Latest study confirms an uncomfortable truth about liberals v conservatives

If you've spent any time arguing with liberals online, you already knew something was off. But now academia has finally caught up after spending twelve years, $8,000,000 in grant money, and at least three emergency therapy llamas trying to figure out why conservatives seem less miserable.

A new study published in the journal Political Behavior reportedly found that “mental illness is emerging as its own political identity and is most heavily aligned with leftist political ideology and causes,” especially among younger Americans whose entire personalities consist of ring lights, pronouns, anxiety disorders, and explaining why capitalism caused Mercury to be in retrograde.

Researchers were stunned to discover conservatives tend to score higher in things like personal agency, religiosity, resilience, self-worth, optimism, and other dangerous extremist behaviors once commonly referred to as “functioning adulthood.”

Meanwhile, researchers noted many liberals continue to identify primarily as “neurospicy,” “trauma-informed,” or “currently processing.”

Columbia University's magazine observed in 2023 that "American adults who identify as politically liberal have long reported lower levels of happiness and psychological well-being than conservatives.” Experts initially blamed climate change, microplastics, Fox News, colonialism, and insufficient emotional support crocheting circles before reluctantly concluding that constantly believing civilization is collapsing and the planet is ready to turn into burnt toast, may not be terrific for mental health.

Scholars from the Universities of Florida and Toronto eventually determined conservatives often benefit from having purpose, accountability, community, and faith, which apparently works far better than posting “Normalize crying at work” on TikTok.

Professor Lauren Van De Hey of Utah State University found that “there is an emerging mental health political identity that is most pronounced among younger (Gen Z) and more liberal Americans."

So it appears that Democrats may have finally discovered a voting bloc even more reliable than vegan cat ladies.

According to the study, nearly half of participants identifying as mentally ill said that identity was very or somewhat important to them personally, just edging out astrology signs and preferred pronouns as core personality traits.

Van De Hey also noted, "I find that the political predictors and political consequences for the emerging mental health identity differ from those for physical disability and serious physical illness categorization and identification."

Conservatives interpreted this to mean one side treats anxiety like a medical condition while the other treats it like a Marvel origin story.

The study further found conservatives are less likely to define anxiety and depression as mental illnesses and are less likely to seek treatment. Van De Hey attributed this to a "personal responsibility ethos: they do not seek help when they think they can resolve the issues on their own." 

What a concept.

The left immediately condemned this dangerous philosophy, warning that independent problem-solving could discourage young Americans from developing lucrative lifelong dependencies on emotional support Discord servers.

Observers also noted the striking similarity between the left’s approach to gender politics and its increasingly activist approach to mental health. First Americans were encouraged to build identities around sexuality and gender confusion. Now they're encouraged to build identities around emotional instability.

Critics say the formula is simple: take a struggle, turn it into an identity, transform the identity into a political movement, then declare anyone questioning it a fascist.

Van De Hey warned, "These findings have far-reaching consequences for mental health advocacy, and the role mental health identity will play in the political sphere, especially as Gen Z matures as a cohort."

Political strategists reportedly agreed, noting that a permanently anxious, emotionally fragile electorate is much easier to manipulate than a population busy raising families, going to church, and mowing their lawns without needing a therapist on standby.

At publishing time, several progressive activists announced the article itself had caused “literal harm” and demanded taxpayers fund an emergency recovery retreat featuring drum circles, vegan snacks, and federally subsidized crying tents.

Literally.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

State Dept, may revoke visas of foreigners who "glorify violence" after Charlie Kirk assassination

Let's cut through the crap with some cold, hard facts. The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative youth influencer, father of two, and co-founder of Turning Point USA, has sent shockwaves through the nation. And now, the State Department is stepping up, signaling they're done playing nice with foreigners who cheer for violence on our soil. This is what happens when you let the woke left's obsession with "tolerance" fester unchecked, people die, and the government finally wakes up.

Bill Melugin, one of the few journalists still doing actual reporting, dropped a bombshell on Fox News about the Kirk assassin. We're talking messages scrawled on the gun and ammo, palm prints, and video surveillance capturing the moments after the shooting. The FBI is scrambling, releasing imagery and begging the public for help to ID the shooter, who's still on the loose. A high-powered bolt-action rifle, ditched in a wooded area, was used to fire a single shot from a rooftop 200 yards away, striking Kirk in the neck during his "American Comeback Tour" at Utah Valley University. 

Ironically, Charlie was answering a question about mass shootings involving transgender individuals. ironic, It's sickeningly ironic that the left's sacred cows might be tied to this tragedy. The event drew 3,000 people, and now one of conservatism's brightest voices is silenced.

Enter Deputy Secretary of State Chris Landau, who has had enough of the X platform turning into a cesspool of violence-glorifying rhetoric. He posted, and I quote, "In light of yesterday’s horrific assassination of a leading political figure, I want to underscore that foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country." Landau is clearly "disgusted" by foreigners on visas praising or rationalizing Kirk's murder online. 

Landau responded by directing consular officials to monitor social media and take "appropriate action." That's right, Big Brother is watching, and for once, it's watching the right target. Landau even invited people to snitch on foreigners posting this garbage, saying, "Please feel free to bring such comments by foreigners to my attention so that the @StateDept can protect the American people." 

Good. It's about time we stopped coddling those who cheer for our destruction.

This isn't new territory for the State Department. They've already yanked over 6,000 student visas for overstays or crimes like assault, DUI, burglary, or even "support for terrorism." Apparently, that's what passes for "diversity" in the Biden era. 

Back in June, they announced they'd be snooping on visa applicants' social media, demanding accounts be set to public. Now, Landau's doubling down, specifically targeting replies to his own X post for evidence of foreign nationals cheering Charlie Kirk's death. This is what happens when you let the left's "free speech for all, no matter how vile" mantra run amok; people start thinking they can glorify murder without consequences.

Let's be clear: Kirk's assassination isn't just a tragedy; it's a wake-up call. The left has spent years demonizing conservatives, painting us as the root of all evil while excusing every form of radicalism as "expression." 

