Pussy Hatters mute as Taliban bans women's voices and showing their epidermis in public

To celebrate their victory on this day three years ago when a suicide jihadi blew himself up and took 13 American military personnel with him, the Taliban is banning females, young and old, from showing their face or any part of their body in public, lest it turns the men into uncontrollable sex machines. In spite of the fact that Islam's prophet had married a 6-year-old in Ayisha, had multiple wives and sex slaves, it offends the Taliban, and thus, Allah, for men to be turned on by the flesh of the female body.

This isn't to imply that Taliban men think of women as desirable. No, they see women as "fields to plow," and are treated like possessions:

"Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers." (Quran 2:223)

After the Biden-Harris impetuous and deadly withdrawal from Hamid Karzai International Airport, in Kabul in 2021, the Taliban took over Afghanistan and the women were the victims left behind.

In the Taliban's latest Islamic decision, they proclaimed that it is a violation of Sharia [Islamic law] for females to show their face or any part of their body in public, or even to speak.

It's unlikely even cavemen treated their women in such a disgusting manner, but the pussy hat people have yet to check in on this vulgar display of misogyny. I suspect they will let this one slide.

It was last Wednesday that the Taliban issued Afghanistan's Sharia to prevent vice and promote, LOL, virtue by prohibiting women from leaving their home without wearing a tent. The Vice and Virtue Ministry will be on the lookout for these loose women and woe to those who disobey for it would mean arrest and only Allah [peas be up in him] knows what will happen to them. In fact, women are not even allowed to look at men they are not related to--seriously.

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris expressed her outrage and deep concern for the Afghan women--oh wait--no she didn't. 

College campuses across the nation are angry and call on the government to do something about this horrible situation--oh, never mind--my bad.

Where is the outrage? No protests on college campuses. No statement from the White House.

& guess who's funding this? We are. pic.twitter.com/JnZ81sMbUJ— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) August 24, 2024

So spare us your empty platitudes about oppressed women and abortion on demand up to when you can hear the baby cry out. Where are you, Sarandon? Where are you, AOC, Michelle Obama, and Oprah? In fact, where are you, Democrats?

Women like Riley Gaines and Roza Otunbayeva who heads the UN mission in Afghanistan, are the real feminists because they have the guts to speak out while the fake feminists ironically act like the Afghan women.

“After decades of war and in the midst of a terrible humanitarian crisis, the Afghan people deserve much better than being threatened or jailed if they happen to be late for prayers, glance at a member of the opposite sex who is not a family member, or possess a photo of a loved one,” Otunbayeva said.

Last year, Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada claimed that Afghan women are given a "comfortable and prosperous" life, despite numerous decrees restricting their access to many public spaces, education, and most employment opportunities.

So if you hear a pussy hat-wearing person complain about how oppressed women are in the West, tell them to go to Afghanistan--it's better than telling them to go to the other place below.

Tweet

Pakistan court frees rapist after he agrees to marry his victim

Dawlat Khan, 25, was sentenced to life in prison by a lower court in Buner district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in beautiful Pakistan [pronounced "Pahkeestaaan" as per former President Barack Hussein Obama, and he should know] for raping a deaf woman. Apparently, that helped him sneak up behind her before his attack.

Well, as it turned out, a Pakistan court freed the scumbag after he married the victim in a settlement arranged by a council of horny elders in the northwest of the country, Khan's lawyer said last week. 

Sure the decision angered, and one can even say outraged, rights activists who claim it legitimizes sexual violence against women, [in a country where most rapes go unreported due to the almost impossible barriers imposed by sharia law to prove it was rape, as opposed to a promiscuous woman forcing a man to have sex with her which would result in her stoning to death if she cannot prove it].

Khan was released from prison Monday afterr the Peshawar High Court accepted an out-of-court- settlement agreed by the rape survivor's family. See, if a woman gets raped, the family blames her and often will kill her to protect their "honor." It's called an honor killing for that reason.

"The rapist and the victim are from the same extended family," Amjad Ali, Khan's lawyer, told AFP. So not only did this POS rape a deaf woman, he raped a family member and all he had to do was marry her and get away with it.

"Both families have patched up after an agreement was reached with the help of local jirga (traditional council)," he added.

Khan was arrested after his unmarried victim delivered a baby earlier this year, and a paternity test proved he was the child's biological father. 

According to the Asma Jahangir Legal Aid Cell -- a group providing legal assistance to vulnerable women -- the conviction rate is lower than three percent of cases that go to trial. This is mainly due to the sparsity of reporting the crime and the social stigma attached to it.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said it was "appalled" by the court's ruling.

"Rape is a non-compoundable offense that cannot be resolved through a feeble 'compromise' marriage," the group tweeted without being censored, now that Musk owns Twitter.

Tweet

The Taliban bans Afghan elections: big surprise? Not!

Taliban member gives the "Let's Go Brandon" hand-sign behind Bilal Karimi

When we left Afghanistan and the allies that our alleged President Biden promised to evacuate, it was obvious the Taliban was going to rule with an iron fist, kill dissenters, and make everyone give up their freedom. It's no surprise, except to the naive and Joe Biden, who is surprised when he wakes up in the morning and finds out that he's the President.

Now that we're gone, the Taliban-run government has dissolved two Afghan election commissions because when you're a conqueror, you don't need the people's permission as to who is going to run things. They also dissolved the state ministries for peace and parliamentarian affairs. 

Bilal Karimi, deputy spokesman for Afghanistan’s Taliban-run government, said the country’s Independent Election Commission and Electoral Complaint Commission have been dissolved [along with fair and honest elections, and all women's rights].

Karimi called them “unnecessary institutes for the current situation in Afghanistan,” which is a government run by terrorists who would just as quickly light you on fire and watch you burn, than have a say in their government. 

He said if there is a need for the commissions in the future, the Taliban government can revive them, a claim as legitimate as the Taliban claim that women will have a say in their government and can even go to school if they wish. 

After it was obvious the women of Afghanistan would be granted nothing but pots and pans to cook with, brooms and mops to sweep with, and babies to give birth to, feminist organizations and individuals across America and Canada rose up as one voice and demanded something be done by both governments to help women. Progressive Democratic women of the so-called squad clamored for justice for the Afghan women.

Just kidding. They did nothing but call White men racists and complain about women's rights while they wore pink "pussy hats" and believed they made a difference in the world with their virtue-signaling.

The international community, except for feminists, is waiting before extending formal recognition to Afghanistan’s new ruling terrorists. They are wary the Taliban could impose a similarly harsh, deadly regime as when they were in power 20 years ago — despite their assurances [aka lies] to the contrary.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Both elections commissions were mandated to administer and supervise all types of elections in the country, including presidential, parliamentary and provincial council elections. Now the Taliban will chose who will be in power using the "pointer finger method."  

This makes as much sense as a brain addled old man promising if he gets the presidential nomination, he will choose a Black woman as his running mate [whether or not she knows the difference between her elbow and her nether regions]. 

Karimi said the Taliban also dissolved the Ministry for Peace and the Ministry of Parliamentarian Affairs. He said they were unnecessary ministries in the government’s current structure but like Orwell's doublespeak in his dystopian novel "1984," peace means war, and baby, that's ungood.

The Taliban had previously shut down the former Women’s Affairs Ministry and then treated women as cattle and sex objects to "have their fields plowed." And by "fields," the Taliban mean coitus.

Tweet

Surprise: male swimmer at UPenn smashes women records, upsets team

Will Thomas, 22, was a swimmer at UPenn for three years. He thereafter changed his name to Lia, said and possibly believed he is a female, and competed against them in swim meets where he won handsomely. 

On November 20th, his school and Cornell competed in a meet in which his time for the 200-meter was 1:43:47, and in the 500-meter freestyle set a time of 4:53:06. Both times were records for Penn and would have placed the young man in second and third, respectively, in the NCAA Women’s Championships, 

according to the website OutKick, meaning that his times were mediocre for a men's time in the same events.

Men competing as women seems to be the new ego-boosting that men, who cannot beat other men, are undertaking--calling themselves female and possibly believing the claim, and perhaps even mutilating their bodies to prove their nonbiological assertion. 

Ever wonder why women who call themselves men don't do as well in sports competitions against men?

It isn't known when Thomas first claimed to be a female but the dude was swimming as a guy up until 2019. And now the women's UPenn Women's Swimming Team is upset with the situation, according to a swimmer on the team who spoke with OutKick anonymously as she is afraid that upon her graduation, she would have difficulty finding employment due to her honesty. The outlet granted her the anonymity for that reason.

In the latest rounds of competition, in Akron, Ohio, Thomas destroyed the women's records so badly to the point where they might never be broken by women who are not men calling themselves women.

For example, in the 1650 freestyle final, Thomas didn’t just win and set new program, pool, and meet records. It was total annihilation. Penn’s Anna Kalandadze finished in second place — 38 seconds behind the young man. Thirty-eight seconds at that distance is an eternity.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

"Pretty much everyone individually has spoken to our coaches about not liking this. Our coach [Mike Schnur] just really likes winning. He’s like most coaches. I think secretly everyone just knows it’s the wrong thing to do," the female Penn swimmer said in a phone interview with the outlet.

"When the whole team is together, we have to be like, ‘Oh my gosh, go Lia, that’s great, you’re amazing.’ It’s very fake," she added. 

Because Lia is a dude with dude-like muscle mass. He was second-team All Ivy League during the 2018 - 2019 season as a dude, which is fair but not fantastic in the testicle-penis category, but as a make believe chick, he puts the girls to shame. But at least he didn't call himself a girl in high school where he would have likely stolen a college scholarship from the fastest woman competitor.

The NCAA’s policy on transgender athletes states:

A trans female [a made up term] treated with testosterone suppression medication may continue to compete on a men’s team but may not compete on a women’s team without changing it to a mixed team status until completing one year of testosterone suppression treatment. [It isn't the amount of testosterone alone that determines speed and strength in sports--it's the inherent biology differences between males and females, and this is true across the species.]

Males cannot be females even if they say or believe they are, and even if they remove their external genitalia and take female hormones. Gender/sex is determined by our chromosomes even before birth. Believe it or not, men cannot have babies and those who say they did, are women with a mental disorder known as gender dysphoria.

Woke society denies reality and hates America. The Democratic Party is fast becoming the Demolition Party as it destroys our history, our religions and kills the unborn babies as a substitute for a religion. What is happening in sports across the country is an insult to women's rights, their unique differences and their individuality.

Tweet

The gentler and sensitive Taliban execute a child

One can only speculate what President Biden would do if a child in his family was executed by the Taliban for whatever reason. I suspect he might have looked at the pullout from Afghanistan in a different light. He most likely would have kept some military troops there to keep the peace to some extent, but he's an uncaring old fool whose political legacy is more important to him than the lives of others.

A child was executed by the Taliban in Takhar province after his father is suspected to be part of the Afghan Resistance Forces. Death by association. The execution was reported by Panjshir Observer, an independent media outlet covering the current Panjshir situation in which Afghan troops are still fighting the Taliban.

"Child executed in Takhar province by Taliban fighters after his father is suspected of being in the Resistance. #WarCrimes #Afghanistan," Panjshir Observer said in a tweet.

Yes, it's a war crime to kill a civilian, and a freaking sin to kill a child.

The execution shows the Taliban's crackdown of Afghans who raise their voices against them and proves their voices are correct.

After the Taliban took over Afghanistan, they tried to project a moderate image to the world. They would like to have a seat at the UN. They would like us all to believe they are not the brutal b@stards they are thought to be--but they are and more. 

They executed a child.

And what they did or allowed to happen at Kabul airport is further proof that they didn't change. People like this never do and Biden is either too stupid to understand this, or is a willing actor in the scheme of things.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Some have claimed the Taliban has "returned to their previous modus opprandi, but the truth is, they never left. It isn't a mere strategy for them--it's how they practice their religion. If they are willing to blow themselves to pieces for jihad, killing a child is justified too.

Violence has always been who the Taliban was an is, and to think they would modify their behavior, allow women in public office or even get an education, is naive. Hell, they are forbidding barbers to trim men's beards because it's un-Islamic. And to think they would no longer use violence as a means to an end is crazy.

Biden's failure in Afghanistan cannot be hidden with words by Jen Psaki or by Biden's BB-brained blatant blatherings about building back better. 

The Taliban executed a child. Let that sink in.

Tweet

Taliban warns U.S. to mind their own business and let them do things their way

Hey, it's their culture and if the Taliban wants to stone women who commit adultery or premarital sex, or for showing their ankle bone, or going to school, it's none of the U.S.'s business, their spokesweasel Suhail Shaheen warned. 

He told Fox News on Friday that "there will be no issue about women’s rights" because Allah gives them the rights he gives them and we're here to ensure those rights are met. For instance, women have the right to go outside with a male chaperone as long as they are properly dressed. And they have the right to chose the color of their burqa, as long as it's black. So what are you talking? Get out of here."

The Taliban now basically owns Afghanistan and Joe Biden, which is concerning to our allies. But leaving that aside, they may soon become our new ally but China will first have to give them permission, if things turn out the way they look like they're going. 

Shaheen also said that he opposes western views that women who are raped are not required to marry their rapist. And he believes that women's education should focus on "cooking and doing the sex."

When asked about future relations with the U.S., Shaheen smiled and said, "we should be focusing how can we work together in a positive and constructive way which is in the best of interest of both sides."

He then proceeded to pick up a stone and throw it at Fox News' female video photographer as he screamed, "There will be no issue about the women’s rights. No problem about their education, their work. But we should not be after changing each other’s culture as we are not intending to change your culture, you should not be changing our culture."

The missed it's target.

Shaheen also described the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan as the closure of one chapter in the country’s history. The next chapter will come directly from the Qu'ran.

Can Shaheen get a hearty 'Allahu akbar?'

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Women Dem. Sens. ignore women rights activists

(Photo: Fox News)

Women's rights activists Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Asra Nomani have accused four useless women Democratic senators of ignoring them completely during a committee hearing. They say the lawmakers didn't even ask them a single question.

The two activists wrote an op-ed in the New York Times stating that "This wasn't a case of benign neglect. What happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives when it comes to confronting the brutal reality of Islamist extremism and what it means for women," in Muslim communities.

The hearing held by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and titled "Understanding the Tools, Tactics, and Techniques of Violent Extremism."

Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and ranking Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) invited Nomani and Hirsi Ali along with two others to testify. Hirsi Ali and Nomani are courageous critics of Sharia law and the policies practiced in Islamic societies that marginalize women.

But both 'witnesses' accused Senators McCaskill, Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.); Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.); and Kamala Harris (D-Ca.) of not asking either of them "a single question."

Nomani and Hirsi Ali added: "Just as we are invisible to the mullahs at the mosque, we are invisible to the Democratic women in the Senate."

"It is inexplicable that the other senators didn't utilize their time to speak with these two women," Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said to Fox News. "I appreciate the courage they have to speak up."

(Photo: Reuters)

"Given time constraints, and the fact that a potential terrorist attack occurred several miles away just hours before the hearing, [McCaskill] chose to direct the majority of her questions that day to Michael Leiter, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center under Democratic and Republican administrations, and one of the world's foremost experts on counterterrorism," McCaskill spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Fox News.

So what was the point of having Hirsi Ali and Nomani there? And how time-consuming is it to ask them at least one question, or to allow them to address the committee?

Johnson pointed out the lack of questions directed to the other witnesses halfway through the hearing.

"This has been a little bit unusual hearing so far, we have four witnesses and all of the questions have been addressed to Mr. Leiter--listen, I appreciate your expertise and service to this country," Johnson said. 

Leiter offered to "step out" of the hearing, but Johnson said that he wanted him there.

Not one question was asked of the women, and not one woman Democratic senator was willing to speak to Fox News about the hearing.

So not only are they cowards when it comes to real civil rights issues regarding women, they're also cowards when it comes to defending their position.

Nomani told Fox News:

"The silencing of Ayaan and me through the act of omission, and ignoring our presence, is just ironic considering this is the grievance that Democratic feminists level against their critics and their opponents. I was prepared for aggressive conversation and debate, but I just was shocked to see how I somehow put on an invisible cloak when I walked into the hearing room from the perspective of the Democratic senators who champion women, and battle to be heard."

Nomani said she and Hirsi Ali are "committed" to working with the committee and plan to meet with all the staff. In fact, one aide from the Democratic staff claim they've invited Nomani in for a meeting but it hasn't been scheduled.

There are no greater hypocrites than Democrats and Antifa.



Tweet

Saudi man jailed for opposing female oppression

A Saudi man has been jailed for campaigning against women's rights. 

Oh wait, no, he was jailed for campaigning against the repressive state control Saudi Arabia has over women, according to local media.

The man was given a one year sentence by the Saudi sharia courts for publicly suggesting the current legal system of "guardianship" should end. For the Saudi Arabia theocracy, that's akin to blasphemy. Lucky for him they didn't behead him in the public square.

He was arrest while putting up posters countering the guardianship system. The court also learned that the man was responsible for a widely-reported petition against the regime.

The Saudi regime orders that every person with a uterus must have a male legal guardian, and must have permission to travel, marry and take certain jobs. They are also forbidden to drive, although if they can find someone to drive them, they can vote for someone who will be subordinate to the king.

Feminists throughout North America have voiced their extreme outrage, oh wait, no they didn't. 

The man was condemned to jail and fined around $8,000 for the offense of "inciting to end guardianship of women." 

The guardianship regime makes women subject to the whims of whoever is in charge of them--even if that happens to be a younger brother or even their son.

How terrible.


Tweet

Hillary's blatant hypocrisy

In her fight for women's health, the LGBT community and the presidency of the United States, Hillary Clinton has reached out to her Clinton Foundation donors, but faces an uphill battle in trying to get their support and win the job as POTUS.

Saudi Arabia, who had "donated" $50 million to the Clinton Foundation said they would not, under any circumstances, support women's rights or gay rights on any level. In fact, Saudi officials made it clear that they did not want to deal directly with Ms. Clinton as she is a woman and considered inferior to men, and the idea of any woman running a country is ludicrous as far as they're concerned.

The Saudis said they preferred to deal with her husband Bill, whose philandering is appreciated by the Islamic nation as they are permitted multiple wives and understand Bill's insatiable sexual appetite.

In fact, Saudi Arabia, like some other Islamic countries, kills homosexuals as prescribed in the Koran. Depending upon the circumstances, the penalty for committing a homosexual act can be public flogging (100 lashes for adultery)  or other strict Sharia sentence.

While Ms. Clinton eagerly accepts money from this homophobic, misogynist nation, she doesn't confront their beliefs nor advertise them to her constituents. 

The Saudis also tend to treat women worse than their camels. 

Saudi women cannot leave home without a male relative as an chaperone, and must be covered "modestly" to ensure they're not raped for indecency or beaten by the "Morality Police." 

Morality Police? What an oxymoron.

Algeria, another Islamic country, donated only $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clintons, but refuse to help gays and any gays caught in their country can get anywhere from 2 months to 2 years in the slammer. If one person is under 18, the other can get as many as 3 years and fined 10,000 dinars. That isn't a lot of money by our standa, about $124, but in Algeria, it's substantial. Human rights in Algeria kind of suck too, but Hillary doesn't care where the money comes from as long as it comes.

Other Islamic countries that have given to the Clintons that treat women with contempt and homosexuals with strong punishments are:

Brunie: donated $1 million to $5 million
Kuwait: donated $5 million to $10 million
Qatar: donated $5.8 million
Sultanate of Oman: donated $1 million to $5 million
United Arab Emirates: donated $11.5 million

Jamaica gave anywhere from $50,000 to $100,000 which for Hillary is "chump change." She makes more than that in a 20-minute Wall Street speech. 

And while being gay isn't a crime in Jamaica, they imprison gays who are caught in the act up to 10 years. 

So while Hillary claims to support gay rights, the LGBT community, and women's rights, her lack of voice against countries who clearly oppose these rights speaks volumes.

The only thing Hillary Clinton clearly supports is Hillary Clinton.



Tweet

U.N. declares Israel most evil on the planet

According to the Koran, the worst people in the world are Jews. They are seen as the most vile creatures, but let's not forget the Christians who are also seen in a pretty bad light. Yes, Jews are pigs and Christians are apes, says the Islamic "holy" book.

So is it any wonder that the United Nations and its 57 Islamic state members (if you count the non-existent country called Palestine) deemed the most evil country in the world to be Israel.

The U.N. Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in its annual meeting in New York condemned Israel for violating women's rights of Palestinian women, also known to their husbands as sex slaves and cooks.

A woman's right to die

Later that day, the U.N. Human Rights Council, a U.N. organization known for its title being an oxymoron, concluded its Geneva session by condemning Israel five times more than any other UN member states of the 192 in total.

Saudi Arabia, a country that does not allow women to leave their home without a male family member as chaperone, lest they get beaten by the other oxymoron organization, the Morality Police, or be stoned to death for daring to show a toenail, did not even come close to the Israeli scoreboard of most evil countries in the world.

Not even North Korea, Libya nor Syria is considered by the U.N. Islamic majority to be as evil as evil evil Israel. They allow women to vote, drive cars, wear whatever they want, go alone in public, vote, and be given equal legal footing as men.

This is okay with Islamic Sharia

In fact, and I do mean fact, Muslim women living in Israel have more rights than any Muslim woman living in any Islamic theocracy.

Now that's evil.

And this is why good Muslims want to annihilate Israel and kill all the Jews along with their children. That's why it's okay for Muslims to stab Jews on the streets of Israel--in fact, it's their religious duty to slay the infidels if they refuse to accept Islam; it's in the Koran.

So here we were all along thinking that groups like Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban and al Shabaab were the bad guys. Now we are told it is Israel.

Who knew?


Tweet

To Avoid Injury, Don't Do Push-ups After Taking Cialis

Sandra Fluke (pronounced Fluck) is too polished to be a random spokesmoron for the left.  While she sounds like a person speaking with a paper pooper, she does so with a certain professionalism that is just too practised to be a novice.

I believe Fluke is a hand chosen extremist, tapped on the shoulder by our President to represent a "faux woman" invented by the left to effectively yell "squirrel" to the voters and hope they're paying attention to this non-issue.

Abortion is not prohibited by our laws.  Women are not being denied anything they need to prevent pregnancy while playing, and anyone who can afford what Ms. Fluke was wearing at the DNC Convention, (even her shiny necklace of what looked like beer can pop tops rings), can afford birth control.  

Touching Hands

What conservatives want is the termination of partial birth abortions.  The reason being is that conservatives believe that humans have inalienable rights even if they cannot speak, walk, or crawl.  They have these rights even if they're too young to vote (although I suspect Obama would reconsider his position of allowing partial birth abortions if the victims could vote for him).  And to kill these people after they made it through the birth canal in spite of the attempt on their life, just doesn't seem fair, and it certainly doesn't sound humane.  What it sounds like is convenient for the mother of the unwanted life in her life.  I believe adoption, not abortion, is the better alternative.  I also believe that Sandra Fluke is the essence of bimbo-hood and should either change her name to Sandra Flake or Sandra Fluck to dispel any doubts as to where she is coming from.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist who is captured by terrorists and who is to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, giving in to terrorist demands is against American policy, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover           

click here for ebook version   

Tweet