Target says sorry after firing woman over what was on her name tag

Fargo, ND -- A woman was fired from Target for wearing "Men Can Have Babies Too" on her name tag.

Just kidding--she was fired for having the words "trust in Jesus" below her name. If she had the former saying, I would likely not be writing this because she would have likely kept her job.

But now Target has issued an apology to Denise Kendrick, who was initially fired for "violating the company's dress code, according to KVLY. She said the firing came after a manager approached her about the tag.

“I replied, ‘Well, I’ve seen people with rainbows on theirs. I’m going to continue to wear this name tag,’ and then they said, ‘Well, you can’t work here anymore,’” she told the news outlet.

Ms. Kendrick said the manager refused to provide documentation explaining the reason for her firing. She also asked for a written statement as to why she was terminated, but she said the manager refused to provide it.

However, Kendrick said she was given a paper with a list of contact information regarding Target’s dress code policy.

“They gave me this paper with all these phone numbers on it and said, ‘If you have any questions about the violation of the dress code, just call one of these numbers.’ And he just kept repeating it, and we just kept going back and forth, and it was going nowhere,” she said.

Kendrick said on the day of her firing, she was wearing a plain red sweatshirt, jeans and her name tag...

However, after reviewing the incident, Target apologized and offered Kendrick her job back.

Kendrick said she didn't understand the manager’s actions because she had worn other religion-themed items previously with no issues. “I’ve worn Christian-themed shirts before to work for months and have never had an issue. I’m wondering why the name tag was any different,” she explained.

Upon reviewing the incident, Target issued a statement with the apology:

“Upon learning of the situation, we conducted a review and determined that the team member should not have been terminated. We apologized to her and offered to reinstate her immediately. We are taking the appropriate steps to address the actions taken by the individual leader involved in this situation and are working with the store to ensure our policies are appropriately followed moving forward.”

Kendrick has not indicated whether she will return to Target, who apparently have more respect for men who think they're women than for many who believe Jesus is the son of God. 

For now, there are no further details about the incident, but it seems as if Kendrick did not violate Target's dress code policy. Rather it was the manager who took it upon himself to make up a dress code violation because he is not a fan of Jesus and may, in fact, be a fan of people with gender dysphoria and perhaps other mental disorders since he did not have issues with people who expressed their support of this mentally ill community since he didn't show the same treatment to the LGBTQ+1XYZ-42&/ community.

Unfortunately, Kendrick's case is all too common as the "woke" often try to coerce others into abiding by their radical ideology. Imagine, a manager was willing to take away a person's income for wearing a name tag that would obviously not threaten normal customers.

Although Target did the right thing with an apology, it isn't known what the fate of the woke manager was or whether Ms. Kendrick returned to her job.

Would you?

Tweet

Ilhan Omar upset on Easter over Christians singing religious songs

Forgets she isn't holding a mic while yelling at unbelievers

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) hate-tweeted about Christians singing Christian worship songs on a flight that she was on. The fact that a group of Christians over Easter weekend would have the audacity to sing Christian songs in the presence of a Muslim congresswoman goes beyond her sense of entitlement.

The flight contained Christian volunteers on an Easy Jet flight in Europe delivering aid to Ukraine.

Some folks more tolerant than Omar criticized her for tweeting:

I think my family and I should have a prayer session next time I am on a plane. How do you think it will end? pic.twitter.com/5696Erwsl5

By 'family' does she mean all of her husbands including her brother, her two daughters from her first marriage, or just her current campaign manager husband? 

By 'end', does she think that we believe she will go all out jihad on the passengers and blow up the plane? Or perhaps the passengers will attack her for praying because that never happened before?

She's an intolerant, angry, entitled person who we now can see has gotten into the business of attacking other people's religion with her bile and somehow making herself out to be a victim when it was never about her and her family in the first place.

Here are just a few of the responses to her garbage tweet:

Kurt Schlichter, attorney and columnist: “I think you should shut up and stop being a bigot.”

John Cardillo, political commentator: “Without issue. I’ve been on many flights with Muslims saying a prayer before takeoff. No one cares.”

Avi Kaner, business owner: “Ilhan Omar @IlhanMN attacks a group of Christian volunteers on an @easyJet flight in Europe delivering aid to Ukraine, because they’re singing. She has no idea about what transpired and whether or not it was approved. But it’s suddenly about her.”

Shant Mesrobian, writer: “A member of Congress is supposed to have the restraint and maturity to not post a stupid, random, old video that for some reason is going viral right now as a way to score religious culture war points on a holy day for millions of people around the world.”

Asra Q. Nomani, activist and former professor: “One thing upon which we can depend: Ilhan Omar/CAIR is a perpetual participant in the Oppression Olympics. And as Easter begins, she has to compete with a Christian ‘prayer session.’”

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Ilhan Omar's time has come to vote her out of office when she's due to run again for her third term in November. Her obvious dislike for our Judeo-Christian way of life should disqualify her for office, except it is precisely our Judeo-Christian way of life that allows her to run.

I hope you all had a wonderful Easter or Passover, and for my Muslim readers, Ramadan Mubarak.

Tweet

Michael Flynn calls for "one religion" in US

Former national security adviser to President Trump, and former Lieutenant General of the Army Michael Flynn, has called for the United States to have "one religion." If we were to guess which religion of the myriad ones that exist he proposes, the best guess would be the religion he practices, which is Catholicism.

There is nothing wrong with Catholicism insofar as religion goes, but there is also nothing wrong with Hinduism, Judaism, Jainism, and all the world's 'isms' in a "live and let live" society.

Flynn spoke Saturday at a Texas rally for ReAwaken America, a Christian-focused speaking tour backed by America Faith, a Christian news network.

“If we are going to have one nation under God, which we must, we have to have one religion. One nation under God, and one religion under God,” he said.

This not only put a bad taste in the mouths of Christians who believe in freedom of religion and the right to worship how one chooses, it did the same with others with various religious beliefs.

The Anti Defamation League's CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt and the American Jewish Congress went on Twitter calling Flynn's statement "anti-American."

