Top Democrat Heroically Explains Virginia Election Law To Actual Virginia Voter, Gets Corrected Immediately

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Democrats continued their proud tradition of lecturing America about democracy while displaying only a passing acquaintance with reality after Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) confidently misrepresented his own state's voter ID law on live television.

The remarkable performance came during ABC's This Week, where Warner attacked President Trump's election security agenda and denounced Republican support for the SAVE America Act, all while accidentally demonstrating why voters are increasingly skeptical of politicians who insist they alone are the guardians of truth.

Host and alleged journalist, Jonathan Karl, asked the Virginia senator whether Democrats should simply embrace photo voter ID, given that overwhelming majorities of Americans support it.

"You know what? In Virginia, we have voter voter ID and photo ID," Warner declared with the confidence of a man who had clearly spent several seconds thinking about the subject and taking a long shot,

Karl, who apparently knew more about Virginia election law than Virginia's senior senator, politely interrupted the lesson.

"That's actually not the case," Karl replied. "I mean, I'm a Virginia voter. You don't need to show a photo ID in Virginia. There are a wide range of things you can show for ID. And if you don't show one of those, you can sign an affidavit." Karl was referring to library cards, credit cards, Blockbuster membership cards and the like. In other words, you don't need to produce actual photo ID.

Sources say producers briefly considered replacing Warner with a random DMV employee, who statistically had a better chance of knowing the law.

Undeterred by the embarrassing correction, Warner quickly shifted to the classic Washington strategy of redefining what he meant after saying something demonstrably balderdash. He insisted Virginia still has "voter ID of one form or another" before racing back to his prepared talking points about Republican election reforms.

Political analysts noted that Democrats have become remarkably consistent in arguing that voter ID laws are simultaneously racist, unnecessary, and already the law everywhere. [Isn't everything the Left disagrees with racist?]

Virginia law, meanwhile, stubbornly refuses to cooperate with Warner's version of events. Voters may present various forms of identification, [see above examples] and those without acceptable ID can simply sign an ID Confirmation Statement and cast a regular ballot. A photo ID is not required.

The irony grew even richer considering Warner serves as the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, where members are generally expected to distinguish between verified facts and things they vaguely remember from a campaign memo.

Warner went on to insist, "The SAVE Act is about voter disenfranchisement. The SAVE Act is going to take anybody that changed their name when they got married. They don't get to vote unless they go back and find [proof of a name change]."

He also claimed, "The irony here would be the case if you can show any photo that is government stamped would be fine. Certain states will say we're going to let you show your … NRA gun license but you can't show your student ID."

Election law experts noted that reality once again refused to cooperate. While some states accept qualifying handgun carry permits, many of those same states also accept qualifying student IDs under specified conditions.

At the present time, Democratic leaders had announced a new initiative encouraging elected officials to spend at least five minutes reading the laws they denounce before appearing on national television, though insiders cautioned the proposal faced stiff opposition for placing an unreasonable burden on public servants.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

CNN Refuses To Air Trump's Election Speech After Producers Mistake Journalism For Vampire Rules

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” --Mark Twain

ABC, NBC, and CNN all decided America simply could not survive the horror of hearing President Trump speak without a panel of nervous commentators interrupting every eight seconds. Apparently, allowing viewers to hear the president's election interference address unfiltered would trigger an extinction level event for democracy . . . or perhaps their own credibility.

The speech covered something that Washington has insisted everyone ignore. America's election systems remain vulnerable. Massive voter databases have been compromised. China allegedly gained access to information on at least 220 million Americans. Beijing also reportedly financed propaganda efforts through American journalists during Trump's first term.

Naturally, CNN concluded the real national security threat was letting Americans hear about any of it.

Instead, the network sprinted away from the speech like it was carrying a subpoena. This is, of course, the same network that spent years enthusiastically promoting the Russia collusion fantasy, a story that consumed the better part of Trump's first presidency before collapsing under the weight of its own fiction.

Remember when election interference was the greatest threat to civilization? Back then, every Facebook meme was apparently a Kremlin special forces operation. Fast forward ten years and election interference has magically become a conspiracy theory because Trump is talking about it. Funny how that works.

The Compromised News Network's Brian "Mr. Potato Head" Stelter accidentally summarized the entire media business model in one remarkable quote.

"Some network executives felt it would be dangerous to just air Trump's speech live, in full, unedited without knowing what he was going to say ahead of time. That's where we are in America."

Dangerous? What the heck is he talking about and how did he conclude that nonsense?

Since when did hearing a speech without a newsroom translator become hazardous? Americans somehow survive congressional hearings, award shows, and college commencement speeches every year. Surely they could endure twenty minutes of President Trump without requiring CNN to hold their hand.

The obvious answer is that viewers might actually make up their own minds. That possibility terrifies corporate media more than any foreign hacker ever could.

Mr. Potato Head continued.

"Trump's election lies led to violence."

That talking point conveniently skips over the inconvenient fact that Trump explicitly urged supporters to act peacefully and later called for the unrest on January 6 to stop. Those details rarely survive the CNN editing room because they interfere with the preferred narrative.

Curiously, none of this concern about "dangerous" speech existed while networks breathlessly reported Russia collusion claims, anonymous intelligence leaks that evaporated under scrutiny, or countless other Trump stories that proved spectacularly wrong. Apparently misinformation is perfectly safe, provided it comes with professionally lit studio cameras.

What CNN and the rest of the legacy media are really saying is simple. You are not qualified to hear information directly. You need licensed television experts to explain what you should think before your brain accidentally forms an independent opinion.

Then they insist there is no coordinated effort to shape public perception while ABC, NBC, and CNN simultaneously arrive at the exact same decision to keep viewers from hearing the President of the United States.

Quite a coincidence.

Nobody remembers these networks treating Joe Biden's speeches as too dangerous for public consumption, despite his remarkable ability to invent stories, confuse world leaders, or wander into verbal cul de sacs that left aides diving for the mute button.

In the end, America was reminded of several timeless truths. The permanent bureaucracy never really left. Questions about the 2020 election remain forbidden territory in polite media circles. The corporate press remains about as objective as a campaign commercial. Our election infrastructure still deserves scrutiny.

Yet these are the same people who assured us with straight faces that the 2020 election was the "most secure ever."

And they wonder why nobody believes them anymore.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

ABC and NBC Skip Trump's Election Security Address, Then Pretend Transparency Still Matters

If there was ever any doubt that legacy media still believes it should decide what Americans are allowed to see, ABC and NBC settled the matter Thursday night.

Both networks declined to air President Donald Trump's election security address on their broadcast channels, prompting Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to torch the decision on Friday. His reaction was difficult to argue with.

"How shameful is that?" Mullin said.

"ABC and NBC not carrying that. Why? What are they trying to cover up? Why wouldn’t they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they’re not actually trying to put the news out there?"

That is the question, isn't it?

Fox News aired the speech in its entirety. CBS carried part of it before cutting away. ABC and NBC relegated it to their streaming platforms, while CNN skipped the live address altogether. MSNBC aired only a portion before pulling the plug. Apparently, when the subject is election integrity and newly declassified intelligence, the gatekeepers suddenly decide viewers have seen enough.

Mullin also pointed out the glaring double standard. The same media outlets that enthusiastically repeated claims that the 2020 election was "the most secure election ever" suddenly lost interest when the Trump administration presented evidence it says raises new concerns.

"Two major networks didn't want to cover it? I think the question really should say why. Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever," Mullin said. "What facts did they have? Because they didn’t have facts. They were taking someone’s word for it. President Trump gave facts. Today we’re giving facts."

That inconsistency is impossible to ignore. When the narrative aligned with the media's preferred conclusion, airtime was unlimited. When information surfaced that challenged it, viewers were expected to hunt it down online instead.

During the address, Trump announced the release of previously classified intelligence that, according to the White House, documented vulnerabilities in voting infrastructure and foreign efforts to obtain American voter data. He also urged Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, legislation that would establish federal voter identification and proof of citizenship requirements.

Trump also blasted ABC and NBC for refusing to air the speech.

"They don't like the topic because they know how corrupt our system is, and they don't want to reveal it," Trump said. "They and others in the media are part of a plot. They want to continue this fraud for whatever reason. They want to keep it going. They want to protect the radical left. They can't have a great country, and that's true, you can't have a great country without free and fair elections."

Whether one agrees with Trump's conclusions or not, refusing to broadcast a presidential address on election security while claiming to be committed to informing the public is a curious editorial choice.

Trump also argued the networks should face regulatory consequences.

"Fraud like this should mean a revocation of their licenses," he said. "They use our public multibillion dollar in value airways for absolutely no money."

That proposal runs into a legal reality. The Federal Communications Commission licenses individual local broadcast stations, not the national television networks themselves.

Still, the larger issue remains. Americans can decide for themselves whether Trump's claims are persuasive. News organizations are supposed to provide access to information, not act as referees who determine which presidential addresses the public is permitted to watch.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

POTUS calls for Kimmel to be fired; Melania calls the "comedian" a "coward"

President Trump called on ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel on Monday after the insensitive, low-talent jerk referred to the first lady as “an expectant widow” two days before Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner. And we all know what happened at the dinner.

“Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by Disney and ABC,” the president wrote in a post on Truth Social, echoing a call made by the first lady earlier in the day.

“Kimmel, who is in no way funny as attested to by his terrible Television Ratings, made a statement on his Show that is really shocking. He showed a fake video of the First Lady, Melania, and our son, Barron, like they were actually sitting in his studio, listening to him speak, which they weren’t, and never would be,” the president noted.

SO the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner, got way more attention than usual because the president and first lady actually showed up for the first time since they entered the White House. Kimmel mocked the whole thing on his show Thursday night, delivering his own lame speech that included this gem: “Our first lady, Melania, is here. Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.”

What an butt-munch.

Melania Trump absolutely torched the late-night hack earlier Monday, calling him a “coward” who “hides behind ABC because he knows the network will keep running cover to protect him.”“Enough is enough,” Melania added on X. “It is time for ABC to take a stand. How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behavior at the expense of our community?” 

The Trump administration went full scorched earth on Kimmel and also hammered the Democratic lawmakers whose unhinged rhetoric helped create the kind of atmosphere that led to Saturday night’s mess.

“Who, in their right mind, says a wife would be glowing over the potential murder of her beloved husband?” asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday. “And having experienced what I did with the first lady on Saturday night, I can tell you that she was anything but.”

Leavitt, who is nine months pregnant, was seated at the head table at Saturday night’s dinner, next to the first lady.

Both women had to crawl off stage as security escorted them, and the president, to safety. 

Kimmel is being blasted from every direction after Saturday’s attack on the gala dinner, where a Secret Service agent took minor injuries when a gunman charged a checkpoint in a pathetic attempt to kill President Trump and others in his administration.

The failed assassin suspect, Cole Allen, 31, was detained by authorities and was arraigned on multiple federal charges Monday afternoon in the DC federal court.

Monday marked the second time Trump has called for the Kimmel's firing. The first was in September 2025, when the scumcrumpet was yanked off the air for a week after affiliates revolted over his disgusting comments about conservative activist Charlie Kirk following his assassination.The week-long suspension of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” triggered massive boycotts of Disney, with liberals screaming that it violated the First Amendment. But he's a Democrat, the media are Democrats, the Democrats hate conservatives like Charlie Kirk and Trump, so all they did was have Kimmel stand in the corner and promise to be a good boy for a while.

Melania Trump called for Jimmy Kimmel to be fired for his comments. Maybe more should be done to those who incite violence, even when it's implied.

Kimmel, ever the coward, failed to apologize upon his return to the air Sept. 23, but said: “It was never my intention to make light of a murder of a young man. I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.” 

But President Trump unloaded on ABC for handing him his show back anyway.

“I can’t believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back,” he wrote in a Truth Social post at the time.

“The White House was told by ABC that his Show was cancelled! Something happened between then and now because his audience is GONE, and his ‘talent’ was never there.”

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, please visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee for any amount--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Trump Drops MTG's endorsement: From loyal sidekick to 'ranting lunatic'

Oh boy, the MAGA family feud just hit DEFCON 1. President Donald Trump, never a shrinking violet, torched Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Friday night via Truth Social, yanking his endorsement faster than a frog's tongue grabbing a fly. 

