Ukrainian woman suspect in Monaco parcel bomb shot dead in Kyiv

Anastasiia Berezovska

Anastasiia Berezovska, is the 39-year-old Ukrainian woman suspected of planting the parcel bomb in Monaco on June 29, 2026. Unfortunately for her, she was found shot dead near Kyiv.

Some of you might not remember or know about the Monaco Bombing so I will provide the facts as we know them.

A shrapnel-packed explosive device detonated in the entrance hall of an apartment building in Monaco, seriously injuring Ukrainian-born businessman Vadym Yermolaiev (a sanctioned oligarch with reported Russia ties), his partner, and their son. Authorities described it as a targeted attack. Berezovska was seen on surveillance disguising herself as a man (heavily built, dark long-sleeved top, light shorts, black bucket hat). She fled the scene on foot, then by car to Germany.Monaco prosecutors and Interpol issued a Red Notice for her on charges including attempted murder, placing an explosive device in a public place with criminal intent, and criminal conspiracy. She was Ukrainian, spoke German, and had a tattoo. German police raided a flat linked to her.

Her body was discovered by Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) and the Prosecutor General’s Office on July 6 - 7. She suffered from gunshot wounds to the head where pistol cartridges were on the ground nearby outside Kyiv.  She had been buried and the site with torture tools was also discovered.

A serving Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR/GUR) officer confessed to killing her, along with a former law enforcement officer, who also took the law into his own hands. The officer admitted he acted on his own initiative, without informing superiors, and had prior contacts with Berezovska (including money transfers). 

The two men were detained.

No confirmed motive or direct link has been publicly established between Berezovska’s killing and the Monaco bombing’s organizers. Ukrainian officials emphasize the intelligence officer acted independently. Speculation (unconfirmed in official statements) includes possible Ukrainian intelligence ties to the original attack, given Yermolaiev’s profile and the rapid cross-border developments.

The case raises questions about internal Ukrainian dynamics and risks to sanctioned figures abroad.The bombing obviously shocked Monaco, a hub for wealthy Ukrainians and Russians and fast cars.

This remains an active investigation with cross-border elements (Monaco, Ukraine, Germany, Interpol). 

Details could evolve as more evidence emerges. 

[Sources include: BBC, Reuters, CNN, AP.]

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

BBC is sorry for 'misleading' editing of J6 Trump speech: apologizes vociferously

Oh, the humanity. Or should I say, the BBC-ity? 

The once-mighty British Broadcasting Corporation, that bastion of impartiality (stop laughing), has slunk into a full-throated apology to President Donald Trump after one of their dusty old documentaries got caught with its pants down in a blatant case of video voodoo. You know, the kind where they stitch together clips like a mad tailor on a bender to make the Orange Man look like he's auditioning for a sequel to The Purge.

It all stems from a 2024 Panorama special titled "Trump: A Second Chance?"  And let's face it, nothing says "second chance" like dredging up January 6th a week before the election to remind everyone why you hate the guy. Trump's legal eagles spotted the hack job and fired off a salvo, calling the clip "defamatory and false." It took Trump's actual words, calm as a sloth on tranquilizers, to then splice them together with "fight like hell" rhetoric to paint him as the pied piper of pitchforks. 

Classic media malfeasance, served with a side of crumpets.

In the reality of unedited glory, PresidentTrump said: "We’re going to walk down,  and I'll be there with you. … We're going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave Senators and Congressmen and women," before adding: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

But in the BBC's funhouse mirror version it becomes: "We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell you're not gonna have a country anymore." They didn't just edit; they Frankensteined three clips, yanking one from nearly an hour later like it was all one seamless call to arms. Subtle as a sledgehammer.

Enter Michael Prescott, the ex-independent watchdog for the BBC's Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee (EGSC), because nothing screams "trust us" like acronyms that sound like rejected Bond villains. He dropped a 19-page takedown, concluding that "in the worst-case scenario, it does appear to be an attempt to influence the election," though he charitably noted it's unlikely many Yanks tuned in before voting day. (Pro tip to Beeb: If you're meddling in American politics, at least make it binge-worthy.)

Trump, never one to suffer fools or fuzzy edits gladly, rattled the saber with a $1 billion lawsuit threat unless they yanked the doc and groveled. His attorney, Alejandro Brito, fired off the missive: a demand for a "full and fair retraction of the documentary and any other false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading, and inflammatory statements about President Trump," plus an apology, compensation, and a hard deadline of 5:00 p.m. EST on Friday, November 14th.

CNN, in a rare moment of not being the story, reported on it Monday. "Overwhelming financial and reputational harm," the lawyers warned, because nothing says "libel" like turning a taxpayer-funded outfit into Trump's personal piñata.

The fallout? Two BBC bigwigs, Director-General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness, bailed on Sunday, presumably to polish their résumés for openings at MSNBC. 

The BBC's mea culpa dropped Thursday: "The BBC acknowledged that their edit unintentionally created the impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

Not an accident.

And get this: BBC chair Samir Shah penned a personal "sorry-not-sorry" to the White House on Sunday, vowing no rebroadcasts. A spokesperson added the fine print: "While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim."

Balderdash, BBC. It was obviously intentional--you don't edit by cutting out the middle and make it sounds like Trump was calling for a civil war.

What the BBC was saying was: "We goofed, but sue us and we'll see you in court, cheerio!" Even the Brits are in a tizzy. Labor MP Lisa Nandy defended the Beeb in Parliament, cooing: "It is by far the most widely used and trusted source of news in the United Kingdom. At a time when the lines are being dangerously blurred between fact and opinion, news and polemic, the BBC stands apart." (Said the woman from the party that thinks "trust" is a four-letter word.)

Meanwhile, furious callers jammed a BBC radio show, one bellowing: "If we have to pay a penny to Trump, then I'm sorry, I'm not going to pay my TV license. The world just seems to be frightened of him. I think the BBC needs to stand up to him."

Frightened? Sweet-cheeks, the BBC just learned what happens when you poke the Trump bear with a rusty editing bayonet. In the end, this is peak establishment panic: a global media giant reduced to whimpering apologies because they couldn't resist one last swing at the man who refuses to stay down. 

Trump needs to see this one out to the end and sue.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Oxford Union Prez Booted for Giggling Over Charlie Kirk's "Assassination." His Meltdown? Chef's Kiss.

