Pussy Hatters mute as Taliban bans women's voices and showing their epidermis in public

To celebrate their victory on this day three years ago when a suicide jihadi blew himself up and took 13 American military personnel with him, the Taliban is banning females, young and old, from showing their face or any part of their body in public, lest it turns the men into uncontrollable sex machines. In spite of the fact that Islam's prophet had married a 6-year-old in Ayisha, had multiple wives and sex slaves, it offends the Taliban, and thus, Allah, for men to be turned on by the flesh of the female body.

This isn't to imply that Taliban men think of women as desirable. No, they see women as "fields to plow," and are treated like possessions:

"Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers." (Quran 2:223)

After the Biden-Harris impetuous and deadly withdrawal from Hamid Karzai International Airport, in Kabul in 2021, the Taliban took over Afghanistan and the women were the victims left behind.

In the Taliban's latest Islamic decision, they proclaimed that it is a violation of Sharia [Islamic law] for females to show their face or any part of their body in public, or even to speak.

It's unlikely even cavemen treated their women in such a disgusting manner, but the pussy hat people have yet to check in on this vulgar display of misogyny. I suspect they will let this one slide.

It was last Wednesday that the Taliban issued Afghanistan's Sharia to prevent vice and promote, LOL, virtue by prohibiting women from leaving their home without wearing a tent. The Vice and Virtue Ministry will be on the lookout for these loose women and woe to those who disobey for it would mean arrest and only Allah [peas be up in him] knows what will happen to them. In fact, women are not even allowed to look at men they are not related to--seriously.

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris expressed her outrage and deep concern for the Afghan women--oh wait--no she didn't. 

College campuses across the nation are angry and call on the government to do something about this horrible situation--oh, never mind--my bad.

Where is the outrage? No protests on college campuses. No statement from the White House.

& guess who's funding this? We are. pic.twitter.com/JnZ81sMbUJ— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) August 24, 2024

So spare us your empty platitudes about oppressed women and abortion on demand up to when you can hear the baby cry out. Where are you, Sarandon? Where are you, AOC, Michelle Obama, and Oprah? In fact, where are you, Democrats?

Women like Riley Gaines and Roza Otunbayeva who heads the UN mission in Afghanistan, are the real feminists because they have the guts to speak out while the fake feminists ironically act like the Afghan women.

“After decades of war and in the midst of a terrible humanitarian crisis, the Afghan people deserve much better than being threatened or jailed if they happen to be late for prayers, glance at a member of the opposite sex who is not a family member, or possess a photo of a loved one,” Otunbayeva said.

Last year, Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada claimed that Afghan women are given a "comfortable and prosperous" life, despite numerous decrees restricting their access to many public spaces, education, and most employment opportunities.

So if you hear a pussy hat-wearing person complain about how oppressed women are in the West, tell them to go to Afghanistan--it's better than telling them to go to the other place below.

Tweet

Iran executes 3 men supporting Amini protests: Democrat feminists silent

Amini protest

Iran executed three men on Friday who they convicted of violence against Islamic Republic's security forces at the Mahsa Amini protests. Amini died in custody last year after being arrested for not wearing Islamic head covering.

The men, Majid Kazemi, Saleh Mirhashemi and Saeed Yaghoubi who were convicted of "moharebeh" or "war against Allah" were the feminists that women like AOC and her so called squad pretend to be. They are accused of drawing a gun during a protest in Isfahan, a central Iranian city, leading to the death of three security force members, according to the judiciary's Mizan Online news website.

Isfahan is known for its Nuclear Technology Facility where it's probable that here is where they are developing 'weapons of infidel destruction'. 

Iran experienced waves of protests following the September 16 death of 22-year-old Amini, an Iranian Kurd who had been arrested for not wearing a hijab.

During the protests, which Tehran generally falsely labeled as foreign-instigated "riots", thousands of Iranians were arrested and hundreds killed including dozens of security forces and many brave women fed up with their oppressed role in society.

Kazemi, Mirhashemi and Yaghoubi were arrested in November and sentenced to death in January.

They were also charged with membership of "illegal groups with the intention of disrupting national security and collusion leading to crimes against internal security," Mizan reported.

It noted "evidence and documents in the case and the clear statements made by the accused" show that "the shootings carried out by these three people led to the martyrdom of three security forces."

