Sam Donaldson's eyebrows go after Sarah Sanders

Donaldson and not Cooper, but Stelter,
another journalistic wizard

Former White House correspondent Sam Donaldson and his eyebrows went after the current White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders saying she has a "lifetime achievement Oscar for lying."

In an interview with the Comedy News Network's Anderson Cooper on Friday, Donaldson and Cooper discussed the level of transparency in the Trump administration.

The last time Sanders held a normal combative press briefing was on March 11th, and Jim Acosta has made note of it in his diary.
.
Donaldson, who retired from ABC News in 2009 due to eyebrow fatigue, said he believed “true transparency” didn’t exist “because I think he [President Trump] doesn’t want it to exist.”

Unlike President Obama who let the public know immediately that the Benghazi attack that killed 4 Americans, one of whom was our US Ambassador, was due to an anti-Mohammed video seen by about 300 people globally.

Donaldson said he had a good relationship with White House press secretaries since the John F. Kennedy administration.

“Except for Ron Ziegler who lied for Richard Nixon,” Donaldson pointed out with his left eyebrow. “I’ve never seen anything like this with Sarah Sanders and there’s a difference. And Ziegler lied about one thing, the question whether the president of the United States was covering up the Watergate burglary and all the questions that had to with that.”

However, the former anchor said Ziegler did answer questions about domestic and foreign policy truthfully.

“On the other hand Sarah Sanders simply lies about everything taking a cue from her boss,” he said. "Not just one thing. She’s had a lifetime achievement Oscar for lying.”

The former anchor admitted he did not know Sanders but felt sorry for her.

“I don’t know her. I feel a little sorry for her because it’s the boss who does it,” he continued. “She takes the cue from him. Leadership begins at the top and so does all the bad things that happen in the administration.”

Sanders came under scrutiny recently after special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report revealed that Sanders admitted to investigators that she had made an unfounded claim that “countless” FBI agents had reached out to express support for Trump’s decision to fire FBI Director James Comey in May 2017.

In a recent interview with “Good Morning America’s” George Stephanopoulos, the former Democratic Party adviser and totally unbiased "journalist" pressed Sanders on the report.

“That’s not a slip of the tongue, Sarah, that’s a deliberate false statement,” Obama's said, having never gone after Obama's White House Press Secretary Jay Carney when he lied for Obama about the aforementioned Benghazi attack.

“Actually, if you look at what I said, I said the slip of the tongue was using the word 'countless.' There were a number of FBI, both former and current, that agreed with the president’s decision, and they continued to speak out and say that and send notice to the White House of that agreement with the president’s decision. James Comey was a disgraced leaker and used authorization to spy on the Trump campaign despite no evidence of collusion,” the press secretary replied.

But at least Obama himself never lied to the American people if you don't count the "keep your doctor" thing, and the Benghazi video thing, and the "ninety percent of guns coming across the border from Mexico come from the United States" thing, along with the "Fast and Furious" thing and the pallets of money for Iran thing.

Funny, but at the end of Obama's reign, there was only a 20 percent approval rating of the Federal government according to a Pew survey. That was the lowest since polls were taken by them starting in 1958.

All politicians lie. That doesn't excuse lying, but if you're going to say crap about the Trump administration without holding Obama's administration to task, you're nothing more than fake news.

Like Sam Donaldson's hair.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Netflix names Susan "It-Was-a-Video" Rice to board of directors

Liberal video giant, Netflix, has named liberal Obama administration official and Benghazi propagandist, Susan Rice, to its board of directors. That's like naming  Louis Farrakhan as President of the Anti Defamation League.

Rice, 53, was U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and served 4 years as Obama's national security advisor. It was Rice who went on five Sunday morning news programs in 2012 claiming the assault on the Benghazi, Libya facility, which killed four Americans, was inspired by a video about Mohammad. 

That was a lie. It was a planned Islamic jihad attack. Lindsey Graham and John McCain were among members of the GOP who said Rice was doing the  morning appearances merely as a political cover-up to boost Obama for the upcoming election. Even Obama eventually admitted the attacks were pre-planned terrorism.

The idea of Rice being selected for the Netflix board of directors sounds like something coming right out of The Onion, except for the fact that it's a left-leaning satirical outlet.

"We are delighted to welcome Ambassador Rice to the Netflix board," said Netflix co-founder and CEO Reed Hastings. "For decades, she has tackled difficult, complex global issues with intelligence, integrity and insight and we look forward to benefitting from her experience and wisdom," [and her incredible ability to cover-up for anyone she works for, no matter how big the lie].

She replied to Hastings' comment: "I am thrilled to be joining the board of directors of Netflix, a cutting-edge company whose leadership, high-quality productions, and unique culture I deeply admire" [with shows that always contain at least one token gay, lesbian, transgender or queer scene of dudes and/or women in intimate circumstances swapping body fluids].

So I have decided to undertake the difficult and complex task of closing my account with Netflix. Actually, it was incredibly easy. I just went onto the site, clicked onto my Account, and found the Close Account button. Instead of checking any of the reasons they listed, I selection "Other" and then in the box wrote "Susan Rice".

It was extremely satisfying to do something that not only saves me a little money each month, but also makes a clear statement that I will not put up with a company that hires Susan Rice, a person who would lie to the American public and condemn someone in order to cover up for a secretary of state who did nothing to protect the facility at Benghazi when numerous times Ambassador Chris Stevens begged her for more security.

Susan Rice is the deplorable Hillary was really referring to.

