Man Accused of Killing Former Trump Adviser's Mother Arraigned on Hate Crime Charges for Targeting Kosher Bagel Shop

Dawood Faisal, 22, [peas be up in him] was arraigned Monday on hate crime charges for twice vandalizing a kosher bagel shop in Queens that displayed Israeli flags. The incidents came days before he allegedly caused the fatal crash that killed Cara Trager, the mother of a former Trump Middle East adviser.

Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz charged Faisal with two counts of criminal mischief in the third degree as a hate crime for the May 15 and May 23 incidents at Bagels & Co. in the heavily Jewish Fresh Meadows neighborhood. 

Prosecutors say he targeted the Jewish-owned shop on Union Turnpike because of the Israeli flags and banners. On May 15 he knocked over nine metal plant stands, spilled dirt and plants onto the sidewalk, and threw dirt at the storefront twice. He returned around 1 a.m. on May 23, pushed and kicked 11 metal plant stands, emptied their contents, and uprooted plants from a large clay pot after failing to knock it over.

“As alleged, Dawood Faisal, repeatedly targeted a Fresh Meadows business specifically because it is Jewish-owned and featured Israeli flags, and destroyed property as an expression of antisemitism,” Katz said in a statement. “Bias crimes are an affront to our entire community and will not be tolerated.”

Queens Supreme Court Justice Michael Hartofilis ordered Faisal to return to court on November 12. Conviction on the hate crime charges carries up to seven years in prison.

Faisal already faces manslaughter and assault charges from the May 25 crash. Prosecutors allege he drove a Toyota Prius more than 75 mph in a 35 mph zone, ran at least two red lights, and collided with two vehicles on Francis Lewis Boulevard. One vehicle was sent into a crosswalk, striking Cara Trager, 71, and her husband Michael as they walked home from dinner. Cara suffered severe head trauma and died four days later. Michael sustained a shoulder injury, cuts to his hands, and facial bruising. Faisal pleaded not guilty to those charges after his June indictment.

The second bagel shop incident occurred just two days before the crash. Cara’s daughter, Rachel Sales, later wrote that her mother had discussed the vandalism with her shortly beforehand. The family has questioned whether authorities could have intervened after the alleged attacks and prevented the death. Officials are not treating the crash as a hate crime.

Michael Trager told The Daily Wire in August that the circumstances warrant scrutiny given the neighborhood and the timing. “My contention is that the area itself is very, very Jewish,” he said. “It’s Bukharian, it’s a Russian Jewish area, and most of the people who were eyewitnesses, the people who detained him, were Bukharian Jews.”

He described the moment of the crash. “The first thing I did was I started punching myself to say, ‘Oh, gee, I’m still alive here,’” Michael recalled. “Then I saw that my wife was dead. I couldn’t believe it happened because I didn’t do anything wrong. We were crossing the street, and next thing I know, I’m on the ground with my wife.”

Michael attended Faisal’s initial arraignment days after the crash while Cara was hospitalized and dying. “I was afraid that my wife was going to officially die when I’m at the arraignment, but I went,” he said. Faisal’s family was present. His mother repeatedly cried in the courtroom. “I’m thinking to myself, ‘What are you crying for? Are you crying for your son, or are you crying because your son killed my wife? Why are you crying?’” Michael said.

Authorities told Michael that Faisal was neither working nor attending school and was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Michael noted that an act of that nature in that area at that time made it more likely the victim would be Jewish, though he acknowledged it did not prove specific targeting. “If you’re going to do that kind of act in that area, at that time, you’re more than likely, if you’re going to kill somebody, to kill a Jew,” he said.

Cara Trager was a longtime Queens journalist active in the Jewish community. She wrote for Newsday, the New York Post, and Crain’s New York Business and produced materials for organizations including UJA-Federation of New York and the Jewish Theological Seminary.

NYPD data for July showed Jews were the targets of nearly 70% of confirmed hate crimes reported in New York City that month, despite making up roughly 10% of the city’s population.

Hey patriots! Please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Ilhan Omar demands her passport be released for some reason, as computers seized in home search by authorities

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) wants federal authorities to return the passport, computers, cellphone, and other personal belongings seized from her home during a criminal investigation. Her attorneys are also demanding recordings of the search, apparently hoping to establish that the government’s investigation is as improper as they insist it is.

On Monday, agents from the Department of Homeland Security searched Omar’s residence after obtaining a warrant approved by a federal judge. According to The Wall Street Journal, agents seized several items, including her cellphone, notebooks, personal computers, and passport.

Omar’s legal team responded Friday with a letter to the Justice Department demanding the immediate return of the property and declaring that the investigation has no legitimate foundation.

“There is no legitimate basis for any suggestion that she has violated any law concerning her citizenship status,” her attorneys wrote.

They then accused the administration of conducting a politically motivated campaign against one of President Donald Trump’s most prominent congressional critics.

“This vindictive, retributive, and politically motivated criminal investigation into one of the President’s chief congressional critics violates Representative Omar’s constitutional rights and threatens the separation of powers,” they added.

Her lawyers also objected to the timing of the search, arguing that investigators deliberately acted during the final weeks before the midterm elections, when voters will decide whether Omar deserves another term in Congress. Justice Department practice has traditionally discouraged overt investigative steps involving political candidates during the roughly 60 days before an election, a guideline Omar’s attorneys contend the department violated.

In other words, Omar’s legal team would prefer that investigators exercise restraint during election season, particularly when their investigation happens to involve Omar.

The Justice Department, meanwhile, offered a less dramatic assessment of its conduct.

“Our attorneys and law enforcement partners complied with all court orders and legal obligations, as they always do,” department spokesperson Emily Covington told ABC News.

Omar’s attorneys also requested copies of any audio and video recordings made inside her home during the search. Whether those recordings will be released remains unclear.

The precise scope of the investigation has not been made public. However, The Daily Wire outlined five possible areas of criminal scrutiny on Wednesday, including questions involving immigration status, citizenship, financial disclosures, and potential conflicts of interest.

