Pakistan: 3 Muslim girls behead their teacher over a dream one had

If you can dream it, they say you can do it. Well, that isn't always a good thing.

According to Pakistani media, three girls of a religious madrassa [Islamic school] in the Pakistani town of Dera Ismail Khan, stabbed their female teacher to death and beheaded her because a 13-year-old relative of their dreamed that the prophet of Islam, Mohammad, told the relative that the teacher had committed blasphemy and, like Mo did with so many others, ordered that she be beheaded. In the spirit of CNN's fake news reporting, some Pakistani media forgot to mention the Mohammad part of the story as the motivating factor.

The teacher has been identified in some reports as 18-year-old S. Bibi or Safoora Bibi, clearly no relation to Bibi Netanyahu, who is Jewish and would have been beheaded just for being in the area.

Dawn newspaper named the three "religious" murderers: Umra Aman, 24; Razia Hanifa, 21, aka Hanifia; and Aisha Noman, 17. The name Aisha was that of Mohammad's 6-year-old wife--he did not have sex with her due to her age, of course--he waited three years before he had sex with her.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Roznama Mashriq, of the Urdu daily, reported: "At 7 am on Tuesday [March 29, 2022], three female students – Razia Hanifa and Ayesha Noman, daughters of Allah Nawaz; and Umra Aman Hanifa, daughter of Deen Badshah belonging to the Mehsud tribe and residents of Anjumabad area – overpowered their 18-year-old teacher 'S' Bibi, resident of Tiarza in South Waziristan and currently resident of Nawab Multan Road Dera, at the gate of the madrassa and beheaded her by mercilessly running knives on her throat."

Yes, Pakistan's blasphemy laws are sick and backward, and to behead someone based upon a dream is also sick. 

And this is a country with nukes!

Tweet

Pakistani man on trial for claiming to be a prophet, shot dead in court

You can't legally commit blasphemy in most Islamic countries. If you say, for example, that the prophet of Islam, a guy named Mohammad, was a pedophile because he married a 6-year-old baby girl named Aisha, or that Islam is not a religion of peace and the Koran's take on science could have been written by a seventh grader, you might be given a peaceful death sentence. In Saudi Arabia, for example, they remove one's head from their body to cut off the flow of blood and oxygen supply to the brain as a way to get them to think differently.

But while the death penalty can be used for blasphemy in Pakistan [aka Pahkeestaahn, as Obama calls it], people are not normally beheaded or hung or thrown from high places like gay folks are to have as their fate, because Pakistan consider itself civilized. However, they still will not tolerate blasphemy and will put you in prison, a place where a guy named Bubbagee will kill you anyway.

Tahir Ahmad Naseem, a Pakistani man who was on trial for blasphemy after claiming to be a prophet, was shot dead Wednesday in a courtroom in the northern city of Peshawar. The man who killed him before opening fire shouted that Naseem was an "enemy of Islam," which is a confusing claim since Islam is a religious ideology and you cannot be an enemy of ideas, only people who hold them.

Video shared on social media of the grisly scene shows Naseem's body slumped over the court's seats. It will not be shown here, not because it is grisly, but because Brain Flushings was unable to obtain the video.

The person who killed Naseem has only been identified as Khalid. Nobody knows how Khalid was able to get a loaded firearm into the court, but chances are the entrance scanner was momentarily on the fritz. 

Naseem was first accused of blasphemy by a teenager named Awais Malik whose future goal was to be a martyr for Islam and to rat out anyone who 

Naseem and Malik became virtual online friends while Naseem was in the United States.

Malik told the BBC that he and the "not for prophet" Naseem met in person at a shopping mall in Pakistan to discuss his views on religion. Malik became upset when he heard Naseem talk about his views and he went to the moral police to get him killed.

Naseem was born into the Ahmadi sect, a branch of Islam that has its own leader and who believe that they are Allah's chosen. Unfortunately for Naseem, he left the sect possibly because he felt they were too weird, and then he claimed to be the real prophet, which turned out to be the wrong thing to tell his good friend Malik.

There are about 500,000 Ahmadis in Pakistan and they're a persecuted minority and victims of the country's severely harsh laws, according to a study by Human Rights Watch.

The Ahmadi community leader suggested to the BBC that Naseem was mentally ill and had uploaded videos on social media claiming to be a messiah without proof.

It's really kind of sad that another mentally ill person went and killed him.

Consider following Brain Flushings, it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

There's a new Sharif in town: sentences man to death

Something apparently smells bad

Lahore, Pakistan -- Taimoor Raza, a 30-year-old man went too far on Facebook: he told the truth about Mohammed and for that, he has been given a death sentence by a Pakistani counter-terrorism court. 

In other words, a counter-terrorism court is going to inflict terror on a young man for saying such things as, "Mohammed was a pedophile," or "Mohammed was a terrorist." He didn't exactly say those words, but they are quite an accurate of the so-called prophet of Islam.

This is the first time someone has been sentenced to death for blaspheming on social media and it follows a high-profile crackdown against freedom of speech when it comes to the religion of peace. We can expect more of this barbarism by the Pakistani government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Blasphemy is a very sensitive topic in Pakistan and in other Islamic countries because Islam is intolerant of criticism due to its anemic theological scripture, which even that cannot be debated properly.

Insulting Mohammed is a capital crime, even though he was just an ordinary killer and thief. Even the accusations of blasphemy are enough to get you stoned to death or thrown off a high building.

According to Shafiq Qureshi, public prosecutor in Bahawalpur, Raza was convicted for allegedly making derogatory remarks against Mo, his many wives and companions. One of Mo's wives was 6 when he married her (he was 52) and 9 when he raped her. 

But we better not go there, after all, Pakistan is our ally.

Qureshi said Raza was arrested after playing blasphemous and hate speech material on his phone at a Bahawalpur bus stop. A counter-terrorism officer arrested him and took his phone. The material on the phone led to his conviction because even Allah, itself, couldn't delete the content.

Raza belonged to the minority Shia community and they are considered apostates by Sunnis. Naturally, they don't get along with each other, but they both don't get along with any other group, particularly Jews, Christians, atheists, gays, lesbians, Hindus and Jains, just for starters.

But at least they agree on something.

Authorities are investigating over 20 students and some faculty members in connection with the murder of Mashal Khan, a student who was beaten to death in April following a spirited dorm debate about religion.

Be careful Pakistan--there's a new Sharif in town.

In the U.S. yesterday, demonstrators against Sharia gathered in dozens of major cities. The protest was not against Muslims; it was against Sharia, or Islamic law. What you read above is why Sharia needs to stay the hell out of North America.




Tweet

One happy happy religion

"Kumbaya m'lord, Kumbaya . . . "

Islamagood, Pahkeestahn -- Ah, the sound of students voicing their love for their religion. Chanting slogans at a rally, supporting their love of sharia and its call for the upholding of blasphemy laws. The photo above of the sweet munchkins was taken on March 8, 2017. They are calling for someone, anyone to be killed.

And just this week, three bloggers, guys like me, were ordered held while blasphemy charges are being investigated by kangaroo sharia officials.

Here's an oxymoron for you: an anti-terrorism court in Pakistan has put three online bloggers in the custody of a federal agency for a week in order to conclude whether or not they committed blasphemy and be formally killed to death, or maybe just whipped until there's no skin left on their backs.

The Islamic punishment for not going along with the program is death. That's what countries under theocratic rule do--anything the leader wants them to do.

Pakistan's Federal Investigation Agency (aka FIA; aka Kangaroo Court) arrested the three free-thinkers this week as part of an ongoing crackdown on suspects who refuse to fall into lockstep and post things online that express their beliefs.

Heads may roll (literally) if authorities investigating the laptops seized from the trio say stuff like: 'Mohammad is a pedophile;" or: 'Religion of Peace--more like religion of pieces;' or: 'There is no such thing as Islamophobia--it's a made up term to shut people up who have different opinions.'

As stated above, Pakistan's anti-blasphemy laws carry the death penalty or life in prison for insulting the terrorist-prophet, Mohammad. Thus far, nobody has been put to death, but it's just a matter of time until someone's head is struck off by another guy named Mohammad.

The latest crackdown on saying truthful things about the prophet of Islam was launched by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (no relation to Omar) when he ordered his henchmen to do what needed to be done to rid social media of any anti-Islam content posted by non-believers in Pakistan.

Imam  bin Flippen-off

The new Sharif in town directed authorities to root out those responsible for exercising their desire to express an opinion contrary to Islamic teachings and bring them to swift justice. 

An example of a contrary opinion of something, say, written in the Koran, might be: "Don't kill them wherever you find them;" or, "Muslim, there's a Jew hiding behind that tree; kiss him."

The crackdown has alarmed rights groups. Five bloggers critical of Pakistan's military and spy agency mysteriously vanished in January and were eventually returned to their families. They accused Pakistani security institutions of being behind the kidnapping. 

Soon after they had gone missing, radical clerics and orthodox Muslims went on Islamic TV interviews and Islamic talk shows where they accused the bloggers of committing blasphemy through online activities.

The five free-thinkers fled Pakistan because they valued the continuity of the bodies they were born with. 

Even accusing someone of blasphemy can provoke the more religious of Muslims to kill the one suspected of it. That's because for some people, it's fun to be able to kill someone, get away with it, and be praised by what may be a hot woman under that cloth cover.

A provincial governor, a federal minister and members of the infidel minority communities have been just a few who have been killed in Pakistan for simply seeking reforms in the blasphemy laws, or for being wrongly accused of insulting an inanimate ideology that can feel nothing by an insult.

Pakistani officials have contacted Facebook and Twitter, asking them to identify Pakistanis outside the country who are posting anti-terrorist (aka Islamic extremist) material so the government can bring them back to Pakistan and bring them to Islamic justice.

In fact, Nisar Ali Khan, Federal Interior Minister, announced this month that a Facebook dhimmi delegation will visit the lovely country of Pakistan to discuss the issue with them. Hopefully the Facebook crowd will not be sharia-compliant and allow those bloggers to live.




Tweet

Maryland mosque memorializes murderers

Pikesville, Maryland -- A mosque held a celebration to honor the sharia-compliant assassin who killed a governor in Pakistan for speaking out against the country's monstrous blasphemy laws. His death was proof that he was correct.

The Gulzar E. Madina Mosque in Pikesville hosted an Urs celebration, a traditional commemoration held for saints and holy people. This Urs was for Mumtaz Qadri, the Islamic extremist who killed Salman Taseer in 2011. Taseer was the governor of Punjab province.

Qadri was, ironically, Taseer's bodyguard. He was enraged when Taseer called for reform of the blasphemy laws, which are part of sharia (Islamic law) and calls for the death of blasphemers and just about everyone else who doesn't follow a particular brand of Islam. 

Taseer also expressed support for Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who was framed for blasphemy (because she drank from the same cup used by Muslim women) and was arrested and sentenced to death in lovely Pakistan.

Blasphemy laws carry the death penalty and are often used to exact revenge against Pakistan's mistreated minority groups. Even a hint of an accusation that the person does not believe Mohammed is a prophet, or that Allah is actually G_d often sparks mob violence and death for the person charged with the thought crime.

After Qadri shot Taseer, he was lauded a national hero with over 100,000 Muslims attending his funeral. Riots began after his arrest for which he was tried and eventually hanged for his crime. He is seen as a saint by many Pakistanis and a shrine is being built in Pakistan to memorialize him.

The Urs event at the Maryland mosque was advertised in the Urdu Times, the largest Urdu newspaper in the U.S. The turnout was very large, with young children and teens attending the event, according to Rabwah Times.

Syed Saad Ali, an Islamic scholar based in New Jersey, chastised the crowd:

"Warrior Mumtaz Qadri kissed the noose in love for Prophet Mohammed. When Qadri was in jail for five years, what did we do? What effort did we make for his release? Why did we not go where he was being held? Qadri did everything for us and for the love of Islam and we could not even stand by him? People say Islam teaches peace . . . I say Islam teaches us ghairat [honor, as in 'honor killing']. Who will now stand up?"

Ali also praised Tanveer Ahmad, a British-Pakistani man who stabbed to death Asad Shah, another British-Pakistani in Scotland. Shah was guilty of being from the Ahmadi sect and made social media postings deemed blasphemous by Ahmad's sect. 

