Jewish women protest outside NY Times over propaganda reporting re: Hamas rapes

Israeli and Jewish women protest outside the Times over propaganda 
article on Hamas rapes. [Photo: Gaby Wine, The Jewish Chronicle]

A protest was held outside the New York Times building over an article the former newspaper published a propaganda piece intended to cast doubt on the visual evidence and testimony of released hostages taken by Hamas terrorists on October 7. 

The article never mentioned that the Hamassholes took video and even  called their families on cellphones taken from the dead, that they killed and raped Jews. 

Anti-Semitism much?

The photo above shows sixteen women wearing pants doused in artificial blood in order to represent the 16 women who are still being held in Gaza since the bloody massacre.

To mark the UN’s International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict But Not For Jews, these Jewish and Israeli women demonstrated outside The Times--a rag whose pages are best served to line the bottom of birdcages or wrap fish--on Wednesday. They called on the global media to acknowledge the sexual violence perpetrated by Hamas and other Arabs on October 7, and is still being perpetrated against the remaining living hostages still being held in Gaza.

The protest also showed graphic video of five female soldiers being kidnapped on October 7, along with interviews of released female hostages who detailed the sexual abuse they endured or witnessed. But apparently, the "Believe All Women" demand doesn't apply to Jews. 

Hypocrisy much?

They chanted "Rape is not resistance," and  “We believe all women,” but while some people passing by stopped to watch the video, most looked away in horror or scurried away in denial, when they were offered an information leaflet, said Orit Eyal-Fibeesh, the protest organizer from 7/10 Human Chain.

Orit Eyal-Fibeesh

“It reminded me of the Holocaust, when people just turned away,” she said. “I was shocked that young women we offered the leaflets to weren’t even curious. You can reserve judgment until later, but at least be curious about why we are here.”

Curiosity can breed guilt in their case.

Ms. Eyal-Fibeesh said that they had decided to hold the protest on the International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict ”because, for whatever reason, it seems that Israeli girls don’t count. We are here to say that Israeli lives matter and Jewish lives matter.”

“Girls and women are still being held hostage in Gaza and there is a substantial amount of evidence to know that they have been subjected to sexual violence, and men have too.”

Maytal Kuperard, who was with a group representing Jewish Women’s Aid, said: “Following the article published in the Times amidst the current climate of silence and denial of the horrific atrocities committed by Hamas on Israeli women, we are here to amplify the voices of the voiceless victims.”

Another woman said that she was here “because it’s outrageous to be doubted. It’s completely devastating to Jewish women.”

But it isn't simply doubt; it's also willful ignorance, or pure anti-Semitism, which is now being exposed by the media exposing themselves, the students whose socialist/communist professors teach it to their students' malleable young minds, and those who simply hate for the sake of hating. 

Israel's Jews, and those in the diaspora, are a perfect target for these evil scum, and their useful idiots who believe their virtue-signaling makes them appear virtuous. 

Tweet

NY Times 'accidentally' publishes identities of Russian soldiers critical of Putin

Former newspaper of record, The New York Times, printed identifying information about Russian soldiers who criticized President Vladimir Putin, supposedly by accident. This will put the lives of these soldiers at great risk if anyone in Russian intelligence uses the Times to line their bird cage and bothers to read through the crap before tossing it in the garbage.

The accidental doxing revealed the phone numbers of soldiers and their families, and appeared in the metadata of a NY Times article in September detailing Russian troops criticizing Putin and the Ukraine war, as reported by Motherboard, Vice News' tech site. The Times kept the information available in the article and finally scrubbed it in January.

One soldier called Putin "a fool" and another said Putin was "gravely mistaken" to invade Ukraine. Others voiced concern about killing Ukrainian civilians, and so on.

Motherboard reported:

"This metadata error is a regrettable and entirely avoidable cockup on the part of the New York Times," Thomas Rid, professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University/SAIS, told Motherboard in an online chat. "The Times says it spent almost two months on translating the recordings—well, it should have spent another 20 minutes on scrubbing the metadata." 

"Exposing the phone number of the families of Russian troops is exposing those family members to risks," Rid added.

It's no secret that The New York Times is friendlier to Russia than it is to Israel and conservatives in the US. And it has been that way for decades.

It would come as no surprise to me to discover the rag known as The New York Times intentionally left the damning information on their site.

Tweet

Zawahiri was droned at the home of NY Times contributor

"And the other one is for my nose"

The birdcage liner known as the New York Times has no problem publishing material from the enemies of the West, and particularly our nation's enemies.

For instance, Haqqani, the deputy leader of the Taliban, is on the FBI's most wanted list for his alleged involvement in the January 2008 attack on a Kabul hotel that killed six people. Yes, the New York Times published him anyway. After all, it wasn't as if he killed hundreds of people, just a half dozen.

Allie Griffin of the New York Post, August 3, 2022 wrote a story titled: “Al-Zawahiri killed at home of Taliban lackey New York Times gave platform to.” 

She wrote that Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed at the home of an FBI-wanted Taliban lackey who was once given a platform by the New York Times. 

But the paper is no stranger to fabricating stories that are, well, stories and have a poor relationship with the truth.

For starters, let's take the Holodomor famine in Ukraine and the work of "reporter" Walter Duranty. He served as the paper's Moscow bureau chief from 1922 to 1936. Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories involving his denial of widespread famine in Ukraine, because that's what Communists tend to do when they need to defend Mother Russia. His most infamous lies were about the Holodomor, the famine in Ukraine in the 1930s.

And let's not forget the anti-American "1619 Project" by Nikole Hannah-Jones. She won the support of the New York Times and won a Pulitzer Prize for her novel pretending to be fact.

The Pulitzer Prize has become a leftist joke.

Finally, in 2003, after the Pulitzer Board started a renewed inquiry, the Times hired Mark von Hagen, a professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review comrade Duranty's work and found it to be uncritical, unbalanced and basically genuflected to Stalinist propaganda. Von Hagen told the press, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."

The Times' coverage of the Holocaust was another black eye for the so-called paper of record. 

In "Buried by the Times" by Laurel Leff, published in 2005, the paper buried in the back pages stories about the genocide of European Jews and they avoided mentions of Jewish victims of persecutions, deportations, and the death camps. Of the 23,000 stories the Times published between 1939 and 1945, half were about the war, and of these, only 26 mentioned the Holocaust.

In the documentary Reporting on The Times: How the paper of record ignored the Holocaust, past editors of the newspaper stated that there was a conscious decision to bury the paper's Holocaust coverage.

Then there's the issue of plagiarism by Jayson Blair, an African American. The New York Times admitted that one of its "reporters" committed serial journalistic fraud over several years time. He resigned after the incident.

The final case I'll make is the Duke University LaCross case from 2007 whereby the paper basically accused the players of rape before the case was adjudicated. Former Times ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, admitted the Times was bias in their coverage of the case and said,  "It was too delicious a story. It conformed too well to too many preconceived notions of too many in the press: white over black, rich over poor, athletes over non-athletes, men over women, educated over non-educated. Wow. That's a package of sins that really fit the preconceptions of a lot of us."

So that's just the tip of the dung heap the Times has dumped on the public.

The fact that al-Zawahiri was staying in the home of Haqqani and that the New York Times allowed this POS to contribute to the paper, should tell you something about their morals. Sirajuddin Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, owned the Kabul home.

The New York Times published an op-ed piece by Haqqani in 2020 to ask for a peace agreement between the US and Afghan leaders. Not only did outside critics bash the paper for giving this crap weasel a platform to spew his propaganda, even the papers' own reporters  were pissed.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

And now the New York Times is stealth editing to leave out this little tidbit of information as to where Zawahiri was blown to kibbles and bits.

The FBI is offering up to $10 million for information leading directly to Haqqani's arrest.

Tweet

OMG: NYT reports Dems used 'similarly deceptive tactics' in Ala. Senate race as Russians in 2016 election

A blockbuster report released Wednesday night alleges that the party of the jackass used "similarly deceptive tactics" in the Alabama Senate race last year as Russia used in the 2016 elections.

The New York Times reported:

"The secret project, carried out on Facebook and Twitter, was likely too small to have a significant effect on the race, in which the Democratic candidate it was designed to help, Doug Jones, edged out the Republican, Roy S. Moore."

The Times noted that the methods used by Democrats concern the few who fear that they "taint elections" in the United States. Other Democrats are okay with it as long as it's their party coming out on top.

"The project’s operators created a Facebook page on which they posed as conservative Alabamians, using it to try to divide Republicans and even to endorse a write-in candidate to draw votes from Mr. Moore. It involved a scheme to link the Moore campaign to thousands of Russian accounts that suddenly began following the Republican candidate on Twitter, a development that drew national media attention."

The New York Times obtained an internal report on the Democrat's operation, which stated it "experimented with many of the tactics now understood to have influenced the 2016 elections."

"We orchestrated an elaborate 'false flag' operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet," the report added.

The Times report states that the operation only had a "budget of just $100,000, in a race that cost approximately $51 million," as the rag tried to downplay the impact of the operation. As much as they suck, however, at least they've reported on it.

Of course, mainstream media outlets, including The Times, have repeatedly hyped Russia's efforts in the 2016 elections to use social media to create division. But when the Democrats do it . . .  no big deal.

How much money did Russia's troll farm spend on Facebook ads? $100,000. Does that amount seem to ring any bells?

The idea that Democrats' deception operation was designed to have "almost no impact" on the race is nearly impossible to prove, especially considering the fact that "when Election Day came, Mr. Jones became the first Alabama Democrat elected to the Senate in a quarter of a century, defeating Mr. Moore by 21,924 votes in a race that drew more than 22,800 write-in votes. More than 1.3 million ballots were cast overall." 

And why design an operation to have "almost no impact" in the first place?

There will definitely be more to follow, just don't expect to get it all at The New York Times.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Schumer threatens Trump over firing Rosenstein

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer flared his enormous nostrils and warned President Trump that just because Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested wearing a wiretap in order to record the president to secure an impeachment, is no reason to fire him. If Trump dares to do that, there will be hell to pay.

"This New York Times report must not be used as a pretext for the corrupt purpose of firing Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein in order to install an official who will allow the president to interfere with the Special Counsel's investigation," Schumer tweeted.

Schumer also alleged that other Trump administration officials have supposedly said negative things about him, but they weren't fired.

Perhaps that is because Trump didn't believe they actually did and that the reports about the allegations were fake news.

"Generals Kelly, Mattis and numerous other White House and cabinet officials have been reported to say critical things of the president without being fired," Schumer added.

But saying critical things about Trump is not the same as threatening to undermine him by wearing a wire.

Schumer's tweets come amid a New York Times article claiming the pencil-neck Deputy AG suggested secretly recording the president's conversations with officials at the DOJ and FBI after former FBI Director James Comey was fired.

If The Times report turns out to be fake news, it will be the first time in recorded history of the Trump administration that a mistake was made in favor of the president.

After Rosenstein was caught, he said he was only kidding, of course.

The blockbuster report also said that Rosenstein talked about invoking the 25th Amendment with Cabinet members to remove Trump from office based on his being unfit for duty. But of course, Rod was just joshing.

Rosenstein denied the accuracy of The Times report, describing it as "inaccurate and factually incorrect" and suddenly the "Gray Lady" had become a lying old whore.

"I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda," he wrote in a statement to Fox News. "But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment."

He said in another statement: "I never pursued or authorized recording the president, and any suggestion that I have ever advocated for the removal of the president is absolutely false,"

Good save, Rod.

So we can now assume that everything The New York Times reports should be considered fake news. Yet somehow I don't believe the left will agree with me when it goes against the GOP.

Do you believe Rosenstein? Feel free to comment.


Click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page.



Tweet

POTUS madder at The Times than a snake that married the garden hose

President Trump is calling on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to use his resources and manpower to launch an intense investigation to uncover the identity of the anonymous person behind the Op-Ed published earlier this week in The New York Times.

Trump has been madder than a mule chewing on bumble bees since the column was published and told reporters aboard Air Force One that the critical piece about his leadership is a "national security" issue.

Reporters asked the president if he would take any action and he said, "we're going to see. I'm looking at that right now."

The op-ed by a cowardly "senior" official, described a covert inside effort to protect the country from Trump's "misguided impulses." Thus began the search for the author while most Cabinet officials and others have quickly denied responsibility and condemned the author.

Michael M. Grynbaum, a journalist at The New York Times tweeted a statement saying they're "confident" the DOJ "understands that the First Amendment protects all American citizens and that it would not participate in such a blatant abuse of government power."

"The President's threats both underscore why we must safeguard the identity of the writer of this Op-Ed and serve as a reminder of the importance of a free and independent press to American democracy," the statement continued.

I have to agree with them on this. But the person who wrote the piece is clearly a coward and a phony. If he worries so much about the country as he or she says, why not come forward with full disclosure for the sake of the country. Unless that person's job is really more important to him or her.

In an interview with "Fox and Friends" Trump said the Times shouldn't have even had the piece--and I agree with him on this issue. It serves absolutely no purpose but to undermine the presidency.

There is a wonderful piece in National Review by David French. It's an open letter to "Anonymous," the person who wrote the Op-Ed.

Unlike Trump, he does not refer to the post as "treason," because it isn't. But it is a rather underhanded and cowardly thing to do.

Whether Sessions will follow up on Trump's call to investigate is unclear. But their relationship is eroding and the president has publicly and repeatedly faulted him over the Russia probe in which Sessions appropriately recused himself.

Trump would probably like Sessions to be his "wingman" like Eric Holder was to Barack Obama and actually said so. But that is not the role of the Attorney General and Sessions appears to be playing his role in a professional manner, whether we like it or not.

Last month President Trump complained to the public that Sessions "never took control" of the DOJ, to which Sessions put out a terse statement saying: "While I am Attorney General, the actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations."

I firmly believe Sessions is doing so and will continue to do so until Trump fires him.

National Review Ads info and privacy

Please follow Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.




Tweet

Israel neutralizes 58 terrorists and stops 1,300 of their supporters

My headline is how the headline should read, not "Israel Kills 58 and Injures Over 1,300 by Gunfire at Gaza Border." The New York Times has distorted the facts with their pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas rhetoric when the violence at the Gaza border erupted.

By Monday evening, the "Gray Lady" tweaked the headline: "Israeli Soldiers Kill Scores at Gaza Border; Thousands Hurt." A subhead described "[a] mass attempt by Palestinians to cross the border fence" that "quickly turned violent, as Israeli soldiers responded with rifle fire."

Never mind that these so-called 'protesters' threw rocks, molotov cocktails, flew fire kites over the fence into Israel, and some even tried to plant bombs. No. Somehow The Times, a bias rag that has become so far left that it should be written in Russian, blames the violence on Israel, the only democratic, free country in the Middle East.

Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus told the Associated Press that Hamassholes disguised as protesters attempted to infiltrate into Israel. There were no less than three instances whereby armed Hamas gunmen tried to carry out attacks. The Times forgot to mention that tidbit until the 42nd paragraph of their bias reporting.

Now you see why President Trump calls them "the failing New York Times."


Tweet

Top GOP donor threatens to stop funding if they don't do as he says

"I will not write another check" unless GOP candidates support assault weapons ban, threatened Al Hoffman Jr., a Florida-based real estate developer, according to The New York Times. 

In an email to six Republican leaders on Saturday, Hoffman denounced the spate of mass shootings across the United States over the years and demanded that GOP politicians do what he tells them to do: go against the Second Amendment and take away the American citizens' right to self-defense.

"I will not write another check unless they all support a ban on assault weapons," he wrote in an email to The Times. "Enough is enough!"

Interestingly, Hoffman did not implore former President Barack Obama to do the same regarding what he labels 'assault weapons' when the Democrats had control of both the House and Senate.

Somehow the left, and some like Hoffman, believe that tighter gun laws will put an end to these horrific mass shootings. It turns out that the gun laws are as effective as "gun-free zones," a place where shooters go where they know that nobody will shoot back.

In an interview with the ultra-liberal Times, Hoffman said he reached the "end of the road" supporting candidates who refused to back tighter gun laws. He did not mention exactly how tighter gun laws will decrease the number of mass shootings because they can't.

It seems that one way to begin dealing with this problem should begin at home. Parents teaching their kids to respect all life. Parents being parents instead of buddies, getting rid of violent video games that normalize killing, monitoring their kids, having 'family time.'

And the media needs to stop putting up photos of the killers and saying their names over and over, analyzing the crime all day long into the night. [You know who you are, Fox News.]

Schools cannot be "gun-free zones." The kids need to be protected by trained people with guns, particularly concealed guns carried by security and teachers who know how to use a firearm. It would be wise to limit entrances to school and have exits that only open from inside the building. Yes, and airport-style detectors with armed security would definitely limit the danger to students.

Consider how Israel does their security--they have virtually no mass shootings at their schools because they can't afford to be politically correct. 

The same is true at their airports--when have you ever heard of an El-Al flight being blown up?

When someone suspicious is identified, be it face-to-face or on social media [as in "see something, say something"] there must be follow-up by law enforcement. If agencies such as the FBI fail to act as they did in Parkland, Florida, people are going to become complacent.

Learning to profile potential mass shooters needs to become "Mission One" to authorities, and political correctness needs to go by way of the dinosaur.

Hoffman, like most liberals, see gun control laws as a simple solution. That's a fool's way of thinking. We need to change the culture and ensure the perpetrators remain a footnote in the media.

It should go without saying that people who go on shooting rampages are mentally ill or carry out a mentally ill religious belief. 


Tweet

Hillary Clinton shielded her top adviser accused of sexual harassment in 2008

Washington -- Burns Strider, a senior adviser to Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, had been accused of sexually harassing a young subordinate. In spite of this, Hillary kept Strider on, according to four people familiar with the allegations, a NewYork Times article reports.

Even Clinton's campaign manager at the time, Patti Solis Doyle, recommended to Clinton that Strider ought to be fired, but Hillary kept him on anyway and merely docked him several weeks pay and ordered he undergo counseling. 

The alleged victim, however, was moved to a new job.

Strider [not to be confused with Strider from "Paw Patrol"] was Clinton's faith adviser, a co-founder of the American Values Network, and provided her with scripture readings every morning during the campaign.

Hillary's "faith adviser" had strange American values, and he didn't get that from scripture, that's for sure.  

Five years after the alleged harassment occurred, Strider was hired to lead an independent group that supported Clinton's 2016 candidacy, Correct the Record, which was created by none other than the "King of Smear," David Brock.

But Strider was fired after a few months for workplace issues, which included allegations that he harassed a young female aide, according to the leftist group's management.

A Clinton mouthpiece provided a statement from Utrecht, Kleinfeld, Fiori, Partners, the law firm that represented her campaign in 2008. The statement said:

"To ensure a safe working environment, the campaign had a process to address complaints of misconduct or harassment. When matters arose, they were reviewed in accordance with these policies, and appropriate action was taken. This complaint was no exception."

The event had not been previously reported and until now, Clinton associates were not willing to discuss the events for publication. However, this all changed as a result of the #MeToo movement in which dozens of men across the nation, and across different professions, have been fired or suspended for sexual misconduct.

The Times account was based on interviews with eight former campaign officials and Clinton associates, and there is a chance that it may influence her decision as to whether she has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the nomination for the Democratic Party. [But they're hypocritical so there remains that possibility.]

Solis Doyle, and other senior campaign officials spoke with Clinton about the situation involving Strider and Ms. Clinton's response at the time. Some were troubled by her decision to allow Strider to remain on the campaign.

The complaint against Strider was made by a 30-year-old woman who shared an office with him. She reported to a campaign official that Strider rubbed her shoulders inappropriately, kissed her on the forehead and sent her suggestive emails, including one during the evening, according to three former campaign officials familiar with the events.

Solis Doyle took the complaints to Hillary Clinton and urged her to fire the Strider, who was married at the time. Clinton said she didn't want to fire him.

The alleged victim signed a nondisclosure agreement and has abided by it. Solis Doyle declined to comment. Hillary Clinton still smells of corruption and is perhaps the biggest hypocrite to ever be elected to public office.

Hillary Clinton still has possession of Harvey Weinstein's generous financial donations to her corrupt foundation.

Tweet

Fusion GPS believes FBI has a mole inside White House

Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, who sponsored the anti-Trump dossier, said in August and again January 2nd, that the FBI has a covert source inside the Trump administration who gave credence to the dossier. 

Was the source James Comey? Steve Bannon? Sarah Huckabee Sanders?The White House cook?

We don't know.

When a transcript of Simpson's secret August testimony was released this past Tuesday, the media got all hot and bothered as they saw it giving credence to the dossier whose charges of the Trump-Russia collusion have been denied and not publicly confirmed.

But immediately after the headlines went up, a person close to the firm waved off reporters. Now they said Mr. Simpson had "mischaracterized" the source. It wasn't a Trump insider, but supposedly an Australian diplomat.

The Aussie was featured in a December 30 New York Times story as the one who tipped off the FBI. Allegedly, campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos told him over drinks that a Russian-linked professor knew of "thousands" of Hillary Clinton emails in the possession of Moscow.

It's highly unlikely that Simpson would have known of the diplomat in August. But in January, he would have known of him when he wrote an op-ed in the canary cage liner known as The New York Times, which he again told of an insider source.

"As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp," he wrote.

In his testimony Simpson said:

"Essentially what he told me was they had other intelligence about this matter from an internal Trump campaign source and that--that they--my understanding was that they believed Chris at this point--that they believed Chris's information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human source from inside the Trump organization. It was someone like us who decided to pick up the phone and report something."

Simpson added that this person was not a Steele source, but an FBI one.

When a government agency tries to covertly undermine the executive branch of government, we are no better than a banana republic. This should bother and concern everyone who actually believes in our country and our Constitution, both liberals and conservatives, but since Trump is our freely elected president, it will only bother the latter.


Tweet

Pence slams slimy NY Times

A fake news report in The New York Times claiming that Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans are running 'shadow campaigns' to defeat President Trump in 2020 was dismissed by Pence as "disgraceful and offensive."

His White House statement said: 

"Today's article in The New York Times is disgraceful and offensive to me, my family and out entire team. The allegations in this article are categorically false and represent just the latest attempt by the media to divide this administration."

The Times, once known as "The Paper of Record," is now known as "The Canary Cage Liner," published the story on Sunday and posits that Mr. Pence and Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) and Gov. John Kasich (R-Oh.) are visiting early voting states and acting as if they're running in 2020.

Pence also said: 

"Thanks to the President's leadership, we are rebuilding the military, ISIS is on the run, and we've seen more than one million jobs created while the stock market hits all time highs.

"The American people know that I could not be more honored to be working side by side with a president who is making America great again.

"Whatever fake news may come our way, my entire team will continue to focus all our efforts to advance the President's agenda and see him re-elected in 2020. Any suggestions otherwise is both laughable and absurd." 

The Times has always been far left-leaning even going so far as to defend and lionize Alger Hiss, an alleged Communist spy for Russia. 

Now The Times is claiming that it's due to the Russia controversy regarding election meddling and the Trump administration's collusion with them, the Republicans are jumping ship on Trump. "Pence's schedule is so full of political events that Republicans joke that he is acting more like a second-term vice president hoping to clear the field than a No. 2 sworn in a little over six months ago."

It's understandable how people no longer trust the media--they make stuff up to suit their political agendas. 

Oh, my canary just gave The Times a gift.

Tweet

CNN's Acosta dubbed "Fake News Guru"

CNN's annoyingly rude Jim Acosta was the target of conservative angry bird tweets on Twitter after he accused the President of holding a "fake news conference." Afterward, he vomited some "fake news" of his own when he pedantically claimed that President Trump misstated the number of intelligence agencies that came to the conclusion Russia was involved with meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump took questions from MSNBC and The Daily Mail in a joint news conference with President Andrzej Duda (duda) in Poland. 

Acosta wasn't pleased.

"Trump finally held a news conference overseas. But he took a question from a friendly reporter [and Barack Obama never did] and then attacked CNN as 'fake news.'" Acosta tweeted, using his pinky to hit 'Send.' He went on, "Isn't it a 'fake news conference' to take a question from a reporter who is essentially an ally of the White House?" [Because Barack Obama had no allies in the news media.]

Acosta was probably referring to The Daily Mail's U.S. political editor David Martosko, a journalist who was possibly being considered for Trump's communication department but pulled out of the running.

Of course, right-wing social media folks went after the CNN "journalist's" sarcastic tweets, saying that the Obama Administration was inundated with friendly reporters who thought Obama could do no wrong and that he often called on friendly journalists.

Some even helped him without his ever asking--Candy Crowley comes to mind.

Donald Trump Jr. even got into the act, tweeting: "So by that logic, was every news conference for the last 8 years #fakenews Jim?"

Steve Deace, a conservative radio host tweeted: "Jim, over two dozen 'journalists' went to work in the Obama WH, including the former WH spokesman."

There's no doubt that 'journalists' tend to be liberal--more than 9 out of 10 vote Democrat and donate to the Democratic Party. 

There is also no doubt that Obama's press conferences could have been used as campaign ads for his party and the questions he often got were powderpuff softballs.

An Atlantic article in 2013 noted Time managing editor Rick Stengel was "at least the 24th journalist to work for the Obama Administration." 

Obama's White House Press Secretary Jay Carney also worked for Time as the Washington Bureau Chief.

While on CNN's "New Day" after Trump's joint news conference Thursday, Jimbo repeated the "fake news" schtick to describe an answer Trump gave to a question about Russian meddling in the election.

"The other thing that was 'fake news' coming from President Trump is when he said, 'Well, I keep hearing it's 17 intelligence agencies that say Russia meddled in the election; I think it's only three or four,'" Acosta said. "Where does this 'three or four' number come from? My suspicion . . . is that if we go to the administration and ask them for this question, I'm not so sure we're going to get an answer." 

Here's the answer, Jimmy: The New York Times, and other media outlets, reported for months that "17 American intelligence agencies" agreed Russia orchestrated cyber-attacks before the election. BUT ON JUNE 28, THE NEW YORK TIMES ISSUED A CORRECTION. 

The Times noted "the assessment was made by four intelligence agencies--the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency.

Of course, The Times put the correction at the bottom of the page where only people with OCD would see it.

Certainly not Jimmy A.



Tweet

Palin sues NY Times for defamation

Former Alaska Governor, vice presidential candidate and butt of Tina Fey jokes, Sarah Palin, is suing the New York Times over an editorial that claimed that her website was responsible for the January 2011 shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) that also killed six others and wounded thirteen.

The suit claims that The Times defamed her in a June 14 editorial, published just several hours after the shooting at the GOP practice field in Alexandria, Virginia for the congressional baseball game. The shooting seriously wounded House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and several others.

The editorial titled "America's Lethal Politics" used verbal calisthenics to link the Giffords shooting to Palin's website and then posted a correction the following day saying "no such link was established." 


So people who only read the editorial didn't get to read the correction, as is often the case with fake news and often the intention of the organization that posted the bs.

The editorial also lied claiming that an ad from Palin's political action committee put "Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs [sic]." The Times also corrected that lie and admitted the crosshairs on the map targeted "electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers."

"The Times used its false assertion about Mrs. Palin as an artifice to exploit the [Scalise] shooting," Palin's attorney stated in the suit. "The Times published and promoted its Editorial Board's column despite knowing . . . the false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited [Tucson shooter Jared] Loughner to murder six people," it went on. "In doing so, the Times violated the law of its own policies."

Mrs. Palin is seeking damages in an amount to be determined by a jury. The Times had no comment.

Hopefully, Mrs. Palin will take the 'Gray Lady' to the cleaners--she's quite dirty.

Tweet

Certainly Not News loses 3 losers

Photo: AP

Journalism isn't dead--it's mentally ill. 

Three so-called journalists who reported a fake story about Anthony Scaramucci alleging he met with an official from the Russian fund and discussed the possibility of the U.S. lifting sanctions during this "meeting." Of course, CNN cited an "unnamed" source.

But according to Scaramucci, there was no secret meeting. All he did was give a speech at Davos on Trump's behalf and fund official Kirill Dmitriev approached him in a restaurant merely to say hello. They had a brief conversation and there was no talk of sanctions whatsoever.

In fact, Scaramucci had only been to Russia once, as a 25-year-old student.

The three stooges who worked on the now-retracted story are leaving CNN. The network is alleging their departures are resignations but it's obvious that nothing CNN reports can be believed. 

They were likely canned, but that's only conjecture.

CNN has come under strong criticism after apologizing for the story and by ridding themselves of the three blind mice, they've put themselves in a better legal position if Scaramucci decides to sue.

However, Scaramucci has no plans to sue, according to Fox News. He has accepted CNN's apology and like fifty percent of U.S. marriages, he wants to "move on."

"I was disappointed the story was published," he told Howard Kurtz from Fox News. "It was a lie."

The alleged "resignations" include Lex Harris, executive editor of the investigative unit; Thomas Frank, who wrote the lie; and Eric Lichtblau, who edited the lie. Lichtblau was once a highly regarded reporter who worked for the "failing New York Times" for nearly ten years.

CNN said, in the retraction that the story "did not meet CNN's editorial standards," which are lower than whale poop.

The network is now requiring  stories that are Russia-related actually be read by two editors before they can be published. 

In the past, it was apparently okay to write anything as long as it would somehow attack President Trump and couldn't be verified. 


Tweet

Manchester loser linked to Canadian imam

Salman Abedi, the Manchester Muslim who blew himself up at the Ariana Grande concert has been linked to an extremist imam from Ottawa, where Canadian intelligence officials had warned that he was "promoting violent jihad."

A senior American official spoke on condition of anonymity told the failed New York Times that Abedi "had links to a radical preacher in Libya identified as Abdul Baset Ghwela."

The report was likely referring to a Libyan-Canadian known to the Canadian government as Abdu Albasset Egwilla. He was formerly an imam at an Ottawa mosque where he enjoyed calling infidels "Islamophobes." He has been accused of inciting violence since returning to Libya.

"The RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) is aware of the latest allegations," Sgt. Harold Pfleiderer, an RCMP spokesman said when asked about the alleged connection with Canada to the loser who perpetrated the cowardly attack which killed 22 and injured over 100 people. 

Pfleiderer wouldn't confirm whether the RCMP was investigating saying it wouldn't be appropriate at this time before charges have been laid. He added that Canada is collaborating with its international partners to "ensure the safety and security of Canadian interests and that of the broader global community."

Egwilla didn't respond for a request for a comment on his Facebook page and The New York Times didn't elaborate on the connection between Abedi and Egwilla. 

Abedi had visited Libya just days prior to his Islamic jihad. ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack, but they claim responsibility for any tragedy that befalls an infidel. 

Libyan authorities arrested Salman's father, Ramadan, (which happens to be the holiday Muslims all over the world are currently celebrating; some callig it the "Ramadan Bombathon") and his brother Hashim. Both scumcrumpets have been accused of belonging to ISIS. 

Egwilla was part of a Libyan militant group from Peshawar and was a big fan of Osama bin Laden. He later arrived in Canada, which forgave Egwilla's past, and they gave him citizenship in fear of being called Islamophobic. 

But the snows and infidels were just too much for him and he returned to Libya several years ago and once again became a hardliner, and served as director of the Tripoli office of the ministry of religious endowments. 

Yes--he is a real Muslim and has not perverted the religion in any way, as politicians like to tell us.

In 2014 Egwilla starred in a video in which he urged his audience "of Libyan Islamist fighters to take part in jihad."

Last month, Egwilla's son Owais, a loser who grew up in Ottawa, was killed while fighting alongside an armed Islamist group in Benghazi. Before he was blown away by our brave soldiers he posted messages on Facebook about jihad and propaganda about the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda. 

After the scumtard's death, a memorial service was held for him at an Ottawa mosque but the mosque distanced itself from Egwilla's call to arms. "You want to talk about politics, take it to Tim Hortons," the mosque president told the Ottawa Citizen. (Tim Hortons is the Canadian version of Dunkin Donuts.)

Meanwhile, back in Libya, Egwilla issued another call to arms to avenge his son's death, but didn't want to do it himself due to the danger involved. 

"Allah breaks the backs of the tyrants and the oppressors and the unjust and those nations of the world that are with them," he said.

Always the victim, the imam continued, "Allah they have gathered against us and are scheming against us, so scheme against them. Trick them, kill them . . .  We are waiting for martyrdom in the name of Allah. And by Allah this is our path until we push back evil. We will not stop nor resign."

He was talking about other people becoming martyrs; not him personally. 

Notice how Islam always portrays themselves as victims of evil, which justifies them killing innocent children and adults. Islam is not a religion--it is a warring death cult that has been a disease on the world for 1400 years. 



Tweet

Trump to Russians: Firing 'Nut Job' Comey eased pressure from investigation

Washington --The New York Times reported that President Trump told Russian officials in the White House that firing former FBI Director James Comey, relieved "great pressure" on him, according to a document summarizing the meeting.

The document has not been verified, was "read by an American official." Nothing has been confirmed so the Times jumped right on it without checking facts.

Mr. Trump allegedly said, "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off." He then added, "I'm not under investigation."

The White House document that supposedly contained President Trump's comments was, according to The Times, "based on notes taken from inside the Oval Office and has been circulated as the official account of the meeting."

The irony in this is the abject indifference to the leaking of the document itself, which is illegal and seditious. 

Wanting a president to fail, any president, is wanting the country to go down the wrong path, to fail just to selfishly appease the egos of the haters.

The New York Times was never fair to conservatives, even though President Trump isn't actually a conservative. But any paper that tried to cast doubt about the guilt of Alger Hiss, an admitted spy, isn't going to treat any Republican fairly.

I just wish Mr. Trump would stop complaining about it and just fulfill his promises.


To follow Brain Flushings click the Follow tab in the margin.

Tweet

NY Times now calls FGM a libido control technique

Now that The New York Times has lost all credibility among people with a brain who actually analyze both sides of the media, the "Gray Lady" has decided the term "female genital mutilation" is too heavy-handed and "culturally loaded." 

The Times worries about the culture that performs FGM on their girls also performs beheadings on critics of their barbarism.

An editor of the rag believes calling it by its proper term, widens the gap between the civilized world and "people who follow the rite" of cutting off the genitals of girls in order for them not to enjoy coitus.

Health and Science editor Celia Dugger (who likely has all of her female anatomy) came to the conclusion, after a trip to Africa in the 1990s that cutting off some or all of the external female genitalia of a female child should simply be referred to as "genital cutting."

Arrested for FGM in Michigan

FGM is practiced in Asia, Africa and the Middle East as well as some communities from countries where it's common. UNICEF estimates in 2016 that 200 million women living in 30 countries today have undergone the procedures. 

Almost 6,000 reported cases of FGM occurred in Britain from April 2015 to March 2016 according to the Health and Social Care Information Center.

Here in the U.S., an Islamic physician in Michigan was charged with doing Allah's work by performing female genital mutilation on a pair of 7-year-old girls.

Typically FGM is performed before the girl reaches the age of five. The procedures differ among countries, but it includes removal of the clitoral hood, the clitoral glans; removal of the inner and outer labia and the closure of the vulva, (known as infibulation, a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual fluid). The vagina is opened for intercourse and further opened for childbirth.

The reason for the procedure: to control a woman's sexuality and ideas about modesty, beauty and purity. But the procedure is usually carried out by women who see it as a source of honor.

Health problems often follow in life after the cutting is done, which includes recurrent infections, difficulty urinating and passing menstrual flow, chronic pain, cysts, and an inability to get pregnant. There are also complications during childbirth and fatal bleeding can occur.

There are no known health benefits other than that of the mental status of men who are so insecure that they refuse to allow their wives to achieve orgasm--that's only for men to enjoy.

When a female's genitals are mutilated, what else can we call it?


Follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow button in the right margin

Tweet

MSM freaks out as Trump calls on less mainstream news outlets

President Trump met with Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and held a press conference afterward. But instead of calling on the old, established, liberal mainstream media outlets, lesser name outlets were called on.

WJLA, a local ABC affiliate and the Daily Caller, a conservative online news outlet were called on but neither asked President Trump about what he planned to do about his national security adviser Michael Flynn, who has been accused of speaking to Russian authorities before Trump took office.

So of course the mainstream media jumped on President Trump like an ISIS jihadist on a goat, saying that he was choosing favorites in order to avoid being asked that question.

The New York Times reporter Peter Baker tweeted: "By handpicking reporters, Trump manages to get through a news conference without being asked about Flynn." Obviously Baker forgot to mention that all U.S. presidents handpick reporters. All presidents.

Now you can see why President Trump didn't call on The New York Times. It was a smart move and a hearty LOL. 


Tweet

Former Ass't US attorney: "O should pardon HRC"

Ever since Hillary Clinton got bagged for having an illegal private server when she was acting as the secretary of state, a clear violation of the Espionage Act, her loyal supporters are concerned that, with Donald Trump as our next president, she might go to jail. 

A New York lawyer appealed to Lame Duck President Obama Wednesday in a New York Daily News opinion piece to pardon the pear-shaped former so-called secretary of state and other "potential targets" of an investigation into her illegal email server.

Bobby Begleiter, a former assistant US attorney in the Eastern District of New York wrote that the Constitution allows a president to pardon someone who has not been charged with a crime, including espionage which endangers the nation.

In spite of the fact that Trump said he will not investigate the incompetent, arrogant shrew he referred to as "Crooked Hillary," even though his supporters are still chanting "Lock her up, lock her up," Begleiter worries that Hillary can end up in the slammer. 

"I don't want to hurt the Clintons, I really don't," Mr. Trump told 'reporters' at The New York Times, shortly after the election. "She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I'm not looking to hurt them at all." The campaign was vicious."

Bobby wasn't comfortable with Trump's statement. He didn't want to gamble with his woman's freedom, just in case she said something Trump didn't like and changed his mind. Bobby even called it "sideways" to believe that a person who accepted a pardon is admitting guilt.

But if she is innocent, then why does she need to be pardoned? Pardoned from what? For what?

In an attempt to sound learned, Bobby wrote that a pardon for Crooked Hillary could, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, "restore tranquility to the commonwealth."

In a word, Bobby Begleiter is a Clinton apologist and the only tranquility he's interested in restoring is Clinton's fear of being rightfully jailed for treason.

John Crudele, of the New York Post, a fairly far left-leaning paper, wrote that Obama is fast to forgive traitors, felons, deserters and basic scum of the earth--he just didn't say it in those words--and commuted the sentences of over a thousand incarcerated scum. But, he said, Obama doesn't like Hillary very much and the email scandal put him in an "embarrassing" position, which is even more important to him than anything else in the world.

"But the best reason for not giving a pardon is simple: Obama doesn't really know what kind of trouble Hillary might be in. And she would have to admit to things she might not be ready to reveal to get completely out of trouble," Crudele wrote.

I hope Trump doesn't let her off the hook--part of the reason he got elected was due to his tough stance on Clinton and to allow her to skate free of the charges, is a real injustice.


Tweet

Trump rethinks waterboarding after speaking to 'Mad Dog' Mattis

President-elect Donald Trump is rethinking his position on torture (aka waterboarding) after discussing the issue with Marine Corps General 'Mad Dog' Mattis, the legendary military man who could scare the crap out of a shark during a feeding frenzy. 

Trump met with the retired four-star general on Saturday at his golf course in Bedminster, NJ and they spoke for an hour to discuss a secretary of defense position possibility.

Now that Trump kissed and made up with The New York Times (aka "the paper of record," aka "the Gray Lady," aka "the leftist rag") the President-elect revealed some information to reporters of that paper about part of their conversation.

The Times wrote: 

"He said, 'I've never found it to be useful,'" Mr. Trump said, describing the general's view of torturing terrorism suspects. He added that Mr. Mattis found more value in building trust and rewarding cooperation with terror suspects: "'Give me a pack of cigarettes and a couple of beers and I'll do better.'" He added: "I was very impressed by that answer."

So now Mr. Trump has reconsidered his position, which is indeed, a sign of reason and intelligence, or perhaps a sign that he tends to agree with the last person to whom he has spoken. Torture, he said, is "not going to make the kind of difference that a lot of people are thinking."

This is a contradictory position of Trump's pick for national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who stated that "all options are on the table," [including that guy with the bag over his head that's getting water poured on it as he screams the first thing that comes to mind to get it to stop.]

Before Flynn campaigned for Trump, he was against the practice, but got on the bandwagon when Trump said he was on board with waterboarding.

If Trump has really changed his mind on the practice, that will sit well with national security experts who see problems with the legality of it.

Mattis appears to be at the top of Trump's list for defense secretary he told The Times. He said that he was "seriously considering" the retired general for the position.




Tweet