New York professor who threatened reporter with a machete fired after anti-Semitic rants

Shellyne Rodriguez, a professor at Cooper Union in Manhattan,  was caught holding a machete to the neck of a reporter last year. The video made it to the mainstream media as Rodriguez appeared to act in a crazy violent way.

She has reportedly been fired from her latest teaching gig due to her anti-Semitic views.

But this isn't Rodriguez's first canning. Last year when she worked at Hunter College, in New York City, she had been terminated for similar craziness.

"Cooper Union has fired me because of a social media post I made about ‘Zionists’… effective immediately," Rodriguez, 47, wrote in a Jan. 23 email to students, according to the New York Post. Cooper Union Students for Justice in Palestine shared the email on Instagram the next day.

"This is fascism. Ya’ll are learning about it in real time," Rodriguez wrote. "Stay strong, [stay] brave, stay defiant, don’t bite your tongue, and drink plenty of water! Pa-lante!"

She obviously thought that the October 7 massacre was okay to do to those, you know, Jews.

"This firing represents an intense escalation of McCarthyist repression meant to intimidate and punish those in support of a Free Palestine, and must be resisted to prevent its further normalization and the ongoing genocide in Gaza," the student group wrote, calling on followers to email the art school dean.

No actually the firing represents decent people unwilling to accept their college age kids being taught to hate any group of people simply for their inherent characteristics. Dolt.

According to the Post, the college spokesperson declined to speak as a spokesperson, but the outlet noted Rodriguez is no longer listed on the Cooper Union faculty page.

The reasoning for her latest termination was not immediately clear but came after Rodriguez participated earlier last month in a CUNY for Palestine virtual panel in which she spoke about the possibility of a Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement rent strike in New York involving not making rent payments to Jewish landlords or landlords who support Israel, which is disgusting and illegal.

Her remarks were widely condemned online as antisemitic. They included the so called professor explaining, "the idea that we could be a Trojan horse, that we are inside empire, and you’re here to upend it." Regarding others who support Israel and condemn terrorism, she went "Maxine Waters and told those on the panel, "You probably wait tables where they go to brunch. Find them, go to their offices, don’t let them sleep." 

According to the Post, the anti-Semite Rodriguez also blasted former Bronx Borough President Rubén Díaz Jr. as a "roach" and "Zionist lapdog" on her Instagram account.

"Jewish students at Cooper Union are very relieved that they fired her," Jeffrey Lax, a CUNY law professor and co-founder of Students and Faculty for Equality at CUNY, which advocates for Jewish students on campus, told the Post. "Her comments were really despicable."

"Normally, I would say I commend the university for taking action against this professor but in this case, how can I possibly say that she did something far worse before they hired her? I mean, she held a knife to a reporter’s neck," Lax told the outlet. "They’re not to be commended, they should be ashamed of themselves."

Her termination from Cooper Union also comes months after pro-Palestinian protesters at the school banged on the windows of the school library while Jewish students had locked themselves inside.

The hateful professor also notably organized "f*** police" demonstrations in 2020 after the death of the thug George Floyd in Minneapolis. 

Rodrigues actually should be in jail and then be required to be in intense psychotherapy. A year in Israel might also clear her thinking.

Tweet

Is Harvard's Claudine Gay a plagiarist or an anti-Semite or both?

Claudine Gay defending Jew harassment

An anti-white racist, an anti-Semite and a plagiarist walk into a bar. The bartender, who happens to be a former socialist congresswoman from New York, smiles and says, "What are you having Doctor Gay?"

Harvard President Claudine "Depending on the Context" Gay is finally coming out. No, not as a gay woman, but as an alleged plagiarist, and definitely as an anti-Semite who also hates white people, especially conservative white men. 

Gay is the first black woman to preside over Harvard, a former prestigious university that has gone the way of the left and continues in its long-standing history of anti-Semitism. Gay has often been accused of bullying colleagues, overseeing a racist admissions program and suppressing free speech. Who among us can forget how she refused to answer Rep. Elise Stefanik's (R-NY) question at the Congressional Hearing as to whether calling for the genocide of the Jews was considered by Harvard to be harassment. Instead she claimed that it depended on the context. She was asked the same question 17 times and came up with the same nonsense.

Chris Rufo of the Manhattan Institute of Policy Research obtained exclusive documentation that appears to indicate another problem with Gay. Specifically, she appears to have plagiarized sections of her Ph.D. dissertation, a violation of Harvard's standards, and virtually every college, university and every publishing house in the nation, mostly because it's illegal and grounds for a lawsuit.

Shades of Joe Biden!

Gay's dissertation, “Taking Charge: Black Electoral Success and the Redefinition of American Policies,” was published in 1997, as part of her doctorate in political science from Harvard. The reason she has gotten away with the alleged plagiarism for so long is that people tend not to read those things because they're tediously boring.

Gay's paper deals with white-black political representation and racial attitudes, much like the tripe that Ihram X. Kendi writes and refuses to debate anyone on.

Chris Rufo

As evaluated under Harvard's own plagiarism policy, the paper contains at least three problematic patterns of usage and citation.

First, the affirmative-action-now-school-president lifted an entire paragraph almost verbatim from Lawrence Bobo and Franklin Gilliam’s paper, “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” She never cited with author and passed it off as her own language.

Here is the original, from Bobo and Gilliam:

Using 1987 national sample survey data . . . the results show that blacks in high-black-empowerment areas—as indicated by control of the mayor’s office—are more active than either blacks living in low-empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status. Furthermore, the results show that empowerment influences black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation to politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs.

And here is the language from Gay’s so called work:

Using 1987 survey data, Bobo and Gilliam found that African-Americans in “high black-empowerment” areas—as indicated by control of the mayor’s office—are more active than either African-Americans in low empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status. Empowerment, they conclude, influences black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation towards politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs.

It's obvious that Gay didn't think too deeply in how to interpret what the authors were saying, using her own words and thoughts. Yes, she referenced Bobo and Gilliam, but uses their language with few exceptions.

But this isn't a "one-off." Gay continues repeating the same violations throughout the dissertation along with passages from Susan Howell, Deborah Fagan, and Richard Shingles, which again was practically copied and pasted.

Gay also apparently lifted work by Carol Swain at least twice, as Rufo points out: "In one passage, summarizing the distinction between 'descriptive representation' and 'substantive representation,' she copies the phrasing and language nearly verbatim from Swain’s book Black Faces, Black Interests, without providing a citation of any kind."

 Swain writes:

Pitkin distinguishes between “descriptive representation,” the statistical correspondence of the demographic characteristics … and more “substantive representation,” the correspondence between representatives’ goals and those of their constituents.

Gay’s version is basically the same, with tiny modifications to the diction and punctuation:

Social scientists have concentrated . . . between descriptive representation (the statistical correspondence of demographic characteristics) and substantive representation (the correspondence of legislative goals and priorities).

Later in the paper, Rufo explains,  Gay uses identical language to Swain, without adding quotation marks, as required. 

Rufo then writes:

Third, Gay composes an entire appendix in the dissertation directly taken from Gary King’s book, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. While she cites King’s book—in fact, King was her dissertation advisor—Gay does not explicitly acknowledge that Appendix B is entirely grounded in King’s concepts, instead passing it off as her own original work. 

Throughout the appendix, Gay takes entire phrases and sentences directly from King’s book, without any citations or quotation marks. In total, Gay borrows material from King in at least half a dozen paragraphs—all in violation of Harvard’s standard on academic integrity.

Rufo et al., then call on Harvard's Board of Overseers to conduct "a full investigation into Claudine Gay's academic integrity."

But they have already given her the green light to support the green headscarf with all that funny Arabic writing on it.

Tweet

MSNBC Fires Racist Host . . . Finally

You can put lipstick on a racist, but she's still a racist

MSNBC's weekend host, Tiffany Cross [her surname fits her chronic demeanor] was finally fired by the far-left network after she was lip-deep in another racist controversy. 

Cross hosted "Cross Connection" and was sent packing Friday, several weeks after saying that "white owners" and "white coaches" were to blame for the failed handling of Tua Tagovailoa's concussion football injury on September 29.

This racist woman is able to make everything bad that ever happened or happens, the fault of the white man.

According to Variety, the network decided to not renew Cross’s contract after two racist years at the network, and after relations between her and her bosses reportedly became “frayed.”

Cross’s NFL non sequitor comments got her in trouble with critics and non-racists who said she inaccurately and for no reason made Tagovailoa's serious injury a race issue.

“To see all these black men crashing into each other with a bunch of white owners, white coaches, and the complete disregard for black bodies and black life … it just represents a larger issue,” Cross pontificated at the time, as reported by Outkick.

Cross’s argument was quickly countered by former Fox News host Megyn Kelly, who called the now ex-MSNBC host “the most racist person on television.”

But Joy Reid is fast coming up from the rear for that "honor."

As reported by Mediaite, Kelly blasted Cross, stating, “he’s Samoan and his coach is mixed race,” Kelly added after the clip aired. “Had a white parent and a Black parent. So, anyway, he’s not White. I guess in Tiffany’s world that’s White.”

“But in any event, this person sees everything through [an] ‘it’s racist’ prism.”

After news broke that Cross had been fired, Kelly commended MSNBC for the move, “I tip my hat to MSNBC and NBC for doing the right thing, because as I said, she was the most racist person on television,” as reported by the New York Post. 

Variety reported that Cross’s termination was caused by her “indulging in commentary executives felt did not meet the standards of MSNBC or NBC News.” Had she blamed Donald Trump or the GOP for the concussion, Cross would still be on the air.

But Cross should not have surprised the brass at MSNBC as her anti-white racist comments were her go-to moves.

After the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict was announced, Cross decried GOP lawmakers as supporting a “murderous White supremacist.”

Commenting on Will Smith’s Oscar slapping incident, Cross declared white people should refrain from talking about the matter, because it was a “family discussion.”

Say what?

Her latest rant came one day before news broke that she was fired, leading many to believe that this was the straw that broke the camel’s back, according to the National Review.

In this rant, she attacked the state of Florida and Florida governor Ron Desantis, saying the state was the “dick of the country.”

“Ron DeStupid, Ron DeSantis, whatever you wanna call Florida man, he is so problematic,” she ranted in a cross manner. “He traffics in stupidity and ignorance, and I just think they are a problem for the rest of the country. Let’s get them out.”

Cross attended, but eventually dropped out, of Clark Atlanta University taking mass communications with an emphasis on tv, radio and film.

Ron DeSantis studied history at Yale University, was captain of Yale's varsity baseball team [with team's best batting average of .336] and was worked while attending school as an electrician's assistant and baseball coach. He graduated in 2001 with a B.A. magna cum laude and went on to teach history and sports at Darlington School for a year. He attended Harvard Law School and graduated in 2006 cum laude and obtained a Juris Doctor.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

It's laughable that Tiffany Cross would make fun of Ron DeSantis' surname and say that he's stupid and ignorant. 

DeSantis did not drop out of school and was not fired from a job.

Tweet

Subpar QB Kaepernick agrees to go on NFL slave trading block

Colin Kaepernick

Former NFL slave, multi millionaire, cop-hating, kneeling for the national anthem scumwafer, Colin Kaepernick, wants to become a slave once again, because the first time he didn't suck enough. I know that may sound harsh but he deserves every word of it.

Kaepernick will once again participate in a throwing a football job interview with the University of Michigan's spring game. He thanked the team for making him "honorary captain," while others have a less flattering opinion of the guy who wore "pig" socks depicting America's law enforcement as such.

The suck-worthy Kaepernick last played in the NFL in 2016, when men were men and women were women. The NFL Network reported that the floundering QB will be throwing a football to draft-eligible players at halftime and NFL team personnel will view his performance.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

In March, Kaepernick said he's still "hopeful" to get the chance to be enslaved to an NFL team and, for the second time after he was out of football, will try to throw a football to prove that he doesn't suck like last time. He said the recently spoke with Seattle Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll and GM John Schneider. If they enslave him to the team, he hopes to lead them to get off his knee and lead them on the gridiron. 

Hopefully Kaepernick gets what he deserves, not what he wants.

