South Korea goes way left

South Korea’s presidential election took a hard left turn on Tuesday, with official vote tallies handing victory to comrade Lee Jae-myung, a left-wing opposition leader. He trounced a conservative candidate tied to the disgraced former president Yoon Suk Yeol, whose disastrous martial law stunt in December cratered his political career.

So it seems that voters went with their emotions, not with their brains.

The election could signal a “kind of a return to normal politics” after six months of chaos, especially as U.S. tariffs loom large, stirring economic uncertainty, according to one expert. But don’t hold your breath, Lee’s victory reeks of trouble. He’s poised to cozy up to China and play footsie with North Korea, a move that’s sure to raise eyebrows in Washington and among freedom-loving South Koreans.

Lee campaigned as a unifier, riding the wave of backlash against Yoon’s martial law debacle. But the Korea JoongAng Daily nailed it: he “will need to navigate a deeply polarized electorate and a shifting geopolitical landscape.” 

Good luck with that when your playbook seems to involve appeasing dictators and alienating allies. South Korea’s in for a rocky ride.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Liberals go blue tattoo to spot "safe people"

A sick religion

There is no doubt in any rational person's mind who supports President-elect Donald Trump that there are myriad leftists with mental health problems.

From those who have cut off all their hair, to those who say they will not have sex with a man for four years while Trump is President, an now to those white women who will wear a blue bracelet tattoo as a signal to others who escaped from the asylum that they're "safe."

What was simply a way of showing support for Kamala Hahahaha-Harris has become a full-blown social media movement.

Although everyone knows that Trump will put women and his opponents in prison, regardless of their crime[s] or absent of them, still a whopping 53% of white women voted for him, if we are to believe the exit polls.

Those white women who voted for the purveyor of word salad started posting online that they hoped there was a way to identify those fellow leftists who were on their side, and those who voted for Trump. And due to their suppressed racism, they also wanted a way to virtue signal women of color that they weren't Trump supporters. 

To take virtue signaling one step further, many chicks of white epidermis encouraged other melanin-deficient women to not make their own bracelets but to support Black-owned jewelry companies to show  that they are better than MAGA women.

Pathetic.

This is how crazy it is getting:

Now bracelets are not enough, tattoos is the new idea 😆pic.twitter.com/iE2yWiWlVO— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) November 8, 2024

Videos promoting the blue bracelet tattoos are all over social media.

First, it was Blue Bracelets. Now, it’s Tattoos. pic.twitter.com/0CWpHvBvyn— Sam Mitha (@MithaEXP) November 9, 2024

This is a vivid example of virtue signaling and has taken on a religious connotation. The one main issue Harris actually verbalized in her fabulously failed campaign was the issue of abortion. The problem with that issue is the fact that the American public wasn't all that interested in it as compared to illegal immigration, crime, and especially the economy.

But Harris, like her boss, was never a top drawer leader.

Tweet

Pittsburgh's Jewish Dems see Trump as a better option after Harris kisses up to anti-Israel/anti-Semitic politicians in PA

PITTSBURGH – The Jewish community in Pittsburgh is sending a strong message to the Harris-Walz campaign as the election nears: continue to align with those who oppose Israel, and expect to lose votes from Jewish Democrats.

The controversy began when the Harris campaign invited speakers to their rallies who attributed the October 7 attacks, which resulted in 1,400 Israeli civilian deaths, to Israel itself, despite the Jewish community's explicit objections.

"These pleas were ignored," a source involved in the discussions told The Post. The campaign proceeded to feature Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey and Allegheny County Executive Sara Innamorato, both of whom have been criticized for implying, alongside Rep. Summer Lee, that the violence wasn't initiated by Hamas on October 7.

"The violence did not start on October 7th." - A statement co-signed by Gainey and Innamorato.
This statement, issued on the anniversary of the attacks, drew immediate backlash from Jewish leaders in Pittsburgh, where a significant portion of Pennsylvania's Jewish population resides and is ready to vote.

With such votes at stake, the Democratic Party's association with anti-Israel figures might cost them Pennsylvania's 19 electoral votes, potentially deciding the 2024 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump.

This scenario isn't far-fetched. Several Jewish Democrats in Pittsburgh have voiced feelings of betrayal by their party, contemplating voting for Trump instead.

Aviva Lubowsky, a mother of two, while not switching her vote, highlighted the risk:

"If the Democratic Party wants to retain its Jewish voter base, they have to eschew and denounce extremists in the party," she said. "The rhetoric they are using is dangerous for the safety of my children. It’s causing people who would otherwise vote for [Harris], to vote for Trump."
Jennifer Murtazashvili, a Jewish political scientist, noted the broader shift:

"The mainstream progressive left has a major problem on its hands," she remarked, indicating that many in her circles are leaning towards Trump due to doubts about Harris' commitment to Israel and fighting anti-Semitism.

The discontent is palpable, with a significant portion of Jewish voters showing less enthusiasm for Democrats than at any time since the Reagan years.

A Jewish Democratic voter expressed the community's frustration:

"There are undecided voters in the Jewish community where I never thought they’d be," he said, mentioning encounters at holiday services where traditional Democrats are now unsure.
The sentiment was echoed by another voter considering Trump:

Summer Lee 

"They obviously understood how dangerous it would be for Summer to be there," she criticized the campaign's strategy, pointing to the careful navigation around Rep. Lee's involvement.
The fear of a Harris administration not adequately preventing Iran from nuclear capability was also a significant concern driving some towards Trump.

These issues resonate deeply in Pittsburgh, where the memory of the 2018 Tree of Life synagogue shooting, the deadliest antisemitic attack in U.S. history, lingers, alongside recent attacks on Jewish students.

Despite this, some like Audrey Glickman, a survivor of the Tree of Life tragedy, still support Harris:

"Kamala Harris is not a Squad member. She’s been to Pittsburgh more than once and talked to us more than once and has worked on antisemitism as an issue," Glickman defended Harris, expressing disappointment in the local leaders' rhetoric.
However, for others like Lubowsky, who still wishes for Harris to win, the Democratic Party must act to reclaim support:

"I have never voted for a Republican in my entire life. I will be for the first time this election," Lubowsky declared, planning to vote for Republican James Hayes in the local election.
This election cycle reveals a historic shift, with American liberal Jews feeling politically homeless.

Tweet

Biden's cold gone, so is his brain as his Wisconsin visit ends in disaster

Thankfully Joe Biden's cold made a quick exit after the debate ended and our part-time President has announced he's staying in the race for a second term in order to protect democracy and the American way. 

On Friday, Joe appeared at a Wisconsin "rally" where he used a teleprompter to yell what was written. He appeared a little lucid, now that the cold meds must have been discontinued, and the Havana Syndrome rays must have stopped beaming down on him, and he got enough rest after only have a week of rest prior to the debacle debate.

So in spite of him arriving more than an hour late and still struggling to appear sentient in public [he's as sharp as a tack in private, for some reason] he spoke-mumbled to a crowd of over a bunch of enthusiastic Democrats to show the country that he is not very senile.

Scheduled to start in less than an hour pic.twitter.com/FiZn7XxION— Gabe Gutierrez (@gabegutierrez) July 5, 2024

When he showed up after the long wait, he stiff-armed shuffled with little steps and a confused look on his face. He seemed lost and alone on some forgotten highway, traveled by many, remembered by few [as the late John Denver sang]. His handlers were likely crossing parts of their bodies beside their fingers hoping Joe wouldn't blow it.

Crooked Joe Biden finally shuffles on stage — over an hour late to his own event pic.twitter.com/k7xFOadVLM— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 5, 2024

A guy in the semi-large crowd held a sigh that read, "Pass the torch Joe." 

Then came the mumbled speech. While Democrats were hoping for a "holy reception," they got a "holy mackerel, does he know where he is?" Biden slurred, forgot words, and in signature Biden fashion, he rambled on incoherently. 

It was a clusterfrack for sure.

BIDEN (VERY CONFUSED): "I'll beat Donald Trump! I will beat him again in 2020!" pic.twitter.com/ke2sNRyw75— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 5, 2024

BIDEN (VERY CONFUSED): "I'll beat Donald Trump! I will beat him again in 2020!" pic.twitter.com/ke2sNRyw75— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 5, 2024

I could go on, but if you don't get the picture by now, you have to be willfully blind. He once again brought up the "suckers and losers" hoax even though it has been thoroughly debunked.

There is no way Biden is going to run come November, We all see what we see and we know he stands zero chance of finishing out. four more years if, heaven forbid, he wins the election. 

And which unelected person is really handling him?

Tweet

FL lawmaker introduces legislation to remove Fani Willis for her political persecution against Trump

Republican Rep. Cory Mills (FL) introduced legislation called the "Against Federal Funds for Allowing Inappropriate Relationships Act," [or the AFFAIR Act] designed to stop federal funding to the office of "any state or local chief prosecutor if any individual in such office has been convicted for engaging in corruption or any other unlawful activity.”

The bill sends a clear and direct message to Fani Willis, the Fulton County DA that her political games against former President Trump will not be tolerated.

Mills blasted Willis for her relationship with the special prosecutor Nathan Wade who she appointed to prosecute the Georgia election case against Trump, accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election. It happens to be a RICO case which Wade has no experience trying. Willis is also  facing accusations that she personally benefitted financially from her relationship with Wade.

In a statement, Mills called on Willis to recuse herself from the investigation against the former President.

"Not only was Fani Willis’ relationship with Nathan Wade extremely inappropriate and created concerns around a conflict of interest, but it also potentially shows violations of bias against political opposition and lawfare for election interference,” Mills told the Washington Examiner in a statement. “Under no circumstance should federal funds be sent to a state or local office if there is unlawful and unethical activity taking place. Our nation was founded on the steadfast tenets that liberty and justice — including the fair and equal application of the law — are crucial to ensuring the preservation of our constitutional republic," Mills continued. "I’m proud to introduce the AFFAIR Act to ensure American taxpayer dollars will not be misappropriated or weaponized due to unlawful and unethical activities."

Trump’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case against the former president after learning of Willis’ affair with the adulterer Wade.

In a letter to the State Bar of Georgia, Mills argued that any alleged relationship between Willis and Wade could “give rise to possible violations of bias, conflict of interest, and potential kickback.”

On the contrary, Willis seeks to dismiss subpoenas that focus on her alleged misappropriation of county and federal funds.

A nine-page motion filed by Willis says, “each of these subpoenas appears transparently to be an attempt to conduct discovery in a (rather belated) effort to support reckless accusations made in prior court filings,” adding that the subpoenas should be “quashed.”

Tweet

The Deep State has a plan to deal with Trump

Biden has nothing to show for his term as President. In fact, some say [like me] that he's not running the show and is actually an 'alleged' president, or a 'so called' president. He is down in the polls and the Democrats are desperate to do something.

Former President Donald Trump is by far the leading candidate for the GOP so the left is doing the "threat to democracy," "he's no different than Hitler" schtick. They have to do this because they have nothing to show for their time in leadership other than porn in the schools, two serious wars, incredibly high inflation, a President who craps his pants in front of the Pope and who is as confused as a pedophile in Boys' Town. 

Biden is a total failure but the left cannot admit it so they go after Trump.

The Red State reported that the Democrat powers that be are trying to do something about the Donald, as per an NBC revealed. According to an NBC report, they worry that if Trump wins the presidency they don't know what he will do so "a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers is quietly devising plans to try to foil any efforts to expand presidential power, which could include pressuring the military to cater to his political needs."

Boys and girls, can you say 'paranoia'?

According to the NBC report, these people are quietly studying Trump's past behavior and his 2024 policy positions in order to be ready should he win this November. They are ready to take legal action and threaten Trump's appointees if they undermine constitutional norms--something the Democrats believe is only their right to do.

“We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things that he [Trump] might do so that we’re ready to bring lawsuits if we have to,” said Mary McCord, executive director of the Institution for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law.

McCord must be referring to actions like using the DOJ to prosecute only those who don't follow the President's narrative--oh wait--that wasn't Trump. Perhaps she is referring to calling for military strikes against the Houthis in Yemen without going through Congress--oh dang--that wasn't Trump.

This garbage needs to stop right now. Trump may or may not win, but if he does get elected, those unelected scumcrumpets better not interfere with the workings of government.

Tweet

Kathy Hochul says crime is down and GOP is lying to you: guess what

The 3 Stoogettes

Unelected Gov. Kathy Hochul's (D-NY) nose grew several inches on Friday after she claimed that Republicans, especially her political nemesis Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), were lying about the amount of crime eating away at New York over the past year. Zeldin is running against Hochul in the gubernatorial race on Nov. 8.

Hochul's lie came even as Democrat-friendly CNN showed statistics revealing that overall crime was up 31% from Oct. 2021 to Oct. 2022 in New York City.

“Because they’re being dishonest about it,” Hochul claimed when asked why GOP candidates are gaining grounds in polls while talking about crime. “They’re not having a conversation about real solutions.”

Democrat solutions is to allow criminals to walk out of custody, bail-free and in some cases, to lessen the charges and sentences.

While Hochul acknowledged that crime is a problem in New York City, she claimed that the real issue was the number of guns on the street and that Republicans were “tough on crime, but soft on guns.”

Yes, by taking guns away from people who are willing to turn them in [aka law abiding citizens] only criminals will have guns.

“That’s not going to give anyone any comfort,” Hochul said of the crime data. “It says we still have a problem, I understand that, but let’s talk about real answers and not just give everybody all these platitudes.”

She is an idiot to think that gun confiscation is going to reduce crime--just tell that to Paul Pelosi.

Obviously guns are not the only problem where crime is an issue.

Earlier this week, Hochul also accused Republicans of being “master manipulators” on the crime topic.

“They have this conspiracy going all across America to try to convince people in Democratic states they’re not as safe,” she claimed. “Well guess what? They’re not only election deniers, they’re data deniers. The data shows that murders and shootings in our state are down by 15%, down almost 20% on Long Island where Lee Zeldin lives.”

But Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams, Jamie Raskin, Kamala Harris [who said Trump was an illegitimate president as did Hillary], and others over the past ten years and more, are not supposed to be election deniers because?

The New York Post documented data that shows violence is surging in New York City, regardless of what Hochul says.

“…citywide murders last year were 67% higher than in 2017, and that, though they’ve fallen slightly this year, other crimes continue to soar,” The Post recently reported. “As of Sunday, rapes in Gotham were up 10.9% over last year, robberies 32.4%, grand larcenies 38.5% and car thefts 34.5%.”

If anything is to blame for the rise in crime, New York's bail reform law of 2019 stands out. It bans cash bail except for the “most serious misdemeanors and felonies.” Judges have no discretionary power to hold defendants based on their "perceived dangerousness," and Politico points out that they are required to use the “least restrictive means” of ensuring charged individuals return to court. Yeah, kind of like illegal aliens returning in a year or two for their hearing. Good luck with that.

Just days ago, a mother was killed in front of her young children by her estranged husband who was let out of jail without bail despite being arrested for beating her as seen in a video she had provided the court.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

The Democrats have attacked law enforcement and policies that impact on criminality and this has got to stop. Hopefully this Tuesday will be a referendum on this issue and the other problems the left's agenda has fostered.

Tweet

Former NY Times reporter says they held Kenosha story until after 2020 election

Nellie Bowles, an ex-New York Times journalist claims the former newspaper held her reporting about the Kenosha riots and their ravaging effects on impoverished neighborhoods until after the 2020 election, an election that saw a stick of wood become President of the United States of America and a woman who called that stick a "racist" become his do-nothing Vice President.

According to a Thursday post on her wife, Bari Weiss’ Substack channel Common Sense, Bowles went to Kenosha in August 2020 to report on the riots in the wake of the righteous shooting of Jacob Blake, a rapist thug who pulled a knife on police when they tried to arrest him. 

Blake was shot seven times and, because he acted as an anti-cop a-hole, became a hero to the Marxist left, all of whom are anti-cop a-holes.

The rioting, burning, looting and violence went on for days in the town, and this became the backdrop of the story of Kyle Rittenhouse’s fatal shooting of three people in self defense, and all of whom had criminal records.

