Biden doubles down on Jew-hating NJ lawyer: nominates him for circuit court judge

Joe Biden once again nominated New Jersey's anti-Semitic attorney Adeel Abdullah Mangi for U.S. Circuit Court Judge for the Third Circuit on Monday. It was just last month that Mangi was raked over the coals by Republicans because the GOP refuses to support anti-Semites.

[H/T The Daily Wire]

Biden initially nominated the Jew-hater in November before Senate Republicans grilled him over his work for a group that featured speakers who backed anti-Semitic and anti-American activism. But our alleged President stayed committed to appointing the POS attorney as a federal judge this year, as the Hamasshole supporter's name appeared in a list of Biden's nominations sent to the Senate.

“Given the alarming rise of anti-Semitism around the world, it’s disappointing that the Biden administration would choose to re-nominate Adeel Mangi to a seat on the federal bench,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told The Daily Wire. “Mangi served on the board of and donated generously to a law school organization that amplifies the most vicious anti-Semitic terrorist propaganda. This should be disqualifying for a lifetime judicial appointment.”

It should disqualify him and those haters like him, from the government altogether and in some cases from living in the United States.

Mangi [the 'i' is silent and his name rhymes with 'range'] was a member of an advisory board for the Center for Security, Race, and Rights [an oxymoron] at Rutgers Law School from 2019 to 2023. 

Republican senators were horrified after discovering that the center co-sponsored a symposium on the 20th anniversary of 9/11 that featured a panelist who pled guilty to providing support for Islamic jihadists and another panelist who publicly called for an intifada in the U.S.

The Biden nominee told Senators during his confirmation hearing that the advisory board he served on only met once a year and focused on addressing academic issues at Rutgers Law School. After all, how much hate can a Jew-hater hate if the Jew-hater meets once a year?

Mangi lied that he never heard of the event that featured anti-Semitic and anti-American panelists. Some of his best friends are Jewish. Not.

When asked by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) if he agreed with the words of the center’s director that Israel is “an occupying force in Palestine,” Mangi responded. “The history of that region is very complex, and I don’t claim to be an expert in it.”

During his questioning last month, Mangi said he could not answer a question from Sen. Josh Hawley on Israel’s right to self-defense because he doesn’t claim to be an expert on foreign policy or the Middle East.

“Senator, I have no basis as a judicial nominee to cast views on the Middle East,” Mangi evasively replied.

“You’re not answering my question,” Hawley shot back. “I’m asking you whether this individual who said that Israel was a violent settler colonial state, I’m just trying to get you to say, do you agree with that or not. … Why can’t you just say, ‘no I don’t agree with this’? Let’s try again, do you agree with this statement, yes or no?”

“Senator, in order to agree or disagree with any statement, I need to have sufficient factual background to address it,” the nominee replied with words that would make Claudine Gay proud.

Biden is either a) an anti-Semite himself; b) a demented old man who isn't aware of what he's doing; or c) both. I go for c.

Tweet

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her own #MeToo too

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg confessed that she, like many other women, had her own brush with sexual harassment and gender inequality.

Of the #MeToo movement the 84-year-old Brooklynite said: "It's about time."

"Every woman of my vintage knows what sexual harassment is, although we didn't have a name for it," the elderly SCOTUS liberal told a crowd during a forum to promote her new documentary "RBG" at the Sundance Film Festival on Sunday. "The attitude toward sexual harassment was simply, 'Get past it. Boys will be boys.'"

Ginsburg told NPR's legal correspondent and longtime liberal friend Nina Totenberg, about an incident that she said occurred when she was a law student at Cornell University in the early 1950s, before most people were born.

Ginsburg spoke about her concerns with her chemistry teacher over her "abilities" ahead of an important exam. He comforted her and told her he'd give her a practice exam to make her more comfortable with the test.

"The next day--on the test--the test is the practice exam. And I knew exactly what he wanted in return," Ginsburg claimed. "That's just one of many examples," she added, without actually giving an example of what happened.

But Ginsburg refused to slough off the professor's inappropriate unexplained gesture. After the exam, she walked straight up to him and confronted him, she said.

"I went to his office and I said, 'How dare you! How dare you, you--" she said without clarifying what the end of her sentence was. "And that was the end of that."

When Ginsburg taught at Rutgers Law School in 1964, she quickly saw how she was treated differently than her male colleagues. 

Because Rutgers was a state school in New Jersey, she knew she'd be taking a pay cut, but when the dean told her how big a cut, she was mortified. She asked a male colleague who had graduated from law school about the same time as her what he was being paid and the difference was quite substantial.

"Ruth, he has a wife and two children to support. You have a husband with a good paying job in New York," the dean responded.

That was the very year the Equal Pay Act had passed," Ginsburg said. "That was the answer that I got."

So the Women's March on Saturday was never about equal pay and equal rights for women--it's now law, just like protection from harassment in the workplace is law. 

The Women's March was actually an anti-Trump march because that's the main issue women really care about.


Tweet