Calaway told the Daily Signal she presented multiple videos to her daughter, including testimonials of detransitioners, “because I wanted her to make an informed decision. I did not want her to ruin her body. I still do not want her to ruin her body.” 

The Calaways’ lawsuit cited 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming deprivation of rights under the color of law. They claim that the therapist and ODHS official conspired to use the power of the state to interfere with Nicole Calaway’s right to direct the care, custody, and upbringing of her child under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Calaways also claim defendants violated their rights to free speech and religious freedom under the First Amendment by attempting to force them to support transgender ideology. The lawsuit also claims that ODHS directed school officials to deny Nicole Calaway access to her daughter’s educational records, even though no court order restricted her parental rights.

The Christian couple seeks compensatory and general damages of at least $5 million, special and economic damages, punitive damages, a declaratory judgment in their favor, attorney’s fees, and an injunction removing them from a child abuse registry or a sex offender registry. 

This is yet another shining example of the progressive orthodoxy machine grinding up families that dare to notice biological reality. Oregon bureaucrats decided that a Christian couple’s refusal to play along with their daughter’s sudden identity crisis counts as “mental injury.” Because nothing says child protection like yanking a teenager out of her home the day after mom and daughter fire a therapist who was apparently more interested in ideology than actual therapy.

The Calaways get branded as abusers on their permanent records for the high crime of showing videos that challenge the prevailing dogma. Dad even gets hit with a late-breaking “grooming” accusation that somehow never involved the police, an arrest, or a jail cell. Funny how that works. Meanwhile the state shrugs off earlier findings that the claims were unfounded and a court that twice refused to declare the kid in immediate danger.

When the dependency petition gets quietly withdrawn months later, the abuse findings stay on the books like a scarlet letter that follows the couple all the way to Florida. Mom can’t volunteer at church. Dad wonders out loud if actual sexual abuse accusations usually skip the part where you get arrested. 

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

“It’s like we’re guilty until proven innocent,” she said, which is a pretty accurate description of how these systems operate once the sacred “gender identity” trigger gets pulled. The couple’s lawsuit lays it out plainly: they wouldn’t affirm something their faith and common sense both reject, and the state treated that as grounds to seize their child. They pointed to the Kass Review and the HHS study that found precious little evidence that “gender-affirming care” helps anyone, let alone adolescent girls. 

The therapist is accused of malpractice for pushing the opposite. 

Mom simply wanted her daughter to see the detransitioner stories before making irreversible decisions about her own body. This is what happens when the administrative state decides that disagreement with transgender ideology is itself a form of child abuse. Parental rights, free speech, and religious liberty get treated as optional suggestions once the orthodoxy is challenged. 

The Calaways are asking for damages and to have their names scrubbed from the registries. In a saner country that wouldn’t even be a close call.

Sunday, July 5, 2026

Orthodox Jewish Man Told He Needs Government Permission to Pray in His Own Living Room as Supreme Court Steps In


Apparently, in modern America, inviting friends over for prayer now requires less faith in God and more faith in the local zoning board.

What began as a simple email from an Orthodox Jewish man to a few friends somehow escalated into a full blown government operation worthy of a narcotics investigation. The only contraband? Prayer. No, not Islamic prayer; Jewish prayer and evidently, that's a problem.

According to Amy Curtis at Townhall, an online magazine, in 2021 Daniel Grand invited several friends to gather for prayer in his home. Someone forwarded that email to the City of University Heights, which responded by issuing a cease-and-desist order declaring that Grand's home had become a "place of religious assembly."

Because nothing says "public safety" quite like a minyan of Jewish men quietly praying in a living room.

The city demanded that Grand obtain a government permit before hosting religious services in his own home. Officials also instructed police and neighbors to monitor his house and report visitors, giving the entire affair an unsettling "see something, say something" flavor, except the suspicious activity was apparently people arriving with prayer books instead of burglary tools.

The case has now reached the Supreme Court, where Alliance Defending Freedom will argue that Americans do not need bureaucratic approval to exercise one of the nation's oldest constitutional freedoms.

Gee, yah think?

"Every American has the right to host a prayer gathering in his home, and he certainly doesn’t need a city permit to do so. When government officials forbid that, courts must hold those individuals accountable, immediately," said ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch. "The city’s actions underscore a troubling trend of weaponizing zoning laws against people of faith while allowing other gatherings of the same size, like book clubs or poker nights, to meet without issue. We’re pleased the Supreme Court will hear this case."