Tweet

Dems apparently afraid to cooperate with Trump on voter fraud

Democratic state officials who may or may not be guilty of voter fraud involvement are refusing to cooperate with the investigation of the same ordered by President Trump. They refuse to hand over "voter roll data" the commission is seeking, possibly due to the fact that it will negate their own elections. 

The refusal comes after Kris Kobach of Kansas (aka KKK) who is the secretary of state and serving as vice chair of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity wrote to all 50 states (not 57, as Mr. Obama believed) asking for their input along with voter registration data.

According to an anonymous source, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D-Va.) was literally shaking with fear and looked as if he lost much sleep over the request. He said in a statement, "I have no intention of honoring this request. Virginia conducts fair, honest, and democratic elections." 

The same source, who asked to be called Vinny Boombots,  said that he noticed McAuliffe had his fingers crossed when he wrote the statement.

The leftist governor claimed the commission is based on the "specious and false notion that there was widespread voter fraud last November."

Hey, what's a few million votes in a country as big and as wonderful as the good ole US of A?

Mr. Trump created the panel via executive order in May to review alleged voter fraud after seeing a show on TV about that topic. He made the tremendous and incredible claim that 3 million to 5 million people illegally voted in the 2016 presidential election.

The Kobach letter politely asked for recommendations on how to improve election integrity, "which had Democratic lawmakers literally rolling on the floor with laughter," Vinny Boombots said.

McAuliffe and a clapping felon

What really got the Democrat's goat was Kobach's request for voter information that would actually identify voters. You know, identification information like their names, date of birth, political party, voter history ("elections voted in"), the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, felony convictions, military status and more.

In other words, could they prove these people existed and were actual US citizens.

Kobach was clear in the request that he was only asking for "publicly-available voter roll data" under each state's laws.

This got the Democrats scurrying like rats on the Titanic without sheet music, Vinny said cryptically.

Connecticut Secretary of State Denise Merrill said in a statement that her office would provide the requested information "in the spirit of transparency," but added that some of the requested data is not sharable under state law, and she would ensure "the privacy of voters is honored by withholding protected data." She also seemed concerned that state officials "have not been told precisely what the Commission is looking for."

Virginia and California were obviously more peeved in their response.

McAuliffe, a close Clinton family ally and possible secret shopper said, "At best this commission was set up as a pretext to validate Donald Trump's alternative election facts, and at worst is a tool to commit large-scale voter suppression."

He was perhaps referring to illegal alien voter suppression, which he sees as racist and a sign of white privilege. He declared he wouldn't "divert resources" to this, as a little bead of sweat trickled down his cheek.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said in a statement that he would "not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally."

Padilla added, "California's participation would only serve to legitimize the false and already debunked claims of massive voter fraud made by the President, the Vice President, and Mr. Kobach."

Show me the debunking.

Kobach told The Kansas City Star he's simply looking for the "best data possible."

He called it "nonsense" that the data could be used to suppress the vote. "The purpose of the commission is to quantify different forms of voter fraud and registration fraud and offer solutions. And so you have to have this data in order to do any meaningful research."

Trump's claims of voter fraud and a commission to investigate it have been controversial from the start. 

In January, Trump called for a major investigation into voter fraud after telling lawmakers that 3 to 5 million people voted illegally in the November election. This allegation may have been inspired by the fact that Hillary Clinton [of Benghazi and illegal private server fame] received more popular votes than Trump and he punched back by claiming that those extra votes were illegal and without them, he would have also won the popular vote.

House Speaker Paul Ryan said at the time Trump first made the claim that he saw "no evidence" to corroborate the existence of fraud.

But there have been documented cases of voter fraud, including some cases Kobach pursued in Kansas.

But 3 to 5 million?

Who knew?




Tweet

Susan Rice: "It's onnaconna I'm a black woman"

Poor little Miss Susie Rice, the Obama national security adviser. She is being scrutinized over her alleged involvement in the "unmasking" of Trump associates during the 2016 presidential election in which Donald Trump destroyed Hillary Clinton and made millions of fluffer-nutters cry uncontrollably to the delight of millions.

Rice is suggesting in a recent interview that her race and gender might be playing a role in the close scrutiny she's facing.

In other words, she's pulling both the race card and gender card out of her fat wallet and crying "You're not being fair to me, a poor, defenseless black woman who means no harm."

"Why me? Why not Jay Carney, for example, who was then our press secretary who stood up more?" she said as the proverbial bus came speeding by with Carney's body under it.

Maybe she has a point and perhaps Carney too should be investigated. By why not her? The gender card is really an indication that the person pulling it actually doesn't see men and women as equal.

Rice, you may recall, went on the Sunday talk shows knowing she was lying when she said the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack was caused by a video.

I could go on, but too much Rice can make you sick, unless it's Condoleezza.



Tweet

Rice afraid to testify after series of lies

If Susan Rice meets you on the street and says "Good morning," she is lying.

Rice is facing growing demands for her to testify under oath, but in order to do that, a fireproof Bible will be needed because it just might go up in flames. 

The former Obama official is accused of ordering the unmasking of Trump officials under surveillance and she has finally admitted it after lying about it in a TV interview. But she said in an interview on MSNBC that she never did it for political purposes. 

"The allegation is that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes," she said, adding "that is absolutely false."

Translation: it is probably true because she was emphatic when she said it.

She also said that it is sometimes "necessary" for investigative purposes. So why did she originally lie about it?

