Meghan, Duchess of Sussex may replace late Sen, Dianne Feinstein: will King Charles III replace Joe Biden?

Both Oprah Winfrey and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex are possibly being considered to replace the late Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). 

Oprah’s name is being floated according to Newsmax and The Desert Sun, but the billionaire TV host and book publishing entrepreneur had already said that she  "is not considering the seat should it become vacant," according to the Los Angeles Times.

No such rejection has been forthcoming from Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) who would be more than willing to assume any political seat that would come along.

However, since Feinstein passed at age 90 on Friday, it will be up to slick-haired Democratic Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, to appoint her successor to finish out the 13 remaining months. Newsom had stated that he will appoint an affirmative action person in the form of a black woman, and alas, Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex's [that’s in England] name came up because she, like all politicians is an actor—not a very good one, but an actor nevertheless.

Newsom has his own political agenda and would one day like to run the nation into the ground as president. And he might just be able to pull it off because voters generally are clueless as to who they pull the lever for other than the way they look, and entertain them.

If Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex should get the appointment to the U.S. Senate, she will be the first Duchess of Sussex, or duchess of anywhere to get the job.

“Meghan [the Duchess of Sussex] is definitely a long-shot but in the craziness that is US politics these days it's not an impossibility. Crazier things have happened," a major Democratic donor told the Mail. 

Other rumors swirl that imply King Charles III is hoping to replace the alleged current president of the United States, Joe Biden, or if that’s impossible due to birth restrictions that the annoying document known as the U.S. Constitution mentions, he is hoping to land a role in a Netflix series.

If you do not believe the country is in trouble, then you need to tell us your pronouns.

Tweet

Markle's 2014 blog is the yin of her yang regarding Oprah interview claims

She was never the world's best actress and proved this handsomely on the interview she and her husband had with Oprah Winfrey, a friend of hers and business associate of her husband.

The Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, contradicted some of her claims, according to the New York Post.

The Duchess claimed that she never ever ever thought about what it might be like marrying a real prince and claimed she knew very little about the British Royal family and her now-husband. Duke of Sussex Prince Harry. She also said that she never even "Googled" him before the couple began dating and who knows what else.

However, Markle did acknowledge that she know of the Royal family, [lest people think she lived under a rock].

BUT, Markle evidently wrote a blog in 2014 in which she imagined about becoming a princess. She specifically mentioned the wedding of her now-brother-in-law, Duke and Duchess of Cambridge William and Kate. Markle's blog has since been deleted but unlike Hillary Clinton, she didn't BleachBit it.

Page Six reported:

“Little girls dream of being princesses. I, for one, was all about She-Ra, Princess of Power,’’ wrote the now-Duchess of Sussex in 2014, while commenting on the “pomp” surrounding Britain’s Prince William and Kate Middleton’s wedding three years earlier, according to the Sun on Sunday.

“For those of you unfamiliar with the ‘80s cartoon reference, She-Ra is the twin sister of He-Man and a sword-wielding royal rebel known for her strength,” Markle said in her since-nixed blog.

“We’re definitely not talking about Cinderella here,” said Markle, who married Prince Harry, William’s brother, in May 2018.

“Grown women seem to retain this childhood fantasy. Just look at the pomp and circumstance surrounding the royal wedding and endless conversation about Princess Kate,” Markle mused.

The above post entitled "The Tig" reportedly “accompanied an interview with Princess Alia Al-Senussi, a descendant of Libyan royalty. Meghan claimed that she had a ‘pinch-myself-I’m-emailing-with-a-princess’ moment during their correspondence,” The Sun reported.

Page Six wrote: “The 39-year-old former actress … also claimed in the explosive TV chat that she basically had no clue about the British royal family before marrying into it.”

“I went into it naively because I didn’t grow up knowing much about the royal family,” Markle lied. She also claimed that discussing the royals “wasn’t something that we followed” at home.

So it looks like Markle will forever remain a Duchess, a grade "B" actress and a liar. We peons aren't supposed to use the word "liar" because it's rude. But lying is worse than rude--it's the belief of the liar that the recipients of the lie are stupid.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet