ACLU forced female prisons to take gender dysphoric male prisoners: two women are pregnant for some reason

Two women at a New Jersey women's prison are pregnant after they had sex with a male inmate who said he is a woman, but proved otherwise.

The once all-female Edna Mahan Correctional Facility in Clinton, NJ was pressured by the woke ACLU to allow men who believe or have the balls to say that they are women, to be incarcerated there. This followed a lawsuit brought by the ACLU of New Jersey, an organization that protects the civil liberties of the minority, but not the majority.

The federal Bureau of Prisons, which is part of the Biden [In]Justice Department, recently revised its operating procedures allowing criminals access to genital-mutilation operations or related procedures. 

The prison in question, houses 27 men [aka human beings born with XY chromosomes, penises, and testicles, like swimmer Lia Thomas, for example] and doesn't require them to surgically remove their sexual appendages but simply say they're women.

Two XX chromosome human beings with uteruses and all the gear they need to become pregnant with child, have become pregnant by men who say they are women, but have sex with women, while not claiming to be lesbians. How confusing.

The prison has begun an investigation but have not said whether the women had sex with one guy saying he's a woman, or two different guys. None of the women prisoners are suspect in this investigation, in spite of the fact that woke judges are unable to define what a woman is, one of whom will soon be heading to the US Supreme Court.

The investigators did reveal that in both cases, the sex was consensual, but the prison has seen its share of alleged sexual abuse.

ACLU legal director Jeanne LoCicero defended the policy her organization forced on the prison.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Housing biologically male individuals in a women's prison is "in line with New Jersey's strong anti-discrimination laws that prevent discrimination and harassment on the basis of gender identity," LoCicero said, in spite of the potential sexual assaults and harassment it may place on female inmates, and a failure to discriminate between the sexes. Edna Mahan prison had a problem with harassment of female prisoners by males who harassed them and tried to overturn the policy forced on them by the ACLU.

But at least LoCicero and the ACLU are woke, no matter who may get hurt.

Tweet

CNN Anal-ist admits he lied about GOP Senators' conversation

It's hard to know whether to call Joe Lockhart a Comedy News Network (CNN) political analyst or just an anal-ist. He apparently thinks with the part of his anatomy that resided down south, or that his readers are gullible.

Lockhart was a Clinton White House official so he evidently picked up the habit of lying from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. On Wednesday, he concocted a conversation from his butt that he said took place between two Republican senators who claimed they were stunned about all the things they were learning during the President Trump Senate trial.

Lockhart tweeted: 

“Overheard convo between two Republican Senators who only watch Fox News. ‘is this stuff real? I haven’t heard any of this before. I thought it was all about a server. If half the stuff Schiff is saying is true, we’re up shit’s creek. Hope the White House has exculpatory evidence.[‘]”

Not long afterward Lockhart added a second tweet to his first tweet: 

“Ok maybe I made up the convo, but you know that’s exactly what they’re thinking.”

If anyone at Fox News, or any other right-wing media outfit tweeted crap like that, it would be all over the news and likely all over for the person who posted it.

Republican National Committee (RNC) Rapid Response Director Steve Guest also noted that self-described Washington Post “conservative blogger” Jennifer Rubin, who is really as conservative as Karl Marx, promoted Lockhart’s fabricated quote on her Twitter account.

Is anyone surprised that @JRubinBlogger would push Joe Lockhart's FAKE NEWS tweet to her followers? pic.twitter.com/YBuQaWp5e1— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 22, 2020

Lockhart was mocked on Tuesday after he went after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for tweeting during the Senate impeachment trial.

Cruz tweeted: 

“NEWSFLASH for Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff: @realDonaldTrump invoking Constitutional privilege is not obstruction of Congress. If it were, nearly every president would have committed impeachable conduct.”

Lockhart responded:

“Senators on the floor are sworn to silence and have no electronic devices. So how is this Senator tweeting? Did he sneak a phone in. Is he willing to go to prison? Or is the tweet from someone other than Cruz. @jack you should investigate”

Numerous journalists and political officials responded to Lockhart by noting that Democrat Senators were doing the same thing as Cruz, proving Lockhart's [and CNN's] journalistic dishonesty

National Republican Senatorial Committee senior adviser Matt Whitlock responded to Lockhart by highlighting tweets from Democrat Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, who were also tweeting during the Senate trial.

Maybe one day Lockhart will remove his head from his cavernous nether regions, but that day has not yet arrived.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

Trump does 'about face' on issue of foreign interference

In the spirit of Joe Biden and most other politicians (except for the crazy socialists like Bernie Sanders), President Trump has walked back what he said on ABC to former Director of Communications for the Clinton administration, George Stephanopoulos earlier this week.

Specifically, Trump said that if was told by a foreign source that they had information on one of his political opponents, would he accept it and would he contact the FBI. He said that he would be willing to listen to a foreign entity with damaging information saying "there isn't anything wrong with it." 