For the same reason she said the 2012 attack on the Benghazi compound was caused by a video slamming prophet Mohammad. For the same reason she said that alleged deserter and Army puss-bag, Bowe Bergdahl, served with "honor and distinction." The reason is she, like Hillary Clinton, cannot keep themselves from lying. It's how they both roll.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) a member of the Senate Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence said in a tweet Tuesday that Rice "needs to testify under oath."

What Cornyn is forgetting is that Rice will probably plead the Fifth Amendment or perhaps be bold enough to lie, as is her wont. Her slogan is: "Oath schmoath. Who cares?"

Cornyn included a link to a Wall Street Journal article "Susan Rice Unmasked." It suggests that she personally sought the name of at least one Trump official in intelligence reports concurrent to when reports on Russia were allegedly being circulated broadly, said a former intelligence official as reported by Fox News.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) also serves on the Judiciary Committee. He told Fox News that while he doesn't know why Rice acted improperly, "when it comes to Susan Rice, you need to verify, not trust."

He's exactly right.  But he also said that he doesn't want to form an opinion just yet. "There's a way to find out," Graham said. "I intend to find out."

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said that Rice "ought to be under subpoena," adding that the stories coming out about her are "actually eerily similar to what Trump accused them of, which is eavesdropping on conversations for political reasons."

He also suggested she needs to be asked whether she communicated with Obama directly about the surveillance information.

So was Rice merely doing her job, or was she doing a job for Obama?

[Please follow me by clicking the link above.]



Tweet

It's Rice who uncovered the covered

The lady who brought us the scoop on Benghazi, informing us the attack of the American compound was caused by a video, and that Bowe Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction" in the Army, is now the focus of the ongoing investigation into Russia's involvement with the 2016 election, and the unmasking of names of Americans caught up in NSA surveillance. 

That lady is Susan Rice.

It wasn't a video that started the terrorist attack and Bergdahl is currently facing court martial charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy for allegedly walking off his post in Afghanistan and being a traitorous pus biscuit.

Rice, the former national security adviser (which, when you think of it, is an oxymoron) under then-President Obama, was the person who requested to unmask the names of the Trump transition officials in the surveillance. She denied this last month in an interview.

The unmasked names made the rounds: to all at the Defense Department, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

It's even possible some of the names were placed on milk cartons to be distributed across the nation, but we're still checking on that.

The names were ostensibly part of incidental electronic surveillance of then-candidate and President-elect Trump and those close to him, including family members. This began up to a year before he took office.

White House Press Secretary and butt of SNL jokes, Sean Spicer, was asked about the revelations at the Monday press briefing but declined to comment on the role Rice may have played or what her motives might be.

"I'm not going to comment on this any further until [congressional] committees have come to a conclusion," Spicer said. He made note of how the media doesn't appear interested in the Rice revelation as much as it is with the possible Trump-Putin links.

Names in this situation are supposed to be masked (redacted from reports) whether it's international or domestic collection. The only time it can be unmasked is when it's an issue of national security, crime, or if the security of the individual whose name was unmasked  is in any danger. There are loopholes and names can be unmasked through backchannels, but Americans are supposed to be protected from incidental collection, and Mike Flynn, for example, was unmasked and illegally revealed to the public. 

Last month, in a TV interview with Dr. Evelyn Farkus (whose brother Marcus Farkus runs a Marcus Farcus focus group) said in part: "I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill--it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration." 

Perhaps it was no coincidence that just as Obama and his crew left office, he approved new rules giving the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share the communications with 16 (!) other intelligence agencies. 

This makes it even harder to determine who in any intelligence agency is leaking things illegally. 

Think of it as Obama-style camouflage.

Tweet

It's all Huma's fault?

It wasn't the cute way Hillary called half of America a "basket of deplorables." It wasn't the way Hillary spoke, or rather yelled her messages out to the public, sounding angry even when she was pushing out a hard smile.

It wasn't even her failure to do her job as secretary of state when the Benghazi complex was attacked and four brave Americans died, after over 600 requests for more security by one of the victims, Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Nor was it Hillary's fault that she kept a private email server that she was not authorized to have and which violated the Espionage Act, and was probably hacked by the Russians.

And James Comey? Well, he didn't help matters but it wasn't his fault that he waited until he had all the latest information on Hillary's email before announcing it just days before the election.

No. It was all Huma Abedin's fault.

While some of Clinton's top advisers blamed the Russians with election interference, Hillary's inner circle, in the so-called "Hillaryland" orbit, are blaming Huma Abedin for Clinton's loss in the election. A loss, by the way, that puts the "freude" in schadenfreude. 

"The real anger is toward Hillary's inner circle," a Clinton insider told Vanity Fair for its Wednesday feature. "They reinforced all the bad habits."

It's bad enough that poor Huma is still married to that scuzzbucket, Anthony "Carlos Danger" Weiner. And that poor Huma's family is associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. And that poor Huma was an editor for a Muslim magazine that opposed women's rights. But to blame her for Hillary Clinton's failure as a presidential candidate?

When is Clinton going to take responsibility for her palpable incompetence? For her massive suckworthiness?


Tweet

Monkey attack sets off human attacks in tribal clashes in Libya

Beautiful Downtown Benghazi, Libya -- According to medics and activists, last week, three young men turned a pet monkey (not named 'Bonzo') loose on a high school girl. It scratched and bit her and the girl's family sought revenge.

So they killed the three young men along with the monkey. 

Not exactly a tit for tat retaliation, but certainly a move that should have ended the situation and brought in the law to deal with the matter.

But this is Benghazi--home to homicidal tribal lunatics.

At least 20 other people were killed and 50 were wounded because that's how they deal with their anger. 

Bader al-Daheli, a civil activist said that the two main tribes in the city of Sabha, Awlad Suleiman and Gadhadhfa, aer both backed by armed groups and nobody, but nobody, walks on anyone else's lawn or allows their monkey to do any monkey business.

This type of behavior and 600 requests for more security at our Benghazi compound by Ambassador Chris Stevens should have been more than enough for any competent secretary of state to take action.

The operant word is "competent."


Tweet

It wasn't the video, it was State hiring the terrorists

The State Department under then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hired an obscure private security firm to protect U.S. diplomats in Benghazi in spite of internal objections by those in the agency who were not incompetent and lazy like Hillary Clinton. 

It has just been discovered that the company, the Wales-based Blue Mountain Group, staffed their ranks with hastily recruited terrorists who helped carry out the Benghazi attack, according to multiple sources telling Fox News.

One source, who spoke on condition of anonymity (perhaps in fear of Clinton "payback") said Blue Mountain used local newspaper ads to assemble a team of 20 guards, many with terror ties, once the company was paid $9.2 million. The source is an independent security specialist who has set up training programs at U.S. Consulates around the world and obviously knows what he's doing, whereas Hillary Clinton does not.

"The guards who were hired were locals who were part of the Ansar al-Sharia and Al Qaeda groups operating in Benghazi," the source said--his own contract ended in Benghazi in November 2011. He added, "Whoever approved contracts at the State Department hired Blue Mountain Group and then allowed Blue Mountain Group to hire local Libyans who were not vetted."

A great number of the terrorist scumcrumpets were members of the Libyan government-financed February 17th Martyrs Brigade, an Islamist militia previously used to guard Americans before Blue Mountain replaced them.

One of the CIA contractors who fought the terrorists in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, John "Tig" Tiegen, confirmed that the locals who attacked the consulate that night included guards working for Blue Mountain.

Hillary Clinton confirmed the next day that a video about the prophet Mohammed was what started the whole thing.

"Many of the local Libyans who attacked the consulate on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, were the actual guards that the State Department under Hillary Clinton hired to protect the Consulate in Benghazi," Tig said. "The guards were unvetted and were locals with basically no background at all in providing security. Most of them never had held a job in security in the past.

"Blue Mountain Libya, at the time of being awarded the contract by our State Department, had no employees so they quickly had to find people to work, regardless of their backgrounds," he said.

How can anyone think that Hillary Clinton (with her illegal email server, a maid who printed out her sensitive documents and had access to the Presidential Daily Briefing, and who did nothing to help Ambassador Chris Stevens after he made literally hundreds of requests for more security) would be a president capable of keeping America safe?

A former Benghazi guard, Weeam Mohamed, also confirmed in an email sent to the Citizens Commission on Benghazi that at least four of the guards hired by Blue Mountain took part in the attack after opening doors of the complex to allow their confederates in.

"In the U.S. Mission, there were four people [who] belonged to the battalion February 17," Mohamed said in a written statement to the Commission, an independent group formed with Accuracy in Media whose purpose was to investigate the attack and how the administration [mis]handled it.

"Always armed, and they are free to move anywhere inside a building mission.

"And therefore, they had a chance to do an attack on the mission's headquarters. They have all the details about the place. At the same time they have given the United States a painful blow," he wrote.

Blue Mountain officials did what Hillary Clinton did during her campaign--they made themselves scare and weren't available for comment.

The State Department officials, who were not there at the Benghazi complex when it was attacked, acknowledged in emails obtained by FoxNews.com that the local recruits fell short of their duty, but denied the claim that any of the guards took an active role that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

State Department spokes-puppet and former man of honor John Kirby said "While the Accountability Review Board report and other reports were critical of our local guards' performance, we are not aware of any evidence that they participated in the attacks themselves."

So the account given by John Tiegen, one of the men who was there, doesn't count.

The source told Fox News: "We kept asking for additional support, including a 50-caliber mounted machine gun, but the State Department would not give it to us, because they said it would upset the locals. Instead, the State Department hired a company that doesn't have employees, which then hired terrorists."

But who are we kidding? Nothing is going to change and Hillary Clinton will very possibly be the next Barack Obama.

Her incompetence is cringe-worthy.



Tweet

Clinton's State Dept. spent $millions on crystal stemware and Facebook

Seriously, what's the point of being in government if you can't use taxpayer money to live high? Hillary Clinton's State Department likes the finer things in life, so why make a big deal over the fact they spent $5,400,000 "no-bid contract for crystal stemware"? It isn't like the peed the money away from the drinking they did out the crystal. It isn't like they spent $630,000 to "increase Facebook 'likes' on four State Department pages.

Oh . . . it is . . . oops.

The RNC put together a 21-page memo showing the frivolous expenditures of other people's money at the State Department under Hillary Clinton's watch. Talk about crummy financial shenanigans--they should have used that money to increase security at the Benghazi complex back in 2012.

Overall, Hillary's agency spent over $600,000,000 on failed projects in Afghanistan and Iraq alone according to the RNC memo.

I guess liberals don't believe they'll ever run out of other people's money.


Tweet

Hypocrisy Rodham Clinton

This isn't brand new--we've always known that Hillary Clinton pays women about $0.71 to the dollar the men at the Clinton Foundation make, but now hacked emails released by WikiLeaks describes a payroll schedule where men at the foundation averaged about $68,000 per year in salary and women averaged about $64,000.

