Normal New Yorkers demand NY Times retract their "dog rape" propaganda garbage and fire Nicholas Kristof

An Egyptian national has been handed a life sentence for firebombing a pro-Israel demonstration in Boulder, Colorado. In that attack last June, a Holocaust survivor was tragically killed. Karol Markowicz, a Fox News columnist, has drawn attention to the surge of anti-Semitism now visible across the United States, especially in the blue states, where violent attacks have multiplied. Her observations come in the wake of fresh clashes between an anti-Israel mob and the NYPD outside a New York City synagogue.

In New York, protesters gathered on Thursday outside the headquarters of former newspaper and current rag, The New York Times. 

Their outrage was directed at a ludicrous opinion piece by the anti-Semitic lunatic columnist Nicholas Kristof. 

The piece contained lurid allegations of serial sexual abuse by Israelis against Palestinian detainees. The article presented the testimony of men and women who alleged "brutal sexual abuse at the hands of Israel’s prison guards, soldiers, settlers and interrogators." Among the bogus bizarre claims were that Palestinians "had their genitals yanked or were beaten on the testicles," that "some men had to have their testicles amputated by doctors," and that metal batons were used to rape men. No victims came forth, no evidence exists.

Kristof further reported that a Gaza journalist claimed he was "mounted" by a dog, before adding that "Other Palestinian prisoners and human rights monitors have also cited reports of police dogs being coached to rape prisoners." Again, no evidence was provided and the idea that Israelis would put themselves in such a tenuous public position is not merely disgusting and crazy, it's illogical.

The article met with immediate and fierce backlash from readers and from the Israeli government, which has threatened legal action against The Times. Commentators have rightly questioned the piece, noting that several of those interviewed by Kristof maintained ties to Hamas or to anti-Israel activism.

The controversy soon spilled onto the streets. Only two days after publication, protesters assembled outside The New York Times building, demanding a retraction and, in some cases, the dismissal of Kristof himself. Many in the gathering were understandably livid.

Protesters stood inside NYPD barricades holding signs that read "Shame on The New York Times for publishing anti-Zionist libels" and "The New York Times: All the blood libel that's fit to print." They chanted for a retraction. Many carried Israeli and American flags, some of them combined in a single banner.

"All the sh*t that fits, they print."

The protest had come together with remarkable speed. Ramon Maislen told Fox News Digital that the effort was organized over WhatsApp in less than forty-eight hours. "The group came together and in 48 hours we are making this happen," he said. "I think it's really important because we've got to get the word out that when you create libel against people, it ends up having violence against them, and we're trying to avoid that."

The demonstrators were angered not only by the content but by the timing. They saw the piece as a deliberate attempt to overshadow reports on the sexual violence suffered by victims of the October 7 massacre. 

One organizer, Jayne Zirkle, Director of Communications and Outreach for The Lawfare Project, made the point plainly. "They published a slanderous article against Israel, and they did this just a day before the October 7th rape report came out," she said. "They want to take away from the horrible sexual abuse that the October 7th victims endured, and we are demanding retraction. We're demanding better journalism."

Adam Louis-Klein, founder of the Movement Against Anti-Zionism, went further. He argued that the article portrayed Israelis as uniquely barbaric and placed Jews everywhere in danger. "It's a racist, defamatory libel. It's meant to make all Israelis look evil and bestial," he said.

Zach Sage Fox, a pro-Israel influencer who addressed the crowd, accused Kristof of relying on "Hamas sources and propaganda to the point of insanity." "They actually have to make up blood libels from the medieval times to paint a picture of the Jews," Fox told Fox News Digital. He warned that even a retraction would come too late, given how widely the claims had already spread. Fox also recalled The Times' own shameful record during the Holocaust. In 2001, on the paper's 150th anniversary, its former Executive Editor Max Frankel described its coverage of the genocide as "the century's bitterest journalistic failure." "History repeats itself, and now, it's reposting itself," Fox observed. He called for Kristof to be fired at once, along with anyone else involved in approving the piece.

The Times declined to comment to Fox News Digital. It has instead issued statements defending the article. Spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander insisted that Kristof's work was "backed by independent studies" and rejected any suggestion of retraction. A later statement claimed that the columnist had relied on "on-the-record accounts" and cited "several analyses documenting the practice of sexual violence and abuse conducted by various parts of Israel's security forces and settlers."

Kristof himself has acknowledged in the piece that there "is no evidence that Israeli leaders order rapes." He has continued to defend his reporting online, including the section concerning dogs. Yet a canine behaviour expert, Michael S. Gould, told National Review that the notion of training dogs to rape prisoners was "absurd." "I’ve trained dogs to do a lot of things in my life. But no, that’s absurd," he said. "It’s absurd for many reasons: the sexual instincts of dogs, their anatomy, the actual physical concept of it."

This episode is a symptom of something deeper: the return of the blood libel in respectable Western guise, dressed up as opinion and granted the platform of a once-great newspaper. The protesters outside The Times understood what was at stake. When institutions of influence traffic in such falsehoods, they do not merely damage Israel. They license violence against Jews everywhere.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Alaa Abd El-Fattah apologizes for frustrations of a 'young man' calling for death of Jews

Alaa Abd el-Fattah stands next to his mother, Laila Soueif, and sister, Sanaa, at home in Giza, Egypt, September 23, 2025.(photo credit: REUTERS/MOHAMED ABD EL GHANY)   

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other cabinet ministers announced that they were “delighted” that El-Fattah had been brought to the UK and reunited with his family after 12 years in the slammer after calling for the death of Jews wherever you can find them. 

Let's face it, kids like El-Fattah are impressionable by Islamic scripture and want to do the best to please their families.

Alaa Abd El-Fattah, the long-imprisoned Egyptian political activist who arrived in the United Kingdom last week, has "unequivocally" apologized for social media statements calling for the killing of Zionists and white people everywhere. 

On Friday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other anti-Semitic cabinet ministers announced on social media that they were “delighted” that El-Fattah had been brought to the UK and reunited with his family after 12 years in prison. However, his previous comments - such as him considering “killing any colonialists and especially Zionists heroic” - soon circulated online.

In a public statement on Monday, El-Fattah said he was "shaken that, just as I am being reunited with my family for the first time in 12 years, several historic tweets of mine have been republished and used to question and attack my integrity and values, escalating to calls for the revocation of my citizenship."

Yeah, social media is nothing like Vegas. What goes on social media doesn't stay on social media. 

He admitted that, looking at the tweets now, "the ones that were not completely twisted out of their meaning, I do understand how shocking and hurtful they are, and for that I unequivocally apologize." He now plans to keep his thoughts and beliefs to himself, and maybe tell his wife and mom.

Partying like it's 1967

Comments expressions of 'anger and frustrations 'El-Fattah said his previous comments were mostly expressions of a young "man's anger and frustrations in a time of regional crises (the wars in Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza), and the rise of police brutality against Egyptian youth." And those Joooze!

He claimed that while he was deeply embedded in "antagonistic online cultures" at the time, his younger self never intended to offend a wider public and was actually "engaged in the non-violent pro-democracy movement."

El-Fattah denied that any of his previous tweets included homophobia, saying that he has paid "a steep price for support for LGBTQ rights in Egypt." He even has gay friends and knows a transgender 'woman' or two.

He also rejected accusations of Holocaust denial in spite of his previous claim in spite of a tweet that. stated something along the lines of:  "There was no genocide against Jews by the Nazis – after all, many Jews are left."

"I take accusations of anti-Semitism very seriously," he claimed.

Can a Jew-hater change his mind after being punished for 12 years? Maybe, but I have my doubts.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you from doing me that solid. Imagine, you could be the first on your block to do that and your friends will thank you . . . for some reason. 

Tweet

Greene stabs Trump's Israel diplomacy in the back with attempt to strip Israel of its defense budge

Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)

It is a curious spectacle when a nation’s leader strides forth to forge alliances, only to find one of his own lieutenants gleefully sawing at the foundations. 

This week, while President Trump shook hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, cementing a partnership vital to the West’s moral and strategic interests, a member of his own Party was busily undermining that very bond. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, with the zeal of a convert to some obscure isolationist cult, declared her intent to gut military aid to Israel from the National Defense Authorization Act. Half a billion dollars, she announced on Steve Bannon’s "War Room," would be struck from the budget for a nation she insists on branding as “nuclear-armed Israel.”

The idea, it seems, is to leave the Jewish state, and thereby the Jews, defenseless against their sworn enemies.

"There are some parts of this NDAA that I cannot support, and that’s continued foreign aid and foreign funding, and it needs to come out," Fraulein Greene proclaimed, as if the defense of a democratic ally were some frivolous line item, akin to funding a community center’s yoga classes. "I’m entering amendments to strike 500 million more dollars for nuclear-armed Israel. And it’s important to say nuclear-armed Israel, because they do have nuclear weapons." 

One wonders if she imagines Israel’s arsenal as some menacing prop in a geopolitical melodrama, rather than a sober deterrent against existential threats.

This is not a one-off tantrum. Greene’s record betrays a consistent animus toward supporting Israel. She voted against all three aid bills passed in the wake of Hamas’s barbaric October 7, 2023, assault, an attack that should have settled any debate about the necessity of standing by a nation besieged by terrorists. She also opposed legislation to ensure arms sales to Israel continued under the Biden administration, a presidency not exactly renowned for its steadfastness toward Jerusalem.

But Greene’s crusade extends beyond Israel, her sights set on slashing aid to other allies, including $500 million earmarked for Jordan, a nation that, she notes with indignation, already receives $1.6 billion annually from the State Department. "This is not a helpless country, and we already give them $3.4 billion every single year in the state — from the State Department. $3.4 billion every single year. They don’t need another $500 million in our defense budget," she huffed. 

One might ask whether Greene has considered the strategic value of Jordan’s stability in a region perpetually teetering on the edge of chaos, or whether she simply delights in the act of budgetary sabotage.

The House’s consideration of the NDAA is, of course, a theater of amendments, most of which are swatted away by leadership to preserve the bill’s core. House Speaker Mike Johnson and other Republican stalwarts have rightly championed military aid to Israel as a cornerstone of national security. In April, they secured passage of the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, funneling $4 billion to replenish missile defense systems, $1.2 billion for Iron Beam defenses, and $3.5 billion for weapons procurement, measures that reflect a clear-eyed recognition of Israel’s role as a bulwark against tyranny.

Yet here stands Greene, a lone dissenter in her party’s ranks, wielding her amendments like a blunt axe. Her actions raise a question that cuts to the heart of the matter: does she truly believe that withdrawing support from allies strengthens America, or is this merely the politics of performative contrarianism? 

Or do her past anti-Semitic statements show us who she really is?

Remember this--in 2018, Greene posted on Facebook about "Jewish space lasers" that she believed were the cause of California's wildfires. These lasers were alleged by her to be connected to the Rothschild banking family, just an old anti-Semitic trope.

Then there was the Holocaust comparisons in 2012 where Greene constantly compared COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates to the persecution of Jews during the Holocaust, including her equating vaccine logos to the yellow stars Jews had to wear in Nazi Germany.

Greene had also expressed support for QAnon, a conspiracy theory that has anti-Semitic elements, like claiming Jewish elites like George Soros, controls global affairs. Soros, of course, is a leftist creep, but it has nothing to do with him being Jewish. In fact, he's an atheist, so there's that little tidbit.

In 2018, Greene shared the video the "Great Replacement" theory. This alleges "Zionist supremacists" were the ones orchestrating nonwhite immigration to replace white population, another narrative tied to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Also, she claimed Soros collaborated with Nazis, which is false, but of course reinforces disgusting stereotypes. [Did I mention that Soros is a scumwafer?]

Aside from Greene associating with overt anti-Semites like Nick Fuentes and hiring Milo Yiannopoulos as an intern, she also opposed the Antisemitism Awareness Act (2024) and voted against it. She cited a lame excuse that the act could "convict Christians of anti-Semitism" for believing the the Gospel account whereby "Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews." This is a trope that has historically been used to justify anti-Semitic violence. 

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

In a world where moral clarity is often clouded by expediency, her choices suggest a troubling indifference to the stakes. As the West faces enemies who do not pause to debate their own resolve, such gestures of isolationism are not merely misguided, they are reckless.

Tweet

Ultra Orthodox lawmaker was the man behind rescue of Israelis on Jordan border

United Torah Judaism Knesset member Moshe Roth. (Knesset)

In the early hours of Saturday, when most people are asleep, an ultra-Orthodox Knesset member, Moshe Roth, orchestrated a daring rescue of Israelis stranded in the perilous wilds of Jordan, as reported by Israel National News. 

These were not mere travelers but families caught in a Kafkaesque nightmare, their flight from Larnaca to Aqaba delayed until midnight, leaving them at the mercy of a border shuttered since 8 p.m. Jordan, a land now so hostile to Israelis that it bears a Level 4 travel warning, offered no solace, except for the rare exception of rescue flights permitted to land in Aqaba, a lifeline for those fleeing to a homeland where Ben-Gurion Airport lies largely dormant.

Roth, a disciple of the Sanz Hasidic movement and a voice for United Torah Judaism, received a desperate call late Friday night. The Sabbath’s sanctity might have bound lesser men, but Roth, grasping the mortal peril facing these unguarded families, acted with the urgency of a man who knows history’s cost. He rallied his comrade, Deputy Transportation Minister Uri Maklev, alongside security officials and the Foreign Ministry’s Situation Room. The diplomatic machinery whirred to life: a Jordanian officer was roused from sleep, the crossing flung open, and the families, escorted by Jordanian police, crossed into Israel at 3 a.m., a mere breath from Eilat’s safety.

“In the end, the ones who took action, made the effort, and cared were the Knesset members from United Torah Judaism,” one of the rescued declared. “It didn’t matter to them who was stranded:  religious, secular, young people, or families. They gave us genuine help without asking questions; their only concern was to help Jews in distress.” 

Such words cut through the cynicism of our age, revealing a truth too often buried; that in moments of crisis, identity and duty can still bind a people.

Roth, born in New York, carries the weight of his grandfather’s suffering, a Holocaust survivor beaten near to death “because of his Jewish identity.” In his first Knesset address in January 2023, he spoke of this as a “fundamental” force, a call to fortify the Jewish soul of the nation. Now, as head of the Knesset’s Ethics Committee, he has shown that such words are not mere rhetoric but a creed lived in the dark hours when lives hang in the balance.

Am Yisrael Chai!

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

AZ Gov. Hobbs (D) wants to allow anti-Semitism to be taught in AZ public schools

Democrat Gov. Kathie Hobbs vetoed bill banning anti-Semitism to be taught in public schools.

She called the law an ‘attack on teachers’ and claimed it would have had a limited impact in combatting bigotry, and after all, what's a little good ole fashion Jew hatred amongst comrades, eh?

The bill would have banned the teaching of Jew hatred material in the state's public schools, community colleges, and universities.

House Bill 2867, sponsored by Republican representative Michael Way, cleared the legislature last week by a margin of 33-20 with the backing of several Democrats who fail to hate Jews and others with immutable characteristics.

If implemented, it would have banned the teaching or promotion of anti-Semitism in public school, requiring students to advocate for anti-Semitic positions and make it a specific offense for teachers to provide anti-Semitic professional guidance or call for the genocide of any group.

But for Hobbs and her ilk, it's simply not fair to have blood libels and general anti-Semitism stifled.

The bill was based on the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which critics, including some Jewish organizations in the state, posit that it could compromise teachers’ ability to provide comprehensive Holocaust education and could stifle legitimate criticism of Israel and discussion of Middle Eastern affairs.

In particular, some pointed to the clause in the definition which labels the claim “that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” as an example of Jew-hate, which, it turns out, is a belief held by racists who refuse to allow a Jewish State to exist.

However, it was the bill’s provision for teachers to be made personally liable to lawsuits against them if they violated the regulations that prompted Hobbs to strike it down at the final hurdle.

The bill would have allowed complainants to sue teachers directly, rather than school districts, and compel the individual educators to cover the costs of the case.

In a letter explaining her veto, Hobbs wrote: “Unfortunately this bill is not about anti-Semitism; it’s about attacking our teachers.

"It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits.”

I suppose she has a point there, but what would Hobbs say about an Arizona teacher explaining to the class that the prophet of Islam was a pedophile, [if that's what the teacher believed based on Mohammed having married a 6-year-old] and consummating the marriage when the child, Alisha, was 9?

And what would Hobbs say about Islamic blasphemy laws that call for the death of those who leave Islam, or burn a Koran, or say negative things about Mohammed, or even draw a picture of Mo?

If she would agree that teachers have the right to teach about all religions in a manner they believe is correct, then her veto is reasonable, but my gut tells me different. My gut also tells me that religion needs to be taught in a different venue, not in the public schools, but teaching about the Holocaust isn't about religion, it's about the hatred of a group of people guilty of being born into the Jewish religion.

To be fair, Hobbs' office took measures to combat anti-Semitism, including expanding Holocaust education requirements in schools and appropriating funding for a Holocaust education centre in the state capital of Phoenix, saying it “was a powerful reminder that the most effective way to combat antisemitism is through education, empathy, and community.” Her letter also included a message from Lori Shepherd, executive director of the Tucson Jewish Museum and Holocaust Center, who said the bill was “not the answer” to the issues faced by the state’s Jewish community.

"While I support the need to fight hate and anti-Semitism, the bill’s vague language and punitive approach send a dangerous message to teachers: avoid controversy, or face a courtroom,” she added.

To be even fairer, we all know about the dirty secret that has bubbled up to the surface like a turd in a cesspool: open anti-Semitism. It's coming to a town near you, if it hasn't already arrived.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Ireland wins the European Anti-Semitism Award

                         Former Irish justice minister Alan Shatter/screen grab

Ireland’s got a problem, and it’s not just the usual rain-soaked misery. The narrative around the Israel-Palestine conflict here is so warped it’s like watching a play where half the script’s been torn out. 

The story begins and ends with October 7, 2023, framed as some “event” that kicked everything off. Some so called journalists call it an atrocity but wink and nod, saying it’s “perhaps understandable.” From there, the tale spins into Israel playing the cartoon villain, “arbitrarily bombing and murdering Palestinians” for revenge. Nuance? Context? Good luck finding either.

Alan Shatter, former justice minister, isn’t having it. He’s as angry as a cat in a bathtub about the free pass given to “Hamas using Palestinian civilians as human shields.” He’s banging his head against a wall, trying to get Ireland to see that “Hamas is still intent on destroying Israel, that it wants to resume its total rule of Gaza.” 

But Ireland’s media? Nothing, because it's hard to see the light when your head is in your nether regions. 

Shatter, once a regular in Irish papers, says Shatter’s been “cancelled” since October 7 for daring to offer a view that doesn’t fit the approved script.

Then there’s Kneecap, the Northern Irish rap crew who’ve made a career out of provocation, and anti-Semitism is right up their alley.

Shatter doesn’t mince words, calling them “attention seeking, looking for notoriety by presenting as rebellious and deliberately engaging in commentary that attracts media attention.” He’s scathing about their name, a grim nod to IRA violence: “It’s very name is a cynical use of a name in the context of appalling atrocities perpetrated by the IRA in Northern Ireland.” You see, they used to shoot the British law enforcement members in their knees to inflict maximum pain and lifelong damage.

The band has been caught on tape chanting for Hamas and Hezbollah, waving the flag of a Lebanese terror group. Now they’re backpedaling, denying support for either because it doesn't bode well for them.

Shatter’s not buying it. On social media, he tore into their anemic apology: 

“Still too stupid to utter a single word of condolences to the loved ones & relatives of those bereaved that day [speaking about the victims of the Nova festival] or of condemnation of that atrocity. Regardless of their ideological brainwashing & lack of sincerity, just as PR at the very least that might have convinced some of their good intentions. Their whining, disingenuous statement of victimhood seeking some sort of martyrdom deserves no credibility & shouldn’t derail any current investigation.”

Kneecap’s rise isn’t some random fluke. Shatter sees them as a symptom of an Irish nationalist scene that’s cozying up to far-left and Islamist rhetoric on the Middle East. It’s not just talk—it’s spilling onto the streets. “People proudly marching in Dublin with Hamas and Hezbollah and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine flags, all chanting ‘from the river to the sea’ and calling for global Intifada.” That’s not a protest; it’s a parade of garbage ideas.

For Jews and Israel supporters in Ireland, it’s grim. Shatter’s blunt: “We have a real problem in this country. I think Ireland is not merely the most anti-Israel country in the European Union, or possibly in Europe. Unfortunately, the hostility to Israel has resulted in narratives being used on a regular basis that replicate the narratives in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.” He’s not pulling punches. “The only difference is the word Israel is substituted for Jew, or the word Zionist, is substituted for Jew.” Here, “Zionist” is a slur, and Kneecap’s riding that wave while the media nods along. “Part of the reason why the Irish journals – most of the Irish media – are uncritical of Kneecap is because Kneecap are simply saying stuff that most of them agree with.”

But it gets uglier. Shatter’s still reeling from a Holocaust memorial in Dublin this year where Jewish attendees were “man-handled and thrown out” for silently protesting President Higgins’ speech. 

“It never ever occurred to me that Jewish people would be man-handled and thrown out of a Holocaust remembrance, or a memorial event in Dublin City in 2025,” he says. He’s baffled that Higgins, a lifelong protester himself, just kept talking as Jews were being dragged out. 

“I cannot personally fathom how he continued to speak and watched Jewish members of that audience thrown out.” If Shatter had been speaking, he’d have stopped the show: “I would have stopped my speech and asked people not to so conduct themselves and to respect their protest.”

Is Ireland the most anti-Semitic country in Europe? 

Shatter doesn’t dodge: “There’s been an escalating problem of anti-Semitism, it already existed pre-October 7, 2023, it has escalated since then, and it is a continuing problem and concern.” He points the finger at Ireland’s leaders—every party, the Taoiseach, the foreign minister—who “never miss an opportunity to be critical of Israel” with “unnecessarily unbalanced” language. Hostages get a passing nod, but the narrative’s clear: Israel’s the bad guy, full stop.

Shatter’s worried—not just about now, but where Ireland’s headed. “I’m deeply concerned as to what’s happening in this country,” he says, both “what’s happening currently” and “where this country is heading to.” The only thing tempering the government’s rhetoric? Fear of crossing President Donald Trump. That’s how low the bar is.

A former Fine Gael man, Shatter ditched the party in 2018, fed up with its “moral compass” going AWOL, chasing headlines and tweets over substance. He’s not shocked by their current stance, but one thing does raise his eyebrow: Ireland’s cozying up to Iran. The embassy in Tehran reopened in October 2024, despite Iran’s government-level anti-Semitism and bankrolling of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Shatter’s incensed: “At no stage have they ever criticized Iran for its endemic – at government level – anti-Semitic pronouncements and its commitment to Israel’s destruction.”

He’s no fan of Israel’s decision to pull its ambassador from Ireland last year, either. Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Saar, called Ireland’s actions and “anti-Semitic rhetoric” a “de-legitimization and demonization of the Jewish state.” Shatter calls it a “massive diplomatic own goal,” one that handed Ireland’s anti-Israel crowd a win.

Trying to talk sense about Israel in Ireland? Near impossible, says Shatter. “I’m frequently, and the past have been and still remain, a critic of some of the conduct of the Israeli government. But in Ireland, there’s no differentiation. It’s Israel is basically vilified.” The media and politicians won’t grapple with October 7’s impact or the fear that Hamas could regroup in Gaza and repeat the carnage. Ireland’s stuck in a one-note chant, and it’s drowning out reality.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Terror supporting organization labels Trump the "new Biden" because he supports Israel against terrorists

Well, well, well, look who’s back at it again—the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the perpetually aggrieved outfit that’s been moonlighting as a cheerleader for terrorist causes while pretending to “advocate” for Muslim Americans. This time, they’ve got their knickers in a twist over President Donald Trump, slapping him with the oh-so-clever label of “the new Joe Biden” because he’s dared to back Israel’s smackdown of Hamas in Gaza. 

Yes, folks, in CAIR’s world, supporting an ally against a terrorist group is apparently a crime worthy of a Biden comparison. Duh.

CAIR, which has spent years dodging accusations of cozying up to some of the nastiest players in the terrorism game, is now clutching its pearls over the body count in Gaza. They’re wailing about Israel’s so-called “genocide”—a term they fling around like confetti—and demanding Trump yank all U.S. support for the Jewish state. 

In their Sunday sob-fest, they whined, “As the minimum death toll in [Gaza] crosses 50,000, the Israeli government is completely out of control because Donald Trump is the new Joe Biden: a president who supports genocide and puts Israel first in violation of federal law and disregard for the wishes of the American people.” 

Translation: Trump’s not bowing to the Hamas fan club, and CAIR’s feelings are hurt.

The terror-fans went on, practically begging: “President Trump must force [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu to permanently stop his self-serving genocide and accept the comprehensive ceasefire deal that frees all captives. If President Trump wishes to be remembered as a peacemaker and not Netanyahu’s poodle, he must act before the death toll crosses 100,000.” 

Oh, the drama! You can almost hear the violins. 

Meanwhile, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry—because who doesn’t trust a terrorist PR firm?—claims 50,000 Palestinians have been killed. Naturally, they don’t bother sorting out how many were gun-toting jihadis versus actual civilians. And let’s not forget the pesky little detail that researchers have caught those numbers being inflated faster than a politician’s ego to smear Israel. Facts? Who needs ‘em when you’ve got a narrative?

Trump, of course, ran on a promise to stand by Israel, our incredibly important ally in the Middle East, while it pounds Hamas into the dirt—a stark contrast to Biden, who spent his term waffling under progressive pressure like a soggy noodle. 

Just last month, the White House green-lit a batch of heavy bombs for Israel that Biden had held back, fretting over civilian casualties. Trump? He’s not here for the hand-wringing. He’s told Israel to “finish the job” against Hamas, and CAIR’s not taking it well.

For the past 17 months, ever since Hamas’s charming little Oct. 7, 2023, rampage across southern Israel—complete with rape, murder, and kidnapping—CAIR’s been on a tear, accusing Israel of “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” at every turn. They even tried pinning “ethnic cleansing” on Israel’s limited ops in Syria after Assad’s regime took a nosedive in December. Then, last month, they screeched that Israel was “moving the genocide from Gaza to the occupied West Bank” during a counterterrorism op dubbed “Operation Iron Wall.” 

It’s like CAIR’s got a Mad Libs book of atrocities, and Israel’s the only noun they know.

Since Trump strolled back into the Oval Office, CAIR’s been whining that his administration’s discriminating against Arab and Muslim Americans. They’re mad he’s cracking down on universities letting anti-Semitism fester on campus—calling it “unconstitutional” censorship and Islamophobia. They also flipped out when Trump moved to deport foreign students waving Hamas flags at rallies, branding it “anti-Palestinian.” Poor dears.

CAIR’s rap sheet isn’t exactly spotless, either, as I posted about here.

Back in the 2000s, they got tagged as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case. Politico pointed out in 2010 that “US District Court Judge Jorge Solis found that the government presented ‘ample evidence to establish the association’” of CAIR with Hamas. The ADL’s noted some of CAIR’s bigwigs had early ties to Hamas affiliates, though CAIR swears up and down it “unequivocally condemn[s] all acts of terrorism,” listing off groups like al-Qa’ida, Hamas, and the Real IRA like it’s a Boy Scout merit badge.

But the mask slipped hard after Oct. 7. CAIR’s co-founder Nihad Awad took the stage at an American Muslims for Palestine convention in Chicago last November and the scumwafer couldn’t hide his glee. 

“The people of Gaza only decided to break the siege—the walls of the concentration camp—on Oct. 7,” he gushed. “And yes, I was happy to see people breaking the siege and throwing down the shackles of their own land, and walk free into their land, which they were not allowed to walk in.” 

Happy? Over the biggest single-day slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust? That’s not a dog whistle—it’s a foghorn.

So here we are: CAIR’s throwing tantrums because Trump won’t ditch Israel for their terrorist buddies. If they think he’s going to cave, they’ve got another thing coming. Pass the popcorn—this is gonna be good.

We dodged a bullet in this last election. 

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

VA Dem compares DOGE job cuts to killing Jews in Europe

"Job cuts? Really?"

"First they came for the gays, but I wasn't gay so I did nothing. Then they came for LGBTQ+1 but I had no idea what it all meant, so I did nothing. Then they came for job cuts; but I was unemployed and not looking, so I did nothing. Then they came for my soul, but I was a Democrat and only pretended to have one, so I did nothing." Anonymous, aka Me

A hyperbolic Virginia state delegate compared DOGE cuts to the Holocaust because it wasn't an actual person he could compare to Adolf Hitler, so one of the world's most evil point in history was used to compare President Trump's work with Elon Musk to decrease budget spending and bring down the nation's debt.

Republicans called this dilution of what actually was the Holocaust "utterly insensitive and hyperbolic." Yeah, just a tad hyperbolic you might say.

Brandon Cole, (Dummy--Fredericksburg) lifted the famous quote from the German pastor Martin Niemöller who spoke out against the Nazi regime. Cole's use of the Holocaust is a frequently used, disgusting ploy by the Democrats to imply how immoral the GOP is, but in truth, saving the nation's future generations from crushing debt is the moral thing to do. And what does it have to do with killing Jews, Gypsies and gays anyway?

House Minority Leader Todd Gilbert (R-Woodstock) said Cole should apologize to Holocaust survivors and "every citizen of Virginia" for associating DOGE's targeting of useless government jobs to the extermination of millions of Jews by German Nazi turds [my words, not is].

"Comparing the loss of some government jobs to the Holocaust is an insult to the memory of the millions who were slaughtered [by the Nazi regime]," Gilbert said.

During a hearing of an "emergency" panel addressing the effects of DOGE on the Virginia workforce, Cole claimed that his constituents are within the congressional district that has the highest concentration of federal workers in the state.

Cole misrepresents a portion of Rep. Eugene Vindman’s, (D-VA) 7th District. Democratic Rep. Don Beyer’s 8th District to the north in Alexandria houses more federal workers, according to the Virginia Public Access Project, but it isn't clear if they actually work.

"I must say that I have seen so many different people on social media rather excited about these [DOGE] cuts; rather excited about these job losses," Cole said. 

"And that reminds me of a quote from a long time ago that said: 'At first they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't Jewish. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. And then when they came for me, there was no one to speak up because everyone had been taken.'"

Seriously? 

These people are not ammunition to make your points

What an ass. If it isn't comparing Republicans to Hitler, it's comparing policies to the Holocaust. The country is tired of this lazy rhetoric and that is exactly why Trump destroyed Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

If you want to support my work, you can subscribe to Brain Flushings or Buy Me A Coffee--or both. :)

Tweet

Candace Owens to headline Trump fundraiser: WTH?

Two anti-Semites jumping on the bed, one fell down and hit his head

I don't know what Donald Trump Jr. is thinking. He is preparing to headline his father's campaign 

fundraiser on Friday in Nashville, TN. Featured at the event is prominent far-right pundit and anti-Semite Candace Owens. 

This cannot be good for the Trump campaign, having Owens who recently amplified the ancient worn out blood libel against Jews, downplayed the Holocaust and defended Nick Fuentes, a disgusting white nationalist,  among other racist remarks.

Owens is an ardent Trump supporter who had worked for the Daily Wire but eventually was let go due to her anti-Semitic rhetoric which didn't sit well with founder Ben Shapiro, an orthodox Jew. She had served as a weekday host but pressure mounted as her antisemitic rhetoric and empty headed criticism of Israel bubbled up like a puss pimple after the Oct. 7 attacks on Israelis. 

So Don Junior has a scheduled appearance with the brazen Jew hater on Friday, while the former President's daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, have appeared to publicly distance themselves from Trump.

And while I don't see any evidence whatsoever that the former President is an anti-Semite or anti-Zionist, [all evidence points to the contrary], there is clear evidence that some in the GOP harbor anti-Jewish sentiment such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, who suggested California wildfires were caused by space lasers controlled by a Jewish banking family.  And the lieutenant gov. of North Carolina, Mark Robinson, invoked anti-Semitic stereotypes, hinted at Holocaust denial, and downplayed the Nazi atrocities.

Of course, Trump invited some Jewish students to speak at the convention as well. And let us not kid ourselves: the Democratic Party has a butt-load of anti-Semites compared to the GOP.

I just don't know what Don Jr. was thinking. Candace Owens is a disgraceful wretched woman.

Tweet

Jewish women protest outside NY Times over propaganda reporting re: Hamas rapes

Israeli and Jewish women protest outside the Times over propaganda 
article on Hamas rapes. [Photo: Gaby Wine, The Jewish Chronicle]

A protest was held outside the New York Times building over an article the former newspaper published a propaganda piece intended to cast doubt on the visual evidence and testimony of released hostages taken by Hamas terrorists on October 7. 

The article never mentioned that the Hamassholes took video and even  called their families on cellphones taken from the dead, that they killed and raped Jews. 

Anti-Semitism much?

The photo above shows sixteen women wearing pants doused in artificial blood in order to represent the 16 women who are still being held in Gaza since the bloody massacre.

To mark the UN’s International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict But Not For Jews, these Jewish and Israeli women demonstrated outside The Times--a rag whose pages are best served to line the bottom of birdcages or wrap fish--on Wednesday. They called on the global media to acknowledge the sexual violence perpetrated by Hamas and other Arabs on October 7, and is still being perpetrated against the remaining living hostages still being held in Gaza.

The protest also showed graphic video of five female soldiers being kidnapped on October 7, along with interviews of released female hostages who detailed the sexual abuse they endured or witnessed. But apparently, the "Believe All Women" demand doesn't apply to Jews. 

Hypocrisy much?

They chanted "Rape is not resistance," and  “We believe all women,” but while some people passing by stopped to watch the video, most looked away in horror or scurried away in denial, when they were offered an information leaflet, said Orit Eyal-Fibeesh, the protest organizer from 7/10 Human Chain.

Orit Eyal-Fibeesh

“It reminded me of the Holocaust, when people just turned away,” she said. “I was shocked that young women we offered the leaflets to weren’t even curious. You can reserve judgment until later, but at least be curious about why we are here.”

Curiosity can breed guilt in their case.

Ms. Eyal-Fibeesh said that they had decided to hold the protest on the International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict ”because, for whatever reason, it seems that Israeli girls don’t count. We are here to say that Israeli lives matter and Jewish lives matter.”

“Girls and women are still being held hostage in Gaza and there is a substantial amount of evidence to know that they have been subjected to sexual violence, and men have too.”

Maytal Kuperard, who was with a group representing Jewish Women’s Aid, said: “Following the article published in the Times amidst the current climate of silence and denial of the horrific atrocities committed by Hamas on Israeli women, we are here to amplify the voices of the voiceless victims.”

Another woman said that she was here “because it’s outrageous to be doubted. It’s completely devastating to Jewish women.”

But it isn't simply doubt; it's also willful ignorance, or pure anti-Semitism, which is now being exposed by the media exposing themselves, the students whose socialist/communist professors teach it to their students' malleable young minds, and those who simply hate for the sake of hating. 

Israel's Jews, and those in the diaspora, are a perfect target for these evil scum, and their useful idiots who believe their virtue-signaling makes them appear virtuous. 

Tweet

450 Jewish celebrities denounce Oscar winner's anti-Semitic speech: better late than never

I suspect Hamas, while hating Jews, has a modicum of respect for Jews who fight back and no respect for Jews who denounce Jews for fighting back. So with that said, I wonder how Oscar winner Jonathan Glazer would have done in Nazi Germany back in the day, or in Israel on October 7, 2023. 

Glazer directed the movie "Zone of Interest" a Holocaust flick and won an Oscar. 

In his speech, Glazer denounced his, and the idiots who stood next to him on stage, their Judaism. By doing so he apparently was making an attempt to virtue signal how he's too good to be a Jew, probably because in fighting back the genocidal Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorists, Israel [aka those Jews] appears to be winning the war. Not surprisingly, the trained seals in the audience clapped to signal their virtue and support of the self-loathing Jew.

While it took most of them over five months to take a stand, 450 Jewish individuals in the entertainment industry denounced Glazer's disgusting acceptance speech about the Israel-Hamas war. Among them were Debra Messing, Julianna Margulies and Michael Rapaport, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Tovah Feldshuh, Lisa Edelstein and Brett Gelman, top producer Amy Pascal, and filmmakers Eli Roth and Rod Lurie.

"We refute our Jewishness being hijacked for the purpose of drawing a moral equivalence between a Nazi regime that sought to exterminate a race of people, and an Israeli nation that seeks to avert its own extermination," an open letter first reported Monday by Variety read. "Every civilian death in Gaza is tragic. But Israel is not targeting civilians. It is targeting Hamas. The moment Hamas releases the hostages and surrenders is the moment this heartbreaking war ends. This has been true since the Hamas attacks of October 7th."

The signatories continued, "The use of words like ‘occupation’ to describe an indigenous Jewish people defending a homeland that dates back thousands of years, and has been recognized as a state by the United Nations, distorts history. It gives credence to the modern blood libel that fuels a growing anti-Jewish hatred around the world, in the United States, and in Hollywood. The current climate of growing antisemitism only underscores the need for the Jewish State of Israel, a place which will always take us in, as no state did during the Holocaust depicted in Mr. Glazer’s film."

"There was no concern for how Jewish people are going to react to a speech like that, to that applause to those red pins, when not even our hostages are being mentioned, and it’s just incredibly hurtful, incredibly painful," Gelman told Variety. "It’s truly baffling to me that people were choosing to be silent that night."

It really shouldn't baffle anyone--the silent ones are the cowards. They play the game of denouncing racism and hatred but they are all hat, no balls. But at least Glazer's speech was enough of a catalyst to get them on their feet in protest.

"Our film shows where dehumanization leads at its worst," Glazer said. "Right now, we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation, which has led to conflict for so many innocent people - whether the victims of October the 7th in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza - all the victims of this dehumanization, how do we resist?"

No, they stood there as anti-Semites who deny the reality of the October 7th massacre of innocent Israelis.

Glazer's words were repudiated by one of his film's executive producers, Danny Cohen, who said last week, "I just fundamentally disagree with Jonathan."

Now that was a powerful renouncement of Glazer's Jew-hatred. 

The speech was condemned in an open letter by The Holocaust Survivors’ Foundation.

"I watched in anguish Sunday night when I heard you use the platform of the Oscars ceremony, to equate Hamas's maniacal brutality against innocent Israelis with Israel's difficult but necessary self-defense in the face of Hamas's ongoing barbarity. Your comments were factually inaccurate and morally indefensible," Holocaust Survivors’ Foundation USA president and 94-year-old Holocaust survivor David Schaecter wrote to the POS Glazer.

"The ‘occupation’ of which you speak has nothing to do with the Holocaust. The Jewish people's existence and right to live in the land of Israel predates the Holocaust by hundreds of years. Today's political and geographic landscape is the direct result of wars started by past Arab leaders who refused to accept Jewish people as their neighbors in our historic homeland. Now that several Arab countries are making peace with Israel because security and prosperity are better for all people, Iran and its terrorist proxies started another war, abetted by too many, who, through naïveté or malice, blame ‘the occupation.’"

"Worse is that you chose to use the Holocaust to validate your personal opinion. You made a Holocaust movie and won an Oscar. And you are Jewish. Good for you. But it is disgraceful for you to presume to speak for the six million Jews, including one and half million children, who were murdered solely because of their Jewish identity," Schaecter continued. "And it is disgraceful for you to presume to speak for those of us who personally saw the world stand silent as our mothers, father, brothers, sisters, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins were murdered. We actually had nowhere to go - no possible place for refuge. No country would accept us even though world leaders knew full well that thousands of Jews were being murdered every day. There was no Jewish nation to which we could flee. You should be ashamed of yourself for using Auschwitz to criticize Israel."

Am Yisrael Chai, mother-lovers!

Tweet

Rep. George Santos apparently can't stop lying: here's 8 lies he spouted

Newly elected Rep. George Santos (R-Lawn Guyland) has done it all and been it all, and almost all have been lies. Here's a short list of his lies:

1. He lied about where he went to high school. He claimed he attended Horace Mann School in the Bronx during his first year of high school but had to leave the private academy due to his immigrant parents by which he explained, "my parents fell on hard times, which was something that would later become known as the depression of 2008. The thing is, a spokesperson for the school said there was zero evidence he ever attended in the first place. In reality, he got a GED later on. 

2. He said he obtained a degree in economics and finance from Baruch College in New York in 2010, meaning that he would have made it through a 4-year degree program in just 2 years if he actually graduated from Horace Mann in 2008. But alas, there is no record of Santos being in the class of 2010, and no record of him being a "star" volleyball player on the Baruch team. He also said he spent some time at New York University but the school could not corroborate his story, which he later admitted to being a lie and never actually graduated any institution of higher learning. 

3. He never worked for Goldman Sachs or Citigroup as he claimed. 

4. He never funded an animal charity but his campaign bio said he ran a foundation called Friends of Pets United, which rescued 2,500 canine and feline critters between 2013 and 2018. Nah. There were no IRS records or even a social media account for the organization in either New York or New Jersey where he said it operated. And The Times reported that the organization did hold one fundraiser with a rescue group in New Jersey in 2017 and Santos charged $50 entry. But the group that held the event said it never received any funds and that Santos made up a few excuses for why he did not have the money. 

5. Santos became the first openly gay non-incumbent Republican elected to Congress. His campaign bio talks about his husband with whom he lives with on Long Island with their four dogs. But he never campaigned with his "husband," and believe it or not, even the Daily Beast could not find a marriage record in New York, but in 2019, Santos did indeed end a marriage in Queens, but it was to a woman. So he lied about being gay. 

6. He claimed the September 11, 2001 attacks "claimed [my] mother's life." But on December 23, 2021, he claimed it was the fifth anniversary of his mother's death and this was confirmed by her obituary. He said that his mother "was in her office in the South Tower on September 11" and "passed away a few years later when she lost her battle to cancer." Fifteen years = a few years? Also, there is no record his mother suffered from the well-documented health problems associated with the toxic debris that followed the attacks nor was there any evidence she was at the World Trade Center on 9/11. 

7. His grandmother was not his Bube. She was not Jewish nor fled the Nazis in WW2. According to genealogy records reviewed by CNN and the Forward, grandma never made it there. Indeed, there is no sign of Jewish nor Ukrainian heritage nor indication of any name changes along the way from the war. But the Santos name is common among Catholics from Brazil, where his parents were from.

8. He told WNYC in an interview that he "lost four employees" in the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2016. Again, none of the 49 dead at the Orlando club worked at any of the companies he pretended to work for as mentioned in his bios.

Santos is now being investigated by the Nassau County DA's office and the New York State Attorney General's office, as well as federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York. They are, in part, planning to look into his finances, including his unusual financial disclosures and the loans be made himself while running for the House.

Soon after being sworn in, Campaign Legal Center, a non-profit, also filed an official complaint with the Federal Election Commission, claiming Santos illegally used campaign funds for personal expenses like his rent.

Meanwhile, in beautiful Brazil, officials there are reopening a case against Santos regarding his alleged fraudulent checks from 2008 and intend to seek a formal response. If he does not hire a local defense attorney, he could be tried in absentia; if found guilty, he could face up to five years in prison.

If the GOP doesn't ditch this guy, the Party may very well be embarrassed by him in the future.

Tweet

Caryn Johnson [aka Whoopi Goldberg] doubles down on her anti-Semitic remarks

Jewish community members and activists are demanding that Caryn Johnson who goes by Whoopi Goldberg be terminated from the Special Ed. show known as "The View" after the former comedienne doubled-down on a past Holocaust remark she made, which created an angry outcry on social media from Jews and Gentiles alike.

The adipose African-American woman got suspended about ten months ago after she bloviated that the Holocaust was "not about race," but she evidently didn't learn anything from the suspension. 

In an interview with the U.K.'s The Sunday Times, the low-information racist showed no remorse for her past sentiments about the targeted, systematic killing of six million Jews for the crime of being Jews.

She also claimed the Nazis targeted people of African descent in addition to Jews because they were physically different and went as far as to suggest that Jews had an easier time blending in with White people and hiding from the Nazis than Black people did at the time of the Holocaust.

"It doesn’t change the fact that you could not tell a Jew on a street. You could find me. You couldn’t find them. That was the point I was making," she ignorantly said. "But you would have thought that I’d taken a big old stinky dump on the table, butt naked." 

At which point the interviewer, Janice Turner, threw up in her mouth.

The Times of Israel called Goldberg's comments "incendiary" in an article Sunday, pointing out that while her real name is Caryn Elaine Johnson, the racist has no Jewish ancestry and adopted a more "Jewish-sounding" stage name.

Goldberg's Holocaust comments in February, which led to her two-week suspension from the network and a subsequent apology, stunned many in the Jewish community. At the time, faith leaders, activists and online critics encouraged her to educate herself on the topic, but largely supported her return to the somewhat retarded show.

Now, with her obvious lack of remorse as seen in her latest interview, some are calling for her termination over her history of ignorant statements that categorize the Holocaust as a "white-on-white crime," rather than what it was.

Perhaps she unveiled her true anti-Semitic, anti-White racism after Kanye West [aka Ye] went public with his. As Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby said of anti-Semitism in response to Goldberg, that . . . "history's oldest and most toxic hatred--is surging, but Whoopi is determined to trivialize it."

Lucy Lipiner, a Holocaust survivor and author of "Long Journey Home: A Young Girl's Memoir of Surviving the Holocaust" responded:

"Whoopi Goldberg continues to use the Holocaust as her punching bag. We told her that her comments harm us and she simply doesn’t care." 

"I survived the Nazis and the Holocaust," she added, "so I’ll be damned if I let a comedy has-been, peddling a fake Jewish name get the better of me."

Newsweek contributor Joel Petlin wrote: 

"Accepting apologies from some people who spew Antisemitic garbage is the triumph of hope over experience. We know that the Antisemitism will likely reoccur, but we still hope that they learned something along the way. Alas Whoopi just learned she could get away with it. Again."

In her write-up of the interview, the Times' Janice Turner revealed that, "Even now [Goldberg] does not understand why her remarks offended. She insists Jewish people themselves are divided about whether they are a race or a religion."

* * *

Sex!? Yes, sex sells but so what? If you enjoy reading this blog, please check out the ads on this page. There is absolutely no obligation to buy anything [this isn't Communist China, after all] but simply clicking on an ad brings sweet, sweet revenue to my blog and helps in the fight against fascism. But sex is still okay, right?

* * *

One thing that is abundantly clear is that we should never be fooled into believing that being a celebrity equates with intelligence. Goldberg is simply a black Karen who spells it differently. It's time for Caryn Johnson to find another means of employment.

Tweet

Zawahiri was droned at the home of NY Times contributor

"And the other one is for my nose"

The birdcage liner known as the New York Times has no problem publishing material from the enemies of the West, and particularly our nation's enemies.

For instance, Haqqani, the deputy leader of the Taliban, is on the FBI's most wanted list for his alleged involvement in the January 2008 attack on a Kabul hotel that killed six people. Yes, the New York Times published him anyway. After all, it wasn't as if he killed hundreds of people, just a half dozen.

Allie Griffin of the New York Post, August 3, 2022 wrote a story titled: “Al-Zawahiri killed at home of Taliban lackey New York Times gave platform to.” 

She wrote that Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed at the home of an FBI-wanted Taliban lackey who was once given a platform by the New York Times. 

But the paper is no stranger to fabricating stories that are, well, stories and have a poor relationship with the truth.

For starters, let's take the Holodomor famine in Ukraine and the work of "reporter" Walter Duranty. He served as the paper's Moscow bureau chief from 1922 to 1936. Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories involving his denial of widespread famine in Ukraine, because that's what Communists tend to do when they need to defend Mother Russia. His most infamous lies were about the Holodomor, the famine in Ukraine in the 1930s.

And let's not forget the anti-American "1619 Project" by Nikole Hannah-Jones. She won the support of the New York Times and won a Pulitzer Prize for her novel pretending to be fact.

The Pulitzer Prize has become a leftist joke.

Finally, in 2003, after the Pulitzer Board started a renewed inquiry, the Times hired Mark von Hagen, a professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review comrade Duranty's work and found it to be uncritical, unbalanced and basically genuflected to Stalinist propaganda. Von Hagen told the press, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."

The Times' coverage of the Holocaust was another black eye for the so-called paper of record. 

In "Buried by the Times" by Laurel Leff, published in 2005, the paper buried in the back pages stories about the genocide of European Jews and they avoided mentions of Jewish victims of persecutions, deportations, and the death camps. Of the 23,000 stories the Times published between 1939 and 1945, half were about the war, and of these, only 26 mentioned the Holocaust.

In the documentary Reporting on The Times: How the paper of record ignored the Holocaust, past editors of the newspaper stated that there was a conscious decision to bury the paper's Holocaust coverage.

Then there's the issue of plagiarism by Jayson Blair, an African American. The New York Times admitted that one of its "reporters" committed serial journalistic fraud over several years time. He resigned after the incident.

The final case I'll make is the Duke University LaCross case from 2007 whereby the paper basically accused the players of rape before the case was adjudicated. Former Times ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, admitted the Times was bias in their coverage of the case and said,  "It was too delicious a story. It conformed too well to too many preconceived notions of too many in the press: white over black, rich over poor, athletes over non-athletes, men over women, educated over non-educated. Wow. That's a package of sins that really fit the preconceptions of a lot of us."

So that's just the tip of the dung heap the Times has dumped on the public.

The fact that al-Zawahiri was staying in the home of Haqqani and that the New York Times allowed this POS to contribute to the paper, should tell you something about their morals. Sirajuddin Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, owned the Kabul home.

The New York Times published an op-ed piece by Haqqani in 2020 to ask for a peace agreement between the US and Afghan leaders. Not only did outside critics bash the paper for giving this crap weasel a platform to spew his propaganda, even the papers' own reporters  were pissed.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

And now the New York Times is stealth editing to leave out this little tidbit of information as to where Zawahiri was blown to kibbles and bits.

The FBI is offering up to $10 million for information leading directly to Haqqani's arrest.

Tweet

Whoopi Goldberg says Holocaust was about two 'White groups' [because she's not that bright]

"The View" should come with a warning label: "Caution, Watching the View Can Cause Severe Damage to the Human Cerebral Cortex." The co-host of this intellectual clusterfrack, Whoopi Goldberg, stated that the Holocaust was "not about race" but about "man's inhumanity to man."

Seriously? This woman makes Alexandria Obviously-Comatose look like a genius.

Goldberg seems to have discounted the systematic killing of six million Jews, a group of people the Nazis believed were "racially inferior" and believed themselves "racially superior" as they desired to create a "racially pure" state. The United States Holocaust Museum explains that the "inferior" Jews "were considered an alien threat to the so-called German racial community."

Other groups were also targeted by the Nazis, including children, due to their "perceived racial and biological inferiority." Also targeted were Gypsies, Germans with disabilities, Poles and Russians, homosexuals and others.

So yes, in part the Holocaust was about man's inhumanity to man, but Goldberg is leaving out the intentions of the Nazis and how they viewed race [the Jews weren't considered to be White], and their determination to create a "pure race" of Germans. And by omitting what they did to the Jews is verging on anti-Semitism if she was doing it intentionally.

The statement by Goldberg came during a half-witted conversation about a Tennessee school district voting to remove "Maus," a Pulitzer Prize winning graphic novel about the Holocaust from its curriculum due to "inappropriate language" [especially upsetting to drag queens who have to read those words to children sitting on their lap], and an illustration of a nude woman without a penis, which might upset the trans community.

The novel is by Art Spiegelman and it tells the story of his Jewish parents living in 1940s Poland and depicts him interviewing his father about his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.

Ana Navarro mentioned a Florida bill that could prevent any conversation in schools that makes students feel uncomfortable race or gender, prompting Sunny Hostin to ponder if teaching students about topics like the Holocaust could eventually be prohibited.

"The Holocaust isn’t about race," Goldberg said as her co-hosts appeared stunned.

"No, it’s not about race," Goldberg continued.

Joy Behar, the show's braintrust said, "Well, they considered Jews a different race."

"It’s not about race," Goldberg, who pulls most of her thoughts from her nether regions insisted.

"What is it about?" Behar asked.

"It’s about man’s inhumanity to man, that’s what it’s about," Goldberg said.

"But it’s about a White supremacist going after Jews and Gypsies," Navarro said as Goldberg attempted to speak over her.

"But these are two White groups of people," Goldberg said as her colleagues disagreed.

She was told Nazis didn’t consider Jewish people to be "White" but continued with her point nonetheless.

"You’re missing the point," Goldberg pontificated. "The minute you turn it into race, it goes down this alley. Let’s talk about it for what it is. It’s how people treat each other. It’s a problem. It doesn’t matter if you’re Black, or White, cause Black ,White, Jews, Italians, everybody eats each other."

So when it's about the Jews being slaughtered for being born Jewish and said to be non-White, it isn't about race. But when it's anyone who supports law and order, or who voted for Trump, or who said Michael Brown didn't have his hands up, or a White Kyle Rittenhouse defending himself and shooting three White guys, it's about race.

Makes perfect sense . . . if you watch "The View."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Goldberg was blasted online for her take on Hitler's belief in a "master race" and his attempt to completely eliminate the Jewish race in Europe.

One writer said Goldberg's statement perfectly captured "the absolute ignorance of the non-Jewish world, encouraged by the mainstream media, when it comes to understanding the Holocaust," adding Goldberg should "open a god--n book."

Please comment and let me know what you think.

Read anytime, anywhere – evewhen yofTweet