Zawahiri was droned at the home of NY Times contributor

"And the other one is for my nose"

The birdcage liner known as the New York Times has no problem publishing material from the enemies of the West, and particularly our nation's enemies.

For instance, Haqqani, the deputy leader of the Taliban, is on the FBI's most wanted list for his alleged involvement in the January 2008 attack on a Kabul hotel that killed six people. Yes, the New York Times published him anyway. After all, it wasn't as if he killed hundreds of people, just a half dozen.

Allie Griffin of the New York Post, August 3, 2022 wrote a story titled: “Al-Zawahiri killed at home of Taliban lackey New York Times gave platform to.” 

She wrote that Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed at the home of an FBI-wanted Taliban lackey who was once given a platform by the New York Times. 

But the paper is no stranger to fabricating stories that are, well, stories and have a poor relationship with the truth.

For starters, let's take the Holodomor famine in Ukraine and the work of "reporter" Walter Duranty. He served as the paper's Moscow bureau chief from 1922 to 1936. Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories involving his denial of widespread famine in Ukraine, because that's what Communists tend to do when they need to defend Mother Russia. His most infamous lies were about the Holodomor, the famine in Ukraine in the 1930s.

And let's not forget the anti-American "1619 Project" by Nikole Hannah-Jones. She won the support of the New York Times and won a Pulitzer Prize for her novel pretending to be fact.

The Pulitzer Prize has become a leftist joke.

Finally, in 2003, after the Pulitzer Board started a renewed inquiry, the Times hired Mark von Hagen, a professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review comrade Duranty's work and found it to be uncritical, unbalanced and basically genuflected to Stalinist propaganda. Von Hagen told the press, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."

The Times' coverage of the Holocaust was another black eye for the so-called paper of record. 

In "Buried by the Times" by Laurel Leff, published in 2005, the paper buried in the back pages stories about the genocide of European Jews and they avoided mentions of Jewish victims of persecutions, deportations, and the death camps. Of the 23,000 stories the Times published between 1939 and 1945, half were about the war, and of these, only 26 mentioned the Holocaust.

In the documentary Reporting on The Times: How the paper of record ignored the Holocaust, past editors of the newspaper stated that there was a conscious decision to bury the paper's Holocaust coverage.

Then there's the issue of plagiarism by Jayson Blair, an African American. The New York Times admitted that one of its "reporters" committed serial journalistic fraud over several years time. He resigned after the incident.

The final case I'll make is the Duke University LaCross case from 2007 whereby the paper basically accused the players of rape before the case was adjudicated. Former Times ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, admitted the Times was bias in their coverage of the case and said,  "It was too delicious a story. It conformed too well to too many preconceived notions of too many in the press: white over black, rich over poor, athletes over non-athletes, men over women, educated over non-educated. Wow. That's a package of sins that really fit the preconceptions of a lot of us."

So that's just the tip of the dung heap the Times has dumped on the public.

The fact that al-Zawahiri was staying in the home of Haqqani and that the New York Times allowed this POS to contribute to the paper, should tell you something about their morals. Sirajuddin Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, owned the Kabul home.

The New York Times published an op-ed piece by Haqqani in 2020 to ask for a peace agreement between the US and Afghan leaders. Not only did outside critics bash the paper for giving this crap weasel a platform to spew his propaganda, even the papers' own reporters  were pissed.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

And now the New York Times is stealth editing to leave out this little tidbit of information as to where Zawahiri was blown to kibbles and bits.

The FBI is offering up to $10 million for information leading directly to Haqqani's arrest.

Tweet

BREAKING: Al Qaeda honcho Zawahiri droned by CIA: Biden to mumble tonight

Al-Zawahiri cuts a silent one

Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was blown to little bite-size pieces by a CIA drone. He was one of the world's most-wanted terrorists who oversaw the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency targeted the scumbag in Afghanistan over the weekend. This was the first U.S. [that we know of] since the Biden botched.withdrawal from Afghanistan for which he refused to take responsibility. However, this operation is a feather in his hair plugs and bodes well for our intelligence agencies.

Zawahiri was the head of al-Qaeda, the terrorist group once led by Osama bin Laden, that was responsible for the 911 attacks back in 2001. He was one of the world's most-wanted terrorists and had been bin Laden's right-hand man, because the left hand is used for something else in their society.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Zawahiri is also believed to be the scumwafer who plotted the October 12, 2000 attack on the USS Cole naval vessel, killing 17 American sailors and injuring 30 others.

Tweet

"Kid Qaeda'' in deep trouble with CIA

Monday was the 16th anniversary of the 9-11 terror attacks al-Qaeda waged against the United States. On that anniversary, al-Qaeda had a message for us: they released an image of the World Trade Center with a picture of Bin Laden's crapweasel son, Hamza superimposed into one of the buildings.

Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo also had a message for al-Qaeda, a person message for Hamza, a scumquat who is emerging as a possible new leader of the terror group.

Since May, Hamza bin Hiden Laden has become the poster puke for AQ. It was clear that he and other terrorist leaders were of concern to Pompeo.

Pompeo was interviewed by Brett Baier of Fox News.

"Hunting the senior leaders has always been important," Baier asked the CIA director. "Is there a hunt on the way for (Ayman) al-Zawahiri and (Osama) bin Laden's son?"

"Oh yes, sir," Pompeo responded.

"Daily?" Baier asked.

"Daily, every day. My team even as we sit here is working diligently to find them and bring them to justice."

"Any positive signs?" Baier asked.

There's a reason it's toilet paper

"If I were them, I would count my days," Pompeo replied. He said that AQ's senior leadership is weaker than it was in 2001, but the war against them and other terrorist organizations is far from over.

"The enemy gets a choice about whether this is over, and today, they have not concluded that they're defeated," he said.

Pompeo was then asked about former President Barack "Lead from Behind" Obama's statement that ISIS is the "JV" team when it comes to terrorism.

Not wishing to call Obama a moron or a Muslim sympathizer, he simply said that it had "never been the case" that ISIS is simply a "second-tier threat."

"The capacity to do a complex attack in the U.S. is diminished," Pompeo said, adding that "the threat here in the U.S. of these localized actors . . . working alongside ISIS figures remains."


Tweet

Black pot calls pot black and un Islamic

Imagine a frothing-at-the-mouth lunatic calling another frothing-at-the-mouth lunatic "mad" and "exceeding the limits of extremism" because the first lunatic was in competition with the second lunatic as to who was the better lunatic. 

The leader of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, attacked ISIS for killing and "slandering" his own jihadis. Al-Zawahiri succeeded Osama bin-Laden who was killed in 2011.

In an audio message al-Zawahiri said ISIS members are "cowards" and liars with a "thirsty desire for authority."  

"ISIS was struck with madness in takfir [declaring other Muslims to be apostates and not true Muslims] and exceeded the limits of extremism," he terrorist scum said.

"They make takfir on the basis of lies, fabrications and even good deeds of obedience . . . it is political, convenient and opportunistic." One of the claims he made was that ISIS was "misusing the enthusiasm of the youth," as if that was immoral--but cutting off heads and flying planes into buildings killing thousands of innocent people was actually rather religious.

The al-Qaeda POS leader has a $25 million on his head since 9/11 and due to his terror links, has global sanctions leveled against him. His terrorist activities goes back to the early 1990s. His audio message was spoken in Arabic but also translated and spread on social media by supporters.

Al- Zawahiri's message comes at a time when pressure on the terror organizations' front groups and allies in Syria with US-led coalition increasingly turning its firepower on AQ while ISIS loses more and more territory.

In the first week of January, more than 20 AQ scumcrumpets were killed in northwestern Syria. But while we have put our focus on ISIS, AQ has been able to gain ground.

In a heartfelt religious plea, al-Zawahiri is trying to make a case for ISIS defectors and urging "ones who seek the truth" to join his group of killers for Allah. 

According to Renad Mansour, a fellow from the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House said that AQ wants to capitalize on ISIS's losses in Mosul and Raqqa province, both key strongholds.

"When ISIS became so successful, many questioned the relevance and legitimacy of al-Qaeda, especially after the death of Osama bin Laden," Dr. Mansour told The Independent. 

"Al-Zawahiri's attack coming now shows that al-Qaeda feels a bit more confident, feels that ISIS is beginning to lose."

So maybe it's time to take al-Qaeda seriously again. They have aspirations that cannot bode well for the west. 

Vigilance is key.




Tweet