One possibility concerns whether Omar’s father committed immigration fraud while seeking refugee status, an allegation that could raise additional questions about her own citizenship, depending on the facts and applicable law. Another involves questions about when her father became a citizen and whether Omar was under 18 at the time.

Neither possibility has been established as a finding of wrongdoing, and the investigation’s actual focus remains unknown.

Other questions involve Omar’s husband, Tim Mynett, and allegations that he used his wife’s congressional position to benefit his firm’s African clients through legislation. Questions have also been raised about the couple’s business interests and financial disclosures.

The couple’s reported finances have attracted attention in their own right. A 2025 filing valued their assets at as much as $30 million, largely attributable to Mynett’s business interests. An amended filing earlier this year, however, reported a net worth of approximately $18,000 to $95,000 and listed Mynett’s businesses as having no value after liabilities.

Those sharply different figures raise questions that may warrant explanation. They do not, by themselves, establish criminal conduct.

Omar, for her part, has framed the investigation as another chapter in her long-running battle with Trump and his administration.

On Thursday, she thanked supporters and constituents who have continued to stand by her.

“Thank you to everyone who stood with me over the years,” she said. “It’s been a scary journey but I have always been grounded in my work and ability to provide exemplary service to my constituents. Trump and his administration have been after me since I arrived in Congress. I have always stood up to him and that will never change. The pedophile protector will never silence me.”

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Daily Wire’s request for comment.

For now, Omar wants her belongings back, her attorneys want the search recordings, and the congresswoman insists the investigation is politically motivated. Federal authorities, meanwhile, have yet to publicly explain what they are investigating or what evidence prompted the search.

That leaves a straightforward question hanging over the controversy: What, exactly, are investigators looking for, and what will the evidence ultimately show?

Hey patriots! Please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

Tweet

Deported Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Returns To U.S., Steals Audi, Gets Drunk, Drives Wrong Way, Kills Young Dad

DUNCANVILLE, TX, In what immigration officials apparently call the "we'll see you again soon" program, a previously deported illegal immigrant is accused of killing a young father while allegedly driving drunk in a stolen Audi the wrong way down a North Texas highway.

Alexander Nunez, 26, allegedly slammed into a vehicle carrying 29-year-old Kenan Ellis and two of his cousins shortly before midnight on September 3 on Highway 67 in Duncanville.

Ellis had recently celebrated his 29th birthday.

Unfortunately, the celebration was followed by what authorities say was an encounter with a previously deported illegal immigrant who had apparently managed to make his way back into the country, acquire access to a stolen luxury automobile, get intoxicated, and drive it directly into oncoming traffic.

Ellis was returning home from a music video shoot for popular rapper BigXThaPlug when the crash occurred, his uncle, Xavier Hicks, told conservative media outlet The Daily Wire. Hicks said the rapper was driving close behind.

Ellis leaves behind a 7-year-old son and a 5-year-old daughter.

Federal authorities had previously deported Nunez, a Department of Homeland Security spokesman told The Daily Wire. Nunez later illegally re-entered the United States without being encountered at the border.

Apparently, "You have been deported" is now less of a legal order and more of a customer loyalty program.

Nunez faces charges of intoxication assault, intoxication manslaughter, and unauthorized use of a vehicle. He is being held in the Dallas County Jail on a $110,000 bond.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement also lodged a detainer, asking local authorities to transfer Nunez to federal custody if they release him.

In other words, the federal government would very much like to have another opportunity to deport the man it already deported.

“Under President Trump and Secretary Mullin, if you break the law, you will face the consequences. Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the U.S.,” the DHS spokesperson said.

When Hicks learned that Nunez had previously been deported, his reaction was understandably brief.

“Wow.”

There are moments when the English language simply runs out of words.

“Honestly and truthfully, that’s unfortunate. But my faith keeps telling me that it was God’s timing,” Hicks said.

“I hold no malice in my heart for Alexander Nunez,” he added.

That is an extraordinary amount of grace from a man whose family has just been devastated.

Ellis’ cousins were left with multiple broken bones, while one is expected to be in a wheelchair for several months, according to Fox 4. Both are expected to recover.

The three men were roughly five minutes from home when the crash occurred.

Five minutes.

They were close enough to home that the tragedy almost certainly began with thoughts about getting through the front door, taking off their shoes and going to bed.

Instead, one man never made it home.

Authorities determined that Nunez was intoxicated after he failed field sobriety tests, Fox 4 reported.

Ellis’ sister, Siniya Allen, described her late brother as “a great dad,” “an amazing brother,” and “an amazing son.”

“He was there for all his friends. He was just a great person,” she told Fox 4.

Ellis is survived by his 7-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter.

Allen said Nunez’s alleged actions left her family with an overwhelming loss.

“He took something important from us. I lost a brother. My mom lost a son. I have another brother. He lost his sibling. His kids have to grow up without a dad. No kid should have to do that at the expense of somebody else’s actions,” Siniya said.

She is right.

No child should have to grow up without a father because someone allegedly decided that drinking, stealing a car and driving the wrong way down a highway was a perfectly reasonable evening itinerary.

And perhaps the most maddening detail is that this did not involve some mysterious individual who had never crossed the government's radar.

Authorities had already found him.

They had already deported him.

He came back.

Now a young father is dead, two families are dealing with serious injuries, and two children are growing up without their dad.

But at least the government has apparently discovered a bold new immigration policy:

Deport them and hope they don't notice the border is still there.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Karmelo Anthony Apparently Wanted the Internet to Keep Receipts

Convicted killer and homophobe Karmelo Anthony apparently spent months assembling what can only be described as a digital scrapbook of crappy decisions, posing with guns, ranting about other black people, and accusing gay people of “f—king everything up” before fatally stabbing Austin Metcalf at a Texas high school track meet.

A newly uncovered 75-page document dump reportedly reveals a disturbing collection of texts between Anthony and his then-girlfriend, offering a glimpse into a teenager whose apparent solution to increasingly serious problems was to create even more serious problems because he's not so bright.

The Daily Mail first reported images of Anthony flashing a handgun in a November 2024 video, just months before he fatally stabbed Metcalf in the heart at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, in April 2025. 

Another image from May 2024 shows Anthony holding an AK-47-style rifle alongside three other teenagers. A third video reportedly shows Anthony aiming a gun at an unknown residence before running away on Jan. 4, 2025.

Apparently, this was not exactly the sort of wholesome extracurricular activity schools like to highlight in their yearbooks.

And because one apparently needs more evidence that Anthony had a serious problem with judgment, the newly uncovered texts reportedly show him directing profanity-laced hatred toward members of his own community.

A week before the killing, Anthony reportedly sent several messages to his girlfriend, Valeria Perez, expressing his deep disdain for other black people.

“I f—king despise Black b*tches,” he said, according to a screenshot.

“F—king n—ers,” he wrote, according to the documents. “They need to go die.” 

Anthony apparently wasn't finished offending people. In a June 2021 text to a friend, he reportedly turned his attention toward gay people.

“These f—king gay people are f—king everything up,” he wrote.

He also reportedly said he hated then-President Joe Biden because he’s “Gay ASB [as balls],” according to the New York Post.

It turns out the internet's permanent memory is not always your friend.

The dossier also contains allegations of criminal behavior unrelated to the stabbing. In an October 2024 text, Anthony reportedly told his girlfriend he “might gt [go to] jail” after claiming he had broken into a neighbor’s home and stolen a watch.

He also allegedly bragged about bringing a gun and knife to school.

Because apparently the concept of leaving the weapons at home was not sufficiently exciting.

The evidence never made it to trial and was not presented to the jury, despite offering prosecutors additional allegations about Anthony's behavior before the killing.

In August, a Texas judge rejected Anthony’s long-shot request for a new murder trial, dealing another setback to his appellate team, which had alleged several errors during the proceedings. The Collin County District Attorney’s Office has maintained that prosecutors acted ethically throughout the trial, The Daily Wire previously reported.

Evidence presented at trial showed that Anthony refused to leave another team's tented area and, when confronted by the unarmed Metcalf, stabbed him directly in the heart.

A Texas jury rejected Anthony’s self-defense claim and sentenced him to 35 years in prison.

The case quickly became a national controversy, fueled in part by the narrative promoted by Anthony's family and what critics described as a striking lack of interest from legacy media outlets that have historically devoted enormous attention to incidents involving race.

The trial began June 1 with jury selection and concluded just nine days later.

Anthony broke down in tears and visibly shook as the verdict was read. He became emotional again when the judge announced his 35-year sentence.

When Metcalf’s family delivered victim impact statements, Anthony reportedly kept his head down and refused to look them in the eyes, even after being asked to do so.

Jeff Metcalf, Austin's father, wasn't interested in excuses.

“You can’t even look me in the eyes right now, but you can stab my f*cking son,” he said.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Illegal alien who murdered restaurant owner gets to spend serious time in the Iron Bar Hotel

An illegal alien will spend 20 years in prison after admitting to murdering a beloved Nashville restaurant owner in what open borders enthusiasts are calling a beautiful tapestry of cultural enrichment gone slightly awry.

Ulises Martinez, a 26 year old illegal alien from Mexico, pleaded guilty on Wednesday to second degree murder after he slammed his truck into 42 year old Matt Carney during an attempted robbery two years ago. The case drew national attention as President Donald Trump pointed to it as an example of a migrant crime wave during his 2024 presidential campaign, somehow managing to notice the pattern while the rest of the media was busy blaming climate change.

The incident took place on June 19, 2024, outside of Smokin Thighs, a popular Nashville chicken restaurant owned and operated by Carney that began as a food truck.

Carney was locking up his restaurant when he walked outside to find two men stealing tools from his truck. After Carney confronted them, the men, both illegal immigrants, rammed into him with their truck, throwing him onto the sidewalk, before taking off in a spontaneous celebration of diversity. Olivia Lehing, who witnessed the scene, said she was driving when she saw a truck send a body “into the air” and then drive “very fast” away from the scene.

Carney died from injuries sustained during the incident several weeks later. Martinez was on the run for several weeks before he was arrested on July 18, hiding out in a Nashville motel while no doubt planning his next contribution to the local economy.

Smokin Thighs closed down in October 2024 after almost ten years in business. “Places like this do not just exist everywhere and in every neighborhood,” former Smokin Thighs manager Landon Allen told The Tennessean. “When he was taken from us, it all died with him.”

In addition to the murder charge, Martinez pleaded guilty to evidence tampering and two counts of theft. Martinez, who required an interpreter throughout the proceedings, is expected to be deported after serving the 20 year sentence assuming the country still has borders by then.

Carney’s widow reportedly supported the plea deal in a display of the kind of grace rarely extended to law abiding Americans.

Martinez’s immigration status was first reported by conservative media outlet, The Daily Wire, with ICE saying that he unlawfully entered the country at an unknown date and location.

The other scumcrumpet in the vehicle with Martinez, was 31 year old Adrian Diaz-Aguirre. He had previous criminal convictions and has been deported four times, proving once again that the third time is not always the charm.

Just months before Carney’s murder, a Nashville judge let Martinez go free after he was accused of stealing a white van, a red truck, and tools from a white truck, proving that even judges with all that schooling, can be a dumb as a rock.

Nashville Judge Jim Todd dismissed all three charges during a preliminary hearing in March 2024, claiming police had failed to show probable cause in what progressive legal scholars are calling a courageous defense of the right to steal vehicles without interruption. Great move, judge.

Trump discussed the incident during an August campaign rally in Montana. “Look at what’s happening to our cities. Our cities are being overrun,” Trump said. “On July 4th, a 42-year-old Nashville man died after he tried to stop an illegal alien from stealing tools out of his truck. The illegal alien did a number on this man that nobody could even believe. The police officers said [it was] one of the most vicious crimes they’ve ever seen.”

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Massive Influx Of Transgender Refugees Is Causing ‘Civil Emergency’ In Leftist City That Apparently Has Infinite Taxpayer Money And Zero Common Sense

Seattle, that rain-soaked progressive Disneyland where the tents have better real estate than the condos and the only thing growing faster than the crime rate is the virtue-signaling, now finds itself choking on its own rainbow-flavored utopia.The latest crisis? Too many refugees from those awful, backward red states: Texas, Florida, Tennessee, places that still harbor the primitive notion that you shouldn’t pump confused teenagers full of hormones and carve them up like Thanksgiving turkeys.

These desperate souls are flooding into Seattle looking for free housing, free validation, and the sacred right to have the government pay for their delusions. And the city’s own LGBTQ Commission is in full panic mode, pen in one hand and begging bowl in the other.In a May 2026 letter to Mayor Katie Wilson, they formally requested she declare a civil emergency, yes, a civil emergency because of the “rapid influx” of transgender and gender-nonconforming arrivals.

These poor “internally displaced persons” need cash, shelter, and an entire underground railroad of nonprofits to keep the dream alive.

The letter spells it out with the usual bureaucratic poetry: these folks are fleeing “anti-trans legislation, threats to personal safety, and barriers to healthcare.” Translation: states that passed laws protecting minors from irreversible medical experiments dared to say no, and now the true believers are stampeding toward the Pacific Northwest like it’s the new Promised Land.

One of the groups on the front lines is Traction, whose executive director, C. Michael Woodward, a man who transitioned decades ago and has been in the advocacy game nearly as long, told conservative outlet The Daily Wire they’ve had over 1,600 applicants since Trump’s election but could only help about 130.

Even the veterans of this movement sound stunned. “I never once imagined we’d be doing this kind of work,” Woodward said. Indeed. When the revolution starts eating its own cities, the script has officially gone off the rails.

At a city council meeting, social worker and commission co-chair Kody Allen painted the picture: his homeless shelter, the biggest in town, is turning away at least ten young adults a night, many of them “trans refugees.” The queer health clinics are running out of money. The whole glorious experiment is straining at the seams. Council members vowed to stand firm, build trans-specific shelters, and create interdepartmental teams for long-term “infrastructure.”

Because what Seattle really needs, amid its existing tent cities and open-air drug markets, is more of the exact same demographic bringing the exact same problems.

Meanwhile, Washington State has positioned itself as a gleaming sanctuary. SB 5599 lets shelters hide runaway minors seeking “gender-affirming care” without bothering to tell the parents.

The Supreme Court is now hearing the challenge, with red states warning that this could turn the country into a parental rights demolition derby. But in Seattle, the message is clear: come one, come all. Your confusion is our sacred mission. Your family’s heartbreak? Somebody else’s problem.

This is the progressive masterstroke in all its glory. A city already drowning in chaos looks at the red states that said “maybe don’t chemically castrate kids” and decides the solution is to import the chaos wholesale. More bodies, more trauma, more demands on a system already collapsing under the weight of its own ideology.What could possibly go wrong? Well, everything, of course. But in Seattle, that’s just another day in paradise.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Incarcerated women launch huge lawsuit against prison system after being terrorized by trans "woman"

Incarcerated women are suing a state prison system that allows violent transgender women to be housed in female prisons.

The Washington Department of Corrections (DOC) gives violent transgender female convicts full access to women’s prisons, including cells, bathrooms, and showers. The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) argues these actions are discriminatory and unsafe. By forcing women to share a prison with violent transgender females, Washington DOC is violating the fundamental constitutional rights of women to be safe while incarcerated, according to a lawsuit filed on April 27.

“Washington’s housing policy subjects women to cruel and unusual punishment by disregarding the biological differences that justify sex-separated facilities in the first place,” Leigh Ann O’Neill, an AFPI attorney representing the plaintiffs, told conservative outlet, The Daily Wire. “I am proud to support this action on behalf of the female inmates.”

The lawsuit highlights public data showing that over 50% of males in federal prisons who self-identified as transgender between May 2024 and January 2025 were sex offenders. Placing transgender female sex offenders in women’s prisons has resulted in physical and sexual assaults against women.

“The housing of these male inmates with females, including as bunkmates in the same cell, has led to multiple instances of violence and sexual abuse against the female inmates, persistent harassment, and the routine intimidation of female inmates in violation of their fundamental constitutional rights to serve their sentences in safety and without further punishment,” states the lawsuit. “[Washington] DOC’s Transgender Inmate Policy exposes female inmates to a population statistically more likely of having committed a sexual offense, and only females can become pregnant as a result of these offenses.”

The plaintiffs, the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism, Inc., and Faith Booher-Smith, are suing the Washington DOC and Tim Lang in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Corrections.

Booher-Smith, an incarcerated woman housed at Washington Corrections Center for Women (WCCW), alleges she was physically assaulted in August 2025 by Christopher Williams, a  biological man who self-identifies as female.

“Williams approached her silently from behind and struck her on the side of her face with a closed fist, then grabbed her hair and threw her to the ground before kicking her repeatedly with such force that she sustained visible injuries, including, facial bruising, a laceration in her mouth, and swelling to her jaw and eye,” states the lawsuit.

Williams is described in the lawsuit as a “six-foot-four, ‘biologically intact’ male” and “convicted child sex offender” that allegedly assaulted and harassed his former cell mate, Mozzy Clark.

“As Ms. Clark has alleged, Williams sexually assaulted her for months during the time she was forced to share a cell with him,” states the lawsuit. “Williams masturbated in front of her, groped her while she slept, and repeatedly threatened her with rape.”

Clark brought allegations against Williams in a lawsuit she filed against the Washington DOC in December 2024.Claiming he did not feel safe “being classified as male,” Williams repeatedly asked to be transferred to WCCW, public records show. A Washington DOC Housing Assignment Review committee denied his request in November 2019, recommending instead that he was transferred to a single cell in a male prison due to his “past violence towards women,” public records show.

When Williams requested to be transferred to WCCW in the summer of 2021, Eric Jackson, the former Superintendent of a male prison where Williams had been incarcerated, recommended against his transfer to WCCW due to his history of violence against women.

“Due to Williams’ serious infraction history and the most recent conviction where Williams assaulted and inflicted serious life-threatening injuries to a female victim, would not recommend placement at WCCW,” a document from August 2021 exclusively obtained by The Daily Wire states.

Despite these recommendations, the Washington DOC moved Williams to WCCW in the fall of 2021 in alignment with its transgender housing policies. Within months of his arrival to WCCW, Williams allegedly assaulted Clark.

Williams is serving a sentence for first-degree assault and has an earned release date of 2038, according to previous reporting, and is currently being housed in a male prison, according to the Washington DOC website.

The Washington DOC published its first transgender policy allowing inmates to be housed according to their gender identity, rather than biology, in February 2020.

“Nothing in the Policy even prohibits a male who is sexually attracted to females — let alone a male convicted of raping females — from ultimately sharing an unsupervised cell with a female inmate, so long as he claims to ‘identify’ as a woman,” states the lawsuit.

“Male inmates known to Plaintiffs who are attracted to females and who make no effort to conform to a female ‘gender identity’ are permitted to be housed at WCCW, share a cell with female inmates, enter the bathrooms and other intimate spaces designated for females, and even have sexual relations with female inmates.”

“Women are uniquely exposed to risks, including the possibility of pregnancy, that male inmates do not face. That disparity underscores a fundamental violation of the women’s equal protection rights,” O’Neill told The Daily Wire.

Washington DOC has further expanded its gender ideology policies in October 2023 after reaching a settlement with Disability Rights Washington (DRW), a federally funded nonprofit that claimed the prison system was violating the rights of transgender inmates by failing to provide medical sex-change procedures. The Washington DOC now provides inmates with cross-sex clothing, surgery, and sex-change medical interventions as part of the settlement.

The AFPI legal team says this special treatment of men is further evidence of discrimination against women, who have to pay for personal items and accommodations that are provided to trans-identifying male inmates at no cost.

“[Washington] DOC routinely categorizes medically necessary care for female inmates as ‘elective’ or ‘non-urgent,’ resulting in delay or denial of treatment. At the same time, sex-rejecting procedures for trans-identifying male inmates are approved and prioritized under standards that are no more urgent, and in many cases less urgent or entirely unnecessary, than the care denied to female inmates,” states the lawsuit.

The Washington DOC does not comment on pending litigation. 

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Joe Kent is no Clark, now under FBI probe for leaking classified info

The FBI is now investigating former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent over allegations that he improperly shared classified information, a source familiar with the matter told conservative outlet, The Daily Wire.

Kent dramatically resigned on Tuesday in protest of the ongoing war against Iran’s Islamic regime, whining in his resignation letter that the regime “posed no imminent threat to our nation.” He also accused President Trump of starting the conflict due to “pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” However, the investigation predates his resignation.

Semafor, which broke the story, confirmed with four sources that this leaking probe was already underway long before Kent’s grand exit and has been dragging on for months. One source described the investigation as a long-running effort, not some petty retaliation for his resignation.After he bolted, people in Trump’s orbit unloaded on him for leaking, with one calling him a “crazed egomaniac.”

“Joe Kent is a crazed egomaniac who was often at the center of national security leaks, while rarely (never?) producing any actual work,” said Taylor Budowich, the former deputy White House chief of staff. “He spent all of his time working to subvert the chain of command and undermine the President of the United States.”

“This isn’t some principled resignation, he just wanted to make a splash before getting canned. What a loser.”

President Trump pushed back hard on Kent’s nonsense, calling his departure “a good thing.”“When I read his statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat,” Trump said. “Iran was a tremendous threat.”

He added, “I always thought he was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security.”In a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe directly contradicted Kent’s hot take.

“I think Iran has been a constant threat to the United States for an extended period of time and posed an immediate threat,” he said.

So there you have it, folks, another self-important leaker bites the dust while pretending to take some noble stand. Shocking, I know.

Hey guys--thanks for following me. Consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. You can even Buy Me A Coffee if you want. No pressure.

Tweet

Biden administration shielded him from deportation and now he's arrested for brutal beach attack

The Biden administration waved this guy in, shielded him from deportation, and now he's been arrested for trying to drown a woman at a Florida beach. This is the kind of story that makes you wonder what exactly "border security" meant under the old regime under a brain-addled POTUS.

Conservative outlet, The Daily Wire, broke the exclusive: Venezuelan illegal immigrant Said Alexander Hernandez Gonzalez, 26, allegedly targeted a woman who was simply walking and chatting on the phone with her sister around 11 p.m. last Thursday at Tiger Shores Beach in Stuart. 

Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek laid it out during a Monday press conference, and it's as brutal as it sounds.

This guy was paroled into the U.S. in 2023 courtesy of the Biden circus, then handed temporary protected status, which basically slapped a "do not deport" sticker on him, per the Department of Homeland Security's confirmation to the outlet.

Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin's statement: "Said Alexander Hernandez Gonzalez, a product of the Biden administration's open-border policies brutally attacked a woman on the beach and attempted to drown and kill her."

McLaughlin continued: "She bravely fought back and survived this wicked attack. ICE has lodged an immigration detainer with the Martin County Sheriff's office, and because of Florida's cooperation with ICE, this sicko will never walk American streets again. Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the U.S."

Hernandez Gonzalez allegedly came up from behind, grabbed her by the throat, shoved her into the ocean, and held her under in a savage 3-5 minute struggle. The sheriff described how she fought like hell: "During that struggle, she punched him, she grabbed his groin area trying to get him to release her."

He just kept going: "He said he just held her down until she went limp," Budensiek said. Thinking he'd finished the job, the Venezuelan bolted, leaving her unconscious on the beach. Miraculously, she came to and flagged down a nearby officer to report it. Deputies scoured the area for two days with nothing.

Then Sunday night rolls around, a woman calls Port St. Lucie PD saying her boyfriend is "suicidal." Cops show up, and Hernandez Gonzalez starts confessing that he'd murdered a woman on a nearby beach. 

Martin County detectives swooped in, confirmed that he's their guy. He admitted he was at the beach smoking marijuana and drinking vodka when he spotted her, got angry for whatever twisted reason, attacked, and tried to drown her. He told investigators he "stopped when he believed she was dead." Before fleeing, he grabbed her cell phone and chucked it into the ocean.

Then he went back to his car, downed more weed and booze, and took off. And when asked if he felt any remorse? "When asked if he was remorseful, Hernandez Gonzalez stated he felt nothing."

He's now facing attempted murder charges. 

This is the predictable fallout from policies that prioritized catch-and-release over actual enforcement. The victim thankfully survived, but the fact that this monster was here at all, shielded from removal, says everything about the prior administration's priorities. Under the current setup, at least ICE is on it, and Florida's playing ball. 

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, or even check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free. So is checking out the advertisers on the blog.

Criminal illegals like this shouldn't get a second chance to roam free.

Tweet

Ohio may give parents back their rights over 'gender identity' affirmation

Ohio might finally grow a spine and protect parents who aren't keen on playing along with their kid's latest fantasy about being the opposite sex. The Buckeye State could actually stand up for moms and dads who prefer biology over the current trendy delusion. 

As the piece notes: "No parent should lose custody, face state intervention, or be deemed unfit simply for affirming a child's sex."

Ohio Rep. Josh Williams, one of the bill's co-sponsors, put it plainly to conservative outlet, The Daily Wire: "No parent should lose custody, face state intervention, or be deemed unfit simply for affirming a child’s sex. The Affirming Families First Act restores common sense to our child-welfare and family-law systems by making clear that affirming biological sex is not abuse, neglect, or contrary to a child’s best interest, it is a protected parental right."

The proposed Affirming Families First Act would slam the brakes on the nonsense where the state swoops in and yanks kids away because Mom and Dad won't jump on the "affirm" bandwagon. Parents could keep using their gender-confused child's original name and pronouns without some social worker or judge deciding that's grounds for losing custody. Courts couldn't ding them for it in parental responsibility decisions, and state agencies would be barred from wasting taxpayer dollars on training sessions that declare "affirming biological sex" to be some form of child abuse.

Fellow co-sponsor Rep. Gary Click didn't mince words either: "It's unconscionable to think that local government entities would flag a parent as being a danger to their son for declining to buy him a dress or call ‘him,' 'her.' We will not tolerate such government overreach in the state of Ohio."

This isn't some isolated outbreak of sanity. Other states are already telling the gender zealots to pound sand. Indiana's Gov. Mike Braun signed something similar back in May 2025. North Carolina's Josh Stein (yeah, even he) pushed through a law banning child welfare probes into parents who stick to biological reality despite the usual Democrat wailing. Texas tweaked its criminal code to make sure this stuff doesn't count as abuse. Georgia and New Hampshire have bills in the works too.

Ohio's been a real hotspot for the crazy, though. 

Cuyahoga County's child services crew got cozy with a federally funded push to ram gender ideology into every corner of family life. They cooked up this AFFIRM.ME program that had workers collecting "SOGIE" data (that's Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Expression for those not fluent in acronym-speak) on kids, even ones still living at home. They kept secret spreadsheets tracking whether parents were "rejecting" or "accepting" the child's chosen fantasy.

Back in April 2022, they mandated "conversations about SOGIE" with teens 13-21 to sniff out if the kid was "unsafe" because of parental "rejection" of their LGBTQ identity. The policy straight-up declared: "Youth in their own homes or in substitute care deserve to reside with affirming caregivers and other household members. We can help ensure this by safely identifying LGBTQ2S+ youth and understanding their individual needs."

They even bragged that AFFIRM.ME was a "blueprint" for the nation. The Biden crew loved it, calling them "trailblazers" while crafting foster care rules that basically held funding hostage to force affirmation nationwide. Texas AG Ken Paxton sued and won; the rule got binned in June 2025. Good riddance.

We've seen the horror stories elsewhere: parents in California, Indiana, Virginia, and Maryland losing their kids just for saying "no, you're still my daughter/son." Erin Lee in Colorado got CPS sicced on her for affirming her 12-year-old daughter's actual sex after the school did the grooming number.

As Laura Hanford from the DeVos Center told the outlet: "Tragically, kids have been harmed, trafficked and even died in state care after being removed from their families on these false claims of abuse. Thousands more have been denied access to loving foster families who affirm reality. There is no scientific evidence or marker for 'gender identity,' yet parents from coast to coast have lost their children for refusing to adopt this belief system."

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, and check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free.

Parental rights advocate Erin Friday nails the bigger picture: "All roads lead to sex-rejecting interventions when child welfare programs get involved with a child who is distressed about their sex. The entire network of child welfare programs is being used to force parents to either subject their child to sex-rejecting intervention or lose all contact with their child."

Ohio stepping up is a welcome dose of reality in a world gone mad. If this spreads, and it should, maybe we'll finally see the end of the state kidnapping kids because their parents won't cosign on puberty blockers and fantasy pronouns. 

Common sense is making a comeback, one state at a time.

Tweet

Michael Cohen says he was "pressured" and "coerced" by Alvin Bragg and Letitia James to testify against Trump

Here we go again with another chapter in the never-ending Trump legal soap opera, but this time the script flip is coming from the guy who used to be the star witness against him.

Michael Cohen, the former fixer who spent years singing like a canary with a grudge, is now admitting he was "pressured" and "coerced" by Alvin Bragg and Letitia James to deliver the anti-Trump testimony they so desperately wanted.

In his latest Substack missive (because, of course, it's on Substack), Cohen drops this gem:"I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony . . .  against President Trump."

And just in case that wasn't clear enough, he doubles down: "I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government's desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump."

He says the pressure started right from the opening bell in his first meetings with the prosecutors working for Bragg and James.

Regarding James specifically, Cohen writes: "Letitia James made it publicly known during her 2018 campaign for attorney general that, if elected, she would go after President Trump. Her office made clear that the testimony they wanted from me was testimony that would help them do just that. Again, I felt compelled and coerced to deliver what they were seeking."

Trump, never one to miss a chance to say "I told you so," called the whole thing proof of a "very corrupt investigation" in a Friday night chat with conservative media site The Daily Wire. He's been calling Cohen a liar since the beginning, and now the liar is basically agreeing that the fix was in to get him to talk. Cohen walks through the two big cases: the civil fraud suit from James' office about Trump supposedly puffing up asset values for loans, and the Manhattan DA's criminal hush-money extravaganza involving Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal.

Juries bought it both times, of course.

Cohen unconsciously covers his groin area

But now Cohen is out here saying: "Letitia James and Alvin Bragg may not share the same office or political calendar, but they share the same playbook. Both used their platforms to elevate their profiles, to claim the mantle of the officials who 'took down Trump.' In doing so, they blurred the line between justice and politics; and in that blur, the credibility of both suffered."

And the reason he's finally speaking up? A federal appeals court just breathed new life into Trump's push to toss the hush-money conviction, and Cohen figures staying quiet would make him complicit.

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, and check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free.

"I am not writing this to defend Donald Trump, nor to re-litigate his conduct," he insists. "That ground has been plowed endlessly, often loudly, and rarely thoughtfully. I am writing because I have seen this system from the inside. . . . When politics and prosecution become indistinguishable, public trust erodes; not just in individual cases, like mine and/or Trump's, but in the system itself. That erosion serves no one, regardless of party, personality, or power."

Translation: The guy who helped build the cases is now telling us the scaffolding was rigged from the start.

Color me shocked. Just kidding. This is New York justice we're talking about, after all.

Tweet

Governor who's committing suicide by food wants Illinois to allow state's visitors to commit suicide too

Illinois Democrats are at it again, shoving through a ghoulish Halloween special that's straight out of a dystopian nightmare: a bill to turn the Land of Lincoln into a one-stop shop for assisted suicide, all while trampling on the religious freedoms of doctors who actually believe in the sanctity of life. And it's just sitting there on Gov. J.B. Pritzker's desk, waiting for his progressive pen to make it official.

In the witching hour just after midnight on All Hallows' Eve, Illinois Senate Democrats bulldozed this death-on-demand legislation through in a 30-27 vote, capping off a House passage back in May. The measure would green-light doctors to hand out lethal prescriptions to terminal patients with six months or less to live, because this is how the left views "compassion."

But here's where it gets even more insidious: Conservative watchdogs are sounding the alarm that this isn't just about "choice," it's a full-frontal assault on faith-based medicine, forcing Christian physicians and hospitals to play along with the grim reaper's playbook.

"You're not just allowing physicians to give people deadly drugs to kill themselves, but you're actually forcing us or people of faith, to be part of it, to promote it," Peter Breen, head of litigation at the Thomas More Society, laid it out bluntly to conservative outlet The Daily Wire. "I know of no other state where the legislature has gone this far in restricting the religious liberty rights of people of faith."

Sure, the bill pays lip service to opt-outs for doctors who won't pull the trigger themselves. But Breen isn't buying it.

 Buried in the fine print are mandates that would compel institutions and physicians to refer patients to the poison pill parade and even advertise the "opportunity" to check out early. It's coercion dressed up as consent.

Worse, Breen warns, the language would tie the hands of Christian hospitals, making it impossible to boot a doctor who peddles assisted dying on the side, on or off campus. Because why stop at killing the patient when you can kill religious liberty too?

Ten states plus D.C. already flirt with this folly on both coasts, but Illinois? This would plant the flag of euthanasia smack in America's heartland, a beacon for the terminally ill from flyover country, and beyond.

"Illinois would become the first state in the middle of the country to enact assisted suicide," Breen hammered home. "There’s a significant concern that this is going to turn Illinois into a suicide tourism state."

What the Prairie State Democrats are peddling here is beyond the pale, a direct middle finger to Christian ethics that value life until the last breath. The Illinois Catholic Conference has blasted the bill and begged Biggie Pritzker to spike it like a bad shot.

Pritzker eyes the other sandwich

Even Breen, no fan of the governor's hard-left bona fides, clings to a sliver of optimism: Pritzker might actually veto this monstrosity over the First Amendment fallout. Fingers crossed, because the guy's track record isn't exactly a rosary of restraint.

For his part, Pritzker's playing the empathy card without committing. "I know how terrible it is that someone who's in the last six months of their life could be experiencing terrible pain and anguish. And I know people who’ve gone through that," he mused Monday. "It hits me deeply and makes me wonder about, you know, how we can alleviate the pain that they’re going through?"

If he inks this abomination, though? Game on. Breen vows the Thomas More Society will haul Illinois into court faster than you can say "equal protection." They've already tangled with the state over a prior outrage forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to shill for abortion, talk about déjà vu from hell. Let's hope the judge's gavel rings louder than the Democrats' death knell.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Trump’s Team Nixes Decades-Old Ban on Federal Job Testing, Paving Way for Merit-Based Hiring Overhau

In a move that could reshape the federal workforce into a lean, mean, merit-based machine, a D.C. judge on Friday finally put a bullet in the head of a 1981 court order that banned the government from using skills tests to screen job applicants. This seismic shift, one of President Donald Trump's potentially most enduring legacies, could drag the federal hiring process out of the dark ages and into the Ivy League.

Back in '81, Angel Luevano sued Uncle Sam over the Professional and Administrative Career Examination, a test designed to sift the cream of the crop from the flood of applicants vying for government jobs. Luevano claimed the test was a roadblock for blacks and Hispanics, keeping them out of federal jobs. In the twilight of Jimmy Carter's garbage presidency, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) caved, agreeing to shelve the test for five years. 