If there's one thing the perpetually offended brigade can't do, it's tie their own shoelaces without tripping into a full-blown existential crisis. Over in jolly old England, where the tea's hot but the takes are ice-cold the brain trust at the Oxford Union just got rid of their president-elect, George Abaraonye, faster than you can say "Brexit regret." The genius decided to laugh his way through what he thought was Charlie Kirk catching a bullet on September 10. 

See, after the dust-up, Abaraonye, ever the bold strategist, rammed through a no-confidence vote to clear his name. Big brain move, except for the fact it backfired like a faulty firework at a Guy Fawkes bash. The membership didn't just vote him out; they steamrolled him with a two-thirds supermajority. And when the ballots dropped, our boy didn't take the L gracefully. He went full 2020 election denial mode, screaming "voter fraud!" from the rooftops. You can't script this level of self-own (hat tip to the BBC for the deets):

The president-elect of the Oxford Union has lost a no-confidence vote after he was criticised for comments appearing to celebrate the death of Charlie Kirk.The motion against George Abaraonye had met the required two-thirds threshold to oust the student from his position, the society has announced.It comes after Mr Abaraonye reportedly posted on social media to seemingly welcome the attack on the US conservative activist in September.Mr Abaraonye is disputing the no-confidence vote, telling the BBC people campaigning to oust him had "unsupervised access" to the email account collecting proxy ballots.According to the Telegraph, Mr Abaraonye posted a message on Instagram which read "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - an elongated version of the phrase 'lol' which means 'laughing out loud'.He is also said to have posted in a WhatsApp chat with fellow students appearing to welcome the incident.Last week, Mr Abaraonye said he had submitted the motion of no confidence in himself, with voting taking place over the weekend.A notice published by extraordinary returning officer Donovan Lock on Tuesday said 1,228 ballots were cast in favour of no confidence, while 501 were against.

"Charlie Kirk got shot loool." I mean, come on, that's not commentary; that's the digital equivalent of cackling at a funeral while wearing a "Thoughts and Prayers" t-shirt ironically. And then, when the Union turns on him like a pack of caffeinated midgets, he pivots to conspiracy theories about "unsupervised access" to emails? Dude, you're at Oxford. If you can't rig a student poll without getting caught, maybe stick to crumpets and call it a day.

This is peak elite hypocrisy: Trash-talk a conservative icon's brush with death (or whatever fever dream they cooked up), then play the victim when the mob you helped radicalize comes for you. Abaraonye's out, the Union's probably drafting a safe-space memo as we speak, and somewhere in heaven, Charlie Kirk's raising a glass to another win by default. 

Moral of the story? Don't poke the bear unless you want to end up as the punchline. Cheers to that, lads.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Hamas is sabotaging hostage deal negotiations to pressure Israeli public

The sordid spectacle of hostage negotiations in Doha has descended into a grim charade, with Hamas once again revealing its true face as a malevolent saboteur of peace. Israel, in good faith, has accepted a Qatari-proposed deal rooted in the Witkoff outline, a framework that, while imperfect, offers a glimmer of hope for the release of captives languishing in Gaza’s hellish confines. Yet Hamas, with its customary cynicism, has slammed the door shut. 

A senior official from the Prime Minister’s Office laid bare the terrorist group’s tactics: "Hamas rejected the Qatari proposal, is creating obstacles, refuses to compromise, and accompanies the talks with psychological warfare aimed at sabotaging the negotiations."

Let's pause to consider the grotesque irony. While families of the hostages,  those anguished souls whose loved ones are held by Hamas’s barbaric grip, protest outside the US Embassy in Tel Aviv, Hamas plays its cruel game of brinkmanship. On July 7, 2025, these families stood in the sweltering heat, their cries for justice captured by Erik Marmor’s lens, a haunting tableau of human suffering. Yet Hamas, unmoved, persists in its intransigence, wielding psychological torment as a weapon to fracture Israeli resolve.

Israel, by contrast, has shown a willingness to bend, however reluctantly, in the name of progress. 

The senior official in Netanyahu’s office was clear: "Israel has shown willingness for flexibility in the negotiations, while Hamas remains steadfast in its refusal, holding positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement." 

Talks in Doha, held even through the Sabbath with mediators from Egypt and Qatar, have been met with Hamas’s stonewalling. The group’s rejection of Israel’s updated proposal, offered late on Wednesday, with concessions on IDF deployments from the Morag Corridor to the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border, underscores its contempt for any meaningful resolution.

Palestinian officials, speaking to the anti-Israel BBC, have the gall to claim that the talks teeter on collapse because of Israel’s supposed bad faith. They accuse Netanyahu of sending a delegation to Doha without decision-making authority, a move they allege is a stalling tactic as he prepares to visit Washington. One can almost hear the sanctimonious tutting from Ramallah. 

Yet the reality is stark: Hamas’s demands unfettered aid flows through UN agencies, a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces, and "genuine guarantees" for a permanent ceasefire, are not merely sticking points but deliberate roadblocks. They insist on controlling the distribution of aid, rejecting Israel’s proposal to channel it through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. 

The result is a stalemate, as one source told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday: "We thought things would move faster due to American and Qatari pressure. At least a few more days of negotiations will be needed."

The deal itself, as it stands, is a painful compromise for Israel. It offers the release of 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others over a 60-day ceasefire, in exchange for an agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners, released without fanfare or public ceremonies. Fifty hostages remain in Gaza. Twenty of them are probably still alive, 30 reduced to mere remains. Each day of delay is a fresh wound for their families, a fact Hamas exploits with chilling precision.

Hamas’s strategy is as clear as it is depraved: to wring concessions from Israel while offering nothing but defiance in return. Their "psychological warfare," as the PMO official rightly termed it, is designed not to secure peace but to deepen division, to inflame tensions, to hold the Israeli public hostage to their caprice. 

And yet, the world’s outrage remains curiously muted. Where are the thundering editorials, the impassioned UN resolutions, the global protests decrying Hamas’s cruelty? The silence is deafening, and it speaks volumes about the moral bankruptcy of those who claim to champion justice.

Israel, for its part, presses on, navigating a treacherous path between principle and pragmatism. The deployment of IDF troops during the proposed ceasefire remains a point of contention, as does the broader question of security in a region where trust is a luxury long extinguished. 

Hamas’s rejection of Israel’s second proposal, which offered increased flexibility on troop presence, only confirms what many have long known: this is not a group interested in peace, but one addicted to the perpetuation of conflict. As the talks falter, the world watches, and the hostages wait. The question is not whether Hamas will compromise, but whether the international community will ever hold them to account for their monstrous intransigence.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

India strikes back on Pakistan after the latter's terror attack

Let us confront the grim spectacle unfolding between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed adversaries locked in a perilous dance of retaliation and recrimination. 

On Tuesday, India unleashed a barrage of airstrikes across Pakistan and its controlled territories, a move that has sent shockwaves through an already fractious region. The Indian military, with characteristic audacity, claims it targeted nine sites where, as the BBC reports, “terrorist attacks against India have been planned and directed.” 

Pakistan, predictably, scoffs at this, asserting that India’s bombs fell not on shadowy terror camps but on civilian soil, claiming the lives of two children, according to its military’s account.

The Indian embassy in Washington, with a tone of righteous indignation, dubs this Operation Sindoor, a direct riposte to a heinous terror attack on April 22 in Jammu & Kashmir that left 26 civilians dead. [A sindoor is the red dot worn by married Indian women and the operation was named to honor the Hindu men who were slaughtered by the Muslim Pakistani terrorists.] 

India points the finger squarely at Pakistan, alleging that some of the terrorists—vile opportunists who singled out Hindus—hailed from across the border. This atrocity, coincidentally or not, erupted as Vice President JD Vance was in India, shaking hands with Prime Minister Narendra Modi over a four-day diplomatic jaunt.

What followed was a grimly familiar escalation: cross-border gunfire, the scrapping of a river water-sharing treaty, and a war of words that threatens to spiral into something far deadlier. India’s embassy, in a statement dripping with conviction, declares it has “credible leads, technical inputs, testimony of the survivors and other evidence pointing towards the clear involvement of Pakistan-based terrorists in this attack.” The strikes, it insists, were “focused and precise,” a surgical effort to excise the cancer of terrorism. Yet, in a lamentable but unsurprising twist, India accuses Pakistan of “indulging in denial and making allegations of false flag operations against India” rather than rooting out the terrorist culprits.

And let us not forget, that Pakistan harbored Osama bin Laden, the model terrorist.

India maintains its strikes were a restrained affair, targeting “terror camps” while sparing Pakistani civilians, economy, or military. Pakistan, however, is having none of it. 

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, with the fervor of a man wronged, condemns the “cowardly attack” on five locations within his borders. “This heinous act of aggression will not go unpunished,” he thunders, vowing that “Pakistan reserves the absolute right to respond decisively to this unprovoked Indian attack — a resolute response is already underway.” 

The Pakistani people and their forces, Sharif assures, “are fully prepared to confront and defeat any threat with our strength and determination.” As if to underscore the point, Pakistan claims to have swatted two Indian jets and a drone from the sky, a boast India has yet to dignify with confirmation, per the BBC, but this turned out to be false and the photos they used were from a previous operation. 

And so, the cycle of vengeance churns. Pakistan’s artillery roars across the border into India-administered Kashmir, a retort to what Sharif calls India’s treachery. “The enemy will never be allowed to achieve its malicious aims,” his statement concludes, a rallying cry for a nation on edge.

What is clear, Pakistan has attacked India's civilian population, much like Hamas did in Israel. And India is returning hostilities in a pin-point response, as Israel did with Hamas.

Across the Atlantic, President Trump calls the strikes “a shame.” 

Freshly briefed as he strode into the Oval Office, he muses, “I just hope it ends very quickly.” A sentiment echoed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, doubling as National Security Advisor, who received a briefing from India’s Ajit Doval on Wednesday. 

Rubio, monitoring the crisis with a wary eye, urges a swift de-escalation and pledges to “engage both Indian and Pakistani leadership towards a peaceful resolution.” The United Nations, through a spokesperson for Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, wrings its hands, expressing “very concerned” murmurs and pleading for “maximum military restraint,” as the BBC notes.

Here we stand, on the precipice of catastrophe, watching two nations armed to the teeth with nuclear arsenals trade blows and bravado. The stakes could not be higher, nor the margin for error slimmer. One can only hope that cooler heads prevail before rhetoric and rockets ignite a conflagration none can control.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call. 

Tweet

BBC blasted for Jew hatred and vows to wipe out all Jews

Samer Elzaenen

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

                                          Martin Niemöller

The BBC [British Bashing Creeps] has revealed itself to be something we Jews knew for a long time before they showed their red hands. They are no longer shown to be simply against Britain, much like CNN and MSNBC are against the US, but now it's clear they are against the Jews.

The BBC recently filmed a pseudo documentary in Gaza that was clearly coordinated and staged, while all who appeared in it were directly or indirectly linked to Hamas. It was definitely a propaganda piece and it got a ton of backlash.

You'd think they'd have learned.

One so called 'reporter' Samer Elzaenen, had appeared over a dozen times on BBC. So British taxpayers are funding an outlet that is part of the IRGC.

In July Elzaenen said, and I paraphrase, that whenever things go wrong, just shoot the Jews and that fixes everything. 

He has also repeatedly said over the years that "[My] message to Jews: we are going to take our land back; we love death for Allah's sake, the same way you love life. We shall burn you like Hitler did, but this time we won't have a single one of you left."

And he works for the BBC. I guess he passed a background check.

This, of course is not an isolated situation. There have been a number of other BBC contributors who were guilty of outright anti-Semitic rhetoric. Dawn Queva was a scheduling coordinator at BBC Three and was canned in 2024 after writing anti-Semitic posts on Facebook.

But it goes back farther. In 2014, Tala Halawa, a BBC reporter covering the Israeli-Palestinian war, was criticized in 2021 for tweets that included such crap as: #Hitler was right" and "Zionists can't get enough of our blood."

Another reporter, Tim Willcox, faced backlash in 2015 for an anti-Semitic comment at a Paris unity rally interview when he suggested Palestinians suffer "at Jewish hands," and for implying Jewish voters oppose a tax due to financial reasons.

Nimesh Thaker, a BBC World News journalist was investigated in 2020 for allegedly using an anonymous Twitter account to troll Jewish presenter Emma Barnett with anti-Semitic attacks.

Sally Nabil, a BBC Arabic service journalist, was outed in 2024 for liking tweets supporting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and endorsing Hamas. This included a tweet about Jews buying land in Northern Cyprus to "seize" it for Israel. 

And more recently, Ahmed Alagha, a BBC Arabic contributor, was reported this year for social media posts referring to Jews as "devils" and Israelis "worse than beasts."

The BBC cannot suck enough.

Where is Queers for Palestine when the BBC needs them?

For Islam, the Jews are the first target; but Israel is definitely not the last. They are the starter menu for a world caliphate. 

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Hamas claims it lost contact with those holding Edan Alexander hostage

In a grim dispatch from the mire of Gaza, Hamas’s al-Qassam Brigades, through their mouthpiece Abu Obeida, declared on Tuesday that they’ve lost touch with the cell holding American-Israeli hostage Edan Alexander. A direct Israeli strike, they claim, hit the location. 

“We announce that we have lost contact with the team guarding soldier Edan Alexander following a direct Israeli bombardment targeting their location. We are still trying to reach them,” Obeida intoned, his words carrying the weight of a calculated lament.

Not content with mere statements, Hamas escalated their psychological warfare, releasing a propaganda video that same day, snarling, “Be prepared, soon your children will return in black coffins.” 

The threat, draped in menace, is a powerful reminder of Hamas' intent to sow dread beyond the battlefield.

This comes as no surprise, for earlier that Tuesday, Hamas reportedly scoffed at Israel’s offer of a six-week ceasefire, according to the anti-Zionist BBC. 

A Palestinian official, speaking to the British outlet, revealed the proposal’s fatal flaw: it omitted any mention of ending the war or withdrawing Israeli troops from Gaza—Hamas’s non-negotiable demands for releasing half the remaining living hostages. The rejection underscores the chasm between the parties, where even a pause in carnage is held hostage to absolutist terms.

Then there’s the matter of Edan Alexander himself, thrust into the spotlight by a Hamas video released just before Passover began in Israel on Saturday. This was no act of charity but a calculated move in their campaign of terror. A teaser had preceded it, with the chilling captions “Soon” and “Time is running out,” priming their audience for maximum dread. 

In the video, Alexander, visibly broken, accuses the Israeli government and American administration of “deserting” him in Gaza. “I am collapsing physically and mentally,” he says, his voice a raw wound, and clearly compromised by his captors. 

“Tell me why. Why am I not at home? Why am I filming my second video? Why?” The questions hang unanswered, a indictment of both Hamas’s cruelty and the impasse that keeps him captive.

This is how Hamas operates: a blend of violence, manipulation, and despair, played out against a backdrop of unrelenting conflict. Their actions reveal not just a disregard for life but a perverse delight in twisting the knife all while playing the victim.

Loving the blog? Toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee if you’re feeling generous – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure.

Tweet

USAID bribed Time Magazine with $4 million to name Zelenskyy "Person of the Year"

As Elon Musk's team known as DOGE sniffs out the rot in government, it has been discovered that USAID paid Time magazine $4,000,000 to name Volodymyr Zelenskyy "Person of the Year." This might be surprising to some people as Ukraine's leader isn't gay or a transgender, but should we really be surprised?

Is there any media outlet on the left that wasn't on USAID's payroll?

If it weren’t for Trump and DOGE, most people would still have no idea how much money the… pic.twitter.com/lYz8hFuykX

— Johnny Midnight ⚡️ (@its_The_Dr)

Thankfully, DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) has put the rot in the sunlight where people can now see it for themselves. Had they not, we taxpayers would never know how much our government wastes.

BBC,CBS, TIME, and Politico, are just some of the media that got paid for telling us what to think.

Tweet

BBC sucked up to who? A Hamas sympathizer?

The BBC praised a "highly respected" extremist imam, who supports the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the so called Palestinian cause.

During a weekend interview on BBC Radio London, Imam Haitham al-Haddad—a British Muslim television personality and Islamic scholar of Palestinian origin—was introduced as a "highly respected" figure. However, al-Haddad's history of making extreme and controversial statements, particularly about Israel and Jews, has raised significant concerns within the Israeli community and beyond.

Can I get an "Allahu akbar!"

Al-Haddad's appearance on BBC was initially published by The Telegraph. He has a PhD from School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, and is on the boards of several Islamic groups in the UK, including the Islamic Sharia Council, has a history of making controversial, inflammatory, and rather disgusting comments.

On October 7, 2023, when 1,200 Israelis were brutally killed and hundreds were kidnapped, the hateful imam posted on Facebook in support of the Palestinian cause. "O Allah, support the people of truth in Gaza, AL-Qudus and Palestine- they have managed to cause confusion to the enemy's calculations with a new tactic. Grant them victory and aid them against their oppressors in their struggle for Justice and Truth."

Al-Haddad added, "The occupation has proven to be weaker than a spider's web." He then ended with a prayer for victory over the, you know, Jews, and the ending of Israel: "Allah will grant victory to those who grant Him victory."

If you bother to read Islamic scripture [if indeed books that preach Jewish and Christian hatred can be called scripture] you will be hard pressed to find anything about love for one's fellow man rather than one's required love of Allah and other Muslims, as well as their love of hating the Jews.

Al-Haddad's statement, widely seen as a prayer supporting Hamas's violent actions against Israel, stands in stark contrast to the BBC's depiction of him as a peacemaker. Evidently, the BBC doesn't want us to believe that he means what he says. Heck, it's only a prayer to their Allah to grant Muslims victory over the Jews and to end the Jewish State.

During the interview, although he primarily addressed the recent riots in the UK, he also voiced strong criticism of the media and politicians, accusing them of unfairly targeting the Muslim community. "When certain media outlets and politicians target Muslims, making the Muslim community a scapegoat, it fuels resentment," the Islamist said, adding that Muslims are often portrayed as "the enemies within."

Then what?

Tweet

3 Nations shamefully recognize Palestine

So-called Palestinians prepare to go kill, you know, the Jews!

Ireland, Norway and Spain are preparing to recognize the make believe place called Palestine, they announced on Wednesday. The date of recognition of the terrorist state is set for May 28. The claim to have hope that this will pave the way for a ceasefire and allow the Hamassholes a victory against Israel.