Tweet

Popeyes greasy chicken store investigated for posting sign: "Will reserve the right to refuse service to white people"

Old white man forgoes his pushups for ice cream after
chowing down on greasy chicken chunks

It's about time the law steps in when a business clearly shows its racist proclivities thinking no one is paying attention. Finally, authorities have begun a  criminal investigation into a sign posted at a Popeyes restaurant in Lake Saint Louis, Missouri. The sign announced that the greasy chicken joint reserved the "right to refuse service to white people."

A photo of the sign — which was reportedly affixed to an area in the restaurant's drive-thru — was widely circulated across social media platforms Wednesday, and said, "Effective 6-1-21 This restaurant is under new management and will reserve the right to refuse service to white people. We apologize for any inconvenience. Signed, General Manager, Mason."

Well, "F" Mason, if that was really his doing, but evidence seems to suggest otherwise.

The restaurant was forced to close on Wednesday over the outrage.

According to KTVI-TV, Lake Saint Louis police said that they believe someone may have erected the sign "unbeknownst to the business" and added that the sign could be related to an act of vandalism that took place at the store earlier in May. 

The vandalism, according to Lt. Pat Doering of the Lake Saint Louis Police Department, said that the vandalism included shattered glass and obscene messages painted on the restaurant's drive-thru menu.

A statement from the department said, "We are currently working and investigating a trespassing and possibly a related vandalism case which occurred at Popeyes located at 6475 Ronald Reagan Drive in Lake Saint Louis. Earlier this month, several drive through menu signs were spray-painted. Today, unknown subjects posted an inappropriate sign on the drive-thru window, unbeknownst to the business."

A manager, who remains unnamed at the time of this reporting, said that surveillance video of the building "confirms employees didn't post the sign."

So Mason, or whatever your real name is, we believe you. While the evidence isn't proof of your innocence, it clearly shows that your restaurant attracts anti-white racists and the probability is very high that at least one of these cretins vandalized your establishment. 

In a statement to KTVI, Popeyes tooted his pipe and said, "Arr, we have been mades awares of the situations and are investigating this matters immediately. Arr. This types of behavior does not align with our brand values, you land lubbers, and we takes such allegations very seriously. The franchise is cooperating with local authorities regarding this ongoing investigation. Arr."

Oddly enough, they do not serve spinach at Popeyes.

— Paris Schutz (@paschutz)

Chicago PBS political reporter said that she could “confirm” what Ahern was alleging.


I can confirm, alderman

— Heather Cherone (@HeatherCherone) May 18, 2021

Lightfoot’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire or Fox News.

Australian political commentator Rita Panahi responded to the allegations by writing on Twitter: “More ‘anti-racist’ racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left.”


More "anti-racist" racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left. https://t.co/VtzpQyfklg

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) May 19, 2021

“Racism in the name of wokeism is still racism,” another commentator said. Another added, “So wouldn’t that make her a racist?”

Progressive writer Zaid Jilani wrote: “Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule?”


Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule? https://t.co/9d7rXZTnCV

— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) May 19, 2021

“It is unclear when such a practice was enacted and if it only applies to local reporters, particularly after her MSNBC appearance with Stephanie Ruhle on Monday,” Fox News reported. “During her MSNBC interview, Lightfoot told Ruhle she would ‘encourage’ Chicago residents to continue wearing masks despite the new CDC guidance allowing those with the coronavirus vaccine to go without them.”

“I know for me personally, I’m going to continue to wear a mask in public and I’m going to encourage others to do so,” Lightfoot told Ruhle. “We’ve got to make sure that people are continuing to follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far, and masks, I think, are a big and important part of that.”

Lightfoot said on Tuesday afternoon that her decision to continue to encourage people to wear masks was not based on distrust of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“But I think their guidance last week regarding masks has people confused…We need clarification,” Lightfoot said. “We still have a long way to go to hit the critical mass (of vaccinations) or herd immunity. I don’t want people to have false confidence.”

“To say, ‘If you’re vaccinated, you don’t have to wear a mask,’ that’s great. But what about all of the other people who are out there that aren’t vaccinated?” Lightfoot added. “There’s no way to know that. So I think for the time being, most people are gonna continue to wear masks outside of their homes.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

NY Times stands with Sarah Jeong after racist tweets surface

The New York Times is standing with its decision to hire tech writer Sarah Jeong despite a Twitter history of derogatory tweets aimed at gays, blacks, lesbians and transgender people.

Oh, wait. I got it wrong--it was aimed at white people, particularly old white men, but not limited to age.

"Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men," Jeong wrote in July 2014. That was merely one of many messages that have gone viral.

On Wednesday social media went ballistic with images of racist tweets sent from an unverified account appearing to belong to Jeong, soon after the Gray Lady announced she was joining the rag.

The Times issued a statement Thursday saying they reviewed her social media history and since finding nothing negative about women, people of color or the LGBTQ community or any other intersectional group of privilege, [Mexicans, little people, Muslims or illegal immigrants] they were going ahead with the hiring.

"We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done . . . her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers," the Times unashamedly said in a statement. "She regrets it, and the Times does not condone it.

So let me get this straight . . . if, say, a guy named Solomon Bernstein tweets: "South Korean hack, Sarah Jeong, writes like crap," she would have responded, "Oh boy, how I love to piss off the Jews" and the Times would be okay hiring her because she was responding in kind?

And how did she know on Twitter that her harassers were "old, white men"? That makes no sense unless she can come up with tweets where they reveal their ages, and melanin levels.

But not all of Jeong's "exceptional" work was about police and old white men--she wasn't too happy with all men in general and white women weren't her cup of tea.

The Times can say whatever they want and hire whomever they want, but let's not pretend they would have hired her if she made racist remarks about the acceptable groups the left holds dear.

Jeong tweeted in 2016 that  "dumbass f***ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants." She also called "old white men" "lemmings" and said that white people will "go extinct soon" using the hashtag "CancelWhitePeople.

So please don't try passing that crap off as 'imitating the rhetoric' of the harassment she experienced.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins, she wrote in 2014. She also added a graph claiming that "whiteness" results in being "awful."

Hard to believe that generalizing to her harassers by globalizing all white people in such racist terms, makes it impossible to believe that she was merely responding to the harassing rhetoric she received.

Oh, and wouldn't it be nice to actually see the 'harassment' she has faced as a dumbass so-called journalist?

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

Farrakhan: 'Mr. Trump is destroying every enemy that was an enemy of our rise'

Louis POS Farrakhan, leader of the anti-Semitic, anti-white Nation of Islam bowel movement, is now shouting his praise about President Trump. [With friends like Farrakhan, you don't need enemas.] 

It was two years ago that Farrakhan said, "If Donald Trump becomes president, he will take America into the abyss of hell." Dramatic words from a dirtbag who once said, "White folks are going down. And Satan is going down. And Farrakhan, by God's grace, has pulled the cover off of that Satanic Jew and I'm here to say your time is up, your world is through." 

And more recently he gave an anti Semitic speech in which he said: "The powerful Jews are my enemy."

Regarding the president, Farrakhan said that it may not have been Trump's intention to help his cause, but claimed that Trump is destroying the enemies of the Nation of Islam, which includes the FBI and DOJ.

If law enforcement are this scumwafer's enemies, it should tell you about his character and modus operandi. 

He tweeted:

"Mr. Trump is destroying every enemy that was an enemy of our rise. Who is the enemy of our rise? Is it the Department of Justice where we get none? Is it Congress where you make a law that favors us and then you turn around and destroy it?

The leftist media hasn't covered this story. It sounds like the media blackout over in the UK when Tommy Robinson got arrested for covering the child sex grooming trial by Muslim immigrants. Only Steven Smith (R-Ga.) tweeted about Farrakhan's words.

And the leader of the Nation of Islam promises that more will follow regarding his opinion of President Trump. [Imagine what his opinion of Trump would be if he happened to be Jewish--it's bad enough that he's white.]

It's unknown what the future will be but it's possible Farrakhan will support Trump in the future, which may sway some of the black vote and will scare the bejesus out of the Democrats.


Tweet

Rev Sharptongue's march numbers suck

Race baiter Al Sharptongue, who passes himself off as a reverend, will be marching on Washington on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, merely five days prior to Donald Trump's inauguration. He is hoping to be accompanied by other people on this "march," but it's looking grim for the anti-white, anti-Semitic Sharptongue.