The comparison is impossible to ignore. 

Across America, public officials routinely accommodate large religious gatherings in parks, streets, and public spaces when they involve politically favored groups. Cities have approved amplified calls to prayer, street closures, and expansive mosque developments with little hesitation, often celebrating them as examples of diversity and inclusion.

Yet an Orthodox Jewish man hosting a few friends in his own home somehow becomes an alleged zoning menace requiring government surveillance. One has to wonder what would happen if the situation involved Muslims or even Christians. 

One has to wonder where the permit requirement begins and ends. Will families soon need city approval before reading the Bible around the dinner table? Will Bible studies require occupancy inspections? Perhaps neighborhood Hanukkah celebrations will need environmental impact statements.

The First Amendment was not written to protect only the fashionable religions of the moment. It was written precisely to prevent governments from deciding which faiths deserve freedom and which require paperwork.

Thankfully, the Supreme Court now has an opportunity to remind local officials that a private home is not government property, prayer is not a zoning violation, and constitutional rights do not come with an application fee.

And maybe, just maybe, the government officials who infringed on this man's First Amendment rights, can be held legally responsible.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Leftist mob attempted to crash Kash Patel's funeral trip


A mob of leftist protesters decided to harass FBI Director Kash Patel while he was reportedly in Portland, Oregon, attending a friend’s funeral this weekend because apparently nothing screams “saving democracy” like stalking federal officials outside a hotel.

According to Fox News, agitators swarmed the downtown area Saturday night after convincing themselves Patel was staying at the Sentinel Hotel. Social media footage showed protesters gathering outside the building, shouting rude slogans and waving professional signs in yet another example of the unhinged activism that has become routine during President Donald Trump’s second term.

The demonstrators claimed they were protesting the alleged “weaponization” of the FBI under Trump and Patel’s handling of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to FOX 12 Oregon. Evidently, the Left now thinks the proper response to political disagreement is tracking government aircraft and mobbing hotels.

It is still unclear where Patel actually stayed.

Police maintained a presence at the scene while unemployed and possibly paid protesters crowded outside the hotel entrance. Thankfully, unlike other recent left-wing demonstrations, the situation did not appear to devolve into leftist violence.

Fox News reported that activists used public flight-tracking data to monitor the Justice Department aircraft Patel reportedly uses. From there, they watched security activity downtown to determine which hotel he was “likely” staying at. Totally normal behavior that isn't well-appreciated by patrons of the hotel.

One protester admitted to Fox 12, “It wasn’t 100% confirmed but very likely he was at the Sentinel.” The same individual claimed the group gathered there “to protest the weaponization of Trump’s and Patel’s FBI to suppress our freedom of speech and freedom of press.”

Sure, surrounding a hotel and intimidating people attending a funeral definitely advances free speech.

Another protester who never personally met the FBI Director, or actually knew anything about him, simply called him “a creep,” because that is what he was told to think.

Others held professionally produced signs reading, “Kash Patel protects pedophiles” and “We don’t want you in our city, oink oink piggy piggy.”

Classy stuff from the self-proclaimed defenders of civility.

And this is becoming a trend. In January, leftist demonstrators in Minneapolis targeted both the Depot Renaissance Hotel and the Hilton Canopy Hotel because they believed ICE agents were staying there, according to Reuters. That protest escalated further, with rioters damaging property while attempting to force their way inside before police shut things down.

Remember when Democrats and the media spent years lecturing everyone about “political violence,” “threats to democracy,” and “dangerous rhetoric”? Funny how those concerns disappear when the mob is aimed at Trump officials.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Lordy, Lordy, Comey indicted for alleged threats against Trump



Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted for a second time by the Justice Department. The charges stem from that unforgettable May 2025 Instagram masterpiece: a photo of seashells arranged in "86 47" formation on a beach, evidently during one of Comey's famous nature walks.

Comey is charged with "knowingly and willfully making a threat to take the life of, or inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States and knowingly and willfully transmitting a communication in interstate and foreign commerce that contained a threat to kill President Donald Trump," according to the indictment.

Both charges, released Tuesday by the DOJ, carry up to 10 years in prison. This follows a predictable wave of Republican criticism and Trump administration officials pointing out that a former FBI boss posting what sure looked like a coded hit on the president might be, you know, a problem.

