EU funding $11 million for Qur'an contributions and Islam regarding European civilization and perhaps its overthrow

Angry that some guy used a Koran as a doorstop

The European Union is forking over $11,000,000 to study the period of 1150 to 1850, a time when Islam had as much influence on European civilization as a fly on the butt of a camel, except for the, you know, constant threat to Europe's existence. Rather than spending the money on exploring ways of alleviating Islamic violence perpetrated on all things unIslamic, the EU would rather capitulate and hope the alligator eats them last.

“‘The European Qu’ran [sic]’: Falsifying European History With Funding from the EU,” by Hélène de Lauzun, European Conservative, April 16, 2025:

The European Union is preparing to provide €10 million in funding for a scientific research project aimed at highlighting the contribution of the Qu’ran [sic] and the Muslim religion to European civilisation. The influence of the Muslim Brotherhood is evident behind this undertaking.

The objective of this programme, entitled ‘The European Qur’an,’ the idea of which was launched six years ago and which is due to last until 2026, is to “challenge traditional perceptions of the Qur’anic text and well-established ideas about European religious and cultural identities” through traveling exhibitions, conferences, and book publications. The starting point of the project’s initiators is that the influence of Islam on European culture is greatly underestimated. “Our project is built on the conviction that the Qur’an has played an important role in the formation of medieval and early modern European religious diversity and identity and continues to do so,” reads the website homepage. The project aims to cover a chronological span of seven hundred years, from 1150 to 1850, from the Iberian Peninsula to Hungary.

But why don't we take a little look at how the Qur'an [aka Koran] has enlightened the world in ways it hasn't seen since the Dark Ages.

Love thy neighbor has been a Judeo-Christian precept long before Islam was brought here by Mohammed, the so called prophet of Islam and a man who married a 6-year-old Ayisha but was descent enough to wait 3 years before consummating the marriage.

When Muslims become your neighbor, be you Christian, Jew, Hindu or atheist, you can bet they're going to show their love in the methods  described in Islamic scripture:

Koran 2:191 "Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them."

Koran 3:28 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends."
Koran 3:85 "Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable."
Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam."
Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran."
Koran 8:60 "Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.'
Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them."
Koran 9:5 "When opportunity arises kill the infidels wherever you find them."
Koran 9:30 "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them."
Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood."
Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.
Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."

But while religious tolerance is not their strong point, Islam is tolerant of most lifestyles not associated with religious beliefs, except when it comes to women:

A hadith in Sahih Muslim, Book 20, Number 4635 (and similar narrations), where it's mentioned that if a Muslim man is killed by a woman, he would not be considered a martyr. This isn't stating he won't go to heaven but specifically that he won't be termed a martyr in the context of jihad.

Okay, speaking about women in Islam, what happens when a woman goes to paradise? 

Glad you asked. When a Muslima dies, paradise for her includes eternal joy and peace. The peace part is obvious because dead people don't have problems, but the joy part includes her dwelling in gardens with rivers, free from pain, hardship or sorrow, so there's no excuse for kfetching [complaining], (Koran 2:25, 9:72). Thus they will have complete contentment and closeness to Allah while their husbands enjoy 72 beautiful virgins.

Jannah [heaven] also offers exquisite houses, silk clothing, ornaments and loads of fruits and drinks (Koran 22:23, 76:21). Women, even the not so beautiful ones and even those who look like something the slave dragged in, will have beauty and adornments that go beyond the expensive stuff you get on Earth.

The women will also be reunited with dead loved ones, such as their martyred kids, parents or spouse, if they're lucky like them to make it to the big show (Koran 52:21).

Finally, women who enter Jannah, will derive the greatest pleasure of all time: getting Allah's approval and perhaps even getting to check him out with their own eyes. (Koran 75:22-23, Hadith in Sahih Muslim). 

This reward is for all believers, but depends on Allah's schedule for when he is not killing infidels, especially the, you know, Jews.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call. 

So while the so called European Koran makes a case for Islam's contribution ot Europe, the hard cold facts can be delineated in such things as the Crusades, the calls for violence in the Koran, especially against the Jews, but not limited to them, their misogynistic rhetoric and having women as less than second class citizens, but more along the lines of possessions. 

Killing in the name of Islam for every slight argument against the ideology, kind of says it all about the religion of peace. 

And don't get me started on gays, lesbians and transgender people.

Tweet

Below average-looking feminists worry about American men marrying foreign women but are clueless why

"I identify as sexy"

Feminists, or as the late, great Rush Limbaugh would call them, feminazis, are miffed that American men find foreign women more attractive soulmates, choosing to marry them over red-blooded American castraters. 

Non-Western women tend to be unaffected by so called feminism, which at its core says nothing about more serious issues that women face all over the world, especially in countries with cultures that practically declassifies them as human and puts them in the category of possessions. I speak of Middle Eastern countries in particular, but while they comprise the largest segment of misogynistic nations, they are not the only ones. 

So feminism in America, and in the West, is more of a political movement than it really is a movement advocating for women's rights. Where actual danger in advocating exists, the presence of feminism is nowhere to be found.

[H/T Redstate.com]

The real feminists are the women in Iran where they are literally risking their lives for equal rights as men, or at least the right to not be forced into a marriage or to wear a hijab or cloth tent to cover themselves, lest the men get turned on.

Foreign women value traditional marriage and gender roles much like real men do in the West. By real men I mean those who think wearing a "pussy hat" is demeaning to women. Real women value and embrace their maternal nature for child-rearing and don't need to feel competitive with their male counterpart. They are family-focused as opposed to career-focused as we often see here in the West.

Feminists are upset by these traditional values as they watch men leave the American dating scene quicker than a Democrat yelling "racist." 

Some so called feminists have gone on social media to express their ire, accusing men of being "predatory" and incapable of "handling" American women. Why it's almost as if they're crying out to be handled.

YouTuber Misha Petrov interviewed women on the street about the issue of American women. She noted that Western feminists insult foreign women by claiming they're uneducated and weak-minded because they lack the same mentality as these feminists who view themselves as being better than men and better than other women. It's kind of an obnoxious virtue signaling to be an American feminist in spite of their lack of true virtue like the Iranian women have.

Petrov uncovers the paradox in which feminists hate men yet focus their entire lives around them. And the notion that men take advantage of "dumb" foreign women is simply not true. Women are taught on day one what to expect from men, but not taught what to give back. Men are thus dehumanized by feminists and viewed as something akin to tools for women's convenience.

In fact, most men simply want a stable, loving relationship and women from countries where traditional marriage is valued generally provides this and it's attractive to these men. Feminism doesn't provide this so men seek out traditional women who want traditional lives in traditional marriages.

Of course, some Western women also value tradition as noted by the trend of the "Tradwife" on TikTok, which features Western women enjoying traditional relationships with men and traditional marriages and gender roles.

You can't blame us for looking elsewhere for happiness.

Tweet

CNN's Lemon makes deplorable apology for sexist words but is called a "eff-ing a-hole"

The eff-ing a-hole of the Comedy News Network (CNN) morning show, Don Lemon, is trying to make people believe he's sorry for saying that women over 50 are past their prime. And if anyone knows Don Lemon, they know he's not an expert on women as much as he is on men, and had to google that information. 

In reality, Lemon was not talking about women being in their cognitive prime, but in their reproductive prime. However, because he's an eff--ing a-hole and an over-achieving misogynistic idiot, he conflated the two. [H/T Fox News Digital]

Lemon attempted to apologize during CNN's morning editorial call after he vomited those comments on Thursday, which was condemned by the few who heard them as sexist. If he did not have a history of being an eff--ing a-hole, as he recently displayed with his co-host on air, [google it, he does], he might have gotten away with his apology in which he said that he "did not mean to offend anyone," but everyone who knows this history knows he's as false as a penis on a woman who has 'transitioned.'

The misogyny came when the Lemon claimed Nikki Haley was past her "prime" as a woman after she announced that she would be running as a candidate in the 2024 presidential election. 

Morons like the Lemon believe they can say whatever they want about Republican women and women on the Left are not going to react when it clearly implies the same about them. Being the eff--ing a-hole that he is, the Lemon was wrong.

"Most pathetic attempt at an apology I have ever heard in my life," a CNN insider told Fox News Digital. "It did not go over well."

The same insider added that Lemon is a "eff--ing a--hole" for claiming that he must not be sexist simply because he has women in his life [but loves him some men] and compared it to a White person trying to downplay racists comments by insisting they have Black friends.

Fox News Digital previously confirmed both the Lemon and CNN CEO Chris Licht addressed staffers following widespread outrage over his comments. Licht called Lemon’s comments "upsetting, unacceptable and unfair" to his morning show co-hosts Poppy Harlow and Kaitlan Collins, calling it a "huge distraction."

"I’m just saying what the facts are. Google it. Everybody at home, when is a woman in her prime, it says 20s, 30s and 40s," the eff--ing a--hole said. "And I’m just saying Nikki Haley should be careful about saying that politicians are not in their prime, and they need to be in their prime when they serve. Because she wouldn't be in her prime according to Google or whatever it is."

But the controversy may be the only way the failing network can pick up a few more viewers. Specifically, people might tune in as they wait for the next shoe to fall and Lemon drops.

Tweet

Maloney's sour grapes blames Democrats' "sexist systems and misogyny" as why she lost to Nadler

Maloney makes noises with her mouth while Nadler uses a different body part

She may be angry she lost the nomination, but she's correct as to why she lost to Jerry Nadler, the big guy Maloney said was senile.

Carolyn Maloney, the career House Democrat, was dumped in favor of another career House Democrat Jerrold Nadler. With the usual helping of grace and class we see with career politicians, Maloney blamed her loss on the “sexist systems and misogyny” and nailed it. The Democratic Party is the most sexist, misogynistic of the two major parties and they make it even worse with identity politics and hypocrisy. They attack all white men as being white supremacists, but they vote for white guys anyway. In fact, they vote for white guys with dementia, and you know the other white guy I'm talking about.

After Rep. Jerry Nadler cruised to victory over Rep. Carolyn Maloney in Tuesday’s contentious Democratic primary to represent New York’s 12th Congressional District — ousting his longtime colleague after three decades in office in the process — Maloney whined that she was the victim of “sexist systems and misogyny” as her supporters vented their wrath at her victorious opponent.

“I’m really sad that we no longer have a woman representing Manhattan in Congress,” Maloney told her teary-eyed boosters, later adding: “In Congress, it is that when women are at the table, great decisions get made.” 

Yes, decisions like allowing men who say they are women compete against women while the women decide to do nothing but complain later.

The longtime lawmaker also thanked great female New York leaders of the past like Shirley Chisholm and Geraldine Ferraro, who Maloney said “fought sexist systems and misogyny that continues today, as we know from my own campaign” — an obvious dig at Nadler who appears confused and in chronic need of a toilet.

The mood was even uglier about an hour earlier, as Nadler, appearing as happy as Kevin Spacey in Boys Town,  addressed his supporters on the Upper West Side. 

Maloney’s "classy" backers at her loser's party in Chelsea booed and jeered Nadler's televised speech, with some yelling “Traitor!” which made no sense. They are both Democrats and therefore they both suck at making good decisions.

Democrats being sexist and misogynist? 

Yes, it's true. Republican women should remind voters as the midterms approach of the Dem's misogyny, because they're going to see it when the Left starts attack ads going after GOP women, like they did with the “holy frijolx” attack on Latina Republican Mayra Flores. 

 However, the truth be told, Maloney has defeated men in the past in primaries [obviously] so her sour grapes are just whine. She initially won her seat in 1992 while Nadler was a special-election winner the same year for the late Ted Weiss. 

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Maloney is not owed that seat just because she is a woman with entitlement issues.

And Nadler's seat is 4X Large.

Hopefully the GOP will capitalize on Maloney's own words when they cut campaign ads in the coming days ahead of the midterms.

Tweet

The fun-loving, gentler Taliban fires guns to scare women protesters rather than just kill them

Taliban spokes-terrorist Mohammad Fartmohr speaks to media stenographers

August 15th is the one -year anniversary of the day the Taliban [pronounced "Taahleebaahn" if you'r woke or an Obama] capture Kabul. For some reason, Afghan women have the balls to protest for more human rights than our women athletes who don't protest men competing against them in sports. 

Rather than stoning these brave Afghan women to death, or setting them on fire, the kinder, more gentle terrorist group fired live rounds over their fully covered heads and scared the bejeezus out of them.

When the boys in the Taliban band took full control over Afghanistan in 2021, after alleged President Joe Biden's brain-fart of an idea to just pack up and leave the country in their hands, the administration told Americans to stay cool, they've got the situation under control. After all, the Taliban leaders promised to allow women the same rights they enjoyed for the two decades they were out of power. This time they meant it and the Biden administration felt that they meant it. Why would they lie? 

Even people with half a brain such as Joe Biden believed the Taliban because you need to be a halfwit to buy their lies.

So when we took off the burqas came on. Women were immediately demoted to the level of cattle and were kicked out of their government jobs, told to get off the streets unless accompanied by a male family member to escort them. This even included their young sons. Imagine how that changed the family dynamics.

Girls and women were no longer permitted to attend a secondary school nor travel beyond 45 miles. If they broke any of these rules, they would be sent to jail for 3 days, if they were lucky.

Imagine the young girls under 20, born after the start of the Afghanistan war, who never knew how much it sucks being under the rule of the Taliban terrorists.

So to protest the current misogynistic situation, about 40 women showed up to protest in Kabul just to have their rights as human beings returned to them. After all, they promised Joe Biden they would and he agreed to the pullout. [Joe's sainted parents should have agreed to the same thing.]

The women carried a banner that read “August 15 is a black day” and chanted, “Bread, work, and freedom.”

The Taliban broke up the protest by firing guns into the air. They snatched the cell phones from the women. It is not known where the bullets landed but so far there have been no reports of people or animals being struck by falling lead.

“They didn’t beat us much this time,” a grateful protester told the BBC.

“They acted differently than earlier protests [when we were beaten]. They fired shots in the air. Though we’re afraid we came out to advocate for the rights of girls, so that at least the Taliban will open schools for them.”

The denial of education for women is a big sticking point. It goes against the Taliban’s alleged promises made to the U.S. which the Biden administration felt in their hearts the Taliban really, really meant it this time.

Afghanistan is the only country in the world that officially limits education to men only--a bad look to the rest of the world who aren't afraid of women in the workplace or in academia.

Girls have been banned from receiving secondary education, the ministry for women’s affairs has been disbanded, and in many cases women have not been allowed to work.

One activist said that some of the women were detained by the Taliban [who may be considering them for their private use as sex slaves to emulate the prophet Muhammed].

“This protest was against the Taliban’s one year in power because they don’t have any agenda for governing, girls’ schools are still closed, women are being fired from their jobs for no reason, poverty is increasing, so for all good reasons we were protesting.”

The clusterfrack of a withdrawal from Afghanistan defined Biden's incompetent presidency. He refused to listen to his Pentagon advisers and the military leaders whose brains are not addled, unlike his. As it still stands, there remain around 80,000 people in Afghanistan who were US military helpers and were promised we would take them to the US. That's almost as many IRS agents our fool in command is hiring.

Biden's poll numbers are in the toilet, where they should be after he screwed up the withdrawal, leaving 13 Americans dead. He could have had the withdrawal staged at the protected Bagram Airbase instead of Hamid Karzai International Airport and saved those lives, but he is too stupid to listen to other people with functioning brains.

The Taliban are back and so are the burqas and terrible times for the Afghans.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Thankfully, Biden isn't running in 2024. He may claim he is but he's lying. He doesn't want to be a lame duck by admitting the truth, but there is no way he will remain fully continent in 2 more years, and you just can't have the head of the most powerful nation on the planet dropping a deuce in his Joe Boxers.

Tweet

Beto is the misogynistic 'Psychedelic Warlord'

"Hey hey, ho, ho, weird things are happening"

It's a good bet that Beto is going to be toast in the 2020 primaries. The media is going after his sordid past and they're coming up with a treasure trove of unsavory information that can only appeal to the lowest amongst us, [e.g., Democrats].

The former Texas congressman and current "Dude of the Dems" has an interesting 'edgy' history that goes beyond his punk band days, as exposed by 

Reuters on Friday.

Joseph Menn, a Reuters reporter, admits that while there is "no indication" O'Rourke took part in the "edgiest sorts of hacking activity" like "breaking into computers" while part of the group known as the Cult of the Dead Cow, his participation did include creating short pieces of writing known as “text files” under the nom-de-plume, "Psychedelic Warlord."  

Archived versions of writings attributed to O’Rourke’s alias “Psychedelic Warlord,” include one that criticized some women as “sluts,” mocked them for having “violent boyfriends,” and suggested a way to deal with these women was to call them “completely ugly,” or inform “Nazi Skins in your area” that they had “AIDS.”

Beto was a teenager when this piece was published but we are living at a time when we are held accountable for the things we may have said or done as humans with undeveloped brains. Nothing gets past the woke haters.

Rob Friedlander, a spokesperson for O’Rourke declined to comment on this story beyond pointing to comments the candidate made on the campaign trail in Iowa on Friday. The El Paso Times reported O’Rourke acknowledged his membership in the Cult of the Dead Cow at one event in Iowa, however, the newspaper pointed out he “did not say whether he regrets his involvement." 

Yes, we must now apologize to the world, to people we don't even know, for some stupid thing we did as stupid kids. I hate to see myself defending Beto [in every other instance, he doesn't deserve it] but to go after him for something he did as a teenager, is ridiculous. It's obvious the media doesn't want a white guy running for president when they might be able to get a hussy [aka: Kamala Harris], or a full-blown socialist, to run instead.

“It was something that I was a part of when I was a teenager in El Paso a long, long time ago,” Beto told the group.

