Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts

Thursday, July 16, 2026

Abdul El Sayed's Campaign of "Getting Money Out of Politics" Depends Heavily on Father in Law Tied to Muslim Brotherhood Linked Organization



One of the more curious habits of modern politics is the insistence that we ignore patterns which, in any other context, would immediately invite scrutiny. We are told that connections do not matter, associations are merely historical accidents, and family ties become irrelevant precisely when they are politically inconvenient.

That indulgence is now being extended to Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El Sayed. And just because his father-in-law has help fund terrorist organizations is no reason to worry where El Sayed's heart lies.

A review by the Washington Free Beacon found that El Sayed's father in law, Dr. Jukaku Tayeb, is both one of the largest financial backers of the super PAC supporting El Sayed's campaign and a longtime senior figure within the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, an organization federal prosecutors identified during the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case as a public facing component of the Muslim Brotherhood's American network.

Tayeb has contributed $200,000 to the Fighting for Michigan PAC, nearly half of the group's fundraising total through the end of March. This might be considered what is often referred to as financial jihad, as it helps fund jihad causes.

His financial support would already merit attention. His organizational affiliations make the story considerably more significant.

According to ISNA's own publications, Tayeb has served on the organization's 20 member founding committee since at least 2007. Membership on that committee is not ceremonial. Founders are expected to contribute at least $5,000 annually while also supporting the group's Founders Legacy Fund.

Federal prosecutors identified ISNA as an unindicted co-conspirator during the landmark Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history. That case resulted in convictions after prosecutors demonstrated that more than $12 million had been funneled to Hamas through charitable fronts. One of the federal prosecutors, you may recall, was Andy McCarthy, who put the "Blind Sheikh" (Omar Abdel-Rahman) behind bars.

Government filings also identified ISNA as one of several organizations "who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood."

This was not a passing allegation or an abandoned theory. This was big guns, or rather sharp swords, to be more precise.

In a 2009 ruling, a federal judge concluded that the Department of Justice had presented "ample evidence" connecting both ISNA and the Council on American Islamic Relations, or CAIR, to Hamas during the litigation.

The court noted that the Holy Land Foundation and ISNA shared banking arrangements and cited evidence showing checks deposited into those accounts were frequently made payable to "the Palestinian Mujahadeen," the original name used by Hamas's military wing.

The ruling also referenced a now well known 1991 memorandum from the Muslim Brotherhood's Shura Council describing its American strategy as "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

These are not the inventions of political opponents. They are findings and evidence introduced during one of the most consequential terrorism financing cases in modern American legal history.

Lorenzo Vidino, director of George Washington University's Program on Extremism, offered little ambiguity regarding ISNA's origins.

"ISNA was historically, no question, an organization created … by the Muslim Brotherhood and fellow travelers from the Indian subcontinent as basically the Islamist organization in America."

He added that Tayeb remained active during years "when they were putting out some really nasty stuff."

"To be on the founding committee, this is the elders of the organization."

Tayeb's involvement did not end there.


IRS records show he served as president of CAIR Michigan from 2005 through 2010 and remains on its board of directors. Like ISNA, CAIR was named as an unindicted co conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation prosecution.

Vidino described the overlap as entirely predictable.

"This is kind of the pattern," he explained. "To some degree, it's a good old boys network. And so, if you're on the board committee in ISNA, chances are you also belong to your local CAIR branch. Chances are you sit on the board of another charity that is part of the network. That's kind of how it works."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy argued that these relationships have long been visible.

"It’s been obvious since the 1970s that the Muslim Students Associations and ISNA … have very strong ties to the extreme fringes of the Democratic Party."

Meanwhile, El Sayed campaigns beneath lawn signs declaring that he wants to push "money out of politics."

His rhetoric frequently targets AIPAC, which he accuses of attempting to "buy off government" to "make sure that our money is sent abroad to kill other people."

Yet while condemning outside money, the super PAC sustaining his campaign is heavily financed by his own father in law.

His Democratic opponent, Representative Haley Stevens, highlighted the contradiction during last week's debate.

"He's great at covering up that his father-in-law is running his super PAC that's spending millions of dollars for him," Stevens said. "Abdul, you talk about getting money out of politics and putting money in people's pockets. But who is putting money in yours? What are you hiding?"

The questions do not stop with campaign finance.

El Sayed has repeatedly appeared alongside some of the loudest anti Israel activists on the American left, including Hasan Piker, who has infamously declared that "America deserved 9/11."

One of El Sayed's former campaign staffers, Mariam Odeh, was indicted in June for allegedly participating in what prosecutors described as a coordinated campaign targeting Jewish officials, businesses, and organizations connected to the University of Michigan.

Perhaps most revealing was El Sayed's own recorded guidance to campaign staff following the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

"I also want to remind you guys that there are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today," El Sayed said. "So, like, I just don't want to comment on Khamenei at all. Like, I don't think it's worth even touching that."

That is an extraordinary statement for any American politician. One might have expected even a minimal condemnation of a man responsible for decades of repression, terrorism, and regional instability. Instead, electoral sensitivities apparently took precedence over moral clarity.

None of this proves Abdul El Sayed shares every belief of his father in law or every historical position associated with ISNA or CAIR. Guilt by association is an inadequate standard.

But neither can serious political journalism pretend these relationships are meaningless.

When a candidate's principal financial benefactor occupies a senior leadership position in organizations repeatedly scrutinized in one of America's largest terrorism financing investigations, and when that candidate consistently avoids condemning Islamist figures while courting activists sympathetic to them, the public has every right to ask difficult questions.

The remarkable thing is that so many in the political and media establishment seem determined to insist the questions should never be asked.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Wednesday, July 8, 2026

President Trump might remove Syria from US's list of state sponsors of terrorism


Trump Eyes Syria Terror List Removal: “Guy’s Crushing It, Folks” POTUS said, referring to Syria's POS.

In a move that has foreign policy experts clutching their pearls and reaching for their smelling salts, President Donald J. Trump announced Wednesday that he’s strongly considering yanking Syria off America’s official “State Sponsors of Terrorism” list, because, in his words, the new Syrian leader is “doing a great job.” [And had probably told "The Donald" that he likes him.]

The announcement came during a press gaggle in Turkey as Trump met with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a man whose résumé apparently now reads “Reformed Bad Boy” instead of whatever it said last week when he was the "Be-header in Charge."

“Are you going to remove Syria from the state sponsor of terrorism list?” a brave reporter asked, bravely risking a brave follow-up question.

“I think I will, yeah,” Trump replied with the breezy confidence of a man ordering a well-done steak. “Why wouldn’t I? He’s done a great job. Maybe he would have brought that up in a little while. That’s a good question. Yeah. Any problems that I think we should? Yeah, I will.

”Translation: Syria went from “Axis of Evil Adjacent” to “Model Student” faster than you can say “Art of the Deal.” The country, which until recently was starring in “Failed State: The Sequel,” now gets the Trump stamp of approval.

For context, Syria currently shares the prestigious terrorism sponsor list with such luminaries as Iran, North Korea, and Cuba, the geopolitical equivalent of the island of misfit toys.

Trump seems ready to hand Syria a diploma and a participation trophy just for showing up and not blowing anything up this week. 

At press time, State Department bureaucrats were reportedly seen wandering the halls muttering, “But we have a process,” while Trump was already sketching out potential Trump Tower Damascus on a napkin. Because if there’s one thing the Middle East needs, it’s more winning. And Donald Trump is, as always, happy to oblige.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Saturday, June 27, 2026

Hezbollah Furious That Lebanon Might Stop Letting Hezbollah Run Lebanon



Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem is having a rough weekend. The terror group's secretary general blasted the newly signed Israel-Lebanon framework agreement as "null," a "humiliation," and an outrageous assault on the sacred tradition of heavily armed militias operating their own private state inside another state.

Apparently, nothing says "national sovereignty" quite like taking orders from Tehran while stockpiling rockets in civilian neighborhoods.

Speaking on Saturday, Qassem declared that any effort to tie Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon to Hezbollah giving up its arsenal crossed "all red lines." Translation: Israel is expected to leave, but Hezbollah is expected to keep enough missiles to redecorate northern Israel whenever the mood strikes.

“We say to the Lebanese authorities, it is time for you to retract your sins that are destroying Lebanon,” Qassem asserted.

That is certainly one way to describe the situation. Another would be to ask whether the organization that has dragged Lebanon into repeated wars, frightened away investors, and treated the country's sovereignty like an optional suggestion is perhaps looking in the wrong mirror.

The framework agreement, signed Friday by the United States, Israel, and Lebanon after days of negotiations in Washington, lays out a step by step plan to dismantle Hezbollah's terrorist infrastructure, disarm the group, and allow the IDF to withdraw from southern Lebanon as the threat disappears.

In other words, somebody finally proposed the radical idea that a country's army should be the country's army.

The agreement also calls for the United States to strengthen the Lebanese Armed Forces so the nation's military, instead of an Iranian proxy, can provide security within Lebanon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the deal, calling it “a major achievement for the State of Israel” in a public address.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun welcomed the agreement as “the first step on the path to restoring Lebanon's sovereignty” in a post on X.

Qassem, meanwhile, appears to believe Lebanese sovereignty is best preserved by ensuring Hezbollah remains more heavily armed than the Lebanese government itself. It is a fascinating constitutional theory, albeit one that seems to exist nowhere outside the offices of Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

For years Hezbollah has insisted it is merely defending Lebanon. Now that someone has suggested Lebanon might defend itself, Hezbollah suddenly finds the proposal deeply offensive.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Friday, June 19, 2026

Silenced no more: The Israeli women who documented Hamas's October 7 sexual crimes


A new 298-page Civil Commission report lays bare the sexual violence of October 7. Drawing on thousands of photographs, videos, and interviews, it shows how social media itself became a weapon of psychological warfare.

When the privately funded Civil Commission on the October 7 crimes against women, men, and children published its landmark report on May 12, Dr. Cochav Elkayam-Levy felt something she had not known for a long time: a deep sense of relief.

The report. Silenced No More: Sexual terror unveiled: the untold atrocities of October 7 and against hostages in captivity. had at last appeared. Elkayam-Levy noted that it received fair and accurate coverage in hundreds of news outlets, among them the BBC, the UK’s Daily Mail, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, and The New York Times.

Elkayam-Levy, the commission’s principal author, had taken on a task of such heartbreak and disturbance. documenting crimes of extraordinary cruelty. that many on her team could not continue. For two and a half years she sat with the evidence and with survivors. She reviewed testimony about the sexual crimes committed by Hamas-led terrorists on October 7, 2023, and in the time that followed.

“One of the most important takeaways is the before-and-after reality of the report,” noted Danae Marx-Callaf, director of international communications and one of the four co-founders of the Civil Commission. “Our report shifts the conversation from ‘whether it happened’ to ‘what are the consequences.’

“Another important thing is recognition of the victims. The report will go around the world to different policy makers and not remain just the knowledge of a few in the world,” Marx-Callaf added.

The comprehensive 298-page document sets out the sexual terror committed on and after October 7. The Civil Commission concluded that this terror stood at the centre of Hamas’s war strategy.

An expert in international law, human rights, and feminist legal theory, Elkayam-Levy serves as a Sophie Davis Fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She was a 2024 Israel Prize laureate for her tireless work on the report. For years she had taught and written about war crimes, gender-based violence, and the duty of legal systems to protect the vulnerable and pursue justice.

Yet she never imagined that other highly committed women’s advocates from other nations. the very people with whom she had spent a career teaching and working. would abandon her after October 7.