In other words, if you're a Muslim of one sect, all other sects that espouse Islamic beliefs are blasphemous. This is why extremist Muslims kill other Muslims as well as infidels, Jews, Christians, gays, lesbians and atheists.

Ali spoke about Ahmad, saying:

"Our warrior Tanveer, who is sitting in a jail in Scotland, I don't know if someone knows it or not, when that Mirzai [Ahmadi] spoke his 'sacrilegious rubbish,' he went there and stabbed him 27 times, and the police arrested him and right now he is in a jail in Scotland. So if we just take a step forward, angels will automatically come for our help. But what Mumtaz Qadri has done is something amazing, he has surpassed all these warriors."

Imam Ijaz Hussain, a Baltimore-based 'religious leader' and sicko also spoke, saying that "Mumtaz Qadri was not a terrorist and whoever says, 'We are with you, O prophet' cannot be a terrorist."

So if you murder a school bus filled with Jewish children, or bomb a Christian church as you scream out "Allahu Akbar!" and "We are with you, O prophet!" you are simply doing Allah's work.

Hussain praised our First Amendment saying it allowed such events as this one to be held.

"We have some freedoms here (in the U.S.) which we do not even have in other Muslim countries. This is the beauty of this country. There are some countries where we can't even praise the prophet, we can't celebrate the Day of Imam Hussain. This country has freedom of religion, and this is the beauty of this country."

What the imam didn't say was that once Islam dominates the U.S., there will no longer be a First Amendment, only sharia.

And if that doesn't concern you, you might be a liberal.


Tweet

Georgetown "professor' goes all out sharia

Jonathan Brown, a Georgetown "professor" of Islamic studies recently gave a lecture essentially condoning slavery and nonconsensual sex (aka "rape") under Islamic sharia. 

That's bad enough but what's worse is that the lecture didn't raise any eyebrows at the university where he professes to know stuff nor elsewhere, except for several blogs that can be seen here  and here.  

Even Jihad Watch picked up the story and is an excellent website to learn more about Islam from the expert, Robert Spencer (not to be confused with Richard Spencer). 

Brown, a 39-year-old convert to Islam, actually said that "It's not immoral for one human to own another human."

He speaks glowingly of the wonderful life a slave has under sharia law, as opposed to slavery under white men in the U.S. South, but doesn't actually describe that life. He should probably ask a sex slave, say for instance a Yazidi girl from Iraq, what it's like to be owned by a Muslim man against her will. What it's like to have to endure being raped at his whim.

But Brown claims slavery itself isn't problematic because "the Prophet of God [Mohammad] had slaves . . . There's no denying that. Was he--are you more morally mature than the Prophet of God? No you're not."

Yes, we are, "professor." We aren't living in the Seventh Century and we find the notion of sex slaves as repugnant as the notion of the Qur'an sura that says "Kill them whenever you find them." As repugnant as beheadings in the name of Allah and your prophet.

Brown claims that "There is no such thing as slavery, as a category, as a conceptual category that exists throughout space and time trans-historically." Then he adds another pile of warm dog crap: "Slavery cannot just be treated as a moral evil in and of itself because slavery doesn't mean anything."

Insofar as sex with slaves is concerned, he says: "Consent isn't necessary for lawful sex." And that would be true under his law of sharia. But we don't live under his law--he lives under ours--and a man can't take what he wants from a woman against her will. However, he disagrees and says that our society is "obsessed with the idea of autonomy and consent." 

I could go on about this asshat's thinking but he's not that interesting and certainly not that erudite. I suggest you read the blogs (linked above) and form your own conclusions about what has gone wrong with our schools in the West. 


Tweet

Glasgow church service uses Koran reading

Scotland is doomed. 

When passages from the Quran that explicitly refutes the divinity of Jesus is read in Arabic from the lectern during an Epiphany service in a Scottish cathedral, a service which celebrates the arrival of three kings bearing witness to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, something is terribly wrong.

To have the passages from Islamic scripture read as part of the service is obscene to religious Christians, particularly those that clearly reject the divinity of Jesus at a ceremony during a festival that Christians believe marks the revelation of Christ's divinity to the world.

The church has since receive over 10,000 messages from angry Christians outraged by this outrageous occurrence. 

"Christians should know what their fellow citizens believe and this can include reading the Quran for themselves, whether in the original or in translation," the Right Rev. Michael Nazir Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester told the BBC regarding the reading. "This is not, however, the same thing as having it read in church in the context of public worship. The authorities of the Scottish Episcopal Church should immediately repudiate this ill-advised invitation and exercise appropriate discipline for those involved."

If it had been a mosque, instead of a Christian church, and Allah or Muhammad were rejected by a reading therein, heads would roll.

The dhimmie who organized the event, the Not Very Rev. Kelvin  Holdsworth, said they received so many threatening messages that they were forced to call the police. [Better them than the Taliban.]

Holdsworth hit back saying the church had been involved in a number of different interfaith events in the past and that Quran readings have been conducted at the church in the past without incident. But he didn't say which verses were read and by whom.

Holdsworth also did not say whether he would attempt to get his church to do a reading of the Bible at a local mosque, but spreading the word of the Bible doesn't appear to be a big priority for the dhimmie.

He then went on to use the Muslim Brotherhood invented term 'Islamophobic,' and blame the 'far-right media' for the problem.

Since Christianity has been around longer than Islam (although Muslims lie and say that Islam has always existed, but it was just practiced the wrong way until Mohammed came around) it should be Muslims who get to hear the Not So Very Rev. Holdsworth preach to them.

Somehow, I don't see that ever going to happen. 



Tweet

Munich: Inexplicable, non-Islamic, random, Allahu Akbar attack

Munich, Germany -- A man, likely disguised as a Muslim, began indiscriminately stabbing people at a commuter rail station in Grafing, about 20 miles east of Munich. Part of his disguise was that he yelled "Allahu Akbar" which is Arabic (aka Islamic) for "my god is greater," according to witnesses of the attack,  carried out to give Muslims a bad name. The absolutely not Muslim man also screamed, "You infidels!" among other things, as he did all he could to make it look like he was a member of the religion of peace.

The attacker killed one person and injured three others Tuesday morning. He used a 4-inch knife, stabbed one man on the train, a second in the station forecourt and two other men passing by on bikes, reported Merkur, a Munich tabloid.

Despite the reports of the non-Muslim man's shouts, German authorities reportedly said they have no evidence linking the man to ISIS, and everyone knows that if you can't link him to ISIS, you can't prove he's a jihadist, and certainly not a member of the beautiful religion of Islam.

Not diagnosed with a mental health issue;
just one angry Muslim speaking his mind.

So the diagnosis on this non-Muslim man is that he must have mental health and/or drug problems. Why else would someone try to kill strangers shouting Arabic slogans and epithets against infidels if he was in his right mind?

This all remains a mystery to German authorities and liberals throughout the Western world.

Police spokesman Karl-Heinz Segerer said the attacker "expressed political motivations" during the attack, but didn't give details. (One can imagine the attacker screaming: "Leave Angela Merkel alone! Just leave her alone!")

Minister Joachim Hermann said that officials will check to see if the guy was mentally disturbed. (Or whether the religion the guy professed to be a member of is a mentally disturbed religion.)

The attacker is believed to have mental health and drug problems, but in cases of Islamic jihad extremism, it serves as a catalyst to the violence rather than being the cause. 

Sergerer described the killer as a 27-year-old German national who does not live in Bavaria and whose religion he'd rather not discuss. Like many sleeper cells or young people turning to Allah and the gang, he had no prior arrests. 

This, he felt, was a good place to start.

Forensic experts at the scene marked over 40 bloody footprints on the train platform as they collected evidence. A cellphone was found between the gap between the train and the platform.

The dead infidel was a 50-year-old man from Wasserburg, a town about 35 miles east of Munich. 

"The idea that people enter [the station] on a beautiful morning . . . and then become victims of a maniac [religion] is terrible," said Grafing mayor Angelika Obermayr. She left out the word 'religion' because she didn't want to be labeled 'Islamophobic.'

The name of the attacker was not explored for fear it may have started with the letter "M" and ended in "mad."


Tweet

Is ISIS Islamic?

Dictionary.com defines religion thus:

 (noun) 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. 2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion. 

There are more definitions to be sure, but these are more than adequate to ask the question, "Is the practice of Islam by ISIS a religious practice?

To begin answering this, the first part of the definition of religion must be considered: do ISIS terrorists hold beliefs about the cause, nature and purpose of the universe?

Human nature is called such because there is a universal component as to how we behave or are motivated. It's part of what makes us human.

We now can ask: how would human nature explain what motivates a suicide bomber to kill him- or herself in such an utterly violent manner in order to kill strangers?

Human nature, in general, is instinctual when it comes to survival, thus it's known as the 'survival instinct.' Most people would not end their lives if they believed that there was nothing coming for them after the suicide (i.e., eternal life in Paradise). The notion that there is eternal life after death is, admittedly, a religious notion, most would agree. 

So committing suicide goes against our instincts, but if religion justifies it [for purposes of jihad] then it isn't viewed by the suicide bomber as killing the self, it's viewed as a way of ensuring eternal bliss (if having 72 sex partners can be considered bliss rather than work). 

Islamic scripture goes into elaborate discussions about jihad. This all came from Mohammad, the so-called prophet, who was a desert terrorist and pedophile. He robbed desert caravans, killed non-believers, especially by beheading them, and taking the wives of the dead as sex slaves. 

Does this sound anything like ISIS?

Islam defines the nature of the universe as the work of Allah, the pagan moon god, originally, then stolen by Mohammad like he stole ideas from the Jews. So the next part of the definition seems to confirm that Islam is a religion.  


ISIS practices Islam stricter than moderate Muslims practice it by far. They actually believe that detonating their suicide vests doesn't kill them in the same way we may envision death, but sends them on an eternal trip to Paradise.

And it isn't as if it is merely a handful of ISIS terrorists who believe in jihad tactics, including suicide bombing, it's millions of Muslims across the world, and all of the ISIS, al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, Taliban, Al Shabaab, Al Nusra, etc. etc. who believe in jihad, including suicide bombing.

The main difference, it seems, between Islamists and moderate Muslims, is that the former is certain in their religious convictions, the latter is still on the fence.

That folks, is a religion. Ands ISIS is, indeed, Islamic to the nines.



Tweet

Why Kasich is wrong about terrorism

The human ego knows no bounds with some people. With politicians, it's almost a rule of thumb (I almost wrote "trump"). But with John "Karate Chop" Kasich, it's an annoying fact.

There exists no avenue to victory for Kasich to win the GOP nomination outright, and if somehow the GOP believes they should nominate him rather than Trump or Cruz, the party will implode. 

Since the Brussels attack that killed 31 and injured over 250 others, Kasich has lectured us and cautioned against monitoring Muslim-Americans. He said that doing so would create division and harm our ability to gather intelligence.

What intelligence was he referring to? How many mosque attenders have provided authorities with intel about future Islamic terror attacks? On the contrary, mosques tend to be breeding nests for terrorists, not sources of information to defeat them.

Kasich spoke after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) his GOP campaign rival called for law enforcement to "patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized."

Kasich naively claimed that "We are not at war with Islam; we are at war with radical Islam." This is the defeated cry of the left and it indicates how little he and his ilk know about Islam.

Kasich said, " . . . in our country, we don't want to create divisions where we say, 'O.K., well your religion, you're a Muslim, so therefore we're going to keep an eye on you." He added that "the last thing we need is more polarization."

Actually, the last thing we need is to pretend the problem exists with people who misunderstand Islam. If Mohammad were alive today, he'd be the head of ISIS because he would be following the prescriptions of the Koran that he wrote.

Jihad isn't an aberration of Islam; it is orthodox Islam.

Kasich obviously hasn't read the 3 main scriptures of the religion of peace.


Tweet

The Queen of Jordan on Islam in the U.S.

Queen Rania appeared on Fox's "Sunday Morning Futures" with Marie Barteromo and was asked about her perception of Muslims in the U.S. You can see the video here.