Fast-forward 44 years, and the "Luevano Consent Decree" was still inexplicably kicking, like a bureaucratic zombie refusing to die.

Enter the Trump administration, which in January threw a legal haymaker by challenging the dusty decree, a move that required cracking open a long-closed case where even the original judge had passed away. The administration argued the decree was dubious from the start and, with recent Supreme Court rulings torching affirmative action, utterly indefensible now. Court papers reveal Luevano, still alive, agreed to kill the decree. His lawyers, tied to Hispanic and black civil rights groups, didn't respond to requests for comment.

For nearly half a century, the feds have been hiring like a community college admitting students without glancing at SAT scores. "We’re making civil service great again," OPM Director Scott Kupor told conservative outlet The Daily Wire (DW) on Friday, barely containing his enthusiasm. This change could vault the government from safety-school mediocrity to elite status, letting agencies hire based on proven aptitude rather than self-aggrandizing resumes.

Kupor, in an exclusive chat with DW, said the move could mean better service for Americans, with agencies becoming more responsive and competent. "The lasting opportunity here is: can we change the culture of the workforce in the federal government? Can we make it a high-performance culture? That will definitely be the president’s legacy, if we can make that successful," he said.

Since the Professional and Administrative Career Examination and similar tests got the boot, the government leaned on "self-assessments," basically letting applicants brag about their skills with zero verification. It's like selecting a Vice President because she's, nothing else required. 

This system rewarded smooth talkers and outright liars, with job seekers now using AI or copy-pasting job requirements to claim they're perfect fits. Kupor called this lack of competency checks "crippling" in today's tech-driven world.

The decree's fallout was a textbook case of "disparate impact" gone wild, the idea that anything producing racially uneven outcomes is inherently racist [except in the NBA]. But it didn’t just hurt minorities; it left the government unable to separate a stellar white applicant from a dud. 

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division repped the government, while OPM General Counsel Andrew Kloster told DW no concessions were made to end the decree. "They just flat out agreed," he said. "It would not have happened without the original named plaintiff agreeing to it and the judge agreeing to accept it."

Kloster didn’t mince words: "This is really kind of an understanding that disparate impact as a way to measure things is not the law of the land anymore. You have to actually show real discrimination. The explicit argument was that the objective tests themselves were racially biased, and obviously that's bogus."

What’s next? OPM hasn’t decided on a universal aptitude test, but specific roles—like computer programmers—will likely face tailored exams. No more asking coders how good they are; they’ll have to prove it with a real coding test. Kupor said the old system, at best, was a random crapshoot and, at worst, a breeding ground for cronyism—the very thing the decree was meant to prevent.

"We’re going to be able to attract really, really good people, because they're going to be fairly tested for their merit," Kupor said. "It also really does eliminate a lot of potential for a bias in the hiring process if you actually use objective standards." He summed it up: "This is a win for fairness, as well as a win for getting American people the ability to get people with the appropriate skills into the right jobs."

Hey guys, if you enjoy Brain Flushings, I hope you'll consider supporting my work with a small donation to Buy Me a Coffee. It fuels my late-night writing sessions with fresh ideas. No pressure.

Tweet

BONGINO’S HAD IT WITH BONDI: FBI Deputy Director Ready to Bolt Over Epstein File Fiasco

Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi are at each other’s throats, and it’s all about those Jeffrey Epstein files.

Word on the street is Dan Bongino, the FBI’s Deputy Director, is ready to walk if Attorney General Pam Bondi keeps her job, as per a source speaking to the Daily Wire. Bongino’s reportedly as angry as a box of wild cats over how Bondi’s handling the Epstein case, and it’s got him eyeing the exit from his FBI post. The source says Bongino’s laid down the law: it’s him or Bondi.

Bongino ditched a sweet broadcasting career to join Trump’s team, but he was MIA at the FBI on Friday after a reported blow-up with Bondi earlier this week over the Epstein mess which started in February when she stated in answer to a question on Fox News that the Jeffrey Epstein "client list" was "sitting on my desk right now to review." But in July 2025, in a Cabinet meeting, she claimed to be referring to the general Epstein case file, not a specific client list when originally making that statement. She also said that there was no evidence of an incriminating "client list." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also defended Bondi, stating she was referring to the entirety of the Epstein files, not a specific list.

Well kids, things got heated Wednesday, right after the DOJ claimed there’s no proof Epstein had a client list, was blackmailing big shots, or got whacked in prison. Bondi had hyped up major Epstein case reveals five months back, but delivered zilch and everyone is now pissed off at her.

Bongino, who’s been skeptical about Epstein’s death since before his Trump admin days, said in May that his deep dive into the file and hours of jail video proved Epstein offed himself. 

FBI Director Kash Patel backed him up, saying the bureau’s evidence shows no murder here. But there’s more. 

A Justice Department source told The Daily Wire that Patel’s also fed up with Bondi and might bounce with Bongino. Patel’s pushing to unseal more documents, too. Bongino’s so fed up, he’s mulling resignation, and his usually chatty social media’s been dead silent since Wednesday’s Bondi clash.

One source close to Bongino told Axios, “He ain’t coming back.” Trump admin folks, though, insist he’s still in the game.

As I said, Bondi’s catching heat for saying in February she had Epstein’s client list “on her desk,” only to backtrack this week when the DOJ said no such list exists. The DOJ and FBI also got slammed after dropping over 10 hours of Epstein’s jail hallway footage, minus one suspicious minute. 

“In February, I did an interview on Fox, and it’s been getting a lot of attention because … I was asked a question about the ‘client list’ and my response was, ‘It’s sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file, along with the JFK, MLK files as well,” Bondi said during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “That’s what I meant by that.”

Do you believe her or do you think she might have been told to say that by someone in more power than her?

At that same meeting, President Trump tore into a reporter for daring to bring up Epstein. "That is unbelievable. … I mean I can’t believe you’re asking a question on Epstein at a time like this when we’re having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas," Trump said. "It just seems like a desecration."

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet