Huma Abedin's email claim contradicted by former aide

Washington -- [from an article in The Epoch Times] On March 19 Justin Cooper, a former aide to Hillary Clinton said in a Judicial Watch (JW) deposition made public on June 18, that he worked with Clinton's closest aide, Huma Abedin in 2009. His job was to set up the unsecured private [and illegal] private email account that was then used by Clinton to illegally conduct official US diplomatic business.

Cooper’s statement contradicts Abedin’s claim in a 2016 deposition by JW, the non-profit government watchdog.

Abedin claimed that she only learned about the private email setup in 2015 by “reading in some news articles about a year, a year-and-a-half ago, when it was—it was being publicly discussed.”

She also claimed that she once saw a unicorn being ridden by a chicken in a top hat.

Abedin was deputy chief of staff throughout Clinton’s tenure as the United States’ chief diplomat and continued with her during the Democratic candidate’s unsuccessful presidential campaign in 2016. Some of her family members belong or belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood and Huma was married to Anthony Weiner, the disgraced former NY congressman and New York mayoral hopeful [until he got caught with his pants down on Twitter trying to score with an underage girl. He recently got out of the slammer.]

To quote The Epoch Times:

Asked if the Cooper deposition represents additional legal problems for Abedin, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told The Epoch Times on June 18 that “the legal liabilities never went away, so it’s a matter of political will by the Justice Department. … The leadership is going to have to step up to move forward on any of this.”

Cooper, who was an adviser to President Bill Clinton, also said that a week before his deposition, he spoke with Cheryl Mills, the attorney who served as Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department and represented her legally during the FBI’s investigation of the email server. Mills accompanied Hillary Clinton when she was interviewed by the FBI.

Mills is especially controversial because U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Royce Lamberth said in a related case that he “was actually dumbfounded when I found out, in reading that report, that Cheryl Mills had been given immunity because … I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case, where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in, by the DOJ [Department of Justice] in the Hillary Clinton email case.”

But so far, everyone involved in the scandal have not been charged and Hillary has been "James Comeyed."


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks







Tweet

GOPers allege DOJ 'double standard' in Mueller probe

There are allegations by Republicans of anti-Trump bias within Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigative team and that a "double standard" exists at the Justice Department. 

GOP critics say that Hillary Clinton received "special" treatment when she was under so-called investigation over her illegal personal email server when she was the incompetent secretary of state. 

"Hillary Clinton gets special justice, and at the same time we're siccing people who hate the president . . . on him and that's deeply unfair," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R.-Fla.) told "Fox & Friends" Wednesday.

Gaetz and other House Republicans now want the FBI Director Christopher Wray to investigate the FBI's treatment of Clinton and then-candidate Trump during the 2016 campaign, and compare them. 

Gaetz has specifically sought information on former FBI head Andrew McCabe who said in an email last fall that the Clinton case was referred to as "special." And what we have recently learned about Mueller's team of liberal Hillary donors and Trump-haters, only adds to these concerns.

It was just learned this past weekend that FBI official Peter Strzok (pronounced "Strzhzhokztlmfk") was removed from the Mueller probe over the summer after he allegedly sent anti-Trump texts to his mistress, an FBI lawyer.

This past Tuesday, Judicial Watch, a conservative advocacy group, released an email showing a Mueller deputy singing the praises of outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates after Trump fired her in January for refusing to defend his travel ban.

The Mueller deputy, Andrew Weissmann wrote in an email to Yates:

"I am so proud. And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects."

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the Weissmann document an "astonishing and disturbing find."

President Trump called the Strzok views regarding his role in the Clinton email investigation as "tainted" and "very dishonest." It could have been worse--President Trump could have called it "very, very dishonest."

Strzok oversaw the FBI interviews with Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. Hillary Clinton and her minions also lied to the FBI, but they are "special."

Strzok (aka "Petey Consonants") was also present during the July 2016 interview with wicked Hillary at the close of the email investigation, right before James Comey, the then-FBI showboat director, called her grossly negligent actions "extremely careless." Because of this wording, he recommended no criminal charges.

Gaetz called that a "double standard" and joined other House GOPers who also want answers to what role Strzok played in the controversial anti-Trump dossier. He called for cleaning out the "deep state" of people "who are so biased against Donald Trump."

Remember, both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills didn't get charged with lying to the FBI when they told them they were unaware of Clinton's private server when, in fact, there were email exchanges between the three stooges.

Special Counsel spokesman Peter Carr claimed Mueller's office removed Strzok from the Russia probe "immediately upon learning of the allegations" of the anti-Trump texts.

In a separate issue, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) has threatened a contempt resolution against leaders in the Justice Department and FBI if they continue to withhold key information related to the dossier and other issues. 

The DOJ is in the process of handing over Strzok's anti-Trump text messages. The agency also contacted the office of House Speaker Paul Ryan to establish a date for Strzok's appearance before the House Intelligence  Committee staff. There will also be two additional witnesses who had been sought after by the Nunes team.

A DOJ spokeswoman said Sunday that the agency will "continue to work with congressional committees to provide the information they request consistent with our national security responsibilities."

And if they do, chickens will darken the sky.


Tweet

Judge orders investigation of 3 Clinton lawyers

Annapolis, MD -- An investigation was ordered by a Maryland judge of three shyster lawyers who helped former secretary of state and "computer illiterate" Hillary Clinton delete her emails on an illegal private server.

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. said the complaints against Clinton's lawyers, Cheryl Mills, David E. Kendall and Heather Samuelson were egregious and the state bar could not dismiss them as frivolous.

"There are allegations of destroying evidence," Harris said Monday and pointed out that the state's rules require investigation by the bar no matter who raises the complaint. In other words, one cannot brush aside accusations simply because they voted for Hillary Clinton for president and cannot tolerate her loss to a television personality.

The announcement by Judge Harris came one day before Clinton released her latest book of excuses for her second presidential loss titled "What Happened." Apparently her lack of insight in how the public is repulsed by her was the inspiration for the book's title.

The Maryland bar complaint was given by Ty Clevenger, an attorney who has attempted to achieve sanctions against Clinton and her legal team in several venues. He also pressed the FBI to release details of its investigation into Hillary's illegal activities that so far have most politicos looking at the squirrel hiding its nuts.

Federal courts as well as bars in D.C. and Arkansas, have poo-pooed Clevenger's requests. He is seeking to have Clinton's lawyers either suspended or disbarred. (Some of you might even hope for incarceration of the attorneys in a cell next to Hillary.) 

Judge Harris, however, said Mr. Clevenger's request seems to have merit and that Maryland will need to at least launch an investigation and demand a response from the three legal eagles.

The FOIA request Clevenger issued for the FBI to release information into Clinton's case was denied at first because it was judged that there wasn't enough "public interest" in the case to continue its pursuit. But alas, that has been reversed as the Justice Department agreed the case met the threshold of intense public interest. (You're reading this, right?)

Clinton's use of a secret [illegal] email server she kept in her New York home was used to conduct official State Department business. Over 100 emails were listed as classified--it only takes one classified email to violate the Espionage Act. 

The FBI agreed with common sense that the email setup risked national security and it's highly probable the classified emails were hacked by foreign entities. 

According to USLegal.com:

The Espionage Act is a federal legislature enacted in 1917. The act criminalizes and punishes espionage, spying and related crimes. The Act prohibits not only spying but also various other activities, including certain kinds of expression. The Act Pursuant to 18 USCS § 793, provides that a person will be punished with fine or imprisonment not more than ten years if s/he copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense. The Act deems any person a criminal if s/he is found obtaining information with respect to the national defense with a reason to believe that the information to be obtained is to be used to the injury of the U.S.

Hillary's defense was that she's computer illiterate--just a poor, stupid woman who thinks the term "wiping a computer" is done with a cloth. 

So the former, fired FBI director James Comey did not recommend charges against Clinton because she was too inept to understand the risks she was running.

However, having your head up inside your nether regions isn't a requirement to absolve Clinton of indictment, and it wasn't Comey's call to make in the first place--it was the Department of Justice's call.

The former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, recused herself after secretly meeting with Bill Clinton for 30 minutes before the case was to be decided. She claimed they spoke about grandchildren and personal garbage, but the public didn't buy the lie. 

But the DoJ could have assigned the Deputy AG to handle the case rather than allow Comey, whose job it was to simply investigate the case and present his findings to the DoJ.

When it was discovered she had a private secret server, Clinton belatedly returned thousands of emails to the government but deleted the rest, claiming they were personal. However, the FBI probe found thousands of emails that were work-related and weren't turned over to the government. 

That alone should have been enough to indict her.

Clinton had her lawyers scour her account--that's what landed them in potential jeopardy.

Let's hope justice prevails--just don't hold your breath.


Tweet

GOPers call for 2nd special counsel to probe Clinton and others

The Three Stooges

Republicans are calling on the Justice Department to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the barge-load of 2016 campaign controversies involving Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. They warn that these questions can't "be allowed to die on the vine" as the Russia probe is going on.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Robert William Goodlatte (R-Va.) and GOP committee colleagues requested in a letter Thursday to Attorney General (for now) Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and Deputy Attorney General Rod Jay Rosenstein.

"The American public has a right to know the facts--all of them--surrounding the election and its aftermath," they said. "We urge you to appoint a second special counsel to ensure these troubling, unanswered questions are not relegated to the dustbin of history."

They want an entirely separate special counsel probe from Robert Mueller's, particularly since Mueller brought along big Hillary Clinton and Democratic donors as part of his team. They argue that many unanswered questions remain from the 2016 campaign cycle that have been swept under the rug amid the intense focus on Russia.

Here is the request:

1. Allegations that former AG Loretta Lynch instructed then-FBI Director James Comey to downplay the nature of the Clinton email probe

2. The FBI and DoJ's decisions in the course of the email probe, including controversial immunity deals with Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and several others

3. The State Department's involvement in which of Clinton's emails to make public

4. Disclosures in WikiLeaks-released emails regarding the Clinton Foundation and, "its potentially unlawful international dealings"

5. Connections between Clinton officials and "foreign entities" that include Russia and Ukraine

6. Revelations in hacked DNC emails about "inappropriate" coordination between the DNC and Clinton campaign against Bernie Sanders' Democratic primary campaign

7. The "unmasking" of Americans in intelligence documents and possibly related "leaks of classified information" 

8. Comey's admitted leak of details of his conversations with President Trump

9. The FBI's "reliance" on controversial firm Fusion GPS, which was involved in the questionable anti-Trump "dossier" 

The lawmakers wrote that "Our call for a special counsel is not made lightly. We have no interest in engendering more bad feelings and less confidence in the process or governmental institutions by the American people. Rather, our call is made on their behalf. It is meant to determine whether the criminal prosecution of any individual is warranted based on the solemn obligation to follow the facts wherever they lead and applying the law to those facts."

The request comes at a time when AG Sessions is under tremendous pressure from Trump (who sees Sessions as his personal attorney) to revisit last year's controversies over Clinton and Democratic officials. Trump has publicly (aka wrongfully) shamed Sessions over his decision to recuse himself from the Russia probe, which eventuated in Mueller's appointment by Rosenstein.

Sessions admitted to Fox News' Tucker Carlson that the criticism was "kind of hurtful" but defended his decision and said he'd stay on the job as long as Trump allows.

Predictably, the Democrats criticized GOP efforts at obtaining justice in the 2016 controversies, saying that Russia's interference in the campaign is more pressing than putting Hillary and her crew in the slammer just because they broke the law and compromised the country.

The Fusion GPS firm came under renewed criticism this week after a Senate hearing witness alleged they were connected to Russia-backed efforts to fight U.S. sanctions on Russia.

