Cops arrest pretty boy Dem for GOP doxxing and more

A Democratic congressional intern was arrested this week for allegedly publishing the private information of three [possibly four] Republican lawmakers. Other incidents are also under police investigation and shows us the levels the left will stoop to in order to undermine the Trump administration.

Jackson Cosko had worked as an unpaid intern for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) was arrested for posting the personal information on Wikipedia of Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Orrin Hatch (R-UT). It included their home addresses and Capitol Hill police are investigating more doxxing incidents involving at least two senators, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). It isn't clear if Cosko was involved in the latter doxxing incidents.

In addition to working with Jackson Lee, Cosko also worked with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), and former Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA). He also worked in many other House and Senate roles including press assistant and legislative correspondent, according to his now unavailable LinkedIn page.

Former Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) told Fox News' "America's Newsroom" Thursday that based on the wide range of charges against young Cosko, including witness tampering and burglary, it's quite likely that there's more to this story than meets the eye.

"With seven different charges out there, it really does make it sound like it's more sophisticated and widespread because now you see Sen. Rand Paul is also having issues," Chaffetz said, admitting that it wasn't known if Cosko was connected to the Paul case.

The exact motivation behind the doxxing (posting of personal information) of the senators came on Thursday just moments after Lindsey Graham made his flame-throwing speech attacking Democrats for what he termed "an unethical sham" in how they treated Brett Kavanaugh.

A day after the doxxing, two activists with female genitalia [not sure how they identify themselves and I don't want to insult them or whatever happens when you say 'she' but were supposed to say 'zah'?] began screaming at Sen. Jeff Flake (Rino--AZ) in an elevator on Friday. Somehow, one of the Soros backed women believed that by him not believing Ford's testimony, Flake believes her sexual assault "doesn't matter."

Flake, who could have pointed out how women, such as Tawana Brawley, and so many others, have lied about being raped or assaulted, but instead he cowered and looked like his big sister was berating him [if she was, indeed identifying as a woman], and just moments later, demanded the FBI take another week to investigate the case.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.


Tweet

Amazing report claims Comey's FBI read less than 1% of Weiner's emails

In an amazing new report, RealClear Investigations reporter Paul Sperry uncovered an incredible find. Apparently, less than one percent of the hundreds of thousands of emails contained on former Congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop were actually read by then-FBI Director James Comey.

Sure, it's understandable why they would be loathe to handle Weiner's device, but it's their job.

Sperry found, among other things, that there were about 700,000 emails on the laptop, not the 300,000 the FBI claimed there to be, which belonged to then-husband of Huma Abedin, a close, long-time Hillary Clinton aide and confidante.

Many of the emails were between Clinton and Abedin, but only about 3,000 were looked at by the FBI because Comey may have thought that ignorance is bliss.

"James Comey told Congress that they had received all of the Clinton emails, hundreds of thousands, that were found on the Weiner laptop. But that was not true. They barely looked at any of them. Just 3,000 of 700,000," Sperry said on Fox News' "Ingraham Angle" hosted by Jason Chaffetz filling in for Ms. Ingraham.

Chaffetz was stunned, "Wait, wait, wait. They looked at how many?" he asked.

"Three thousand out of potentially relevant 700,000 emails were actually individually examined for classified information and incriminating evidence," he answered. "Peter Strzok, the disgraced agent who was in charge of this midyear investigation into the Clinton emails, he actually personally handpicked the 3,000 sample. And with two other investigators, they went through them all supposedly, pulled an all-nighter, ordered pizza, and said nothing new here. Case closed once again."

Sperry's report noted a total of 3,077 emails were "directly reviewed." He showed through detail after detail how Comey "skirted the truth" by claiming that "the FBI left no stone unturned" in the probe [except for the stone Comey hides behind].

"I've got to tell you, as the former member of the committee, as a former member of Congress, I mean, how can that be anything other than the director of the FBI lying to Congress and misleading us?" Chaffetz asked Sperry on air.

"Well he also swore under oath, that, he had this story that there was this miraculous breakthrough in technology that allowed the FBI to process the Weiner laptop for evidence rapidly," Sperry said. "Turns out that doesn't pass the smell test. That didn't check out either. Turns out there was a technical glitch that thwarted that effort."

The report ended with the question as tot he whereabouts of the Weiner laptop. It noted that it could still be with the FBI or perhaps returned to Abedin and Weiner for his tweeting pleasure.

"Wherever its location, somewhere out there is a treasure trove of evidence involving potentially serious federal crimes--including espionage, foreign influence-peddling and obstruction of justice--that has never been properly or fully examined by law enforcement authorities," Sperry concluded.

I believe that this is the truest definition of the deep state. And sadly, I don't believe anything will happen to those guilty of any offenses involved here.


Please follow Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.


Tweet

Hillary: I sort of take responsibility for losing, BUT

Hillary Clinton takes responsibility for the miserable loss she suffered at the mouth of Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. She talks about this in her novel titled What Happened: can someone please explain it to me because I'm too stupid to figure it out?

The book discusses how she always has a 'big but' when it comes to blaming others rather than taking full responsibility for her loss. I take responsibility, but if it wasn't for Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, Jason Chaffetz, Joe Biden, James Comey, the New York Times and the media in general, sexism, Vladimir Putin, the gullible public, Trump's Twitter account, Facebook, and the Democrats.

It's laughable that she even went so far as to blame the Clinton News Network (CNN) reporters and other media outlets who went after Trump with a frenetic viciousness never seen before.

The fact that the Clinton machine lost to a then unknown senator from Illinois in 2008 should have been fair warning to the Democrats that she is a horribly flawed candidate because she is a horribly flawed human being and a crappy campaigner. 

All she had going for her was that she would be the "FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" That was her only message, her main platform, and she counted on the stupidity of the American voter to carry her across the line to victory.

But the American voter isn't stupid . . . and that makes us Hillary's biggest obstacle.


Tweet

Is Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton having an affair?

I cannot prove this, but it seems highly likely that Maxine Waters (D-CA) is having a lurid sexual affair with Al Sharpton (Dummy-NY). 

They think alike, they hate alike, there has got to be a reason for this and I believe that they are in bed together not just in their ideas and hatred, but in bed together in bed. 

Maxine Waters has served thirteen terms as a useless Democratic congresswoman. 

Al Sharpton has served 90 days in jail in 2001. They both serve and I believe they're serving each other now . . . if you know what I mean.

Waters who for decades has made her living from your tax dollars is now considered the "rock star" of the Democratic party. 

Al Sharpton, who for decades made his living as a race baiter has been former President Obama's "go-to guy" on race relations. 

They say that being on the dole brings couples together.

The congresswoman infamously supported the thug, Damian Williams. He was the creep who threw a large chunk of concrete at white truck driver Reginald Denny as Waters performed a victory dance over him as he laid on the street during the LA riots.

Big Al Sharptongue is a thug while claiming to be a man of G_d. Sharpton is so fervently religious that he has referred to Jews in the past as "hymies" and white people as "crackers." When Mitt Romney, a Mormon, ran for president in 2007, Sharpton said, "As for the Mormon running for office, those who really believe in G_d will defeat him anyway."

(Photo: Getty images)

Sharpton was even indicted for tax evasion. 

Waters owns a mansion off the back of taxpayers.

A match made in heaven.

So while Waters makes brainless claims (without evidence) about the behavior of Republicans and has earned praise from her fellow parasites, she has coddled Crips and Bloods gangbangers and proudly performed a dance with them to show her "fearless support and understanding of young people and their efforts at self-expression." Among other things.

She got an ambassadorship to the dangerous Bahamas for her husband, a former pro football player and car salesman. Yes, he has all the qualifications to be an ambassador, just like Maxine has to be in Congress and Al Sharpton to be a "Reverend."

Waters' cronyism and corrupt self-interest dealing has earned her the title of "Most Corrupt Member of Congress" from the left-wing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington five times--2006, 2006, 2009, 2011. and 2017. 

At least she earned those titles.

So while Maxine Waters makes crazy statements about Republicans like Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) that he's probably part of the Kremlin conspiracy that won Trump the election, it seems more probable that Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton are "getting it on" together.

And I have as much, if not more, evidence than she that it's probable.

Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the right margin



Tweet

Hillary aider testifies

Hillary Clinton aider and FBI Director James Comey testified Wednesday that Hillary Clinton's chief of staff Cheryl Mills and another top aide had "some" classified material on laptops that they turned over to the liberal-leaning bureau in its "probe" (LOL) of Clinton's private and therefore illegal server. Not surprisingly, Comey granted Mills immunity in spite of her involvement in the case.

The Clinton aider made the acknowledgment in his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. 

Liberals feel that the only reason Comey is being asked questions about a crime is for political reasons, not because Hillary Clinton is actually guilty of breaking the law by her simply using a private server in a bathroom to carry out her business as secretary of state, and possibly for the Clinton Foundation.