The disclosing email was sent by an employee to Bruce Lindsey, the foundation's chairman, and to Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta.

The averages were based on 25 men and 37 women employed by the foundation.

Hillary has always been quite vocal for a woman's right to choose for herself if she wants to kill her unborn child. She has also advocated equal pay for all but the foundation checkbook evidently didn't get the memo.

Her hypocrisy is palpable.

She lies when she claims to be for women's rights--if she really was, she would be appalled at anyone who accepted money from nations that oppress, beat and kill women. But she accepts money from the Saudis and a bunch of other Islamic nations that do just that.

She lies when she denies all wrong doing with national security. She lies about a video being responsible for the attack in Benghazi, and then lied to the families of the dead.

She lies about her support of TPP and open borders. 

She lies when she says "hello."



Tweet

Arms dealer the Obama scapegoat on Libya to 'protect' Hillary

Marc Turi, an American arms dealer and contractor for the CIA was interviewed on Fox News in an exclusive since the criminal charges against him were dropped. He told the news organization that the Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton's State Department cooperation, tried and failed to make him a scapegoat for a 2011 weapons program designed to arm Libyan rebels, which actually spun out of control.

If you were wondering what the hell we were doing in Libya, this should help you understand.

"I would say, 100 percent, I was victimized . . . to somehow discredit me, to throw me under the bus, to do whatever it took to protect their next presidential candidate," he told Catherine Herridge, Fox News chief intelligence correspondent.

Turi, 48, explained the he has been in the middle of a failed federal investigation by the Justice Department that has cost the taxpayer about $10 million and has gone on for five years.

He said the Justice Department quickly dropped the case to avoid exposing the details of the Libyan weapons program to the public that was designed to force the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi during the 2011 Arab Spring.

"Those transcripts from current as well as former CIA officers were classified," he explained of the evidence in the case. "If any of these relationships [had] been revealed it would have opened up a can of worms. There wouldn't have been any good answer for the U.S. government especially in this election year."

The Justice Department had a deadline of last week to produce records to the defense as part of the disclosure requirement. 

Turi claims he was specifically "targeted by the Obama administration," adding the he "lost everything -- my family, my friends, my business, my reputation."

Turi was going to have the U.S. supply conventional weapons toQatar and the UAE, which would then turn around and supply them to Libya--keeping us out of the spotlight. But he says he never sold any weapons and was cut out of the plan. Working with the CIA, he said Clinton's State Department had the lead and used its own people, with weapons flowing to Libya and Syria.

"Some (weapons) may have went out under control that we had with our personnel over there and the others went to these militia. That's how they lost control over it," Turi explained. "I can assure you that these operations did take place and those weapons did go in different directions."

Turi believes all the weapons fell into the hands of Al Qaeda, Ansar al-Sharia and ISIS. He also believes the emails sent about the weapons programs were deleted by Hillary Clinton and her team because "it would have gone to an organization within the Bureau of Political Military affairs within the State Department known as PM/RSAT (Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfers.) That's where you would find Jake Sullivan, Andrew Shapiro and  a number of political operatives that would have been ultimately involved with this foreign policy."

The four felony counts were dismissed last week "with prejudice." The government can't come after him again on this matter.

The DOJ's decision to drop the case against Turi sheds new light on Clinton's Benghazi testimony of 2013. When she was questioned by Sen. Rand Paul if any of the weapons were sent to other countries, Turkey included, she claimed that she did not know the answer.

Robert Stryk, a close friend and adviser of Turi described him to Fox News: "Marc Turi is a true patriot who served his country in the fight against Islamofascist terrorists in the Middle East. His fraudulent prosecution by Hillary Clinton's associates in the Justice Department is deplorable as is the fate of the American heroes murdered in Benghazi. Our most loyal citizens deserve better."

Turi alluded to the idea that there will be more coming on the 2012 Benghazi attacks--that is, if he doesn't end up "mugged" and shot in the back on some city street.



Tweet

Hillary casts the first stone, but is she stoned?

The Famous "Trump Forefinger to Thumb" gesture

Let's be honest, you're not going to trip over Donald Trump at a Mensa meeting anymore than you're going to hear Hillary Clinton apologize to the victims of her husband's sexcapades and the families of the Benghazi victims.

Trump announced Saturday that there is "zero chance" he'll leave the presidential race after the release of the damning tape and calls from Republicans et al, for him to step aside and allow Mike Pence to be the party's presidential candidate.

Easier said than done, even if Donald agreed.

Many people have already voted in this election on write-in ballots. There's no legal way their vote for Trump can be changed to any other candidate, Pence or anyone else. But that being said, and the fact that I'm not a lawyer, there may be a way to get it done, if Trump steps aside, which he vows he won't. 

Trump is just single digits behind the Democratic nominee Hillary "Speaks with Forked Tongue" Clinton and the election is only four weeks from now.

"There is zero chance I will quit. I'm getting unbelievable support," Trump said, referring to every one of his family members and people who would vote for him even if he burned a bag of puppies.

No question, the tape was lewd and offsetting. But guys actually do brag that way, particularly those in power or are famous. I have zero doubt that Bill Clinton, JFK and a host of world leaders (Putin included) brag about their sexual prowess, boldness and endowment. They're usually smart enough not to do it into a microphone.

What Donald did was stupid and beneath the office of president, but I don't think it was at all unusual or reason to vote for the lying, incompetent felon on the left side of the ticket.

In the now immortal words of Trump, "When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything." He later used a feline term for an area of feminine anatomy as well as the "F word."

"I'd never withdraw. I've never withdrawn in my life. No, I'm not quitting this race. I have tremendous support," he said, (not adding: "except from the GOP").

Hillary simply uses deceit and, like abortion, does things out of convenience, like her personal server that only compromised national security.

Trump has not, and likely would not, compromise national security, but I don't believe we're ever going to test that come 2017.


Tweet

And she's still running for president

Marc Turi, an American arms dealer who threatened to reveal information about Hillary Clinton's alleged role in arming Islamic terrorists until his case was abruptly dropped by federal prosecutors on Tuesday, told Fox News that the case cost him everything.

Turi was charged with selling weapons to Libyan rebels.

The feds faced a Wednesday deadline to turn over discovery documents to Turi's lawyers. Late Tuesday they announced that the government was dropping the case, which was scheduled to go on trial on November 8th (aka Election Day).

It smells like the feds are worried that the discovery documents, if flushed out, may reveal information that could potentially cause Hillary a legal problem that only Obama can pardon.

"I am glad this horrific five-year ordeal is over and I am pleased to be able to move on with my life," Turi said in a statement. "The American public has the right to know that an injustice was committed against an innocent American." 

Turi's legal team advised him to accept the deal but he insisted that his actions were to further his ongoing support of U.S. foreign policy. In other words, he was selling weapons to the government because the government (in this case, Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration) wanted to supply the weapons to Islamic militants in Libya.

In a TV interview on Fox News last year, Turi provided them with emails and documents between him and high-level members of Congress, State Department employees and military personnel, that backed up his claim that the Obama administration authorized in 2011, a covert weapons program that spun out of control. This was at the height of the Arab Spring.

"The government took away my life, my savings, and my company that I worked so hard to build to serve our nation, and for what?" Turi said, "I still don't really know who the unjust actors were who launched this attack against me from the shadows. I just hope that someday there will be someone that will be held accountable."

"That's where I came up with this 'zero footprint' Arab supply chain, whereby our foreign ally supplies another Arab country," he said, depicting the plan as one in which the US would supply conventional weapons to Qatar and they would then supply them to Libya, as a workaround to hide the deal.

"If you want to limit the exposure to the US government, what you simply do is outsource it to your allies. The partners--the Qataris and the Emiratis did exactly what they were contracted to do."

And that's why four Americans died in Benghazi and Clinton is still running for president.

Turi said he never supplied weapons to Qatar. That honor went to the US government and the State Department's Bureau of Political and Military Affairs headed by Andrew Shapiro, a key Clinton aide. His responsibility was to oversee the export control process at the State Department and he answered to Clinton, who used incompetence as her defense when testifying.

And she is still running for president.

Documents reported last year by Fox News were cited showing US officials supported Turi's efforts to get weapons to Libyan rebels while Clinton was in charge as secretary of state. As we later learned, many of the weapons that were supposed to go to Libyan rebels fell into the bloody hands of Muslim militants, even those in Syria.

Turi described how once the weapons landed in Libya, half went one way and half went the other way, ending up in Syria.

In the motion to dismiss, federal prosecutors acknowledged that discovery rulings from U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona factored into the decision. The motion includes a request that Judge David Campbell accept a confidential agreement to settle the case civilly, making the deal struck to keep things under wraps very plausible.

Turi's advisor Robert Stryk accused prosecutors of charging Turi in order to cover up Clinton's mishandling of Libya and he total incompetence.

And she is still running for president.

Something is rotten in Denmark and in Washington D.C.


Tweet

Clinton's IT guy dodges subpoena

Former State Department IT specialist Bryan Pagliano was the guy responsible for setting up Hillary Clinton's private server. He was subpoenaed to appear before a House committee hearing but ignored the subpoena. The other tech experts who were involved with maintaining the system asserted their Fifth Amendment right not to testify. 

Needless to say, Republican lawmakers are frustrated and angry as they attempt to probe deeper into Clinton's email setup.

The House oversight committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, (R-UT) said he will now consider a "full range of options" to address Pagliano's "failure" to comply with the subpoena. "He should be here," Chaffetz said, "it is not optional. His attendance is required here."

Hopefully, the authorities will arrest Pagliano, throw him in prison with a guy named Bubba, (not Bubba Bill Clinton) and get him to sing. He is a vital witness in the Clinton email case and previously spoke to the FBI under immunity. He told them that there were no successful security breaches of the server, but as a Clinton staffer, he could be lying.

Last year, Pagliano refused to answer questions in front of a House panel investigating the 2012 Benghazi, Libya attacks that killed 4 Americans, including Ambassador Stevens. His then lawyer said that Pagliano didn't want to give up his rights to plead 'The Fifth' to prevent self-incrimination.

Republicans questioned why he would avoid the latest hearing since he had immunity but Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) said that Pagliano's lawyer remarked that the request was an "abuse of process."

Officials from Platte River Networks, Bill Thornton and Paul Combetta, complied with the subpoenas but plead the Fifth. That company maintained Clinton's illegal server in Denver after it was removed from her home, and finally moved to a data center in New Jersey. Both men were eventually excused.

Cummings, who would fall on a grenade for Hillary, said he could understand why the men refused to testify.

Chaffetz said that there would be consequences for Pagliano's refusal to testify, but the American public has finally figured out that nothing is going to come from this and that it's all talk and posturing by an impotent Congress. 

Hillary, I predict, will skate all charges, possibly become THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! as she likes to scream, and Bill will help himself to the smorgasbord of women who will agree to have sex with him and can do so without tossing their lunch.

