Showing posts with label Claire McCaskill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Claire McCaskill. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 2, 2021

White men increasingly embarrassed by John Brennan being a White man


Former CIA Director John Brennan said that he was increasingly embarrassed over his own "whiteness." Maybe he knows something about himself that we don't know, but one thing is clear, we on the White don't care for his insincere lament, or even the effeminate way he speaks on MSNBC.

Brennan claims that men of his race act in embarrassing ways. We play violent sports like football, LaCross and extreme frisbee. We hunt; we fish; we love femininity and we believe there are only two sexes and the concept of gender refers mostly to words that languages attribute to them. [The Spanish word pollo for "chicken"  is masculine in spite of chickens being female, or chicks, as it were.]

And yes, some White men are gay, but they know they are men who love other men, just like those women who know they are women and love other women. Having your genitalia mutilated, or wearing a dress, or getting hormone injections, doesn't change your sex.

"I’m increasingly embarrassed to be a White male these days, when I see what my other White males [are] saying," Brennan told MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace, who chuckled at the racist comment.

Wallace, Brennan, and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) were arguing that Republicans had lied about what happened during the Capitol Hill riots on Jan. 6, much like CNN lied about the severity of the riots in Portland, New York, Seattle, and Chicago, calling them "mostly peaceful" as fires raged and looting took place behind reporters as they spoke on camera.

"It just shows that with very few exceptions, like Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, there are so few Republicans in Congress who value truth, honesty, and integrity," Brennan, who is and knows a liar when he hears one, said. "And so, they'll continue to gaslight the country the way that Donald Trump did," he ironically added, attributing these RINOs with a 'strange new respect.'

When people judge people by their skin color or any other immutable attribute, they generally are themselves what they are labeling others. Psychologists call this projection.

As a White man, and perhaps I speak for many White men, I am embarrassed to have John Brennan in my race. He is a disgusting racist and rejects the tenets of the American spirit.


Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.



Friday, November 6, 2020

Win or lose the presidency, the Dems are in a world of hurt



As of this writing, President Trump may have lost Tuesday's presidential election, that's still up in the air, but one thing for certain, the Democratic Party lost political ground big time. Of course, we can't count President Trump out yet because he has an uncanny way of turning things around in the third act, and this indeed, is the third act if you think of his presidency as a play.

The way it looks now, the Republicans are going to hold the Senate by a narrow margin.

Better than that, one hundred state legislatures went to the GOP, not one went to the lefties. In fact, even New Hampshire lost its Democrat seat to the Republicans and for that state, we can think of it as a Thanksgiving miracle.

Montana now has a new Republican governor. Greg Gianforte got 54.4% of the vote while his Democratic challenger, Mike Cooney, got 41.6% and Libertarian Party's Lyman Bishop got 4%.

In this districting year, the Democrats did not pick up even one state legislature, and it looks like the Democratic coalition is fragmented and unworkable.

There's the AOC squad, a group comprised of young, progressive, woke anti-Semitic, anti-Israel women who believe their party needs to go further to the left to win bigly, and hopefully the Dems will go along with that.

Alexandria Occasionally-Comatose (AOC, as previously mentioned) reacted to former Sen. Claire McCaskill's (D-MO) reaction [below] to the losses suffered by the party of the donkey.


The socialist congresswoman from New York believes that the reason McCaskill lost her reelection was due to her failing to go further to the left. She mocked McCaskill as you can see in her tweet below. However, it is a bit ironic now that McCaskill lost her election, MSNBC has hired her as an election expert.



As you can see, AOC, the freshman congresswoman, isn't very respectful of people, even in her own party who refuse to go along with her socialist thinking. And yes, although she beat a longstanding Democrat to win her congressional district in Queens, New York, she did so because he took it for granted he was going to win and she didn't agree. 

But let's not pretend that while she won this latest election in a landslide against a Republican, a D-shaped dog turd running against Abe Lincoln would have won an election in her district.


C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.



Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Senate Dems frustrated over Alexandria Occasionally Coherent Cortex

AOC after someone said, "Look, a dead bird"
She can dance, she can cook and she can tweet. But she isn't very good at math and many of the friends she hangs out with are terrorists fans and anti-Semites, [but I repeat myself].

Rep. Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex (D-soc-NY) still needs to ask directions to find her office, but she, like a teenager, knows everything and Democratic senators are frustrated with her lack of basic knowledge about most things. They say her views aren't in line with those of their constituents. Actually her views are more in line with Joe Stalin.

Since becoming famous [mostly for her dancing and lack of math skills] Cortex has accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, of "death," attacked the media and fact checkers for checking her "facts."

She also proposed a 70 percent socialist-style tax rate for the evil wealthy because she just does not like them and believes it would somehow pay for free healthcare, free college, free Skittles, whatever.

Centrist Democrats are worried about the party adopting these and other untenable positions for their platform, saying it will hurt their chances for reelection in upcoming races, the Hill reports. But it should be popular with their unemployed, lack of motivation and dead-spirited base.

Her Green New Deal is a clear example of how she wants to implement socialism into the fabric of our economy. She actually thinks that taking away the budget for the military [before Russia, Iran and China decide to walk all over us] will pay the $40 TRILLION for her socialist programs. All the money spent on the military, since the country was formed, would not come close to that figure and she doesn't have a real clue about how to pay for the spending she wants.

Democrats have to pick up at least three seats in 2020 to gain control of the Senate. In order to do so they will need to focus on winning in centrist or Republican-leaning states like Alabama, Colorado, New Hampshire, Iowa and North Carolina by pretending to be conservatives.

Some of the bipartisan issues Democrats would prefer to focus on in those states include helping veterans, lowering health care costs, and focusing on the federal deficit, but Cortex is driving the party to focus on other issues, according to some lawmakers and wants to defund the military.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., NH), who faces a competitive reelection in 2020, said Cortex's "views don’t represent a lot of my constituents." It turns out that a lot of her constituents are not communists and have jobs.

Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), one of the most vulnerable incumbents up for reelection in 2020, said he's not happy the idiot is becoming a sort of spokesperson for the party, saying, "I think it skews what’s really there for the Democratic Party."

In the House, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) said last summer that "Meteors fizz out. What she will learn in this institution is that it’s glacial to begin with, and therefore no matter how far you rise, that’s just how far you will ultimately get your comeuppance."

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who won reelection in a state President Donald Trump won by 42 points, echoed Jones' sentiment, saying that while liberals in the party might be getting widespread media attention now, it will be the centrist Democrats who get bills passed into law. In other words, the swamp-dwellers.

Cortex hasn't been shy about criticizing Trump, but centrist Democrats have warned the approach isn't a recipe for victory in 2020. On the other hand, it seems that even centrist Democrats have little to show for a plan other than criticizing the entire GOP with their claims of sexism, bigotry, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, phobiaphobia bull droppings.

Former Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Joe Donnelly (D-IN), who both lost during the 2018 midterms, expressed concern "Trump bashing" will hurt Democrats' chances of taking back the Senate and defeating Trump in 2020. This, they believe, may have something to do with the notion that the nation elected him president of the United States.

"I worry that the Democrats are majoring in Trump bashing," she began, unaware that Democrats often majored in lesbian dance theory. "And we’ll have to do more than that in order to win the confidence of enough Americans to regain the Senate and importantly the presidency," McCaskill said.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Monday, December 3, 2018

Outgoing Loser McCaskill gets it half right

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) lost her re-election shot in the midterm elections in November, and doesn't have the ability to understand, at least in part, as to why she lost.

She blames her loss on how her party tried to destroy Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life over bull crap accusations, not one of which was corroborated, on sexual assault.

She doesn't see her own role in the hearing as to why normal people were disgusted with the Democrats.


"I don't think my vote [against Kavanaugh] hurt me as much as the spectacle that occurred," McCaskill told NPR host Rachel Martin last week.

The very fact that she didn't have the courage to vote against her party is why she lost her seat. There was no evidence but still she was ready to condemn a man to a ruined career.

"There were mistakes made by my party in terms of how that was handled. I don't think that communication [from Christine Ford] to the judiciary committee should have been kept private as long as it was. The FBI deals with a lot of confidential information, and that would have absolved [judiciary committee ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein] of the very real perception that this was an 11th-hour attempt to gut a guy."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) received the allegations from Ford on July 30, 2018 – nearly a month after Kavanaugh had been nominated and before his confirmation hearings. Feinstein didn't share the letter with fellow liberals and didn't bring it, or its contents up, during the confirmation hearings. It wasn’t until the letter was leaked to certain members of the press that Feinstein acknowledged its existence. 

It was a plan to "gut a guy," as McCaskill said, and still, she voted against his confirmation.

Kavanaugh's name was dragged through the mud over empty allegations that had no evidence to back them up. In fact, there is more evidence that points to the allegations being mistaken or flat out untrue.

But let us not forget that McCaskill paved the way for these types of accusations with her support of the Obama administration’s war on due process, something that all accused deserve. She is the freaking Queen of the "Believe Women" movement that insists due process is an impediment to justice.

It is truly excellent that she lost the election. She deserves to be put out to pasture in the field of politics. The American voters who refused to cast their trust in her have everything to be proud of because, by their vote, they support due process and our rule of law.

Now Missouri has Josh Hawley waiting to be seated in the U.S. Senate. I don't know much about him [and I plan to learn] but he has to be better than someone who has no regard for ethics, law and decency.


Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, if you would visit the ads on this page it helps the economy grow and it does a world of good for me.




Sunday, May 20, 2018

McCaskill votes against Trump's CIA pick

Sen. Claire "No Lips" McCaskill (D-Mo.) "put partisan politics over national security," another senator charged after she voted against Gina Haspel to be the first female CIA director.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) made that statement about the Missouri liberal as she voted the party line, which is anything Trump wants, vote against. The two states border each other.

But worse than her vote was the reason she gave--it was classified and she couldn't talk about it.

On a positive note, 54 senators, including six Democrats, supported Haspel's appointment and she was, indeed, confirmed.

Cotton said McCaskill values "obstructionist politics" over "keeping this country safe."

"McCaskill proved once again that she is so liberal, and so reflexively opposed to the president that she cannot represent Missourians in the Senate," Cotton said during a conference call organized by McCaskill's opponent in the upcoming Senate race, Republican Josh Hawley. "She put partisan politics over national security."

McCaskill used a clever ploy saying that she was influenced by Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona who voted against Haspel's confirmation.

McCain is suffering from terminal brain cancer and is a sympathetic figure to anyone with a heart. During the Vietnam War, he was captured and tortured. He is a strong advocate who opposes waterboarding, which he considers torture, and although Haspel was a CIA employee under John Brennan, he blames her for the agency's perfectly legal use of waterboarding at that time, and thus, voted against her confirmation.

But like a reporter who makes wild accusations against President Trump and only cites anonymous sources, McCaskill has done a similar thing with her so-called reason for voting against Haspel--it's classified ['if I tell you, I'll have to kill you'].

"I cross-examined her on the classified material. And I was very uncomfortable with her answers," 'No Lips' told the Associated Press. "I wish I could explain to all my constituents the details of all that, but the law will not allow me to do so."

Just like the law doesn't allow illegal immigrants protection from the law, but try telling that to a liberal.

"I can tell you this," McCaskill said in a conspiratorial whisper, "if everyone in Missouri read and listened to her answers to the questions I asked, I believe that a vast majority of Missourians would have voted the same way I did."

Yeah, sure. Brennan gets confirmed and has Khalid Sheikh Mohammed waterboarded, which helps avoid further deaths, and somehow Haspel is culpable because Donald Trump nominated her.

Let's hope that McCaskill loses her Senate seat in the midterms; she deserves it.


Monday, November 27, 2017

Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) now hides her private plane logs from public

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.) has her own family plane and she uses it for her own private use. Being that she's a government employee, supposedly working for the American people, she wants to make the use of her private plane untrackable to the public, according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) documents.

In her last reelection campaign, McCaskill was criticized for her use of her private aircraft at taxpayer expense. She told her husband to "sell the damn plane." 

He didn't--they bought a bigger, more expensive plane soonafter she fooled the people of Missouri and won reelection. 

Now that she's getting ready for yet another reelection bid [we really need term limits], she's doing all she can to limit the taxpayer from seeing what they are paying regarding the use of her private plane, a Swiss-made Pilatus PC-12/47E, a single engine turboprop. 

The Pilatus PC-12/47E costs around $5 million and can comfortably accommodate up to nine passengers from Russia or elsewhere. It has a range of 1,845 nautical miles and can honk along at 328 mph. This bird can also land on rough airstrips that other jets cannot negotiate.

The company McCaskill hired to operate the plane submitted paperwork in April to request tracking information of the jet be blocked from the pubic, according to email records obtained by the Washington Free Beacon via a FOIA request.

Before 2013, private aircraft owners or operators needed to present a "certified security concern" to the FAA in order to block aircraft data from public display on websites that track aircraft, such as FlightAware.com. But during the Obama error, this requirement was removed so that the public could be bilked out of tax money without knowing the reason. It made the "blocking process as simple as possible."

McCaskill and her crew refused to comment to media after multiple requests to explain why she's hiding her taxpayer-funded activities. 

She reminds me of a kid who uses her dad's credit card and hides the bill.



Thursday, August 17, 2017

Mo. Dem Sen. hopes Trump is assassinated

A Democratic state senator and seditionist from Missouri, is facing calls for her resignation for posting on Facebook of her apparent hopes that President Trump is assassinated.

"I hope Trump is assassinated!" state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal cryptically wrote, using Trump's signature exclamation point.

The DNC is saying they aren't certain if what she meant by 'assassinated' was 'assassinated-assassinated' or just plain killed, but they agree that it isn't a nice way for a proper person to talk.

Chappelle-Nadal soon deleted the post, but a screenshot saved and shared it on Twitter, "the poor man's megaphone to the world."

The seditious Chapelle-Nadal (to whom I will simply refer to as "the traitor") spoke with media outlets and said she regretted getting caught her post but not her venom at President Donald J. Trump. She blamed her anger on his post-Charlottesville response to the violence there.

"I posted something on my personal Facebook and I should not have done that, and for that I am sorry for that," the traitor said redundantly to KMOV of St. Louis TV. "But I am not going to shy away from what caused that anger at all, I'm not going to shy away from that," the traitor said again. 

She did not mention as to whether or not she was hoping that President Trump should have been the victim of the vehicular attack by the Charlottesville white supremacist, but I know where I'd put my money.

The Secret Service told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that it's investigating the traitor's post and if they believe she really and truly hopes that President Trump gets his lights put out forever, they're going to take their investigation to the next step.

Meanwhile, top Missouri leftists--including Sen. Claire McCaskill and the Missouri Democratic Party chairman--are calling on the traitor to resign.

McCaskill told the Post-Dispatch, "I condemn it. It's outrageous and she should resign."

The Missouri Party Chair Stephen Webber called the traitor's comments "indefensible," adding "I believe she should resign."

But the traitor told the media that they can go to hell. "There is no way in hell I'm resigning," she screamed.

Chappelle-Nadal (aka the traitor) is exactly what's wrong with the country today. We have become so divided and hateful of each other and this puts us in a dangerous place in the world.


Sunday, June 25, 2017

Women Dem. Sens. ignore women rights activists

(Photo: Fox News)
Women's rights activists Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Asra Nomani have accused four useless women Democratic senators of ignoring them completely during a committee hearing. They say the lawmakers didn't even ask them a single question.

The two activists wrote an op-ed in the New York Times stating that "This wasn't a case of benign neglect. What happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives when it comes to confronting the brutal reality of Islamist extremism and what it means for women," in Muslim communities.

The hearing held by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and titled "Understanding the Tools, Tactics, and Techniques of Violent Extremism."

Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and ranking Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) invited Nomani and Hirsi Ali along with two others to testify. Hirsi Ali and Nomani are courageous critics of Sharia law and the policies practiced in Islamic societies that marginalize women.

But both 'witnesses' accused Senators McCaskill, Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.); Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.); and Kamala Harris (D-Ca.) of not asking either of them "a single question."

Nomani and Hirsi Ali added: "Just as we are invisible to the mullahs at the mosque, we are invisible to the Democratic women in the Senate."

"It is inexplicable that the other senators didn't utilize their time to speak with these two women," Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said to Fox News. "I appreciate the courage they have to speak up."

(Photo: Reuters)
"Given time constraints, and the fact that a potential terrorist attack occurred several miles away just hours before the hearing, [McCaskill] chose to direct the majority of her questions that day to Michael Leiter, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center under Democratic and Republican administrations, and one of the world's foremost experts on counterterrorism," McCaskill spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Fox News.

So what was the point of having Hirsi Ali and Nomani there? And how time-consuming is it to ask them at least one question, or to allow them to address the committee?

Johnson pointed out the lack of questions directed to the other witnesses halfway through the hearing.

"This has been a little bit unusual hearing so far, we have four witnesses and all of the questions have been addressed to Mr. Leiter--listen, I appreciate your expertise and service to this country," Johnson said. 

Leiter offered to "step out" of the hearing, but Johnson said that he wanted him there.

Not one question was asked of the women, and not one woman Democratic senator was willing to speak to Fox News about the hearing.

So not only are they cowards when it comes to real civil rights issues regarding women, they're also cowards when it comes to defending their position.

Nomani told Fox News:
"The silencing of Ayaan and me through the act of omission, and ignoring our presence, is just ironic considering this is the grievance that Democratic feminists level against their critics and their opponents. I was prepared for aggressive conversation and debate, but I just was shocked to see how I somehow put on an invisible cloak when I walked into the hearing room from the perspective of the Democratic senators who champion women, and battle to be heard."
Nomani said she and Hirsi Ali are "committed" to working with the committee and plan to meet with all the staff. In fact, one aide from the Democratic staff claim they've invited Nomani in for a meeting but it hasn't been scheduled.

There are no greater hypocrites than Democrats and Antifa.



Thursday, May 18, 2017

Crystal ball readings from the Dems

Clairvoyant Democratic senators say that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein knew that FBI Director James Comey was going to be fired before he learned that he had to write the letter saying that Comey should be fired.

One Democratic senator even predicted that by 2027 a meteor would come dangerously close to the earth and Al Gore would buy back Al Jazeera, the TV station he sold to the sharia advocates.

The Rosenstein memo was cited by the White House as the reason for Comey's firing, but the story changed and the White House Press Secretary and Deputy Press Secretary were made to look foolish.

The crystal ball reading came Thursday from a Democratic senator who has made 'a killing' on the ponies as he knew the outcomes in advance.

Rosenstein had named a special counsel (not councel, President Trump) to oversee the Russian probe that Comey helped lead before he was fired. The previous day, Rosenstein briefed all of the Senate on Capitol Hill.

Even Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said: "He knew that Comey was going to be removed prior to him writing his memo."

How McCaskill knew that is under a special committee investigation and Republicans are calling for her impeachment as they believe she is the leaker of all things secret since she knows about Rosenstein.

To follow Brain Flushings, click the Follow tab in the margin.


Friday, March 3, 2017

Are the Democrats colluding with Russia against the Trump administration?

Is Sergey Kislyak working for the Democratic Party? Nobody seems to be asking this obvious question.

Why would the top Democrats be calling out Attorney General Jeff Sessions for meeting with Kislyak on two occasions while they've also met with him on several occasions?

Did Chuck Schumer just talk about coffee and doughnuts to Putin when he came to New York to visit a gas station? Do you really think Putin came all the way to the U.S. just to see a gas station with Chuck Schumer tagging along, or do you think there may be more to the visit than meets the eye?

Sergey Kislyak has met with U.S. lawmakers on both sides of the aisle but the left is pretending otherwise.

And when the Washington Post first wrote about the Sessions hearing, where the failed comedian, Sen. Al Franken, asked him about whether he spoke with the Russian ambassador while involved in Trump's campaign, why did the Washington Post write about the questioning, but not quote the actual question Franken asked Sessions?

Kislyak met with seven then-Democratic senators in a 2013 single sit-down, among other discussions, and he was a frequent visitor to the Obama White House.

What did he speak about with Obama? Was it about Obama having 'more flexibility'? Was this the former president's long-term plan for when he was out of office? A landmine, so to speak?

As I previous blogged, Claire McCaskill attacked Sessions, but she also met with Kislyak, as did all the Democrats pictured above. 

Sessions claimed in the confirmation hearing that he had no "communications" with Russian officials during his time as a Trump surrogate. That was the problem the Democrats pointed to, but Sessions rejects the idea that he misled Congress saying that he answered the question in the context of campaign-related discussions. He was not saying he never met with the Russian official in the context of his position as a Senator and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Like McCaskill, Jeff Sessions was merely 'doing his homework.'

In summary, I believe the Democrats are colluding with the Russians to get rid of Trump and his people. The idea that the left is going further and further in that direction and will soon be indistinguishable from communism may not be proof, but it sure is grist for the mill.

I say investigate Schumer and every other Democrat who met with Kislyak. And that includes Obama.



Thursday, March 2, 2017

Sessions, Russia and hypocrisy

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is getting backing from both sides of the aisle over leftists' calls for his resignation over revelations that he met with a Russian ambassador last year, which he omitted from recent congressional testimony. 

The Dumocrats are claiming the meeting was in concert with the Trump campaign.

Even Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO)  gave Sessions an unintended boost after she demanded Sessions' resignation and claimed she never called or met with Russia's ambassador. But tweets resurfaced showed she lied--at least twice.

Other former colleagues came to the AG's defense backing his claim he only met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in his official capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"I've met with the Russian ambassador with a group, in my capacity, with a group of other senators," Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) told CNN. "That's in my official capacity. That's nothing. That's my job."

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) said he'd spoken with "at least twenty ambassadors in the last six weeks."

He added that "It would have been very normal for Sessions, as a senator, to have talked to the Russian ambassador without discussing the election."

Old establishment leftists Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer and Nancy "Hands" Pelosi demanded Sessions resign. 

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told MSNBC that he'd met with "six ambassadors in the last five months." Although he never met with Kislyak, Cruz said he'd do it in a heartbeat.

The leftist rag Washington Post, first reported that Sessions met with Kislyak in July and September despite his testimony during his confirmation hearing that he'd never spoke with Russian officials during the time he was a campaign surrogate for then candidate Donald Trump.

He maintains that he never spoke about campaign matters with the ambassador, and the White House has backed him.

In a politically motivated move to drive a stake into Sessions' heart, McCaskill tweeted Thursday that she had "been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years. No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel. Com."

Except she lied.

Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review, uncovered 2 tweets  that McCaskill wrote in 2013 and 2015:


"Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador. Upset about the arbitrary/cruel decision to end all U.S. adoptions, even those in process." McCaskill tweeted on Jan. 30, 2013
On Aug. 6, 2015 she tweeted: "Today calls with British, Russian, and German ambassadors re: Iran deal. #doingmyhomework."
True to liberal form, McCaskill blamed Twitter's character limit for the seeming disparity in her tweets, suggesting the limit prevented her from being more specific in Thursday's tweet, downplaying the significance of her own conversations with Russia's ambassador, and proving she has the credibility of a scorpion to a frog.


Saturday, November 26, 2011

Weekend Brain Flushings: OLA, Weiner's Hair, Small Pox

"Boss, you want I should break a leg or two?"
Occupy LA protesters were told that they had to pull up stakes with their 485 tents by Monday. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa made the announcement Friday when he, and police Chief, Charles Beck, kissed up to the stinkathon sociology and women's studies majors, known as Occupy LA. 

 Villaraigosa claimed, "The movement has awakened the country's conscience, it has given voice to those who have not heard."



Oh, the humanity. Oy, the smell.
I say, the movement has awakened the country's sense of smell and has given voice to those amongst us whose voices cry into the night, "Yo, man, like don't lip that joint, and pass it over here." This seems to be the extent to which these anarchists are making a point. They hate everything about capitalism, hard work, and personal achievement, and are used to being given everything they want by some form of nanny-parent, which makes it impossible for them to tolerate someone telling them "no, you can't have that." They play their video games, ipads, iphones, computers, notebooks and smartphones, but want to topple the companies that produced those items--just another indication of their short-sightedness and lack of insight. They want respect for their simplistic demands but they defecate on police cars and in the streets, and honest taxpayers have to foot the bill for the cleanup.

The Occupy Anything But a Real Job Mob are angry, but have so little focus about where this anger should be directed--they don't even see how the present administration is responsible for any of the cronyism, because Obama is "cool" somehow, perhaps because they are so easy to trick into believing that he cares about them. Solyndra belongs to him completely. Fast and Furious belongs to his administration and the cronies he put in place to run it, Chicago-style.


Nostrils flared and belly bared, the Weiners set out
And then we have the latest Weiner news. Anthony Weiner, the disgraced U.S. Representative from the 9th District in Queens, NY, was recently spotted doing his "holiday" shopping on Black Friday. But Tony has changed--he's sporting sparse facial hair in the form of a moustache that closely resembles a caterpillar whose furry hair had been brutalized by a bratty bully. Note how the Weiner is wearing a New York Mets cap--a team that hasn't won a World Series Championship since 1986, and only won one other in 1969. Don't get me wrong, I love the Mets as much as Weiner loves his, well, bodypart of the same nomenclature. His pregnant wife, Huma My-Family-Funds-Muslim Brotherhood-Hoedowns Abedin, accompanied him.They had no comment but the marriage still seems like it's going as planned.

Sen. McCaskill: "Oh what a tangled web we weave"


Senator Claire McCaskill, D-Mo, chairs a subcommittee on the Homeland Security Senate Committee and is calling for an investigation into a $433 million government contract for a smallpox drug from Siga Technologies, a company that appears to have gained political favor.  Democratic donor, Ronald Perelman, has the controlling share of Siga and emails revealing the Obama administration replaced the lead negotiator on the project after Siga complained about them, when they showed concern about how much money Siga would make from the deal. In fact, small pox doses would cost $255 a pop, and this is an extraordinary amount of money for something that is already in supply with the government. There will be more on this, and morons involved, in the future. For now, let us give kudos to McCaskill in her pursuit of ethics in spite of her party affiliation.

FBI evidently confronted Eric "Boom Boom" Swalwell over the weekend and hoo boy

It has been a rough stretch for former Rep. Eric "Boom Boom" Swalwell . You know, the guy who's known for the fart heard round...