Biden's team distances itself from anti-Semite Linda Sarsour

She is the former Women's March leader, an overtly anti-Semitic organization led by an overtly anti-Semitic Linda Sarsour.

Sarsour made a DNC appearance during the convention but now the Biden campaign is claiming that it has nothing to do with Sarsour.

Linda Sarsour along with Tamika Mallory were booted out of the Women's March organization after making anti-Semitic statements against the Jewish state of Israel and claims that Jewish activists were being excluded from the movement.

Sarsour is also a blatant supporter of the Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement (BDS) against Israel and she supports the terrorist organization of Hamas.

"Joe Biden has been a strong supporter of Israel and a vehement opponent of anti-Semitism his entire life, and he obviously condemns her views and opposes BDS, as does the Democratic platform," Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement, referring to Sarsour. "She has no role in the Biden campaign whatsoever."

Former prostitute, thief and current rapper, Cardi B, is a strong supporter of Biden and he supports her, along with Megan Thee Stallion's efforts at performing their rap video known as "WAP" [not shown here as it is too vulgar to be considered for my blog, but you can Google the lyrics if you're so inclined].

The DNC platform, which was approved Tuesday, also condemns the BDS movement, while recognizing the rights of individuals who may feel anti-Semitism is their right.

What the DNC has not as yet condemned is the rioting across American inner cities controlled by their party; the anti-Semitic remarks made by Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN) and others in the "squad"; the pardon by Trump of Susan B. Anthony; moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem after Obama and George W. Bush promised the same thing and failed to do it; China; the Steele dossier; and spying on an elected President of the United States, to name just a few issues.

Sarsour was involved in this year's primary season, however, as she was a surrogate for Bernie Sanders' campaign. In February, she reached out to the Muslim Democratic Club of New York trying to drum up support for Sanders, according to The Intercept.

Sarsour appeared on screen during the convention on Tuesday during a meeting of Muslim delegates. While the Muslim Delegates Assembly was approved by the DNC to participate, but the meeting itself was not run by the DNC.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Women's March 2019: bitter cold, global warming baby killers

A fairly large group of women, as well as men who think they're women, and women who are married to women, and men looking to meet women, gathered up in Washington, D.C. and 180 other cities for their annual redundant march for rights they already have, and to protest the president who beat Hillary Clinton in 2016. 

"I am even more outraged than I was three years ago," said a placard carried by a 40-year-old severely depressed Washington resident, who was down four doses of her Zoloft. "We all knew that Trump was going to be horrible, and he has been even more horrible than we realize."

Sure, he's more horrible than we realize: his job numbers horribly soar; he horribly lowered taxes; reduced the horrible number of regulations, recognized the horrible city of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel; killed Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and his terror-buddy, Cassem Soleimani in the most horrible way; horribly made decent trade deals with China, Mexico and Canada; horribly decreased illegal immigration, and got rid of the crappy Iran nuclear deal, just for starters.

Oh so horrible is he.

Pussy hats or Trump: you make the call

Despite the relatively paltry turnout, with only a few thousand participants on the streets of Washington, activists remained hopeful about the power to organize marches, but for what, remains unclear.

"It is a cold day and it does not matter if it's 10 people or 100 people or 1,000 people if our voices are strong," said a runny-nose lonely 50-year-old woman who added that she regularly attends the march that started in 2017 because it gives her something to do with her hands now that she's trying to quit smoking. "We are powerful together — that's the most important thing." Then she sighed.

In 2017 the Women's March attracted almost a million people to the streets of Washington, D.C. and hundreds of thousands across the country one day after President Trump was inaugurated and Hillary Clinton finally pulled herself together and stopped sobbing.

Many of the protesters cited Trump's hard-line policy on women's "reproductive rights," which is a false premise.

Trump and conservatives have no qualms with a woman's right to reproduce. The President and conservatives just have a qualm with a woman thinking she has the right to kill her baby after she reproduces. It isn't as if anyone stops her from doing what people to do get pregnant; it's just that her failure to take precautions regarding her behavior should not give her the right to kill her baby. And even in the horrible case of a child being conceived from rape, that should not be a death sentence on the innocent baby.

The cold protesters were also protesting climate change. They support the Green New Deal written in crayon by a low-information socialist with the notion that if enough money is taxed, and the government takes over the ownership of all the means of production, somehow the climate will dutifully fall into place, like Obama's promise to stem the rise of the oceans and heal the planet, this is nonsense.

"Look what's he's doing to Greta Thunberg," said a denture-chattering 70-year-old climate alarmist, referring to the teenage Swedish socialist who launched the Fridays for Future school strikes to draw attention to the man-made destabilization of earth's climate, hoping that if successful, it would excuse her from all the school she has missed.

In spite of the revelation that it is her father who apparently writes her Facebook posts, and who knows what else, Thunberg was named the leftist Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2019.

Trump has regularly targeted Thunberg on Twitter as he tends to target everyone on Twitter who has far-left opinions. Trump lamented climate change as a ploy "created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive." I don't know how true that is, but it made Thunberg's meany face even meaner.

"He's the biggest bully in the world," added the 70-year-old activist. Actually, it's more likely that Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and Cassem Soleimani were bigger bullies, but what does a frozen 70-year-old woman know when her hobby is walking with a sign and thinking it will change the weather?

Other protests took place in New York, Los Angeles and other major cities across the US.

Some men joined the march in the hope of getting it on with a stranger.

The march was held the same day the US National Archives apologized for blurring anti-Trump signs in a promotional image for a women's suffrage exhibition.

This marked an historical mistake because it was a mistake going in the direction that favored the President rather than against him as all the other "mistakes" have gone in the media.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

AOC whines about being called out on her fake accent with black audience

If she looked like this, would she have won?

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose got a ton of negative blowback after she spoke at Al Sharptongue's National Action Network in New York City using a feeble accent that she apparently assumed made her sound like a black person. It was an embarrassment, but AOC has the self-awareness of a newborn baby whose Democrat mother and doctor is deciding what to do with her.

