Latinx bartender congress-cretin accuses Israel, not Hamas, of war crimes

Former bartender, anti-Semite, and author of the Green New Deal, Rep.[ulsive] New York City Democratic-Socialist Alexandria Obviously-Comatose  (AOC) accused Israel of committing war crimes. 

Evidently the Jewish State has no business defending itself after all the things they've done such as not dying and wanting to live life.

The over-achieving dolt appeared on the far-left's MSNBC "The Mehdi Hasan Show," [may peas be up in him] to defend her idiotic position that Israel should take the Hamas sneak attack on October 7th like a mensch and just stop fighting. She didn't actually come out and say that, but she's making that implication loud and clear.

Sandy Cortez was asked whether Israel has the right to defend itself and her response was that "war crimes" are not the appropriate response. 

So for AOC, when Hamas committed a Nazi-like war crime of killing innocent Israelis, including young people at a desert music festival, children, babies and their parents, and then use mosques and civilian facilities where they fire rockets at Israel from, it does not call for the Jews to fire back because they might kill a Gazan civilian who voted for Hamas.

She said nasally, "I think one of the things that’s important to recognize about this situation is the asymmetry of what is going on as well as the collective punishment of what is happening to the Palestinian people at this moment. Hamas has absolutely engaged in horrific attacks. Every single day there are more details that are released about what occurred on October 7th that shocks the human consciousness and shocks our conscience, our collective conscience."

"However we do know as well that war crimes do not constitute and are not an appropriate response for other war crimes," the anti-Semite said.

"It is inacceptable to think that 1700 Palestinian children alone, their deaths will somehow make up or justify the violence of what we saw on October 7th."

Jewish children, 32 child hostages, well, um, not so much.

The socialist boob then went on to accuse Israel of committing an "indiscriminate bombing campaign" against Gaza and questioned the effectiveness of its recent actions.

Hamasshole killing an unarmed Jewish family

Except it was not and is not indiscriminate. Israel is using drones and other military intelligence to target Hamas targets: the secondary explosions we see on video proves that they are striking munitions, rocket sites, and they have also neutralized a number of Hamasshole leaders.

"It occurs to me, I think a question we all must ask ourselves, what price of innocent life is acceptable in terms of targeting Hamas? And are we even receiving? We are receiving daily counts every day about the number of innocent people that are dying. We are not seeing reports on how effective this has actually been in terms of dismantling Hamas. I think it’s very important for us to raise that point. I think it’s important for us to understand that this is part of a larger intergenerational cycle of violence," the ditzy Latinx [her word, not mine] said.

AOC then tried to tap dance away from the accusations that she is defending Hamas. She insists that to criticize Israel is not a defense of the terrorists and "both-sided" the argument saying that the "political aims of violence" ON BOTH SIDES is the "dehumanization" of the other.

Sorry, dummy, Israel is nothing like Hamas or Hezbollah. They have never aimed for the total annihilation of the Palestinians or any Islamic nation. However, these Iranian-backed terrorist groups are an existential threat to Israel and need to be neutralized. Israel warned the citizens of Gaza to get out of the region; Hamas did exactly the opposite. There is not a shred of moral equivalency and AOC knows it--she just hates Jews along with the others who support Hamas. 

We all know that.

You don't kill someone's baby and other loved ones and expect anything less than what Israel is doing in response to the Islamist atrocities.

Tweet

Terrorist sympathizer and CNN host claims unarmed Israeli family killed in a "shootout"

When you hear the word "shootout" you think of two sides firing at each other with weapons. Bullets fly in both directions and there's usually a sense of an equal chance of victory to both sides. But when a fake news, anti-Zionist, Jew-hating "reporter" calls the execution of a Jewish family in Israel a "shootout," fake news has reached a new and more disgusting level.

Last week the Compromised News Network's Christiane Amanpour claimed that members of the British-Israeli Dee family were "killed in a shootout." HonestReporting, a media watchdog organization, showed video of Amanpour making the claim about mother Lucy Dee and her daughters Maya and Rina.

The media watchdog noted, “A shootout is two sides firing at each other. A mother and her two daughters were shot at close range by Palestinian terrorists.”

But people like Amanpour don't see terrorist acts as terror, they see it as freedom fighters that fight for their cause.

Terrorist in training

The Jerusalem Post reported that the Israeli Consulate in Atlanta intends to send a letter of complaint to the Crappy News Nitwits. It's doubtful that they'll apologize or do anything about their so called reporter, but to do nothing would be a crime. The outlet also said that the Israeli Foreign Ministry confirmed they are working on the letter.

The murders of the Dee mother and daughters occurred over the Passover holiday as they drove through the Jordan Valley and terrorists fired multiple rounds at their car, shooting them over 20 times. 

Tell us, Amanpour, how the hell is that considered to be a shootout?

The family patriarch, Rabbi Leo Dee, told HonestReporting that he demands an apology, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“This is the perfect example of ‘terror journalism,’ where you have moral equivalence between the terrorist and victim,” Rabbi Dee told The Post. “This type of journalism perpetuates the conflict in the Middle East,” he added. “The real cycle of violence is a comment like this followed by a terrorist atrocity and then more of the same.”

Tweet

YouTube's head is up its tube

Screen grab from the video

I remember several years ago inadvertently coming across a YouTube video depicting a captive of an Islamist group being drawn and quartered, not by horses, as done in the "good old days,"but by jeeps going in different directions.

 I still cannot get that horribly barbaric image out of my head--it really affected me.

Since then, YouTube has incorporated a new "hate speech" policy and those videos of Islamic terrorism (for that's exactly what it is and I say so unapologetically) have been taken down from the site.

But in applying its new policy, YouTube has removed a video posted by an anti-extremist organization known as CounterJihad.com. The only reason one can extrapolate from removing a video that goes against hate speech and hateful behavior is that YouTube has its head up its tube.

The CounterJihad.com video depicts how Islamic ideology, Sharia governance (Islamic law) in particular, along with the goal of a sharia-governed global caliphate, is behind the terrorism and justifies it as a religious pursuit.

If you're interested in seeing the video, you can watch it here. 

I believe any reasonable person would agree that hate speech is unacceptable in social media and needs to be eliminated. But discussing the ideology behind hate speech does not equate to hate speech itself. That's an absurdity that boggles the mind.

We really need to stop pretending that all cultures and religions are equally moral and the same as those in the West. They are not the same and there is no moral equivalency as the left would have us believe.


Tweet

US-Israeli citizen murdered--administration plays it off with moral equivalency

Another attack on a Jewish, U.S. - Israeli dual-citizen by Palestinian Muslims, elicits another verbal response designed to show moral equivalency between Israel and the Hamas-led Palestinians.

The Obama administration "condemned in the strongest possible terms on Friday an attack by knife-wielding Palestinians in the West Bank that resulted in the death of a dual Israeli-US citizen, the State Department said in a statement," as reported by FoxNews.com.

The moral equivalency came when FoxNews.com went on to report that "The death of American Tuvia Yanai Weissman on Thursday underscores the need for all sides to reject violence. . ."

What the hell are they talking about?

The guy was a 21-year-old off-duty IDF soldier shopping with his wife and 4-month-old baby in a supermarket in the West Bank's Binyamin region. A pair of Palestinian Muslim teens went on a stabbing spree in the market injuring another shopper. Tuvia's wife and baby thankfully were in a different aisle when he was attacked--Palestinian terrorists are known for killing Jewish babies.

Weissman was taken to Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem but was pronounced dead.

The two Palestinians were shot and wounded by a bystander--giving credence to our Second Amendment, which has been effective in Israel.

Weissman's father eulogized his son: "You loved your daughter, Netta, so much. You took her to see the flowers in the Negev the day before you were murdered. No hate and no enemy will ever stop that."

Rabbi Nathanson, the preparatory leader in the program Tuvia attended also spoke of his former pupil.

"Your wife informed me yesterday that you all had been in a different aisle in the supermarket, you heard screams, and she bent over to cover Netta, and you disappeared. You couldn't listen to screaming and stand back--you were like that--you did not have a weapon because you were off-duty. You fought with your fists, your body, your whole heart," Rabbi Nathanson said as he recounted the conversation he had with Weissman's wife.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner condemned the attack saying that it underscores the need for Israelis and Palestinians to reject violence, reduce tensions and restore calm.

Mark Toner and the entire Obama administration apparently doesn't know what a fatwa is, or they don't want to call any attention to it. To suggest moral equivalency between Israel and the Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority is not only bizarre and stupid, it's downright evil.


Tweet