O’Rourke later said he regretted the writings during an interview with a podcast in Iowa.

The various writings attributed to O’Rourke’s alias were dated between 1987 and 1989, a period when he was under eighteen, which included a mix of fiction and commentary. And while one of the files had derogatory remarks about some women, the Reuters article credited O’Rourke with having “tried to do something about sexism in the male-dominated world of hacking” by pushing for the Cult of the Dead Cow to admit a female member. It isn't known, however, if Beto planned to refer to female initiates as "cows."

The text file with the misogynistic language was not referenced in the Reuters article because the outlet leans left and they didn't want to damage a possible 2020 contender too badly, just in case he got in. 

If he looked like this, would he be electable? 

Beto was last seen pumping gas in his pollution spewing vehicle. In spite of the fact that he's worth about $9 million, and that he supports the Green New Deal, he asked the public for gas money.

In one piece, Psychedelic Warlord [O'Rourke] writes from the perspective of a narrator who confronts a feeling of boredom and aimlessness by going on a killing spree including hitting children with a car. 

The piece, dated 1988, continues with the narrator describing the murder as an “act of love” and saying the feeling it provoked was “simply ecstasy.”

“I had killed nearly 38 people by the time of my twenty-third birthday, and each one was more fulfilling than the last,” Psychedelic Warlord wrote.

Like Alexandria Obviously-Comatose, Beto is just "living in the world." And just because he called women "sluts" and mocked their appearance, and wrote about killing children, is no reason to fault him. 

He is older now and is only willing to kill the unborn up to the moment of birth--they don't get to be "living in the world."

But he can skateboard, dude.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Samantha Bee: you can cut the hypocrisy with a dull knife

Roseanne Barr made a stupid racist remark about Valerie Jarret, a horrible human being, and she apologized for it and begged ABC not to fire her. Barr, being a Trump supporter, didn't stand a chance and within a few hours found herself out the door.

I do not blame ABC for firing Barr. I believe President Trump should have applauded their move, but he didn't.

Samantha Bee made a vulgar, misogynist remark about Ivanka Trump and she apologized for it, saying her expletive (she called Ivanka a "c**t") crossed the line and that it was "inexcusable," but she's hoping to be excused for it and the chances are great that she will be.

Both Barr and Bee have shows on the Disney-owned networks, but the four hours it took Barr to get axed has long-since passed while Bee remains employed and even received an award last night, the Television Academy Honors for her contribution to social change.

In this instance the change involved making it acceptable for the left to call women who appear to be on the right (Ivanka is actually a Democrat) a "c**t," the most vile and disgusting word anyone could use to describe a female she or he doesn't like.

Worse, Bee made an innuendo that Ivanka should dress sexy to manipulate her father. Rather than mentioning that, the unfunny phony said:

"We spent the day wrestling with the repercussions of one bad word, when we all should have spent the day incensed that as a nation we are wrenching children from their parents and treating people legally seeking asylum as criminals. If we are OK with that then really, who are we?"

That claim is a lie. Nobody is 'wrenching children from their parents.

President Trump tends to fight back over every personal attack, even when he's 'punching down.' I think it diminishes him, although I know many believe it's okay. But in this instance, where a talentless person attacks his family and suggests that his daughter should use her sexual allure to get him to do what Bee wants him to do, is beyond the limit.

I don't blame Trump at all for coming back at this vulgar pig. I just wouldn't blast her for having "no talent," that speaks for itself. But he's right to call it a "total double standard" is right on the money, and asking why Bee hasn't been fired is a "total fair question."

Trump tweeted Friday:

"Why aren't they firing no talent Samantha Bee for the horrible language used on her low ratings show? A total double standard but that's O.K., we are Winning, and will be doing so for a long time to come!"

Trump often speaks to the 'no talent' of his enemies, but that is irrelevant to the discussion. He needs to consider how Bee's words are in opposition to the feminist movement, which only seems to be a movement for women on the left. He needs to point out the abject hypocrisy of such a statement.

But he seems more caught up in TV ratings and level of talent, or whether a media outlet is "failing," and that isn't important to the conversation.

Now let's see how Bee's "heartfelt" Roseanne Barr-ish apology works on the leftist media.

"I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it," Bee lied Thursday. The only thing she regrets is the fallout from her vulgarity.

TBS issued a "heartfelt" apology too. They said that Bee "has taken the right action in apologizing for the vile and inappropriate language she used about Ivanka Trump," and added that "those words should not have been aired."

Bee's TBS show, "Full Frontal" is taped. It's a mystery how her words got past their own review.

"It was our mistake too, and we regret it," TBS said.

No, they don't regret it.

TBS allowed Samantha Bee to make those vulgar remarks that were inspired by a simple photo of Ivanka Trump and her child posted on Twitter. It was not a mistake, unless the person or people responsible are also held to the proper standard and are fired along with Bee.

How did they miss these words:

"You know Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices you feckless c**t! He listens to you! Put on something tight and low cut and tell your father to f**king stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes."

The italics are mine--they point out the implication of incest in Bee's words. Let's call them a "micro-aggression;" that seems to work for their side.

Bee's monologue was uploaded to her YouTube channel where the "C" and "F" words were not censored.

So there's that.


Tweet

Samantha Bee does a Roseanne Barr but will she go?

Possibly one of the least funny comediennes to hold that position and host "Full Frontal," Samantha Bee thought she was being hilarious by calling Ivanka Trump a "feckless c**t adding that she "should put on something tight and low cut" in her Wednesday monotony log. The vulgar comment was in response over a photograph Ivanka shared on social media. One theory says that Bee is likely jealous over Ivanka's attractive physical appearance while she is as pretty as a bag of camel vomit.

No doubt there will be no repercussions over Bee's disgusting verbiage--after all, she's no Roseanne Barr so she'll be protected by her liberal bosses.

Ivanka was criticized by several leftist celebrities for sharing a photo of her hugging her son amid reports the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) lost track of 1,500 immigrant children in the last three months of last year. The left evidently blames her for the problem because, as you all know, Ivanka holds the data of the ORR and somehow lost it. Not.

"Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we've seen this week," the garbage mouth Bee tweeted, referring to Barr's racist tweet.

"You know, Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices you feckless c**t! 

"He listens to you! Put on something tight and low cut and tell your father to f***ing stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes," she said.

Bee's show airs on Wednesday's on TBS, an asset of Turner Broadcasting System which also owns CNN, HLN, and TNT.

TBS declined comment when Fox News requested it.

One Twitter user wrote: "If this statement had been addressed to a child of a former president, Samantha Bee would be out of a job.

Another observed: "Roseanne deserved to get fired for her comment. Samantha Bee called Ivanka a 'c***' on air and Keith Obermann routinely calls the President a 'motherf***er.' Do you think either will get fired? Maybe see why so many Americans think there's a media double-standard for liberals.

According to Dan Gainor, the vice president of business and culture for Media Research Center, the story about Bee's vulgar comments was not covered.

When appearing  on Fox News, Jessica Tarlov , a liberal commentator, was asked whether Samantha Bee, like Roseanne Barr, should be fired for her comment. Guess what--she claimed that a racist statement is worse than a sexist, anti-woman statement, so no, she gets a free pass. 

Foul Richard Fowler, a liberal, also made it sound like Barr's words were more inflammatory than Bee's vulgar, misogynistic [with incestuous implications] words. 

Using the "C" word demeans womanhood but it's okay when liberals do it while blaming Trump for being vulgar.

Samantha Bee has no insight, no brilliance and no actual sense of humor. She sounded like a junior high school girl trying to impress her little friends with a naughty word, but a word that shows her incredible hypocrisy.


Tweet

Democrat Esty called to resign over violent abuse allegations against key staffer

The Democrats are putting pressure on Rep. Elizabeth Esty, trying to get her to resign because of the way she mishandled harassment and abuse claims against a key staffer. 

Esty has been under the gun since Thursday after reports in The Connecticut Post and Washington Post were levied which stated that the three-term House member allowed a chief of staff to remain on the job despite her being aware of allegations that he physically harmed and threatened to "kill" a female staff member.

Democrats hate it when their hypocrisy shows.

According to the allegations, then Chief of Staff Tony Baker on May 5, 2016, call-bombed (nearly 50 times) Anna Kain, a female staffer with whom he had a romantic relationship, and once punched the woman while in Esty's Washington office.

Ms. Kain provided a voicemail tape to The Washington Post in which Baker was reported to have said: "You better f**king reply to me or I will f**king kill you." [Fill in the blanks.]

Esty learned of the incident within a week but rather than suspending or firing Baker, she instead met with lawyers to cover her butt. She acknowledged that she didn't adequately protect Kain [by 'adequately' she meant 'did not protect Kain at all'] and has vowed to "do better." 

She said she was sorry, sort of, but added that she would not resign because she's a hypocritical feminist nightmare, as are many liberal women who pretend to care for other women while failing to advocate for women with differing political views and abused women in Middle Eastern cultures.

On Saturday, Connecticut Senate President Martin Looney along with at least six other state Democrats, called for Esty to resign. Naturally, Republicans called for the same.

To save face for his party, Looney claimed "Congresswoman Esty has long been a conscientious leader in the fight against harassment and abuse in the workplace." [Except when she wasn't.] "However . . . if the facts of this matter involving former staff of the congresswoman's office are as they are alleged to be in recent news articles, then Congresswoman Esty should do the right thing and resign."

Asking a Democrat to actually do the right thing is like the frog telling the scorpion not to sting him while riding on his back. It is the nature of Democrats to do things at the expense of others that make them feel good abut themselves.

That's how Looney got his name.

Mae Flexer, a Democratic state senator, jumped on the Esty resignation bandwagon at the very beginning.

"I was devastated to learn about the situation," Flexer told the tabloid. "The congresswoman failed her staff on every level when she decided to protect an alleged abuser instead of them. It's completely unacceptable."

Esty fired Baker in 2016 and gave him a neat $5,000 severance along with a positive job recommendation--the absolute worst thing of all that she did or didn't do.


Esty supposedly repaid the severance money and demanded counseling for Baker. 

Too little, too late. 

Esty must go.


Tweet

Philippine's Duterte orders female commie fighters shot in genitals

Speaking through his facial sphincter, Philippine President Rodrigo "Eyeweelkeelyew" Duterte bragged about ordering his troops to shoot female communist fighters in their vaginas, according to several reports. 

His words triggered criticism after the remark was published Monday.

The former mayor, now president, told the group of about 200 former rebels in Malacañang, "Tell the soldiers, 'There's a new order coming from the mayor. We won't kill you. We will just shoot your vagina.'"

"If there is no vagina, it would be useless," the moronic misogynistic Duterte added as the crowd of sycophants laughed on cue.

The official transcript of the speech replaced the word "vagina" with a dash.

Duterte is famous for killing drug dealers and users. He is alleged to have thrown some of them from helicopters at altitude.

The comment "is just the latest in a series of misogynistic, derogatory, and demeaning statements he has made about women," Carlos Conde, a Human Rights Watch researcher told the failing New York Times. He added that encouraging state troops to sexually assault women during a conflict violates "international humanitarian law."

In other words, do not shoot communist women combatants in the vagina--follow the law and just kill them.

Congresswoman Emmi de Jesus, who represents the Gabriela Women's Party, called Duterte a "macho-fascist" who endorsed "state terrorism" against women, according to the Guardian. "He has further presented himself as the epitome of misogyny and fascism rolled in one," she added.

But the scummy Duterte is much worse than that--he's sadistic and cruel.

He once said that a gang rape victim was so "beautiful" that he wished he had "been first."

Last week, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said she is starting an investigation into alleged crimes by security officers in the Philippines. 

Duterte's take on the situation was that he wouldn't care if he was imprisoned by the ICC as long as he could have conjugal visits from more than one woman.

And the left thinks Trump is bad.


Tweet

Matt Taibbi: fact equals fiction when writing, he writes

Matt Taibbi: sexual predator or just a liar?

You can't believe liberals when their lips are moving or when they're writing a hit piece.

Rolling Stone magazine "journalist" Matt Taibbi, 47, author of "Insane Clown President" was a big hit with his choir of anti-Trump leftists, but it turns out he's the one with the bike horn and seltzer bottle.

He wrote a memoir in 2000 detailing his time in Russia and his behavior toward Russian women there, but now he claims his memoir was a work of fictional "satire."

Busted.

The book talks about Taibbi's galavanting around Russia when he and colleague Mark Ames, worked for an English-language newspaper there. 

The book includes anecdotes in which he and Ames apparently mistreated and maybe even assaulted some of the women they encountered in Russia, according to Reuters.

The book, co-authored with Ames is titled: "The Exile: Sex, Drugs and Libel in the New Russia." 

It refers to Russian women as being "usually available to the highest bidder" and willing to engage in "condomless sex," an excerpt published in the Chicago Reader published.

In a Facebook "Hail Mary" last week, Taibbi wrote that the memoir was really fictional and that his intent was to poke fun at the idea of Americans living in Russia. 

He just forgot to mention that at the time.

Taibbi suddenly canceled a scheduled appearance at a Chicago humanities festival after an interview gone bad with an NPR reporter was poorly received by liberals who still listen to NPR. The reporter asked Taibbi about the memoir.

"I regret many editorial decisions that I made back then [like printing the truth], and misogynistic language to describe many people and women in particular," the liar said. "I hope readers can forgive my poor judgment at that time."

Ames, the book's co-author, quickly followed up with a post saying the book was fictional [even though they lied to their readers in 2000 by passing it off as nonfiction].

"I never raped, harassed, assaulted anyone, and it sickens me that I'm dragged into having to make this sort of denial," Ames wrote, according to Reuters. [But mostly, it sickens him and Taibbi that they got caught.]

Aimee Levitt of the Chicago Reader, notes that Twitter users pointed out that the book contains a note at the beginning saying it was nonfictional.

The question is, which time did they lie?

Levitt writes: "To fail to acknowledge Taibbi's earlier work is to say that what he and Ames wrote about doing didn't matter, how those women felt didn't matter, and, by extension, to say we don't matter, and you, our female readers, don't matter. But we do. And you do."



Tweet

First they came for our statues . . .

Now that the North American movement to remove all traces of offensive history (most recently the memorial marking the pew where slave owner and the first U.S. President George Washington sat in church over 200 years ago with his family) it's time for us to get serious with all offensive reminders from every American who ever offended anyone. 

Specifically, we must rid Facebook of all white men who ever told a sexual joke, masturbated to Playboy Magazine or used the "N" word. All photos must be taken down, and any mention of them by name must be taboo and they should be shamed forever more.

Next, we need to sort through our memories of those liberals, white, black, brown or otherwise, who ever told a racist/racial joke, wore a Halloween costume of a culture not their own, and made fun of anyone for any reason at any time.

Next, we need to speak out against groups that are misogynistic and treat women as lower forms of life. 

Specifically, we need to speak out against those people who practice sharia law and Islamic countries that practice it and refuse to give women the same rights as men. 

A good way to begin this process is to do the same thing to mosques that leftists and college students do to statues of dead slave owners who are part of the history of this country. 

In fact, misogyny still exists while slavery in the United States does not, so it's important the left speak out immediately against the misogyny of Islamic law.

What's that sound?

Oh, it's George Washington rolling over in his grave over selective outrage.



Tweet

"Mister America, tear down this madrassa"

The angry left is tearing down statues of Confederate soldiers and their leaders because they believe those men advocated for slavery. They even want to go further with the tearing down and include such historical figures as the founding fathers.

Yale is removing a stone carving depicting a Puritan settler aiming a musket at a Native American. The 88-year-old carving on Sterling Memorial Library will be moved to another location.

In fact, Yale earlier this year renamed Calhoun College because John C. Calhoun was not just a former Vice President, he was a slavery supporter.

The Charlottesville City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday morning to cover the city's statues of Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson in black fabric to represent the city's mourning of Heather Heyer, who was killed when a white supremacist intentionally mowed her down in his car.

In the confederate statues debate, libtard and political commentator Al Sharptongue is taking the whole thing personally--screw whatever the public thinks--it's not about them, it's about Sharptongue.

During a recent interview with PBS's Charlie Rose (see video) Sharptongue said that he doesn't want his tax dollars to support monuments honoring even men who owned slaves. He got specific with the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C. 

The irony is, Sharpton owes about a million dollars in taxes he refuses to pay. Obama protected him in the past. Let's hope Trump will end that protection in the present.

"This is personal to us. My great grandfather was a slave in South Carolina," the tax evading Sharpton said. "People need to understand that people were enslaved."

I don't know why Sharptongue thinks everyone skipped that class in school.

But nobody on the left seems to care about the one religion that through their practices and scripture continues to promote slavery, misogyny and attacks basic human rights.

Take a guess which religion I'm referring to . . . 

Yes, it's Islam. And we have to ask ourselves why are we looking the other way when a religion practices slavery and forced marriages of young girls to old men.

The prophet of Islam, Muhammad, made sex slaves from the wives of the men he killed. He also enslaved the children and promoted anti-Semitism. 

Why are we allowing American Muslim children and adults to be taught that this is okay? 

Who in America will stand up against modern slavery instead of going after men who were a product of their culture and times? 

Why aren't these same leftists tearing down of madrassas and mosques that advocate slavery, misogyny and hatred of the American way of life as opposed to Sharia which clearly goes against our values?

Let me be clear: I am not talking about individual Muslims who live as normal Americans. 

I'm talking about those who have no problem with some of the teachings of the Quran that has inspired slavery, anti-Semitism and yes, terrorism.

Where's Antifa when it comes to real fascism by religion? Where are the women's organizations in America when it comes to female genital mutilation and basic women's rights denied to them in Islam?

And why do only black lives matter to some, but not all lives, and certainly not Jewish lives to some on the alt left and alt right.



Tweet

Philippine Duterte defends adultery, gets criticized

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte was criticized on Wednesday for defending adultery committed by a political ally. So for Duterte, killing drug users and pushers is good and so too are extramarital sexual relationships. The guy sounds like he's president of ISIS.

The sadistic leader said that, like himself, House of Representatives Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez--who made it public he had extramarital affairs--had "many wives." 

He did not explain the main reason why he had "many wives" is because they thought he was pond scum for cheating on them, but that's to be expected.

"This is a world of hypocrisy," the iron-fisted leader said. "Who among you here does not have a mistress?" he said in a speech aired on live TV--apart from the Vatican itself.

"All of it is sexist and misogynistic to explain improper behavior simply by virtue of being male," Senator Risa Hontiveros told AFP. "It sends a message that undermines the many struggles and gains so far for women's rights and gender equality."

Alvarez is the country's fourth-highest official and is buddies with Duterte. He made headline last week when he publicly admitted have sired eight kids, six from two women other than his lovely wife, Stupidalita. 

Duterte admitted on a televised speech to government employees in Manila that his comments defending Alvarez's behavior were "a chauvinist statement." Then the idiot added, "But really, there are so many women and you (have) so short a time in this world. My God!"

The chauvinist crowd laughed along with him.

Duterte thought he'd save himself by adding, "The thing there, is that you're able to support the children. That's it."

Duterte argued that while Christian Filipinos are allowed one wife, Alvarez "never converted to Christianity. So he is not bound by the rules of the number of women that you can have." [See, I told you Duterte sounds more like the president of ISIS.]

His critics dispute his statements, saying that Muslim men are permitted to marry more than once, and even beat their wives, but adultery is a criminal offense. 

Of course, Muslim women cannot have more than one husband, and when the husband dies before her, she gets half of what her sons get in the estate. 

Duterte, whose IQ is coincidentally the same as his age, 72, and whose first marriage was annulled, is in a long-term relationship with a woman, and has openly bragged about having mistresses and using Viagra to get it going.

"Who isn't entitled to happiness?" the sexist pig asked. "Ask these lawmakers, how many of them have two, three or four mistresses? Ask them," he said.

And while you're at it, as Duterte how he feels about the women having two, three or four men who don't require Viagra.

There is nothing wrong and everything right about fidelity and having one wife.


Tweet

Potty mind Democrat apologizes to Kellyanne Conway

A Democratic congress pig apologized for a tasteless and rather disgusting joke he made about the photo of Kellyanne Conway sitting with her feet up on the Oval Office sofa.

Rep. Cedric Richmond (Dumb-o-crat--La.) is also chair-pig of the Congressional Black Caucus, and they should be ashamed having him as their leader. He made the remark at the Washington Press Club Foundation's congressional dinner Wednesday night. In his speech, he referenced a photo showing Conway on the sofa during a gathering.

Prior to his remark in question, the prior speaker Tim Scott (R-S.C.) referred to the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal. 

Richmond responded to Scott saying "But I really just want to know what was going on there, because, I won't tell anybody. And you can just explain to me that--that circumstance, because she really looked kind of familiar there in that position there. But don't answer. And I don't want you to refer back to the '90s."

Anyone with at least half a brain, (aka leftists) understands the innuendo Richmond was making. 

On Thursday, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel (Mitt's daughter) urged the misogynist to apologize for the comments she referred to as "disgusting" and "offensive."

Ya think?

"A snarky joke for you is just a reminder of the demeaning comments women hear every single day," Romney McDaniel said. "And trust me, it happens to all women."

After trying to decide if it helped or hurt his career with hypocritical Democratic women voters, Richmond decided to apologize. He said he came to his decision to apologize "after a discussion with people I know and trust." 

In other words, he didn't take it upon himself to decide to apologize, or realize how much he sucks at hiding his misogyny. 

He added that he understood "the way my remarks have been received by many." 

Yes, those leftists mentioned above and conservatives with our silly old values of respect for women understood his remarks to be disgusting, demeaning and a revelation of Richmond's character.

"I have consistently been a champion for women and women's issues, and because of that the last thing I would want to ever do is utter words that would hurt or demean them," his balderdash statement read. "I apologize to Kellyanne Conway and everyone who has found my comments to be offensive."

Anyone fluent in the English language, for example.

Now I'm going to have to research on comments Richmond made about President Trump on women.


Tweet

Selective-issue feminists safely condemn an Oscar winning non-Muslim white guy

In a safe display of moral outrage, feminists, too frightened to condemn Islamic misogyny, attacked actor Casey Affleck's Oscar win on Sunday. 

Rather than being outraged over Islamic practices that include wife beating, honor killings, forced marriages, legal subordination to men, and the forced wearing of cloth sacks to cover all exposed skin, Affleck is alleged to have sexually harassed women for years. His feminist detractors are demanding that he be shunned rather than celebrated.

None of the feminists involved have ever won an Oscar or the approval of their fathers.

Most recently, Affleck had the audacity to kiss a female entertainment reporter on the cheek prior to the Oscar ceremony. How cheeky of him. His critics called the kiss sexist and demeaning to women--particularly women misandrists who rebuke all affection bestowed upon them by men who identify as men.

In a predictable article in Elle, progressive (aka leftist) writer Sady Doyle said that men accused of having abusive pasts deserve nothing but contempt. The predictable part was her tying Affleck's continued celebrity to the election of Donald Trump, because leftists think, talk, dream and fart politics.

And then there's the predictable and trusty 'privileged white guy ploy.' Doyle wrote "By endlessly forgiving abusive men, we tell women that the abuse they suffer is less important than some guy's right to get his point of view across. White men in entertainment can get away with anything."

Tell that to Robert Blake. (Google it.)

Of course there are abusive men out there. I think we can all agree they suck. But making a racist statement about white men of privilege sucks just as much. I resent that and so should all decent people.

Feminists, you want to make a real difference? Go shun Muslims who beat their wives according to sharia. Make bold, public political statements against Islamic theocratic countries that treat women like possessions. 

It's easy to attack American white men--we're soft targets for the most part.

But I dare you, I double-dare you to put aside your hypocrisy and speak out against the misogyny of sharia law and how women are treated under it. 

I dare you.


Tweet

Hypocrisy Rodham Clinton

This isn't brand new--we've always known that Hillary Clinton pays women about $0.71 to the dollar the men at the Clinton Foundation make, but now hacked emails released by WikiLeaks describes a payroll schedule where men at the foundation averaged about $68,000 per year in salary and women averaged about $64,000.

The disclosing email was sent by an employee to Bruce Lindsey, the foundation's chairman, and to Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta.

The averages were based on 25 men and 37 women employed by the foundation.

Hillary has always been quite vocal for a woman's right to choose for herself if she wants to kill her unborn child. She has also advocated equal pay for all but the foundation checkbook evidently didn't get the memo.

Her hypocrisy is palpable.

She lies when she claims to be for women's rights--if she really was, she would be appalled at anyone who accepted money from nations that oppress, beat and kill women. But she accepts money from the Saudis and a bunch of other Islamic nations that do just that.

She lies when she denies all wrong doing with national security. She lies about a video being responsible for the attack in Benghazi, and then lied to the families of the dead.

She lies about her support of TPP and open borders. 

She lies when she says "hello."



Tweet

Sadiq Khan[Job] elected London's mayor

In an article in The Independent, the new mayor of Londistan, Sadiq Khan[man] pledged to help Hillary Clinton defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

Wait--how does Khan know that Hillary Clinton is going to actually be nominated? She might, and probably should be, indicted for breaking the law with using an unauthorized private email server.

London, as you might know, is located in a place called England, a region which is not in the United States of America. Why is a Muslim mayor with a spotted past interested in manipulating American politics, you ask.

First of all, Prime Minister David Cameron accused the Khan[artist] of sharing a platform with an extremist who called for the Jews to drown in the ocean. In spite of this, Khan was elected mayor, but perhaps it's what got him elected in Londonistan in the first place.

Guilt by association is the cry Islamists will argue, but if the shoe was on the other foot, the Labour Party would have used the same tactic to discredit their opposition.

Interestingly, the UK's Labour Party has been accused in several instances of anti-Semitism. Even their fearless leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has called Hamas and Hezbollah 'friends.' 

The London election pitted Khan against Zac Goldstein, 41, the son of a billionaire financier, and whose education was elite. Upon winning the election, Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and the majority party in the nation's National Assembly held up a sign saying: "Heartiest Congratulation [sic] to Sadiq Khan 1st Muslim Mayor of London who defeated millionaire Jew Zec [sic] Goldsmith." 

The idiots didn't even know how to spell Goldsmith's first name, but they sure knew he was a rich Jew.

Never to miss a leftist opportunity, Hillary Clinton tweeted: "Son of a Pakistani bus driver, champion of workers' rights and human rights, and now Mayor of London, Congrats, @SadiqKhan." --H.

Cameron and Corbyn went at it over the Khan-Goldsmith campaigns in a heated debate. Cameron accused Khan of sharing "a platform with an extremist who called for Jews to drown in the ocean," while Corbyn, ever the extremist sympathizer and anti-Zionist accused the Conservatives of "smearing" Khan.

The Muslim extremist supporter Khan claimed he has fought extremism all his life and regrets sharing a stage with speakers who held "abhorrent" views. Then Khan had to distance himself from Corbyn after the Labour leader's row over anti-Semitism involving another Labour party puke, Ken Livingstone for his moronic statement that Hitler supported Zionism.

But Khan had to perform a vociferous and groveling apology over his comment that moderate Muslims are "Uncle Toms." Khan said he regretted using the term, which is a notorious racial slur used against blacks to suggest that they are subservient to whites. 

The apology evidently worked, or the voters didn't care, so long as their guy got elected.

In 2004, Khan spoke at a gender-segregated event entitled: "Palestine--the suffering still goes on." He shared the bill with Daud Abdullah, of the Muslim Council of Britain, a group of scumcrumpets who had led a boycott of Holocaust Memorial Day. Ibrahim Hewitt, the chairman of Interpal, a group designated a "global terrorist" organization by the U.S. Treasury Department; Azzam Tamimi, who has called for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state; Suliman Gani, who cites the Koran (4:34) calling for women to be subservient to men.

And the list of anti-Zionist sand misogynists goes on. 

Khan and his Islamozombies cried foul for his being held responsible for the views of those with whom he shares the same dais on many occasions. This is what the left does all the time, and also uses the same tactics against conservatives.

Raheem Kassam of Breitbart summarized Khan's record thus:

A letter to the Guardian in the wake of 7/7 terrorist bombings in London, blamed the attacks on British Government policy;

His legal defense of Zacarias Moussaoui, a 9/11 terrorist who confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda;

His chapter in a book entitled: "Actions Against the Police" which details how to bring charges against the police for "racism." Ironically, the same police force he'd would have authority over;

His defense of Islamist extremist Azzam Tamimi. When Dr. Tamimi told a crowd that the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad would "cause the world to tremble" and predicted "Fire . . . throughout the world if they don't stop," Mr. Khan, who shared a platform with him, dismissed the threats as "flowery language;"

His platform-sharing with Sulliman Gani, a south London imam who has urged female subservience to men, and called for the founding of an Islamic state. 

It's going to be interesting to see how Khan handles terrorism in London, should it occur, or how he will deal with "no go zones" that dot the landscape of the city like bedbugs.

Anti-Semitism is as Islamic as getting out of bed in the morning. In fact, the very first prayer, Al Fatiha, speaks to anti-Semitism. 

But the Koran is loaded with anti-Semitic crap: "Jews are the worst enemies of the Muslims (5:82); under the curse of Allah (9:30) and transformed by him into apes and pigs (2:63-65; 5:59-60). The people of Pakistan got a collective tingle in their loins not simply over the fact that a Muslim had become mayor of London, but that he did so by defeating a "rich Jew."


Tweet