Jonathan Turley destroys Debbie Wasserman Schultz's dumb hearing questions

Unfortunately, she gives blonde jokes credibility

Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Duh) went head-to-head with George Washington Law professor and legal expert Jonathan Turley and showed the nation that she was completely out of her league, over her head, and in deep poo. Sadly, she gives dumb blonde jokes credibility.

Debbie Downer tried to discredit Turley in the House hearings on the weaponization of the federal government. That's like taking a rubber knife to an AK47 fight.

Debbie's questioning began with this gem: "So essentially your answers to questions yesterday were your own opinion and pure conjecture."

Professor Turley politely responded, “No, I wouldn’t say that, I try to base them on what we know from the Twitter Files—” 

Then Debbie interrupted him with the same BS premise: “But this is only just your opinion, would you say, as a Twitter account user?” 

Turley tried once more to answer the cretin's question: “No, I’ve come to give legal advice based on facts that are in the public domain and I would really refer to—” 

True to form Wasserman Schultz didn't allow Turley to complete a sentence saying that his answers were using up her time to question him [I paraphrase]. Since she couldn't discredit his answers nor compete with his intellect, the only thing she could do was to try to keep him from responding to her questions. She is an obvious idiot and a rude one to boot.

Subsequently, during a Friday morning appearance on “Fox and Friends,” Professor Turley immolated Wasserman Schultz's insistence that he was merely offering "opinion and conjecture" about Twitter working with the FBI, but that he had no “specific or unique knowledge” to speak about the issue. 

Professor Turley responded to the idiot congress-cretin:

"The congressman was asking if I’ve ever worked at Twitter as a condition for my talking about what the Twitter files. It’s like saying you have to work at the Pentagon if you want to testify about the implications of the Pentagon Papers. The point of witnesses before committees is often to give legal analysis based on what is known and what could be found in this investigation.

"The exchange she was referring to was a member who expressly asked me about the Twitter files and what this suggests about what I’ve called ‘censorship by surrogate.’ And then she went into this issue of, ‘Well, you’ve never worked at Twitter. How do you know what goes on at Twitter,’ which is completely absurd.

"The whole premise of my testimony was that Twitter has now authenticated and confirmed these facts. These facts are coming from Twitter. These are Twitter files. And the facts indicate that they had weekly meetings with the government.

"They indicate that the government would send long lists of citizens and others to be targeted, censored, to be in some cases, banned. Those are very serious allegations that raise constitutional questions, which is why I was there to discuss it."

Evidently, Debbie Wasserman Schultz is clueless about the role of an expert witness and not very bright. She is the embodiment of the Democratic Party, which has half the country fooled by their false promises about the future, and their lies about the love of the country they can't wait to change.

If the Democrats could have their way, there would be no free speech and no Constitution as we know it.

Tweet

Rahida Tlaib cannot hide her anti-Semitism

"I'll get you, my pretty."

Leftist Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) made the outrageously anti-Semitic comment this week about Democrats. She said that they could not be considered "progressive" if they supported Israel's government.

Tlaib, born in Detroit to a Palestinian working-class family, is an overt Jew-hating anti-Zionist [but I repeat myself] with an extensive history of anti-Semitism. The creep has spoken at events where far-left activists have called for the elimination of Israel.

Last Tuesday, Tlaib spoke at a seminar held by Americans for Justice in Palestine Action (AJP Action) which was co-sponsored by American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).  “I want you all to know that among progressives, it has become clear that you cannot claim to hold progressive values, yet back Israel’s apartheid government,” she said, implying that in order to be considered "progressive," you must call for the destruction of Israel. [H/T Daily Wire]

“We will continue to push back and not accept this idea that you are progressive, except for ‘Philistine,’ any longer,” the hateful Tlaib continued.

RNC Research tweeted:

Democrat Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib says the quiet part out loud about today's Democrat Party: "You cannot claim to hold progressive values yet back Israel's 'apartheid' government." pic.twitter.com/MrPo0gLoev

Tlaib is so disgustingly outrageous that even many leftists and activists, such as ADL Jonathan Greenblatt condemned her for her remarks. He tweeted:

“In one sentence, Tlaib simultaneously tells American Jews that they need to pass an anti-Zionist litmus test to participate in progressive spaces, even as she doubles down on her antisemitism by slandering Israel as an apartheid state. It’s absolutely reprehensible and does nothing to advance the cause of peace. We call on people of goodwill and leaders across the political spectrum to make clear that such antisemitism will not be tolerated.”

But it isn't as if Tlaib is the only leftist to harbor such strong anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist sentiments.  Her "Squad" sisters, Reps' Ilhan Omar, AOC, and Ayanna Pressley, for example, have all spewed their anti-Zionist views.

The Anti-Semite Twins

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) tweeted: 

“I fundamentally reject the notion that one cannot support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and be a progressive. … I would happily put my progressive record and credentials up against anyone’s. It is both wrong and self-defeating for progressive leaders to abide such an offensive litmus tests.”

“That’s right, Chairman Nadler,” Rep. Ted Deutch (D-FL) tweeted. “And remember, there are progressive activists, progressive students, and progressive Members of Congress whose support of democratic Israel is fundamentally a part of their progressive values. They all belong at the table. We will not be silenced.”

Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) tweeted: “There’s nothing progressive about advocating for the end of Israel as a Jewish State. Nothing progressive about opposing the Abraham Accords, which promotes peace. Nothing progressive about opposing Iron Dome, which protects civilians from indiscriminate rocket fire.”

“The outrageous progressive litmus test on Israel by @RashidaTlaib is nothing short of antisemitic,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) tweeted. “Proud progressives do support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. Suggesting otherwise is shameful and dangerous. Divisive rhetoric does not lead to peace.”

