ABC and NBC Skip Trump's Election Security Address, Then Pretend Transparency Still Matters

If there was ever any doubt that legacy media still believes it should decide what Americans are allowed to see, ABC and NBC settled the matter Thursday night.

Both networks declined to air President Donald Trump's election security address on their broadcast channels, prompting Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to torch the decision on Friday. His reaction was difficult to argue with.

"How shameful is that?" Mullin said.

"ABC and NBC not carrying that. Why? What are they trying to cover up? Why wouldn’t they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they’re not actually trying to put the news out there?"

That is the question, isn't it?

Fox News aired the speech in its entirety. CBS carried part of it before cutting away. ABC and NBC relegated it to their streaming platforms, while CNN skipped the live address altogether. MSNBC aired only a portion before pulling the plug. Apparently, when the subject is election integrity and newly declassified intelligence, the gatekeepers suddenly decide viewers have seen enough.

Mullin also pointed out the glaring double standard. The same media outlets that enthusiastically repeated claims that the 2020 election was "the most secure election ever" suddenly lost interest when the Trump administration presented evidence it says raises new concerns.

"Two major networks didn't want to cover it? I think the question really should say why. Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever," Mullin said. "What facts did they have? Because they didn’t have facts. They were taking someone’s word for it. President Trump gave facts. Today we’re giving facts."

That inconsistency is impossible to ignore. When the narrative aligned with the media's preferred conclusion, airtime was unlimited. When information surfaced that challenged it, viewers were expected to hunt it down online instead.

During the address, Trump announced the release of previously classified intelligence that, according to the White House, documented vulnerabilities in voting infrastructure and foreign efforts to obtain American voter data. He also urged Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, legislation that would establish federal voter identification and proof of citizenship requirements.

Trump also blasted ABC and NBC for refusing to air the speech.

"They don't like the topic because they know how corrupt our system is, and they don't want to reveal it," Trump said. "They and others in the media are part of a plot. They want to continue this fraud for whatever reason. They want to keep it going. They want to protect the radical left. They can't have a great country, and that's true, you can't have a great country without free and fair elections."

Whether one agrees with Trump's conclusions or not, refusing to broadcast a presidential address on election security while claiming to be committed to informing the public is a curious editorial choice.

Trump also argued the networks should face regulatory consequences.

"Fraud like this should mean a revocation of their licenses," he said. "They use our public multibillion dollar in value airways for absolutely no money."

That proposal runs into a legal reality. The Federal Communications Commission licenses individual local broadcast stations, not the national television networks themselves.

Still, the larger issue remains. Americans can decide for themselves whether Trump's claims are persuasive. News organizations are supposed to provide access to information, not act as referees who determine which presidential addresses the public is permitted to watch.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Trump Slams the Brakes on Weak-Kneed Bureaucrats: Orders ICE to Get Back to Work Nabbing Criminals

President Trump wasted no time telling the Department of Homeland Security to cut the nonsense. One day after DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin hit the brakes on ICE vehicle stops, Trump ordered the agency to reverse course and resume one of its most effective tools for catching illegal aliens and criminals.

In a blunt social media post, Trump made his position crystal clear. "We CANNOT give up one of ICE's most important and effective Crime fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!" He added that pausing the tactic would only play right into the criminals' hands.

The Radical Left Dumocrats (sic) would love nothing more than to see ICE tied down, he noted, but that surrender would not happen on his watch.

Trump told the agents directly to be judicious, fair, and smart, then get right back to doing their important job. The White House confirmed the pause was dead. Nationwide instructions telling agents to stop most vehicle stops, except for the worst violent offenders, were scrapped.

The original plan had been to keep the pause going indefinitely until new training was rolled out. That idea lasted about 24 hours once Trump weighed in.The pause came after two fatal shootings during stops in Maine and Texas. Some inside ICE called the change "horrible but needed."

Trump saw it differently. He praised the men and women of ICE for doing a great job under tough conditions and pointed out that crime is way down across America, with numbers not seen in decades. He reminded everyone that Sleepy Joe Biden opened the border and let in roughly 25 million people, many unchecked and unvetted, including plenty of criminals. Getting them out requires strength, toughness, and smarts, Trump said, not timid pauses cooked up by nervous bureaucrats.

To the agents on the ground he sent a clear message: Keep those crime statistics coming. Remember, you are loved and respected in America. While sanctuary city politicians and their media allies try to make every enforcement action look like a crisis, Trump continues to back the officers who actually have to clean up the mess. Traffic stops remain on the table. The adults are back in charge.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Congress Hosts Finger-Wagging Olympics As DHS Chief Reminds Democrats About 450,000 Missing Kids

Washington's latest episode of Political Theater Live featured enough finger pointing to qualify as an OSHA workplace hazard after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Rep. Rosa DeLauro turned a routine budget hearing into an audition for daytime television.

Testifying before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, Mullin found himself on the receiving end of another well rehearsed Democratic outrage performance centered on family separation.

"3,900 children were separated from their families," DeLauro declared, delivering the line as though nobody had updated the script since 2019.

Mullin promptly reached into the file Democrats apparently keep locked in a basement.

"450,000 kids were lost during the Biden administration, and you didn’t say a word about it."

That was apparently the signal for the hearing to transition from congressional oversight into interpretive finger wagging.

"Mr. Secretary! Do not interrupt," DeLauro snapped, raising her voice as cameras happily captured every second.

"Don’t you point your finger at me," Mullin answered. "Don’t be a hypocrite."

Not to be outdone, DeLauro doubled down.

"I will point my finger at you," she fired back before asking the committee chairman to put Mullin "in his place."

Mullin wasn't interested in playing along.

"You should be as upset about the 450,000 kids that were lost. You didn’t say a word about it. For four years, you never said a word."

Then he delivered one final jab.

"You should be put in your place."

The Capitol Hill fireworks came just hours after the Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two major immigration victories, triggering what could only be described as a nationwide shortage of coping mechanisms on the Left.

In one 6 to 3 decision, the Court ruled the administration could move forward with ending Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Haitian migrants and 6,000 Syrians currently living in the United States. In another 6 to 3 ruling, the justices upheld the federal government's authority to limit asylum processing at ports of entry through the "metering" policy, rejecting claims that every migrant who arrives at the border must immediately be processed.

Adding another twist, Florida officials announced that the now famous Everglades detention center nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz" is closing its gates after helping deport roughly 21,000 illegal immigrants.

Standing beside White House Border Czar Tom Homan, Gov. Ron DeSantis explained that the facility had always been intended as a temporary emergency measure.

"I said from the beginning that this was an emergency solution that would be temporary, that once DHS had the wherewithal to be able to handle these illegal aliens, particularly the criminal illegal aliens, that they would be able to do so, and we would still help," DeSantis said. "In terms of us managing this facility, the minute that’s no longer needed, then we obviously would break down the facility."

In Washington, however, one thing remains permanent. As long as there are cameras rolling, there will always be another finger to point.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Conservatives Erupt After Al Green Melts Down During Viral Clash: 'Unhinged Lunatic Who Just Got Voted Out Like Yesterday's Garbage'

In what experts are calling "peak 2026 Democrat energy," outgoing Rep. Al Green (D-TX) delivered a masterclass in unhinged congressional performance art Tuesday, accusing Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin of racism for the unforgivable crime of not wanting a giant sign waved in his face during the State of the Union.

The Texas Democrat, famous for filing more impeachment articles against Trump than most people have socks, apparently decided his best strategy in a hearing was to channel his inner toddler who just discovered the word "no."

When Mullin had the absolute gall to defend himself, Green unleashed the devastating rhetorical nuke that has defined his entire career:

"Shut up," Green barked.

The clip spread faster than a Hunter Biden laptop story on social media, prompting the Republican National Committee to repost it with the simple, elegant caption: "UNHINGED.

Green, 80 years young and freshly rejected by his own voters in a primary that basically screamed "please retire," doubled down by holding up a photo of the sign incident like it was the Zapruder film of systemic racism.

"A racist would depict people of color as apes. A racist would take offense at a peaceful protest. This was a peaceful protest, Mr. Secretary," Green said, apparently unaware that "peaceful protest" now includes yelling at cabinet secretaries while your party gets demolished at the ballot box.

After Mullin tried to interject, Green continued to ask that Mullin be silenced. When Mullin continued, the congressman tried to ask the Republican chair to force Mullin’s compliance.

"Reclaiming my time. Ask him to shut up. It’s my time. Tell him to shut up," Green said, in the most compelling argument for term limits since forever.

Benny Johnson, a political commentator, blasted Green's attempt to block Mullin's response in his own post to X.

"This is the modern Democratic Party in one clip. Green's response? 'Shut up, up, up, up. Shut up.' No respect. No argument. No facts. No substance. Just 'shut up' and a temper tantrum. This is all they have left," Johnson said.

The Libs of TikTok, a conservative influencer account, similarly called the moment an embarrassment for Democrats, the Party immune to introspection and thus, embarrassment. 

