Guess who George Stuffaballotbox tries to blame for Trump assassination attempt

ABC  Democratic operative and fake news nebbish, George Stephanopoulos said Sunday that it's Donald Trump and half of America who have contributed to "violent rhetoric" after a failed assassination attempt on Trump's life was thwarted on Saturday in Butler, PA. This was said in spite of his political opponent, Joe Biden, who on Monday called for America to put a bullseye on Trump, not to mention all that the left has said regarding their advocating for violence against him and the "MAGA Republicans."

Stephanopoulos [aka Stuffaballotbox; aka Snuffleupagous] was on ABC's "This Week" where he outlined statements by Vivek Ramaswamy and Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) who both criticized lefties for their rhetoric about Trump that they suggest lead up to the assassination attempt.

"Of course, President Trump and his supporters have contributed to this violent rhetoric, as well," the former Clinton team member and fake news munchkin said.

"Absolutely, George," host Martha Raddatz agreed.

"We were just looking back this morning at some of the things President Trump has said," Raddatz continued. "He warned last March of potential death and destruction if he were charged by the Manhattan district attorney, ‘our country is being destroyed as they tell us to be peaceful.’ Trump in January warned of bedlam in the country if the criminal charges against him succeeded, and of course, in March he said, ‘Now if I don’t get elected … it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.’"

Raddatz noted Trump has said the "bloodbath" quote was a joke and taken out of context – he was referring to economic woes with his remarks – before adding, "But those are indeed his words."

Were Biden's words taken out of context when he wanted to put a bullseye on Trump, and if so, why was Sarah Palin, who put crosshairs on a voting district map excoriated while Biden received applause? 

Were Maxine Waters' words taken out of context when she called for people to harass Trump? 

And when the Left has depicted Trump as evil, akin to Hitler, and a man who would 'end democracy', how else are people to respond than to eliminate the threat?

Raddatz said Trump supporters have offered similar rhetoric and quickly evoked the January 6 Capitol riot.

"Let’s remember January 6," she said. 

Yes, let's do that. 

Do you remember when, on January 6, Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd shot and killed Ashli Babbitt during the unarmed 'insurrection'? Contrary to the lies the media spread, no other person was killed that day--not even Brian Sicknick--he died from a pair of strokes that day, but the media lied to you.

What about when Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise, the Republican House Majority Whip, was shot, along with four others, at a baseball game in Alexandria, Virginia in 2017? The shooter belonged to several anti-Republican groups and was a staunch supporter of comrade Sen. Bernie Sanders.  

Perhaps the bigger problem with the violent rhetoric and the horrible comparisons of Trump and Republicans to Hitler and white supremacists, [which is not to say Republicans are totally innocent of ever saying incendiary statements about the Left] is the media who makes the violent offenders, like this moron, famous. His photo was shown all over the front pages of paper and digital media and everyone knows his name. 

Copycat cretins are out there wanting the same notoriety and are willing to kill and die for it. The media knows this and publicize them despite this. 

Vote for Trump in November, not the head of lettuce. Even George Stephanopoulos thinks Biden won't make another 4 years as President. Ask him; just don't ask him on camera.

Tweet

Trump sues Stephanopoulos and ABC for defamation

If there is one thing we know about former President Donald Trump, it's that he's a mud fighter. While he's on the defense on many legal matters right now, he's going offense against ABC News' George Stephanopoulos [aka Mister Snuffalopougus] over comments he made in an interview with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace early in March.

In the interview, Stephanopoulos tried to shame Mace for supporting Trump because she had been raped as a 16-year-old and he mischaracterized legal findings against Trump by saying that  "judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape."

This is a total lie and now Trump has filed a lawsuit for defamation against the former Clinton operative and ABC over the remarks.

Trump’s lawsuit highlights how Stephanopoulos at various points in his questioning of Mace said that Trump had been found "liable for rape." What the jury actually found was that the former President was liable for sexual abuse under New York law--not rape.

“Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape. How do you square your endorsement of Donald Trump with the testimony we just saw, ” Stephanopoulos asked Mace.

“These statements were and remain false, and were made by Defendant Stephanopoulos with actual malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth given that Defendant Stephanopoulos knows that these statements are patently and demonstrably false,” Trump’s attorney, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the 20-page complaint.

“Indeed, the jury expressly found that Plaintiff did not commit rape and, as demonstrated below, Defendant George Stephanopoulos was aware of the jury’s finding in this regard yet still falsely stated otherwise,” Brito continued.

The 20-page complaint pleads two counts — one for defamation per se (statements automatically deemed harmful) and one for defamation per quod (statements the plaintiff must prove caused damage) — and seeks an unspecified amount of damages.

It is definitely harmful for Trump's re-election because anyone who watches the mainstream media will never be told about the mischaracterization of how Stephanopoulos lied. 

As seen in the complaint, the jury, though it found Trump liable for defamation and sexual abuse in the E. Jean Carroll suit tried first (Carroll II), declined to find him liable for rape. (The second Carroll trial involved only a claim for defamation.) And, as the complaint points out, Stephanopoulos was well aware of this, as he specifically asked Carroll about it in an interview shortly after the initial verdict in May of 2023. 

So the little man lied.

Hopefully Trump will be able to collect $500 million to cover his bond in another case waged against him. 

Tweet

Kinzinger blasts his own Party over letter someone wrote threatening his family

"Sniff, sniff, It's just something in my, sniff, eye. I'll be okay."

Congressperson Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) attacked his own party on Sunday because someone wrote a nasty letter threatening to kill him. He said the letter was addressed to his wife and delivered to his home. So unlike the GOP who never blamed the Democrats or Bernie Sanders for the crazed Sanders supporter who shot up a baseball field of players, nearly killing Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), Kinzinger blamed the entire Republican Party for the act of one person.

Kinzinger is one of only two Republicans who Nancy Pelosi selected for the January 6 kangaroo court. Pelosi chose Kinzinger and Liz Cheney (R-AZ) in spite of the GOP selecting actual conservatives for the farce because she knew they hated former President Donald J. Trump and would be their attack poodles.

Kinzinger spoke about the nasty letter during a Sunday morning appearance on ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos. He theatrically told the former Clinton operative that he wasn't scared for himself, but he worried about his family, in spite of the fact that threats to people in politics are as common as illegal immigrants.

 “This threat that came in, it was mailed to my house. We got it a couple of days ago, and it threatens to execute me, as well as my wife and 5-month-old child. We’ve never seen or had anything like that. It was sent from the local area,” he said.

“I don’t worry – but now that I have a wife and kids, of course, it’s a little different. There’s violence in the future, I’m going to tell you. And until we get a grip on telling people the truth, we can’t expect any differently,” he added.

It's disgusting that anyone should ever be threatened along with their family. It's cowardly and the author of the letter is probably just a bag of hot air. In spite of that, Kinzinger should arm himself and his wife, if he hasn't already done so, because for now, Americans still have the right to self-defense.

Kinzinger later tweeted a photo of the letter, saying, “Here is the letter. Addressed to my wife, sent to my home, threatening the life of my family. The Darkness is spreading courtesy of cowardly leaders fearful of truth. Is this what you want @GOP? Pastors?”

The letter, addressed to Kinzinger’s wife Sofia, read:

You are one stupid c***!

That pimp you married not only broke his oath, he sold his soul. Yours and Christian’s too! Adam’s activities have hurt not only this country, but countless patriotic and God-fearing families. Therefore, although it might take time, he will be executed. But don’t worry! You and Christian will be joining Adam in hell too!

We find it blasphemous that you name the son of the devil Chistian! [sic]

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Obviously, the person who wrote this letter does not in any way represent our Judeo-Christian values. They couldn't even spell Christian correctly. 

The only way we want to get rid of Adam Kinzinger is by voting him out of office. But he probably will not run again, certainly not as a Republican. Unfortunately for him, however, there is no Whiner Party.

Tweet

Biden rejects criticism of pullout clusterfrack from Afghanistan

Biden flashes a "White Supremacy" gesture

Alleged President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. poo-pooed the criticism he received by functional people regarding the clusterfrack of the Afghanistan withdrawal that led to the deaths of 13 American service personnel. 

His response to criticism on an interview Sunday was that "no one's come up with a way to indicate to me" how to withdraw "without anybody getting hurt." Had he even bothered to read "How to Pull Out of a Taliban Overthrown Nation for Dummies" he might have actually done a better job. 

Usually when you have civilians and military in a foreign country where ongoing hostilities have been happening for decades, the smart move would be to evacuate the civilians first, including allies who helped our troops and all Americans and green card holders. You certainly would not have chosen Harmid Karzai International Airport, a single runway airport to withdraw from. Instead, you would have chosen Bagram airport which is much larger and easier to defend. And you would not leave in the middle of fighting season--you would wait until winter.

Next you would systematically withdraw the military along with the equipment and weapons and protect them as they leave. You wouldn't leave anything behind for the enemy to use against the Afghans who remain in country.

It's right there on page one of the "For Dummies" book.

During an interview with CBS News Correspondent Rita Braver, Biden mentioned Afghanistan, claiming that he opposed the war from the beginning and shifting responsibility for the horrendous withdrawal because he has never had the buck stop at his desk. 