The Georgia congresswoman has been complaining like a kid who didn't get the last Capri Sun, and Trump ain't here for the drama.

In a epic-length screed that could double as a greatest-hits album of his grievances, Trump branded Greene a "ranting lunatic" and accused her of ditching the conservative playbook for a joyride to the left, specifically, that infamous pit stop on ABC's The View. "She has gone Far Left," the President fumed, dubbing her "Wacky Marjorie" in the process. 

Ouch, that's gonna leave a mark. And get this: He vowed "Complete and Unyielding Support" to any primary challenger gunning for her seat come 2026. Talk about a plot twist; Greene, the queen of Trump rallies and impeachment defenses, is now on the chopping block.

Trump laid it all out, claiming her meltdown kicked off when he hit her with a poll showing her bombing at 12% for a Senate or governor run. "It seemed to all begin when I sent her a Poll stating that she should not run for Senator, or Governor, she was at 12%, and didn't have a chance (unless, of course, she had my Endorsement, which she wasn't about to get!)," he wrote. 

Bahdahbing!

But the real slap in the gourd was Trump painting himself as the world's busiest man, too swamped with "219 Congressmen/women, 53 U.S. Senators, 24 Cabinet Members, almost 200 countries, and an otherwise normal life to lead" to field calls from a daily dose of crazy. ""She has told many people that she is upset that I don't return her phone calls anymore, but with 219 Congressmen/women, 53 U.S. Senators, 24 Cabinet Members, almost 200 Countries, and an otherwise normal life to lead, I can’t take a ranting Lunatic’s call every day," Trump added. Classic Trump, part humblebrag, part mic drop.

Cue Greene's clapback on X, because nothing says "civil discourse" like a Twitter war with the boss. She fired off: "President Trump just attacked me and lied about me." And no, she insists, she hasn't been blowing up his phone. "I haven't called him at all, but I did send these text messages today," she added with screenshots of text messages. "Apparently this is what sent him over the edge. The Epstein files. And of course he's coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next week's vote to release the Epstein files. It's astonishing really how hard he’s fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out that he actually goes to this level."

Whoa, Epstein files? That's the grenade she lobbed? 

Suddenly, this isn't just about hurt feelings, it's conspiracy central, with Greene positioning herself as the brave truth-teller Trump wants buried. She even slammed the door on any makeup tour, declaring independence in the most Bible-thumping way possible: "I have supported President Trump with too much of my precious time, too much of my own money, and fought harder for him even when almost all other Republicans turned their back and denounced him. But I don’t worship or serve Donald Trump," Greene wrote. "I worship God, Jesus is my savior, and I serve my district GA14 and the American people."

Trump, meanwhile, wasn't about to let her steal the spotlight without a victory lap. After rattling off his second-term wins, turning America from a "DEAD Country" into the "HOTTEST" one on the planet in just 12 months, he couldn't resist the dig: "having created the "HOTTEST" Country anywhere in the World from being a DEAD Country just 12 months ago (and so much more!), all I see "Wacky" Marjorie do is COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN!"

Look, Greene's been ride-or-die since Day 1 in Congress, stumping with Trump in red strongholds, staring down impeachments like they were bad hair days. Remember that kiss after his March address to Congress? Or the Oval Office photo-op with RFK Jr. getting sworn in? 

But now, not so much. This spat could crack open her ruby-red district like a piñata for ambitious GOP hopefuls eyeing 2026. Will Trump really back a rando to boot her? Nobody knows, probably not even Trump.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Nexstar’s Still Shunning Kimmel’s Smirkfest, Even After Disney’s All-Clear

Well, folks, the late-night clown car is back, but not everyone's ready to buy a ticket to the circus. 

Nexstar Media Group, which runs 32 ABC affiliate stations, is keeping Jimmy Kimmel Live! on the bench, despite Disney cowardly waving the green flag for its return. You'd think a corporate giant like Disney could strong-arm everyone into compliance, but Nexstar's not budging, not yet, anyway. And honestly, it's refreshing to see someone stand their ground against the Hollywood sanctimony machine.

Nexstar dropped the hammer in a statement Tuesday, saying, "We made a decision last week to preempt 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' following what ABC referred to as Mr. Kimmel's 'ill-timed and insensitive' comments at a critical time in our national discourse. We stand by that decision pending assurance that all parties are committed to fostering an environment of respectful, constructive dialogue in the markets we serve." 

So, Kimmel's mouth got him in trouble, and we're not here for it until he learns to play nice. They added that Kimmel's show can still be streamed on Disney's platforms, while their stations will stick to local news and programming that actually matters to their viewers. Smart move, less sanctimonious snark, more real-world relevance.

Sinclair Broadcast Group, which controls 30 ABC affiliates, is also keeping Kimmel's smug mug off their airwaves. Their statement was equally no-nonsense: "Beginning Tuesday night, Sinclair will be preempting 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' across our ABC affiliate stations and replacing it with news programming. Discussions with ABC are ongoing as we evaluate the show's potential return." Sounds like they aren't holding their breath for Kimmel to suddenly become a beacon of civility.

This whole clusterfrack kicked off when Kimmel, in his infinite wisdom, decided to weigh in on the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10. Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two little girls, was fatally shot in the neck by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson during a college event.

Robinson, reportedly linked to a gender confused partner, allegedly confessed via text messages, according to the FBI. Kimmel, never one to let facts get in the way of a good narrative, went on a rant last Monday, accusing conservatives of hitting "new lows" by trying to "characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." 

Classy, Jimmy. Nothing says "thoughtful discourse" like baselessly smearing a grieving conservative base while a family buries their loved one. It is definitely time for conservatives to consider boycotting his sponsors now that he's going back on air.

The backlash was swift. Disney yanked Kimmel's show last Wednesday after Nexstar and Sinclair pulled it from their stations, and even the FCC's Brendan Carr called Kimmel's remarks "some of the sickest conduct," hinting at potential consequences. Kimmel, doubling down like a true Tinseltown titan, reportedly told execs he wouldn’t apologize. The left cried "free speech!" while conservatives pointed out that falsely tying Kirk's killer to MAGA wasn’t free speech; it was reckless defamation.

Disney announced Monday that Kimmel, [who is also known for his blackface when he did a Karl Malone imitation] is back on ABC Tuesday night, is likely to address the controversy with his trademark smirk and zero self-awareness. 