Since Queen Rania is the Queen of Jordan, I'm not clear as to how accurate of an opinion she can give about U.S. Muslims, but nevertheless, she spoke at length on Islam and how we should not believe our lying eyes regarding the religion of peace.

The first thing Ms. Barteromo posed was: "Give us your reaction to what has taken place with regards to ISIS and ISIS terrorizing the West and the world."

Queen Rania responded: "The two things I would like people to understand is that first of all, Islam in now way condones the actions of these extremists. Those barbaric savage acts that we've been seeing on TV; the public beheadings, the rape, the slavery, the mass murders. There's nothing in Islam that condones these kinds of actions."

Wrong.

The Koran, Islam's holiest book, a book "perfect" and eternal is chock full o' nasty stuff. "Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out from where they drove you out. Persecution is worse than slaughter" (2:191).

"When you meet the unbelievers, strike their necks" (4:34).

"Oh you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you and let them find harshness in you" (9:123). Only to be certified by: "Mohammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another but harsh to disbelievers" (48:29).

Ant that's just the tip of the ISIS-berg in the Koran. If you also read the Hadith, the collection of obsessive-compulsive traditions, and the Sunnah, actual sayings and terrorist history of Islam's Mohammad, you will get a better understanding of just how wrong Queen Rania is about Islam.

The Queen of Jordan goes on to say that "I know that there are people who say that there are verses in the Koran that refer to violence; but I would say there are such verses in the Bible as well, and if you take something out of context and you manipulate it to serve your agenda . . . there is no holy script that condones these actions."

I would ask the queen to kindly point out anywhere in the Koran that condemns violence against non-believers, especially if they refuse to pay a tax or convert to Islam. In fact, anything in the Koran that talks about tolerance, such as "there is no compulsion in religion," has been abrogated in the Koran. That is, it has been overridden with better suras--which makes no sense to me if the Koran is supposed to be perfect. 

There should be no need to change or abrogate anything that is perfect.

Queen Rania mentioned the fact that Muslims have killed more Muslims than non-Muslims. She's correct in terms of modern times. But that's because Muslims see those other Muslims they're killing as either apostates or blasphemers. For example, the Sunnis and Shi'ites see each other as blasphemers because of the way they practice the religion of peace. That's precisely why they hate each other.

She also mentioned Islamophobia, a term that is highly offensive to anyone with a brain. 

A person accused of Islamophobia implies that he or she is a racist, which implies Islam is a race. It is a tool to shut up conflicting opinions, where truth has no part of the process. Islamophobia implies the fear of Islam is irrational, which is crazy.



Tweet

"Hey Cameron & Obama: bounce on this"

Hey moms, he can get you a good deal

He went from selling bouncy castles to killing infidels. Not an easy transition if you're normal, but if you become a believer in the religion of peace, beheading people, burning or shooting them, can be as much fun for you, as a bouncy castle is for a kid. 

With Jihadi John having a go at 72 heavenly virgins, a new replacement was just what the doctrine ordered. Siddhartha Darr, a 32-year-old Londoner and convert to Islam is believed to be the pond scum in the latest video of an ISIS execution of five "spies."

Hands up, don't jump

Darr left his cushy job selling bouncy castles to join ISIS. Perhaps he hated seeing all those bouncy kids having all the fun.

Darr was also a fan of Nirvana, the rock band, and Arsenal, the soccer team that is currently in first place in the Premier League standings. Guess Darr won't get to see the rest of the season.

According to the Telegraph Darr's mother and sister agreed that the crap weasel on the video sounded similar to him.

Darr's family told the Telegraph that he had been raised a Hindu but in order to be accepted into the family and be allowed to marry Aisha, he would have to convert to Islam because they don't cotton to no infidels. Muslim men may marry non Muslim women but Muslim women haven't the same rights as men and beasts of burden. 

So Darr converted and it was all "Allahu akbar!" after that.

He was arrested in September 2014 for belonging to Al-Muhajiroun, a banned group whose goal is to bring Sharia law to Britain. Once Darr posted bail, he went to Syria via Paris.

Darr, or whoever is in the video, vows that ISIS will soon invade Britain and establish Sharia law. He mocks the mockable David Cameron, calling him a "slave of the White House" and "mule of the Jews."

Muslims are commanded in the Koran to hate Jews and not make non-Muslims their friends (although they can pretend they are if it gets them what they need to promote Islam).

There is also a small boy in the video named Isa Dare, believed to be 4 or 5 years old. The cute little munchkin wears camouflage gear as he points to the camera and says, "Go kill the kuffar (non-believers) over there."

How adorable.

The child's mother, Grace Dare, was raised in a Christian family of Nigerian descent and converted to Islam. She changed her name to Khadijah before going to Syria in 2012. She married Abu Bakr, a Swedish ISIS scumcrumpet, who was likely killed since.

Always the loving, kind mother, Grace Dare said on social media that she hoped to be the first British woman to kill a British or American ISIS hostage. Last year she tweeted a lovely photo of her little boy with his very own AK-47 rifle.

Just a few tidbits on Islamic lore here. 

Aisha, the namesake of Darr's wife, was Mohammad, the prophet of Islam's young wife. He fell in love with her as he saw her playing with dolls. The couple married when he was 52 and she was 6. Mohammad knew she was too young to be treated in a wifely way so he waiting until she was fully 9-years-old when he consummated the marriage. This is why the legal age for marriage in Islamic countries is 9, and in the more moderate countries, it's 13.

Khadijah was Mohammad's first wife and commonly known as "The Mother of the Believers." She had been married several times before she tied the knot with Mo, and she was a successful business woman. She was already in her 50s when she married her much younger husband and it appears historically, that once Mo married her, he never worked a regular day afterward in his life, but after marriage, her business in the trades seemed to go down the dumper and her family was worse off than Hillary Clinton in terms of being dead broke.

It's believed Mo and Khadijah had 6 to 10 kids of their own but Mo never took care of them. At the time, Mo spent most of his time in caves, retreating to his make-believe world and contemplation. He'd only return home to get more food and head back out.

There is no doubt that Mo had a mental disorder, probably schizophrenia and narcissistic personality disorder (like most politicians) but Khadijah too must have been mentally ill to be married to Mo. Most likely, she suffered from dependent personality disorder, or at the very least, she was codependent. 

This would explain her willingness to fund Mohammad's pursuits and ultimately the religion that is anything but peaceful.


Tweet

CAIR leader blames Americans for jihad attacks

They never point their bloody fingers inward, only outward. Blaming the victims of their evil attacks. They've been blaming their victims since Mohammad told Omar to go out and lie in order to kill someone who said something negative about him.


According to Hussam Ayloush in a CNN interview, we Americans bear some of the blame for the wave of Islamic extremism causing the terror attack in San Bernadino last Wednesday. 

Yes, America, it's all your fault. You made us kill you because, well, we don't like the way you refuse to do what we demand.

Why we give these CAIR dirtbags a national voice is beyond all comprehension. Wait, I almost forgot, it's CNN, aka Certainly Not News. 

CAIR, as you probably know, is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). The MB is a known terrorist organization that our president refuses to acknowledge and even has them over at the White House for tea and crumpets. (See Holy Land Foundation trials for more information on CAIR and the MB).

Ayloush said that American foreign policy has helped fuel the rage that drives Muslim radicals to kill in the name of their faith. Perhaps it would be more accurate for the scumcrumpet to have admitted that it's jihad itself that is doing the driving.

"Let's not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism," Ayloush told "New Day" host Chris Cuomo, a hard-line liberal who cannot even understand how a photographer's religious beliefs would be violated if he were forced to work a same-sex wedding. "After all, it's not like the photographer is being asked to marry another man. In an article in The Federalist, Cuomo comes across as an asshat when trying to trip up Marco Rubio on the abortion issue.

But getting back to Ayloush; he said that U.S. support for repressive regimes in the Middle East, including Egypt, "push people over to the edge."

"Then they become extremists. We are partly responsible. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it," added Ayloush, making full use of Taqiyya, or the act of lying for the benefit of Islam.

When Ayloush says "we" he is pretending to be an actual American is spirit. That's a load of camel excrement--he sees himself as a Muslim first and an American last--even after Lebanon, his country of origin.

Cuomo didn't challenge him on the claim that American foreign policy triggered terrorism, but that's probably what Cuomo believes as well. He apparently isn't the brightest light on the "holiday trees." (Of course I mean Christmas tree.)

The Daniel Pipes Middle East Forum had an interesting comment submitted by David Campbell back in September 2006, where he discussed how he had been corresponding via email with Ayloush and believes he and his CAIR soulmates are in "a constant state of denial," as CAIR calls the U.S. government the "New Saddam."

It's about time we stop giving credence to these haters of the West. Since 9/11 we should know better, we should know who they really are. Not that CNN ever will until it bites them on their butt.


Tweet

Palestinian man killed; blame it on Mohammad

Jerusalem -- A Palestinian man was killed by Israeli military as he tried to stab a pedestrian at a busy West Bank junction. Another Israeli was also stabbed prior to the Israeli intervention--he was only slightly wounded.

The wave of Islamic anti-Semitism began back when Mohammad was having his scribe write the Koran, the alleged word of Allah, the moon god of the Pagans.

This latest attack in Jerusalem is the latest one in a wave that began in mid-September. The excuse for killing Jews that is being used by Palestinians is over the Jerusalem holy site. Imams and other so-called religious leaders of Islam have called for the killing of Jews to honor the wishes of Mohammad, a guy who was upset when the Jews refused to follow his religion of peace.

Since the September attacks began, 19 Jews have been killed, mostly by stabbings and shootings. On the other side of the scoreboard, 99 Palestinians have been killed, 64 of whom were trying to kill Jews. The remaining 35 Muslim Palestinians died in battles with Israeli forces.

Israel claims the violence is due to Palestinian incitement and incendiary videos on social media. Palestinians say the violence is caused by their frustration over their lack of hope for obtaining independence as a separate state. I say the cause is due to down-home anti-Semitism that began at the start of the religion of peace.

Muslims throughout the world refuse to accept non-Muslims as neighbors and expect special treatment when they are in the minority. Once they gain sufficient numbers in population, they become increasingly violent and act out against infidels, particularly Jews, but they also go after Christians and all other religions that don't "worship" as they do.

Islam is the religion of total intolerance when practiced in an orthodox manner. If you travel to Saudi Arabia, for example, you better not take a Bible or any other religious artifacts, They will be confiscated at the airport and destroyed.

Try doing that to a Koran and see what happens.

"From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," is the chant of the Palestinians. When you look at the words of this chant, it's obvious they are referring to the River Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea. That's all of Israel and all of the Jews therein.

They want it all, so Palestine, stop pretending to be the victim.

Tweet

Arabs back out over Western Wall

As I previously reported, here, six Arab nations drafted a plan to claim the Western Wall, Israel's most religious Jewish site, for Muslims. 

I can now happily report that the Islamic domain was removed from an Arab coalition-backed motion passed by a UN cultural council today. The draft decision was revised and the clause, calling for the Western Wall to be recognized as part of the Al-Aqsa Mosque structure on Jerusalem's Temple Mount, was removed.

The Western Wall is part of a retaining wall that supported the second Jewish temple and is the closest they can come to the Temple Mount to pray. This ground is so holy to the Jewish people, even the earth worms wear yarmulkes (Jewish skull caps).

This decision by UNESCO will likely anger Muslims throughout the Muslim world, although this anger has been going on since Mohammad married a six-year-old girl named Aisha.




Tweet

Kerry "Surprised" by Palestinian violence: I told you he was stupid

According to Fox News, Secretary of State John Kerry has called for an end to "senseless" violence in Israel and rejects an international presence at the Al-Aqsa Mosque as anti-Semitic tensions escalate.

However, Kerry and the Obama administration never use the term "anti-Semitic" because to do so would be Islamophobic.

For Kerry to call the violence senseless merely shows that he has no common sense or understanding of why these Palestinian attackers are killing Jews [unless, of course, he actually understands but is being directed by the Obama administration to employ moral equivalency regarding the violence.]

First of all, the Palestinians are constantly fed a diet of anti-Semitism; it's how they're brought up from the moment they open their eyes. The children's TV programs depict Jews as evil and dangerous, using the blood of children to add to their holiday matzohs. Their parents encourage anti-Semitic thought because it's the patriotic thing to do. 

Muslim kids rarely meet actual Jews, but the early impressions are powerful.

Second, the heroes of the Muslim mindset are not sports figures nor television personalities, nor are they Nobel Prize winners because there are a disproportionate number of Jews on the list. No, the heroes of the Muslim mindset, particularly for Palestinians, are the martyrs, the jihadists, especially those who have killed a Jew.

They even name streets and town squares after Muslim martyrs who have killed for Allah. Not surprisingly, many of these streets are named Mohammad Something-or-Other.

Third, they have been fed propaganda. They're told by their leaders, for example, that the Jews plan to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and the Jews executed the 13-year-old boy who killed an Israeli boy his age. 

This turned out to be balderdash of the highest order and proved false when the kid was shown on Israeli TV in bed at the hospital where he was being treated.

Finally, the Koran [Mohammad's ripoff of the Old Testament and written to suit a militant agenda] is filled with anti-Semitic, anti-Christian claptrap that depicts Jews and Christians as apes and pigs, and prescribing horrible deeds to be done to us. They also have a lot of bad things to say about other infidels.

Kerry told reporters at a Madrid news conference that "We don't contemplate any change, but nor does Israel. Israel understands the importance of that status quo. What is important is to make sure everybody understands what that means. We are not seeking some new change. We are not seeking outsiders or others to come in."

France, the home of the attack where Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were murdered by Muslims for printing an unflattering caricature of Mohammad, has called for action at the UN for an international presence to ensure the status quo at the Temple Mount, the hilltop compound revered by Jews and home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam's third-holiest shrine and national symbol for Palestinians, where Jews can visit but cannot pray.

In addition to the U.S. and Israel being against an international presence in this area, Jordan also agrees.

Kerry will be meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu this week to discuss the situation regarding the Temple Mount, and wants to make clear to PA scumcrumpet, Mahmoud Abbas and Jordan's King Abdullah what the plans will be in respect to this situation.

Meanwhile, the violence continues in Israel as  21-year-old Mohannad al-Okbi, an Arab citizen from Hura, a Bedouin town in southern Israel was armed with a gun and knife and began shooting in a southern Israeli bus station. He killed an Israeli soldier and wounded 10 others before he was shot and sent to his 72 virgins.

One of al-Okbi's relatives was arrested on suspicion of assisting him in the cowardly attack. Al-Okbi has no past record of jihadist involvement, which means his mosque is not being monitored.

Unfortunately, an Eritrean migrant was also killed in the attack by Israeli security who, in the heat of the battle, thought he was an assailant. 

You can be that the mainstream media will have a field day with that event.




Tweet

Selective Belief

Why dis an example o we believe them when they say we've killed one of their leaders, but don't believe them when they say that they are Islamic, and will one day will fly their ISIS flag over the White House?

Bought his shirts at Costco
before "buying the farm"

This is an example of selective belief and it depends upon the public's gullibIlity.

Al Qaeda has confirmed that a U.S. airstrike killed their number 2 leader, a terrorist scum-merchant, who commanded Al Qaeda's Yemeni affiliate. This means we have dealt these "folks," as Barack calls them, a serious blow and perhaps the worst since Hillary Clinton was in the same room watching Navy SEALs take out Osama bin Laden.

The scum-merchant, Nasir al-Wahishi, was a charismatic, albeit odoriferous leader, and his death was announced in a June 14 video statement and released on Tuesday by a senior Yemeni affiliate operative, Khaled Batrafi (his friends call him "Batman").

Qassim al-Raimi has been selected to replace him and, Lord willing, die next.

"Our Muslim nation, a hero of your heroes and a master of your master left to God, steadfast," Batrafi bellowed, assuming that the killing of non-Muslims gets you into Paradise. He vowed that Al Qaeda's war on America would continue.

"In the name of God, the blood of these pioneers makes us more determined to sacrifice. Let the enemies know that the battle is not with an individual . . . the battle led by crusaders and their agents is colliding with a billion-member nation."

So according to Obama, Al Qaeda and the Islamic State are not Islamic, but they actually believe they are. We should not believe them when they say they are, but we should believe them when they say we've killed one of their own.

The truth is, Al Qaeda believes their version of Islam is the true version, while Islamic State believes theirs is the true version. Moderate Muslims do not believe that they should go out and follow the warring Medina Koran, but they also think they should let the chips fall where they may and after the smoke clears, and heads roll, they plan to pick up the pieces.

Islam is, as evidenced by its scripture, anti-Semitic. The Koran specifically tells Muslims to hate the Jews. This is because Mohammad (peas be up in him) hated the Jews for not converting to his warrior so-called religion. 

So it should come as no surprise that Batrafi vowed to make the USA "taste the bitter flavor of war and defeat until you stop supporting the Jews, the occupiers of Palestine, until you leave the lands of the Muslims and stop supporting apostate tyrants."

Israel and the Jews is mentioned hundreds of times in the Old Testament; Palestine not once.



Tweet

Big Freedom of Speech Rally tonight in Phoenix: bring weapons

Phoenix, AZ--Jon Ritzheimer is a former Marine who is planning to hold a rally outside the Islamic Community Center in Phoenix. He is calling it a "Freedom of Speech Rally," and he said that he was "driven by a desire to tell the truth about Islam." The event will also have a Draw Mohammad Cartoon contest.

Ritzheimer wears a shirt that says: "F--- Islam" and suggested to rally attendees to bring guns just in case there's a jihadist uprising. I believe that's good advice.

This Islamic center and mosque is the same one that was attended by the Garland, Texas Muslims, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi. They attempted to kill as many in attendance of a "Draw Mohammad Cartoon" contest that was sponsored by Pamela Geller, an advocate of the First Amendment and a person who has been exposing the horrendous treatment of women, gays, Jews, Christians and all other infidels who do not follow the exact Islamic dictates set out in the Koran. 

Fortunately, an off-duty cop with his service revolver took the jihadists out before they could kill in the name of Allah, the moon god of the pagans.

Many Muslims consider all images of the prophet of Islam, Mohammad, to be blasphemous. These same Muslims consider all Jews and Christians pigs and apes (they say the Al Fatiha prayer about 17 times a day to acknowledge their anger) and find it a religious act to kill infidels and gays. 

"These are the measures we have to take to expose the true colors of this religion," Ritzheimer said. "Unfortunately, we have to hold a cartoon contest, as silly as it sounds."

Ritzheimer informed the Islamic center of his intentions and about 600 people have said that they would be attending.

The head of the Islamic Center and mosque, Usama Shanni, (no known ties to Usama bin Laden) said: 

"Everybody has the right to be a bigot. Everybody has the right to be a racist. Everybody has the right to be an idiot."

When it comes to bigotry, Islam wrote the book--it's called the Koran. When it comes to racism, Shanni is confused because Islam is not a race. It is an ideology and ideologies are ripe for scrutiny--except Islam, they kill people who question it. 

When it comes to being an idiot, well, perhaps Ritzheimer could make his point in other ways; certainly wearing a tee shirt saying "F--- Islam" is not going to convince Muslims that their religion is not the way to worship a loving god, or win any over to their side of the debate.

 Allah hates everyone who doesn't believe he exists. If Allah failed to give mankind the sensory equipment to actually perceive of his existence, rather than relying only on faith, then it's on him. Christians and Jews don't kill non-believers.

Anyway, the event is scheduled to go off at 6:15 pm Phoenix time (9:15 pm EDT). Let's hope nothing else goes off when it does, if you know what I mean.

Arizona Governor, Doug Ducey said, "Of course I'm a believer in free speech and the First Amendment. I'm also a believer in good judgment and common sense." He was going to add the word "but" to the second sentence, and knew that leaving it out kept him from sounding like a moron. 

There are no "buts" in the Constitution and there is no justification or excuse for killing people who are exercising their rights. If we only had nice things to say to those who disagree with us, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. 

Let's hope the Muslims exercise common sense. After all, it is our Constitution and our rights as a free country. And we will not be cowed into silence when it comes to our rights, whether it's tacky or not.

In our nation's capital, the Washington Metro voted to stop showing "issue-oriented" ads throughout their system after Pamela Geller attempted to place ads with Mohammed cartoons on the D.C. transit system. 

Washington Metro balked because they are afraid of Islamic terror repercussions. Unfortunately, we have become a nation of cowards, and this is what extreme Islam is counting on.

I sincerely doubt that there will be any Mensa members at this rally due to the strategy being used to get their message out, but there will be Americans there who on one level are sick and tired of being told by the media to shut up because they are "asking for it."

They are not asking for anything more than the right to say what you and I may not want to hear.




Tweet

Anti-Semitism, the Koran, Sharia and Smart Jews

It's easy for bullies to go after the smallest kid in the playground; this allows them to feel tough, brave and superior. The reason they attack in the first place, however, often has to do with the sense of inferiority they feel about themselves and the envy they have for their victim. Of course, they will never admit it.

So envy and inferiority feelings may account for why there is such a high level of anti-Semitism in Europe today. 

But part of the reason for the hatred some have for the Jewish people can be explained by the teachings of Islam and the Muslims who follow it to the letter, (i.e., in an orthodox manner).

It has been about a year since four people were murdered at the Jewish Museum in Brussels. Since then, Jews have been killed in Paris and Copenhagen and there had been similar attacks several years prior to that. 

Killing Jews is not a new phenomenon any more than attempting to kill freedom of speech is new. The former began in earnest back in the days when Mohammad humped across the desert with his band of merry jihadists around Medina. The latter has been done since tyrants walked the earth and continue to bully people to this day. We see it in all Islamic theocracies and countries like Russia where criticizing Putin can be suicidal.

According to Moshe Kantor, chief of the European Jewish Congress, Islamic jihad in Europe does not discriminate solely against the Jewish community. "Islamic extremists see European democracy and freedom as their primary enemy. However, Jews remain on the frontlines," he said.

Kantor believes that more attacks in Europe are likely when jihadists return home from Middle East fighting, and to date, several thousand European nationals have joined jihadist groups in Iraq and Syria.

So what is this "envy" all about?

It began when Mohammad attempted to get a Jewish tribe to join his so-called religion. He tried convincing the rabbis that his religion is superior to theirs but they weren't buying his sales pitch because they saw through his narcissistic self-promotion. "Prophet, indeed," they thought (in Hebrew).

This angered the Prophet of Islam, the main guy, the dude who somehow couldn't read or write yet found his way into the Koran, the holy book of Allah, (written even before writing was being done and certainly before Mohammad was born).

After that, the Koran began telling how the Jews were "apes and pigs," and even today there are Muslims who continue to refer to them as such. 

If Einstein, Benjamin Disraeli, Moses, Sigmund Freud, Jonas Salk, Robert Oppenheimer, Niels Bohr, Gustav Mahler, Baruch de Spinoza, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jesus were apes, what does that make of Ayatollah Khomeini and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi? What does it make of Mohammad, a warrior and a pedophile who founded a warrior religion with himself at the center?

The proportion of Jews with IQ's of 140 and above is about six times the proportion of any other ethnic group. While they comprise about 0.2% of the world's population, they have won 29% of the Nobel Prizes in literature, medicine, physics and chemistry after 1950. Now in the 21st century, they comprise 32% of Nobel prizes--almost exclusively male Jews mostly of Western European ancestry (less than one-tenth of one percent of the world's population), and they've done this in spite of anti-Semitism, blatant and pervasive discrimination, legal barriers, ongoing and frequent persecution and the Holocaust. 

In 1954, 28 New York City students in the public school system had IQ's of 170 or higher. Of the 28 students, 24 of them were Jewish.

Maybe anti-Semitism is caused by envy or maybe it's pure hatred that has been ingrained in people through religion. 

In the words of another Jew, a man who had won a Nobel Prize in Physics:

"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg 

 Both Christianity and Judaism have come quite far over the centuries.Jewish fathers do not stone their daughters if they lose their virginity prior to marriage. Christians no longer fight in the Crusades. Both religions are religions of peace.

But Islam needs to unstick itself from the Seventh Century and Sharia law. They have no claim on being a religion of peace because their definition of peace only occurs when there is nobody left to fight.

Tweet