Carville finally decides his Party has become a circus

The Democratic Party has spent years insisting it's a "big tent." Now one of its own elder statesmen has looked around the circus and decided the tent has become a full blown asylum.

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville has finally reached the point where reality has overpowered partisan loyalty, publicly disowning a candidate backed by New York City Mayor Comrade Zohran Mamdani and calling for nothing less than a formal split in the Democratic Party.

Speaking with co-host Al Hunt on the "Politics War Room" podcast, Carville reacted to the stunning primary victories of three Mamdani-backed candidates in New York, including Democratic socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier. While both men complained that Republicans are exaggerating these candidates' influence, Carville immediately demonstrated why conservatives don't have to exaggerate anything.

"I have the quote right here, I’ll get to it. She has attacked interracial relationships and the American flag. Lady, I ain't in the same party as you. I'm sorry," Carville said. "I’m just not, and I actually do think it's time for Democrats to talk ‘the S-word.’ ‘Schism.’ I really do."

Imagine that. After years of being told conservatives were the ones harboring extremists, one of the Democratic Party's chief strategists is now openly wondering whether his own party needs an exorcism.

"Everybody's always said, 'No, no, we're coalition. We're a big tent,'" Carville continued. "And there's some there's just some s--- that I can't be in the same tent with."

Welcome to the party you helped build.

Carville argued that many of these far left activists don't even believe in the Democratic Party itself but use its ballot line as a convenient vehicle to push radical ideas.

"Let's negotiate a terms of a schism here. Maybe we can part under some kind of advantageous terms for both of us, but I'm done. And I'm not in that f---ing political party."

His breaking point was not merely socialism. It was Israel.

"I am totally comfortable in a political party that spends time questioning the policies of the government of Israel. In fact, I'm enthusiastic about that. I don't want to be in a political party that denies the right of the state of Israel to exist. That's just not I just can't do that. I'm sorry. It's just not doable."

It's remarkable to hear one of the Democratic Party's longest serving strategists say aloud what many moderate Democrats whisper behind closed doors. The anti Israel faction is no longer knocking on the door. It's redecorating the living room.

Hunt didn't disagree.

"They are a great gift to Donald Trump," he replied, urging prominent Democrats including Barack Obama to publicly distance themselves from the movement. "Certainly people like Obama, but also some of the younger Democrats and said, ‘This is not us.’"

They're doing the Comrade Polka

He also warned that unless Democrats score a decisive victory in November, "that group of crazies" could spend years undermining House Democratic leadership.

Even Hunt, who credited Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with eventually becoming a functional member of Congress after her early years, admitted he saw little hope for Mamdani's political allies.

"I don't think this group has that potential."

"I don't either," Carville answered. "And I think AOC is smart. I could be in the same party with her in many ways. I can't be in the same party with Miss Chevalier. Can't do it. Sorry."

It's a remarkable admission. When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suddenly qualifies as the reasonable wing of your political party, your ideological Overton window hasn't shifted. It has fallen off a cliff.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Disturbing details about what Hamas did to Israelis on October 7

WARNING: The content of this post may be disturbing to many individuals, but I feel that it must be made known.

Former newspaper The New York Times, has become a disgusting propaganda rag that yesterday said Israel abused Palestinians, including training dogs to rape prisoners. Anyone with a functioning cortex knows by now that allegation has been debunked and condemned.

Finally, we are now learning even more of the sick, depraved behavior of Hamasshole terrorists toward Israelis, including men, women, children and babies, on October 7, 2023.

Among the mutilated and butchered bodies of young women slaughtered on October 7, it was their colorful, polished nails that many of the morgue staff remember.

Hamas-led scum had not just executed these women. They had “deliberately and systematically” defiled them, as the most comprehensive account of the atrocity released by The Civil Commission today shows.

The terrorists shot their eyes, their faces and their breasts, and even targeted their most intimate parts, to destroy their beauty and rob their loved ones of a final goodbye. The bast***ds even used GoPro cameras to record their atrocities.

Women were stripped, bound, stabbed, shot and burned. They were executed both during and after rape amid an orgy of violence in which 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage. Heads were decapitated. Pelvic bones shattered. Even after death, sexual assault continued. A grotesque, medieval obsession with sexual organs pervaded the crime scenes at the Nova Festival and in the Kibbutzim near Gaza.

This is disgusting. This is monstrous, and it is precisely what anyone who chants “globalize the intifada” is, in effect, endorsing. And if this post gets taken off my blog, then that's another censoring of free speech.

It is almost unbearable to contemplate. Yet it is even more breathtaking to watch people in the West defend and justify such savagery, not despite their hatred of Jews and Israel, but because of it.

That, too, is part of the moral collapse we are witnessing.

And unlike the equivocations that sometimes appear in outlets such as The New York Times, Hamas proudly recorded these atrocities for posterity. We have hundreds of witnesses and more than two years of painstaking research.

That is exactly what happened and anyone who condones it, is evil.

And still segments of the Western Left justify it, including figures such as Hasan Piker, who have found ways to excuse the systematic rape of Israeli women.

If they can justify this in Israel, they will justify it in Europe and America too. The same ideological sickness travels.

Yes, it does. The world must see Hamas for what it truly is—especially as Hamas and Hezbollah sympathisers march through the streets of New York, and as a Hezbollah-linked terrorist recently attempted to murder Jews in Michigan.

This is the barbarism the anti-Semitic Left now supports and excuses. And in doing so, it reveals far more about itself than it ever intended.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Alexandria Obviously-Commie and dozens of Dems refuse to condemn Kirk's murder

Well, folks, the House of Representatives just gave us another masterclass in political theater, and this time it's wild. On Friday, 58 Charlie Kirk-hating Democrats decided to thumb their noses at a resolution from House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) that honored Kirk and condemned political violence. 

Yes, you read that right, 58 leftists couldn't bring themselves to say, "Hey, maybe assassinations are bad." The resolution, which passed 310-58, denounced Kirk's murder in Utah last week. All Republicans and 95 Democrats managed to find their moral compasses, but 58 others said, "Nah, we're good," and 38 more just shrugged and voted "present" like intellectual cowards.

Johnson's resolution wasn't exactly controversial, unless you're allergic to basic decency. It "honors the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk, whose steadfast dedication to the Constitution, civil discourse, and Biblical truth inspired a generation to cherish and defend the blessings of liberty." It also calls on "all Americans, regardless of race, party affiliation, or creed, to reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans." 

In a speech, Speaker Johnson painted a picture of Kirk as a decent person who could spar in the political arena and still keep it human: "After political debates, Kirk would 'reach out a hand of friendship or offer an arm around the shoulder of someone who he had just defeated in a contest.' Why? Because it wasn't about winning … the policy arguments. It was about the people," Johnson said. "And Charlie loved vigorous debate, but he loved people more." 

A conservative who could out-debate you and still buy you a beer afterward? That’s the kind of unicorn the left apparently can't handle.

So, who were the 58 Democrats who couldn’t stomach this? Oh, just the usual suspects: Reps. Jasmine Mega-lashes Crockett (Texas), Pramila Jayapal (Washington), Alexandria Obviously-Commie (New York), Rashida From the River Tlaib (Michigan), and Ilhan Brotherly Lover Omar (Minnesota). The Squad and friends, basically, doing their best to remind everyone why "unity" is just a buzzword they toss around when it suits them. 

AOC, never one to miss a chance to grandstand in her signature nasal way, took to the House floor to call Kirk a racist. She doubled down on X, writing, "His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans, far from 'working tirelessly to promote unity' as asserted by the majority in this resolution. We can condemn his horrific assassination and the scourge of political violence without uplifting these ideas." 

Translation: "Sure, murder is bad, but let's not pretend this guy wasn't the worst and was asking for it." 

House Democrat leadership actually agreed on Thursday to support Johnson's resolution. So, what happened? Did the Squad just wake up on Friday feeling extra spicy, or is this just another day in the life of a party that can't decide if it wants to be the grown-up in the room or the kid throwing a tantrum in the corner?

For a little perspective, earlier this year, a resolution condemning the assassination of Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband passed unanimously, with every single Republican on board. No hemming, no hawing, no "but their policies were icky" bullcrap. Republicans managed to condemn violence without playing morality roulette. Funny how that works. 

Meanwhile, the Senate pulled off a rare moment of clarity on Thursday, unanimously passing a resolution to mark October 14, Charlie's birthday, as the "National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk." 

It's ceremonial, sure, but it's a nice gesture in a world that seems to have forgotten how to do those. And if that isn't enough to tug at the heartstrings, a memorial service for Kirk is set for Sunday in Glendale, Arizona, with heavy hitters like President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance slated to speak. 

Say what you will about Kirk, but he clearly left a mark. So, here we are: a resolution condemning political violence and honoring a decent person who lived for debate and country, and 58 Democrats couldn't be bothered to sign on. If that doesn't sum up the state of our politics, I don’t know what does. 

Maybe next time they'll vote "present" on common sense, too.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

State Dept, may revoke visas of foreigners who "glorify violence" after Charlie Kirk assassination

Let's cut through the crap with some cold, hard facts. The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative youth influencer, father of two, and co-founder of Turning Point USA, has sent shockwaves through the nation. And now, the State Department is stepping up, signaling they're done playing nice with foreigners who cheer for violence on our soil. This is what happens when you let the woke left's obsession with "tolerance" fester unchecked, people die, and the government finally wakes up.

Bill Melugin, one of the few journalists still doing actual reporting, dropped a bombshell on Fox News about the Kirk assassin. We're talking messages scrawled on the gun and ammo, palm prints, and video surveillance capturing the moments after the shooting. The FBI is scrambling, releasing imagery and begging the public for help to ID the shooter, who's still on the loose. A high-powered bolt-action rifle, ditched in a wooded area, was used to fire a single shot from a rooftop 200 yards away, striking Kirk in the neck during his "American Comeback Tour" at Utah Valley University. 

Ironically, Charlie was answering a question about mass shootings involving transgender individuals. ironic, It's sickeningly ironic that the left's sacred cows might be tied to this tragedy. The event drew 3,000 people, and now one of conservatism's brightest voices is silenced.

Enter Deputy Secretary of State Chris Landau, who has had enough of the X platform turning into a cesspool of violence-glorifying rhetoric. He posted, and I quote, "In light of yesterday’s horrific assassination of a leading political figure, I want to underscore that foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country." Landau is clearly "disgusted" by foreigners on visas praising or rationalizing Kirk's murder online. 

Landau responded by directing consular officials to monitor social media and take "appropriate action." That's right, Big Brother is watching, and for once, it's watching the right target. Landau even invited people to snitch on foreigners posting this garbage, saying, "Please feel free to bring such comments by foreigners to my attention so that the @StateDept can protect the American people." 

Good. It's about time we stopped coddling those who cheer for our destruction.

This isn't new territory for the State Department. They've already yanked over 6,000 student visas for overstays or crimes like assault, DUI, burglary, or even "support for terrorism." Apparently, that's what passes for "diversity" in the Biden era. 

Back in June, they announced they'd be snooping on visa applicants' social media, demanding accounts be set to public. Now, Landau's doubling down, specifically targeting replies to his own X post for evidence of foreign nationals cheering Charlie Kirk's death. This is what happens when you let the left's "free speech for all, no matter how vile" mantra run amok; people start thinking they can glorify murder without consequences.

Let's be clear: Kirk's assassination isn't just a tragedy; it's a wake-up call. The left has spent years demonizing conservatives, painting us as the root of all evil while excusing every form of radicalism as "expression." 

Now, a conservative leader is gunned down, and the same crowd that cries "hate speech" when you misgender someone is suddenly silent, or worse, celebrating. The State Department's move to crack down on visa-holding foreigners who applaud this madness is a start, but it's not enough. We need a cultural reckoning. We need to stop pretending that every opinion deserves a platform, especially when it's calling for blood. 

As Landau put it, "foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome." Period. Maybe it's time we applied that standard to everyone, not just foreigners. Facts don't care about your feelings, as Ben Shapiro says, and neither should our national security.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

Latest on Chris Van Hollen's trip to El Salvador

In my previous post I wrote about Sen. Chris Van Hollen's (D-MD) trip he took to El Salvador in order to see Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an MS-13 gangbanger who was also an illegal alien and was deported to his native El Salvador along with fellow scumcrumpets who are a blight on the USA. 

President Trump had a mandate to deport dangerous illegal aliens as part of his campaign pledge, and he has done so, but Van Hollen obviously saw this as an opportunity to virtue-signal and fly to El Salvador on taxpayer's money, and make a show of seeing Abrego Garcia.

But wait! The El Salvador government said no to the senator's request Wednesday to see Abrego Garcia and they have the right to do this.

Van Hollen traveled to El Salvador allegedly to “check on [Abrego Garcia’s] condition — and remind him that we won’t stop fighting until he’s home.”  Yes, the Democrat senator is going to fight for the MS-13 guy because Democrats will stand behind guys like him, and others who shoot healthcare CEOs in the back, and universities that support pro-Hamas students who keep Jewish students from attending classes, and have even committed violence on them.

The leftist senator said he spoke to Salvadoran Vice President Félix Ulloa and asked why the government is holding Abrego Garcia in a high-security prison for terrorists, Axios reported.

“His answer was that the Trump administration is paying El Salvador, the government of El Salvador to keep him,” Van Hollen said. 

It seems to be fair that we help El Salvador deal with our problem with dangerous people, and based on the dangers they pose on our society, it's actually cost-effective.

Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary, spoke about this issue today, Wednesday, and made it clear that Abrego Garcia is an illegal alien, not simply "a Maryland father," as the Left and the media likes to depict him. 

He [Abrego Garcia] is "an MS-13 gang member and foreign terrorist," and when he was first caught, he was wearing a sweatshirt and had on him rolls of money with the eyes, ear, and mouth of the president on the bills covered, symbolizing: "see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil." She pointed out that Democrats still refuse to accept the will of the American people.

Ms. Leavitt also revealed that Abrego Garcia's wife petitioned for two orders of protection against him, court documents revealed. This occurred in May 2021, where he punched her, ripped off her shirt, and bruised her, in one instance.

Van Hollen said that Ulloa told him that he must make earlier arrangements to visit Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, or CECOT, as the prison is called. When Van Hollen asked if he could speak to Abrego Garcia over the phone, Ulloa said that a phone call must be arranged through the American embassy.

Van Hollen was blasted by the Trump administration for his trip to El Salvador on the taxpayer dime. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz wrote on X, “Democrats miss Biden’s open borders so much they are flying to El Salvador to personally try and bring violent criminals to the United States.”

Loving the blog? Toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee if you’re feeling generous – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure.

Biden's EPA funneled money to Leftists

Lee Zelden with a blurry woman behind him

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said on Wednesday that his agency uncovered a plan where the Biden administration was funneling money to leftist activist groups as they were leaving office.

“An extremely disturbing video circulated two months ago featuring a Biden EPA political appointee talking about how they were ‘tossing gold bars off the Titanic,’ rushing to get billions of your tax dollars out the door before Inauguration Day,” Zeldin said in a video message. “The gold bars were tax dollars, and tossing them off the Titanic meant the Biden administration knew they were wasting it.”

Zeldin mentioned that he had reached out to the Department of Justice and the inspector general to look into the $20,000,000,000 that was moved to an outside financial institution to distribute to hard left leaning groups just as Biden was physically leaving office--he had mentally left office as vice president.

“Fortunately, my awesome team at EPA has found the gold bars. Shockingly, roughly $20 billion of your tax dollars were parked at an outside financial institution by the Biden EPA,” Zeldin said. “This scheme was the first of its kind in EPA history, and it was purposely designed to obligate all of the money in a rush job with reduced oversight. Even further, this pot of $20 billion was awarded to just eight entities that were then responsible for doling out your money to NGOs and others at their discretion with far less transparency.”

Zeldin insisted that the deal with the financial institution should be canceled right away and the money returned to the government, adding that “[T]he days of irresponsibly shoveling boatloads of cash to far-Left activist groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equity are over.”

Tweet

Virginia Democrats vote 100% for murdering babies up to birth

Leftists are great with words. They are "pro-choice," which means "pro-abortion," which also means "in favor of ending the life of a baby in the womb of his or her mother." They call it "the right to choose," when it also means the right to decide whether the baby in question lives or dies. It's akin to "gender affirming care," but never "delusion affirmation," or "genital mutilation."

The left used to pretend that abortions should be safe, legal and rare, but now they dropped all pretense, at least the leftists in Virginia.

The radical pro-abortion members of the Virginia Senate debated the most extreme baby-killing measure ever introduced on Monday, SJ 247, the so called Right to Reproductive Amendment, introduced by Sen. Jennifer Boysko, D-38. See how nice they describe their horror show? It has nothing to do with 'reproduction,' it has to do with preventing it.

“The effect of this extreme amendment to the state constitution should it ultimately be adopted will almost certainly prevent passage of any future bills intended to provide appropriate protections to the women and babies of Virginia from unchecked abortion businesses,” said Olivia Gans Turner, President of VSHL. “It is merely a way to give abortion promoters the ability to operate in the Commonwealth without regulations. It is the responsibility of the legislature to consider the best ways to protect vulnerable individuals. This amendment will seriously interfere with that role and cause more preborn babies to be killed and put women in harm’s way.”

Sen. Tara Durrant, R-27, suggested a sensible change to make sure the proposed amendment wouldn't mess with or challenge Virginia's Parental Consent law. Sen. Emily Jordan, R-17, tried to tweak SJ 247 to let lawmakers pass bills that would protect babies who survive abortions by ensuring they get the medical care they need.

Some Senators pointed out the risks of passing a resolution that might lead to lawsuits against the few sensible pro-life laws still standing in Virginia. In other states, similar changes have resulted in court decisions that wiped out all pro-life laws there.

Sen. Mark Obenshain, R-2, called out supporters of the amendment for not protecting parental rights and the safety of young girls, urging them to accept the reasonable changes proposed by Republican members. He also noted that Constitutional Amendments always override regular laws in Virginia, suggesting that even the partial-birth amendment could be overturned, leaving other laws vulnerable to legal challenges.

“Democrats rejected the two rational amendments offered proving that they have no interest in protecting teens or parents’ rights,” said Gans Turner. “These members are clearly committed to the abortion industry over the lives of those affected by this extreme amendment.”

Tweet

Pres. Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize, and the left has a cow

Former President Donald J. Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize under strange circumstances: he actually did something to earn one as opposed to former President Barack Hussein Obama who got one before he did anything to earn one. Sixty-one percent of Americans agreed that he didn't do anything to deserve it, and so did Obama. In fact, he was waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan at the time, while Trump's time in office [the first time] saw no new wars.

The nomination for Trump comes from Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) who cited Trump's "historic" Abraham Accords treaty as the reason for the nomination.

The Abraham Accords was signed at the Trump White House on September 15, 2020 having to do with agreements whereby both the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain recognized Israel's sovereignty. This, in turn, allowed for full diplomatic relations with Israel.

Trump's achievement proved foreign policy experts and international organizations wrong, Tenney told Fox News Digital. He was the leader in facilitating the first real peace agreements in the Middle East in almost 3 decades in spite of the "experts" saying he had no chance of getting that agreement without a resolution in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

The "experts" were wrong . . . as usual.

As Tenney continued to laud the former president, she also took a well-deserved shot at the Nobel Peace Prize Committee for ignoring Trump's achievement.

President Trump's efforts in creating the Abraham Accords were unprecedented and continue to go unrecognized by the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, underscoring the need for his nomination today.

This wasn't Trump's first Nobel nomination — it was actually his fourth.

In 2020, Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian Parliament applauded Trump's efforts in "resolving protracted conflicts worldwide," and he first nominated the then-president.

Several months later, Laura Huhtasaari, a member of the conservative Swedish Finns Party, wrote to the Nobel Committee to nominate Trump for the 2021 prize "in recognition of his endeavors to end the era of endless wars, construct peace by encouraging conflicting parties for dialogue and negotiations, as well as underpin internal cohesion and stability of his country."

Again in September 2020, he was nominated by a group of Australian lawmakers.

What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided he would no longer have America involved in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing but the killing of thousands of young Americans and enormous debts imposed on America. He's reducing America's tendency to get involved in any and every war.

All four times, Trump was denied. Is anyone surprised?

Leftists are going to go ballistic if he actually gets the Prize. But will he take the fifth?

I doubt it--no matter what he does, the left hates him so much they will never approve of anything for him short of jail at the very least, and a firing squad, composed of the Capitol Hill "Squad" to pull the triggers.

Tweet

SCOTUS Justices release joint statement about leftist extremism

All nine Supreme Court justices issued a joint statement last week opposing Senate Democrats' trying to impose new ethics oversight measures to control their decision-making process. This attempt comes after the leftists tried to stir up ire and controversy aimed at the three conservative justices whose decisions they despise, just like they do with the U.S. Constitution. 

Some Democrats have described the U.S. Constitution as an outdated, irrelevant document because that outdated document allows them the free speech in which to make that almost seditious claim.

So last week, all nine justices, including non-biologist Ketanji Brown-Jackson, released a statement opposing the fascistic efforts to impose their power move over the judiciary and the nation's highest court.

The justices' statement also contained a letter from Chief Justice, John Roberts, to Senate Judicial Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-IL) stating that he will not be attending a hearing requested by Senate Democrats.

“Testimony by the Chief Justice of the United States before the Senate Judiciary Committee is extremely rare, as one would anticipate in light of the separation of powers concerns along with the importance of maintaining judicial independence,” Roberts stated, refusing to bend a knee for the left.

The justices explained that they wrote the statement to "offer further clarification to the bar as well as the public regarding the way the Justices handle certain recurring problems and is also to put to rest a few common misconceptions." 

Those misconceptions primarily arise from the left who hate the idea of separation of powers as clearly elucidated in the U.S. Constitution in which the three branches of government, executive, legislative and judiciary, are kept separate. Each branch is given certain powers which checks and balances the other branches. In the left's latest move on the Supreme Court, they would like to have control over them with a final say on their rulings. 

The fact that leftists were able to protest with impunity in front of the homes of conservative justices in order to pressure and scare them when a ruling on Roe v. Wade was being considered, showed their hand even before this latest move. The letter highlighted those previous threats, which reached their peak last year when a leftist attempted to murder three conservative justices.

“A word on security is required. Judges at all levels experience increased threats to their personal safety,” the letter stated. “These threats are amplified in the case of Supreme Court members due to the higher profile of the issues they address. Recent events demonstrate that such threats are not just hypothetical. The Supreme Court Police, United States Marshals, state and local law enforcement, and other agencies are in charge of security. Matters discussed here, including travel, lodging, and disclosure, may at times be subject to security recommendations.”

So good for the justices, even the ones who cannot tell us what is a woman. At least when it comes to their own power, they're willing to take a stand to remain separated from the executive and legislative branches of government.

Tweet

Chicago Mayor-elect makes excuses for rampaging youths as the city circles the bowl

Chicago's Democrat Mayor-elect Brandon Johnson couldn't get an entire first paragraph out about the teen takeover riots that terrorized the Windy City, destroying property, and wrecking violence as hundreds of youths descended upon the downtown area for two consecutive nights, without making excuses for their wild behavior.

On one side of his mouth, Johnson condemned the rioting, and on the other side said that condemning them is "not constructive." But he doesn't offer any alternative and condemning them following up with consequences for their violence and destruction, seems like it might make them, or other young people, think before they rampage. 

Attacking innocent bystanders, destroying property, firing guns in the streets should be vilified, should have consequences.

Two teenage males, 16 and 17, were shot while hanging out in a crowd during the rioting on Saturday night. They were taken to the hospital and listed in fair condition.

Hundreds of teens smashed cars, fought in the streets and blocked traffic. Johnson responded to the rioting in a statement Sunday:

"In no way do I condone the destructive activity we saw in the Loop and lakefront this weekend. It is unacceptable and has no place in our city. However, it is not constructive to demonize youth who have otherwise been starved of opportunities in their own communities. 

"Our city must work together to create spaces for youth to gather safely and responsibly, under adult guidance and supervision, to ensure that every part of our city remains welcome for both residents and visitors."

Chicago police arrested nine adults and six juveniles in connection with the rampage, which was advertised on social media. A 16-year-old boy was charged with unlawful use of a weapon, while two other suspects were charged with possession of a stolen vehicle. Most of the other arrests were for reckless conduct.

Current Mayor and loser in the recent election, Lori Lightfoot, condemned the "reckless, disrespectful and unlawful behavior" on display over the weekend. She blamed the parents but, like Johnson, had no solutions other than to point fingers.

"As I have said before, we as a city cannot and will not allow any of our public spaces to become a platform for criminal conduct," Lightfoot said in a statement. "Most importantly, parents and guardians must know where their children are and be responsible for their actions. Instilling the important values of respect for people and property must begin at home."

But they, as a city, allowed their public spaces to become a platform for criminal conduct. So what the hell is she talking about? What is the city going to do about it? Blame parents, when the real problem isn't the one parent raising these kids, it's the lack of fathers in the home, the disrespect the left constantly displays for law enforcement and even the law itself?

Johnson has caught backlash from the centrist wing of the Democratic Party during the mayoral run over his history of support for defunding the police by giving funds earmarked for them to other social services. Just another position he had to walk back until now.

Johnson had proposed to fund social workers, not cops, in 2020, calling it an "actual, real political goal." But when he ran for mayor, he changed his tune and walked it back with what sounded like a Kamala Harris excuse for lying in a debate ["It was a debate, hahahaha. It was a hahahaha, debate."] Johnson said, "I said it was a political goal. I never said it was mine." 

In other words, political goals are simply goals to get elected and don't need to represent what you're really going to do.

Johnson also wants to raise taxes on financial transactions, and increase large company head tax from $1 to $4 per company employee, and raise $98 million in jet fuel tax. All this in order to provide all kinds of services to illegal aliens and even allow them to vote in school board elections. 

What is also very important to him is to protect the right to kill the unborn and punish those who misgender people disguised as members of their opposite sex.

So don't expect much of a difference between Lori Lightfoot and Brandon Johnson when it comes to crime and leftist values.

Tweet

NC bill favors tougher sentencing for rioters

North Carolina lawmakers have approved significantly stiffer punishments for rioters. This is the second such bill in three years, which first was drafted in response to the 2020 destructive riots following the death of George Floyd, a thug-turned martyr for the left.

House Bill 40 now needs Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, to sign it, but the leftist had vetoed a similar bill which was approved by the Republican-controlled General Assembly in 2021. However, the GOP gained enough seats to override Cooper's veto if only one House Democrat votes for the bill and the Republicans stand united.

[H/T Fox News]

The bill does not interfere with peaceful protests, as guaranteed in the First Amendment, but will drop the hammer down on rioters who damage property and perpetrate violence.

House Speaker Tim Moore voted for the bill both times it had been proposed and pointed out that North Carolina's current laws were useless in preventing rioting and looting in downtown Raleigh in June 2020. Last Thursday Moore urged the governor to sign the "commonsense bill into law without delay." But the chances of most Democrats having common sense is on par with winning the lottery without having purchased a ticket.

However, six House Democrats, including a chief sponsor of the bill, voted in support of the measure last month. In the Senate, lawmakers passed the bill with a 27-16 vote – first-term Sen. Mary Wills Bode, the only Democrat with balls, was the only Democrat to vote in favor.

The Associated Press reported that social justice and civil rights advocates have consistently pushed back on the measures, probably because it stops Black Lives Matter rioters and other rioting leftists, from destroying what they have the right to destroy due to centuries of repression and stuff like that.

CNN: "Mostly peaceful protests"

Sen. Danny Britt (R) of Robeson County, said on the Senate floor  that the bill only targets "violent actors" causing mayhem, and not those peacefully demonstrating. But Democrats know that it will result in targeting most of the "demonstrators" if they're members of BLM or Antifa, because they come with weapons and they come to destroy. 

Other opponents say the language is too broad and laws addressing rioting are already in place, but those laws proved to be as useless as Pete Buttigieg at a train derailment.  

Sen. Natalie Murdock, a Durham County Democrat, said the bill "doubles down on the punitive system that created the scars of mass incarceration that we’re still dealing with today," and blah, blah, blah.

Putting criminals in jail has decreased the number of crimes where that is happening, for some reason. 

Murdock also said it will only "stifle free speech, criminalize protest and erode our First Amendment freedoms," in spite of the fact that it will actually enhance free speech of counter-protesters, which she never considered.

   
Jordan Monaghan, a spokesperson for the governor, said Cooper "has worked to increase public safety and protect constitutional rights, and he will review this legislation." When he vetoed the bill in 2021, he deemed it "unnecessary" and said it is "intended to intimidate and deter people from exercising their constitutional rights to peacefully protest."

The AP said the new bill would increase punishments already in place [that are rarely upheld when the Democrats are in power]  for the crimes of those willfully participating in a riot or inciting one to cover more severe circumstances like brandishing a weapon or causing serious bodily injury. Rioters who cause a death or rioters who incite rioting that contributes to a death would face harsher punishment and assaults on emergency personnel would also result in higher felony sentencing.

The bill would also force rioters who destroy property during protests to have consequences to their behavior, like big boys and girls, and pay for any damages they created. This would obviously help business and property owners to recoup their losses and perhaps make the rioters who seek to destroy, think twice. It might even help lower insurance premiums.

Finally, those accused of rioting would have a 24-hour 'time out' before their bond and pretrial release rules are set. This would allow them time to think about what they had done, the impact their behavior had on others, and a lesson on how to act like a grownup. 

North Carolina would be the tenth state to pass similar laws since the 2020 riots, if the bill is signed into law, according to the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law.

The question is, what are the Democrats so afraid of by passing a law that doesn't violate the rights of anyone involved in a riot, but punishes those who violate the rights of others? Those characters must be their voting base.

Tweet

Democrat asked to lead group in Pledge of Allegiance but doesn't know the words

Covo: she knows LGBTQ but not the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

A Florida Democrat whose campaign photo shows an American flag behind her, does not know the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag. This woman, Sabina Covo was supposed to be a trailblazer for her party last Thursday, but ended up being an ignoramus in American culture. 

Every school child is taught, or at least used to be taught, the 31-word pledge [if you don't eliminate 'under G_d'], and if you are going to use the American flag as your backdrop and symbol of sorts, you might want to know the Pledge of Allegiance. But it isn't her fault--she's an America-hating Democrat who like her colleagues, only pretend to love the nation.  

The event, which should have embarrassed her, occurred at the opening of the Miami-Dade County Commission meeting.

Covo a former "reporter" has a squeaker of an election in which she barely received a plurality of votes among the 13 candidates on Feb. 27 for an open commissioner seat in District 2. The rules state that the candidate with the most votes won, and there will be no runoff.

Covo will hold that seat for 8 months until the next regular election takes place in November.

Florida Politics reporter Jesse Scheckner noted, “Covo’s win marked the first Democratic victory in the Sunshine State under the new party leadership of Nikki Fried.” Meanwhile, the Democrats got their butts handed to them in the 2022 midterm elections.

In an embarrassing moment for Fried, other socialists, and Drag Queen Story Hour supporters, Covo did not know the country’s Pledge of Allegiance.

“Commissioner Covo, could you lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance, please,” someone asked her before the meeting began.

After some inaudible dialogue, someone said, “You don’t know it? OK.”

OK? It's OK that an elected official sworn to uphold the U.S.Constitution doesn't know the Pledge of Allegiance of the flag the Constitution represents? What are you gonna tell me next, that Abe Lincoln and Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. were Democrats?

Giving her shade, the entire room recited the pledge for her.

Newly elected Democrat #Miami Commissioner @SabinaCovo admits she doesn’t know Pledge of Allegiance when asked to lead it during commission meeting. 🤯 #BecauseMiami #OnlyInDade
(cc: @Not_the_Bee @LeftismForU @DefiantLs @ONLYinDADE) pic.twitter.com/fcJaLVk3eQ

— Christian 🇺🇲 (@ChristianCamara) March 10, 2023

Is anyone really surprised a leftist doesn't know the Pledge of Allegiance? But this idiot can probably tell us about all 57 varieties of sexual identification.

What a disgrace.

Tweet

Hillary Clinton calls deplorable Trump supporters Nazis: they pointed in the air

Deplorable Trump supporters showing their true colors

When history is written about this period of time in American politics, the person being labeled "Number One" is "Worst Politician Ever" will be Hillary Rodham Clinton. The main reason she sucks at politics so much is that she never seems to learn from her mistakes.

The failed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, former failed Secretary of State, and failed wife of former President Bill Clinton, spoke at the Texas Tribune festival in Austin, Texas last Friday. She recalled the days when she was a student and wondered why people in the 1930s and 1940s liked Hitler so much. While musing about the question, she stuck both feet in her mouth by implying that a similar phenomenon to Adolf Hitler's was that of former President Donald Trump, the man who defeated her in the presidential election. 

She implied that similar to Hitler's rallies, people at Trump's rallies raised their arms upward while he was speaking.

“I remember as a young student, you know, trying to figure out, how people get basically drawn in by Hitler,” the execrable Clinton said. “How did that happen? I’d watch newsreels and I’d see this guy standing up there ranting and raving, and people shouting and raising their arms. I thought, ‘What’s happened to these people?’”

“You saw the rally in Ohio the other night,” she continued. “Trump is there ranting and raving for more than an hour, and you have these rows of young men with their arms raised. I thought, ‘What is going on?’ So there is a real pressure, and I think it is fair to say we’re in a struggle between democracy and autocracy.”

First of all, Trump doesn't rant and rave. He excoriates his enemies and Hillary has first-hand knowledge about that tactic. 

Jon Levine of the NY Post tweeted:

Hillary Clinton likens Trump supporters to Nazis during remarks at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin

“What’s happened to these people?”https://t.co/fWLON5d2b3 pic.twitter.com/b8H6Cm4AKF

Clinton was referring to Trump’s “Save America” Rally in Youngstown, Ohio, on September 17. The former President closed his rally with a prepared monologue set to music, and as he spoke, his supporters raised their arms and pointed upward with one finger, not at all reminiscent of Hitler's salute. But some idiots on the Left said the pointing was associated with QAnon conspiracy theory, while normal people said they were simply showing the number one in the "America First" message.

Frau Clinton

Other leftist jumped on the Hillary band-jalopy because, while conservatives look for solutions, liberals look for something to complain about conservatives. The Left has no solutions, only complaints and attacks. 

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Even Joe Biden has gotten into the act, and it isn't a good look for a President to join, especially a demented president.

Tweet

Musk seals the deal, America wins!

Elon Musk has bought Twitter and my first tweet was: 

Freedom of speech. As Mike Lindell of My Pillow said, "What a concept." Except he was speaking about pillows or something like that.

When I first got onto Twitter this morning, I saw that the deal had not gone through but the Twitter twits were considering Musk's offer after the company's shareholders got pissed at them for trying to keep them from making serious money. Meanwhile, everyone was holding their collective breath. The left hoping the deal falls through so that the platform could still ban people they don't want to speak there such as: former President Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, the Babylon Bee, and thousands of our conservative friends who simply think and believe differently than the far-left.

So I watched and waited to see if the deal was going to go through, and then I saw this tweet from Robby Starbuck:

Twitter is reportedly accepting the offer Elon Musk made. We’re about to see a Nov 2016 level freak out from the left.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck)

Wow! 

My imagination immediately pictured the "Screaming at the Sky" woman who lost her s**t when Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016. I searched my cupboard and retrieved my Leftist Tears decanter from my Daily Wire membership and poured me a glass of the fine liquid from my Zero Water pitcher.

I knew there would be a mad dash of leftists running out of Twitter's door. They can't deal with discussions that come from people with whom they disagree and with whom have facts, not just feelings. But I really hope they stay on Twitter because this may be the first opportunity in a very long time where both sides of the aisle can have some dialogue, hopefully honest and respectful dialogue. We shall see, but I won't hold my breath.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Twitter's board did all they could to stop Musk from buying the company. They used what is colloquially known as a "poison pill" but that didn't work as Musk got others involved in his mission. They did their best to smear him and their game became obvious to the public.

The deal cost about $44 billion and Elon Musk wholly owns the company for $54.20 per share that he paid for in cash. Once the transaction is completed, Musk will own the company privately.

They lost, Musk won. Even better, we all won.

Tweet

Electric vehicles: "soon you'll see it our way--you'll have no choice"

Transportation Secretary in absentia mostly Pete "What, Me Worry" Buttigieg said Monday that electric vehicles will bring "cost savings" [after you pay for the vehicle and wait twenty-seven years to break even]. 

Okay, I made the last part up, but EVs are expensive and need coal to create the electricity to charge them. 

Buttigieg forgot to detail how these former bumper cars would be affordable in the future and who in the Democratic Party stands to gain from the conversion from gas driven cars, because someone is making a bundle on this idea if it ever happens anytime soon.

Buttigieg ended his paternity leave and left his husband and their child recently to hit the ruddy road and push for these vehicles while a war rages on between Russia and Ukraine and we still buy oil from the former so they can kill the latter and take their land all the while pretending to support Ukraine.

The left is dead set against drilling for the oil below our sands. Their excuse is the environment, but since there's one planet producing the oil, it makes no difference where the oil is drilled for, but that isn't the point of the left. The point is they are better than you because you don't care where all the flowers have gone. You don't care that a snotty mentally ill teenager from Sweden told us not to drill. "How dare you?"

The gay Trans Sec'y appeared with Federal Transit Administrator Nuria Fernandez and Vice President Kamala Hahaharris, who had recently informed President Biden that Russia is a country and it's near another country called Ukraine. . . and there's a war between these countries and it's bad.

Buttigieg announced that the Biden administration plans to fork over more than $2,000,000,000 in COVID relief money to transit agencies in 18 states that have no idea how to manage their funding and he thinks giving them more money will teach them how.

Another $1,500,000,000 will be made available to Biden's infrastructure law for transit energies to buy buses with lower to no emissions made in the U.S. by U.S. workers and perhaps a bunch of illegal aliens.

Buttigieg claims electric buses will create better, high-paying jobs with taxpayer money and somehow lower highway congestion, possibly due to the loss of over 8 million jobs with a return of only 6.5 million. Some of that money is, according to anonymous sources, rumored to be slated for Hunter Biden's Rainy Day Medication Fund. This has also been confirmed by two other sources who needed to remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of the claim.

"Clean transportation can bring significant cost savings for the American people as well," Buttigieg said.

This is our Second in Command "pumping" electricity into an EV
We are led by idiots

Other anonymous sources say that this administration is choking off the public from fossil fuels by allowing prices to soar under Biden's watch. At least he can pretend it's due to Russia and Ukraine, but gas prices have been steadily climbing ever since the ficus took office.

And Buttigieg as Transportation Secretary is actually quite funny: the guy was mayor of an average size town, South Bend, Indiana, and he couldn't even fix the potholes there or the transportation problems there.

* * *

For more hard-hitting content, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against global warming, the heebie-jeebies and COVID-19.

* * *

Buttigieg added that $5 billion have been invested into building a nationwide electric vehicle charging network "so that people from rural, to suburban, to urban communities, can all benefit, from the gas savings of driving an (electric vehicle)." But with the average cost of an electric vehicle being $56,437, and the economy seeing prices soaring higher than Hunter Biden at a Motel 8 Ball, most people cannot afford to drive one.

That being said, soon we will have no choice if the Left gets their way.

Tweet

Hillary Clinton blasts Joe Biden and flips off the Dems

"I don't feel noways tired"

Former failed Secretary of State, former First Lady to a cheating husband, former failed New York Senator, and two-time failed presidential candidate, soon to be a third timer if she runs, Hillary Clinton is doing all she can to be in the public spotlight. Instead of attacking former President Trump or the Republican Party, she has decided to go after far-left Democrats.

Clinton interviewed with NBC's Willie Geist on "Today" on December 10, and warned Democrats about obstacles they will face in the 2022 midterm elections. [Hillary giving election advice is like Brian Stelter giving advice on how to be macho, or Bill Clinton giving advice on fidelity.]

“I think that it is a time for some careful thinking about what wins elections, and not just in deep-blue districts where a Democrat and a liberal Democrat, or so-called progressive Democrat, is going to win,” Clinton said, unaware of the sheer irony. To his credit, Geist did not wet himself over that statement.

“I understand why people want to argue for their priorities. That’s what they believe they were elected to do. But at the end of the day, nothing is going to get done if you don’t have a Democratic majority in the House and the Senate. And our majority comes from people who win in much more difficult districts.”

By 'difficult districts' she means districts where there is a low communist/socialist/welfare population.

The former First Lady to [the Jeffrey Epstein island adventure-buddy] Bill, then went after the so-called Biden administration.

“Look, I’m all about having vigorous debate. I think it’s good, and it gives people a chance to be part of the process. But, at the end of the day it means nothing if we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive.”

Sober? Another area in which Hillary needs remedial work.

"While Biden promised to govern as a moderate, he has done next to nothing to rebuke members of the 'squad' and other leftist members that are dividing the country. Instead, he has taken aim at Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia for prioritizing their constituents’ interests as opposed to fully supporting his agenda."

Hillary is warning that if Democrats continue to focus their priorities and messaging on the far-left side of the issues, they will lose the swing voters who refuse to vote for their socialist, anti-police, anti-American, anti-White, anti-gun, anti-free speech, anti-science, and perhaps even antidisestablishmentarianism. In other words, they will lose the competitive races, as well they should.

Of course, there is the strong possibility that Clinton wants another crack at the presidency after losing to a reality TV show host and businessman. And the strong possibility also exists that the former President may also give it another go and run again in 2024. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Hopefully, Trump will give someone like Ron DeSantis the chance to run as he has youth and vocabulary on his side.

Given the age of Clinton and Trump, and the mental status of Biden, it will ultimately boil down to health if any of them decide to throw their hat in the ring, and if arthritis doesn't limit their range of motion.

Democrats are not interested in Clinton's advice as it is coming from a bitter loser and the party refuses to compromise on their leftist agenda. They must think Americans are gullible to believe their messaging, and all they have done is create the most polarization the country has seen since the Civil War.

Tweet

Fake You Leftist Hypocrites With Your Strategic Outrage Over "Let's Go Brandon!"

"Let's go Brandon!"

A pilot on Southwest Airlines allegedly said over the intercom "Let's go Brandon" and an alleged reporter for the Associated Press got the vapors and tried to enter the cockpit of the aircraft, possibly to wag a finger at said pilot and berate him if this really happened in the first place. She said that she was nearly kicked off the plane [for breaking federal law].

The media hearing about this story from the so-called reporter who almost had to be taken to the ICU compared the slogan "Let's Go Brandon!" to an ISIS sympathizer and many voiced outrage over the vulgarity of the name Brandon and what it now stands for. 

The chant "Let's Go Brandon!" became an internet sensation in September after an alleged reporter for NBC at a NASCAR Xfinity Series race claimed the crowd, that was clearly chanting "F**k Joe Biden!" was actually chanting "Let's Go Brandon" following the win by Brandon Brown.

"This is, I think, a witty and funny viral take on the media’s dishonesty that they tell us something that is clearly not true that we can see with our own eyes, and that is why I think it’s so popular with so many people," Outkick founder Clay Travis said on Monday on "America’s Newsroom."

Soon after the race, jokes and memes went viral and spread across the nation while the legacy media had to work fast to support their candidate and current co-President, Francis Joseph Biden [aka F. Joe Biden]. Now the "Let's Go Brandon!" chant is everywhere as Biden's poll numbers sag lower than his chin when he got caught napping at the G20 climate joke. 

The chant "Let's Go Brandon!" has made the left even crazier and angrier than normal. They tweeted, they shouted, they wrote columns and voiced hot takes by pundits calling the chant "vulgar" and offensive. But it's only offensive when it's their guy being mocked.

Alleged reporters for the Washington Post, Ashley Parker and Carissa Wolf wrote about what they considered "vitriol" from Biden critics in a piece titled "Biden’s critics hurl increasingly vulgar taunts."

The article claimed, "The current eruption of anti-Biden signs and chants, however, is on another level, far more vulgar and widespread" than anything seen in previous administrations. [Italics mine.]

Oh my, oh my, get me some smelling salts.

Not so ironically, but clearly hypocritically, these same leftists cheered when their fellow leftist used actual vulgarity to attack former President Donald Trump--the guy from the previous administration.

Take the aging actor Robert de Niro, for example. Hollywood stood and cheered for him at the Tony Awards when he twice proudly said "f**k Trump." 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Leftists also cheered Kathy Griffin when she was photographed with the likeness of President Trump's severed head--they showed no outrage at all and she later claimed to be the victim when conservatives and Trump supporters called her out for her vulgar display. Other leftists also threatened to blow up the White House and posed with a mock severed head of Trump and even celebrated his fictional assassination in a poor adaptation of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar."

CNN has also complained about the chant on air when Democratic "political analyst" and New York Times writer, Maggie Haberman, spoke somberly about South Carolina Republican Congressman Jeff Duncan wearing a mask with the "Let’s Go Brandon" phrase on it.

"There's nothing serious about this. This is literally done so that he will get attention. And it's working. ..." Yes, Maggie; that's the point. He's a politician, you're a hack.

Also on "New Day," CNN’s John Avalon called the chant "trollish" and "not patriotic."

But it wasn't 'trollish' and 'not patriotic' when last June, Los Angeles magazine had an entire article about an art show whose theme was F**k Trump art. That did not cause mental harm on the left nor any consternation by the hordes of hypocrites who went ballistic over "Let's Go Brandon1"

However, a pilot on Southwest Airlines was able to cause "reporters" to freak out and have a cow just for saying those words: "Let's Go Brandon!"

Nobody in their right mind would freak out hearing someone from the old West say, "Dagnabbit." That's because he isn't saying "G-d d**nit." It's a substitute and is used to remove the vulgarity or offensiveness of the term it substitutes. 

So Fake You, leftists for your fake outrage and your fake moral superiority. You can all go to H-E-double hockey sticks!

Tweet

Leftist brain-trusts Dave Bautista and Alyssa Milano petition for Cruz to be expelled from Senate

Alyssa Milano, 48, born in Brooklyn, NY is a left-wing political activist She left Brooklyn and attended the Buckley School in Sherman Oaks, California serving grades kindergarten through the 12th grade as a college prep school, although there does not appear to be any evidence of higher education in her history.

Two reviews of the school state:


"They also have a huge gym and a cafeteria that has delicious food."

"Buckley is terribly overpriced, and overrated."

Ms. Milano sports seven tattoos including a sacred heart on her butt cheek, a fairy kneeling on the grass along her hip, rosary beads on her back, an angel on her left ankle, a snake biting it's own tail [an Ouroboros] and on her dainty right wrist, an "om" as well as on her other wrist with flowers there and also on her right ankle. 

But in spite of her apparently Catholic-inspired images [of the heart and rosary], Milano had two abortions, putting her in the same "church pew" as Joe Biden who supports the killing of the unborn.

Dave Bautista, 52, whose birthday is today, Jan. 18th, is a former wrestler and mixed martial artist-turned actor. His mom, a lesbian, is of Greek descent and his father a Filipino immigrant. He was raised in poverty and had serious run-ins with the law. By age 13, he was stealing cars, and by 17 he was estranged from his parents, living on his own.

Bautista worked as a nightclub bouncer but was arrested after a fight that left two patrons injured, one who was left unconscious. He was given a year on probation, later working as a lifeguard and then got into bodybuilding, which he said saved his life.

He became a wrestler at which time he called himself "Batista." Finally he went into acting and used his real name at this point, while pretending to be the characters he played.

Rafael [Ted] Edward Cruz, 50, never went to acting school. Instead, he went to Princeton University and Harvard Law School and worked as a policy advisor for George W. Bush and then Solicitor General of Texas from 2003 to 2008. Liberal Harvard Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz once said that Cruz was the brightest pupil he ever taught.

Cruz was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2012 and became the first Hispanic American to serve as a U.S. senator from Texas and was re-elected to the Senate in 2018, beating out Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke, a gun-grabbing leftist who respects the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution the way a snake respects a mouse.

Cruz and others faced criticism for perpetuating the idea that Joseph Robinette Biden won the presidential election using organized, wide-scale voter fraud. In the video below, he explains that he never intended to set aside the results of the election, but he asked to look into what half the nation believes was an unfair election.

On Sunday, Bautista took to Twitter to share the petition writing: "This cause is close to my heart - please sign."

Milano also shared the MoveOn.org petition later in the day with a gif that reads: "The path to unity flows through accountability. The path to healing begins with justice."

Their definition of justice is that conservatives either agree with them or shut up. Witness big tech lately. 

Neither one of these actors live or even come from Texas where Cruz was duly elected. 

The path to unity as a nation flows through the acceptance of our differences and the freedom to discuss and debate them. It comes from compromise at times. Healing will follow, not through punishing those with whom you disagree, but with honest, talk, and even more important, real listening.

You want healing and unity, start there.

Finally, please consider subscribing to my free blog, Brain Flushings. I can be satirical, sometimes angry, and generally fair. Sometimes I can even be funny--at least to myself and hopefully you. The only ways I get paid is by knowing I've made a difference in the world and also when you click on one of the ads on the page. Just one click does the trick.

Tweet