House Judiciary Republicans voted to call an investigation into Comey's handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe in which she clearly used an illegal private email server which contained high levels of classified documents.

One of the Republicans was Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL). "I don't think that the crimes of the prior administration, of Hillary Clinton, the collusion with James Comey and Loretta Lynch should be forgotten just because Hillary Clinton lost the election," he told "Fox & Friends" on Friday, saying too that there seems to be a "double standard in justice."


Tweet

WikiLeaks emails show Clinton's allies unaware over 'insane' private server

It's good to know that some of Hillary Clinton's top advisers weren't aware that she was using a private [illegal] server as secretary of state. It gives one hope that if she becomes POTUS (heaven forfend) that one or two of her top aides may actually be concerned over national security, not that it will change the open borders that Clinton wants.

Some of her top advisers had no clue as to the depth and scope of her email system when the scandal broke in March 2015. Even her current campaign manager had no idea about the bathroom server according to the Thursday WikiLeaks release of emails.

A close ally ('You go girlfriend') of Hillary's, Neera Tanden, the head of the Center for American Progress, was still p'd off months after the scandal broke. She pressed John Podesta over who gave Hillary permission to use the private system.

"Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered?" Tanden wrote in July. "Like whole thing is f***ing insane."

But some of Clinton's closest aides, especially those who worked with her at the State Department (like Cheryl Mills and Huma Weiner Abedin) were very likely aware and on board with the illegal email setup, while others were in the dark.

On March 2nd, Podesta wrote to campaign manager Robby Mook asking if he had "any idea of the depth of this story?"

March 3rd, 1:32 a. m. Mook wrote back: "Nope. We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of."

March 2nd, John Podesta also wrote to Tanden about his worries the day the email scandal broke. "Speaking of transparency, our friends [attorney David] Kendall, Cheryl and Phillipe [Reines] sure weren't forthcoming on the facts here."

Tanden's reply implied that keeping the [illegal] email setup a secret was probably Cheryl Mills' doing: "This is a Cheryl special," she wrote. "Know you love her, but this stuff is like her Achilles heel. Or kryptonite. She just can't say no to this s**t. Why didn't they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy. I guess I know the answer they wanted to get away with it."

Six months afterward, Tanden was still angry, and in a September 4th interview said Clinton still owed the American people an apology.

Actually, the American people are owed more than an apology. We are owed an FBI director who upholds the law and is apolitical. We are owed an Attorney General who wears the blindfold of fairness and justice. 

We are owed true transparency, not just words.

And we are owed a prison sentence for Hillary Clinton who clearly broke the law simply by having a private server and a real investigation into the Clinton Foundation with questionable practices.

Tweet

Hillary aider testifies

Hillary Clinton aider and FBI Director James Comey testified Wednesday that Hillary Clinton's chief of staff Cheryl Mills and another top aide had "some" classified material on laptops that they turned over to the liberal-leaning bureau in its "probe" (LOL) of Clinton's private and therefore illegal server. Not surprisingly, Comey granted Mills immunity in spite of her involvement in the case.

The Clinton aider made the acknowledgment in his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. 

Liberals feel that the only reason Comey is being asked questions about a crime is for political reasons, not because Hillary Clinton is actually guilty of breaking the law by her simply using a private server in a bathroom to carry out her business as secretary of state, and possibly for the Clinton Foundation.

Comey, who refused to answer certain legal questions and suggested they be redirected to Clinton's lawyers, then had it both ways--he claimed the finding did not constitute a crime. So, as a lawyer FBI director, he can make that claim, but as a Clinton probing FBI director, he redirects the legal questions to other lawyers.

Of course, Comey declined to directly answering a question as to whether having classified material on a laptop or other private electronic device was against federal regulations.

This is puke-worthy balderdash politics at its worst.

"You'd have to know the circumstances," the Clinton aider told committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA).

Yes, Jason Chaffetz was right when he said the FBI handed out immunity "like candy." Kind of like a load of candy.








Tweet

Powell warned Clinton to keep him out of her scandal

When Hillary Clinton gets in trouble her default position is to blame someone else and lie to the public. She apparently did the same about her private email server and Colin Powell was the person she tried to blame.

Powell tried to persuade Hillary and her aides to not use him as a scapegoat over why she used the private server, according to emails that were hacked and leaked from Powell's Gmail account.

One of the leaked emails Powell wrote to a confidant about his ongoing warning to Clinton not to blame him for the scandal. "I told her staff three times not to try that gambit. I had to throw a mini tantrum at a Hampton's party to get their attention. She keeps tripping into these 'character' minefields," he wrote, according to The Intercept.

Powell apparently tried to settle the matter with Cheryl Mills.

In another email Powell said that he "warned her staff three times over the past two years not to try to connect it to me." 

In March of last year, Powell complained that "Hillary's Mafia keeps trying to suck me into" the email controversy, according to The Daily Caller. This was at the start of the scandal.

The authenticity of the emails were confirmed to Fox News saying that they are "confirming that he was hacked and these emails are his."

Powell had originally accused Hillary of trying to "pin" the scandal on him when she told authorities in July that he explained in detail his email practices when he was secretary of state under George W. Bush, according to the New York Times. "Powell told her to use her own email, as he had done, except for classified communications, which he had sent and received via a State Department computer," they wrote, citing a passage from an upcoming book on Bill Clinton's post-presidency.

Although Powell regularly emailed friends and reporters about Clinton's server scandal, explaining that his situation was different than hers, he never set up a private server and used a government computer for classified matters.

And while he was at it, Powell also discussed his thoughts about Donald Trump, calling him "a national disgrace" and an 'international pariah."

Powell has not endorsed any presidential candidate for the 2016 race, but it sounds as if he isn't voting for Trump, and it's hard to fathom that he's going to vote for Clinton.

Powell was obviously upset over Clinton's finger-pointing. "They are going to dick up the legitimate and necessary use of emails with friggin record rules. I saw email more like a telephone than a cable machine," he wrote to Jeffrey Leeds, a business partner. "As long as the stuff is unclassified. I had a secure State.gov machine. Everything HRC (Hillary Rodham Clinton) touches she kind of screws up with hubris."

I have no doubts that Hillary has a deep-seated personality problem, all hubris aside.


Tweet

Case Not Closed on Hillary

The U.S. State Department is going to re-open an internal investigation regarding whether Hillary "He-did-not-have-sex-with-that-woman" Clinton and her top aides Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills mishandled classified information while Clinton was Secretary of State. This was confirmed by FoxNews Thursday.

The investigation will focus on how classified emails sent and received by Clinton's private server were categorized at the time they were sent. The investigation actually began in January after finding 22 emails from her server were classified as "top secret." But when the FBI started their investigation regarding Clinton's "home-brew" email setup last April, the State Department put a halt on their investigation.

State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement, "Given the Department of Justice has now made its announcement, the State Department intends to conduct its internal review. Our goal will be to be as transparent as possible about our, while complying with our various legal obligations."

And if you believe any truth about Clinton and her minions will come out of this, you probably also believe that snakes have hips.

Kirby set no deadline for the investigation but you can be sure, it will be after January 2017 and will likely exonerate her and her aides. I'm not 100% certain, but it's a powerful gut feeling.

Kirby said that the former aides can still face "administrative sanctions" which could even be the loss of security clearances, and the only way they would be able to obtain top secret information would be on Hillary's presidential basement server if [G_d forbid] she becomes president. 

She would merely need to provide them with her password.

But seriously, if she became president, she would need to rethink who she'd appoint on her national security team.



Tweet

Former U.S. Attorney sees a "red flag" with Hillary's email scandal

Eh, what's up, doc?

Beth Wilkinson is an attorney representing four main figures in the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton's email malpractice. This is what Matthew Whitaker, a former U.S. attorney and now running a government watchdog group calls a "red flag."

Wilkinson is representing former chief of staff Cheryl Mills; media gatekeeper Philippe Reines; Jake Sullivan policy adviser, and former aide Heather Samuelson, the person who helped Hillary decide which Clinton emails were the most damaging and therefore had to be destroyed before turning over to the State Department the 30,000 that remained.

"I think it would be a real red flag," Whitaker said, referring to the legal defense tactic. He is the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT). He believes that having a single lawyer helps the four get their stories straight for the FBI interviews.

That would imply that something untoward was perpetrated by these four in service of the Clinton dynasty. Otherwise, what's the big deal? 

"The benefit is to have one lawyer's brain have all the knowledge of the various pieces and parts, and so each of those potential targets or subjects of the investigation get to share information across that same attorney--and quite frankly get their story to sync up and understand what other people know of the situation," Whitaker said.

Wilkinson is a Washington D.C. lawyer who's married to former NBC "Meet the Press" host David Gregory. When asked for comment, her office gave no immediate response as it has been their practice not to respond to the press on this case.

Whitaker explained that "All you're trying to do is seek the truth, and when someone is sharing a lawyer, you worry that the interview that you just did an hour ago with that attorney has been shared with the next witness and they can fix or reconcile their story to be the same."

Why that isn't illegal is anybody's guess--it ought to be. And while it isn't the norm, the legal representation hasn't been challenged by Justice Department officials, perhaps because, hey,  it's Hillary Clinton, after all.

In April, Cheryl Mills and Wilkinson blocked questions about Bryan Pagliano, Clinton's IT specialist and a key figure in the probe. Although Pagliano struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department last year, now he is seeking to invoke the Fifth Amendment right not to answer questions in the same Judicial Watch proceedings. That's what is known as wanting to have it both ways.

FACT is seeking the emails of Dennis Cheng, Clinton's former deputy chief of protocol at the State Department. His records may reveal a connection between the slush fund known as the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton's time as secretary of state. 

Cheng was the main person dealing with senior foreign government officials, and there were only a few emails of his among the 30,000 she turned over when she apparently felt comfortable to do so. Cheng was also a consultant to the William J. Clinton Foundation.

The plot sickens.


Tweet

State Dept. official thought Hillary used personal email for friends & family

A State Department official thought that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was merely using her unauthorized personal email to "stay in touch with family and friends." He also knows that Elvis is working at a shopping mall in Sheboygan. 

Lewis Lukens gave a two-hour deposition with Judicial Watch last week and said that he volunteered to set up a "stand-alone" computer for Hillary's personal emails. He was told that the woman who wants to run our country, doesn't know how to run a computer. That is she "does not know how to use a computer to do email."

Lukens' testimony was released on Thursday, the day after the State Department IG released his report criticizing Clinton's email setup, explaining that it violated federal records rules and cybersecurity guidelines.

In other words, she probably broke the law as it applies to the Espionage Act and her next pantsuit should be orange.

The investigation by the FBI is exploring the possible incompetent and illegal handling of classified information that never went to the proper [government] server, but instead, went to Hillary's server in the basement of her Chappaqua, N.Y. home. 

So the woman who does not know how to use a computer to do email exposed herself to strangers--something the Clintons are famous for--and compromised the nation's security. She has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, sounding like Bill denying he had "sex with that woman . . . Monica Lewinsky." 

Lying seems to run in the family--it's their oxygen.

"This report makes clear that personal email use was the practice for other secretaries of state," the Queen of Benghazi told ABC News. "It was allowed. And the rules have been clarified since I left."

And chickens have lips.

Lukens first suggested a computer that could be "connected to the internet, through a separate system, which would allow her to check emails from her desk. He said he proposed that in order to make it easier for her to "log on." He said that " .  .  .  at that point, as far as I knew, there was no requirement for her to be connected to our system."

The system wasn't installed and he told Hillary that she could only send and receive emails on her Blackberry smartphone.

Lukens said he couldn't recall discussing Clinton's personal email use with other officials and assumed she was using "a commercially available email account." 

There are five more named witnesses to be called on this investigation. There is no "security review" as Clinton called it. That's simply another lie.

Cheryl Mills is scheduled to testify (aka, not answer any direct questions) Friday.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that recordings of her deposition are to be kept sealed due to concerns that it might be used "as part of partisan attack" against Clinton. Partisan attacks against Hillary are defined by something called "truth."


Tweet

Just how much damage has Hillary's server done?

Heather Samuelson, 34, is a lawyer and a long-time Hillary Clinton aide. She was Hillary's campaign staffer back in 2008 when the presumptive  "Queen of the White House" lost the campaign to a terrorist sympathizer who gave good speech, but was "all sizzle and no steak."

In any case, Samuelson was tasked with separating Hillary's 30,000 'personal emails' from her 30,000 'work-related emails.' And while all Secretary of State emails belong to the American people, the 'Pantsuit Princess' took it upon herself to keep them hidden and then decide which category she was going to put them in.  

Then Hillary Clinton had the server wiped of all emails.

The person who revealed Samuelson's role in this scandal was Cheryl Mills, Hillary's State Department chief of staff. Mills gave this information to the House Select Committee on Benghazi when questioned about the emails.

Clinton lied when she claimed to have turned over all of her work-related emails. This is one of those "stubborn facts" Ronald Reagan once spoke about. 

You see, Sidney Blumenthal, a close friend/confidant of Hillary's, and a man who was not supposed to be involved with her role as Secretary of State, produced 15 emails he exchanged with Clinton and they were clearly work-related and she failed to turn them over in December. Hillary also lied when she said that she only had "one device" for her emails--she had several.

At least 2 emails Hillary turned over that Samuelson had seen had "Top Secret" information in them at the time they were sent. So Clinton lied when she claimed to have never sent or received classified information on her private unsecured server, and this was the catalyst that got the FBI involved.

But what about Heather Samuelson? Does she have a security clearance to allow her to even see the emails in the first place? And what about David Kendall, Clinton's lawyer who was given a memory stick with classified information on it?

Is Hillary Clinton simply too stupid to be our president? Is her judgment so impaired that she would compromise the security of our nation just for her convenience? Or did she have something to hide?

We the people have a right to know.

Tweet

Hillary: "I don't know how to even plug it in"

If you believe Hillary Clinton thinks you need a rag to wipe a server, you just might believe that one day chickens will darken the sky and Islam is a religion of peace. Somehow, some way, Hillary's computer devices along with those of her inner circle (some with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood) have been wiped clean.

What, me worry?

But the information on those devices don't belong to Clinton nor her lackey's, they belong to us, and now they are probably in the hands of China and/or Russia.

With a shrug of her shoulder, a roll of her eyes, she claimed to Fox News' Ed Henry that she doesn't know "how it works digitally at all."

Hillary's attorney, David Kendall, told a Senate committee the emails and other stored data on her computer server were erased before the devices were turned over to federal authorities. 

Kendall said in a letter to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, that the server was given to the FBI on August 12 by Platte River Networks. They had the server in a closet in a bathroom and give the term "flushing the evidence" a new meaning.

In order to protect herself, Clinton, at a presser, refused to say whether the server was erased. Her ignorance of this seems to be a liberal theme in the present administration. 

When Ed Henry tried to press her as to whether the server was wiped clean, Hillary joked, "What, like with a cloth or something? I don't know how it works digitally at all."

She apparently knows nothing about anything that might get her in trouble. The scandals continue but so does her run for president of the United States. It's a sad state of affairs to think that many liberals would give her a free pass from blame because of her last name and gender.

Hopefully, the FBI will be able to recover at least some, if not all, of the contents of her server and the deleted files.

However, in a separate case, the State Department filed a court report stating that the Blackberry devices belonging to two former Clinton aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma-Weiner-Wife-Abedin, have probably been destroyed or sold off by the agency.

The plot sickens.



Tweet