James "with a nutsack' Talarico trashes "neighbors with a uterus"

Democratic Senate nominee James "With A Nutsack" Talarico has apparently discovered the secret to progressive theology: if you reduce a woman to a reproductive organ, you can then explain why protecting unborn children is somehow oppressive.

The Texas state representative and failed Presbyterian seminarian has repeatedly referred to women as “neighbors with a uterus” while defending the killing of babies in the uterus, apparently deciding that “women” was simply too biologically specific for the modern progressive vocabulary. What kind of Christian believes that garbage?

In one clip addressing a congregation after the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Talarico declared: “Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the state.”

This is, of course, a rather creative interpretation of what the Supreme Court actually did. The Court didn't announce that women had suddenly become government property. It simply returned the abortion question to the states, allowing voters and their elected representatives to decide whether unborn children should be legally protected. That's why we call our country is a republic, specifically a democratic republic.

Apparently, in Talarico's fake theological universe, allowing citizens to debate whether unborn babies should be protected constitutes government ownership of women. Somehow the unborn child, who is actually the one being killed, manages to disappear entirely from the argument--how convenient.

Talarico has also declared that he wants “our neighbors with a uterus to be able to control their own body.”

The phrase is certainly useful if the objective is to discuss abortion without mentioning the inconvenient biological reality that there are two bodies involved, much like the two tiny nuts in his sack.

A 2024 recording provides another glimpse into Talarico's linguistic gymnastics. While discussing the morality of abortion, he began to say “woman” before correcting himself and returning to his preferred leftist terminology.

Apparently, even the word “woman” has now been placed on the progressive theological watchlist.

Talarico later shared a version of his remarks on X in November 2022, accompanying video of himself bloviating: “This summer, more than half our population became second-class citizens. Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the State. And nothing is more un-Christian.”

Talarico replaces “woman” with a description from a medical textbook and then declares that anyone who disagrees with you is violating Christianity is contradicts Christian theology.

Jimmy with a nutsack has used the phrase repeatedly when discussing biological women and has even declared that “our trans community needs abortion care too,” apparently overlooking the minor biological inconvenience that men who claim to be women do not become pregnant simply because a progressive politician says they can.

Pro-life observers have condemned the language as demeaning and dehumanizing, arguing that reducing women to a single body part is hardly the great feminist breakthrough progressives claim it to be. Apparently, the movement that once insisted women should be valued as complete human beings has now decided that “uterus” is the preferred substitute for “woman.”

Religious and political figures have also sharply criticized Talarico's theological arguments, accusing him of bending Scripture to accommodate progressive political orthodoxy.

Islam much?

Evangelist Franklin Graham rejected Talarico's claim that Scripture is silent on abortion, saying: “Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico couldn’t be more wrong! The Bible is not silent on abortion as he claims—that’s an absolute lie. God commands us, ‘You shall not murder’ (Exodus 20:13). Abortion is taking a life—it is murder.”

Graham further warned: “Don’t be deceived by wicked politicians spouting lies like this.”

Daily Wire host Matt Walsh has likewise accused Talarico of twisting biblical teaching concerning life in the womb, describing him as a “creepy-looking heretic and fake pastor who pathologically lies to Christians over and over again about what the scripture says… he is completely insane.”

And evil, if you really consider what he spouts.

Blaze Media host Allie Beth Stuckey has also challenged Talarico's theological arguments, calling his use of Scripture to justify abortion “absurdly evil” and “demonic.”

The controversy, originally amplified earlier this year by groups supporting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, has resurfaced as the Senate race heats up.

And if Talarico's rhetoric is any indication, voters can apparently look forward to a Senate campaign in which the Democratic nominee explains that women are actually “neighbors with a uterus,” unborn children are apparently a secondary consideration, and the Bible becomes considerably more flexible whenever progressive politics needs a little divine assistance.

At this rate, the Ten Commandments may soon require a progressive translation. “You shall not murder” could become “Please respect everyone's reproductive choices,” while “Honor thy father and mother” will presumably be replaced by “Ask your neighbors with a uterus.”

Progressive theology has never sounded so strangely anatomical. 

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Democrats Scramble to Replace One Embarrassing Candidate With Guy Who Had Kids With His Second Cousin

[COUSIN] BANGOR, ME — The Democratic Party, ever the champions of normalcy and family values, has once again demonstrated its unmatched talent for candidate selection. 

After Graham "HH" Platner withdrew from the Maine Senate race amid a rape allegation (which he called "categorically false"), party leaders tapped Troy Jackson as their shiny new replacement. A Maine Wire report soon revealed that Jackson and his high school sweetheart share the same great-grandparents, and the couple has two adult sons together. 

But at least they aren't siblings like Ilhan Omar.

Jackson, a former state senator and failed gubernatorial candidate, was formally nominated at the Maine Democratic Party's U.S. Senate Nominating Convention earlier this month. The report noted that such relationships are not uncommon in northern rural Maine and remain perfectly legal, a detail that only heightened the internet's reaction.  

Conservatives wasted no time celebrating the party's latest personnel decision."Can’t wait for Democrats to defend cousin marriage!," Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), posted on X.

"If you thought Platner was a freak - meet Troy Jackson," former White House press secretary Sean Spicer posted on X.

"WTF?! Maine’s new Democratic Senate candidate Troy Jackson is in a ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP with his COUSIN, and has TWO CHILDREN with her. THIS is the guy the Democrat Party swapped Graham Platner out for," conservative influencer Nick Sortor posted on X.

I have no idea WTF stands for but it sounds bad.

"The Democrats are having a REALLY tough time finding candidates who aren’t total freaks," Sortor added.

"Troy Jackson's 'partner' is his second cousin, according to genealogical records found in Maine. Which means his kids are also his third cousins. Who said Democrats were anti-family?" Drew Berkemeyer, a writer for the Daily Wire, posted on X.

In a post on X, Independent Women's Forum Senior Policy Analyst Inez Stepman wrote, "Second cousins seem like relevant information here. But it is funny that Dems keep selecting candidates who fit the vicious stereotypes they hold about rural or working-class people: beats women, hooks up with cousin, etc."

"It's truly hysterical how Democrats can't seem to find one normal dude to run for office," conservative commentator Greg Price posted on X. The Republican account on X also posted, "Wellness check on Maine Democrats." 

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

The Jackson campaign responded by changing the subject, telling Fox News Digital: "Susan Collins will do anything to distract from the fact that she votes with Trump 96% of the time and has sold out working people in Maine. Personal attacks on Troy's family are shameful and desperate."