The only witness who actually testified was Bill Clinton's aide Justin Cooper. He confirmed that he had access to the Clinton server in spite of not holding a security clearance. One would think that this alone should be grounds for indicting Hillary Clinton.

 But nobody will do anything to Hillary, except perhaps her own ailing body.

Tweet

Poor Hillary is being treated "unfairly" by the liberal media

Donald Trump believes the media is dishonest and in the bag for Hillary Clinton. He said that "@CNN is unwatchable. Their news on me is fiction. They are a disgrace to the broadcasting industry and an arm of the Clinton campaign." Then, of course, he took his personal swipes at Jeff Zucker, CNN president: "Jeff Zucker failed @NBC and he is now failing @CNN.

But since being asked actual probing questions by NBC's Matt Lauer, Hillary's campaign is complaining that the media is bias against her.

For the older conservative crowd who have heard this complaint, the Attends adult diaper sales have skyrocketed from loss of bladder control.

Yes, Hillary went around 277 days without a press conference, and this may have ticked off journalists, or rather liberal "journalists," but when push comes to shove grandma over the cliff, the mainstream media is totally loyal to the Democratic Party and no longer pretend to be unbiased. 

Clinton's newest 'untruth' is her way of raising more money. 

The "Oh, woe is me, I'm just a poor, scared, little girl who's treated unfairly by journalists and big, strong men who hate women" complaint is getting worn out, but there are still women who buy into that garbage.

If Hillary was actually a strong woman, what liberals call a "feminist," she would never have to raise gender issues in order to get the female vote, and she would not have gone after the women her husband sexually abused. If she was truly a strong woman, she wouldn't have used her husband's economic record with a promise to make him her advisor to win votes.

And what should concern us about the 'Worst Lady' is her claim that not a single American was killed in Libya. Tell that to the loved ones of the four men who died in Benghazi, Libya. 

Hillary's fundraising appeal comes after the commander-in-chief forum moderated by Matt Lauer. Her campaign quotes an article by uber liberal Jonathan Chait in New York Magazine describing Lauer's interview as "pathetic," and ends by calling Trump "an ignorant, bigoted, pathologically dishonest authoritarian."

"Most voters aren't like us. Most people are picking up on politics when it finds them on Facebook, on the radio in the car, or when they flip through a magazine in line at the grocery store," the Clinton campaign pitch goes.

"Their information is filtered through the press. And right now, a lot of journalists are failing to hold Trump accountable and grading him on a curve, while forcing Hillary to meet an entirely different standard."

Send money now, they imply, and we will defeat this horrible human being with a true, honest American.

Poor Hillary. The Washington Post's editorial is doing its best to preserve her fine reputation with the headline: "The Hillary Clinton Email Story is Out of Control." They argue that poor Hillary has endured a lot more scrutiny than someone who isn't running for president would have to endure.

Perhaps if she wasn't using an illegal personal email server, lied about the number of devices she used, didn't BleachBit her deleted emails after they were subpoenaed, didn't receive Clinton Foundation money from misogynistic countries and didn't lie about her current bout with pneumonia, the liberal press would go even easier on her than they already do.


Tweet

9/11 memorial asked to leave out 'Islamic'

In the town of Owego, New York (not to be confused with Oswego, New York) a 9/11 memorial monument is causing an Islamic organization to fret, frown and call them names.

Owego is a small town of around 20,000 people in Tioga County's southwest corner. The Islamic Organization of the Southern Tier (IOST) is quite concerned that the wording on the monument could encourage hatred for non-jihadist Muslims living in the area because it would paint all Muslims with the same brush.

There is clear evidence that the IOST has a strong argument because the original 9/11 terrorist attack by a group of "Allahu Akbar" screaming terrorists caused ordinary American citizens to go on killing sprees against every Muslim they could find. 

Muslim blood ran in the streets of Detroit, Baltimore, New York and Chicago.

Thousands of Muslims were slaughtered in the streets, mosques were razed and all heck broke loose throughout America. And that was even before any monuments went up after the buildings went down.

Oh, wait .  .  .

That didn't actually happen. Americans did not go out and kill Muslims, in spite of knowing that it was an Islamic terrorist group, under the leadership of Osama bin Laden, who killed 3,000 infidels that sunny Tuesday in 2001. 

The next 9/11 in 2012 was in Benghazi, Libya where 4 Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists. American citizens understood that the attack was inspired by Islam, (aka the religion of peace).  

Even if Hillary Clinton had not lied when she claimed that a video, critical of Muhammed, was the catalyst of the attack on the American complex, the attack would still be tied to Islam and the intolerance some Muslims have for the West.

Islamic apologists frequently use this worn out talking point, as if identifying the ideology that motivates a particular faction of Muslims to resort to terror tactics is followed by all Muslims causing Americans to paint them all with the same brush. 

Implying that notion also implies Americans are too stupid to understand the differences between Islamic jihadists and Muslims who just want to live in peace. 

We get it.

The IOST wants the word 'Islamic' removed from the monument to read just "terrorists" or even"Al Qaeda terrorists." They want to divorce the ideology from the act, as if Islam had nothing to do with jihadist terror.

But Americans are smart enough to know better and to understand the motives of organizations that want to pretend that jihad has nothing to do with Islam. Many Americans are even reading the Koran to better understand how some Muslims commit terrorism in the name of Islam.

If Muhammed, the prophet of Islam, was alive today, he would say that those who are willing to die in the name of Islam are the most religious Muslims and will be rewarded in the afterlife.

