Black nat’l anthem to be sung at Super Bowl LVIII: there is some social media blowback

The National Football League announced that it intends to have something called the Black national anthem played before the game because the country isn't divided enough. Sure, former President Barack Hussein Obama tried his best to do the job, and to his creds, he almost completed his mission. But nothing comes close to finishing the job as to have a separate national anthem for people with darker skin from White people.

Of course we also should have an LGBTQI+1 anthem for those fine folks. And why not an Hispanic national anthem what with all the folks coming here from Spanish speaking countries? Asians too should have their own anthem, it's only fair.

The Black national anthem, "Lift Every Voice and Sing" needs a new title. How about "Lift Every Black Voice and Sing?" or "Lift Every Voice Except You Know Whose and Sing." 

"Lift Every Voice and Sing," has been played at every Super Bowl since Super Bowl LV and has stirred controversy on social media every time. This year, the NFL said the song will be performed by Grammy-winning R&B singer Andra Day.

The NFL started to play the Black national anthem in the 2020 season following the death of a Black thug named George Floyd who was being arrested by Minneapolis police officers. The incident started a wave of actions against racial injustice across the U.S. even though it was found that the officer who was pinning Floyd to the ground used proper police procedure. 

"Bro, we're American. Why tf do we need Lift Every Voice and Sing?" one NFL fan wrote in response to ESPN’s Adam Schefter’s post on the NFL’s announcement.

Conservative radio host Larry Elder was among others who spoke out.

"Sigh… While they’re at it, how about the University of Michigan fight song?" he posted on X.

Others on social media wondered what would happen if Americans had a "White national anthem." But race hustler Nikole Hannah-Jones claimed the U.S. already had a "White national anthem," which is racist on its face.

Tweet

Zawahiri was droned at the home of NY Times contributor

"And the other one is for my nose"

The birdcage liner known as the New York Times has no problem publishing material from the enemies of the West, and particularly our nation's enemies.

For instance, Haqqani, the deputy leader of the Taliban, is on the FBI's most wanted list for his alleged involvement in the January 2008 attack on a Kabul hotel that killed six people. Yes, the New York Times published him anyway. After all, it wasn't as if he killed hundreds of people, just a half dozen.

Allie Griffin of the New York Post, August 3, 2022 wrote a story titled: “Al-Zawahiri killed at home of Taliban lackey New York Times gave platform to.” 

She wrote that Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed at the home of an FBI-wanted Taliban lackey who was once given a platform by the New York Times. 

But the paper is no stranger to fabricating stories that are, well, stories and have a poor relationship with the truth.

For starters, let's take the Holodomor famine in Ukraine and the work of "reporter" Walter Duranty. He served as the paper's Moscow bureau chief from 1922 to 1936. Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories involving his denial of widespread famine in Ukraine, because that's what Communists tend to do when they need to defend Mother Russia. His most infamous lies were about the Holodomor, the famine in Ukraine in the 1930s.

And let's not forget the anti-American "1619 Project" by Nikole Hannah-Jones. She won the support of the New York Times and won a Pulitzer Prize for her novel pretending to be fact.

The Pulitzer Prize has become a leftist joke.

Finally, in 2003, after the Pulitzer Board started a renewed inquiry, the Times hired Mark von Hagen, a professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review comrade Duranty's work and found it to be uncritical, unbalanced and basically genuflected to Stalinist propaganda. Von Hagen told the press, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."

The Times' coverage of the Holocaust was another black eye for the so-called paper of record. 

In "Buried by the Times" by Laurel Leff, published in 2005, the paper buried in the back pages stories about the genocide of European Jews and they avoided mentions of Jewish victims of persecutions, deportations, and the death camps. Of the 23,000 stories the Times published between 1939 and 1945, half were about the war, and of these, only 26 mentioned the Holocaust.

In the documentary Reporting on The Times: How the paper of record ignored the Holocaust, past editors of the newspaper stated that there was a conscious decision to bury the paper's Holocaust coverage.

Then there's the issue of plagiarism by Jayson Blair, an African American. The New York Times admitted that one of its "reporters" committed serial journalistic fraud over several years time. He resigned after the incident.

The final case I'll make is the Duke University LaCross case from 2007 whereby the paper basically accused the players of rape before the case was adjudicated. Former Times ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, admitted the Times was bias in their coverage of the case and said,  "It was too delicious a story. It conformed too well to too many preconceived notions of too many in the press: white over black, rich over poor, athletes over non-athletes, men over women, educated over non-educated. Wow. That's a package of sins that really fit the preconceptions of a lot of us."

So that's just the tip of the dung heap the Times has dumped on the public.

The fact that al-Zawahiri was staying in the home of Haqqani and that the New York Times allowed this POS to contribute to the paper, should tell you something about their morals. Sirajuddin Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, owned the Kabul home.

The New York Times published an op-ed piece by Haqqani in 2020 to ask for a peace agreement between the US and Afghan leaders. Not only did outside critics bash the paper for giving this crap weasel a platform to spew his propaganda, even the papers' own reporters  were pissed.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

And now the New York Times is stealth editing to leave out this little tidbit of information as to where Zawahiri was blown to kibbles and bits.

The FBI is offering up to $10 million for information leading directly to Haqqani's arrest.

Tweet

According to one race hustler, if you tip your waiter, you're a racist

Eeny meeny miney mo is racist. Everything nowadays is racist, especially if you're a white man who identifies as a man and maybe is also religious. At least that's what race hustlers tell us because that's how they make their money.

Certain words are labeled racist. Math is racist. Grades are racist. And things that aren't racist are homophobic, transphobic, and for that reason, are also racist anyway.

The non-historian of "The 1619 Project" is now claiming that not only is America racist [she seems to have never left the country and checked out other countries, particularly those in the Middle East and Africa] but tipping waiters is racist. 

Her name is Nikole Hannah-Jones and she is an actual racist, albeit a shrewd rich one who has made a career throwing the word 'racist' around like a campus frisbee, and has demonized everyone who refuses to fall in line with her anti-American leftist crap.

When she wrote "The 1619 Project" in 2019, she rewrote history to depict America as an evil, racist country and that level of racism still exists today. Hannah-Jones presented her outhouse worthy book as the “true founding” of America, and makes the claim that America exists only because of slavery. She discounts all of the gains we have made since our founding because it's financially beneficial for her to do that in order to sell books and crappy ideas that tear at the fabric of America.

And the trouble is, if you criticize her, guess what she calls you.

So she sees the founding of America when the first slaves were brought here in 1619, not when the founding fathers signed the Declaration of Independence or penned the Constitution and ratified it. 

Actual historians eviscerated the falsehoods asserted by Hannah-Jones, starting with the claim that 1619 was our “true founding.” The New York Times quietly changed that lede, removing the reference to “understanding 1619 as our true founding.”

She also claimed that the Revolution fought against the British was not for freedom from their tyranny, but to preserve slavery, a total fabrication to fit her racism narrative against white people.

Hannah-Jones won a Pulitzer Prize for her novel, but not for literature. It was for commentary for her essay in 2020. This should tell you all you need to know about the value of the Pulitzer Prize. Since winning it and being rewarded for her balderdash, she has become quite active on social media, posting a lot of garbage on Twitter.

Last November, she accused America of nuking Japan because America had spent a lot of cash on the bomb. According to Hannah-Jones, Japan was about to surrender but America dropped a nuke on Hiroshima anyway. Why? We built an expensive tool (A-Bomb), so why not use it?

“You’re the only one who poorly understands history,” she tweeted. “They dropped the bomb when they knew surrender was coming because they’d spent all this money developing it and to prove it was worth it.”

She offered no proof, no references, no other reason other than the synaptic strands of goo in her brain. 

The race hustling hater soon deleted her tweet but caught hell online from both sides of the aisle for her historic ineptitude.

Hannah-Jones believes that everything can be traced to racism, and American slavery, in particular. Every aspect of human existence can be traced to America and not just racism but white racism because it’s the only racism that exists. 

The only reason anyone cares about Ukraine, she posits, is because Ukrainians are white.

Now this idiot wants convince you that tipping a waiter or the guy delivering your new fridge is racist. At the very least, it’s traced back to American slavery and that, of course, makes it racist.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

A depressed person sees everything as sad. An anxious person sees everything a danger. A racist sees everything as racist.

If you leave a tip for your waiter, you're a racist, so now you can feel good about yourself instead, and be a cheap a-hole by stiffing the wait staff.

Tweet

2 Race Hustlers Disagree on Significance of Trader Joe's Recent Steak Theft

Race hustler and leftist NY Times Magazine propagandist Nikole Hannah-Jones (NKJ) went after fellow racist, tax-evader and MSNBC host Al Sharptongue on Wednesday after he aired a discussion over New York City's serious problem with petty theft.

NKJ is the Marxist author of the ahistorical, anti-American "1619 Project." She went on Twitter criticizing the network for spending air time discussing the thief who was captured on video stealing steaks from a New York City Trader Joe's. While she fails to share her material goods with the public and the personal fortune she made with her racist writing, NKJ believes that others should share their possessions and wealth--that's how Marxist think.

"This drumbeat for continued mass incarceration is really horrific to watch. A person stealing steak is not national news, and there have always been thefts from stores. This is how you legitimize the carceral state," Hannah-Jones wrote in response to a tweet from Sharpton, which included a video clip of the Wednesday "Morning Joe" segment.

When a nation being led by people who allow rampant petty theft to go unpunished, causing more serious crime to grow and fester, it is national news. 

"An alleged shoplifter has been caught on tape appearing to steal 10 steaks from NYC Trader Joe’s. I joined MSNBC to speak on the need for public safety and to address criminal justice concerns," Sharptongue wrote.

During his discussion with MSNBC's Willie Geist, Sharpton expressed bewilderment at going to a local New York pharmacy and needing assistance to get toothpaste that's been locked up. This is like Joe Biden expressing bewilderment over people saying that he is in cognitive decline.

"What did I miss that we now have to lock up toothpaste?" Sharptongue asked.

Yes, if you don't want thieves to steal toothpaste, along with whatever else they can grab that adds up to less than $950, you have to lock it up. Ironically, the store that Geist was referring to, a Walgreen's, went out of business due to the unbridled thefts. 

Frustrated workers told the New York Post they were prevented from stopping him.

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, noting New York City Mayor Eric Adams, D., was elected in part on a law-and-order message, appeared "surrounded by elected officials who want New York to remain chaotic." Sharptongue said he shared concerns of overloading jails with petty criminals, but he added there couldn't be a "culture where people are just at random robbing and stealing."

This upset NHJ, whose response to Sharptongue was completely out-of-touch with what urban Americans have been increasingly experiencing: skyrocketing crime and soaring theft rates that have become progressively worse. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Small and medium-size businesses are being destroyed, and while the left pretends to care for the "working class," they are the ones being hurt the most by theft that is practically encouraged under the lack of accountability for the crimes. And for the communities that are in these high theft neighborhoods, prices have gone up dramatically just for stores to stay in business to make up for the stolen goods.

So while the Commie NHJ would rather not discuss light-fingered theft and how it hurts the poor and middle-class the most, for once in his miserable, racist life, Al Sharpton has been on the right side of an issue.

Tweet

College faculty member Nikole Hannah-Jones says she's not an educator-- but she might be a clown

Circus Clown Chic 

The founder of the 1619 Project, Nikole Hannah-Jones, is a Marxist and admits that she isn't a "professional educator" in spite of the fact that she is a tenured faculty member at Howard University in Washington, D.C. 

Hannah-Jones (HJ) was speaking Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," where she spoke about the 1619 Project, the influence critical race theory (CRT) played in the Virginia governor's race, and how parents should mind their own business when it came to their children's education at school.

HJ claimed the Virginia election was "decided based on the success of a right-wing propaganda campaign," the clown impersonator then admitted that she's not a "professional educator," the first honest thing she said. If anything, her grasp of history is a hateful fiction with false assertions and gross omissions. 

"And I don't really understand this idea that parents should decide what's being taught. I'm not a professional educator. I don't have a degree in social studies or science. We send our children to school because we want them to be taught by people who have an expertise in the subject area. And that is not my job," HJ said, failing to see the irony in her words.

"When the, when the governor or the candidate said that he didn't think parents should be deciding what's being taught in school, he was panned for that. But that's just the fact. [How can it be fact if the governor was giving an opinion?] This is why we send our children to school and don't homeschool, because these are the professional educators who have the expertise to teach social studies, to teach history, to teach science, to teach literature. And I think we should leave that to the educators," HJ continued, still failing to see the irony she spewed. 

HJ acts as if being homeschooled is a bad thing because teachers wouldn't have influence over how the child thinks; the parents would. There are many famous people who were homeschooled. Albert Einstein is the first who comes to mind among the many others.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

In July, Howard University announced HJ would be joining the Cathy Hughes School of Communications as a tenured member of the faculty, for some reason. She "will also found the Center for Journalism and Democracy, which will focus on training and supporting aspiring journalists in acquiring the investigative skills and historical and analytical expertise needed to cover the crisis our democracy is facing," according to the Howard University announcement.

And here you thought journalism was dead. Just kidding, journalism as it was originally intended is dead.

Hannah-Jones told Fox News that "professional K-12 educators, not parents, are the experts in what to teach including those educating my own child." But since she, by her own admission, is not a professional educator, how can she know that? Did she make that "fact" up the same way she made up "facts" in her 1619 Project? 

You make the call.

Tweet