Other than it being immoral and potentially damaging politically due to the hostile media that actually found Trump to be at fault when Iran mined two ships in the Straits of Hormuz this week. In other words, anything that goes wrong or is wrong with the world, is somehow Trump's fault.

On Friday in a Fox News interview, the president, singing a totally different tune, said that he would "of course" contact authorities.

In the initial interview with ABC, he said he disagreed with his FBI Director Christopher Wray's position that if approached by foreign entities, political campaigns should report suspicious communications from them.

Those comments drew sharp criticism from the hypocritical Democrats, who said Trump was giving Russia a green light to interfere in the 2020 presidential election. They failed to condemn Hillary Clinton's use of the foreign national, Christopher Steele, with the Steele dossier, when her campaign used him for opposition research for the 2016 campaign and for which the Mueller probe was based on.

Trump did his "about face" Friday telling Fox News, "Of course, you have to look at it . . . but of course, you give it to the FBI or report it to the attorney general or somebody like that. You couldn't have that happen with our country, and everybody understands that," he said.

“If I thought anything was incorrect or badly stated," he stated imprecisely, "I’d report it to the attorney general, the FBI. I’d report it to law enforcement, absolutely.”

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the current frontrunner at the moment for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, countered Trump on Friday by releasing a video statement on Twitter pledging to not use misinformation in his campaign or tolerate outside interference.

Trump was “dead wrong,” Biden said. “I won’t be part of any attempt to undermine our democracy or public confidence in our institutions.”

Biden's presidential platform seems to be that a) Orange man bad; b) I will cure cancer if you elect me, but not before then; c) Orange man very bad.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks

Tweet

All 4 explosive devices apparently linked

Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) were sent to Hillary and Bill Clinton, former president Obama, George Soros, and CNN in Manhattan's Time Warner Center. Officials believe the 4 IEDs are linked.

The U.S. Secret Service intercepted the devices addressed to Clinton's Chappaqua home and to Obama in Washington, D.C. They never made it to their homes but were found off-site.

Hillary Clinton was in Florida at a fundraiser at this time but Bill was home when the device was found by the Secret Service.

Another suspicious package was addressed to ex-CIA chief and leftist John Brennan, whose new job at MSNBC consists entirely of trashing the Trump administration. [MSNBC stands for: "Morons Speaking Nothing But Communism."]

Columbus Circle was shut down and New York City's emergency alert system instructed New Yorkers at 11:10 a.m. that anyone in the vicinity of Columbus and Eighth Avenues to immediately shelter in place.

Officials say that at least three of the packages--those addressed to Soros, Obama and Clinton--had a manila outer packaging and were stamped. Also, they appear to be working explosives but more analysis of the devices is needed. For now, we know the devices appear to be crude.

As this is being written, it was just now learned that one device was just found at the office of Eric Holder, but more information will be forthcoming.

The questions that come to mind are: were these connected by one individual or group? Was this perpetrated by the alt-right because they're crazy? Were they sent by the left in order to inspire the Democratic vote, and/or take the focus off the caravan of illegal migrants? Why didn't they go off--was that the intention?

According to officials, the signature on all three packages [to Clinton, Obama and Soros] is nearly the same. Former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's [aka: Debbie Downer] Florida office also received a suspicious package, which is now under investigation.

"The packages were immediately identified during routine mail screening procedures as potential explosive devices and were appropriately handled as such," Secret Service explained in a statement. "Both packages were intercepted prior to being delivered to their intended location. The protectees did not receive the packages nor were they at risk of receiving them."

The Secret Service says it has initiated a "full scope criminal investigation that will leverage all available federal, state, and local resources to determine the source of the packages and identify those responsible.

In the Soros case, one of his employees came across the package, put it in a wooded area and called police, who then alerted the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Explosives. The device contained explosive powder; it was detonated as a precaution.

There have been no injuries resulting from these incidents.

President Trump was briefed on the situation and the White house said in a statement:

"We condemn the attempted violent attacks recently made against President Obama, President Clinton, Secretary Clinton, and other public figures. These terrorizing acts are despicable, and anyone responsible will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. The United States Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are investigating and will take all appropriate actions to protect anyone threatened by these cowards."

Several streets in Manhattan remain closed as of this posting.

This is a developing story so more will follow.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Liberal hypocrites still stuck on a word they all use to dump Trump

Hypocrites in the Democratic Party said Friday they will try to censure President Trump next week for saying something similar to what other presidents have said, like when President Obama called Libya a s**tshow. 

Or when Lyndon B. Johnson was asked why he didn't take a speech by Richard Nixon more seriously when he was Senate majority leader and Nixon was Vice President and responded, "Boys, I may not know much, bit I do know the difference between chicken s**t and chicken salad."

Or in 2003 when then Sen. John "Hair-plugs" Kerry told Rolling Stone about his decision to vote for the Iraq war, said, "Did I expect George Bush to f**k it up as badly as he did? I don't think anybody did."