Now, a conservative leader is gunned down, and the same crowd that cries "hate speech" when you misgender someone is suddenly silent, or worse, celebrating. The State Department's move to crack down on visa-holding foreigners who applaud this madness is a start, but it's not enough. We need a cultural reckoning. We need to stop pretending that every opinion deserves a platform, especially when it's calling for blood. 

As Landau put it, "foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome." Period. Maybe it's time we applied that standard to everyone, not just foreigners. Facts don't care about your feelings, as Ben Shapiro says, and neither should our national security.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

Fox News, Having No Humility, Secretly Celebrates Pride Month

Fox News has given the term 'foxhole' an entirely new meaning. That is, the outlet is digging themselves an even deeper "Fox Hole" than they dug when they fired Tucker Carlson. The network is no longer considered to be the go-to source for conservative views and has gone woke in the spirit of CNN and MSNBC.

When Tucker was fired, ratings fell faster than the skivvies of a Bill Clinton aide, not only in Tucker's 8 p.m. prime time slot, but in the time slots of shows before and after his. Jessie Watters, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham all lost myriad viewers once Tucker left.

Still, the network pretended to be conservative and the voice of those on the right, until Harris Faulkner announced that Fox was going to the DEI agenda [diversity, equity and inclusion] into its business model to comply with New York's marxist laws.

However, Fox was hiding one thing they didn't want to trumpet, but then Daily Wire's Matt Walsh revealed the find on Tuesday. He went on Twitter and unmasked the out-of-the-way page on Fox's website: "America Together: Celebrating Diversity." The theme on the entire page was LGBT "Pride Month." 

“FOX News Media celebrates the contributions to America by the LGBTQ+ community,” the page quietly read. So Walsh tweeted out: 

Your trusted conservative news source is celebrating diversity this LGBTQ+ Pride Month pic.twitter.com/NAXoNuhISm

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog)

Conservatives were livid and those of us already angry over the firing of Tucker Carlson were finding yet one more reason to dump Fox and go online to the conservative podcasts and websites.

WTF happened to Fox News? pic.twitter.com/EZvlKdjNXo

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 6, 2023

Another tweeted: 

I’m glad I cancelled our Fox Nation subscription. I wish I could cancel it twice! 🤣

— Tommy’s Garage (@TommysGarageTV) June 6, 2023

And this:

@FoxNews lost me a while ago. Replaced by substack subscriptions, @realDailyWire subscription, and a few other micro subscriptions. It is the way.

— ToBeRight (@ToBeRight) June 6, 2023

Like Bud Light and Target, Fox News is in a hole and doesn't know to stop digging and seems quite happy to jump on the child gender mutilation, diversity, and everybody wins a trophy bandwagon. 

Perhaps it's only a matter of time when Greg Gutfeld goes woke. He and the rest of the Fox News staff are not allowed to utter the words "Tucker Carlson" lest they suffer the same fate.

So who the hell is going to watch Fox News? Liberals certainly won't because as bad as Fox has become, they are still too conservative for their woke taste.  And conservatives who know they have choices also will go elsewhere. 

The not so foxy LGBTQ website is not who put Fox at the top of cable television and it's a betrayal of these conservatives. If you have any principles, you need to consider going elsewhere for your news and information because Fox News has been corrupted. Try Daily Wire, Megyn Kelly's podcast, Breitbart, Newsmax, and there are plenty of other choices.

Tweet

Biden tries to stir up anti-white racism

Alleged President and leader of the Biden Crime Family, Joe Biden, isn't just brain addled and corrupt, he is also evil. 

Yes, that's a bold statement but consider what he said Saturday during a commencement address to inflame Howard University's, an HBCU (Historically Black Colleges and University) graduating class. Speaking at Capital One Arena, in Washington, D.C., Scranton's village idiot claimed that White supremacy is the "most dangerous terrorist threat" in the United States. 

Biden was speaking about the threats the Black students face from the division of America. He somehow forgot to mention that both he and former President Obama were an integral part of creating that division. In fact, before the Obama-Biden administration came into power, the nation was coming together, so much so that they elected the first Black president. 

After he mumbled about the dangers of White supremacy, the so called president assured his Black audience he wasn’t just saying that because he was at a Black school, but the reason he said it really was because he was at a Black school.

At the beginning of his statement Biden mush-mouthed about America’s battle with racism from the time of its inception, "We know American history has not always been a fairy tale," he said. "From the start, it’s been a constant push and pull for more than 240 years, between the best of us – the American ideal that we’re all created equal – and the worst of us, a harsh reality that racism has long torn us apart."

"It’s a battle that’s never really over," he continued. "But on the best days, enough of us have the guts and hearts to stand up for the best in us, to choose love over hate, unity over disunity, progress over retreat…"

Then the Democratic hair sniffer got into the meat of the matter saying,  "…To stand against the poison of White supremacy as I did in my inaugural address." He then called it "the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland." The audience erupted in applause and one might have expected to hear them call for the heads of White supremacists, who are now defined as Republicans.

Pointing his finger, he added, "And I’m not just saying this because I’m at a Black HBCU. I say this wherever I go." 

Conservatives were upset at what they viewed as Biden's blatant, politically divisiveness, the only policy they believe can get them a win in 2024. 

A Hot Air article by David Strom titled "Yale research accidentally proved liberals more racist than conservatives," shows just who the real racists are, without even considering the Dixiecrats or KKK, or even how Hillary Clinton and AOC use "southern black accents" when speaking to a Black audience.

Twitter reacted in kind to Biden's mindless remarks.

Elijah Schaffer tweeted, "Biden just told a bunch of black people that white supremacy is the greatest threat to America."

Gee, I wonder what effect that will have on people who believe that statement.

Miranda Devine of the New York Post simply tweeted "Pure evil." 

That's exactly what it is and it can only lead to violence, which may be the feature, not the bug.

Foundation for Economic Education managing editor Jon Miltimore tweeted, "The Democratic Party spent most of the 19th Century and much of the 20th using overt racism to win elections. They are doing again in the 21st century. The racism just looks a lot different than the 19th century version."

Racial division is all the Democrats seem to have as journalist Julie Kelly pointed out by tweeting, "No you’re saying it because you’re a pathological liar propped up by the media to help fuel dangerous racial division." She was referring to Biden's claim that he wasn't saying what he said because he was speaking to a Black university.

The biggest threat to the country isn't White supremacy, although White supremacists suck. No, the biggest threat as I see it is the left itself, who decriminalize crime, decrease the police force, stifle free speech, protect a brain impaired POTUS, divide the country into Black vs. White, and own the media.

It's no wonder they were crazy angry when Elon Musk bought Twitter.

Tweet

Fweedom-loving Harris asked Mommy: "Why are conservatives bad?"

Vice President in name, Kamala Hahaharris told a tale aimed at attacking conservatives which was so fake and divisive that it caused people to throw up in their collective mouth and point out how ridiculous she sounds, even when she isn't talking gibberish.

She recently spoke a group of words at  Colorado's Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities in a moderated conversation on climate policy where she spun the tale of her childhood.

"I grew up learning about - we called it ecology at the time and so some of us who were born around that time know what I’m saying - and we talked about it in the context of conservation," she said, while uproariously laughing at something apparently going on in her head. 

"In fact, I’m going to share with you a very simple story, which is that I went home one day and I said, 'Well, why are conservatives bad, mommy?’ I thought we were supposed to conserve things." She then added, "I couldn’t reconcile it. Now I can."

This was not the 'fweedom' story; this was bigger but equally as believable.

A clip of the quote went viral on Twitter, and users tore her claim apart. 

"This never happened," Dana Loesch host of "The Dana Show" wrote.

Loesch wasn't alone in her doubting that the story was completely fabricated by our laughing VP, who obviously believes that people are as stupid as she is.

Conservative Twitter personality ALX begged, "PLEASE MAKE IT STOP."

"I'll take, 'Things that never happened for $1,000,'" special advisor for communications for Sen. Ted Cruz, Steve Guest tweeted.

"Her comms team would be wise to keep her far, far away from a camera and a microphone. Forever," 2022 New Hampshire congressional candidate Karoline Leavitt wrote.

"She’s been around POTUS too long, the only thing missing is ‘not a joke’ at the end," WGY Mornings with Doug Goudie tweeted.

Can you imagine Hahaharris and Biden sitting around the Oval Office talking about their childhood?

Biden: "When I was a boy, my dad, my dad would say to me, 'Joey, you see those two men going at it? That's a beautiful deal.' I'm serious."

Harris: "No Joe, fweedom is a beautiful deal, hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Fweedom!"

Tweet

Alleged journalist Katie Couric defends her strategic omission of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's remarks

Self-described journalist/reporter Katie Couric defended her selective editing out of an incredibly important statement made by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in an interview she had with RBG shortly before she died, much like Couric's journalistic credibility.

The fake news reporter appeared on the Today Show on Tuesday, saying that the media makes editorial decisions "all the time." This is especially the case with the legacy media when it comes to truths that conflict with their ideology, an ideology that is increasingly moving toward all out Marxism.

Couric admitted, in her new book that she selectively edited a 2016 interview with Ginsburg because she told her that she was critical of America hating scumbags like Colin Kaepernick who, while he still worked as a failed NFL quarterback, took "a knee" during the national anthem. The gesture, she said, showed “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life.”

Ginsburg also did not approve of the protests against alleged police brutality and suggested they showed a lack of appreciation for the best America has to offer. 

So Couric edited those statements out of the book because, she claimed that she ‘wanted to protect’ Ginsburg and felt that the issue of racial justice was a ‘blind spot’ for her,” as the Daily Mail noted in their report.

Yeah, sure. Couric was covering for the Justice to protect her from their Marxist allies who didn't share those sentiments.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

“Couric felt that when Ginsburg said that people like Kaepernick were ‘dumb and disrespectful’ they were comments that were ‘unworthy of a crusader for equality’ like the liberal Supreme Court justice,” the Daily Mail wrote. “The day after the sit-down, the head of public affairs for the Supreme Court emailed Couric to say the late justice had ‘misspoken’ and asked that it be removed from the story. Couric writes that she was ‘conflicted’ because she was a ‘big RBG fan’, referring to Ginsburg’s moniker.”

Ultimately, Couric says she contacted fellow journalist David Brooks, who suggested that Ginsburg “probably didn’t understand the question.” 

Sure, a Supreme Court Justice with a hundred and fifteen years of experience on the bench and in the SCOTUS, didn't understand Couric's question. What does that say about Ginsburg's judicial prudence and her consistent leftist decisions?

One thing for sure, the media has earned the public's distrust and the polls show it. Below are the numbers from a Gallop poll:

The left controls the narrative and that's why they hate conservative media and are doing all they can to silence them. Fox News, the Daily Wire and more to the right media such as OAN, Breitbart News and Newsmax are in the crosshairs of the left.

Fortunately for Brain Flushings, I don't have that problem, but if everyone subscribes who reads this blog then I would, and would look forward to the fight.

Tweet

Leftist brain-trusts Dave Bautista and Alyssa Milano petition for Cruz to be expelled from Senate

Alyssa Milano, 48, born in Brooklyn, NY is a left-wing political activist She left Brooklyn and attended the Buckley School in Sherman Oaks, California serving grades kindergarten through the 12th grade as a college prep school, although there does not appear to be any evidence of higher education in her history.

Two reviews of the school state:


"They also have a huge gym and a cafeteria that has delicious food."

"Buckley is terribly overpriced, and overrated."

Ms. Milano sports seven tattoos including a sacred heart on her butt cheek, a fairy kneeling on the grass along her hip, rosary beads on her back, an angel on her left ankle, a snake biting it's own tail [an Ouroboros] and on her dainty right wrist, an "om" as well as on her other wrist with flowers there and also on her right ankle. 

But in spite of her apparently Catholic-inspired images [of the heart and rosary], Milano had two abortions, putting her in the same "church pew" as Joe Biden who supports the killing of the unborn.

Dave Bautista, 52, whose birthday is today, Jan. 18th, is a former wrestler and mixed martial artist-turned actor. His mom, a lesbian, is of Greek descent and his father a Filipino immigrant. He was raised in poverty and had serious run-ins with the law. By age 13, he was stealing cars, and by 17 he was estranged from his parents, living on his own.

Bautista worked as a nightclub bouncer but was arrested after a fight that left two patrons injured, one who was left unconscious. He was given a year on probation, later working as a lifeguard and then got into bodybuilding, which he said saved his life.

He became a wrestler at which time he called himself "Batista." Finally he went into acting and used his real name at this point, while pretending to be the characters he played.

Rafael [Ted] Edward Cruz, 50, never went to acting school. Instead, he went to Princeton University and Harvard Law School and worked as a policy advisor for George W. Bush and then Solicitor General of Texas from 2003 to 2008. Liberal Harvard Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz once said that Cruz was the brightest pupil he ever taught.

Cruz was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2012 and became the first Hispanic American to serve as a U.S. senator from Texas and was re-elected to the Senate in 2018, beating out Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke, a gun-grabbing leftist who respects the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution the way a snake respects a mouse.

Cruz and others faced criticism for perpetuating the idea that Joseph Robinette Biden won the presidential election using organized, wide-scale voter fraud. In the video below, he explains that he never intended to set aside the results of the election, but he asked to look into what half the nation believes was an unfair election.

On Sunday, Bautista took to Twitter to share the petition writing: "This cause is close to my heart - please sign."

Milano also shared the MoveOn.org petition later in the day with a gif that reads: "The path to unity flows through accountability. The path to healing begins with justice."

Their definition of justice is that conservatives either agree with them or shut up. Witness big tech lately. 

Neither one of these actors live or even come from Texas where Cruz was duly elected. 

The path to unity as a nation flows through the acceptance of our differences and the freedom to discuss and debate them. It comes from compromise at times. Healing will follow, not through punishing those with whom you disagree, but with honest, talk, and even more important, real listening.

You want healing and unity, start there.

Finally, please consider subscribing to my free blog, Brain Flushings. I can be satirical, sometimes angry, and generally fair. Sometimes I can even be funny--at least to myself and hopefully you. The only ways I get paid is by knowing I've made a difference in the world and also when you click on one of the ads on the page. Just one click does the trick.

Tweet

Nikki Haley views Trump Twitter ban as act of Communism, others see Jack Dorsey as a Nazi

Banning President Trump from Twitter and Facebook is worse than Watergate. Throw in Instragram, and Twitch and now it's worse than Hitler. The Apple Store went so far as to remove Parler's app from its store. Parler is the free speech alternative to Twitter.

Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley went on Twitter, where Trump no longer treads, and slammed the tech giants in their attempts at "silencing people" akin to "what happens in China, not our country."

Well, evidently it just happened in our country and it's probably going to get worse.

Haley's tweet was posted soon after Twitter announced it was going to permanently ban our duly elected American President from it platform.

Like Trump or hate him, if this doesn't scare you and piss you off, you are either stupid, the legacy media, or a leftist, but my redundancy is showing.

Haley's tweet:

Silencing people, not to mention the President of the US, is what happens in China not our country. #Unbelievable

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) January 8, 2021

But there's no question that it's believable.

Just this past November, Twitter flagged Haley's tweet about election fraud. She called out the Twitter scumbags for ignoring a tweet casting doubt on the Holocaust by Iran’s Ayatollah.

Wow. When Iran’s Ayatollah says the Holocaust didn’t happen, Twitter doesn’t say “this claim is disputed.” When I say ballot harvesting makes election fraud easier Twitter says that’s disputed. Wonder why conservatives don’t trust big tech? pic.twitter.com/5SGkqyOhUe

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 13, 2020

It looks like the country is splitting in half and this is a trend that has been taking place most obviously in the Obama administration after he promised to bring the country together and instead, did the exact opposite.

The left basically owns the media along with big tech. They own the message and they still want to shut us up because their message is weak and false. Everything is seen with a patina of racism and identity politics because their economics and basic human rights ideas are failures and falsehood respectively.

Joe Biden is a liar and so is Harris. The Capitol riots were horrible but they had nothing at all to do with racism. Somehow they think the American people have short memories and are too stupid to know when we are being gas lighted.

I hope you will take this small piece of advice: support websites like Daily Wire, Louder with Crowder, Washington Times, Washington Examiner, One America News Network, Newsmax, The Daily Caller, and yes, even Fox News. I know you may be having problems with Fox, but they are still the only cable network that has a few good people doing good work. Support conservative thought and I hope you continue to read Brain Flushings too.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Netflix's worst political series: Designated Survivor

I am not a movie critic but I know leftist garbage when I see it and the Netflix series "Designated Survivor" is a garbage dump of woke.

Starring the whispering Kiefer Sutherland as the designated survivor, and his vivacious far-fetched liberal immigration lawyer wife, starring Natascha McElhone, the series gets off to an equally far-fetched start in which Congress along with the President and VP are killed in a [spoiler alert] white nationalist terrorist attack, a huge "surprise" we discover later.

President Kirkman is depicted as an American version of Mohandas Gandhi [aka Mahatma Gandhi] but more perfect and feely-teary and astute. He adores his wife who adores him, adores his kids, who adore him, and loves the country, who have bipartisan love for him too.

Because it's Netflix, I kept waiting for the gay/lesbian/transgender encounter, but it took three seasons before it was learned that the President's sister-in-law, Sasha, is a transgender woman, aka a dude in a dress. I stopped watching the show before season 3 as Sutherland's crappy acting and whispering almost caused a quarantine fight between my more patient, forgiving wife and me when I kept commenting on the whispering ["What? What did he say?"] which eventually got to her more than Sutherland's acting inability. I researched Season 3 to have a more comprehensive take on the entirety of the series.

Of course, my take on Kiefer Sutherland is my own opinion but I can say with certainty that he was the same person in "24" as he is in this diaper load of political mistreatment of reality.

Season 3 also had a gay scene that was the "poster woke of woke" in which Dontae Evans, a social media strategist on Kirkman's campaign staff, got into a gay sex scene between Evans and another gay HIV positive black Secret Service agent. According to my research, viewers unaware that Netflix is honor-bound to show at a minimum two LGBTQ+ sex scenes as directed by Barac Obama.

Let me be clear: there is nothing wrong with being gay [although I view transgender people as mentally ill] but media makes it appear as if every third person you encounter is either gay or a transgender/gender dysphoric person.

Netflix calls "Designated Survivor" 'thoughtful and compassionate.' I call it liberal propaganda perpetrated by a hard-leaning leftist media. In fact, in the third season, it was said that it was extremely rare to see a "thoughtful, compassionate conservative."

And of course, the GOP presidential candidate, Cornelius Moss, is portrayed as a sleazy politico who admits to holding increasingly extreme views to fit what voters allegedly want.

When Kirkman whispers to him why he wasn't as "compassionate" as he used to be, Moss says that given his right-leaning base, that it's impossible.

The only saving grace with the pile of dog poop is that it can be a learning tool for insight into the leftist mind. This is how they really see conservatives and can't differentiate between us and the extreme right who conservatives abhor just even more than they do.

None of this series is surprising if you have an understanding how Netflix operates. Like most of the mainstream media, it can easily be mistaken for the DNC.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Samantha Bee attacks 'Prager U': and helps 'Prager U' raise money

Failed comedian Samantha Bee went on a potty mouth attack of conservative Prager University for six and a half minutes and unintentionally helped the outlet raise $25,000 at last count. 

Bee, who is probably the least funny so-called comedian that ever disgraced a stage, on Wednesday's TBS "Full Frontal" claimed in a overly long and angry rant claimed the "dangerous" outlet known as Prager University is "brainwashing" youths with "conservative propaganda" via their short [5-minute] videos.

Bee's "Full Frontal" Twitter account whined:

While Fox continues its lifelong quest to scare your grandparents into hoarding Franklin Mint coins, one growing conservative outlet is using colorful graphics and social media to appeal to a new generation. That outlet is Prager U. 

Prager U’s website says ‘Prager University is not an accredited academic institution…but it is a place where you are free to learn.’ That describes every single place! The last place Sam learned something for free was in a bra store. She learned she’s been wrong for 35 years.” 

Ha ha ha. Very witty. But they weren't finished:

Prager U is actually dangerous. They’re reaching a new, younger audience with bullshit conservative propaganda. They trick kids into thinking their videos are educational even though Prager U is as much of a real college as Monsters University.

And Samantha Bee is as much a real comedian as Rashida Tlaib is a sabra.

The Bee segment was widely shared by conservatives, who sarcastically thanked Bee for the exposure and coupled their posts with popular Prager U videos. Bee also triggered donations to the outlet, over $25,000 worth.

“THANK YOU [Full Frontal]!” Prager U posted via Twitter on Thursday, when at the time the intake was over $10,000.

“$10,000+ raised & counting to ensure we continue to reach more young people with our ‘dangerous’ videos,” the outlet said. “Please consider making a tax-deductible donation in honor of Samantha Bee to help us continue our impact.”

THANK YOU @FullFrontalSamB! $10,000+ raised & counting to ensure we continue to reach more young people with our "dangerous" videos.

Please consider making a tax-deductible donation in honor of Samantha Bee to help us continue our impact.

DONATE HERE: https://t.co/fbR6gnH36A pic.twitter.com/fGyM5nRlhA

— PragerU (@prageru) February 13, 2020

“The left is TERRIFIED of PragerU!” the group added. “This is how you know you’re making an impact!”

Like the old saying goes, if you aren't getting any flak, you're not over the target.

Bee apparently hates all conservatives. In May 2018, she called President Trump'a eldest daughter and White House advisor Ivanka Trump a “feckless c**t” on her show, after attacking her for posting a photo of herself holder her child. She used the photo to attack President Trump's immigration policies.

“Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we’ve seen this week,” Bee said on-air. “You know, Ivanka, that’s a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad’s immigration practices, you feckless c**t!”

That Samantha Bee is one classy c***k.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

John Hair-plugs Kerry: Immigrants 'crushing Europe'

"Stayin' alive, stayin' alive"

Former fake war hero and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry went on a trip to Europe rather than taking his normal macho bike vacation. He spoke publicly at a Guardian Live event in London about his observation of the continent, saying that Europe has been "crushed" by what immigration has done to it.

Of course, like any Iran-loving leftist, Kerry also took the occasion to slam President Trump. He didn't understand how his attack on immigration was actually confirming what Trump has warned us.

"Europe is already crushed under this transformation that is taking place due to migration," the Lurch lookalike said. "In Germany, Angela Merkel is weakened. Italian politics is significantly impacted."

Then James Taylor's buddy claimed that extreme climate change in Africa could spark an even more serious migration crisis that will impact Europe, kill puppies and elephants, and it was all Trump's fault. Nothing short of impeachment will stop the hot summers and cold winters. Kerry told The Guardian that Trump's decision to leave the useless Paris Climate Accord [where nations sign a paper saying that the weather needs to just chill] was going to kill even more people, puppies, pussies, and cows.

"You know what I'm angry about? [That he never became president?] People are going to die because of the decision Donald Trump made," he told The Guardian without offering a modicum of evidence for such a wild claim. "My kids and my grandkids are going to face a difficult world because of what Donald Trump has done," he said, leaving out the threat of Iran as they continue to develop weapons of mass destruction due to his time in office in the Obama error.

A week after "The Hero of Hanoi" made his empty remarks, another loser, Hillary Clinton, made similar remarks to The Guardian because she just refuses to go away.

Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro wrote: "Clinton told The Guardian  (UK) that Europe has badly mishandled the migration crisis from the Middle East. In verbiage reminiscent of one Donald J. Trump, Clinton acknowledged that Europe's influx of unvetted immigration from Muslim countries has led to social fracturing on the continent."

It's just that when Trump says it, that makes him a racist xenophobe.

"I think Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame," the execrable Clinton said. "I admire the very generous and compassionate approaches that were taken by leader like Angela Merkel [of Germany, who will never actually have to live next door to any of the migrants], but I think it is fair to say Europe has done its part and must send a very clear message--'we are not going to be able to continue providing refuge and support'--because if we don't deal with the migration issue it will continue to roil the body politic."

Kerry and Clinton could not avoid their negative observations over the migration problem because it cannot be hidden from those who are affected by the invasion. It's only when conservatives or others on the right try to do something about it that they see it as a shirking of our responsibility that only exists in their minds.

Hey guys, please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.


Tweet

Hypocrisy Alert: 43% of GOP say Trump should be allowed to shut down media

POTUS continues to call news organizations that report false, disagreeable or negative things about him as "fake news." He's right in many instances--the left hates him and most mainstream news outlets are left-leaning and no longer report the news but provide consumers of news with opinions. That isn't fake, it's slanted.

But Trump has gone so far as to call journalists the "enemies of the American people." That, folks, is fake news.

The press often lies by omission and slants their take in accordance with their political views, but that's actually their right, whether it's right or wrong to do so. A flat out lie is not what I'm talking about--omitting something is unethical, but it isn't the same thing as a lie.

Sadly, in an Ipsos survey reported on by the Daily Beast, 43 percent of Republicans now say he "should have the authority to close news outlets engaged in bad behavior."

Bad behavior? Isn't that kind of the same idea as hate speech? Aren't conservatives and other staunch constitutionalists upset over social media giants banning conspiracy theorist Alex Jones? As much as he sucks as a human being, he has the right to say whatever he wants as long as he doesn't call for violence or do anything vile regarding children.

The Ipsos survey resulted in only 36 percent of GOP voters disagreeing with the notion that Trump should have the authority to close news outlets he believes engage in "bad behavior."

When asked whether Trump should close down specific organizations such as CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, 23 percent said he should and 49 percent did not.

The survey also showed that overall, Republicans were likely to dislike the media more than Democrats.

Gee, I wonder why when they ask hard-hitting questions like: "What's your favorite color, Mr. Obama?" or "Does your awesomeness ever get in the way of your boyish good looks, Mr. Obama?"

Forty-eight percent in the survey said they believe the "news media is the enemy of the American people." Only 28 percent disagreed.

One statistic that's hard to dispute is the one whereby nearly four out of five (79 percent) believe "the mainstream media treats President Trump unfairly."

Show me one instance where they erred on the side of Trump rather than against him.

Trump has referred to US libel laws "a sham and a disgrace," and often says that journalists lie and make up sources, and they knowingly report false information to make him look bad.

The danger to these claims is to a free press, and that becomes a danger to freedom.

Speaking of free, it's the free market that can put so-called fake news in check. If you don't believe a source of news, don't support it. If it can be proven they are intentionally lying, that's when libel laws should kick in.

"The Fake News hates me saying that they are the Enemy of the People only because they know it's TRUE. I am providing a great service by explaining this to the American People. They purposely cause great division & distrust. They can also cause War! They are very dangerous & sick!" he tweeted on Sunday.

If you believe all of those claims, then you're simply believing in the other fake news, and that's just as dangerous as the claims Trump is making.

Dictatorships usually censor the media and have it support their own agenda.

I may hate MSNBC and despise CNN, but I don't want them muzzled any more than I want the idiot Alex Jones muzzled.

There is a saying that liberals hates it when conservatives talk. And conservatives want liberals to keep talking.

According to the survey, it isn't only the GOP who think POTUS should have the power to shut up the media. Twelve percent of Democrats and 21 percent of Independents agree that "the president should have the authority to close news outlets engaged in bad behavior."

Proof that the average IQ is around 100, and our schools are teaching to the low end.

On a positive note, 74 percent of Democrats and 55 percent of Independents disagreed with the statement. However, 12 percent of Democrats and 26 percent Independents agree "the news media is the enemy of the American people," and 74 percent Dems and 50 percent Independents disagreed.

Overall, 57 percent of all surveyed believe the news media and reporters are "necessary to keep the Trump administration honest," including 39 percent plurality of Republicans.

It's just too bad the media didn't do that with the Obama administration nor would they have been likely to have kept the Hillary Clinton administration honest had she won. [God forbid.]

A large majority, 85 percent, rightfully believe that "freedom of the press is essential for American democracy" compared to 4 percent who stupidly oppose that statement.

A recent Gallup poll showed that 41 percent of voters approve of the job Trump is doing while 54 percent wouldn't approve of him if he cured cancer and brought us world peace. They'd say he put a lot of doctors out of work and he only created world peace because he's a racist and to stroke his ego.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.


Tweet

Seattle progressives want to punish success

The immoral left

Progressives believe in equal outcome. Conservatives believe in equal opportunity. 

Progressives believe if I have ten dollars in my wallet and they only have one dollar in theirs, I somehow screwed them out of their money. If a person is wealthy, progressives see him/her as evil.

But if a person starts off poor, which is a good person to a progressive because the person is somehow a victim of someone rich, but then this person works hard, earns a decent  amount of money and then becomes wealthy, at what point did this person become a 'bad person'?

The Seattle City Council unanimously approved an income tax on their wealth residents Monday--this will be legally challenged before you can say, "Where are your papers, comrade?"

The progressives (aka leftists) are calling for a 2.25 percent tax on total income above $250,000 for individuals and for married couples filing jointly above $500,000.

"Seattle should serve everyone, not just rich folks," Carissa Knipe told the council before the 9-0 vote, saying she makes over $170,000 per year. Lucky for her she isn't affected by the socialistic proposal.

She clearly doesn't understand that she has the absolute right to pay more tax than required, or give money to the less fortunate, as she wants others to do. "I would love to be taxed," the 24-year-old from Ballard lied. The crowd of socialist tax supporters applauded her, none of whom are likely to be directly shelling out any dough.

I'm not a lawyer but this seems unconstitutional. There's the sense of inequality in the eyes of the law. A sense of taxation without representation. A sense of highway robbery--the Robin Hood Syndrome.

The only "fair share" is an equal share--a percentage that everyone pays based on their earnings. What could be more fair than that? But socialists (aka Communists) believe the rich should pay a far greater percentage than they pay, if they pay at all.

They were the kids who took your toys in the sandbox.

Hopefully they will be defeated in court.




Tweet

The left rises again, because it floats

You can't swing a dead Australian gecko  without hitting a leftist swinging a fist, usually at a woman, or trying to over-scream a conservative. Some protesters are paid to start trouble, just ask George Soros, and some are just looking for something to do other than go to work.

The Trump rally in Chicago last night was no exception. Instead of it making "America great again," it made us look like a Third World nation. And the fact that we have a so-called president who didn't attend the funeral of the wife of a real president, makes the country look as divided as he wanted it to be. 

Obama is as shameful as he is incompetent.

It's just more proof that Obama hasn't a clue on how to be a real leader, much less a president. He never seems to do anything right because his political ideology gets in the way of good manners and propriety. If Nancy Reagan was a Democrat, you know Obama would have been there.

In fact, the hatred by progressives on social media, saying vile, disgusting things about Nancy Reagan, is enough to make a normal person, Democrat or Republican, feel depressed. The question remains, however, are there any "normal" Democrats anymore.

When I first heard about the Trump protests and rioting, I believed that either George Soros or the Black Lives Matter (BLM) haters were behind it. Then I learned that Breitbart News predicted that if either Cruz or Trump became the nominee, the BLM army and the organized Left would do whatever they could to shut them down. 

Sadly, Donald Trump was trumped by rioters and cancelled his rally. 

Conservatives need to recognize what the problem is--it isn't Trump or conservatives in general--it's the low information voters who haven't a clue about who are the organized Left. The GOP candidates need to unashamedly define them and educate voters that BLM will continue to intimidate until they are called out.

Therefore I blog.

Tweet

Al Speaks with Sharp Tongue

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period. If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan. Period. America is probably in its day-to-day interactions less racially divided and has improved in the last six years.

Jonathan Gruber would be proud to hear these lies spoken to the "stupid American public."

And these are lies just from the top of my head.

Is Obama so out of touch with reality that he actually believes half the bull crap he touts? Or, like Gruber, does he really think the American public is stupid?

What Conservatives Can Learn from Liberals

Nothing is more frustrating than listening to a liberal discuss a social or political issue in emotional terms. Well, maybe trying to get gum off your shoe is more frustrating, or removing toilet paper stuck to the gum--but you get the idea.

Hillary Clinton

Yet you have to give credit to liberals, in spite of them having little or no verification of their beliefs, be it on social issues, gun control, or economics, however, they still manage to win elections.

Part of their success they receive with public support can be attributed to how they use words. Liberals are black belts in verbal karate. They refer to abortion as a "health issue" or "a woman's right to choose," and it almost sounds plausible because there's usually an element of guilt attached to it--liberals thrive on guilt--it's the manure of their soil.

We conservatives try to counter liberal talking points but are less successful at it because we fail to make their rebuttals emotionally labile. We rely on facts and logic, which doesn't play well with liberals who might be disillusioned by the leftists who have destroyed the promise of hope, but who are not willing to give us a chance because the left is promising change that they can believe in--and they do. We need to do what the left has done since Washington was a corporal: baffle 'em with our BS.

When a liberal appeals to the emotions with "a woman's right to choose," conservatives need to counter that with emotional content such as: "a baby's right to live."

When a liberal declares that a 20 week old fetus isn't yet a human being, we need to ask: "Then what is it if not human? If you aren't killing a human being, then what are you killing?" Now that's emotion a liberal can identify with and get behind. But unfortunately, that will probably not convince a true liberal to accept your point of view--they made up their mind when the day they bought their first pair of Earth Shoes, and trying to change their thinking and get them to use logic, is like trying to use a pogo-stick for body surfing.

Not surprisingly, liberals love liberal art courses, which puts them at an advantage at cocktail parties and picking up LBGTXYZ people (I believe Facebook has 57 varieties of sexual preference--like the Heinz Corporation's products). And liberal arts is the way to go if you're looking for work at Bob's Big Boy or the Obama administration. But the most gainful employment liberal arts courses offer is for those who want to teach Gender Studies, Black Studies, Medieval Knuckle Jousting and the like.

Another important thing we can learn from liberals is how to be cool. A liberal can wear a Che Guevara t-shirt and look cool. Anyone who can wear a shirt with the likeness of that cold-blooded, scumbag, commie killer must know a thing or two about how to be cool, and we need to learn how to do that in case Osama t-shirts go on sale.

Liberals are usually experts in walking back stupid, obvious lies, present administration excluded. When Susan-Sunday-Talk-Show-Knuckle-Jouster-Rice said that Bowe Bergdahl served his country with "honor and distinction," she was obviously talking out of the wrong bodily orifice.  But when CNN's Jim Acosta interviewed her on D-Day about this obviously moronic remark, she tried to walk it back with: "What I was referring to was the fact that this was a young man who volunteered to serve his country in uniform at a time of war. That in itself is an honorable thing."

Is it, Susie? Did Bradley (aka Chelsea) Manning serve honorably? He/she/it (say that fast) volunteered to wear the uniform. Benedict Arnold volunteered to wear it too. Would you say the same about them as you did about Bergdahl?

See Sue, it isn't about how you start off that counts--it's how you end up. If you don't believe me, go ask the New York Rangers about the first two Stanley Cup Games they just played.

So if conservatives are going to take walking back lessons they need to learn them from America's premiere back walker and bull artist, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the veritable Queen of Balderdash.

Hillary said she takes full responsibility for the Benghazi scandal in which 4 Americans were under attack by Muslim jihadists and we were only 400 miles away with jet fighters that could have made the trip in an hour. But, of course, we "stood down." In the same breath in which she said she takes full responsibility, she passed that responsibility off to "the experts" that know more about security than she knows. So she made it a kind of "responsibility hot potato" and time heals all non-life-threatening wounds.

But dude, that was, like two years ago.


ADDENDUM: This is more an after thought than an addendum, but I like the sound of addendum better. 

One thing we conservatives need to learn better from our friends across the aisle is how to use the trusty old ad hominem attack. Imagine, we have a soldier, Bowe Bergdahl, who walked off his base, possibly deserted, and all of his brothers in arms said he deserted. Instead of taking that for what it's worth, the lamestream media attacked the soldiers who unanimously made the same claim. That's simply incredible.

It seems like everything of late has become politicized, even behavior that has no bearing on politics, like desertion in time of war.

Tweet

A Convenient Claim: racism

"The word 'racism' is like ketchup. It can be put on practically anything--and demanding evidence makes you a 'racist.' --Thomas Sowell

Nobody with at least half a brain believes that racism has been totally eradicated in the world. But to generalize and say that America is a racist country, as if it is the rule rather than the exception, makes as much sense as claiming Malaysian Flight MH 370 was abducted by aliens from the planet Deneb. I mean, who do you think you are anyway, Alex Jones?

Barack Obama and his point man, Eric Holder, are still trying to deal out the race card. Just listen to Holder's take on America--he believes that segregation still exists in our schools but liberals refuse to allow for school choice.

The left speaks about conservatives as if we are all racists, but it's the left who robs the poor and minorities of incentives with social welfare programs, 'Obama Phones,' and Food Stamps, treating the masses as if they are children who don't know what's best for them.

Like Thomas Sowell said, racism is like ketchup. But who are the real racists? Is it those of us who treat all people as adults and apply adult expectations to them, or is it the left who believe minorities need special help, special entitlements and services in order to survive? 

The real problem with racism is that it's used to describe anyone you disagree with or who is trying to debate an opposing belief. People who disagree President Obama are labeled 'racists,' and those of us aware enough of the perils of the spread of Islam in the West are dubbed the same, in spite of the fact that a religion is not a race, it is a belief, and beliefs can be questioned.

The left isn't sensitive over racism; it's looking for it in every nook and cranny of our lives. The Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California are upset that over 140 years ago, Mark Twain (whose real name was Samuel Clemens) held racist views of native people. Thus, they are protesting the naming of Lake Tahoe cove in his honor.

The left is angry over the Washington Redskins name, in spite of the fact that native Americans aren't upset about it, in general. They say it insults native Americans. The truth is closer to the notion that the left is insulted for them.

Ayaan Hirsi-Ali was forbidden to speak at Brandeis "University" due to her beliefs about Islamic practices (like gender mutilation, beheadings, stonings, and arranged marriages) that she observed or experienced growing up in Somalia. They said she is racist.

Maybe in 100 years from now, society will look back at us and say, "Thank you, liberals. Inshallah."

Tweet

4 Ways to Tell a Conservative from a Leftist

America was once called "the melting pot," because it became home to people from all over the world. They "melted" into the culture that was America and were proud to be known as Americans. Today, America is less of a melting pot and more of a smoke some pot, kind of nation. We are divided mainly by two philosophically opposed poles, conservatives and leftists.

Sometimes it isn't obvious as to which pole a person positions him or herself, but hopefully the information below will help sort it out for you.

1. American exceptionalism: President Obama told the world in a Tele Prompter speech that America is exceptional just like countries in Europe are exceptional. No more, no less. 

Conservatives believe that America is exceptional and goes above and beyond any other country in the world. It is not egotistical banter, nor is it simply bragging, because it`s true--at least conservatives believe so.

Leftists don`t believe America is exceptional in a good way--they see America as a nation of bullies who staunchly believe in a 200 year old document that has outlived its usefulness, the US Constitution. They believe the president has the power to override the Constitution at those times when a leftist president is in office. 

Insofar as other countries are concerned, leftists believe that we are no better than Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, or China. In order for us to peacefully coexist with these nations, we must have an open and honest dialogue, shake hands, and show cooperation. Leftists believe that if we could just all sit around a camp fire, belt out a round of Kumbayah, and roast marshmallows, the world would get along. They even have the feelings to prove it.

2. Military: Conservatives believe that "God made man, but Samuel Colt made them equal." They believe in a strong military as a deterrent to tyrants like Vladimir Putin, Hitler and Ed Schultz. (More on him later.) 

Conservatives worry that Obama's military cuts will weaken our national strength and make us look weak to the Putins and Hitlers of the world, while being just right for the Ed Schultz's. 

Bullies are usually afraid of real strength, and this goes for our enemies. 

Leftists, on the other hand, believe the military is populated by knuckle-dragging cretins. They wince when conservatives call soldiers and marines returning from Afghanistan, "heroes." To leftists, the real heroes are basketball players and media darlings who come out of the closet and admit they're gay. How brave to be seen by the left as "cool." 

3. Power: Conservatives make no secret that they want the GOP in power, and some would like to see the Tea Party rise to power and reduce the federal government. In order to win elections, the party members hand out fliers, knock on doors, and air TV ads.

Leftists do the same, but they take it a step farther. Not only do they run TV ads, hand out fliers, and visit houses, they go to cemeteries and visit graves where some of the best registered voters' remain remain. (Try using "remain" in tandem like that, eh.)

Conservative principals are dictated by the successes from the past and some go as far back as the Founding Fathers and the aforementioned Constitution.

Leftists principals are dictated by emotional processes that go back to what the media tells them it should be, and to unproven beliefs that often fly in the face of facts.

Where a conservative might say: "I may not believe in what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it;" a leftist might say: "I do not agree with what you say, but will work tirelessly to get you fired for saying it."

4. Income equality: Conservatives believe that income should be performance-based. A fully competent person working at a company for 10 years is more valuable to the company than a fully competent person working for the same company in the same position for ten days. Now if that newbie turns out to be more valuable to the company for whatever reason, the free market will dictate to the company (without even really dictating) that he or she should be compensated more than someone with less value.

Leftists want to see everyone making the same income for the same job, regardless of intrinsic value to the company. It's the "everyone gets a trophy" attitude, and it's putting a pin in the balloon of ambition and drive.

The reason leftists believe this way is because honest competition scares the crap out of them. Rarely are they the ones who came in first in suicide dodge-ball or soccer. If they lose at something, they define themselves as losers. 

Conservatives have less fear of competition. They know how it has driven America to be first to the moon, for example. They know how hard work pays off. 

Leftists know how hard work is.

Tweet