Not only has he opposed the war in Afghanistan, Biden also opposed the killing of Bin Laden, the funding of Israel's defensive Iron Dome system that helps thwart Hamas missile attacks on civilians, and the Gulf War. 

"Afghanistan. Well, I've been against that war in Afghanistan from the very beginning," Biden said. "We're spending $300 million a week in Afghanistan over 20 years."

"Everybody says, ‘You could have gotten out without anybody being hurt,’" the house plant continued to mumble. "No one's come up with a way to indicate to me how that happens." [See "For Dummies" above]

Actually, Biden didn't oppose the invasion of Afghanistan--he lied.

As a senator from Delaware, he joined his colleagues, who voted unanimously in support of the 2001 authorization of military force against "nations, organizations, or persons" that then-President George W. Bush determined to have helped perpetrate the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The alleged President has repeatedly spoken about his opposition when he was Vice President under then-President Barack Obama. He touted his opposition to Obama's "surge" of additional troops into Afghanistan in 2009. But his opposition to the surge is not the same as him being "against that war . . . from the very beginning." He was for it before he was against it.

"President Biden, please send us money and supplies"

Biden's argument about the criticism he received about the withdrawal was a misdirection of what the real criticism was: breaking his promise not to leave Americans behind, beside the unnecessary loss of lives and other matters.

"If there's American citizens left, we're gonna stay to get them all out," Biden bragged to ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, on August 16. But on August 31, the ficus marked the end of the war in Afghanistan with a speech in which he lied that "about 100 to 200 Americans remain in Afghanistan with some intention to leave."

"What’s really troublesome and almost frightening to know is that we have a commander in chief who does not see the imperative of bringing the Americans home," Lt. Gen. (Ret.) William "Jerry" Boykin told Fox News in an interview on September 1. "That’s a longstanding ethos, not just of the military, but of America."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

After the clusterfrack of a withdrawal, Boykin and other retired military leaders called for the resignations of Biden's top military and diplomats, including national security advisor Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley. 

As Afghanistan insidiously deteriorates economically, the Taliban is begging for the U.S. and other of its enemies to send money aid in order for them to remain in power and suppress the freedom and self-determination of the people they have been allowed to conquer.

Tweet

Biden's past blather may have created international incident as Russia pulls its ambassador

It wasn't just those historical words to Corn Pop that might have resulted in an all-out interracial kerfuffle, but more recently it might be the words about Vladimir Putin's soul, or lack thereof, that may have just sparked an international incident.

In an obeisant interview with George Stephanopoulos [no relation to Nicholas Dellarackkatakkapolous] that aired on "Good Morning America,"  Biden called Vladimir Putin a "killer" and then claimed that in 2011 he told the Russian dictator to his face that he was soulless, but did not go so far as to challenge him to an arm-wrestling match as is Joe's wont. 

It's possible, however, that Biden was exaggerating and instead told Putin, in no uncertain terms, that he likes the way he rides horses without a shirt.

Sounded like his effort to throw down with Corn Pop with the chain. The reality was he was attacking Mitt Romney in 2012 for saying that we should be concerned about Russia.

The U.S. intelligence community released a report this week stating that Putin was behind the influence operation in the 2020 election aimed at helping Trump and hurting Biden. The Kremlin has denied the claim.

This seems to be the modus operandi by the Democrats as we've seen in the 2016 election in which Hillary Clinton vilified half of the country by calling us "deplorables." Russia had nothing to do with her loss--she simply sucks at campaigning and only got to where she is at on Bill's coattails.

We don't know for sure whether it was the intel report or Biden's macho braggadocio that got the Kremlin to recall its ambassador, Anatoly Antonov, for "consultations," but there's little doubt that our current relationship with Russia is strained..

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that relations with the U.S. “are in a difficult state, which Washington has brought to a dead end in recent years. We are interested in preventing their irreversible degradation, if the Americans are aware of the associated risks.”

According to Russian politician Alexey Pushkov, it was Biden’s remarks that caused the rift:

Посол РФ в Вашингтоне вызван в Москву для консультаций – в ответ на оскорбительный выпад Байдена в адрес Путина. Это – исключительный в дипломатии шаг, следующий – отзыв посла и понижение уровня дипотношений. Москва явно настроена на переоценку всей совокупности отношений с США.

— Алексей Пушков (@Alexey_Pushkov) March 17, 2021

Translation:
“The Russian ambassador to Washington has been summoned to Moscow for consultations – in response to Biden’s insulting attack on Putin. This is an exceptional step in diplomacy, the next is the recall of the ambassador and the lowering of the level of diplomatic relations. Moscow is clearly determined to reassess the entire set of relations with the United States.”

Well there you go, Joe. Your "mine is bigger than yours" mentality, [if there's any mentality left in that head of yours] has needlessly put us at odds with Russia. Now it isn't only Corn Pop who's angry at you, it's Putin. You and your puppet masters have really gone and screwed things up.

Do you guys miss Trump yet?

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Susan Rice believes the rioting is out of the Russian "playbooks"

Former Obama adviser Susan "It Was The Video" Rice blames the violent rioting on the Russians, or some "foreign actors," but insisted that the Russians might be involved with stirring up the chamber pot.

“I’m not reading the intelligence today, or these days—but based on my experience, this is right out of the Russian playbook,” the woman who went on all the Sunday talk shows to lie about the Benghazi attack, blaming on a video watched by a few hundred bored individuals.

Rice, who incompetently served as national security adviser to president Barack Hussein Obama, said this in a Compromised News Network (CNN) interview on Sunday, with Wolf "I Can Hardly Breathe" Blitzer. “But we cannot allow the extremists, the foreign actors, to distract from the real problems we have in this country that are longstanding, centuries old, and need to be addressed responsibly.”

It is unclear whether Rice had smoked a spliff before entering the interview but she sounded like she might have done a few deep tokes.

Saagar Enjeti of "Rising" a news show, tweeted about Rice's hallucination:

Absolutely Incredible: Obama's Former NSA Susan Rice on CNN talking about the protests and domestic strife
"This is right out of the Russian playbook" pic.twitter.com/luXiPV0bOq
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar)

Blitzer, who anchors the show responded, “you’re [puff] absolutely right on the foreign interference.” and then breathlessly asked Rice if she thought the Russians were attempting to “embarrass” the U.S. by “promoting the racial divide in our country.”

“Well we see it all the time, we’ve seen it for years, including on social media where they take any divisive, painful issue…and they play on both sides,” the dolt said. “I would not be surprised to learn that they have fomented some of these extremists on both sides on social media…[or] that they’re funding it in some way, shape, or form.”

Meanwhile, current National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Sunday pointed to a number of countries that were trying to instigate unrest via social media. The main country is China, but he also mentioned Russia, Iran, and Zimbabwe as possibly trying to enflame tensions through social media.

Pressed by former Obama leftist adviser  @GStephanopoulos about evidence that foreign adversaries are exploiting U.S. unrest, O’Brien pointed to social media activity from China “coming straight from the government.”

The pretense for the riots, as opposed to peaceful protests, was initiated by the death of George Floyd during his arrest on May 25 by former officer Derek Chauvin of the Minneapolis PD. Chauvin has been charged with murder 3 and sits in jail awaiting trial. 

The looting, burning of police vehicles, buildings, banks and small businesses, along with several deaths, were done in the honor of Floyd's memory, if you believe that crap.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Stephanopoulos caught cutting his throat on camera when Jay Sekulow spoke to press

Evidently afraid the public was about to hear the other side of the story, the American Bullcrap Corporation's [ABC] George Stephanopoulos was caught on camera doing a "throat slash" or cut, gesture as President Trump attorney Jay Sekulow took questions from actual journalists on Thursday during the Senate impeachment trial coverage.

Stephanopoulos was a staffer for former President Bill "I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton. We can surmise that Stephanopoulos was signaling to his producers to stop allowing his one viewer [named Jim] to hear Sekulow's thoughts about the trial.

The cut gesture was made after explaining that Trump’s legal team will call witnesses who don’t think alleged actions are impeachable. It was then that the camera cut back to Stephanopoulos, who was making the throat-slash gesture.

The embedded Democrat Stephanopoulos then smirked, appearing to realize his gesture was caught on live television. He is the epitome of fake news along with Jim "Dear Diary" Acosta, Chrissy Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Chrissy Hayes and avowed Communist Lawrence O'Donnell.

“And that is Jay Sekulow right there,” Stephanopoulos told viewers before zipping his fly and quickly moving along to a leftist panel discussion.

Just before ABC cut off the press feed, Sekulow was telling actual journalists that the President's legal team plans to prove two different views on impeachment and both would result in Trump remaining in office.

Stephanopoulos' hate Trump lizard brain kicked in and he made the cut sign.

“We’ve got lawyers that are going to be put forward when our side of the case goes, that represents multiple schools of thought on what is and what is not an impeachable offense,” Sekulow said. “But they have one thing in common, that the actions alleged and the actions of the president do not reach that level. No matter what school of thought you’re on… our position is, you still have to meet basic, fundamental constitutional obligations and they haven’t.”

Before becoming an embedded Democrat in ABC, Stephanopoulos was a Bill Clinton staffer who due to his grossly overt sycophantic behavior got him a senior aide position, possibly "with benefits."

But Stephanopoulus' ties to the Clintons eventually became a source of embarrassment to the American Bullcrap Corporation when he was again caught in an illuminating position. That is, he was caught secretly giving money to the Clinton Foundation and had to recuse himself from hosting any presidential debates

It isn't as if he's the only one with ties to the Democrats or someone who is nefarious. Let's not forget Donna Brazile who gave Hillary Clinton the debate questions in the Democratic nomination campaign of 2016 when she went up against Bernie Sanders, or how the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz had to resign as the DNC chair after it was learned that there was an agreement in which Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy and all the money raised. Her campaign also had the right of refusal of who'd be the party communication director and all the decision-making on all the staff.

No, Stephanopoulos, like the above-mentioned Democrats, got caught. Donna Brazile got a gig on Fox News for some odd reason. Wasserman-Schultz is still in office. And George Stephanopoulos still works for ABC.

The left controls the media and buys digital ink by the barrel. Those of us on the right need to be very smart and call them out whenever we see injustice or lies.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.




Tweet

Trump does 'about face' on issue of foreign interference

In the spirit of Joe Biden and most other politicians (except for the crazy socialists like Bernie Sanders), President Trump has walked back what he said on ABC to former Director of Communications for the Clinton administration, George Stephanopoulos earlier this week.

Specifically, Trump said that if was told by a foreign source that they had information on one of his political opponents, would he accept it and would he contact the FBI. He said that he would be willing to listen to a foreign entity with damaging information saying "there isn't anything wrong with it." 

Other than it being immoral and potentially damaging politically due to the hostile media that actually found Trump to be at fault when Iran mined two ships in the Straits of Hormuz this week. In other words, anything that goes wrong or is wrong with the world, is somehow Trump's fault.

On Friday in a Fox News interview, the president, singing a totally different tune, said that he would "of course" contact authorities.

In the initial interview with ABC, he said he disagreed with his FBI Director Christopher Wray's position that if approached by foreign entities, political campaigns should report suspicious communications from them.

Those comments drew sharp criticism from the hypocritical Democrats, who said Trump was giving Russia a green light to interfere in the 2020 presidential election. They failed to condemn Hillary Clinton's use of the foreign national, Christopher Steele, with the Steele dossier, when her campaign used him for opposition research for the 2016 campaign and for which the Mueller probe was based on.

Trump did his "about face" Friday telling Fox News, "Of course, you have to look at it . . . but of course, you give it to the FBI or report it to the attorney general or somebody like that. You couldn't have that happen with our country, and everybody understands that," he said.

“If I thought anything was incorrect or badly stated," he stated imprecisely, "I’d report it to the attorney general, the FBI. I’d report it to law enforcement, absolutely.”

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the current frontrunner at the moment for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, countered Trump on Friday by releasing a video statement on Twitter pledging to not use misinformation in his campaign or tolerate outside interference.

Trump was “dead wrong,” Biden said. “I won’t be part of any attempt to undermine our democracy or public confidence in our institutions.”

Biden's presidential platform seems to be that a) Orange man bad; b) I will cure cancer if you elect me, but not before then; c) Orange man very bad.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks

Tweet

Will Hannity be blowing the lid off Mueller report

The following is satire.

Sean Hannity asks the tough questions, especially those related to the Mueller probe. On his Fox News show, where he promises never to be a Trump basher and always be kind to our president, he spoke about the Mueller report and how it's becoming increasingly clear that people "up at the top" are likely involved with going after the president.

"Here's a question I'd pose to you, James Comey, if you had the guts to come on my show: How did you know that you knew what you knew and when did you know that you knew it?" he asked of the former FBI director who was unceremoniously fired by President Trump.

Comey didn't respond to Hannity's question but merely replied to George Stephanopoulos on his show: "I knew what I knew when they said what they said when the dossier was given to me."

Hannity promises us, the American public, that there's going to be a lot more to follow and it's going to be BIG. So BIG that it's going to blow the lid off the FBI and its corrupt leadership, according to investigative reporters John Solomon and Sarah Carter.

Meanwhile, there are still 30 million people on food stamps, and women still have half the rights of men in Saudi Arabia.

More to follow . . . or not.


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.





Tweet

Trump hopes Kasich runs against him, but the gov's adviser cautions to be careful what he wishes for

John Kasich, winner of "Capitol Hill's Most
Punchable Face Award" 3 years in a row

An adviser to Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) cautioned President Trump Thursday after he said that he'd be happy to run against Kasich, one of the most annoying persons in politics, in the 2020 presidential election.

"Be careful what you wish for," John Weaver a chief political strategist told CNBC after Trump said he’d welcome a run by either Kasich or outgoing GOP Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, who isn't really a Republican.

Trump's comments came Thursday during an interview with Fox News’ Harris Faulkner.

“So you mentioned Ohio, so I'm going to bring up John Kasich and I'm going to bring up Arizona Senator Jeff Flake. Because they say they may run against you in 2020,” Faulkner said.

Kasich is “open-minded” about potentially campaigning as an Independent versus within the GOP, Weaver also told CNBC, before noting that Kasich, the most annoying pontificator in politics “is a Republican” yet he is willing to screw up the GOP's chances of winning because he will only take away Republican votes and has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the election.

Flake is cut of the same used handkerchief cloth.

Representatives for Kasich did not immediately return Fox News’ request for comment.

Kasich, annoyingly discussed a possible White House run, telling ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos" earlier this month that “we’re seriously thinking about it.”

“We're seriously talking about it with family and friends and political allies who have come to me about this,” Kasich said annoyingly.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

John 'Methane Man' Kasich is 'very seriously' considering running for president in 2020

Accepting the award: "The GOP's Most
Punchable Face"

He calls himself a Republican and a conservative yet he refused to allow a bill to pass that would prohibit killing a baby when a heartbeat is present. When he speaks, he is the number one person who is most annoying to listen to in the entire political world.

He is John Kasich and he is "very seriously" considering a White House run in 2020. But he is very seriously not going to get the GOP nomination--Trump will--and all Kasich will serve to do is screw up the results of the party to which he claims to be a member.

On Sunday, Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) was on ABC's "This Week" with Bill Clinton's pool boy,\ and advisor, George Stephanopoulos where he said that he was "very seriously" considering feeding his ego needs.

Kasich told George "This is our earnest conversation that go on every day with some of my friends [his two dogs], with my family. We need different leadership [because it isn't him]. There isn't any question about it. [Sure there is. He's just refusing to ask it.] I'm not only just worried about the tone and the name-calling and the division in our country and the partisanship [which all began under George Washington and continued on], but I also worry about the policies, rising debt, inability to deal with immigration, the problems we have as America alone in the world, what I consider a rotten deal with the Saudis to look the other way. I'm worried about our country, not just in the short term. The question for me is what do I do about this?"

Answer: sell bonds. Just don't run you moron.

Then he had a moment of a psychotic break where he asked himself a question. "Do I run because I've determined that I can win? Or is it important for me to make such a good showing that I can send a message that can disrupt the political system in this country? So yeah, I have to think about it. I think about it seriously."

Because he is an egotistical schmuck who would rather destroy the GOP's chance of winning in 2020 and be in the public eye, than to stay in the background. He will never win. He should not run. He should go and have an illicit affair with Hillary Clinton--they seem to be two peas in a pod.

Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

ABC uses Chinese 'torture of a thousand cuts' on Comey interview

Thinking royalties

It's unclear whether ABC edited the James Comey interview because some of the things he said were unbelievable or his answers detracted from the impact. 

Either way, the George Stephanopoulos Sunday night interview with fired FBI director James Comey sucked.

Even critics on the left thought the interview was poorly produced and choppy. And it seems pretty obvious that the purpose of the interview was for Comey to sell his book, "A Higher Loyalty."

Comey's loyalty is to the 'almighty dollar.'

The truth is, the person who is going to help him the most to sell books isn't Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton crony and flaming leftist, but President Trump, because he can't keep himself from punching down on Twitter.

If Trump would just let Comey implode and not give him publicity, he would be doing himself and his presidency a favor.

Comey likely chose to appear on ABC News rather than "60 Minutes" because he knew he'd get softball questions from Stephanopoulos. The show attracted about 9.8 million viewers while Stormy Daniels, the pornography film "actress" raked in 22 million viewers on "60 Minutes."

Neither Comey nor the Stormster said they were doing any of these activities for the money, but Daniels' appearance fees have climbed to $75,000 per appearance. Comey is doing it to hawk his book.

The Comey interview was produced by "20/20" news magazine, which isn't a real news program but more like a cheap tabloid affair. They stopped doing actual hard news and now focus on issues such as infidelity, mysterious murder cases, and other garbage.

The ABC News producers tried to do a real piece with Comey, but they blew it when they edited a 5-hour interview into a one hour turd.

Tweet

Donald doesn't duck but misses the point

It's a terrible thing to lose your son in a war. It's worse to politicize it because when you do, the target of your political assault has every right to return fire, as it were.

Khizr and Ghazala Khan lost their son, Humayan Khan in the Iraq war. That is a terrible thing and Humayan is a hero.

Khizr Khan and his wife, Ghazizi, appeared on the DNC stage demanding that Donald Trump read the Constitution, and if he didn't have a copy, Khizr would be happy to give him his, as he pulled the pocket Constitution and held it high. His hijab-clad wife said not a word throughout the drama.

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one," Khan said, addressing Trump through the magic of television, as he held his hand over his heart, the new 'tell' that indicate liberals are in the process of lying about something.

Trump, as is his wont, replied to the Khans. Unfortunately, he missed his chance to put his ego aside and make a better point than he ended up making.

Trump spoke to Maureen Dowd of the New York Communist Times, stating, "I'd like to hear his wife say something." 

Later, in an interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, Trump made it clear what he meant by the first quote when he said: "I saw him [Khizr Khan]. He was very emotional and probably looked like a nice guy to me. His wife . . . if you look at his wife, she was standing there. She had nothing to say. She probably, maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me. But plenty of people have written that. She was extremely quiet, and it looked like she had nothing to say. A lot of people have said that."

Stephanopoulos said to Trump, "He says, 'You have sacrificed nothing and no one.'"

Trump replied, "Who wrote that, did Hillary's scriptwriters write it?"

"How would you answer that father? What sacrifices have you made?" he asked Trump, in that liberal media ambush way they get you.

And here is where Trump screwed up, I believe. He said, "I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I've worked very hard. I've created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs."

That's when George asked, "Those are sacrifices?" Another 'got ya' moment.

"Sure, I think they're sacrifices. I think when I can employ thousands and thousands of people, take care of their education, take care of so many things," Trump said. "Even the military. I mean, I was very responsible along with a group of people for getting the Vietnam Memorial built in downtown Manhattan, which to this day people thank me for.

"I raised and I have raised millions of dollars for the vets."

Those are not sacrifices and didn't answer the question. Donald missed the point.

If you remember, Trump had declined participating in the Fox News GOP debate and held a fundraiser instead. He said he raised millions of dollars for veterans' charities and contributed one million dollars of his own money. The Washington Post investigated and found that he overstated the amount that was raised and contributed and that Trump didn't make a personal contribution. It was only after that article that Trump wrote a check.

But that isn't the problem.

First of all, rather than defending himself over his 'sacrifices,' he should have addressed the fact that Hillary voted for the war in Iraq while he opposed it. Humayan Khan would have not died if Trump was in command. 

He didn't say that.

Second, Trump should have asked Dowd and Stephanopoulos the same question: "What have the Clintons ever sacrificed? After all, Bill Clinton dodged the Vietnam War draft and Hillary's move to kill Osama bin Laden was a no brainer.

Finally, while many Trumpsters will hate me for saying this, I believe it was a bad idea to go after Ghazala Khan. Trump may he totally correct that she was told to keep her female Muslim mouth shut, but in a later interview with Communist media moron, Lawrence O'Donnell, she made a case for being too emotionally overwrought, which made Trump look foolish.

Trump needs to win this election against "Shoutin' Hillary." But he needs to put his narcissistic ego aside (all politicians are narcissistic--every one of them), stop with the name-calling (I need to listen to my own advice) and go after Hillary on the real issues: Benghazi, her emails, her refusing to have a real press conference for over 200 days, her contradictory stances regarding what she will do as POTUS, her salary discrepancies with women on her staff, and the Clinton Foundation's foreign connections with terrorist nations and those that are misogynistic. 

And that's just for starters.

Facts. Stick to the facts and keep hammering at them, Mr. Trump. You need to convince independent voters that you're the real deal . . . and I believe you are. 

Oh, and don't be afraid of using bigger words. We're smarter than you think.



Tweet

ISIL is contained and here comes the Tooth Fairy

"The Islamic State is a JV team, ISIS is not gaining strength, we have them contained, and we are making progress to defeat and destroy them, hey, look what the tooth fairy left under my pillow."

It is almost like an Onion moment to listen to Obama speak about the Islamic State. The only difference is that the Onion knows what they write is satire and parody, but Obama doesn't have a clue about what he says.

In a knee-slapping interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC's Good Morning America, Obama spoke after a drone strike killed "Jihadi John," the Muslim extremist seen on YouTube beheading foreign captives.

When asked if ISIS was growing in strength Obama replied with a straight face: "I don't think they're gaining strength. What is true is that from the start our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria they'll come in, they'll leave, but you don't see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain."