Norway's anti-Semites were the first to announce their support of the terrorists in a coordinated move with the other two anti-Semitic nation leaders.

Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre claimed in an address that the endorsement of the terrorists was "in support of moderate forces that are on a retreating front in a protracted and cruel conflict." 

"This is an investment in the only solution that can bring lasting peace in the Middle East," the naive idiot added, referring to the so-called "two state solution" which would see an Israeli and a Palestinian state existing peacefully next to each other. 

And if you believe that can happen, you aren't paying attention to what Hamas has promised, which is to attack Israel, not ten more times or a hundred, but ten thousand times. There can be no coexistence with Hamas in charge, and the Gazans aren't so great either when it comes to their feelings about Jewish people.

Ireland and Spain followed suit soon after Støre's announcement.

"Today, we state clearly our unambiguous support for the equal right to security, dignity, and self-determination for the Palestinian and Israeli peoples," Irish Foreign Minister, Micheál Martin, said, tongue-in-cheek.

If Hamas wanted security they would not have slaughtered 1,200 Israeli men, women and children on October 7th. 

The country's Prime Minister, Simon Harris, later stressed that "Hamas is not the Palestinian people," in spite of the fact that they voted for them and many participated in the slaughter of the Jews. 

"Today's decision to recognize Palestine is taken to help create a peaceful future," he said, with a straight face.

Mr Harris's comments were echoed by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who said the move was "not against Israel, is not against the Jews," although if all the Jews in Israel were slaughtered, one has to wonder what Sanchez would say.

"It is not in favor of Hamas which is something that has been said. This recognition is not against anyone, it is in favor of peace and coexistence." as reported by the BBC.

In response, Israel immediately called on its ambassadors in the nations to return.

"I’m sending a clear and unequivocal message to Ireland and Norway: Israel will not remain silent in the face of those undermining its sovereignty and endangering its security," Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said. "Today’s decision sends a message to the Palestinians and the world: Terrorism pays. After the Hamas terror organization carried out the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, after committing heinous sexual crimes witnessed by the world, these countries chose to reward Hamas and Iran by recognizing a Palestinian state. This distorted step by these countries is an injustice to the memory of the victims of [10/7], a blow to efforts to return the 128 hostages, and a boost to Hamas and Iran's jihadists, which undermines the chance for peace and questions Israel’s right to self-defense. Israel will not remain silent - there will be further severe consequences."

Katz also said the ambassadors from the three countries in Israel will be given "reprimand talks" and shown footage from the Oct. 7 attack, according to BBC.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority celebrated the move by Norway, Spain, and Ireland, which was denounced by those on the left and right in the U.S. except for the Democrats in the so called Squad, who support Hamas in their efforts to free the world of those, you know, Jews.

Tweet

BBC fires raging anti-Semitic, anti-white proud racist

Dawn Queva: racist, anti-Semite, all around hater

The BBC finally got around to firing an employee who wrote a series of antisemitic Facebook posts that included calling Jewish people “Nazi apartheid parasites” who funded a “holohoax” no longer works for the news corporation. [H/T New York Post.] Now all they need to do is to stop broadcasting anti-Semitic lies.

Dawn Queva, a senior employee of the BBC Three who could not stop writing antisemitic Facebook posts since the October 7 massacre by Hamas, is no longer working for the network. Perhaps Al Jazeera will find her material to their liking. She had been a senior scheduling coordinator and playout planner at BBC Three.

Queva’s posts also attacked white people, calling them a “virus” and “mutant invader species" which were shared with her employer last week amid calls for her removal from the organization, which confirmed her exit to UK media outlet The Telegraph on Monday.

“The individual concerned is no longer employed by the BBC,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement, referring to Dawn Queva, who was not mentioned by name in order not to hurt her chances at getting a new gig for a different Hamas propaganda outlet.

Queva has since deleted her profile under the name Dawn Las Quevas-Allen. While she apparently went all out Nazi after Oct. 7, her social media posts actually go back almost ten years, according to screenshots by Deadline, which first reported the situation.

In one of her racist rants, Queva called Jewish people “Nazi apartheid parasites” and accused them of funding a “holohoax.” True antisemitic scumbags like to call Jewish people "Nazis" because of what the Nazis did to them in the Second World War, knowing how it makes them feel.

She also referred to Israel as “Israhell,” in a 2014 post and made several other updates criticizing Israel and Zionism. 

It's highly likely she had never been to Israel nor had a followup trip to Gaza or any other Middle East Islamic country. She might have learned the difference of how women and gays are treated in Israel versus the other countries. And if she is a non-Muslim woman, she might get a different view of the Middle East from that perspective.

“The Zionist genocidal land squatting so called Jew’ irrespective of the fact that The UKKK and Amerikkka gave away land they had no god given right to a people who have no god given right to,” Queva wrote in one post, according to screenshots shared by Deadline.

How can Israel be a 'genocide land' if the Palestinian population has grown over the last decades while the Jewish population in all Islamic countries has gone to almost zero? Duh.

Queva — who once worked for A+E Networks, UKTV and Disney — incessantly, and rather psychotically, denigrated white people, whom she deemed a “virus” and a “mutant invader species.”

Several of her posts refer to Great Britain as the “UKKK,” in reference to the Ku Klux Klan and in another she wrote that white people were a “barbaric bloodthirsty rapacious murderous genocidal thieving parasitical deviant breed.” 

She obviously hasn't seen the October 7 video Hamas gleefully put out of their massacre of Israeli men, women, and children. Or if she had, somehow believes the Jews deserved it.

There have also been recent reports that 22 employees at the national broadcaster have filed complaints about antisemitism in the workplace, the Telegraph added.

The woman is clearly mentally ill and has no business outside a mental institution.

Tweet

A Boeing 737 turns back mid-flight due to cockpit window crack

Japan's All Nipon Airway 737-800 carrying 59 passengers and six crew had to turn back mid-flight after a crack developed in the cockpit window, where Safelite Repair had no access.

The passenger jet returned to Sapporo-New Chitose Airport once the crack was discovered--it was originally heading to Toyama Airport

The crack was found in the most outward of four cockpit windows, but it wasn't clear whether it was the pilot side or first officer side of the plane, although that really makes no difference.

This latest incident comes at a time when airlines emphasizing Diversity Equity and Inclusion [DEI] among staff face closer scrutiny over safety concerns amid an uptick in crashes and malfunctions. Everyone is scratching their collective heads over the matter. What could it be?

“The crack was not something that affected the flight’s control or pressurization,” an airline spokesperson said, unless it developed into a wider crack and the window eventually blew out completely sucking out the pilot and first officer into the clouds. 

Aviation expert John Strickland said the crack may have been caused by the plane hitting a bird or also could have been a stress fracture. Had it happened at the airport one might blame it on protestors, for whatever the protest of the day happened to be.

“These things do sometimes happen, something may have struck the window, for example a bird, a large hailstone, it’s not unheard of,” he told the BBC. “You might occasionally get a stress fracture too, from wear and tear.”

The incident comes less than two weeks after a plane crashed into a Coast Guard plane on the runway in Tokyo, Japan and burst into flames. Fortunately, the 379 passengers and crew on board escaped with their lives while five of the six people in the Coast Guard plane were killed.

And then there's us. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration is investigating Boeing after a piece of plane belonging to Alaska Airlines was blown out mid flight causing emergency depressurization. It had to make an emergency landing in Oregon, with the more than 170 passengers. That happened on a Boeing 737 Max 9. In that event, a child's shirt was sucked out into the clouds without the child in attendance.

As a result, the FAA has temporarily grounded all Boeing 737 Max 9 planes and called for more stringent safety inspections. Boeing said it will fully comply with the FAA’s investigation and will cooperate “transparently.” Because it has no choice if it wants to stay in business.

“Safety is our top priority and we deeply regret the impact this event has had on our customers and their passengers,” Boeing spokeswoman Jessica Kowal said in a statement. “We agree with and fully support the FAA’s decision to require immediate inspections of 737-9 airplanes with the same configuration as the affected airplane.”

Truthfully, air travel is incredibly safe, which is why any accident or emergency is newsworthy because it is so rare compared to automobile travel.

Tweet

Anonymous exposes 364K files on Russia's censorship of the invasion

A Ukrainian hacking group associated with Anonymous released 364,000 files Thursday from Roskomnadzor, the Russian agency that monitors and censors information by the media. The documents were generated as late as Saturday, this past weekend.

The documents show that Moscow censored everything that referred to Russia's military action as an invasion,  and in fact, some Russian citizens were totally unaware an invasion of Ukraine took place.

"Roskomnadzor has given instructions about what can be said and ordered media outlets to delete stories that call Russia's invasion of Ukraine an Invasion," Anonymous said in a message posted online.

Russia President Vladimir Putin signed a new law on March 4th that makes it a crime to report anything that goes against the government's narrative over that what Russia did was not an invasion of Ukraine, it was a "special military operation." It's almost as if Russia is taking its cues from our Big Tech companies.

The foreign news outlets decided they had to protect their reporters, including the Compromised News Network (CNN), which stopped live broadcasts from Russia. The BBC also suspended the reporting of its Russia correspondent. When the law was put in place, that day Putin blocked its citizens from going on Facebook but in spite of that, many Russian citizens have been using virtual private networks to bypass the government's censoring of real news.

In another online development, Meta (formerly known as Facebook) says that it temporarily made allowances for some violent speech on its platform, such as "death to the Russian invaders" that would normally violate its rules. But it will still prohibit violent speech against Russian civilians and keep Donald Trump from accessing the platform.

* * *

For more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

On Feb. 26, the Anonymous group announced on Twitter that it had successfully taken control of Russian streaming services and TV channels, replacing state-sponsored broadcasts with "the truth about what happens in Ukraine."

Anonymous also claimed credit for hacking Russia's Internet service providers as well as leaking content from a Belarusian weapons producer.

Anonymous warned in late February that it had declared a cyberwar against Russia for invading Ukraine and targeting civilian populations across the Eastern European nation.

Tweet

BBC finally dropped documentary that promotes sympathy for jihadist who murdered 16 innocent people

It took an action campaign begun by the father of a murdered victim of Islamic terror and anti-Semitic hatred. The campaign was waged against the BBC network with the help of Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) and United With Israel (UWI). The result was the BBC dropped the documentary that was sympathetic to the Palestinian scumcrumpet who planned the 2001suicide bombing of a Sbarro pizzaria in Jerusalem in which 15 people were murdered. 

She was not the suicide bomber, but sent someone to do her wet work.

The BBC’s Arabic show “Trending” had broadcast an item whose sole purpose was to give a voice and sympathetic exposure to terrorist Ahlam Tamimi. 

She planned and coordinated the suicide bombing that killed eight children, including an American-Israeli dual citizen, Malki Roth. the daughter of Frimet and Arnold Roth.

UWI asked its readers to support Mr. Roth, who worked with PMW to demand BBC remove the disgusting video championing the killer, and asked they also apologize.

“Together with PMW, and in the name of our murdered child, my wife and I call on BBC ‎management … BBC must immediately remove the videos from YouTube, and issue a ‎sincere public apology to the families of Tamimi’s victims whose memories BBC has ‎desecrated by promoting their murderer,” Roth stated. ‎

The campaign finally got through to the BBC management, and last week the public corporation pulled the video and offered an apology.

“Following an editorial review we found that this segment was in breach of our editorial guidelines and we removed the clip from our digital platforms last week. We accept that the segment should not have been shown and apologize for the offense caused,” a BBC spokesperson told the UK’s Jewish News with as much sincerity as Joe Biden on fracking.

PMW verified the removal of the interview and the link is now broken. Yet while the BBC published an apology on the London-based Jewish news site, they have not come out publicly to apologize, according to PMW.

Earlier this year, 18 major Jewish organizations called on the Trump Administration to put pressure on Jordan’s King Abdullah to extradite Tamimi to face murder charges in the U.S. for the death of Malki Roth, 15, and 31-year-old teacher Judith Hayman Greenbaum. An additional victim, a young mother who was also an American national, has remained comatose since the bombing.

Although sentenced to only 16 life terms, Tamimi was released as part of the 2011 prisoner release in exchange for hostage IDF soldier Gilad Shalit and moved to Jordan, where she hosts a talk show on a TV station affiliated with the Hamas terror group.

In a 2006 interview in prison, Tamimi said, “I’m not sorry for what I did. I will get out of prison and I refuse to recognize Israel’s existence.”

“The BBC’s apology does the world’s most influential broadcaster no honor at all. It does not even pretend to deal with the deeply troubling issues that make BBC Arabic’s October 8, 2020 ‘Trending’ program – in effect a tribute to the world’s most wanted female fugitive – so disturbing,” Roth said. “What’s certainly not changing yet is the incredible consensus among Jordanians that Tamimi is a hero, an inspiration, a role model.

“That the BBC has encouraged and played into this is unforgivable. It cannot be resolved with a fatuous apology,” he said.

She kills Jews, among them children and hosts a freaking tv show.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Islamic prayer is being broadcast on BBC local radio

Former President Barack Hussein Obama described the Muslim call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." Now the BBC Coventry and Warwickshire is giving local Muslims the same treat by airing broadcasts for Muslims stuck at home due to the Chinese Communist coronavirus. 

Buddhists, Hindus, Catholics and Jews will have to wing it.

The Islamic prayer broadcasts will become a weekly spot every Friday morning in the run up to Ramadan at the end of April, led by a different Muslim imam each week.

Dhimmie Chris Burns, head of BBC Local Radio, said:

“Many Muslims will feel a void in their lives where prayers used to be - a feeling the will be magnified as we [we?] approach Ramadan. 

“Local radio is all about connecting communities and we hope these weekly reflections will go some way to helping Muslims feel a sense of community while they are isolating."

Ending his broadcast, the imam said: "We pray that Allah almighty will give us the strength to replace pessimism with hope, loneliness with kindness and to show love to all his creations in these testing times."

BBC CWR presenter Phil Upton said: "Ramadan is just a few weeks away and I appreciate that for many that's a big void to fill with as many as one and a half hours of your day, especially in the evening, in Ramadan month, spent in your local mosque."

Yeah, well Easter is sooner than that, falling on April 12th,  and Passover begins on April 8th and goes until April 16th. Valsahki, Vishu and Baisakhi, Hindu holidays fall on April 14th. Theravada New Year for Buddhists, falls on April 9th, and I could go on.

But not all groups get special treatment it seems.

"With many local mosques being closed because of the coronavirus outbreak there's an overwhelming sadness with the loss of your spiritual connection that can be gained from congregational prayers, so we are trying to fill the void in some small way with Islamic reflections."

With most churches, synagogues and temples being closed because of coronavirus outbreak there's an overwhelming sadness with the loss of equal treatment by the BBC.

But at least a Christian service is also being broadcast on Sundays at 8am on all 39 BBC local radio stations nationally, but not one specifically for Catholics or Orthodox Greek or Russian.

A ban on mass gatherings is in place in response to the Chinese Communist coronavirus, along with social distancing measures, preventing group worship. 

When this will end, only G_d knows.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

ISIS scum admits to beheading female hiker in Morocco: 'I regret getting caught'

An ISIS jihadi supporter who admitted to leading a jihadist cell told the court that he regrets beheading one of two Scandinavian women in Morocco, especially now that he has been caught.

Abdessamad Ejjoud,  a religious 25-year-old Muslim terrorist, made confessed on Thursday in Morocco where he is on trial for the murders of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, 28, of Norway.

“I beheaded one of them…I regret it,” he told the BBC reported.

"After failing to join the Islamic State, [due to flat feet] we decided to do jihad at home," the 33-year-old crap weasel said, according to Sky News.

Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, and Maren Ueland, 28, were killed in ISIS-inspired attacks while backpacking in Morocco.

The two incredibly naive women, roommates at Norway’s Bo University, were on a Christmas camping trip in Morocco when they were killed Dec. 17, 2018. They were on an unguided trip and camping close to North Africa's highest mountain, Mount Toubkal.

A video of the beheading was shared widely on social media by ISIS supporters showing just how much the scum who committed these atrocities were regretful.

In Denmark, charges have been brought against 14 people who shared the video to get their vicarious rocks off.

Ejjoud and 23 others are on trial in connection with the killings. The killers will, unfortunately, not get the death penalty because Denmark believes in giving them another shot at not getting caught.

"After failing to join the Islamic State, we decided to do jihad at home," said Ejjoud, a total loser, liar and father of two future jihadis from Marrakesh.

Ejjoud admitted that he had beheaded one of the women: "I regret what happened and I am still trying to grasp it," the human garbage said.

He is trying to "grasp" the fact that he cut off the head of an innocent human being who did him or anyone no harm. A young beautiful person who did not deserve to be butchered by this POS.

Maybe the women were just too Islamophobic for him.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and don't be shy about visiting the ads on these pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

NZ mosque shooting suspect charged with murder

New Zealand -- The 28-year-old Australian national was facially expressionless as District Court Judge Paul Kellar read one charge of murder to him, and more will follow. After the charge was read the white supremacist POS was led out in handcuffs and was ordered to return to court on April 5th.

He did not enter a plea, according to Fox News, who said they would not name him but they actually did on camera.

During the appearance, the scumcrumpet allegedly flashed an “OK” white supremacist hand gesture, meaning "white power," during the court appearance.

The suspect’s face is not permitted to be seen in photos due to the country’s strict media laws. This seems to make more sense than our laws, which tend to name him and reveal his ideology and may incite other violent morons to copycat the terrorism.

After the weasel left, the judge said that while “there is one charge of murder brought at the moment, it is reasonable to assume that there will be others.”

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said “gun laws will change” in the country. Ardern said the evil guns used in the attack “appeared to have been modified.” The alleged gunman obtained a gun license in November 2017, and that's the real problem.

Not surprisingly, here in the U.S., the left blamed President Trump, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, the NRA, and even Chelsea Clinton for the shooting in New Zealand. The left never blames the person who actually did the shooting--in fact, those idiots often offers sanctuary to criminals. Also, the left tends to blame the weapons used in shootings and believe that banning them will stop the violence. Psychologists believe that this is due to the left's inability to view reality in a realistic manner, which would be reality.

New Zealand’s Attorney General David Parker said the country’s government would consider banning semiautomatic weapons, the BBC reported. The government also plans to allow only the blunderbuss and flintlocks to be used for hunting purposes. Knives with sharp blades and heavy stones [often used for carrying out sharia punishments] are also on the list of banned weapons as well as pin rollers, hammers, cricket bats, baseball bats, cars and trucks.

Butter knives and pebbles will not be banned in consideration for people who enjoy toast or have tropical fish, respectively.

Two other armed suspects were taken into custody, a man and a woman, while police tried to determine what role, if any, they played in the cold-blooded attack that shocked the world and is the deadliest shooting in the country’s modern history.

The suspect allegedly used a helmet-mounted camera to livestream the massacre at the Masjid [mosque] Al Noor in central Christchurch and allegedly posted a white nationalist manifesto online, which should be deleted to stifle the shooter's anonymity.

The New Zealand Herald reported Ardern’s office “received a copy of a manifesto from the alleged gunman less than 10 minutes before the attacks.” The media outlet reported “70 other recipients,” including media outlets, received the manifesto.

In the terrorist's rambling manifesto, he said he was not a member of any organization but had donated to and interacted with many nationalist groups, though he acted alone and no group ordered the attack. He said he chose New Zealand because of its location, to show that even the most remote parts of the world were not free of "mass immigration." Especially areas where the people he planned to shoot, would not be able to shoot back.

At one point, he exits the mosque to rearm before going back inside to shoot more people. Eventually, the coward flees as emergency vehicles can be heard approaching in the background.

Several more people were killed in an attack on the Linwood Masjid mosque, about three miles away from Masjid Al Noor a short time later. It was not immediately clear if the same person was responsible for both shootings.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Google 'idiot' get photos of Trump

Do you know if you Google the word "idiot" photos of the President of the United States, Donald Trump, comes up?

Democratic Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren pointed this out at the congressional hearing to the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai. The purpose of the hearing was to determine whether Google displays bias among the website searches. Take a guess.

Pichai explained to Congress (a body of individuals whose combined knowledge of computers adds up to that of a twelve-year-old child) why searching for 'idiot' turns up pictures of Trump.

“If you Google the word ‘idiot’ under images, a picture of Donald Trump comes up. I just did that. How would that happen?” Lofgren asked.

Pichai answered by explaining that Google’s searches are based on multiple factors that determine the end result. [See video below for the exchange.]

“We take the keyword and match it against their pages and rank them based on over 200 signals -- things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it,” he testified. “Based on that, at any given time, we try to rank and find the best search results for that query.”

Trump’s face also appears on Google image searches for “stupid” and “racist.”

Okay, that seems to make sense, although it's very disrespectful to the office of the president and can probably be controlled in a civil way if Google really tried harder.

I googled the word 'idiot' early in the morning and some interesting results came up:

1. "Google Image Search makes Trump the World's Top Idiot, but is it fair?"--South China Morning Post

2. "Google Hearing Sees 'Idiot' Trending"--BBC.com [There is a photo of Trump and he wasn't even at the hearing.]

3. "This is why you get Trump's image when you Google 'idiot'"--Nairobi News 

Then about thirty minutes later I googled the word again--here's what came up:

4. "His worst nightmares: Trump's life under a legal microscope"--CNN

5. "Reasons to Worry? Trump Endures Turbulent Week"--The Guardian

6. "Trump's Interior Chief to Step Down as Pressure Mounts from Ethics Inquiries"--Bloomberg

I now ask, how is this not bias results? The wording of the headline's first article is clearly anti-Trump and it literally calls him an idiot.

Number two's wording speaks about trends and couples the word 'idiot' with Trump's photo taking away any doubts that the president and the word go together.

Three is just disgusting.

After thirty minutes CNN was the top site to respond about Trump's woes when you google the word 'idiot.' What the president's problems are, and what the word 'idiot' have in common is unclear, but CNN will use any opportunity to attack him and his administration.

Think of the Honduran father whose 7-year-old child died of malnutrion and dehydration after the dangerous journey to illegally cross the Mexican-U.S. border. The media is blaming Trump, when it's obvious the father should be put behind bars for not feeding or giving water to his child. But blame the U.S. Border Patrol and by extension, Trump.

Looking at 5 and 6, all you see is negative press about Trump and the administration, both having nothing to do with the word 'idiot.' But Google says that relevance is one of the main criteria for how results are displayed, and there is no obvious relevance in these articles. It's just a way to attack Trump.

The mainstream media are the real idiots and Google is their partner.

You may not like everything President Trump says or does, but it's appalling the way he is treated by those with the power to communicate and influence.

Also, it's damn scary because it works.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Oldest British man to have the procedure discusses his voluntary genital mutilation

Four years ago, the oldest man in Britain had gone ahead and had his penis and testicles mutilated to accommodate the delusion that he's a woman, in spite of his X chromosome and his ability to produce sperm cells.

Fortunately for him, and to his surprise, the National Health Service [aka taxpayers] footed the bill for the mutilation--he is currently 85 years quite old.

Changing his name from James Rose to Ruth Rose, his doctor had finally told him he would be considered for the genital procedure which would mentally confirm his delusion. The "good news" elicited a throaty giggle from the dude.

British newspaper The Sun, interviewed him and he spoke of his joy over his mental illness and the surgery he was not required to pay for out of pocket or skirt.

Rose defended the £4,000 cost for the penile mutilation to make it resemble a labia. His defense was that he volunteered for charities that support the elderly and he sat on an NHS advisory board. In his mind, that should qualify him for taxpayer funded a genital "cut and tuck.""

He told the BBC, "It is only in the past 15 years that this has become acceptable. Before that people thought it was just for freaks."

He's wrong.

In reality, intelligent people did not think genital mutilation was for freaks, but for the mentally ill. Fifteen years ago people who wanted their genitals mutilated to accommodate their delusions were diagnosed with gender identity disorder. But that changed due to pressure placed on the National Institute of Mental Health by the LBGTQ etc., community.

Ruth had been living as a transvestite several years prior to his surgery. He had been an ex-Royal Air Force navigator, mechanical engineer and financial consultant. You would think with his last position he would have the knowledge to have saved up for his own surgical procedure, but perhaps he wasn't very good at it.

The guy was married but didn't tell his wife that he dressed like a woman, In 1973 she found pictures of him dressed that way and they divorced in 2003.

He waited until his retirement to come out as a transvestite but he said he wanted to be female at age nine. Sadly, once he was born male, that was "all she wrote."

[Pardon the pun.]


Please follow Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet