Mamdani is to Reagan as AOC is to Einstein

Leave it to the New York comrade mayor Zohran Mamdani to lecture Americans on hardship while taking aim at one of the most popular and economically successful presidents in history.

During a Monday press conference, Mamdani mockingly referenced former President Ronald Reagan’s iconic 1986 quip: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Mamdani, who never ran a real business and is a failed rapper, thought of himself as a master of rhetoric. The dolt replied: “I think nine more terrifying words are actually ‘I worked all day and can’t feed my family.’”

It is a fantasy line, but is completely a figment of his tiny imagination. 

Mamdani is attacking Ronald Reagan, a man whose conservative policies actually rescued the American worker, all while Mamdani practices a brand of fiscal theft today that guarantees future generations will pay the price tomorrow. If you don't believe that, ask the Teachers Union and the veterans from whom he stole money from their retirement funds and military parade funds, respectively.

Let us look at the facts. 

When Reagan took office in 1981, the American economy was being suffocated by Carter-era stagflation, a toxic mix of double-digit inflation and high unemployment. Reagan did not use big-government handouts; he crushed inflation from 13.5 percent down to 4.1 percent. He slashed the astronomical 21.5 percent prime interest rate in half, sparked a 92-month peacetime economic expansion, and oversaw the creation of over 16 million new jobs.

Reagan’s supply-side miracle did not simply help the wealthy; it lifted everyone. Real median family income rose by 12.6 percent, and poverty rates plummeted. Minority communities thrived, with black unemployment at a near all-time low and black-owned businesses expanding by nearly 38 percent.

Aside from bashing Israel, what has Mamdani actually done?

Reagan knew that the American taxpayer did not exist to fund bureaucratic overreach. As he noted in his 1980 GOP acceptance speech, any program representing a theft from their pocketbooks had to go.

Contrast that economic boom with Mamdani’s current high-wire balancing act in New York City. He recently took a rooftop victory lap, boasting that he magically closed a 12 billion dollar budget deficit without resorting to austerity. But take a look under the hood and see that Mamdani’s solution is just a massive shell game of short-term gimmicks and fiscal procrastination.

To patch the hole for fiscal year 2027, the socialist mayor relies on roughly 2.8 billion dollars in one-time measures. He is implementing a punitive pied-a-terre tax and clawing back unincorporated business tax credits that hit self-employed New Yorkers making as little as 142,000 dollars, giving productive citizens an explicit incentive to flee the city. Worse yet, he is extending the amortization period for unfunded pension liabilities, pushing hundreds of millions in city obligations well into the 2030s.

By kicking the pension can down the road and relying on temporary state aid infusions from Albany, Mamdani is not saving New York; he is merely loading up a fiscal time bomb. Fiscal experts note that these gimmicks leave the city dangerously exposed to massive multi-billion-dollar deficits in the years ahead, topping out at an estimated 9.8 billion dollars by 2030. 

Mamdani wants to pretend that he's the champion of the working class. In reality, Reagan’s free-market policies allowed families to feed themselves through dignity and work. Mamdani’s progressive playbook simply steals financial stability from the future to fund big-government hubris today.

And for the bonus round, he and his wife are full-blown anti-Semites.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Dems Use Obese Woman to Court Male Voters

She's hot, but then again, she's always hot

After four disastrous years and a poor showing in the 2024 election, the Democratic Party is on a mission to win back male voters. However, their strategy has raised eyebrows, with many questioning how they plan to attract young men.

Young male voters, especially those under 30, are increasingly abandoning the Democratic Party. Polls reveal a widening gender gap, with men trending conservative while women continue to support Democrats. 

According to a recent Harvard Youth Poll, approval of Congressional Democrats among 18- to 29-year-olds has dropped 19 points since 2017, falling from 42 to 23 percent. Meanwhile, approval of Congressional Republicans in the same age group has increased slightly, from 28 to 29 percent. 

This is the first time in years that Republicans have surpassed Democrats in youth approval ratings.

The Left's conception of bright and beautiful

Are you Curious to know the left’s strategy to win back male voters? Hiring a female Democrat activist to attract men back to the party. While you might expect them to pick a young, attractive woman to appeal to young men, they instead chose morbidly obese left-wing content creator Olivia Julianna.

Not only is she about 500 pounds, or a quarter of a ton, but Julianna said that she has spent a lot of time on college campuses and found that young men, particularly frat boys, are almost always pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and support Black Lives Matter.

What has she been smoking?  

“I spend a lot of time on college campuses . . . I love young men. I love frat guys, and in that, I realize, even the ones who identify as conservative are almost always pro-choice. [Yeah, sure.] Almost always pro-gay marriage. You'd be surprised at the number of them who supported Black Lives Matter. [Yes, we all would be surprised.] I feel like people kind of just lump them into this box when the truth is, again, a lot of them are with us on the issues. They're just not part of our coalition because they feel like they're not welcome," Julianna told Micah Erfan during an interview.

However, her claims are so full of crap, they would make a farmer's manure-spreader break down.

According to a Gallup poll, only 49 percent of men identify as pro-choice, with support declining further among younger age groups. Additionally, a Pew Research survey found that just 42 percent of white men support the Black Lives Matter movement, while 82 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning voters oppose it.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Alex Marlow, host of the “Alex Marlow Show,” criticized the Democrats’ strategy, saying it’s telling that they chose to feature someone “500 pounds” claiming to love frat guys to appeal to young men. He also argued that the left’s approach is ineffective and pointed out the stark contrast to when Democrats previously relied on major celebrities to promote their message.

Men tend to be attracted to women who weigh less than them and who don't lie whenever their lips move.

Tweet

Democrat donor busted for threatening to murder 6 SCOTUS Justices: DOJ

A Democrat donor was arrested this week for allegedly threatening to murder six U.S. Supreme Court Justices and some of their family members evidently due to his hatred of people with differing opinions than his.

Panos Anastasiou, 76, sent over 465 messages to the Supreme Court via a public website run by the court, the Department of Justice announced Thursday. These messages were sent from March 10, 2023, through July 16, 2024. 

The situation “escalated to messages intending to threaten harm toward the victims,” the DOJ said. “The messages contained violent, racist, and homophobic rhetoric coupled with threats of assassination by torture, hanging, and firearms.”

Court documents said the threats were “intended to intimidate Supreme Court Justices 1-6 and retaliate against them for official actions Supreme Court Justices 1-6 had taken in their official capacity as federal judges.”

While prosecutors did not name the justices who were targeted, and six of the nine justices are conservative, and Anastasiou is a Democrat donor, my money is on the conservative ones.

The would-be murderer was charged with nine counts of making treats against federal judges and 13 counts of making threats via interstate commerce. He faces up to 155 years in prison if convicted: 19 years per count for threatening judges and five years per count for making threats via interstate commerce.

“We allege that the defendant made repeated, heinous threats to murder and torture Supreme Court Justices and their families to retaliate against them for decisions he disagreed with,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland in that whiny, irritating voice that he has. “Our justice system depends on the ability of judges to make their decisions based on the law, and not on fear. Our democracy depends on the ability of public officials to do their jobs without fearing for their lives or the safety of their families.”

Federal Election Commission (FEC) records state that Anastasiou had donated 82 times to various left-wing causes and Democrat candidates dozens of times on the Democrats’ fundraising platform ActBlue, proving that there is something wrong with him.

Tweet

Trump Jr. got it wrong, DeSantis got it conservative right

Some people on the right have decided to support Bud Light and end the boycott that began when the VP of Marketing, Alissa Heinerscheid decided to use a guy in drag to promote the beer while flipping off the "fratty" and "out of touch" folks who made up the customers who bought that beer. 

Even Donald Trump Jr. wants the boycott to end because Anheuser-Busch gives the GOP more in campaign financing than they give the Democrats. As I've said before, if you are going to boycott a company, boycott one that depends on you as a customer, where it counts. Woke corporations don't really care about your business as much as Bud Light does, which is why they lost $5 billion in one week of the boycott.

And now, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has gotten it right.

While RINOs and the meek on the right have lost their nerve and now want us to support Anheuser-Busch, DeSantis unequivocally supports conservative efforts to boycott them.

So don't allow any GOPer to sway your thinking. Make it count and change beers if you're a Bud Light trans-beer drinker. At least give it up until things change, such as an honest apology from the Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth rather than his wishy-washy "let's go America" balderdash. And maybe wait until they fire Heinerscheid because she sucks at marketing and sucks at decency. 

And remember that it is Ron DeSantis who seems to hold honest conservative values, at least from what I see. I'm not saying he's better than Trump, just more conservative. And no, Jews don't hate DeSantis--just the ones who showed up to protest, and they probably weren't even Jewish. If they are, they're likely Democrats in disguise.

DeSantis has guts and took a different path than the RINOs and Don Jr. 

On two separate occasions, he made clear that he’s not wavering against these woke corporations, whether it’s Disney or Anheuser-Busch. 

Ron DeSantis speaks out on the boycott of Bud Light and why it’s necessary to keep up the pressure. Make it hurt and don’t let them keep doing the woke stuff. pic.twitter.com/oOFWOKigEj

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) April 18, 2023

"Why would you want to drink Bud Light?" DeSantis said.  "I mean like, honestly, that’s like them rubbing our faces in it, and it’s like, these companies that do this, if they never have any response, they’re just going to keep doing it. So if you as a consumer are like, “yeah, they’re basically,” and it’s such a fraud what they’re doing with that, “like yeah, they’re doing that, but I’m going to keep drinking it anyway,” well they’re just gonna keep doing it.

"So I think we have power as consumers to make our voice heard, and not on every company because sometimes conservatives consumers aren’t gonna make a dent in some companies. This one is one, if you don’t have conservative beer drinkers, you’re gonna feel that.

"And so, I think it’s a righteous, uh, I think it’s a righteous thing. You know, some of these controversies, they come up, and people can kind of just say, “Oh well, it’s kind of a one-off, yeah it was stupid to do.” But it’s part of a larger thing where corporate America is trying to change our country. Trying to change policy, trying to change culture, and you know, I’d rather be governed by “we the people” than woke companies. So I think pushback is in order across the board, including with Bud Light."

When asked whether he would ever drink Bud Light again, he said that he did not believe he would.

He didn't call the Heinerscheid "Horseface" or say anything bad about the CEO of Anheuser-Busch. His answers are thoughtful, even when he doesn't use a teleprompter, which he didn't. 

I've said it before but I'll say it again, if Trump gets the nomination, I would vote for him in a heartbeat. But I like DeSantis from what I have seen of him and what he's done for Florida. 

Tweet

Trump blames abortion issue for GOP midterm losses

Former President Donald Trump (R?) blamed the abortion issues for the poor overall showing in the November midterm elections across the nation. 

“It wasn’t my fault that the Republicans didn’t live up to expectations in the MidTerms,” Trum said in a Sunday statement on Truth Social. “I was 233-20! It was the ‘abortion issue,’ poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on No Exceptions, even in the case of Rape, Incest, or Life of the Mother, that lost large numbers of Voters.”

I'm not sure where he got the idea that pro-lifers firmly insisted on 'No Exceptions even in the case of Rape, Incest, or Life of the Mother' because pro-life advocates do not insist on that. Sure, some of us believe an unborn baby should not have to pay with his or her life because of rape, but with issues regarding the life of the mother and even incest where deformities are common, pro-lifers totally agree that the life of the mother should be the first consideration.

Trump added that “the people that pushed so hard, for decades, against abortion, got their wish from the U.S. Supreme Court, & just plain disappeared, not to be seen again. Plus, Mitch stupid $’s!”

Doesn't he understand what the Supreme Court did when they ended Roe v. Wade? All they did was relinquish the federal government's authority over abortion and put it into the hands of the individual states. That's what states rights is all about and it allows for the differences among the states in how they view life and morality.

“First, not a single candidate Trump endorsed who lost backed his fictional ‘no exceptions even in the case of rape incest or life of the mother,’” tweeted conservative commentator and husband of Meghan McCain, Ben Domenech. “Literally zero Republican candidates think abortion should be banned when a mother’s life is at risk.”

He predicted the ex-president’s blast would come back to haunt him in the 2024 Republican presidential primary, when Trump will be 78 years old on Inauguration Day 2025, just about the same age Biden was when he was inaugurated. He was just a few weeks shy of that age.

Ben Domenesch continued: “Trump betraying the pro-life cause on Dobbs has been telegraphed for a long time and is a huge opening to bash him in the 2024 stakes which I expect several candidates to seize. Finally, think how stupid it is for Trump to run left on the pro-life issue. This is the biggest win of his presidency. Huge vested goodwill from pro-lifers. And what does he do? Call them quislings and say they’re too radical! Very dumb.”

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, which spent a record $78 million during the 2022 campaign with the Women Speak Out PAC, reiterated its position that Republicans should have done more to contrast their abortion stances with those of Democrats, instead of ignoring the issue.

“The approach to winning on abortion in federal races, proven for a decade is this: state clearly the ambitious consensus pro-life position and contrast that with the extreme view of Democrat opponents,” the group said in a Monday statement. “We look forward to hearing that position fully articulated by Mr. Trump and all presidential candidates.”

Conservatives pointed out that Trump endorsed a ton of GOP candidates who took a hard line on abortion and lost. These include Michigan gubernatorial candidate Tudor Dixon, Wisconsin gubernatorial nominee Tim Michels, and Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano.

However, there were GOP governors who signed legislation limiting abortion access and kicked butt in November, including Ron DeSantis of Florida, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Greg Abbott of Texas, and Brian Kemp of Georgia. Trump wasn't "a fan" of any of these folks.

Let's remember that Trump was pro-abortion before he was pro-life. And it looks like he shot himself in the foot on this issue with conservatives. But if Donald Trump should win the GOP nomination for the next presidential election, I would vote for him in a heartbeat over any Democrat, however, I'd like to see some younger person carry the torch for us this time.

Tweet

Dr. Oz on abortion: say what?

On Saturday at a rally in Selma, NC, former President Donald Trump endorsed Dr. Mehmet Oz for senator in Pennsylvania. 

But is Dr. Oz. really a conservative or just a guy who's playing the part and is merely a salesman scamming the public? Is he really a "conservative Republican" as he describes himself?

The best way to answer this question is to ask whether or not Dr. Oz supports or opposes the right to life of the unborn because this is one of the most defining question all conservatives agree on.

When he announced his senatorial bid, Dr. Oz said that "as a surgeon" he "knows how precious life is." He even showed a video clip of him kissing a baby.

Dr. Oz has tried to put the issue to bed with an op-ed in the Washington Examiner.

“From the moment of conception to natural death, all life is a miracle,” the TV doctor wrote. “I have literally held a baby’s tiny beating heart in my hand. And in that very moment, it is impossible to deny how precious every life is.”

“I will be a bold voice in the Senate and a proud champion for the pro-life movement. I won’t ever shy away from sharing my pro-life beliefs, even as pro-abortion advocates in medicine, the media and Big Tech try to silence me,” he says now.

But he hasn't always said the same in the past.

In 2019 at a Breakfast Club interview he admitted that he was "really worried" about the Alabama law banning most abortions, including the case of a mother's life at risk, and he was against "heartbeat laws." At the time he said that a baby's heart is not beating in the womb but only sending "electrical charges." He was clear that he did not agree with those who say life begins at conception.

“At a personal level, I wouldn’t want anyone in my family to have an abortion. I told my kids this, I mean I love the lives that they’re creating so much that I personally wouldn’t want it. But I don’t want to interfere with everyone else’s stuff because it’s hard enough getting through life as it is,” he said, taking the same position as "Cafeteria Catholics" like Joe Biden and the late Mario Cuomo. 

It's like saying: "I'm personally against murder but it's your choice in the matter.

Last December, Dr. Oz appeared in a friendly Fox News interview in which he was asked several times when he believes life begins. His answer was that it begins "when you're in the mother's womb." That certainly happens after conception, if you know anything about biology, and Dr. Oz should--he's a doctor.

“If I’m pro-life, then that’s a decision that comes back to the sanctity of when you think life does begin. And I believe that begins when you’re in the mother’s womb,” he said.

“Life’s already started when you’re in your mother’s womb,” he asserted when challenged, “But it’s a rathole to get trapped in the different ways to talk about it.”

Huh?

Soon after that interview, Oz tried to clean up his act and released a statement that basically said the same thing he wrote in his Examiner op-ed:

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

“I believe life begins at conception. My whole life has been about saving lives. As a heart surgeon, I have held a beating heart in my hand, and I understand how precious life is — it’s why I am pro-life. As the senator for Pennsylvania, I will vote to protect the sanctity of life and the unborn.”

Well sure, this is what conservatives want to hear, but is it what Oz truly now believes after three years of singing a different tune?

Tweet

Hungary elects Trump-like Viktor Orbán in spite of Soros money and neo-Nazi attack

It didn't matter that the Biden administration, George Soros and the EU's opposition to him, Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz Party has won the day in the Hungarian national elections, causing PINO Biden to crap his pants.

“We’ve won a victory so big that you can see it from the moon. You can certainly see it from Brussels. Don’t be afraid, hold on, the motherland is with you,” Orbán said in Budapest. Orbán’s Fidesz Party has won 61% of the seats in the National Assembly.

It was a close election, as the EU and Open Society spent millions to dethrone Europe’s most respected conservative voice. The NGO's tied to Open Society have recently tried and thus far has failed, to introduce a program of transgenderism to Hungary.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

The globalist anti-Orbán parties had formed an alliance with the neo-Nazi parties in the campaign to dethrone Orbán, as Gateway reported.

It's beginning to look as if conservatism is making a comeback and the lump in the White House may be responsible for the needed return.

Tweet

Carlos Maza has hissy fit over Ted Cruz defending Steven Crowder. Cruz destroys him

The stream of BlazeTV's  "Louder With Crowder" has been demonetized by YouTube mainly because they don't have a backbone or a single set of cojones amongst the entire staff at YouTube. Steven Crowder, the conservative comedian, was shut down after complains by the lisping gay Mexican activist Carlos Maza.

Maza is formerly of Media Matters, so that should tell you where his head is at when it isn't elsewhere [i.e., stuck in his nether regions]. The Vox activist went berserk over Cruz’s voiced support for free speech and traded words with the Republican Senator from the great state of Texas.

"This is ridiculous. YouTube is not the Star Chamber — stop playing God & silencing those voices you disagree with. This will not end well," said Cruz on Thursday.

In a subsequent tweet, Cruz wrote: 

"This is nuts. YouTube needs to explain why [Steven Crowder] is banned, but [Samantha Bee] ('Ivanka is a feckless c***.') & [Jim Carrey] ('look at my pretty picture of Gov. Kay Ivey being murdered in the womb') aren’t. No coherent standard explains it. Here’s an idea: DON’T BLACKLIST ANYBODY."

Maza took a shot at Cruz and, without a shred of even one example, insanely accused YouTube of being biased in favor of "right-wingers."

"A U.S. senator is coming to the defense of someone who spent two years calling me a 'lispy queer,'" the lispy queer responded. He actually refers to himself as a "queer" so in respect to his use of a personal pronoun, so will I.

"They do this because they know that [YouTube] cares more about looking fair to right-wingers than it does about stopping hate speech and harassment," he said, proving that he is delusional.

In follow-up tweets, Maza claimed that the censorship of right-learning creators on big tech platforms is not actually censorship and protested against "hate speech," a vaguely defined, subjective term that's as honest as the term "Islamophobia." That is, the term "hate speech" usually means any speech the person making the accusation wants to shut down, a totally unconstitutional move.

"Conservatives have spent years arguing that even basic content moderation is a form of 'censorship.' Their goal is to scare platforms like [YouTube] away from enforcing their hate speech policies. And it’s working, because YouTube doesn’t have the guts to protect its creators," the lispy queer dishonestly wrote.

"You can’t give these people an inch. They won’t stop crying ‘liberal bias!’ until they’re allowed to use hate speech with impunity. And that’s exactly what [YouTube] is allowing them to do,” Maza whined, not defining his use of the term.

"Sigh," replied Cruz. "This individual claims to be a 'journalist.' Then he throws a fit & demands that YouTube CENSOR views he doesn’t like."

"Here’s a crazy idea," offered Sen. Cruz, "if you don’t like what [Steven Crowder] says, ARGUE AGAINST HIM. Make your case in what John Stuart Mill called the 'marketplace of ideas.'"

This confused Maza. He had no idea why a cereal company would have any say in the matter about marketplaces.

On Tuesday, YouTube admitted that Steven Crowder's videos "don’t violate" any of their policies after "conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged" by queer activist Carlos Maza. But the platform reversed course after the queer activist threw a hissy Twitter fit, accusing YouTube of being anti-LGBT and encouraging LGBT employees at the company to "walk out" in protest.

The scared the bejeezus out of YouTube as they feared the world would not see them as being woke and not respect the wishes of queers and transgender minorities by refusing to go along with their demands.

"Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization," YouTube said on Wednesday, as they capitulated to the demands of the drama queen. 

"We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies.”

YouTube is full of crap. Their Partner Program policies is a moving target and constantly changing as it moves ever further to the left. If you want to see our First Amendment rights disappear, you can just sit back and do nothing. Otherwise, I suggest you support conservative speech, join websites like LouderWithCrowder.com and DailyWire.com, among many others.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

Kyrsten Sinema rejects family values; claims stay-at-home moms 'leech off their husbands'

Arizona socialist and Democratic senatorial candidate Kyrsten Sinema once agreed that it was just fine for Americans to join the Taliban. She accused of President George W. Bush of "Crowning himself King of the World for Life," and of putting arsenic in the nation's drinking water, and referred to Arizona citizens as "racists."

Now she has made it clear of her contempt for stay-at-home mothers.

In a 2006 interview with Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944, the socialist went berserk when describing women who stay at home to care for their children and run a household. "These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bullsh*t. I mean, what the f**k are we really talking about here?"

Well, for one thing, we're talking about what was once traditional in a standard household--the mother stayed home, took care of raising the kids to a degree, cooked and cleaned while the father was out earning a living.

Good fathers would help their wives with doing things around the house, but there were gender roles and nobody had a problem with that until the second wave of feminists came around to tell women how to think.

Sinema was once married to a BYU classmate but later divorced him. [Lucky guy.] Fortunately, she has no children and is a strong advocate for killing babies in the womb if they pose an inconvenience. She co-sponsored the Women's Health Protection Act, which has almost nothing to do with women's health, but almost everything to do with allowing mothers to kill their baby while it was still growing in the womb.

Carol Tobias, president of the National Right to Life Committee told the Senate Judiciary Committee:

We find the formal title or marketing label, "Women's Health Protection Act," to be highly misleading. The bill is really about just one thing: stripping away from elected lawmakers the ability to provide even the most minimal protections for unborn children, at any stage of their development. The proposal is so sweeping and extreme that it would be difficult to capture its full scope in any short title. Calling it the "Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act" would be more in line with truth-in-advertising standards.

The bill would subject any law or government policy that affects the practice of abortion, even indirectly, to an array of sweeping legal tests, designed to guarantee that almost none will survive. The general rule would be that any law that specifically regulated abortion would be presumptively invalid. The same would be true of any law that is not abortion-specific but has the effect or claimed effect of reducing access to abortion. It is apparent that those who crafted this bill believe that, where abortion is involved, immediate access to abortion, or any stage of pregnancy, is the only thing that matters.

In her 2009 obscure book, "Unite and Conquer: How to Build Coalitions That Win--And Last,"  Sinema wrote: "I don't mean that we should all of a sudden abandon our principles and adopt moral relativism. I just mean that we should consider the idea that perhaps people with views different from our own come about those ideas honestly and that those ideas aren't inherently evil."

As long as those ideas are the same as hers and aren't about mothers raising their children in the centuries old way.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Ontario Premier-designate Doug Ford to end the Jew Hate Day March

Canada -- Ontario Premier-designate of the Progressive Conservative Party Doug Ford just announced that he plans to put the kibosh on the Al Quds march (aka Jew Hatred Day).

Now that former Premier of Ontario and  Liberal Party Kathleen Wynne has been defeated [due to her inability to run a Canadian province] Ford owes nothing to Muslim voters, especially since anti-Semitism has been on the rise in our neighbors to the north, not to mention in many other parts of the world.

Canada's leftist politicians have made the country less safe for Jews as left-wing politicians appeased and pandered to the Canadian Muslim voters, all for self-interest.

The Al-Quds Day march is an event calling for genocide of the 6.5 million Israeli Jews. The flags of Hezbollah wave proudly and placards ironically depicting Israelis as Nazis are everywhere on display.

How not to raise your kids

Kathleen Wynne has always turned a blind eye to this disgusting event because winning elections seems to be more important than being morally correct. She always had a large Muslim immigrant base.

Any Jew who votes for liberals in Canada is either too misinformed, stupid, suicidal or nuts. Same goes for anyone who works for a living and pays his or her own way through life.

The World Israel News discussed this in a June 13, 2018 article that openly states the annual Quds Day march "calls for the killing of an entire civilian population in Israel."

Ford stated that "anti-Semitic ideology should never be permitted on the grounds of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario."

He added: "Our government will take action to ensure that events like Quds Day, which calls for the killing of an entire civilian population in Israel, are no longer part of the landscape in Ontario."

Former beauty queens

Quds day was established in 1979 in Iran after the Islamic Revolution. Anti-Zionist terror-fests are held in Iran on the last Friday in the month of Ramadan, a holiday of fasting when the sun is up, and gorging oneself when it sets. [Islamic scripture doesn't cover those areas on the planet where the sun doesn't set in summer, such as the north pole.]

Not to be left out, calls for death to the US is also part of the terror-fest and a time when flammable American flag concessions make a ton of money.

Tweet

BREAKING: Moore accuser omitted telling us something about her yearbook

Photo: Getty Image

UPDATE: It was just learned that Fox News has issued a correction to their headline (see their original headline below) regarding this story. It now reads: "BREAKING NEWS:Roy Moore accuser admits she forged part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama senate candidate."

Breaking: Beverly Young Nelson, the woman who accused Judge Roy Moore, the Republican who is running for the Alabama Senate seat, of molesting her when she was 16-years-old and showed her school yearbook with Moore's signature to prove her connection to him, admitted that she had written the alleged time and location of the signature below the signature.

The now not so young Moore accuser said of his denial "That really hurt me. God knows, and Roy knows, and I know what happened . . . He did sign it," she said. 

When asked by a reporter if it was she who made the notes underneath, she answered, "Yes."

Beverly Young Nelson and her publicity hound lawyer Gloria Allred did not reveal that little tidbit of information when they originally showed the yearbook, and Allred should be ashamed, but she has no conscience so shame is not a possible emotion for her.

Now one wonders whether any of the other writing was tampered with, but honesty and openness is too much to ask for when your motives are political and monetary, it seems.

The fact that Nelson wrote the time and location under Moore's signature and failed to disclose it to the public, pegs the date to Nelson's memory without acknowledging that Moore didn't date the signature at the outset.

Fox News went into full right-wing mode stating: "Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook."

That's kind of going overboard with the facts. But Moore supporters were looking for something to suit their needs of supporting the alleged sexual predator--Nelson and Allred obliged them.

It's false to say Nelson admitted she "forged" the yearbook. She insists the note and signature from Moore are authentic. Moreover, there's another woman who claims to have a copy of a graduation card with Moore's signature.

And worst of all, there's another woman who alleges Moore molested her when she was 14, and other women have said that Moore tried to date them when he was in his early 30s and they were underage.

So the truth as we know it is that Nelson wrote in her yearbook without revealing it, which can raise some doubts about her overall credibility, but, she did not admit to forging Moore's signature or his note.

Sorry Alabama conservatives--vote for Moore if your conscience can allow it, but don't pretend he's as clean as a whistle or say "If they can do it, so can we." 

If your conscience tells you it's better to have an alleged child molester from decades ago than a current late-term abortion supporter, I can understand that, and at least you're being honest.

But let us not be like the liberals who defended Conyers and Franken until they didn't because it was politically unfeasible. 


Tweet

UC Berkeley Sued after denying conservative student group official status

UC Berkeley used to be a icon in the world of academia and free speech. Now it's a cesspool filled with snowflakes and other stuff one finds in cesspools . . . like far left professors who think Karl Marx's body odor was unfairly judged. 

A conservative nonprofit group filed a lawsuit earlier this week against the University of California, Berkeley, after the so-called school denied a pro-liberty student group official status.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) sued UC Berkeley after the school kept Young Americans for Liberty (YAL) which has over 900 college chapter throughout the country, from obtaining a registered student organization status, according to a press release first obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The lawsuit alleges that UC Berkeley denied verifying YAL because they said the group was "too similar" to Cal Libertarians.

YAL President Cliff Malone had something to say on the matter:

"It is absurd to think that other Berkeley groups are lighting the campus on fire and throwing rocks through windows, but YAL's efforts to peaceable promote the message of liberty are being shunned by university administrators. This incident is exactly why Young Americans for Liberty launched the national Fight for Free Speech campaign. All students, regardless of ideology, should be guaranteed their First Amendment right to Free Speech."

Sadly, what is truly absurd is to believe the Berkeley administration would think rationally on this matter. They are devout leftists and leftists don't want free speech unless it's in lockstep with leftist ideology. The reason being is that leftist ideology is easily defeated by the conservative track records of history.

The fact is, without conservative governance, socialism and communism could not exist. The building has to be borne first before it can be torn down.

If YAL cannot be registered as a student organization, they cannot invite speakers (Ben Shapiro springs to mind), reserve rooms, or use funds for their tuition to cover organizational costs.

Let's hope that ADF wins the court battle because a lot depends on it. The left needs to be stopped from their shameless disrespect for the Constitution.

We cannot allow them to tear down the building.

Tweet

'Miss American Conservative' beauty contestants asked tough questions

From Obama to the Clintons, Joe Biden to Maxine Waters and more, the 'Miss American Conservative' contestants were grilled to see who would be crowned as this year's winner.

Miss Mississippi, Charlene Fingascrost, was crowned Miss Conservative American 2018 Sunday night in Atlantic City's Trump Casino, in New Jersey following an evening of tough political questions during the "Question-Answer" session. 

The first question Fingascrost was asked was whether she believed former president Barack Obama should stay out of current political discussions and quit attacking the Trump administration. 

Her answer surprised no one: "I believe Mr. Obama lacks the ability to remain neutral on issues he cares deeply about, such as socialism and partnering with Islamic countries in the fight against Israel. And yes, I believe he should stay out of politics, take up gardening and grow some class."

In another onstage interview, Miss Wyoming, Debbie Waitless, was asked if Trump was wrong to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord.

"The Paris Climate Accord was nothing more than a 'handshake' between nations promising to fight manmade climate change. While it's plausible that mankind has some influence on the climate, scientists still have no idea how much influence nor what can actually be done about change. The accord said that richer countries would pay poorer countries money to deal with climate change, but that they had 30 years in which to get off their butts and do something. It was a bad deal to begin with, and the United States is already limiting carbon emissions while the other big polluters, Russia, China and India, are doing squat."

The audience went wild.

Miss Montana, Jennifer Lustwagon, was asked to be "the jury" on whether President Trump or Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russian government in order to win the 2016 presidential election.

"In the United States, a person is said to be innocent until proven guilty. While there is no evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, there is a greater possibility that Hillary Clinton had more to do with the Russians. For example, her husband was paid half a million dollars to speak at a sanctioned Russian bank known as Renaissance Capital. It was sanctioned under the Magnitsky Act and the speech was made while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state.

"The sanction was named after Sergei Magnitsky, a whistle blower attorney who was put in a Russian prison in 2009 and later died there under suspicious circumstances. Magnitsky represented a U.S. investor, Bill Browder, the largest foreign investor at that time, and he claimed Russian organized criminals colluded with the Russian government officials to collect over two hundred million dollars on a tax rebate on Browder's companies.

"In 2015, Hillary opposed the Magnitsky Act while serving as secretary of state and this coincided with the time Bill gave his speech for Renaissance Capital, whose executives were at risk for being hurt by the sanctions.

"Hillary had also received a huge payout by Renaissance Capital in 2010, so if either Hillary or Trump were involved with Russian collusion in the election, I would imagine Hillary Clinton would be my first choice. But as a conservative, I still believe a person must be proven guilty, which is why I believe she needs to be fully investigated for this and other dealings."

Again, the crowd cheered wildly for Ms. Lustwagon.

Miss Nevada, Amanda Fanbubble, was asked to give her opinion on Confederate statues and whether they should be removed from public display.

"The entire statue issue is silly," she began. "The statues have been standing for years and suddenly they've become offensive to the leftists who claim moral superiority over all things dealing with race. Rather than actually fighting real racism, they object to inanimate objects and illegally knock them down as if they're actually fighting a Confederate soldier.

"The Civil War was about slavery, but it was also about state's rights, which was the issue many in the south were fighting for--in fact, most confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves.

"But yes, the idea of slavery is repugnant, except to Democrats in the KKK and other Democrats like Robert Byrd, George Wallace and Bull Connor," Fanbubble said. "And it was the Democratic Party that mostly voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, while the Republicans overwhelmingly  voted for its passing."

The casino crowd began to applaud loudly.

"So removing statues of Confederate generals and soldiers is a joke and a distraction from real issues such as tax reform, health care and the spread of terrorism in the West."

Miss Alabama, Hortense Flaturlance, was asked about her thoughts regarding Trump's comments after the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where he blamed "both sides." A counter-protester, Heather Heyer, died there when a white supremacist mowed his car into the crowd of counter-protesters.

"It was absolutely horrible that Ms. Heyer was killed. The individual who killed her must be brought to justice along with anyone at the rally who initiated violence.

"The terrorist group known as Antifa was at the rally. They came with makeshift shields and weapons. They came to start trouble. 

"The white supremacists disgust me and should disgust every decent human being who believes in human dignity. But denying anyone their right to free speech disgusts me just as much. This was the purpose of Antifa, so yes, President Trump was right to blame "both sides," but I also think he should have specified exactly what he meant by it. Also, I believe he should have immediately admonished the KKK and the neo-nazis for their beliefs instead of waiting two days before he did.

"Finally, it should be obvious that when Antifa initiates violence against the neo-nazis and KKK, it serves the purposes of the white supremacists."

Miss Missouri, Hope Springs, was asked if she thought Maxine Waters is "over the top" in her call for President Trump's impeachment.

"I think 'Aunty Maxine' should be evaluated for either a nursing home or a mental institution and Joe Biden should get a room next to hers."

Lustwagon and Fanbubble were First and Second Runners-Up, respectively.

Tweet

MSNBC getting 'too white Conservative'

Self-loathing white progressives and progressives of color are extremely angry with MSNBC's recent programming changes. In fact, they came up with a petition of 175,000 signatures threatening a "backlash" if the network doesn't do things their way.

The network has apparently shifted to hiring center right staff and a few diehard libtards are petitioning that the network go back to the progressive reporting that's in their safe zone.

The recent petition, hosted on Cretin Credo Action, urges network executives to "Stop the white conservative hiring spree at MSNBC." [Because they're afraid of hearing any opposing point of view].

The petition/warning goes like this: "NBC had troubling ties to Trump during the presidential campaign and gave the racist sexual predator a national platform. Now MSNBC, too, is tilting to the right. We need to let NBC executives know that there will be a sharp backlash if MSNBC becomes another platform for right-wing hate."

The petition's author expressed frustration with "progressive shows . . . skyrocketing" in ratings, conservatives, or those with a history on right-leaning networks such as Fox News,  George Will, Hugh Hewitt, and Greta Van Susteren. 

Obviously, the petition's author is intolerant of different points of view and believes that he can make million dollar business decisions for a network whose ratings had gone into the toilet until recently.

Last month, a protest was scheduled to march on NBC headquarters after reports that Lawrence "Comrade" O'Donnell's contract might not be extended. 

A petition posted on Change.org to save comrade O'Donnell's job received 16,000 signatures, about the same number of people that generally sit on the roof of an India train. 

In spite of the petition, the network announced earlier this month that O'Donnell will remain at MSNBC to spout his Communist tripe.

Other rumors about MSNBC president Phil Griffin (no relation to Kathy Airhead Griffin) claimed that he would be getting canned this month, but that information was as reliable as Hillary Clinton's testimony about her email server. Griffin signed a multi-year contract last month, possibly because he is the guy who built up the prime time lineup of the network.

This new petition, however, sets its sights on NBC President Andy Lack, who has supposedly behind the programming changes.

Tamron Hall

The petition reads: " . . . Lack has pushed out Black and Brown talent including Melissa Harris Perry, Alex Wagner, Touré Neblett, Dorian Warren, Michael Eric Dyson, Adam Howard, Jamil Smith, José Diaz-Balart and Tamron Hall. In fact, Lack has a history of replacing Black on-air personalities wherever he goes," the author alleges.

But perhaps the canning of Melissa Harris Perry was justified certainly, News Busters believes she was a loose cannon.

Alex Wagner left MSNBC to join The Atlantic as senior editor, not because she was fired.

Touré was fired because of what he tweeted about Holocaust survivors as noted in an article by Mediaite. MSNBC apparently doesn't suffer racists of any stripe.

Interestingly, Tamron Hall was not fired but left on her own even after she was asked to stay.

Michael Eric Dyson my have gone too far with the network after he compared police to ISIS.

An article by TV Newser reported that Diaz-Balart was a victim of upward mobility. He didn't get fired but left the network to join NBC Nightly News Saturday edition as part of a rotating cast of anchors.

So the "push out" by MSNBC wasn't really a push out at all. 

No company should be forced to retain a person who can injure their reputation. And if a person leaves to enhance their career, the company should be allowed to replace that individual with whom they believe best suits that position, and not base it on the melanin in their skin, or from where they or their family originates. 

Those who so carefully focus on racial issues, who are the racial "bean counters" in all facets of social life, are more likely to be racists than those they accuse of racism.



Tweet

Leftists attack nuclear scientist for having different opinion

Kara McCullough is a black 25-year-old nuclear scientist for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. She was crowned Miss USA on Sunday in Las Vegas, baby, beating Miss New Jersey for the crown, not to mention every other woman in every state.

So it should be obvious that not only is she smart, she is also beautiful and has a true sense of grace.

In order to attract and bring back viewers of the "Miss USA Pageant," more controversial topics were brought into the question and answer part of the event.

#NotMyUSA

The questions that were asked of  Miss McCullough were on healthcare and feminism. But due to the fact that her answers didn't fall in lockstep with the liberal point of view, leftists went ballistic and sparked a Twitter feeding frenzy. The hashtag was [quite laughably] #NotMyMissUSA.

When she was asked if healthcare was a right or a privilege,
McCullough's opinion was that it is a privilege: "I'm definitely going to say it's a privilege," she began. "As a government employee, I am granted healthcare and I see firsthand that for one to have healthcare you need to have jobs, so therefore we need to cultivate this environment that we're given the opportunity to have healthcare as well as jobs to all the American citizens worldwide."

Leftists all over our land of opportunity were pissed off.

"How dare she say that healthcare isn't my right. If I'm sick, there sure as hell better be a doctor willing to take care of me even if I don't pay him or her. I was born, so it's my right, not the doctor's to refuse me."

On feminism, Miss USA also gave an unacceptable "problematic" answer when asked how she viewed feminism.

"As a woman scientist in the government, I'd like to transpose the word feminism to 'equalism,'" she said. "I try not to consider myself this diehard, like, I don't really care about men. But one thing I want to say is that women are just as equal to men when it comes to opportunity in the workplace."

What a horrible concept. 

It caused the vagina-centric crowd of social progressives to go nuts, which was no surprise to normal people.

One person, apparently named for a species of shark, tweeted using Donald Trump punctuation:

What's wrong with being a feminist Miss DC USA!?!? Who says feminists hate men? Gurl!!! #MissUSA 

pic.twitter.com/jr5Hc5p2DN 

--Makho Ndlovu (@makhondlovu) May 15, 2017

The funniest tweet, however, had to do with the notion that Miss New Jersey was robbed, a la Hillary Clinton.

DC may have won the electoral judges, but NJ won the popular vote #NotMyMissUSA #MissUSA . 

--Kelsey Klemme (@Kelsey Klemme) May 15, 2017

If I wasn't a conservative, I might call Kelsey Klemme a racist, but I'm sure she's just a narrow minded leftist.



To follow Brain Flushings, please click the Follow tab in the margin.



Tweet

Freedom of Speech but not Freedom of Association?

Milo Yiannopoulos, the gay conservative provocateur plans to sue Simon & Schuster for $10 million because they decided not to go ahead and publish his book, Dangerous.  

Yiannopoulos made a remark in 2016 which appeared to endorse gay sex between 13-year-old boys and adult men. It was then that the publisher decided he was too volatile and that it would be a wise business decision not to publish his book--that's their right and they are under no obligation to go beyond the $250,000 cash advance.

"I am suing Simon & Schuster for $10 million," Yiannopoulos said in a livestream promoting Milo Inc., his new venture. "I want to send them a message that they can never again do this to a libertarian or a conservative."

Interesting how he wants to force Simon & Schuster to publish his (symbolic) "gay wedding cake" which goes against the free trade and free association philosophy he pretends to espouse as a conservative/libertarian.

Yiannopoulos lost a primo speaking event  at CPAC over the pederasty statement but he announced last month that he raised $12 million for his new business venture and plans to publish his book through his own label, called Dangerous Books. 

He also plans to begin a new nationwide college tour he calls "Troll Academy." 

I stand behind the publisher's right not to take him on as a client, but I believe the advance he received is his. 

Finally, Milo now refers to Simon & Schuster as a leftist organization, but let's remember, he was going to have them publish his book and they agreed to it, so how far left are they really?

Please follow Brain Flushings and click the Follow tab.


Tweet

Pro-choice Tomi Lahren: suspended and a hypocrite

She may be pretty but she's also pretty lame. Tomi Lahren has been suspended from The Blaze, where she works as a so-called conservative anchor. The Daily Caller was first to report the story.

Lahren caused a cow-chip storm when she revealed on The View that she is pro-choice when it comes to killing babies inside the womb. 

It isn't yet known if this was the reason for her suspension, but it's a really good reason to assess her actual political ideology and her understanding of conservatism. 

Right-leaning talk-show hosts and conservative pundits lashed out at the little blonde cutie, including Glenn Beck, the network founder of The Blaze. 

Beck promised to address the situation on his radio show Monday but before it was to happen it was learned by the Daily Caller that Lahren would not be returning to her time slot until next week at the earliest.

It was reported that there was tension between her and some of her colleagues, including head-lining hosts. Lahren is no stranger to controversial statements and no stranger to flip-flopping when it suits her or when she forgets what she'd already stated on a position.

She's about as conservative as Bernie Sanders.

Here's what she said on The View: 

"I'm pro choice, and here's why. I am a constitutional, y'know, someone that loves the Constitution. I'm someone that's for limited government. So I can't sit here and be a hypocrite and say I'm for limited government but I think the government should decide what women do with their bodies. I can sit here and say that, as a Republican and I can say, you know what, I'm for limited government, so stay out of my guns, and you can stay out of my body as well."

The audience, equipped with a 105 IQ collectively, applauded like trained monkeys. 

The issue of abortion has nothing to do with limited government--she conflated the two and was playing to the choir.

When it comes to the abortion issue, the fake conservative flip-flopped like a freshly caught trout at the edge of a stream. 

In an article by Red State, a video shows her on her show, "Final Thoughts" in a segment where she went full-throttle after Lena Dunham who had stated on her podcast that she wished she had an abortion. Lahren's response was a lot different back then: 

"This woman, and I use the term loosely, single-handedly kills legitimacy of the modern-day feminist movement every time she speaks . . . does she realize how damaging she is to her own narrative? Think about it: the 'pro-choicers' are supposed to be about rare and safe abortions. That's how they avoid sounding like straight-up baby killers . . . then we have Lena freaking Dunham out there wishing she could have murdered a fetus. Wishing for the option to kill your child doesn't exactly say much about the cause, her character, or the pro-choice movement. . . "

Lahren probably forgot that anything you say in the media is going to be recorded and your words may come back to haunt you. Her words: "Wishing for the option to kill your child doesn't exactly say much about the cause, her character, or the pro-choice movement." 

But that was then.

There's talk that Lahren wants to move up in the conservative world, and even Sean Hannity thinks she's the grooviest thing since LP records. President Trump reportedly called to congratulate her after she defended him on Hannity's show.

Perhaps Mr. Trump will hire her for her support of him against the "fake news" media. That sounds like her plan.


Tweet