Tweet

Below average-looking feminists worry about American men marrying foreign women but are clueless why

"I identify as sexy"

Feminists, or as the late, great Rush Limbaugh would call them, feminazis, are miffed that American men find foreign women more attractive soulmates, choosing to marry them over red-blooded American castraters. 

Non-Western women tend to be unaffected by so called feminism, which at its core says nothing about more serious issues that women face all over the world, especially in countries with cultures that practically declassifies them as human and puts them in the category of possessions. I speak of Middle Eastern countries in particular, but while they comprise the largest segment of misogynistic nations, they are not the only ones. 

So feminism in America, and in the West, is more of a political movement than it really is a movement advocating for women's rights. Where actual danger in advocating exists, the presence of feminism is nowhere to be found.

[H/T Redstate.com]

The real feminists are the women in Iran where they are literally risking their lives for equal rights as men, or at least the right to not be forced into a marriage or to wear a hijab or cloth tent to cover themselves, lest the men get turned on.

Foreign women value traditional marriage and gender roles much like real men do in the West. By real men I mean those who think wearing a "pussy hat" is demeaning to women. Real women value and embrace their maternal nature for child-rearing and don't need to feel competitive with their male counterpart. They are family-focused as opposed to career-focused as we often see here in the West.

Feminists are upset by these traditional values as they watch men leave the American dating scene quicker than a Democrat yelling "racist." 

Some so called feminists have gone on social media to express their ire, accusing men of being "predatory" and incapable of "handling" American women. Why it's almost as if they're crying out to be handled.

YouTuber Misha Petrov interviewed women on the street about the issue of American women. She noted that Western feminists insult foreign women by claiming they're uneducated and weak-minded because they lack the same mentality as these feminists who view themselves as being better than men and better than other women. It's kind of an obnoxious virtue signaling to be an American feminist in spite of their lack of true virtue like the Iranian women have.

Petrov uncovers the paradox in which feminists hate men yet focus their entire lives around them. And the notion that men take advantage of "dumb" foreign women is simply not true. Women are taught on day one what to expect from men, but not taught what to give back. Men are thus dehumanized by feminists and viewed as something akin to tools for women's convenience.

In fact, most men simply want a stable, loving relationship and women from countries where traditional marriage is valued generally provides this and it's attractive to these men. Feminism doesn't provide this so men seek out traditional women who want traditional lives in traditional marriages.

Of course, some Western women also value tradition as noted by the trend of the "Tradwife" on TikTok, which features Western women enjoying traditional relationships with men and traditional marriages and gender roles.

You can't blame us for looking elsewhere for happiness.

Tweet

AOC slams CNN reporter but obviously had not done her homework

2020: "Would you like to supersize that meal?"

Rep[ugnant] Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (Socialist-NY) went after Andrew Kaczynski, a Compromised News Network (CNN) reporter on Thursday indirectly calling him a sexist after posting a report by Sen. Elizabeth "Dances with Facts" Warren. The report discussed Warren's huge paychecks as a lawyer.

But Comatose's freak-out was merely proof that she had not actually read the article because  Kaczynski didn't write it.

Two reporters from The Washington Post both having uteruses, wrote the piece. And while it was rather pointless piece of trash, it wasn’t, nor dared to be, an attack on Warren. 

Ironically, it is usually AOC who attacks people for making the megabucks.

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters during her career as a professor at Ivy League law schools, charging as much as $675 an hour to advise a variety of clients, from people with asbestos disease to a corporation facing possible liability over ruptured breast implants,” explained The Washington Post article. All that Kaczynski did was to share it.

"While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour,” Kaczinski  captioned in his posting of the article.

But AOC mindlessly tweeted accusingly about Kaczinski:

“BREAKING NEWS: Lady Had A Job, Got Paid More Than Me. Nice work.”

But the "genius" wasn't finish as she added:

“Now do the amount of Wall Street, Big Pharma, & Fossil Fuel presidential candidates accepted over their careers & how much they’re taking now.”

AOC was obviously implying that it was Kaczynski’s “sexist” scoop when he didn’t even write the report.

Washington Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold highlighted the blatant stupidity of AOC’s mindless tweeting:

“AOC tweeted at a male reporter and strongly implied sexism was his motive for the piece. In fact it wasn't his piece. In fact, the piece was written by two women.”

Griswold noted that it’s “a pretty low bar for most people, and most people are not freaking U.S. Representative” to actually go ahead and click the link of an article they’re commenting on. She didn't even bother to do that simple task, and now we can wait for AOC to attack him for attacking her idiocy.

As highlighted by Twitchy, others commented on the problems with the freshman Congresswoman’s tweet, including her typical disdain for “the rich.” But it's more likely that socialists have more than simple disdain for the rich, they clearly have high levels of envy and want to punish the rich for their success.

“BREAKING NEWS: Communist Who Considers Wealth a ‘Policy Failure,’ & ‘White Supremacy’ Nation's Biggest Threat, Exempts Perpetrator of Racist Fraud b/c She's Female,” said radio host Ben Crystal.

“Is Elizabeth Warren a smart, hard-working woman who deserves to be compensated at 80X the minimum wage, or is she an exploitative wage-thieving capitalist? Did she pay her 'fair share' of taxes, or no?” asked popular political Twitter account @notwokieleaks. “Why defend Warren here while calling most other high-earners monsters?”

Why indeed. It all depends which side of the aisle you sit on.

“He didn’t write the article. 2 WaPo women reporters did & the article does everything it can to flatteringly portray her work on Chapter 11 bankruptcy creditor committees. There is, literally, no attack in the entire piece,” another Twitter user noted.

If AOC should have attacked anyone, it would have to be Warren and her money bags.

And AOC isn't innocent as she pretends to be--in March, it was reported that a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission alleged AOC's chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti funneled over $1 million in political donations to private companies he owned.

“The cash transfers from the PACs — overseen by Saikat Chakrabarti, the freshman socialist Democrat's chief of staff — run counter to her pledges to increase transparency and reduce the influence of ‘dark money’ in politics,” The Washington Examiner reported. “Chakrabarti's companies appear to have been set up for the sole purpose of obscuring how the political donations were used.”

How do you like them big apples, New York?

Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

Hey Bette Midler, what is that odor?

It almost seems as if the elders in the entertainment industry is using the Trump administration as a vehicle for rekindling their creds as relevant human beings.

Whatever that wind was underneath her wings, Bette Midler has yet to say, but last month she referred to women as the "most disrespected creatures on earth." You just cannot get any dumber than that.

Now Midler is in a jam after showing disrespect to a woman, namely Melania Trump. Yes, Midler disrespected a woman--maybe she's the source of the problem.

The 72-year-old singer posted a photo on Twitter of Melania posing in an aircraft cockpit for a GQ photo shoot that included a vulgar, insulting, disrespectful caption.

We all know that "FLOTUS" stands for "First Lady of the United States." Midler, in a feeble attempt to be edgy, captioned the photo: "The dry cleaning bill for the upholstery on Air Force One must be insane. #FLOTITS," Midler wrote.

It's apparent that whatever liberals say, they do the opposite. Liberals who say they're for women equality and respect, people like, say, Michael Avenatti and Harvey Weinstein, tend to do exactly the opposite of what they preach. I'm not saying Avenatti is guilty, but I am saying Weinstein is and Avenatti's guilt or innocence has yet to be determined, but I don't see much respect for women from either liberal.

After Midler went on social media with her disrespectful words on Melania, many users slammed her for being so disgusting to the first lady. Or any lady for that matter.

One Twitter user, @Nanileeaki tweeted:

"Why are you doing this? Haven't you had enough of bashing this poor woman? She was a model, so what. Don't hate. You really just made a fool of yourself with such a catty comment. Did you feel better after posting this? This made you feel good? You should apologize."

Another user, @waterspryt tweeted about body shaming:

"Now you've moved on to body Shaming? You? Honestly? Is this what you want your daughter to be like as well. Teach her that if you disagree Politically that all bets are off when it comes to how you are as a human being? #Shameful.

@Susaninokc tweeted:

"Disagree on politics all day long, but this is a mean-spirited and childish jab at a woman's choices. THIS is what has finally made me put away my love for your great talent. You are a hypocrite."

Last month Midler posted a racially insensitive tweet about feminism saying that "women are the N-word of the world" and the "most disrespected creatures on earth."

Then she goes and disrespects the first lady, who happens to be, and identifies as, a woman.