And that's the rub.


Tweet

Clinton being sued for "doing a Hillary"

Charles Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, and Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith, are suing Hillary Clinton, mother of Chelsea Clinton.  

Tyrone and Sean were two of the four people who died in Benghazi in 2012, while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. The other two were Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Glen Doherty.

Charles and Patricia are alleging that Clinton's "reckless handling" of classified information contributed to their deaths.

Wow--where did we hear that before?

Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA is handling the case on behalf of both parents for causing the death of their sons as well as for defamation and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

The lawsuit implies that Hillary's use of a private email server contributed to the deaths in Benghazi as the terrorists were able to 'obtain the whereabouts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and thus the U.S. State Department and covert and other government operations in Benghazi, Libya and subsequently orchestrate, plan, and execute the now infamous September 11, 2012 attack."

"Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs' sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist that took their lives," Layman said in the introductory statement.

Additional to the wrongful death and negligence charges, the parents also claim that Clinton defamed them in statements to the media, according to court documents.

Basically, during her presidential campaign, Clinton has "negligently, recklessly and/or maliciously" defamed Smith and Woods by implying that they were liars or directly calling them liars to protect her public image. She is also alleged to intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to keep their mouths shut about the Benghazi attack on at least four separate occasions, Klayman wrote.

Clinton's campaign hasn't yet responded to requests for comment.

Speaking last week to Fox's Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," Clinton claimed she didn't tell family members that the attack was due to a video and was not terrorism.  She suggested the family members misunderstood her because they where overwhelmed by grief.

Of course, anyone with a brain realizes that there was no reason for Smith and Woods to lie to the American public about what Clinton told them as the bodies of their children were on the tarmac. The fact that Woods kept a diary and wrote down what Clinton told him, suggests that he wasn't overwhelmed and should inform the public of the truth.

"I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that," the former First Liar said. "As other members of families who've lost loved ones have said, that's not what they heard. I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who, in that moment, may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said."

Hillary Clinton doesn't seem to know how to tell the truth. She clearly lied about her email scandal and refuses to come clean. If you don't think she's a liar, then you're not paying attention.



Tweet

Over 20 dead in Benghazi jihadist car bombing

At least 23 are dead and dozens more wounded from a car bombing targeting security forces in Benghazi.

Some experts believe that a connection exists between the car bombing and the U.S.-launched campaign the previous day against the Islamic State in their current stronghold in Sirte, Libya, several hundred miles west of Benghazi.

A hospital official spoke to the Associated Press saying the bodies  were still arriving there in the aftermath of Tuesday's bombing in the al-Qawarsha district on the outer fringes of the city. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was a newly hired janitor and wasn't authorized to speak.

The Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries, a coalition of several Islamic militias that includes Ansar al-Sharia, (an Al Qaeda affiliate) took credit for the bombing. 

They posted the claim on Twitter and it isn't known how many retweets and 'likes' the tweet received.

Hillary Clinton was unavailable for comment.


Tweet

If Hillary gets her way, they'll be celebrating in Benghazi

Hillary launched her "foreign policy" speech which wasn't really a foreign policy speech [is it ever what she says it is?] but was actually an attack on the presumptive Republican nominee for the presidency, Donald Trump.

The Queen of Benghazi spoke at a San Diego auditorium. Behind her stood 19 American flags, each one representing an American woman who slept with husband while he was in a political office--Hillary was never told that small tidbit of my imagination.

"It's not hard to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin," Hillary said, managing not to shriek, as she normally does. This ploy
appeared to be an attempt to scare the crap out of the liberals in the "peanut gallery," many who have loved ones in the military. 

They have no clue that they will be as supported by Clinton as she was supportive of the "Benghazi Four."

Just like the Obama administration has kept us safe against terrorism (not counting Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, Benghazi and San Bernadino, just for starters) Hillary claims that she can protect us.

"Donald Trump's ideas aren't just different--they are dangerously incoherent. They're not really ideas, just as series of bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies." This coming from a woman who is more comfortable with a lie, than her husband is lying with an underage girl on an Epstein getaway.

Hillary had the audacity to promise "to keep America's security at the heart of my campaign." How will she do that? Like the 3 a.m. phone call she slept through?

She blathered on: "He is not just unprepared. He is temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability, and immense responsibility [something Hillary has never taken]. This is someone who should ever have the nuclear codes."

It probably doesn't matter if Trump has the nuclear codes--Hillary allowed Putin to have it when her server was exposed like a Bill Clinton monogramed pair of under pants to an underage prostitute. 

Some of the things Hillary said have weight, but only if someone else had said them. Having her be the messenger to attack Trump is as effective as an aspirin treating cancer.

Never forget that she told the families of the Benghazi dead that a video was to blame. 

Hillary Clinton has never met a lie she doesn't tell if it promotes her political agenda. Trump may be loud, thin-skinned, narcissistic and obnoxious; he may speak to us on a 4th grade level and repeat himself like he blamed "Little Marco" for doing, but if it came down to voting for a felon, a socialist or an obnoxious blowhard, I'd take the blowhard any day if I had no other choice.

Remember, nobody really goes into the office of the presidency with full foreign policy knowledge. Obama obviously didn't and he learned nothing along the way. Trump may be able to learn. 

And Hillary's performance record is like a black hole that simply sucks beyond belief.

If Hillary becomes POTUS, they'll be celebrating throughout the Middle East and hand out sweets in Benghazi.


Tweet