Showing posts with label Ron Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ron Johnson. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Fired! Kash Patel Delivers the Pink Slips to the Deep State Spies Who Stalked GOP Senators



Folks, if you thought the FBI's hall of shame under the Biden regime was bad—and let's be honest, it was a non-stop circus of politicized persecutions—this week's fireworks from Director Kash Patel should have every red-blooded American cheering. As Susie Moore laid out over at RedState on Monday, the bureau just dropped a dossier of dynamite: former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his merry band of partisan hacks were caught red-handed spying on a baker's dozen of Republican heavy-hitters in what they dubbed the "Arctic Frost" probe into January 6 and the 2020 election steal. We're talking phone taps on Sens. Lindsay Graham (SC), Marsha Blackburn (TN), Ron Johnson (WI), Josh Hawley (MO), Cynthia Lummis (WY), Bill Hagerty (TN), Dan Sullivan (AK), Tommy Tuberville (AL), and even Rep. Mike Kelly (PA) for good measure.

Patel, that no-nonsense warrior Trump tapped to drain the swamp at the FBI, didn't just file a complaint or issue a tsk-tsk memo. Instead, he swung the axe like it was personal. By Tuesday, the entire crew was shown the door, and he made it crystal clear: this is just the appetizer. The FBI has already terminated employees and abolished the CR-15 squad just one day after it was revealed that several Republicans' private communications and phone calls had been tracked. 

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Patel stated: "We are cleaning up a diseased temple three decades in the making, identifying the rot, removing those who weaponized law enforcement for political purposes and those who do not meet the standards of this mission while restoring integrity to the FBI. I promised reform, and I intend to deliver it." 

He followed up in a tweet that read like a declaration of war on the weaponized bureaucracy: "As a result of our latest disclosure about the baseless monitoring of members of Congress by the prior leadership team of the FBI, we have already taken the following actions: We terminated employees, we abolished the weaponized CR-15 squad, and we initiated an ongoing investigation with more accountability measures ahead."

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino piled on in the replies, hitting all the right notes: "We promised you transparency and accountability. We will continue to deliver on those promises. You deserve better."

Is this what we voted for? Damn right we did.

One of the targets, Missouri's firebrand Sen. Josh Hawley, wasn't exactly sending thank-you notes to the Obama-Biden holdovers. But Patel shot back with the kind of reassurance that makes you believe in justice again: "We’re ON IT."

Look, the systematic sabotage of our institutions by the Biden White House and that sanctimonious hack Merrick Garland wasn't just incompetence, it was a full-throated assault on the Republic, the kind of banana-republic thuggery that makes Nixon's Watergate plumbers look like choirboys. They wiretapped, doxxed, and dragged their enemies through the courts like it was a blood sport, all while lecturing us about "democracy." In my book, and I suspect yours too, it eclipses any scandal in the postwar era for sheer audacity and rot.

Thank heaven (and about 75 million voters) that Donald Trump is back in the Oval, with lieutenants like Patel enforcing the kind of accountability the left only dreams of imposing on everyone else. No more kid gloves; we're talking real consequences, swift and severe. And brother, it's arriving fashionably late—but right on time.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Friday, March 10, 2023

National Archives reveals a load of documents in office of Biden's lawyer



A total of nine boxes of documents were removed from the law office of Patrick Moore, our alleged President Joe Biden's attorney, however the National Archives does not yet know what's in those boxes. 

But with the problems the Bidens currently face for having classified documents in an office at the Penn Biden Center, you can imagine those in his family who are still lucid and drug-free, are worried of being busted.

At least Joe isn't concerned as his biggest worries are staircases and the location of toilets.

Documents were also found at his Wilmington, Delaware, home, but again, not to worry--Attorney General Merrick Garland has put in place Robert Hur as special council to "investigate" the handling of Biden's classified document trove that he has been collecting since he was a senator after former President Lincoln was assassinated. Hopefully Hur, a registered Republican, will render a fair investigation and Biden is removed from office forthwith. 

The existence of the nine boxes of documents was disclosed by Debra Steidel Wall, acting archivist of the United States, in a letter to Republican Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Chuck Grassley of Iowa. Grassley, you may know, was critical of Tucker Carlson's releasing of video at the Capitol Hill demonstration on Jan. 6th 2021. He along with 10 other Republicans were against Carlson's First Amendment rights and, in this case, responsibilities. 

In response to a question from Johnson and Grassley about whether there were classified documents in the boxes, the reply said the contents are still a mystery four months after they were obtained.

“NARA [National Archives and Records Administration] has not reviewed the contents of the boxes found at Mr. Moore’s Boston office,” the letter said, revealing that they knew about the documents since Nov. 3, the day after the Penn Biden Center classified documents were uncovered. The American public did not learn of this find until weeks later.

“NARA contacted President Biden’s personal counsel on November 3, 2022, to arrange to pick up boxes from the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C., they informed NARA that Mr. Moore had moved other boxes from the Penn Biden Center to Mr. Moore’s law firm in Boston,” the letter said.

So you can almost bet there will be confidential material in this find. Luckily for Joe Biden, he's incompetent to stand trial.

Journalist John Solomon posted:
Biden’s document story keeps changing, this time by nine boxes | Just The News https://t.co/AW9oHSQReI

— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) March 9, 2023
“[W]hen NARA referred this matter to the Office of Inspector General on November 4, 2022, NARA informed the OIG that some boxes had been moved to Boston,” the letter said.

The letter said the boxes were moved to Boston sometime in October.

Things are looking bad for Joe Biden, but he'll only be mildly aware.


Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Joe Biden busted by whistleblowers: knew and may have been involved with Hunter's shenanigans


Whistleblower documents reveal that President Biden was aware of his son Hunter's shady business deals and may have even been directly involved in at least some of them, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA). He implied that the FBI has "voluminous evidence" regarding the possible criminality of those business ventures. If this can be proved, President Joseph Robinette Biden could be the first U.S. President indicted without a functioning brain.

Sen. Grassley sent a leter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney for Delaware David Weiss on Monday morning. The letter specifies new allegations by whistleblowers that the bureau possesses "significant, impactful and voluminous evidence with respect to potential criminal conduct by Hunter Biden and the president's brother, James Biden." 

David Weiss has oversight of the Hunter Biden investigation.

Grassley explained that the FBI has a series of documents related to information on Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings. The president's brain addled son, Hunter, sat on the board of that company. Hunter's major qualification for that position is his ability to successfully snort an entire eight ball from the belly button of a prostitute.

"The documents in the FBI’s possession include specific details with respect to conversations by non-government individuals relevant to potential criminal conduct by Hunter Biden," Grassley wrote.

"These documents also indicate that Joe Biden was aware of Hunter Biden’s business arrangements and may have been involved in some of them," the Iowa Senator said. He added it is "unclear whether the FBI followed normal investigative procedure to determine the truth and accuracy of the information or shut down investigative activity based on improper disinformation claims in advance of the 2020 election."

"It is also unclear whether U.S. Attorney Weiss has performed his own due diligence on these and related allegations," Grassley wrote.

Senators Grassley and Ron Johnson (R-WI) led an investigation into Hunter Biden  in 2019 and found that Obama administration officials "knew" that Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma was "problematic" and that it interfered "in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine."

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

But you know that nothing is going to happen to the Biden circus clowns. They are all judgment-proof because the laws don't work the same for them and us. I could go on and discuss how the Bidens were outed by Tony Bobulinski on Tucker Carlson's show "Tucker Carlson Tonight," but that won't matter. They will most probably get away with it like they've been getting away with it for years. 

"Rules for thee, not so much for me."


Thursday, July 6, 2017

Senate report warns of national security fallout from leaks

A Senate report released Thursday warns that the Trump administration is experiencing an "alarming" and "unprecedented" scads of media leaks that pose a real danger to national security.

The Republican-generated report estimates the administration has dealt with about one leak per day. It was sent to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and urges law enforcement officials to press harder in their investigation of these leaks exposing potentially sensitive information.