“To suggest that the United States of America, a nation founded on twin bedrocks of pluralism and the freedom to practice any religion, should ‘have one religion’ is anti-American, anti-democratic and downright dangerous,” Greenblatt said.

“Michael Flynn’s statements are both unacceptable & anti-American,” the American Jewish Congress tweeted. “Such dangerous rhetoric runs counter to American values and threatens the foundations of our democracy.”

Others joined in the condemnation of Flynn's words.

Trump’s Pardoned NSA Michael Flynn: “We have to have ONE RELIGION under God.”????pic.twitter.com/rCXgZE6eUr

— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller)

The rally was held at the sanctuary of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio. It is run by John Hagee, the prominent evangelical pastor and founder of the Christian Zionist group Christians United for Israel who spoke at former President Trump's inaugural address.

In response to a query, the Cornerstone press team said: “This past week, Cornerstone Church facilities were used by an outside organization. Cornerstone Church is not associated with this organization and does not endorse their views.”

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Remember, President Trump fired Flynn after he admitted to lying to senior Trump administration officials about conversations he’d had with Russian officials. He pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about those conversations.

Greenblatt performed some verbal calisthenics and tried to tie Flynn’s rhetoric to the Jan. 6 Capitol protests in which an unarmed woman was shot and killed by a Capitol police officer. And while Flynn's rhetoric sucks lemon heads, it's a real stretch to tie them together. 

Flynn had at least one Jewish backer: Josh Mandel, a Republican candidate for senator in Ohio who would say anything to get elected and who has pushed for what he calls “Judeo-Christian” values in his campaign. Mandel said on Twitter, “We stand with General Flynn.”

Sorry, but we conservatives and even a few liberals [as opposed to leftists] stand for the U.S. Constitution and freedom of religion. 

As far as this writer is concerned, Michael Flynn is irrelevant and will no longer be taken seriously.

Tweet

NY Gov. Kathy Hochul forms the "Church of the Holy Covidnant"

Kathy Hochul, aka "The Messenger"

Unelected New York Governor and Right Reverend "Sister" Kathy Hochul, the messenger of the Lord, has brought Jesus to the vaccinated and the wrath of God to those who have not as yet received the holy jab, a vaccination so effective that will protect us from the coronavirus. 

The vaccine is totally effective but those who refuse the shot can still infect those who have taken it. Yes, it doesn't make sense but the ways of "The Messenger" are mysterious and need no explanation. In fact, if you question the word of The Messenger," you will be punished both here and in the afterlife.

Hochul, "The Messenger," pontificated at a Brooklyn-based evangelical megachurch, the Christian Cultural Center, using it as her bully pulpit on Sunday. 

"The Messenger" called upon vaccinated congregants to be her “apostles” to promote New York’s vaccine mandate agenda because their unvaccinated brothers and sisters “aren’t listening to God and what God wants.”

And she has a direct line to God, and spaketh she did: “He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers — he made them come up with a vaccine. That is from God to us, and we must say, ‘Thank you, God.'”

Actually, it was the Trump administration and the prodding by the former president to push for a vaccine and the scientists came through. Even President Joe Biden has received both Trump vaccines and the Trump booster shot.

“I need you to be my apostles,” she told the congregation. “Jesus taught us to love one another. And how do you show that love but to care about each other enough to say, ‘Please get the vaccine because I love you and I want you to live.'”

Even though those brothers and sisters who already had COVID have a better immunology to the disease than those with a vaccine but the Lord and "The Messenger" still want them to get the vaccine.

Call me crazy, but it seems to me that some people are getting a lot of money from these vaccine mandates. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

The irony is how this idiot is using religion to peddle her product while trying to take away the freedom of those who have reasons for not getting vaccinated.

It's ironic how healthcare workers bravely worked without masks to help those with the disease and now they are being mandated to take the vaccine or risk termination, as many already have. And it's ironic how these elites have created their own healthcare emergency by the loss of staffing at hospitals and clinics.

On Aug. 16, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced the New York Department of Health regulation mandating all health care workers in the state receive their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine by Sept. 27 – with “limited exceptions for those with religious or medical reasons” — or risk termination.

Just ten days later after "The Messenger" was sworn in as New York's first Prophet governor,  New York’s Public Health and Health Planning Council approved an emergency regulation completely removing the religious exemption but leaving the medical exemption in place.

This sparked a group of anonymous health care workers, represented by the Thomas More Society, to file a lawsuit on Sept. 13 against the state, arguing that their constitutional rights were violated when the state issued a vaccination mandate with “no exemption for sincere religious beliefs.”

The next day, Judge David Hurd of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York temporarily blocked the mandate for those seeking religious exemption. This pushed back the requirement at least another two weeks until Oct. 12 when the judge will decide “whether to make the preliminary injunction more permanent,” the New York Post reported.

According to "The Messenger," nobody has the right to exceed her authority.

Tweet

House passes resolution condemning blasphemy laws

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution calling for the global repeal of blasphemy, apostasy and heresy laws. It was overwhelming passed on Monday, Dec. 7, with a vote of 386 - 3 under House Resolution 512.

As anyone who doesn't merely watch CNN or MSNBC, and reads beyond The New York Times or the Washington Post, there are Islamic majority countries in the world who imprison and even execute people for violating their theocratic laws against blasphemy of their majority religion or even observing the fact that their prophet married a 6-year-old girl [Aisha] and consummated the marriage when she turned nine.

Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman, was on death row for eight years following an incident in which she was accused of insulting Muhammad, their prophet and war leader. 

Just being accused of this violation of sharia law, is often a death sentence, and can be initiated by an angry husband, for example. Other religious violations that can be punished by death are homosexuality, lesbianism, converting out of Islam, and even burning a Koran.

“Blasphemy laws have affected Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Baha’i, secularists, and many other groups, are inconsistent with international human rights standards because they establish and promote official religious orthodoxy and dogma over individual liberty, and often result in violations of the freedoms of religion, thought, and expression that are protected under international instruments, including Articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” the resolution says. 

