'Final batch' of damning Clinton emails tied to ;delete or destroy' uncovered

Almost four years have passed since Judicial Watch (JW) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking all emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton and her staff via her unsecured private email server [located in a bathroom] during her tenure as Secretary of State. JW has finally received what appears to be the "final batch" of those emails Hillary "tried to delete or destroy" that the FBI managed to recover.

Among this newly uncovered crapload of emails, which amount to 756 pages of documents, JW uncovered what appear to be five more email exchanges containing classified information. 

It only takes one classified document to indict someone under the Espionage Act, and this latest batch only added to the number of classified material on her illegal server. And this find apparently contradicted Clinton's oath-sworn insistence that she turned over all of her sensitive work-related emails to the State Department, and it also included a load of classified communications on issues from foreign policy to State Department personnel matters.

"Hillary Clinton repeatedly stated that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails," Judicial Watch explained in its announcement of the release of the final batch of emails. "In response to a court order in another Judicial Watch case, she declared under penalty of perjury in 2015 that she had 'directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.' In 2017, the FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose."

JW noted that this should be "the final batch" of emails because the production of documents in this case has now "concluded." In total, the FBI was only able to recover or find less than a fifth, about 5,000 of the 33,000 government emails Clinton "took and tried to destroy."

The files came from a trove of 72,000 documents the FBI recovered and turned over to the State Department in 2017.

The documents, representing a small proportion of the tens of thousands of emails still unaccounted for from Clinton's 'Bleach Bit' server, also underscored the significant political threat that the Obama administration felt it faced at the hands of Israel.

Additionally, according to the email dump, Clinton spoke with former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair about foreign policy before she was sworn in, aided the application of at least one State Department applicant who was connected to her daughter, Chelsea, and apparently met with Putin-aligned Georgian oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili before he became prime minister on a staunchly pro-Russian platform -- and with reported help from a Russian interference operation. 

In some of Clinton's conversations with Blair -- which included a classified 2011 conversation on foreign policy, and another classified 2011 conversation concerning a "speech" -- she apparently discussed job-related topics on January 16, 2009 -- while George W. Bush was still president but after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee had approved her for the position of Secretary of State. In one email thread with the subject line "Re: Gaza," dated January 16, 2009, Blair said he wanted to have a matter "resolved before Tuesday," apparently referring to Obama's inauguration.

Clinton replied: “Tony – We are finally moving and I am looking forward to talking w you as soon as I’m confirmed, tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest. Your emails are very helpful so pls continue to use this address,” hr15@att.blackberry.net."

Blair responded: “It would be great if we could talk before any announcements are made.”

In closed-door testimony last year, former FBI special agent Peter Strzok acknowledged that the Justice Department "negotiated" an agreement with Clinton's legal team that ensured the FBI did not have access to emails on her private servers relating to the Clinton Foundation, even as they probed her handling of classified information.

And so far, nobody has been prosecuted for any of this crap.

Below is the JW summaries of and links to the "classified" communications:

On April 27, 2011, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair sent classified information discussing Palestinian issues to Clinton’s personal unsecured email account. 

On May 19, 2011, Blair again sent classified information to Clinton’s personal unsecured email account discussing a “speech.” 

A classified email exchange between Blair and Clinton took place from January 16, 2009 (while George W. Bush was still president) and January 24, 2009. The subject line is “Re: Gaza.” Blair on January 16, 2009, relayed information he learned from Middle East leaders and noted that he wanted to get something “resolved before Tuesday” (when Obama would be sworn in as president). Clinton responded to Blair on January 19, 2009, writing “Tony – We are finally moving and I am looking forward to talking w you as soon as I’m confirmed, tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest. Your emails are very helpful so pls continue to use this address,”[email protected]. Blair followed up by saying “It would be great if we could talk before any announcements are made.” 

Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane sent Clinton classified information, apparently during early 2009. The subject line of the email is redacted, but the text appears to show a discussion on information about Iraq.
In September 2, 2010, email exchange marked classified, longtime Clinton confidante Lanny Davis tells Secretary Clinton that he could serve as a private channel for her to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying he had a “private and highly trusted communication line, unofficial and personal, to PM N[etanyahu].” Davis goes on to say “[N]o one on the planet (other than your wonderful husband) can get this done as well as you.…” Secretary Clinton responds with classified information, saying “I will reach out to you directly and hope you will continue to do the same w me. The most important issue now is [Redacted B1].”

Judicial Watch notes that, based on what the documents revealed, Clinton had already been assigned an official government email address which she could have used.

Instead, she arrogantly chose to use her unapproved, unsecured private server. One email contains a comment from her former chief of staff as a senator discussing getting "a secure computer set up soon."

She has thus far gotten away with her illegal behavior, but that's only because Lady Justice has a hole in her blindfold that Hillary gave her after she wiped her server with it.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

More Clinton ties on Mueller's team

More Clinton connections have come into the sunlight for members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe as Republican complaints about potential bias inside the office of the investigative team.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that Mueller investigator Andrew Weissmann, attended Hillary Clinton's election night party at the Javits Center in New York City last November. Weissmann is a former partner at WilmerHale.

You may recall that Weissmann's the guy who in January praised outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who was fired for refusing to defend President Trump's travel ban. He had also donated thousands of dollars to former President-from-behind Obama's campaign and the DNC.

Now, at least two Mueller investigators' past legal work for Clinton-tied liberals are getting careful scrutiny as Republicans search for signs of bias.

Aaron Zebley, another former WilmerHale partner, and a former chief of staff to Mueller when he served as FBI director, represented Justin Cooper, a significant person in the Hillary Clinton illegal email scandal for which she was never brought to justice. [Just sayin'].

Cooper is the Bill Clinton aide responsible for helping set up the illegal private email server and later admitted to "two instances where he destroyed [Hillary] Clinton's mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."

He too has escaped justice and is walking the streets of Washington, D.C. in his swamp boots.

Jeannie Rhee, another former partner at WilmerHale, represented Ben Rhodes, an ex-Obama National Security Adviser. She also represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case. And hey, she even represented Hillary herself, in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.

"You've got Donald Trump being prosecuted by Hillary Clinton's fan club--that's inequitable," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R.-Fl.) a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News on Friday. "Many of the members of Mueller's team donated to the Clinton campaign. We have a lot of highly qualified federal prosecutors in the Justice Department and we could have found a bunch of them who didn't donate to either candidate. But that didn't occur, and that's troubling."



Tweet

Makeshift lab on K Street and HIllary's emails

"It's alive! It's alive!" You can almost hear IT specialist  Bryan Pagliano screaming that from the confines of the K Street office where he went to all ends of the earth to create a Hillary Clinton computer.

Documents were released Friday evening indicating that Pagliano worked to design and build the illegal server that was once used as part of her campaign headquarters. The Fifth Amendment wonder also used computer parts from Hillary's failed 2008 presidential bid--he was an IT specialist for her then as well.

Information on Clinton's server was made clear based on witness interviews known as 302s. The information within them was highly redacted by the FBI but include details Pagliano revealed in an interview on June 24th with the bureau.

Pagliano said that Clinton Foundation aide Justin Cooper asked him to build the server "in the fall of 2008" and the work was completed in early 2009.

Once completed in a makeshift lab on K Street, Pagliano said he "rented a minivan and drove to Chappaqua, New York to install the email server in the Clinton residence.

Both Pagliano and Cooper were interviewed separately by Comey's comrades five times while Clinton was the impotent secretary of state.

Pagliano's first interview was on December 22, 2015 and again on June 21, 2016. Cooper was interviewed once in 2015 and twice in 2016. He also appeared before Congress. 

Pagliano and four others received limited immunity, but he took the Fifth and refused to testify before Congress. He told the FBI that "he could not recall any existing computer systems at the Chappaqua residence other than the Apple server described previously by the FBI."

Although he joined Clinton in the State Department as an IT employee, he continued to work on her home brew illegal server. He insisted, however, that he "believed the email server he was building would be used for private email exchange with Bill Clinton aides."

Why the FBI granted immunity to all five involved with the email scandal and the server is beyond comprehension. It's like a game of tag where nobody is "It," as someone whose name I can't recall, described it.




Tweet

Hillary aider testifies

Hillary Clinton aider and FBI Director James Comey testified Wednesday that Hillary Clinton's chief of staff Cheryl Mills and another top aide had "some" classified material on laptops that they turned over to the liberal-leaning bureau in its "probe" (LOL) of Clinton's private and therefore illegal server. Not surprisingly, Comey granted Mills immunity in spite of her involvement in the case.

The Clinton aider made the acknowledgment in his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. 

Liberals feel that the only reason Comey is being asked questions about a crime is for political reasons, not because Hillary Clinton is actually guilty of breaking the law by her simply using a private server in a bathroom to carry out her business as secretary of state, and possibly for the Clinton Foundation.

Comey, who refused to answer certain legal questions and suggested they be redirected to Clinton's lawyers, then had it both ways--he claimed the finding did not constitute a crime. So, as a lawyer FBI director, he can make that claim, but as a Clinton probing FBI director, he redirects the legal questions to other lawyers.

Of course, Comey declined to directly answering a question as to whether having classified material on a laptop or other private electronic device was against federal regulations.

This is puke-worthy balderdash politics at its worst.

"You'd have to know the circumstances," the Clinton aider told committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA).

Yes, Jason Chaffetz was right when he said the FBI handed out immunity "like candy." Kind of like a load of candy.








Tweet

Scout gets 4 years, Hillary gets free pass

Christopher Correa, a former baseball scout for the St. Louis Cardinals, was sentenced to four years in prison Monday for hacking the database of the Houston Astros' player personnel and email system. 

It's a case of high-tech cheating to which Correa had pleaded guilty to five counts of unauthorized access of a protected computer from 2013 to 2014. 

Correa was fired last summer and ordered to pay the approximate equivalent to a 20-minute Hillary Clinton speaking fee of $279,038 in restitution. He's not quite as lucky as Hillary Clinton, but he faced up to five years in prison for each count and is only getting four years in the slammer. That's a relatively good deal for him.

Of course, Hillary was even luckier by getting a scolding without an indictment, but let's face it, Christopher Correa is no Hillary Clinton--he confessed to his wrongdoing.

The shamed former scout is free on bond and will report to the federal slammer in six weeks.

Correa read a heartfelt letter in court before his sentencing by U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes, who admittedly, is no James Comey. 

Correa said he was "overwhelmed with remorse and regret for my actions" that cost him his career and his home. Hillary is overwhelmed with joy that she got away with it on her end.

"I violated my values and it was wrong. I behaved shamefully," he said. "The whole episode represents the worst thing I've done in my life by far."

But is the personal email server the worse thing Hillary has ever done in her life so far? 

Probably not.

Hughes said Correa's actions were mainly about a loss of trust and admitted that in spite of the episode, as a woman, she is still voting for Hillary Clinton for President, "because if she can get away scot-free with her email server situation and compromise the national security, she can get away with anything, and that's what we need in a president. That and a uterus."


Cardinals Chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. blamed the hack on "roguish behavior" by a few people who may have been influenced by the outcome handed down by James Comey in his decision not to advise indicting Mrs. Clinton.

DeWitt said in an interview, "That poor bas**rd Correa figured he wasn't doing anything wrong compared to what the former Secretary of the freaking State was doing. Boy, was he surprised when the judge threw the book at him. Let's face it, he's no Hillary Clinton."




Tweet

Hillary Makes History--or Herstory

Hillary Rodham Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, has made American history. She is the first presidential nominee ever to be interviewed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Of course, she doesn't refer to it as a criminal investigation--she calls it a security review.

Perhaps the FBI should itself the Federal Bureau of Reviews.

Hillary's interview with several FBI agents has not fazed her loyal fans (fan comes from the word 'fanatic' and in this case it is totally valid).  They would take a bullet for her or have a baby by Bill, if that's what she demanded.

Like Donald Trump, who believes he can shoot someone on Broadway and not get arrested for it, Hillary believes she can endanger our national security by using an unauthorized private email server, send and receive over 2,000 top secret documents, and not get arrested for it.

The frightening thing is, she's probably correct.

But whether or not Hillary is indicted, her loyal fans will support her because Hillary Clinton somehow represents the one thing she clearly hates: women.

Hillary Clinton is a disgrace to women and all 58 varieties of how people can now identify their gender.



Tweet

An administration of idiots

Are we being led by an administration of idiots? Amateurs? Do they care about our national security or are they so clueless that they don't even realize how dangerous their blase attitudes are about how they secure their government emails?

Defense Secretary Ash Carter did a "Hillary Clinton" during the first thrree months as SecDef this year. That is, he used his personal email account for his "professional" correspondence (scare quotes for me indicate my skepticism), the Pentagon admitted on Wednesday.

The New York Times first reported this story saying that Carter had been confronted about his email habits by Denis McDonough, the White House Chief of Staff, three months after he took office as defense secretary (aka "Government Secrets Disseminater to Russia, China, ISIS and Fox News"). 

Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook released a statement saying that Carter believes his use of personal email for work-related business was a mistake, but did not mention whether it was a violation of Pentagon email policies.

If it was not a violation of Pentagon email policies, that would mean the Pentagon email policies were either written by a) one of our enemy countries or entities; b) Hillary Clinton; or c) an Alzheimer patient.

Cook said Carter stopped using his personal email, but he didn't say when. That is very reassuring to us.

Carter admitted that he occasionally used his personal iPhone to send messages to his staff, but added that no classified information was in those messages [or at least marked classified].

The Times reported that our SecDef was assigned a government email account when he first became Obama's SecDef "yes man" in February, but he didn't think he needed to use a secure account when a personal account could almost do the same job. Even his own staff thought he would or could be hacked.

In 2012 Pentagon policy barred all employees, not just the upper echelon, from conducting government business on their personal email, and even President Obama barred federal employees from sending or receiving emails from personal accounts unless the messages were either copied or forwarded into government accounts within 20 days. Did Carter follow that directive? 

You make the call.

Even while Hillary was under FBI investigation about her alleged mishandling of classified information, using a private account for all her emails as secretary of state, evidently Carter didn't think it also pertained to him. He continued this practice no less than two months after the "Scandal Queen's" practices were made public.

The Times reported that the emails it received under FOIA were between Carter and Eric Fanning, his then chief of staff and now acting secretary of the Army.

Personally, I don't care a fig what the emails said or who the emails involved, the fact that our secretary of defense, like our incompetent secretary of state, cannot follow a simple procedure is an indication of an administration that is out of control with its arrogance and belief that the law and common sense don't apply to them.

Tweet

In other words, they lied about Benghazi

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, obtained an email showing that a high-ranking Pentagon official urgently messaged then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's top deputies offering military help as the Benghazi attack unfolded. 

In other words, help was offered at the outset of when the attack began.

Parts of the email were redacted that described what military forces were available.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta back in 2013 told lawmakers that there wasn't enough time to get military help to Benghazi. He said that "time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response."

In other words, Panetta lied through his nose.

Jeremy Bash, Panetta's chief of staff, emailed the following at 7:19 p.m. ET on September 11, 2012: 

"I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [Secretary of State Hillary Clinton]." The email went on: "After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak."

This email was sent in the early stages of the attack, right after the first wave at the consulate, before the mortar strike on the CIA annex that killed Ty Woods and Glen Doherty.

This email shows clearly that military help was offered and was never deployed.

In other words, Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta lied about Benghazi at every turn, every question asked of them. 

It was never about a video and Clinton knew it, just as she told her daughter what really happened and the public, what Obama wanted us to believe.



Tweet

"Three Hots and a Cot" for Hillary?

A document with classified information is a classified document. Does that confuse you, Mrs. Clinton? It does not have to be marked classified to be classified. It's all in the flavor.

Let me 'splain.

If I give you orange juice in a plain, unmarked glass, it is still orange juice. Just because it doesn't say "Orange Juice" doesn't make it something else.