Jackson will face incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins on Nov. 3 as Republicans work to protect their 53-47 Senate majority. In the meantime, Maine Democrats continue their proud tradition of proving that when it comes to finding candidates free of personal baggage, they remain the gold standard of political incompetence.

Tweet

GOP-er Tony Gonzales will retire from Congress: admits the affair with aide

Well, folks, strap in because the swamp is serving up another double helping of congressional sleaze today, and the timing is almost too perfect to be accidental.

Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) announced Monday that he plans to file his retirement from Congress on Tuesday after admitting to an affair with a former staffer who committed suicide last year.

“There is a season for everything and God has a plan for us all. When Congress returns tomorrow, I will file my retirement from office. It has been my privilege to serve the great people of Texas,” Gonzales posted on X, invoking his intimate relationship with G_d.

This mini bombshell dropped about an hour after Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said he’d be stepping down over his own sex scandal. These bipartisan scumcrumpets should walk away holding hands as they walk toward the sunset with their women folk.

Back in early March, Gonzales had already dropped his re-election bid in Texas’s 23rd Congressional District after getting dragged into a runoff by feisty GOP challenger Brandon Herrera. He’d also been catching heat from fellow Republicans who were loudly suggesting he might want to consider resigning his seat.

Those calls got a lot louder once Gonzales owned up to the affair with former staffer Regina Santos-Aviles, a 35-year-old married mother who, according to the fire department, “doused herself in gasoline and was ignited into flames” in the backyard of her Uvalde, Texas home. 

Conservative media The Daily Wire had reported that Gonzales claimed the affair wrapped up in the summer of 2024, more than a year before Santos-Aviles took her own life. But those text messages the San Antonio Express-News published back in February painted a rather uncomfortable picture, with Gonzales apparently making some very direct sexual requests to the woman who worked for him.

Let's face it, politicians behaving badly is hardly breaking news, but when it ends in tragedy and then gets wrapped up in a neat little “God has a plan” bow, it’s enough to make even the most jaded observer roll their eyes. 

The voters in Texas-23 deserved better. Hell, the staffers who have to work in these offices deserve better. And the taxpayers footing the bill for all of it are the ones who really get screwed every single time.

Another day, another reminder that power attracts exactly the kind of people you wouldn’t want babysitting your kids. Enjoy your retirement, Congressman. Try not to set anything else on fire on the way out.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Trump admin freezes 'all child care payments' to MN due to daycare fraud scandal

Gov, Tim Walz

Happy New Year's Eve, dear friends. As we close out 2025 with a bang, or in Minnesota's case, the sound of a money spigot being slammed shut, it's time to celebrate the Trump administration finally doing what Democrats have been pretending to do for years: actually fighting fraud.

The Department of Health and Human Services dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing they've frozen every last dime of child care payments to the Land of 10,000 Lakes (and apparently endless scams) amid a massive fraud scandal that's been bubbling under the surface.

“We have frozen all child care payments to the state of Minnesota,” Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill and Administration for Children & Families Assistant Secretary Alex Adams declared in a video posted on X. “You have probably read the serious allegations that the state of Minnesota has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to fraudulent daycares across Minnesota over the past decade.”

HHS laid out three no-nonsense moves to tackle what they called the “blatant fraud that appears to be rampant in Minnesota and across the country.” First up: flipping the switch on their “Defend the Spend system,” which now demands justification plus a receipt or photo evidence before any federal bucks head to a state.

Second: Thanks to the dogged investigative work of journalist Nick Shirley over recent months, O’Neill and his team have zeroed in on the folks featured in Shirley's videos. They're now demanding a “comprehensive audit of these centers,” covering everything from attendance records and licenses to complaints, investigations, inspections, and beyond.

Nick Shirley

Third: HHS is rolling out a dedicated fraud reporting hotline and email address so parents, providers, and everyday Americans can drop tips on the grifters.

“We have turned off the money spigot and we are finding the fraud,” the officials said.Shirley's viral videos have been spotlighting some seriously sketchy activity around Minneapolis, showing alleged daycare and autism centers that look more like ghost towns than places caring for kids. This all piles onto earlier revelations, like a federal prosecutor estimating at least $9 billion in fraud across Minnesota programs during Democratic Governor Tim Walz's tenure. 

The Daily Wire even reported that Minnesota was still cutting checks to an accused Somali fraudster running assisted living homes while he awaited trial for what was called the nation's biggest COVID scam, running a fake charity, no less.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson has flagged 14 Medicaid services in the state as “high risk” for fraud.

Shirley, fresh off an appearance on Fox News, laid it out plain and simple: “It’s so obvious,” Shirley explained, referring to the apparent fraud. “If you’re living in Minnesota, you have to raise your eyebrows and think, ‘What’s going on?’ Literally, if you drive around Minneapolis, you’ll see daycare centers, autism centers — you will then see transportation companies that have snow piled up as if they haven’t moved it in months.”

"A kindergartner could've figured out there was fraud going on."

Walz finally piped up on Tuesday, admitting the state had been “taken advantage of” by fraudsters chasing “greed” over helping kids and the elderly. But in classic Democrat fashion, he pointed the finger elsewhere: “We’ve spent years cracking down on fraud – referring cases to law enforcement, shutting down and auditing high-risk programs,” he said in a social media post. “Trump keeps letting fraudsters out of prison. To the national news just now paying attention, here’s what we’ve done to stop it.”

Ah yes, blame Trump, the guy whose administration just shut down the gravy train. Classic deflection from the party that's been overseeing this mess for years.Here's to more spigots getting turned off in 2026. Cheers!

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you from doing me that solid. I hope you have a happy, healthy New Year.

Tweet

Many National Security Council staff fired after Laura Loomer visits White House

The Trump White House just got a spring cleaning, courtesy of activist journalist Laura Loomer, who waltzed into the Oval Office with a stack of opposition research thicker than a D.C. lobbyist’s expense report. 

[H/T The Daily Wire]

Up to ten National Security Council officials got the boot after her visit, and if you believe Axios—who broke the story Thursday—this wasn’t just a random purge. Loomer reportedly handed Trump a hit list of staffers she deemed insufficiently loyal, and the firings followed like clockwork. A source close to the meeting called it “an anti-neocon move,” which is Washington-speak for “someone’s finally draining the swamp, and the alligators are pissed.”

Trump, ever the master of coy confirmation, chatted with reporters aboard Air Force One and didn’t exactly deny Loomer’s influence. “We’re always going to let go of people — people we don’t like or people that take advantage of or people that may have loyalties to someone else,” he said. When asked about Loomer, he didn’t hold back the praise: “Laura Loomer is a great patriot. She’s a very strong person. She makes recommendations and people, and sometimes I listen to those recommendations. I listen to everybody and then I make a decision. She always has something to say and it’s usually constructive … She recommended some people for jobs.” 

Translation: She’s got a loud mouth, a sharp eye, and the president’s ear—deal with it.

The rumor, per Axios, is that Loomer was fuming over “neocons” who’d “slipped through” Trump’s vetting process like cockroaches in a cheap motel. “She went to the White House yesterday and presented them with her research and evidence,” an official told the outlet, adding that three senior NSC bigwigs—plus as many as ten total staffers—got the axe. “Bloodbath” was the word used, and I’m guessing the survivors are updating their LinkedIn profiles as we speak.

CNN, [aka Comedy News Network] never one to miss a chance to clutch pearls, named the fallen: Brian Walsh, Thomas Boodry, and David Feith. Walsh, a former Marco Rubio lackey, was director for intelligence. Boodry, once Mike Waltz’s legislative director, handled legislative affairs. Feith, a State Department vet from Trump’s first term, oversaw tech and security. Sounds like a mixed bag of establishment types who didn’t get the memo that MAGA means business.

The meeting wasn’t a solo act—National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, VP JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and personnel guru Sergio Gor were all in the room, per the Associated Press. Axios says Loomer’s beef was that these NSC folks weren’t ride-or-die for Trump’s agenda. Fair enough—why keep snakes in the grass when you can mow the lawn?

NSC spokesman Brian Hughes played the “no comment” card, while Loomer herself dodged The Daily Wire’s request for a chat. Instead, she took to X Thursday morning to blast “people in and around the West Wing” for leaking to the “hostile, left-wing media” about Trump’s private powwows. “I want to reiterate how important it is that people who gain access to the White House or the administration respect the privacy of their conversations with President Trump and his senior staff,” she wrote, sounding like the only adult in a room full of gossipy teenagers. 

But she couldn’t resist a victory lap: “It was an honor to meet with President Trump and present him with my research findings. I will continue working hard to support his agenda, and I will continue reiterating the importance of, and the necessity of STRONG VETTING, for the sake of protecting the President of the United States of America, and our national security.” 

Preach, Laura—someone’s got to keep the RINOs from sneaking back in.

Meanwhile, Trump jetted off to Florida with Waltz, Wiles, Gor, and a few other top dogs, per the travel pool. Sounds like the A-team’s ready to keep the MAGA train rolling, while the B-team’s left crying into their résumés. 

Loomer’s got her critics, sure, but if she’s the one sniffing out the disloyal, maybe she’s the pitbull this administration needs. Neocons beware—there’s a new sheriff in town, and she’s not afraid to bite.

"I pour my heart into these posts, and if they’ve sparked something for you, I’d be thrilled if you’d treat me to a coffee over at Buy Me a Coffee – totally optional, of course!"

Tweet

Fox News accuses Israel of killing "two Palestinian Journalists" when, in fact, they were Hamas terrorists

It seems the intrepid Fox News reporter Trey Yingst has once again taken to the airwaves to castigate Israel, this time accusing them of killing "two Palestinian journalists, Mohammed Mansour and Hossam Shabat." 

Of course, Yingst conveniently omits some rather pertinent details - namely that Mansour worked for the terror outfit Palestinian Islamic Jihad's propaganda arm Filastin Al-Youm, while Israeli intelligence revealed months ago that Shabat moonlighted as a sniper for a Hamas battalion. 

But why let inconvenient facts get in the way of a good story?

Appearing on America's Newsroom this Monday morn, Fox's chief foreign correspondent solemnly intoned about "new developments out of Gaza today, where two Palestinian journalists, Mohammed Mansour and Hossam Shabat, were killed by the Israelis." He went on to lament that "Last year, 124 journalists were killed around the world, two-thirds of them in Gaza," to which host Bill Hemmer could only grimly reply, "More to come, unfortunately."

 
Yingst doubled down on Twitter, mournfully noting that "Palestinian journalists Mohammed Mansour and Hossam Shabat were killed by Israel today in Gaza" and that "124 journalist were killed around the world in 2024, around two-thirds of them were Palestinian." Stirring stuff. One can almost hear the violins swelling.

Except Shabat's Hamas ties are hardly news. 

As far back as September, the diligent Egyptian-British researcher Khaled Hassan uncovered Shabat's social media posts from that fateful October 7th in 2023, replete with celebratory captions and emojis alongside photos of Hamas terrorists infiltrating Israel and returning triumphant to Gaza. 

"All of Beit Hanon is at the garage, receiving the kidnapped soldiers," he crowed in one missive about the Israeli hostages, including a 9-month-old babe. "The heroes are in Beit Hanon," he gushed beside a snap of the returning killers.

A month later Israel released declassified intelligence from documents unearthed in Gaza confirming that six Al Jazeera journalists, Shabat among them, were in fact terrorists tied to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The files detailed training courses, salaries, personnel rosters - including Shabat's role as a sniper in Hamas's Beit Hanoun Battalion. Fox's own LiveNow covered it under the banner "Israel-Hamas war: IDF exposes Al Jazeera journalists as Hamas terrorists." Anchor Stephanie Coueignoux breathlessly shared the "breaking news" that "Six Al Jazeera journalists have been exposed as Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists."

 
As for Mansour, he plied his trade for Filastin Al-Youm, a mouthpiece of Palestinian Islamic Jihad that Israel's Shin Bet says works to "incite the population, calling for terrorist attacks against the State of Israel and its citizens." Israeli forces shuttered its West Bank HQ back in 2016, nabbing its director, though it continued spewing venom from Gaza.

Neither Fox nor Yingst had the stones to comment. Quelle surprise.

This all unfolded as Israel resumed operations in Gaza last week after Hamas nixed a US-brokered ceasefire. Monday's strikes took out Hamas finance chief Ismail Barhoum as well as Shabat and Mansour, the former killed in his car in a precision hit while moonlighting for Qatar-funded Al Jazeera. 

Beyond his October 7th paeans and Hamas ties, Shabat peddled lurid propaganda, falsely alleging Israeli "occupation army" atrocities - from soldiers sexually assaulting a pregnant Palestinian woman before her family to using "new weapons that cause bodies to evaporate on the scene."

 
Yingst has made a cottage industry of spotlighting Gaza journalists killed in Israel's operation. 

Just this month at the Radio Television Digital News Association's First Amendment Awards gala, he waxed eloquent: "I would like to give special recognition to the brave Palestinian journalists in Gaza, who have risked and often given their lives to practice our craft. We live in a dangerous time of attack on journalists, of misinformation, and efforts to silence those holding truth to power. Our work is more important now than ever." Cue the applause. And pass the sick bag.

Perhaps it's time to take a pass on Fox News and check out other sources such as The Daily Wire, Newsmax, Townhall, Breitbart, and blogs [like mine, hopefully].

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

Mannheim, Germany: 1 dead, several injured in car ramming attack

On Monday, the civilized tranquility of a crowded market in Mannheim, Germany was shattered by the roar of an engine and the screams of the innocent. A suspect, now in custody, rammed their car into the unsuspecting throng, leaving a trail of carnage in their wake. 

The Mannheimer Morgen newspaper relayed the chilling accounts of eyewitnesses who watched in horror as the driver sped from a nearby water tower to the parade ground, striking multiple victims with callous disregard.

"As part of the search measures that were immediately initiated, a suspect was identified and arrested," the Mannheim Police declared, as reported by NBC News. "No further, reliable information can currently be released beyond the information published so far." A reticence that does little to assuage the fears of a public left to wonder at the scope of the devastation, with no word on the tally of the injured or the gravity of their wounds.

The scene of this brutality was a carnival market opened just last Thursday, where attendees sought the simple pleasures of food stalls, rides, and games—joys now forever tainted by the memory of this assault. Initial reports from the Morgen suggest that, by some small mercy, the vendors and employees of the carnival emerged unscathed. Yet one eyewitness recounted to the outlet the grim spectacle of the driver crashing through barricades, claiming lives in his path—one soul found lifeless amid the wreckage.

"It is terrible here," an employee lamented to the Morgen, "nobody knows what happened, you only see injured people and the dead, and you don’t know what to do." A lament that echoes across a nation still reeling from similar atrocities.

Just two weeks prior, an Afghan national plowed his vehicle into a crowd in Munich, snuffing out two lives—including that of a small child—and wounding dozens more, as The Daily Wire reported. "The suspect is a 24-year-old man of Afghan nationality," Munich Police stated. "He drove a car into a gathering in the Seidlstrasse area from behind." 

Bild revealed that this perpetrator was no stranger to law enforcement, known for drug and theft offenses, his extremist leanings a festering threat. Bavarian Minister-President Markus Söder minced no words: "The attack shows that something has to change in Germany – and quickly!"

It's all about jihad, isn't it?

What emerges from this grim chronicle is a portrait of a nation under siege, not merely by the acts themselves, but by a willful blindness to the warning signs that precede them. The blood on the streets of Mannheim, Munich, and Magdeburg cries out for a reckoning—a demand that Germany confront the peril within its borders before yet another market is stained red.

But it isn't only about Germany; it's an attack on Western civilization, and one can only deny this at their peril.

Tweet

Trump demands FBI retain all DEI records from the closed office

President-elect [but not for long] Donald Trump demanded on Thursday evening that the FBI keep all records from the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office that was shut down last month.

The FBI quietly closed its Office of Diversity and Inclusion last month, just before Trump’s inauguration. This happened because Trump has promised to reduce DEI efforts in the federal government, similar to what many companies have done in the last year.

“We demand that the FBI preserve and retain all records, documents, and information on the now closing DEI Office—Never should have been opened and, if it was, should have closed long ago,” Trump wrote on social media. “Why is it that they’re closing one day before the Inauguration of a new Administration? The reason is, CORRUPTION!”

The FBI stated that the office was closed last month but didn't explain why.

Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) criticized the FBI's DEI focus recently, saying it prioritizes the wrong things. “I am deeply concerned that—under your leadership—the Bureau has prioritized Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives over its core mission of protecting the American people,” Blackburn wrote in a letter this month.

Former FBI special agent Nicole Parker criticized the FBI's focus on social justice, stating, “constant push for social justice weaponization at the FBI whose top priorities are to protect the American people and uphold the constitution.”

The FBI still mentions the Office of Diversity and Inclusion on its website, stating its mission is to “provide guidance and implement programs that promote a diverse and inclusive workplace that allows all employees to succeed and advance.”

“The FBI’s efforts to diversify are crucial to creating an inclusive workforce and to being increasingly effective and efficient in our investigations and keeping the American public safe,” said Scott McMillion, the FBI’s first Chief Diversity Officer, on the site.

The website also promotes joining employee resource groups which, according to The Daily Wire, are used to push left-wing agendas. It's not clear if these groups will continue now that the DEI office is closed.

Despite this closure, many federal agencies continue to push DEI agendas, with around 500 actions taken under the Biden administration to promote diversity. Once Trump is inaugurated, he and his team will have the chance to remove these "woke" officials and dismantle the DEI initiatives in government and the military.

Tweet

Jim Jordan opens inquiry into Jack Smith's "Latest sham indictment"

As summer came to an unofficial end on Labor Day, and the November presidential election looms large, the left is freaking out over their fear that Democrat candidate and current Vice President Kamala Harris is a garbage candidate and will somehow blow the election [no pun intended]. 

Last week Special Counsel Jack Smith filed yet a new indictment against former and possibly future President Trump regarding the Nancy Pelosi-botched January 6th clusterfrack [sic]. Several days after the filing, House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan (R-OH) fired off a letter to the pencil-neck Attorney General Merrick Garland. Jordan was rightfully angry over the "latest sham indictment" and called Smith's move "Election interference." [H/T  Daily Wire]

If not that, then what is it?

As Jordan began by reminding, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered the Trump v. United States decision on July 1. The ruling established that the office of the president is immune from criminal prosecution. The Court's opinion explained the scope of presidential immunity and criticized Special Counsel Jack Smith for violating this Constitutional principle in his political prosecution of President Donald J. Trump, as Jordan noted.

Referring to Smith's updated indictment from August 27, Jordan expressed concerns that "Special Counsel Smith seems to have breached longstanding Department policy designed to safeguard our democratic processes. Consequently, the Committee needs to know whether you endorsed Special Counsel Smith’s indictment beforehand or if he is continuing to act with prosecutorial authority without your 'meaningful direction or supervision,'" his letter stated, once more referencing the Trump v. United States decision.

Jordan's letter specifically mentions a 60-day rule that advises against filing indictments immediately before a primary or general election. "Even though it isn't formally written into law, there is a broad consensus that the 60-day rule is essential for preserving the integrity of the electoral process," Jordan wrote, citing an op-ed from The Washington Post by Barack Obama's wingman, former Attorney General Eric Holder.

"Special Counsel Smith obtained the superseding indictment against President Trump just 10 days before early voting begins in some states," Jordan's letter continued, going on to comment on how this could affect the upcoming presidential election. "There can be little question that the superseding indictment has some effect on the election, especially coming after the Supreme Court’s opinion on presidential immunity cast significant doubt on Special Counsel Smith’s ability to prosecute the initial indictment."

The letter further criticizes the timing in relation to the Trump v. United States decision. Jordan continued. "In light of the Court’s opinion, Smith’s superseding indictment amounts to the initiation of a prosecutorial action by the Biden-Harris Administration against its opponent in the upcoming election. There is no persuasive argument why Special Counsel Smith could not wait until after the election to file this superseding indictment. It is therefore difficult to believe that the superseding indictment was filed now for any purpose other than to affect the outcome of the election," Jordan continued.

Jordan's letter asks for the following information and documents by September 13, going back from January 1, 2024 to the present:

1. All documents and communications between Main Justice, including but not limited to the Office of the Attorney General, and Special Counsel Smith’s office referring or relating to the superseding indictment filed against President Trump on August 27, 2024.

2. Did you personally approve the superseding indictment filed against President Trump on August 27, 2024? If so, please provide documentation sufficient to reflect your approval.

3. Did you evaluate the superseding indictment against President Trump in the context of the Department’s longstanding policy counseling against prosecutorial action so near an election? If so, please provide documentation sufficient to reflect your evaluation of these issues.

Jordan's letter also mentioned Judge Aileen Cannon, who in July tossed out Smith's classified documents case against Trump. Also last week, just the day before filing the superseding indictment, Smith appealed Cannon's move to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. [H/T Townhall.com]

There does not seem to be any doubt that Smith's move is desperate and politically motivated to prevent Donald Trump from seeking reelection. Allowing this to happen and by extension, jailing the former president, is nothing more than a banana republic type of move and the nation cannot allow this to happen.

Tweet

Candace Owens to headline Trump fundraiser: WTH?

Two anti-Semites jumping on the bed, one fell down and hit his head

I don't know what Donald Trump Jr. is thinking. He is preparing to headline his father's campaign 

fundraiser on Friday in Nashville, TN. Featured at the event is prominent far-right pundit and anti-Semite Candace Owens. 

This cannot be good for the Trump campaign, having Owens who recently amplified the ancient worn out blood libel against Jews, downplayed the Holocaust and defended Nick Fuentes, a disgusting white nationalist,  among other racist remarks.

Owens is an ardent Trump supporter who had worked for the Daily Wire but eventually was let go due to her anti-Semitic rhetoric which didn't sit well with founder Ben Shapiro, an orthodox Jew. She had served as a weekday host but pressure mounted as her antisemitic rhetoric and empty headed criticism of Israel bubbled up like a puss pimple after the Oct. 7 attacks on Israelis. 

So Don Junior has a scheduled appearance with the brazen Jew hater on Friday, while the former President's daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, have appeared to publicly distance themselves from Trump.

And while I don't see any evidence whatsoever that the former President is an anti-Semite or anti-Zionist, [all evidence points to the contrary], there is clear evidence that some in the GOP harbor anti-Jewish sentiment such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, who suggested California wildfires were caused by space lasers controlled by a Jewish banking family.  And the lieutenant gov. of North Carolina, Mark Robinson, invoked anti-Semitic stereotypes, hinted at Holocaust denial, and downplayed the Nazi atrocities.

Of course, Trump invited some Jewish students to speak at the convention as well. And let us not kid ourselves: the Democratic Party has a butt-load of anti-Semites compared to the GOP.

I just don't know what Don Jr. was thinking. Candace Owens is a disgraceful wretched woman.

Tweet

Ben Shapiro's take on Kamala Harris' rise to VP

Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro has a three-part series called, "Scamala: Kamala Harris Unmasked. Each part is approximately a half-hour long and it dissects the Vice President with facts, video evidence and quotes and shows us just how she scammed the public.

Some of the points Ben makes are as follows:

1. Harris has no actual political position, and shows a clear inconsistency in the stances she takes. For example, her position on criminal justice went from hard to soft, soft to hard, depending on how the political winds were blowing at the time she was Attorney General of California and later the Senator. And she got to those positions with the help of her then paramour, Willie Brown, a political powerhouse in the state.

Shapiro points out that Harris has no actual political ideology and gives examples. He basically labels her a political opportunist, taking advantage in the moment rather than adhering to any consistent framework.

2. Shapiro questions her performance and competency in her roles both past and present, criticizing her effectiveness as Vice President where he uses the border crisis as an example and her interactions with people that come off as disingenuous and contrived. For example, the child actors she used to discuss the space program. 

3. Her public perception and media coverage tends to portray Harris in a more favorable light than she deserves, critiquing the positive media coverage and overlooking her blunders and word salads.

4. Shapiro points out Harris' emphasis on identity politics where race and gender take center stage. He argues that her qualifications and policies should be primary focus rather than her identity of being a woman of color. But then again, isn't that what Joe Biden decided to use when selecting his vice president?

5. Finally, Shapiro briefly discusses Harris' parents, both professionals, both were communists. She came from an affluent background but pretends to be a child of the ghetto. Nothing about Harris is real and her personality is what destroyed her presidential primary run against Joe Biden, a man she referred to as a racist. 

And while Biden's popularity has sunk in the polls since the left had to admit his cognitive decline puts him on par with phlegm, he is still polling better than Harris. However, that doesn't mean she will not be the next POTUS--she tends to worm her way up the political landscape.

Let's hope the GOP doesn't pull defeat from the jaws of victory by getting the left to "25th Amendment" Joe. He needs to run and Trump needs to win.

You need to consider subscribing to the Daily Wire for its take on Harris and all other political and cultural viewpoints--it's worth the membership just on the Harris take alone, but even more worthwhile in the long run.

Tweet

MO AG suing IBM for alleged discrimination against Asians, Whites, and Men

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey

Missouri's Attorney General, Andrew Bailey, has filed a lawsuit against the huge technology company, International Business Machines (IBM). He claims that IBM is unfair in how they hire people, preferring certain groups over white, Asian, and male applicants. Bailey says that IBM even forces workers to follow these rules by linking their pay to how well they meet diversity goals.

[H/T The Daily Wire]

Bailey told conservative outlet The Daily Wire that he wants this lawsuit to stop what he calls "corporate racism" at IBM. He says that the company's "diversity modifier" system unfairly connects executive pay to meeting targets that are biased against white, Asian, and male applicants.
“But if he or she fails to meet it, IBM swings the stick: they lose part of their bonus and, eventually, their job,” the lawsuit says.

“We will not tolerate racist employment policies in the state of Missouri. That’s the plain text of the Missouri Human Rights Act,” Bailey explained.

“It has come to my attention that IBM has adopted an unlawful policy that blatantly favors applicants of a certain gender or skin color over others, and that managers within the company who refuse to comply with said policy face adverse action, including and up to, termination,” Bailey said.

In a secret video posted by journalist James O'Keefe, IBM’s CEO, Arvind Krishna, reportedly admitted that the company was hiring based on race. In the video, Krishna said that he expected all executives in the company to increase the number of underrepresented minorities by 1%.

“You got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus,” Krishna said about hiring… pic.twitter.com/UUK26HX8IP

Krishna warned that people who didn't hire more employees from different races would lose part of their bonuses.

Paul Cormier, who used to be the CEO of Red Hat, a part of IBM, talked about the company's DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion--or--Didn't Even Interview) policies. Cormier said that some leaders didn't meet the company's standards and were held accountable, so they no longer worked for the company.
“We’re going to hold, we are continuing to hold, and going to hold even more of our executives accountable for all of this and they will have metrics around this,” Cormier added.

Bailey’s lawsuit said tying a “quota system to bonus compensations” is “a cudgel against those who do not fall in line.”

The Attorney General said that IBM's "discriminatory practices" were not just because of a few mid-level managers. Instead, he explained that these practices were a deliberate decision by the most powerful people at the company. He stated, "At IBM, there's a culture of racism from the top leaders downward. We're not just talking about some mid-level manager, but about the CEO of the entire company, who threatened his top executives with punishment if they didn't follow his racist policies."
“Missourians deserve answers as to why one of the largest technology and consulting companies in the world, with offices based in Missouri, is discriminating against both prospective and current employees,” he added.

The news outlet had previously revealed that IBM was discriminating against white people, Asian people, and men. They offered an internship that was only available to people from certain backgrounds. This opportunity, which was for “underrepresented minorities,” stated that applicants should be “African American, Hispanic, or Indigenous.”

Another IBM internship, called the “Internship for Undergraduate Women,” stipulated that “applicants must be female, including all students who present or identify as women and/or trans women.”

David Bernstein, a professor at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia School of Law, said that these internship programs “clearly violate Title VII,” which bars race and sex-based employment preferences.

Tweet

6 Debate rules: Trump will have gag order in debate vs. Biden and guess who's excluded

Alleged President Joe Biden and former President Donald J. Trump, will debate . . . sort of. The ground rules and plans for the debate will have strings attached in order to help the brain addled Biden deal with the more energetic, sharper and wittier Trump.

After Trump gave Biden an open invitation to debate anytime, anywhere, Biden's handlers rose to the challenge. But of course, the Biden team had to tilt the field to his advantage, which still may be problematic as Biden tends to have problems with tilts and stairs. So with Biden's mumbled announcement a letter followed from his campaign to the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), which stated several critical limits that Biden's handlers placed on any debate with Trump.

Here are a few, some real, some not so much. 

1. No Audience because Biden's handlers criticized the CPD for making debates "huge spectacles with large audiences." This makes Joe uncomfortable when people listen to his every word.

2. Toilet breaks every ten minutes. Biden's handlers know their candidate and will do everything they can to avoid unnecessary embarrassing moments. Furthermore, they know that should there be insufficient toilet breaks, former President Donald J. Trump will jump at the chance to comment on what Joe just did.

3. The debates must take place in a television studio with just the candidates and the moderator present. Naturally, there will be camera men and women as well as transgender, lesbian, and queer camera people allowed.

"The debates should be conducted for the benefit of the American voters, watching on television and at home – not as entertainment for an in-person audience with raucous or disruptive partisans and donors, who consume valuable debate time with noisy spectacles of approval or jeering. As was the case with the original televised debates in 1960, a television studio with just the candidates and moderators is a better, more cost-efficient way to proceed: focused solely on the interests of voters," Biden's handlers wrote.

4. RFK Jr. is not allowed to debate because he's very smart and his vocal disorder may create an unfair sympathy advantage. And he's smart. No other 3rd party candidates will be allowed to be at the debate no matter what the U.S. Constitution says.

"The debates should be one-on-one, allowing voters to compare the only two candidates with any statistical chance of prevailing in the Electoral College – and not squandering debate time on candidates with no prospect of becoming President," Biden's handlers wrote.

Kennedy condemned his ban from the deabte in a post on X, accusing both Trump and Biden of colluding to block him from the debate stage.

5. No conservative news outlets will host any debate, especially not Fox News, Daily Wire, New York Post, Epoch Times, Washington Post, or Breitbart News. If there is going to be a slant in the news, it should be slanted toward the current POTUS, although as previously stated, the current POTUS doesn't negotiate slants very well so he will be wearing sneakers. 

This demand set limits the networks that can host a debate to CNN, ABC, CBS or Telemundo.

6. Candidate's mics will mute once their time expires. This is to prevent Trump from making a snappy remark or challenging the veracity of Biden's lies, and to keep Biden from making a confused one.

"There should be firm time limits for answers, and alternate turns to speak – so that the time is evenly divided and we have an exchange of views, not a spectacle of mutual interruption. A candidate’s microphone should only be active when it is his turn to speak, to promote adherence to the rules and orderly proceedings," the handlers wrote.

Former President Donald J. Trump accepted the Biden team's restrictions and the first debate is scheduled for June 27 and will be hosted by the Commie News Network (CNN).

"I am Ready and Willing to Debate Crooked Joe at the two proposed times in June and September," Trump posted. "I would strongly recommend more than two debates and, for excitement purposes, a very large venue, although Biden is supposedly afraid of crowds – That’s only because he doesn’t get them. Just tell me when, I’ll be there. ‘Let’s get ready to Rumble!!!’"

So who will come out the winner in the upcoming debates? Trump, who people seem to love or hate with no in-between? Or Biden, who is going to need a boatload of drugs to get him through these debates without looking like Bernie, on the weekend?

For Trump not being allowed to interrupt, will be like a gag order. At least he's used to it.

Tweet

Comedy News Network (CNN) will be chopping off top names as ratings go down the toilet

CNN staff whose names are not on the tip of tongues

Long ago in a country far, far away from where it is now, a cable tv network was considered the go-to station for news you could trust. But things have changed and most people know that the cable network in question, CNN, is no longer a trusted name in news and seems to be going the way of another once upon a time news outlet, The New York Times. 

Big changes are down the road over at CNN, as the ratings have gone down deeper than Lia Thomas diving for his pearls. The company can't even compete with Fox News or even the execrable MSNBC.

What happened, you ask. Well, when CNN went ballistic on conservatives to the extent they recently have, especially when Trump was President, the decline began.

They initially blamed CEO Chris Licht for the circling of the bowl. It's like a sports team that was once great and now sucks--they blame the coach even though he had brought them to a championship in the past. The coach didn't suddenly become suckworthy--it's the players who did. 

With Licht gone, the new guy on board is known for cutting the fat off the cash cow. That could mean the big budget personnel, like pretentious Anderson Cooper, who rakes in $20,000,000 annually, could become CNN history, like Donald Le'mon and Brian Stelter.

According to a new report, many of the network's big "stars" as mentioned, could face large pay cuts or the chopping block.

The new CEO Mark Thompson is the guy with the butcher knife and is likely to use it before it's too late to salvage the network. Other names like Chris Wallace, Jake Tapper, and Wolf "take-a-breath" Blitzer may become CNN history, according to a source who will remain anonymous, so you don't need to trust what he or she says.

“Anderson knows he’s on the chopping block because he makes a whopping $20 million a year. He’s already started looking for a new gig!” a network insider exclusively tells In Touch. “Chris Wallace takes $8 million and figures he’s a likely target, too!” Wallace, you may recall, worked for Fox News and was quite job secure in spite of his left-leanings. But he went to CNN for a new show but it failed faster than Al Sharpton yells 'racist,' and the network gave him another spot.

Insiders say other network favorites — including $15 million man Blitzer and $8 million gent Tapper – are also bracing for the boot!

The network's ratings have fallen below Hallmark and History. I suspect that with the way things are going for them, The Daily Wire's "Bentkey" series for kids is going to outpace them.

Don't believe for a minute, however, that CNN is going to shuffle over to the right anytime soon. They might, but it's doubtful. But people are getting fed up with woke "wisdom" because a) it's anti-reality; b) it's anti-capitalism, which means those who subscribe to the woke philosophy will indeed go broke.

Tweet

Biden leaks strike plans and IRGC Commanders go into hiding

"I'm mahaman hum beh dee dah man"

It looks as if our alleged President leaks in more ways than one. He and his administration have been repeatedly leaking plans of alleged retaliatory strikes against those who were behind the murders of three U.S. soldiers and wounding about 40 other personnel. Predictably, those responsible, the commanders of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have gone into hiding to avoid being "Qasem Solemeinied."

Thanks Joe--we knew we could count on you for f*****g things up.

CBS News reported that Biden officials confirmed  “that plans have been approved for a series of strikes over a number of days against targets — including Iranian personnel and facilities — inside Iraq and Syria.”

[H/T The Daily Wire.]

He might as well have gotten on top of the White House with a megaphone and mumbled his plans out to the public to forewarn the terrorists that we're coming for them with plans to blow them to smithereens.

Jennifer Griffin of Fox News, responded to the CBS report by noting that “all of those IRGC commanders have already left Syria and gone into hiding leaving those bases.”

“The Pentagon usually does not telegraph so much if it wants the element of surprise,” she added, implying that Biden wanted them to leave so he could put on a show for the public that he's finally do something.

The Biden administration tried to diminish Iran’s involvement in the over 160 Iranian-backed terrorist attacks against U.S. forces in the region over the last few months, telling Politico that they don’t believe Tehran has full control of the terrorist groups that it funds. 

Why the administration is trying to take the heat off the world's biggest sponsor of global terrorism can possibly be explained by former Obama adviser Susan Rice, whose heart is in Iran.

Politico said that the “disclosure” by the Biden administration, “could lower the chance of the U.S. getting pulled into a direct confrontation with Iran,” as long as no terrorism commander gets hurt.

The Biden administration blames Israel for Iranian-backed terrorist groups attacking U.S. forces, saying that if Israel stopped trying to kill Hamas terrorists inside Gaza who carried out the October 7 terrorist attack, “there would at least be a tactical pause in the region by all Iran-backed groups,” Politico reported.

So all Israel had to do was to allow Hamas to do their thing and leave with no retaliation and those brave Americans would not have been killed.

The Biden administration is not only weak, it' cowardly and clearly anti-Semitic, because anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.

Useless Secretary of State Lloyd Austin was asked on Thursday about IRGC commanders running for cover back to Iran to avoid being killed by U.S. forces.

“Has there been too much telegraphing, or is the point not to kill any Iranian commanders?” a reporter asked.

“In terms of telegraphing about strikes and whether or not people leave or would have left, you know, I won’t speculate on any of that,” Austin said, proving he's a 'good company man' who's should know the answer to that question. “I will just tell you that, you know, we will have a multi-tiered response, and again, we have the ability to respond in a number of times depending on what the situation is.” 

Blah, blah, de blah.

Tom Cotton (R-AR) blasted the Biden boobs on Thursday for tipping off the terrorists saying that it's a reflection of  “Biden’s policy of fear and appeasement and conciliation.”

“Just like with Ukraine and before that with Afghanistan, he’s scared of his own shadow,” Cotton said. “He keeps worrying about escalation. What we saw over the weekend was a massive escalation by Iran. The only way to solve that threat is to directly target Iran’s terrorist forces throughout the region and in Iran itself, to make it clear that we will never tolerate the deaths of our fellow Americans.”

And for G_d's sale. quit blaming the victim, Israel.

Tweet

Biden doubles down on Jew-hating NJ lawyer: nominates him for circuit court judge

Joe Biden once again nominated New Jersey's anti-Semitic attorney Adeel Abdullah Mangi for U.S. Circuit Court Judge for the Third Circuit on Monday. It was just last month that Mangi was raked over the coals by Republicans because the GOP refuses to support anti-Semites.

[H/T The Daily Wire]

Biden initially nominated the Jew-hater in November before Senate Republicans grilled him over his work for a group that featured speakers who backed anti-Semitic and anti-American activism. But our alleged President stayed committed to appointing the POS attorney as a federal judge this year, as the Hamasshole supporter's name appeared in a list of Biden's nominations sent to the Senate.