It's amazing that Democrats have done nothing about these anti-Semitic clowns in their party, but some were skeptical. Pradheep J. Shanker, a physician tweeted:  “Unless you punish such antisemitism, its [sic] all talk. So, you have a chance to be better. Punish the anti-semites in your party, Take the high road. DO BETTER.”

Writer Peter Roff tweeted: “Why don’t you move to kick her off her committees like you all did to a Republican for similar reasons?”

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

The Left never kicks leftists off committees because for them, power is more important than morals. We see it with our open border and our relationship with our enemies, China and Iran.

Tweet

Stephanopoulos caught cutting his throat on camera when Jay Sekulow spoke to press

Evidently afraid the public was about to hear the other side of the story, the American Bullcrap Corporation's [ABC] George Stephanopoulos was caught on camera doing a "throat slash" or cut, gesture as President Trump attorney Jay Sekulow took questions from actual journalists on Thursday during the Senate impeachment trial coverage.

Stephanopoulos was a staffer for former President Bill "I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton. We can surmise that Stephanopoulos was signaling to his producers to stop allowing his one viewer [named Jim] to hear Sekulow's thoughts about the trial.

The cut gesture was made after explaining that Trump’s legal team will call witnesses who don’t think alleged actions are impeachable. It was then that the camera cut back to Stephanopoulos, who was making the throat-slash gesture.

The embedded Democrat Stephanopoulos then smirked, appearing to realize his gesture was caught on live television. He is the epitome of fake news along with Jim "Dear Diary" Acosta, Chrissy Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Chrissy Hayes and avowed Communist Lawrence O'Donnell.

“And that is Jay Sekulow right there,” Stephanopoulos told viewers before zipping his fly and quickly moving along to a leftist panel discussion.

Just before ABC cut off the press feed, Sekulow was telling actual journalists that the President's legal team plans to prove two different views on impeachment and both would result in Trump remaining in office.

Stephanopoulos' hate Trump lizard brain kicked in and he made the cut sign.

“We’ve got lawyers that are going to be put forward when our side of the case goes, that represents multiple schools of thought on what is and what is not an impeachable offense,” Sekulow said. “But they have one thing in common, that the actions alleged and the actions of the president do not reach that level. No matter what school of thought you’re on… our position is, you still have to meet basic, fundamental constitutional obligations and they haven’t.”

Before becoming an embedded Democrat in ABC, Stephanopoulos was a Bill Clinton staffer who due to his grossly overt sycophantic behavior got him a senior aide position, possibly "with benefits."

But Stephanopoulus' ties to the Clintons eventually became a source of embarrassment to the American Bullcrap Corporation when he was again caught in an illuminating position. That is, he was caught secretly giving money to the Clinton Foundation and had to recuse himself from hosting any presidential debates

It isn't as if he's the only one with ties to the Democrats or someone who is nefarious. Let's not forget Donna Brazile who gave Hillary Clinton the debate questions in the Democratic nomination campaign of 2016 when she went up against Bernie Sanders, or how the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz had to resign as the DNC chair after it was learned that there was an agreement in which Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy and all the money raised. Her campaign also had the right of refusal of who'd be the party communication director and all the decision-making on all the staff.

No, Stephanopoulos, like the above-mentioned Democrats, got caught. Donna Brazile got a gig on Fox News for some odd reason. Wasserman-Schultz is still in office. And George Stephanopoulos still works for ABC.

The left controls the media and buys digital ink by the barrel. Those of us on the right need to be very smart and call them out whenever we see injustice or lies.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.




Tweet

Ilhan Omar to join Black-Jewish Caucus as their first anti-Semite

Falls asleep on the job

Rep[ulsie] Ilhan Omar (D-MN) said that she will be joining the Congressional Black-Jewish Caucus, according to Jewish Insider. Seriously--this is no joke. Omar would therefore be the first full-blown anti-Semite to join the organization.

Omar had previously offered support for this bipartisan partnership, posted on Twitter:

Reps. Brenda Lawrence (D-MI), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), and Lee Zeldin (R-NY) announced the launch of the Black-Jewish Caucus on June 3rd. The launch of the Caucus was facilitated by the American Jewish Committee.

Omar made blatantly anti-Semitic rhetoric on many occasions — such as her claiming that Israel had “hypnotized the world” or that American support for Israel was based solely upon Jewish money she termed "Benjamins".

But lucky for her, the Democratic Party is hunky-dory with anti-Semitic rhetoric if it's couched in anti-Zionist statements.

Her supporters are certain to laud her announcement as final and incontrovertible proof that Ilhan Omar is not an anti-Semite, which is very likely why she's doing it in the first place.

Not only that, they say, but she is now pretending to actively fight against anti-Semitism.

The truth is, Ilhan Omar doesn't care about fighting anti-Semitism. She merely wants to profit politically from certain forms of anti-Semitism, while stubbornly ignoring others.

She claims that most "extremist murders" were committed by white supremacists. This is true in the United States, but globally the violence is being committed by Islamic extremists in far greater numbers. And even then, Omar gives the false choice that we must choose which form of the threat to combat. There's no reason to think this way--we should all agree that extremism, no matter from which group it comes, must be put down.

But Democrats refuse to admonish Omar and they allow her to get away with anti-Semitic tropes.

Omar is a person who asked for lighter sentences for ISIS combatants and has a history of taking international terrorism lightly. She has even aligned herself with terrorist sympathizers and in a 2013 interview, was seen giggling about Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. If she was serious about fighting anti-Semitism, she'd speak out against anti-Semitic terrorist groups such as Hamas, who seeks to destroy the state of Israel, and would break off her ties with them and the Muslim Brotherhood.

She will make an interesting member of the Congressional Black-Jewish Caucus. I know she'll get along famously with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. The fact that they would allow her in the group without condemning Hamas and the MB, tells you all you need to know about the Democratic Party.

Just watch how Omar uses the group to weaponize anti-Semitism. Just watch.


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks.





Tweet

Bernie Sanders will jog slowly in 2020 if he's the best chance to beat Trump

Bernie Sanders, 77, says that he will likely run again in 2020 and is betting he'll still be alive and in fairly decent health as he will be almost 80 if he takes the oath of "awfuss."

The Brooklyn-born Vermont communist who calls himself an independent said he would go after another presidential bid if he thought he would be the best guy to defeat President Trump.

"If there's somebody else who appears who can, for whatever reason, do a better job than me [like anyone who understands economics and why the free market works better than socialism] I'll work my as* off to elect him or her," he said as he scratched the very same area he had just mentioned. "If it turns out that I am the best candidate [LOL] to beat Donald Trump, then I will probably run."

If he runs, he better consult his doctor first.

Sanders ran against the Hillary Clinton machine in the 2016 presidential primary, but with the assistance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, lost in the nomination to her.

Rumor has it that Hillary is thinking about trying for a third time to become THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAAA!!! and we can only hope that she and Sanders get to square off at each other again--it would be a howl.

Maybe this time Sanders won't wimp out.

Pres. Sanders and VP Clinton

But Sanders' aides are reportedly watching Sen. Elizabeth "Very White" Warren (D-Mass) who is widely seen as a possible contender because the more you lie as a liberal, the better chance you have in an election. Do the math.

Sanders traveled to South Carolina, an early voting state where he spoke at a "Medicare for All" rally, organized by the S.C. arm of Our Revolution, a leftist offshoot of his 2016 White House bid.

He also views Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as brilliant, but he's getting old and his judgment is impaired.

But the kids love him and he may one day turn America into Venezuela if elected.

Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

The law sides with Florida's Rick Scott re: 'violation' of state constitution

The left has never met a constitution they didn't hate and Florida is no exception.

A state judge on Friday ruled with Florida Republican Rick Scott in ordering that Republicans be granted "immediate" access to requested information about ballots in Broward County, amid lawsuits against the county's top election official, Brenda Snipes.

Snipes is the County Supervisor of Elections for 15 years and was appointed to this position after her predecessor, Miriam Oliphant, was removed for incompetence by then-Gov. Jeb Bush. Snipes has won election for the office in 2004 and has been re-elected every 4 years since.

Her first problem as supervisor was ahead of the 2004 presidential primary whereby a handful of mail-in ballots were sent to the wrong address. She took full responsibility and had her office recheck addresses on remaining mail-ins. One week before the election, her office informed 100,000 voters that their polling place had moved, but luckily on Election Day, things went swimmingly.

Until the actual general election of 2004 when problems were as serious as a scream of "Allahu Akbar!" in a bar. About 58,000 mail-in ballots were not delivered and the post office attempted to figure out what the heck just happened. Snipes' office scrambled to send out replacements.

Like an omen to future elections, the Sun Sentinel reported that the Broward elections office WAS STILL COUNTING BALLOTS DAYS AFTER the 2004 election!

In the 2006 election, after the rest of Florida had finished tallying votes, BROWARD WAS STILL COUNTING because there was a chance that some votes may have been left in machines at polling places, which led to the term, "Thumb stuck in their nether regions."

Even though Gov. Rick Scott tried to purge felons from the voter rolls after his 2010 win as governor, at least five felons voted in Broward County in 2012. The same year, people waited in line past the 9 pm deadline because some locations ran out of ballots. A week after the election, about 1,000 uncounted ballots turned up in a warehouse.

Brenda Snipes

In 2012, Florida came in dead last to report election totals. Initially, Snipes defended her incompetence but eventually agreed to pursuing reforms to end long lines and misplaced ballots.

Snipes' first lawsuit came in 2014 over confused ballot layout, a possible problem in this year's election.

In the August 2016 primary, her office posted election results for early and mail-in voting on its website before polls closed at 7 p.m., which is a violation of state law. Snipes blamed a third-party vendor.

Before the November 2016 election in which Hillary Clinton loss to Donald Trump, a few voters complained that their mail-in ballots were missing the medical marijuana amendment that passed that year.

Then Snipes got sued again.

Tim Canova (I) for Congress lost to U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Weston) in 2016 and sued to see the ballots from that primary in March 2017. Snipes had ordered the ballots destroyed in September 2017, signing a certification that no court cases that centered on the ballots were pending. But under federal freaking law, those ballots were required to be kept 22 months after the election. Snipes had them destroyed after only 12 months.

Now we have Gov. Scott's Senate campaign suing elections supervisors in Broward and Palm Beach county Thursday where "fraud" and "incompetence" have been cited.

In their lawsuit against Broward, Scott, who is narrowly leading in the state's race for a U.S. Senate seat, allege that election officials are hiding critical information about the number of votes cast and counted.

In an emergency court hearing on Friday, state Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips ruled there has "been a violation of the Florida constitution," as well as the states' public records act, by not turning over requested records.

Gee, ya think?

For more information on Snipes, check out the Sun Sentinel.

Phillips ordered Snipes to allow for the "immediate inspection" and "photocopying" of the requested records no later than 7 p.m. Friday, hardly giving her enough time to doctor enough records to give the Democrats the win.

Scott's emergency complaint accused Snipes of being "unwilling to disclose records revealing how many electors voted, how many ballots have been canvassed, and how many ballots remain to be canvassed," adding that charges of uncertainty "raises substantial concerns about the validity of the election process."

President Trump, who doesn't like to get in the middle of controversies that don't directly involve him [just kidding] said of Snipes, "She has had a horrible history . . . and all of a sudden they're finding votes out of nowhere."

It is amazing that this incompetent woman has not been fired.

