State Dept. calls ISIS genocide 'not nice'

Killing Christians--not genocide

Leftist lawyers from the State Department are removing the word "genocide" in documents and speeches regarding the genocide of Christians, Yazidis and everyone they can kill who doesn't practice Islamic State's (aka ISIS, Daesh) style of Islam. according to The Washington Free Beacon.

The Beacon cites human rights activists and attorneys familiar with the dhimmie policies of the State Department as their sources. 

According to Nina Shea, an international human rights attorney and director of the Hudson Institute's Center for Religious Freedom, Richard Visek is the dhimmie responsible for the policy. Visek is not only an Islamic State apologist and dhimmie, this Obama appointee is the head of the State Department's Office of Legal Adviser.

And why Trump hasn't canned his butt is a mystery.

Even then Secretary of State John Lurch Kerry announced that Islamic State was responsible for the mass slaughter of Christians, Yazidis and other ethnic groups. Even Kerry, can you imagine that?

"Daesh is responsible for genocide against groups in areas under its control, including Yazidis, Christians and Shia Muslims," the Vietnam traitor said. "Daesh is genocidal by self-proclamation, by ideology and by actions, by what it says, what it believes and what it does," the world's leader in boring speakers professed.

James Taylor agreed and broke out in song.

So what is genocide? Let's look it up, boys and girls.

genocide: noun--the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

Designating the IS slaughter as genocide, which it clearly is, helps direct relief funds and efforts to these beleaguered peoples and potentially single them out for preferential immigration.

But let's face it, Yazidis and Iraq/Syrian Christians aren't illegal immigrants so they don't get preferential treatment from liberals.

When Obama was in office, of the 10,000 immigrants admitted from war-torn Syria in fiscal 2016 (1,000 above the quota), only 56 of them were non-Muslim. Fifty-six out of 10,000!

In a trial concerning a related issue, a federal judge chastised the Obama administration for this immigration policy. "To date, there has not been a good explanation for this perplexing discrepancy," Judge Daniel Manion wrote.

"I don't think for a minute it's a bureaucratic decision--it's ideological," said Shea.

"Allahu Akbar!" said Obama.


Tweet

Ontario: "Criticism of Muslim prayer in public schools is 'RACIST'"

A Daily Caller article titled: "Ontario Province Says Criticism Of Muslim Prayer In Public Schools is 'Racist'" (March 25, 2017) reports the Ontario provincial government sanctioned special religious status for Muslim students in the public school system. 

This comes after the House of Commons defecated over the people's right to free speech and voted in favor of an "Islamophobia" motion Thursday. The motion M-103 will have consequences in Canada's future regarding free speech.

The Peel District School Board, which controls huge areas of Toronto suburb schools, allows Muslim students to participate in regular Friday prayers during school time on public school property! 

Christians and Jews are not allowed the same religious privilege and for some reason, this is objectionable to Christian and Jewish parents.

"I have met with the leadership of Peel and have obviously been very concerned about what I've seen and heard," said Education Minister Mitzie Hunter in a joint statement with Children and Youth Service Minister Michael Coteau. "It felt important to Minister Coteau and I to really reinforce our expectations . . . there's just no tolerance for discrimination of any sort. We don't tolerate issues of racism and Islamophobia." . . . 

The two Ontario ministers dismissed the concerns of infidel parents and refused to address the question of why one religion is being taught in public schools, and claiming teaching Islam was in full compliance with the human rights code and religious accommodation guidelines.

The two Ontario dhimmie ministers even had the temerity to suggest that opposition to the weekly prayers was based in prejudice, not in the fact that it places the religion of Islam over all others.

At the Peel board's Wednesday evening meeting, about 100 protesters refused to be ignored, which prompted the board's chair dhimmie, Janet McDougald to speak: "To say it's disrespectful is a great understatement. It's hateful--the social media has just been abysmal, it's just been awful, and some of our students are feeling a little unsafe because of it."

In the past, McDougald told angry parents to leave the board meeting and called one or more a "racist."

So let's go to the definitions of some terms.

Definition of racism (noun): prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race on the belief that one's own race is superior.

Definition of race (noun): a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.

Definition of religion (noun): 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. 2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects.

