"Three Hots and a Cot" for Hillary?

A document with classified information is a classified document. Does that confuse you, Mrs. Clinton? It does not have to be marked classified to be classified. It's all in the flavor.

Let me 'splain.

If I give you orange juice in a plain, unmarked glass, it is still orange juice. Just because it doesn't say "Orange Juice" doesn't make it something else.

Hillary laughed when CNN's Jake Tapper explained that, while Bernie Sanders may have said "the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails," there are "a lot of people who are not, including FBI officials."

That didn't stop the Scandal Queen--she continued to cackle like a crow on hallucinogenics as Tapper continued the interview.

But Tapper didn't let her off the hook.  

What, me worry?

"And this is something else that is very confusing to me. With all your experience, why wouldn't you anticipate that over the course of four years, handling very sensitive diplomatic negotiations, overseeing military interventions and surveillance, why wouldn't you anticipate that something classified, whether about North Korea or Iran or drones or an informant for the CIA, that it wouldn't be emailed to you? And why wouldn't you consider that having it on your personal account with some server in Colorado might be a potential risk?" he asked the Democratic presidential candidate whose main qualification for the position is her lady parts.

That's when she doubled-down on the "marked classified" nonsense, saying that "nothing that I was sent or that I sent was marked classified."

So Tapper said, "The inspector general of the intelligence community said some of this stuff contained classified information when it was generated whether or not it was marked classified."

"Well, that is just a very strong difference of opinion. The State Department does not agree with that . . . " She babbled on to say, "All the time there was nothing marked classified, and that is the fact that hasn't changed."

Hillary could fertilize Nebraska with her excuses.

As it stands, the FBI's investigation into Clinton's emails is reportedly focused on possible violations of the Espionage Act in how she handled national defense information.

That's nothing to chuckle over, Hillary.

The investigators are specifically focusing on those sections of the Espionage Act that addresses security clearance holders who permit national defense information to be separated or abstracted from its secure location due to the security holder's "gross negligence." 

If the Espionage Act also contained a section on "gross arrogance," Hillary would be in even deeper poo.

The Espionage Act also requires the security clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer." (My italics.) The punishment is a fine, imprisonment up to 10 years, or both.

Hillary has made it abundantly clear that in no way, shape or form is she a "he," so she doesn't believe she has anything to worry about. But if somehow she's nabbed for being grossly negligent, she's opting to pay the fine--she can easily afford it with the Clinton Foundation money.

Of course, if someone knew there was an investigation going on, and tries to impede it by, say, destroying emails or documents, or threatening witnesses, that would likely be a separate charge and could land Hillary in the slammer by the time she's wearing adult diapers (if that time has not yet arrived).

Although the Scandal Queen has denied using her private email server to send or receive classified information, the inspector general has already found that she lied about two such emails that included "top secret" information at the time they were sent. 

If that doesn't get her "three hots and a cot," I don't think anything more will.



Tweet