USAID bribed Time Magazine with $4 million to name Zelenskyy "Person of the Year"

As Elon Musk's team known as DOGE sniffs out the rot in government, it has been discovered that USAID paid Time magazine $4,000,000 to name Volodymyr Zelenskyy "Person of the Year." This might be surprising to some people as Ukraine's leader isn't gay or a transgender, but should we really be surprised?

Is there any media outlet on the left that wasn't on USAID's payroll?

If it weren’t for Trump and DOGE, most people would still have no idea how much money the… pic.twitter.com/lYz8hFuykX

— Johnny Midnight ⚡️ (@its_The_Dr)

Thankfully, DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) has put the rot in the sunlight where people can now see it for themselves. Had they not, we taxpayers would never know how much our government wastes.

BBC,CBS, TIME, and Politico, are just some of the media that got paid for telling us what to think.

Tweet

Kamala Harris: "We seek spy balloon competition and it only brings us closer to my favorite cuisine"

"Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha"

When a person runs for president, he or she selects a vice president with less presence, less charisma, and in the latest case, the intelligence of gum.

China is beefing up its military, stealing our intellectual material, spying on Eric Swalwell and others, and sending spy balloons across our nation, even in areas where our Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles are secreted. 

The Biden administration did nothing for days and made excuses until it became public that a balloon fifty times the size of the Canadian shop teacher's prosthetic breasts was floating across our land.

But this administration refuses to acknowledge that Communist China is our enemy and is apparently gearing up militarily for some unmentionable reason. 

However, it's so bad with these White House clowns that our Vice President Kamala Hahaharris views China as a respected challenger of the United States, and can't get enough of that Moo Shoo Pork, like the Bidens can't get enough of a different kind of Chinese 'pork,' if you get what I mean.

On Wednesday, POLITICO released an interview with our cackling Vice President where she said that America's relations with China aren't hampered by their spying on us. Okay, she didn't say spying but that's because hahahahahahaha, time.

Harris told POLITICO when she was asked whether the White House diplomatic strategy with the CCP has changed at all, and the idiot replied, “I don’t think so, no.” 

She mysteriously added, “Everything that has happened in the last week and a half is, we believe, very consistent with our stated approach. Besides, nothing beats Chinese food. I love the won ton, the moo goo stuff and egg rolls, hahahahaha, and yes, yellow school buses.”

And time, and the concept of time, for time is what it is in concept this time and all of the time.

It isn't that this administration doesn't understand the fact that China is our enemy, it's that they are personally profiting from China. 

Just ask Hunter.

Tweet

TIME says exercise is racist: perhaps hoping people of color will die from lack of it

I first saw this article about TIME and exercise while working out at my local gym. I [who is white] was running on the treadmill and looked around. It was me and two other white guys working out, then there was my wife, who is from India and is brown, three black men, two Chinese men, a Chinese woman, four black women, and a man who looked to be Middle Eastern. So I wondered if all these people of non-white lineage were exercising to try emulating whiteness [whatever the hell that means] or because the theory in TIME is as racist a f***. 

The idea that someone can attribute an activity to racism clearly shows they are so focused on race that they have to be racist to be so focused. After all, a person with serious anxiety sees the world as a dangerous place; a person with depression sees the world as a sad place. It stands to reason that someone who sees racism in even the most mundane things is a closet racist him- or herself.

So fitness influencers along with Twitter twits blasted the TIME interview for claiming that exercise is an activity with roots in White supremacy. [Yeah, maybe in prison it does to a degree, but that's about it.]

"How did U.S. exercise trends go from reinforcing white supremacy to celebrating Richard Simmons?" the TIME article, titled "The White Supremacist Origins of Exercise, and 6 Other Surprising Facts about the History of U.S. Physical Fitness" asked.

The article was heavily mocked by normal Twitter users, with critics saying it was destroying the media's credibility.

White supremacist doing a white supremacist pushup

Ed Latimore, a former heavyweight boxer, tweeted, "First math was a tool of white supremacy. Now it's exercise. Pretty soon, food is gonna be a tool to continue systemic racism oppression."

Latimore is correct, but it has gotten to the point where not allowing for the aborting of black babies is considered racist. 

"Honestly, I want them to keep pumping articles like this out to eviscerate every remaining shred of their credibility and perceived legitimacy," British rapper Zuby tweeted. "It doesn't anger me at all. It's so goofy I consider it satire."

Dr. Gad Saad, marketing professor at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada, also jumped onto the fun bandwagon and said, "Precisely. The only way to fight against the white supremacy roots of exercise is by leading a sedentary life. Say no to exercise as a means of being an ally to people of color."

And of course, people of color should not exercise because it only feeds into the white supremacists' plan to get fit, while minorities become fat and sedentary or aborted.

Tweet

Time names Simone Biles the "Non-Participating Athlete of the Year Award" for 2021

Time magazine announced Thursday that Simone Biles is being given the "Non-Participating Athlete of the Year" award for 2021. This award is only given to those who, in the past, have shown excellence in disappointing the American public for dropping out of competition and "putting themselves first, ahead of country" for personal reasons.

Winners never quit and Time magazine winners never participate in anything difficult. And because they cannot win if they are not competing, Time is not going to allow that little factoid stand in the way of their winning.

Biles disappointed the American Olympic Gymnastics Team by dropping out of competition at the summer Olympic Games. She said that she wasn't sufficiently focused mentally on her routine and could have hurt herself had she competed in her mentally frail condition. That's sad and it definitely allows her to be put into a victim's status, which is praised by devout leftists.

Time explained that those old-fashioned views about athletes achieving excellence in their sports had nothing to do with its decision to award Biles the non-participation award. Their philosophy is, if we can award kids with a participation trophy, why not award grownups with a non-participation trophy?

Alice Park and Sean Gregory of Time wrote:

“An athlete’s clout is increasingly measured in much more than wins and losses. If 2020 showcased the power of athletes as activists after the murder of George Floyd, this year demonstrated how athletes are uniquely positioned to propel mental health to the forefront of a broader cultural conversation.” 

So now I understand why Biles got the award. She's an activist and George Floyd was a thug.  

“Not only did I get to use my voice, but it was validated as well,” Biles told the leftist rag.

Athletics used to be about, you know, athletics. People competed in an athletic competition and the better athlete won the event. Now it isn't about winning events--it's about your politics. And the public bought into that nonsense. It's like awarding a Nobel Peace Prize to a president who had been in office only a few months, never did anything to foster peace anywhere, but was in the correct political party to get the now meaningless award. The person whose name I'm thinking about rhymes with 'bedrock pajama.'

Time's selection for "Suicide Bomber of the Year"

Before she quit, Biles said that quitting was the last thing she would ever do, but it seems as if she's still doing stuff.

“If I were going to quit, I had other opportunities to quit,” she said. “There is so much I’ve gone through in this sport, and I should have quit over all that — not at the Olympics. It makes no sense.”

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

So in the spirit of the "Non-Participating Athlete of the Year Award" of 2021, there can be no better candidate than Simone Biles. She is the one former athlete who can make her quitting an issue about racism and body image, rather than, you know, quitting on the team.

When Biles speaks, people compete anyway.

Tweet

CNN's Acosta dubbed "Fake News Guru"

CNN's annoyingly rude Jim Acosta was the target of conservative angry bird tweets on Twitter after he accused the President of holding a "fake news conference." Afterward, he vomited some "fake news" of his own when he pedantically claimed that President Trump misstated the number of intelligence agencies that came to the conclusion Russia was involved with meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump took questions from MSNBC and The Daily Mail in a joint news conference with President Andrzej Duda (duda) in Poland. 

Acosta wasn't pleased.

"Trump finally held a news conference overseas. But he took a question from a friendly reporter [and Barack Obama never did] and then attacked CNN as 'fake news.'" Acosta tweeted, using his pinky to hit 'Send.' He went on, "Isn't it a 'fake news conference' to take a question from a reporter who is essentially an ally of the White House?" [Because Barack Obama had no allies in the news media.]

Acosta was probably referring to The Daily Mail's U.S. political editor David Martosko, a journalist who was possibly being considered for Trump's communication department but pulled out of the running.

Of course, right-wing social media folks went after the CNN "journalist's" sarcastic tweets, saying that the Obama Administration was inundated with friendly reporters who thought Obama could do no wrong and that he often called on friendly journalists.

Some even helped him without his ever asking--Candy Crowley comes to mind.

Donald Trump Jr. even got into the act, tweeting: "So by that logic, was every news conference for the last 8 years #fakenews Jim?"

Steve Deace, a conservative radio host tweeted: "Jim, over two dozen 'journalists' went to work in the Obama WH, including the former WH spokesman."

There's no doubt that 'journalists' tend to be liberal--more than 9 out of 10 vote Democrat and donate to the Democratic Party. 

There is also no doubt that Obama's press conferences could have been used as campaign ads for his party and the questions he often got were powderpuff softballs.

An Atlantic article in 2013 noted Time managing editor Rick Stengel was "at least the 24th journalist to work for the Obama Administration." 

Obama's White House Press Secretary Jay Carney also worked for Time as the Washington Bureau Chief.

While on CNN's "New Day" after Trump's joint news conference Thursday, Jimbo repeated the "fake news" schtick to describe an answer Trump gave to a question about Russian meddling in the election.

"The other thing that was 'fake news' coming from President Trump is when he said, 'Well, I keep hearing it's 17 intelligence agencies that say Russia meddled in the election; I think it's only three or four,'" Acosta said. "Where does this 'three or four' number come from? My suspicion . . . is that if we go to the administration and ask them for this question, I'm not so sure we're going to get an answer." 

Here's the answer, Jimmy: The New York Times, and other media outlets, reported for months that "17 American intelligence agencies" agreed Russia orchestrated cyber-attacks before the election. BUT ON JUNE 28, THE NEW YORK TIMES ISSUED A CORRECTION. 

The Times noted "the assessment was made by four intelligence agencies--the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency.

Of course, The Times put the correction at the bottom of the page where only people with OCD would see it.

Certainly not Jimmy A.



Tweet