Scott is running against longtime incumbent Democrat Sen. Bill Nelson, a man with a strange voice who always looks as if he had just finished crying.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Dummy Debbie compares NRA to terrorist groups

Debbie does illegal 'gun-finger'

Debbie Wasserman Overbite Schultz (Duh-FL) cannot see significant differences between ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Al Shabaab, Hamas, Hezbollah and the NRA.

She characterized the NRA as "just shy of a terrorist organization" on Tuesday, in response to the recent appointment of its new president, Oliver North, who contended that the Parkland, Florida students pushing stricter gun-control legislation are engaging in "civil terrorism."

Speaking of shy, Schultz is "just three cards shy of a full deck."

"The NRA is kind of just shy of a terrorist organization," she told HuffPo Tuesday. "They have done everything they can to perpetuate the culture of violence that we have in our country with the spread of assault weapons across the nation."

The blame really lies on the shoulders of our nation's founders who believed that it is a person's God-given right to defend him/herself. In fact, as I write this Friday morning, there is a shooting in Santa Fe, Texas in progress and the one hope I have is that there is someone with a gun to stop the guy with a gun who it is said to have gone into a classroom and shot a young woman. [The story is unfolding this very minute so the facts are fuzzy.]

Oliver North depicted the Parkland survivors as criminals, accusing them as relying on "intimidation and harassment and lawbreaking" in an interview he had May 9th with the Washington Times.

"They call them activists. That's what they're calling themselves. They're not activists--this is civil terrorism," North said.

The congress-cretin took issue with North's rhetoric that the NRA is facing opposition the likes of which has "never been seen against a civil rights organization in America." He also characterized the gun-control activists as reminiscent of "the terrible days of Jim Crow," led by the Dixiecrats.

To compare the NRA, an organization that teaches gun safety as a top priority, and whose members are virtually all law abiding citizens, as "just shy of a terrorist organization," shows just how little she knows about the NRA and terrorist organizations.

The NRA follows the law; terrorist organizations do not. The NRA has never been accused of killing anyone but its members and other gun-carrying citizens have stopped crimes and protected themselves from crimes such as rape and armed assaults. 

Terrorist organizations kill indiscriminately, and to make such a false comparison of them with the NRA merely shows the desperation of the left to discredit decent gun owners and the value of the U.S. Constitution.

It's also fake virtue-signaling. By blaming the gun, the left doesn't need to deal with the real problems we face, such as the breakup of the nuclear family, where having a father in the home, or a man in the life of male teens, makes a huge difference in whether a young man gets involved with crime.

The problem isn't the guns or knives or vans that plow into crowds, it's the person behind those tools. The NRA simply teaches us how to use the first on the list responsibly and safely.

And let's not forget, Debbie has problems with her own shady past.

Tweet

DNC out of money, out of their minds

"I don't give a s**t"

The Democratic National Committee has entered this year of midterm elections "dead broke" but they found a way to twist logic and blame it on the Republicans. The committee only has a little more than $400,000 in party coffers, according to federal records.

Finishing 2017 with about $6.8 million in available cash, they found themselves is about $6.1 million in debt. The balance, therefore, is a measly $422,582.04 [kidding about the four cents] to start 2018 midterm elections with little more than pizza money.

The DNC's woes seemed to begin shortly after the 2016 elections, when a TV reality star defeated Hillary Clinton, the worst candidate ever to win the nomination without having one redeeming moral quality and who uses incompetence as her excuse for her actions. The DNC was rocked with turmoil and the chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz had to resign amid leaked emails implying the DNC leadership "rigged" the primaries so Clinton would defeat Sen. Bernie "The Socialist" Sanders.

In February 2017, former Obama administration official Tom "Potty Mouth" Perez was selected to replace Wasserman Schultz, over Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison. This sparked discord in the party as some Democrats of like mind anti-Semitic leanings wanted Ellison, who is a Muslim, to run the DNC.

Most recently, the DNC is being scrutinized as a key figure in the Russia collusion investigation, and information that it helped fund the "anti-Trump" dossier that apparently led to the start of the probe, or at least partially so.

Party officials claim the figures on the funding aren't all that poor. 

The Party will still have the mainstream media on their side and plans for the "Dress Like the Other Gender Dance and Mixer" will take place as scheduled, led by the inimitable Chelsea Manning, who still plans to run for the Senate as a female in spite of "her" chromosomes and male junk.

The RNC raised $132 million last year but they better not sit on their hands like the Democrats did at the State of the Union speech. The GOP faces a battle in the midterms and they need to not take anything for granted, in spite of their superior money management skills over the Democrats, who spend money like drunken sailors in a cat house.

The only difference is that it's never their own money.

Tweet

Debbie Wasserman Schultz poo-poos the thousand bucks tax savings

Former disgraced DNC head and current Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz joined another Democratic brain trust, Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi, to poo-poo the $1,000 tax savings that resulted from the  Trump tax reform legislation.

An echo-chamber liberal audience at Florida Atlantic University watched Pelosi double down on her recent minimization of the cash bonuses given out by many companies such as Disney, AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, Wal-Mart, Wells Fargo, Fiat Chrysler, Southwest Airlines, Home Depot, Apple and Boeing.

The event was sponsored by a group called Not One Penny. Wasserman Schultz, who appeared with Pelosi, asserted that a thousand dollars doesn't go "very far for almost anyone."

She downplayed the impact that the bonuses and wage increases will have on middle-class families.

"Frankly, if you look at the bonuses, which I haven't heard of a corporate bonus more than $1,000 so far--which by the way is taxed, so it's not $1,000--and then you spread $1,000 over the course of a year, to think of about how much that is, of course they get it all at once. But I'm not sure that $1,000 (which is taxed, taxable) goes very far for almost anyone."

So the party that loves to tax is using the tax differential for the bonus to illustrate how little $1,000 is for "middle-class families."

Wasserman Schultz's net worth is around $972,000. 

Nancy Pelosi's net worth is $196 million on a $193,000 senator's salary. 