"To ensure the security of our country's most sensitive information, federal law enforcement officials ought to thoroughly investigate leaks of potentially sensitive information flowing at an alarming rate," the report's executive summary read.

The 24-page report, titled "State Secrets: How an Avalanche of Media Leaks is Harming National Security," was compiled by Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), along with the committee's majority staff.

The report authors analyzed media leaks that began on Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration to May 25, his 126th day in office. In that time period, the Trump administration faced one leak per day involving potentially destructive information to national security under the standards laid out in an executive order by then-failed-President Barack Obama in 2009.

The leaked information is "potential violations of federal law, punishable by jail time."

The report notes that the leaks flowed "seven times faster" under Trump's administration than the first 126 days of both Obama and George W. Bush's presidency.

"It is also apparent that the arguments often used to justify leaks are at odds with the Trump administration--that leakers are bringing to light potentially illegality, unwise policies, or concerns about the President's temperament--have no legal basis," the report found.

A total of 78 leaks were about the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and potential collusion with the Trump campaign, revealing intelligence community intercepts, FBI interviews and intelligence, grand jury subpoenas, and "the workings of a secret surveillance court."

Some of the violations may fall under the Espionage Act, which are punishable by up to 10 years in prison--something that Hillary Clinton is apparently immune to.

A letter by Johnson to Sessions with the report said it's the "responsibility of the Justice Department" to decide if the leaks justify criminal prosecution.

Of course they do.



Sunday, June 25, 2017

Women Dem. Sens. ignore women rights activists

(Photo: Fox News)
Women's rights activists Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Asra Nomani have accused four useless women Democratic senators of ignoring them completely during a committee hearing. They say the lawmakers didn't even ask them a single question.

The two activists wrote an op-ed in the New York Times stating that "This wasn't a case of benign neglect. What happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives when it comes to confronting the brutal reality of Islamist extremism and what it means for women," in Muslim communities.

The hearing held by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and titled "Understanding the Tools, Tactics, and Techniques of Violent Extremism."

Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and ranking Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) invited Nomani and Hirsi Ali along with two others to testify. Hirsi Ali and Nomani are courageous critics of Sharia law and the policies practiced in Islamic societies that marginalize women.

But both 'witnesses' accused Senators McCaskill, Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.); Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.); and Kamala Harris (D-Ca.) of not asking either of them "a single question."

Nomani and Hirsi Ali added: "Just as we are invisible to the mullahs at the mosque, we are invisible to the Democratic women in the Senate."

"It is inexplicable that the other senators didn't utilize their time to speak with these two women," Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said to Fox News. "I appreciate the courage they have to speak up."

(Photo: Reuters)
"Given time constraints, and the fact that a potential terrorist attack occurred several miles away just hours before the hearing, [McCaskill] chose to direct the majority of her questions that day to Michael Leiter, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center under Democratic and Republican administrations, and one of the world's foremost experts on counterterrorism," McCaskill spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Fox News.

So what was the point of having Hirsi Ali and Nomani there? And how time-consuming is it to ask them at least one question, or to allow them to address the committee?

Johnson pointed out the lack of questions directed to the other witnesses halfway through the hearing.

"This has been a little bit unusual hearing so far, we have four witnesses and all of the questions have been addressed to Mr. Leiter--listen, I appreciate your expertise and service to this country," Johnson said. 

Leiter offered to "step out" of the hearing, but Johnson said that he wanted him there.

Not one question was asked of the women, and not one woman Democratic senator was willing to speak to Fox News about the hearing.

So not only are they cowards when it comes to real civil rights issues regarding women, they're also cowards when it comes to defending their position.

Nomani told Fox News:
"The silencing of Ayaan and me through the act of omission, and ignoring our presence, is just ironic considering this is the grievance that Democratic feminists level against their critics and their opponents. I was prepared for aggressive conversation and debate, but I just was shocked to see how I somehow put on an invisible cloak when I walked into the hearing room from the perspective of the Democratic senators who champion women, and battle to be heard."
Nomani said she and Hirsi Ali are "committed" to working with the committee and plan to meet with all the staff. In fact, one aide from the Democratic staff claim they've invited Nomani in for a meeting but it hasn't been scheduled.

There are no greater hypocrites than Democrats and Antifa.



Tuesday, February 14, 2017

POTUS, GOP lawmakers check for "illegal" leaks

Now that Michael Flynn has resigned as national security adviser after politically fatal talks with a Russian diplomat, President Trump and GOP allies are looking at the possibility of "illegal" leaks in those discussions.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) wants the FBI to get involved and conduct an assessment of recent media leaks.

Hillary Clinton has yet to tweet to any possible anonymous leaker not to worry--it's only the FBI, after all.

Mr. Trump accepted Flynn's resignation Monday night and tweeted Tuesday morning: "The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N. Korea etc?"

He failed to add a tag-word such as: "Angry!" or "Sad!" He also didn't reveal to whom the question was addressed.

Confused!

Flynn was asked by Fox News Tuesday morning whether the leaks were targeted, coordinated and possibly a violation of the law, and he responded: "Yes, yes and yes."

Other recent leaks have revealed details from calls between President Trump and the leaders from Australia and Mexico as well as from the intelligence community investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. presidential campaign.

Whoever is leaking this sensitive information, need to be indicted and tried.

Nunes is going to "be asking the FBI to do an assessment of this to tell us what's going on here because we cannot continue to have these leaks as a government."

Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman said that "somebody in the nebulous intelligence community" would have had access to the Flynn discussions.

"Who tapped the phones, who was listening to it, who leaked it? I think those are legitimate questions to ask," Johnson told Fox News. "Leaks of this nature are incredibly damaging to America . . . and we need to look into it."

A congressional source told Fox News they believe the intelligence was known to a small circle of Obama administration officials and appointees at the end of last year. This includes some people working in the intelligence community. The source said the leaks were targeted and coordinated to undermine the Trump administration.

And if the leaker undermined national security in the process, well, you have to break some eggs to make a president fail.

True to form, House Democrats aren't really interested in the leaker, only in Flynn's contact with Russia.

Both are relevant.


Thursday, August 20, 2015

Hillary: "I don't know how to even plug it in"

If you believe Hillary Clinton thinks you need a rag to wipe a server, you just might believe that one day chickens will darken the sky and Islam is a religion of peace. Somehow, some way, Hillary's computer devices along with those of her inner circle (some with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood) have been wiped clean.
What, me worry?

But the information on those devices don't belong to Clinton nor her lackey's, they belong to us, and now they are probably in the hands of China and/or Russia.

With a shrug of her shoulder, a roll of her eyes, she claimed to Fox News' Ed Henry that she doesn't know "how it works digitally at all."

Hillary's attorney, David Kendall, told a Senate committee the emails and other stored data on her computer server were erased before the devices were turned over to federal authorities. 

Kendall said in a letter to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, that the server was given to the FBI on August 12 by Platte River Networks. They had the server in a closet in a bathroom and give the term "flushing the evidence" a new meaning.

In order to protect herself, Clinton, at a presser, refused to say whether the server was erased. Her ignorance of this seems to be a liberal theme in the present administration. 

When Ed Henry tried to press her as to whether the server was wiped clean, Hillary joked, "What, like with a cloth or something? I don't know how it works digitally at all."

She apparently knows nothing about anything that might get her in trouble. The scandals continue but so does her run for president of the United States. It's a sad state of affairs to think that many liberals would give her a free pass from blame because of her last name and gender.

Hopefully, the FBI will be able to recover at least some, if not all, of the contents of her server and the deleted files.

However, in a separate case, the State Department filed a court report stating that the Blackberry devices belonging to two former Clinton aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma-Weiner-Wife-Abedin, have probably been destroyed or sold off by the agency.

The plot sickens.



NJ Mayor Says Sanctuary Policies Need a Tune-Up After Baby Killed in Crash

Apparently, there are limits to how many “condolences” a grieving family can use in place of actual government policy. Jackson Township Mayo...