Bowles said she was sent to report on the “mainstream liberal argument” that vandalizing buildings for racial justice was not detrimental because businesses had insurance. So with that logic, racial justice is justified if the victims of the destruction are insurance companies.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

“It turned out to be not true,” Bowles wrote. “The part of Kenosha that people burned in the riots was the poor, multi-racial commercial district, full of small, underinsured cell phone shops and car lots. It was very sad to see and to hear from people who had suffered.”

So she filed her story and her editors told her the story would run after the election, and cited "space, timing, tweaks," according to her post.

So there was the election and the stick of wood won. The piece eventually ran but it was well after the fact and made no difference in the election.

“Whatever the reason for holding the piece, covering the suffering after the riots was not a priority,” Bowles wrote.

Whatever the reason? Are there any doubts what the reasons were?

The Times' new slogan should be: "All the news that fits our narrative, we print."

Tweet

Biden threatens Trump to more than just pushups

The Biden campaign is threatening to "escort President Trump out of the White House if he refuses to leave.

But what if he is determined to be the winner? Will the Biden campaign need to be escorted away from trying to enter the White House?

And what if Biden does win the election and suddenly dies mysteriously--will they investigate whether it was Kamala Harris that poisoned him? Well, the Trump team is vowing to investigate Harris should Biden mysteriously die for unknown reasons.

Anonymous sources believe that the odds are excellent that Harris will make her move on Biden, and I don't mean the same kind of move she made on Willie Brown, the former Mayor of San Francisco to whom Harris gave her body in order to advance her political career. And while my anonymous sources will remain unnamed [because that's what anonymous sources do], they assure Brain Flushings that the one thing Biden should immediately do, even before curing the world of COVID-19 and the miraculous vaccine he invented just days after the election, is to hire a food taster and maybe keep an epipen handy.

Biden said that if Trump and Melania refuse to leave the White House, he is personally going to take him out behind the White House gym and beat the hell out of him. This is not the first time Biden has physically threatened the President of the United States, but if history is any indication as to the veracity of the threat, Trump has nothing to worry about. Actually, even if the threat came to fruition, Trump would have nothing to worry about--he would easily beat the crap out of Biden and do a number on his dentures.

Biden often goes to the vacuous braggadocio as his default position when strong arguments escape his deteriorating mind. If it isn't a fistfight, it's a pushup contest. The only pushup contest Biden might win has more to do with bras than exercise.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

MI Republicans claim software undercounted Trump votes

It's as if the Trump legacy is a Three Act play that's playing itself out as we wait for the final election outcome.

Act One is when Trump came down the escalator, announced his run for President, and campaigned against "Low Energy Jeb"; "Lyin' Ted"; and the others.

Act Two is the Democratic Party impeaching Trump on the grounds that he colluded with the Russians to win the election. Of course, that was proved to be false, and in fact, it was Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi and the other Democrats that were using Russian disinformation to try to pin collusion on Trump.

Act Three is this election and the outcome that will come of it. 

Will Biden, a barely sentient human being, come away from this debacle and become our next President? Will Trump keep his presidency? Will the country go into a frenzy and civil war?

Now that it seems a Trump victory might be impossible, is it just part of a third act and will there be an outcome in which Trump emerges victorious? That would be how it plays out if this was, indeed, a play.

In this third act, Trump's supporters are pointing to a small Michigan county in which vote counting software used in the entire state may have undercut Trump's number of votes.

As of this writing, Trump trails barely sentient Joe Biden by 146,123 votes in Michigan’s unofficial results, with 98 percent of the votes counted. However, in northern Antrim County thousands of votes have been counted in error for Biden as well as Democrat Sen. Gary Peters, rather than John James, the Republican candidate.

Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said at a Friday press conference that “in Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said, ‘tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes.'”

Cox explained that “since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties used this same software in the same capacity,” or over half of Michigan’s 83 counties. She urged those counties to “closely examine their results for similar discrepancies.” 

The Detroit Free Press reported that Antrim County uses Dominion Voting Systems equipment. Results are stored on computer cards at precincts, where Republican observers are forbidden to observe, then uploaded to another computer by Democratic county election officials.

Well, that's no big deal, right?

Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, a Republican, told the Free Press that it’s unclear if human error or a glitch caused the error, which was discovered because a Democratic wins were incongruous with the county’s conservative leanings. A manual review confirmed the error or tampering, as it were.

University of Michigan computer science professor J. Alex Halderman, a voting machine expert and former juke box repairman, told the Free Press that “it’s plausibly human error, but if a simple screw-up could cause these problems, that sounds like a technical design flaw.”

“It’s natural to wonder whether similar problems could have occurred in other jurisdictions that use the same machine. Fortunately, even if the county hadn’t noticed, this would have been caught and corrected during Michigan’s normal canvassing procedures, when they compare the results to the paper tapes from the machines,” he claimed.

A Michigan judge on Thursday tossed out a lawsuit from the Trump campaign to stop the counting of ballots in the state, ruling that the vote count had already ended in Biden’s favor. 

Trump won Michigan by just 10,704 votes in 2016 against the execrable Hillary Clinton, and Biden boasted of his apparently wider lead in Wednesday remarks, when the state’s race was still tighter.

“In Michigan, we lead by over 35,000 votes, and it is growing, a sub, a sub, a substanbilly bigger margin that George, um, President Trump won Michigan in 2016,” Biden mush mouthed in earnest.

Trump’s path to a second term appeared bleak Friday, with unofficial vote counts in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania tilting toward a confused Biden. If those results hold, Biden will become the first president-elect who does not know where he's at, who is able to distinguish his wife from his sister, and who was called a racist by his VP running mate.

In any case, he has an entire nation rooting for him--China.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Win or lose the presidency, the Dems are in a world of hurt

As of this writing, President Trump may have lost Tuesday's presidential election, that's still up in the air, but one thing for certain, the Democratic Party lost political ground big time. Of course, we can't count President Trump out yet because he has an uncanny way of turning things around in the third act, and this indeed, is the third act if you think of his presidency as a play.

The way it looks now, the Republicans are going to hold the Senate by a narrow margin.

Better than that, one hundred state legislatures went to the GOP, not one went to the lefties. In fact, even New Hampshire lost its Democrat seat to the Republicans and for that state, we can think of it as a Thanksgiving miracle.

Montana now has a new Republican governor. Greg Gianforte got 54.4% of the vote while his Democratic challenger, Mike Cooney, got 41.6% and Libertarian Party's Lyman Bishop got 4%.

In this districting year, the Democrats did not pick up even one state legislature, and it looks like the Democratic coalition is fragmented and unworkable.

There's the AOC squad, a group comprised of young, progressive, woke anti-Semitic, anti-Israel women who believe their party needs to go further to the left to win bigly, and hopefully the Dems will go along with that.

Alexandria Occasionally-Comatose (AOC, as previously mentioned) reacted to former Sen. Claire McCaskill's (D-MO) reaction [below] to the losses suffered by the party of the donkey.

The socialist congresswoman from New York believes that the reason McCaskill lost her reelection was due to her failing to go further to the left. She mocked McCaskill as you can see in her tweet below. However, it is a bit ironic now that McCaskill lost her election, MSNBC has hired her as an election expert.

As you can see, AOC, the freshman congresswoman, isn't very respectful of people, even in her own party who refuse to go along with her socialist thinking. And yes, although she beat a longstanding Democrat to win her congressional district in Queens, New York, she did so because he took it for granted he was going to win and she didn't agree. 

But let's not pretend that while she won this latest election in a landslide against a Republican, a D-shaped dog turd running against Abe Lincoln would have won an election in her district.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Lou Dobbs wants you to vote for Democrat challenger to Lindsey Graham

Fox Business' Lou Dobbs does not want South Carolinians to vote for the Republican Senator Lindsey Graham on Election Day. He would rather the GOP give up a senate seat than reelect Graham because he believes the senator "... has betrayed the American people."

“Well, just to be clear, I don’t know why anyone in the great state of South Carolina would ever vote for Lindsey Graham,” Dobbs said. “It’s just outrageous. This is the guy who keeps saying, ‘Stay tuned.’ He said he was going to get to the bottom of Obamagate with the Judiciary Committee, which has been a year-and-a-half—actually longer—of absolute inert, inert response to these pressing issues of our day.”

“And this is what, by the way, Donald Trump said of Senator Lindsey Graham back in 2016, while he was campaigning for the presidency in South Carolina,” Dobbs continued. “I believe the president’s words about the senator then apply today.”

The Fox Business News host referenced a Trump quote the president made while competing as a candidate in the SC primary against Graham:

"I think Lindsey Graham is a disgrace, and I think you have one of the worst representatives of any representative in the United States. I don’t think he could run for dog catcher in this state and win again. I really don’t. Other than that, I think he’s wonderful. He’s one of the dumbest human beings I’ve ever seen … The guy is a nut job."

Does anyone really believe that Trump believes his own words about Graham? President Trump goes for the jugular on his opposition all the time and does so with hyperbole.

Dobbs accused Graham of betraying President Trump and the country. "Graham has betrayed President Trump at almost every turn. He has betrayed the American people and his oath of office. He’s done absolutely nothing to investigate Obamagate, except to tell everyone, ‘Stay tuned.’ Time and time again: ‘Stay tuned.'”

“Senator Graham needs to be tuned out in South Carolina,” Dobbs said.

The senate race in question is against Jaime Harrison (D).

“A political action committee founded by national Democratic operatives to help Harrison’s campaign—Lindsey Must Go PAC—recently spent more than $133,000 on mailers highlighting former Constitution Party candidate Bill Bledsoe, who has dropped out of the race and thrown his support behind Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. The mailers say Bledsoe is ‘the only true conservative on the ballot,’” the outlet reported.

Bledsoe dropped out of the race weeks ago when his campaign failed to raise so much as a dime.

Harrison's campaign launched ads supporting Bledsoe, a tactic he used before.

“The ads call Bledsoe ‘the only Senate candidate who stood with President Trump on day one’ and note that he ‘opposes all abortions’ and ‘believes that any gun-control law infringes upon the Second Amendment.’ The ads also link to a website paid for by the South Carolina Democratic Party, which calls Bledsoe ‘pro-Trump,’ ‘pro-gun,’ and ‘anti-abortion,’” the Free Beacon reported. 

Harrison is anti-Trump, pro-gun confiscation and pro-baby killing. 

If Harrison wins, the Senate will have one less Republican vote and somehow that's okay with Lou Dobbs. 

Fox News and Fox Business ain't what they used to be.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Chelsea Handler "whitesplains' to 50 Cent about how to be black

Chelsea Handler was very upset with her former boyfriend, 50 Cent, and publicly blasted him on "The Tonight Show" for leaving the plantation by supporting President Trump.

The former lugubrious comedian has been undergoing a chronic hissy-fit since Monday when Mr. Cent shared a photo from a newscast on Instagram depicting the tax rates of various locations under a Joe Biden tax plan. He highlighted New York state (58%) and specifically, New York City (62%). Due to his understanding of finances and how percentages work, he has decided to vote for President Trump and tweeted:

"F--K NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway. I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya f--king mind."

The caption of the graph read: "WHAT THE F--K! (VOTE ForTRUMP) IM OUT,"

Showing her lack of understanding of Biden's tax hike, Handler insisted the 62 percent "isn't a plan" under Biden, calling it a "lie" during her interview with "Tonight Show" host Jimmy Fallon.

No, the real lie was the one that Biden told about fracking.     

"So he doesn't want to pay 62 percent in taxes because he doesn't want to go from '50 Cent' to '20 Cent' and I had to remind him that he was a Black person, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump and that he shouldn't be influencing an entire swath of people who may listen to him because he's worried about his own personal pocketbook,“ Handler said. 

In other words, if you don't vote for Biden "you ain't black." What a racist thing to say as a white person to a black person. 

Chelsea Handler is a racist by the left's standards.

Handler said she "hasn't heard back" from Mr. Cent but told Fallon she's willing to "seal the deal in more ways than one" in order to get her ex-boyfriend to publicly denounce Trump. In other words, she would prostitute herself for one Biden vote.

It isn't known whether or not Handler is willing to do this with other undecided voters or Trump voters, but if you don't ask her, you'll never know. She sounds rather easy going, if you know what I mean.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

NY Times typist warns Compromised Nonsense News of potential civil war if Trump wins

New York Times typist Tom Friedman thinks the country might be on the verge of a "potential second Civil War" over the Trump-Biden presidential election. Fortunately, Friedman generally has no idea what he's talking about so it would be wise not to take him seriously.

The hunt-and-peck typist said Trump's remarks from Wednesday whereby he danced around whether he'd commit to a peaceful transfer of power should he lose sounded like a "six-alarm fire" to him. However, the words of Hillary Clinton, in which she advised Biden not to concede in the election "no matter what," merely made his groin itch, or perhaps it was that gas station toilet seat.

Trump told a possible reporter in a White House news conference that he'd have to "see what happens" after the election first, because he just can't bring himself to not be controversial--it isn't only how he rolls, it's how he persuades. "You know that I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster," he said.

CNN's host and son of the late Gloria Vanderbilt, Anderson Cooper, blew Friedman's mind by asking if he really meant what he asserted.

“Yeah,” Friedman answered with street lingo. “The president of the United States has told us, ‘Either I win the election or I delegitimize the election.’ Those are your choices, folks.” He added he was “surprised and shocked” by the remarks, which Friedman made up off the top of his semi-useless head.

Actually, the "reporter" asked Trump "Win, lose or draw in this election, will you commit today for a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" The reporter apparently assumed that Sleepy Joe would win the election based on how he worded the question. [start at about 8:35 of the video to see the entire conversation.]

"Well, we're going to have to see what happens," Trump responded. "As you know, I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster."

The "reporter" jumped on his answer and interrupted with, "I understand that, but people are rioting. Commit to make sure that there's a peaceful transfer of power."

"Get rid of the ballots and there will be a very peaceful, there won't be a transfer frankly, there will be a continuation . . . " 

Friedman read Trump's mind and said he was also trying to “break people’s will” with the remarks, so voters might say “‘What the heck, he wants it so bad, just give it to him.'”

Actually, what he was telling the "reporter" was that he believes he's going to win the election and that if the election did not seem fair, he would see what he might do. That isn't a threat, it's a reasonable remark, unlike Hillary Clinton's to Biden about not abiding by the decision of the people.

He said he thinks Trump will inevitably dispute the election results unless he’s named the winner. 

“If you’re not frightened now, if you are not terrified for what could happen, it’s not ‘We might have a disputed election.’ It is, ‘We are going to have a disputed election, almost certainly,’ unless Trump wins, in which case I shudder to think what four more years of this would be like,” he said in a scary Halloween voice, because fear is the best persuader, the best motivator--think COVID 19 and how the government has us jumping through fiery hoops.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Thursday assured us that there would be "an orderly transfer of power" in January, just as it has been "every four years since Washington was elected for a second term in 1792."

Even Joe Biden should know that--he was there.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

BREAKING: Democrat Gillum concedes to Republican DeSantis in FL governor's race

Finally, this midterm election is coming to an end, sort of. Democrat and far left gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum has conceded Saturday to GOP challenger Ron DeSantis, a person Gillum wrongfully accused of being a racist.

The concession from Gillum, the failed mayor of Tallahassee, was made on a Facebook Live post with his wife at his side.

Gillum said he wanted "to congratulate Mr. DeSantis on becoming the next governor of the great state of Florida."

This is a developing story as Democrats appear to be trying to make this election as contentious as possible, and voter fraud, particularly in the state of Florida, seems to be rampant.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

Beto loses and drops 'F' Bomb in concession speech

Like Stacey Abrams who lost in the Georgia gubernatorial race and wants a recount, another loser, Robert "Beto" O'Rourke is also a garbage person and a bad sport.

The far left upstart who vied for Texas Senator Ted Cruz's seat and reaped millions of dollars from Hollywood celebrities and others, dropped the F bomb in his concession speech on live TV, showing his absolute lack of class or respect for the public who watched the democratic process unfold.

"Tonight's loss does nothing to diminish the way I feel about Texas or this country," O'Rourke said. "I'm so f**king proud of you guys."

Morons Saying Nothing But Crap (MSNBC) didn't censor O'Rourke, but Brian Williams [whose chin oddly veers to the left] later apologized and said, "We have no control of what's in the concession speeches."

But the truth is, it didn't appear to be a mistake at all. Even MSNBC was f***ing proud of Beto.

Ted Cruz was a gracious and classy winner.

During Cruz's victory speech, a few in the crowd booed when he mentioned O'Rourke, but Cruz said, "No. He worked tirelessly, he's a dad, and he took time away from his kids. Millions across this state were inspired by his campaign. They didn't prevail."

But leftists love profanity and you can bet your a** that Beto's not done with his potty mouth. His supporters think it's cool now that they've moved out of the basement away from mommy and daddy.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

Fla. Dem. scores upset primary but targeted by city's corruption probe

It is said by many psychologists that people who are clinically depressed see much of everything in the world in hopeless, sad terms. People who are suffer from anxiety disorder see the world as a dangerous place.

It seems reasonable, therefore, to think that people who see everything in racial terms, believing everyone's statements they disagree with are racially motivated, are quite likely to be racists themselves.

Leftist Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, a Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fan boy, just finished up with an upset victory in Florida's gubernatorial primary. His two socialist Economics 1.1 dropouts were glowing with praise for him, as he clashed with Trump-supported Rep. Ron DeSantis.

Gillum, however, is involved with a controversy of an FBI investigation over possible corruption in Tallahassee, in which he was mayor since 2014.

Of course Gillum denied any wrongdoing, just like Anthony Weiner denied tweeting to underage girls, claiming his Twitter account was hacked. [We all know how that turned out].

Gillum claims the FBI told him that he is not a focus of the investigation, and perhaps he's telling the truth--we shall see.

Rep. DeSantis who won the GOP nomination for the governorship Tuesday told Fox News, "This guy can't even run the city of Tallahassee. There is no way Florida voters can entrust him with our entire state."

Because as a socialist, Gillum will eventually run out of other people's money.

"With Andrew Gillum, Florida Democrats have selected a radical far-left politician who remains at the center of an FBI anti-corruption investigation," the Republican Governors Association said on primary day.

President Trump has thrown his support months ago to DeSantis and on Wednesday tweeted [believe it or not]. He accused Gillum of allowing "crime" and "many other problems" to flourish in Tallahassee. He didn't go into detail about those 'many other problems.'

"Not only did Congressman Ron DeSantis easily win the Republican Primary, but his opponent in November is his biggest dream ... a failed Socialist Mayor named Andrew Gilum who has allowed crime & many other problems to flourish in his city. This is not what Florida wants or needs!"

After the election, however, DeSantis made a comment that the Democrats jumped all over [in the race-labeling way they have].

DeSantis warned voters not to "monkey this up" by voting for a socialist.

You judge a man by his actions and his past. If DeSantis had a history of racism or racist remarks, well, then the Democrats might have a case--but DeSantis does not have a racial bias history.

The word 'monkey' was said to be a racially inflammatory word against blacks; and they might be correct if that was the intention DeSantis had. But it takes a racist like an Al Sharpton, for example, to see everything in racist terms.

The Democrats accused DeSantis of using "racist dog whistles" because Gillum is black. Even Gillum, who promises to bring the people together [as once did a president named Obama], asserted that the word was racially motivated.

The DeSantis campaign dismissed the claim his words had a racial dimension, saying that it's "absurd."

And with the diverse population of Florida, it would be foolishly absurd for DeSantis to alienate a large population of people of color--that would be political suicide. It therefore stands to reason that he never meant the term 'monkey up' to be racial in undertone, but probably meant 'muck up' but it sounded too close to the "F" word and his tongue skipped on past it and grabbed the closest word to describe how Gillum would muck up the state as he did the city.

If Gillum somehow pulls off a victory in the election, he would be the first black mayor and first socialist to muck things up in the state.

Please follow Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.




Tweet

Merkel cuts out as election heats up

Hot pants and tub chair

Berlin -- Angela Merkel is leading by a substantial margin in the German opinion polls clearly indicating that Germans have no idea how much she has screwed them with her unrealistic immigration policy titled: "Come one, come all."

Feeling like she has nothing to worry about with just two months before the election, she left for a quiet three-week summer vacation to a secret location known only to herself and her gaggle of armed security who are charged with protecting her from all of those she let into the country.

Her vacation, which local media says will be spent at the opera and in the Italian Alps, isn't about her confidence in winning as much as it has to do with her being 'too pooped to pop.'

It will also keep her out of the limelight and free of controversy if the migrants and refugees don't go on a rape-fest in Cologne again.

If she wins a fourth term, Germany will deserve what they get--a country that doesn't look like Germany.


Tweet

Hillary's blames everyone but herself for her loser status

Pointing a gnarly finger everywhere but at herself, Hillary Clinton blames Russia and Donald Trump for her second presidential election loss.

At the annual Code Conference in California on Wednesday, the 69-year-old said, "I take responsibility for every decision I made, but that's not why I lost," she lied. "Anti-American forces are going after our economy and they are going after our unity as a nation," she said, ending with the joke.

If anyone or any entity was going after our unity as a nation, it is clearly the left. But that's another story for another day.

Clinton accused the White House of colluding with Moscow in weaponizing technology to bring her campaign down. And she knows about technology--she keeps her server clean "with a cloth."

The former Worst Lady linked the campaign interference of last year's election to Trump and said she hopes investigators would be able to unmask a plot to interfere in the U.S. election. 

Somehow she believes that most Americans care why she lost yet again and she also sounds as if she's going to run again for the 2020 election. The Democratic Party is stupid, but not that stupid. Clinton is done; put her pitchfork in her.

She said a Russian-led misinformation campaign was launched against her and used Facebook and other social media networks that couldn't distinguish among the "fake news" being circulated on those sites.

"What we saw in this election particularly the first time we had the tech revolution really weaponized politically. It was aimed at me, but it's a much deeper, more persistent effort to literally turn the clock back on so much of what we have achieved as a country," she said, obviously misusing the word 'literally.'

When asked who she believed was responsible for involving the Russians, she sneered, "I'm leaning Trump."

She blames Trump, Russia and misogyny for her loss, but pretends to take responsibility for the stupid butthead decisions she made in her horrible campaign.

Clinton said she and her cronies often tried to bring up Russia's interest in the election but said her claims were ignored--possibly due to her "Reset Button" she gave to her Russian counterpart and Obama's open mic statement to the Russian president about how he would have more flexibility. In other words, it was obvious to authorities that if anyone had ties to Russia, and perhaps get them involved in the election, it was the Democratic Party.

"Putin wants to bring us down," Clinton said. "It's way beyond me . . . " she added, admitting how many things are way beyond her. "I believe that what was happening to me was unprecedented. Over the summer we went and told anyone we could find that the Russians were messing with the electin and we were basically shoo'd away . . . We couldn't get the press to cover it."

When the left can't get the press to cover something that helps the left, then you know it's balderdash. The press was in bed with the Clintons, but try not to get a mental picture lest you vomit on your computer and have to wipe it with a cloth.

Hillary also took issue with a 2010 Supreme Court decision that opened up campaign spending. She didn't want an even playing field to match the Clinton Foundation foreign and domestic donations.

"The first time you saw the tech revolution really weaponized politically . . . you had Citizen United come to its full fruition," she complained. "So unaccountable money flowing in against me, against other Democrats in a way we hadn't seen. You had effective suppression of votes."

Yes, she really said that. 

Does anyone recall the New Black Panthers suppressing the white voters of at least one Philadelphia polling place when Obama was running? 

Also, voter ID does not suppress votes--it legitimizes them. So Clinton is just being the lovable hypocrite she's always been.

Cryin' Hillary said she was treated unfairly for accepting millions of dollars in speaking fees from Wall Street firms during her primary race against the self-proclaimed "democratic socialist" Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT), followed by Trump.

Clinton tried to minimize her millions in speaking fees. "I have to say . . . I never thought someone would throw out my entire career because I made a couple of speeches. Men got paid for speeches they made . . . I got paid for the speeches I made."

Hillary is always trying to make it sound like the world is sexist because that's her only political position that resonates with her fellow misandrists.





Tweet

POTUS calls for congressional probe into wiretapping of his campaign

The Trump administration called for congressional investigations on Sunday, into his claim the Obama administration orchestrated an attempt to gain information on then-GOP nominee Donald Trump.

Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in a statement: "Reports concerning potentially motivated investigations immediately ahead of the 2016 election are very troubling . . . President Donald J. Trump is requesting that as part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committee exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigative powers were abused in 2016."

In a reflexive tweet Mr. Trump wrote: "Who was it that secretly said to Russian President, 'Tell Vladimir that after the election I'll have more flexibility?'"

Spicer's statement comes after President Trump's explosive allegation that former President Obama ordered phones wiretapped at Trump Tower and added that nobody in his administration "will comment further until such oversight is conducted."

Trump's wiretap allegations in a bunch of tweets Saturday, along with the White House statement, are the latest developments in the "Vladimir Putin is trying to influence the U.S. election for Trump over his rival and shrew, Hillary Clinton" controversy. 

National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had to resign over this situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from any DoJ probe in the matter because it was learned that he spoke with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak after a gaggle of Democrats did the same.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my 'wires tapped' in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism," the president tweeted Saturday.

And then he tweeted again: "Is it legal for a sitting president to be 'wire tapping' a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!"

It isn't clear to whom Mr. Trump was directing the legal question, but we can rule out Alan Dershowitz and Rosie O'Donnell.

And then he tweeted again that a "good lawyer could make a great case of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to election!"

And again: "How low has President Obama gone to tap (sic) my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!" he said, overusing exclamation points and asking rhetorical questions, as he often does.

Obama denied Trump's accusation that he had Trump's phones tapped weeks before the November election. But that doesn't mean he didn't have someone else do it for him--like Loretta "How-are-your-grandkids-Bill" Lynch.

But Kevin Lewis, an Obama towel boy and caddy, refuted the idea that Lynch or Obama had anything to do with the alleged wiretapping. "Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply racist false."

So deniable plausibility aside, it's possible that the FBI or an outside source did the tapping.

In a Breitbart article on Friday it claimed the Obama administration made two Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) requests last year to monitor Trump's communications and a computer server in Trump Tower. The purpose was to determine if there were links with Russian banks.

No evidence of such links were found. Nada. Zilch.

Trump, on Sunday, has again attacked Obama saying he colluded with Russia.

Brilliant strategy: throw the grenade back at him.



Tweet