The largest pro-life event in the nation, the 46th annual March for Life, in Washington, D.C., will be ignored by the ignoramuses at ABC, CBS and NBC, [aka Biased News Media] but they sure as hell will be covering tomorrow's feminazi Women's March rally.
I don't mean to hijack the term 'feminazi' which was coined by Rush Limbaugh, but the leaders of the national Women's March actually approve of real nazis in their virulent anti-Semitic statements and support of long-standing anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, the head of the Nation of Islam.
According to LifeNews, despite an estimated 100,000 people being in attendance at the pro-life march along with President Trump's address to the crowd via video, the left-wing machines could not so much "give a passing mention to the March for Life" during the Friday morning shows. The main reason for this is that they are leftist networks which support the pro-abortion agenda. That is, the left supports women who, for any rhyme or reason they want to use to kill her unborn baby, is okay.
According to LifeNews, despite an estimated 100,000 people being in attendance at the pro-life march along with President Trump's address to the crowd via video, the left-wing machines could not so much "give a passing mention to the March for Life" during the Friday morning shows. The main reason for this is that they are leftist networks which support the pro-abortion agenda. That is, the left supports women who, for any rhyme or reason they want to use to kill her unborn baby, is okay.
Vice President Mike Pence spoke via phone to the massive crowd there on Friday as Ben Shapiro addressed the crowd.
FACT: The biggest cause of death in the United States is no longer heart disease or cancer--it's abortion.
"It seems an anti-Trump march happening tomorrow is more interesting to the networks," reports LifeNews. "CBS gave a whole segment to the feminist, anti-Semitic'Women’s March' scheduled for Saturday but didn’t even give a passing mention to the March for Life. ABC and NBC had plenty of time to give to fluff stories Friday morning, from Meghan Markle’s fashion, to 'nomophobia' which is an addiction to one’s phone."
The networks never learn it seems, and have continually blackballed the March for Life.
"It seems an anti-Trump march happening tomorrow is more interesting to the networks," reports LifeNews. "CBS gave a whole segment to the feminist, anti-Semitic'Women’s March' scheduled for Saturday but didn’t even give a passing mention to the March for Life. ABC and NBC had plenty of time to give to fluff stories Friday morning, from Meghan Markle’s fashion, to 'nomophobia' which is an addiction to one’s phone."
The networks never learn it seems, and have continually blackballed the March for Life.
In 2017, President Trump rendered reporter David Muir speechless when he told him right to his face that the press refuses to cover the march.
“Let me just ask you while we’re standing outside, could you hear the voices from the Women's March here in Washington," Muir asked President Trump during the interview.
Trump replied, “No, I couldn't hear them. The crowds were large, but you will have a large crowd on Friday, too, which is mostly pro-life people."
He continued, "You’re going to have a lot of people coming on Friday. And I will say this, and I didn't realize this. But I was told. You will have a very large crowd of people. I don’t know as large or larger. Some people said it will be larger. Pro-life people and they say the press doesn't cover them."
Muir began to stutter as he was left with no answer. "I don't want to compare crowd sizes again. I – I—I," he said in schmuck-like tones.
"No, you should—But let me just tell you. What you do say is that the press doesn't cover them," Trump said.
LifeNews reports that MRC Culture did a five-year study in 2018 showing that the big networks gave three times more coverage to the Women's March in one year than the March for Life.
"They gave a whopping 13x more coverage to Parkland’s 'March for our Lives' which was backed by several radical gun control groups, even as the two marches both claimed to seek the same goal, saving lives," reports the outlet.
Alexandra DeSanctis of National Review noted at the time that the March for Life actually deserves more coverage than either of the other marches because it is a recurring event and grows every year.
“Let me just ask you while we’re standing outside, could you hear the voices from the Women's March here in Washington," Muir asked President Trump during the interview.
Trump replied, “No, I couldn't hear them. The crowds were large, but you will have a large crowd on Friday, too, which is mostly pro-life people."
He continued, "You’re going to have a lot of people coming on Friday. And I will say this, and I didn't realize this. But I was told. You will have a very large crowd of people. I don’t know as large or larger. Some people said it will be larger. Pro-life people and they say the press doesn't cover them."
Muir began to stutter as he was left with no answer. "I don't want to compare crowd sizes again. I – I—I," he said in schmuck-like tones.
"No, you should—But let me just tell you. What you do say is that the press doesn't cover them," Trump said.
LifeNews reports that MRC Culture did a five-year study in 2018 showing that the big networks gave three times more coverage to the Women's March in one year than the March for Life.
"They gave a whopping 13x more coverage to Parkland’s 'March for our Lives' which was backed by several radical gun control groups, even as the two marches both claimed to seek the same goal, saving lives," reports the outlet.
Alexandra DeSanctis of National Review noted at the time that the March for Life actually deserves more coverage than either of the other marches because it is a recurring event and grows every year.
The left has since sent out a hit team to take her out.
"March for Life attendance is consistently downplayed," DeSanctis said. "Obviously, reports on attendance always come with possible bias and error. But mainstream media have reported "tens of thousands" at the March for Life when organizers report as many as 650K in recent years."
"March for Life attendance is consistently downplayed," DeSanctis said. "Obviously, reports on attendance always come with possible bias and error. But mainstream media have reported "tens of thousands" at the March for Life when organizers report as many as 650K in recent years."
I suspect the correct number is somewhere in the middle, which still dwarfs the slowly dwindling Women's March due to their anti-Semitic leaders and the fact that they don't include all women--especially those with different political views.
She continued, "The fact that the March for Life happens every year makes it even more notable. Every single year for 45 years there has been a huge march protesting U.S. abortion law, despite making little headway in national policy over that time. That's incredibly newsworthy."
And why is it feminists never really march against the imposition of sharia law, which is extremely misogynistic?
Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.
No comments:
Post a Comment