Kimmel doing blackface

But Nexstar and Sinclair aren't going along with their crap, and good for them. 

Nexstar, the biggest local TV broadcasting group in the U.S., reaches 220 million people across 116 markets. They're not some small-time operation, they have real clout, and they're using it. Just last month, they inked a $6.2 billion deal to acquire Tegna, which will expand their reach and boost political ad revenue in key election markets like Phoenix and Atlanta. That deal is still pending FCC approval, but it shows Nexstar's focused on real priorities, not Kimmel's ego trip.

Clay Travis, the OutKick founder, weighed in on The Will Cain Show, and you can bet he didn't mince words about ABC's handling of this fiasco. Kimmel's return might thrill the blue-check crowd, but with Nexstar and Sinclair holding firm, it's clear not everyone is ready to forgive and forget. Maybe Jimmy should take a cue from the affiliates and focus on "respectful, constructive dialogue" instead of cheap shots. 

But hey, I'm not holding my breath.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure.

Tweet

AOC's attack on Trump should get her sued into oblivion

Florida’s top law dog, Attorney General James Uthmeier, unloaded both barrels on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, [aka Alexandria Obviously-Comatose, aka Sandy from da Bronx] the Bronx’s favorite communist, for cheering on ICE protests aimed at derailing Trump’s mass deportation plans. AOC, never one to shy from a fight because she's too dumb to know that she will lose, stepped in it big time, tossing around the word "rapist" like it’s confetti at a parade, slamming Trump on X over the Jeffrey Epstein clusterfrack.

The far-left Latina, who’s been trading haymakers with Trump since she swapped bartending for congressional hearings, couldn’t resist stirring the pot on the Epstein case. The disgraced financier, who took the coward’s way out in a New York cell in 2019, left a trail of slime that still has politicos pointing fingers. 

Sandy, never missing a chance to grandstand, fired off this gem on X: "Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?" She was poking at the 2023 E. Jean Carroll civil trial, where a jury pinned Trump for sexual assault but stopped short of rape, so the fact is, it isn't rape.

Her critics pounced, screaming defamation faster than you can say "hey buddy, got a dollar?"

The Trump DOJ, meanwhile, insists there’s no secret Epstein client list, but that didn’t stop AOC from dropping the “R” bomb. Trump’s loyalists and legal eagles smelled blood. "The President should sue AOC into bankruptcy. I realize she’s trying to raise her profile but this is way way too far," legal analyst Phil Holloway, one of my favorite lawyers said on X.

Utah’s Sen. Mike Lee, not exactly a shrinking violet, also piled on: "Even under the ridiculously lenient standards of NY Times v. Sullivan, you’ve managed to incur defamation liability Wow." 

Oklahoma’s Sen. Markwayne Mullin took a different jab, snarking, "Why didn’t you guys release the Epstein files over the last 4 years? Maybe you were too busy covering for Joe Biden… or, could it have something to do with another former Democrat President?"

The X peanut gallery wasn’t done. Bill Mitchell, host of YourVoice America, laid into her: "Well we have grounds for a huge defamation suit here you idiot because Donald Trump has never been indicted for rape much less convicted." 

Another X user chimed in, "You realize your X account doesn't carry the same protections to defame people that you enjoy during congressional proceedings?"

The "rapist" jab hit a nerve, especially after ABC coughed up $15 million to Trump for George Stephanopoulos’ loose lips last year. Stephanopoulos, in a March 2024 cage match with another GOP Rep. Nancy Mace, he kept hammering that Trump was “liable for rape” in the Carroll case. "You’ve endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape," Stephanopoulos said.

Stephanopoulos, a former Senior Advisor to President Bill Clinton for Policy and Strategy and Communications Director, used that term ten times, per Fox Digital. 

Trump, who’s always denied knowing Carroll, called her a liar chasing book sales. ABC and Stephanopoulos later ate crow, settling for $15 million and a public "regret" note: 

"Editor's Note: ABC News and George Stephanopoulos regret statements regarding President Donald J. Trump made during an interview by George Stephanopoulos with Rep. Nancy Mace on ABC’s This Week on March 10, 2024."

AOC’s low-information defenders on X argued she didn’t name Trump directly, so good luck with that defamation suit. But Trump ally Laura Loomer wasn’t buying it: "Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted of being a rapist. This is defamatory. And I hope you are sued by Trump for this the same way George Stephanopoulos was sued and forced to pay Trump $15 million dollars. I hope you have millions ready for Trump, Porky. @AOC."

Townhall’s Rachel Alexander cackled, "This is gonna be fun. AOC is so dumb she just called Trump a rapist, after ABC was forced to fork over $16 million in a settlement with Trump after George Stephanopoulos called him a rapist."

White House comms chief Steven Cheung threw the final punch: "AOC likes to play pretend like she’s from the block, but in reality she’s just a sad, miserable blockhead who is trying to over-compensate for her lack of self-confidence that has followed her for her entire life." 

Fox News Digital had reached out to AOC’s office Sunday for a response but got crickets, similar to the sound you can hear if you put your ear next to AOC's

So here we are, watching AOC swing for the fences and maybe whiffing into a legal buzzsaw. She’s got the lefty faithful cheering, but the Trump train’s ready to roll her into court. Just another day in the circus.

Gosh, I hope he goes through with a lawsuit and takes her to the cleaners.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

6 Debate rules: Trump will have gag order in debate vs. Biden and guess who's excluded

Alleged President Joe Biden and former President Donald J. Trump, will debate . . . sort of. The ground rules and plans for the debate will have strings attached in order to help the brain addled Biden deal with the more energetic, sharper and wittier Trump.

After Trump gave Biden an open invitation to debate anytime, anywhere, Biden's handlers rose to the challenge. But of course, the Biden team had to tilt the field to his advantage, which still may be problematic as Biden tends to have problems with tilts and stairs. So with Biden's mumbled announcement a letter followed from his campaign to the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), which stated several critical limits that Biden's handlers placed on any debate with Trump.

Here are a few, some real, some not so much. 

1. No Audience because Biden's handlers criticized the CPD for making debates "huge spectacles with large audiences." This makes Joe uncomfortable when people listen to his every word.

2. Toilet breaks every ten minutes. Biden's handlers know their candidate and will do everything they can to avoid unnecessary embarrassing moments. Furthermore, they know that should there be insufficient toilet breaks, former President Donald J. Trump will jump at the chance to comment on what Joe just did.

3. The debates must take place in a television studio with just the candidates and the moderator present. Naturally, there will be camera men and women as well as transgender, lesbian, and queer camera people allowed.

"The debates should be conducted for the benefit of the American voters, watching on television and at home – not as entertainment for an in-person audience with raucous or disruptive partisans and donors, who consume valuable debate time with noisy spectacles of approval or jeering. As was the case with the original televised debates in 1960, a television studio with just the candidates and moderators is a better, more cost-efficient way to proceed: focused solely on the interests of voters," Biden's handlers wrote.

4. RFK Jr. is not allowed to debate because he's very smart and his vocal disorder may create an unfair sympathy advantage. And he's smart. No other 3rd party candidates will be allowed to be at the debate no matter what the U.S. Constitution says.

"The debates should be one-on-one, allowing voters to compare the only two candidates with any statistical chance of prevailing in the Electoral College – and not squandering debate time on candidates with no prospect of becoming President," Biden's handlers wrote.

Kennedy condemned his ban from the deabte in a post on X, accusing both Trump and Biden of colluding to block him from the debate stage.

5. No conservative news outlets will host any debate, especially not Fox News, Daily Wire, New York Post, Epoch Times, Washington Post, or Breitbart News. If there is going to be a slant in the news, it should be slanted toward the current POTUS, although as previously stated, the current POTUS doesn't negotiate slants very well so he will be wearing sneakers. 

This demand set limits the networks that can host a debate to CNN, ABC, CBS or Telemundo.

6. Candidate's mics will mute once their time expires. This is to prevent Trump from making a snappy remark or challenging the veracity of Biden's lies, and to keep Biden from making a confused one.

"There should be firm time limits for answers, and alternate turns to speak – so that the time is evenly divided and we have an exchange of views, not a spectacle of mutual interruption. A candidate’s microphone should only be active when it is his turn to speak, to promote adherence to the rules and orderly proceedings," the handlers wrote.

Former President Donald J. Trump accepted the Biden team's restrictions and the first debate is scheduled for June 27 and will be hosted by the Commie News Network (CNN).

"I am Ready and Willing to Debate Crooked Joe at the two proposed times in June and September," Trump posted. "I would strongly recommend more than two debates and, for excitement purposes, a very large venue, although Biden is supposedly afraid of crowds – That’s only because he doesn’t get them. Just tell me when, I’ll be there. ‘Let’s get ready to Rumble!!!’"

So who will come out the winner in the upcoming debates? Trump, who people seem to love or hate with no in-between? Or Biden, who is going to need a boatload of drugs to get him through these debates without looking like Bernie, on the weekend?

For Trump not being allowed to interrupt, will be like a gag order. At least he's used to it.

Tweet

Notso Sunny Hostin claims 'the war would be over in 3 days' if US stopped aiding Israel

Sunny Hostin, the resident anti-Israel/anti-Semite of ABC's "The View" suggested on Wednesday that the U.S. should stop sending aid to our ally Israel after they were invaded in a brutal massacre, consisting of torture, raping, beheading and burning to death of 1,200 people, mainly civilian men, women, children, and babies by the terrorist group Hamas. She said if we left Israel to defend against Hamas unarmed, “the war would be over in three days.” 

And so would Israel.

Hostin, whose given name is an oxymoron, is an obvious Jew-hater. She made the remarks during Wednesday’s broadcast of “The View,” with her cloaked suggestion that the U.S. should step aside and let Hamas destroy the Jewish State and the Jews therein. 

Surprisingly, she received an immediate rebuttal from Joy Behar who typically goes along to get along.

“The United States, the U.N. has found, is complicit,” Hostin said of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. She apparently thinks the U.N. is a peace-promoting organization rather than a supporter of Middle East propaganda and terrorist organizations that votes against Israel on every occasion it gets.

Hostin, who also seems to be rather homophobic based on a history of Facebook posts about gays that have since been deleted and of which she claims her account was 'hacked,' went on with her dark thoughts. “That is because the United States sends $3.8 billion worth of aid to Israel, and that also includes arming them. Social scientists have found that if the United States stopped providing that aid —”

Several of Hostin’s cohosts began talking at once then, but she pushed ahead with her anti-Israel point.

“—can I just finish this? The war would be over in three days,” Hostin continued, clearly implying that U.S. aid and arms were the only factors preventing Israel from being completely annihilated, and in short order.

“You know when the war would be over? If the — Hamas would release the hostages,” Behar shot back, over objections from Hostin. “That’s when the war would be over.”

Hostin went on to argue that there were Americans who would vote based on their disappointment in President Joe Biden’s continuing support to Israel, adding that she believed Biden was “listening.”

It's amazing that people like Hostin continues to be employed in the mainstream media, but then again, it's just as amazing what the mainstream media gets away with saying and with what they withhold. 

So here's what I have to say to Notso Sunny Hostin: Am Yisrael Chai! 

Tweet

It’s obvious Biden’s brain is chopped liver as he screws up Times Square appearance on ABC

"That smell is familiar"

I’ve been to the New Year’s Eve Times Square ball-drop once in my life as a young man. I was born and raised in New York City and believed I owed it to myself to have gone at least once in my life. It was cold, over-hyped, standing in an anus-to-belly button crowd and it sucked for me. I cannot speak for others whose dreams are to go there for the festivities, but once was enough for me.

Of course, New Year's Eve in the Big Apple is a huge event as it marks the hopes of the nation for a better year to come, so why wouldn't the President of the United States of America not show up somehow for the event? The White House handler[s] thought it would be a great idea for Joe to get away from his vacation and spends some time with the peons. So he made an appearance with Ryan Seacrest on ABC's live broadcast. 

Yes, they took a chance that Joe wouldn't screw things up but the chances of that not happening were as good as the chances of a double cheeseburger minding its own business had sitting in front of Chris Christie.

The interview with Seacrest was as hard-hitting as a toddler hitting a whiffle ball. Understandable, of course since this was New Year's Eve and politics should be nowhere on the table. Seacrest knows this and only asked the easiest questions he could find or was given.

What sort of holiday foods have you been enjoying over the last few days?" Seacrest asked the head of the free world.

"Well, I've been eating and everything is put in front of me,” Biden quipped thoughtfully as he coughed up a loogie. “I've been [sic] pasta—which I love—eating a lot of chicken, chicken parmesan, I've been eating all Italian foods, basically."

One thing he forgot to add was his signature food but Doctor Jill Biden likely knew what Seacrest was trying to elicit from Biden. “And ice cream," Doctor Jill Biden said.

“And ice cream,” Joe added. “Chocolate chip ice cream." He smiled at the memory of the last ice cream cone he had or hair he sniffed--it's hard to tell.

Doctor Jill Biden said that she's trying to get her President husband to quit the ice cream as it's high in fat and cholesterol, but it really tastes good and Joe's not worried about his health after his White House doctor told him he is in the prime of his dementia.

The next question Seacrest asked of Joe Biden was: "As you look back and reflect on 2023, what sort of memories, highlights stand out for you?"

Softball question, as it should be--it was New Year's Eve, darn it.

As Biden did the mental windup from the mound in the jasmine of his mind, he looked a pensive and ready to answer the question of what stands out in his mind as he reflects on 2023.

"Well, one of the big highlights stands out for me is—my dad used to have an expression. He said, ‘Joey, a job's about a lot more than a paycheck; it's about your dignity. It's about respect.' So many people through the midwest and in the center in the country, their factories are shipped overseas the last couple of times are out."

Where was the Easter bunny when you needed her/him?

"And then they were losing hope and faith,” Biden blathered on. "So we brought a lot of jobs back to the United States. People are in a position to be able to make a living now and they've created a lot of jobs, over 14 million. And I guess what, I just feel good that the American people got up, they've been through a rough time with pandemic and now we're coming back. They're back."

Seacrest, unprepared for the dementia infused answer tried not to look confused. That was President Joey Biden's job.

Tweet

Caryn Johnson [aka Whoopi Goldberg] apologizes yet again over anti-Semitic regurgitations she made

High school drop-out and thrice divorced former comedienne Caryn Elaine Johnson, [aka Whoopi Goldberg] does not know when to stop talking, especially when comments offend so many decent people who find anti-Semitism repugnant.

Goldberg [who dropped Johnson and appropriated the Jewish surname] was blasted by the Anti-Defamation League for making "deeply offensive" comments in an interview with The Sunday Times of London.

Goldberg suggested that Jews are not a race. “My best friend said, ‘Not for nothing is there no box on the census for the Jewish race.’ So that leads me to believe that we’re probably not a race,” the co-host of "The View" shared.

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement that Goldberg’s comments “are deeply offensive and incredibly disappointing, especially given that this is not the first time she had made remarks like this. In a moment when antisemitic incidents have surged across the U.S., she should realize that making such ignorant statements can have real consequences.”

In a move to save her job, Goldberg has since apologized once again, in a statement to Variety. If you believe her this time, I would like to interest you in an investment property in Giza, where cotton is a My Pillow miracle.

“Recently while doing press in London, I was asked about my comments from earlier this year,” she said. “I tried to convey to the reporter what I had said and why, and attempted to recount that time. It was never my intention to appear as if I was doubling down on hurtful comments, especially after talking with and hearing people like rabbis and old and new friends weighing in. I’m still learning a lot and believe me, I heard everything everyone said to me. I believe that the Holocaust was about race, and I am still as sorry now as I was then that I upset, hurt and angered people. My sincere apologies again, especially to everyone who thought this was a fresh rehash of the subject. I promise it was not. In this time of rising antisemitism, I want to be very clear when I say that I always stood with the Jewish people and always will. My support for them has not wavered and never will.”

Yeah, sure.

Goldberg was referring to the anti-Semitic comments she made earlier this year on The View, when she claimed the Holocaust was not racially motivated when the panel of semi-geniuses were discussing a Tennessee school district's decision to ban Art Spiegelman's novel about the Holocaust, Maus.

“Well also, if you’re going to do this, then let’s be truthful about it, because the Holocaust isn’t about race. It’s not about race,” Goldberg said in February.

She was suspended from the ABC show for a mere 2 weeks, which ABC News President Kin Godwin announced in a statement.

“Effective immediately, I am suspending Whoopi Goldberg for two weeks for her wrong and hurtful comments,” Godwin wrote. “While Whoopi has apologized, I’ve ask her to take time to reflect and learn about the impact of her comments. The entire ABC News organization stands in solidarity with our Jewish colleagues, friends, family and communities.”

But the semi-genius couldn't keep her thoughts to herself and like her high school experience, learned nothing from it.

Should she be fired from "The View"? 

It's her First Amendment right to say stupid crap and it might even reveal to some of her liberal audience just how biased their pundits are. It's like the old say that leftists want to shut conservatives up while conservatives want leftists to keep talking.

Thoughts?

Tweet

Caryn Johnson [aka Whoopi Goldberg] doubles down on her anti-Semitic remarks

Jewish community members and activists are demanding that Caryn Johnson who goes by Whoopi Goldberg be terminated from the Special Ed. show known as "The View" after the former comedienne doubled-down on a past Holocaust remark she made, which created an angry outcry on social media from Jews and Gentiles alike.

The adipose African-American woman got suspended about ten months ago after she bloviated that the Holocaust was "not about race," but she evidently didn't learn anything from the suspension. 

In an interview with the U.K.'s The Sunday Times, the low-information racist showed no remorse for her past sentiments about the targeted, systematic killing of six million Jews for the crime of being Jews.

She also claimed the Nazis targeted people of African descent in addition to Jews because they were physically different and went as far as to suggest that Jews had an easier time blending in with White people and hiding from the Nazis than Black people did at the time of the Holocaust.

"It doesn’t change the fact that you could not tell a Jew on a street. You could find me. You couldn’t find them. That was the point I was making," she ignorantly said. "But you would have thought that I’d taken a big old stinky dump on the table, butt naked." 

At which point the interviewer, Janice Turner, threw up in her mouth.

