31 Dead in China: the mystery continues

On Thursday Muslim terrorists attacked a West China open air market in the town of Urumpki, of the Xinjiang province, killing 31 and injuring 90 more. 

The Islamic jihadists plowed through the crowds in an off-road vehicle, threw explosives out the window and finally crashed and then blew up. Eye witnesses said they believe there may have been as many as a dozen explosions in all. 

It wasn't immediately clear that the attackers were Islamic jihadists, those who take their religion literally, but what were they thinking in China? Could it be Amish marauders? Disenfranchised Hindus? Pissed off Jains?

For those keeping score, the death toll in this attack was the highest in Xinjiang since the riots of '09 between the hearty Uighur Muslims, and the Chinese Hans, in which almost 200 people were killed in the name of Islam. 

Of course, CAIR and other Islamic groups with terrorist ties will say that the attack had nothing whatsoever to do with the "real" Islam. Jihad, they will claim, is an internal struggle. 

Sure it is; but the jihad that's going to get you the 72 virgins, boys who will serve your needs in every way, and rivers of wine for eternity, is the jihad of war. Don't let 'em convince you otherwise--that's taqiyya.

Islamic jihadist protocol requires that Boko Haram, the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban, and Brandeis University send "Thank You" cards to the families of the dead jihadists. 

A New York reporter, is captured by Islamist terrorists who demand the release of three Gitmo prisoners in exchange for him. If the president refuses their demands, they plan to behead the reporter and videotape it for the Internet. But the United States doesn’t give in to terrorist’s demands and he has 24 hours before he is to be executed. The clock is ticking . . .                                         

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet

A Convenient Claim: racism

"The word 'racism' is like ketchup. It can be put on practically anything--and demanding evidence makes you a 'racist.' --Thomas Sowell

Nobody with at least half a brain believes that racism has been totally eradicated in the world. But to generalize and say that America is a racist country, as if it is the rule rather than the exception, makes as much sense as claiming Malaysian Flight MH 370 was abducted by aliens from the planet Deneb. I mean, who do you think you are anyway, Alex Jones?

Barack Obama and his point man, Eric Holder, are still trying to deal out the race card. Just listen to Holder's take on America--he believes that segregation still exists in our schools but liberals refuse to allow for school choice.

The left speaks about conservatives as if we are all racists, but it's the left who robs the poor and minorities of incentives with social welfare programs, 'Obama Phones,' and Food Stamps, treating the masses as if they are children who don't know what's best for them.

Like Thomas Sowell said, racism is like ketchup. But who are the real racists? Is it those of us who treat all people as adults and apply adult expectations to them, or is it the left who believe minorities need special help, special entitlements and services in order to survive? 

The real problem with racism is that it's used to describe anyone you disagree with or who is trying to debate an opposing belief. People who disagree President Obama are labeled 'racists,' and those of us aware enough of the perils of the spread of Islam in the West are dubbed the same, in spite of the fact that a religion is not a race, it is a belief, and beliefs can be questioned.

The left isn't sensitive over racism; it's looking for it in every nook and cranny of our lives. The Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California are upset that over 140 years ago, Mark Twain (whose real name was Samuel Clemens) held racist views of native people. Thus, they are protesting the naming of Lake Tahoe cove in his honor.

The left is angry over the Washington Redskins name, in spite of the fact that native Americans aren't upset about it, in general. They say it insults native Americans. The truth is closer to the notion that the left is insulted for them.

Ayaan Hirsi-Ali was forbidden to speak at Brandeis "University" due to her beliefs about Islamic practices (like gender mutilation, beheadings, stonings, and arranged marriages) that she observed or experienced growing up in Somalia. They said she is racist.

Maybe in 100 years from now, society will look back at us and say, "Thank you, liberals. Inshallah."

Tweet

Brandeis' Girly-Man President and Frazier Glenn Cross

The 73 year old Brandeis University graduate Missouri man, Frazier Glenn Cross, aka Frazier Glenn Miller (not the famous Glen Miller), who allegedly killed 3 people outside a Jewish community center and a retirement community, was brought into custody. It is unclear that he was targeting Jews, because asking people if they were Jewish outside of these Jewish establishments and attempting to shoot Jews in the process is not evidence enough. The fact that he went to a second Jewish establishment where he shot and killed a female (age uncertain) was also not enough to label this a hate crime. The fact that Frazier Glenn Miller has a history with the KKK (a Democratic organization that Democrats pretend is conservative), and has publicly declared his hatred of Jews and blacks, is not enough to call him a racist. It takes more proof than that.

No, it's the GOP who is racist. And the evidence is clear.

When Democrat, Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, his landmark decision was so spectacular that he declared: "Now the niggers will vote Democratic for the next 200 years." The GOP had nothing to do with this law--unless you consider how they voted for it in the past but were defeated repeatedly by Democrats.

However, this piece of legislation effectively got rid of the Jim Crow laws. These laws have an interesting origin.

Between 1865 and 1877, federal law protected the US South for freedmen, or African Americans who were previously slaves. In the 1870s, the Democrats regained power in the South and used paramilitary groups to screw up Republican party organizing, and they ran GOP officeholders out of town. In a "show of care" for blacks, Democrats intimidated them and kept them from voting. As we still see examples of this today, voter fraud was rampant--even without the help of the New Black Panthers and Eric Holder's refusal to press charges against them. Democrats knew back then that blacks would vote for the party that actually supported their civil rights--the Republican party.

Increased violence against blacks, perpetrated by white Democrats, continued on from 1868 to 1877. Soon, Southern White Democrats regained political power in every Southern state and they legislated Jim Crow laws which segregated black people from the white population.

In spite of the fact that some blacks were elected to local office in the 1880s, the Democrats in power were passing laws to restrict voter registration and before long, black participation in the voting practice decreased significantly.

But now we see that blacks tend to vote Democratic in spite of what history shows. That's because the Democrats have changed the message and claims that it's the GOP who are the racists. At one university in Ohio, (I forget which one, but you can google it), there is a statute of Lincoln with an inscription that claims he was a Democrat. You cannot make this s**t up.

So like blacks, who show support for their suppressors, there are Jews who show support their haters--the religion of Islam.

The president of Brandeis University, Frederick-Are-They-Gone-Yet-Lawrence, supports the wishes of the Counsel on American-Islamic Relations. This organization is the "Al Sharpton of Islam" and makes their unapologetic support of HAMAS and Hezbollah no secret, while doing the opposite about their relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The only way apologists for Islam can argue against someone quoting Islamic scripture, is by attacking them personally. The way the actual religion has Muslims respond is with killing their opponents. So far the American Muslim population hasn't reached critical mass for that to begin, but when it does, it will.

How Lawrence can be so cowardly by rescinding Ayaan Hirsi-Ali`s honorary degree and speech is quite sad, but it might be further explained by the fact that many US universities receive secret donations from Saudi Arabia. I am only speculating about Brandeis, but the fact that many universities receive oil money is true. Harvard and American University are two such benefactors.

How a university president can compromise his principals can only be explained by the notion that Lawrence has none.

In my latest novel, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here ebook version

Tweet

Brandeis University Wets Itself and Runs

Brandeis Mascot: Pussalot

Brandeis University caved to pressure from the Council on American-Islamic Relations(CAIR), a make-believe civil rights group and a real unindicted co-conspirator of the Holy Land Foundation, (the folks who were instrumental in funding terrorist activities in the USA, including 9-11). 

CAIR has its roots with the Muslim Brotherhood, and they, in turn, have stated in their charter that their goal is to destroy our "miserable house" from within. Meaning, they will use our laws and freedoms to attack us until we're all either bowing to Mecca or paying the jizzya--or infidel tax--to them.

Brandeis, a school known for its large Jewish population, was to honor Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born Muslim apostate, woman's rights advocate and critic of Islamic extremism, with a degree from this once prestigious university. The date for the ceremony was scheduled on May 18th, but the school has said about Ms. Ali, (a former member of the Dutch Parliament, a survivor of female genital mutilation, and friend of Theo Van Gogh, a film maker who was murdered by a Muslim man who didn't like his movie  Islam's negative violence), "She is a compelling public figure and advocate for women's rights, and we respect and appreciate her work to protect and defend the rights of women and girls throughout the world. That said, we cannot overlook certain of her past statements that are inconsistent with Brandeis University's core values."

In a 2007 interview with Reason Magazine, Ms. Ali spoke about radical Islam. "Once it's defeated, it can mutate into something peaceful. It's very difficult to even talk about peace now. They're not interested in peace. I think we are at war with Islam. And there's no middle ground."

The brave administration at the "school" (where learning depends on the subject matter and the subject giving it) said that they were not aware of Ms. Ali's former statements. But Ibrahim Hooper, a spokes-jihadist for CAIR, said, "It is unconscionable that such a prestigious university would honor someone with such openly hateful views." No, he wasn't talking about Islam's hatred for Jews--he's okay with that--he was talking about Ms. Ali, a woman who also survived a civil war, beatings, and an arranged marriage. Maybe she has a thing or two to say about her views on Islam and what she believes is wrong with it.

Ibrahim Hooper appeared on Megyn Kelly's Fox News program last night, and will appear again tonight, and his signature debating techniques are to interrupt all criticism and then use ad hominem attacks wherever they serve best. He is fearful of debating Robert Spencer, an expert on the Koran and Islam, because some of the things in the Koran is clearly repugnant.

So what are Brandeis University's "core values"? The exclusion of free speech? Genital mutilation? Arranged marriages of young girls to old men? Women not being allowed to drive a car or having half the legal rights as a man? Stopping the education of women altogether? Maybe it's all about money and secret donations made by Saudi Arabia.

Sarah Fahmy, who created the petition against Ms. Ali, and a member of the Muslim Student Association, a group funded by the Saudis and part of the Muslim Brotherhood umbrella, said, "This is a real slap in the face to Muslim students." 

In Ms. Ali's defense I must say, at least it wasn't a beheading. Look, she didn't kill anyone or say things about Muslims that Muslims say about Jews and Christians. Of course, since she renounced Islam in her 30's, she is supposed to be killed for that, based on the teachings of the Koran.

Of all the faculty, only Thomas Doherty, chairman of American Studies, refused to sign the cowardly letter and said that it would have been great for the school to honor "such a courageous fighter for human freedom and women's rights, who has put her life at risk for those values."

Bravo, Professor Doherty. You're too good for that school and ought to think about a better future where discourse is free.

One can only wonder why NOW is unwilling to stand up for Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Of all the true women heroes of the movement, she is in the forefront. But we really don't expect leftists organizations like NOW to actually be for anything other than liberal talking points and this one is not, and is too dangerous.

Sarah Fahmy is also quoted as saying: "But it's not just the Muslim community that is upset but students and faculty of all religious beliefs. A university that prides itself on social justice and equality should not hold up someone who is an outright Islamophobic." (sic)

Now we have a representative Muslim Student Association speaking on behalf of all the other religions. I wonder how well that would go over with the Hindus, Jews, and Christians who have been killed in the name of religion? And let's not forget the atheists and gays. They're to be thrown from high places, for Allah doesn't stand for that stuff.

Brandeis University has made its bed and it looks like they've taken the Caliphate with them. They are not representative of free discourse in learning; they represent the world of the Dhimmie, the enabler. And like Winston Churchill said of the enabler, they feed the alligator hoping it will eat them last.

Their time will come. Islam will come for them soon.

In my latest novel, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here ebook version

Tweet