The MSNBC host's "We Shall Not Be Moved" march has inspired less than 1,000 people (with nothing better to do) on Facebook so far. However, the Women's March on Washington scheduled the same day has drawn 175,000 RSVPs and another quarter million people saying they're interested in attending.

Maybe people are getting tired of the venom and hatred Sharptongue spits out against "white folk" and "Hymies," as the anti-Semite calls Jewish people.

The Women's March will be held on January 21st, one week after the Sharpton protest march. This generally means that unless you live in the area, you're going to have to choose between which event you want to attend, and most people obviously don't want to be part of Sharptongue's event.

If Facebook is giving an accurate picture of preference to the two events, Sharptongue is being abandoned 175 to one (LOL).  

A source close to the Rolex watch-wearing Rev. (as in "Revolting") Sharptongue says he's hoping to get at least 5,000 angry anti-white racists to march with him. But that's like flatulence in the wind compared to his competition.

The Women's March has partnered with over 150 organizations, including the National Action Network that once partnered with the Rev. 

In contrast, official materials for Sharptongue's march shows only endorsements from the National Coalition of Black Civic Participation and the National Urban League, both who will obviously partner with anyone willing to ask. But recently, Sharptongue's people published material indicating 29 partners, many of whom are also sponsoring the Women's March and feel sorry for the Rev.

A spokeswoman for the Rev said he's getting support from "labor organizations, clergy, civil liberty groups and activists." She also claimed they're getting interest from college students, specifically from Howard University and Spelman College, but a representative from Spelman dispelled the claim saying they're not sending any students to the march.

But the Rev's spokeswoman disputed the claim saying that "There are over a 100 buses and people coming from all around the country including 21 buses coming from Harlem alone."

Taken literally, this translates to 21 buses coming alone, meaning that 21 bus drivers will attend, and over 100 other bus drivers as well.

And I don't know about now, but in the past, the Rev may have counted as two people.


Tweet

Lena Dunham apologizes, sort of

Mentally impaired "actress" Lena Dunham is taking back her comment she made on her podcast "Women of the Hour" in which she said: " . . . I still haven't had an abortion, but I wish I had." 

The reason she's taking it back is obviously due to the huge backlash she received from normal human beings who, even if they don't oppose abortion, see it as something not to wish for and viewed her remark as offensive.

Dunham explained in an Instagram post that her "latest podcast episode was meant to tell a multifaceted story about reproductive choice in America."

She hoped that by using a big word, 'multifaceted' people would be fooled into believing she is intelligent.

"I truly hope a distasteful joke on my part won't diminish the amazing work of all the women who participated [in the podcast]. My words were spoken from a sort of 'delusional girl' persona I often inhabit, a girl who careens between wisdom and ignorance . . . and it didn't translate. That's my fault. I would never, ever intentionally trivialize the emotional and physical challenges of terminating a pregnancy."

But she did, so that's a lie.

And her cop-out is to pretend she has multiple personality? "Delusional girl"? 

No wonder this woman was big on Hillary Clinton. They're cut from the same pitchfork.

She's no better than the MTV racists and sexists who attack all white men and after the backlash say it was a joke.

Go to hell, Dunham and MTV .  .  .  just joking.

Tweet

Controversial Keith Ellison hopes to run the DNC

I have faith in the intelligence of the American people (maybe not so much faith in the intelligence of liberals). That's why I believe the GOP should hope Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) becomes the next chairman of the DNC. 

Normal people would vote Republican.

Anyone with analytical powers or plain common sense would have a totally changed view of the Democratic Party if Ellison is appointed, and voters, as described above, would have to think twice before pledging allegiance to a party that would have such a leader.

But again, we're talking about liberals--they don't seem to like America as it is now and always want to change her.

Ellison is the first Muslim to be elected to U.S. Congress. That in and of itself is not an issue, but beside a history of not paying his parking tickets (something that is unlawful) Ellison is a strong supporter of Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam. 

When Ellison attended the University of Minnesota Law School, he wrote several articles supporting the anti-Semitic, anti-white Farrakhan. You can see more on Farrakhan here, here  and here.

But Farrakhan doesn't like white people either. 

Ellison had also called for the impeachment of Dick Chaney and compared George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler, so of course Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren love the guy as does Chuck Schumer (D. NY) and Harry Reid (D. Nev.).

Another website,  Jihad Watch, has a lot to say about Ellison and his relationship to Islam.

Ellison back Bernie Sanders in the election. "Bernie sparked the beginning of a revolution y'all," he said at the DNC in Philadelphia. "Together we call for climate justice, racial justice, wage justice."

Nobody is quite sure what 'climate justice' means, and racial justice is Ellison's idea that cops need to stop returning fire. Wage justice is the belief that your money needs to be divided up, but not the money of the elite.

Sanders has also backed Ellison and said in a fundraising email that an Ellison-led Democratic Party will stand up to Wall Schtreet greed and corporate America. 

Socialists hate big corporations because they're big.

Ellison is expected to announce his bid Monday. On Sunday, he hinted he would run and said the party needs to focus on middle- and working-class Americans and less on donors.


Tweet

A Racist Twit

If the story went like this:

Boston University has a new incoming assistant professor of sociology and African-American studies who will be starting to teach there in June. Her name is Saida Grundy.

She is the first white professor to teach African-American studies and recently her Twitter account tweets were exposed by someone from another school. The tweets went like this: "Black masculinity isn't a problem for america's (sic) colleges. White masculinity is THE problem for america's (sic) colleges."

There would be outrage and Grundy would be fired quicker than a Bill Clinton pickup line in a sorority house.

But Grundy is black and she wasn't tweeting about black masculinity, she was tweeting about white masculinity. So, no harm, no foul, in the liberal mind. In fact, on Friday, the school's spokesman, Colin Riley (not to be confused with Anus O'Toole who runs the debate club) told FoxNews.com that Grundy was "exercising her right to free speech and we respect her right to do so."

I'm all for free speech, even when I don't want to hear what the liberal exercising that right is saying. But let's face it, if Grundy was white making the exact statements about black men on campus, she would have been told to go elsewhere to teach her racist hatred.

She has also tweeted more racist crap incorrectly claiming that only whites had enslaved entire generations of people. "Deal with your white shit, white people. slavery is *YALL* thing."

Grundy does not seem to like white folks very much, I believe.

On Saturday, the school had been inundated by angry emails. Some of these emails were from former donors to the so-called institution of higher learning stating they would no longer donate to the school.

So after the brave staff of Boston University finished peeing in their skivvies, the tune changed: "The University does not condone racism or bigotry in any form and we are deeply saddened when anyone makes such offensive statements." the university's Colin said with a tremble in his voice.

Nick Pappas, a student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst was the person who discovered the tweets and posted Grundy's racist tweets on his website SoCawledge.com.

Pappas questioned how she could teach a diverse group of students when she holds racial hostility toward an entire group of people. "You have to teach college-aged white males eventually, no? . . . this seems like you are unqualified to grade their work as you clearly demonstrate some kind of special bias against them," he wrote.

When the fertilizer hit the proverbial fan, this was when alumni and donors wrote to complain. 

Riley doubled-down stating: " . . . the opinions expressed by Dr. Grundy, in what were seemingly private electronic messages, constitutes her opinion and we must recognize her right to have that opinion whether or not we agree."

True, we all have equal dibs on the First Amendment.

But the school does not have to hire her if her opinion is racist, vile and likely to interfere with her ability to grade students fairly. Also, the "seemingly private electronic messages" were not so private that Nick Pappas was unable to retrieve them from social media.

Grundy didn't respond to requests for comment from FoxNews.com and has now made her Twitter account private, which proves my point about it.

David Horowitz, who runs the website FrontPageMagazine.com and is the author of "Reforming our Universities," told FoxNews.com that "Anti-white racism is rampant in Black Studies programs." 

He also pointed out how the school's reaction to the blowback betrays double-standards on race. "If she were a white racist rather than an anti-white racist, she would never be hired. Professors are supposed to be experts in some scholarly field and professionals in their classroom discourse. They don't have a license to indoctrinate students in their prejudices--whether those prejudices are right or left," Horowitz said.

Let me repeat: I am all for free speech. We all have the right to express our opinions. But if I work for Burger King and tweeted that I believe their burgers taste like the leather of a bicycle seat on a hot summer day after Michael Moore rode it, I would expect to be looking for work at McDonalds very soon thereafter.

Tweet