Illegal alien charged with brutal murder just one day after California judge set him loose

Todd Stewart

California’s revolving door criminal justice system appears to have produced another horrifying result.

Marcos Iriarte-Valdez, a Venezuelan illegal alien with a prior criminal record, was facing burglary charges when a judge in Democratic-majority Contra Costa County released him on his own recognizance, a pledge to return to court when scheduled, much like illegal aliens who came into the country illegally promised to show up in court for immigration purposes. Didn't work then; didn't work with this scumcrumpet, but judges aren't judged for their poor judgment.

Just one day later, he allegedly stabbed 68-year-old retiree Todd Stewart to death during an attempted burglary, prosecutors said.

The Department of Homeland Security is now demanding answers, and it is not being particularly subtle about who it believes should be held accountable.

DHS told media outlet Fox News Digital that it had placed an immigration detainer on Iriarte-Valdez on Sept. 23, 2025. The department said he is from Venezuela and holds Spanish citizenship [and is a horrible human being].

"Valdez is charged with murder, inflicting corporal injury on spouse, three counts of burglary, receiving known stolen property, trespassing, entering non-commercial dwelling, loitering, as well as convicted of violation of court ordered protective order," the department said in a statement.

Then DHS had a message for failed Democratic California Gov. Gavin 'Crazy Hands' Newsom.

"CA Governor Gavin Newsom must not release this murderer from jail and turn him over to us so we can REMOVE him from our nation," the department later tweeted about Iriarte-Valdez.

DHS also took aim at the socialist-inspired sanctuary policies that routinely put immigration enforcement at odds with local authorities.

"Sanctuary politicians must stop putting politics above public safety. This type of insanity leads to more crimes and more innocent victims," DHS said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

That last part is becoming increasingly difficult to dismiss as mere political rhetoric when someone accused of serious crimes is released and allegedly kills a man the next day.

Iriarte-Valdez is accused of murdering Stewart, 68, in Martinez during an attempted burglary. Stewart had reportedly lived on his quiet neighborhood street for about 40 years.

According to prosecutors, Stewart encountered Iriarte-Valdez in his garage. The suspect allegedly attempted to flee before stabbing Stewart. Obviously, the POS didn't need to kill him if all he wanted was money or whatever. But this blot of human excrement had to kill the man.

Investigators eventually used automated license plate recognition technology, along with tips from members of the community, to identify and track Iriarte-Valdez.

But the real troubling question is how this guy was on the streets in the first place.

Contra Costa prosecutors had already charged Iriarte-Valdez in connection with alleged burglaries at occupied residences in April. He was on pretrial release in that case when he was arrested Tuesday for allegedly violating a home detention condition.

Then, on Wednesday, the court released him on his own recognizance.

Stewart was killed the following day.

Iriarte-Valdez will probably get what is equivalent to a slap on the hand.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Left Eats Its Own: Pro Hamas Activists Chase Scott Wiener Out of San Francisco Pride Event Anyway

If anyone still needed proof that the modern Left eventually devours everyone who isn't sufficiently revolutionary, California state Sen. Scott Wiener, a gay Jewish activist, just volunteered as Exhibit A.

Wiener, a Democrat, is one of the architects of California's progressive agenda, discovered the hard way that decades of faithful service to the activist class earn you exactly nothing once the mob decides your loyalty to Israel is unforgivable.

Video posted to X shows Wiener attempting to walk through crowds gathering for San Francisco's Trans March before being greeted with the sort of tolerance, inclusion, and acceptance progressives are always promising everyone else.

"You stopped being queer the moment you started supporting Israel, you piece of sh*t!" one participant screamed in a high-pitched falsetto.

Nothing says "love is love" quite like informing a gay Jewish man that his sexual orientation has been revoked because he refuses to hate the Jewish state.

Ironically, the video begins with the person filming praising Wiener's record on LGBT legislation. Apparently all of those years of advancing progressive causes were erased the instant Israel entered the conversation.

"I think your policy on the genocide of Gaza is terrible," the person filming Wiener said as masked activists converged around him. "I think you do not belong here."

Soon, more masked protesters surrounded the senator, shouting that he was a "genocidal piece of sht" while chanting, "We fcking hate you!" Because they love Hamas.

It was another inspiring display from the same political movement that constantly lectures America about kindness, empathy, and stamping out hate. 

To view the video, click here

Former MTV reality star Spencer Pratt could not resist pointing out the poetic justice.

"Hey, Wiener guy! Remember when you called me a 'McBigot'?" Pratt wrote on X. "How does it feel now that the Frankenstein you created is coming for you? Every stupid communist learns this history lesson the hard way. Enjoy!"

That may have been the most accurate political analysis of the entire episode.

The activists repeatedly insisted Wiener had betrayed the LGBT community by refusing to adopt their preferred anti Israel orthodoxy.

"It sucks because you've been wonderful, you've been wonderful for trans people, and you've been terrible, and you've been terrible, you've been terrible, you've been terrible on Gaza!" one protester yelled as Wiener kept walking.

Dimitry Yakoushkin, who shared the video online, celebrated the confrontation by declaring Wiener insufficiently radical.

"Scott Wiener showed up to the trans march and for the first time we kicked his a** out," Yakoushkin wrote. "It's sad because while he's written some good legislation for queers, hes [sic] ultimately a genocidal-supporting center right shill."

Imagine being a California Democrat who helped push one of the most progressive agendas in America only to be branded "center right" because you failed the latest ideological purity test. On today's Left, anyone to the right of Che Guevara is apparently a conservative.

The truly remarkable part is that Wiener has hardly been an unwavering defender of Israel. After the October 7 Hamas massacre, he criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and by January 2026 even declared in a video that he does "believe Israel has committed genocide in Gaza."

That dramatic shift earned him exactly zero forgiveness.

The revolutionary tribunal had already reached its verdict.

"You're a piece of sh*t on Gaza!" the person filming shouted. "How could you do that? How could you betray queers? How could you oppress people?"

For years, conservatives have warned that identity politics eventually collapses into endless purity tests where no amount of ideological conformity is ever enough. Scott Wiener spent years helping build that machine.

This week, it finally decided to run over one of its own.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Gov. Newsom tries his Trump impression on Joe Rogan after he called Gavin a "f----ing con man"

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom got his skivvies in a knot after Joe Rogan referred to him as a f---ing con man." Newsom's press office account slammed Rogan's podcast as "failing" and claimed the host is being "relegated to irrelevancy."
I asked Grok if Joe Rogan's webcast is losing subscribers. Here is the answer: 

No, Joe Rogan's webcast (The Joe Rogan Experience) is not experiencing significant subscriber losses overall. It remains one of the most dominant podcasts globally, though there have been some short-term fluctuations in monthly downloads/views tied to political events.

California Governor Gavin Newsom completely lost his waste product on Joe Rogan via his official press office X account. The trigger? A resurfaced clip where the podcast giant labeled Newsom an "f---ing con man."

The all-caps meltdown read: "JOE 'LITTLE GUY' ROGAN IS TOO CHICKEN TO HAVE ME ON HIS FAILING PODCAST BECAUSE HE KNOW I'D CRUSH HIM, SO HE TAKES CHEAP SHOTS FROM THE PEANUT GALLERY AS HE GETS RELEGATED TO IRRELEVANCY. ALL TALK, NO ACTION. I'M READY WHEN YOU ARE, 'LITTLE GUY.' OR KEEP HIDING!!!! — Governor GCN."

It was vintage Trump-style bravado from the California governor's team, aimed at a 2023 clip of Rogan chatting with Patrick Bet-David about the 2024 race.

In that old conversation, Rogan did not hold back: "Nobody wants President Newsom either. Nobody believes in that guy. That guy’s a f---ing con man. I mean, everything he did in California, from trying to mandate vaccines for kids when it was totally unnecessary to being caught out in public without a mask and lying about the fact that he was outdoors. All of it. It’s just, nobody believes in the guy. He’s just a politician, just a stone-cold, narrative-driven politician, you know, and nobody thinks he’s a real human."

Rogan has kept the heat on Newsom more recently too. After Newsom's press shop mocked an investigation into daycare fraud by posting what looked like a satirical AI-generated image of investigator Nick Shirley, Rogan called it out on his show.

"Did you see what the governor posted, what Newsom’s press office posted?" Rogan asked his guest. "They posted a photo of Nick Shirley, like a fake Nick Shirley, like a meme — like Nick Shirley peeking into windows."

Back in October, Newsom had already taken to his personal X account to whine that Rogan was too scared to book him. 

The specific clip Newsom's team was having multiple hissy-fits over featured Rogan tearing into the governor's record: "You can’t ruin a city and then go on to ruin a state and say, ‘Guys, that was just practice. Once I get in as president, I’m gonna fix it all.'"

Rogan piled on: "Like, everybody’s LEAVING. You have the highest unemployment. You have the highest homelessness. Money’s missing. You killed Hollywood. Like, Hollywood doesn’t exist anymore. It’s literally gone. You mandated vaccines for kids that didn’t need them. He did horrible s---."

California's one-party disaster under Newsom keeps delivering the receipts, and Rogan is more than happy to read them aloud. Newsom can scream "little guy" all he wants. The numbers, the exodus, and the body count of failed progressive experiments do not lie.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, please visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee for any amount--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Gavin Newsom's wife says pro-lifers are "pulling us back as a country"

Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, is attacking pro-life Christians. She has criticized pro-life Christians and evangelicals as living in an “evangelical, conservative silo” that is “pulling us back as a country.”

What's the problem, Jenny, not enough dead babies?

Meanwhile, Newsom is arguing that the term “pro-life” should be redefined to mean government-funded social programs rather than protecting unborn children from abortion.

In a 2022 interview with journalist Elex Michaelson of a local Los Angeles station, Siebel Newsom promoted her documentary “Fair Play” on gender roles in the home and praised progressives for redefining the meaning of “pro-life.”

“I appreciate that so many people, so many progressives, are leaning into redefining what pro-life is really about, and that’s what we’re doing in California,” the unelected wife of Gavin Newsom said. “You know, pro-life is about prenatal care and universal preschool and universal after-school and universal healthcare and taking care of foster kids and feeding, you know, universal meals and childcare. Like, that’s pro-life. It’s not conception.”

She went on to criticize those she described as being on the far right, which includes anyone who didn't vote Democrat, and especially not for her husband.

“They’re living in this silo, this evangelical, conservative silo that, ultimately, is just pulling us back as a country to a time and a place where we don’t deserve to be, and we’re not going to be,” she said. “Because honestly, young women and fathers of daughters are awake now, and they’re woke, and they’re not going to let us go back.”

Siebel Newsom added that she has “so much hope because of that, and obviously California has a huge responsibility to lead.”

The clip resurfaced this week and drew fresh attention online as California continues to position itself as a leader in expanding abortion access through taxpayer funding. The state is also a leader in exfiltration of its wealthier residents who refuse to allow the state to steal their money.

Last month, at a bill-signing ceremony for Senate Bill 106, which provides $90 million in one-time emergency funds to Planned Parenthood and other abortion businesses to kill more babies, Newsom scolded reporters for focusing questions on topics such as the state’s failed high-speed rail project and the governor’s planned trip to Munich rather than the legislation.

“We just find it incredulous that we have Planned Parenthood here, and women are 51% of the population,” she said. “And the majority of the questions, all of these questions, have really been about other issues. So, it’s just fascinating.”

Pro-life advocates have condemned the $90 million allocation as an effort to celebrate and subsidize abortion at a time when many Americans support greater protections for unborn children. 

Not every woman views the expansion of abortions as advancing women’s interests. Many women actually want to be a mother and see abortion as a legal right to murder the babies.

Hey guys--thanks for following Brain Flushings. Consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. It really helps me. You can even Buy Me A Coffee if you want to show your appreciation, but really, there's  no pressure.

Tweet

California Billionaires Heading for the Hills--Just Not the California Ones

The spectacle unfolding in California is both predictable and profoundly depressing: a state once synonymous with boundless opportunity and innovation, aka the Golden State, is now watching its most productive citizens flee in droves, taking with them the very wealth that has long sustained the public purse.

For years, we have observed the steady accumulation of failures under Governor Gavin Newsom and the Democratic supermajority that controls Sacramento, some ninety Democrats to a mere thirty Republicans. High taxes, rampant crime, unchecked homelessness, waves of illegal immigration, and a housing crisis that has rendered the state all but unaffordable: these are not mere policy missteps but a sustained project of self-sabotage, transforming the California dream into something closer to a cautionary tale.

The latest folly is the proposed 2026 California Billionaire Tax: a one-time levy of five percent on the net worth of individuals exceeding one billion dollars. It remains, for now, only a proposal, yet even the threat has proved sufficient to concentrate minds wonderfully.

The top one percent of earners in California already shoulder over thirty-nine percent of the state's income taxes, a figure that ought to give any rational policymaker pause. These are the engines of revenue, the reliable payers who have been sheared year after year at the state's punishing 13.3 percent top rate.

Yet now, sensing the arrival of an asset tax that would reach into illiquid holdings and accumulated fortunes, many are departing. Entrepreneur Chamath Palihapitiya captured the scale of this flight on X:

The total wealth that has left California is now $1T. We had $2T of billionaire wealth just a few weeks ago. Now, 50% of that wealth has left - taking their income tax revenue, sales tax revenue, real estate tax revenue and all their staffs (and their salaries and income taxes) with them.

The consequences are immediate and cascading. By frightening away the golden geese, the state risks exploding its already precarious budget deficit, all before the measure has even qualified for the ballot.

Palihapitiya continued: 

California billionaires were reliable tax payers - 13.3% every year. They were the sheep you could shear forever. Now California will lose this revenue source FOREVER.

Unless the initiative is withdrawn, the exodus will continue. With no rich people left, the burden will fall, as it always does in such experiments, upon the middle class.

Nor are the departures limited to anonymous fortunes. As RedState reported, the Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are scaling back their ties to the state as the proposed ballot initiative threatens to impose a one-time wealth tax on the state's richest residents, according to The New York Times. Their combined net worth approaches some five hundred and eighteen billion dollars, hardly trivial sums.

Even those who might be expected to cheer such measures have recoiled. LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman described the wealth tax as a "horrendous idea" and counterproductive." Poorly designed taxes incentivize avoidance, capital flight, and distortions that ultimately raise less revenue," he said.

The billionaires did not become so by being foolish. They recognize a punitive and unstable regime when they see one. 

If you enjoy Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, and check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free.

Governor Newsom has distanced himself from the tax, yet he cannot so easily escape responsibility. He has presided over, indeed, cultivated, an environment of relentless extraction and mismanagement. This is his ship, and he has steered it straight into the rocks. The failures are his, as are so many others that have turned California from a beacon of aspiration into a warning for the rest of the nation.

Tweet

POTUS sends 2,000 additional National Guard troops to L.A.: Newsom, Bass upset with law and order move

Los Angeles is crawling with over 4,700 military personnel, thanks to President Donald Trump’s decisive action to quell the chaos that erupted after a weekend of rioting. On Monday night, Trump sent an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, joining the 2,000 already deployed Saturday and 700 Marines dispatched Monday. 

The Washington Post confirms this beefy response, which Trump says saved L.A. from becoming a smoldering ruin.

“If I didn’t ‘SEND IN THE TROOPS’ to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. do [sic] to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,” Trump blasted on Truth Social. And he isn't wrong; L.A. was spiraling into anarchy before he stepped in and both Newsom and Bass sided with the rioters, looters, and rock-throwers.

But leave it to California’s left-wing leader governor to go after the Trump administration with a lawsuit Monday, whining that the National Guard deployment stepped on his toes. Apparently, Newsom thinks there’s no “invasion” or “rebellion” to justify federal intervention. 

Tell that to the rioters torching Waymo robotaxis and chucking rocks at cops.

Newsom’s response? Send 800 more state and local officers to “clean up President Trump’s mess.” Typical Democrat—blame Trump for fixing their failures.

L.A.’s Mayor Bass, another Karen Democrat, chimed in with her own spin: “While Washington choreographed these chaotic events, the LAPD and local law enforcement continue to effectively respond.” 

Choreographed? The only thing choreographed here is the left’s playbook of deflecting responsibility while cities burn and the riots themselves. Note the Mexican flags are all the same size with the same folds, probably from the same box, and handed out to the rioters.

The riots kicked off after federal immigration raids last week, including one at a Home Depot parking lot that nabbed suspected illegal immigrants, some with gun and drug convictions, per Fox News’ Bill Melugin. That apparently triggered the usual suspects, who took to the streets waving those Mexican flags, setting Waymo vehicles ablaze, and attacking police with rocks, cement, and fireworks. 

CBS News reports 42 arrests, with some facing charges like assault on an officer and attempted murder. Downtown L.A. is a mess, smashed T-Mobile and athletic stores, shattered glass at a Jordan Studio 23 and Adidas, and the charred remains of five Waymo robotaxis. 

Waymo’s now suspended service in the area for some reason. This is the chaos these anarchists were aiming for.

Meanwhile, the chaos is spreading. San Francisco saw 150 arrests Sunday night and two injured cops as anti-ICE riots flared up, per ABC 7. 

Newsom and Bass can keep pointing fingers, but Trump’s the one keeping California from descending into total lawlessness.

At least this time, Bass didn't go to Africa.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Far-left fertility clinic bomber had crazy "anti-pro-life manifesto"

Buckle up, folks—Palm Springs, California, just got rocked by a car bomb outside a fertility clinic, and the feds are pointing fingers at a 25-year-old with a chip on his shoulder and a manifesto to match. This ain’t your average Saturday night.

 
The suspect? Guy Edward Bartkus, a Twentynine Palms local, now presumed dead in the fiery explosion that lit up the parking lot of American Reproductive Centers (ARC). U.S. Attorney BiIVF,ll Essayli didn’t mince words in his X post Sunday, laying it out: “Bartkus is believed to be the individual who is deceased at the scene. Investigators are working to positively identify the remains. An anti pro-life manifesto believed to be authored by the suspect has been located and is being examined by the FBI.”

 

 

Essayli added, “We are happy to report that no embryos at the IVF center were damaged by the explosion. This case is being treated as an intentional act of domestic terrorism. The investigation is ongoing.” Yeah, you read that right—domestic terrorism.

 
The blast went off Saturday, turning a silver Ford Fusion (plate 8HWS848, if you’re keeping score) into a fireball. The ARC clinic and its IVF lab took a beating—think “extensive damage,” per The Los Angeles Times, with windows shattered blocks away. Miraculously, ARC says all eggs, embryos, and reproductive materials are “fully secure and undamaged.” No staff were hurt, though a few folks caught some shrapnel.
The FBI’s Los Angeles crew jumped in, dropping Bartkus’s name and a photo of the guy on X, begging for tips: “Please call 1800 CALLFBI with information or upload relevant video/images at https://t.co/CnxyRN1YIv.” They even raided a spot in Twentynine Palms, sniffing out connections to the explosion.

 

Akil Davis, the FBI’s L.A. honcho, got real at a presser: Bartkus “had nihilistic ideations and this was a targeted attack.” Oh, and get this—the guy was apparently trying to livestream his handiwork. “We believe he was attempting to livestream it and, yes, that is also part of our investigation,” Davis said. Twisted, right?

 
ARC’s not backing down, posting on Facebook that they’ll be “fully operational on Monday morning” and thanking the Palm Springs cops, firefighters, and community for having their back. “We appreciate the incredible support from our patients and local community, as well as the swift action of Palm Springs Police, Fire, and emergency responders,” they said.

 
Feds say there’s no ongoing threat, even with some locals evacuated. But a manifesto-toting nihilist blowing up a fertility clinic? That’s a wake-up call. Stay sharp, people.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Guess what Trump is doing to deal with the "dregs of society"

Alright, folks, strap in—Donald Trump’s got a wild plan to dust off the rusty gates of Alcatraz and turn it into a hardcore slammer for America’s worst criminals. 

Yes, the iconic prison island in San Francisco Bay, left to rot since the ‘60s, is getting a Trump-sized makeover. Why? Because after four years of what he calls “pro-crime Democrat policies,” the Don’s had enough of the chaos and wants to lock up the bad guys where they can’t cause trouble. 

Tourists might have to share the ferry with some serious law enforcement vibes now.

Trump dropped this bombshell on Monday, and it’s classic Trump—big, bold, and in-your-face. Alcatraz, once a fortress for the likes of Al Capone, is about to become a high-security home for “criminal illegal aliens” and “dangerous domestic criminals.” 

He’s not mincing words either: “REBUILD, AND OPEN ALCATRAZ! For too long, America has been plagued by vicious, violent, and repeat Criminal Offenders, the dregs of society, who will never contribute anything other than Misery and Suffering.” 

Ouch. That’s Trump painting a picture of a country fed up with robbers, rapists, and killers who, in his view, Democrats have been coddling like wayward pets.

Check out his post on X for the full fire: “REBUILD, AND OPEN ALCATRAZ! For too long, America has been plagued by vicious, violent, and repeat Criminal Offenders, the dregs of society, who will never contribute anything other than Misery and Suffering. When we were a more serious Nation, in times past, we did not hesitate…” You can almost hear him shouting it from a podium, right?

Trump’s leaning hard into nostalgia here, waxing poetic about a tougher, no-nonsense America: “When we were a more serious Nation, in times past, we did not hesitate to lock up the most dangerous criminals, and keep them far away from anyone they could harm. That’s the way it’s supposed to be. No longer will we tolerate these Serial Offenders who spread filth, bloodshed, and mayhem on our streets.” 

It’s like he’s channeling a black-and-white crime flick, and he’s the sheriff cleaning up Dodge.

So, what’s the plan? 

Trump’s ordering the Bureau of Prisons, DOJ, FBI, and Homeland Security to team up and rebuild Alcatraz into a fortress for “America’s most ruthless and violent Offenders.” His words, not mine: “And that is why, today, I am directing the Bureau of Prisons, together with the Department of Justice, FBI, and Homeland Security, to reopen a substantially enlarged and rebuilt ALCATRAZ, to house America’s most ruthless and violent Offenders. We will no longer be held hostage to criminals, thugs, and Judges that are afraid to do their job and allow us to remove criminals, who came into our Country illegally.” 

Boom. He’s not just reopening a prison; he’s making it a symbol of his whole “Law, Order, and JUSTICE” shtick. And, of course, he caps it off with the inevitable: “We will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Now, let’s talk context, because this isn’t just Trump throwing darts at a map. He’s in a cage match with Democrat judges who, according to him, keep throwing wrenches into his crime-fighting plans. Take U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, who last week tried to muddy the waters on federal immigration laws that let authorities nab illegal aliens without warrants. Trump’s team says, “Nope, we’re doing it anyway,” and now they’re eyeing Alcatraz as the ultimate flex—lock ‘em up, ship ‘em out, and let the island do the rest.

Look, whether you’re cheering or clutching your pearls like some silly Democrat, this is Trump doing Trump. He’s betting that Americans are sick of crime and ready for a throwback to the days when the worst of the worst got sent to the Rock. Will it actually happen? Will Alcatraz 2.0 become the ultimate deterrent? Or is this just another headline-grabbing stunt? 

Stay tuned, because if Trump’s involved, it’s gonna be a loud ride either way.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call. 

Tweet

Newsom backpedals about nearly freed illegal alien drunk driver

Listen up, because this one’s a gut-punch that’ll make your blood boil. A twice-deported illegal alien, some lowlife named Oscar Eduardo Ortega-Anguiano, got behind the wheel, blitzed out of his mind, and snuffed out two young lives in a fiery crash. Now, California’s ready to cut this scumcrumpet loose after serving barely a third of his measly ten-year sentence. 

You heard that right—six years early, like he’s getting a gold star for good behavior instead of a life sentence for manslaughter.

This Mexican national, who clearly thinks borders are just suggestions, slammed into Anya Varfolomeev and Nicholay Osokin’s car in Orange County back in November 2021. He was drunk, high, and tearing down the road at nearly 100 miles an hour. The impact turned the young couple’s car into a death trap, leaving them to burn alive. 

Two teens, full of promise, reduced to ashes because this guy couldn’t stay out of the country or off the bottle.

And yet, the state thought, “Hey, let’s give this guy a early parole present.” The family got a cold, bureaucratic heads-up that Ortega-Anguiano was about to stroll out of prison, probably with a pat on the back and a bus ticket. 

Anya’s father, Anatoly Varfolomeev, isn’t having it. “It’s disgusting,” he fumed. “You have two young, unbelievable future, productive American citizens killed for nothing and that illegal immigrant who already has been deported twice is going to be released again? For what? If even he is deported, he will come back.” 

You can feel the man’s heart breaking through every word. He’s not wrong—this guy’s a boomerang of bad decisions.

The public, thank G-d, lost their collective minds over this travesty, and it finally got some traction. 

ICE slapped an immigration detainer on this loser, and after the backlash hit fever pitch, Governor Gavin Newsom’s team decided to pretend they care. “After being deported in 2013, the guy unlawfully re-entered the US & committed heinous crimes,” their press office posted on X, all high and mighty. “CDCR will again coordinate with ICE — as they have w/ 10,000+ inmates — to transfer him before release.”

Wow, Gavin, such leadership. Maybe next time don’t wait for the pitchforks.

But wait, there’s more! The DOJ’s stepping up to slap new federal charges on Ortega-Anguiano for sneaking back into the country after his deportations. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli’s not playing around. 

“My office has filed a felony immigration charge against this defendant. He faces up to 20 years in federal prison if convicted for 8 USC 1326,” he wrote on X. “If the State of California will not seek the full measure of justice against this individual, the [Department of Justice] will.” 

Translation: California’s dropping the ball, so the feds are picking it up.

Attorney General Pam Bondi is just as fed up. “This is absolutely unconscionable. What about Justice for these teens? What about the rights of their parents?” she blasted on X, promising the DOJ “will work with ICE to make sure this illegal alien receives full punishment for his crimes.” 

Good. Because letting this guy walk after what he did isn’t just a slap in the face—it’s a middle finger to every law-abiding citizen.

So here we are, two kids are dead, their families are shattered, and the system’s still trying to coddle the guy who did it. If this doesn’t light a fire under you, check your pulse. Justice better come down like a hammer, or we’re all just screaming into the void.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

USDA Investigating CA for gener mutilation of kids and hiding gender identity

The US Department of Agriculture is working with the Department of Education in an investigation of California's state law prohibiting school officials from sharing a child's "gender identity" with parents, The Daily Wire reported exclusively.

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins informed California Governor Gavin Newsom of the move in a letter sent Thursday evening, the outlet reported.

“This is to inform you that, at the direction of President Donald J. Trump, the United States Department of Agriculture is undertaking a review of its research and other education-related funding in California for compliance with the Constitution, federal laws including Titles VI and IX, and the priorities of the Trump Administration,” Rollins wrote.

Rollina tols Newsom that her department will work with other agencies to ensure the sate is in compliance with the U.S. Constitution, federal laws (including Titles VI and IX), as well as the administration's priorities.

The USDA is supporting the DOE’s investigation into the California Department of Education for violations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

“As the ED reported today, FERPA gives parents the right to access their children’s education records, but the California Department of Education has allegedly abdicated the responsibilities FERPA imposes, due to a new California state law that prohibits school personnel from disclosing records about a child’s ‘gender identity’ to that child’s parent,” Rollins wrote.

Why it's almost as if the state of California wants to be the 'parent' that raises California's children.

“USDA will support ED’s investigation and efforts to vigorously protect parents’ rights and ensure that students do not fall victim to a radical transgender ideology that often leads to family alienation and irreversible medical interventions,” she added, adding: “Similarly, we will be reviewing our federal funding with respect to other related matters under investigation.”

The move comes almost immediately after the Education Department’s Student Privacy Policy Office announced an investigation into the California Department of Education (CDE) for “alleged violations” of FERPA, which “gives parents the right to access their children’s educational data.”

C'mon--what gives parents the right to know what's going on in their child's life? Who do they think they are anyway . . . teachers?

The Education Department said Thursday that CDE has “abdicated the responsibilities FERPA imposes” due to California’s law prohibiting school officials from sharing information about a child’s supposed “gender identity” with parents. 

In a release, the department said that it has reason to believe that numerous local educational agencies in California may be violating FERPA as they socially transition kids in school and hide their activities from parents. While this doesn't constitute the death penalty, it should result in a serious period of incarceration.

Given the number of local educational agencies involved, the Education Department said, it is concerned that CDE is playing a role in the “widespread adoption of these practices.”

“Teachers and school counselors should not be in the business of advising minors entrusted to their care on consequential decisions about their sexual identity and mental health. That responsibility and privilege lies with a parent or trusted loved one,” Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement on Thursday. “It is not only immoral but also potentially in contradiction with federal law for California schools to hide crucial information about a student’s wellbeing from parents and guardians.”

“The agency launched today’s investigation to vigorously protect parents’ rights and ensure that students do not fall victim to a radical transgender ideology that often leads to family alienation and irreversible medical interventions,” she added.

California schemin' on such a pleasant day.

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

LA Mayor walks back paying wildfire czar $500K for 90 days for recovery ideas regarding LA wildfires

Imagine getting paid $5,556 per day for 90 days to consult on how to recover from the wildfires that plagued Los Angeles since last month. Half a million dollars for 90 days of work.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Steve Soboroff, would be paid the money over the course of three months working as LA's "chief recovery officer." After all, Steve is a real estate developer and civic official and does not in any way stand to monetarily benefit over rebuilding efforts of the city, beyond the paychecks he would have received advising on the plans. And if you believe that, you might also believe that one day the skies will be darkened with the flight of chickens heading north.

Soboroff's money was supposed to come from charity organizations [perhaps like USAID], but Democrat LA Mayor Karen Bass who initially chose him for the job on January 17, walked it all back by Saturday night, saying that Soboroff would now do the work for free. Now that gives credence to the notion that he still has something to gain--remember, he's a real estate developer. I don't know, of course, if it's true, but would you honestly be surprised if he stood to gain something 'under the proverbial table'?

"Steve is always there for LA. I spoke to him today and asked him to modify his agreement and work for free. He said yes," Bass said, according to the Times. "We agree that we don’t need anything distracting from the recovery work we’re doing."

Another real estate executive, Randy Johnson, was supposed to be paid $250,000 from charity groups but even he is willing to do the work for free, Bass said.

Real estate executive, eh?

Regarding Johnson, Bass said she was "grateful for his generosity and expertise," but the mayor's office declined to name the charity organizations or clarify how the funding was raised, according to the Times.

Los Angeles City Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez, a member of the five-person committee tasked with recovery, told the LA Times it was "infuriating" that philanthropic groups would pay two people $750,000, calling the amount "obscene."

"He’s getting paid $500,000 for 3 months of work?" President Donald Trump's envoy for special missions, Ric Grenell, posted on X about Soboroff. "And they call this a charity. Gross. Offensive."

Grenell, who was seated next to Trump during a round table discussion in the Pacific Palisades last month, added: "I’m getting paid $0 – as are many people. It’s a good thing there will be strings on the Federal money for California."

Steve Danton, who resides in a temporary apartment in Marina del Rey after his home was destroyed in the Palisades Fire, said Soboroff’s compensation is a "money grab," adding that the city is experiencing a "crisis of leadership."