"Rep. Al Green (D) has a complete MELTDOWN, calling DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin a 'racist' before telling him to 'SHUT UP' Thank God this unhinged lunatic was voted out," the account wrote.

Eric Daugherty, another conservative media personality, also celebrated an impending end to Green's time in Congress.

"Insufferable Rep. Al Green (D) just went on a BERSERK RANT and DHS Sec. Mullin took NO BS," Daugherty wrote. "Al Green just lost his House seat. GOOD RIDDANCE!"

Homeland Security Chairman Andrew Garbarino (R-NY), eventually had to gavel the room like a substitute teacher breaking up a food fight, reminding everyone that character attacks are frowned upon, unless they're coming from Democrats calling everyone racist, of course.

Before the hearing resumed, Mullin couldn't resist one final mic drop:

"Evidently, his constituents heard enough of him because they voted him out," Mullin said Green, ever the statesman, closed with one last profound thought: "I will speak into the microphone so that I may be heard. I ask that any person who desires to interrupt me shut up," Green said one last time.

At press time, sources confirmed Al Green was already drafting his seventh impeachment resolution against Trump from the retirement home he'll soon be calling home.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

GOP stands with Trump over Senate challenge regarding Operation Epic Fury

Senate Republicans closed ranks on Wednesday, delivering President Trump a solid victory on his use of force against Iran, This came despite the usual lingering questions about America's role in the Middle East mess.

The Senate decisively shot down a resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) that sought to limit Trump's military actions in Iran. This followed days of speculation about whether any Republicans would break ranks, as some have done in the past, to slap the president on the wrist.

The administration went all-in to rally support for Operation Epic Fury. They held multiple briefings with Congress to lay out the case. It worked, at least for the moment. It convinced some wavering Republicans to stick with continued military action against the regime.

President Donald Trump confirmed the U.S. launched strikes on Iran on Feb. 28, 2026.

Only Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) voted for Kaine's resolution. On the flip side, Sen. Jon Fetterman (D-Pa.) was the lone Democrat to cross over and support the president's position.

Democrats tried to frame Trump's moves as yet another case of him blowing past Congress's authority on military force. They complained about no clear strategy ahead and accused him of breaking another campaign promise.

"It's time for the president to keep promises, not break them," Kaine said ahead of the vote. "That's why I'm so glad that we're going to put everybody on the record … Nobody gets to hide and give the president an easy pass or an end run around the Constitution."

Democrats also hammered the administration for refusing to take ground troops off the table."They refuse to take off the table the insertion of ground troops," said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). He warned the conflict could balloon beyond air and naval ops. "This is going to make the operations in Libya look like child’s play."

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) introduced a war powers resolution to rein in President Donald Trump's military action in Iran.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), who once backed a similar resolution to curb Trump's war powers in Venezuela, made it clear he opposed this one.

But like before, he noted that any ground operation would need congressional approval."I’ve always said that committing ground troops would be something I think would require immediate congressional authorization, but that doesn’t appear to be on the immediate horizon," Hawley said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) claimed the administration kept moving the goalposts, which he called proof positive that "a strategy is missing."

Republicans fired back that the president was squarely within his constitutional authority as commander in chief. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) dismissed the War Powers Act as "an unconstitutional shift of authority from the president." He pointed out that Congress can always pull the funding plug if it really disagrees with the action.

"We don’t need 535 commanders in chief," said Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), tearing into the legislation.

There was also clear fatigue in GOP circles over Kaine's habit of repeatedly pushing these congressional power plays in every conflict.

Republicans huddled privately on Tuesday to hash out the strikes and the looming war powers vote. This came ahead of their briefing with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan "Raizin" Caine, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio looks on during a meeting with oil and gas executives in the East Room of the White House, Jan. 9, 2026.

A source familiar with the closed-door session told Fox News Digital that some Republicans who might have been persuadable were fed up with Kaine's nonstop use of the Senate floor to limit Trump's war authorities.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-WY) highlighted that this was Kaine’s fifth resolution targeting Trump’s war powers since he returned to office last year. That tally accounts for nearly half of all war powers resolutions in U.S. history.

"These resolutions have been used only 11 times in 50 years," Barrasso said. "The senator from Virginia alone accounts for nearly half of them. Yet Senator Kaine introduced zero war powers resolutions when Barack Obama and Joe Biden were president."

Rubio told reporters after Tuesday's all-senators briefing that the administration had complied with the War Powers Act, even though it views the law as unconstitutional. He added that congressional leaders got notified before the strikes.

Rubio had earlier floated that the U.S. acted in Operation Epic Fury because Israel was set to strike first, though he later dialed that back.

"If you tell the President of the United States that if we don't go first, we're going to have more people killed and more people injured, the president is going to go first," Rubio said. "That's what he did. That's what the president will always do."

Meanwhile, U.S. forces have hammered more than 2,000 targets in Iran so far, zeroing in on the regime’s air defenses and missile stockpiles. Six American service members have been killed in the operation, along with nearly 50 top Iranian leaders.

The Iranian government claims at least 1,045 people have been killed across the country during the campaign.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Tweet

Dem. who didn't call for Biden's impeachment, calls for Trump's: "It isn't about partisanship"

"This is not about partisanship," claimed Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI), who did nothing to impeach a braindead Democrat president but wants to impeach President Trump.

On Monday, Thanedar introduced seven articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, kicking off a bid that has as much chance of succeeding as this guy has of winning the Lottery twice on the same day. 

Congress is led by the GOP so it's obvious Thanedar is simply trying to make a name for himself.

The impeachment resolution accuses Trump of “high crimes and misdemeanors” over alleged constitutional violations related to taxpayer funds, deportations, tariffs, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) effort led by Elon Musk, retaliation against the press, and others. All the things the majority of Americans voted for when we elected Trump.

“Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated that he is unfit to serve as President and represents a clear and present danger to our nation’s constitution and our democracy,” Thanedar said in a statement, plagiarizing the words of the late author Tom Clancy. 

“His unlawful actions have subverted the justice system, violated the separation of powers, and placed personal power and self-interest above public service. We cannot wait for more damage to be done. Congress must act.”

In a video posted on social media, Thanedar claimed the “final straw” was Trump defying a Supreme Court ruling that the government must “facilitate” the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal alien, alleged MS-13 gang member, and known wife-beater deported to his home country of El Salvador.

The announcement came hours after Michigan state Rep. Donavan McKinney launched a 2026 primary campaign for the Detroit-area district against Thanedar, a 70-year-old, below average, Indian immigrant serving his second term in the House. McKinney joins former state Sen. Adam Hollier, who is challenging Thanedar for a third time, and has already received an endorsement from the leftist Justice Democrats.

“People like our congressman, Shri Thanedar, are the problem,” McKinney said in an announcement video. “A multimillionaire who spent millions to buy a seat in Congress, who has more in common with Donald Trump and Elon Musk than people like us.”

Due to the fact that the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans who are largely aligned with the President, Thanedar’s articles of impeachment are likely to become landfill. That has been the case with articles of impeachment announced by the execrable Rep. Al Green (D-TX), who accused Trump of committing “dastardly deeds” in the first couple of weeks of his second term.

How President Trump is portrayed by the Left

“This is not about partisanship,” Thanedar lied in his statement. “It’s about protecting our democracy and ensuring that no one, not even a President, is above the law.”

Referring to what has been dubbed “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) was among those to mock the latest impeachment attempt.

“It’s a day that ends in ‘-Y’, which means liberal Democrats are again trying to impeach [the president] for delivering the will of the people,” Mullin said in a post on X. “TDS is strong. MAGA is stronger.”

Thanedar is weak tea.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

House GOP considering expunging Trump's impeachment from the record

A day didn't go by after Trump took his oath of office that the Democrats did not had the main goal of impeaching him. Never mind that the reasons turned out to be lies but the legacy media supported the lies and the Department of Justice and the FBI went after him.

But all hope for the Left came crashing down after the Robert Mueller 22-month investigation ended in 2019 with the failure to find something to impeach him with.

Plan B came to pass when the Left tried to imply that a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was about Trump asking him to investigate the Biden family business dealings with Ukraine. So there was a sham inquiry and Trump was impeached by the House.

Plan C came one week after the January 6, 2021 Capitol incursion, the House voted to impeach Trump a second time over his alleged role in what Democrats insist to this day was an “insurrection.”

Sadly for the Jackass party, this impeachment trial ended the same way as Trump was acquitted by the Senate.

However, The Washington Times reports that the House Republicans are considering expunging Trump’s impeachments from the record. Heads on the Left will explode. Adam Schiff will schiff a brick.

When asked if he'd be willing to bring such legislation to the floor, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said, “We’d look at it. … When you find that the final information of the Russia document is all a lie, and we watch what he went through, I would understand why members would want to bring that forward.”

According to The Times, 42 Republicans are on board with the idea, including House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (NY). She got behind the resolution to exonerate Trump, but the Democrats, of course, refused to vote on it when the Democrats had full control of Congress. So even if Trump was exonerated due to the fact that these allegations were all lies, the Left hates him enough to allow the record to stand.

But now that Republicans control the House, it’s a real possibility.

Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia called both impeachments “inappropriate” and said he would “certainly be interested” in wiping them off the books. Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas told the Times he was “definitely interested.”

The lead sponsor of the resolution was then-Rep. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, who won his Senate race in November. Mullin had previously spearheaded a resolution to expunge the first impeachment as well.

However, some Republicans are weasels and are less ready to support expunging the record. Rep. Dan Bishop (NC) said,  “I tend to think we’ve got plenty to focus on looking through the front windshield, rather than the back.”

Of course, if it was Bishop in the rearview mirror with impeachment on his resume, he would be singing a different tune.

While the expungement of Trump’s impeachments would be huuugely demoralizing for the Democrats, with only 20 percent of the Republican conference supporting the resolution, it isn't going to be enough to get it to fly. In order to clear the record, an almost unanimous backing by the GOP House would be needed but too many of them are RINOs. 

Tweet

Old Doc Fauci 'caught lying' to Congress after book exposes details of Wuhab Lab-linked grant

Dr. Anthony Fauci heads the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Congress is currently reacting to reports that he initially resisted a Trump-era order to cancel an NIH grant to EcoHealth Alliance linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology [where the coronavirus likely originated] in April 2020.

EcoHealth Alliance is a nonprofit conducting research on coronaviruses and they had previously worked with the Wuhan lab, the place where a number of experts agree the pandemic virus originated from. Fauci later "reluctantly agreed" after learning then-President Trump was directly behind the order, according to an upcoming book by Washington Post reporters Yasmeen Abutaleb and Damian Paletta.

[H/T Fox News]

In their book titled, "Nightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration's Response to the Pandemic That Changed History," Abutaleb and Paletta provide a behind-the-scenes account of how Old Doc Fauci and his colleagues at the NIH responded to the White House’s directive.

In June 2020, however, Fauci said the grant, worth a remaining $370,000, was "canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it," and he didn't "know the reason" behind the White House's order during a House Energy and Commerce hearing after Rep. Marc Veasey (D-TX), asked why the Trump administration cut off NIH funding for EcoHealth.

Lawmakers on the House Energy and Commerce Committee are now reacting to the book excerpt in comparison to Fauci's June 2020 comments before Congress and are repeating calls for an investigation into the virus's origins and Fauci's firing. Imagine that--Fauci lied.

Fauci did not immediately respond to inquiries from Fox News nor from Brain Flushings.

"Dr. Fauci is so obsessed with maintaining his own relevance and downplaying President Trump’s role in combatting this crisis that he’s once again been caught lying," Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), told the outlet. "We need someone leading the pandemic response and our investigation into its origins who is more concerned with the truth than their own PR campaign. It’s time for Dr. Fauci to go."

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), said "there are many unanswered questions that can only be answered with a full investigation by Congress."

The truth is, if Fauci is somehow directly involved in the spread of the COVID-19 virus, he needs to be prosecuted criminally. 

"It is perplexing that [House Speaker] Nancy ["Frenetic Hands"] Pelosi refuses to allow any formal investigation into the origins of COVID," he said, adding that "without a real complete and transparent investigation…we have not been able to get the answers the American people deserve," but Congress "will not stop working to get the facts."

Scalise and more than 200 House Republicans have called on Pelosi to direct committee chairs to investigate the origins of the virus and devote congressional investigatory resources to examining claims that the novel coronavirus pandemic stemmed from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology which the Chinese Communist Party "covered" up.

Yeah, yah think?

Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), said the discrepancies between Fauci's hearing comments and the book excerpt "very concerning,"  and saying it "goes to show just how important it is to have full investigation into the origins of COVID-19."

"We owe it to the American people to find answers about how the pandemic happened and what Dr. Fauci knew and when he knew it," he said.

Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), said he became concerned about early reports of COVID-19 when it was being described as a new respiratory virus in December of 2019, and in February of 2020, he "called on Energy and Commerce Committee Democrats to hold hearings to ensure that America was prepared if the virus came to our shores, and that we understood exactly of how this virus originated."

He added, however, that "committee Democrats … lacked the curiosity," for some strange reason.

The NIH’s decision to fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is an ongoing point of contention between Fauci and several Republican lawmakers. 

Something smells Fauci.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet