Showing posts with label Hebrew University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hebrew University. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2026

Israeli Poll Finds 71% No Longer Trust Trump, 92% Convinced Everyone Lost, Including the Winners


JERUSALEM — A shocking new poll has revealed that a growing number of Israelis no longer trust President Donald Trump to protect Israel's interests in negotiations with Iran, marking the first time in modern history that a majority of Israelis have looked at a Middle East peace deal and said, "Wait, this feels like a Middle East peace deal."

According to the survey, 71% of Israelis said they do not trust Trump to look out for Israeli interests in an agreement with Iran. Another 13% said they do trust him, while 16% admitted they had stopped paying attention somewhere around the fifteenth ceasefire announcement.

The numbers represent a sharp decline from just one week ago, when only 62% distrusted Trump. Analysts say the rapid shift suggests Israelis are becoming familiar with the contents of the agreement.

The poll also found widespread pessimism about the outcome of the war itself. Asked how the conflict ended, 43% said Israel lost, 41% said the result was inconclusive, and 11% said Israel won. The remaining respondents reportedly spent several minutes staring into the distance before muttering, "Define 'won.'"

A separate survey found that 52% believe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu harmed Israeli interests in the U.S.-Iran agreement, while 24% said he helped and another 24% said they could no longer distinguish between strategic victories and political press conferences.

The findings represent a dramatic reversal for Trump, who for years enjoyed near-rock-star status among many Israeli voters and was often described by Netanyahu allies as one of the most pro-Israel presidents in American history. Unfortunately, that reputation collided headfirst with a deal involving Iran, which historically has not been a major crowd-pleaser in Israel. 

Apparently Israelis agree with Albert Einstein who said that if you do the same thing over and over [like a peace deal with terrorists] and expect different results, you're crazy.

The agreement, signed this week, establishes a 60-day negotiation period intended to end nearly four months of war and address Iran's nuclear program, missile capabilities, sanctions relief, oil exports, regional ceasefires, and apparently everyone's expectations.

Vice President JD Vance expressed optimism before departing for follow-up talks in Switzerland.

"I think we're going to hopefully make progress on the nuclear issue, make progress on the Lebanon ceasefire issue." He isn't big on Einstein, evidently.

Observers noted that "hopefully" remains the most heavily armed word in international diplomacy.

Trump also defended the agreement while issuing a characteristically subtle warning to Tehran.

"We're going to bomb the hell out of them if they violate the agreement," Trump said. "I don't want them to [violate the agreement]. I want them to honor the agreement."

Political scientists described the statement as a rare example of combining a peace offering and a threat of overwhelming military force into the same sentence.

Meanwhile, a Hebrew University poll found that roughly 92% of Israelis believe Iran benefited more from the conflict than Israel, while only 8% viewed Israel as the winner. Nearly 90% said the war's goals had not been met, and fewer than 30% believed Netanyahu's claims of major achievements.

Experts say these numbers indicate that Israelis are becoming increasingly skeptical of political leaders declaring victory while simultaneously explaining why none of the objectives were achieved.

At press time, Israeli officials were reportedly considering a new strategy that involves winning wars before announcing victory.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.



Friday, June 19, 2026

Silenced no more: The Israeli women who documented Hamas's October 7 sexual crimes


A new 298-page Civil Commission report lays bare the sexual violence of October 7. Drawing on thousands of photographs, videos, and interviews, it shows how social media itself became a weapon of psychological warfare.

When the privately funded Civil Commission on the October 7 crimes against women, men, and children published its landmark report on May 12, Dr. Cochav Elkayam-Levy felt something she had not known for a long time: a deep sense of relief.

The report. Silenced No More: Sexual terror unveiled: the untold atrocities of October 7 and against hostages in captivity. had at last appeared. Elkayam-Levy noted that it received fair and accurate coverage in hundreds of news outlets, among them the BBC, the UK’s Daily Mail, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, and The New York Times.

Elkayam-Levy, the commission’s principal author, had taken on a task of such heartbreak and disturbance. documenting crimes of extraordinary cruelty. that many on her team could not continue. For two and a half years she sat with the evidence and with survivors. She reviewed testimony about the sexual crimes committed by Hamas-led terrorists on October 7, 2023, and in the time that followed.

“One of the most important takeaways is the before-and-after reality of the report,” noted Danae Marx-Callaf, director of international communications and one of the four co-founders of the Civil Commission. “Our report shifts the conversation from ‘whether it happened’ to ‘what are the consequences.’

“Another important thing is recognition of the victims. The report will go around the world to different policy makers and not remain just the knowledge of a few in the world,” Marx-Callaf added.

The comprehensive 298-page document sets out the sexual terror committed on and after October 7. The Civil Commission concluded that this terror stood at the centre of Hamas’s war strategy.

An expert in international law, human rights, and feminist legal theory, Elkayam-Levy serves as a Sophie Davis Fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She was a 2024 Israel Prize laureate for her tireless work on the report. For years she had taught and written about war crimes, gender-based violence, and the duty of legal systems to protect the vulnerable and pursue justice.

Yet she never imagined that other highly committed women’s advocates from other nations. the very people with whom she had spent a career teaching and working. would abandon her after October 7.

In the days after the massacre, while Israel was still counting its dead and families searched for missing loved ones, Elkayam-Levy travelled to New York to address the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. She reported on the sexual atrocities retrieved from Hamas’s phones and the victims’ phones, from survivors’ testimonies, and from the accounts of those given the grim task of identifying mangled corpses.

She arrived expecting that evidence of atrocities committed against women would command urgent international attention. Instead she encountered the UN Committee’s apathy and hatred as dozens of pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas activists accused Israel of genocide. The experience left a profound impression.

“I remember feeling devastated,” Elkayam-Levy told the Magazine in an interview at the commission’s office in Modi’in.

The silence was deafening.

For a scholar of international law and human rights that moment became a turning point. “The silence was deafening,” she said.

“I remember thinking we had to establish an organization. If the crimes were not being investigated, documented, and preserved with the urgency they demanded, we in Israel would have to do it ourselves,” she continued.

At first the goal was simply to preserve evidence before it vanished. The terrorists’ horrific photographs and videos of sexual violence and torture spread virally through email, WhatsApp, and social media platforms.

“Hamas itself had uploaded and distributed large quantities of material to cause as much psychological damage as possible. We knew we had to preserve those images before they vanished,” Elkayam-Levy added.

What began as an emergency response soon became the Civil Commission. an independent civilian initiative separate from government institutions. Its purpose was not only to investigate the crimes but to do so according to the highest international legal and evidentiary standards. so that its findings could withstand scrutiny in courts, tribunals, academic research, and historical inquiry.

For Elkayam-Levy the aim was to place a meticulously documented historical record before the world. a wake-up call not only to governments and legal institutions but to humanity itself. The report, for instance, records the account of Raz Cohen, a Supernova music festival survivor: “The men pulled a woman from the vehicle... forcibly removed her clothing, and raped her… They repeatedly stabbed her, killing her… they continued to rape her after her death.”

Said Elkayam-Levy: “I never imagined something like this would happen here in Israel. For hours, terrorists moved freely through communities in southern Israel, murdering families in their homes, burning houses, taking hostages, raping them, and broadcasting much of it live.

“The attacks shattered more than Israel’s border defenses. They shattered a basic sense of security. One of the things we lost from the outset was our sense of safety. It felt like it could happen to any of us. Even today, that sense of vulnerability lingers,” Elkayam-Levy said.

Recalling her 51 days in Hamas captivity, Agam Goldstein, who was 17 when she was abducted, is quoted in the report: “It’s these little things that break you… when you have no control over your body and no control over how to take care of your body.”

Elkayam-Levy is the mother of four children. Her youngest son was two-and-a-half years old when she co-founded the commission. Each day she moved between two worlds. One filled with evidence of cruelty, degradation, and suffering. The other filled with children, homework, family dinners, and ordinary life.

“My children were the reason I did this,” she said. “They were what kept me sane.” Time with family became a form of emotional recovery. At the same time she worried constantly about what she was missing. “I wasn’t there enough. They needed me,” she said wistfully.

Elkayam-Levy worried about what her family was also sacrificing. While she immersed herself in evidence, interviews, and the daily demands of the investigation, her husband carried most of the burden of raising their four children. “He understood and supported me. But it was a lot.”

When Elkayam-Levy was awarded the Israel Prize in the newly created category of Arvut Hadadit (Mutual Responsibility) in 2024, the honour was deeply meaningful, she said, but not primarily for professional reasons. Her older children suddenly saw the work through the eyes of the nation after years of watching their mother disappear into a mission they were too young to understand.

“They take pride in it now. The recognition helped them understand why I had been absent so often, why the work mattered, and why I had felt compelled to continue despite its enormous toll emotionally and on family life,” she added.

The establishment of the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas against Women, Children, and Families grew organically out of the independent, non-governmental Dvora Research Institute, which Elkayam-Levy established in 2021. Recognised as a prominent legal scholar and human rights expert, and active in the Israeli women’s protests against the judiciary overhaul, she quickly gathered a team of professionals and colleagues.

The Civil Commission drew on legal experts, trauma specialists, archivists, researchers, and volunteers. It was guided by a board of high-level international advisers, including the Hon. Irwin Cotler, former minister of justice and attorney-general of Canada, and Sheryl Sandberg, the American technology executive and Lean In Foundation founder. According to a commission spokesperson, Sandberg provided steadfast support, mentorship, and moral leadership from the earliest days.

“Very few people agreed to bear witness to these crimes,” explained Marx-Callaf, the communications director. “The exposure to this violent material is one of our biggest challenges, and the fact that [the authenticity of] these crimes were questioned even by prominent figures kept us motivated to do this work, despite the difficulties. We wanted to ensure that the world knows what happened and the victims receive the dignity they deserve.”

Among the key figures was Karen Jungblut, director of archives, whose task was both technical and deeply human, Elkayam-Levy said. “Before evidence could become part of a legal record, someone had to view it, authenticate it, classify it, preserve it, and ensure it would remain accessible to future investigators, prosecutors, and historians. That responsibility fell to Jungblut.“She was among the first people to confront much of the material that would eventually form the backbone of the commission’s findings: evidence of murder, torture, humiliation, sexual violence, rape, and gang rape in the aftermath of the attacks. The scope of that effort was staggering.”

By the time the report was completed, the commission had reviewed more than 10,000 photographs and video segments representing approximately 18,000 minutes of footage, and conducted 430 in-depth interviews with survivors, former hostages, eyewitnesses, first responders, medical professionals, bereaved families, and others connected to the events of October 7 and its aftermath.

Her task was not only to see it but to create order from chaos. to transform scattered fragments of evidence into a permanent historical archive. Without such documentation much of the evidence might have disappeared into deleted accounts, broken phones, fading memories, and the endless churn of social media. Instead it became part of a carefully preserved historical record, Elkayam-Levy explained.

What emerged from a collection of seemingly isolated incidents were patterns. The Civil Commission studied them to understand the broader picture.

The report found recurring patterns of sexual violence, torture, humiliation, and degradation across multiple locations. These led investigators to conclude that the crimes reflected a wider operational method rather than the actions of a few individuals acting alone.

Social media as psychological warfare.

One of the report’s most consequential findings concerns the role of social media itself. The videos, photographs, and live streams were not incidental byproducts of the attacks. According to the commission’s findings they were part of the strategy.

“The terrorists were trained, instructed, and encouraged to maximize pain and suffering,” Elkayam-Levy said. “Many of these acts were documented by the perpetrators themselves and uploaded onto social media and other digital platforms.”

For investigators this became one of the clearest indications that psychological warfare was not incidental to the attacks but part of the strategy itself. Among the videos were acts of extreme cruelty, helplessness, torture, degradation, and humiliation. Family members were often forced into impossible situations, compelled to witness the suffering of loved ones or participate in unspeakable acts intended to shatter personal dignity and destroy the sanctity of family bonds.“They leveraged social media and digital platforms to maximize the terrorization,” the report concludes.

Hamas made families bear witness, prompting the commission to develop new terminology to describe this deliberate, widespread use of violence to impact an entire family.

Family members often learned what had happened to loved ones through videos circulating online before any official notification arrived. The report found that the violence was designed to harm the victims, traumatise families, communities, and the wider public through deliberate acts of forced witnessing.

“The videos created so much suffering for people who were not physically there,” Elkayam-Levy said. She added that the tactic represents an evolution in modern terrorism. The violence did not end at the crime scene. The phone became part of the weapon, and the screen an extension of the battlefield, intended to target family and loved ones by amplifying their trauma.

The report points to a troubling gap between the speed with which terrorist organisations exploit digital platforms and the ability of societies, legal systems, and the world’s leading technology platforms to respond.

Elkayam-Levy noted that she is deeply troubled that phone usage in warfare now serves another purpose. “I have no doubt that these videos serve as inspiration for other terrorist groups around the world.”

A civil commission led by women.

The Civil Commission team was made up largely of women, many of whom had spent years working in human rights, sexual violence, and victim advocacy. At the centre of that effort was adv. Merav Israeli-Amarant, the commission’s CEO. “She’s my ‘partner in justice,’” Elkayam-Levy said.

Noted Israeli-Amarant: “To produce this report, our team spent months immersed in some of the most painful evidence imaginable.

“This is deeply lonely work, because so few people are willing to look at these materials, or even hear about them,” she added. “We understood from the outset that it would come at a personal cost. With the guidance and support of trauma experts, we carried not only a responsibility to the victims and survivors, but also to one another.

“The solidarity within the team was not simply a source of strength; it was a form of protection. In order to bear witness to such profound suffering, we had to ensure that no one carried that burden alone.”

The report includes evidence and pictures documenting a range of sexual atrocities, including the burning of genital areas, the insertion of foreign objects into genital areas, sexual torture, and sexual humiliation. These materials contributed to the identification and mapping of the 13 categories of sexual violence documented in the report. Throughout the process, extensive measures were taken to protect the privacy, dignity, and identities of victims and survivors whenever possible.

For all the evidence collected by the commission, nothing prepared investigators for the conversations they would have with former hostages. People often assume the hardest part of the work was watching the videos.

Elkayam-Levy disagreed. “The hardest conversations were with families, the bereaved, the first responders, the search-and-rescue teams, and the doctors and nurses who treated survivors and returning hostages.

And, most difficult of all, the former hostages. The investigators found themselves confronting experiences that seemed to resist language.

“There aren’t enough words,” she said. “We don’t have enough legal definitions.”From the outset the commission partnered with the Israel Trauma Coalition to provide professional support for Civil Commission staff and volunteers exposed to profoundly disturbing material. Founded in 2001 at the initiative of the UJA-Federation of New York, the Israel Trauma Coalition is an NGO that serves as a cornerstone of trauma treatment in Israel.

“We realized from the beginning that we needed emotional support,” Elkayam-Levy said.As the project evolved, the commission began establishing new criteria for those joining the effort. Professional experience became increasingly important, not only because of the complexity of the work but because of the emotional demands it imposed.

“We understood that you needed people with significant professional experience,” Elkayam-Levy said. “People with young children were often especially affected.”

As a mother herself, Elkayam-Levy understood the challenge. After long days immersed in testimony, evidence, and legal analysis, she would leave the office and return to her family. Simply holding her toddler-age son became a source of comfort. “My children kept me sane,” she said. Time spent with them reminded her of what she was fighting for.

The commission’s report records testimony from former hostages who described reaching a point where they no longer wanted to live. Yet something kept them going. Some say it was important to go back to their families and survive for their families. Others drew strength from faith, or the deep spiritual experiences in captivity that kept them alive, and fighting for their lives.Listening to former hostages speak about survival, Elkayam-Levy found herself thinking about other survivor narratives she had encountered throughout her career. “It sounds similar to the testimonies of Holocaust survivors,” she said. “In the most difficult reality, they wanted to keep their humanity. Their victory would be to establish a family, to continue with their lives, to show they survived for their family and for future generations.”

Yet even as she spoke about resilience, Elkayam-Levy was careful not to romanticise survival. The report makes clear that many victims, witnesses, and former hostages continue to carry profound psychological wounds. Among the accounts that remain with Elkayam-Levy is that of a psychiatrist who stayed beside a newly released hostage for three days. without sleeping the entire time.

As the report neared completion, Elkayam-Levy found it increasingly difficult to set the work aside, even during the time she treasured for her family.

“The work often followed me home,” Elkayam-Levy recalled.

On one recent Shabbat she caught herself thinking about the report’s final edits. “What if something happened to me before the report was finished?” she worried. The weight of the responsibility was enormous.

The commission’s report would even follow her into her dreams. One night, after reviewing agonising evidence of sexual violence inflicted upon a woman whose name and story had become etched in her mind, Elkayam-Levy found herself wrestling with a question that had accompanied the commission from the beginning. How much should be shown? How much could be revealed while still protecting the dignity of the victim?

That night the victim appeared to her in a dream and said: “Share it. People need to know.”Scrolling through her notes she found a message she had written to herself: “In order to do this work, I had to believe that there is as much goodness in this world as there is evil.”She paused. “The cruelty is real. But so is human courage. So is love. So is humanity. So is the goodness in people. Hold on to that. Especially now.”

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.




Sunday, July 20, 2025

Zohran Mamdani supported terrorist who murdered Jewish students in supermarket



In 1969, Edward Joffe, 22, and Leon Kanner, 21, both students at Hebrew University, were obliterated in a bomb attack at a Jerusalem supermarket. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a group designated as terrorists by the United States, orchestrated the carnage. Among those involved was Rasmea Odeh, convicted in an Israeli court in 1970 for her role in this atrocity. Two young men, shopping for groceries before the Sabbath, reduced to mere casualties in the name of a vicious cause.

Enter Zohran Mamdani and his outfit, Students for Justice in Palestine, a group tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, openly supportive of Hamas and the barbarism of October 7. They rallied for Odeh, a convicted terrorist, with a fervor that betrays their priorities. 

Mamdani, ever the smooth-talking progressive, assures New York’s Jewish population that they will be safe under his stewardship. Yet his track record, his enthusiasm for “localizing the intifada,”casts a long, dark shadow over such promises. 

Supporting a terrorist linked to the murder of two Jewish students in a supermarket bombing is not exactly a ringing endorsement of peace.

Edward Joffe and Leon Kanner were barely out of their teens when their lives were snuffed out. They were at the SuperSol supermarket when a bomb, hidden under a counter, detonated, killing them and wounding ten others. This was no random act of violence; it was a calculated strike, meant to terrorize and destroy.

Rasmea Odeh, the terrorist in question, later slipped into America, where she became a darling of Islamists and their leftist fellow travelers. Zohran’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, with its unapologetic embrace of Hamas and the October 7 atrocities, took up her cause with gusto. This is what it means to “globalize” and then “localize” the intifada—a chilling euphemism for importing the rhetoric and reality of terror.

Terrorist Rasmea Odeh

A commenter on JW unearthed the grim details from US Immigration records about Odeh’s past. The bombs that killed Joffe and Kanner were planted in 1969:

Before immigrating to the United States, Odeh had been convicted overseas for her participation in two 1969 terrorist bombings in Israel, and for having been a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), which has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States. Specifically, she was convicted of placing two bombs at a supermarket that killed two individuals and of planting a bomb at the British Consulate in Jerusalem, as well as membership in an illegal organization. Odeh was sentenced to life imprisonment, but was released after serving more than 10 years in prison as part of a prisoner exchange with the PFLP.

Odeh obtained a US immigrant visa in 1994 and lived in America for 22 years, even securing citizenship in 2004. She achieved this by lying, brazenly, deliberately, about her criminal past. She failed to disclose her arrests, convictions, and imprisonment in both her visa and citizenship applications. According to her plea agreement, she admitted:
she lied about her criminal history by falsely denying that she had ever been arrested, charged with a crime, convicted, or imprisoned. In her plea, Odeh also admitted that at the time she made the false statements, she knew the statements were false, and that "she made the false statements intentionally and not as a result of any mistake, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or any other psychological issue or condition", as she had previously claimed in court proceedings, "or for any innocent reason."



Odeh knew her lies were unlawful. Had she told the truth, as required, she would never have set foot in America, let alone gained citizenship. Her deception allowed her to live freely for over two decades, celebrated by those who, like Mamdani, seem to find in her story not shame but inspiration.

This is the reality of "localizing the intifada," a grotesque romanticization of violence, dressed up in the language of justice. And it raises a question that Mamdani and his allies must answer: how can you claim to protect a community while championing those who have sought its destruction?

The good news is that Rasmea Odeh was deported from the United States to Jordan on September 19, 2017, and stripped of her U.S. citizenship and removed from the country following a plea agreement in April 2017, where she admitted to immigration fraud. She is barred for life from reentering the United States.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 


Friday, June 20, 2025

Israelis Dig In for Total Victory Against Iran, With or Without the USA


TEL AVIV—Missiles rain down, sirens wail, and Israelis are still shouting from the rooftops: take out Iran’s nuclear program, and don’t stop ‘til it’s done. 

A fresh poll from Agam Labs and Hebrew University lays it bare: 83% of Israeli Jews and 70% of the whole country back the shock-and-awe campaign that kicked off Friday night to gut Iran’s nukes and missiles. Only 1% of Jews and 16% overall are still clinging to the pipe dream of “let’s talk it out” with Tehran. 

Airstrikes are a crowd-pleaser: over 90% are all in for hammering Iran’s nuclear sites, with 54% of Jews and nearly half the public say keep pounding, even if the U.S. and allies stop playing goalie against Iran’s missile barrages. Still, two-thirds call the U.S.-Israel bromance “critical” for survival, and only 30% would tell Trump to shove it if he pushed for a deal to end the war. 

The poll, which questioned 1,057 Israelis Sunday and Monday with a 4.2% margin of error, screams one thing: Israel’s ready to go solo if it means neutralizing Iran’s existential threat—but they’d rather not.

“There’s a rock-solid consensus: we had to hit Iran, and we ain’t stopping,” says Nimrod Nir, Agam Labs’ head honcho. “Half the country’s ready to keep swinging without U.S. backup, even if they’re not sure we can seal the deal alone.”

Netanyahu’s out here projecting incredible energy, saying Israel can handle its business without help. But whispers from the brass admit only U.S. bunker-busters can truly turn Iran’s nuke dreams into rubble. They’re begging Trump for the heavy artillery, like bunker-busters, for example.

This war’s been a gut-punch. Iran’s ballistic missiles and drones have killed to date 24, wounded hundreds, displaced thousands, and turned daily life into a nightmare. Schools have been shuttered, businesses tanking, yet, Israelis aren’t cowering. The poll says pride and hope are outmuscling fear and despair two-to-one. The air force [IAF] and Mossad are gods right now, with “very high” trust, while the military and emergency crews aren’t far behind.

Bar Shalev Nathan, a 34-year-old marketing analyst from Tzofim in the West Bank, is living the war’s grind. She’s hunkered down in a public shelter with her husband, three kids, and four other families, hot, buggy, sleeping on thin mattresses. “I really don’t mind spending another 30 or 60 nights sleeping on the floor in a shelter, if this means we will eliminate the Iranian threat,” she says, steely-eyed. “I’m not hopeful. I’m confident. I’m so sure we’ve got this, and it’s going to be sweet in the end.”

Military leaders are talking a week or two to crush Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Yuval Shamir, a 35-year-old Tel Aviv engineer, shrugs off Iran’s retaliation as weak sauce, even with two missiles hitting near his place. Mid-siren, he doubles down: “It doesn’t matter how many of us they kill now. If we let them get the bomb, they will kill us all.”

The poll splits down the middle on whether the endgame’s total victory or a beefier diplomatic deal, and if Israel can finish Iran’s nukes without Uncle Sam. But with the stakes this high, most say there’s no choice but to try. Another poll from the Israel Democracy Institute backs this up: 69% of Jews and 63% overall say Israel was right to pull the trigger, even knowing the U.S. might be needed to close the deal.

Shalev Nathan’s not mincing words: “Eliminate all the ballistic missile capability that Iran currently has, and of course, demolish every part of the nuclear program.” Or, as she puts it, quoting Trump, Iran could opt for “unconditional surrender.” She’s bullish: “I think we can definitely succeed even without U.S. help. It will be much harder and probably take much longer, but we can and we definitely should do it.”

Shamir’s got no time for naysayers saying Israel can’t crack Iran’s fortified sites like Fordow. “We have ways to do it ourselves, even if it takes many bombs or soldiers on the ground,” he says. “I’m sure we have a plan.”

But Eyal Barad, a 42-year-old engineer from Kiryat Gat, isn’t so sure. He doubts Israel can breach Fordow without U.S. bunker-busters. Worse, he’s betting Iran’s mullahs will rebuild their nuke program, deal or no deal. Only regime change—something Israel’s starting to cozy up to—might stop Iran’s “genocidal crusade” against the Jewish state. “Changing the regime in a different country usually doesn’t end well,” Barad admits. “But if we leave the regime in place, we will only have succeeded to hurt their pride, and five years from now, they will attack us without warning.”

Barad has skin in the game. He lived in Kibbutz Nir Oz, one of the hardest-hit spots in Hamas’s October 7, 2023, slaughter, backed by Iran’s cash. That day taught him tolerating enemies is a losing bet. He hopes crushing Iran weakens Hamas enough to free the remaining hostages—four from his old kibbutz—and end the Gaza war. The poll says 75% of Israelis want that deal, a softer stance than their hawkish vibe on Iran.

“There’s no need to keep fighting in Gaza,” Barad says. “Just finish it, especially now that it looks like the Iranians will not be able to continue backing and funding Hamas. It will be harder for Hamas to get stronger again.”
 
Israelis are riding a wave of defiance, ready to take on Iran alone if they must. But the shadow of U.S. support, or its absence, looms large. They’re betting on victory, and they’re not blinking. 

Am Yisrael Chai.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Thursday, August 1, 2019

Palestinian Authority paid $1.26 million to jihad mass murderers who killed 9 people at Hebrew U.

Palestinian Authority have already paid $1,257,259 to the enforcers of the "religion of peace," [aka jihadists] for killing 9 people at Hebrew University on the anniversary of its bombing.

Let's never pretend that the PA will ever be a "partner for peace" with Israel. The idea is crazy--they will never negotiate with Israel unless a miraculous revision is found in the Koran.

In an article by Maurice Hirsch, Palestinian Media Watch, July 31, 2019, he writes, “On 17th anniversary of Hebrew University bombing: PA has already paid the murderers over 4.3 million shekels,” going on to explain that 17 years ago today a bomb was detonated in the Hebrew University cafeteria in Jerusalem murdering 9 people, including five American citizens, and injuring over 80 others. This attack was one of many terror attacks carried out by the same cowardly terrorist cell.

Many people call jihadis cowards when they assault innocent people, but they aren't really cowards because they're willing to die for Allah's prurient rewards.  But to set a bomb off in a public space and run away is cowardly.

Six Palestinians were caught and convicted of the crime and sentenced to multiple life sentences. Since their arrests, the Palestinian Authority has rewarded the imprisoned terrorists paying them no less than 4,371,100 shekels ($1,257,259).

And that is the tragedy of Islam.

Among the convicted terrorists for this and other attacks were Adballah Barghouti – serving 67 life sentences, one for each of the victims he murdered – and Ibrahim Hamed – serving 54 life sentences, one for each of the victims he murdered. Through June 2019, the PA cumulatively paid them 1,271,000 shekels ($339,862) and continues to pay them thousands of shekels per month.

Despite its (self-inflicted) financial crisis, since the beginning of 2019 alone, the PA has cumulatively paid the terrorists almost 300,000 shekels ($86,000). This makes people such as Rashida Tlaib proud.

The PA obligated itself to pay monthly salaries to imprisoned terrorists when it passed the Law of Prisoners and Released Prisoners in 2004. The exact amount paid is set in regulations passed by the PA government. Mahmoud Abbas has twice raised the salaries the PA pays to the imprisoned terrorists.

The PA is nothing more than an anti-Semitic group of terrorist supporters and actors. Anyone who supports them and not Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, are no better than they are.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.




Kamala Hahaharris Tried to Explain How an Algorithm Works--"Pass the Italian Dressing Please"

Former Vice President Kamala Harris appears to be keeping the door open to another standard-issue presidential run. If her recent appearanc...