The Times of Israel called Goldberg's comments "incendiary" in an article Sunday, pointing out that while her real name is Caryn Elaine Johnson, the racist has no Jewish ancestry and adopted a more "Jewish-sounding" stage name.

Goldberg's Holocaust comments in February, which led to her two-week suspension from the network and a subsequent apology, stunned many in the Jewish community. At the time, faith leaders, activists and online critics encouraged her to educate herself on the topic, but largely supported her return to the somewhat retarded show.

Now, with her obvious lack of remorse as seen in her latest interview, some are calling for her termination over her history of ignorant statements that categorize the Holocaust as a "white-on-white crime," rather than what it was.

Perhaps she unveiled her true anti-Semitic, anti-White racism after Kanye West [aka Ye] went public with his. As Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby said of anti-Semitism in response to Goldberg, that . . . "history's oldest and most toxic hatred--is surging, but Whoopi is determined to trivialize it."

Lucy Lipiner, a Holocaust survivor and author of "Long Journey Home: A Young Girl's Memoir of Surviving the Holocaust" responded:

"Whoopi Goldberg continues to use the Holocaust as her punching bag. We told her that her comments harm us and she simply doesn’t care." 

"I survived the Nazis and the Holocaust," she added, "so I’ll be damned if I let a comedy has-been, peddling a fake Jewish name get the better of me."

Newsweek contributor Joel Petlin wrote: 

"Accepting apologies from some people who spew Antisemitic garbage is the triumph of hope over experience. We know that the Antisemitism will likely reoccur, but we still hope that they learned something along the way. Alas Whoopi just learned she could get away with it. Again."

In her write-up of the interview, the Times' Janice Turner revealed that, "Even now [Goldberg] does not understand why her remarks offended. She insists Jewish people themselves are divided about whether they are a race or a religion."

* * *

Sex!? Yes, sex sells but so what? If you enjoy reading this blog, please check out the ads on this page. There is absolutely no obligation to buy anything [this isn't Communist China, after all] but simply clicking on an ad brings sweet, sweet revenue to my blog and helps in the fight against fascism. But sex is still okay, right?

* * *

One thing that is abundantly clear is that we should never be fooled into believing that being a celebrity equates with intelligence. Goldberg is simply a black Karen who spells it differently. It's time for Caryn Johnson to find another means of employment.

Tweet

Networks cover for Waukesha parade terrorist Darrell Brooks

Darrell Brooks: racist, anti-Semite, all around scum weasel

Darrell Brooks is an anti-Semitic, white-hating black man who made the news on November 24th after ramming an SUV into marchers at the Waukesha Christmas Parade in Wisconsin. The 39-year-old scumbag killed six people, including Jackson Sparks, an 8-year-old child; Virginia Sorenson, 79; LeAnna Owen, 71; Jane Kulich, 52; Tamara Durand, 52; and Wilhelm Hospel, 81. Scores of others were injured too.

But since the attack the mainstream media has forgotten about it because it doesn't fit their woke agenda. After all, when a black man intentionally kills white folks, that isn't as important than a white person killing white people in self-defense at a Black Lives Matter riot, as Kyle Rittenhouse had to do to save his life. By December 7th, ABC, CBS, NBC and MSNBC completely dropped the story altogether and the Left didn't seem to notice.

Brooks is a disgusting racist and an anti-Semite. He posted memes stating that "Hitler was right" and he hated white people, threatening, “we start bakk knokkin white people TF out. [sic]” 

Not one of the legacy media outlets looked into this and the last time they even mentioned Darrell Brooks' name was the day he murdered innocent people. In fact, the Washington Post, a crappy paper fit only to be used as birdcage liner, suggested that an SUV was responsible for the attack.

ABC last spoke of the attack on that day's Good Morning America. Same for CBS who mentioned it on CBS Mornings. While NBC made the final mention of the attack on the Nightly News that day as well. And by then, it was well-known that Brooks was a flaming anti-Semite but this was never mentioned. The only reason one can imagine this lack of "journalisming," as Ben Shapiro calls it, is that Brooks is black and his intended victims were white.

Instead, journalists such as CBS Mornings co-host Tony Dokoupil provided only the tiniest of details on November 24: “The alleged driver, 39-year-old Darrell Brooks, appeared in court yesterday as well.” Alex Perez promised “details on the suspect accused of plowing his SUV through crowds at a Christmas parade.” He added, “Darrell Brooks shackled in court Tuesday.” But Perez didn’t provide any facts about what might have been the motivation.

CBS dropped the Brooks Waukesha killings completely after November 25. ABC last covered it on December 5, 2021 and NBC on December 7, 2021. By then, Brooks' act of murder had seemingly become a self-driving car. On the December 7 Today, Tom Llamas, a total leftist hack, blamed the SUV itself:

"For decades the Dancing Grannies spinning and twirling their way into the hearts of people across Wisconsin. But just weeks ago, the beloved dance troupe making national headlines after an out-of-control SUV crashed right through the Waukesha Christmas Parade."

No dummy, the SUV was in total control by Darrell Brooks. He had every intention of plowing into the crowd as he had to avoid closed off streets to get to the parade and terrorize white people.

CBS Mornings previewed the blame-the-car talking point back on November 24 as if the tragedy was a traffice accident. Dokoupil insisted, “There is now a sixth victim after an SUV barreled through a holiday parade.” 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Brooks has a history of ranting about “fake Jews” and sharing quotes claiming the “negroes are the real children of Israel.” 

Where's Joy Reid when we need her? Where's Joy Behar and the girls of The View? Where's Brian Stelter and his flock of reliable sources? 

Say his name: Darrell Brooks! That's what they would say if the actors in this tragedy had their races reversed, and it's disgusting.

Tweet

"Experts" blasted for telling public to not use term "looting" to describe California looters

Alleged experts Monday cautioned against using the term "looting" to describe the recent large-scale looting and destruction of property from California retail stores because it might be associated with people of color and that would make whoever the looters are, feel upset.

Perhaps we should refer to looters as "retail products acquisition engineers." We wouldn't want to offend them.

Some reacted to the claims made by these self-described "experts" of verbiage online and not so complimentary.

A government looter innocently whistling as she makes off with a coat load of stuff

According to the local ABC affiliate for the Bay Area, the California Penal Code didn't allow for the use of the term "looting" to describe the thefts involving large groups of people because, it claimed, the definition didn't match the act as defined by law. 

And we should care how the law terms bum-rushing a store and stealing items off the shelves because why?

The network also cited two individuals it referred to as "experts," who described the term as being reminiscent of Black people and people of color being associated with the act of looting. They gave no actual examples of when this happened or who used this term in such a manner, but if ABC says they're experts, who are we peons to disagree?

"According to the California Penal Code, what we saw was not looting," it wrote. 

What we saw was worse than simple looting, which is basically taking booty which was not yours during a "state of emergency," "local emergency," or "evacuation order." 

What happened in California was more like a coordinated attack on local businesses with the intent of obtaining merchandise that would likely be resold at a later date, while terrorizing store employees and customers, destroying store property and taking advantage of California's laws which decriminalizes theft below $950.

Alleged expert Lorenzo Boyd, a guy I go to when I need to know what not to call looting, is a professor of Criminal Justice and Community Policing at the University of New Haven. As an obvious progressive, Boyd described the term "looting" through a racist lens, just as everything else the Left disagrees with is likewise described.

"Looting is a term that we typically use when people of color or urban dwellers are doing something. We tend not to use that term for other people when they do the exact same thing," he told ABC.

And just because the looters used the Kyle Rittenhouse 'not guilty' verdict to excuse their looting, is no reason to use the term "experts" say.

ABC admitted they didn't know the races or identities of the looters but just in case they aren't white it's best we don't call them looters so we can avoid any problems.

Some critics pointe out that it wouldn't make any difference if we called them looters or whatever else we use to describe their criminal behavior. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

One critic compared the pushback on using the term "looting" to people claiming critical race theory was taught only in law schools and not to school-age children. "There was no looting. As a matter of fact, 'looting' is only a term used in law school," he wrote.

"It’s looting. Just like there were riots in Kenosha, not just protests," former Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker wrote, referring to the unrest in Kenosha following the non-fatal police shooting of Jacob Blake.

"'Experts.' Remember-- they believe if they can control the language they control reality. Time to 'smash and grab' this garbage," Fox News' contributor Tammy Bruce wrote, while another simply wrote, "Umm ok."

So call it looting. Call it stealing. Call it retail products acquisition engineering.

It is what it is.

Tweet

Brian "Rambo" Williams talking to Comedy News Network and ABC about a job

A white shirt under a camouflage vest: brilliant

Now that we know Brian Williams is leaving MSNBC, we can surmise that he isn't leaving on his own accord because he's looking for a job at CNN and ABC [aka the Always Been Communist" network]. So it isn't as if he's hanging up his flak jacket and helmet as he rides off into the sunset.

The ABC network might cause indigestion for some of their "star" propagandists like George Stephanopoulos and David Muir, neither of whom have flown as many combat missions, saved as many villagers, and helped Jesus carry the cross to Calvary as Brian Williams did in his own mind.

Williams, 62, announced that he is leaving NBC "News" after 28 years, at the end of the year. And now that the announcement has been made, he isn't supposed to be negotiating with other networks while still under contract.

Some of his close friends have alluded to the possibility the former "Nightly News" anchor might even go back to the business of entertainment and comedy as he already has 28 years experience in the latter.

One friend said that  “[P]eople forget that Brian is really funny, he’s always wanted to do an interview show that gives him room to have fun. He likes to do profiles and interviews — even though that is what got him into trouble.” 

Yes, Williams is a real hoot and he covered the news in such a way as to prove it, along with his extracurricular appearances on "The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon" in 2015.

Although he was given a second chance by MSNBC with a late night time slot after NBC News booted him in 2015 for lying about his journalistic balls, some sources said he still believed he was under appreciated at the far left network, and some people even thought he sucked even when he wasn't lying.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Williams announced on Tuesday that he had finally decided not to sign another contract because he doesn't want to get sued for breach of contract, and that he plans to take a few months off, but, in the spirit of Jeffrey Toobin, he added. “[T]here are many things I want to do, and I’ll pop up again somewhere.”

Supposedly, Williams is leaving in part due to a pay cut as a result of the piss poor viewership his show has made. But the source said the main reason was “[B]ecause he wasn’t being looked after at MSNBC. You’ve got to take care of the talent. He’ll probably go to a streaming service next, he wants to do his own thing.”

His own thing consists of going to a safe area located near an area not as safe and claiming to have braved the dangers he didn't face and saved the people who don't exist.

Tweet

Busted: TV cameraman for ABC, CNN and Conan O'Brien arrested for threatening Rep. Matt Gaetz

A man was arrested for threatening the lives of Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and his children in a foul-mouth phone message to Gaetz's office, according to reports.

Eugene Huelsman was arrested last week in the Los Angeles area for a call made in January to Gaetz's office, according to Politico, three days after the U.S. Capitol riot. 

The indictment was handed down in May but was sealed pending Huelsman's arrest, according to Fox News.

The indictment refers to Heulsman's target only as M.G., but the congressman has since confirmed to the media that he was the target.

“Tell [M.G.] to watch his back, tell him to watch his children,” Huelsman said in the call, the indictment states, which was obtained by Politico. “I’m coming for him, he’s gonna f—king die … I’m gonna f—king kill him."

Huelsman allegedly continues with, “Watch your back, I’m coming for you. I’m gonna put a bullet in you and I’m gonna put a bullet in one of your f—king kids too,” allegedly sounding like a vulgar wicked witch of the west.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Huelsman, of Thousand Oaks, CA, was a longtime camera operator in TV and film. He worked with “Late Night with Conan O’Brien,” according to Politico, and also worked for ABC and CNN, according to Fox. 

It is possible that his work with Don LeMon and Chris Fredo Cuomo may have influenced his hate for Trump supporting Matt Gaetz, but there is no proof of that at this time.

Gaetz had recently said on the House floor that federal investigators were not taking the threats against him and his children seriously and believed those statements may have been the catalyst for the arrest.

“An indictment was issued in May, and has now been unsealed the week after my criticism,” Gaetz reportedly said. “If they if they took our security seriously, they would arrest all of the people who violate federal law and the threats to kill us, not just some of them … I think that the Department of Justice is biased against Republicans.”

Ya think?

Tweet