Showing posts with label Roe v Wade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roe v Wade. Show all posts

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Was James Talarico in a mental institution or did he actually have the flu?


Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico has returned to the campaign trail after nearly two weeks out of public view, but a recorded phone call alleging he was discharged from an Ohio mental-health facility has intensified scrutiny of his absence. His campaign insists he was home in Austin recovering from the flu. So far, neither the allegation nor the campaign’s account has been independently verified in full. 

But we all know a politician and his staff, would never lie on their behalf.

The state representative went roughly 12 days without an in-person campaign appearance in late September and early October. His campaign blamed influenza, saying he was diagnosed at a Dallas urgent-care facility on September 30 and recovered at home in Austin.

And we all know a politician and his staff, would never lie on their behalf.

For a candidate hoping to flip a Republican Senate seat, disappearing during a critical stretch of the campaign is hardly ideal. President Donald Trump, Republican nominee Ken Paxton, and political commentators all took notice.

Talarico resurfaced at the festival on October 9. Campaign spokesman JT Ennis posted video of the candidate and declared, “Hate to disappoint the conspiracy theorists, but James is still alive and meeting with voters at ACL today.”

Being alive and attending a music festival, however, does not answer every question about an extended absence. If you pay attention to some of the things he had said, including his take on Christianity, you would not be surprised to hear another take on where he actually was during his absence.

On October 11, independent journalists Nick Sortor and Rhein Amacher released a recording of a phone call with an unidentified employee at the Lindner Center of Hope, a residential mental-health facility in Mason, Ohio. According to the journalists, the employee reportedly said, after a pause, that Talarico “was just discharged this evening,” or within the preceding 24 to 48 hours, and confirmed the facility's name.


Sortor and others have presented the recording as evidence that Talarico was a patient there, contradicting the campaign's explanation that he was recovering from the flu at home in Austin. Related reporting has cited private-flight tracking involving a nearby Ohio airport and the fact that Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo previously stayed at the same facility. Neither detail independently establishes that Talarico received treatment there.
 
The campaign has categorically denied the allegation.

Ennis responded: “This is a lie designed to promote a pathetic conspiracy theory. Last week James Talarico was home in Austin, Texas recovering from the flu.”

The facility has issued no public confirmation of Talarico's alleged stay. Subsequent callers, including Brian Krassenstein, reportedly received the standard response that patient information cannot be confirmed or denied.

As of October 11, no official records, facility statement, or independent verification establishes that Talarico was treated at the center. The recording has fueled speculation, but it does not conclusively prove the allegation. Earlier reporting also described the mental-health rumors as unverified.


The distinction matters. Voters have every right to question a candidate's unexplained absence, but allegations should not be presented as established facts without evidence.

Talarico offered his own explanation during a September 30 video appearance at the United States Hispanic Business Council's “In Dialogue: Texas” candidate forum in Edinburg. He had originally planned to attend in person.

“I was starting to feel kind of under the weather a few days ago and last night it got so bad that I went to the urgent care here in Dallas, and I was diagnosed with the flu.”

His last scheduled in-person appearance before the illness was reportedly a September 28 New York fundraiser featuring actor Robert De Niro.

Talarico is expected to resume a full schedule of in-person events. CNN and Jubilee Media have also scheduled a live town hall with him in Fort Worth for October 14 at 7 p.m. Central, with Paxton invited.

That appearance will give Talarico another opportunity to address voters. Whether he can put the controversy behind him remains to be seen.
A Candidate With a Rather Unusual Christian Message

Talarico has made Christianity central to his political identity. His campaign describes him as “a Presbyterian seminarian studying to become a pastor.”

Yet his policy positions include support for federal legislation codifying Roe v. Wade and protecting same-sex marriage, putting him at odds with many traditional Christians.

His longtime Austin congregation, St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church, has previously listed Planned Parenthood Greater Texas among organizations that shared its “vision and goals for the world.” The church's benevolence budget has also supported the organization, according to The Dallas Express.

Talarico has also attracted criticism for declaring that “God is non-binary” and arguing that there were six biological sexes. He subsequently revised those positions.

In a September Fox News interview, he acknowledged that he had “missed the mark on some of my past statements,” said there are two sexes, and supported a federal ban on sex-alteration surgeries for minors.

The reversal raises an obvious political question: Has Talarico genuinely reconsidered his views, or is he adjusting his message to appeal to Texas voters as Election Day approaches?

Even some on the left have expressed dissatisfaction. The Washington Post reported that Texas Stonewall Democrats leader Robert Vargas III called Talarico's recent remarks “a significant shift,” while Equality Texas CEO Brad Pritchett said, “We expect better.”

Meanwhile, socialist streamer Hasan Piker has applied pressure from another direction. At a September 30 event at the University of Texas at Austin, Piker told activists who helped Talarico win his primary to remind the candidate who put him in power. As The Dallas Express reported, Piker said that “if he wants to maintain it he’s got to play ball.”

Talarico must therefore navigate competing demands from progressive activists while attempting to reassure voters who may be uncomfortable with his earlier statements. His challenge is to explain whether his changing positions reflect genuine conviction or political expediency.
Democratic Unity Shows Cracks

Talarico's difficulties extend beyond Republicans and religious conservatives.


The Congressional Black Caucus PAC endorsed him in September, and Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett publicly supported him after losing her own primary. Yet Crockett's Fueling Individual Rights Everywhere PAC later released an endorsement list that did not include Talarico.

That omission does not establish a falling-out, but it illustrates the complications facing a nominee who must unite competing factions of his party.

Sheena Flanary, a former Collin County Democratic Party chair who now serves as Texas Democratic Party vice chair for voter engagement, also said in an undercover recording that Talarico's campaign had rebuffed her offers of assistance, according to The Dallas Express.

Talarico has faced pointed questions from Black voters before, including at a July 19 town hall in Houston.

Winning the Democratic nomination is one thing. Building a statewide coalition is another. Talarico must persuade voters that his candidacy offers more than carefully calibrated messaging designed to appease whichever faction happens to be demanding his attention.
Why the Race Matters

Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, compared with 45 Democrats and two independents who caucus with them. A Democratic victory in Texas would eliminate one Republican seat in a cycle in which Democrats need a net gain of four seats to reach 51.

Texas has not elected a Democrat to the U.S. Senate since Lloyd Bentsen won reelection in 1988. Flipping the state would therefore represent a major Democratic victory, with consequences for legislation, judicial confirmations, federal spending, and President Donald Trump's agenda.

For Republicans, the opportunity is to make Talarico defend his record, his shifting positions, and his vision for the country. For Talarico, the challenge is to demonstrate that he can withstand scrutiny and represent Texans rather than simply satisfy the demands of progressive activists.

The allegation concerning the Ohio mental-health facility remains unverified and should be treated accordingly. But the broader questions surrounding Talarico's campaign, including his public statements and ability to manage a high-stakes Senate race, are legitimate subjects of debate.

Voters need neither accept every campaign explanation at face value nor believe every rumor circulating online. They should demand evidence, examine the candidates' records, and judge them on their policies and conduct.

Early voting in Texas begins October 19 and runs through October 30. Election Day is November 3.

Talarico's return to public view may end his absence from the campaign trail, but it does not end the scrutiny. With control of the Senate potentially at stake, Texas voters deserve a clear account of what their candidates believe, what they intend to do in Washington, and why they should be trusted with the responsibility.

Dear readers, please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.



Wednesday, August 26, 2026

James "with a nutsack' Talarico trashes "neighbors with a uterus"





Democratic Senate nominee James "With A Nutsack" Talarico has apparently discovered the secret to progressive theology: if you reduce a woman to a reproductive organ, you can then explain why protecting unborn children is somehow oppressive.

The Texas state representative and failed Presbyterian seminarian has repeatedly referred to women as “neighbors with a uterus” while defending the killing of babies in the uterus, apparently deciding that “women” was simply too biologically specific for the modern progressive vocabulary. What kind of Christian believes that garbage?

In one clip addressing a congregation after the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Talarico declared: “Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the state.”

This is, of course, a rather creative interpretation of what the Supreme Court actually did. The Court didn't announce that women had suddenly become government property. It simply returned the abortion question to the states, allowing voters and their elected representatives to decide whether unborn children should be legally protected. That's why we call our country is a republic, specifically a democratic republic.

Apparently, in Talarico's fake theological universe, allowing citizens to debate whether unborn babies should be protected constitutes government ownership of women. Somehow the unborn child, who is actually the one being killed, manages to disappear entirely from the argument--how convenient.

Talarico has also declared that he wants “our neighbors with a uterus to be able to control their own body.”

The phrase is certainly useful if the objective is to discuss abortion without mentioning the inconvenient biological reality that there are two bodies involved, much like the two tiny nuts in his sack.

A 2024 recording provides another glimpse into Talarico's linguistic gymnastics. While discussing the morality of abortion, he began to say “woman” before correcting himself and returning to his preferred leftist terminology.

Apparently, even the word “woman” has now been placed on the progressive theological watchlist.

Talarico later shared a version of his remarks on X in November 2022, accompanying video of himself bloviating: “This summer, more than half our population became second-class citizens. Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the State. And nothing is more un-Christian.”

Talarico replaces “woman” with a description from a medical textbook and then declares that anyone who disagrees with you is violating Christianity is contradicts Christian theology.

Jimmy with a nutsack has used the phrase repeatedly when discussing biological women and has even declared that “our trans community needs abortion care too,” apparently overlooking the minor biological inconvenience that men who claim to be women do not become pregnant simply because a progressive politician says they can.

Pro-life observers have condemned the language as demeaning and dehumanizing, arguing that reducing women to a single body part is hardly the great feminist breakthrough progressives claim it to be. Apparently, the movement that once insisted women should be valued as complete human beings has now decided that “uterus” is the preferred substitute for “woman.”

Religious and political figures have also sharply criticized Talarico's theological arguments, accusing him of bending Scripture to accommodate progressive political orthodoxy.

Islam much?

Evangelist Franklin Graham rejected Talarico's claim that Scripture is silent on abortion, saying: “Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico couldn’t be more wrong! The Bible is not silent on abortion as he claims—that’s an absolute lie. God commands us, ‘You shall not murder’ (Exodus 20:13). Abortion is taking a life—it is murder.”

Graham further warned: “Don’t be deceived by wicked politicians spouting lies like this.”

Daily Wire host Matt Walsh has likewise accused Talarico of twisting biblical teaching concerning life in the womb, describing him as a “creepy-looking heretic and fake pastor who pathologically lies to Christians over and over again about what the scripture says… he is completely insane.”

And evil, if you really consider what he spouts.

Blaze Media host Allie Beth Stuckey has also challenged Talarico's theological arguments, calling his use of Scripture to justify abortion “absurdly evil” and “demonic.”

The controversy, originally amplified earlier this year by groups supporting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, has resurfaced as the Senate race heats up.

And if Talarico's rhetoric is any indication, voters can apparently look forward to a Senate campaign in which the Democratic nominee explains that women are actually “neighbors with a uterus,” unborn children are apparently a secondary consideration, and the Bible becomes considerably more flexible whenever progressive politics needs a little divine assistance.

At this rate, the Ten Commandments may soon require a progressive translation. “You shall not murder” could become “Please respect everyone's reproductive choices,” while “Honor thy father and mother” will presumably be replaced by “Ask your neighbors with a uterus.”

Progressive theology has never sounded so strangely anatomical. 

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


PP told Dem AGs to shut down pro-life centers


Democrats Took Notes: Planned Parenthood Handed State Attorneys General a Post-Roe To-Do List

Apparently, overturning Roe v. Wade was not supposed to end the abortion industry’s relationship with government. It was merely supposed to move the relationship into the states, where Democrat attorneys general could continue doing what Washington had been doing for decades.

Just a month after the Supreme Court overturned Roe, Planned Parenthood circulated a 14-point memo giving state attorneys general a handy-dandy checklist for fighting back against the Dobbs decision. The document essentially amounted to an abortion-industry field manual, complete with instructions for targeting crisis pregnancy centers, pressuring federal regulators, enforcing state abortion laws and issuing abortion-friendly legal opinions.

And, according to documents obtained by the Daily Signal, several blue-state attorneys general appear to have read the memo and thought, “Excellent. Where do we sign?”

On July 25, 2022, Brittany Jenkins, policy director of the Progressive State Leaders Committee, forwarded the Planned Parenthood memo to attorneys general and their staffs. Jenkins informed them that Rachel Sussman, Planned Parenthood’s vice president of state policy, would brief them the following day “to continue our discussion of continued actions AGs can take in response to the Dobbs decision.”

The memo declared war on pro-life crisis pregnancy centers, organizations that provide expecting mothers with food, clothing, shelter, counseling and other assistance while encouraging them not to abort their children.

Planned Parenthood apparently considered all that assistance suspicious.

“Provide information to the public about CPCs and take steps to curb their misleading and deceptive practices. For example, CA issued a Consumer Alert,” the memo stated. It also urged attorneys general to ask the Federal Trade Commission to “target misinformation perpetuated by crisis pregnancy centers regarding medication abortion.”

In other words, if someone is offering a pregnant woman diapers instead of an abortion, the government may need to investigate.

Less than a month later, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a “consumer alert” targeting crisis pregnancy centers because, apparently, “pregnant people” needed the government to explain which pregnancy-related organizations they were allowed to trust.

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin followed in December 2022 with his own consumer alert. He later subpoenaed First Choice, a crisis pregnancy center, demanding the names, phone numbers, addresses and places of employment of its individual donors.

Unfortunately for the subpoena, the First Amendment has an annoying habit of getting in the way.

In April of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that donors have a First Amendment right to contribute anonymously.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose state Planned Parenthood had already held up as an example, went even further, suing several crisis pregnancy centers. In October 2023, Bonta joined 15 other Democrat attorneys general in an open letter attacking the centers.

“We have watched with increasing concern in recent years as anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) have proliferated in our states, outnumbering abortion clinics by a three-to-one ratio,” the letter said.

Apparently, having three times as many places offering women an alternative to abortion is considered a crisis.

And the abortion industry was not merely making suggestions from the sidelines. According to documents obtained by the Daily Signal through a public records request to the office of Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, Planned Parenthood was coordinating with multiple state attorneys general.

That would be quite a coincidence, except that the memo helpfully provided the blueprint.

The Planned Parenthood memo urged states to use their own versions of the FACE Act, the federal law governing access to abortion clinics, pregnancy centers and houses of worship.

“States should utilize all state laws, including state FACE Acts, to protect health care facilities that provide abortion.”

Eight days later, Platkin announced a partnership with the U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New Jersey and issued guidance to state prosecutors concerning enforcement of clinic-access laws.

But Planned Parenthood was not finished handing out assignments.

The memo also encouraged attorneys general to issue legal opinions resolving abortion-related questions, including “guidance explicitly asserting consent to abortion rights for minors.”

According to the Center for American Progress, attorneys general in Arizona, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania subsequently issued guidance concerning abortion and medication abortion.

Planned Parenthood also urged states to coordinate legal representation for women seeking abortions, abortionists and abortion funds. Arizona, California, New Jersey and New York later established task forces for that purpose, according to the Center for American Progress.

At this point, calling the document a “memo” seems almost quaint. It looks more like a corporate franchise manual.

Step one: Target crisis pregnancy centers.

Step two: Pressure federal regulators.

Step three: Encourage state prosecutors to enforce abortion-friendly laws.

Step four: Issue legal opinions supporting abortion.

Step five: Establish task forces.

Step six: Hope nobody notices that the supposedly independent government officials are following the abortion industry's homework.

The revelations come after the Biden administration's Justice Department released an 882-page report detailing coordination between the administration and major abortion-industry groups, including Planned Parenthood, in efforts to use federal law enforcement against pro-life activists.

The documents now suggest that the strategy did not stop at the federal level.

Some attorneys general had already begun taking action before the Supreme Court handed down Dobbs. But Planned Parenthood's memo provided a remarkably specific roadmap that closely resembled policies subsequently adopted by several blue states.

Kaul’s office, which fulfilled its legal obligation to provide the records, did not respond to inquiries for this story.

A spokesperson for Planned Parenthood did not respond to phone and email inquiries.

Neither a spokesperson for the Progressive State Leaders Committee nor the Democratic Attorneys General Association responded to inquiries.

The Progressive State Leaders Committee is a 501(c)(4) advocacy group founded in 2005 that shares an address with the Democratic Attorneys General Association and, according to the Capital Research Center, lists no paid staff on its tax filing.

So there you have it.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe, Planned Parenthood produced the homework, and Democrat attorneys general apparently showed up to class prepared.

The only thing missing from the memo was a note at the bottom saying, “Please remember to turn in your assignment by Friday.”

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Iran regime's January crackdown murdered 221 children

In late December 2025, economic grievances ignited nationwide protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran that rapidly escalated into systemic...