Based on the notion that Islam is alleged to be a religion, (although it seems to be much, much more) it is then, by definition not a race. Anyone of any race can be Muslim and if I am not allowed to criticize some of it's practices, particularly those regarding jihad, then my freedom of speech is being taken from me.

But the fact that in the Peel School District only one religion is allowed to be practiced and taught in the schools is prejudicial, anti Semitic, and anti-Christian. 

Not to mention that because it's a public school where a religion is being practiced, it's against the freaking law.

McDougald needs to be prosecuted and replaced.


Tweet

British special needs lawmaker speaks out

A British special needs lawmaker, Lord Digby Jones, is unable to make the connection of the Islamic terrorist's jihadist beliefs in London's terrorist attack and the fact that he acted on those beliefs.

Jones, ever the naive schmuck, declared, "You're safer in London than you've ever been." (Except if you happened to have been strolling along Westminster Bridge Wednesday morning.)

The brilliance from Jones comes in the wake of Trump's criticism of London Mayor Sadiq Khan for saying that terrorist attacks are "part and parcel" of living in a big city. Even some British dhimmies were offended from Trump's tweet saying he was attacking the mayor in the midst of a terrorist situation.

Jones went on to say, "If this turns out to be an act of Islamic terrorism, I think the fact that the man is a Muslim is utterly and completely irrelevant."

Then he flung his feces at reporters.

British Prime Minister Theresa May confirmed the attacker, who killed 4 and injured over 40, was a known Muslim extremist to British intelligence services. He was on their watchlist for all the good it did for those four who were murdered.

The Islamic State's propaganda arm, Amaq news agency (Amaq is Arabic for 'scumcrumpet') claimed responsibility for the attack in London calling Khalid Masood, the killer, a "soldier of the caliphate."

As an afterthought, police arrested 8 others in connection to the attacks in a series of anti-terrorism late night raids across the country. It was their way of closing the barn door after the horses fled.

In a way, it was fortuitous Masood attacked near Parliament because the police carry firearms there. But in the rest of Britain they don't. Imagine what it would have been like if the attacker had a gun and went on a shooting spree elsewhere.

Prime Minister May emphasized that the current attacker was "peripheral" and not currently "part of the intelligence picture." She said "The terrorist chose to strike at the heart of our capital city, where people of all nationalities, religions and cultures come together to celebrate the values of liberty, democracy and freedom of speech."

But with the new 'hate crime' laws, much of Europe is losing the above.



Tweet

Does Islamophobia exist? Does it fuel terrorism?

Antonio Guterres, the United Nations secretary general actually believes that policies, speeches and feelings that express "Islamophobia," a term that the un-indicted co-conspirator to the terrorist-funding organization found guilty in the Holy Land Foundation trials invented, is fueling terrorism.

Guterres said this load of nonsense on Sunday during his visit to Saudi Arabia, the country that supplied fifteen of the nineteen 9-11 hijackers in 2001. 

His dhimmie-style comments to reporters came after speaking with King Salman, Crown Prince and Interior Minister Mohammed bin Nayef, and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and the janitor, Mohammed bin Mohammed Abu Bakr Mahmoud bin Mohamed.

"One of the things that fuel terrorism," the UN idiot began, "is the expression in some parts of the world of Islamophobic feelings and Islamophobic policies and Islamophobic hate speeches."

Then he made another unsubstantiated claim that "This is sometimes the best support that Daesh can have to make its own propaganda." In other words, don't say anything bad about Islam and ISIS will leave you alone and not hate you and nobody else will join.

"So, we need to have a comprehensive approach to fight terrorism, including creating the conditions for societies that are multiethnic, multi-religious, multicultural, to be inclusive, to be cohesive, investing in the conditions to make diversity a richness, not a threat."

Tell that to all the Christians who were driven out of their countries by Islamic inclusiveness. Tell that to the Jews who are seen as less than human in the precious 'holy' Qur'an. Tell that to the Yazidi sex slaves.

ISIS doesn't need Donald Trump temporarily halting immigration from a few terror-spawning countries to recruit jihadists. They do just fine with their internet reach-out to the psychopaths who enjoy their insanity. 

Sure, blame Trump for ISIS recruiting, for increasing "Islamophobia," which isn't a real thing in the first place. A phobia is an irrational fear--being afraid of Islamic terrorism is rational.