In the days after the massacre, while Israel was still counting its dead and families searched for missing loved ones, Elkayam-Levy travelled to New York to address the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. She reported on the sexual atrocities retrieved from Hamas’s phones and the victims’ phones, from survivors’ testimonies, and from the accounts of those given the grim task of identifying mangled corpses.

She arrived expecting that evidence of atrocities committed against women would command urgent international attention. Instead she encountered the UN Committee’s apathy and hatred as dozens of pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas activists accused Israel of genocide. The experience left a profound impression.

“I remember feeling devastated,” Elkayam-Levy told the Magazine in an interview at the commission’s office in Modi’in.

The silence was deafening.

For a scholar of international law and human rights that moment became a turning point. “The silence was deafening,” she said.

“I remember thinking we had to establish an organization. If the crimes were not being investigated, documented, and preserved with the urgency they demanded, we in Israel would have to do it ourselves,” she continued.

At first the goal was simply to preserve evidence before it vanished. The terrorists’ horrific photographs and videos of sexual violence and torture spread virally through email, WhatsApp, and social media platforms.

“Hamas itself had uploaded and distributed large quantities of material to cause as much psychological damage as possible. We knew we had to preserve those images before they vanished,” Elkayam-Levy added.

What began as an emergency response soon became the Civil Commission. an independent civilian initiative separate from government institutions. Its purpose was not only to investigate the crimes but to do so according to the highest international legal and evidentiary standards. so that its findings could withstand scrutiny in courts, tribunals, academic research, and historical inquiry.

For Elkayam-Levy the aim was to place a meticulously documented historical record before the world. a wake-up call not only to governments and legal institutions but to humanity itself. The report, for instance, records the account of Raz Cohen, a Supernova music festival survivor: “The men pulled a woman from the vehicle... forcibly removed her clothing, and raped her… They repeatedly stabbed her, killing her… they continued to rape her after her death.”

Said Elkayam-Levy: “I never imagined something like this would happen here in Israel. For hours, terrorists moved freely through communities in southern Israel, murdering families in their homes, burning houses, taking hostages, raping them, and broadcasting much of it live.

“The attacks shattered more than Israel’s border defenses. They shattered a basic sense of security. One of the things we lost from the outset was our sense of safety. It felt like it could happen to any of us. Even today, that sense of vulnerability lingers,” Elkayam-Levy said.

Recalling her 51 days in Hamas captivity, Agam Goldstein, who was 17 when she was abducted, is quoted in the report: “It’s these little things that break you… when you have no control over your body and no control over how to take care of your body.”

Elkayam-Levy is the mother of four children. Her youngest son was two-and-a-half years old when she co-founded the commission. Each day she moved between two worlds. One filled with evidence of cruelty, degradation, and suffering. The other filled with children, homework, family dinners, and ordinary life.

“My children were the reason I did this,” she said. “They were what kept me sane.” Time with family became a form of emotional recovery. At the same time she worried constantly about what she was missing. “I wasn’t there enough. They needed me,” she said wistfully.

Elkayam-Levy worried about what her family was also sacrificing. While she immersed herself in evidence, interviews, and the daily demands of the investigation, her husband carried most of the burden of raising their four children. “He understood and supported me. But it was a lot.”

When Elkayam-Levy was awarded the Israel Prize in the newly created category of Arvut Hadadit (Mutual Responsibility) in 2024, the honour was deeply meaningful, she said, but not primarily for professional reasons. Her older children suddenly saw the work through the eyes of the nation after years of watching their mother disappear into a mission they were too young to understand.

“They take pride in it now. The recognition helped them understand why I had been absent so often, why the work mattered, and why I had felt compelled to continue despite its enormous toll emotionally and on family life,” she added.

The establishment of the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas against Women, Children, and Families grew organically out of the independent, non-governmental Dvora Research Institute, which Elkayam-Levy established in 2021. Recognised as a prominent legal scholar and human rights expert, and active in the Israeli women’s protests against the judiciary overhaul, she quickly gathered a team of professionals and colleagues.

The Civil Commission drew on legal experts, trauma specialists, archivists, researchers, and volunteers. It was guided by a board of high-level international advisers, including the Hon. Irwin Cotler, former minister of justice and attorney-general of Canada, and Sheryl Sandberg, the American technology executive and Lean In Foundation founder. According to a commission spokesperson, Sandberg provided steadfast support, mentorship, and moral leadership from the earliest days.

“Very few people agreed to bear witness to these crimes,” explained Marx-Callaf, the communications director. “The exposure to this violent material is one of our biggest challenges, and the fact that [the authenticity of] these crimes were questioned even by prominent figures kept us motivated to do this work, despite the difficulties. We wanted to ensure that the world knows what happened and the victims receive the dignity they deserve.”

Among the key figures was Karen Jungblut, director of archives, whose task was both technical and deeply human, Elkayam-Levy said. “Before evidence could become part of a legal record, someone had to view it, authenticate it, classify it, preserve it, and ensure it would remain accessible to future investigators, prosecutors, and historians. That responsibility fell to Jungblut.“She was among the first people to confront much of the material that would eventually form the backbone of the commission’s findings: evidence of murder, torture, humiliation, sexual violence, rape, and gang rape in the aftermath of the attacks. The scope of that effort was staggering.”

By the time the report was completed, the commission had reviewed more than 10,000 photographs and video segments representing approximately 18,000 minutes of footage, and conducted 430 in-depth interviews with survivors, former hostages, eyewitnesses, first responders, medical professionals, bereaved families, and others connected to the events of October 7 and its aftermath.

Her task was not only to see it but to create order from chaos. to transform scattered fragments of evidence into a permanent historical archive. Without such documentation much of the evidence might have disappeared into deleted accounts, broken phones, fading memories, and the endless churn of social media. Instead it became part of a carefully preserved historical record, Elkayam-Levy explained.

What emerged from a collection of seemingly isolated incidents were patterns. The Civil Commission studied them to understand the broader picture.

The report found recurring patterns of sexual violence, torture, humiliation, and degradation across multiple locations. These led investigators to conclude that the crimes reflected a wider operational method rather than the actions of a few individuals acting alone.

Social media as psychological warfare.

One of the report’s most consequential findings concerns the role of social media itself. The videos, photographs, and live streams were not incidental byproducts of the attacks. According to the commission’s findings they were part of the strategy.

“The terrorists were trained, instructed, and encouraged to maximize pain and suffering,” Elkayam-Levy said. “Many of these acts were documented by the perpetrators themselves and uploaded onto social media and other digital platforms.”

For investigators this became one of the clearest indications that psychological warfare was not incidental to the attacks but part of the strategy itself. Among the videos were acts of extreme cruelty, helplessness, torture, degradation, and humiliation. Family members were often forced into impossible situations, compelled to witness the suffering of loved ones or participate in unspeakable acts intended to shatter personal dignity and destroy the sanctity of family bonds.“They leveraged social media and digital platforms to maximize the terrorization,” the report concludes.

Hamas made families bear witness, prompting the commission to develop new terminology to describe this deliberate, widespread use of violence to impact an entire family.

Family members often learned what had happened to loved ones through videos circulating online before any official notification arrived. The report found that the violence was designed to harm the victims, traumatise families, communities, and the wider public through deliberate acts of forced witnessing.

“The videos created so much suffering for people who were not physically there,” Elkayam-Levy said. She added that the tactic represents an evolution in modern terrorism. The violence did not end at the crime scene. The phone became part of the weapon, and the screen an extension of the battlefield, intended to target family and loved ones by amplifying their trauma.

The report points to a troubling gap between the speed with which terrorist organisations exploit digital platforms and the ability of societies, legal systems, and the world’s leading technology platforms to respond.

Elkayam-Levy noted that she is deeply troubled that phone usage in warfare now serves another purpose. “I have no doubt that these videos serve as inspiration for other terrorist groups around the world.”

A civil commission led by women.

The Civil Commission team was made up largely of women, many of whom had spent years working in human rights, sexual violence, and victim advocacy. At the centre of that effort was adv. Merav Israeli-Amarant, the commission’s CEO. “She’s my ‘partner in justice,’” Elkayam-Levy said.

Noted Israeli-Amarant: “To produce this report, our team spent months immersed in some of the most painful evidence imaginable.

“This is deeply lonely work, because so few people are willing to look at these materials, or even hear about them,” she added. “We understood from the outset that it would come at a personal cost. With the guidance and support of trauma experts, we carried not only a responsibility to the victims and survivors, but also to one another.

“The solidarity within the team was not simply a source of strength; it was a form of protection. In order to bear witness to such profound suffering, we had to ensure that no one carried that burden alone.”

The report includes evidence and pictures documenting a range of sexual atrocities, including the burning of genital areas, the insertion of foreign objects into genital areas, sexual torture, and sexual humiliation. These materials contributed to the identification and mapping of the 13 categories of sexual violence documented in the report. Throughout the process, extensive measures were taken to protect the privacy, dignity, and identities of victims and survivors whenever possible.

For all the evidence collected by the commission, nothing prepared investigators for the conversations they would have with former hostages. People often assume the hardest part of the work was watching the videos.

Elkayam-Levy disagreed. “The hardest conversations were with families, the bereaved, the first responders, the search-and-rescue teams, and the doctors and nurses who treated survivors and returning hostages.

And, most difficult of all, the former hostages. The investigators found themselves confronting experiences that seemed to resist language.

“There aren’t enough words,” she said. “We don’t have enough legal definitions.”From the outset the commission partnered with the Israel Trauma Coalition to provide professional support for Civil Commission staff and volunteers exposed to profoundly disturbing material. Founded in 2001 at the initiative of the UJA-Federation of New York, the Israel Trauma Coalition is an NGO that serves as a cornerstone of trauma treatment in Israel.

“We realized from the beginning that we needed emotional support,” Elkayam-Levy said.As the project evolved, the commission began establishing new criteria for those joining the effort. Professional experience became increasingly important, not only because of the complexity of the work but because of the emotional demands it imposed.

“We understood that you needed people with significant professional experience,” Elkayam-Levy said. “People with young children were often especially affected.”

As a mother herself, Elkayam-Levy understood the challenge. After long days immersed in testimony, evidence, and legal analysis, she would leave the office and return to her family. Simply holding her toddler-age son became a source of comfort. “My children kept me sane,” she said. Time spent with them reminded her of what she was fighting for.

The commission’s report records testimony from former hostages who described reaching a point where they no longer wanted to live. Yet something kept them going. Some say it was important to go back to their families and survive for their families. Others drew strength from faith, or the deep spiritual experiences in captivity that kept them alive, and fighting for their lives.Listening to former hostages speak about survival, Elkayam-Levy found herself thinking about other survivor narratives she had encountered throughout her career. “It sounds similar to the testimonies of Holocaust survivors,” she said. “In the most difficult reality, they wanted to keep their humanity. Their victory would be to establish a family, to continue with their lives, to show they survived for their family and for future generations.”

Yet even as she spoke about resilience, Elkayam-Levy was careful not to romanticise survival. The report makes clear that many victims, witnesses, and former hostages continue to carry profound psychological wounds. Among the accounts that remain with Elkayam-Levy is that of a psychiatrist who stayed beside a newly released hostage for three days. without sleeping the entire time.

As the report neared completion, Elkayam-Levy found it increasingly difficult to set the work aside, even during the time she treasured for her family.

“The work often followed me home,” Elkayam-Levy recalled.

On one recent Shabbat she caught herself thinking about the report’s final edits. “What if something happened to me before the report was finished?” she worried. The weight of the responsibility was enormous.

The commission’s report would even follow her into her dreams. One night, after reviewing agonising evidence of sexual violence inflicted upon a woman whose name and story had become etched in her mind, Elkayam-Levy found herself wrestling with a question that had accompanied the commission from the beginning. How much should be shown? How much could be revealed while still protecting the dignity of the victim?

That night the victim appeared to her in a dream and said: “Share it. People need to know.”Scrolling through her notes she found a message she had written to herself: “In order to do this work, I had to believe that there is as much goodness in this world as there is evil.”She paused. “The cruelty is real. But so is human courage. So is love. So is humanity. So is the goodness in people. Hold on to that. Especially now.”

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.




Saturday, May 16, 2026

IAF Strike Gets Hamasshole Honcho responsible for Oct 7th Massacre, his 72 Goats

Jihad sympathizers mourn over the body of Izz al-Din al-Haddad
(AP photo: Jehad Ashrafi)

An Israeli airstrike in Gaza blew away Hamasshole military wing leader Izz al-Din al-Haddad,  described by Israel as one of the last surviving terrorist bastards of the October 7, 2023 massacre that killed over 1,200 Israelis who were guilty of being Israelis, and thus, likely Jewish. They also kidnapped over 250 people, many of whom they killed in captivity, all of whom they tortured, most of whom they sexually assaulted.

The Israeli military said the scumcrumpet was killed Friday in a strike in Gaza. Hamas later confirmed his death and the 72 goats confirmed the death as they all readied for his entry into what Hamas mistakenly believes to be heaven.

Israeli officials said al-Haddad had recently taken over leadership of Hamas’ military wing following the death of Mohammed Sinwar, who died like a dog in a chair with a stick.

The military also accused al-Haddad of surrounding himself with Israeli hostages, many of whom were innocent children and women during the war to deter attacks against him, because Jews have morals.

Al-Haddad’s family confirmed to The Associated Press that he was killed alongside six other people, including his wife and daughter. It is not known if she was his only wife or one of several. 

Israel Defense Forces chief Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir called the killing a “significant operational achievement” and said Israel would continue pursuing those responsible for the Oct. 7 massacre.

FAFO Hamassholes.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.


Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Disturbing details about what Hamas did to Israelis on October 7


WARNING: The content of this post may be disturbing to many individuals, but I feel that it must be made known.

Former newspaper The New York Times, has become a disgusting propaganda rag that yesterday said Israel abused Palestinians, including training dogs to rape prisoners. Anyone with a functioning cortex knows by now that allegation has been debunked and condemned.

Finally, we are now learning even more of the sick, depraved behavior of Hamasshole terrorists toward Israelis, including men, women, children and babies, on October 7, 2023.

Among the mutilated and butchered bodies of young women slaughtered on October 7, it was their colorful, polished nails that many of the morgue staff remember.

Hamas-led scum had not just executed these women. They had “deliberately and systematically” defiled them, as the most comprehensive account of the atrocity released by The Civil Commission today shows.

The terrorists shot their eyes, their faces and their breasts, and even targeted their most intimate parts, to destroy their beauty and rob their loved ones of a final goodbye. The bast***ds even used GoPro cameras to record their atrocities.

Women were stripped, bound, stabbed, shot and burned. They were executed both during and after rape amid an orgy of violence in which 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage. Heads were decapitated. Pelvic bones shattered. Even after death, sexual assault continued. A grotesque, medieval obsession with sexual organs pervaded the crime scenes at the Nova Festival and in the Kibbutzim near Gaza.

This is disgusting. This is monstrous, and it is precisely what anyone who chants “globalize the intifada” is, in effect, endorsing. And if this post gets taken off my blog, then that's another censoring of free speech.

It is almost unbearable to contemplate. Yet it is even more breathtaking to watch people in the West defend and justify such savagery, not despite their hatred of Jews and Israel, but because of it.

That, too, is part of the moral collapse we are witnessing.

And unlike the equivocations that sometimes appear in outlets such as The New York Times, Hamas proudly recorded these atrocities for posterity. We have hundreds of witnesses and more than two years of painstaking research.

That is exactly what happened and anyone who condones it, is evil.

And still segments of the Western Left justify it, including figures such as Hasan Piker, who have found ways to excuse the systematic rape of Israeli women.

If they can justify this in Israel, they will justify it in Europe and America too. The same ideological sickness travels.

Yes, it does. The world must see Hamas for what it truly is—especially as Hamas and Hezbollah sympathisers march through the streets of New York, and as a Hezbollah-linked terrorist recently attempted to murder Jews in Michigan.

This is the barbarism the anti-Semitic Left now supports and excuses. And in doing so, it reveals far more about itself than it ever intended.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Terrorists displaced 98,000 with 217 churches destroyed in recent Islamci attacks in Nigeria



The Catholic Diocese of Wukari in Taraba State has reported that 98,000 persons have been displaced and 217 churches destroyed amid persistent attacks that have now become a permanent feature of life in the region.

Wukari lies in the northeastern corner of Nigeria, a state that shares borders with several others and with Cameroon to the east. The diocese made its disclosure in a communique released at the conclusion of its third general assembly, held on Saturday in Wukari itself.

The statement, signed by Bishop Mark Nzukwein, noted that the displaced have been scattered particularly around the Donga and Takum Local Government Areas.

“From September 2025, there has been a resurgence of attacks by criminals on communities in the southern part of Taraba, especially in Takum, Donga LGAs and the Yangtu Special Development Area.

“These attacks have left scores killed, maimed and injured, with property worth millions of naira and means of livelihood destroyed.

“The records of the diocese show that over 98,000 persons have been displaced, including 16 priests, while 217 churches have been completely destroyed.


“Residences of eight priests have also been destroyed, and more than 100 persons have been reportedly killed,” it stated.

The diocese further condemned the accelerating pattern of land grabbing, in which the ancestral territories of the displaced are simply seized by the very criminals responsible for driving them out. Such behavior reveals a conflict that is not merely about violence but about the methodical erasure of communities and their claims to the land.


The statement urged the federal government and its security agencies to act with genuine urgency against the forces that continue to terrorize this part of Nigeria. It also called upon authorities at every level to take concrete steps that would allow these displaced thousands to return safely to their homes, rather than consigning them indefinitely to the limbo of refugee existence within their own country.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Amnesty Int'l wants Iran strike to be investigated as a war crime


On March 1, the Iranian regime lit another match and civilians paid the price.

Ballistic missiles slammed into the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh, killing nine and wounding at least 46 in the Ramat Lehi neighborhood. Now, Amnesty International is finally saying what’s been obvious: this needs to be investigated as a war crime.

After combing through social media footage, images, and on-the-ground digital evidence, Amnesty concluded the damage tells a clear story. The destruction of the Tiferet Israel synagogue, along with a bomb shelter beneath it, and the strike trajectory point squarely to ballistic missile use. Not surprisingly,  investigators found no military targets anywhere near the impact zone. The closest Israeli base was more than two miles away.

In other words, this wasn’t collateral damage. It looks deliberate because it was, because this was not an isolated incident.

Amnesty, along with media and humanitarian groups, says Iran has also been deploying cluster munitions, indiscriminate weapons that scatter explosives over wide areas and are banned under international law for good reason.

This escalation didn’t come out of nowhere. The March 1 strike followed joint U.S.-Israeli operations against Iran on February 28, setting off a regional chain reaction. What started as targeted strikes has metastasized into something far bigger, with attacks now hitting Qatar, Lebanon, the UAE, and beyond.

Meanwhile, the human toll keeps climbing and the stories are brutal.

“After I worked up the courage to go, I saw the synagogue was completely destroyed, and the [bomb] shelter was split open. The shelter wasn’t safe. It did not provide protection,” Rabbi Yitzak Biton told Amnesty International, “I lost not one, not two, but three children.”

That’s not just a statistic, that’s the reality on the ground.

And the numbers are staggering. Amnesty estimates the conflict has killed 1,900 people in Iran, more than 1,116 in Lebanon, and at least 16 in Israel.

This is a widening war with civilians caught in the blast radius.

And it's clear, the Iranian people, not the regime, welcome Israel's and the USA's help in removing the terrorist regime from their country.

Thank you so much for following Brain Flushings. Please consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. It really helps. You can even click on Buy Me A Coffee in the sidebar, if you want to show your appreciation, but really, there's  no pressure.


Friday, March 20, 2026

Rama Duwaji, NYC First Lady, deletes old X account on account of it glorifying Islamic terrorists, Jew hatred and no love for USA



NYC Mayor Comrade Zohran Mamdani’s wife, Rama Duwaji, deactivated an old X account after a series of resurfaced posts showed her praising Palestinian terrorists, bashing Israel, and criticizing the US military.

The 28-year-old first lady of New York City, who has faced intense backlash over her social media history these past two weeks, removed the account a day after the Washington Free Beacon exposed a collection of disturbing posts she made on X and Tumblr during her teenage years and early twenties.

Although her X account, under the username @_RamaDee, has now been deleted as of Thursday, Duwaji’s public Instagram page, boasting 2 million followers, remains very much active.

Some might say

The wife of the socialist comrade mayor has come under sustained fire for her past online activity, ever since it emerged last week that she had liked Instagram posts celebrating Hamas’s deadly October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, including one that dismissed as a “mass hoax” the rapes carried out by the terror group against hostages and victims.


One cannot help but notice the pattern here: a young woman who once openly admired figures like Leila Khaled, the notorious plane hijacker, and members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, now finds those youthful declarations inconveniently returning to public view, just as her husband occupies the highest office in America’s largest city. 

The deletions and the silences speak volumes, even if the words themselves have been quietly taken down.

Hey guys--thanks for following me. Consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. You can even Buy Me A Coffee if you want. No pressure.


Saturday, March 14, 2026

USA's first Antifa terrorism trial has a verdict



Nine North Texas Antifa cell fascists just got hit with major guilty verdicts in federal court on Friday for their roles in the violent July 4 attack last year on the Prairieland ICE Detention Center in Texas.

One of the fascists was convicted of attempted murder.

The jury convicted the nine fascists on a range of serious charges, including rioting, providing material support to terrorists, conspiracy to use and carry an explosive, and using and carrying an explosive during what prosecutors described as a coordinated North Texas Antifa Cell assault that left a local Alvarado police officer shot in the neck.

FBI Dallas Special Agent in Charge R. Joseph Rothrock called the incident a "coordinated attack" on the facility holding illegal immigrants ahead of deportation.

Two individuals were also convicted of conspiracy to conceal documents.

According to the Department of Justice, Benjamin Song was pegged as the attack's leader. He handed out firearms and recruited participants for the operation. Song was convicted of attempted murder of federal officers for the unlawful attempt to kill with malice aforethought the Alvarado Police Officer and for unlawful discharging of a firearm in the attempted murder of two correctional officers and an Alvarado Police Officer, since he was the shooter who hit the officer in the neck.

Song bolted from the scene like a roach when the lights come on, but he got nabbed on July 15, 2025, while most of the other suspects were arrested shortly after, per the DOJ.

Song now faces up to life in prison, with a mandatory minimum of 20 years, the Department of Justice press release noted. Seven others could see only 10 to 60 years, and Daniel Rolando Sanchez Estrada might get up to only 40 years.

"These guilty verdicts and convictions rightly reflect the vicious, armed attack that these Antifa cell members planned and executed against law enforcement and detention center officers on the night of July 4 last year," U.S. Attorney Ryan Raybould said in a statement.

"Their terrorist acts, attempted murder, vandalism, and explosives launched at a detention facility were a far cry from some peaceful protest or First Amendment expression. Because of the prompt action of first responders that night and tenacious work of our law enforcement partners in tandem with the prosecutors in my office, sixteen people have been brought to justice for these violent acts and their attempts to conceal them. We will continue in this mission to hold others accountable who perpetrate such violence and fund these ANTIFA groups in the Northern District of Texas."

Notably, the attackers used monikers in their group chats to plot the riot. They also set off fireworks and trashed the place, including spray-painting "F*ck You Pigs" on a building. How mature.

This was no spontaneous outburst. It was a calculated ambush on law enforcement, and the jury saw right through any claims otherwise. Justice served.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 


Four arrested after Rotterdam synagogue explosion: Ashah Al Yamin claims responsibility



Four young men, aged seventeen to nineteen, were arrested in Rotterdam after an explosive device detonated at a synagogue in the heart of the city. No one was injured, thank God, though the blast at around 3:40 a.m. left its mark on the building and, one suspects, on the nerves of every Jew in the Netherlands.

The terrorism suspects, all from Tilburg, were apprehended when police stopped a car prowling suspiciously near another synagogue. The driver's description matched one of the perpetrators from the earlier attack. One can only imagine the scene: young men in a vehicle, perhaps flushed with the adrenaline of what they had just done, now suddenly confronted by officers who had pieced it together with commendable speed.

A group calling itself Ashab Al Yamim, a hitherto unknown Shi'ite terror outfit, has claimed responsibility. 

This is no idle boast; the same shadowy organization has recently launched a series of assaults on Jewish institutions, including a bombing at a synagogue in Liège, Belgium, and another attack in Greece. One is tempted to ask: where do these groups spring from, fully formed, with videos and statements ready to hand out? While the name translates roughly as "Companions of the Right,"  their actions suggest something altogether darker: proxies, perhaps, in a wider campaign of intimidation that has escalated since the joint US-Israeli operations against Iran commenced in late February.

It is difficult not to see a pattern here. Jewish communities across the West find themselves under siege. 

Earlier this week, a synagogue in Michigan was rammed by a vehicle in an incident involving an active shooter. In Canada, several synagogues have endured targeted shootings over the past month. And now this in Rotterdam, arson by explosion, claimed by a new Shi'ite entity whose emergence coincides precisely with heightened tensions in the Middle East.

The police, to their credit, have increased surveillance at other synagogues throughout the city and launched an extensive investigation. [What can their motive possibly be?] 


Whether the four suspects intended further targets remains unconfirmed, but the question hangs in the air: how many more such plots are being hatched, even as we speak?

One cannot help but reflect on the broader malaise. Europe, once so proud of its post-war tolerance, now watches as its Jewish citizens, citizens who have every right to worship in peace, are forced to live behind heightened security, metal detectors, and armed guards. The euphemisms of "heightened concerns" and "increased surveillance" mask a grim reality: Jews are once again being hunted in the streets of European cities, this time under the banner of a resurgent ideological war exported from the Middle East.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

As any great historian of totalitarianism might have observed, the first step toward barbarism is the normalization of targeting a particular group. 

We are well past the first step now. The question is whether the West still possesses the moral clarity, and the will, to confront it before the next explosion claims not just windows and doors, but lives.

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Compromised News Network blasted over 'bizarre' post about teens charged with throwing bombs at NYC protest






CNN deleted a post about an ISIS-inspired attack in New York and admitted it didn't meet their standards. Classic mainstream media malpractice, especially when they get caught misrepresenting the truth.

Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi were walked out of the 19th precinct in Manhattan on March 9, 2026, after their arrest for tossing an explosive device while allegedly yelling "Allahu akbar" into a protest crowd outside Mayor Zohran Mamdani's home where people were protesting "Stop the Islamic Takeover of New York," and "Stop New York City Public Muslim Prayer."

The fake news network is getting hammered on social media for a now-deleted Tuesday post on X that described the two suspects as "Pennsylvania teenagers" who were charged with hurling bombs at a protest near Gracie Mansion on Saturday. They conveniently left out the part when they yelled and what their motives were. 

The CNN post read: "Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather. But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti-Muslim protest outside of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home. Here's what we know so far."


So it was just a couple of kids out to enjoy a normal day in the Big Apple and maybe show a little concern about a group of Islamophobic protesters who just don't care about allowing the 'Religion of Peace' to do their thing,

These weren't just some kids out to enjoy the day. 

The suspects, 18-year-old Emir Balat of Langhorne and 19-year-old Ibrahim Kayumi of Newtown, came from Bucks County to Manhattan. Police say they ignited and threw improvised explosive devices into the crowd outside the mayor's residence, hoping to kill as many people as possible. Federal prosecutors hit them with charges of material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, ISIS, and use of a weapon of mass destruction.

CNN yanked the post and issued this explanation on X: "A post regarding the two individuals arrested for throwing homemade bombs outside of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home failed to reflect the gravity of the incident thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all our reporting. It has therefore been deleted."


They also failed to explain how these sweet teens were inspired by ISIS, the terrorist organization that beheads and burns people alive if they're considered to be infidels.

Even CNN media analyst Brian Stelter called it out in his newsletter Tuesday morning: "The story itself was solid. But the tweet was outrageous, and quickly addressed by CNN management." He added that the outlet was "rightly criticized" for the post.

Social media lit up over the bizarre framing, which somehow avoided words like "terror" or "terrorist" entirely."This is the weirdest framing," Examiner columnist Tim Carney posted on X. "The major left-leaning outlets hate this story, but know they cannot ignore it, so they go to bizarre contortions."

Deputy editor of Jewish News U.K. Daniel Sugarman pointed out that the post would have been "extremely strange" even right after the attack, but "given everything we now know about these [two] people and their motives, is journalistic malpractice."

Gee, CNN being accused of journalistic malpractice--what will they say next?

But CNN wasn't the only outlet. 

ABC News referred to the ISIS-inspired man as an 'activist' who threw a homemade bomb towards police. And Libs of TikTok posted this: 



"Wow. ISIS-inspired perpetrators commit a literal terrorist act, and this is what CNN comes up with?" media watchdog group HonestReporting asked. "Oh, those poor ‘Pennsylvania teenagers,’ whose lives have ‘drastically changed’ because they made the conscious decision to throw bombs. When will the media stop employing narrative storytelling to infantilize perpetrators of ideologically motivated crimes?"

"Who writes this garbage?" Rep. Eli Crane, (R-AZ), wrote on X. "They are radical Islamic terrorists."

Journalist Scot Bertram had some brutal fun rewriting it to mimic 9/11: "Nineteen men arrived at East Coast airports Tuesday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying a cross-country flight. But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change."


RedState writer Bonchie nailed it: CNN was doing "everything they can to make these Islamists [seem] like misguided victims."

"I don’t really understand this framing by CNN," News2Share editor-in-chief Ford Fischer wrote. "Couldn’t anybody who does something life-changing have ‘a normal day’ if they don’t do the thing?"

And Barstool Sports content creator Jack Mac summed up the absurdity: "Man you just gotta hate when two teenagers, who could’ve been enjoying the warm weather, have their life drastically changed because they accidentally brought a home made bomb that would’ve killed multiple people. Oops! I did some terrorism! Can’t believe my life has changed!"This is peak legacy media: soft-pedal radical Islamic terrorism, paint the perps as sympathetic kids whose big day got ruined, then delete and issue a half-hearted mea culpa when the backlash hits. The double standards never stop.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Monday, March 9, 2026

Comrade Mamdani addresses terror attempt



New York City's shiny new socialist Mayor Zohran "Smiley" Mamdani finally found a moment in his busy schedule to address the little incident outside his official digs. It only took him a full day after protesters were yelling "Allahu Akbar" and chucking a couple of homemade devices into a crowd. Devices that the NYPD bomb squad later confirmed were, surprise, actually lethal.

NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch dropped the official word on Sunday: "The NYPD Bomb Squad has conducted a preliminary analysis of a device that was ignited and deployed at a protest yesterday and has determined that it is not a hoax device or a smoke bomb. It is, in fact, an improvised explosive device that could have caused serious injury or death."

So it turns out that this jihadist and his buddy were seriously trying to kill people.



Tisch added that the second one was still getting the full lab treatment with "further analysis" needed.

Then came the gratitude portion of the program: "Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi were arrested on scene yesterday and are in custody in connection with this matter. The NYPD is working on this investigation with our partners at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI through our Joint Terrorism Task Force. I want to again thank the brave members of the NYPD who ran towards the danger without hesitation and quickly apprehended the suspects."

Meanwhile, Comrade Mamdani released his own statement, which managed the impressive feat of moral equivalencing the guys who threw bombs at people with the people they were throwing bombs at.

"Yesterday, white supremacist Jake Lang organized a protest outside Gracie Mansion rooted in bigotry and racism," Mamdani complained. "Such hate has no place in New York City. It is an affront to our city’s values and the unity that defines who we are."

The leftist mayor kept going: "What followed was even more disturbing. Violence at a protest is never acceptable. The attempt to use an explosive device and hurt others is not only criminal, it is reprehensible and the antithesis of who we are. I want to thank the brave men and women of the NYPD who acted quickly to keep New Yorkers safe. Our officers ran toward danger without hesitation, demonstrating once again the courage and dedication it takes to protect this city every single day. My administration is closely monitoring the situation and I remain in close contact with our Police Commissioner."

Yeah, sure.

For context, there were two dueling protests in front of Gracie Mansion. One was a tiny gathering of less than two dozen folks led by January 6 defendant Jake Lang, billed as "Stop the Islamic Takeover of New York City, Stop New York City Public Muslim Prayer." The other side pulled in over 100 people under the banner "Run the Nazis out of New York City, Stand Against Hate." [They forgot to add: Death to Israel; death to America.]

Cops kept them separated, but things still got ugly. Someone from Lang's group hit counter-protesters with pepper spray and got arrested. Then tensions boiled over further when Balat and Kayumi got nabbed for the homemade bombs.

In the grand tradition of progressive mayors who love to lecture about unity while carefully avoiding any mention of who actually tried to blow people up, Mamdani's response was a master class in deflection. The bombs were bad, sure, but let's not forget to lead with the real villain: the guy with the offensive protest sign. Classic gas lighting.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 


Sunday, March 8, 2026

IDF's surgical strike takes out IRGC Quds Force leaders at Beirut hotel


The Israel Defense Forces carried out a surgical strike that targeted Quds Force's Lebanese Corps commanders, part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC ) operating in a Ramada ["You do your thing. Leave the rest to us"] hotel in formerly beautiful Beirut.

The IDF reported that the commanders [aka terrorists] were planning to advance terror plots against, you know, the Jews in Israel from Lebanese territory.

The military said the Quds Force’s Lebanon Corps acts as a liaison between Iran’s IRGC and the Hezbollah terror organization, supporting Hezbollah's military buildup.

As is their practice, the IDF took calculated steps to minimize civilian casualties, unlike the IRGC who take calculated steps to maximize civilian casualties. They used precision munitions and aerial surveillance prior to the strike.

“Prior to the strike, steps were taken to minimize the chance of harm to civilians,” the military said, and added that it will continue targeting Iranian regime commanders operating in the region.

Rumor has it that US forces in the region are considering naming the next operation "Operation Fafo."


Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 



Luigi Mangione Seeks Plea Deal, Apparently Discovering That Revolutionary Courage Has Its Limits

Luigi Mangione, the alleged cowardly assassin who became an unlikely folk hero for parts of the online left, is reportedly looking for a ple...