One can only imagine what that wind is beneath her wings. It definitely stinks, however.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Arizona troopers' union pull support from Dems opposing McSally in Senate race

Arizona -- A union representing state public safety employees withdrew its endorsement of U.S. Rep. Kyrsten Sinema this week. Members say the executive board voted on the endorsement without asking the members for their input.

Sinema, a bi-sexual, far-left, divorced, former social worker, Arizona-hating, Democrat [but I repeat myself] is in a close senate seat race against U.S. Rep. Martha McSally, a retired USAF colonel, one of the highest-ranking female pilots in Air Force history, who flew the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, and was the first female commander of a USAF fighter squadron. They are vying for a seat being vacated by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ).

McSally also successfully sued the DoD in McSally v. Rumsfeld, challenging the military policy mandating servicewomen stationed in Saudi Arabia wear an abaya, a cloth coffin pretending to be clothing, when traveling off base in the country.

But I digress.

After union members objected to the board's unilateral actions, the Arizona State Troopers Association polled its members via email Monday asking whether they wanted to endorse the far-left Sinema [who once described Arizona as the "meth lab of democracy" and called Arizona men "Neanderthals"], or stay neutral.

The poll indicated "the membership has indicated a preference to stay neutral."

It's possible the male troopers were influenced by their wives who may have taken issue with other statements Sinema made in the past.

Specifically, in 2006 Sinema described what she thought of women who stay at home to care for their children: "These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bulls**t. I mean, what the f**k are we really talking about here?"

So a woman's right to choose is only okay if the choice a woman makes agrees with Sinema's.

Hypocrisy. Sad!


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Germaine Greer views rape as non-violent and no big deal

"Women have very little idea of how much men hate them" -- Germaine Greer

In what could only be an attempt to make the intellectually deficient seem bright, Australian "feminist" Germaine Greer said that rape should be viewed more as "lazy, careless and insensitive" and that the lawful punishment should be lessened.

She believes that most rapes are just "bad sex."

Some believe that Greer is being coached by a secret Islamist organization that grooms young girls to be gang-raped and would like it if law enforcement would look the other way.

Others believe that Greer is a total fraud and an imbecile. Sign me up for this group.

Greer spoke at the Hay literary festival in the UK and said the legal system wasn't working in regards to rape.  The 79-year-old divorcee argued that the issue always comes down to whether a person consented or not.

Brilliant.

"Most rapes don't involve any injury whatsoever," Greer claims without providing actual facts. "We are told that it is a sexually violent crime, an expert like Quentin Tarantino will tell us that when you use the word 'rape' you're talking about violence, a throwing them down . . . it is one of the most violent crimes in the world. B******t Tarantino.

"Most rape is just lazy, just careless, insensitive. Every time a man rolls over his exhausted wife and insists on enjoying his conjugal rights, he is raping her. It will never end up in a court of law," she pontificated.

Greer, in an attempt to normalize rape said that we shouldn't think of it as a "spectacularly violent" crime.

"It is moments like these, I can hear the feminists screaming at me, 'you're trivializing rape!'" she said. "Well, I'll tell you what. You might want to believe that the penis is a lethal weapon and that all women live in fear of that lethal weapon, but that's bull***t. It's not true. We don't live in fear of the penis. A man can't kill you with his penis."

Right. It's the knife he's holding to your throat after he cuts off your skirt and panties and forces himself on you that he can kill you with. No big deal.

The so-called feminist suggests that a rapist should be sentenced to 200 hours' community service and maybe an "R" tattoo on his hand, arm or cheek.

She believes that without an external injury, a rape is not violent.

I agree with Greer when she said that transgender women are "not women." You can't change biology.

But this pretentious academic also said that female genital mutilation is akin to getting a tattoo.

What a horrible misunderstanding and lack of empathy this woman has for other women. She's a perfect representative of those on the left who are willing to slaughter their unborn baby due to its "inconvenience," as Barack Obama labeled it in reference to his own daughters.

The woman is appalling and does not deserve to be a spokesperson for true feminism.

Tweet

Glamourous Linda Sarsour and jihad

Glamour Magazine has just announced their picks for their 2017 "Women of the Year." And using the same standards the Nobel Committee used to select Al Gore, Barack Obama and Mohammed Yasser Abdel Rahman Raouf  Arafat al-Qudwa (aka Yasser Arafat) as their selection for the Peace Prize, Glamour chose Linda Sarsour.

Sarsour is one of the most vile, anti-Semitic, as well as a pseudo feminist and leftist  that one can imagine.

Vile, in the sense that she once tweeted:

"Brigitte Gabriel = Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She's asking 4 an a$$ whippin'. I wish I could take their vaginas away--they don't deserve to be women."

Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel represent what feminism is really all about, because they oppose Sharia (Islamic law) because it subordinates women and exists in countries where feminine genital mutilation is standard practice. These women are some of the real heroes of the movement. 

Sarsour is a puppet of Islam and has even made the claim that anti- Semitism doesn't really exist!

Glamour Magazine traditionally uses their annual award to honor only women who advance extreme leftist political views while perpetually ignoring women with right of center ideology. But will this eventually hurt the rag?

Women who read the magazine are less interested in paying tribute to the organizers of an extremely partisan Women's March--they care about fashion and all that goes with it.

The Women's March was held in January to protest President Trump's election and to afford the opportunity for Hillary supporters to clean the streets with their liberal tears while proudly wearing vagina hats.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel only want women to have the same rights as men, not have their genitals mutilated (as Hirsi Ali had done to her as a young girl), and not be honor killed for wanting an independent life.

Sarsour wants Sharia. She has defended Saudi Arabia's legal system which makes women second class citizens where they cannot freely marry, divorce, travel, work outside the house and drive, without the permission from their male guardians. Sometimes that guardian can even be their son.

The march the hijab-clad Sarsour organized had nothing to do with women's rights--it was all about the political agenda of the left and the hatred they have for the country. In her case, it was also about normalizing Sharia.


Tweet

Hillary's one-neuron epiphany

Two-time presidential nominee and two-time election loser, and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, experienced a lonely brain neuron firing in her frontal lobe, causing her to speak about the thoughts it elicited: sexist comments by President Donald Trump and women who continue to support him.

"When I see women doing that," she said loudly, "I think [which is a lie] why are they publicly disrespecting themselves? Why are they opening the door to have someone say that about them in their workplace?"

After all, it isn't as if her husband kept his door closed in the workplace as he received oral sex from a young presidential aide. 

Nor is it as if Hillary defended her husband and attacked the slew of women he either raped or had an affair with--oh wait--she did, and he did.

Of all the areas Hillary Clinton would be wise to avoid discussing, sexism is the star of the show.

She continued with "In a community setting? Do they not see the connection there?"

Does she not see the connection there too? Not with Trump supporters, but with Bill's women. And the connection that lost her the election: disrespecting half of the American voters--the 'deplorables'.

Identity politics isn't working for her but she believes that the fight against sexism still rages on. As an attorney, she should know better--there are anti-discrimination laws that protect women and minorities.

But sore loser that she is, and still harping on her election debacle, she had to point out that while more women voted for her, she lost the white women's vote and said this was progress. In fact, she even went after Obama, bragging that she won more women's votes than he did.

But she lost.

Yes, voting for Hillary Rotten Clinton is progress because, like voting for Obama shows you're not a racist, voting for Hillary shows you're not a sexist. 

You have a choice.

Like I said, identity politics isn't working for Clinton anymore. More women see her for the weak (albeit extremely rich) person that she is.

"We had such a public and still an ongoing movement to expand civil rights. Again, I'm proud of the progress, but we still have a lot of problems we have to confront," the one brain neuron endowed former Worst Lady posited without facts or any sort of proof.

Yes, women are oppressed . . . in Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries. But, like most "feminists," she never discusses that.


Tweet

The Great Racist Pumpkin Delusion

It's about time left-leaning Starbucks has become the target of leftist creeping meatballism and mindless name-calling.

An overachieving so-called feminist group known as Ultra Violet is going after Starbucks for their fall tradition of serving pumpkin spice lattes. They believe the Trump Organization might financially benefit from the sales of this beverage, or so they say.

The latte isn't the real reason the fake feminists are making a stink--they are attempting to strong arm Starbucks into pulling out of any properties owned by the Trump Organization and have linked this demand to when Starbucks rolls out its special pumpkin flavor as it does every Autumn.

So it's one thing to hate Trump, and another thing to attempt taking away his income and that of Starbucks employees.

"Pumpkin spice just doesn't taste as good when you add a shot of racism, and Starbucks customers deserve to know that their favorite products, including the recently rolled-out pumpkin spice lattes, help put money into Donald Trump's pocket. If Starbucks and Howard Schultz are serious about living up to the values and ideals that they claim--it's time to take real action when it comes to denouncing hate and sever all financial ties to Donald Trump and the Trump Organization," said Shaunna Thomas, co-founder of Ultra Violet.

Ultra Violet refuses to denounce misogynist Sharia law which categorizes women slightly below the status of cattle, is anti-Semitic, homophobic and promotes jihad. But going after an American company is a lot safer so they stated that Starbucks' objections to Trump's policies do not meet its demands.

The statement said:

 "Ultra Violet argues that if Starbucks is serious about rejecting Trump's hateful and dangerous policies, that they would sever all financial ties to the Trump Organization--that includes finding new locations for Starbucks stores within Trump properties."

But why let the facts trump the feelings of the feminists?

It turns out that the Starbucks within Trump Tower isn't even a corporate establishment--it's a franchise privately owned. And overall, Starbucks is clearly a progressive company--attacking them is foolish and counterproductive to the delusional thinking of the left.

Furthermore, there is really no hard evidence whatsoever that Trump is a racist or a white supremacist, other than the fact that he is white, which to many leftists is enough to convict.

"First they came for the Soy Strawberries & Cream Frappuccino--but I don't drink Soy Strawberries & Cream Frappuccino . . . so I didn't speak out.

Then they came for the Chai Crème Frappuccino Blended Beverage--but I don't drink Chai Crème Frappuccino Blended Beverage . . .  so I didn't speak out.

Then they came for the Teavana YouthberryⓇ Brewed Tea--but I don't drink Teavana YouthberryⓇ Brewed Tea . . . so I didn't speak out.

Then they came for my Pumpkin Spice Latte--and there were no baristas left to serve me."

Sad!


Tweet

Leftists attack nuclear scientist for having different opinion

Kara McCullough is a black 25-year-old nuclear scientist for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. She was crowned Miss USA on Sunday in Las Vegas, baby, beating Miss New Jersey for the crown, not to mention every other woman in every state.

So it should be obvious that not only is she smart, she is also beautiful and has a true sense of grace.

In order to attract and bring back viewers of the "Miss USA Pageant," more controversial topics were brought into the question and answer part of the event.

#NotMyUSA

The questions that were asked of  Miss McCullough were on healthcare and feminism. But due to the fact that her answers didn't fall in lockstep with the liberal point of view, leftists went ballistic and sparked a Twitter feeding frenzy. The hashtag was [quite laughably] #NotMyMissUSA.

When she was asked if healthcare was a right or a privilege,
McCullough's opinion was that it is a privilege: "I'm definitely going to say it's a privilege," she began. "As a government employee, I am granted healthcare and I see firsthand that for one to have healthcare you need to have jobs, so therefore we need to cultivate this environment that we're given the opportunity to have healthcare as well as jobs to all the American citizens worldwide."

Leftists all over our land of opportunity were pissed off.

"How dare she say that healthcare isn't my right. If I'm sick, there sure as hell better be a doctor willing to take care of me even if I don't pay him or her. I was born, so it's my right, not the doctor's to refuse me."

On feminism, Miss USA also gave an unacceptable "problematic" answer when asked how she viewed feminism.

"As a woman scientist in the government, I'd like to transpose the word feminism to 'equalism,'" she said. "I try not to consider myself this diehard, like, I don't really care about men. But one thing I want to say is that women are just as equal to men when it comes to opportunity in the workplace."

What a horrible concept. 

It caused the vagina-centric crowd of social progressives to go nuts, which was no surprise to normal people.

One person, apparently named for a species of shark, tweeted using Donald Trump punctuation:

What's wrong with being a feminist Miss DC USA!?!? Who says feminists hate men? Gurl!!! #MissUSA 

pic.twitter.com/jr5Hc5p2DN 

--Makho Ndlovu (@makhondlovu) May 15, 2017

The funniest tweet, however, had to do with the notion that Miss New Jersey was robbed, a la Hillary Clinton.

DC may have won the electoral judges, but NJ won the popular vote #NotMyMissUSA #MissUSA . 

--Kelsey Klemme (@Kelsey Klemme) May 15, 2017

If I wasn't a conservative, I might call Kelsey Klemme a racist, but I'm sure she's just a narrow minded leftist.



To follow Brain Flushings, please click the Follow tab in the margin.



Tweet

Women make a lot less than men under Liz Warren

Leftists such as Elizabeth Warren always seem to think the rules never apply to them, but if you don't follow them, you're a: racist, sexist, Islamophobe, Nazi or white supremist. 

In Warren's case, if you don't agree with her, you're an 'Indian hater.'

But like most leftists, Warren is a hypocrite.

The gender pay gap in Warren's office is almost 10 percent wider than the entire national average. Women in Warren's office, therefore, will have to wait longer than most others in the U.S. to recognize Equal Pay Day.

Equal Pay Day was created in 1996 by the National Committee on Pay Equity and this year, it was celebrated in the U.S. on April 4th.  

This day was chosen by feminists because they say it marks how far into the year a woman must work in 2017 to earn what men did in 2016. Of course, like all things the feminists support, it's a flawed concept. 

The pay gap statistic where women make 82 percent comes from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and actually measures the median earnings of women and men in full-time wage and salary jobs. It does not take into account significant differences in the choices of jobs men and women may take, nor does it account for education, years of experience and hours worked. These variables obviously influence earnings.

But let's forget about those facts and look at the Warren situation.

Last year's figures showed that women earned 79.6 cents on the dollar that men earned.

But women working for Fauxcahontas were paid 71 cents to the men's dollar according to the Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The median annual earnings for women staffers was $52,750 which was over $20,000 less than the median for men ($73,750), according to the analysis of publicity available Senate data.

Therefore, the math says that the pay gap under Warren's female staff is about 31 percent (a little over $26,050).


Tweet

Le Pen sans hijab: take that, feminists!

A real feminist

France's populist candidate for President, Marine Le Pen, puts feminists like Gloria Steinem to shame. 

Le Pen is running for France's top political position on the right-wing National Front ticket and was in Lebanon this week. She was scheduled to meet President Michel Aoun, a Christian, and the nation's top Sunni Muslim cleric, Sheikh Abdel-Latif Derian.

Ms. Le Pen was told that women were required to wear traditional headscarves before entering the presence of the cleric, lest he lose control of his bladder or something worse.

She refused. After a few uncomfortable minutes between her staff and the sheikh's, she called off the meeting and left. She later said, "I consider the headscarf a symbol of a woman's submission. I will not put on the veil."

"I met the grand mufti of Al-Azhar, and the highest Sunni Authority didn't have this requirement, but it doesn't matter," she said. "You can pass on my respects to the grand mufti, but I will not cover myself up."

Some may think she was playing up to her home team but she seemed truly surprised and insisted that her team informed the mufti's staff the night prior to the intended audience that she would show up bare-headed, like a normal Westerner. The mufti people said she agreed to don the Islamic symbol of submission [but not in those words].

At present, Le Pen is ahead in the presidential polls and has long called for limits on immigration to France--many of whom are Muslims from Africa and the Middle East. 

This should strengthen her core support.

Coincidentally, on the same day this occurred, police arrested three Muslim suspects in southern France for plotting what they termed "an imminent terror attack," as is their wont. Perfect timing for Le Pen as that headline alongside her face-off with a Muslim pedoopadoop, reinforces her warning that France already has too many immigrants.

Various media organizations covered the incident very differently, but the AP quoted Le Pen, who spoke of herself in the third person: "I note that when Marine Le Pen refuses to don the headscarf, it is criticized, but when Michelle Obama refused to do it in Saudi Arabia, it was considered admirable."

No wonder journalism is dying faster than a moth trying to roast a tiny marshmallow.

Not a real feminist

Al Jazeera, a favorite media organization of Al Gore and funded by the ruling family of Qatar, wrote: "This was a trap and a set-up because she wanted to send a message to her own voters and supporters that she somehow refused to respect the local customs in a Muslim-majority country." 

When has Islam respected the customs of Western Christian-Judeo countries? And how does anyone really know the reason she had?

It wasn't out of disrespect in a 'Muslim-majority country,' it was a sign of her refusal to 'submit' as the word 'Islam' actually means.