“Given the alarming rise of anti-Semitism around the world, it’s disappointing that the Biden administration would choose to re-nominate Adeel Mangi to a seat on the federal bench,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told The Daily Wire. “Mangi served on the board of and donated generously to a law school organization that amplifies the most vicious anti-Semitic terrorist propaganda. This should be disqualifying for a lifetime judicial appointment.”

It should disqualify him and those haters like him, from the government altogether and in some cases from living in the United States.

Mangi [the 'i' is silent and his name rhymes with 'range'] was a member of an advisory board for the Center for Security, Race, and Rights [an oxymoron] at Rutgers Law School from 2019 to 2023. 

Republican senators were horrified after discovering that the center co-sponsored a symposium on the 20th anniversary of 9/11 that featured a panelist who pled guilty to providing support for Islamic jihadists and another panelist who publicly called for an intifada in the U.S.

The Biden nominee told Senators during his confirmation hearing that the advisory board he served on only met once a year and focused on addressing academic issues at Rutgers Law School. After all, how much hate can a Jew-hater hate if the Jew-hater meets once a year?

Mangi lied that he never heard of the event that featured anti-Semitic and anti-American panelists. Some of his best friends are Jewish. Not.

When asked by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) if he agreed with the words of the center’s director that Israel is “an occupying force in Palestine,” Mangi responded. “The history of that region is very complex, and I don’t claim to be an expert in it.”

During his questioning last month, Mangi said he could not answer a question from Sen. Josh Hawley on Israel’s right to self-defense because he doesn’t claim to be an expert on foreign policy or the Middle East.

“Senator, I have no basis as a judicial nominee to cast views on the Middle East,” Mangi evasively replied.

“You’re not answering my question,” Hawley shot back. “I’m asking you whether this individual who said that Israel was a violent settler colonial state, I’m just trying to get you to say, do you agree with that or not. … Why can’t you just say, ‘no I don’t agree with this’? Let’s try again, do you agree with this statement, yes or no?”

“Senator, in order to agree or disagree with any statement, I need to have sufficient factual background to address it,” the nominee replied with words that would make Claudine Gay proud.

Biden is either a) an anti-Semite himself; b) a demented old man who isn't aware of what he's doing; or c) both. I go for c.

Tweet

Qatar funds Hamas and Liberal US Universities

Harvard Madrassa

Nobody of good conscience should have anything to do with Qatar--they fund and harbor leaders of the terrorist group Hamas and that should be reason enough. But worse, Qatar paid universities nearly a billion dollars since 2021 and some of these former institutes of higher learning, have turned a blind eye to their staff who have taken the side of the terrorists who slaughtered Israeli civilians on October 7th.

Qatar is a small country with only 300,000 Muslims, but it's rich with oil money and it has it's oily fingers in global politics. The way it influences the narrative is by pouring money to American universities, their number one recipient of the bribes. [H/T The Daily Wire]

Between 2021 and April 2023, Qatar's funding totaled $842,000,000, outpacing interests in countries such as China, Germany, Japan, and England.

George Washington University is one of the institutions Qatar bribes.

This week, someone projected giant text on the wall of the school library of GWU saying “Glory to our martyrs,” “Free Palestine from the river to the sea,” and “Divestment from Zionist genocide now.” 

The school president issued a morally anemic statement saying the “projections on the university’s library violated university policies,” but did not say whether it would divest from the $521,000 it took from Hamas’ benefactors since 2021. Can you guess what the school is going to do?

But there are way more universities getting funded by terrorist funding Qatar:

Money from Qatar since 2021Cornell University: $443 million
Texas A&M University: $182 million
Carnegie Mellon University: $150 million
Virginia Commonwealth University: $40 million
Georgetown University: $7 million
Bard College: $4.7 million
Harvard University: $4.5 million
George Mason University: $2 million
Stanford University: $1.8 million

This might help us understand how the students have been indoctrinated with anti-Israel, anti-Semitic hatred.

So as for me, I want nothing to do with Qatar, although that isn't going to bother them, but I believe it's time for all concerned citizens to communicate with their local congressmen and women, and tell them how you feel. And perhaps you parents who have college-ready kids think twice about sending them to any of these "schools."

Tweet

There is no excuse for Biden's reaction to the Nashville mass shooting: he starts off with jokes

This is our alleged President

I am livid. 

There is absolutely no excuse for the President of the United States to take such a serious situation as a mass shooting of three 9-year-old children and three adults and start off with levity. Okay, perhaps the only excuse one could imagine is if that so called President was suffering from dementia, possibly near the end stages. But the leftist press isn't going to show you that part of Biden's speech in which he started off with jokes. No, they'll only show the part in which he finally spoke about sympathy.

I have never heard of any world leader be so offensive. Never. Just get a load [below] of this cretin's address to his audience in the New York Post's video that most leftist outlets didn't include, save for ABC. This was how he started off what was supposed to be his addressing the mass shooting.

Even the crowd of loyal clapping seals did not seem to mind his pre-staged-sadness speech. They came for what they thought would be the commemoration of lives lost, and stayed for the dribbles and giggles.

Biden mush-mouthed for over two minutes about bullcrap: how's he's Doctor Jill Biden's husband, how much he likes ice cream and has lots of it in his freezer, no joke, and then pointed out some "good-looking kids" in the audience, I'm surprised he didn't sniff their hair. 

He finally, and perhaps reluctantly, got to the Nashville tragedy.

Tim Meads of the Daily Wire tweeted:

This is single handedly the most offensive thing I have ever witnessed from the office of the president.

Biden jokes as the audience laughs about ice cream, good looking kids, and his sister for more than two minutes before addressing the Nashville shooting. pic.twitter.com/2L3L90Hl2I

Fox News anchors appeared stunned that Biden was making light of what happened and quickly cut away from his remarks, which tells us something about the changes of Fox News.

“John, we’ll jump back in here, uhm, considering the moment,” a shaken Martha McCallum said in disbelief. “There’s a shooting that just happened, that left three children dead, three adults dead, and we were told that he would be addressing this off the top.”

“Yeah, it’s rather surprising, I thought that somber president would have come to the podium and would have addressed this school shooting,” her colleague said.

They should have let the video fully play. This is real news--this is who Biden is and the nation needs to see him for the buffoon they elected: a barely sentient, unintelligent and highly corrupt career politician who spoke about the horrible shooting in a way that sounded as if it was a 'necessary evil' that he was forced to deal with because his unelected handler(s) made him do it.

I truly hope he gets impeached and kicked out of office.

Biden's full remarks can be read here.

Tweet