This is precisely why the UN sucks and should be thrown out of the United States or at least no longer funded by us.

The UN has become an Islamic organization that is constantly trying to destroy Israel and delegitimize them, while sympathizing with Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. 

It's a sad joke that Guterres spoke in Saudi Arabia--a country that practices sharia law, beheads blasphemers and does not even allowing Jews to enter, while prohibiting Christians from bringing their Bibles or other religious items into the country.


Tweet

Glasgow church service uses Koran reading

Scotland is doomed. 

When passages from the Quran that explicitly refutes the divinity of Jesus is read in Arabic from the lectern during an Epiphany service in a Scottish cathedral, a service which celebrates the arrival of three kings bearing witness to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, something is terribly wrong.

To have the passages from Islamic scripture read as part of the service is obscene to religious Christians, particularly those that clearly reject the divinity of Jesus at a ceremony during a festival that Christians believe marks the revelation of Christ's divinity to the world.

The church has since receive over 10,000 messages from angry Christians outraged by this outrageous occurrence. 

"Christians should know what their fellow citizens believe and this can include reading the Quran for themselves, whether in the original or in translation," the Right Rev. Michael Nazir Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester told the BBC regarding the reading. "This is not, however, the same thing as having it read in church in the context of public worship. The authorities of the Scottish Episcopal Church should immediately repudiate this ill-advised invitation and exercise appropriate discipline for those involved."

If it had been a mosque, instead of a Christian church, and Allah or Muhammad were rejected by a reading therein, heads would roll.

The dhimmie who organized the event, the Not Very Rev. Kelvin  Holdsworth, said they received so many threatening messages that they were forced to call the police. [Better them than the Taliban.]

Holdsworth hit back saying the church had been involved in a number of different interfaith events in the past and that Quran readings have been conducted at the church in the past without incident. But he didn't say which verses were read and by whom.

Holdsworth also did not say whether he would attempt to get his church to do a reading of the Bible at a local mosque, but spreading the word of the Bible doesn't appear to be a big priority for the dhimmie.

He then went on to use the Muslim Brotherhood invented term 'Islamophobic,' and blame the 'far-right media' for the problem.

Since Christianity has been around longer than Islam (although Muslims lie and say that Islam has always existed, but it was just practiced the wrong way until Mohammed came around) it should be Muslims who get to hear the Not So Very Rev. Holdsworth preach to them.

Somehow, I don't see that ever going to happen. 



Tweet

Facebook can't face facts of Sharia

Facebook is the dhimmie social media site that has been censoring discussions on Sharia (Islamic law) and most recently banned a video allegedly showing the execution of gays in Libya in accordance with Islamic law. 

The video is entitled "Should America Fear Sharia" and can be seen on the Clarion Project website or on YouTube.  It was originally posted on the Center for Security Policy's  (CSP) page, but if I post it here, I have no doubt that I too will be censored by losing my advertising rights.

In the 45-second video, you can see the jihadists throwing people from the roof of a building as they yell that famous phrase that gets happy feet running in the opposite direction: "Allahu Akbar."

The CSP's Executive Vice President Jim Hanson told Alpha News, "In a situation where it's Facebook or these things, that's not a government suppression. They can do whatever they want, they're private companies, but it has an element of what we consider free speech. We don't think it's particularly good to have folks saying, 'No, you can't talk about that. You can't mention that because it bothers us.' Well sorry; that's what we do here."

The "Should America Fear Sharia" page posted a notification on their page that the video had been removed by Facebook, and included screenshots of their communication with Facebook. They wrote: "After receiving over 750,000 views, the Thought Police at Facebook decided that too many people were beginning to learn the truth about Sharia Law and removed the post."

One gets the feeling from this level of censorship that some people will do everything in their power not to defeat Islamic terrorism (aka jihad). In order to win the war against Islamic terrorism, we need to understand what is being done in the name of sharia. Throwing gays "from high places" is part of sharia, but that is merely one of the atrocities you will find in the scripture. 

Of course, many Muslims separate how they use sharia for their religious personal guidance, such as when to pray, etc., but do not allow sharia to interfere with the laws of the state. But in theocracies, the laws of the state are the laws of sharia which is why it isn't a crime and why the terrorists yell "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is greatest") because they believe they are doing Allah's work.

Based on all of Allah's quirks, it seems he has made a lot of mistakes creating humans he hates so much: gays, lesbians, atheists, infidels, Jews, Christians and even the 'wrong' kind of Muslim. 

He even hates dogs, and he created them too.

I would never hire Allah to build a world after all his screw-ups.

But is it really Allah, or was it Muhammed who had all the problems with people?


Tweet

Bernie Sanders is in a self-induced coma

"I hope I can live to the end of my first term, if I win"

BREAKING: Bernie Sanders is in a coma. He went into the coma in college and has been brain-dead ever since. But without a "Do Not Resuscitate" order, he just keeps plugging along with the same old ideas that haven't worked for the left, and he refuses to wake up from his self-induced coma, which makes him a perfect leftist candidate for the DNC.

Bernie interviewed with the New York Daily News' editorial board who asked him how his signature policy of breaking up the big banks would work. His coma worsened and he lost his ability to speak.

However, Sanders regained his verbal abilities when they asked him about the Middle East, specifically the issue of Israel and the Palestinian conflict. But his words reflected a disconnect from reality and it is feared that Bernie may have gone full schizophrenic.

The 2014 war with Gaza was discussed and Sanders showed his lack of understanding of what the hell was going on. He said that Israel's retaliation for Hamas' rocketing and shelling Israeli civilian centers was disproportionate. "Anybody help me out here," Sanders said, "because I don't remember the figures, but my recollection is over 10,000 innocent people were killed in Gaza. Does that sound right?"

Yeah, sure--that figure is right if you're into that Islamic thing known as "Taqiyya." The figure isn't even close to being correct. The only figure we have is from the United Nations [of Islam] which is 1,500 and that's likely as trustworthy as Hillary Clinton at a Benghazi hearing.

Civilian deaths are reported by local authorities who, in this case, happen to be a terrorist organization whose religious duty is to annihilate Israel and the Jews. The Hamassholes [jihadists of Hamas] use mosques, schools and their own kids to hide behind while lobbing rockets at Israeli children and civilians.

Sanders wants Israel to halt settlement activity and to also "pull back settlements in the West Bank, just as Israel did in Gaza."

But just when the editorial staff asked him to simply "describe the pull back that you have in mind," the coma worsened and he dodged the question and went on to blather about Palestinian suffering which, he blamed on Israel and not the Palestinian elites, Hamas and institutions. 

Sanders would make a great POTUS for Islamic terrorism--as an insulated, naive Jewish leftist, who rarely discusses his Jewish background, he is clueless about how Islamist organizations use victimhood as a way to create a climate of guilt of the actual victims of their jihad.

Bernie Sanders is their favorite Dhimmie and they will kill him last.



Tweet

Will Islam dominate the world?

Edward Archer, a Muslim man, tries to kill a cop in Philadelphia because, he says, the police defend laws that aren't consistent with Islam's holy scripture, the Koran. 

Jim Kenney, the Mayor of Philadelphia, says that what Archer did in the name of Islam had "nothing to do with being a Muslim or following the Islamic faith." There are currently around 200,000 Muslims living in Philadelphia, and they vote Democratic for the most part. 

Kenney is a Democrat and a graduate of Saint Joseph's Preparatory School in 1976. He received a bachelor's degree from La Salle University in Philadelphia. Perhaps his Irish roots and Jesuit upbringing have illuminated him on Islam, or maybe he attended a mosque and has a better knowledge of Islam than the shooter who has been an avid Muslim for years.

In any case, it's no surprise that someone would come along after the shooting and make such an asinine statement. As Greg Gutfeld might say, "He's an Islamophobe Islamophobe." That's a person with the fear of being called an Islamophobe, and in Kenney's case, it's a man who's looking ahead for a second term and wants the Muslim vote, no matter what it takes for the sycophant Kenney. 

The fact is, Archer is exactly correct: the teachings of Islam and the U.S. laws enforced by our police completely clash. For example, women's rights are basically nonexistent in the Koran. Anti-Semitism is touted, and the punishment of homosexuality, sometimes with death, is extolled. Police defend against these insults to our freedoms. 

Call me Islamophobic, but God bless America.

After the sexual assaults and robberies by mostly Muslim Syrian refugees in Cologne, is it so crazy to hear Donald Trump say that we ought to hold off on Muslim immigration until we "figure things out?" We may pretend to be offended by such a powerful and politically incorrect statement, but many of us felt the same way in private.

Multiculturalism simply doesn't work and with the new Pew poll indicating that by 2040 Muslims will be the second largest religion in the U.S., only after Christianity, we need to be very concerned over what that may imply.


Tweet

Crimes against Allah and the Fidels

A horrible crime was committed. A crime so heinous, so evil, so shocking that the FBI is offering a $5,000.00 reward for any information leading to the apprehension and conviction of the person who surreptitiously placed raw, dead swine in the Masjid Tawheed, a Las Vegas mosque.

So now, whatever happens in Vegas, gets punished in Vegas, if it goes against Islam.

FBI spokes-dhimmie, Barack Obama, said "We will catch the perpetrator who did this, Inshallah, and bring the infidel to justice."

Okay, so maybe Barack Hussein isn't the FBI spokes-dhimmie, per se, and maybe he didn't actually say that, but it isn't a far reach to imagine him saying something along those lines.

A surveillance camera captured the image of a bespectacled man entering the mosque and wrapping raw bacon around door handles. Bacon, as you might know, is haram, the Islamic version of non-Kosher, and is considered to be worse to Muslims than committing an honor killing of their daughter for going out with an infidel.

The FBI originally suspected, and brought in for questioning, Oscar Mayer, but the bacon magnate had a solid alibi and was released.

Seven worshipers from the mosque were slightly injured trying to escape after seeing the haram meat seductively hanging on doorknobs in their holy place of worship, and one man actually touched the meat with his unprotected, naked hand. Under Sharia law, it is possible the hand will have to be amputated--oh, wait--sorry, that's done for stealing. He gets to keep his hand but must wash it seven times for seven days at a Seven Eleven.

On a lighter note, a Muslim man of North African descent screamed "Allahu akbar" ("my god is greater") as he religiously tried to run down four military infidels with his car outside his mosque in Valencia. The imam of the mosque, Abdullah Dliouah (his friends call him "Abby Vowels") told the press that the man was known by him, but he never expressed his love for jihad prior to the attack so it came as a pleasant surprise.

Meanwhile, in Jerusalem, a teenage girl  under the influence of Palestinian TV's version of the religion of peace, was toting a knife and a Koran in her backpack. She was later arrested for attempting to kill a few Jews wherever she could find them. This was her second attempt--the first was two weeks prior to her arrest. 

No bacon was involved in the attack and fortunately, nobody was killed.

In order to assist the FBI and other law-enforcement Sharia-compliant agencies, I've created a short-list of un-Islamic activities that they should keep on the lookout for so as to prevent insulting those members of the religion of peace:

(1)  Bacon and all forms of swine, excluding ISIS, Hamas, Taliban, al-Shabab, and Al Gore.
(2)  Women not wearing cloth sacks or at minimum covering their face in public.
(3)  Dogs--Mohammad hated dogs so Muslims are supposed to hate them too (also see Jews, Christians, infidels, apostates, gays, lesbians, Hindus, Jains, and so on).
(4)  Women leaving their home without a male family member.
(5)  Making friends with un-believers--they can pretend to be friends, but only to help the cause.
(6)  Drinking alcoholic beverages--this is to be saved until getting to Paradise where rivers of wine flow like the BS from a liberal's lips.
(7)  Music that isn't about Allah or Mohammad. 
(8)  Women marrying a non-Muslim. Men are allowed to marry a non-Muslim but she must convert after the marriage.
(9)  Insulting Islam. In spite of the fact that an ideology cannot be insulted because it has no feelings, it's best for your health not to say anything even slightly negative about the religion of peace if you value yours.
(10) Having 5 wives. Only 4 wives are permitted, unless you happen to be Mohammad (peas be up in him) who had as many as 12 because he was a special case.
(11) Shaking hands with the opposite sex or being a woman alone in a room with a man.
(12) Failing to spit at a Jewish person in passing on the street.

Any one of the above un-Islamic (haram) happenstances should result in nothing less than a $5,000.00 fine and 6 months in a federal prison.

Allahu akbar, Obama.


Tweet

Terrorism and why Salon sucks

Ben Norton, a useful idiot who writes for Salon Magazine, is upset that for some unknown, crazy reason, we in the West are blaming Muslims for Islamic Jihad attacks against infidels. How can we be so naive? 

In an uninformed, dhimmie-styled apologist article by Norton, witlessly titled: "Our terrorism double standard: After Paris, let's stop blaming Muslims and take a hard look at ourselves," the useful idiot wrote: 

Any time there is an attack on civilians in the post-9/11 West, demagogues immediately blame it on Muslims. They frequently lack evidence, but depend on the blunt force of anti-Muslim bigotry to bolster their accusations.

Actual evidence, on the other hand, shows that less than 2 percent of terrorist attacks from 2009 to 2013 in the E.U. were religiously motivated . . .

Well, it's quite clear that the Paris slaughter of innocent people was religiously motivated--the attackers said so. Even if they didn't cop to being Muslim, who in their right mind would blow himself up just to kill people if it was not religiously motivated with promises of an afterlife?

Now multiply the odds of 7 or 8 people willing to blow themselves up to kill strangers screaming "Allahu Akbar!" (allah is great) and tell me it wasn't religiously motivated. Read the Koran, Ben.

Norton can write whatever he wants and play with the data to make it seem accurate, but the threat of Islam is real and anyone who is being honest knows it's real. Calling Islamic jihadists "militants" describes their methods, but it tells us nothing as to who they are and what motivates them.

People like Norton, like Obama and his administration, refuse to delve into the root causes of Islamic terrorism, (aka Jihad) and create strategies to destroy the threat that it poses. This is why Obama has not Syrian strategy. This is why he called ISIS the JV team--he refuses to acknowledge who they are, and to some degree, appears more sympathetic to Islam than he is to Christianity and the West.

Norton actually believes that it is "right wing exploitation" that is preventing these attacks from being stopped. Not only is that insulting and stupid, it's downright bull crap. I suspect Norton has never read the Koran or spoken to a devout Muslim like one of the 13% of the Syrian refugees who is sympathetic to ISIS. Yes, that's a real number--I don't need to make up my facts like Norton.

"As soon as the news of the attacks broke," writes Norton, "even though there was no evidence and practically nothing was known about the attackers, right-wing pundits immediately latched on to the violence as an opportunity to demonize Muslims and refugees from Muslim-majority countries."

Perhaps Norton should consider the notion that when most apparently random terrorist attacks are carried out by an Islamic terrorist group, pundits tend to look in that direction. If Norton had his way, we would only be checking 80-year-old nuns at airports. But besides that, I'd like to see the evidence of his claim about pundits "latching on to the violence . . . as an opportunity to demonize Muslims and refugees . . ."

Who should pundits be latching on to, the Amish? Oh, wait--the Jews are always a good target for the left. Let's blame them for the attack. We'll say they inspired it because of what they're doing to the poor Palestinians in Gaza.

People like Norton and others who write for Salon are the real danger to society because they would have you look the other way when danger presents itself.

If you don't believe that orthodox Islam is dangerous to the health of infidels, you're not paying attention to what they say and what they do. Of course I'm not saying that all Muslims are terrorists--but check out real terrorist attacks throughout the world and you'll notice that most of them are Islam-inspired.




Tweet

The religion of peace is pissed off--again

I know it's hard to imagine Muslims being angry at us here in the West, but that's exactly what happened in New Jersey at a school board meeting. 

The board told a group of angry Muslims that the schools will remain open during Thursday's Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, which caused several Muslim parents and their children to scream in a rage that only jihadists would display. Some of them even wept openly ad nauseum.

The school board refused to inconvenience 5,000 to 10,000 students whose families did not have time to make other arrangements with their children at home. In fact, they made it clear that Muslim students could take the day off with no penalty, as many kids of minority religions (e.g. Jewish kids) did when I was in school.

But that wasn't a good enough offer. Unless we are willing to bow to their demands, we can go to hell.

One woman in a purple head scarf grabbed the microphone and told the board, "We're no longer the minority; that's clear from tonight. We're going to be the majority soon," she said vehemently. [She did not add that once Muslims become the majority, they will take over the schools, get rid of the Jewish kids and enforce Sharia laws, ensuring all the girls wear hijabs or burqas, and the boys can rape those who don't.]

Some in the media tried to blame the Jews for the problem. NBC New York reported that some Jews from the community who were at the meeting claimed discrimination as they do not have off for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year for Jews.

But that claim by the media is a bunch of crap, as Laura Herzog of NJ Advance Media for NJ.com points out.

No Jews spoke out at the meeting, asking for those holidays to be included on the school holiday calendar, according to Pamela Geller, but a leftist rabbi, Debra Hachen of Jersey City's Temple Beth-El said, "I personally plan to offer my assistance to the Muslim community."

Rabbi Hachen added: "Our community is fully in support of religious freedom of expression and understands the desire of our Muslim friends and neighbors to have the schools closed for Eid el-Adha."

What Rabbi Hachen should have added but did not: "but in order to have true religious freedom in the world, Muslim extremists need to stop killing Christians and Jews, among others, and all Muslims should seriously think about amending the Koran, which refers to Christians and Jews as apes and pigs, and condemns all non-Muslims to hell."

Which proves that even leftist rabbis can be dhimmies.


Tweet

CNN and a Dhimmie Flick

Winston Churchill said of appeasers: "An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."

That's Hollywood and that's the mainstream media being appeasers.

John Nolte, of Breitbart.com reported that CNN's National Security Analyst, Peter Bergen, used the recent shootings by KKK member, Frazier Glenn Cross, to say that conservatives are more deadly than jihadists (April 15, 2014). Cross aka Miller, was targeting Jews it was found, and he has a history of hatred for both Jews and blacks.

Brandeis University Wets Itself and Runs

Brandeis Mascot: Pussalot

Brandeis University caved to pressure from the Council on American-Islamic Relations(CAIR), a make-believe civil rights group and a real unindicted co-conspirator of the Holy Land Foundation, (the folks who were instrumental in funding terrorist activities in the USA, including 9-11). 

CAIR has its roots with the Muslim Brotherhood, and they, in turn, have stated in their charter that their goal is to destroy our "miserable house" from within. Meaning, they will use our laws and freedoms to attack us until we're all either bowing to Mecca or paying the jizzya--or infidel tax--to them.

Brandeis, a school known for its large Jewish population, was to honor Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born Muslim apostate, woman's rights advocate and critic of Islamic extremism, with a degree from this once prestigious university. The date for the ceremony was scheduled on May 18th, but the school has said about Ms. Ali, (a former member of the Dutch Parliament, a survivor of female genital mutilation, and friend of Theo Van Gogh, a film maker who was murdered by a Muslim man who didn't like his movie  Islam's negative violence), "She is a compelling public figure and advocate for women's rights, and we respect and appreciate her work to protect and defend the rights of women and girls throughout the world. That said, we cannot overlook certain of her past statements that are inconsistent with Brandeis University's core values."

In a 2007 interview with Reason Magazine, Ms. Ali spoke about radical Islam. "Once it's defeated, it can mutate into something peaceful. It's very difficult to even talk about peace now. They're not interested in peace. I think we are at war with Islam. And there's no middle ground."

The brave administration at the "school" (where learning depends on the subject matter and the subject giving it) said that they were not aware of Ms. Ali's former statements. But Ibrahim Hooper, a spokes-jihadist for CAIR, said, "It is unconscionable that such a prestigious university would honor someone with such openly hateful views." No, he wasn't talking about Islam's hatred for Jews--he's okay with that--he was talking about Ms. Ali, a woman who also survived a civil war, beatings, and an arranged marriage. Maybe she has a thing or two to say about her views on Islam and what she believes is wrong with it.

Ibrahim Hooper appeared on Megyn Kelly's Fox News program last night, and will appear again tonight, and his signature debating techniques are to interrupt all criticism and then use ad hominem attacks wherever they serve best. He is fearful of debating Robert Spencer, an expert on the Koran and Islam, because some of the things in the Koran is clearly repugnant.

So what are Brandeis University's "core values"? The exclusion of free speech? Genital mutilation? Arranged marriages of young girls to old men? Women not being allowed to drive a car or having half the legal rights as a man? Stopping the education of women altogether? Maybe it's all about money and secret donations made by Saudi Arabia.

Sarah Fahmy, who created the petition against Ms. Ali, and a member of the Muslim Student Association, a group funded by the Saudis and part of the Muslim Brotherhood umbrella, said, "This is a real slap in the face to Muslim students." 

In Ms. Ali's defense I must say, at least it wasn't a beheading. Look, she didn't kill anyone or say things about Muslims that Muslims say about Jews and Christians. Of course, since she renounced Islam in her 30's, she is supposed to be killed for that, based on the teachings of the Koran.

Of all the faculty, only Thomas Doherty, chairman of American Studies, refused to sign the cowardly letter and said that it would have been great for the school to honor "such a courageous fighter for human freedom and women's rights, who has put her life at risk for those values."

Bravo, Professor Doherty. You're too good for that school and ought to think about a better future where discourse is free.

One can only wonder why NOW is unwilling to stand up for Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Of all the true women heroes of the movement, she is in the forefront. But we really don't expect leftists organizations like NOW to actually be for anything other than liberal talking points and this one is not, and is too dangerous.

Sarah Fahmy is also quoted as saying: "But it's not just the Muslim community that is upset but students and faculty of all religious beliefs. A university that prides itself on social justice and equality should not hold up someone who is an outright Islamophobic." (sic)

Now we have a representative Muslim Student Association speaking on behalf of all the other religions. I wonder how well that would go over with the Hindus, Jews, and Christians who have been killed in the name of religion? And let's not forget the atheists and gays. They're to be thrown from high places, for Allah doesn't stand for that stuff.

Brandeis University has made its bed and it looks like they've taken the Caliphate with them. They are not representative of free discourse in learning; they represent the world of the Dhimmie, the enabler. And like Winston Churchill said of the enabler, they feed the alligator hoping it will eat them last.

Their time will come. Islam will come for them soon.

In my latest novel, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here ebook version

Tweet

Latest Terms from the North American Infidel Dictionary

Well, here's what you've been waiting for: a concise and accurate glossary of some Islamic terms as defined by the North American Infidel Dictionary, 2014 edition. This list is by no means complete but that's because I want you coming back for more. I have also taken the liberty (which is something you probably won't find in most Islamic nations) of not putting the list in alphabetical order.

Mujtahid: a guy who specializes in interpreting Islamic rules and regulations using 4 major Islamic sources: 1) the Koran (a.k.a. The Islamic Military Field Guide), 2) Hadith (a collection of tales about the life of Muhammad--peas be up in him--and his army of beheaders, 3) conscience of the community (if you are a woman in Saudi Arabia, for example, forget about the car), and 4) reasoning (an Islamic oxymoron).

Muslim Piece Prize: not to be confused with the Nobel Peace Prize, although it's possible to be awarded both, (see Yasar Arafat,  Al Gore, and Barack Obama). The Piece Prize is awarded to a noble jihadist who creates the most human damage as measured by the greatest number of body parts found in the aftermath of a suicide bombing. The prize is awarded posthumously to the proud parents and/or spouse of the lucky winner, and the jihadist is awarded 3 extra brown-eyed virgins in Paradise. However, in order to be eligible, the words "Allahu Akhbar" must be screamed out before the contestant gets his "Islamic Haircut."

Shari'ah: rules and regs of Islam, sponsored by Muhammad, peas be up in him. Some of the rules sound misogynistic but make perfect sense, especially if you're a man, or better still, an imam. Women get half the rights of men. If a woman is raped, she must have 4 male witnesses testify for her defense, but failing that, she is to be buried up to her shoulders and stoned to death. Shari'ah rules that if you steal, your hand is cut off. If you're Jewish and you steal, you're beheaded. If a father dies and has land, the daughter only gets half that which her brother gets, but if she has more than one brother, she gets whatever is left over after they divide it up. If she's Jewish, she's beheaded. If you leave Islam, you're put to death. If you're gay, you're put to death. If you're a lesbian, you're put to death. If you're a Jewish lesbian, you're beheaded.

A religious man of peace

Religion of Peace: American presidents all agree--it's Islam.

Salat: Obligatory prayers. They are prayers that have less influence on Allah than spontaneous, heartfelt prayers, but hey, a fragile ego must be assuaged, so give Allah his due. If you are able to perform Salat, but fail to do so, you might be put to death, depending upon the conscience of the community (see Mujtahid, above).