Comey, who refused to answer certain legal questions and suggested they be redirected to Clinton's lawyers, then had it both ways--he claimed the finding did not constitute a crime. So, as a lawyer FBI director, he can make that claim, but as a Clinton probing FBI director, he redirects the legal questions to other lawyers.

Of course, Comey declined to directly answering a question as to whether having classified material on a laptop or other private electronic device was against federal regulations.

This is puke-worthy balderdash politics at its worst.

"You'd have to know the circumstances," the Clinton aider told committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA).

Yes, Jason Chaffetz was right when he said the FBI handed out immunity "like candy." Kind of like a load of candy.








Tweet

Will Donald call her "Dodging Lynch"?

Capitol Hill -- Loretta Lynch was called before congress to discuss her decision not to indict Hillary Clinton on charges that she used a private email server. What happened at the committee hearing was appalling.

Lynch said she would accept the decision made by James Comey, basically because she apparently didn't want to take responsibility to squash Clinton's run for the presidency and also has her own secret agenda. 

During the hearing, Lynch dodged and deflected straight forward questions like a Clinton in a sexual misconduct impeachment hearing. Rather than voice an opinion, she referred them back to James Comey, the politically savvy FBI Director.

Democrats didn't really ask questions as much as they made speeches now that they knew they'd be on national TV. And of course, the speeches had absolutely nothing to do with the purpose of the hearing. They spoke about gun control and violence, but left the issue of espionage alone--it wasn't important to them.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said that Lynch's "lack of clarity is bad for the republic." 

But it's really just another example of how the Clintons are made of Teflon and all charges seem to roll off.

House Judiciary Committee Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) asked about the legality of sharing classified information outside the proper channels. Lynch said it would be unfair to give a blanket answer. 

In other words, sometimes sharing classified information outside proper channels isn't such a terrible thing--you just need to know who did it. If it's Hillary Clinton, it isn't an issue.

Chaffetz responded to that sentiment by saying: "I think you're sending a terrible message to the world. The lack of clarity that you give to this body . . . is pretty stunning."

One thing that I got out of the hearing is how transparent Lynch's politics is--she's in the bag for the Clintons. Anyone who isn't surprised if she gets to keep her AG position if Hillary wins the election is as naive as a lamb to the slaughter.

Every answer that Lynch gave was calculated not to get her in trouble with the law. That's what crooked lawyers do.

Suddenly, it all makes sense when Donald Trump dubs a sobriquet on people like "Crooked" Hillary. I wonder what he's going to call Loretta Lynch.



Tweet

Ben Rhodes and Jonathan Gruber: counting on stupidity

Both Ben Rhodes and Jonathan Gruber seem to believe that the American people are stupid and deserve to be fooled, as long as it's for what they consider to be the greater good.

Gruber talked about how Obamacare depended upon the stupidity of the American voter in order to become a law, and because it was for Obamacare, it was for the greater good, in his mind. The administration knows best what's good for us.

Rhodes, on the other hand, bragged to the New York Tomes Magazine about the Obama administration's success in selling the Iran deal to the American people. He explained that they built an "echo chamber" to sell the plan and made fun of the young reporters who got their information from him.

The House Oversight Committee hearing was to called to look into White House "narratives" regarding the Iran deal after Rhodes shot off his mouth. 

Several senators tried to get Mr. Obama to fire Rhodes and a House committee looking into his braggadocio went forward with their hearing in spite of him not showing up to testify. Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) called on him but Obama shielded his appearance in order to conceal their embarrassment over getting caught with their pants down, much like Bill Clinton did on many occasions, but under different circumstances.

The White House used the old ploy, "executive privilege."

Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise Institute, (they'll pick you up) a guy who is not known to smile or ever crack a joke, accused Rhodes of creating a "propaganda operation."

Ben Rhodes is a journalist like Kim Kardashian is an actress.

Of course, the Democrats could always count upon the committee's top liberal Rep. Elijah-Black-Lives-Matter-Cummings (D-Md.) to to after Republicans with the only arsenal in his quiver--the ad hominem attack--as he criticized the analysts they called while not inviting military generals who support the agreement.

The truth is, Obama fired all of the military generals who didn't agree with him and left a bunch of "Yes Men" in uniform to validate his views.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said that at least Cummings could question the witnesses who showed up, but Rhodes, he said, "didn't bother to show up."

Several GOP-ers wrote to Barack asking him to dump Rhodes, "before he further tarnishes the Office of the President," but we all know that it's too late for that.

The truth is, it's probably foolish at this point for the GOP to make a big fuss over this--the administration looks like lying idiots all by themselves. Just let Trump talk about this with Hillary when they throw down on the debate stage.

Gruber and Rhodes think they've pulled a fast one on the American people, but in fact, the only people who buy their bull are progressive liberals and they're not so American when you get right down to it. If they had their way, they would get rid of the Constitution and replace it with "Rules for Radicals."



Tweet

Eenie meenie meinee visa

The U.S. has revoked over 122,000 visas and of those, about 9,500 were revoked due to terrorism concerns. This means that 122,000 visas were issued to people who should not have received them initially, and 9,500 of those people likely got the visas to enter the U.S. and perform terrorist acts against Americans.

The really frightening thing isn't the issuance of the visas, although it shows how stupid our government is, but the fact that the State Department doesn't know where thousands of these possible terrorists are.

"You don't have a clue, do you?" Rep. Jason Chaffetz, (R-Utah) told Michele Thoren Bond, assistant secretary for the Bureau of Consular Affairs.

Bond's straightforward admission when pressed by Chaffetz was a simple "I don't know," reminiscent of Obama's response when he told the American public that he finds out about things just like we do--in the media. 

This line of questioning came at a point in the hearing when administration officials were asked about what safeguards are in place to reduce the risk of would-be Islamic terrorists to be in the country. The big picture is the question of just how closely the government vets the background of people seeking entry into the U.S.A., including reviews of their social media.

Even some Democrats were taken aback at the lack of scrutiny we give to people from terrorist spawning countries, like Syria, for example. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass) said "If half the employees are doing it in the United States of America, if colleges are doing it for students, why wouldn't Homeland Security do it? We don't even look at their public stuff, that's what kills me."

Let's hope that it doesn't kill him or anyone else, but one has to be skeptical about the government protecting us.

Homeland Security Secretary and highly incompetently placed Jeh Johnson said that "There are some legal limits to what we can do."

WTF???? Legal limits?

People coming from other countries have no Constitutional rights like we do. They don't have any right to privacy unless we ask them to undress at the airport to check that strange bulge in their burqa. 

Homeland Security and the rest of the government involved with vetting foreigners have the responsibility to use every avenue available to them to ensure that there are no more Tashfeen Maliks and her ilk. Heck, she and her scumcrumpet American husband were communicating even before they were married about waging jihad in the U.S.

If I may use a Trumpian term: Jeh Johnson is a loser and so are the rest of the administration who fail to do their job.



Tweet

OPM Director Canned, a little too late

It only took 21 million plus people to have their records stolen by cyber scum to get U.S. personnel chief Katherine (Katy) Archuleta to hand in her resignation. Perhaps the left will soon praise her like they do Edward (Fast Eddie) Snowden.

Katy handed in her resignation to another incompetent, President Obama, on Friday morning and it is effective at the end of business today. Her replacement will be Beth Cobert, who has no nickname, which is probably a good thing.

Jason Chaffetz, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said that "This is absolutely the right call. OPM needs a competent, technical savvy leader to manage the biggest cybersecurity crisis in this nation's history. The IG has been warning about security lapses at OPM for almost a decade. This should have been addressed much, much sooner but I appreciate the President doing what's best now."

Of course, the biggest cybersecurity crisis in the opinion of me and others is the Edward Snowden/Wikileaks scandal in which hundreds of thousands of classified documents were made public and have affected our nation's security against our enemies, excluding the left.

Now back to Archuleta. 

People had been calling for her firing had grown recently after government data records had been breached during her employment. But as recently as yesterday, she basically flipped off people who asked for her resignation, making it clear that she wasn't going anywhere. She assured the skeptics that her agency was dealing with the problem, while somewhere in a Chinese restaurant, people were laughing in their moo goo gai pan. 

This morning, she allegedly told Barry that it was best for her to step aside to allow new leadership to deal with the recent situation. Patriots from all walks of life pray that Obama does the same.

"What's that cologne
you're wearing, George?"

White House spokesliar, Josh Notso Earnest, bullcrapped that Katy submitted her resignation at her own volition, adding that it is "quite clear" to Barry that Katy had to go because new leadership at OPM is needed like Mohammad needed more wives.

Archuleta (her close friends call her "Archie") didn't mention the 21.5 million stolen government records, but only said that she believed that it was best to allow OPM to "move beyond the current challenges."

She failed to mention that those current challenges consist of the difficulties the agency endures with the incompetence it maintains. She praised the agency's staff, calling them "some of the most dedicated, capable and hardworking individuals in the federal government."

And if that statement is true, imagine what the rest of the federal government employees must be like. 



Tweet