Hillary laughed when CNN's Jake Tapper explained that, while Bernie Sanders may have said "the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails," there are "a lot of people who are not, including FBI officials."

That didn't stop the Scandal Queen--she continued to cackle like a crow on hallucinogenics as Tapper continued the interview.

But Tapper didn't let her off the hook.  

What, me worry?

"And this is something else that is very confusing to me. With all your experience, why wouldn't you anticipate that over the course of four years, handling very sensitive diplomatic negotiations, overseeing military interventions and surveillance, why wouldn't you anticipate that something classified, whether about North Korea or Iran or drones or an informant for the CIA, that it wouldn't be emailed to you? And why wouldn't you consider that having it on your personal account with some server in Colorado might be a potential risk?" he asked the Democratic presidential candidate whose main qualification for the position is her lady parts.

That's when she doubled-down on the "marked classified" nonsense, saying that "nothing that I was sent or that I sent was marked classified."

So Tapper said, "The inspector general of the intelligence community said some of this stuff contained classified information when it was generated whether or not it was marked classified."

"Well, that is just a very strong difference of opinion. The State Department does not agree with that . . . " She babbled on to say, "All the time there was nothing marked classified, and that is the fact that hasn't changed."

Hillary could fertilize Nebraska with her excuses.

As it stands, the FBI's investigation into Clinton's emails is reportedly focused on possible violations of the Espionage Act in how she handled national defense information.

That's nothing to chuckle over, Hillary.

The investigators are specifically focusing on those sections of the Espionage Act that addresses security clearance holders who permit national defense information to be separated or abstracted from its secure location due to the security holder's "gross negligence." 

If the Espionage Act also contained a section on "gross arrogance," Hillary would be in even deeper poo.

The Espionage Act also requires the security clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer." (My italics.) The punishment is a fine, imprisonment up to 10 years, or both.

Hillary has made it abundantly clear that in no way, shape or form is she a "he," so she doesn't believe she has anything to worry about. But if somehow she's nabbed for being grossly negligent, she's opting to pay the fine--she can easily afford it with the Clinton Foundation money.

Of course, if someone knew there was an investigation going on, and tries to impede it by, say, destroying emails or documents, or threatening witnesses, that would likely be a separate charge and could land Hillary in the slammer by the time she's wearing adult diapers (if that time has not yet arrived).

Although the Scandal Queen has denied using her private email server to send or receive classified information, the inspector general has already found that she lied about two such emails that included "top secret" information at the time they were sent. 

If that doesn't get her "three hots and a cot," I don't think anything more will.



Tweet

Clinton privilege: above the law

How many laws does it take for a Clinton to break before they have to defend themselves in court?

Now we have found dozens of emails released by the State Department that belonged to Hillary Clinton to have contained classified information as deemed by that department. 

With the release of about 3,900 emails, over 200 have been marked "B1," meaning they contain classified information. There were over 100 "B5" emails that refer to internal deliberations by the president and they are exempt from disclosure to Congress and the public.

Almost all of the emails were "confidential" and at least 3 so far, are "secret." That level is sensitive enough to cause serious damage to our national security if made public.

Officials upgraded the classification level of parts of 215 emails, State Department spokes snuffy John Kirby said. "The information we upgraded today was not marked classified at the time the emails were sent. It has been subsequently upgraded."

That's no excuse. The secretary of state should know what's classified and what isn't. The secretary of state should not use a private server for those emails and then lie to the American people about not sending or receiving classified emails. Then changing the lie to not sending or receiving emails marked classified.

But why blame Hillary for lying when it's just another vast right wing conspiracy? After all, how can she be the first woman president of the United States if serving time in Federal prison?


Tweet

Schiff-less in Benghazi

Adam Schiff  is a Democratic member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. Adam (his political friends tease him with "Hey, Schiff-head!") who served the committee by attending 1 out of the 45 meetings the committee held, is from, you guessed it--California.