Or in 2008 when former president Clinton was upset as Obama overtook Hillary in the primaries. He didn't know anyone could hear him, after an interview with a radio station in Philadelphia that put him on the defense over racial equality issues. Clinton said, "I don't think I should take any s**t from anybody on that, do you?"

So Rep. Cedric Richmond, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus that doesn't allow black conservative congressmen to join, and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, rank Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said they're going to pursue the censure after the MLK Jr. holiday.


Tweet

MSNBC in a "there you go again" minute of Maddow

Donald J. Trump is now the 45th President of the United States of America. He broke the glass ceiling that kept non-politicians from the presidency--all except for Dwight D. Eisenhower, or "Ike" as he was known. 

Hillary Clinton lost.

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow predictably attacked President Trump's inauguration speech saying that "it was militant and dark" and adding "The crime, the gangs, the drugs, this 'American carnage,' disrepair, decay. You can't imagine the outgoing president giving a speech like that."

I totally agree, for the first time in my life, with Maddow. Obama never would have pointed out his failures--nothing he did seemed to work, unless he did what he did for "dark" reasons, which I don't want to believe.

Maddow said the speech was reminiscent of nationalistic trends in America around WWII using the isolationist America First Committee as her main example. "The America First Committee is something that means a specific thing in this country. To repurpose it now, not that far down the historical path, it's hard. It's hard to hear."

Yes, for Maddow and her ilk, patriotism and national pride is hard to hear. Putting our interests first is hard for leftists like her to hear. 

Perhaps she should have her ears checked and then maybe go all in for a brain scan.




Tweet

Sean Spicer claims no 'conclusive evidence' Russia hacked DNC emails

The Trump team on Monday made it clear that it isn't clear that Russia executed a cyber-attack on the presidential race. "Rushing to judgment on stuff like this is not in anybody's best interest," Sean Spicer, incoming White House Communications Director said on "Fox & Friends" Monday.

Spicer said that Trump isn't disputing statements made by U.S. intelligence officials, but instead is waiting for a final report due later in the week that could provide more conclusive evidence.

"Then I think we'll have a better idea of what to make to the situation," he said. 

Several U.S. intelligence agencies have claimed that Russia was behind the hacking and release of John Podesta's emails from the DNC, but if you know anything about who runs some of these intelligence agencies, you might not be totally convinced that they're telling the whole truth.

Last week, Obama had 35 Russian diplomats expelled who are believed to be spies and involved with the email hack. The Russian compounds, which are large mansions, in New York and Maryland have been since closed.

Hillary Clinton's team and supporters believe the hacked emails, contributed to her upset loss to Donald Trump because the public got to see how little she and her team think of the American people. 

They never disputed the validity of the emails, only where they came from. 

Obama, who only reacted to the email hack after the election but knew about the hacking beforehand, said the investigation and sanctions were in the interest of protecting the U.S. election system especially if the GOP wins.

Spicer suggest that Obama's actions were politically motivated.

When Obama pees, it's politically motivated.

"There is a question about whether there's a political retribution here versus a diplomatic response, he told ABC on Sunday.

Regarding Trump's New Year's Eve comments about "know(ing) things that other people don't know," about the hacking, Spicer said that Trump gets briefed daily and this is "privy to information that nobody else is. What he's driving at is that there doesn't seem to be conclusive evidence."

Spicer also dismissed the FBI and Homeland Security report supporting the accusations against Russia, and called the report a "how-to" manual on basic cybersecurity for Democrats. He said the report isn't even final but is being taken "as gospel."

Interestingly, Spicer pointed out that in 2015 China stole sensitive information from millions of Americans, including federal workers, and Obama failed to issue "a single statement."

Or get off the golf course.

Donald Trump will meet this week with intelligence officials to get more input about the allegations against Moscow.

Trump said, "I know a lot about hacking. And hacking is a very hard thing to prove, so it could be somebody else."

Like that 400 pound couch potato.




Tweet

Russian diplomats are gone

The 35 expelled Russian diplomats connected with the cyberattacks during the 2016 presidential campaign have left the country, according to the State Department.

The diplomats (aka spies) and their families left on flights from Dulles International Airport outside of Washington D.C.

Russian news reported the departures earlier Sunday.

President and lame duck, Obama, expelled the diplomats, claiming that they are really spies, and ordered new sanctions on Russian spy agencies for alleged hacking by the Russians of political sites--including the DNC--during the presidential election, which uncovered emails on Clinton's campaign chair John Podesta's server that revealed just how mean-spirited and disgusting the Democratic party can be to the GOP and to each other.

But as usual, I digress.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said he will not take retaliatory action right now, but will wait for Donald Trump to take office January 20th.


Tweet

"No Nazi Trump voters allowed"

It's strange--if you're a Christian baker and feel that it goes against your beliefs to cater a gay wedding, you can be forced to do so. Thus you do not have freedom of association.

But if you're a liberal cafe owner in Honolulu, no problem. Be as intolerant as you like.

The Honolulu Cafe has a bright yellow sign that tells potential customers they cannot eat at the establishment if they voted for Donald Trump. The color of the sign is totally appropriate.

The sign says: "If you voted for Trump you cannot eat here! No Nazis."

The sign is posted on the cafe's Facebook page and has received at least 40 "likes."

One FB person wrote: " . . . The next time you're in Honolulu, eat lunch here, not only are they on the right side of things, the food is delicious and reasonable."

Being on the "right side of things" in politics is strictly a matter opinion. You can hate Trump for what he said about women so many years ago in a "locker room talk" type situation. Or you can hate Clinton for her lies about Benghazi and her illegal private server which compromised national security.

It's up to you to decide which is worse, and overall, Americans across the nation decided on Trump.

One person commented on the sign in an email saying: "It's childish and very unprofessional . . . "The restaurant owner doesn't have to worry . . . I will not be stepping foot in that establishment."

Another said it was in "extreme poor taste."

And it is, if you believe that calling everyone who voted for Trump a Nazi. That's disgusting to conflate what the Nazis did to people who merely thought Trump would actually be better for the country than Clinton, whose likability was in the tank. But then again, she called Trump voters "deplorables," so what's the difference?

Not a Trump voter

Why is it okay for liberals to force religious conservatives to provide services that go against their beliefs, but not for liberals to have to do the same?

Willes Lee, the former chairman of the Hawaii Republican Party and current president of National Federation of Republican Assemblies, told FoxNews.com the sign is discriminatory and harkens back to "racist and hate-filled" days before statehood.

"Remember when Filipinos couldn't go in certain places, or Japanese wouldn't be allowed [in] many homes? And, it didn't matter who they voted for," Lee said, who is of Japanese descent.

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser said the cafe was founded by Robert Warner, a former hair stylist along with his wife Jali, who downplayed the "ban."

Jali told FoxNews.com that the cafe isn't asking customers if they voted for Trump, and claimed that even if they see a customer with a Trump shirt, "we don't put anything different [in] your food." 

Jali refused to say whether this meant that they spit in everyone's food, just in case they voted for Trump.

Everything has become political. Everything. And it's getting disgusting--even the holidays bring political arguments to the table.

Some customers say that while Jali is soft-spoken, Warner is known to channel the "soup Nazi" persona of New York City Seinfeld fame. " . . . throwing pots and pans," "telling off customers," and "hanging not-so-friendly reminders on butcher paper for his customers to read."

One Yelp reviewer took issue with the sign and wrote: "It was funny on Seinfeld, but this place can rot away. Stay away. Hawaii ain't like this. There's a lot of better places on the island than to have to deal with extra crap like this."

But the hypocrisy is palpable--liberals would be suing the cafe if Clinton's name was substituted for Trump on the sign.


Tweet

Obama: "I coulda won a third term"

Believing that Americans still subscribe to his leftist ideas, Lame Duck Obama told "The Axe Files" and CNN (formerly: the Clinton News Network) that if he was eligible to run ("and I think I should be allowed" he whined) that he could have beaten President-elect Donald Trump.

"I am confident in this vision because I'm confident that if I had run again and articulated it, I think I could've mobilized a majority of the American people to rally behind it," the delusion president said, as he totally discounted the fact that Trump's win over Clinton was a referendum on Obama's leftist vision for his Amerika. 

Obama made that ridiculous statement to his former senior adviser David Axelrod on "The Axe Files" podcast produced by the University of Chicago Institute of Politics and CNN.

The first time she was proud of our country

He blathered on: "I know that in conversations that I've had with people around the country, [all 57 states] even some people who disagreed with me, [they're called patriotic Americans] they would say the vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one."

"In the wake of the election and Trump winning, a lot of people have suggested that somehow, it really was a fantasy," Obama went on, trying to defend his 'hopey-changey' position that left most intelligent Americans with the hope that the party running the show would change to the party that lost twice in a row. "What I would argue is, is that the culture actually did shift, that the majority does buy into the notion of a one America that is tolerant and diverse and open and full of energy and dynamism," [and, and, and].

What a crock.

Deportation numbers were a scam; unemployment of full-time workers sucked; economic growth never went above 3% in all of his 8 years in office; he allowed the Middle East to blossom into a war zone; and [hopefully] his final horrendous act: he screwed over Israel worse than anyone before him.

I'm just glad the presidency is term-limited. I would like to see the same for Congress.


Tweet

Podesta says Putin wants Trump as his lap dog

'Adolf Eichmann Lookalike Contest' winner, and chairman of the failed presidential campaign for Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, claims that Vladimir Putin was "personally involved" in the election email hacking and he knows this because when he hit the link on his computer to see naked photos of the Nigerian princess, and noticed that she looked a lot like Vladimir in drag. It almost made him sick.

The reason Russia did the hacking was because they wanted Trump in office, Podesta whined. They wanted Trump as their "lap dog."

There are plenty of ways one can picture Donald Trump, but as anyone's lap dog doesn't conjure up an image for me. 

Sure, the Donald can be easily manipulated with a kind word, a soft smile, and even a compliment or two, but to get him to do your bidding as your lap dog? Hardly.

