Lordy, Lordy, Comey indicted for alleged threats against Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted for a second time by the Justice Department. The charges stem from that unforgettable May 2025 Instagram masterpiece: a photo of seashells arranged in "86 47" formation on a beach, evidently during one of Comey's famous nature walks.

Comey is charged with "knowingly and willfully making a threat to take the life of, or inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States and knowingly and willfully transmitting a communication in interstate and foreign commerce that contained a threat to kill President Donald Trump," according to the indictment.

Both charges, released Tuesday by the DOJ, carry up to 10 years in prison. This follows a predictable wave of Republican criticism and Trump administration officials pointing out that a former FBI boss posting what sure looked like a coded hit on the president might be, you know, a problem.

"I think it's fair to say that threatening the life of anybody is dangerous and potentially a crime threatening the life of the president of the United States will never be tolerated by the Department of Justice," Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters during a news conference without going into specifics of the case.

"While this case is unique and this indictment stands out because of the name of the defendant, his alleged conduct is the same kind of conduct that we will never tolerate and that we will always investigate and regularly prosecute," he added.

In the slang often used in the service industry, to "86" something means to eject, cancel or get rid of it, kind of the similar expression: to 'deep 6' something.  And Trump is the 47th president. A reasonable person familiar with the circumstances would interpret this image as a "serious expression of an intent to do harm" to the president, per the charges.

The indictment also includes a Forfeiture Notice. If convicted, Comey must forfeit any property or proceeds derived from his alleged unlawful activities to the government.

A grand jury issued an arrest warrant for Comey. Blanche said he expects communication with Comey's legal counsel.

U.S. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan, a George W. Bush appointee, has been assigned to the case.

"Well, they're back. This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago," Comey said in the 39-second clip. "But nothing has changed with me. I'm still innocent. I am still not afraid and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go."

Comey added that it was "really important that all of us remember this is not who we are as a country."

"This is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be. And the good news is we get closer every day to restoring those values," he added.

In a statement to Fox News, Comey's lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said, "Mr. Comey vigorously denies the charges contained in the Indictment filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina. We will contest these charges in the courtroom and look forward to vindicating Mr. Comey and the First Amendment."

Comey removed the social media post of the shells the same day it was uploaded, claiming he had misinterpreted the shells as a general political message.

"I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message," Comey wrote in a subsequent post. "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind, so I took the post down."

Following the post, Comey was questioned by the U.S. Secret Service in Washington D.C. At the time, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the former FBI chief should be "put behind bars" for allegedly "issuing a call to assassinate" Trump.

In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Trump rejected this explanation.

"He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant," Trump said. "If you're the FBI director, and you don't know what that meant, that meant ‘assassination,’ and it says it loud and clear."

House Judiciary Ranking Member Jamie Raskin criticized the move by the DOJ, while recalling Trump's own remarks about Democratic lawmakers who urged military service members to disobey unlawful orders and his statement about former Rep. Liz Cheney.

"Trump's DOJ just criminally indicted James Comey for a beach photo of seashells and no other evidence cited," he said. "If that’s a crime in America, then what is calling the free speech of six Democratic Members of Congress ‘seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH’? What is suggesting a former Republican Member of Congress should have to ‘face nine barrels shooting at her’ with ‘the guns trained on her face’?"

This second indictment against Comey comes just hours after a federal judge in New York allowed a separate lawsuit brought by his daughter, Maurene Comey, to move forward against the DOJ.

Maurene Comey, a former federal prosecutor, is suing the DOJ over what she describes as an unlawful dismissal. Her lawsuit alleges she was terminated "solely or substantially because her father is former FBI Director James B. Comey, or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs, or both."

Comey was fired by Trump in 2017 during his first term over the handling of the Russia investigation. Since then, Comey has been a vocal critic of the president.

In September 2025, Comey was charged with lying to Congress regarding press leaks. However, a federal judge dismissed that case after ruling that the prosecutor involved had been improperly appointed. Comey’s legal team has declined to comment on this latest indictment.Earlier this month, Blanche said Trump has a "right" and a "duty" to influence federal investigations, including those involving his political enemies who probed him in the past.

"We have thousands of ongoing investigations and prosecutions going on in this country right now. It is true that some of them involve men, women and entities that the president in the past has had issues with and believes should be investigated," Blanche said at a press conference.He previously dismissed the notion that the DOJ has improperly been going after Trump opponents.

On April 14, the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group published a report accusing the Biden administration of weaponizing federal law.

Poor Jim. The seashells were just innocent little shells, you guys. Nothing to see here except a guy who ran the FBI deciding to play amateur assassination semaphore on Instagram. The left is already melting down, because of course they are. This is going to be fun.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, please visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee for any amount--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Swalwell (D) freaks out--threatens legal action against FBI as Patel considers "Fang Fang" files release

Democrat Rep. Eric "Gas Man" Swalwell (CA) is threatening legal action against the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as it reportedly considers releasing potentially damaging files just weeks before he faces voters in California’s wide-open gubernatorial race. 

Never mind that Swalwell was diddling a Communist Chinese spy, he wants his privacy.

Lawyers for below average Swalwell sent a cease-and-desist letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, warning the bureau would violate federal privacy law if it moves ahead with releasing records regarding the congressman’s decade-old relationship with possible Chinese spy named Christine "Fang Fang" Fang.

"[Y]our attempt to release the file is a transparent attempt to smear him and undermine his campaign for Governor of California," Swalwell’s attorneys, Sean Hecker and Norm Eisen, said in a recent letter to Patel obtained by The Associated Press. "Your actions threaten to expose you, others at the FBI, and the FBI itself to significant legal liability. Indeed, disclosure of the investigative file would violate federal law in several respects."

Actually, an investigation might uncover more honey trap Chinese spies working Capitol Hill.

The FBI rejected claims of political motives in a statement to The Washington Post, which it also shared with Fox News Digital.

FBI Director Kash Patel is reportedly weighing the release of files related to Rep. Eric Swalwell's decade-old relationship with suspected Chinese intelligence operative Christine "Fang Fang" Fang.

"This FBI, being the most transparent in history, prepares documents for numerous different reasons, including for release to different agencies and departments to further review investigations that may have been opened under previous administrations," an FBI spokesperson said.

The letter comes as The Washington Post first reported that Patel is weighing the release of investigative records related to Swalwell’s past relationship with Christine 'Fang Fang' Fang, who is accused of cultivating ties with Swalwell and other California Democrats for espionage purposes, as is the wont of spies.

The almost obvious Chinese spy operative helped fundraise for Swalwell’s 2014 House re-election campaign and placed at least one intern in his office. Swalwell cut off ties with Fang in 2015 after the FBI alerted him to the suspected Chinese influence campaign. 

He wasn't bright enough to figure this out for himself.

The Justice Department did not pursue criminal charges at the time and Swalwell has denied any wrongdoing. A probe launched by the House Ethics Committee also concluded in 2023 without accusing Swalwell of any violations.

Lawyers for Swalwell, a Democrat, have threatened the FBI with legal action if the bureau forges ahead with releasing decades-old files relating to his relationship with a probable Chinese spy.

Swalwell’s lawyers also accused Patel of potentially violating long-maintained DOJ policy that prohibits law enforcement from taking any public investigatory action against political candidates in the two months prior to an election.

Early voting for California’s June 2 gubernatorial primary begins in early May. Swalwell, who is on the Democratic side of the aisle, is vying to be among the top two vote-getters that advance to the general election after jumping into the race in late 2025.

"It's not lost on me that we're 34 days until Californians start voting," Swalwell told CNN’s Brianna Keilar on Monday. "We've consistently been in the lead in this governor's race. And the president wants a Western White House."

Swalwell, a Democrat, is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump and served as an impeachment manager during the president’s second impeachment in 2021, following the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. His role as a manager was to keep count of the number of impeachment attempts the left has launched on the President. After all, Swalwell got a C+ in 8th grade math.

The California Democrat has also been criminally referred to the DOJ for alleged mortgage fraud.

The Gas Man has denied any wrongdoing over his relationship with spy Fang Fang Fang and was never criminally charged.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, (D-MD) has also blasted Patel for reportedly advocating for the release of the so-called "Fang Fang" files.

"What the hell does that have to do with law enforcement?" Raskin said Saturday. "This is plain weaponization of the FBI for partisan political purposes." Children all over the nation said "that man used a bad word."

Look, folks, here we go again with Eric Swalwell, the gift that keeps on giving to comedy writers everywhere. The guy whose idea of national security is apparently letting a Chinese honey trap waltz around his office is now waving legal threats at the FBI like it's his personal bouncer service. "Don't you dare release those files or we'll sue!" Because nothing says "I have nothing to hide" like trying to gag the bureau with a cease-and-desist letter right before voters get a say.

Classic Swalwell. 

The low-information Democrat who got easily played by "Fang Fang" like a kazoo is suddenly clutching his pearls over "privacy" and "legal liability." 

His lawyers are out there claiming it's all a dirty smear job timed to torpedo his long-shot gubernatorial dreams. Sure, because Kash Patel waking up one morning and thinking, "You know what would be fun? Releasing decade-old spy files on a random California congressman," is totally how this works. 

No, this smells more like the deep state finally getting a little sunlight after years of selective blindness.

And of course, the usual suspects are lining up to defend him. Jamie Raskin, bless his heart, is out there asking what any of this has to do with law enforcement. Jamie, when a suspected Chinese operative is fundraising for your campaigns and planting interns in your office, it has everything to do with law enforcement. But hey, in Democrat world, that's just "cultivating relationships." 

Shades of Dianne Feinstein.

Swalwell's out on CNN whining about the timing, how it's 34 days until voting starts and he's been leading (in his dreams, maybe). Meanwhile, the rest of us are wondering how a guy who couldn't spot a spy if she was wearing a "Made in Communist China" name tag thinks he's qualified to run the state that's already circling the drain.

This is peak Swamp, and in Swalwell's case, it's just as malodorous. 

The same crowd that spent years screaming about Russian collusion now cries "weaponization" the second someone suggests looking at actual Chinese influence ops. Sit back and watch, guys, November's going to be entertaining if this clown car keeps rolling.

Thank you so much for following Brain Flushings. Please consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. It really helps. You can even click on Buy Me A Coffee in the sidebar, if you want to show your appreciation, but really, there's  no pressure.

Tweet

Raskin’s Flip-Flop on Israel: Another Dem Joins the ‘Block the Bombs’ Brigade

The Democratic Party's love affair with Israel is starting to look like a bad rom-com heading for a predictable breakup. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the guy who has never met a progressive talking point he didn't want to hug, or more, has thrown his weight behind the so-called "Block the Bombs Act." 

Raskin, a Jewish Democrat, [aka JINO] is now cheering for a bill that would slam the brakes on sending offensive weapons to Israel. Because nothing says "supporting our allies" like leaving them high and dry in a war zone after they've been mercilessly attacked and slaughtered for no other reason than being Jewish.

Raskin is not alone in this head-scratcher. He's joined by other Jewish Democrat scumwafers like Rep. Sara Jacobs (CA), Rep. Becca Balint (VT), and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL), all piling onto a bill that now has 34 sponsors. Apparently, the memo went out, and the progressive wing of the party RSVP'd with a resounding, "Let’s stick it to Israel like the Hamassholes stuck it to them on Oct. 7th." 

This comes on the heels of Senate Democrats' record-breaking support for two resolutions last month to block U.S. military sales to Israel. Spoiler alert: they flopped in the Republican-led Senate. Any Jew or decent Christian who still votes for this garbage Party is either ignorant, self-destructive or stupid.

Now, let's rewind the tape on Raskin's track record, because this guy has been practicing for the anti-Israel audition for a while. "In November 2023, just one month into the war in Gaza, Raskin was one of the first Jewish Democratic House lawmakers to call for a ceasefire."

That is while Hamas was still lobbing rockets at the, you know, Jooze, Raskin was ready to wave the white flag. Fast forward to May 2024, and he teamed up with Jacobs to vote against emergency aid to Israel. Because, you know, priorities. And just for good measure, last December, he signed a letter with 76 other House Dems accusing Israel of violating U.S. arms sales law.

Look, I get it; politics is a game of optics, and Raskin is playing to the Squad's cheering section. But when you're a Jewish lawmaker jumping on the "Block the Bombs" bandwagon while Gaza has been a war zone for 22 months, you're not just signaling a policy shift; you're sending a flare to every anti-Israel activist that the Democratic Party's backbone is turning to Jell-O. This isn't about nuance or "tough love" for an ally, it's a slow-motion betrayal dressed up as principle. 

And what the Democrats accuse conservatives of, that is exactly what they are: deplorable.

And if you want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

Dems are the real threat to our democratic republic

They tried twice, perhaps thrice to assassinate former President Donald Trump. He is still standing and is still running for a second term. The Democrats have continuously attacked him with lawfare ever since he ran for President and won the first time. Biden won in 2020 in spite of the ill-begotten votes, but let's just say he won. 

With the election just three weeks away, the Party of the unqualified dummy, Kamala Harris, is having a conniption over the good possibility that she will lose and some people in her Party are considering not certifying a Trump victory in November.

This kind of trolling attacks really are, in effect, attacks against democracy. We know that when/if Trump wins, there will be gnashing of teeth, meltdowns of epic proportions, claims the election was fixed, and nobody in Hollywood doing what they promised to do if Trump wins.

It's all talk and the talk is balderdash.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said that Trump "is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process, whether we're talking about manipulating electoral college counts in Nebraska or manipulating the vote count in Georgia or imposing other kinds of impediments." 

Actually, it's the legacy press/media that's doing the interfering in the sense that they are clearly on the side of the Democratic Party and have not reported accurately or fairly. The things they fail to report has a greater impact on voter sway than what they do report, and the lies they get caught telling is always in the same direction: they go against the GOP.

On a positive note, Democratic leaders appear to be willing and prepared to certify a Trump victory, so the dissenters like Raskin, are a tiny minority. When he was asked if he believes a Trump win would be free, fair, and honest, he said,  "I definitely don't assume that."

Meanwhile, it was the Democrats who attacked Trump for assuming the same thing about the Biden victory. If Trump wins, there will be much complaining, wailing, screaming toward the clouds, and environmentally induced trichotillomania. 

Tweet

GOP offers to accommodate Hunter Biden's demand

House Republicans say they are willing to go along with Hunter Biden and agree to subpoena him again for the impeachment inquiry into his demented father, President Joe Biden, after refusing to comply with the last subpoena.

Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) and Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) wrote to Abbe Lowell, Hunter's lawyer. They gave kudos to Hunter's "newfound willingness" [aka come to Jesus moment] to testify before Congress in a deposition under subpoena.

“Although the Committee’s subpoenas are lawful and remain legally enforceable, as an accommodation to Mr. Biden and at your request, we are prepared to issue subpoenas compelling Mr. Biden’s appearance at a deposition on a new date in the coming weeks,” Comer and Jordan wrote.

So Lowell wrote back to Comer on Friday after the oversight and judiciary panels approved resolutions to hold Hunter in contempt of Congress for flagrantly defying subpoenas issued in November.

The lawyer said Hunter Biden would appear for a deposition or hearing in compliance with a “proper subpoena” since the House voted to formally authorize the impeachment inquiry in December.

The recovering crack addict and whore mongering first son showed up on Capitol Hill twice: once on the day of his scheduled deposition and next as the House considered the contempt resolutions, demanding he be allowed to appear in an open setting such as a public hearing to answer "legitimate" questions while keeping lawmakers from somehow distorting his testimony.

House Republicans said they were willing to have Hunter testify in a public hearing — but only after a deposition — and have insisted throughout the standoff that their subpoenas were valid.

“To be clear, the issuance of these subpoenas does not in any way suggest or imply that the Committees believe the assertions in your January 12 letter to have any merit,” Comer and Jordan wrote in the Sunday letter. “Our willingness to issue these subpoenas is rooted entirely in our interest in obtaining Mr. Biden’s testimony as expeditiously as possible.”

The GOP had been expected to move forward with a floor vote this week, and the Democrat attack dog, Rep. Jamie Raskin (MD) encouraged the Republicans to call off the plan following Lowell's letter.

“Hunter Biden is giving Republicans exactly what they have been demanding this week,” Raskin claimed on Friday, adding that the doper “has offered to appear for a ‘hearing or deposition.’ It is time for Chairs Comer and Jordan to call off this truly absurd and wasteful contempt proceeding and finally take yes for an answer, which Chair Jordan already said he would ‘certainly’ do.”

Raskin is an annoying leftist who lies for a living.

Tweet

House Oversight Committee goes after Biden family bank records

House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer (R-KY) leads an organizational meeting for the 118th Congress, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2023.

The House Oversight Committee has issued subpoenas on the banking institutions of the Biden crime family's financial records.