Fun Fact: German Chancellor Angela Merkel refused to meet with Le Pen. Hopefully, that will signal the end of Merkel's political career.

Ironically, not one of the news agencies that reported on her visit failed to call her 'right-wing,' and true to form, not one of them called her a 'feminist.'

Bite it, Hillary voters!


Tweet

Saudi man jailed for opposing female oppression

A Saudi man has been jailed for campaigning against women's rights. 

Oh wait, no, he was jailed for campaigning against the repressive state control Saudi Arabia has over women, according to local media.

The man was given a one year sentence by the Saudi sharia courts for publicly suggesting the current legal system of "guardianship" should end. For the Saudi Arabia theocracy, that's akin to blasphemy. Lucky for him they didn't behead him in the public square.

He was arrest while putting up posters countering the guardianship system. The court also learned that the man was responsible for a widely-reported petition against the regime.

The Saudi regime orders that every person with a uterus must have a male legal guardian, and must have permission to travel, marry and take certain jobs. They are also forbidden to drive, although if they can find someone to drive them, they can vote for someone who will be subordinate to the king.

Feminists throughout North America have voiced their extreme outrage, oh wait, no they didn't. 

The man was condemned to jail and fined around $8,000 for the offense of "inciting to end guardianship of women." 

The guardianship regime makes women subject to the whims of whoever is in charge of them--even if that happens to be a younger brother or even their son.

How terrible.


Tweet

Poor Hillary is being treated "unfairly" by the liberal media

Donald Trump believes the media is dishonest and in the bag for Hillary Clinton. He said that "@CNN is unwatchable. Their news on me is fiction. They are a disgrace to the broadcasting industry and an arm of the Clinton campaign." Then, of course, he took his personal swipes at Jeff Zucker, CNN president: "Jeff Zucker failed @NBC and he is now failing @CNN.

But since being asked actual probing questions by NBC's Matt Lauer, Hillary's campaign is complaining that the media is bias against her.

For the older conservative crowd who have heard this complaint, the Attends adult diaper sales have skyrocketed from loss of bladder control.

Yes, Hillary went around 277 days without a press conference, and this may have ticked off journalists, or rather liberal "journalists," but when push comes to shove grandma over the cliff, the mainstream media is totally loyal to the Democratic Party and no longer pretend to be unbiased. 

Clinton's newest 'untruth' is her way of raising more money. 

The "Oh, woe is me, I'm just a poor, scared, little girl who's treated unfairly by journalists and big, strong men who hate women" complaint is getting worn out, but there are still women who buy into that garbage.

If Hillary was actually a strong woman, what liberals call a "feminist," she would never have to raise gender issues in order to get the female vote, and she would not have gone after the women her husband sexually abused. If she was truly a strong woman, she wouldn't have used her husband's economic record with a promise to make him her advisor to win votes.

And what should concern us about the 'Worst Lady' is her claim that not a single American was killed in Libya. Tell that to the loved ones of the four men who died in Benghazi, Libya. 

Hillary's fundraising appeal comes after the commander-in-chief forum moderated by Matt Lauer. Her campaign quotes an article by uber liberal Jonathan Chait in New York Magazine describing Lauer's interview as "pathetic," and ends by calling Trump "an ignorant, bigoted, pathologically dishonest authoritarian."

"Most voters aren't like us. Most people are picking up on politics when it finds them on Facebook, on the radio in the car, or when they flip through a magazine in line at the grocery store," the Clinton campaign pitch goes.

"Their information is filtered through the press. And right now, a lot of journalists are failing to hold Trump accountable and grading him on a curve, while forcing Hillary to meet an entirely different standard."

Send money now, they imply, and we will defeat this horrible human being with a true, honest American.

Poor Hillary. The Washington Post's editorial is doing its best to preserve her fine reputation with the headline: "The Hillary Clinton Email Story is Out of Control." They argue that poor Hillary has endured a lot more scrutiny than someone who isn't running for president would have to endure.

Perhaps if she wasn't using an illegal personal email server, lied about the number of devices she used, didn't BleachBit her deleted emails after they were subpoenaed, didn't receive Clinton Foundation money from misogynistic countries and didn't lie about her current bout with pneumonia, the liberal press would go even easier on her than they already do.


Tweet