Tampon Tim forcing teachers to abide by "horribly disgusting" "crazy" race standard says lawmaker

Minnesota state Sen. Mark Koran (R), is speaking out against a teacher requirement that he says amounts to forcing educators to take an oppressor "vow."

Public school teachers in Gov. Tim Walz’s Minnesota are required to abide by a "horribly disgusting" and "crazy" race standard that forces them to assess how their "biases, perceptions and academic training" perpetuate oppression, a state lawmaker said.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Republican state Sen. Mark Koran pointed to the requirement as further evidence of how education in Minnesota has "eroded."

According to Minnesota’s guidebook on "Standards of Effective Practice," public school teachers hoping to be licensed by the state must demonstrate that they have assessed "how their biases, perceptions and academic training may affect their teaching practice and perpetuate oppressive systems."

The requirement, which Minnesota classifies as one of its "professional responsibilities," further demands teachers use "tools to mitigate their own behavior to disrupt oppressive systems."

Koran said this requirement effectively amounts to forcing teachers to take a "vow of being an oppressor," which he called "just crazy" and "horribly detrimental."

He ripped into Walz over the changes, saying, "He's tied to the radicals, he's tied to the teachers’ unions, all the public unions of a really wild, radical agenda."

According to Koran, Minnesota has recently redone all of its teaching licensing standards "under the guise of racism."Under the new standards, he explained, teachers "have to embed in their curriculum, in their pedagogy, the understanding of the ‘oppressed’ and the ‘oppressor’ environment and overtly include that in their curricula."

"It's horribly disgusting," he said. "It is racism. It is instilling the systemic racism that doesn't exist today."Another professional responsibility required by Minnesota is that teachers understand "how prejudice, discrimination, and racism operate at the interpersonal, intergroup and institutional levels."

Teachers are required to demonstrate an understanding of "the historical foundations of education in Minnesota, including law, policies, and practices, that have and continue to create inequitable opportunities, experiences, and outcomes for learners."

The guidebook continues that teachers must highlight how the education system has created inequitable opportunities for "Indigenous students and students historically denied access, underserved, or underrepresented on the basis of race, class, disability, religion, gender, sexual orientation, language, socioeconomic status, or country of origin." In other words, it tells us to acknowledge that the white man sucks.

Further, under the section on student learning, the guidebook requires teachers to demonstrate their understanding of "the diverse impacts of individual and systemic trauma" on learning, including "racism, and micro and macro aggressions."Teachers are required to know how to support students using "culturally responsive strategies and resources to address these impacts."

Koran asserted that this "wild political ideology" is going to drive out more and more teachers from teaching in public schools.

"It's an offensive statement to assume that somebody's an oppressor based on who's the disfavored race of the week," he said. "We just can't have that."

Koran said that these race-based changes have been made as academic outcomes in Minnesota have simultaneously been plummeting.

"They've lowered the standards under the guise of equity," he said. "Today in Minnesota, half of our children can't read or write or do math at grade level, 50 percent, and they have high school diplomas."

"Minnesota is bragging about the graduation rates; we hit the highest ever, but fewer people have an education and are set up with a foundation to be successful," he lamented.

This comes as Walz and the state of Minnesota are facing increased national scrutiny over one of the largest fraud scandals in U.S. history. Koran said that if there is one message he could communicate to Minnesotans, it is that "the governor matters."

"We’ve got to get Minnesota back on the right track," he said. "The governor sets the tone, sets the direction, and sets the goals for which we need to work to achieve."

Look, only in Tim Walz's fever-dream version of Minnesota do they decide the best way to fix education is to make teachers swear allegiance to the Church of Oppressor Guilt. This isn't teacher training. It's a re-education camp with lesson plans. Koran is out here dropping truth bombs while the radicals turn classrooms into struggle sessions where "bias" is whatever the latest DEI commissar says it is.

They've got educators confessing their sins against the "oppressed" and "disrupting systems" like they're in some cult initiation. Meanwhile, half the kids can't read or do basic math but hey, at least the graduation rates look good on paper. Classic Minnesota: fake the numbers, push the ideology, and watch the whole thing collapse in slow motion. Walz and his union buddies own this mess, and voters are starting to notice.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Biden doubles down on Jew-hating NJ lawyer: nominates him for circuit court judge

Joe Biden once again nominated New Jersey's anti-Semitic attorney Adeel Abdullah Mangi for U.S. Circuit Court Judge for the Third Circuit on Monday. It was just last month that Mangi was raked over the coals by Republicans because the GOP refuses to support anti-Semites.

[H/T The Daily Wire]

Biden initially nominated the Jew-hater in November before Senate Republicans grilled him over his work for a group that featured speakers who backed anti-Semitic and anti-American activism. But our alleged President stayed committed to appointing the POS attorney as a federal judge this year, as the Hamasshole supporter's name appeared in a list of Biden's nominations sent to the Senate.

“Given the alarming rise of anti-Semitism around the world, it’s disappointing that the Biden administration would choose to re-nominate Adeel Mangi to a seat on the federal bench,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told The Daily Wire. “Mangi served on the board of and donated generously to a law school organization that amplifies the most vicious anti-Semitic terrorist propaganda. This should be disqualifying for a lifetime judicial appointment.”

It should disqualify him and those haters like him, from the government altogether and in some cases from living in the United States.

Mangi [the 'i' is silent and his name rhymes with 'range'] was a member of an advisory board for the Center for Security, Race, and Rights [an oxymoron] at Rutgers Law School from 2019 to 2023. 

Republican senators were horrified after discovering that the center co-sponsored a symposium on the 20th anniversary of 9/11 that featured a panelist who pled guilty to providing support for Islamic jihadists and another panelist who publicly called for an intifada in the U.S.

The Biden nominee told Senators during his confirmation hearing that the advisory board he served on only met once a year and focused on addressing academic issues at Rutgers Law School. After all, how much hate can a Jew-hater hate if the Jew-hater meets once a year?

Mangi lied that he never heard of the event that featured anti-Semitic and anti-American panelists. Some of his best friends are Jewish. Not.

When asked by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) if he agreed with the words of the center’s director that Israel is “an occupying force in Palestine,” Mangi responded. “The history of that region is very complex, and I don’t claim to be an expert in it.”

During his questioning last month, Mangi said he could not answer a question from Sen. Josh Hawley on Israel’s right to self-defense because he doesn’t claim to be an expert on foreign policy or the Middle East.

“Senator, I have no basis as a judicial nominee to cast views on the Middle East,” Mangi evasively replied.

“You’re not answering my question,” Hawley shot back. “I’m asking you whether this individual who said that Israel was a violent settler colonial state, I’m just trying to get you to say, do you agree with that or not. … Why can’t you just say, ‘no I don’t agree with this’? Let’s try again, do you agree with this statement, yes or no?”

“Senator, in order to agree or disagree with any statement, I need to have sufficient factual background to address it,” the nominee replied with words that would make Claudine Gay proud.

Biden is either a) an anti-Semite himself; b) a demented old man who isn't aware of what he's doing; or c) both. I go for c.

Tweet

Whoopi Goldberg says Holocaust was about two 'White groups' [because she's not that bright]

"The View" should come with a warning label: "Caution, Watching the View Can Cause Severe Damage to the Human Cerebral Cortex." The co-host of this intellectual clusterfrack, Whoopi Goldberg, stated that the Holocaust was "not about race" but about "man's inhumanity to man."

Seriously? This woman makes Alexandria Obviously-Comatose look like a genius.

Goldberg seems to have discounted the systematic killing of six million Jews, a group of people the Nazis believed were "racially inferior" and believed themselves "racially superior" as they desired to create a "racially pure" state. The United States Holocaust Museum explains that the "inferior" Jews "were considered an alien threat to the so-called German racial community."

Other groups were also targeted by the Nazis, including children, due to their "perceived racial and biological inferiority." Also targeted were Gypsies, Germans with disabilities, Poles and Russians, homosexuals and others.

So yes, in part the Holocaust was about man's inhumanity to man, but Goldberg is leaving out the intentions of the Nazis and how they viewed race [the Jews weren't considered to be White], and their determination to create a "pure race" of Germans. And by omitting what they did to the Jews is verging on anti-Semitism if she was doing it intentionally.

The statement by Goldberg came during a half-witted conversation about a Tennessee school district voting to remove "Maus," a Pulitzer Prize winning graphic novel about the Holocaust from its curriculum due to "inappropriate language" [especially upsetting to drag queens who have to read those words to children sitting on their lap], and an illustration of a nude woman without a penis, which might upset the trans community.

The novel is by Art Spiegelman and it tells the story of his Jewish parents living in 1940s Poland and depicts him interviewing his father about his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.

Ana Navarro mentioned a Florida bill that could prevent any conversation in schools that makes students feel uncomfortable race or gender, prompting Sunny Hostin to ponder if teaching students about topics like the Holocaust could eventually be prohibited.

"The Holocaust isn’t about race," Goldberg said as her co-hosts appeared stunned.

"No, it’s not about race," Goldberg continued.

Joy Behar, the show's braintrust said, "Well, they considered Jews a different race."

"It’s not about race," Goldberg, who pulls most of her thoughts from her nether regions insisted.

"What is it about?" Behar asked.

"It’s about man’s inhumanity to man, that’s what it’s about," Goldberg said.

"But it’s about a White supremacist going after Jews and Gypsies," Navarro said as Goldberg attempted to speak over her.

"But these are two White groups of people," Goldberg said as her colleagues disagreed.

She was told Nazis didn’t consider Jewish people to be "White" but continued with her point nonetheless.

"You’re missing the point," Goldberg pontificated. "The minute you turn it into race, it goes down this alley. Let’s talk about it for what it is. It’s how people treat each other. It’s a problem. It doesn’t matter if you’re Black, or White, cause Black ,White, Jews, Italians, everybody eats each other."

So when it's about the Jews being slaughtered for being born Jewish and said to be non-White, it isn't about race. But when it's anyone who supports law and order, or who voted for Trump, or who said Michael Brown didn't have his hands up, or a White Kyle Rittenhouse defending himself and shooting three White guys, it's about race.

Makes perfect sense . . . if you watch "The View."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Goldberg was blasted online for her take on Hitler's belief in a "master race" and his attempt to completely eliminate the Jewish race in Europe.

One writer said Goldberg's statement perfectly captured "the absolute ignorance of the non-Jewish world, encouraged by the mainstream media, when it comes to understanding the Holocaust," adding Goldberg should "open a god--n book."

Please comment and let me know what you think.

Read anytime, anywhere – evewhen yofTweet

7-year-old Black girl shot and killed at a McDonald's drive-thru--BLM mum

Black Lives Matter does not give a fig about Black lives. Not one iota. BLM only cares about their Marxist agenda and the proof of that is sadly seen in the death of a seven-year-old girl who was waiting with her dad in a McDonald's drive-thru is dangerous Chicago. The child's dad was also shot but survived the attack.

The motives behind the brazen attack have not been released by police officials, but it appears the car was targeted as it was filled with bullet holes. This was no stray bullet we often hear about killing an innocent person.

There were about 30 shell casings outside the vehicle after the shooting, said a CBS Chicago report. The car's tinted windows were also blown away by the attack.

The child, Jaslyn Adams, was hit multiple times in her upper body. She was rushed to an area hospital by the evil racist police who tried to save her life, but sadly, she died from her injuries. 

Say her name!

The child's father, Jontae Adams, the person likely targeted and shot, survived.

BLM did not protest the shooting; they did not march; they did not care. Even Chicago's Democratic Mayor Lori Lightfoot called the shooting "gun violence," as if the gun had a mind of its own, and never mentioned the child's race because a cop didn't do it, and a cop tried to save the child.

Lightfoot, who could easily land any zombie role she wishes to play, posted Sunday:

“I am heartbroken and angered that a 7-year-old child was killed this afternoon on Chicago’s West Side. This unthinkable act of violence has no place here. The epidemic of gun violence cutting our children’s lives short cannot go on.”

There's no epidemic of "gun violence." Guns are tools and can be used for good or bad reasons, just like baseball bats, knives, or rat poison. In fact, knives kill more people annually than rifles. 

But the narrative of BLM and their media flunkies is to make people think that we need to eliminate guns in our society because of their violence and then defund and thereby eliminate police. So the people who would be most affected by such a far-left move would be minorities, mainly Black lives. Their lives don't matter when your agenda is political rather than moral.

BLM along with CNN and the other legacy media refuse to shine a light on all the innocent Black lives that are affected by violence but rather choose to focus only on cases that suit their hard-left goals. Black-on-black crime is totally ignored by the movement.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Taylor Notso Swift gets woke scolded on animal abuse and bows out

Taylor Swift

Singer Taylor Swift has been educated by the woke scold animal rights activists and has bowed out of performing at the 2019 Melbourne Cup because horses run there and that isn't nice for the race horses who would rather lollygag in the barn and get fat on hay.

Fox News called the horse racing event "controversial" but did not elaborate on the nature of the controversy but implying, perhaps, that it had to do with humans riding atop race horses to race in a horse race Down Under.

The event announced that Swift, 29, would be headlining in early September but then said on Saturday that she pulled out.

Swift's decision comes after animal rights activists criticized her on social media for "endorsing animal abuse" by agreeing to perform at an event that made animals that love to run, um, run.

Michael Gudinski from Mushroom Events, which organizes the Cup, said in a statement online, “Regrettably, Taylor is no longer able to make it to this year’s Melbourne Cup. Changes to her Asian promo schedule have made it logistically impossible for her to be here. To all of Taylor’s fans, we hope to see Taylor in Australia in 2020.”

Now let's go beat some horses to run faster.

Victoria Racing Club (VRC) Chief Executive Officer Neil Wilson added, “The VRC has learned that Taylor Swift is now unable to make the trip to Australia and therefore cannot be with us on Melbourne Cup Day. Obviously, this is disappointing for everyone. We understand how important the pre-Cup entertainment is and we look forward to providing an update shortly.”

We should all be thankful that our military has a hell of a lot more courage than our entertainers.

After Swift's name was attached to the event, animal rights group Coalition for the Protection of Racehorses, took to Twitter asking her to cancel her performance with its #NupToTheCup hashtag.

Six horses have died while racing in the Melbourne Cup, including an Irish racehorse that was euthanized on the racetrack last year after breaking its shoulder.

"Taylor Swift has put money before compassion by agreeing to perform at the 2019 Melbourne Cup. An event where at least 6 horses have been KILLED over the past 6 years," the group wrote on Facebook.

They were not killed, they died doing what they loved, running swift.

Upon learning the news, Coalition for the Protection of Racehorses spokeswoman, Kristin Leigh, said she was happy about the decision. "The pressure on Taylor Swift to cancel her performance was significant. Her fans did not want to see her supporting animal abuse," she said. "She's easier than we thought," she failed to add.

No word at this time on who will replace Swift on November 5, but with her voice and her surname, it's a shame she'll be elsewhere. Perhaps she's thinking of running for office.


Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue. And you can also see my blog on the Times of Israel.




Tweet

Smollett cut back from 'Empire'

Singer, actor, purveyor of false stories, Jussie Smollett [aka Smellit] will reportedly be getting his appearances on Fox's "Empire" cut back amid his probable false police report that he was attacked by two white men in Chicago. They called him a f****t and n****r and punches were allegedly thrown, and a noose put around his neck and bleach thrown on him, but Jussie fought back because even though he's gay, he is tough, he said.

Oh, and they also shouted "This is MAGA country," which it certainly is not. Any city that would elect Rahm Emmanuel as its mayor is the enemy of MAGA.

The alleged attack supposedly occurred, he claims, in the tony Streeterville neighborhood on Chicago's north side. No video captured the alleged so-called attack, in spite of the over 30,000 cameras in the city, and after purchasing a Subway sandwich, being attacked and going home, he still had the sandwich intact, the noose still around his neck and his phone in his pocket.

He told police that he was on the phone with his manager when the alleged, hard-to-believe attack supposedly took place. But when Chicago police asked to see the phone, Smollett denied them access.

The leftist media had a field day with the fake story and blamed President Trump and the negative atmosphere he created in this country with his racism, homophobia, sexism, antidisestablismentarianism, and all the bad isms one can imagine.

But then the story unraveled and the two men who allegedly jumped him turned out to be two black Nigerian brothers who later said Smollett paid them to carry out the fake attack.

CBS affiliate WBBM-TV has now reported that sources informed them that Chicago police are seeking to interview the actor again after receiving information the attack was staged. Smollett is believed to have paid two men $3,500 to carry out the fake assault, which is a damn good price for the hire.

The Nigerian men — Olabinjo Osundairo and Abimbola Osundairo — left for Nigeria the day after the attack and have since returned to the U.S.

According to TMZ, in light of these revelations, production sources for the Fox show “Empire” have cut back the nine scenes Smollett was supposed to appear in to only four.

He was slated to appear in a “big musical number” in the second to the last episode, which has been nixed.

“As for the remaining 4 scenes … we’re told he’s no longer the focus. The scene features an ensemble, meaning he’s flanked by a number of cast members,” TMZ reported.

As “Empire” writers scramble to rewrite the season’s closing scripts, Smollett faces the prospect of being charged with filing a false police report. If he is found guilty, and since James Comey is not on the case, there's a chance this will happen, he can go to prison for up to 3 years. However, probation is also an option for the judge in this case.

Thus far, Smollett has not agreed to a second interview by police, according to The Wrap.

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about the incident:

 “No problem, its not like he faked a vicious hate crime and rehearsed it thoroughly to try to create a national narrative of hate against Trump supporters… Or that he went on TV to bolster his whole hoax to create attention for himself as a victim or anything like that… Right?”

Several of the Democratic 2020 hopefuls, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand as well as Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Alexandria Obviously Communist, and the race-baiting Al Sharptongue, jumped on the story with both feet before the facts were known.

But the funniest thing was Sharptongue saying that if Smollett lied, he should pay the price for it. What? Like he paid for lying regarding the Tawana Brawley case?


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Fake portrait of Michelle Obama unveiled to stunned public

The National Portrait Gallery unveiled portraits of former President Barack Hussein Obama and his wife Michelle on Monday. It's unclear who the "artist," Amy Sherald, used as a model because it sure didn't look like the shrew who goes by the feminine monicker Michelle.

The woman in the portrait looked charming, soft and pleasant, unlike the former first lady who is often repugnant, hard and angry.

Former failed president Obama praised the Baltimore-based Sherald "for so spectacularly capturing the grace and beauty and intelligence and charm and hotness of the woman I love." 

Just another Obama lie.

For the portrait, the model was painted in "grayscale" --a charcoal color with taupe undertones. She is seated with her hair falling around her shoulders which are not as muscled as the former first lady's shoulders.

"Michelle Obama is an elegant lady and the portrait looks nice. But clearly, the artist drew someone else," Dr. Eugene Gu, a health care columnist for The Hill said.

Michelle did not show disappointment in the painting--perhaps she knows the model who sat for it in her place.

When her portrait was unveiled, Michelle said she "was a little overwhelmed, to say the least."

Then never missing an opportunity to bring race into the discussion, she added, "I'm also thinking about all the young people, particularly girls and girls of color, who in years ahead will come to this place and they will look up, and they will see an image of someone [we don't know who] who looks like them hanging . . . on the wall."

Yes, and if Michelle had a son, he would look like Travon Martin.

Sherald is the first-prize winner of the Portrait Gallery's 2016 Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition. She beat out 2,500 other artists, while the model only beat out Michelle Obama.

Former failed president Obama's portrait was painted by Kehinde Wiley.

It features a seven-foot portrait sitting in a field of pansies or some such flower, and includes chrysanthemums and jasmine, along with African blue lillies to symbolize Obama's Muslim father who was also from Kenya.




Tweet

Jackson-Lee pulls out one of her race cards, as predicted

It's as predictable as the United Nations condemning Israel for something, Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee is pulling out her stack of race cards and using the top one to attack the woman whose seat she bumped from her first-class seat on a United Airlines flight. 

Pulling the race card is Jackson-Lee's default position.

Lucky for her the woman she bumped out of first-class wasn't black because, like Nancy Pelosi with her hands tied behind her back, she'd be speechless. The overweight and overpaid congresswoman bloviated on Twitter that she believes the incident was all about race.

Poor Jackson-Lee. Everybody hates her not because she's a racist herself, but because she's black.

"Since this was not any fault of mine, the way the individual continued to act appeared to be, upon reflection [she actually doesn't have her own reflection] because I was an African American woman, [as still is] seemingly an easy target along with the African American flight attendant who was very, very nice, [unless it was her who got bumped], the Texas Democrat posted. "This saddens me," she lied, " especially at this time of year given all of the things we have to work on to help people."

Aside from herself, who has she really helped? 

Everything for Jackson-Lee is about race, because that's precisely how real racists think. It's like depressed people thinking that everything is depressing.

"But in the spirit of this season [she cannot write or mouth the word "Christmas"] and out of the sincerity of my heart, [which is better than your heart] I am kind enough to simply say sorry."

That isn't kindness--that's called bragging about being better than the woman. 

The ridiculousness continiued: "But as an African American [she isn't from Africa, she's an American American] I know there are too many examples like this all over the nation [because Jackson-Lee cannot finish a complete thought without throwing in race and trying to sound superior]."

Jean-Marie Simon, 63, was the woman who was tossed out of her first-class seat to make way for a bigot who can only see Simon's motive for feeling upset as one of racism.

Simon witnessed a uniformed United employee pull Jackson-Lee from the priority boarding line and escort her political butt to a first-class seat before any other passengers got on the plane.

I personally saw Patrick Ewing, a former New York Knick, at JFK Airport, standing in line behind me to purchase an airline ticket. He was taken off the line with his son to go to the front of the line for priority treatment. Ewing is black, I am white [I believe] and nobody said a word because if I had said something about fairness, I would have been labeled a racist.

And if Jean-Marie Simon somehow bumped Sheila Jackson-Lee from the first-class seat because she paid for it,  I believe Jackson-Lee would have still called Simon a racist.

What I believe had really happened was that United bumped Simon to give Jackson-Lee the first-class seat and then made up a story that she had canceled. It makes no sense that Simon would show up if she actually canceled the flight, so it's probably United is lying.

Sheila Jackson-Lee should have kept silent about the situation as it wasn't directly her fault--especially if she believed the seat wasn't booked for Simon. But like most liberals, she just can't keep her mouth shut and has to have a racial opinion about everything and everybody.

Not every white person is a racist. In fact, relatively few white people are racist, especially to the level Jackson-Lee contends we are.

Only an apology specialist apologized to Simon, nobody at the management level did.

The only way to change things is to frequent businesses that treat you better, even if sometimes it's more expensive or an inconvenience--you're worth it.


Tweet

Rachel Dolezal changes her name to sound black

Former National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) branch president Rachel Dolezal is a caucasian woman who lied and said she is a negro because she identifies with being black. She has now changed her name to sound as if she really is black.

But in spite of the words, the biology doesn't lie. She's still a white woman saying she is black.

Her new name: Nkechi Amare Diallo. 

She may have lifted the last name from the famous black shooting victim, Amadou Diallo who, back in 1999, was shot and killed by four NYPD officers who were all found not guilty of second degree murder based on the circumstances.

Dolezal changed her name in October 2016. The first name, Nkechi, is short for Nkechinyere, which comes from the lgbo language of Nigeria and means "what God has given" or "gift of God."

What God has given Nkechi, formally known as Rachel, is her melanin composition that biologically signifies that she is caucasian. 

It isn't clear why Dolezal changed her name--perhaps it's because of the scandal she went through in 2015 when her parents publicly revealed that she wasn't actually black.

She admitted that she was "biologically born to white parents" but said that race isn't "coded in your DNA." 

Forensic anthropologists consider race biological and argue that it's possible to determine race from physical remains with a reasonable degree of certainty--what is thus identified is known as the geographic phenotype. The field of medicine sees racial categories as a means to assess risk of different heritable illnesses that occur with different frequencies among different geographic ancestries.

Recently, Dolezal has revealed to The Guardian that she is experiencing financial problems since losing her job due to her lying, and is currently nearly homeless and living on food stamps. In that interview she failed to disclose her new name.

Liar that she is, Dolezal started a Change.org petition at the time she changed her name to Diallo but didn't reveal that it was she who made the petition. 

The purpose of the petition was to urge the TEDx organization to release one of her controversial speeches she made on race at the University of Idaho in April 2016. 

The petition read: "Rachel Dolezal's TEDx Talk on Race & Identity, given at the University of Idaho in April 2016, is still not available online. Please post her talk online immediately. She should not be censored due to her unique perspective. We want to watch this speech."

The petition only reached 30 signatures with 100 needed to release the video. However, TEDx released the video in November and they claimed it "has sparked much internal debate."

One could make the argument that everything about Rachel Dolezal is now a lie.


Tweet

Rev Sharptongue's march numbers suck

Race baiter Al Sharptongue, who passes himself off as a reverend, will be marching on Washington on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, merely five days prior to Donald Trump's inauguration. He is hoping to be accompanied by other people on this "march," but it's looking grim for the anti-white, anti-Semitic Sharptongue.

The MSNBC host's "We Shall Not Be Moved" march has inspired less than 1,000 people (with nothing better to do) on Facebook so far. However, the Women's March on Washington scheduled the same day has drawn 175,000 RSVPs and another quarter million people saying they're interested in attending.

Maybe people are getting tired of the venom and hatred Sharptongue spits out against "white folk" and "Hymies," as the anti-Semite calls Jewish people.

The Women's March will be held on January 21st, one week after the Sharpton protest march. This generally means that unless you live in the area, you're going to have to choose between which event you want to attend, and most people obviously don't want to be part of Sharptongue's event.

If Facebook is giving an accurate picture of preference to the two events, Sharptongue is being abandoned 175 to one (LOL).  

A source close to the Rolex watch-wearing Rev. (as in "Revolting") Sharptongue says he's hoping to get at least 5,000 angry anti-white racists to march with him. But that's like flatulence in the wind compared to his competition.

The Women's March has partnered with over 150 organizations, including the National Action Network that once partnered with the Rev. 

In contrast, official materials for Sharptongue's march shows only endorsements from the National Coalition of Black Civic Participation and the National Urban League, both who will obviously partner with anyone willing to ask. But recently, Sharptongue's people published material indicating 29 partners, many of whom are also sponsoring the Women's March and feel sorry for the Rev.

A spokeswoman for the Rev said he's getting support from "labor organizations, clergy, civil liberty groups and activists." She also claimed they're getting interest from college students, specifically from Howard University and Spelman College, but a representative from Spelman dispelled the claim saying they're not sending any students to the march.

But the Rev's spokeswoman disputed the claim saying that "There are over a 100 buses and people coming from all around the country including 21 buses coming from Harlem alone."

Taken literally, this translates to 21 buses coming alone, meaning that 21 bus drivers will attend, and over 100 other bus drivers as well.

And I don't know about now, but in the past, the Rev may have counted as two people.


Tweet

Obama's administration kept list of Muslims for top jobs, excluded infidels

Obama's message to America

The media, mainstream and otherwise, doesn't appear to be interested in this story, perhaps because they're too scared to be labeled Islamophobic or racist (if you believe that an ideology can be considered to be a race). 

This story didn't even make it to the right-of-center Fox News, yet its significance is breathtaking. 

According to a WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta's emails, the Obama administration kept a list of Muslim candidates for jobs in the administration. Podesta is Chairman of the Clinton's presidential campaign and was also a former chief of staff for Bill Clinton.

An aide wrote to John Podesta: "High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted."

As it turned out, many high-profile Muslims were not carefully vetted and still worked for the Obama administration. 

Mohamed Elibiary is a prime example of the failed vetting process. He believes that the United States is an Islamic country and will be part of the caliphate. Elibiary was a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council and there were doubts about his true allegiances years before his appointment.

Elibiary's Twitter profile had the pro-Muslim Brotherhood hand signal "R4BIA" or Rabaa, and Rabbi'ah, sometimes known as Rab3a, which is a common hand gesture and a sign that appeared in late August 2013 in social media and protest marches in Egypt and used to show allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Elibiary was also a speaker at a December 2004 conference in Dallas titled: "A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary." It was all about the visionary, and founding father of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Ayatollah Khomeini.

The Obama administration was obviously okay with that little tidbit.

The Podesta email chain indicated that from 2008, he received lists of exclusively Muslims and Asians to be considered for jobs in the Obama administration, and it further revealed that in the process, Christians from the Middle East were purposefully excluded, or put on a separate list and an aide writing:

"In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of uncertain religion (esp. Christian).

"Also notable, there was concern that some of the Muslims suggested would not survive media scrutiny, with one aide writing, "High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted.

"I suspect some of the people I list would not survive such a vet--but I do personally know, at least in part, virtually all of the candidates in the 1st two categories (but I know very few of those listed for outside boards/commissions."

The lists themselves had a breakdown of candidates with each labeled by their nationality and sometimes race, which depicts the Obama administration's pattern of using race and religion to determine hiring showing some potential appointees labeled with an "F" for female, "B" for black, "H" for Hispanic (definitely not Hebrew) and "M" for Muslim.

In the best of worlds, all potential candidates for any job would be chosen with absolutely no attention paid to religion and race. But in today's world, governments are pressured to show the public a diverse staff that represents the population they represent.

So, in an ideal world, Muslims would be represented in the USA according to their population percentage which is roughly 1 percent. And to take it one step further, 3.8 percent of the American population self-identifies as gay/lesbian, bisexual, or transgender but are represented in the entertainment media by highly overrepresented numbers, proving the enormous power of the left.



Tweet

Rachel Dolezal quits NAACP

Rachel Dolezal, 37, head of the Spokane branch of the NAACP (Not Actually A Colored Person, or so she thought) has quit her post after her white parents accused her of being white. Ms. Dolezal has been portraying herself as a black woman and allegedly told her adopted siblings not to "out" her to anyone because it would hurt her career choices and her credibility when falsely reporting racially-motivated hate-crimes.

When questioned by a reporter as to whether she was an African-American, Ms. Dolezal told him that she didn't understand the question. He spoke slowly the second time: "Are . . . you . . . an . . . African- . . . American?"

She offered no answer.

Ms. Dolezal said that she remains committed to fighting for "what is right and good in this world" except for honesty, integrity and the American way.

She was scheduled to speak at a chapter meeting Monday about issues regarding her racial identity, but canceled. Other liberal folks who "feel" that Ms. Dolezal is black, still planned to meet Monday night because, hey, it's Monday and there's nothing good on television.

Like the true pseudo-professional she is, Ms. Dolezal tendered her resignation on Facebook. She received 1,213,459 "Likes" for her decision.

"This is not me quitting, this is a continuum," the poser wrote. "It's about moving the cause of human rights and the Black Liberation Movement along the continuum from Resistance to Chattel Slavery to Abolition to Defiance of Jim Crow to the building of Black Wall Street to the Civil Rights and Black Power Movement to the #BlackLivesMatter movement and into a future of self-determination and empowerment."

When a Facebook follower asked her if she knew what year it was, she responded: "I don't understand the question."

Dolezal also said that serious problems plague Spokane's black community but "the dialogue has unexpectedly shifted internationally to my personal identity in the context of defining race and ethnicity."

Some members of the NAACP were planning to demand her resignation. Kitara Johnson, a bona fide black woman with a birth certificate to prove it, organized an online petition calling for the white Dolezal to take a leave of absence.

"It's not about race, it's about integrity. If you're a leader, you have to have integrity. She clearly lacks integrity. The other piece is credibility," Johnson said.

The NAACP supported Dolezal because it is possible that this once-upon-a-time non-partisan institution now lacks integrity and credibility. They have tried to dismiss Dolezal's lie by bringing "racial identity" into the mix. So if Dolezal identifies with being black, that works for them.

What if she identified with being African-Lebanese? Is it really any different?

Where is Martin when you need him?

Harriet Tubman

Ruthanne Dolezal, Rachel's biological mother, (and not even distantly related to Harriet Tubman) revealed the family's ancestry as Czech, Swedish and German with a little dab of Native American. 

So, Elizabeth Warren aside, makes Rachel white or perhaps black-Swedish, at least biologically.

Dolezal may have told a little fib about her ethnicity when she applied for the Spokane police board. But for now, Spokane police are suspending investigations into her racial-harassment complaints and looking into her racial-asshat complaints made against her by the public.

Notice how it's mostly the left that defends lies and incredulous claims.

Sadly, Rachel Dolezal could have presented herself honestly and thereby done a lot more for the NAACP. The only thing black about her is the eye she gave them.

Tweet

Why Not Blame the Jews--Jihadists Do

Blame the Jews. Newly elected Brooklyn councilwoman, Laurie Cumbo does. She believes that blacks resent the success of Jewish people and this is why they have been targeted in the crime whose diminutive, less serious term is known as the "knockout game." 

Ms. Cumbo, who is black posted on her Facebook page that black residents in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, are afraid of being "pushed out" by their Jewish landlords. Now that is definitely a new, neat way of looking at what is motivating these young thugs to attacking unsuspecting, often elderly Jewish women and men. They are afraid they will lose their apartments. It makes perfect sense; if I want to remain living in my current apartment house, the way to ensure that is to beat the crap out of my landlord, or at least do it symbolically. That's like a damn James Joyce novel. To be fair, Ms. Cumbo stated that she admires Jewish people, but added "The accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success." You mean to tell me that if I break a world record in the New York City Marathon that record doesn't include everyone else along the sidelines? Okay, maybe not the Jews, but what about all the others who stood there and watched me succeed--don't they deserve credit too?

Chris Matthews: from Hardball to Oddball

It’s incredibly obvious just how liberal the lame stream media is—they can easily be mistaken for Obama’s campaign strategists. But to listen to Chris Matthews and take him seriously, you would have to suspend your intellect and take a flight of fantasy on the Oddball Blimp. Michele Bachmann's campaign announcement and Matthews' response follows.

MICHELE BACHMANN: I want my candidacy for the presidency of the United States to stand for a moment when we, the people, stand once again for the independence from a government that has gotten too big and spends too much and has taken away too much of our liberties. Government thinks it knows better. Government thinks it knows better how to spend our money. Government thinks it knows better how to make a better life for us. They think they create jobs. They even think they can make us healthier, but that's not the case. We have to recapture the Founders' vision of a constitutionally conservative government if we are to secure the promise for the future.

So naturally, this MSM idiot had a different take as he spoke to Michael Steele, former RNC Chair:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: What is this, Michael? The Protestant Reformation? That somehow we're going back to the purity of the original Christian church? We're going back to the original perfection of slaveholders and how perfect they were and government is the enemy. She speaks pure Tea Party lingo.

‘Lingo?’ Matthews’ use of the word ‘lingo’ takes me back to bell bottoms and “Saturday Night Fever.” Can you picture Matthews “cutting up a rug” at the disco? But the purpose of my blogging about him isn’t to put forth an ad hominem attack on the man who would be drooling, but to look at his take on all things not socialistic.  So Michael Steele responds:

MICHAEL STEELE: Well, she's like the Council of Trent for the Catholic Church.

MATTHEWS: Right. What is it she's going back to the purity of the old days?

STEELE: She's not going back to the purity of the old days.

MATTHEWS: Yes, she is.

Isn’t it enlightening to listen to the persuasiveness of the Matthews comeback?  He’s like the kid in the schoolyard who thinks he wins the argument because he yelled louder than the other kids.


STEELE: It's reminding us of some of the foundational principles.

STEELE: What? Slavery?

MATTHEWS: Well, that was in the original founding principles.

Was slavery considered a principal? I don’t think so—while it is mentioned in the Constitution, it seems the Democrats forget that it was the Republicans who fought against slavery in the Civil War, not the slave-owning Democrats. Many liberals like to think of themselves as the only moral group of individuals on earth, as they sail the Gaza flotilla to protest the only moral and civilized country in the Middle East, with their anti-Semitic agenda. The truth is, liberal social systems, like Welfare, keep people slaves to those systems, and most of these people are minorities. Abortion is another liberal notion that is killing more black children than any other killer right now. So don’t tell a conservative about racism. We just have too much dignity to use that term on liberals because we know the real power of that word and we don’t want to make you cry.

STEELE: Please, Chris. Stop. Stop jumping in. You know that's not what this is about. And the reality is, when I became chairman of the RNC in 2009, I inherited a party that was lost. Its moorings not anchored as they once were. And, so, you've have candidates now who have emerged out of the last two years who understand by going around the country and listening to the people what some of those foundational issues are for them. Let me speak to that.

               
MATTHEWS: Okay, let's take Michael at his word. The foundational issues: Government is bad.

This simplistic response from Matthews should not trick you into believing he is an idiot—I’m sure he isn’t really an idiot. That would give idiots a bad name and label them liberals. Matthews is a man whose TV audience is limited to viewers who will only watch whatever preconceived notions they have gotten from The Daily Show. They don’t like Fox because the moment a report disagrees with something Jon Stewart has said in order to make conservatives look stupid, these viewers become angry, lost, and confused. They find solace in finding someone to call a racist, because while race seems to be the one issue they cannot get out of their mind, they know how to hurt with the label. So Chris Matthews stoops to the lowest level he can find in order to appease his zombie followers.  His “racist-oriented.”

Click here to sample Jihad Joe, a novel

 


Tweet