The banks in question are Cathay Bank, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and HSBC USA N.A. In addition, Mervyn Yan, a former 'business associate' of bag man Hunter Biden, is also having his financial records subpoenaed. 

Jamie Raskin

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee. He complained that Chairman James Comer (R-KY) was attempting to hide information regarding the Biden crime family from Democrats on the committee adding, "that's not fair," after which he stormed out of the room and headed for his safe space.

Rep. Comer told Fox News in a statement that "Ranking Member Raskin has again disclosed Committee’s subpoenas in a cheap attempt to thwart cooperation from other witnesses. Given his antics with the first bank subpoena, the American people and media should be asking what information Ranking Member Raskin is trying to hide this time. No one should be fooled by Ranking Member Raskin’s games. We have the bank records, and the facts are not good for the Biden family."

When asked to comment Hunter Biden said that he was 'tied up' at the moment, which Brain Flushings confirmed when rope was found outside the door of his hotel room and what sounded like female giggling could be heard in the room.

Tweet

House passes resolution condemning blasphemy laws

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution calling for the global repeal of blasphemy, apostasy and heresy laws. It was overwhelming passed on Monday, Dec. 7, with a vote of 386 - 3 under House Resolution 512.

As anyone who doesn't merely watch CNN or MSNBC, and reads beyond The New York Times or the Washington Post, there are Islamic majority countries in the world who imprison and even execute people for violating their theocratic laws against blasphemy of their majority religion or even observing the fact that their prophet married a 6-year-old girl [Aisha] and consummated the marriage when she turned nine.

Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman, was on death row for eight years following an incident in which she was accused of insulting Muhammad, their prophet and war leader. 

Just being accused of this violation of sharia law, is often a death sentence, and can be initiated by an angry husband, for example. Other religious violations that can be punished by death are homosexuality, lesbianism, converting out of Islam, and even burning a Koran.

“Blasphemy laws have affected Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Baha’i, secularists, and many other groups, are inconsistent with international human rights standards because they establish and promote official religious orthodoxy and dogma over individual liberty, and often result in violations of the freedoms of religion, thought, and expression that are protected under international instruments, including Articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” the resolution says. 

The resolution was introduced in 2019 by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD). It cites a finding by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) pointing out that blasphemy charges are often based on false accusations, are used for sectarian or political purposes, and foster religious intolerance, discrimination, and violence. 

The commission found that at least 70 countries had blasphemy laws as of 2018, including 18 Middle East and North African countries, eight countries in the Americas, 18 Asia-Pacific countries, 14 European nations, and 12 Sub-Saharan African countries.

In Russia, these laws were used in 2018 to ban Jehovah’s Witnesses as an extremist organization and fueled persecution of this religious group.

And we all know what's going on in China, where the laws have been used to arbitrarily detain an estimated 800,000 to 2,000,000 Uighur Muslims in internment camps because they followed Islamic rituals and practices.

In North Korea, they have been used to detain between 50,000 to 70,000 Christians in labor camps because they followed the tenets of Christianity.

The resolution calls on the President and the Secretary of State to prioritize the repeal of blasphemy, heresy, and apostasy laws in the bilateral relationships of the United States with all countries that have such laws.

It's a good thing.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads. Christmas is coming.

Tweet

Kucinich attacks Dems for going after Trump's mental illness

Former Democratic congressman and presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich blasted colleagues from his own party Tuesday over their feeble attempts to examine President Trump's mental and physical fitness for office. 

They would hopefully use these finding to seek his removal and find favor with Hillary Clinton who would then demand to be appointed as the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!

The campaign is being led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). Raskin is trying to rally support for his bill in the wake of Trump's attacks on the media and others.

Kucinich says the Democrats aren't helping the party with proposals like this one. "It's a political statement, not a medical statement," he said. "I think it's destroying the party as an effective opposition."

"People want political parties to be focused on America's economic needs, jobs, wages, health care, education, retirement security and peace," he told Fox News, "and they want American politicians to be constructive, not destructive."

Kucinich speculated that some Democrats still can't get over the election results and cry themselves to sleep or watch a little CNN or MSNBC to reaffirm their commitment to get Trump out of office before he ruins Obamacare altogether.

"What's happening here is not good for the country," he said, meaning that Democrats overall are not good for the country.

Raskin's bill would establish another commission, as if we don't have enough already. This would be the "Oversight Commission on Presidential Capacity," and would carry out a "medical examination of the President to determine whether the President is mentally or physically unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office."

Under this bill the determination could be made if the "Commission finds that the President is temporarily or permanently impaired by physical illness or disability, mental illness, mental deficiency, or alcohol or drug use to the extent that the person lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to execute the powers and duties of the office of President."

Had Hillary Clinton won the election, this bill would refer to her alcohol or drug use, not Trump's because he doesn't drink or take drugs. Hillary, we know, drinks like a fish.

It would also have referred to he mental deficiency as exemplified in her belief that you can wipe an email server clean "with a cloth." It would take an imbecile to believe something as stupid as that.

And in terms of her physical disabilities, they very possibly exist as we have seen when she on several occasions needed the help of staff to keep her from falling on her face. She has also displayed eye movements that appear to be related to seizure activity.

The Raskin bill cites the 25th Amendment, which states the vice president shall assume the powers of the presidency when the president is declared "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

If Raskin thought he could get away with it, he would put Donald J. Trump's name on the bill because that's the only reason he's submitting it, and he made no bones about it.

In the same section, it's clear that the vice president and others would need to sign off on such a decision--meaning, of course, that the bill is merely a symbolic gesture, like Kathy Griffin's severed head of Trump. (Of course, in Griffin's case the Secret Service questioned her for over an hour. I bet she was more than simply inconvenienced.)

It's ironic how the bill was introduced by Raskin around the time of Trump's media attacks in April. When MSNBC's Morning Joe attacks him on a daily basis, with such scathing, brutal and disgusting insults, they believe that they should be immune to a response. That's not how Trump rolls.

The bill has almost two-dozen cosponsors, including the sneaky Bernie back-stabber Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who went all to pieces when Hillary failed for a second time to be the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!


Tweet

Trump is POTUS: get over it

Still in the throes of disbelief that Hillary Clinton lost the presidential election for the second time in a row, Democrats are scrambling to get rid of President Trump through any means necessary, except, perhaps, by assassination. (Heaven forbid.)

A Democratic congressman has proposed convening a select committee of psychiatrists along with other physicians to determine whether President Trump is fit to service in the White House.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) also teaches constitutional law at American University and is the person responsible for trying to remove the nation's choice for president from office. Not surprisingly, the leftist hasn't been able to get any Republicans on his side.

However, the Constitution's 25th Amendment allows for a majority of the president's cabinet, or 'such other body as Congress may by law provide,' to decide if Trump isn't capable to carry out his duties--and then put it to a vote by the full Congress. The Amendment has been around since right after the John F. Kennedy assassination, but Congress has never formed its own committee in the event it's needed to determine a president's mental health.

In order to make it all happen, Vice President Mike Pence would also have to agree with the decision. 

The Maryland Democrat Rep. Raskin is himself suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and, according to an anonymous source (yes, Vinny Boombots, as he calls him- or herself) believes that President Trump is responsible for everything from ISIS to "the knockout game."

Raskin has a plan that would allow Congress to name a commission with the power to determine Trump's mental fitness to hold office. His bill would allow four Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate to each choose a shrink and another doctor. Then each party would add a former statesman--like Hillary Clinton, for instance--to be part of the decision-making.

The final group of 10 would meet and choose an 11th member, like, say, Barack Obama, to be the committee chairman.

Once the group is officially seated, the House and Senate could direct it via joint resolution to conduct an actual examination of Trump 'to determine whether the president is incapacitated, either mentally or physically,' according to the Raskin bill.

Had this bill been in place during the FDR or JFK presidencies, these leaders would have been under scrutiny for the 'physical' incapacitation part of the bill.

If Trump refuses to take part in this kangaroo court, that would go against him in the final conclusion in which he would likely be removed from office and beaten until dead, if Raskin and his ilk have their way. 

Vinny Boombots

Vinny said that Raskin and former Secretary of State and twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, may or may not have been secret lovers, unbeknownst to Huma Abedin or would have been extremely upset if she knew.

Raskin made no pretenses that his bill proposal is an attack on President Trump specifically, and that he often cries himself to sleep at night because Donald J. Trump is President of the United States of America.

Period.



Tweet