Larry Vein, a Pacific Palisades resident whose home suffered smoke damage, condemned Soboroff's reported $500,000 compensation, saying no one should handle recovery efforts for "financial gain."

Tweet

Joe and Kamala hold wildfire briefing and it sucked

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris tried to act like leaders on Monday by talking about the horrific wildfires in California. But pretending to lead can often go wrong, and that's what happened when the clown show came to town.

While sitting at the famous Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, Biden focused on his prepared speech. He talked, almost mumbling, about giving the victims a cough, "one-time payment of $770." It wasn't clear how that amount of money was supposed to help the situation. Perhaps it could pay for a few nights at a Motel 6 where they would leave the lights on, or for those who plan to rebuild their next home from scratch, it might pay for a window [without the labor cost]. 

BIDEN: "People impacted by these fires are gonna receive one-time payment of $770. One-time payment." pic.twitter.com/9E7Toj5BEo— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 14, 2025

Giving away a one-time payment of $770 is a cruel joke to anyone who lost their home in the wildfires. If in December the Biden administration could hand out $3,400,000,000 to Ukrainian bureaucrats and teachers who live in the safe part of Ukraine, not for the war effort, why do they rate more than Californians?

Taxpayers are obligated to finance the salaries of officials from another country, yet American disaster victims receive a mere $770 after losing everything. This is an absurd distortion of priorities, one that the public can no longer ignore.

"If anyone is still confused as to why Donald Trump won the 2024 election, this is one of the reasons why," critics argue. Democrats have shown care and empathy, albeit with taxpayers' money, to everyone except the citizens they are supposed to represent and protect. This critique is not about questioning Ukraine's right to defend itself, which it undeniably has; rather, it's about Americans consistently receiving less while they foot the bill.

Kamala Harris' speech was equally unhelpful. Instead of providing concrete assistance to those in need, the twice-failed presidential candidate resorted to a confusing monologue, urging victims to be "patient."

Kamala to wildfire victims: "It's critically important that, to the extent you can find anything that gives you an ability to be patient in this extremely dangerous and unprecedented crisis, that you do." pic.twitter.com/zjV2KVxr8u— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 14, 2025

Yes, another Kamala Harris word salad. She offers nothing in her cosplaying as Vice President. Asking the wildfire victims who lost their homes and are getting a whopping $750 should be told to be "patient" while she sits in front of the camera in the Oval Office.

At least the briefing ended somewhat quickly when our alleged President made faces at members of the press causing his handlers to yell at them to leave the room.

It's as if this clown show doesn't know that 25 people are dead and many remain unaccounted for. Oh, but he just became a great grandfather in the midst of this disaster, because everything is always about him.

The good news is that he and Harris will be out of office in five days and an actual competent president will take over. Let us hope and pray that he remains safe.

Tweet

DEI FEMA Director claims Calif. was "very prepared" for fires.

Failed FEMA Administrator Deanna Criswell, was interviewed on CBS News by Margaret Brennan over the weekend. Brennan asked Criswell "why the area was so unprepared" for the fires, to which she said that in Southern California officials "were very prepared" for the fires, "I think they were very prepared," because that is the type of answer a D.E.I. hire who is thoroughly incompetent for this job would give to cover their butt. 

Criswell also claimed that it was difficult for firefighters to reach the fires due to the fact that they were in "such a populated area."

But the areas are well known to have high winds and as this is being written there are gusts of winds blowing between 60 - 70 miles per hour in one area. They knew this and they knew the areas involved in fire were highly populated. 

But California didn't have enough water, nor enough firefighters to fight the fire, but Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass refused help when the New York Fire Department offered it.

The Palisades fires at this time destroyed 23,713 acres and Eaton area lost 14, 117 acres--these are biblical proportions compared to prior wildfires. None of these fires, now and in previous years, is a surprise; it's an ongoing phenomenon as are the Santa Ana winds. Twenty-four people have been confirmed dead.

No rain is forecasted for the week so Los Angeles remains dry.

Where is Kamala Harris?

Tweet

Bombshell Memo Spells Disaster for Karen Bass Amid California Wildfires

We have witnessed the absolute ineptness and crazy priorities of woke leaders throughout Los Angeles County as wildfires rage, destroying billions of dollars of property belonging to the people who mostly voted for the fools they put in power. The failures of the Left have become so obvious that even the die-hard leftists are eating their own, especially after being personally affected.

The spotlight has been focused on Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass lately, with good reason. First off, for some reason, she was in Ghana when the wildfires started, which is kind of a big deal because she had promised not to travel internationally while in office and attack Florida Governor Ron DeSantis The way it looked was bad, but the real issue goes back at least two months.

In November, LAFD LGBTQ+1 Chief Kristin Crowley sent a memo warning of severe staffing shortages and training gaps. The department was dangerously undermanned, yet the mayor’s office reportedly ignored or even buried the warning, or perhaps she just didn't bother to read the memo.

“Los Angeles fire chief Kristin Crowley warned city officials in November that her department had about half as many firefighters as it needed,” reports the Washington Free Beacon. “When deadly wildfires struck the city two months later, Mayor Karen Bass's administration pulled Crowley's memo from its website.”

The report reveals that on November 18, Crowley wrote to the city’s fire commissioners — a five-member board appointed by Bass — urging them to relay her concerns to Bass and the city council. She highlighted that the fire department’s staffing levels had remained stagnant for decades, even as the city’s population grew significantly.

"In many ways, the current staffing, deployment model, and size of the LAFD have not changed since the 1960s," Crowley, a lesbian wrote, noting that a surge in emergency calls combined with a shortage of fire stations had resulted in longer response times.

Crowley’s memo also pointed out that in 2022, 61% of the department’s firefighters failed to meet the national standard of a four-minute first response time. The National Fire Protection Association recommends a ratio of 1.51 to 1.81 firefighters per 1,000 residents for cities like Los Angeles, but according to Crowley, the city only maintains 0.91 firefighters per 1,000 people.

Two months later, historic wildfires erupted across the Los Angeles area. Since last week, 37,000 acres and more than 12,000 structures have burned, 16 people have died, and more than 150,000 are under evacuation orders.

As the catastrophe unfolded, Crowley's memo disappeared from a city website. The New York Times referenced the memo in a Thursday piece but did not link to it. The memo was available online at this link as recently as Friday. By Saturday night, however, the memo was replaced with a message stating, "404! We are sorry, but the page you requested was not found." A Google search preview includes Crowley's quote on the inadequate "size of the LAFD."

In April, Crowley requested a significant budget increase to recruit firefighters and boost wildfire suppression efforts amid expected retirements. Instead, Mayor Bass approved a budget that cut the department’s funding by $17 million compared to the previous year. Meanwhile, Crowley herself has faced criticism for prioritizing woke DEI initiatives over hiring firefighters and general preparedness.

Tweet

Homeless man with blowtorch busted for arson re: Kenneth Fire in LA

The California fire started on Thursday evening in Woodland Hills [even the name suggests a wildfire warning] and spread fast, burning about 900 acres.

Authorities are looking into one of the wildfires around Los Angeles as a possible case of arson, and they arrested a suspect on Thursday.

The suspect is said to be a homeless man [big surprise] in his 30s, according to the Daily Mail. Charles Dinsel, a senior lead officer at the LAPD, mentioned during a press conference that, "A suspect was detained over in Woodland Hills area by citizens," about 30 minutes after the fire started. He was then taken to Topanga station.

When a reporter asked if the Kenneth Fire was deliberately set, Dinsel responded, "At this time that's what we believe, yes." He described the area as a crime scene, stating, "The fire is being investigated as a crime," but he didn't go into details on how the fire was started. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed they are treating the fire as arson.

A local had called 911 to report seeing a man trying to start a fire at the 21700 block of Ybarra Road around 4:30 pm. The Washington Examiner reported that the man had a blowtorch.

Tweet

Planned Parenthood busted for selling 23-week old aborted babies to University

America's biggest baby-killer business has done it again: the got caught selling baby body parts to a university for shady research.

There are documents released under a California public records request showing that the abortion factory was selling 23-week-old aborted babies.

The documents that have been recently exposed demonstrate that Planned Parenthood, an organization that doesn't plan parenthood but ends it, has been providing the University of California, San Diego with fetal tissue from fetuses aborted in elective procedures, up to the 23-week mark, where these fetuses might have been viable outside the womb. These contracts hint at a trade where fetal material is used in research, with the possibility of gaining intellectual property rights in return.

David Daleiden from the Center for Medical Progress, among other critics, argues that these arrangements could breach laws by potentially engaging in illegal partial-birth abortions and showing racial bias in the consent process. There's been an upsurge in demands for a federal investigation, asserting that there might be a breach of regulations concerning the sale of human tissue for monetary gain.

The transactions involving the sale of aborted fetuses and their parts were detailed in agreements where UCSD was to acquire “proprietary” fetal material from Planned Parenthood. In return, Planned Parenthood would receive "valuable consideration," meaning they would own any patents or intellectual property resulting from research using this material.

This troubling revelation starts with a heavily-censored research plan that the UCSD Institutional Review Board (IRB) accepted in 2018. Specifically on page 3, it's noted that the research lab at UCSD intended to "collect tissues from fetuses with gestational ages of 4 to 23 weeks from individuals having elective abortions at Planned Parenthood in San Diego." The document also specifies that fetuses deemed "viable and nonanomalous" were included in the study. It's crucial to note that at 23 weeks, most healthy fetuses can now survive with the aid of advanced medical technology.

The IRB submission elaborates that part of the clinical data for each subject will involve “evidence of fetal heart activity by ultrasound immediately prior to the dilation and evacuation procedure.” The research project aimed to procure fetal material from as many as 2,500 patients.

In related communications at the time of the plan's creation, an individual involved in the harvesting process mentions, “[A]ny sample greater than about 12.5w[eeks] requires the use of a dilating medication which is given to the patients 3 hours ahead of their procedure (these are called “cyto” patients).” “Cyto” refers to Cytotec, or Misoprostol, which is commonly utilized in medical abortions to induce labor contractions.

Research indicates that a dose of 50 micrograms of Misoprostol can typically initiate labor within 4 hours. However, Planned Parenthood's guidelines suggest using between 400 to 800 micrograms for later-stage "dilation and evacuation" abortions, which is significantly more, and they advise against letting patients depart from the facility after receiving the medication.

“Planned Parenthood’s use of heavy doses of a labor contraction drug to dilate pregnant women targeted for a viable fetus harvesting project means these are likely not standard ‘dismemberment’ abortions, but either intact partial-birth abortions or full delivery of live preemies,” notes David Daleiden, founder and president of CMP.

Further email correspondence supports this assertion. When discussing the collection of fetal hearts, a UCSD researcher asked the harvesting lab, “Is there someone that we can coordinate with in your lab? We were unclear as to whether you bring the fetuses back to your lab for dissections or if the dissections will be done in clinic. I can have my folks who are cc’d coordinate with whomever is doing the collection.”

Documentation from earlier this year, obtained through a public records request, revealed that there were transfers of aborted fetuses from Planned Parenthood to UC San Diego facilitated by a “Biological Materials Transfer Agreement” contract. This contract, exchanged for “valuable consideration,” allows UCSD “access” to “fetal and placental tissue, which are proprietary materials of PPSD”. It stipulates that “PPSD shall retain all right, title, and interest in and to the Material, including but not limited to all right, title, and interest in patents and patent applications and other intellectual property rights relating to the Material”.

In March, Sen. Marco Rubio requested an investigation from the U.S. DOJ and HHS. The transfer of any aborted human fetal tissue for “valuable consideration” is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).

Disturbingly, the documents released today also show racial discrimination in what consent forms for the harvesting program tell pregnant women at Planned Parenthood. The English-language forms include 15 bullet-pointed disclosures, the thirteenth of which states: “I understand that the donated blood, tissue, or their derivatives may have significant therapeutic or commercial value. I consent to such uses.” However, this disclosure about the “commercial value” of the patient’s aborted baby is missing from the Spanish-language forms. The documents show UCSD’s IRB approved the racially-disparate translations in at least four consecutive years, from 2017 to 2020.

“The University of California’s documents show Planned Parenthood using labor-inducing chemical abortion drugs to deliver viable, healthy preemies with ultrasound-documented heartbeats in their taxpayer-funded abortion factories—and rather than rushing those preemies to the University hospital NICU, they cut out their hearts and other body parts to sell for patent royalty-generating experiments,” states Daleiden. “These are not just the federal crimes of partial-birth abortion and selling body parts, but also of murder for hire—disparately targeted to Spanish-speaking minorities. State and federal authorities should act to protect the civil rights of mothers and infants immediately.”

Today’s revelation comes just one day after alleged President Joe Biden gave a Presidential Medal of Freedom to former Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards, who oversaw the aborted baby part sales.

If that doesn't disgust you, I have no words.

The times they are a changing on some colleges and univesities

Pro-Palestinians supporting genocide

Accusing Israel of genocide is a sneaky way for pro-Palestinians to justify their attempts of Jewish genocide and the useful idiots of the West have bought it. Besides, they think it makes them look cool along with all the protests they attend and the kufiya shawl they wear. It has reached a point where, on college and university campuses, protests have become commonplace and students, along with non-students, have taken over the campuses and the buildings of these institutions.

However, it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas . . . or even Chanukah, as college presidents appear to have grown a spine or a pair of you-know-what, and are finally fed up with the campus disruptions as they are increasingly pushing back against rampant anti-Semitism. (Calling it anti-Zionism is just another term for the same thing, and they know it.)

Fox News recently reported about the anti-Israel protesters on campus, and how at least three colleges have warned, suspended or even expelled students for taking part in disruptive, anti-Semitic protests in the last few days.

"Any participants in today’s events… who turn out to be Pomona students, are subject to immediate suspension. Students from the other Claremont Colleges will be banned from Pomona’s campus and subject to discipline on their own campuses," Pomona College President Gabrielle Starr said in a warning to students on Friday. She gave them a ten-minute warning but they didn't believe her until the cops arrived in riot gear.

An estimated 150 useful idiots at California's Pomona College protested outside Starr’s office in a campus administrative building on Friday, before storming the building and refusing to leave over the removal of a pro-Palestinian "mock apartheid wall" on campus. No less than 20 people were arrested, which sparked Starr’s letter to the school community warning that those who took part would be suspended.

Several students reportedly used "a sickening, anti-black racial slur in addressing an administrator," according to Starr's letter, while the New York Post reported students referred to police as the "KKK." The irony that an anti-Semitic, [and some obviously anti-Black] group of protesters would label the police as KKK members should not be lost on us--these useful idiots think exactly like the KKK and are too stupid to see it.

Friday’s protest drew a large police response, and is just the latest that hit campuses since Hamas invaded Israel and slaughtered innocent civilians, including men, women, children, mothers and their babies. Pro-Hamassholes have taken over school buildings, libraries and offices and have defaced walls with graffiti, in schools across the nation. Jewish students feel threatened and believe it's "open season for Jews on our campuses."

It's finally looking like the grownups have had enough. It's time for moral clarity.

Tweet

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex may replace late Sen, Dianne Feinstein: will King Charles III replace Joe Biden?

Both Oprah Winfrey and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex are possibly being considered to replace the late Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). 

Oprah’s name is being floated according to Newsmax and The Desert Sun, but the billionaire TV host and book publishing entrepreneur had already said that she  "is not considering the seat should it become vacant," according to the Los Angeles Times.

No such rejection has been forthcoming from Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) who would be more than willing to assume any political seat that would come along.

However, since Feinstein passed at age 90 on Friday, it will be up to slick-haired Democratic Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, to appoint her successor to finish out the 13 remaining months. Newsom had stated that he will appoint an affirmative action person in the form of a black woman, and alas, Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex's [that’s in England] name came up because she, like all politicians is an actor—not a very good one, but an actor nevertheless.

Newsom has his own political agenda and would one day like to run the nation into the ground as president. And he might just be able to pull it off because voters generally are clueless as to who they pull the lever for other than the way they look, and entertain them.

If Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex should get the appointment to the U.S. Senate, she will be the first Duchess of Sussex, or duchess of anywhere to get the job.

“Meghan [the Duchess of Sussex] is definitely a long-shot but in the craziness that is US politics these days it's not an impossibility. Crazier things have happened," a major Democratic donor told the Mail. 

Other rumors swirl that imply King Charles III is hoping to replace the alleged current president of the United States, Joe Biden, or if that’s impossible due to birth restrictions that the annoying document known as the U.S. Constitution mentions, he is hoping to land a role in a Netflix series.

If you do not believe the country is in trouble, then you need to tell us your pronouns.

Tweet

Halloween kiddy drag shows spark protests and threats

It's "Dragoween" time kiddies so tell Mommy and Daddy that you want to see men dressed up as cartoonish women while they have you sit on their bony laps and tell you stories of brave cross-dressers and their pronouns.

So how are your kids going to spend their Halloween--going door-to-door trick-or-treating' as they collect candy from strangers who may or may not have included a little bit of rainbow fentanyl as a trick? Or maybe you plan taking them to a drag show for children where they can be groomed into something they are not.

These so-called 'Dragoween' shows have sparked outrage, threats and protests in some states such as Florida, California and Oregon. For some reason, parents don't want their children being sexualized by guys dressed as whores. Can you believe it?

The events are touted as being suited for all ages and include slutty performances and story hours.

This week, drag show organizers in Orlando canceled a story hour, and others in Eugene, Oregon, called police to disperse violent protests at another. 

In California, complaints have driven administrators at the Encinitas Union School District to disown a Disney villain-themed drag show occurring Saturday as part of a queer youth “Boo Bash.”

“This is adult entertainment, it’s not for children,” said Kimberly Fletcher, president of the parental rights group Moms for America. “What do these drag queens want from our children? Our kids need their innocence.”

There it is: what they want is your child's innocence--it's obvious.

Bob Witeck, president of the LGBTQYADDAYADDA+1 marketing firm Witeck Communications, says there’s no right way to advertise the events with different political groups “vying for the votes of suburban women” in next month’s midterm elections.

“Drag has been around forever, but we’re in a toxic political environment right now,” Mr. Witeck said. 

No, the toxicity was created by the LGBTQ community by pushing their agenda onto our kids, into the schools and into the libraries. It's the disinfecting sunshine of the internet on these issues that have exposed these exposers.

He claimed that drag has “always been on the risqué side, with burlesque and innuendo,” but said most drag performers keep story hours clean for children, but that's bull crap. Children are supposed to be innocent and this is an assault on their innocence.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

“It’s their way of giving back,” he claimed. “They read children’s books and might lip-sync or [dirty] dance to Disney songs.”

It's great to finally see an angry response to these grooming attempts.

Tweet