"I think it's fair to say that threatening the life of anybody is dangerous and potentially a crime threatening the life of the president of the United States will never be tolerated by the Department of Justice," Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters during a news conference without going into specifics of the case.

"While this case is unique and this indictment stands out because of the name of the defendant, his alleged conduct is the same kind of conduct that we will never tolerate and that we will always investigate and regularly prosecute," he added.


In the slang often used in the service industry, to "86" something means to eject, cancel or get rid of it, kind of the similar expression: to 'deep 6' something.  And Trump is the 47th president. A reasonable person familiar with the circumstances would interpret this image as a "serious expression of an intent to do harm" to the president, per the charges.

The indictment also includes a Forfeiture Notice. If convicted, Comey must forfeit any property or proceeds derived from his alleged unlawful activities to the government.

A grand jury issued an arrest warrant for Comey. Blanche said he expects communication with Comey's legal counsel.

U.S. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan, a George W. Bush appointee, has been assigned to the case.

"Well, they're back. This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago," Comey said in the 39-second clip. "But nothing has changed with me. I'm still innocent. I am still not afraid and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go."

Comey added that it was "really important that all of us remember this is not who we are as a country."

"This is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be. And the good news is we get closer every day to restoring those values," he added.

In a statement to Fox News, Comey's lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said, "Mr. Comey vigorously denies the charges contained in the Indictment filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina. We will contest these charges in the courtroom and look forward to vindicating Mr. Comey and the First Amendment."

Comey removed the social media post of the shells the same day it was uploaded, claiming he had misinterpreted the shells as a general political message.

"I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message," Comey wrote in a subsequent post. "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind, so I took the post down."

Following the post, Comey was questioned by the U.S. Secret Service in Washington D.C. At the time, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the former FBI chief should be "put behind bars" for allegedly "issuing a call to assassinate" Trump.

In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Trump rejected this explanation.

"He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant," Trump said. "If you're the FBI director, and you don't know what that meant, that meant ‘assassination,’ and it says it loud and clear."

House Judiciary Ranking Member Jamie Raskin criticized the move by the DOJ, while recalling Trump's own remarks about Democratic lawmakers who urged military service members to disobey unlawful orders and his statement about former Rep. Liz Cheney.

"Trump's DOJ just criminally indicted James Comey for a beach photo of seashells and no other evidence cited," he said. "If that’s a crime in America, then what is calling the free speech of six Democratic Members of Congress ‘seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH’? What is suggesting a former Republican Member of Congress should have to ‘face nine barrels shooting at her’ with ‘the guns trained on her face’?"

This second indictment against Comey comes just hours after a federal judge in New York allowed a separate lawsuit brought by his daughter, Maurene Comey, to move forward against the DOJ.

Maurene Comey, a former federal prosecutor, is suing the DOJ over what she describes as an unlawful dismissal. Her lawsuit alleges she was terminated "solely or substantially because her father is former FBI Director James B. Comey, or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs, or both."

Comey was fired by Trump in 2017 during his first term over the handling of the Russia investigation. Since then, Comey has been a vocal critic of the president.


In September 2025, Comey was charged with lying to Congress regarding press leaks. However, a federal judge dismissed that case after ruling that the prosecutor involved had been improperly appointed. Comey’s legal team has declined to comment on this latest indictment.Earlier this month, Blanche said Trump has a "right" and a "duty" to influence federal investigations, including those involving his political enemies who probed him in the past.

"We have thousands of ongoing investigations and prosecutions going on in this country right now. It is true that some of them involve men, women and entities that the president in the past has had issues with and believes should be investigated," Blanche said at a press conference.He previously dismissed the notion that the DOJ has improperly been going after Trump opponents.

On April 14, the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group published a report accusing the Biden administration of weaponizing federal law.

Poor Jim. The seashells were just innocent little shells, you guys. Nothing to see here except a guy who ran the FBI deciding to play amateur assassination semaphore on Instagram. The left is already melting down, because of course they are. This is going to be fun.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, please visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee for any amount--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.


Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Calif. proposes a bill to criminalize undercover journalism


California Democrat Assembly-member Mia Bonta authored bill AB 2624 which has advanced out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee on a reported 11-2 vote as of April 13th. It has yet to become law, but if it does, the Golden State will become even more Orwellian than it already is.

Let me 'splain.

Assembly-member Carl DeMaio and independent journalist and YouTuber Nick Shirley along with other critics, have dubbed the bill the "Stop Nick Shirley Act," asserting that it would put the kibosh on investigative journalism by allowing taxpayer-funded organizations [particularly those serving immigrant communities] to demand the removal of videos that record in or even around their facilities, while imposing civil penalties, (such as fines up to $10,000 in some descriptions). 

Nick Shirley has used public filming to expose alleged fraud in daycares, hospices, and government-funded programs, and opponents say the bill is a direct response to shield such entities from scrutiny.

So the 'Learing Centers' will remain in business by not providing services to children who don't go there, for example.

Supporters frame the bill as protecting privacy, particularly of those committing fraud, preventing doxxing/harassment, which is exceedingly a tactic on the left, and safeguarding vulnerable organizations or clients (e.g., in immigration support services and other 'Learing Centers') rather than broadly banning journalism. 

The bill targets the release or use of recordings in specific contexts involving fraudulent government-funded entities, not all undercover work. 

This is not the first time California has seen proposals affecting undercover or hidden-camera investigations. Past efforts included "ag-gag" [agriculture gag] style bills aimed at farms (to restrict secret filming of animal cruelty), some of which failed or were challenged on free speech grounds. An older bill (AB 1671 from 2016) sought to punish media for publishing certain undercover videos of health care providers but did not broadly pass in the criticized form.

Similar "ag-gag" laws in other states have faced court challenges for restricting First Amendment-protected news-gathering. As of April 15, 2026, AB 2624 remains in the legislative process (likely needing further votes in the Assembly and Senate, plus the governor's signature to become law). Some internet platforms make claims that it has already "passed" but it is only at the committee stage.

The bill's final scope, constitutionality (especially regarding public recordings or news gathering), and enforcement would depend on its exact text if enacted.

For the latest status, check the official California Legislative Information site (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov) for AB 2624. Free speech concerns around restrictions on filming in public or semi-public spaces tied to government funding have drawn significant criticism from journalists and transparency advocates across the spectrum.

Journalism is not dead--it's on life support.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.


Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Comrade Mamdani: New York's Mayor-Elect, Ready to "Protect" the City from Those Pesky Babies


Oh, joy. Comrade Zohran Mamdani, the freshly minted Mayor-elect of New York City, has decided that his first order of business, after the confetti settles and the socialist chants fade, is to play exterminator with pro-life pregnancy centers. 

During the campaign, he "vowed to 'protect' New Yorkers from pro-life pregnancy centers which he accused of spreading 'false or deceptive information.'" 

This isn't some vague threat; it's aimed straight at CompassCare, the plucky outfit running the city's only three pro-life medical pregnancy centers. Mamdani's tough-guy routine is basically a remix of the lawsuit filed by New York's Attorney General, pro-abortion firebrand Letitia James, who, surprise, endorsed the democratic socialist's bid for the big chair. It's like watching a bad buddy-cop movie where the villains high-five over their shared love of red ink and ruined lives.

Folks are understandably twitchy: How is this self-proclaimed Islamic communist going to treat the already shell-shocked Christian pro-life clinics like CompassCare? These places are dodging lawsuits from New York State busybodies, city ordinances that read like Satan's to-do list, James' endless legal jihad, Big Tech's digital Iron Curtain, and the ever-present whiff of pro-abortion rage-fests egged on by Democrats in Che Guevara drag. It's a miracle they haven't started selling "I Survived Albany" T-shirts yet.

But let's cut the drama: What can these centers actually brace for under Mayor Mamdani? 

It boils down to which of his pet fundamentalisms clocks in on day one. The religious zealot version, or the commie-utopian fever dream? Spoiler: Either way, it's a body blow to America's Constitutional setup, that dusty old Judeo-Christian foundation where "don't murder the vulnerable inconvenient" was kind of a big deal.

Remember the Declaration of Independence? You know, the one where our founders, those dead white guys the left loves to cancel, said we're all endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, starting with the right to, oh, not get vacuumed out of existence. Handing governments the keys to decide who's "human enough" for protection is how you end up with guillotines for the disabled, the sick, the old, the sad sacks, or anyone who forgot to like the right tweet. 

History's littered with dictators who started with "exceptions" and ended with mass graves. Pro tip: Don't be that society.

And don't forget the Bill of Rights, guys. 

First Amendment: Free speech and religion, so pro-lifers can holler about the unborn without Big Brother slapping a gag order. Fifth: No stripping life, liberty, or property without due process, sorry, Planned Parenthood, that "clump of cells" schtick doesn't fly in court. Fourteenth: Equal protection for all persons, not just the ones who've aced their first ultrasound.

Here's the dirty little secret that'd make Mamdani and his pro-abortion Dem pals choke on their fair-trade lattes: They couldn't care less about "women's rights" or "choice." If they did, they'd admit abortion is the ultimate cover for NYC's sex-trafficking slimeballs, glove over the bloody fingerprints, and that it jacks up breast cancer risk by 44%, preterm births by 52%, and suicide odds by a factor of five. No, they love abortion for the power trip: Whip up the sisterhood with feel-good slogans, harvest the votes, then torch the rule of law while everyone's too busy fist-pumping to notice.

In the end, propping up this Frankenstein "right" to abort clashes head-on with the real deal—life for the kid, freedoms in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth. It's a slick legal shell game, funneling control to the elite puppeteers who get off on herding the masses into appetite-driven servitude.

It's about as American as a gulag.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Friday, November 7, 2025

Governor who's committing suicide by food wants Illinois to allow state's visitors to commit suicide too



Illinois Democrats are at it again, shoving through a ghoulish Halloween special that's straight out of a dystopian nightmare: a bill to turn the Land of Lincoln into a one-stop shop for assisted suicide, all while trampling on the religious freedoms of doctors who actually believe in the sanctity of life. And it's just sitting there on Gov. J.B. Pritzker's desk, waiting for his progressive pen to make it official.

In the witching hour just after midnight on All Hallows' Eve, Illinois Senate Democrats bulldozed this death-on-demand legislation through in a 30-27 vote, capping off a House passage back in May. The measure would green-light doctors to hand out lethal prescriptions to terminal patients with six months or less to live, because this is how the left views "compassion."

But here's where it gets even more insidious: Conservative watchdogs are sounding the alarm that this isn't just about "choice," it's a full-frontal assault on faith-based medicine, forcing Christian physicians and hospitals to play along with the grim reaper's playbook.

"You're not just allowing physicians to give people deadly drugs to kill themselves, but you're actually forcing us or people of faith, to be part of it, to promote it," Peter Breen, head of litigation at the Thomas More Society, laid it out bluntly to conservative outlet The Daily Wire. "I know of no other state where the legislature has gone this far in restricting the religious liberty rights of people of faith."

Sure, the bill pays lip service to opt-outs for doctors who won't pull the trigger themselves. But Breen isn't buying it.

 Buried in the fine print are mandates that would compel institutions and physicians to refer patients to the poison pill parade and even advertise the "opportunity" to check out early. It's coercion dressed up as consent.


Worse, Breen warns, the language would tie the hands of Christian hospitals, making it impossible to boot a doctor who peddles assisted dying on the side, on or off campus. Because why stop at killing the patient when you can kill religious liberty too?

Ten states plus D.C. already flirt with this folly on both coasts, but Illinois? This would plant the flag of euthanasia smack in America's heartland, a beacon for the terminally ill from flyover country, and beyond.

"Illinois would become the first state in the middle of the country to enact assisted suicide," Breen hammered home. "There’s a significant concern that this is going to turn Illinois into a suicide tourism state."

What the Prairie State Democrats are peddling here is beyond the pale, a direct middle finger to Christian ethics that value life until the last breath. The Illinois Catholic Conference has blasted the bill and begged Biggie Pritzker to spike it like a bad shot.

Pritzker eyes the other sandwich

Even Breen, no fan of the governor's hard-left bona fides, clings to a sliver of optimism: Pritzker might actually veto this monstrosity over the First Amendment fallout. Fingers crossed, because the guy's track record isn't exactly a rosary of restraint.

For his part, Pritzker's playing the empathy card without committing. "I know how terrible it is that someone who's in the last six months of their life could be experiencing terrible pain and anguish. And I know people who’ve gone through that," he mused Monday. "It hits me deeply and makes me wonder about, you know, how we can alleviate the pain that they’re going through?"

If he inks this abomination, though? Game on. Breen vows the Thomas More Society will haul Illinois into court faster than you can say "equal protection." They've already tangled with the state over a prior outrage forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to shill for abortion, talk about déjà vu from hell. Let's hope the judge's gavel rings louder than the Democrats' death knell.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Kamala Hahaharris Tried to Explain How an Algorithm Works--"Pass the Italian Dressing Please"

Former Vice President Kamala Harris appears to be keeping the door open to another standard-issue presidential run. If her recent appearanc...