Stephanopoulos sat quietly like a good puppet as Obama continued: "What we have not yet been able to do is to completely decapitate their command and control structures. We've made some progress in trying to reduce the flow of foreign fighters and part of our goal has to be to recruit more effective Sunni partners in Iraq to really go on offense rather than simply engage in defense."

ISIL, aka ISIS, doesn't march across the terrain--they use our vehicles left behind by our fleeing partners.

Let's be real--ISIS has been gaining in strength in spite of our anemic bombing campaign and have gone on to take territory in northern Syria and Ramadi in Iraq. It appears that Mr. Obama is back to smoking weed.

The latest ISIS attack in Paris that killed 129 and injured over 350 others came right after Obama spoke with Stephanopoulos. It shows just how informed he is about the state of the Islamic State and that they are "contained."

It's no wonder why the rest of the world thinks he's weak and is an empty suit.

When Obama bragged that the United States and our allies were going to "degrade and ultimately destroy" the folks who seized large territories in Iraq and Syria, some people may have bought his line of bull.

Since bragging however, he's changed his carefully crafted rhetoric and dropped the "defeat" and "destroy" from his language and inserted "contain" instead. Perhaps he'd like to concede that ISIS went from "JV" to "All Islamic."

ISIS is contained alright--they're contained in at least 8 countries from Afghanistan to Algeria. And the only strength they may have lost is from being tired after downing a Russian passenger jet, pulling off 6 terrorist suicide attacks in France, and committing carnage in Beirut from suicide attacks.

Obama is an insult or a joke--I'm still trying to figure out which one or both.


Tweet

Why We're Handing Over the Election to the Left

Mitt with his constituency--or Bachmann's kids?

 Why do we do it? Why do we allow the left-biased, liberal, socialist-leaning, Obama-loving, Islamophilia media to dictate the show? Both George-I-Did-Not-Have-Sex-With-Clinton-Stephanopoulos, and David-I-Am-Not-a-Racist-You-Are-Gregory, hardly asked any serious conservative questions to the GOP candidate contenders, according to Brent Bozell in Townhall Magazine.  In fact, Stephanopoulos asked a slightly higher percentage of conservative questions compared to Gregory, who asked about 1 out of 28.  But when all is said and done, I have to ask myself, why do they even entertain these pseudo-journalists in the first place?  One theory is that Conservatives are masochists--I'm still working on that theory.
 

I talk about media bias in my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  The hero, Zed Nill, works for The Free World Press, a fictional newspaper that actually reports the facts and leaves opinions to the people who matter most--the readers.  But you don't find that in the media today.  Even The New York Times has a long history of leaning far over to the left--look at the way they reported on Joseph McCarthy--demonizing his efforts to uncover communism in America's elite.  Time Magazine, The New Yorker, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, are all prime examples of the left's attack on the foundations of this country, it's religious majority, and the heroes on the right.  

Wasn't it great when Tim Tebow threw for 316 yards against the Steelers while wearing glare patches that cited John 316?  C'mon, that's just what creeps like garbage-mouth Bill Maher needed.  I'm a New Yorker, born and bred, but I've become a Tebow fan and would probably explode from mass confusion overload if the Broncos ever played the Giants in the Superbowl (the chances of that happening in my lifetime are about the same as being struck by Bill Maher during a solar eclipse on a Tuesday at a Tea Party meeting with Maher as guest speaker).


So it looks like Mitt is going to go all the way (speaking of football), but Ron Paul needs to go away.  To call him a Republican is like calling Diane Sawyer "perky."

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet

George Stephanococcus Disease: Why the Right is Stupid

 If Obama gets re-elected, buy gold. If Ron Paul gets elected, move to a safer country. If Huntsman gets elected, learn Chinese, because what he didn't do as Ambassador to China was challenge them when they hacked into our nationwide power grids, thereby having the same capabilities as a nuclear pulse bomb would have on the nation's electrical output.

But seriously, weren't the last debates the absolute most boring debates you've seen thus far?  George Stephanococcus, the new disease that spreads liberally throughout the land, should not be taken seriously by conservatives, and the fact that the Republicans entertained ABC by agreeing to a debate where the panel obviously tries to ambush them with their questions, is ridiculous.  

Josef Pulitzer scratching

At least Diane Sawyer was too stoned to be an effective Democratic party campaigner, although she tried. At least she didn't throw out some unconfirmed statistic on Mitt's job creating numbers, and she didn't ask "what if" questions about birth control, like Georgie boy did. It is un-freaking-believable how transparent their agenda is--and they used to call it journalism.


Journalism is dead--as dead as Josef Pulitzer, as dead as the credibility of the "Gray Lady.

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

 http://tinyurl.com/6p69cb7    FREE Smashwords version of “Conservatweets “

Tweet