With the knowledge acquired from about 2% attendance, Schiff has issued the call to disband the committee, according to the New York Times in a Friday op-ed. He says the committee has lost sight of its purpose in the investigation of the September 11, 2011 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. He believes the committee is only concerned about bringing Hillary Clinton to justice (my words, not his), and should be disbanded.

"The committee is solely concerned with damaging her candidacy, searching for something, anything, that can be insinuated against her," Schiff wrote in his op-ed piece of Schiff's thinking on the matter.

Like the typical liberal you know and love to not know nor love, Schiff is coming from a place of ignorance since he couldn't find his way a second time to the committee meetings and has no clue of what he's talking about. 

"It is interesting he made this call considering Mr. Schiff himself has only attended one of the more-than-45 interviews conducted to date by the Select Committee on Benghazi," Jamal Ware, a committee spokesman said on behalf of Republicans on the committee.

"In fact, save for voting not to create the committee and then attending a press event on the now well-disproven Democratic talking point that all has been 'asked and answered,' Mr. Schiff has largely been a Member of the committee in absentia."

But Schiff "FEEEEELS" the committee is making life hard for Hillary and that isn't nice. Why can't they just leave Hillary alone?

Schiff wrote: "Whatever their original purpose, [and he wasn't around to know what that purpose was] the Select Committee's leaders appear no longer to have any interest in Benghazi, except as the tragic events of that day may be used as a cudgel against the likely Democratic nominee for president."

How would this cretin know that? Oh, yeah, he "FEEEEELS" it.

The FACT that she lied about the video to the families of the dead in the Benghazi attack when knowing full well it was a terrorist attack, should matter to Schiff. But maybe he's worried that she has to testify next month and that might not go over well if they could just get those darn emails off her wiped server.

Schiff is not in a position to make an argument about the Select Committee on Benghazi when the Democrats in those committee meetings, except for one, were "Schiffless."


Tweet

Liberals Defined by their Emails

Whether or not the Sony Pictures document dump obtained by WikiLeaks is, as Julian Assange claims, "public domain," the information Assanges' Web site revealed is incredibly illuminating and reveals the true hearts of liberals.

WikiLeaks unveiled the database of over 30 thousand documents and 172 thousand emails the hacker group Anonymous stole from the Sony film division back in last November.

Assanges' actual quote was: "This archive shows the inner workings of an influential multinational corporation. It is newsworthy and at the center of a geopolitical conflict. It belongs in the public domain. WikiLeaks will ensure it stays there."

Some of the information revealed in the WikiLeaks documents was that Sony has close ties to the Democratic party and the company also tried to gather "intelligence" on rival studios including Oliver Stone's soon to be released film on the scumcrumpet, Edward Snowden. (Yes, I know that some of you might see Snowden as a hero, but I see him as a traitor for allowing the information to get into the hands of Putin.)

Amy Pascal, a liberal, and the head of Sony movies left her position with the company after her hacked emails were revealed to the public. She had emailed a friend, Scott Rubin, asking him what questions she should ask President Obama at a breakfast they would be attending for Hollywood brass.

Pascal emailed: "What should I ask the president at this stupid Jeffrey breakfast?" referring to a breakfast hosted by DreamWorks Animation head and important Democratic donor Jeffrey Katzenberg.

Rudin replied: "Would he like to finance some movies."

Pascal, ever the racist, replied: "I doubt it. Should I ask him if he liked DJANGO?" to which Rubin responded: "12 YEARS."

Pascal continued trying to guess the movies a black president might prefer, perhaps those starring black actors: "Or the butler. Or think like a man? [sic]."

Rudin: "Ride-along. I bet he likes Kevin Hart."

Amy Pascal donated $5000 to the Obama re-election campaign and $30,800.00 to the DNC, according to OpenSecrets. So in spite of the fact that she seems focused on race, being a liberal trumps her racial feelings.

Of course, after they were "outed" Rudin wrote to Deadline.com: "Private emails between friends and colleagues written in haste and without much thought or sensitivity, even when the content of them is meant to be in jest, can result in offense where none was intended. I made a series of remarks that were meant to only be funny, but in the cold light of day, they are, in fact, thoughtless and insensitive--but not funny at all. To anybody I've offended, I'm profoundly and deeply sorry, and I regret and apologize for any injury they might have caused."

Scotty, words don't cause injury unless you're a liberal who wants to shut up people with opposing opinions (see American college professors, for more on this). 

Pascal sent her apology to Variety: "The content of my emails were insensitive and inappropriate but are not an accurate reflection of who I am," she lied. "Although this was a private communication that was stolen, I accept full responsibility for what I wrote and apologize to everyone who was offended."

If she was being genuine in her apology, she wouldn't have tried to soften it with mentioning that the emails were stolen. 

It's what people say to their friends when they believe nobody else is able to hear them, that is most revealing about what they really think. 

The same is true of corporations.

Sony Entertainment CEO, Michael Lynton, thought the email issues with WikiLeaks was old history but instead, they drew attention to Lynton's directorship at the Rand Corporation, a US military intelligence think tank. WIkiLeaks then went on to mention a dinner Lynton attended with our so-called president at Martha's Vineyard and that Sony tried to establish a fund-raising collective "to get around the $5,000 limit on corporate campaign donations," the site stated.

But the real FunFact was WikiLeaks revealing that actor, Ben Affleck, the guy who went off on Sam Harris's criticism of Islam on Bill Maher's show, was trying to hide the fact that his ancestors were slave owners and tried to hide the fact by censoring it from the PBS show "Finding Your Roots."

In a hacked email from July 22, 2014 now in the hands of WikiLeaks, the "Finding Your Roots" host, Henry Louis Gates Jr., wrote to Michael Lynton asking him how to go forward with this: "One of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors--the fact that he owned slaves. Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We've never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He's a megastar. What do we do?"

Guess what the sneaky liberal Lynton replied.

His advice was to leave out Affleck's family secret, as long as nobody would find out. He wrote: "On the doc the big question is who knows that the material is in the doc and is being taken out. I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky."

Gates admitted to Lynton that he was aware that censoring the documentary goes against PBS rules. Lynton responded that "It is tricky because it may get out that you made the change and it comes down to editorial integrity," to which Gates then responded "It would embarrass him and compromise our integrity."

What integrity?

Lynton caved and liberal injustice was served.

I marvel at the lies liberals (and some conservatives) will tell in order to appear to be seen in the image they see themselves. I don't care one iota if Affleck's great-grand-whatevers owned slaves, but he is worried that people will see him as less a liberal. 

I do believe, however, that if his ancestors owned slaves, the chances are excellent that they were Dixiecrat/Democrats.


Tweet

Dude, Two Years Not Too Late

Former White House Spokesliar, Tommy Vietor was interviewed by Fox News' Brett Baier a few nights ago. The interview was on the Benghazi talking points and young Tommy denied that he remembered the role he played in the now famous (and some call "smoking gun") e-mail that was sent to Susan Rice to "PREP" her for the Sunday morning talk shows that she was to appear on.

"Dude, that was like two years ago," the former chewing gum aficionado told Baier.

"Dude, it's the thing that everybody's talking about," Baier shot back. Tommy looked as uncomfortable as a bomb-defuser with the DTs. 

Tommy said that he was in the Situation Room during the attack but Obama was not there. Vietor said: "It is well known that when the attack was first briefed to him, it was in the Oval Office and he was updated constantly." But when pressed for Obama's physical location in the White House, Tommy said that he didn't know Obama's whereabouts in the night because he didn't have a "tracking device" on him.

It's easy to see the arrogance in Tommy Vietor--it's recognizable in many of those who speak for Obama. Jay Carney acts as though you're stupid for not believing him, and Marie Harf is no different. Clearly, the Obama administration treats the American public as if we are stupid, but it is only the Obama robots who actually are.

Here is the tweet that Tommy Vietor sent out before appearing on Fox: 

Tommy Vietor @TVietor08

Follow

Guessing @BretBaier invited me to come on @SpecialReport to talk #Benghazi as a #TBT thing since it happened in 2012 but tune in!

5:15 PM - 1 May 2014

#TBT is for "Throwback Thursday." How utterly juvenile and arrogant.

Tweet