"I'm proud to be a bartender, ain't nothin wrong with that," comrade AOC said, using a straw man argument as if anyone said there's something wrong with that. "There's nothing wrong with working retail, folding clothes for other people to buy. There is nothing wrong with preparing the food that your neighbors will eat. There is nothing wrong with driving the buses that take your family to work."

There's nothing wrong with being a surgeon, like Dr. Ben Carson. Or being an economist, like Thomas Sowell. Or being a Supreme Court Justice, like Clarence Thomas. But AOC would never mention them because they're not Democrats and they're certainly not how she apparently views black people.

And AOC, heck, she too don't feel no ways tired.

After being ripped a new one, the socialist neophyte played the victim card complaining on Friday about the backlash she faced after she spoke to an audience of predominately black people in an accent she believed would ingratiate herself with them, but which sparked widespread accusations that her remarks were racist and patronizing.

Obviously-Comatose — who generally refers to Republicans as racists, white supremacists, and xenophobes, because she cannot actually debate the issues — complained that is was "so hurtful" that people would call her out for the way she talked to black audience members. Poor Alex. Poor, poor girl.

"Folks talking about my voice can step right off," the socialist Clinton-style panderer tweeted. "Women’s March & Kavanaugh speech, same. Any kid who grew up in a distinct linguistic culture & had to learn to navigate class enviros at school/work knows what’s up. My Spanish is the same way. These conspiracy mills are [garbage emoji]."

Gee, I don't know . . .  I grew up in a mixed neighborhood. I didn't need to pretend to be anyone else. I once worked for a Dominican organization and never did I have to fake a Spanish accent to be accepted. I also worked for Black Veterans for Social Justice. I was one of the only white guys working there and I never had to ingratiate myself using a fake black accent. In fact, if I had done that, I would have been seen as a fraud.

Whenever AOC is called out on her obvious shortcomings, she attacks the accuser [Alinsky style] and plays the victim card. Always. She doesn't have the moral courage to ever admit her mistakes.

"As much as the right wants to distort & deflect, I am from the Bronx," AOC lied.

She was born in the Bronx but since the age of  5, grew up in the affluent Yorktown Heights area, which is just fine, but don't lie about it.

"I act & talk like it, *especially* when I’m fired up and especially when I’m home. [LOL] It is so hurtful to see how every aspect of my life is weaponized against me, yet somehow asserted as false at the same time."

Poor victim Alex-from-da-Bronx. BTW, she's also Jewish if she's talking to a Jewish group.

"This is what organizing looks like, this is what building power looks like, this is what changing the country looks like," the black-Jewish-socialist said in a southern accent while speaking at Al Sharpton's National Action Network in New York City.

Obviously-Comatose's response to her latest controversy was filled with factual inaccuracies, which is generally how she rolls. But facts don't matter to her.

She claimed in an interview with CBS News' "60 Minutes" that it was more important to be "morally right" than "being precisely, factually and semantically correct."

Huh? How can you be "morally right" without being factually honest? Being correct? It's like leftists who speak about "[my] truth." No, there's only THE truth.

The socialist freshman appeared to suggest that she spoke the same way in a speech she gave at the anti-Semitic Women's March and at a speech she gave about then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. But she didn't use the same accent at any point.

AOC's claim that accurately reporting on what she said and how she said it is not a "conspiracy mill," as she stated — it's called unbiased, accurate reporting.

Her claims that pointing out what she said and how she said it is some kind of attempt to "distort" and "deflect" is also not accurate--it's called journalism.

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose revealed her true intelligence to the American public when she posted her sophomoric Green New Deal online, which, after it was roundly criticized, claimed that it was a draft that wasn't supposed to be posted. She blamed her staff, but she never reposted a follow-up of it. And while her fellow Democrats said they supported it, not one single Dem voted for it after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell put it up for a vote.

And in true AOC fashion, she attacked McConnell for forcing the Senate to take it seriously and put their votes where their mouths were.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Blatant anti-Semite Linda Sarsour says she's 'triggered' by 'hate mob' criticizing Ilhan Omar

Full-blown anti-Semite and America-hater Linda Sarsour, slammed the infidels who expressed sadness and condolences for the victims of the New Zealand terrorist shooting. The hateful Women's March leader claimed that she's "triggered" by those who criticize fellow anti-Semite Rep[ulsive] Ilhan Omar (D-MN) when she spews anti-Semitic remarks. She also reached out to those Muslim families who lost family members in the shooting by a white supremacist POS.

For Sarsour, critics of obvious anti-Semitic language can't also express support for Muslim victims of terror because they are 'Islamophobic." And for Sarsour, that would be especially true for Jews.

"I am triggered by those who piled on Representative Ilhan Omar and incited a hate mob against her until she got assassination threats now giving condolences to our community. What we need you to do is reflect on how you contribute to islamophobia and stop doing that," Sarsour tweeted Saturday

Sarsour's bile echoes that of two women who angrily confronted Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of Hillary Clinton, the loser in the 2016 presidential election who escaped criminal prosecution regarding the illegal private email server scandal. The confrontation occurred at a memorial for the New Zealand victims on Friday evening.

It's obvious that criticizing any Muslim lawmaker -- even one like Omar who repeatedly uses anti-Semitic slurs against her colleagues, even after meeting with Jewish leaders who explained the history and consequences of the "dual loyalty smear" -- is labeled "Islamophobic," regardless of the content of the criticism. The label, of course, is used to shut off all reasonable dialogue because it has racist connotations.

The two women who confronted Clinton went so far as to claim Clinton was directly responsible for inciting the New Zealand attacks after she spoke out, in general terms, about opposing anti-Semitism.

Sarsour took aim at a wider audience, using the victims of the New Zealand mass shooting to smear Omar's and her own critics. By the end of the day Saturday, more than 14,000 idiotic people had "liked" her tweet.

CNS News also reports that an advocacy group Sarsour co-founded, MPower Change, also used the tragedy to smear all opposition with "Islamophobia" and "white supremacy," as embraced by "elected officials" and "talking heads."

“This deadly violence is the inevitable conclusion of unchecked white supremacy and Islamophobia,” the group said, according to CNS. “To the elected officials who actively promote bigotry or stay silent as our communities are attacked; to the media who treat the proponents of hatred as mere talking heads; to the social media companies who either promote or make excuses for white supremacists and Islamophobes: Your words today are not enough.”

So when Clinton comments against bigotry, it isn't the kind of bigotry the group is talking about--anti-Semitism apparently doesn't count.

But the irony is that Sarsour and other leftists tried to paint the shooter as a right-wing white supremacist and Trump-lover. He is not--he is an eco-fascist Red China loving scumbag who hates the President's policies--the media doesn't report this little fact.

What the media also left out is that the New Zealand mosque has a history.

Nothing excuses the killing of innocent people and the alleged shooter in this instance needs to pay the price for his despicable terrorist act. But there's more to the mosque than meets the eye and it isn't clear if this is what motivated the POS who killed those people who were worshipping at the mosque.

In 2013, two jihadis were killed by a U.S. drone in Yemen, according to stuff.co.nz.  The parents of one of the terrorists said that their son was radicalized in the same Christchurch mosque [where the shooting by the white supremacist took place]. An article in the Geller Report explains more about the mosque and its involvement with jihadis.

Getting back to Omar: it's clear that out of fear of backlash of the leftist wing of their party, Democrats feared censuring her, and even diluted a Congressional resolution initially meant to condemn anti-Semitism, with "inclusive" language condemning everything under the sun in order to give cover to Omar's anti-Semitism.

Sarsour, in particular, lashed out at Speaker of the House, Democrat Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for "white feminism" and "white supremacy," for even insisting that Omar be censured in the first place, because hey, it's okay, the Jews deserve whatever she says about them.

Sarsour pretends to preach against "hate" and "division," but she and other Women's March leaders are directly linked with anti-Semitic, hate preacher Louis Farrakhan and his hate-filled organization, the Nation of Islam.

The organization has contracted with the Women's March to provide security, and they're hoping they can bust a few heads while providing it.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Women's March Mallory says Jews are white supremacists but says she's not anti-Semitic

Women's March co-leader Tamika Mallory said in an interview on Friday that Jews are white Supremacists while she attempted to defend herself against well-documented allegations of anti-Semitism.

Mallory made her stupid remarks on PBS's "Firing Line with Margaret Hoover," recently defended calling notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan the "greatest of all time." [She used the acronym 'GOAT' to refer to the human pile of dog feces known as Louis Farrakhan.]

Others such as Barack Obama, Keith Ellison, Linda Sarsour, Andre Carson, to name a few, have appeared quite cozy with the scumcrumpet leader of the Nation of Islam.

Mallory also refused to say that Israel had the right to exist and even suggested that Jews were white Supremacists, which proves she's an idiot because the idea of Jews being in that category is an oxymoron. White Supremacists hate Jews.

The Daily Wire reported:

"The Women's March openly embraced the anti-Semitism it has been repeatedly accused of Saturday, with leaders openly embracing the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement from the Women's March podium, and issuing a new manifesto, released to coincide with the Washington, D.C., signature event, excoriating Congress and state legislators for condemning the BDS movement," 

Far-left activist and Women's March leader Linda Sarsour expressed support for BDS during the event as Mallory looked on and clapped like a trained seal.

It's sickening how intersectionality allows certain groups to be anti-white, anti-masculine and anti-Semitic because intersectionality elevates victimhood to the height of wisdom and truth. 

There are reasons that so many "victims" in foreign countries want to come here and it isn't because they enjoy being victimized. 

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Now even Sarah Silverman calls out Women's March Leader

The Women's March is led by four overt anti-Semites, although Tamika Mallory tries to pretend she isn't one of those creatures. But her refusal to denounce public anti-Semite Number One, Louis Farrakhan, in spite of many opportunities to do so, has caused the organization the loss of some famous celebrities such as Debra Messing and Alyssa Milano. But now, even comedian Sarah Silverman has stepped away from the organization.

Of course, Democrats who have loudly supported the Women's March in the past haven't the guts to denounce the leadership of the group because having actual principles for leftists means losing some votes. So weasel wafflers like Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand have suddenly become "too busy" with other things.

On Wednesday, Silverman, who is Jewish [because she eats knishes] took to Twitter to call out Women's March leader Tamika Mallory for refusing to denounce scummy anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan.

"I cannot imagine having such mild feelings over such a furious hatred of an entire people. He calls us termites," she wrote of Mallory, referencing one of Farrakhan's recent openly anti-Semitic comments in which he compared Jews to "termites" needing to be exterminated. "I’m heartbroken but im gonna stay hopeful because I don’t wanna give up on Tamika. (oh wow I s that how SHE feels about LF?) Oh this life..."

Silverman can stay hopeful about Mallory but it sounds like nothing is going to change.

In the video Silverman retweeted, Mallory repeatedly refuses to specifically condemn Farrakhan's horrific statements about Jews, only saying generally, "I don't agree with many of Minister Farrakhan's statements" despite Meghan McCain repeatedly offering her a chance to get more specific. But Mallory didn't go into detail because she is obviously is anti-Semitic or wouldn't sit back and say nothing about this hatred of an entire group of people who Farrakhan would like to see murdered as would Mallory's co-leader in the organization, Linda Sarsour.

There's one thing they agree on

Obama did the same thing with his minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who, after 9/11 said of the event, "The chickens have come home to roost." And "God bless America? No, no. God damn America." But most troubling was when Wright said of his lack of conversation with President Obama since January 20, 2009: "Them Jews ain't gonna let him talk to me."

But Obama is a Democrat and he gets a free pass on the anti-Semitism question-- a lot of Dems do.

 The Daily Wire's Emily Zanotti reports about Harris et al:

Both Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) told Buzzfeed News that they're otherwise indisposed this weekend, even though both have been directly involved with the Women's March in the past. Harris was a keynote speaker at the 2017 event, and Gillibrand headlined the Women's March's campaign against now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 

But neither will appear this weekend at the Women's March's third annual demonstration in Washington, D.C., and neither will Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the third most prominent female candidate for president. 

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), is also "traveling" during the march, so he won't be able to make it. Meanwhile, the DNC acknowledged Tuesday that it doesn't have any future plans to partner with the march.
Mallory's refusal to condemn Farrakhan hasn't just been documented on The View, in an interview published this week, Mallory suggested to Elle Magazine that she doesn't plan on cutting ties with Farrakhan or his Nation of Islam.

The one thing that should be absolutely clear is the cowardice on the part of some top contenders for the 2020 Democratic primary. They don't have the courage to speak out against blatant anti-Semitism but they all stand firm on the belief that it's perfectly okay to proudly "shout" one's abortion.

Watch and see how much the leftist media covers the Women's March while they neglected yesterday's March for Life with its hundreds of thousands of participants that is growing each year.


Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

All 3 networks refuse to cover 'March for Life' but cover 'Pro-kill life' Women's March

The largest pro-life event in the nation, the 46th annual March for Life, in Washington, D.C., will be ignored by the ignoramuses at ABC, CBS and NBC, [aka Biased News Media] but they sure as hell will be covering tomorrow's feminazi Women's March rally.

I don't mean to hijack the term 'feminazi' which was coined by Rush Limbaugh, but the leaders of the national Women's March actually approve of real nazis in their virulent anti-Semitic statements and support of long-standing anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, the head of the Nation of Islam.

According to LifeNews, despite an estimated 100,000 people being in attendance at the pro-life march along with President Trump's address to the crowd via video, the left-wing machines could not so much "give a passing mention to the March for Life" during the Friday morning shows. The main reason for this is that they are leftist networks which support the pro-abortion agenda. That is, the left supports women who, for any rhyme or reason they want to use to kill her unborn baby, is okay.

Vice President Mike Pence spoke via phone to the massive crowd there on Friday as Ben Shapiro addressed the crowd.

FACT: The biggest cause of death in the United States is no longer heart disease or cancer--it's abortion.

"It seems an anti-Trump march happening tomorrow is more interesting to the networks," reports LifeNews. "CBS gave a whole segment to the feminist, anti-Semitic'Women’s March' scheduled for Saturday but didn’t even give a passing mention to the March for Life. ABC and NBC had plenty of time to give to fluff stories Friday morning, from Meghan Markle’s fashion, to 'nomophobia' which is an addiction to one’s phone."

The networks never learn it seems, and have continually blackballed the March for Life. 

In 2017, President Trump rendered reporter David Muir speechless when he told him right to his face that the press refuses to cover the march.

“Let me just ask you while we’re standing outside, could you hear the voices from the Women's March here in Washington," Muir asked President Trump during the interview.

Trump replied, “No, I couldn't hear them. The crowds were large, but you will have a large crowd on Friday, too, which is mostly pro-life people."

He continued, "You’re going to have a lot of people coming on Friday. And I will say this, and I didn't realize this. But I was told. You will have a very large crowd of people. I don’t know as large or larger. Some people said it will be larger. Pro-life people and they say the press doesn't cover them."

Muir began to stutter as he was left with no answer. "I don't want to compare crowd sizes again. I – I—I," he said in schmuck-like tones.

"No, you should—But let me just tell you. What you do say is that the press doesn't cover them," Trump said.

LifeNews reports that MRC Culture did a five-year study in 2018 showing that the big networks gave three times more coverage to the Women's March in one year than the March for Life.

"They gave a whopping 13x more coverage to Parkland’s 'March for our Lives' which was backed by several radical gun control groups, even as the two marches both claimed to seek the same goal, saving lives," reports the outlet.

Alexandra DeSanctis of National Review noted at the time that the March for Life actually deserves more coverage than either of the other marches because it is a recurring event and grows every year. 

The left has since sent out a hit team to take her out.

"March for Life attendance is consistently downplayed," DeSanctis said. "Obviously, reports on attendance always come with possible bias and error. But mainstream media have reported "tens of thousands" at the March for Life when organizers report as many as 650K in recent years."

I suspect the correct number is somewhere in the middle, which still dwarfs the slowly dwindling Women's March due to their anti-Semitic leaders and the fact that they don't include all women--especially those with different political views.

She continued, "The fact that the March for Life happens every year makes it even more notable. Every single year for 45 years there has been a huge march protesting U.S. abortion law, despite making little headway in national policy over that time. That's incredibly newsworthy."

And why is it feminists never really march against the imposition of sharia law, which is extremely misogynistic?

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Linda Sarsour still holds most of the money she raised for Jewish gravesite desecration

She has the face heart of a serpent and a face of a weasel--Linda Sarsour--and it comes as no surprise that the anti-Semitic wench staged a publicity stunt after hundreds of Jewish gravestones were desecrated and destroyed at various cemeteries, [with a good possibility by her Islamic jihadist comrades] where she grabbed the news story and made it hers.

Sarsour jumped on a campaign to raise money to repair the the vandalism (and her reputation due to her long history of antisemitism), and began a campaign — named “Muslims Unite to Repair Jewish Cemetery” which raised $162,468 through the Muslim crowdfunding site LaunchGood, far beyond its set goal of $20,000.

Yet it's no surprise that only 30% of the proceeds were disbursed, while designated cemeteries pleaded for promised funds. Their calls were met with deafening silence and a hijab-covered sneer by the rodent-face Sarsour.

She hijacked the horror for her own aggrandizement, and the elite media ate it up. That's what the media does because they seem to either be afraid of being labeled Islamophobic or hate the status quo of our nation so much that they are willing to support anyone who goes against it.

But this wasn't the first time that the witch defrauded people before with hoaxes. She used the Islamophobic ploy to her benefit and cashed in on unfounded guilt.

However, exploiting dead Jews was a new low, even for that lowlife who's used to going low and will probably do it again as the media supports her as much as she supports the anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.

No surprise that the Women's March local chapters are distancing themselves from her and her ilk.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

'The View' grills Tamika Mallory, Women's March co-founder over love of Farrakhan's anti-Semitism

“The View” co-hosts Sunny Hostin and Meghan McCain grilled Women's March co-founder and anti-Semite Tamika Mallory over her ties to Madagascar hissing cockroach, Louis Farrakhan, in a heated discussion on Monday morning.

Mallory tipped her hand and raised eyebrows when she said that the scumbag Nation of Islam leader is the “greatest of all time because of what he’s done in black communities.”

And Hitler was a vegetarian and liked dogs-so what?

“Tamika, you came under some fire for your relationship with Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam,” Hostin told the crap-weasel. “He’s known for being anti-Semitic, for being homophobic, but you do attend his events and you posted… a photo calling him the G.O.A.T., which means the greatest of all time. You are running an organization that says it fights bigotry. Do you understand why your association with him is quite problematic?”

Mallory fired back: “I think it’s important to put my attendance, my presence at Savior’s Day, which is the highest holy day for the Nation of Islam, in proper context.” Which is that she's an anti-Semitic horrible person and there should be no mistake about that.

Mallory then said that “as a leader, as a black leader, in a country that is still dealing with some very serious, unresolved issues, as it relates to the black experience in this country,” she often has to go into “difficult spaces” to promote her cause. Which simply means that if she has to hang out with anti-Semites to get what she wants, so be it.

“I wrote a piece immediately following the beginning of this controversy, talking about wherever my people are, that’s where I must also be,” Mallory said with an air of self-importance. “I also go into prisons… I am trying to help people.” Except not Jews, gays, lesbians, transgender people, Republican women and white men.

Mallory said that “just because you go into a space with someone that does not mean that you agree with everything that they say,” but Hostin immediately pushed back, asking, “Why call him the greatest of all time?”

“I didn’t call him the greatest of all time because of his rhetoric. I called him the greatest of all time because of what he’s done in black communities,” the hater said. A person's rhetoric is a reflection of how they think.

 Meghan McCain, the show’s conservative voice, jumped in.

“I would never be comfortable supporting someone who (said) … ‘I’m not anti-Semite, I’m anti-termite. It’s the wicked Jews, the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality” McCain said, quoting Farrakhan, a ploy hated by people with something to hide.

McCain added that reporters feel there is anti-Semitism surrounding the Women’s March, mostly because there is, and it doesn't simply surround the March, it oozes like a slug crushed under a bus.

“A lot of people, by a lot of people I include me in this, think you’re using your organization as anti-Semitism masked in activism and that you’re using identity politics to shield yourself from critiques,” McCain said. “You’re talking about all women being invited to that march? I’m pro-life. We were not invited.”

An angry McCain added that all women, including Jewish and conservative women, should be welcomed to the organization. Mallory was joined by Women’s March co-founder Bob Bland in Monday's segment, which didn’t feature co-hosts Abby Huntsman or Joy Behar, who gave up their seats on the show for the Women’s March leaders.

“Those allegations are not true,” Bland responded.

“So the journalist I spoke to was lying?” McCain asked.

Bland accused the journalist of receiving untruthful insight and said the Women’s March “unequivocally condemns anti-Semitism.” But they absolutely do not condemn it, and they also spout anti-Israel crap.

McCain asked if she condemns Farrakhan’s remarks about Jewish people.

“Yes, and we have repeatedly,” Bland said as Mallory remained stone silent. “We condemn any statements of hate.” Balderdash.

McCain, visibly annoyed, said she was confused as she continued to read controversial, hateful quotes attributed to Farrakhan.

“We did not make those remarks,” Mallory said. But she stood by the scumcrumpet who spat those words out.

McCain reminded her that she’s associating with someone who does.


“What I will say to you is, I don’t agree with many of Minister Farrakhan’s statements,” Mallory said of Farrakhan, the minister of hatred.

McCain asked if she specifically disagrees with Farrakhan's rhetoric about Jewish people – to which Mallory said she doesn’t agree.

McCain asked, “Do you condemn them?”

Mallory refused to condemn the remarks [for some strange reason] and simply repeated that she doesn’t agree.

“You won’t condemn it,” McCain pointed out.

“To be very clear, it’s not my language. It’s not the way that I speak,” Mallory said. That does not dispel the fact that she agrees with the sentiment.

McCain then said Mallory [because Linda Sarsour, the other anti-Semitic co-leader, wasn't in attendance] was associating with “extreme anti-Semitism.”

Co-host Whoopi Goldberg, who was silent for most of the segment, asked if Mallory understood why some people think it would be best if she stepped down from her position atop the Women’s March.

“I also know of people who don’t want me to step down,” she answered, referring to her fellow anti-Semites. “There is both sides of that.”

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

OMG the SPLC broke up with the Women's March over anti-Semitism

It's not typical of me to say anything good about the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center, but I will to a degree do so in this post.

The SPLC is the latest in leftist organizations to quietly sever ties with the national Women's March after it was revealed in the New York Times and Tablet that senior leaders of the organization expressed anti-Semitic sentiments in early organizational meetings, and affiliated with the anti-Semitic, anti-LGBT, and anti-women's rights organization, the Nation of Islam, expressing admiration for their crap weasel leader Louis Farrakhan.

The Daily Beast reports that SPLC had quietly withdrawn its support for the Women's March, and the Women's March, in turn, had removed SPLC from its list of co-sponsors. The SPLC was a prominent member of the Women's March coalition for the first two years of marches.

The SPLC, in an effort to avoid looking like fans of Hitler supporters, was closed-mouth about the development in their statement to the Daily Beast, telling reporters that “other projects were a priority,” and that they would continue to be involved with local marches, even if they were cutting ties with the national Women's March.

Now we know the real reason.

Just a few short months ago, the SPLC was expressing unqualified support for the March, claiming, in a press release that:

“As an official partner of the march, the Southern Poverty Law Center stands in solidarity with its organizers’ vision — that ‘women’s rights are human rights’ — and with the march’s mission to bring together communities ‘insulted, demonized and threatened by the rhetoric of the past election cycle,’ the SPLC said in January of 2017, calling itself “dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of our society. Through our core issues, we work to protect the rights of the working poor, LGBT, and undocumented immigrant women whom the Women’s March on Washington seeks to unite.”

But that seems to have changed since reporters at Tablet and the New York Times revealed a significant link between the Women's March's national organizers -- including Linda Sarsour, Tamika Mallory, and Carmen Perez -- and Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, which the SPLC has long-designated as a "hate group," and Louis Farrakhan as a purveyor of anti-Semitism.

A handful of local "Women's March" organizations have also cut official ties to the national Women's March over the revelations of anti-Semitism, and a number of other organizations, besides the Southern Poverty Law Center, have cut ties with the national March pending turnover at their top levels.

According to Tali Goldsheft, the activist who began a major petition drive to encourage left-leaning organizations to cut ties with Sarsour, Mallory, and Perez, more than half of the Women's March's original sponsors and affiliates have dropped off, including several major labor unions, at least two top LGBT-rights organizations (GLAAD and the Human Rights campaign), and one top women's rights organization, NARAL, have all recently dropped off the list of Women's March supporters.

It seems that killing gays under sharia [Islamic law] as Farrakhan believes, doesn't appeal to the LGBT-rights organizations. You will also not see any Jewish organizations sponsoring the March, and the AFL-CIO, NARAL, GLAAD, Human Rights Campaign, NRDC, OXFAM, Greenpeace, Amnesty and other major orgs are no longer listed as @womensmarch partners.

Goldsheft says there are only a handful of "major" sponsors left: Planned Parenthood, an organization that specializes in killing babies for profit. The American Civil Liberties Union, [but if you want to defend your civil liberties, don't look to the ACLU]. And the American Federation of Teachers, an organization that, since 1980 has contributed tens of millions of dollars, 95 percent of which has gone to Democrats. Members' dues underwrite much of the AFT's political support and in 2015, four California teachers sued AFT and its California unit over the use of member dues for political activities, arguing that unions were violating constitutional right to free speech by forcing them to either support union-favored causes and candidates or lose access to important job benefits such as life insurance and disability. The matter was resolved last year by SCOTUS in Janus v AFSCME concluding public sector union fees violate the First Amendment compelling nonmembers to "subsidize private speech on matters of substantial public concern." Unions will, subsequently, need to gain the affirmative consent of individual teachers before enrolling them in the union.

The next national Women's March is set to take place next Saturday, January 19, in Washington, D.C. Turnout is anticipated to be way down from previous years.

Rightfully so.


Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.



Tweet

New Orleans Women's March cancels over anti-Semitism accusations

Yet another Women's March march event has been canceled just days before it was scheduled to be held on January 19th. The organization was first founded following the election of Donald Trump as president over Hillary Clinton who is not president. The Baton Rouge [which translated means 'red stick'] chapter of the Organization for Women posted on Facebook that the New Orleans March will not be taking place due to the refusal of the anti-Semitic national Women's March leaders to resign.

The late December announcement coincides with the cancellation of two other events in major areas. A Northern California Women's March was canceled because attendees at the first two events had been " overwhelmingly white." Chicago organizers are not holding a January event there, saying a substitute event was held in October to drum up excitement for the midterm elections.

"The controversy is dampening efforts of sister marches to fundraise, enlist involvement, find sponsors and attendee numbers have drastically declined this year. New Orleans is no exception," the Baton Rouge chapter wrote. "Many of the sister marches have asked the leaders of Women’s March, Inc. to resign but as of today, they have yet to do so."

The leaders, Linda "Sarsour, Carmen Perez, Tamika Mallory and Bob Bland [a woman] have commandeered the organization and spread their anti-Israel and anti-Semitic bile publicly.

For example, the Women's March, Inc. has been hit with accusations of anti-Semitism when it was reported that leaders of the organization may have tried to push a theory that Jews were "proven to have been leaders of the American slave trade." Three of the national group's co-chairs, Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, and Tamika Mallory, support Louis Farrakhan, the black nationalist leader of the Nation of Islam who has also made anti-Semitic comments. The revelations led one of the founders of the Women's March to ask the co-chairs to resign. 

The Women's March also posted a controversial tweet criticizing white women for not voting how the organization wanted them to vote, tweeting: 

"There needs to be accountability and an honest reckoning. There’s a lot of work to do, white women. A lot of learning. A lot of growing."

The flagship Women's March is set to return to D.C. after holding the 2018 event in Nevada, which was a key state during the run-up to the midterm elections.

The snake is eating its own tail.

It's a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.

Tweet

New Orleans Women's March Canceled: lack of support

The January event of the New Orleans Women's March is now canceled due to a "drastic" drop-off in support, The Washington Times reports.

“Due to several issues we have decided it is necessary to cancel the 2019 Women’s March in New Orleans,” the National Organization for Women’s Baton Rouge chapter posted on social media Friday. 

The reason for the cancelation may have to do with the notion that some people, even some on the left, don't want to be associated with a group led by anti-Semites such as Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, Tamika Mallory and a woman named Bob Bland, although they did not initially specify the "issues" that led to NOW canceling the New Orleans Women's March.

This march is one of the largest in the country, and a further statement indicated a severe drop-off in both participation and fundraising after two major exposes in Tablet and in The New York Times revealed that the national Women's March's hierarchy was a hotbed of anti-Semitism and a refusal to denounce the loudest anti-Semite in the public eye, Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the hate group Nation of Islam (NOI).

NOW Baton Rouge clearly believes the national Women's March leadership, including organizers Bob Bland, Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour, and Carmen Perez, should resign.

"Many of the sister marches have asked the leaders of Women’s March, Inc. to resign but as of today, they have yet to do so,” NOW Baton Rouge's statement read. “The controversy is dampening efforts of sister marches to fundraise, enlist involvement, find sponsors and attendee numbers have drastically declined this year. New Orleans is no exception.”

Anti-Semitism is practically the normal cocktail conversation of the EU lately and has become increasingly open and accepted in some circles. Hatred of the Jews is actually part of the Islamic religion, which is why the Middle East is mainly on board with the total annihilation of Israel.

NOW Baton Rouge added that while they will be moving away from the annual marches, they will continue to work on behalf of the "resistance" in Louisiana.

"However, this does not mean the end of our momentum in Louisiana. It’s time to look past the marching and look towards a new stage of the movement," they added. "Going forward, we will re-organize and re-evaluate the momentum that the Women’s March gave all of us the first two years."

To prevent accusations of mismanagement, Baton Rouge NOW noted that they will be refunding donations and t-shirt purchases from unhappy members.

Although conservative organizations have often reported on Women's March leaders like the rodent-face Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory, and their support for Farrakhan, stories published in Tablet and even The New York Times revealed to the mainstream that several of the March's key players associated regularly with the NOI and openly expressed anti-Semitic sentiments, even in the early days of the Women's March organization.

The New York Times and Tablet reports revealed that Sarsour, Mallory, and Perez pushed out Jewish women in leadership positions with the Women's March, and that Mallory -- who only recently attended the Nation of Islam's "Saviors Day" event, where Farrakhan likened Jews to tools of the devil -- "confronted" Jewish Women's March leaders over their role in the "oppression" of minorities.


Mallory, Tablet says, “asserted that Jewish people bore a special collective responsibility as exploiters of black and brown people—and even, according to a close secondhand source, claimed that Jews were proven to have been leaders of the American slave trade.” Which, of course, is bull crap. 

If any country is involve with the slave trade today, it would be Saudi Arabia, and many laborers in the Middle East are treated like slaves, sleeping dozens in one room, being beaten and paid a paupers salary.

And it wasn't the Jews dealing with the American slave trade--there weren't enough Jews, first of all, and the Jews that were in America during slavery were mainly powerless. It was primarily the British and it began in England. But to learn more about Jews and the slave trade, click here .

Instead of apologizing and distancing themselves from the Nation of Islam and its crap weasel leader, the Women's March has issued a series of lukewarm statements on "intersectionality." Mallory herself issued a shocking statement to The New York Times that only made the situation worse and proves the existence of her anti-Semitic sentiments.

The revelations have triggered a wave of Women's March cancellations.

In fact, the New Orleans Women's March is just the latest in a number of Women's Marches that won't be marching this year. Last week, the Chicago Women's March announced that it was canceling its annual event, which drew more than a quarter million people last year, over the same accusations of anti-Semitism. Several other, smaller marches are also canceled.

The anti-Semitic leadership is groveling in its own waste.

The Humboldt County Women's March was also canceled, but for a different reason unrelated to the national March. Northern California will not have a march because the racist organizers believed the march was "too white."

It doesn't get any crazier than this, folks.

Happy New Year fellow conservatives. Health and happiness to all. I hope that you follow Brain Flushings throughout the New Year and comment on any issues within. Please feel free to check out the sponsors on these pages too.


Tweet

Calif. Women's March canceled for being too white

Organizers of the Women's March in Humboldt County, California have canceled the January 19 event because the marchers do not have a sufficient amount of melanin, the pigment that gives color to the skin. They are saying, in effect, that the marchers are too white and therefore lack the intersectional attributes that make them relevant.

In a Facebook post, the group said it decided to cancel the third annual march “after many conversations between local social-change organizations [aka: socialists] and supporters of the march,” saying they would work on how to “broaden representation in the organizing committee.”

I suggest they get black and brown illegal alien transgender Muslim midgets with physical disabilities to march for them. That should do the trick. They are so under-represented in our society.

“Up to this point, the participants have been overwhelmingly white, lacking representation from several perspectives in our community,” said the statement. “Instead of pushing forward with crucial voices absent, the organizing team will take time for more outreach.”

The Humboldt County group said it was still interested in holding an event in March on International Women’s Day. If interested you can apply here.

PROOF OF WHAT A SCAM THIS IS…Organizers cancel Women’s March Jan. 19 due to ‘overwhelmingly white’ participants https://t.co/jvcHrs68Oi— Lyrnn Carter (@lyrnncarter05) December 28, 2018

Some followers on Facebook said they were disappointed in the decision, particularly those followers who see the Women's March being about gender, not melanin or other status.

“I was saddened to hear that the March is off for 1/19,” said David Holper. a poetry slam guy. “Isn’t there still time to reach out to minority groups and make this event more inclusive? I’d be happy to help.”

Others pointed out that the Northern California community of about 137,000, located near the Oregon border, is predominantly white and there aren't enough transgender midgets there to fill a pay toilet.

Census Bureau data from July showed that the county was about 74 percent non-Hispanic white, 12 percent Hispanic, 6 percent Native American, 2 percent Asian, and 1 percent black. And possibly 1/137,000 transgender of both delusions.

“I was appalled to be honest,” said Amy Sawyer Long. “I understand wanting a diverse group. However, we live in a predominantly white area … not to mention how is it beneficial to cancel? No matter the race people still want their voices heard.”

Amy apparently doesn't get it. The Women's March is no longer about women. That's the past and the current pretense. It .   's about socialist agendas with an Islamic, anti-Semitic flavor, a là Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, Tamika Mallory and Bob Bland.

The national Women’s March is scheduled to hold Jan. 19 its #WomensWave rally in D.C., while some state and local sister organizations are also holding marches.

Also organizing events that day are other women’s groups such as March On and the Women’s March Alliance, which have formed as alternatives to the Women’s March over those aforementioned anti-Semitism concerns. The four  national co-chairs [mentioned above] of the Women’s March have denied allegations of anti-Semitism, in spite of public evidence to the contrary.


I hope you have a great New Years, my fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.





Tweet

Women's March heads: 'Yeah, Jews are white supremacists'

Chicago called off its next Women's March as controversy grows over anti-Semitism claims against the anti-Semitic group leaders. So the local group will not host a march this coming January--an event that for two years drew hundreds of thousands of supporters in the Windy City's Grant Park.

Women’s March Chicago organizers cited high costs and limited volunteer hours as the main reasons for nixing the annual rally and march, but the real reason is the controversy and it's to their credit that they refuse to align with the leaders of the national movement involving their ties to self-proclaimed anti-Semite scum crumpet Louis Farrakhan the leader of Nation of Islam.

Marches and rallies are still planned for Jan. 19 in Washington, D.C., and dozens of cities nationwide and internationally, as well as other parts of Illinois like Rockford, southwest suburban New Lenox and northwest suburban Woodstock because anti-Semites or no anti-Semites, they want something for which to march.

Women's March Chicago leaders say they'll commemorate the anniversary of the original march with another activity but haven't released any details on the location or nature of the event.

“There’s no march, there’s no rally,” said Sara Kurensky, Women’s March Chicago board member. “We’re going to provide ways for people to organize and take action in their local communities.”

Leaders of the national group Women’s March Inc. have come under fire for their reluctance to condemn the rhetoric of Farrakhan, whose Chicago-based Nation of Islam is considered an anti-Semitic hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

In a February speech, Farrakhan praised Women’s March Inc. co-President Tamika Mallory and in the same address declared “the powerful Jews are my enemy.” The national organization denounced Farrakhan’s comments in March, but many criticized leaders for not speaking up sooner. Mallory has also praised Farrakhan on social media.

Co-founder of the national movement Teresa Shook in November called for national leaders to step down, after having “allowed anti-Semitism, anti-LBGTQIA sentiment and hateful, racist rhetoric to become a part of the platform by their refusal to separate themselves from groups that espouse these racist, hateful beliefs,” according to a social media post.

The president of a Women’s March chapter in Washington state earlier this month announced the group would be dissolving in protest. The Rhode Island chapter in May said it was separating from the national organization.

 International Policy Digest talks about Linda Sarsour and the rest of the anti-Semitic leadership in more detail.

In a New York Times article published Sunday, when questioned about a report stating that the leadership had discussed the issue [i.e., their disapproval] of having Jewish women at their initial meeting days after the presidential election, two Women's March leaders, Tamika Mallory and Carmen Perez, admitted they had, but lied in an earlier report in Tablet magazine where they denied the claim:

To this day, Mallory and Bland deny any such statements were ever uttered, either at the first meeting or at Mallory's apartment. "There was a particular conversation around how white women had centered themselves--and also around the dynamics of racial injustice and why it was essential that racial justice be a part of the women's rights conversation," remembered Bland. But she and Mallory insisted it never had anything to do with Jews. “Carmen and I were very clear at that [first] meeting that we would not take on roles as workers or staff, but that we had to be in a leadership position in order for us to engage in the march,” Mallory told Tablet, in an interview last week, adding that they had been particularly sensitive to the fact that they had been invited to the meeting by white women, and wanted to be sure they weren’t about to enter into an unfair arrangement. “Other than that, there was no particular conversation about Jewish women, or any particular group of people.”

 Afterward, when The New York Times spoke to Mallory about the meeting, she uttered a statement that might well be taken as an indictment of Jews themselves for white supremacist attacks on them, saying, “Since that conversation, we’ve all learned a lot about how while white Jews, as white people, uphold white supremacy, ALL Jews are targeted by it.”

Yeah--it's those white Jews who are white supremacists and uphold white ideas. And that's why whitey is racist and we are not.

One of the original Women's March leaders, Fay Wruble, a Jewish woman, was kicked out soon after the initial march by the anti-Semitic leadership that replaced the original founders. Wruble, as the Times reported, went on to found an organization called March On.

A group affiliated with March On will march on the same day in January as the Women’s March; that group will make a point of denouncing anti-Semitism. The Times reported, “Some Jewish women have announced on social media their skipping the Washington mass protest on January 19th.

Wruble said that at the initial meeting, Mallory and Perez told her that Jews had been heavily involved people in the slave trade. Surprised and perplexed by the accusation, she googled the claim, and found it had been publicized by the anti-Semitic and racist low-life Louis Farrakhan in his book, “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and the Jews," a book which Henry Louis Gates Jr., a Harvard professor who is black, termed the “bible of the new anti-Semitism.”

Perez and Mallory denied that the slave trade had ever been mentioned.

Wruble also claimed that one of the leaders of the movement told her “we really couldn’t center Jewish women in this or we might turn off groups like Black Lives Matter.”

Mallory’s remarks about Jews being white supremacists and the movement’s apparent anti-Semitism drew plenty of criticism:

Seth Mandel

✔@SethAMandel

 · Dec 23, 2018

The Women’s March grappling with whether to erase Jews’ entire identity for the purpose of strict racial categorization is itself a good example of anti-Semitism. Also a bold display of how leftist intersectionalism is unavoidably anti-Semitic.

Seth Mandel

✔@SethAMandel

Here is a Women’s March cofounder and leader, who has repeatedly voiced anti-Semitism, telling the NYT *in a prepared statement* that Jews are responsible for their own deaths at the hands of modern day Nazis. pic.twitter.com/hgTbN2izWM

629

7:50 PM - Dec 23, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

322 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Hen Mazzig

✔@HenMazzig

Nazis killing us because we aren’t white, @womensmarch attacking us because we “uphold white supremacy”.https://www.timesofisrael.com/womens-march-leader-says-white-jews-uphold-white-supremacy/ …

325

9:45 AM - Dec 24, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Women’s March leader says white Jews ‘uphold white supremacy’

Jewish co-founder of movement says was marginalized over her heritage, was told by Tamika Mallory and Carmen Perez that Jews played a significant role in the slave trade

timesofisrael.com

176 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

The Reagan Battalion

✔@ReaganBattalion

.@lsarsour and @TamikaDMallory are grappling with the ‘Jewish question’ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/23/us/womens-march-anti-semitism.html …

Disgusting antisemitism.

22

10:03 AM - Dec 24, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Women’s March Roiled by Accusations of Anti-Semitism

As the second anniversary of the Women’s March approaches, charges of anti-Semitism are overshadowing the movement and plans for more marches.

nytimes.com

See The Reagan Battalion's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Bianna Golodryga

✔@biannagolodryga

This is beyond disturbing... https://nyti.ms/2Rge0Zg?smid=nytcore-ios-share …

380

12:02 PM - Dec 23, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Women’s March Roiled by Accusations of Anti-Semitism

As the second anniversary of the Women’s March approaches, charges of anti-Semitism are overshadowing the movement and plans for more marches.

nytimes.com

219 people are talking about this

The anti-Semitism among the leadership of the national Women's March is palpable. If you don't see it, you aren't paying attention. And the way the left always flings around race and color and other intersectional notions is evidence enough to question what they really think about anyone who doesn't fit their mold.


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.






Tweet