Why would they consider a thousand bucks significant for the average American? They are as out of touch with Americans as Harvey Weinstein.

Tweet

Trump shines a light on ex-Dem IT aide Imran Awan

So whatever became of the federal court case against Imran Awan, the former IT aide to congressional Democrats, particularly his most ardent defender, Debbie Wasserman Schultz? An inquiring president wants to know.

President Trump is throwing a stick for the media to chase regarding the Pakistani who is alleged to have committed bank fraud, as is Bernie Sanders' wife. 

"Whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the DNC?" he asked in an interview published Thursday in The New York Times. 

Both Awan and his lovely wife Hina Alvi, were charged with a total of four counts, which included federal bank fraud and conspiracy. Awan pleaded not guilty to all charges.

"Whatever happened to them?" Trump repeated. "With the two servers that they broke up into a million pieces? Whatever happened to them?"

Awan hasn't been charged with anything related to his specific IT duties in Congress, but Debbie Wasserman Schultz seems to have 'a thing' for him. 

The case has Republican lawmakers concerned about the Pakistani's access to sensitive information and he, along with other IT aides for House Democrats, have been on investigators' radar for months over concerns of alleged (ha) equipment theft, access to sensitive computer systems that would make terrorists dance in the streets and hand out halvah, and more, according to reports going back to the beginning of the year.

Awan and Alvi (remember, his lovely wife) are facing allegations they conspired to get home equity lines of credit from the Congressional Federal Credit Union by using taqiyya (lying) about two properties and sending the money to individuals (possibly terrorists, possibly ice cream vendors) in Pakistan.

Awan was born in Pakistan and came to the U.S. with his family when he was a teenager. He became a U.S. citizen over ten years ago, but he left his heart in Islamabad.

The case surrounding Awan has created renewed scrutiny on Wasserman Schultz for allowing him to stay on the payroll for months after the criminal investigation was revealed and he was barred from the House IT network, which greatly angered Mamnoon Hussain for unknown reasons.

Most lawmakers fired Awan in February when the news came out, but Wasserman Schultz kept him on until his arrest in July. That's when she knew their relationship was over, professional or otherwise, you make the call.

Earlier this month, prosecutors warned that Awan is a "flight risk" and could head to Pakistan if a judge approves his request to lift "all of the conditions of his release."

U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu filed a motion urging the U.S. District court to deny Awan's request.

Awan is now enrolled in the High Intensity Supervision Program (HISP) with conditions he abide by an electronically monitored curfew of 12 a.m. to 6 a.m. and limit traveling beyond 150 miles from his home. Pakistan is about 7,069 miles from his current home, which is probably why he filed the request, and also to have his monitoring bracelet removed in order to make a clean break.

The only question is, would Awan make that break with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a married congresswoman with a slight lisp who has troubles of her own and might see Awan and Pakistan as a new lease on life, if she doesn't tell them that she's Jewish.

"While the government possesses Awan's Pakistani passport, nothing prevents him from obtaining a new Pakistani passport at the Embassy in D.C. That passport would permit Awan to board a flight and leave the country at any time," the motion read. "The government asserts that Awan is a flight risk and that his participation in HISP is by far the least restrictive condition that can be imposed on him to ensure his return to Court."

Wasserman Schultz refuses to see any wrongdoing by Awan and naturally blames the "right-wing media circus fringe," for the attention on Awan. 

Yeah sure, the right-wing media is everywhere, from ABC to CBS to MSNBC to CNN. Heck, even Netflix is left-wing.

Perhaps we should focus more on Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Think about that, Mr. President.



Tweet

Democrats and their wacky weed want 80-seat House gain

Pelosi thinking about tearing down
the Capitol because it was built
for slave-holders

Orange County, Calif. -- The midterm elections are just down the road and the Democrats may be smoking wacky weed. They are hallucinating about winning 80 House seats and the Republicans are not going to take it sitting down or lighting up.

"We are building the largest battlefield in a decade," Tyler Law, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman bragged.

With people like Nancy Pelosi, Anthony Weiner, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the party, what could possibly go wrong?

Wasserman Schultz, who looks like a spokeswoman for the now defunct "Poofume" has her own troubles, and Pelosi may be completely senile by the time the midterms roll around.

The Democratic organizers believe they have a good chance in no less than 80 districts across America, and they might, if they can get more illegal immigrants to vote. But the truth is, they lost all four of this year's special election bids for seats held by Republicans and they will likely have a similar showing.

According to Steve Doocy of Fox News Network, the Democrats' best chances at picking up seats could happen in the 23 districts  where voters split their tickets last year by picking Hillary Clinton for president and a GOP lawmaker for the House.

The Democrats, historically seen as the party of slavery, are trying to place emphasis on recruiting candidates who have actually served in the military--a rare bird for them indeed.

"Veterans obviously have a huge amount of credibility," Law told Fox News. "Credibility with Democrats, with independents, and with Republicans."

But just because someone is a veteran, it doesn't make them politically astute or competent.

So the GOP is going on offense.

"Just three weeks before Election Day in 2016, [Democratic House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi was on TV saying they'd take the House back, win 30 seats," said Matt Gorman, the communications director at the National Republican Congressional Committee. "We're still in the majority."

"We're going to expand the map into Trump country," Gorman said and the GOP is going to zero in on those 12 districts where voters split between Trump and Democratic lawmakers on the ticket.

Real Clear Politics election analyst David Byler believes the Democrats may be at a disadvantage. "The math is slanted against them in terms of how the districts are drawn," he said, referring to gerrymandering.

Hopefully, the Democrats are totally off base with their hopes to take so many seats back in the House and hopefully, as an aside, Michael Moore will move to another country and take up the Communist cause.  



Tweet

Kucinich attacks Dems for going after Trump's mental illness

Former Democratic congressman and presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich blasted colleagues from his own party Tuesday over their feeble attempts to examine President Trump's mental and physical fitness for office. 

They would hopefully use these finding to seek his removal and find favor with Hillary Clinton who would then demand to be appointed as the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!

The campaign is being led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). Raskin is trying to rally support for his bill in the wake of Trump's attacks on the media and others.

Kucinich says the Democrats aren't helping the party with proposals like this one. "It's a political statement, not a medical statement," he said. "I think it's destroying the party as an effective opposition."

"People want political parties to be focused on America's economic needs, jobs, wages, health care, education, retirement security and peace," he told Fox News, "and they want American politicians to be constructive, not destructive."

Kucinich speculated that some Democrats still can't get over the election results and cry themselves to sleep or watch a little CNN or MSNBC to reaffirm their commitment to get Trump out of office before he ruins Obamacare altogether.

"What's happening here is not good for the country," he said, meaning that Democrats overall are not good for the country.

Raskin's bill would establish another commission, as if we don't have enough already. This would be the "Oversight Commission on Presidential Capacity," and would carry out a "medical examination of the President to determine whether the President is mentally or physically unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office."

Under this bill the determination could be made if the "Commission finds that the President is temporarily or permanently impaired by physical illness or disability, mental illness, mental deficiency, or alcohol or drug use to the extent that the person lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to execute the powers and duties of the office of President."

Had Hillary Clinton won the election, this bill would refer to her alcohol or drug use, not Trump's because he doesn't drink or take drugs. Hillary, we know, drinks like a fish.

It would also have referred to he mental deficiency as exemplified in her belief that you can wipe an email server clean "with a cloth." It would take an imbecile to believe something as stupid as that.

And in terms of her physical disabilities, they very possibly exist as we have seen when she on several occasions needed the help of staff to keep her from falling on her face. She has also displayed eye movements that appear to be related to seizure activity.

The Raskin bill cites the 25th Amendment, which states the vice president shall assume the powers of the presidency when the president is declared "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

If Raskin thought he could get away with it, he would put Donald J. Trump's name on the bill because that's the only reason he's submitting it, and he made no bones about it.

In the same section, it's clear that the vice president and others would need to sign off on such a decision--meaning, of course, that the bill is merely a symbolic gesture, like Kathy Griffin's severed head of Trump. (Of course, in Griffin's case the Secret Service questioned her for over an hour. I bet she was more than simply inconvenienced.)

It's ironic how the bill was introduced by Raskin around the time of Trump's media attacks in April. When MSNBC's Morning Joe attacks him on a daily basis, with such scathing, brutal and disgusting insults, they believe that they should be immune to a response. That's not how Trump rolls.

The bill has almost two-dozen cosponsors, including the sneaky Bernie back-stabber Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who went all to pieces when Hillary failed for a second time to be the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!


Tweet

Class-action suit against DNC turns weird

Since last summer, a group of people who supported the Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) campaign for president, have waged a class-action suit against the DNC for alleged fraud. They claim that then-chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz worked to get Hillary Clinton the nomination by undermining Sanders. The debacle ended at the time in the resignation of Wasserman Schultz only to eventually be replaced by potty mouth Tom Perez.

Now things have gotten a bit strange and involves the Capitol Police.

A court document filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by the attorneys of the plaintiffs said they received a call for information regarding the case from the office of Wasserman Schultz, and claimed the caller used a voice changer.

Attorney Elizabeth Lee Beck said "At 4:54 p.m. today [June 1], an individual called our law office from '305-936-5724.'" It was discovered that the number is the contact phone number for Wasserman Schultz's Aventura office in Florida.

"My secretary stated that it sounded like the caller was using a voice changer because the voice sounded robotic and genderless--along the lines of the voice changers used when television show interviews are kept anonymous," Beck said. "The caller concluded with 'Okey dokey,' after my secretary gave the caller public information about the case. After the call ended, a simple Google search of the phone number '305-936-5724' shows that it is the phone number for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Aventura office . . . What just occurred is highly irregular and we will be filing the instant e-mail with the court forthwith."

Attorneys representing the DNC claim that no one in Wasserman Schultz's office, including Wasserman Schultz herself, has any knowledge of the call.

So, like Hogan's Heroes' Master Sergeant Schultz, Debbie "Doesn't know anything; didn't see anything."

Hopefully there will be more to follow.


Tweet

Holey moley, the DNC has legal problems

(Photo: Fox News)

The DNC is facing a class-action suit alleging that Bernie "Sandinista" Sanders was robbed in the 2016 presidential primary against Crooked Hillary Clinton. It doesn't get any better than that.

Of course the media is keeping it quiet while they attack Trump for what he didn't say in Saudi Arabia and for messing up the word 'ethnicity' when he read it off the TelePrompter after a long, tiring flight. 

The media doesn't want to talk about the lawsuit against the Democratic Party as it continues to play out in the courts claiming in one instance that the Clinton campaign had a coordinated effort with the DNC against Sanders.

The case is being heard in a Florida courtroom (or as Sanders says, 'Cawtroom') and dates back to last June when the DNC got nailed colluding with the Clinton campaign after documents were leaked appearing to show DNC officials seeking to undermine the old socialist with three houses.

The lawsuit, filed by Jared Beck, a Harvard law expert, includes residents of 45 states and goes against the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, its former chairwoman. 

The DNC desperately wants the case dismissed and last year was able to get a small victory when it was decided the plaintiffs improperly filed paperwork.

Beck (no relation to Glenn) is demanding the party repay individuals and Sanders supporters for contributions they made during the election, and is alleging misappropriation of funds.

"If we can't trust the two political parties to run an election in a fair manner, who can we trust?" he told Fox News, as he somehow brought the GOP into the situation in which they we not involved.

Bruce Spiva, a shyster lawyer for the DNC, argued in its motion to dismiss that the Democratic Party holds the right to select its candidate any way it chooses and isn't bound by pledges of fairness.

That ought to put a smile on the faces of Schultz and Hillary--they hate fairness. And screw 'pledges;' they're merely promises.

Spiva, who used to steal coins from his mother's purse, argued, "We could have voluntarily decided that, 'Look, we're gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.' That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right."

The DNC deserves him.

In spite of the fact that Article 5, Section 4 of the Democratic Party charter stipulates that it will function with total neutrality during Democratic primaries, Spiva argued the promise was non-binding. 

"And there's no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There's no contractual obligation here," Spiva said.

Spiva means 'sleep' in Bulgarian, but it must mean 'snake' in another language.

"This lawsuit has nothing to do with politics or political disagreements within the DNC. This case should concern everyone because it goes to the heart of the country's democratic institutions," Beck said. 

According to law experts and my source, Vinny, Beck faces a tough climb if he is to win this case.

"I don't think it is going to amount to much," Michael Toner, an attorney with Wiley-Rein and former legal counsel for the RNC.

"Courts don't typically get in the middle of intra-party disputes and while I'm sure the DNC does not appreciate having to fight this lawsuit, judges are very reluctant to exercise their jurisdiction over politics," Toner said.

The DNC shysters also say the suit is meritless, much like the GOP's contention that the classified emails on Hillary Clinton's illegal private email server did not merit further investigation.

"The vast majority of whom almost certainly do not share Plaintiff's political views--have no realistic means of disassociating from this action, brought in their name against the political party they likely support," a mind reading expert and DNC lawyer wrote.

In another case against the DNC ("Do Not Care" party) plaintiff's who worked for them the DNC allege they failed to pay overtime wages during the campaign which they lost miserably.

Toner said the danger to the DNC would come if the lawsuit of the Sanders case entered the discovery phase. Both cases pose a potentially dangerous threat to the party that lost to a TV personality.

The DNC filed a motion to dismiss the second class-action suit alleging those workers were not paid a minimum wage, while others were refused overtime compensation guaranteed by federal and state law.

So even their own socialist-leaning party that fights for a $15 minimum wage refuses to pay their own workers at that rate. 

You can't make these jokes up.



Tweet

DNC head calls Trump a bully who lost election

He never learned how to tie a tie but he sure knows how to holler. Democratic National Chairscreamer Tom Perez yelled at New Jersey liberals screaming that Donald Trump "didn't win the election." 

Actually, if you go to the video tape, you will notice that it was Donald Trump indeed, who beat Perez's fellow screamer, Hillary Clinton. She lost t he election by "a lot" of electoral votes. Hillary's California win put her over the top in popular votes but that isn't how the United States determines the election win. So she lost. Trump win. Case closed.

Perez also suggested to the choir that President Trump doesn't care about voters, which is why he is doing, or at least attempting to do, that which he promised to the voters.

If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. Period. Hmm.

Perez, who was Labor secretary under Obama, is clearly taking the left in a battle with the Trump administration, and is trying his doggone best to sound like 'The Donald.' But instead, he sounds like Hillary Clinton with small testicles.

Rather than using his title, Perez said, "Donald Trump, you don't understand our values. You didn't win the election."

I must repeat myself--he won, you lost, get on with your miserable, petty life, you ugly bald-headed loser. Since Obama screwed the pooch starting in 2010, the Democrats lost the House, then the Senate, and now, yes now, the White House. Trump won.

Beating Hillary Clinton really hurt the Democrats emotionally--they even were able to get some of the questions for the presidential debate from Donna Brazile and still Hillary lost. Perhaps it had more to do with how much the country distrusted her, thought her incompetent, sneaky and had no actual platform. 

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (Duh-FL) resigned after Trump was victorious and won the election [Perez]. It was also revealed that Wasserman-Schultz was in the bag for Clinton and wanted to do whatever it took to defeat the socialist Sanders.

"We have a bully in Washington in the White House," Perez told the Newark crowd who previously didn't know the White House was in Washington.

One thing for sure is that Tom Perez is no bully to the banks. Under Obama he was quite friendly to them just like Hillary was to Wall Street. If Trump is a bully to the banks, that's more in line with Perez than Perez being in line with his party.

To see where Perez stands on the few issues he's willing to stand on, click here.




Tweet

Schultz grills Comey over Russian hacking

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, disgraced former chairperson of the Democratic National Committee, whose leaked emails supporting Clinton's nomination over Sanders, forced her to step down or else be fired, which would clearly bring her to tears.

Well, Debbie finally got to turn the tables on FBI Director James Comey on Friday and questioned him during a closed-door meeting regarding alleged Russian interference during the presidential campaign and election.

Wasserman Schultz (Duh-FL) was DNC chairwoman for over five years but knew that her days were numbered after the anti-Bernie bias was leaked in her emails. Party heads are not supposed to show a bias toward any one of the candidates of their party, but Debbie was all in for Hillary and would have dated her if one of them identified as a male.

The Hill reported that the closed-door meeting that included intelligence chiefs and members of Congress was tense.

At one point, a leftist Democrat screamed: "You let us down!" 

The questioners wanted to know why Comey withheld information about the hacking scandals from its members.

"Essentially Debbie asked, how was it that the FBI knew that the DNC was being hacked and they didn't tell her? He gave some bulls**t explanation, 'That's our standard, we called this one, we called that one' [she said] 'Well, why didn't you call me?" a Democrat told The Hill.

Wasserman Schultz said she won't discuss what went down in the meeting. 

Comey was "unflinching" when he answered their questions and this got Nancy Pelosi the goat perturbed. She said that his cool demeanor was being "condescending to members," because he refused to grovel.

Many Democrats are now trying to make the case that Hillary Clinton would have been our next president if not for the Russian hack. Not only would she have been our first woman president, she might have been our first president convicted of espionage as a new investigation looms large.


Tweet

Unpredictable Comey causing RNC and DNC to be prepared

Both the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee are preparing responses in the event of any new developments that may come from the FBI Director James Comey in the case of Hillary Clinton's investigation of her private server and the Clinton Foundation and a possible conflict of interest as the presidential election is just hours away.

Depending on orders that Comey will get from his boss, Loretta Lynch, the  Committees' speeches will be geared to either attack or praise Comey's decision, depending on which party is doing the speeches at that time.

As it stands now, Comey announced, that based on the most recently reviewed emails, the investigation remains the same. However, after the election, 'stuff' may hit the proverbial fan.

Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) made it clear that he wants the investigation to be forever closed and for everyone to just "leave that poor woman alone. If she wasn't a woman, she wouldn't be attacked the way she has been .  .  .  damn Republicans." After Comey said that nothing had been found that any prosecutor would indict Clinton for, Cummings sang praises for the director. 

But a little over a week ago when Comey revisited the investigation when emails were found on Anthony Weiner's computer related to Clinton's time at the State Department, he sang a different tune.

"James Comey is the worst FBI Director that ever directed the FBI. I don't know if his family is watching this, but they should be ashamed." 

President Obama (D-allegedly from Ill.) commented on the investigation saying: "If, if, if, if, if, if, if, if, if you look at Hillary compared to Trump, you will see there's no comparison. You can't vote for a man who talks that way to women. You, you, you, you, you just can't. That'd be foolish. Hillary's innocent and this is just a witch hunt."

Now that Comey has decided that he is going to halt further investigation on Clinton at this time, the tunes again have changed.

GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump commented on Comey's most recent change of heart. "The system is rigged, folks. The system is rigged. Crooked Hillary shouldn't be allowed to run for president; she should be in prison, but the system is rigged. Rigged."

Former DNC Chairwoman Debby Wasserman Schultz (Duh-Fl.) recently commented, "Would you like fries with that?"


Tweet

Hillary cheated, Brazile gets booted

CNN said that it is "completely uncomfortable" with emails just leaked showing that interim head of the Democratic National Committee, Donna Brazile, helped Hillary Clinton cheat on the primary debate. 

The Clinton News Network has accepted Ms. Brazile's resignation as a contributer, but it's obvious that they still feel "completely comfortable" with the fact that Hillary Clinton accepted the "heads-up" from Brazile and used the opportunity to provide the debate moderator with an "intelligent" and lengthy response.

"CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate," claimed CNN spokesliberal Lauren Pratapas in an email she sent to the New York Post.

"We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributer."

Brazile's contract was merely suspended in July when former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz had her emails outed by WikiLeaks which showed bias toward Clinton over Bernie Sanders. She was ousted after the discovery was made and replaced by Brazile.

It is unclear if Hillary Clinton or anyone in her campaign was aware of the Debbie Wasserman Schultz bias (probably) and nobody in the campaign declined to accept the help.

What is clear is that wherever Clintons go, scandal follows. 

The mere fact that Clinton's acceptance of Brazile's and Wasserman Schultz's help was not discussed and never questioned by CNN.

In a way, isn't that election tampering? 



Tweet

WikiLeaks' Assange not ready to leak

After much anticipated ballyhoo, promising the American public and the world that he was going to announce the "October surprise," Julian Assange fizzled out. 

I know if anyone is surprised, it's Alex Jones, but perhaps he can make up a conspiracy theory that his gullible fans will believe and tweet 'till their fingers turn blue. 

In any case, there is the possibility that Assange, founder of WikiLeaks and purveyor of U.S. intelligence information to our enemies, will make a video for Tuesday on the 10th anniversary of the website.

Currently, Assange, 45, lives in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London for the past 5 years due to the fact that the Swiss want him to stand trial for sexual assault. Evidently, he took advice from Bill Clinton and found sanctuary in the embassy whereas Bill had the government on his side.

If Assange speaks, the Trumpers believe Hillary Clinton will be the target of the verbal assault and what he might say will be extraordinarily damaging to her campaign hopes.

James Comey has vowed that if anyone stands in the way of Hillary's quest for the presidency, they will have him to contend with.

"I don't want to give it away," Assange told Megyn Kelly of Fox News in August, "but it's a variety of documents, from different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles, some quite interesting, some even entertaining," (perhaps involving Hill and Huma, if you ask Donald).

Last month, Assange told Sean Hannity of Fox News and the Trump Fan Club for Life, that his next round of revelations was coming "reasonably soon." Hannity went all gaga and moist.

Assange released 20,000 internal DNC emails in August showing what appeared to be an anti-Bernie Sanders conspiracy, to keep him from winning the Democratic nomination. It led to the resignation of Debbie "Downer" Wasserman Schultz and should have embarrassed the Clinton campaign.

But in order to embarrass someone, that person (or campaign) must have a sense of right and wrong. The Clintons have always been able to justify their nefarious behavior as long as it served their political ambitions. The Clinton campaign believes that it is so important to elect Hillary Clinton as president, that any means necessary to accomplish this goal is justified.

While Assange in saying that he cannot make the announcement in person due to security concerns, there is no evidence that any danger for him exists. That said, some officials and pundits have made threats directed at him in the past. 

WikiLeaks tweeted an alleged quote from Hillary Clinton from a 2010 State Department meeting. She asked if Assange could be killed in a drone strike (see below.)

View image on Twitter

The sad part in all this is that in spite of Hillary wanting to 'drone' Assange, or anyone, would not make any difference to her zombies, anymore than it would make a difference to Trump's if he shot someone on Broadway.

This is perhaps the strangest and most frightening election in our country's history--and that's not Trump hyperbole or a Clinton lie.




Tweet