"Squad" anti-Semite had covert YouTube page subscribed to Jew hating, flat Earth and Illuminati bs

Rep[ulsive] Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) is alleged to have kept a personal YouTube account that subscribed users pushed conspiracy theories, many of which were anti-Semitic. 

Gee, a Democratic congressman and member of the so-called "Squad," that features Reps. Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Obviously-Commie and Ayanna Pressley, what could be anti-Semitic about that, eh?

In January, the Daily Beast reported that Bowman had promoted 9/11 conspiracy theories on his blog when he worked as a public school principal in New York. He now claims that those days when his head was stuck in his nether regions were long gone, but his YouTube account where he still follows new channels and create recent playlists, show his continued predilection for fringe comment and bizarre thinking.

His page screen name "Inner Peace" features his photo and videos from the middle school where he worked, and his subscriptions to weird, bizarre accounts, including known Russian and Chinese disinformation peddlers, flat earthers, UFO believers, and “signs you’re being prepared to cross to the new earth.” He even has a post that explains a CIA document explaining time travel.

The Daily Beast also reported that Bowman's channel follows many accounts that push claims about aliens, UFOs and the Illuminati. Bwah hah hah!

Bowman loves him some fringe material. However, it's likely his "Inner Peace" account was taken down after the Jew-hating lunatic was outed. The video: "The American Takeover: How 2 Years of War Made Ukraine a US Colony" on his channel may have been too embarrassing for him, like BreakThroughNews, which farts out Russian and Chinese propaganda.

This is the dolt who defeated Republican candidate Patrick McManus for New York's 16th Congressional District in 2020, proving New Yorkers will vote for any idiot with a "D" behind his name, including those who claim to not know the difference between a door button and a fire alarm.

Tweet

Comrade Kirsten Powers acts like she's working for Pravda, oh wait, she's working for CNN

CNN's Kirsten Powers has suggested that Republicans should just shut up because she doesn't agree with what they say. 

Brilliant! 

She's miffed that YouTube is finally changing their censorship policies that have gagged conservative speech in the past, partly because Twitter, under Elon Musk, was first to abide by the First Amendment and is kicking YouTube's symbolic butt all across the Internet, and is doing a 180 degree turn.

YouTube, on Friday, tried to justify their American-way move this way: “In the current environment, we find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech without meaningfully reducing the risk of violence or other real-world harm.”

YouTube also noted, “As with any update to our policies, we carefully deliberated this change.”

Of course historically, they tended not to curb any misinformation by the Left, but they forgot to mention that for some reason. Ideally, they would not curb any information that wasn't calling for violence, but that was never going to happen. 

Regarding the 2024 election season that is now getting underway, the company wrote:

“The ability to openly debate political ideas, even those that are controversial or based on disproven assumptions, is core to a functioning democratic society — especially in the midst of election season.”

Well-said. Now. But it was also true for the entire time they were removing videos over the last three years. And now they want to try to make up with people and pretend they care about free speech? Sorry if I don’t believe it. They took a political side and now they can’t roll it back.

Even with this change, they’re still leaving some wiggle room to go after things that will likely benefit the Left.

But it's fairly obvious that the reason they're doing this about-face is because of Twitter's potential takeover of political shows and podcasts, leaving YouTube in the dust, so this may be YouTube's attempt at assuaging the situation.

https://t.co/u5QM3vi4fVhttps://t.co/2IMmmVapCu

— T(w)itter Daily News  (@TitterDaily) June 4, 2023

However, the Compromised News Network's Kirsten Powers had a cow and couldn’t seem to deal with it.

WATCH: CNN’s Kirstin Powers calling for the complete censorship of Republicans’ speech. pic.twitter.com/x5jLqA1cg7

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 3, 2023

“And so, if the problem is that, ‘Oh, people aren’t going to be able to upload things that Republicans are saying,’ maybe Republicans should stop saying it, right? Is that not the solution to the problem?” Comrade Powers complained. 

She later tried to clean up the load she had dumped, but it went over like another load. 

So, I [don't] think that — look, I [don't] support free speech, and I don’t think we want to silence political speech. But this company does [not] have [the] responsibility [to decide what can or cannot be spoken]. And that’s not a violation of free speech to say, “We’re not going to allow you to upload information that is demonstrably false.”

Who gets to determine what is “false,” Kirsten? I know you'd like to be on that company committee. 

Why did 2020 questions about election mishandling from Republicans get censored, yet all the Democrats floating election denialism in 2016 never did?

Because the liberal media is like an extension of the DNC, and anyone with eyes and a brain knows this.

Tweet

Louder with Crowder YouTube account locked: Steven Crowder responds: "We've got something for them"

The tyrannical YouTube technodictators have again demonized and locked out conservative funny pundit Steven Crowder's account for what they claim is in violation of their fungible leftist community guidelines.

The weasels at YouTube blocked Crowder from uploading new content to his channel for an entire week and pulled one of his videos that the platform said violated its rules against spreading misinformation about the 2020 election. 

The left considers any claim that election violations may have occurred in the presidential race to be misinformation, but in reality, it's hard to believe that any election is totally devoid of fraud--from both sides of the aisle. 

YouTube also booted Crowder from its YouTube Partner Program, which allows creators to run ads on videos and turn a profit, indefinitely. The did this mostly due to the fact that they suck and are willing to hold a drool cup for President Biden and practically President Kamala Harris.

When YouTube and Twitter give reasons as to why they suspended an account or banned it [as they did with former President Trump] they tend to cite the violation of their guidelines, but they never get specific as to what the violation was, nor provide facts that support their claims.

Crowder announced YouTube’s suspension against him in a Monday Instagram post accusing the media monopoly of manipulating its community guidelines to target conservatives. He also teased having “something for them [YouTube]” in response to his ban. Perhaps his half Asian lawyer Bill has something up his sleeve.

“I’ve been warning about this for a long time and now it’s here. BigTech, and specifically Youtube, have painted a target on Conservative’s backs for years, with yours truly being target #1,” Crowder wrote.

“Today, Google/YouTube just fired a HUGE shot across our bow. They are no longer enforcing ‘community guidelines,’ but creating entirely new ones with the express purpose of removing any and all Conservative voices of dissent,” he charged. “For the crime of investigative journalism, we are forbidden from uploading, posting or live-streaming for an entire week on the main channel. Don’t worry, we’ve got something for them.”

This is not the first time YouTube has demonetized Louder with Crowder. They did it from June 2019 to August 2020 over jokes he made about the scummy then-Vox's gay "journalist" Carlos Maza, and also for selling merchandise with the label “Socialism is for f*gs,” according to Tubefilter. 

[I cannot write out the full word "f*gs" as it is offensive to the gay male community and British people who merely see f*gs as something to smoke.]

At the time YouTube demonetized Crowder, they conceded that none of Crowder’s content had violated its hate policies. YouTube ultimately pulled advertising off of Crowder’s content after stating that he had engaged in a “pattern of egregious actions” that “harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies.”

But not one precious snowflake came forward claiming actual harm to themselves because if words can do harm, imagine what sunlight can do.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

YouTube removes video supporting Trump's statement

The leftists at YouTube removed a video showing how UV light treatment can kill the Chinese Communist Wuhan Coronavirus in the air. There was no reason given for the removal, but it might have something to do with the fact that President Trump mentioned it, and therefore, it is bad, not good.

The medical team at Cedars Sinai and Aytu Bioscience showed how the treatment for the virus is effective and safe for humans, but "Orange Man" likes it, and thus, it was removed.

The video was flagged by New York Times "reporter" Davey Alba to Youtube. She flagged the video because people who were sharing it showed scientists were actually developed the idea that President Donald Trump had mused about during a briefing and giving him kudos is out of the question.

Alba tweeted [brackets are my thoughts]:

I contacted YouTube about this video, which is being shared on tons of replies on Twitter & on Facebook, by people asserting that it backs up Trump's idea throwing it out there that UV rays kill coronavirus.
YouTube just said it removed it for violating its [whatever we say is their] community guidelines. pic.twitter.com/gbs5Igq0yy
— Davey Alba (@daveyalba) April 24, 2020

YouTube apparently would rather disrupt treatment efforts of the virus than give Trump even one iota of credit for his musings. The so-called community guidelines seem to be whatever Trump or conservatives assert must be a lie or harmful in some way and must, therefore, be removed.

Nobody was being endangered by the medical team and the video, it merely explained the science behind the treatment, and it was not possible to duplicate so again, nobody could possibly get injured in any way by the video.

The team tweeted:

Many are now talking about UV light being used as a treatment for COVID-19. We are proud to have teamed up with @MarkPimentelMD and his team at @CedarsSinai. They developed Healight. Peer-reviewed data will be published in days, but here's how it works: https://t.co/9E6dyOkwhI
— Aytu_BioScience (@BioscienceAytu) April 24, 2020

Lifesaving ideas are only permitted on YouTube if they and the New York Times, a former newspaper, approve. And if the idea in question is provided by Trump, you can forget about it.

The situation has deteriorated even more, however.

YouTube is not only going along with requests from the envious left, they are pulling anything that "goes against WHO recommendations,” according to Youtube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki.

#YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki says anything that goes against the W.H.O. is a violation of YouTube policies. All content that isn't "medically substantiated," such as advising people take Vitamin C, will be removed by the platform.
This is called CENSORSHIP folks.#smh pic.twitter.com/9cnB2dnS7O
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) April 21, 2020

If social media platforms are going to censor information they don't like, then they need to be considered publishers, not merely platforms, and as such, they need to be held accountable for what they publish.

Nasheed is right. When these social media platforms are political and biased, they need to be called out on it, particularly when they spew crap that WHO [aka Wuhan Health Organization] is the final arbiter of what is "proper."

YouTube and the New York Times would rather give credit to an organization that on Jan. 14th said that there was no evidence the Wuhan coronavirus was communicable between humans, despite Taiwan saying it is. And then not including Taiwan as a separate nation.

WHO also said toward the end of January [when Trump halted travel with China] that there was no reason to halt travel with the Communist nation, allowing many thousands to travel all over the globe to spread the virus.

YouTube is obviously not neutral but is grossly political. They choose what to promote and what to censor and need to be treated as such.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet

Carlos Maza has hissy fit over Ted Cruz defending Steven Crowder. Cruz destroys him

The stream of BlazeTV's  "Louder With Crowder" has been demonetized by YouTube mainly because they don't have a backbone or a single set of cojones amongst the entire staff at YouTube. Steven Crowder, the conservative comedian, was shut down after complains by the lisping gay Mexican activist Carlos Maza.

Maza is formerly of Media Matters, so that should tell you where his head is at when it isn't elsewhere [i.e., stuck in his nether regions]. The Vox activist went berserk over Cruz’s voiced support for free speech and traded words with the Republican Senator from the great state of Texas.

"This is ridiculous. YouTube is not the Star Chamber — stop playing God & silencing those voices you disagree with. This will not end well," said Cruz on Thursday.

In a subsequent tweet, Cruz wrote: 

"This is nuts. YouTube needs to explain why [Steven Crowder] is banned, but [Samantha Bee] ('Ivanka is a feckless c***.') & [Jim Carrey] ('look at my pretty picture of Gov. Kay Ivey being murdered in the womb') aren’t. No coherent standard explains it. Here’s an idea: DON’T BLACKLIST ANYBODY."

Maza took a shot at Cruz and, without a shred of even one example, insanely accused YouTube of being biased in favor of "right-wingers."

"A U.S. senator is coming to the defense of someone who spent two years calling me a 'lispy queer,'" the lispy queer responded. He actually refers to himself as a "queer" so in respect to his use of a personal pronoun, so will I.

"They do this because they know that [YouTube] cares more about looking fair to right-wingers than it does about stopping hate speech and harassment," he said, proving that he is delusional.

In follow-up tweets, Maza claimed that the censorship of right-learning creators on big tech platforms is not actually censorship and protested against "hate speech," a vaguely defined, subjective term that's as honest as the term "Islamophobia." That is, the term "hate speech" usually means any speech the person making the accusation wants to shut down, a totally unconstitutional move.

"Conservatives have spent years arguing that even basic content moderation is a form of 'censorship.' Their goal is to scare platforms like [YouTube] away from enforcing their hate speech policies. And it’s working, because YouTube doesn’t have the guts to protect its creators," the lispy queer dishonestly wrote.

"You can’t give these people an inch. They won’t stop crying ‘liberal bias!’ until they’re allowed to use hate speech with impunity. And that’s exactly what [YouTube] is allowing them to do,” Maza whined, not defining his use of the term.

"Sigh," replied Cruz. "This individual claims to be a 'journalist.' Then he throws a fit & demands that YouTube CENSOR views he doesn’t like."

"Here’s a crazy idea," offered Sen. Cruz, "if you don’t like what [Steven Crowder] says, ARGUE AGAINST HIM. Make your case in what John Stuart Mill called the 'marketplace of ideas.'"

This confused Maza. He had no idea why a cereal company would have any say in the matter about marketplaces.

On Tuesday, YouTube admitted that Steven Crowder's videos "don’t violate" any of their policies after "conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged" by queer activist Carlos Maza. But the platform reversed course after the queer activist threw a hissy Twitter fit, accusing YouTube of being anti-LGBT and encouraging LGBT employees at the company to "walk out" in protest.

The scared the bejeezus out of YouTube as they feared the world would not see them as being woke and not respect the wishes of queers and transgender minorities by refusing to go along with their demands.

"Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization," YouTube said on Wednesday, as they capitulated to the demands of the drama queen. 

"We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies.”

YouTube is full of crap. Their Partner Program policies is a moving target and constantly changing as it moves ever further to the left. If you want to see our First Amendment rights disappear, you can just sit back and do nothing. Otherwise, I suggest you support conservative speech, join websites like LouderWithCrowder.com and DailyWire.com, among many others.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

They wanted a BIGGER WALL before Trump was POTUS and it's on video

President Trump needs to hold off on declaring a national emergency at the border. All he needs to do is to show the American public the video [below] to make his case that he already mention: that the only reason the left doesn't want a wall along the southern border is because he is president and they don't want him having a win before the 2020 election.

Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich shared the video on Thursday. It shows former President Obama asking for more security at the border in the form of fencing and more. It also shows Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin — a harsh critic of President Trump’s efforts to build a border wall — complaining in 2006 because border fencing legislation that year did not cover enough of the U.S.-Mexico border. He, along with a gaggle of other Democratic hypocrites such as Chuck Schumer (NY), Joe Biden (DE),  Dianne Feinstein (CA) voted to support Obama's efforts.

In fact, the Secure Fence Act of 2006 enjoyed strong bipartisan support, passing the House of Representatives on a 238-138 vote and the Senate 80-19. Overall,   Sixty-four House and 25 Senate Democrats voted for the measure. Dick Durbin was a hold out because he believed the fencing would be inadequate because it would not cover enough of the border--he apparently wanted fencing to run the entire length, based on his comments:

“Our border is more than 2,000 miles long, and we are building 300 or 700 miles worth of fencing and barriers. 

“I would say that that leaves a lot of area uncovered,” he continued. “I guess it’s not a leap of the imagination to believe that people will find a way to go around this wall, around this fence, over or under it, it’s going to happen.”

And the only thing that's different today is that the situation along the southern border has gotten worse, not better.

The video uncovered by Pavlich clearly depicts the Democrats’ support.

Obama argued in favor of the bill saying, “It will authorize some badly needed funding for better fences and better security along our borders that should help stem the tide of illegal immigration in this country.”

Now the hypocrite Durbin, like most of his fellow hypocrite Democrats, opposes Trump’s push for funding for a border wall or barrier, describing the plan as “medieval.”

During an Oval Office meeting with Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last month, the president said illegal alien traffic decreased by 92 percent in the San Diego sector, 95 percent in El Paso, Texas, and 92 percent and 95 percent in Tucson and Yuma, Arizona, respectively, after fencing and other barriers were added.

Pelosi called into question those figures; however, they are in line with statistics given by the Border Patrol to NPR in 2006 following the initial erection of double and triple fencing in the San Diego area. Feelings, not facts, matter to Pelosi and her ilk.

According to the Border Patrol, the number of apprehensions of those trying to cross the border illegally dropped from approximately 162,000 at its peak in 2008 to 26,000 in 2017.

Earlier this month, Yuma County Sheriff Leon Wilmot told Fox News the fence also worked in his region.

As part of the Secure Fence Act, a 20-foot tall steel fence was built and the number of border patrol agents was tripled

“It was a 91 percent drop [in crime],” Wilmot said. “It obviously helped us curb some of the criminal activity that we unfortunately had to deal with.”

In 2005, apprehensions by Border Patrol was at 138,400. But in 2017, there was an enormous drop in apprehensions to about 12,900.

Walls work.

It's a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.






Tweet

Dems got it backwards on democracy

The survival of our democracy depends on the adherence to the Bill of Rights. Democracy never depends on banning any right guaranteed by the finest document ever put to paper.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) is calling for more tech companies to ban more sites that he and his party disagrees with, like Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Pinterest, and Spotify have done to Infowars. Murphy says the survival of American democracy depends on it.

Murphy has it a** backwards: the survival of our democracy depends on our ability to express ourselves and defend ourselves against the tyranny of government, just like the tyranny of censoring free speech erodes democracy.

If it's Alex Jones today, who will it be tomorrow? Ben Shapiro?Sean Hannity? Robert Spencer? Pamela Geller?

Even the speech of Milo Yiannopoulos, which is as detestable as Alex Jones', should not be banned because the more these idiots talk, the more normal people can see their lies.

But Chris Murphy and his ilk are more dangerous than both Jones and Yiannopoulos.

"Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart," Murphy said. "These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it," he tweeted Monday.

Murphy never explains just who determines what are the lies. He also doesn't understand that free speech is not the speech we want to hear, but the speech we don't want to hear. It's a person's right to say whatever he wants to say and our right to not listen, to walk away, to disagree and use more speech to debate.

Speech that calls for violence or puts lives at risk is already illegal.

And no, Alex, we are not 'all Alex Jones'. Just because someone defends your First Amendment right to free speech, doesn't mean they like you or believe a word you say. You are a loathsome individual who deserves not to be taken seriously, but that's the only restriction that should be placed on your words.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

Why lunatics like Alex Jones should not be banned

How is it that Apple, YouTube and Facebook banned Infowars on the same day? Is it possible the tech giants are band together to ban people they don't agree with?

Look, Alex Jones, who heads Infowars, is a conspiracy theory moron and a disgusting human being. I dislike the way he comes across; I dislike the garbage he spouts, but I like the First Amendment a lot more than I dislike Jones.

Facebook unpublished four of Jones' pages for "repeated violations of community standards," the company said Monday, without defining with clarity what the hell they were talking about.

Then YouTube terminated his account after he continued appearing in videos despite a 90-day ban from the company. Spotify also removed all of one of his podcasts for "hate content". They didn't explain what hate content is, but apparently it's anything the left disagrees with and wants banned.

Sarah Jeong is a racist just hired by the New York Times for its editorial staff. She has said horrible, anti-white, anti-cop, and anti-white woman statements on Twitter and was never banned for her hateful rhetoric.

But when Candace Owens, a conservative black woman, substituted the word 'white' with 'black' using Jeong's own tweets, Owens was banned from the website until conservatives voiced strong complaints and she was reinstated.

To rectify the situation, Twitter claimed they made a mistake by banning Owens. That was as feeble an excuse as Jeong's was when she claimed she received racist remarks on Twitter and countered those remarks with her own racist remarks.

If you believe that, you've got to be a liberal.

Have you noticed that leftist mistakes only go in one direction? Has anyone seen The New York Times or CNN make a "mistake" in favor of President Trump?

Removing speech one doesn't like or agree with is dangerous to the freedoms of this country. If you do it with Jones, you will not stop if you know you've gotten away with it. The First Amendment wasn't made to protect speech we like--it was made to protect speech we don't like. And the best way to deal with speech we don't like is with more speech, obviously.

But like a certain religion that will go unnamed, leftism cannot tolerate good debate because it's a weak ideology.

Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Spotify, Apple or any tech giant, should not be the arbiters of what is considered acceptable speech.

As mentioned, Jones is a disgusting person who has even gone so far as to claim the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School was a hoax and the children were all actors, to give merely one example of his conspiracy theory claims, but he should be viewed as the idiot he is and be allowed to show how big an idiot on Inforwars, as long as nobody is threatened with violence or that violence is called for by Jones.

The left is losing its collective mind and our rights are about to take a serious hit.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

Bat-poop crazy: guy goes on anti-Trump/killing spree rants

"Richard Simmons Lookalike Contest Winner"

His best defense is going to be an insanity plea because this liberal anti-Trump man is clearly mentally ill.

Orange County police found 9 loaded firearms inside the home of 39-year-old David Kenneth Smith of West Hollywood, after he posted a series of bizarre video rants about President Trump. In another video he spoke about going on a "killing spree."

The Los Angeles Times reported that police were called by staff members of Soka University in Aliso Viejo, after Smith, a former student, sent a faculty member "a link to a YouTube video that showed him sitting with a semiautomatic pistol on his chest talking about the university," said the Sheriff's Department. That video did not go public.

Smith has been charged with one felony count of making criminal threats on Monday, several days after his arrest by Orange County deputies.

The leftist Smith released dozens of YouTube videos about Trump, science fiction reviews, and his philosophy on life.

But on November 1st, he posted a bizarre 2-minute rant about the pros and cons of going on a murder rampage. He also revealed (whether true or not) that his father committed suicide. 

On the first video, he says the words "you know" 17 times.

"Well, what should I do? Should I just be homeless, or should I go on a killing spree? I go on a killing spree because I think being homeless is an entirely artificial situation. It's a situation that we made up. It's not like starving or famine because the crops didn't grow because you didn't know what to do."

And he rambled on as to how homelessness is entirely artificial and an abstract creation of our own minds, possibly indicating an actual break with reality. If that's the case, and he's schizophrenic, let's say, then that would explain why he's a liberal/leftist/progressive/Democrat/Communist.

"Investigators believed the suspect's threats were credible and an attack possible," the Sheriff's Department stated. They also said they found four revolvers, three shotguns and two rifles at Smith's West Hollywood home when they arrested him on November 2nd.

According to the statement, Smith may have been angered over a punishment he received at Soka University for marijuana use in 2008. The school is described as a "non-profit four-year liberal arts college and graduate school" founded on Buddhist principles, which means if you're not willing to work growing lotus blossoms or teaching yoga, good luck finding a job. (Go Grasshoppers!)

Smith is being held on $1 million bail and it's not out of the question that Antifa will try and raise the dough on a "Go Fund Me" page for his bail.

It isn't known at this time whether the weapons were acquired legally or illegally.


Tweet

Hijab-girl twerks, gets death threats from the jerks

If you twerk in a hijab, you're a sinner. But if you cut the head off of a Muslima who twerks in a hijab, you're a hero. 

A Muslim girl was captured on camera twerking in Britainstahn and has received death threats for being an independent spirit. Dancing, music, singing, comedy, laughing and saying nice things about Jews is forbidden in Islam, (the last one is okay if you're only saying the nice things to trick the Jew for whatever nefarious reason) so twerking obviously falls into that category known as haram.

Since the video went viral, the poor girl has apologized for "disrespecting" Islam. But the question that comes to mind is: how does one disrespect an ideology when it's inanimate? Ideas have no feelings to disrespect.

The girl, whose name is unknown because she values life and dance, was criticized after the video filmed in Birmingham showed her having fun by twerking. She happened to be wearing a piece of cloth around her head known as a hijab, which identifies her as Muslim and a prime target to be killed by other Muslims for twerking. Over a million people viewed the video on social media and it received thousands of negative comments by people with opinions on how you should lead your life. Some of the comments included death threats.

One extremely pious and devout person, possibly having just finished Salat al-'asr (late afternoon prayer) tweeted: "F*****g s**t someone give me her address I will kill her." Followed by another person, possibly an extremist imam: "Stupid b***h needs to be killed."

They only watched the video 72 times--one for each virgin they can't wait to score.

Evidently, these two found twerking more offensive than their language and threats.

A conservative YouTuber Ali Dawah, called the girl's dance "really bad" and "inappropriate." Dawah, a conservative Muslim interviewed the girl on YouTube and she apologized for disrespecting the religion after his repeated reminders that the community is judging her actions and is hoping she will identify herself with her home address.

Dawah asked her why she'd twerked in public. She said, "I was out with my friends, we were going shopping and there were these people playing music [OMG!] there was one song that a girl want to dance with me," she said, adding that she has mental health problems and often can't "think straight."

Dawah got the girl to a point where she began crying. He forced her to apologize for her unchained moment of joy.

"To all the girls that wear hijab and wear abayah I'm sorry for disrespecting it," she said. "I've learnt from my mistake . . . I'm just hurt, I just want everybody to leave it alone and keep everything away.

"I don't want it to be how it was and I'm not gonna do anything like that again and I'm sorry for disrespecting it and thank you to all of you that helped." [While thinking 'and please don't kill me'.]

His co-host Musa, said in the show, "this is why music is haram [forbidden]."

Maryam Namazie, an Iranian critic of sharia and proponent of secularism, criticized those social media jihadists who demanded the girl apologize. She tweeted: "Why the hell does she need to say sorry".

Islam, the tolerant, softer religion of peace.

Tweet

ISIS threatens: 'Stop deleting our accounts'

We're looking for a few good sheep

ISIS is upset over their social media accounts. The accounts are being systematically deleted by the social network administrators and it's twisting their skivvies in a knot.

One group of scumcrumpets took to an encrypted Telegram channel to cry over the constant deletion of their propaganda channels. They also mocked intel agencies, accusing them of infiltrating ISIS channels to obtain "real and credible information about the Islamic State."

Well that's what intel is supposed to do--to mock them means they're being successful and that's a good thing.

The idiots wrote: "We are not dumb nor stupid not to know that you are monitoring our Channels! . . . Reporting our Channels to be Disabled cuts off your source of information therefore rendering you useless and naive," the post reads.

I have a feeling that people who think that by blowing themselves to smithereens they are doing God's work, are not all that intelligent. Our intel agencies know what they're doing.

The dummies also suggested that without news and propaganda reports from them, the social media platforms would have a harder time generating revenue. What they're saying, in other words, "Please don't shut us out--it's good for you too."

"Reporting our Channels to be Disabled means You will run out of Business because Our Channels are Your Sources of income," the post says ungrammatically.

Twitter announced last year that it had shut down 360,000 accounts that were promoting or threatening terrorist acts, and who knows how many pro-Trump tweeters.

YouTube and Facebook also deleted thousands of videos and social media accounts promoting jihad.

Telegram, the 'app of choice' by the Islamic barbarians, created an ISIS 'watch-bot' that tracks the number of ISIS-affiliated channels and bots removed every month.

ISIS, however, has created a bot that generates random email addresses, temporary mobile phone numbers and pin codes required by many social media accounts for sign-up. They've also resorted to 'invite only' groups on Facebook to avoid deletion for several weeks before being discovered.

On Twitter, the jihadis set their tweets to protected viewing, which only allows 'vetted' followers (aka fellow scumcrumpets) to see their posts.


Tweet

YouTube's head is up its tube

Screen grab from the video

I remember several years ago inadvertently coming across a YouTube video depicting a captive of an Islamist group being drawn and quartered, not by horses, as done in the "good old days,"but by jeeps going in different directions.

 I still cannot get that horribly barbaric image out of my head--it really affected me.

Since then, YouTube has incorporated a new "hate speech" policy and those videos of Islamic terrorism (for that's exactly what it is and I say so unapologetically) have been taken down from the site.

But in applying its new policy, YouTube has removed a video posted by an anti-extremist organization known as CounterJihad.com. The only reason one can extrapolate from removing a video that goes against hate speech and hateful behavior is that YouTube has its head up its tube.

The CounterJihad.com video depicts how Islamic ideology, Sharia governance (Islamic law) in particular, along with the goal of a sharia-governed global caliphate, is behind the terrorism and justifies it as a religious pursuit.

If you're interested in seeing the video, you can watch it here. 

I believe any reasonable person would agree that hate speech is unacceptable in social media and needs to be eliminated. But discussing the ideology behind hate speech does not equate to hate speech itself. That's an absurdity that boggles the mind.

We really need to stop pretending that all cultures and religions are equally moral and the same as those in the West. They are not the same and there is no moral equivalency as the left would have us believe.


Tweet

Terrorism Gone Viral

If you see yourself as a loser, then you've got nothing to lose. So it is with terrorism--if you get on the jihad bandwagon, you can be a "somebody," a "hero," even "a contender," (pronounced "contendah"). 

With terrorism, you can even get back at the nasty government that only gives you Food Stamps, a phone and maybe housing subsidies.

Plus, as an Islamic terrorist, if you're gullible enough you might even get a bunch of virgins who will do all kinds of things to you that virgins aren't supposed to know about and you've only fantasized about it as you perused your Playboy Magazines "for the stories" of course.

Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Tx) is chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security and believes that there is an increase in threats that face our nation. This comes after last week's jihad attempt to kill attendees at the "Draw Mohammad" contest in Garland, Texas and the subsequent FBI warning that more is to come.

"We're seeing these directives on almost a daily basis," McCaul told Fox News Sunday. It's very concerning. Terrorism has gone viral." Perhaps that's why they're such a hit on YouTube.

The good news is that with proper monitoring, our intelligence community can learn a great deal about these terror threats and thwart them.

The bad news is that they actually did know about the threat in Garland and the only thing that thwarted the attack was a cop with a pistol who outshot the scumbuckets who were trying to kill unarmed citizens.

FBI Director James Comey said that the Islamic State (IS) has thousands of English-language followers on Twitter, many of whom live in the U.S. (The Islamic State is a religious organization that follows the Islamic tradition of beheading non-believers who refuse to convert to Islam.)

IS encourages followers to travel to Syria to join their caliphate, but if they can't make the trip, not to worry--you can "kill where you are."



Tweet