"Russia clearly intervened," Podesta complained in a series of carefully worded responses about who was behind the leaked emails that WikiLeaks got its hands on. 

After he was hacked by "the Naked Nigerian Princess," Podesta said the FBI contacted him only once about the hacking. This came 2 days after WikiLeaks began publishing the emails showing the world the kind of scumcrumpets make up the Democratic Party, which is part of the reason Clinton lost.

Podesta wrote "something is deeply broken at the FBI" and said the Russian email hacking was the "political equivalent" of the 9/11 terror attacks, but never said that directly to any of the family-members who lost loved ones that day, shameful POS that he is to make that comparison.

The Russian hacking was bad, very bad, but keep 9/11 out of it unless you're qualified by having been at the targets that day, or lost someone.

Anyway, once Donald Trump takes office, the country may have hope that everything Clinton will go away and hide, including those unethical, immoral people who worked for her.


Tweet

The Trump-haters exit to Canada

Not one promise was kept. They all lied to the American people and now Canada can breathe a sigh of relief.

Before the US presidential election, boat-loads of  Hollywood celebrities promised that if Donald Trump ever won the election, they would relocate in Canada.

Well, he won; they lied. 

Not one of them kept to their promise--which doesn't surprise many conservatives--we know that many of them lie even when they say "good morning," so why is this any different?

But some liberals did leave the US and relocated to Canada. Hopefully, Canada will be able to accommodate the ex-patriots who now will make the cold north their "safe zone."

Canada's immigration services has been inundated with as many as 28 requests for Trump-related refugee status. Not a single one came from Hollywood despite all the promises.

Canadian officials say there was a "bump" in requests for refugee status following Trump's dramatic win over the US former Worst Lady, Hillary Clinton, or at least they say there seemed to be a bump (of as the French Canadians call it, a "boomp") in November, which immigration lawyers say is due from political change.

"The rhetoric coming from (U.S. political) discussion . . . was filled with a lot of concerning language, including hate, exclusion, deportation," one Canadian lawyer said to Canadian state news. "I could see why people would be concerned for their own safety, their own lives, and evaluate whether they could live (there)."

Yes, come January 20th, the United States of America is expected to become the Untied States of America. People will die. A wall will keep out undocumented people coming to the US illegally from Mexico and Muslims will be extremely vetted.

Of the 28 leftist snowflakes who have applied for refugee status, it's possible none will be approved because Canada is generally thought to be slow at taking in seriously mentally ill people who will evidently complain about anything that doesn't go their way.

The CBC found only two successful claims for asylum out of hundreds of cases filed from the U.S. since 2010.

If you are not fleeing an unjust war, or fleeing actual threat of death, Canada will probably decline your stupid request. 

Fleeing what you consider an unjust election because your screaming shrew didn't win, doesn't count.

And did it ever occur to you that maybe Canada doesn't want you? Canada has enough snowflakes.

Tweet

Trump in the loop for "unbelievable" super secrets

President-elect Donald Trump will be sworn in on January 20, 2017, but he now has access to the most classified information of the U.S. government--and he didn't have to get it from Hillary's server through WikiLeaks.

The President's Daily Brief (PDB) is now available to the newly elected Trump after the White House, before the Tuesday election, directed that the winner [thinking it would be Clinton] have full access to the material, to ensure a smooth transition.

When Mr. Trump saw the PDB his first response was "This stuff is unbelievable. It's fantastic. I'm honored that you showed it to me, Mr. President."

The sources told Fox News they believe the briefings will start next week at the earliest.

"These briefings are the real thing," Trump said. "I am humbled that President Obama is willing to share it with me--I thought I was going to have to sue him."

The PDB is a newspaper with super-secret intelligence for the president and now the president-elect. If the candidate briefings can be seen as a tricycle, the PDB is a Harley Davidson on steroids. 

Presidential candidates have been allowed to request additional briefs on topics of personal interest. Hillary Clinton, for example, requested more information on computer forensics, but was denied her request. Donald Trump requested information on the locations of Darfur and Chad, which were granted.

But the PDB is much more focused and in order for information to be included in it, there has to be a significantly higher threshold. The information must be read in a secure facility and the White House has dedicated a transition space nearby to be used for Mr. Trump to receive the briefing.

Currently, Trump is working hard to assemble potential candidates for key roles in his administration. He tweeted that he planned a "busy day" in New York and would soon "be making some very important decisions on the people who will be running our government."

It's rumored that President-elect Trump is planning to institute a "Nerf Football League" (NFL) to replace the current NFL which is failing to attract fans due to an imbalance of team strengths. The rumor suggests that Fox News' Sean Hannity will be its commissioner. 

January cannot come soon enough.


Tweet

Trump will not stump for funds now

When a person is nominated to represent his or her party in the run for president, it is customary for the nominee to help the party with fundraising efforts. Except when the nominee is Donald Trump.

Trump has no fundraising events planned for the remainder of his campaign, which is a serious kick in the butt to the GOP's get-out-the-vote operation before Election Day. Traditionally, the Democrats have been better at this task, but now there should be no question that they are going to be hurting because it appears that somebody's ego is hurt. In part, that's understandable--they all took the pledge to support the nominee, and some, like Paul Ryan, isn't living up to his end of the deal.

Steve Mnuchin, the Trump national finance chairman, told the Washington Post on Tuesday that Trump Victory, a joint fundraising committee between the party and campaign, held its last formal fundraiser on October 19th. That was a luncheon in Vegas, baby, on the day of the last presidential debate.

"We've kind of wound down," Mnuchin said. "But the online fundraising continues to be strong."

In contrast to the Trump move (or lack thereof) Hillary Clinton is having her last fundraiser Tuesday night in Miami, but her campaign has scheduled 41 more events between now and November 3rd. The events will feature such surrogates as Hillary's running mate, Tim "The Interrupter" Kaine, Chelsea "Howdy Doody" Clinton and Cher, who cannot remember her last name.

Although Trump's campaign will still bring in donations to help the party, the lack of formal fundraising effectively closes the taps of the money flow to the RNC., which relies on money to help pay for hundreds of field staffers across this great nation of ours. These staffers work on a ground operation to turn out voters to support the entire Republican ticket.

Reince Priebus and other top RNC leaders continue to bring in money for the party, and New York financier Lew Eisenberg , the top RNC fundraiser and chairman of Trump Victory, said he's working "in a united effort" with Mnuchin to raise money via phone calls and impromptu events.

The Trump campaign decided to spend the final two weeks before the election to stay focused on taking his message to the voters: 

Hillary sucks, the elections and media are rigged, he doesn't know any of those 11 women and will sue them, he gets huge crowds at his rallies, Obama is a failure and the worst president the country has ever had, ObamaCare is a disaster, make America great again, build the wall and Mexico will pay for it, and Hillary sucks.

"We have minimized his fundraising schedule over the last month to emphasize his focus on political [events]," Mnuchin said. "Unlike Hillary, who has been fundraising and not out and about, he has constantly been out and about."

Mnuchin said Donald doesn't need high-dollar fundraisers because his campaign gets a lot of their funds online, which are on track to hitting a record in October.

The RNC only gets 20 oercent of the money that Trump raises online in conjunction with the party, and the big donations that go to Trump Victory are routed to the party.

As of September 30, Trump's campaign has raised $219 million while Clinton's raised $499 million. 

Clinton also appeared to use her advertising wisely, doing ads during the high view times of the Olympic games, while Trump did no ads at all during the games. But Trump out-tweeted Clinton 47 to 1, and has "lots of followers, folks."

And although Trump promised to put $100 million of his own money into the campaign, he only gave $56 million, according to the financial records. Mnuchin went silent when asked if Trump intended to put in the remaining $44 million, but he did say that "He has been very supportive of the campaign with his contributions."

Well, that was his campaign pledge and his talking point at the start. 

In spite of the fact that Clinton is leading in the polls, Trump believes that he is leading in the race. Unfortunately, the way it seems to be going, Trump is lagging substantially in the projection of electoral votes.

But with Trump, you never know. I do not count him out and will not be surprised if he pulls it off. It's just that it doesn't seem that he will. 

That being said, please go out and vote.


Tweet

POTUS debate drinking game

Donald and Hillary are set to square off once again unless Donald ducks the debate. If he does, he might as well kiss his chances goodbye, but I suspect he'll go the debating distance. In view of the fact that debates, even Trump debates, tend to grow weary on us. 

In order to make the next debate slightly more appealing and gain more attention, I have developed a drinking game that you and your friends can do at home while watching these curmudgeon senior citizens fight it out.

When Trump speaks:
1. Take one large gulp of whatever you're drinking every time he says any of these words: amazing, incredible or unbelievable, liar (or any variation thereof), China.
2. Finish whatever you're drinking if he uses the phrase: "believe me, folks." If he just says "believe me," you must take two big gulps.
Whenever Trump interrupts Clinton while she is speaking: take one medium sip.
3. If Trump uses a word with more than three syllables, take one large sip, then another.

When Clinton speaks:
1. Take one large gulp whenever she uses any of these words: misogynist, racist, tax(es), cheat, women (or any variation thereof), free, grand daughter, fairer, poor
2. Finish whatever you're drinking if she uses the phrase: "We're going to make the economy moving again." or "poor growing up."
Whenever Clinton interrupts Trump while he's speaking, take one large sip.
If Clinton spontaneously mentions the word "Benghazi," the game is over, both for you, and for Clinton. 
3. If Clinton tells an obvious truth, take one large sip, then another.

WARNING: this writer is not responsible for the results of this game and the accompanying intoxication that may result in playing it. Do not drive or operate heavy machinery after or during the game and do not make any important life decisions.

Play wisely.
    



Tweet

Lester Holt: a closet liberal or a full-blown liberal?

Lester Holt may be a registered Republican, but it looks more like a coverup than his true political philosophy. He complied with the wishes of the Clinton campaign and while Trump blew it all by himself on several occasions, Hillary skated.

Holt called out Trump and interrupted him repeatedly, while Clinton got no questions about Benghazi or her emails. Trump, on the other hand, didn't bring it up when the issue of national security came up--that was his golden opportunity and he blew it.

The Clinton campaign gamed the system, according to the MRC (Media Research Center). Holt was in total compliance with their wishes. He pushed the birther issue, Trump's tax returns, and asked him about Clinton being "the first woman nominated by a party" and not having "the look."

The issue of the "deplorables" never once came up and Donald never went there--another big mistake.

It almost felt as if there was a conspiracy going on of a secret agreement between Trump and Clinton whereby he promised to give her the debate. Of course that's nonsense but Alex Jones will probably jump on that idea if it occurs to his paranoid brain. Can't you just see his lede: "Trump purposely throws the debate for Clinton--does she know something about him that she isn't telling?"

Dan Gainor of the MRC discussed six ways in which Clinton got to skate the debate and Holt was in the tank for the former Worst Lady.

First there's the issue of jobs. Holt shot two questions at Trump on how he planned to add jobs in spite of the fact that the first answer talked about renegotiating trade deals.

Next, Holt depicted the liberal tax plans where Clinton wanted to tax the rich and Trump supposedly was "calling for tax cuts for the wealthy." Trump had to correct him, which clearly showed Holt's bias.

On tax returns, Trump got slammed by Holt with questions on "business conflicts" but Hillary was never asked about her emails, her Goldman Sachs and other corporate speeches, or anything about Clinton Foundation business conflicts.

She was also never asked about money the Foundation received from misogynistic countries.

Fourth, Holt asked Trump about the "birther" question which went longer than Clinton's email answer and then asked Trump three separate follow-ups.

And fifth, he attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War, never discussing how Clinton had voted to do the same. Also, it's important to realize that Trump wasn't privy to information about the Iraq situation whereas Clinton was and still voted for it. Holt never made that distinction either.

Finally, Holt asked Clinton about whether the police in the US are biased against African-Americans. She answered "I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police." Holt ignored the gaffe rather than challenge her wide brushstroke about everyone being bigoted.

I believe that Holt must have taken his cue as moderator from Candy Crowley. He was like a third debater and failed miserably, but so did Donald Trump.

Trump missed golden opportunities to destroy Clinton's position in the debate. When she accused him of being chummy with Putin, he might have replied, "I think he knows more about you, Hillary, just from reading through your emails."

It should never be the role of journalists to be the ones to make the news, anymore than an umpire or referee should determine the outcome of a game. Both sides need to be prepared, know the facts and challenge lies. It is never up to journalists to determine what is truth and what is lie.

Sometimes I wish the candidates could bring along YouTube video to prove their points. Both sides would be proven liars and the public would then have more information to make better informed decisions.

I think Clinton won this debate and I wish it wasn't so. But I'm not going to pretend that she didn't, in my opinion. Trump needs to monitor his narcissism (all presidential candidates need to be narcissistic in order to run for that office) and anticipate her strategy better than he did this time. He also needs to be able to use her attacks to his advantage--there's so much dirt on Clinton that just got swept under the carpet this time.

Finally, Trump's excuse to lay off Clinton because her family was in the room, and that he thinks Chelsea is a nice person, is not a good reason to throw the debate. 

Just lift the carpet and you'll easily show us the dirt. Chelsea knows it's there--she probably helped put it there.

Tweet

Barack nominates Abid Riaz Qureshi for federal District judge

Now that he's a lame duck president, Obama figured that it's time to nominate a Muslim for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He isn't running for POTUS anymore so he's free to fly like a pigeon.

Barack Hussein Obama nominated Abid Riaz Qureshi for the court position on Tuesday. Qureshi is a partner in a Washington law firm that specializes in bringing lawsuits for False Claims Act cases, healthcare fraud and securities violations, all specialties that ironically could take Obama and the Clintons 'to the cleaners'.

The Quresh was the tribe that the prophet of Islam, Muhammed, belonged to, and how better to represent the 'religion of peace' whose sharia laws are the most misogynistic in the world than by nominating someone from that tribe? 

He would be the first Muslim nominated to the federal bench.

"I commend President Obama for taking this important step in continuing to pick the best and brightest from every community to serve as part of our nation's judiciary," stated another Muslim, Farhana Khera, former counsel to the State Judiciary Committee and executive director to a Muslim legal advocacy organization that defends only Muslim clients. "A judiciary that reflects the rich diversity of our nation helps ensure the fair and just administration of the law," she said.

The sharia-friendly nomination comes at a time when Democratic lawmakers and groups are trying to pressure Senate Majority Leader Mitch McCommell (R-KY) to go forward with Judge Merrick Garland's nomination to the Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The GOP has decided to wait for the next president to decide on the nominee, but the hypocritical Democrats, who have done the same, want to stuff the Supreme Court with liberal lawmakers to push their failed policies on the American public. 

Some of the same hypocrites are holding a rally for Garland on the steps of the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

"The Senate's obstruction on Judge Garland's nomination is emblematic of the blockade throughout the entire judicial system," stated Why Courts Matter, a group who stole the idea for its name from Black Lives Matter, and George Soros may decide to sue them for that.

Hopefully for Obama, the nomination will, Inshallah, go smoothly for Qureshi. It's high time that Muslims are are way over-represented in the public's eye.



Tweet

Protesters try to trump Trump

Pelted by eggs by anti-Trumpers

Protesters at a Donald Trump rally in San Jose attacked supporters of the GOP presumptive nominee and created a rowdy scene in which over a dozen people were punched and one woman was pelted with an egg.

According to the leftists, this is all Trump's fault. This has to be due to the fact that leftists have no control over their own behavior and take no responsibility for their actions. Another name for them might be "zombies" or "Clinton Clingons," but Donald Trump is not responsible.

Thinking like that is similar to the abusive husband who blames his wife for "making [me] beat the crap out of [you]."

I could go on with how the anti-Trump rioters grabbed Trump hats from supporters and set the hats on fire; or how they threw eggs at a young woman (cowardly pond scum), but the point is missed. The point being about assigning blame.

"Do you think Hillary Clinton knew of Bill's affairs?"

You cannot make me hit you unless you grab my hand, ball it into a fist, and throw it toward you against my will. Even then, I suspect you wouldn't be successful in making me punch you.

Fox News, in their quest to look fair and balanced, invariably has a libtard on the programming to make the leftist point of view (see Geraldo Rivera, Alan Colmes, Robert Zimmerman and Juan Williams, for examples). 

I believe many conservatives already know their point of view and are becoming weary of hearing it over and over. If we want to hear something over and over it ought to be the conservative point of view (as long as it isn't Sean-Women-in-Saudi-Arabia-Can't-Drive-a-Car-Hannity).

Finally, I would not be in the least surprised to learn that George Soros is behind these protesters. If he could help the Nazis in WW2, he could help a socialist like Sanders or a felon like Clinton.


Tweet

Sanders and the fate of the Paw People

"Paw people don't vote," Bernie Sanders complains, and he doesn't mean animals with paws. He's talking people in poverty. He's using that as an excuse to explain why he, a socialist, is losing to the felon, Hillary Clinton.

Bernie was asked on "Meet the Press" Sunday why he consistently loses to the most distrusted, unlikeable, loud-mouthed candidate of all time. 

He said that he wouldn't be trailing the incompetent Clinton by 275 delegates if the delegates themselves were socialists and math challenged, and if "maw paw people would come out and vote" [for him]. 

"I mean, that's just a fact," the socialist said. "That's a sad reality of American society; and that's what we have to transform."

"We have one--as you know--one of the lowest voter turnouts of any major country on Earth. We have done a good job bringing young people in. I think we have done--had some success with lower income people. But in America today--the last election in 2014, 80 percent of poor people did not vote."

And Bernie knows about poor people. Back as a young man living for a while on a commune in Vermont, he lost his job and then his first wife to divorce. Unemployed, a failed carpenter, and overall, a failed hippie, Bernie knew what it meant to be paw.

Eventually, he turned to writing pornography. He (you should forgive the expression) sucked at that too.

If we only give him a chance at the presidency, I am completely confident his record will not be tarnished.


Tweet

North Korea makes a splash

New sanctions imposed by South Korea on the North has led Kim Jong Un to have a hissy fit with the firing of short-range ballistic missiles into the sea, making a huge splash and killing several fish and who knows what else.

The sea firing is the latest in hissy fit behavior in an escalating standoff between the North and South that started in January. Pyongyang said that it detonated an "H-bomb of justice" in a nuclear test, and later launched a long-range rocket.

The South since has closed a factory jointly run by the two Koreas and slapped sanctions on the North. The U.S. and South Korea began large-scale war games as the North threatened to nuke the South and the U.S. mainland. This brought great laughter to the U.S. and South Korea.


On Wednesday,  the North Korean media printed photos of a mock-up of a miniature nuclear warhead.  

North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea (an oxymoron if there ever was one) said Thursday that the North will "liquidate" South Korean assets at the closed factory park along the North Korean border town of Kaesong as well as a scrapped tourism resort at Diamond Mountain.cThe statement from the "peaceful" committee also said that it will impose "lethal" military, political and economic blows on the government of the South to accelerate its "pitiable demise."

South Korea called the statement a "provocative act." They warned the North to keep its hands off South Korean assets, although the North didn't say what they planned to do with them. One possibility is to use the Diamond Mountain site for a basketball camp with Dennis Rodman at the helm.

The North's statement said the new sanctions were "laughable, unsightly," and called South Korea's female president, Park Geun-hye, an "American prostitute." 

They must have been trying to emulate a campaign debate or mistaken her for a Clinton escort.


Tweet