The resolution was introduced in 2019 by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD). It cites a finding by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) pointing out that blasphemy charges are often based on false accusations, are used for sectarian or political purposes, and foster religious intolerance, discrimination, and violence. 

The commission found that at least 70 countries had blasphemy laws as of 2018, including 18 Middle East and North African countries, eight countries in the Americas, 18 Asia-Pacific countries, 14 European nations, and 12 Sub-Saharan African countries.

In Russia, these laws were used in 2018 to ban Jehovah’s Witnesses as an extremist organization and fueled persecution of this religious group.

And we all know what's going on in China, where the laws have been used to arbitrarily detain an estimated 800,000 to 2,000,000 Uighur Muslims in internment camps because they followed Islamic rituals and practices.

In North Korea, they have been used to detain between 50,000 to 70,000 Christians in labor camps because they followed the tenets of Christianity.

The resolution calls on the President and the Secretary of State to prioritize the repeal of blasphemy, heresy, and apostasy laws in the bilateral relationships of the United States with all countries that have such laws.

It's a good thing.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads. Christmas is coming.

Tweet

Montana mook charged with toppling Ten Commandments monument

Montana law enforcement arrested yet another moron in the country's fight against anarchy and anti-religion. They say the crap-stain pulled down a Ten Commandments monument outside a courthouse using a chain and pickup truck. He is allegedly a Biden supporter.

Anthony Weimer [as opposed to Weiner] was booked into jail on a charge of felony criminal mischief after the Kalispell incident, according to KHQ.

Callers reported seeing the dickwad on the grounds of the Flathead County Courthouse to the police who responded. He attached a chain to a pickup truck [which may or may not have had bare breasted women on the mud flaps] and pulled down the monument into the street.

The man [aka Weimer the Weasel] then was said to have retrieved the chain before running off in the pickup, the station reported.

Officers later located the truck, found the turd and arrested him. The cops have no idea what provoked the act of Judeo-Christian anarchy, but it's a good bet that Weimer can go to hell for what he allegedly did.

Online records show that the pile of human excrement has a court appearance on Monday.

The AP reported that the Fraternal Order of the Eagles had given the Ten Commandments statue to Flathead County in 1950. At that time was placed in front of the courthouse.

The group took possession again prior to 2011 when the monuments became the target of a legal challenge because the religion of atheism means one cannot tolerate others who believe in the existence of G_d.

Workers later moved the monument to the courthouse's southwest corner during a courthouse renovation.

Aren't we all just getting sick of this garbage?

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Islamic prayer is being broadcast on BBC local radio

Former President Barack Hussein Obama described the Muslim call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." Now the BBC Coventry and Warwickshire is giving local Muslims the same treat by airing broadcasts for Muslims stuck at home due to the Chinese Communist coronavirus. 

Buddhists, Hindus, Catholics and Jews will have to wing it.

The Islamic prayer broadcasts will become a weekly spot every Friday morning in the run up to Ramadan at the end of April, led by a different Muslim imam each week.

Dhimmie Chris Burns, head of BBC Local Radio, said:

“Many Muslims will feel a void in their lives where prayers used to be - a feeling the will be magnified as we [we?] approach Ramadan. 

“Local radio is all about connecting communities and we hope these weekly reflections will go some way to helping Muslims feel a sense of community while they are isolating."

Ending his broadcast, the imam said: "We pray that Allah almighty will give us the strength to replace pessimism with hope, loneliness with kindness and to show love to all his creations in these testing times."

BBC CWR presenter Phil Upton said: "Ramadan is just a few weeks away and I appreciate that for many that's a big void to fill with as many as one and a half hours of your day, especially in the evening, in Ramadan month, spent in your local mosque."

Yeah, well Easter is sooner than that, falling on April 12th,  and Passover begins on April 8th and goes until April 16th. Valsahki, Vishu and Baisakhi, Hindu holidays fall on April 14th. Theravada New Year for Buddhists, falls on April 9th, and I could go on.

But not all groups get special treatment it seems.

"With many local mosques being closed because of the coronavirus outbreak there's an overwhelming sadness with the loss of your spiritual connection that can be gained from congregational prayers, so we are trying to fill the void in some small way with Islamic reflections."

With most churches, synagogues and temples being closed because of coronavirus outbreak there's an overwhelming sadness with the loss of equal treatment by the BBC.

But at least a Christian service is also being broadcast on Sundays at 8am on all 39 BBC local radio stations nationally, but not one specifically for Catholics or Orthodox Greek or Russian.

A ban on mass gatherings is in place in response to the Chinese Communist coronavirus, along with social distancing measures, preventing group worship. 

When this will end, only G_d knows.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Study: religious kids are less generous than secular urchins--proven wrong!

Let's be real, the mainstream media does not view religious people favorably because their religion is progressivism or leftism.

A study undertaken in 2015 claimed that kids who were religious were less generous than their non-religious counterparts. It was proven wrong but the agenda-driven media continued to use the original findings in spite of the proof they were invalid.

The retraction took about four years!

More than 80 media outlets covered the erroneous conclusions in "The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children's Altruism across the World," including the Boston Globe, the Economist, the Los Angeles Times and Scientific American, said Psychology Today.

Azim Shariff is a religion and pro-social behavior expert and was asked to review the study data. His previous findings had shown the opposite effect of religion on children: that religious households and environments showed increased generosity, Psychology Today said.

Shariff found an error in the data analysis method and published a paper on his findings the following year in Current Biology--the same journal in which the original study was published.

Of the gazillion media outlets that covered the false findings, only four picked up on the corrected data, the magazine reports. The other outlets were too thrilled with the negative findings on the effects of religion, which, ironically, were as true and accurate as their reporting.

In fact, Psychology Today said articles just last month in Buzzworthy and Truth Theory still cited the original flawed paper saying religious children were less generous. The magazine said the study's "influence seems to continue even after it has been shown to be wrong."

Finally the 2015 study was retracted in August of this year.

"When we reanalyzed these data to correct this error, we found that country of origin, rather than religious affiliation, is the primary predictor of several of the outcomes," the retraction read. "While our title finding that increased household religiousness predicts less sharing in children remains significant, we feel it necessary to explicitly correct the scientific record, and we are therefore retracting the article."

Gee, you think that a poor religious country would tend to give less charity due to the fact that the giver's own need for help would affect the outcome?

Psychology Today acknowledged that "correction mechanisms in science can sometimes work slowly, but they did, in the end, seem to be effective here. More work still needs to be done as to how this might translate into corrections in media reporting as well: The two articles above were both published after the formal retraction of the paper."

The magazine also cited their own research on the same topic at the Human Flourishing Program at Harvard, and found similar results to that of Shariff. Using a meta-analysis, they went beyond simply exploring whether religious children are more or less generous as children, but delved into how their religious upbringing shaped them over time:

1. They found that during childhood and adolescence, those who attended religious services regularly were subsequently 29 percent more likely to have high levels of volunteering than those who did not. 

2.  Those who attended services regularly were also 87 percent more likely to subsequently have high levels of forgiveness. 

3.  Those who prayed and mediated regularly were 47 percent more likely to have a high sense of mission.

4. Those raised religiously were protected from depression, drug use, and risky behaviors and more likely to have higher levels of happiness in young adulthood. 

The finding are things the left and the media [but I repeat myself] do not want to admit. It makes it difficult to justify abortion and other aspects of their agenda. And it keeps people from making leftism their religion.


Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue. And you can also see my blog on the Times of Israel.




Tweet

Ilhan Omar attacks Judeo-Christian values--shows her hypocrisy

Rep[ugnant] Ilhan Omar (D-MN by way of Somalia) attacked people who refuse to agree with the premise that killing babies in the womb is a moral act of kindness. Her brother/ex-husband agrees with her.

"I rise today to defy the horrifying attacks happening against women's reproductive rights all across this country," Omar began in English."Religious fundamentalists, [as opposed to jihadists] are currently trying to manipulate state laws in order to impose their beliefs on an entire society, all with complete disregard for voices and the rights of American women."

By "manipulate state laws," Omar means 'change' them. By "rights of American women" she does not include those who have been created and await their trip through the birth canal, she only means those who have been born, but not including "those Jews."

"The recent efforts like those in Alabama, in Georgia, are only the latest in a long history of efforts to criminalize women for simply existing, to punish us when we don't conform to their attempts to control us," Omar continued, totally lying about the criminalization remark.

The laws in all states proposing pro-life measures clearly state that mothers will not be legally liable, only the abortion providers. Her statement is not merely false, it's ridiculous, but liberals believe those lies.

Omar continued by highlighting other measures across the U.S., saying that if they were happening anywhere else on earth that they would be considered "a dangerous violation of human rights."

Like in Muslim countries where abortions are prohibited, but she fails to mention that tidbit of fact or condemn her own country of Somalia. She also never speaks to the moral implication of murder.

"But because it's happening here with the support of the ultra-conservative religious right, [by "ultra-conservative" she means people who take their religious beliefs seriously] we call it religious freedom," Omar continued.

"Let's just be honest, for the religious Right this isn't simply about their care or concern for life. If they cared about or were concerned about children, they would be concerned about the children that are being detained and those that are dying in camps across our borders, or the children who are languishing in hunger and facing homelessness," she said, conflating two unrelated issues.

And religious people are concerned about the children being detained but also care about the sovereignty of the USA. If we close our borders, fewer children would be dying on the trek to get here because it will discourage those who would otherwise make the journey.

"This isn't about religious morality or conviction because we've seen time and time again those that talk about their faith and want to push policies because of their faith are the ones that simply are caught with the hypocrisy of not living it out in their personal lives," Omar said as she gave two examples of Republican lawmakers who made decisions in their personal lives that were contrary to their political views, as if these GOP lawmakers represent all Republicans and all pro-lifers.

In other words, killing babies is killing babies. You can try to justify it with words like "women's right to decide," or 'my body, my decision," but that just ain't so. Science proves it, and the Democratic science deniers would have you think it didn't.

"I am frustrated every single time I hear people speaking about their faith and pushing that on to other people because we know those so-called religious politicians, when it comes to their life, their choices, they want to talk about freedom," Omar said, again conflating religion with the immorality of killing human life. In fact, there are many atheists who are pro-life because they see the immorality of abortion and don't celebrate it like the leftists do.

"But when it comes to other people's lives and other people's choices, they want to talk about religion. This should outrage every single person. It certainly outrages me and we can no longer stand for it."

The law is designed to put a limit on people's choices. The law clearly says you cannot do things that endanger the lives or welfare of others. You cannot drive recklessly. You cannot steal. You cannot murder people. And by people, those of us who believe that when conception occurs, a human life begins, we include the unborn, awaiting that trip across the border of the birth canal into the USA as legal immigrants from the land of the womb.

Ilhan Omar is a horrible person. She is anti-Christian and clearly anti-Semitic.

But technically, she is even a horrible Muslim, like her friend, Linda Sarsour, because their religion is against abortion.


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.



Tweet

Lesbian couple sues religious retirement home for denying them admission--they lose

St. Louis, Missouri -- A lesbian couple lost their lawsuit against a religious retirement home for denying them approval to purchase a home in the senior living facility.

St. Louis Public Radio reports that U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton ruled in favor of Sunset Hills retirement community this week because no illegal discrimination took place.

One observer who wished to remain anonymous out of fear for his or her safety told Brain Flushings' Vinny Boombots, "It's a good thing they tried this place onnaconna the one down the next town, an Islamic joint, they have a much different way of dealing with women who dig women, if you catch my drift."

"Mary Walsh and Beverly Nance took Friendship Village to federal court for sex discrimination in July, after the senior-living facility denied the same-sex couple’s housing application," reports SLPR. "Friendship Village cited its ‘Cohabitation Policy’ as the reason for the rejection. The policy defines marriage as between one man and one woman, as 'marriage is understood in the Bible.'" How utterly racist of them to follow their religious beliefs.

Representing the plaintiffs were the ACLU of Missouri and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, which argued that Friendship Village discriminated against the couple on the basis of sex.

No, they discriminated on the basis of their biblical beliefs. I discriminate good beer from so-so beer based on whether it comes from the U.S. or Canada.

"Friendship Village’s denial of housing to Mary and Bev because they are two women, and not a man and a woman, is discrimination ‘because of sex’ in the most literal sense," said Arlene Zarembka, a lawyer for the plaintiffs. "That Mary and Bev are lesbians doesn’t change this analysis." It just forces a lesbian life style on a community that sees it as a sin, and only wants to keep their community Christian.

The plaintiffs could not argue they were discriminated against due sexual orientation given that the federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against renters or homebuyers due to "race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin." Judge Jean Hamilton wrote in a memorandum, "the Court finds the claims boil down to those of discrimination based on sexual orientation rather than sex alone."

The lesbian couple ought to try the retirement village over in the next town. It's the Sharia Arms and they would be happy to meet with them.

Neither the Fair Housing Act nor the Missouri Human Rights Act declares it illegal for a property owner to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.

But even more, it goes beyond sexual orientation per se--it goes against their right to a religious belief that does not force their belief on others and asks that you don't force your beliefs on them.

Mary Walsh expressed disappointment with the court's decision. "We are disappointed by the court’s decision," Walsh said in a statement. "Bev and I are considering our next steps, and will discuss this with our attorneys."

Simply put, they know they can go elsewhere but they're looking to make a legal case out of this because that's what the LGBTQsilentP community does.

"We've been together for nearly 40 years and have spent our lives in St. Louis. We want to grow older here by each other's side. We should not be prevented from accessing the housing and care we need."

Nobody is preventing the loving couple from accessing housing. They simply have no right to access housing in a faith-based community that specifically has rules against it based on their beliefs.

Back in August, Walsh told the New York Times that she felt good about the community after meeting several of its residents whom she described as "very friendly." The couple put down a $2,000 security deposit after filling out the applications. Trouble started when the resident director inquired about the nature of Mary and Bev's relationship, as reported by The Blaze.

"We'd met other people from the community, and they were very friendly," Walsh said. "I was feeling good about it."

Of course they were friendly--they're probably decent Christians. But they may have been unaware of how you interact with each other, or even if they do know, the community rules make it very clear that you should not have applied to live there in the first place.

In a statement, attorney Julie Wilensky, of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, a center whose mission has been accomplished some years ago, said, "Mary and Bev were denied housing for one reason and one reason only — because they were married to each other rather than to men. This is exactly the type of sex discrimination the Fair Housing Act prohibits. Their story demonstrates the kind of exclusion and discrimination still facing same-sex couples of all ages."

No. They were considered by the community to be living in an unacceptable way for their community. If they were not engaged in lesbian sexual behavior the community wouldn't give a fig about the fact they weren't married to men. [Check out Little Sisters of the Poor.]

ACLU of Missouri Legal Director Tony Rothert also said, "Mary and Bev were financially and otherwise qualified for residency in the Friendship Village community. Their exclusion from this community is the result of discrimination alone."

On the other hand, can't a case be made to say that Mary and Bev purposely selected this community, not because they are religious  but because they aren't and instead have a point to make?

The question is, does the community have a right to their religious beliefs and freedom to express them?

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Sinead O'Connor Muslim convert says white people 'are disgusting'

White woman looking like a dude

Irish singer and new convert to Islam (with a long history of mental illness and ongoing difficulties resolving her religious convictions) Sinead O'Connor now hates "disgusting" white people and that "f**ker" President Donald Trump.

This is a woman who, on October 3, 1992 appeared on Saturday Night Live as a musical guest, sang a Bob Marley song "War," which she intended as a protest against sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, then showed a photo of Pope John Paul II and while singing the word "evil" tore the photo into pieces and said, "Fight the real enemy," then threw the photo at the camera.

The crazy, hate-filled O'Connor, tweeted on Tuesday that she never wants to associate with non-Muslims [read "white people"] ever again "for any reason."

"I'm terribly sorry," she began. "What I'm about to say is something so racist I never thought my soul could ever feel it. But truly I never wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-muslims are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting."

O'Connor revealed that in 2007 she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and told Oprah Winfrey that before her diagnosis she struggled with suicidal thoughts and overwhelming fear.

Recently, O'Connor, 51, announced her conversion to the religion of peace and changed her name to Shuhada' Davitt, at the end last month.

"This is to announce that I am proud to have become a Muslim," she tweeted, hoping Allah was watching on Twitter. "This is the natural conclusion of any intelligent theologian's journey. All scripture study leads to Islam. Which makes all other scriptures redundant."

Proving her lack of historical knowledge.

Her Twitter rant is disturbing:

"Interesting to see if Twitter bans this when it allows people like Trump and Milbank spew satanic filth upon even my country."

"Everyone says the Poor Americans are the victim of Trump. But you hired him. So fire him. Otherwise you're complicit. It is the same with all so called Islamic Terrorism. Which is exactly what the devil wants and loves. #WatchTheWomen sing the f***er to sleep."

In another tweet where she responded to criticism of her anti-white message, her mental illness was clearly revealed:

"Forgive me. Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers."

Finally she said of her current status: "Final word. If it's Crazy to care. Then by all means, spank my ass and call me Fruity loops."

O'Connor is a truly sad case of a religiously confused, angry, hateful person. Perhaps along with her depression there is a growing paranoia. Who knows?

Who cares?

As for me, I'm tired of being insulted simply for being white. I'm tired of the new racism that has somehow been acceptable and promulgated by the left, particularly by self-loathing white folks who apologize for their so-called "white privilege." It is the new version of the "N" word being leveled at an entire race and it's just as evil and disgusting.

Sinead O'Connor is a sick woman. She has always had difficulty with religion and her own brand of self-loathing. She has four children and was married four times, the last to a therapist that lasted a week.

She admits to being a "dyke" [aka: lesbian], and it isn't clear if she's aware that her new religion forbids any form of homosexuality and in some countries it's punishable by death.

Her conversion to Islam will change nothing and she is apparently confused about what she really believes. Her statement: "Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers" illustrates that.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

Sinead O'Connor has another epiphany: she's now a Muslim

Sinead O'Connor's journey into the deeper recesses of mental illness has taken an alarming turn for the worse. She has converted to Islam saying: "I am proud to have become a Muslim."

O'Connor also changed her name again. Now it's Shuhada Davitt. Shuhada means "martyr" in Arabic, and hopefully becoming one of those isn't in her future plans.

The 51-year-old religiously confused singer tweeted:

This is to announce that I am proud to have become a Muslim. This is the natural conclusion of any intelligent theologian's journey. All scripture study leads to Islam. Which makes all other scriptures redundant. I will be given (another) new name. It will be Shuhada'

1:42 PM - Oct 19, 2018 (@MagdaDavitt77) 

I believe O'Connor's knowledge of the various scriptures might have a few holes in it. There's the Old Testament written over 6,000 years ago, the Bhagavad  Gita written sometime between the fifth and second century BCE, the New Testament written about 2,000 years ago, and then we finally have the Qu'ran, the Islamic scripture written around 1,400 years ago. Not to mention the scriptures of the Jains, Zoroastrians and others.

So who convinced O'Connor [who is obviously very, very disturbed and has a history of suicidal ideation] to convert to the one religion that rewards suicidal [jihad] behavior? Maybe her voices. Maybe someone else. Was she exploited by someone?

What we do know is that O'Connor has had a history of conflicted thoughts over religion. She was once ordained a priest by the Irish Orthodox and Apostolic Church, and now has turned her back on Catholicism.

Her religious angst is best exemplified when, years ago, on "Saturday Night Live," she ripped up a photo of the Pope. Dr. Yasir Qadhi Dean of Academic Affairs at the Islamic Seminary of America loved that moment and tweeted:

"May Allah bless you Sr. Shuhada! As a child of the 80s I grew up listening to your lyrics, & I watched live in the 90's when you expressed your anger at the Pope for the abuse scandal by tearing up his picture! I always felt you were a deeply religious person. Salam and welcome!"

@YasirQadhi 8:53 AM October 25, 2018 

Last year, O'Connor changed her name to Magda Davitt and said in an interview that she did so to be "free of parental curses." She added that her Christian faith helped her overcome personal turmoil.

In 2011, however, she labelled the Vatican a "nest of vipers" regarding the alleged child sex abuse.

In 2017, she sent a sexually explicit message to another lunatic, Russell Brand, after he offered her mental health assistance.

Brand sent a message to O'Connor via YouTube, saying, after she went public over her mental health, that she needed "connection, meaning, purpose, love and a bit of time, really."

O'Connor replied: "Could also do with a jolly good rogering, frankly. The last man who touched my body took out my reproductive system two years ago.

"So if you really wanna be part of my healing journey, c'mon, horse it into me, boss."

Woa, Nelly!

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Dutch cops shoot jihadi waving ax

The Hague, Netherlands -- A man waving an ax screaming "Allahu akbar!" and acting all jihad-ish as he stood on a balcony of a residential apartment was shot and wounded by local police.

Rotterdam police tweeted about the shooting early Wednesday afternoon in Schiedam. They tried to calm the Muslim man but he was on a religious mission in the jasmine of his mind.

When an arrest team entered the apartment, the jihadi tried to attack the cops and in the process, injured a police dog.

Police are investigating the man's background and motive--they have no idea why he would do such a crazy thing such as shouting "Allah is greater" in Arabic. What could it be?

This latest jihad incident comes just one day after another jihadi in Belgium attacked and killed two female police officers and fatally shot a passer-by.

Nobody has a clue what this is all about. It cannot be about religion, because we all know Islam is a religion of peace--just check their record.

Tweet

Joy Behar implies Oprah is 'mentally ill'

Mega star Joy Behar of "The View" has implied that Oprah is mentally ill because she claims to speak and hear from God. 

Behar, whose psychiatric credentials are under review, has made the same brave claim about Vice President Mike Pence when he claimed to speak with Jesus. 

It all began after Oprah spoke at the Golden Globe Awards after receiving the Cecil B. DeMille Award for lifetime achievement of making lots of money and giving stuff away. 

She made a speech that made the country sit up and take notice. The speech almost made it sound as if Oprah would be running for president in 2020 and the nation was all hyped up.

Now the TV star says that she spoke with God and He told her to just keep doing all the great stuff she's doing now and forget about running for president of the most powerful country on the planet.

"I was just trying to give a good speech," she said. "I was looking for a way to express what was going on in this moment in terms of gender and class and race. I cared about landing that speech in the room."

Because that's what entertainers do.

"Everybody gets a car!"

But outside the room, Oprah said campaign financiers took notice.

"I had a lot of wealthy men calling, telling me that they would run my campaign and raise one billion dollars for me," she said. "I think that when you have that many people whose opinions you value coming at you, it's worthy of thinking about."

But the woman with the eating disorder wasn't done. She told CBS's "Overtime" that she has not heard the call to higher office: "And wouldn't I know? Because if God actually wanted me to run, wouldn't God kinda tell me? And I haven't heard that," she said, but she's waiting for His 'go-ahead.'

In the meanwhile, Joy Behar is in the process of having Oprah committed to a mental institution "for her own good," Joy said joylessly. "If it's good enough for Pence, it's good enough for Oprah."

Tweet

Toilet humorist Sarah Silverman calls patriotism 'perverted'

Toilet-centric comedian Sarah "Doody, I Said Doody" Silverman ended her variety series "I Love You America," in which she pretends to try finding common ground with the ordinary folk who have differing political opinions and who actually do love America.

Now she's trying to understand what the experience has taught her with issues such as patriotism and religion in America.

Speaking to Vice, the scatological 47-year-old dealt with many topics on the 10-episode schtick on Hulu. She believes it gave her deep, special insight into the country but after hearing her responses to questions posed to her by Vice, she obviously allowed her leftist predilections inform her thoughts.

"The right has perverted the meaning of being liberal, or being feminist," she pontificated. "Even 'social justice warrior' is an insult. We pervert language so much. Patriotism has always been a bot owned by the right."

As "right to choose" instead of "abortion" has been owned by the left.

"Patriotism is perverted. We're not on the same page of what it means. To me, being patriotic is loving your country--being a citizen, having a voice, being e pluribus unum. How perverted it is to go from 'We are one' to 'We are number one,' which is such a childish idea," she bloviated. She put President Trump into the childish category.

Silverman believes that e pluribus unum means 'We are one,' and tried to sound intelligent. But of course, even we 'patriots' know that it means 'Out of man, one.' That's the motto of the United States and Silverman got it wrong.

Pretending to be smarter than you are is great for job interviews, but it kind of signifies an immature need to sound smart--that's kind of childish in and of itself.

Then the not very funny comedian accused Trump of stopping his emotional growth at eight years of age, and I don't know where the evidence is for that developmental analysis. Maybe she took Psych 101, I don't know, but I'm going to 'Wiki' her butt now . . . well, it says she graduated from the Derryfield School in Manchester, NH and attended New York University for a year but did not graduate. Instead, she performed stand-up comedy in Greenwich Village.

So it looks like she didn't take many psychology courses. But, on the other hand, she did win a Creative Arts Emmy Award on September 13, 2008 f9r writing the song "I'm F**king Matt Damon." Now we know that her emotional growth is right up there with Gandhi and Bret Baier.

In terms of her "thoughts" on religion, she argued that the right paints American Muslims with a broad brush while the left does the same with Christianity.

I don't completely disagree.

The right clearly does paint Islam with a broad brush because many on the right actually have read Islamic scripture and know more about the religion than the low-information folks on the left. There are those on the right who paint Muslims with a broad brush, but with what's going on in the world, it's somewhat understandable. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims. That's simply the truth.

And yes, the left tends to see all Christians as 'born again' people waiting for the second coming. That's actually quite a small number of people but the left doesn't care about that fact because it suits them to pigeon-hole Christians.

"Like patriotism, religion can be sometimes used as a weapon, or to support someone's own narrative or fears and prejudices. These Christian-fringe, Roy Moor, do-what-I-say-not-what-I-do people--they're not very Jesus-like. I see them as fringe the way I see ISIS as fringe," she said. "But when we look at the fringe as a whole, it's dangerous That's why there's the Muslim ban . . . "

I understand why liberals call it a 'Muslim ban' because Trump screwed up, like he often does when he tweets and/or speaks off script. He did, at one time, call it as such, but the truth is, the countries he selected for the flight ban are the same ones Obama chose because they're terrorist-spawning countries.

The unfortunate truth is that Islamic countries are where the terrorists come from when they're not home-grown. Facts are stubborn things, and facts don't care how liberal you are.

Tweet

'Jingle Bells' is racist says racism specialist "professor"

A modern day secular leftist professor from Boston University says that "Jingle Bells," one of the most popular Christmas carols in the entire world, is suddenly racist, [and is probably also going to hurt the gay community once GLAAD reads the article].

According to this moron, "Jingle Bells" has a "problematic history" because it was originally performed to make fun of African Americans.

But in truth, any so-called 'professor' who tries to pass this crap off as being racist about African Americans (including those who have never been to Africa and should simply be called 'Americans' because it is not at all racist) is making fun of black people by acting as if they cannot see through this garbage.

Kyna Hamill is a BU theater historian. It appears that she is to theater history as the liberal media is to President Trump--always looking to attack the target for anything they can.

Anyway, Hamill said, "The legacy of 'Jingle Bells' is one where its blackface and racist origins have been subtly and systematically removed from its history."

If that's true, then isn't it a good thing? Doesn't it show that we've come a long way since it was sung they way she claims? 

In other words, if the offensive thing isn't treated the same way as it formerly was, like the Jews who do not treat the Old Testament's Leviticus as prescribed, (whereby a husband may stone his new bride to death at the doorsteps of her father if he discovers she wasn't a virgin) then what's the problem? 

If you want to find something wrong with your clock it's easy to do so. However, the clock is still useful if it's close to the correct time. 

People such as Hamill make their living by being hyper-critical because it makes them appear to be intelligent and "deep," rather than the chronic self-victimizing they do.

The song was written in 1857, pre-Civil War, by a Yankee named James Lord Pierpont. He was the son of a Unitarian minister and I hardly believe James meant the song to be a parody to make fun of black people any more than I believe that those who commit terrorist acts as prescribed in the Quran, are justified to be viewed the same way as Muslims who believe in peaceful coexistence.

It's the spirit of how "Jingle Bells" is sung today that matters, not the obscure alleged history it may or may not have.

Merry Christmas.

Tweet

Gov. Moonbeam: hot weather to follow--Trump better be scared

Photo: Reuters

Governor Jerry Moonbeam Brown (D.-Calif.) said on Sunday that President Trump's apparent lack of fear "of the wrath of God" explains his denial of climate change.

"I don't think," Brown accurately stated, but then added, "President Trump has a fear of the Lord, the fear of the wrath of God, which leads one to more humility." He pontificated this nonsense on CBS' "60 Minutes."

"And, this is such a reckless disregard for the truth and for the existential consequences that can be unleashed," he continued, using the word 'existential' in a sentence. He was referring to climate scientists who believe global warming is due to the burning of fossil fuels, and made it sound like Trump is the first person to burn the midnight oil.

Brown's connection with God can be seen in the wildfires in California, the worst in the state's history. He is being punished by the wrath of the Lord for being so arrogant as to believe that he is right about climate change in spite of his inability to pass a special ed Earth Science class with Mister Putterman. He is also being punished for not becoming a priest, as he was apparently thinking of doing as a young hippie.

Brown then went full-body political saying that nature is not a "political game" as he fired up a fatty and blew smoke rings into the heavens.

"The truth of the case," he lied, "is that there's too much carbon being emitted, that heat-trapping gasses are building up, the planet is warming and all hell is breaking loose. {Run! Run!]" He went on: "So I'd say to Mr. Trump, take a deeper look. Now is not the time to undo what every country in the world is committed to," he said, ending the sentence with a preposition.

Everyone's a scientist. 

The real truth is that the United States has already reduced carbon emission below the level called for in the Paris accord. It's China, India and other nations who need to get on the stick, not us. 

The only thing our membership means for us is that we give other countries money to get on their sticks in 30 years.

Tweet

Muslim extremists gather near D.C. calling for jihad

"The Habibster"

Washington, D.C. -- At a gathering last weekend, Islamist speakers from Virginia, Maryland, Texas and Pakistan spoke out against America calling us the "land of infidels."

The keynote speaker, Habib-ur-Rehman Ludhianvi, (aka "The Habibster") the principal of an Islamic seminary in Faisalabad, told his 100 or so listeners that "ignorant infidels" need to be forced to accept Islam.

"They are ignorant and there is no need for dialogue with them. God has given them two options, one is the holy book and one is the stick, and if one does not accept the holy book, they have to be forced," the scum muffin said.

Several Ahmadiyya Muslims attended the conference under cover and reported on the event held at the Holiday Inn Express in Springfield, Virginia. It was organized by two U.S.-registered charities, Idara Dawat-O-Irshad and Khatme Nubuwwat Center. 

Both organizations are IRS tax-exempt. Thank you Lois Lerner.

Ludhianvi had issued fatwas against women in the past, who had the un-Islamic audacity of using cellphones or wearing high heels in public. 

"The biggest threat that Islam is facing today is the disruption of the family system, for which they [the West] are urging women to go out of their homes," the easily turned-on lunatic said.

Other speakers at the conference deprecated Ahmadiyya Muslims, whom they view as heretics. In fact, booths that were set up for participants handed out anti-Ahmadiyya literature calling them infidels and the "greatest enemy of Islam," which implies that they need a good beheading by the real religion of peace.

Ludhianvi stated that Ahmadiyyas are worse than Jews and Christians and said the American justice system ought to outlaw the faith altogether--how very Constitutional of him.

"Have all Muslim lawyers died? Why can't they learn and understand U.S. laws and then go present their case in front of the judge and explain that Qadianis [Ahmadiyyas] are disrespecting Islam?"

But Islam is allowed to disrespect Jews and Christians? Makes perfect sense.

Ahmadiyyas shun jihad and believe a messiah known as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad came after Mohammed to reform Islam and renounce jihad, declaring it against Islamic beliefs.

Sounds too peaceful, I suppose.

Pakistan (pronounced 'Pahkeestaahn' by former president Obama) passed a constitutional amendment declaring Ahmadiyyas non Muslim and instituting blasphemy laws against them. If they dare recite the holy Quran, or call their mosques 'mosques,' they are to be killed.

One such victim of the religion of peace was American cardiologist Mehdi Ali Qamar. He was an assistant professor at Ohio University and was volunteering at a heart institute in Pakistan, built and funded by the Ahmadiyya community.

Mehdi was with his wife and one of his three sons and a cousin paying respects at a grave when he was shot 11 times by two real Muslims on a motorbike.

Shazad Hussain (no relation to Barack Hussein Obama) the imam of the Noor Mosque in Springfield, Virginia, accused the Ahmadiyyas of joining with the British to stop Muslims from "fighting jihad and committing bloodshed."

Of course, the Ahmadiyyas were only one sect in Islam the conference-goers objected to. The Shi'ite Muslims were also victims of their bile. Omar F. Khan, a teacher at the Idara Dawat-O-Irshad charity, loudly proclaimed why Shi'ites are considered to be infidels.

But let's face it--if you aren't their brand of Muslim, you're an infidel. And if you're an infidel, you need to come to Islam their way. And if you refuse, you must be forced. If you still refuse . . . well, you're in deep trouble.

You might say, you had a good head on your shoulders.


Tweet

Another Affleck groping episode

Ben Affleck apologized for grabbing Hilarie Burton's left breast  in 2003 during his appearance on TRL. But hours later another woman came forward accusing him of touching her inappropriately.

Annamarie Tendler, a makeup artist married to former "Saturday Night Live" writer John Mulaney, castigated Affleck for allegedly groping her buttocks at a party in 2014.

"I would also love to get an apology from Ben Affleck who grabbed my ass at a Golden Globes party in 2014," Tendler tweeted Wednesday evening.

"He walked by me, cupped my butt and pressed his finger into my crack," she said and added, "I guess he tried to play it like he was politely moving me out of the way and oops touched my butt instead of my lower back."

(You may recall a photo of Barack Obama doing something similar to the mother of traitor Bowe Bergdahl.)

"Like most women in these situations I didn't say anything but I have thought a lot about what I'd say if I ever saw him again."

Comedy writer Jen Statsky tweeted confirmation of Tendler's allegation, tweeting, "I was also at this party and *multiple* friends had this same exact experience."

That's a lot of butt-grabbing, if true.

On Tuesday, Burton, 35, tweeted that she "didn't forget" Affleck "tweaking" her left breast during the taping of TRL.

The allegations became public after Affleck denounced Harvey Weinstein for his alleged harassment and rape of multiple women who've come forward.

Affleck said of Burton's accusal, "I acted inappropriately toward Ms. Burton and I sincerely apologize."

A liberal source, attempting to minimize Affleck's disgusting behavior said, "Any allusion that he's anywhere close to Harvey Weinstein is absurd and could be considered defamatory," the source warned, hinting to those who might argue the point with possible legal action. And while the source wasn't disclosed, my guess is that it's his mommy.

A representative for the lowlife actor declined to comment because, hey, what can you say about such behavior?

The liberals pretend to own the moral high ground. Most of them hate America, free speech, guns and religion. And they hate those of us who love all or most of those things.

So next time they try to act superior, just laugh and walk away--it really pisses them off.

Tweet